PATRICIA JULIANA VAN DER WESTHUIZEN JUDGMENT. [1] The plaintiff was a rear seat passenger in a motor vehicle which was involved
|
|
- Susan Leonard
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH Case No.: 1024/2013 Date Heard: 23 October 2014 Date Delivered: 4 November 2014 In the matter between: PATRICIA JULIANA VAN DER WESTHUIZEN Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant JUDGMENT EKSTEEN J: [1] The plaintiff was a rear seat passenger in a motor vehicle which was involved in a collision with another vehicle (herein referred to as the insured vehicle ) in Circular Drive, Port Elizabeth on 1 October She sustained severe bodily injury, in particular a fracture through the lateral/tibial plateau of the right knee joint. In consequence of her injury she contends that she has suffered damage and that the collision was caused by the negligence of the driver of the insured vehicle. She has accordingly instituted action against the defendant for damages in terms of the Road Accident Fund Act No. 56 of 1996 (herein referred to as the Act ). [2] It is not in dispute that the plaintiff sustained a serious injury as defined in terms of the provisions of the Act. As a result of her injury she was hospitalised and
2 2 has incurred medical and hospital expenses. She will incur further medical expenses in future and she alleges that she will be required to employ an assistant to help her in her daily activities as a consequence of the incapacity which results from her injury. She further alleges that she has suffered loss of earning capacity and general damages. The plaintiff claims an amount of R ,91 which is made up as follows: Past Hospital Expenses R ,20 Past Medical Expenses R ,71 Future Medical Expenses R ,00 Costs of an assistant R ,00 Past Loss of earnings R ,00 Future Loss of earnings and/or Loss of earning capacity R ,00 General damages R ,00 [3] At the commencement of the trial I was advised that the defendant acknowledged and admitted that the driver of the insured vehicle was negligent in causing the collision. [4] The defendant accepted liability for past hospital and medical expenses in the amount of R64 193,00. The plaintiff s claim for past hospital and medical expenses is in the total amount of R ,91. The defendant specifically disputed liability for the costs incurred in respect of a total knee replacement performed at the Life St George s Hospital on 26 April 2013 in the amount of R ,73. This leaves a further amount of R3 990,18 of the plaintiff s claim for past medical and hospital
3 3 expenses unaccounted for. Mr Schubart, on behalf of the plaintiff, advised that the plaintiff abandoned her claim in respect of the latter unaccounted amount. [5] The parties advised that the defendant has agreed to furnish to the plaintiff an undertaking in terms of the provisions of section 17(4)(a) of the Act to compensate the plaintiff in respect of the costs of future accommodation in a hospital or nursing home or treatment of or rendering of a service or supplying goods to her after such costs had been incurred and on proof thereof. In the result the claims in respect of future medical expenses and the cost of an assistant have been settled. [6] The parties were in agreement that the plaintiff is entitled to be awarded an amount of R ,00 as and for general damages. [7] In the circumstances what remains for decision is the plaintiff s claim for payment of the sum of R ,73, as reflected on the invoice of the Life St George s Hospital in respect of the knee replacement to which I have referred earlier and the claim for past and future loss of earnings or earning capacity. [8] There is little dispute relating to the facts. Medico-legal reports of Dr Keeley, a neurosurgeon, Dr Olivier, an orthopaedic surgeon, Ms Ansie van Zyl, an occupational therapist and Ms Wessels, a clinical psychologist have been filed and I was advised at the trial that these reports, including the opinions expressed therein and the factual foundation upon which such opinions are based were admitted. The plaintiff was the only witness to be called.
4 4 [9] The plaintiff is currently 66 years old, she is divorced and she has a son aged 37 who lives with her. She is a qualified nursing sister and was employed as such on a full-time basis until she took early retirement in She was in good health at the time of her retirement and it appears that she retired in order to care for her ailing mother. After her mother passed away she again took up employment as a nursing sister at an old age home. [10] While she was employed at the old age home she says that she was required to climb many steps. Her right knee developed pain which had troubled her for some time. In May 2011 Dr Mike Els, a radiologist, took certain X-rays of the right knee joint. He reported the knee as normal without any abnormality. Dr Olivier reports that thereafter she developed pain in the right knee joint and she resigned from her employment with effect from 31 August On 2 September 2011 an Arthroscopy of the right knee joint was performed by Dr Polderman. Dr Polderman reported in his theatre report that the patella-femoral joint showed a grade 2-3 degeneration condition, the trochlea grade 2, the medial meniscus normal, femoral condyle a grade 2 degeneration, tibial plateau normal. On the lateral side the femoral condyle showed a grade 2 degeneration and the tibial plateau grade 3-4 degeneration. The Arthroscopy accordingly revealed a degree of osteo-arthritis present in the right knee joint. [11] The accident occurred on 1 October 2011 at a time that the plaintiff was still recovering from the Arthroscopy, however, she states that she was already able to walk unassisted at the time.
