YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:"

Transcription

1 Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Settlement Hearing and Right to Appear If You Were a Stockholder of Windstream Holdings, Inc. to whom its April 26, 2015 One-for-Six Reverse Stock Split Shares were Distributed, Please Read this Notice of Class Action Settlement If you are a nominee who held Windstream Holdings, Inc. common stock for the benefit of another, please read the section below entitled NOTICE TO PERSONS OR ENTITIES HOLDING RECORD OWNERSHIP ON BEHALF OF OTHERS. Members of the Class are referred to as Class Members. The Settlement will provide a gross amount of $10.5 million to be distributed, after payment of fees and expenses, to holders of common stock of Windstream Holdings, Inc. ( Windstream or the Company ) to whom the Company s April 26, for-6 reverse stock split shares were distributed following Windstream s implementation of its partial spin off of certain real estate and fiber assets into Communications Sales & Leasing, Inc. ( CS&L ) (currently known as Uniti Group Inc.), a real estate investment trust ( REIT ). The Settlement resolves a lawsuit in which plaintiffs allege that Windstream s board of directors failed to disclose material facts in connection with a stockholder vote on two charter amendments relating to the partial spin off and reverse stock split at a special meeting of Windstream stockholders held on February 20, The Settlement avoids the risks of continuing the lawsuit; pays money to stockholders like you; and prevents you from ever filing another lawsuit about the stockholder vote, special meeting or spin off. The two sides disagree about who would have won at trial, and how much money, if any, would have been awarded. Your legal rights are affected whether you act, or do not act. Read this notice carefully. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: OBJECT DO NOTHING Write to the Court by June 10, 2018 about why you don t like the Settlement. If the Settlement is approved by the court, you will receive a pro rata distribution of the net settlement proceeds based on the number of shares you owned at the time the April 26, for-6 reverse stock split shares were distributed, and you will release any claims you may have concerning the subject matter of this lawsuit. Your right to object and the deadline to exercise that right is explained in this notice. The Court in charge of this case still must decide whether to approve the Settlement. This Notice describes the process by which the Court will consider the Settlement for approval. Payments will be made if the Court approves the Settlement and after objections and appeals, if any, are resolved. 1. Why did I get this notice? This Notice is being sent to you pursuant to an Order of the Court because you or someone in your family may have been a Windstream stockholder at the time the April 26, for-6 reverse stock split shares were distributed. You are getting this notice because you have a right to know about the proposed Settlement of this lawsuit, and about your options, before the Court decides whether to approve the Settlement. This Notice explains the lawsuit, the Settlement, your legal rights, what benefits are available, who is eligible for them, and how they will be distributed. The Court in charge of the case is the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the Court ), and the case is called Doppelt v. Windstream Holdings, Inc., et al., C.A. No VCS (the Lawsuit ). The

