Guidance on the Investigating Committee s power to review a warning
|
|
- Corey Simpson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Guidance on the Investigating Committee s power to review a warning 1
2 A. Introduction 1. On 13 April 2016, the General Dental Council (Fitness to Practise etc.) Order 2016 amended the Dentists Act 1984 ( the Act ) to give the Investigating Committee the power to a review a determination made by them to issue a warning. 2. The new power of review contained in the Act (as amended) 1 enables the Investigating Committee to review a warning where an application is made by the person to whom the warning was issued ( the registrant ), or by the Registrar. That application must be made within two years of the date on which the original determination was made. 3. If, upon review, the Investigating Committee considers it appropriate to do so, they may revoke the warning and direct the Registrar to remove details of the warning from the entry in the register relating to the person to whom the warning was issued. B. The review process 4. In order for an application to review a warning to be valid under the terms of the Act, it must: (i) (ii) be made either by the registrant or the Registrar (i.e. the GDC itself); be made before the end of the period of two years beginning with the date on which the original determination was made; and 5. The Act does not require an application for review of a warning to be made in any specific format. However, an application should be made in writing to the Investigating Committee (c/o the caseworker who previously handled the matter) and should set out the basis on which review is requested. 6. When an application for a review of a warning is received from the registrant to whom the warning was issued, it will, provided that it meets the requirements set out in paragraph [4] above, be listed for consideration at a forthcoming meeting of the Investigating Committee. 7. Under the Act, an application to review a warning may also be made by the Registrar. In those circumstances, the registrant who is the subject of the warning should be informed of the application and should be invited to comment, prior to the matter being considered by the Investigating Committee. 8. The GDC will, depending on the particular circumstances of the case, endeavour to ensure the review is conducted by different personnel to those who made the original decision; however this may not always be necessary depending on the particular circumstances of the case, or possible for operational reasons. 1 the new power is contained in section 27A(11) and section 27A(12) 2
3 C. Factors to be considered by the Investigating Committee: initial consideration 9. The Investigating Committee will consider the application (including any supporting documents provided by the applicant, together with any comments made by the registrant, if the application is being made by the Registrar), the original determination, and the bundle of documents available to the original Investigating Committee. 10. At this initial consideration stage, the Investigating Committee is not considering whether or not the original decision to issue a warning should be revoked, but the preliminary question of whether to conduct a full review. The Investigating Committee should bear in mind that, at this early stage, they will be considering relatively limited information, in that comments have not yet been sought from any potentially interested parties, and nor has the Registrar had the opportunity to conduct any further relevant enquiries. 11. As such, the threshold for considering whether to conduct a review is relatively low, and the Investigating Committee should, at the initial stage, examine whether the application has some merit in that: there is evidence that there may have been a material flaw in the original decision to issue a warning, and/or there is new information, either immediately available or potentially available to the GDC upon enquiry, which now indicates that it may not have been appropriate to issue a warning. 12. If so, the Investigating Committee may consider that it is appropriate to conduct a review of its original decision. Material flaw 13. The reviewing Investigating Committee should not conclude that the original decision was materially flawed simply because it would have made a different decision. 14. The reviewing Investigating Committee should also bear in mind that not every identifiable defect in the process followed to date, or in its the previous decision, will necessarily amount to a material flaw in the original decision. 15. Ultimately, in order for the Investigating Committee s original decision to be considered to be materially flawed, the flaw or flaws identified must be capable of having made a difference to the ultimate outcome i.e. the issuing of the warning. In other words, the reviewing Investigating Committee should consider whether the flaw or flaws identified may have had an impact on the original Investigating Committee and may have influenced its judgment. 16. Some examples of what may amount to a material flaw are set out at paragraph [17] below. New information 17. The Act does not define what amounts to new information. However, in order for information to be considered new information, it must not have been in the possession of the GDC at the time the original decision was made. If the information was in the hands of the GDC at that time, but was not provided to the Investigating Committee, the failure to provide the information to the Investigating Committee may instead be considered under the material flaw ground referred to above. 18. New information may be information of a factual nature, or further expert evidence. The new information should, however, be relevant to the specific allegation of impairment which formed the basis of the Investigating Committee s original decision. 3