5 5 [12] When the accident occurred the plaintiff was a left rear seat passenger. She made use of the safety belt but her right knee was thrust against the front seat. She was taken by ambulance to the Greenacres Hospital where Dr Wickens examined her and referred her to Dr Mandaba, an orthopaedic surgeon. The knee was bandaged and stabilised in bed. On 3 October 2011 Dr Mandaba did an open reduction and fixation of the tibial plateau fracture. She then received physiotherapy in hospital and was discharged on 6 October At the time of her discharge she was mobilised on crutches with a knee brace, however, she still complained of a very painful right knee. X-rays taken 8 weeks post-operatively, on 1 December 2011, showed the internal fixation of the lateral tibial plateau fracture with the normal anatomy restored and the fracture lines no longer visible. She still remained dependant on the use of crutches. [13] Dr Olivier reports that the pain produced by a fractured tibial plateau in the right knee is reckoned as severe pain because of the intra joint surface damage of the right knee joint. The pain, he states, was stabilised after the initial fixation on 3 October 2011 and lessened over the next 2-4 weeks. Notwithstanding that a proper internal fixation was done the damage to the joint surface of the tibial plateau in the right knee still caused pain. [14] In June 2012 the plaintiff still remained dependant on the use of crutches and she again consulted Dr Polderman. The screws and plate were removed a week later and she continued with her use of crutches for another three months. On 12 March 2013 a further consultation with Dr Polderman followed and the total knee replacement was done on 26 April 2013 because of the osteo-arthritis and damage
6 6 to the joint surface of the knee. Thereafter she underwent rehabilitation, received physiotherapy and remained on crutches for a further 6 weeks. Dr Olivier reports that the plaintiff has now regained her normal right knee function. [15] As recorded earlier herein Dr Olivier reports that a total knee replacement was done of the knee joint because of osteo-arthritis and the damage to the joint surface of the knee. The Arthroscopy performed in September 2011 revealed a measure of osteo-arthritis. Dr Olivier does not declare the extent, if any, to which the findings of Dr Polderman at the Arthroscopy on 2 September 2011 indicated a possible or probable future knee replacement. Dealing, however, with the causes of the operation which was performed he says: It is difficult to determine the degree of osteo-arthritis of the right knee caused by the fracture of the tibial plateau but taking in consideration the great force of injury mechanism to the right knee and a crush effect onto the lateral plateau with the result of a fracture through the joint surface of the lateral/tibial plateau a 50% worsening of the patient s right knee joint osteo-arthritis can be accepted as caused by the injury. [16] Dr Olivier proceeds to suggest therefore that 50% of the cost of the total knee replacement should be recovered from the defendant. [17] Mr Schubart argues in support of this latter view expressed by Dr Oliiver. He has urged me to award to the plaintiff 50% of the costs associated with the knee replacement. Mr Jooste, on behalf of the defendant, on the other hand, submits that the plaintiff has failed to establish on a balance of probabilities that the knee
7 7 replacement operation would not in any event have been required, but for the accident. [18] Whether expenses are fairly attributable to injuries received in an accident is largely a question of fact to be determined principally on the medical evidence. The plaintiff bears the onus to establish on a balance of probability that the expenses are fairly attributable to the injuries received in the accident. I have recorded earlier that Dr Olivier s report is silent in respect of the possibility or probability that a total knee replacement would have been required in any event at some stage due to the preexisting degeneration of the knee joint. He acknowledges that the knee replacement was required both because of osteo-arthritis and damage to the joint surface of the knee. I am satisfied on the medical evidence presented, and in particular by the report by Dr Olivier, that the osteo-arthritis of the right knee joint which ultimately led to the total knee replacement was caused, in part, by the fracture of the tibial plateau. I am not satisfied however, in the absence of medical evidence relating to the prognosis of the pre-existing degeneration of the knee joint but for the accident, that the operation would not in any event have been required and was therefore fairly attributable to the accident (compare Selikman v London Assurance 1959 (1) SA 523 (T) at 527A-E). The claim for the costs of the operation can therefore not succeed. [19] I turn to consider the claim for past and future loss of earnings. [20] The plaintiff s working history has been set out earlier herein. She testified that during or about 2011 she became somewhat depressed by her working
