In preparing this response we have drawn on the assistance of FODO s defence lawyers, Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP, in formulating this response.
|
|
- Brooke Thornton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Federation of Ophthalmic and Dispensing Opticians (FODO) represents registered opticians in business. It accounts for over three quarters of market activity and over two thirds of eye examinations. The majority of FODO members are covered by FODO professional indemnity insurance. The Association of British Dispensing Opticians (ABDO) represents over 5,000 dispensing opticians in the UK; it also provides professional liability insurance for its members. Response to Consultation on the New GOC Fitness to Practise Rules We are responding on behalf of FODO and the ABDO to the GOC s consultation on the new Fitness to Practise Rules which, once approved, will replace the General Optical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2005 ( the 2005 Rules ). In preparing this response we have drawn on the assistance of FODO s defence lawyers, Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP, in formulating this response. Overall, we consider that the proposals will significantly improve the management of GOC fitness to practise cases and we welcome the introduction of the new rules, subject to the points raised below. Question 1 Do you agree with our proposed approach to the single allegation of impairment of fitness to practise, in the light of the public and registrants interest issues described above? We agree that this is consistent with the approach of other regulators and also reflects the way in which GOC charges are currently framed, with a single allegation of impairment based on any one or more of the grounds set out in s13d(2) and 13D(3) of the Opticians Act 1989 ( The 1989 Act ). On a related note, we consider that the registrar should provide the registrant with draft allegations prior to the case examiners considering the matter. This will enable the registrant to focus their response to the allegations considered to be of concern to the GOC. We note that Rule 4 (1) (a) of the 2005 Rules requires that a registrant be provided with a notice of each allegation prior to the Investigation Committee considering the matter. In practice however, we note that registrants are instead provided with a copy of the complainant s letter of complaint which they then have to decipher and respond to. We regard the implementation of the new rules as a good opportunity for this to be remedied. Question 2 Do you agree that the introduction of the case examiner provisions will make the throughput of complaint cases faster and more efficient? We agree that the introduction of the case examiner provisions will be beneficial. We consider however that guidance should be given, setting out the role of the case examiners, their remit and the test that they must apply when deciding whether or not to refer a matter to an Investigation Committee 1
2 or Fitness to Practise Committee. Training will also need to be given to the case examiners to ensure that they are clear as to how to apply these tests. The case examiners will also need to be made aware of the importance of evidence of remediation and the legal significance that such evidence has. In relation to professional case examiners, we believe that it is important that clinical complaints should be considered by a case examiner with the same title as that of the registrant. For example, a complaint concerning an optometrist should be considered by a registered optometrist, a complaint concerning a dispensing optician or contact lens optician by a registered dispensing optician or contact lens optician and a complaint concerning an enrolled body corporate by a professional with relevant and senior-level experience in body corporate management. This would be the appropriate way to proceed both in terms of efficiency and fairness to the registrant. We also note that the case examiners will not be able to direct an assessment of the registrant s health or performance and that if they consider such an assessment appropriate, they must refer to the Investigation Committee, which will direct an assessment. Furthermore, case examiners who are not unanimous in their decision about disposal of an allegation must inform the registrar who will in turn refer the allegation for consideration by the Investigation Committee. In these circumstances, whilst we agree that the case examiner provisions will make the throughput of complaints faster and more efficient, there may remain a significant number of cases which are referred back to the Investigation Committee for consideration. We have dealt with this issue in more detail in response to Question 10 below. Question 3 Do you agree with the terms of guidance to the case examiners relating to complaints where more than five years has elapsed since the incident leading to the complaint? Whilst we agree with the factors listed to be taken into account by the case examiners when considering the allegation under Rule 12, we suggest that the case examiners should also consider the extent to which the passage of time is likely to have impacted upon the quality of the evidence. This is separate from the issue, already listed for consideration within the guidance, of whether evidence is no longer available due to the lapse of time. On a related note, the registrant should have full opportunity to address the case examiners on the issue of the five year period having elapsed and whether there are exceptional circumstances warranting the case being investigated. In our submission, one way of dealing with this is for the registrar to be required to inform the registrant in the letter to be sent under Rule 5 of the proposed new rules that the complaint is outside of the five year time limit (with specific reference to the date that the complaint was brought to the attention of the GOC and the date of the most recent complaint). The registrant should then to be invited to submit representations on the five year issue along with any substantive response to the complaint. Question 4: Do you agree with the terms of the guidance where the complainant wishes to remain anonymous? We recognise the difficulties created where a complainant is unwilling to disclose their identity, both in terms of evidential issues and fairness to the registrant and consider that the guidance is helpful in dealing with this issue. 2