4 Overlap with judicial review 19. Decisions of the Investigating Committee, including a decision to issue a warning (published or unpublished) may be subject to challenge by way of judicial review. However, judicial review is a remedy of last resort and the claimant must generally demonstrate that they have exhausted all alternative remedies. 20. As such, it is likely that in the Investigating Committee s power to review a warning will be used as an alternative to judicial review. In practice, many of the grounds for judicial review can also be said to be grounds for considering that the decision was materially flawed, for example that: the original Investigating Committee misinterpreted the law governing the decision; the original Investigating Committee took into account irrelevant considerations, or failed to take into account relevant considerations; the decision was so unreasonable that no reasonable decision maker could have come to it i.e. it was outside a reasonable range of decisions; the GDC did not comply with its own Rules during the decision making process (for example, in failing to allow the registrant adequate opportunity to comment upon the allegation as required by Rule 7(2) of the General Dental Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2006); there was failure to provide all relevant evidence to the Investigating Committee, for example observations provided by the registrant (or informant) or records; inaccurate information was provided to the Investigating Committee, for example in relation to the registrant s fitness to practise history; there are allegations of actual bias, or the appearance of bias; there was failure to give adequate reasons; and/or the case proceeded on an erroneous basis, for example upon the assumption that the registrant has been convicted of a criminal offence (or has an adverse finding from another Regulator) when this is not in fact the case 2. D. Review process 21. Having given the request for review initial consideration, the Investigating Committee must prepare a written determination, setting out the reasons for its decision to review or not to review the original decision, and must notify the Registrar (i.e. the GDC s casework team) accordingly. 22. The GDC s casework team will then inform the applicant (and registrant, if the application is made by the Registrar) of the Investigating Committee s decision and the reasons for it. If the Investigating Committee decides not to review its original decision, the applicant (and registrant, if the application is made by the Registrar) will be informed of the outcome and no further action will be taken. 2 this potential ground for review overlaps with the principle established in Fajemisin v General Dental Council [2013] EWHC 3501 (Admin) i.e. that in addition to correcting slips, a regulatory body can revisit a decision that was made in ignorance of the true facts when the factual basis on which it proceeded amounted to a fundamental mistake of fact 4
5 23. If, on the other hand, the Investigating Committee decides to review its original decision, the Registrar will notify: (i) (ii) (iii) the registrant, the maker of the allegation (if any); and any other person who in the opinion of the Investigating Committee has an interest in the decision to issue a warning, of the decision to review and the reasons for that decision. 24. The Registrar will, at the same time as notifying the above individuals of the Investigating Committee s decision to conduct a review, provide any new information which is available, and will seek representations from them regarding the review of the decision. 25. The Registrar may also carry out any investigations which the Registrar considers are appropriate to facilitate the making of the Investigating Committee s ultimate decision. This may include obtaining further factual or expert evidence, or obtaining legal advice on any of the issues raised. 26. After any appropriate investigations have been carried out, the matter will be relisted for consideration by the Investigating Committee. E. Review decision 27. The decision as to whether the original decision was materially flawed, or that there is new information which now indicates that it was not appropriate to issue a warning, is ultimately a question of judgment for the reviewing Investigating Committee, taking into account all the relevant information, including representations provided by those entitled to comment, and material obtained during the course of any further investigations conducted by the Registrar. 28. Where the reviewing Investigating Committee, taking account of all relevant material, concludes that the original decision was materially flawed for any reason, or that there is new information which now indicates that it was not appropriate to issue a warning, the reviewing Investigating Committee must: (i) (ii) revoke the decision to issue a warning; and if the warning has been published, direct the Registrar to remove details of the warning from the entry in the register relating to the registrant. 29. Where, on the other hand, the reviewing Investigating Committee concludes that the original decision was not materially flawed, or that there is no new information which now indicates that it was not appropriate to issue a warning, it must decide that the original decision to issue a warning should stand. 30. The reviewing Investigating Committee s power of review under the Act is limited to revoking the warning, or determining that it should stand; the reviewing Investigating Committee does not have the power to amend the warning issued, or to substitute it with advice. 31. A situation may therefore arise where a warning based on two elements has been issued, but after the review process, one of those elements may have fallen away. Such a situation is more likely to arise where there is new information in relation to one element of the original case. 5