2 judge presiding over this case is Vice Chancellor Joseph R. Slights III. The stockholders who sued on behalf of the Class, Jeffrey Doppelt and Neil Dolgin, are the Plaintiffs, and the people they sued, Windstream s former Board of Directors (Anthony W. Thomas, Carol B. Armitage, Samuel E. Beall, III, Dennis E. Foster, Francis X. Frantz, Jeffery R. Gardner, Jeffrey T. Hinson, Judy K. Jones, William A. Montgomery, Alan L. Wells, William LaPerch, and Michael Stoltz together the Board ), are the Defendants. If the Court approves the Settlement and the Settlement becomes effective: (a) the Lawsuit will be dismissed with prejudice, (b) all members of the Class will be deemed to have released the Released Claims (a full copy of the Released Claims is in question 11), and (c) the Settlement Administrator ( Settlement Administrator ) approved by the Court will make payments pursuant to the Settlement What is this lawsuit about? The following summary does not constitute findings of the Court. The Court has made no findings about the following matters and these descriptions are not opinions of the Court as to the merits of any of the claims or defenses raised by any of the parties. On February 9, 2015, Plaintiff Jeffrey Doppelt filed the Lawsuit. The Lawsuit alleges that the Board breached fiduciary duties owed to Windstream stockholders in connection with the special meeting of stockholders on February 20, The lawsuit claims that the two charter amendments that stockholders were being asked to approve were necessary for the partial spin-off of assets into CS&L and the reverse stock split, and that the Board failed to disclose material facts in connection with the vote, including a planned reduction in the aggregate per share dividend that would be paid to original Windstream stockholders by Windstream and CS&L following the implementation of the partial spin off and reverse stock split. The first charter amendment allowed Windstream to convert its operating subsidiary into a limited liability company, a conversion that Defendants asserted would avoid a large tax liability from the spin-off, and the second charter amendment authorized the reverse stock split. On February 19, 2015, the Court denied a motion for preliminary injunction that sought to enjoin the stockholder meeting until Windstream disclosed the facts the Lawsuit alleges should have been disclosed. On February 20, 2015, a majority of outstanding Windstream shares approved the two charter amendments proposed by Windstream. On April 24, 2015, Windstream completed the spin off, and on April 26, 2015, implemented the reverse stock split. The CS&L shares began trading on April 27, On February 5, 2016, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants motion to dismiss the Lawsuit, including dismissal of the Plaintiffs request to undo the spin-off. Consequently, only a claim for monetary relief remained available. Such a claim required Plaintiffs to prove that Windstream stockholders suffered economic injury as a result of the allegedly uninformed vote, and that the Defendants acted knowingly and intentionally. Defendants have denied, and continue to deny, all allegations of wrongdoing, fault, liability, or damage. Plaintiffs counsel reviewed thousands of documents, took numerous depositions, and consulted with and submitted reports of their experts concerning liability and damages resulting from the allegedly uninformed shareholder vote. Both Defendants and Plaintiffs presented arguments to the Court about various issues in the case. The Court has not made any final decisions about the merits of the case, Plaintiffs claims, or Defendants defenses. 3. Why is this a class action? 1 All capitalized terms used in this Notice that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings provided in the Stipulation of Settlement dated April 3, 2018 (the Settlement Stipulation ), which is available on the Settlement website, 2

3 The Court in this case certified the Lawsuit as a class action on behalf of stockholders of Windstream who were entitled to vote at the special meeting of stockholders on February 20, 2015, and their transferees, excluding Defendants. The Court reasoned that transferees should be included in the Class because the claims alleged a breach of fiduciary duty resulting in an improper charter amendment and such claims transfer with the shares. Once the partial spin off was implemented and Windsteam s shares were replaced with the April 26, 2015 reverse stock split shares, purchasers of stock in the much smaller, post spin off Windstream were on notice of the completed transactions and did not suffer economic injury from the allegedly uninformed vote. Consequently, holders of Windstream stock at the time that the April 26, 2015 reverse stock split shares were distributed, whether they were holders entitled to vote at the special meeting on February 20, 2015 or transferees of such holders (by purchase or otherwise), constitute the members of the Class entitled to recovery in the Settlement. 4. Why is there a settlement? Both sides are confident in the merits of their respective legal positions. However, instead of risking the outcome of a lengthy trial, both sides agreed to a settlement. The Plaintiffs and their attorneys think the Settlement is fair and is what is best for all Class Members. Plaintiffs counsel conducted an investigation and pursued extensive discovery relating to the claims and the underlying events and transactions alleged in the Lawsuit. Plaintiffs counsel have analyzed the evidence obtained during their investigation, and the extensive discovery obtained in the Lawsuit, including documents produced by the Defendants and numerous subpoenaed third parties, and the depositions of various Defendants, Windstream executives, and third party consultants. At the same time, Plaintiffs counsel thoroughly researched the applicable law with respect to the claims asserted in the Lawsuit and the potential defenses. Plaintiffs counsel consulted numerous experts regarding the economic damages that could be attributed to the allegedly uninformed vote, retained three experts who prepared reports and rebuttal reports for testimony at trial and also considered the report and opinions of the expert retained by Defendants. In negotiating and evaluating the terms of the Settlement, Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs Counsel considered the significant legal and factual defenses to the claims and the additional expense, delay, and risk that would be incurred if they pursued their claims through trial and appeals. While Plaintiffs believe that the February 20, 2015 stockholder vote was not fully informed and the product of breaches of fiduciary duty by the Defendants and that stockholders suffered economic injury as a result, Defendants have argued that they acted appropriately and that stockholders benefited economically as a result of the stockholder vote and partial REIT spin off, and Defendants continue to deny all allegations of wrongdoing, fault, liability or damage. In light of the risks of continued litigation, the amount of the Settlement and the immediacy of recovery to the Class, Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs Counsel believe that the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate, and in the best interests of the Class. Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs Counsel believe that the Settlement provides a significant benefit to the Class, namely $10.5 million in cash to be provided by third party insurers (less the various deductions described in this Notice), as compared to the risk that the claims in the Lawsuit would produce a smaller or no recovery after trial and appeals, possibly years in the future. 5. How do I know if I am part of the Settlement? If you are a member of the Class, you are subject to the Settlement. The Class certified by the Court consists of: Stockholders of Windstream Holdings, Inc. and their heirs, successors, assigns and transferees (excluding Defendants), who were entitled to vote (or direct the vote of) shares of common stock of Windstream at the February 20, 2015 special meeting of stockholders. Please note: receipt of this notice does not mean that you are a Class Member or that you will be entitled to receive money from the Settlement. If approved by the Court, the Settlement will be distributed directly to holders of record of Windstream stock to whom the April 26, for-6 reverse stock split 3