3 We further suggest that the guidance be amended to require the case examiners to consider the extent to which the allegation in question is capable of being supported without reliance on the evidence of the anonymous complainant. The guidance should, in our view, also state that where there are no cogent reasons given for the anonymity of the complaint and no evidence in support of the complaint beyond that of the anonymous complainant, the case should normally be closed with no further action. Question 5 Do you agree with the terms of the guidance relating to vexatious complaints? We agree with the terms of the guidance on this issue and, in particular, the helpful examples of complaints which may be considered vexatious. Question 6 Do you agree that the provision for the registrar to refer a matter directly to the Fitness to Practise Committee for consideration of an interim order is appropriate in the public interest? For this provision to work effectively, it will be vital that the registrar has appropriate guidance and training on when referral for consideration of an interim order is necessary, especially given that a decision previously taken by a committee is now to be taken by one person alone. We consider that the guidance should be open and transparent and would therefore suggest that the guidance is made available on the GOC s website. If the introduction of this provision leads to an increase in cases being referred for consideration of an interim order, we strongly recommend that the issue of guidance and training be revisited as, although interim orders may be imposed at an earlier stage, the overall number of interim order cases should not be expected to rise. Question 7 Do you support the provision for the registrar to refer serious criminal convictions directly to the Fitness to Practise Committee? Whilst we agree in general terms that there should be provision for serious criminal convictions to be referred directly to the Fitness to Practise Committee, we would suggest that there should remain a mechanism for those exceptional circumstances in which the registrant wishes to challenge direct referral. As has been noted within the consultation paper itself, it might, for example, be argued that the registrant is not the person who was convicted. We envisage that it would be possible to deal with this situation by way of written representation to request termination of the referral under Rule 16. However, this would require that the new Rules be amended to include referrals made under Rule 4(5) of the rules as well as those made under s13d(6)(b) of the 1989 Act. Question 8 Do you support the express provision for a process for the submission of observations by the registrant and the maker of the allegation? No, we do not agree with the proposed process for submission of observations by the registrant and the maker of the allegations. It is, we believe, wholly unfair that the complainant should have the final 3
4 word in the exchanging of comments as, whilst the GOC s stated mission is to protect the public, it is the registrant s livelihood and professional reputation at stake. The registrant should therefore be entitled to respond to any further comments made by the complainant (although registrants representatives are likely to advise that no further comments be made where the complainant merely restates previously expressed concerns). If the complainant is given the final opportunity for comment on the allegation there is a greater risk of prejudice to the registrant as the complainant may well seek to put forward new issues not previously raised and in relation to which the registrant has not been given 28 days to respond (Rule 5 of the 2005 Rules). If the registrant is permitted the final opportunity to respond, any new issues raised by the complainant can be dealt with within representations made on the registrant s behalf including, where appropriate, making clear to the case examiners that such new issues should be disregarded as they do not form part of the allegation to be considered. This process causes no prejudice to the complainant, ensures fairness to the registrant, provides helpful guidance to the decision makers and ensures that the basis of any subsequent referral to the Fitness to Practise Committee is clear, thereby avoiding unnecessary legal argument at a later stage. We note the reference within the consultation paper to the recommendations of the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence (CHRE) on this subject in its December 2009 report, Handling Complaints. It is our view, having considered that report, that our approach is entirely consistent with the CHRE recommendations, as we make no objection to disclosure of the registrant s responses to the complainant. We wholly support the comment at paragraph 4.8 of that report to the effect that: sharing the registrant s response can facilitate an exchange of information between the registrant and complainant, which is particularly valuable when the source of the complaint is a misunderstanding or a breakdown of communication. However, the CHRE report does not make any recommendations regarding who should have the last opportunity for comment and in fact touches upon the risk of the complainant changing the nature of their complaint on receipt of the registrant s response. Question 9 Do you agree that the new Rules should allow the Investigation Committee (IC) and Fitness to Practise Committee to draw such inferences as seem appropriate to them in relation to a registrant who does not co-operate with an assessment that has been directed by the IC? We agree with this proposal and that there should be parity between the Investigation Committee and the Fitness to Practise Committee in this regard. We consider however that guidance should be given to the Investigation Committee as to the factors to be taken into account and the threshold that needs to be overcome when the Committee are considering drawing an adverse inference. This guidance should be open and transparent and we would therefore suggest that the guidance be made available on the GOC s website. Question 10 Do you agree with the provisions relating to the decisions which the case examiners may take? We note that under Rule 12 of the proposed new rules, where the case examiners decide that an allegation ought not to be referred to a Fitness to Practise Committee, the options open to them are to conclude the case with no further action or to impose a warning. We would suggest that a further option should be added in that the case examiners (or Investigation Committee where the case 4