6 32. In those circumstances, the reviewing Investigating Committee should consider carefully whether or not the warning should be rescinded. The test under the Rules, and therefore the key question for the reviewing Investigating Committee, is whether the new information now indicates that it was not appropriate to issue the warning. 33. In considering the question of appropriateness, the reviewing Investigating Committee will wish to consider all the facts and circumstances of the case, using as a starting point the reasons given by the original Investigating Committee for imposing a warning. 34. Having considered all the facts and circumstances, the reviewing Investigating Committee may, in particular, wish to examine whether the element that remains, post review, would be insufficient to amount to misconduct (bearing in mind that misconduct denotes serious acts or omissions, suggesting a significant departure from what would be proper in the circumstances), or is otherwise insufficiently serious for a warning to have been imposed. 35. The reviewing Investigating Committee should also bear in mind that there is an issue of fairness in leaving a warning in place which contains reference to matters which have now fallen away. In considering fairness, the reviewing Investigating Committee should take into account any submissions made by the registrant, and also that, as a matter of general principle, there is a degree of censure implicit in a warning, which can have a significant professional impact upon a registrant, and which is unlikely to be justified where an element of the warning can no longer be supported. 36. Overall, if the reviewing Investigating Committee considers that the new information now indicates that it was not appropriate to issue a warning, the warning must, under the terms of the Rules, be revoked in its entirety. F. Outcome 37. Where the reviewing Investigating Committee have reviewed a decision, they must notify in writing and as soon as reasonably practicable, the registrant, the maker of the allegation (if any) and any other person who in the opinion of the reviewing Investigating Committee has an interest in receiving the notification. The notification should include the decision made and the reasons for it. December
Guidance on the Registrar s Rule 9 power of review (July 2017)
Guidance on the Registrar s Rule 9 power of review (July 2017) 1 Introduction 1. Since 1 November 2016, the GDC s Registrar has had the power to review decisions to close cases without referring them to
More informationFitness to Practise Rule 6E Guidance for informants
Fitness to Practise Rule 6E Guidance for informants Fitness to Practise Rule 6E Guidance for applicants Version 2.0 Reference FTP/GUI/031 Department Fitness to Practise Author Caroline Jaggard Approved
More informationFitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for informants
Fitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for informants Fitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for applicants Version 2.0 Reference FTP/GUI/034 Department Fitness to Practise Author Caroline
More informationFitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for applicants
Fitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for applicants Fitness to Practise Rule 8E and Rule 10 Guidance for applicants Version 1.0 Reference FTP/GUI/033 Department Fitness to Practise Author Caroline
More informationSOCIAL CARE WALES (INVESTIGATION) RULES 2017 INTERNAL VERSION
SOCIAL CARE WALES (INVESTIGATION) RULES 2017 INTERNAL VERSION APRIL 2017 PLEASE NOTE: this copy of the Rules is for the use of Social Care Wales staff, panel members, presenters and legal advisers only.
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE
HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from the text. ROBERTSON, Harry Gordon Registration
More informationRULE 9 INFORMATION FACTSHEET
RULE 9 INFORMATION FACTSHEET 1. This factsheet is intended to help you better understand the review process, and should be read in conjunction with the Rule 9 Guidance, available here. 2. There are terms
More informationIntroduction. Guidance on Warnings July 2017 Page 1 of 6
Guidance regarding warnings issued by Case Examiners and the Investigation Committee under the provisions of the General Optical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2013 Introduction 1. The General Optical
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC LIMBU, Dino Registration No: 246153 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE AUGUST 2015 Outcome: Fitness to practise impaired; erasure with an immediate suspension order Dinu LIMBU, a dental
More informationGuidance for decision makers on the impact of criminal convictions and cautions
Guidance for decision makers on the impact of criminal convictions and cautions Page 1 of 11 Contents Introduction... 3 Reporting Criminal Proceedings... 4 General Principles... 5 Applications for Registration...
More informationGuidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance
Guidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance Effective 1 st October 2016 1 2 Contents 1 Introduction and background... 4 2 The Professional Conduct Committee (PCC)... 5
More informationNorthern Ireland Social Care Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2016
Northern Ireland Social Care Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2016 The Northern Ireland Social Care Council, with the consent of the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety, makes the
More informationINDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE DRAFT
INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE DRAFT Contents Purpose of document... 2 What is this document about?... 2 Who is this document for?... 3 1. Part 1: Fitness to Practise stages... 3 Investigation... 3 Scrutiny
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC HOUGHTON, Nicola Louise Registration No: 130502 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2015 Outcome: Erasure (with immediate order) Nicola Louise HOUGHTON, Verified competency
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC BANNATYNE, Ashleigh Registration No: 214342 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE JUNE 2017 - JUNE 2018* Most recent outcome: Suspension extended for 12 months (with a review) *See page
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC MAYCOCK, Andrew Edward Registration No: 170502 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2018 Outcome: Erased with Immediate order of Suspension Andrew Edward MAYCOCK, a dental nurse,
More informationGUIDANCE FOR CASE EXAMINERS The purpose of this guidance 1. The General Optical Council (GOC) recognises that it is important that patients, registrants, professional and representative organisations,
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC UPTON, Natalie Jane Registration No: 110087 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE JULY 2018 Outcome: Suspension for 12 months with immediate suspension (with a review) Natalie UPTON, a
More informationIn preparing this response we have drawn on the assistance of FODO s defence lawyers, Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP, in formulating this response.
The Federation of Ophthalmic and Dispensing Opticians (FODO) represents registered opticians in business. It accounts for over three quarters of market activity and over two thirds of eye examinations.
More informationGuidance on Undertakings
Guidance on Undertakings Introduction and overview 1 The purpose of this guidance is to demonstrate the way in which Rule 10 of the Fitness to Practise Rules 2004 (revised) is to be put into effect by
More informationGood decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance
Good decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance Revised March 2017 The text of this document (but not the logo and branding) may be reproduced free of charge in any format
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE*
HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE* *The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from this text. GRAHAM, Lisa Marie Registration
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC AYOR-AYO, Auma Hilda Registration No: 198660 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE AUGUST 2017 Outcome: Suspended for 12 months with immediate suspension (with a review) Auma Hilda AYOR-AYO,
More informationA guide to GMC investigations and fitness to practise proceedings
A guide to GMC investigations and fitness to practise proceedings Contents Introduction 2 What is the GMC s role? 3 Stage 1 Initial complaint 5 Stage 2 Formal investigation 6 Stage 3 Conclusion of investigation
More information2004 No 2608 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004
This is a version of The General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules which incorporates the 2004 Rules and amendments made to those rules in 2009, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2017 2004 No 2608 HEALTH
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC LARKIN, Matthew Peter Registration No: 74917 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2017 Outcome: Erased with Immediate Suspension Matthew Peter LARKIN, a dentist, BDS Lpool 1998
More informationRe: Dr Jonathan Richard Ashton v GMC [2013] EWHC 943 Admin
Appeals Circular A11/13 14 06 2013 To: Fitness to Practise Panel Panellists Legal Assessors Copy: Interim Orders Panel Panellists Investigation Committee Panellists Panel Secretaries Medical Defence Organisations
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC MARQUEZ LOPEZ, Daniel Registration No: 260732 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE JULY 2018 OUTCOME: Fitness to Practise Impaired. Reprimand Issued Daniel MARQUEZ LOPEZ, a dentist, Grado
More informationGUIDELINES ON COMPENSATION FUND CLAIMS PROCEDURES. Overview
GUIDELINES ON COMPENSATION FUND CLAIMS PROCEDURES Overview These Guidelines outline the general principles that will guide the Law Society of Ireland (the Society ) in the exercise of its functions regarding