4 shares were distributed. It will not be necessary for Class Members to take any action to receive their pro rata share of the Settlement. If you held your stock in street name through a broker, your broker will be responsible for crediting your pro rata share of the Settlement to your account. 6. What does the settlement provide? In consideration for the full and final settlement and dismissal with prejudice of the Lawsuit, and the release by the Class Members of any and all Released Claims, the Defendants insurers have agreed to pay $10.5 million in cash for the benefit of the Class, to be divided, after payment of fees and expenses, among all Class Members who owned shares of Windstream common stock at the time the April 26, for-6 reverse stock split shares were distributed. The settlement will be funded entirely by Defendants third party insurers. Neither Defendants nor Windstream will make any settlement payment. 7. How much will my payment be? Your share of the fund will depend on the number of shares you owned at the time the April 26, 2015 reverse stock split shares were distributed. There were approximately 100,900,000 shares of Windstream stock issued and outstanding immediately upon distribution of the reverse stock split shares. The Settlement Fund (before any deductions) represents approximately $.10 per common share distributed in the April 26, 2015 reverse stock split. The costs to administer the Settlement claims and to pay the attorneys and litigation expenses will be deducted from Settlement Fund prior to distribution to stockholders on a pro rata basis. The entire Settlement Fund, net of costs, fees and expenses, will be distributed automatically to stockholders, and no amounts will revert to the Defendants. The allocation of the Settlement described in this Notice is being proposed by Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs Counsel to the Court for approval, which the Court may approve as proposed or may modify without further notice to the Class. Any orders regarding a modification of the allocation of the Settlement will be posted to the Settlement website, 8. How can I get a payment? As soon as practicable after final approval of the Settlement (approval by the Court and the resolution of, or expiration of time to pursue, an appeal) the Settlement Administrator will cause the Settlement amount, less any costs of administration, attorneys fees and litigation expenses (inclusive of any incentive awards to the Plaintiffs) approved by the Court, to be distributed on a pro rata basis to holders of Windstream stock to whom the April 26, for-6 reverse stock split shares were distributed, either by check to record holders or by payment to Cede & Co, as the record holder for stockholders in street name, with instructions to distribute such payment to the brokers (for further credit to their customers) on whose behalf Cede & Co. owns the stock of record. The Settlement Administrator will post the status of the distribution on the Settlement website, 9. When would I get my payment? The Court will hold a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on June 20, 2018, at the Kent County Courthouse, 38 The Green, Dover, Delaware 19901, to decide whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, after that, there may be appeals. Resolving the appeals, if they are filed, can take time. The Settlement will be distributed as soon as reasonably practicable after the resolution of the appeals, or the expiration of any applicable time for appeal. 10. How Does the Settlement Affect My Rights? If the Settlement is approved, you cannot sue or be part of any other lawsuit about the issues in this case. It also means that all of the Court s orders will apply to you and legally bind you. 11. What Am I Giving Up in Connection with the Settlement? 4