5 examiners cannot reach a unanimous decision) should be able to give the registrant a letter of advice, setting out what the registrant should do or refrain from doing in the future. This is an option that is open to the Investigating Committee at the GDC and we would suggest that its use allows greater flexibility to the decision makers whilst ensuring that warnings are only used where they are warranted. We note that Rule 14 of the proposed new rules sets out the procedure that would be followed where the case examiners (or Investigation Committee) are considering imposing a warning. We note that this requires the registrar to write to the registrant informing them that a warning is being considered. The registrant will then be invited to make representations within 28 days, as currently allowed for under the 2005 Rules. We support this process and would only add that any representations made by the registrant should be taken into account by the case examiners when deciding on the wording of the warning. With regard to the process for referring consideration of an assessment report to the Investigation Committee, we wonder whether in reality it will be the case examiners taking the decision that an assessment report should be ordered, with the Investigation Committee endorsing their recommendation. We note that Rule 12(1)(b) of the proposed new rules states that the case examiners must refer cases requiring an assessment to the Investigation Committee to request that it direct such an assessment but that Rule 13 does not specifically require the Investigation Committee to comply with this request. However, the consultation paper creates the strong impression that this process is merely a formality and designed to circumvent the restrictions of the delegated power under the 1989 Act. We note that the consultation paper states that where the case examiners decide to refer a registrant for an assessment the Investigation Committee must direct an assessment of the registrant, even though this goes further than the position stated within the new Rules. In these circumstances and whilst fully acknowledging the limitations as a result of the 1989 Act, this does appear to be an artificial process which will result in unnecessary delay. In relation to the potential for delay, we would request that information be provided as to how often it is anticipated that the Investigation Committee will meet once the new rules are implemented and many of the Committee s powers are delegated to the case examiners. In relation to the case examiners power to refer cases to the Fitness to Practise Committee for consideration of the making of an interim order, the points made in relation to Question 6 above apply. Once again as the decision to refer will be capable of being made by one person alone in this instance an individual case examiner - appropriate training and guidance will be vital and the guidance should be made available on the GOC s website. Question 11 Do you agree with the provisions relating to the decisions which the Investigation Committee may take? Please see above response to question 10. 5
6 Question 12 Do you agree with the provision for the registrar, rather than the Investigation Committee, to be able to review a decision not to refer? We are concerned by the prospect of review of a decision not to refer being undertaken by a single individual and, in view of the potential consequences for a registrant if the original decision is overturned and the case referred to the Fitness to Practise Committee, or a warning given where one had not previously been given, we would recommend that that this remain the preserve of the Investigation Committee. If our submission in respect of the continued use of the Investigating Committee is not accepted, we would submit that, as a minimum, fairness to registrants requires that the registrar only be permitted to substitute the original decision for a less serious outcome, i.e. to decide that a warning given at the time of the original decision should not have been given and to remove the record of it. If a more serious outcome is proposed, the matter should be put before the Investigation Committee for consideration. We note that the new rules retain the opportunity provided under the 2005 Rules for the registrant to make representations regarding the review of the decision not to refer. In these circumstances, if it is decided that the registrar is to consider the decision not to refer in the first instance with an opportunity for this to be transferred to the Investigation Committee if a more serious outcome is being considered, the registrant should have full opportunity to make representations both to the registrar and to the Investigation Committee prior to each review of the decision to refer. Question 13 Do you agree that a time limit should be imposed upon the ability to review a decision not to refer? Question 14 If you agree under question 13, do you agree that five years is an appropriate time period? We consider that a shorter time period of 1 year would be fairer to registrants. We refer to the guidance to case examiners for cases where five years or more has elapsed since the events complained of. We are concerned that, if there is a further period of five years within which to challenge the decision not to refer, registrants could potentially be required to face allegations which are up to 10 years old. We note that the public will remain adequately protected by a 1 year requirement as there remains the facility under the new Rule 15(1) to review the decision not to refer within a longer period where there are exceptional reasons for doing so (subject to the view, expressed in response to Question 12 above, that review of the decision not to refer should be undertaken by the Investigation Committee and not the registrar). 6
7 Question 15 Do you support the new provisions in rule 15(4) relating to warnings where a decision not to refer has been reviewed? We do not agree with the provisions relating to warnings where a decision not to refer has been reviewed in so far as it is currently suggested that the registrar will be able to exercise this discretion. We refer to our answer in respect of Question 12 for full details in this regard. Question 16 Do you agree that it is appropriate for the case examiners rather than the Investigation Committee to be able to terminate a referral to the Fitness to Practise Committee? We agree with this proposal, subject to the amendment to Rule 16 proposed in response to Question 7 above. Question 17 Do you support the new provisions in rule 16 permitting the maker of the allegation to be notified of the possible termination of the referral and to be given the opportunity to make comments which the case examiners will take into account? We agree with this proposal, subject to the amendment to Rule 16 proposed in response to Question 7 above. Question 18 Do you agree that it is appropriate that Interim Order hearings should be held in private? Question 19 Do you agree with the provisions in rule 20 that in most cases, oral evidence will not be given at interim order hearings? Question 20 Do you support the new procedure set out in the Rules for Interim Order hearings? Question 21 Do you agree with the proposal that standard directions should apply in all cases unless varied and that a procedural hearing is not then necessary in every case? We note that the parties can agree to vary the directions and this is welcomed. It is agreed that a procedural hearing is not necessary in every case and should be reserved for cases where they are specifically requested. We also recommend that consideration be 7