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing Friday, 5 January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Mr Razvan
More informationGCC code of practice for criminal investigations and prosecutions under the Chiropractors Act 1994 July 2012
GCC code of practice for criminal investigations and prosecutions under the Chiropractors Act 1994 July 2012-1 - GCC code of practice for criminal investigations and prosecutions under the Chiropractors
More informationChanges to the threshold for investigating criminal matters
Agenda item: 6 Report title: Report by: Action: Changes to the threshold for investigating criminal matters Anna Rowland, Assistant Director Policy, Business Transformation and Safeguarding, anna.rowland@gmc-uk.org,
More informationComplaint Handling and Resolution Policy. Section 1 - Purpose and Context
Complaint Handling and Resolution Policy Section 1 - Purpose and Context (1) NOTE: A revised version of this policy is currently under development. Any questions relating to processes within this policy
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 22 July 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Nomathemba Amanda Primrose Socikwa 10G0506E
More information4. This guidance is a public document and is available from the GOC s website at:
GUIDANCE FOR CASE EXAMINERS The purpose of this guidance 1. The General Optical Council (GOC) recognises that it is important that patients, registrants, professional and representative organisations,
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 23 February 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of registrant: NMC
More informationGood decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance
Good decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance Revised March 2017 The text of this document (but not the logo and branding) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or
More informationThe Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board. Disciplinary Procedure Rules
The Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board Disciplinary Procedure Rules The Patent Regulation Board of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys and the Trade Mark Regulation Board
More informationGeneral Optical Council: Consultation on Guidance for the Investigation Committee, Case Examiners and the Fitness to Practise Committee
General Optical Council: Consultation on Guidance for the Investigation Committee, Case Examiners and the Fitness to Practise Committee The Optical Confederation represents the 12,000 optometrists, 6,000
More informationINVESTMENT SERVICES RULES FOR RECOGNISED PERSONS
INVESTMENT SERVICES RULES FOR RECOGNISED PERSONS Part A.I: RECOGNISED FUND ADMINISTRATORS 1. Regulation of Fund Administrators The Investment Services Act, 1994 ( the Act ) provides a statutory basis for
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC CROOK, Stacey Registration No: 199655 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE AUGUST 2017 Outcome: Erased with Immediate Suspension This case was heard in parallel with the case of MOLLOY,
More informationIndependent Arbitration Scheme for the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA)
Independent Arbitration Scheme for the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) 2007 Edition 1 Introduction 1.1 The Independent Arbitration Scheme for the Chartered Institute of Management
More informationHEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004
2004 No 2608 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004 Made 4th October 2004 Laid before Parliament 7th October 2004 Coming
More informationHealth Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process
Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process The following notes have been prepared to explain the complaints process under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance
More informationThe Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board)
The Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board) Final Draft Disciplinary Procedure Rules The Patent Regulation Board of the Chartered
More informationSummary of the new rules and transitional provisions
Summary of the new rules and transitional provisions The Structure of the Property Chamber 1. The Property Chamber is divided into three parts i) Agricultural Land and Drainage; i Land Registrations; and
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC BAPU, Raisha Registration No: PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2015 Outcome: Erasure and immediate suspension
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC BAPU, Raisha Registration No: 110944 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2015 Outcome: Erasure and immediate suspension Raisha BAPU, a dental nurse, NVQ L3 Oral Health Care:Dental
More informationStudent and Employee Grievance Policy