8 8 circumstances in the old age home. She accordingly resigned her position on 31 August 2011 with the intention of seeking less onerous work, possibility on a half day basis, within the medical field. She postulated a post at a pharmacist clinic, blood transfusion services or as a receptionist at a doctor s surgery. In such a position she would not be required to perform the physical work which a full-time nursing sister is required to perform. She states that it had been her intention to seek such employment in the early part of 2012 and to continue in such less onerous work for approximately 5 years longer, until the age of approximately 70. [21] As a result of the accident and the injury to her knee she was unable to seek such employment and remained incapable of performing such work until after the performance of the total knee replacement. It is common cause that she is now able to perform all those functions associated with such less onerous work as she had envisaged prior to the accident. Dr Olivier expresses the view in his report that the plaintiff had regained full knee movement by the end of During her evidence the plaintiff herself ventured a guestimate that she would have been able to perform all those functions associated with such work as she had intended and still intends to seek after approximately 6 months to 1 year after the total knee replacement was performed. Ms van Zyl, in her report dated 20 August 2014 states, however, that the plaintiff has not been able to work at all since the accident and that this is reasonable. The report of Ms van Zyl, as recorded earlier is admitted. I will accordingly accept, for purposes of this judgment, that the evidence establishes that it is reasonable to accept that the plaintiff was unable to perform such work as she had hoped to obtain from the date of the accident until the end of August 2014.
9 9 [22] The plaintiff, during evidence, suggested that she had been hopeful of obtaining employment of the nature set out earlier herein at a remuneration of approximately R5 000 to R8000 per month. The parties were agreed that I should consider a remuneration of R5 000 per month for purposes of an assessment of the plaintiff s past loss of earning capacity. [23] There does not appear to be any dispute on the evidence that the plaintiff is currently in a position to perform all those functions associated with the employment opportunities which she desires to pursue and which she had envisaged prior to the accident. She states that she has begun to make enquiries but that a suitable position has not yet presented itself. She has not applied for any position yet. She is currently 66 years of age and is able to perform all those functions required for any position which she wishes to pursue. It is true that she is not able to return to fulltime nursing with the more onerous obligations of such employment. She was, however, not in full-time nursing at the time of the accident and had no intention to return to such employment. In these circumstances I do not think that any claim for future loss of earnings has been established. [24] In respect of the past loss of earnings I have accepted herein that the plaintiff was unable to pursue employment as from the date of the accident to the end of August She was, however, unemployed at the time of the collision and had no intention of seeking employment prior to January The duration of her incapacity was accordingly for a period of 32 months for 1 January 2012 to 31 August The loss, would therefore, on a purely arithmetical calculation, amount to R ,00.
10 10 [25] It cannot be gainsaid, however, that a probability exists that the plaintiff would for some period after 1 January 2012 have remained unemployed whilst seeking suitable employment. This is borne out by her own evidence that she has currently not been able to find a suitable position notwithstanding her recovery. On the other hand, the plaintiff is an experienced nursing sister who has worked both in the private sector and the public sector. I consider that her services are likely to be sought after and the possibility exists that if she did secure employment on a part time basis she might have commanded a higher salary than R5 000,00 per month. Both positive and negative contingencies need to be considered. [26] There was some debate at the Bar as to the correction which I should make to the calculated figure to allow for contingencies. Mr Jooste has urged me to reduce the calculated amount by some 25% to make allowance for what he considered to be a probability that the plaintiff would have remained unemployed for several months seeking employment. Mr Schubart on the other hand suggests that a contingency deduction of 5% be applied. In the exercise of my discretion I am constrained to recognise, as set out earlier, that it is probable that the plaintiff would not have obtained employment immediately as from 1 January I do not, however, consider given her qualifications and experience that she would have remained unemployed for an extended period. The claim is calculated over a very brief period of some 32 months. In the circumstances I think that it would be fair to reduce the amount of R ,00 in respect of the past loss of earnings by 7,5%. I accordingly propose to award an amount of R ,00 in respect of past loss of earnings.