8 given to having procedural hearings take place by telephone where appropriate, in order to reduce unnecessary costs. Question 22 If you answered yes to question 21, do you agree with the form of the standard directions, including the timescales, set out in the table at rule 29? We agree with the form of the proposed standard directions. Question 23 Do you agree that it is now appropriate for the reference point in the Rules in relation to admissibility of evidence should be the civil rather than criminal rules? Question 24 Do you agree that the provisions relating to evidence now included at Rules 40(3) to (8) are appropriate for the GOC s Fitness to Practise hearing process? Question 25 Do you agree that the detailed hearing process now set out at rule 46 will facilitate and provide certainty in the procedure to be followed at substantive hearings of the Fitness to Practise Committee? We recommend that in respect of Rule 46(11), the Fitness to Practise Committee should be required to give detailed reasons for its findings of fact. We consider that the detailed hearing process set out at Rule 46 is likely to be very useful. Question 26 Do you support the provision in rule 46(20) for the Fitness to Practise Committee to amend an allegation at a hearing, bearing in mind the safeguards and the public interest? We agree with this proposal, subject to the in-built safeguards. Question 27 Do you agree that the power for the Fitness to Practise Committee to make costs orders should be available for substantive and review hearings, but not for either initial or review hearings relating to interim orders? We would be grateful for clarity with regard to the circumstances in which the Fitness to Practise Committee will consider summarily assessing a party s costs. It would be helpful if guidance on this issue could be given and published on the GOC s website and details of the considerations which will be taken into account provided. For example, will cost awards only be considered where a party s behaviour has been unreasonable? 8
9 We would also like clarification that the extent to which it is anticipated that the Fitness to Practise Committee will order costs against the GOC or whether this is unlikely to happen in reality. It would be helpful to have confirmation of the extent to which Rule 56 of the 2005 Rules has been used against the GOC in the past in this regard. We agree that costs orders should not be available for either initial or review hearings relating to interim orders. As Rule 52 of the new rules refers to costs of a hearing, we note that this provision will not be applicable in respect of Investigation Committee meetings. Question 28 Do you agree that the new procedure for the costs process will make the process clearer for the parties and the Fitness to Practise Committee? We are not in a position to comment on whether the new procedure for the costs process will make the process clearer for the parties and the Fitness to Practise Committee until we have received further guidance on the basis on which summary assessment of costs will be carried out, as referred to in answer to Question 27 above. Question 29 Do you support the change to the Rules to make express the ability for the GOC to notify a registrant s current employer of key outcomes of the fitness to practise process under Rules 15, 16 and 51? Yours faithfully David Hewlett Chief Executive FODO Sir Anthony Garrett Secretary General ABDO 9 May,
General Optical Council: Consultation on Guidance for the Investigation Committee, Case Examiners and the Fitness to Practise Committee
General Optical Council: Consultation on Guidance for the Investigation Committee, Case Examiners and the Fitness to Practise Committee The Optical Confederation represents the 12,000 optometrists, 6,000
More information4. This guidance is a public document and is available from the GOC s website at:
GUIDANCE FOR CASE EXAMINERS The purpose of this guidance 1. The General Optical Council (GOC) recognises that it is important that patients, registrants, professional and representative organisations,
More informationGUIDANCE FOR CASE EXAMINERS The purpose of this guidance 1. The General Optical Council (GOC) recognises that it is important that patients, registrants, professional and representative organisations,
More informationIntroduction. Guidance on Warnings July 2017 Page 1 of 6
Guidance regarding warnings issued by Case Examiners and the Investigation Committee under the provisions of the General Optical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2013 Introduction 1. The General Optical
More informationGuidance on the Registrar s Rule 9 power of review (July 2017)
Guidance on the Registrar s Rule 9 power of review (July 2017) 1 Introduction 1. Since 1 November 2016, the GDC s Registrar has had the power to review decisions to close cases without referring them to
More informationALLOCATION OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
ALLOCATION OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES This document sets out the role of the Council, its Committees, the Registrar and the Council staff Part 1 The Council and Registrar Part 2 The Education Committee
More informationRegulatory enforcement proceedings
Regulatory enforcement proceedings The aim of this note is to give practical guidance on the likely course of enforcement proceedings instituted by the FCA. Set out below is an overview of the process.
More information2004 No 2608 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004
This is a version of The General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules which incorporates the 2004 Rules and amendments made to those rules in 2009, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2017 2004 No 2608 HEALTH
More informationNorthern Ireland Social Care Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2016
Northern Ireland Social Care Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2016 The Northern Ireland Social Care Council, with the consent of the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety, makes the
More informationFitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for applicants
Fitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for applicants Fitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for applicants Version 1.0 Reference FTP/GUI/033 Department Fitness to Practise Author Caroline
More informationDeclarations guidance for student registrants
Declarations guidance for student registrants How we consider information that applicants or registrants declare. A guide for students. November 2013 Contents Who is this document for?... 3 About this
More informationSOCIAL CARE WALES (INVESTIGATION) RULES 2017 INTERNAL VERSION
SOCIAL CARE WALES (INVESTIGATION) RULES 2017 INTERNAL VERSION APRIL 2017 PLEASE NOTE: this copy of the Rules is for the use of Social Care Wales staff, panel members, presenters and legal advisers only.
More informationHEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004
2004 No 2608 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004 Made 4th October 2004 Laid before Parliament 7th October 2004 Coming
More informationGuidance on the Investigating Committee s power to review a warning
Guidance on the Investigating Committee s power to review a warning 1 A. Introduction 1. On 13 April 2016, the General Dental Council (Fitness to Practise etc.) Order 2016 amended the Dentists Act 1984
More informationGood decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance
Good decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance Revised March 2017 The text of this document (but not the logo and branding) may be reproduced free of charge in any format
More informationHealth Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process
Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process The following notes have been prepared to explain the complaints process under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance
More informationFitness to Practise Rule 6E Guidance for informants
Fitness to Practise Rule 6E Guidance for informants Fitness to Practise Rule 6E Guidance for applicants Version 2.0 Reference FTP/GUI/031 Department Fitness to Practise Author Caroline Jaggard Approved
More informationGCC code of practice for criminal investigations and prosecutions under the Chiropractors Act 1994 July 2012
GCC code of practice for criminal investigations and prosecutions under the Chiropractors Act 1994 July 2012-1 - GCC code of practice for criminal investigations and prosecutions under the Chiropractors
More informationFitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for informants
Fitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for informants Fitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for applicants Version 2.0 Reference FTP/GUI/034 Department Fitness to Practise Author Caroline
More informationDeclarations guidance for fullyqualified
Declarations guidance for fullyqualified registrants How we consider information that applicants or registrants declare. A guide for fully qualified optometrists and dispensing opticians, and those who
More informationENGLAND BOXING DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
ENGLAND BOXING DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE DEFINITIONS Code: EB: EB Committee: EB Officer: Procedure: the England Boxing Code of Conduct; England Boxing Limited (RCN: 02817909) whose registered office is The
More informationINDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE DRAFT
INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE DRAFT Contents Purpose of document... 2 What is this document about?... 2 Who is this document for?... 3 1. Part 1: Fitness to Practise stages... 3 Investigation... 3 Scrutiny
More informationTHE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD EDITORIAL COMPLAINTS: GUIDANCE on POLICY & PROCESS
THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD EDITORIAL COMPLAINTS: GUIDANCE on POLICY & PROCESS Introduction This document sets out guidance as to the policies and processes which The Financial Times Ltd ( FT ) shall apply
More informationGuide to ACCA s complaints and disciplinary procedures
Guide to ACCA s complaints and disciplinary procedures Introduction This guide aims to assist complainants and members to understand ACCA s complaints and disciplinary process. In the event of any conflict
More informationThe Enforcement Guide
Contents list The Enforcement Guide 1. Introduction Overview 2. The 's approach to enforcement 3. Use of information gathering and investigation powers 4. Conduct of investigations 5. Settlement 6. Publicity
More informationTHE GENERAL OPTICAL COUNCIL (REGISTRATION) RULES 2005
THE GENERAL OPTICAL COUNCIL (REGISTRATION) RULES 2005 The General Optical Council, in exercise of their powers under sections 7, 8A(4) and (5), 9(1), 10(1), (1A) and (5) and 31A of the Opticians Act 1989
More informationGood decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance
Good decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance Revised March 2017 The text of this document (but not the logo and branding) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or
More informationFinancial Services Tribunal Rules 2015 (as amended 2017 and 2018)
Rule c FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL RULES 2015 Index Page* (* page numbers below relate to original legislation, not to this document) PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 Title... 3 2 Commencement... 3 3 Interpretation...
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC LIMBU, Dino Registration No: 246153 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE AUGUST 2015 Outcome: Fitness to practise impaired; erasure with an immediate suspension order Dinu LIMBU, a dental
More information4 September Monitoring of Complaints against the Merseyside Police and Crime Commissioner March to August 2014
4 September 2014 Monitoring of Complaints against the Merseyside Police and Crime March to August 2014 1. Purpose of the Report The purpose of this report is to update Panel Members on how complaints against
More informationBritish Columbia. Health Professions Review Board. Rules of Practice and Procedure for Reviews under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.