Student and Employee Grievance Policy Policy Number: HR 009 Purpose I. To describe the procedure to be followed when a student, employee, or visitor files a conduct complaint with the College. This process
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 20 October 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant: NMC
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC JAMALI, Nisreen Registration No: 86173 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE September 2014 Outcome: Erased with immediate suspension. Nisreen JAMALI, BDS Karachi 2002, Statutory Exam
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 16 July 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Part(s) of the register:
More informationALLOCATION OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
ALLOCATION OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES This document sets out the role of the Council, its Committees, the Registrar and the Council staff Part 1 The Council and Registrar Part 2 The Education Committee
More information2009 No (L. 20) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES
S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2009 No. 1976 (L. 20) TRIBUNALS AND INQUIRIES The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 Made - - - - 16th July 2009 Laid
More informationHealth and Care Professions Tribunal Service PRACTICE NOTE. Finding that Fitness to Practise is Impaired
Health and Care Professions Tribunal Service PRACTICE NOTE Finding that Fitness to Practise is Impaired This Practice Note has been issued by the Council for the Guidance of Panels and to assist those
More informationThe General Teaching Council for Scotland Fitness to Teach Rules 2017 These Rules are available in alternative formats on request
DRIVING FORWARD PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR TEACHERS The General Teaching Council for Scotland Fitness to Teach Rules 2017 These Rules are available in alternative formats on request Table of Contents
More informationAppeals by the GMC pursuant to s.40a of the Medical Act 1983 ( s.40a appeals ) Guidance for Decision-makers
Appeals by the GMC pursuant to s.40a of the Medical Act 1983 ( s.40a appeals ) Guidance for Decision-makers Introduction 1 Section 40A of the Medical Act 1983 (as amended by Article 17 of The General Medical
More informationTHE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE Disciplinary Procedure Rules
THE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE Disciplinary Procedure Rules Part 1 General Authority and Purpose 1.1 These Rules are made pursuant to The Chartered Insurance Institute Disciplinary Regulations 2015.
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Hearing 17 December 2018
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 17 December 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of registrant: NMC
More informationTHE SCOTTISH GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION ("SGA") CONDUCT IN SPORT CODE
1 THE SCOTTISH GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION ("SGA") CONDUCT IN SPORT CODE The object of the Conduct in Sport Code is to set down rules and procedures with a view to obtaining justice in gymnastic Conduct proceedings
More informationDisability Living Allowance. How to make a DLA appeal.
Disability Living Allowance How to make a DLA appeal www.dls.org.uk Disability Living Allowance How to make a DLA appeal Introduction There are 3 levels of appeal when appealing a decision by the Department
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting NMC, 20 Old Bailey, London, EC4M 7LN 18 June 2014 Name of Registrant: Mr Matthew Robin Pitts NMC PIN: 93A0777E Part(s) of the register: Registered Nurse
More informationCouncil meeting 15 September 2011
Council meeting 15 September 2011 Public business GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) Recommendation: The Council is asked to agree the GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) at Appendix 1.
More informationTHE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS
THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE RULES 2015 RULE CONTENT 1 Introduction 2 Interpretation 3 Jurisdiction 4 Preliminary matters; Notification of referral; Meeting
More informationDelegated powers policy
Delegated powers policy Revised September 2013 1 Contents Introduction... 3 The Association of Accounting Technicians... 3 The compliance framework and procedures of AAT... 3 Compliance framework... 4
More informationUniversities Psychotherapy and Counselling Association. Fitness to Practise Procedures
Universities Psychotherapy and Counselling Association Fitness to Practise Procedures Introduction Universities Psychotherapy and Counselling Association (UPCA) is professional body for graduates of university
More informationOFFICIAL MISCONDUCT AND PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE POLICY
OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT AND PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE POLICY DOCUMENT CONTROL Document Name: Version: 001 Official Misconduct and Public Interest Disclosure Policy Approved by: Board Date approved: 29 May