5 As a result of the Settlement, if approved by the Court, you will no longer be able to sue for any of the claims made in the Lawsuit. Giving up these claims is called a release. The full release language agreed to in connection with the Lawsuit is as follows: Effective upon Final Approval, Lead Plaintiffs and every Class Member (collectively, the Releasing Persons ) shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Order and Final Judgment approving this Settlement shall have, completely, fully, finally and forever compromised, settled, released, discharged, extinguished, relinquished, and dismissed with prejudice any and all claims, demands, rights, actions, causes of action, potential actions, liabilities, damages, diminutions in value, debts, losses, obligations, judgments, interest, penalties, fines, sanctions, fees, duties, suits, costs, expenses, matters, controversies, and issues known or unknown, contingent or absolute, suspected or unsuspected, disclosed or undisclosed, liquidated or unliquidated, matured or unmatured, accrued or unaccrued, apparent or unapparent, including known claims and Unknown Claims, whether individual, direct, class, derivative, representative, legal, equitable or of any other type or asserted in any other capacity, that have been, could have been, or could ever be, asserted in any court, tribunal or proceeding (including, but not limited to, any claims arising under federal, state, local, foreign, statutory or common law, including the federal or state securities, antitrust, and disclosure laws or any claims that could be asserted derivatively on behalf of Windstream), by or on behalf of Lead Plaintiffs or any Class Member, which arise out of or relate to such Class Member s Windstream stockholdings or such Class Member s status as a Windstream stockholder, against Defendants, or any of their respective, direct or indirect, families, parent entities, controlling persons, associates, affiliates or subsidiaries and each and all of their respective past or present, direct or indirect, officers, directors, stockholders, principals, representatives, employees, attorneys, financial or investment advisors, public relations advisors, proxy solicitors, consultants, accountants, investment bankers, commercial bankers, entities providing fairness opinions, advisors or agents, insurers, heirs, executors, trustees, general or limited partners or partnerships, investment funds, limited liability companies, members, managers, joint ventures, personal or legal representatives, estates, administrators, predecessors, successors or assigns (the Released Persons ), whether or not each of the Released Persons was named, served with process, or appeared in the Action, which the Releasing Persons ever had, now have, or may in the future have by reason of, arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the acts, events, facts, matters, transactions, occurrences, statements or representations or any other matter whatsoever set forth in, or otherwise related directly or indirectly to, the allegations in the Action, the complaints in the Action, the Proposals, the Spin Off, the Special Meeting, any term, condition or circumstance of the Special Meeting or the events associated with the Special Meeting, or disclosures made in connection therewith (including but not limited to any alleged misstatements or omissions or the adequacy and completeness of such disclosures) (the Settled Claims ); provided, however, that the Settled Claims shall not include any claims to enforce this Settlement or the rights of the Parties to enforce this Stipulation. This Settlement is intended to extinguish all Settled Claims, including Unknown Claims, and all Defendants Released Claims, including Unknown Claims, and, consistent with such intention, the Releasing Persons and the Released Persons shall waive and relinquish, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the provisions, rights, and benefits of any state, federal or foreign law or principle of common law, that may have the effect of limiting the releases set forth above. Unknown Claims means any claim that a Releasing Person or a Released Person does not know or suspect exists in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of the Settled Claims and the Defendants Released Claims, including without limitation those which, if known, might have affected the decision to enter into or object to the Settlement or any assertion by a Party that the Parties did not comply with the provisions of Delaware Court of Chancery Rule 11 or any similar provision. This shall include a waiver by the Releasing Persons and the Released Persons to the extent applicable, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, the provisions, rights and benefits of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which states that: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, 5