British Columbia Health Professions Review Board Rules of Practice and Procedure for Reviews under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 183 These rules for reviews to the Health Professions Review
More informationEHRiC/S5/18/ACR/26 EQUALITIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE AGE OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY (SCOTLAND) BILL SUBMISSION FROM THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND
EQUALITIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE AGE OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY (SCOTLAND) BILL SUBMISSION FROM THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND Ag Introduction The Law Society of Scotland is the professional body for
More information2009 No (L. 20) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES
S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2009 No. 1976 (L. 20) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 Made - - - - 16th July 2009 Laid
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 23 February 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of registrant: NMC
More informationThe General Teaching Council for Scotland Fitness to Teach Rules 2017 These Rules are available in alternative formats on request
DRIVING FORWARD PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR TEACHERS The General Teaching Council for Scotland Fitness to Teach Rules 2017 These Rules are available in alternative formats on request Table of Contents
More informationGUIDE TO OIPC PROCESSES (PIPA)
GUIDANCE DOCUMENT GUIDE TO OIPC PROCESSES (PIPA) UPDATED FEBRUARY 2018 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 REFER BACK POLICY... 7 B. Making a Complaint... 7 C. Decline to Investigate Policy... 8
More informationGuidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance
Guidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance Effective 1 st October 2016 1 2 Contents 1 Introduction and background... 4 2 The Professional Conduct Committee (PCC)... 5
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC HOUGHTON, Nicola Louise Registration No: 130502 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2015 Outcome: Erasure (with immediate order) Nicola Louise HOUGHTON, Verified competency
More informationOMBUDSMAN FOR BANKING SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS TERMS OF REFERENCE
OMBUDSMAN FOR BANKING SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS TERMS OF REFERENCE Purpose 1. These Terms of Reference describe the principal powers and duties of OBSI, the duties of Participating Firms, the scope of OBSI
More informationCONCERNS & COMPLAINTS POLICY. November 2017
CONCERNS & COMPLAINTS POLICY November 2017 1 Contents Page Policy for Academies in Surrey : Introduction and general principles 3-5 Complaints Procedure 7 Stage 1 8 Stage 2 9 Stage 3 10 Stage 4 11 Further
More informationA guide to GMC investigations and fitness to practise proceedings
A guide to GMC investigations and fitness to practise proceedings Contents Introduction 2 What is the GMC s role? 3 Stage 1 Initial complaint 5 Stage 2 Formal investigation 6 Stage 3 Conclusion of investigation
More informationDispute Resolution Service Policy
Dispute Resolution Service Policy 1. Definitions Abusive Registration means a Domain Name which either: i. was registered or otherwise acquired in a manner which, at the time when the registration or acquisition
More informationDisciplinary & Dispute Resolution Procedures
Disciplinary & Dispute Resolution Procedures RCSA, PO Box 18028, Collins Street East, Victoria 8003 Australia T: +61 3 9663 0555 F: +61 3 9663 5099 E: ethics@rcsa.com.au www.rcsa.com.au ABN 41 078 60 6
More informationTHE CONTACT LENS (QUALIFICATIONS ETC.) RULES 1988
The General Optical Council, in exercise of their powers under section [25(3), 31(1)(e), 31(3) and 31A] of the Opticians Act [1989], hereby make the following rules:- Citation, commencement and interpretation
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 22 July 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Nomathemba Amanda Primrose Socikwa 10G0506E
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 16 July 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Part(s) of the register:
More informationComplaints Policy. Policy: Complaints Policy Effective Date: December 2014 Revision Number : 3.0 Revised: January 2018
Complaints Policy Policy: Complaints Policy Effective Date: December 2014 Revision Number : 3.0 Revised: January 2018 Reviewable: As required Author: Educate HR/Senior Team Revision History Revision Number
More informationBERMUDA COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL RULES 2014 BR 11 / 2014
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL RULES 2014 BR 11 / 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 PART 1 PRELIMINARY Citation Interpretation Overriding objective Tribunal
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC BANNATYNE, Ashleigh Registration No: 214342 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE JUNE 2017 - JUNE 2018* Most recent outcome: Suspension extended for 12 months (with a review) *See page
More informationAshton St. Peter s Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School. Complaints Procedure Policy
Ashton St. Peter s Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School Complaints Procedure Policy Ratified in July 2018 Update in July 2019 1 Purpose We want all pupils and their families to be happy with
More information3 February Monitoring of Complaints against the Merseyside Police and Crime Commissioner September 2014 to January 2015
3 February 2015 Monitoring of Complaints against the Merseyside Police and Crime Commissioner September 2014 to January 2015 1. Purpose of the Report The purpose of this report is to update Panel Members
More informationPublic and Licensed Access Review. Consultation on Changes to the Public and Licensed Access Rules
Public and Licensed Access Review Consultation on Changes to the Public and Licensed Access Rules June 2017 Contents Contents... 2 Executive Summary... 3 Part I: Introduction... 7 Background to the suggested
More informationCouncil meeting 15 September 2011
Council meeting 15 September 2011 Public business GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) Recommendation: The Council is asked to agree the GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) at Appendix 1.
More informationGuidance for decision makers on the impact of criminal convictions and cautions
Guidance for decision makers on the impact of criminal convictions and cautions Page 1 of 11 Contents Introduction... 3 Reporting Criminal Proceedings... 4 General Principles... 5 Applications for Registration...
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE*
HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE* *The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from this text. GRAHAM, Lisa Marie Registration
More informationThe Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board. Disciplinary Procedure Rules
The Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board Disciplinary Procedure Rules The Patent Regulation Board of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys and the Trade Mark Regulation Board
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES 1. Advice and Guidance 1.1 It is strongly recommended that the advice and guidance of the Employing Authority be sought when any
More informationFinancial Dispute Resolution Service (FDRS)
RULES FOR Financial Dispute Resolution Service (FDRS) DATE: 1 April 2015 Contents... 1 1. Title... 1 2. Commencement... 1 3. Interpretation... 1 Part 1 Core features of the Scheme... 3 4. Purpose of the
More informationCOMPLAINTS POLICY. Reference: Delta/EM/DM Issue Number: 2.0 Issue Date: September 2017 Review Date: September 2018 Approved by: Trust Board
COMPLAINTS POLICY Reference: Delta/EM/DM Issue Number: 2.0 Issue Date: September 2017 Review Date: September 2018 Approved by: Trust Board CONTENTS 1. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES... 2 2. SUGGESTED AUDIENCE...