11 11 [27] In the result, I make the following order: The defendant is ordered: 1. To pay to the plaintiff the amount of R ,00 as and for damages. 2. To pay interest on the aforestated award calculated at the legal rate from a date 14 days after judgment to the date of payment. 3. To furnish to the plaintiff an undertaking in terms of section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act, 56 of 1996, to pay the costs of the future accommodation of the plaintiff in a hospital or nursing home, or the treatment of or rendering of a service or supplying of goods to her after the costs have been incurred and upon proof thereof. 4. To pay the plaintiff s costs of the action, including, (i) The qualifying expenses, if any, of Dr Johan Olivier, Ms Ansie van Zyl and Ms Ilonka Wessels; and (ii) the costs of the photographs. 5. To pay interest on the plaintiff s taxed costs calculated at the legal rate from a date fourteen (14) days after the taxation to the date of payment. J W EKSTEEN JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT
12 12 Appearances: For Plaintiff: Adv L Schubart SC instructed by Goldberg de Villiers Inc, Port Elizabeth For Defendant: Adv P Jooste instructed by Friedman Scheckter, Port Elizabeth
JUDGMENT. numbers DRF 631 EC and the insured vehicle registered VHC 667 GP was driven by
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN Case no: 2802/2010 Date heard: 7.11.2011 Date delivered: 17.5.2012 In the matter between: SIYANDA BULELANI MAJOLA Plaintiff vs ROAD ACCIDENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationPlaintiff JUDGMENT. was the driver of a motorcycle which the collided with a motor vehicle, driven at the time by a Mrs
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSKEI DIVISION) CASE NO.: 978/06 JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSKEI DIVISION) CASE NO.: 978/06 In the matter between: AKHONA NTSONTSOYI Plaintiff And ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant JUDGMENT PAKADE, J.: BACKGROUND: [1] The plaintiff
More informationSOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 29295/08 (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED...... DATE SIGNATURE In the matter between:
More informationJACOBUS FREDERICK DE BRUIN THE ROAD ACCIDENT FUND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) In the matter between: Case No.: 2056/2008 Date heard: 2 February 2010 Date delivered: 11 May 2010 JACOBUS FREDERICK DE BRUIN Plaintiff and
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED Case number: 06771/2015..... In the matter between: MBATHA
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationFORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT
FORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT ECJ NO: 021/2006 PARTIES: DALEEN SMIT AND THE ROAD ACCIDENT FUND REFERENCE NUMBERS Registrar: 277/05 DATE HEARD: 15 FEBRUARY 2006 DATE DELIVERED: 23 FEBRUARY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy. Please note also that this is a corrected version
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG,
More informationTLOTLEGO TLAMELO MABALE JUDGMENT
IN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT (MAFIKENG) CASE NO.: 1285/2011 In the matter between: TLOTLEGO TLAMELO MABALE PLAINTIFF and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT LANDMAN J: [1] The plaintiff is Tlotlego Tlamelo
More informationF T M...Plaintiff. ROAD ACCIDENT FUND...Defendant JUDGMENT. [1] The plaintiff, who was born on 5 March 1993 and presently 18 years of age,
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG In the matter
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA Case Number: 4951/2014 NOT REPORTABLE NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES REVISED
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA)
REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA) CASE NO: 77426/2009 DATE: 18/03/2013 In the matter between: RADEBE, JULIA obo TD PLAINTIFF and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT
More informationTHE_HIGH COURT OP SWAZILAND
IN THE_HIGH COURT OP SWAZILAND In the matter between: JOSE FERREIRA RAMOS Plaintiff and SWAZILAND ROYAL INSURANCE CORPORATION Defendant C O R A M F. X. ROONEY FOR P. COETSEE For Plaintiff P. FLYNN For
More information[2] The following were placed on record as common cause; [2.1] The Plaintiff is the person mentioned at. paragraph 1 of the Particulars of claim.