6 WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. In addition, the Releasing Persons and the Released Persons shall be deemed to waive any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable or equivalent to California Civil Code Section Do I have a lawyer in this case? Plaintiffs counsel, the law firms of CSS Legal Group PLLC and Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P.A., represent you and other Class Members. You will not be charged any out of pocket money for representation as Class Members by these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. 13. How will the lawyers be paid? Plaintiffs Counsel will ask the Court to approve payment for attorneys fees and expenses of up to 25% of the Settlement amount plus out-of-pocket expenses (such as expert fees and deposition expenses) in an amount not to exceed $250,000 (the Fee and Expense Application ). Plaintiffs will also each request an incentive award fee of $15,000 from the Settlement amount for the work that each performed on behalf of all stockholders (the Incentive Fee Applications and, together with the Fee and Expense Application, the Fee Applications ). Plaintiffs Counsel have been working on this case since 2015, without any payment at all. A detailed summary of what was done in this Lawsuit is included in the Stipulation, which may be obtained by visiting the website at or by ing info@windstreamsettlement.com, or calling The Court may award less than these amounts. The amount of the fees, expenses and incentive awards will be paid from the Settlement Fund. The costs to administer the Settlement will also be deducted from the Settlement Fund. The Settlement is not conditioned on the Court granting the Fee Applications. 14. How do I tell the Court if I object to the Settlement? You can object to any part of the Settlement or the Fee Applications. To object, you must file with the Court, no later than June 10, 2018, a written statement setting forth the reasons for your objection. The Court will consider all timely submitted, compliant objections. Be sure to: (a) identify the case as Doppelt v. Windstream Holdings, Inc., et al., C.A. No VCS; (b) include your name, address, address, telephone number, and, if represented by an attorney, the name, address, address and telephone number of your attorney; (c) provide proof of membership in the Class and a statement certifying that you are a Class Member; (d) affix your signature; (e) and describe in detail the specific reasons you object to the Settlement or the Fee Applications. Please also include any documents you wish the Court to consider. To file with the Court you must either have an electronic filing account or mail or hand deliver your papers to the Register in Chancery, Court of Chancery, 38 The Green, Dover, Delaware Also by June 10, 2018, you must serve the objection by e-filing, hand delivery or overnight mail to the following attorneys: Carmella Keener ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT & GODDESS, P.A 919 North Market Street, Suite 1401 P.O. Box 1070 Wilmington, DE Robert S. Saunders SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP One Rodney Square, 920 N. King Street P.O. Box 636 Wilmington, DE

7 15. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement? The Court will hold a Settlement Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on June 20, 2018, at the Kent County Courthouse, 38 The Green, Dover, Delaware At this hearing the Court will consider whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and whether to approve the allocation of the Settlement. The Court will also consider the Fee Applications. If there are objections, the Court will consider them. After the hearing, the Court will make decisions whether to approve these matters relating to the Settlement and the Fee Applications. We do not know how long these decisions will take, but the Court may choose to render its decisions at the conclusion of the hearing. 16. Do I have to come to the hearing? No. Plaintiffs Counsel will answer questions the Court may have. But, you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you send an objection, you do not have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as you mailed your written objection with the proper documentation and in the manner described above, the Court will consider it. You may also pay your own lawyer to attend, but it is not necessary. Unless the Court orders otherwise, any Class Member who does not object in the manner described above will be deemed to have waived any objection and will be forever foreclosed from making any objection to the proposed Settlement, its allocation among Class Members, or the Fee Applications. Class Members do not need to appear at the hearing or take any other action to indicate their approval. 17. How do I get more information? You can call the Settlement Administrator at toll free; write to Windstream Settlement, P.O. Box , Louisville, KY , the Settlement Administrator at info@windstreamsettlement.com, contact Carol Shahmoon of CSS Legal Group PLLC (one of counsel for Plaintiff) at or cshahmoon@csslegalgroup.com, or visit the website where you will find answers to common questions about the Settlement, plus other information to help you determine whether you are a Class Member and whether you are eligible to get money from the Settlement. PLEASE DO NOT CALL OR WRITE THE COURT. NOTICE TO PERSONS OR ENTITIES HOLDING RECORD OWNERSHIP ON BEHALF OF OTHERS. If you held Windstream common stock at the time that the April 26, for-6 reverse stock split shares were distributed for the beneficial interest of a person or entity other than yourself, you must either (a) within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of this Notice, request from the Settlement Administrator sufficient copies of the Notice to forward to all such beneficial owners and within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of those Notices forward them to all such beneficial owners; or (b) within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of this Notice, provide a list of the names and addresses of all such beneficial owners to Windstream Settlement, P.O. Box , Louisville, KY , or by to Nominees@WindstreamSettlement.com. If you choose the second option, the Settlement Administrator will send copies of the Notice to the beneficial owners. Upon full compliance with these directions, such nominees may seek reimbursement of their reasonable expenses actually incurred, by providing the Settlement Administrator with proper documentation supporting the expenses for which reimbursement is sought. Copies of this Notice may also be obtained from the settlement website maintained by the Settlement Administrator, or by calling the Settlement Administrator at

8 Windstream Settlement P.O. Box Louisville, KY WDP «Barcode» Postal Service: Please do not mark barcode Claim#: WDP-«Claim8»-«CkDig» «First1» «Last1» «Addr1» «Addr2» «City», «St» «Zip» «Country»