More informationNon-compliance hearings guidance for medical practitioners tribunals
Non-compliance hearings guidance for medical practitioners tribunals Introduction 1 The aim of this guidance is to promote consistency and transparency in decision making relating to non-compliance hearings.
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES 1. Advice and Guidance 1.1 It is strongly recommended that the advice and guidance of the Employing Authority be sought when any
More informationDelegated powers policy
Delegated powers policy Revised September 2013 1 Contents Introduction... 3 The Association of Accounting Technicians... 3 The compliance framework and procedures of AAT... 3 Compliance framework... 4
More informationSUBMISSION FROM THE SCOTTISH LEGAL AID BOARD (SLAB)
SUBMISSION FROM THE SCOTTISH LEGAL AID BOARD (SLAB) Introduction 1. The Scottish Legal Aid Board ( the Board ) welcomes the opportunity to provide written evidence to the above Committee on the Children
More informationagainst Members of Staff
Procedural Guidance Security Marking: Police Misconduct and Complaints against Members of Staff Not Protectively Marked Please click on the hyperlink for related Policy Statements 1. Introduction 1.1 This
More informationTHE LMAA TERMS (2006)
THE LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATORS ASSOCIATION THE LMAA TERMS (2006) Effective for appointments on and after 1st January 2006 THE LMAA TERMS (2006) PRELIMINARY 1. These Terms may be referred to as the LMAA
More informationCOTHAM SCHOOL COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES
COTHAM SCHOOL COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES Version control The table below shows the history of the document and the changes made at each version: Version Date Summary of changes 1.0 November 2015
More informationData Protection Bill, House of Commons Second Reading Information Commissioner s briefing
Data Protection Bill, House of Commons Second Reading Information Commissioner s briefing Introduction 1. The Information Commissioner has responsibility in the UK for promoting and enforcing the Data
More informationVOLUNTARY REGISTER OF DRIVING INSTRUCTORS GOVERNING POLICY
VOLUNTARY REGISTER OF DRIVING INSTRUCTORS GOVERNING POLICY 1 Introduction 1.1 In December 2014, the States approved the introduction of a mandatory Register of Driving Instructors, and the introduction
More informationThe Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board)
The Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board) Final Draft Disciplinary Procedure Rules The Patent Regulation Board of the Chartered
More informationTribunals Powers and Procedures Legislation Bill, Subpart 10 Proposed amendments to the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
Tribunals Powers and Procedures Legislation Bill, Subpart 10 Proposed amendments to the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 16/02/2018 Submission on the Tribunals Powers and Procedures Legislation Bill,
More informationRefusing a request under the EIR
Environmental Information Regulations Contents Introduction... 2 Overview... 2 When can a public authority refuse a request?... 3 Time limits for issuing a refusal notice... 3 What to include in a refusal
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing Friday, 5 January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Mr Razvan
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE
HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from the text. ROBERTSON, Harry Gordon Registration
More informationProcedures for investigating breaches of competition-related conditions in Broadcasting Act licences. Guidelines
Procedures for investigating breaches of competition-related conditions in Broadcasting Act licences Guidelines Guidelines Publication date: 28 June 2017 About this document Ofcom is the independent regulator
More informationCivil Procedure Act 2010
Examinable excerpts of Civil Procedure Act 2010 as at 2 October 2018 1 Purposes CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY (1) The main purposes of this Act are (a) to reform and modernise the laws, practice, procedure and
More informationCOMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE
Supporting local communities to thrive COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE Bob Watts, Corporate Services Document Control Sheet Title: Formal Complaints Revision: 01 Status: Revisions approved by EMT 16 December
More informationComplaints, Comments & Compliments Policy
Complaints, Comments & Compliments Policy Policy Name: Complaints, Comments & Compliments Policy Status: Approved Approved by: Group Board Drafted by: Kerry Wood Date approved: 26 November 2018 Date effective
More informationFreedom of Information Policy, Procedures and Requests
Freedom of Information Policy, Procedures and Requests Last reviewed: February 2017 This document applies to all academies and operations of the Vale Academy Trust. The following related document(s) can
More informationCHAPTER 14 CONSULTATIONS AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT. Article 1: Definitions
CHAPTER 14 CONSULTATIONS AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT For the purposes of this Chapter: Article 1: Definitions Parties to the dispute means the complaining Party or Parties and the Party complained against;
More informationNO About this consultation paper. Introduction 3. Background 3-5. The Standard of Proof Rule The Proposed New Rules 9-10
INDEX PAGE NO About this consultation paper Introduction 3 Background 3-5 The Standard of Proof Rule 5 5-8 The Proposed New Rules 9-10 Equality Impact Assessment 10 How to Respond 11 Appendix A: Draft
More informationThe Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law, 2011
Refusing a request: Writing a refusal notice The Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law, 2011 Published: January 2015 Brunel House, Old Street, St.Helier, Jersey, JE2 3RG Tel: (+44) 1534 716530 Email: enquiries@dataci.org
More informationThird country auditor deregistration procedures
Third country auditor deregistration procedures A public consultation issued by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) Comments from December 2016 Ref: TECH-CDR-1467 (the Association of Chartered Certified
More informationTertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011
Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 Act No. 73 of 2011 as amended This compilation was prepared on 3 October 2012 taking into account amendments up to Act No. 136 of 2012 The text
More informationCode of Procedure for Matters under the Personal Health
HEALTH MARCH 2017 Code of Procedure for Matters under the Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004 CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTION...1 1. Application...1 2. Purpose and Interpretation...1 3. Definitions...2
More informationComplaints Policy. Director of Operations August 2017
Complaints Policy Director of Operations August 2017 Contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. Types of Complaints... 2 3. Persons Eligible to make a Complaint... 2 4. Complaints against the Chief Constable...