More informationTHE GENERAL OPTICAL COUNCIL (REGISTRATION) RULES 2005
THE GENERAL OPTICAL COUNCIL (REGISTRATION) RULES 2005 The General Optical Council, in exercise of their powers under sections 7, 8A(4) and (5), 9(1), 10(1), (1A) and (5) and 31A of the Opticians Act 1989
More informationUndertakings at Medical Practitioners Tribunal hearings
Undertakings at Medical Practitioners Tribunal hearings 1 Under Rules 17(4) and 22(3) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise (FTP) Rules Order of Council 2004, the Medical Practitioners Tribunal
More informationBELIZE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT CHAPTER 318 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT CHAPTER 318 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner
More informationBefore: MR JUSTICE WYN WILLIAMS Between: R (on the application of) - and - THE ROYAL PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY
Neutral Citation Number: [2010] EWHC 2832 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Case No: CO/8236/2009 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 10/11/2010
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 10928-2012 BETWEEN: SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant and PHILLIP JOSEPH LABRUM Respondent Before: Mr D. Potts
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 01/11/2017 03/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Mohamed AMRANI GMC reference number: 3419692 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MD 1987 Universite
More informationEMPLOYMENT AND DISCRIMINATION TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) ORDER 2016
Arrangement EMPLOYMENT AND DISCRIMINATION TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) ORDER 2016 Arrangement Article PART 1 3 INTRODUCTORY AND GENERAL 3 1 Interpretation... 3 2 Overriding objective... 4 3 Time... 5 PART 2 5
More informationAccountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance
Guidance Financial Reporting Council April 2018 Accountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance The FRC s mission is to promote transparency and integrity in business. The FRC sets the UK Corporate Governance and
More informationFuneral Planning Authority Rules
Funeral Planning Authority Rules 1. GENERAL 1.1 Interpretation In these Rules: "Appellant" means the party serving a Disciplinary Appeal Notice in accordance with Rule 7.9.1; "Applicant" means a person
More informationORDINANCE XVII DISMISSAL AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE OF ACADEMIC STAFF: TRIBUNAL AND APPEALS PROCEDURES
ORDINANCE XVII DISMISSAL AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE OF ACADEMIC STAFF: TRIBUNAL AND APPEALS PROCEDURES Preamble Statute 21 requires that procedures be defined by Ordinance in relation to: A. Part III: Paragraphs
More informationINTERNAL REVIEW DECISION MAKING CONSIDERING & DECIDING INTERNAL REVIEW APPLICATIONS
1. Purpose The purpose of this guidance principle is to: a) Set out the decision making process used by WorkSafe Victoria 1 to deal with applications for internal review, and b) Provide guidance for the
More informationNon-compliance hearings guidance for medical practitioners tribunals
Non-compliance hearings guidance for medical practitioners tribunals Introduction 1 The aim of this guidance is to promote consistency and transparency in decision making relating to non-compliance hearings.
More informationA BILL. entitled CORPORATE SERVICE PROVIDER BUSINESS ACT 2012
Corporate Service Provider Business Act 2012 - Draft 6.xml gnjohnson 27 February 2012, 16:00 DRAFT A BILL entitled CORPORATE SERVICE PROVIDER BUSINESS ACT 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
More informationENFORCEMENT GUIDE STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES & GUIDANCE ON THE EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT POWERS. September
ENFORCEMENT GUIDE September 2018 STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES & GUIDANCE ON THE EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT POWERS - 1 - GLOSSARY OF TERMS AML/ATF Anti-Money Laundering & Anti-Terrorist Financing The AML/ATF The
More informationHealth Profession Corporations
Health Profession Corporations Information and application for certificate of authorization for a health profession corporation by members of the College of Medical Radiation Technologists of Ontario Date:
More informationBefore : LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES
Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWCA Crim 1570 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION) Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Before : Date: 23/07/2014 LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES
More informationSanctions Policy August 2016
Sanctions Policy August 2016 SANCTIONS POLICY Contents Section 1 Overview of the policy... 1 Section 2 About sanctions... 3 Section 3 Reviewing a sanction... 5 Section 4 Appeals against sanctions... 5
More informationThis Guidance applies to complaints where the Complaint Form was received between 01/03/13 and 08/07/15.