If You Were a Stockholder of Primedia, Inc. Between January 11, 2011 and July 13, 2011 You May Be Entitled to Money From a Class Action Settlement

If You Were a Stockholder of Primedia, Inc. Between January 11, 2011 and July 13, 2011 You May Be Entitled to Money From a Class Action Settlement Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Settlement Hearing and Right to Appear If You Were a Stockholder of Primedia, Inc. Between January 11, 2011 and July 13, 2011 You May Be Entitled to Money

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE CABLEVISION/RAINBOW MEDIA TRACKING STOCK LITIGATION Cons. C.A. No. 19819-VCN NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE BOISE INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 8933-VCG NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-11044-DJC Document 70-4 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG, INC. C.A. No. 12619-CB NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING, AND

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE X THE EDITH ZIMMERMAN ESTATE, By And : Through STANLEY E. ZIMMERMAN, JR., : A Personal Representative Of The Estate; : THE ESTATE OF GEORGE E. BATCHELOR,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, Plaintiffs, v. DOUGLAS W. BROYLES, MARVIN D. BURKETT, STEPHEN L. DOMENIK, DR. NORMAN GODINHO, RONALD

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BRAD WIND, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, v. Case No. 07-2380CI-20 CATALINA

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION IN RE SWISHER HYGIENE, INC. SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION X X MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TRADING STRATEGIES FUND, on CIVIL DIVISION Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, No. 12-11460 Plaintiff, -against- NOORUDDIN S.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-00580-BEN-RBB NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Derivatively on Behalf of THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., v. Plaintiff, JOSE B. ALVAREZ, ALAN M. BENNETT,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. ) ) C.A. No VCN

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. ) ) C.A. No VCN IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: FREEPORT-MCMORAN COPPER & GOLD INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) ) C.A. No. 8145-VCN SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF DERIVATIVE ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ADELE BRODY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, Index No.: 008835/2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest ROBERT

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA SARATOGA ADVANTAGE TRUST and THEODORE HYER, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. ICG, INC. a/k/a INTERNATIONAL COAL

More information

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

More information

THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) Consolidated C.A. No VCL

THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) Consolidated C.A. No VCL THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE REHABCARE GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION Consolidated C.A. No. 6197 - VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION JOHN NICHOLAS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2013 CH 11752 Consolidated

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To ALL ACTIONS. x x Civil Action No. 05-CV-2827-RMB ELECTRONICALLY

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GUY RATZ, Individually and on behalf of : all others similarly situated, : : Plaintiff, : : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:13 cv 06808

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Enzymotec Securities Litigation Toll-Free Number: 844-418-6627 Claims Administrator Website: www.enzymotecsecuritieslitigation.com PO Box 4079 Email: info@enzymotecsecuritieslitigation.com Portland OR

More information

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant.

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant. Case 116-cv-02487-KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x SHIVA STEIN, Plaintiff, - against

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated shareholders of Landry s Restaurants, Inc.,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, CAMDEN COUNTY Docket No. L IN RE METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, CAMDEN COUNTY Docket No. L IN RE METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION IN RE METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, CAMDEN COUNTY Docket No. L-6430-06 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND CLASS CERTIFICATION, PROPOSED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VISWANATH V. SHANKAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. IMPERVA, INC., et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

Polycom, Inc. Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281

Polycom, Inc. Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281 Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 23, 2016 PLC Polycom, Inc Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281 *P-PLC-POC/1* Dublin, OH 43017-5781 1-855-907-3170 wwwgardencitygroupcom/cases-info/polycomsettlement

More information

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>>

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>> IN RE SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION STOCKHOLDER AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION C/O RUST CONSULTING INC - 5568 PO BOX 2563 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9563 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *CLMNTIDNO* - UAA -

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. EFiled: Oct 20 2015 11:35AM EDT Transaction ID 58039964 Case No. 10553-VCN IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE NPS PHARMACEUTICALS STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO. 1:11-CV JGK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO. 1:11-CV JGK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Plaintiff, - against - U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements), Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BROADCOM CORPORATION CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Lead Case No.: CV-06-5036-R (CWx) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND

More information

CAUSE NO. DC C

CAUSE NO. DC C CAUSE NO. DC-13-06601-C JACOB HULSEBUS, IBEW LOCAL 363 PENSION TRUST FUND, IBEW LOCAL 363 MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN and PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION GUANGYI XU, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA v. Case No: 2:15-cv-07952-CAS (RAOx) CHINACACHE INTERNATIONAL

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION A court in Nevada authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Please be advised that if you held the common stock of ClubCorp

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TRUE RELIGION APPAREL, INC SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 8598-VCG NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Autoliv Securities Litigation Website: www.autolivsecuritieslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@autolivsecuritieslitigation.com P.O. Box 4259 Toll Free: 1-877-880-0181 Portland, OR 97208-4259

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE SUNRUN INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:17-cv-02537-VC CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DIVISION IN RE ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC. Master File No. 07 C 7083 SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To:

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X ANTHONY CAIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re PROVIDIAN FINANCIAL CORP. SECURITIES ) Master File No. C 01-3952 CRB LITIGATION ) ) ) This Document Relates to:

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TERRI MORSE BACHOW, Individually on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff v. C.A. No. 3:09-CV-0262-K

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. C. A. No VCS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. C. A. No VCS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HAMILTON PARTNERS, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership, and FILITSA ALEXANDER, v. Plaintiffs, HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., a Delaware limited

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WILLIAM E. BURGES and ROSE M. BURGES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BANCORPSOUTH, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE 360NETWORKS SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) 02 CV 4837 (MGC) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS'

More information

OBJECT NO LATER THAN JULY 5, 2016 GO TO A HEARING DO NOTHING

OBJECT NO LATER THAN JULY 5, 2016 GO TO A HEARING DO NOTHING NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you purchased Violin Memory, Inc. common stock between September 27, 2013 and November 21, 2013, you could receive a payment from a class action settlement.

More information

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D Case 211-cv-03535-CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D Case 211-cv-03535-CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 2 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY!

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY! IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-01243-CMA-KMT (Consolidated for all purposes with Civil Action No. 14-cv- 01402-CMA-KMT) UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL

More information

District of New Hampshire X :: : X

District of New Hampshire X :: : X United States District Court District of New Hampshire In re: StockerYale, Inc. Securities Litigation. X :: : X Master File No. 1:05cv00177-SM CIVIL ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, AEROPOSTALE, INC., THOMAS P. JOHNSON and MARC

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv DAK-EJF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv DAK-EJF PATRICK LENTSCH, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH v. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv-00012-DAK-EJF VISTA OUTDOOR INC., MARK W. DEYOUNG,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR Gentiva Securities Litigation Website: www.gentivasecuritieslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@gentivasecuritieslitigation.com P.O. Box 3058 Toll Free: 888-593-7570 Portland, OR 97208-3058

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE RAYTHEON COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 19018 NC NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : x STANLEY YEDLOWSKI, etc., v. Plaintiffs, ROKA BIOSCIENCE, INC., et al., Defendants x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : Case No. 14-CV-8020-FLW-TJB NOTICE OF: (1) PENDENCY

More information

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL MONAHAN, on behalf of himself And all persons similarly interested Civil Action No. 02-CV-496M Plaintiffs, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN

More information

IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE

IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE In re PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master Docket

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK COUNTY, ss. SUPERIOR COURT ALAN SANDERSON, DONATO BUCCELLA and MARK SILVERMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. : : : VERDASYS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-00715-KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND HEARING If you

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 2 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE Case No. 30-2009-00236910 CLASS ACTION Assigned

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM In the United States District Court For the Western District of Oklahoma NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and On Behalf of All Others

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Deadline for Submission: September 15, 2017 PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM IF YOU PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED CAESARSTONE, LTD. COMMON STOCK ( CAESARSTONE ) DURING THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 12, 2014

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE THIRD AVENUE TRUST SHAREHOLDER AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Consolidated C.A. No. 12184-VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF DERIVATIVE ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE COMVERGE, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION ) CONSOLIDATED ) C.A. No. 7368-VCMR STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE This Stipulation

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT United States District Court Northern District of California San Jose Division In re: TVIA INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document relates to: ALL ACTIONS. X :: X :: : : X No. C-06-06304-RMW CLASS ACTION

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY x JOANN KRAJEWSKI, PAUL Consolidated Case No. 02-CV-221038 MCHENDRY, and MICHAEL LAMB, Division No. 8 Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant

More information

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2 Case5:09-cv-02147-JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13 Exhibit A-2 Case5:09-cv-02147-JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page2 of 13 1 SCOTT+SCOTT LLP MARY K. BLASY (211262) 2 WALTER W. NOSS (pro hac

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) IN RE CYTRX CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) Exhibit A(1) Docket No.: 2:14-CV-01956-GHK-PJW CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY ROBERT ENGLEHART, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. CHARLES M. BROWN, PATRICK J. BYRNE, JERRY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION ------------------------------------------------------x IN RE CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES : Civil Action No. W-04-CA-177 SECURITIES LITIGATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case CIV WPD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case CIV WPD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In re: Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A. Securities Litigation Case 14 81156 CIV WPD NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND SANDRA KAFENBAUM and STEVEN SCHULMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, CA 00 413L vs. GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MOBILEIRON, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Lead Case No. 1-15-cv-284001 CLASS ACTION Assigned to:

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SAMCO PARTNERS, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, JOSEPH M. O DONNELL, EDWARD

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION CONCERNING SEVERANCE CLAIMS The United States Bankruptcy Court for

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you purchased or otherwise acquired Corinthian Colleges, Inc. ( Corinthian ) common stock between August 23, 2010 and April 14, 2015 (both dates inclusive)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RAMON GOMEZ, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BIDZ.COM, INC., and DAVID ZINBERG, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS, AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING; AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM AND SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM AND SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9 In re American Business Financial Services Inc. Noteholders Litigation I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA X X Master File No. 05-232 PROOF OF

More information

Plaintiff, Defendants.

Plaintiff, Defendants. United States District Court For the District Court of Massachusetts WILTOLD TRZECIAKOWSKI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. GSI GROUP INC., SERGIO EDELSTEIN and ROBERT BOWEN,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. No. 4:10-MD Honorable Keith P. Ellison PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. No. 4:10-MD Honorable Keith P. Ellison PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re BP p.l.c. Securities Litigation No. 4:10-MD-02185 Honorable Keith P. Ellison I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND BUSINESS COURT Lead Case No CB Hon. James M.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND BUSINESS COURT Lead Case No CB Hon. James M. In re ITC HOLDINGS CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND BUSINESS COURT Lead Case No. 2016-151852-CB Hon. James M. Alexander This Document

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement.

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Lead Case No.: CV R (CWx)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Lead Case No.: CV R (CWx) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BROADCOM CORPORATION CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Lead Case No.: CV-06-5036-R (CWx) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND

More information

Notice of Proposed Settlement in Derivative

Notice of Proposed Settlement in Derivative Page 1 of 20 Notice of Proposed Settlement in Derivative Action NEWS PROVIDED BY Third Avenue Management 09:00 ET WILMINGTON, Del., April 21, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- The following is being released pursuant

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * * * * * * * * * * *

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * * * * * * * * * * * IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Bernice Polage, et al., v. Christopher H. Cole, et al. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 24-C-13-006665 * * * * * * * * * * * AMENDED STIPULATION AND

More information

01-CA4180. X0791 v.05 1

01-CA4180. X0791 v.05 1 In re ProNAi Shareholder Litigation Settlement Claims Administrator c/o Epiq P.O. Box 5053 Portland, OR 97208-5053 Toll Free Number: (877) 734-5338 Settlement Website: www.pronaishareholderlitigation.com

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG IN RE VENOCO, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION TO: IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 6825-VCG NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION MDL DOCKET NO. 1506 (CAS) ALL CASES STONERIDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------- X PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT NOTICE The only official website from which to submit a claim is www.accountholdsettlement.com/claim. DO NOT submit a claim from any other website, including any website titled Paycoin c. PayPal

More information

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-13-000352 IN RE PERVASIVE SOFTWARE INC, SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 15-cv-1249 (WHP) NOTICE OF (I) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION;

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BENJAMIN MICHAEL MERRYMAN, AMY WHITAKER MERRYMAN TRUST, B MERRYMAN AND A MERRYMAN 4TH GENERATION REMAINDER TRUST AND CHESTER COUNTY EMPLOYEES

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Bernice Polage, et al., v. Christopher H. Cole, et al. CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 24-C-13-006665 * * * * * * * * * * * NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF DERIVATIVE AND

More information