More informationAND KATIE MOHAN REGISTRATION NUMBER: DETERMINATION OF A SUBSTANTIVE HEARING 2 OCTOBER 2017
BEFORE THE FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE OF THE GENERAL OPTICAL COUNCIL GENERAL OPTICAL COUNCIL F(17)04 AND KATIE MOHAN REGISTRATION NUMBER: 01-27469 DETERMINATION OF A SUBSTANTIVE HEARING 2 OCTOBER 2017
More informationIndependent Arbitration Service for Customers Service Rules Cavity Insulation Guarantee Agency (CIGA)
Independent Arbitration Service for Customers Service Rules Cavity Insulation Guarantee Agency (CIGA) These Rules apply to applications forms received by Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR)
More informationPractice Guidance Case Management and Mediation of International Child Abduction Proceedings 1. Introduction
Practice Guidance Case Management and Mediation of International Child Abduction Proceedings 1. Introduction 1.1. For the purposes of this Practice Guidance, international child abduction proceedings are
More informationCode of Practice on the discharge of the obligations of public authorities under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (SI 2004 No.
Code of Practice on the discharge of the obligations of public authorities under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (SI 2004 No. 3391) Issued under Regulation 16 of the Regulations, Foreword
More informationEnforcement guidelines for regulatory investigations. Guidelines
Enforcement guidelines for regulatory investigations Guidelines Guidelines Publication date: 28 June 2017 About this document Ofcom is the independent regulator, competition authority and designated enforcer
More informationA GUIDE. for. to assist with LIAISON AND THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION. when there are simultaneous
A GUIDE for THE POLICE THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE LOCAL SAFEGUARDING CHILDREN BOARDS to assist with LIAISON AND THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION when there are simultaneous CHAPTER 8 SERIOUS CASE REVIEWS
More informationDisclosure of Documents in Disciplinary Proceedings
Disclosure of Documents in Disciplinary Proceedings The purpose of this document is to set out the BSB s policy on disclosure of documents in the course of disciplinary proceedings and to provide guidance
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC LARKIN, Matthew Peter Registration No: 74917 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2017 Outcome: Erased with Immediate Suspension Matthew Peter LARKIN, a dentist, BDS Lpool 1998
More informationPart(s) of the register: Registered Nurse Sub Part 1. Eileen Skinner (Chair Lay member) Colin Kennedy (Lay member) Catherine Gale (Registrant member)
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting (CPD) Date: Thursday 13 August 2015 Nursing and Midwifery Council 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC
More informationComplaints Procedure
Complaints Procedure Version: 5.0 Approval Status: Approved Document Owner: Graham Feek Classification: External Review Date: 07/07/2017 Effective from: September 2014 Table of Contents 1. What is a Complaint?...
More informationNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE REGULATION 10 DISCIPLINE WITH RESPECT TO STUDENTS
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE REGULATION 10 DISCIPLINE WITH RESPECT TO STUDENTS (A) CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCES GIVING RISE TO DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AND PROCEDURES FOR INITIATING DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
More information4 A member shall discharge his obligations to all those with whom he has professional relations faithfully and with integrity.
Modified and approved by Council of Management on 3 rd June 2004 in accordance with by-law No 68. Updated September 2009 to coincide with the launch of the Chartered Institution of Civil Engineering Surveyors.
More informationCIArb/IMPRESS ARBITRATION SCHEME RULES ( the Rules ) FOR USE IN ENGLAND & WALES
CIArb/IMPRESS ARBITRATION SCHEME RULES ( the Rules ) FOR USE IN ENGLAND & WALES 1 CIArb/IMPRESS ARBITRATION SCHEME RULES ( the Rules ) FOR USE IN ENGLAND & WALES Where any claim is referred for arbitration
More informationPART 3A PROCEEDINGS AND APPEALS
Service of notification PART 3A PROCEEDINGS AND APPEALS 23A. (1) A notification under this Act which is required to be served on any person may be served, subject to subsections (2) and (5) below, by:-
More informationNATIONAL VETTING BUREAU BILL 2011 PRESENTED BY THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE, EQUALITY AND DEFENCE
27 July 2011 DRAFT HEADS NATIONAL VETTING BUREAU BILL 2011 PRESENTED BY THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE, EQUALITY AND DEFENCE ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation.
More information