This Guidance applies to complaints where the Complaint Form was received between 01/03/13 and 08/07/15. Refer to http://oiahe.org.uk/media/100348/ guidance-note-scheme-eligibility-july-2015.pdf for Guidance
More informationGENERAL BY LAW. Code of Ethics means the CCSA code of ethics for Members and Students that forms part of the Rules of Professional Conduct;
CANADIAN CUSTOMER SERVICE ASSOCIATION A PROFESSIONAL NOT-FOR-PROFIT SOCIETY established under the provisions of the Province of British Columbia Registry Services BC Societies registration number S0067393
More informationDiscipline How does it work? February 15, 2017
Discipline How does it work? February 15, 2017 Regulatory Process Specialist Office of the Registrar James Howell Human Resources Professional Association 2 Rebecca Durcan HRPA s Regulatory Counsel Partner
More informationBefore : LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES. Practice Direction (Costs in Criminal Proceedings) 2015
Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWCA Crim 1568 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION) Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 29/09/2015 Before : LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES
More informationGuide to sanctioning
Guide to sanctioning Contents 1. Background. 2 2. Application for registration or continued registration 3 3. Purpose of sanctions. 3 4. Principles in determining sanction.. 4 A. Proportionality... 4 B.
More informationPROFESSIONS SUPPLEMENTARY TO MEDICINE AMENDMENT ACT 2006 BERMUDA 2006 : 34 PROFESSIONS SUPPLEMENTARY TO MEDICINE AMENDMENT ACT 2006
PROFESSIONS SUPPLEMENTARY TO MEDICINE AMENDMENT ACT BERMUDA : 34 PROFESSIONS SUPPLEMENTARY TO MEDICINE AMENDMENT ACT Date of Assent: 12 December Operative Date: 9 February 2007 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
More informationIMMIGRATION FINGERPRINT BUREAU...3
FINGERPRINTING 1. INTRODUCTION...2 1.1. Purpose of...2 2. IMMIGRATION FINGERPRINT BUREAU...3 2.1. Safeguards...3 2.2. Data protection rights...3 2.3. Retention of Fingerprints...4 3. REFUSAL TO PROVIDE
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 6 March 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 114-116 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4LH Name of registrant: Deborah Iris Gallagher
More informationConduct & Competence Committee. Substantive Meeting. 20 October Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, London E20 1EJ
Conduct & Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 20 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, London E20 1EJ Registrant: NMC PIN: Sean Michael Ridout 10H3375E Part(s) of the register:
More informationREPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT GAZETTE ACTS SUPPLEMENT. Published by Authority NO. 28] FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21 [2012 REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE
REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT GAZETTE ACTS SUPPLEMENT Published by Authority NO. 28] FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21 [2012 First published in the Government Gazette, Electronic Edition, on 20th December 2012 at
More informationINVESTMENT BUSINESS ACT 2003 BERMUDA 2003 : 20 INVESTMENT BUSINESS ACT 2003
BERMUDA 2003 : 20 INVESTMENT BUSINESS ACT 2003 [Date of Assent: 5 December 2003] [Operative Date: 30 January 2004, except Section 27: 30 April 2004 and Part IV: 15 September 2004] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
More informationInvestments, Life Insurance & Superannuation Terms of Reference
Investments, Life Insurance & Superannuation Terms of Reference These Terms of Reference apply to those members of the Financial Ombudsman Service Limited who have been designated as having the Investments,
More information/...1 PRIVATE ARBITRATION KIT
1007453/...1 PRIVATE ARBITRATION KIT Introduction This document contains Guidelines, Rules and a Model Agreement in respect of private arbitrations. It is designed to assist practitioners when referring
More informationFitness to Practise Committee 21 October Practice Note: Misuse of the HPC Collective Mark
Fitness to Practise Committee 21 October 2010 Practice Note: Misuse of the HPC Collective Mark Executive summary and recommendations Introduction HPC has a HPC Registered collective mark which registrants
More informationDECISION IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2014] NZIACDT 102 Reference No: IACDT 11/12 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationAssessment Offences Policy
Assessment Offences Policy Introduction 1. An assessment offence is defined as an action which could give a candidate an unfair advantage in any element of assessment over other candidates participating
More informationDiscretionary leave considerations for victims of modern slavery. Version 2.0
Discretionary leave considerations for victims of modern slavery Version 2.0 Page 1 of 19 Published for Home Office staff on 10 September 2018 Contents Contents... 2 About this guidance... 4 Contacts...
More information