2 there driven by Mr Masala Mulaudzi, alternatively Mrs Sarah Ratombo, knocked down the plaintiff. At the time of collision the plaintiff was a pedestrian. I then ordered to that effect. [2] The following
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA MESHAKE: NTHABISENG EMILY J U D G M E N T
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NUMBER: 42384/14
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH) JONATHAN WAYNE MULLINS JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More information[1] The plaintiff, an adult male, has instituted a damages action against the
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 09479/2013 (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED...... SIGNATURE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Cousins v Palmer [2004] QSC 358 PARTIES: FILE NO/S: 4816 of 2004 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: WILLIAM ANDREW COUSINS (Plaintiff) v DAVID JOHN PALMER (Defendant)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO.: 3890/2015 In the matter between: JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE
More information[1] This is an action arising from injuries the plaintiff sustained on 17 January 2013 in Bloemfontein in a motor vehicle collision.
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION,
More informationFORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT JONATHAN ELROY MULLER PLAINTIFF ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT
FORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT PARTIES: JONATHAN ELROY MULLER PLAINTIFF and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT Case Number: 2473/05 High Court: SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION Date Heard: 14,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA BISHO CASE NO. 1709/04. In the matter between: SINDILE VUKUBI. Plaintiff. and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA BISHO CASE NO. 1709/04 In the matter between: SINDILE VUKUBI Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant J U D G M E N T SANGONI J: 1] It was on 5 September 1999 when a
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT (JOHANNESBURG) ALFRED KGOMO on behalf of L M K
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH
More informationJUDGMENT. [1] The plaintiff is the mother of Imange Ntaba, who was born on 1 October
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION BHISHO) CASE NO 175B/2012 DATES HEARD: 29/08;15;16/10/2013; 03/02/2014 DATE DELIVERED: 07/02/2014 In the matter between TABISA ETHEL NTABA PLAINTIFF
More informationROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT,
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Reportable: NO Of Interest to other Judges: NO Circulate to Magistrates: NO Case No. : 5897/2017 In the matter between:- MESA FRANCIS HALE Plaintiff
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT JOHANNESBURG
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT
More informationFor Reasons for Judgment on Costs, see Date of Release: September 19, 1995
For Reasons for Judgment on Costs, see 1848.95.Date of Release: September 19, 1995 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA No. C911774 New Westminster Registry BETWEEN: TONY KOSKO PLAINTIFF AND: DARYL
More informationFORM A FILING SHEET FOR SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION JUDGMENT
FORM A FILING SHEET FOR SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION JUDGMENT PARTIES: ALLAN KLEIN V ROAD ACCIDENT FUND NOT REPORTABLE Case Number: 3050/06 High Court: SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION DATE HEARD:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION CASE NO: 120/2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION CASE NO: 120/2006 In the matter between: ONALENNA WILLEM PELO PLAINTIFF and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT FOR THE PLAINTIFF : ADV C ZWIEGELAAR
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA /ES (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA /ES (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 44981/2013 (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED...... SIGNATURE
More informationSAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND [1] GARY TRUBBIE DE FREITAS [2] MICHAEL EMMONS
CLAIM NO: SVGHCV2010/0303 SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: ANDY BUTE AND [1] GARY TRUBBIE DE FREITAS [2] MICHAEL EMMONS Claimant Defendants Appearances: Ms. Suzanne
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) In the matter between: S. N. H. Plaintiff JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationFILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 02/14/ :14 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF RICHMOND -----------------------------------------------------------------------X â â â â â â X KENNETH EARLand DONNAEARL, VERIFIED BILL Plaintiffs, OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationJUDGMENT. [1] The plaintiff a 39 year old male instituted an action against the Road
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU NATAL, PIETERMARITZBURG CASE NO: 441/2003 In the matter between: CASSIM MAHOMED SARDIWALLA NO PLAINTIFF (In his capacity as Administrator/ Executor of Estate
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF
More informationFILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/26/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/26/2016
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/26/2016 01:45 PM INDEX NO. 607940/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/26/2016 1 of 20 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROXANNE CHRISTIAN and
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON LOCAL DIVISION EASTERN CAPE)
Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON LOCAL DIVISION EASTERN CAPE) Case No: EL 321/08 ECD 721/08 Date Heard: 16/03/11 Date Delivered: 30/06/11 In the matter between NTOMBIZANDILE NDABA
More informationHILMER WALTER OSTLING N.O.
In the High Court of South Africa (South Eastern Cape Local Division) (Port Elizabeth High Court) Case No 565/07 Delivered: In the matter between HILMER WALTER OSTLING N.O. Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT
More informationNot Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION) Case No: EL 74/07 ECD 174/07 Date Delivered: 25/02/09
Not Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION) Case No: EL 74/07 ECD 174/07 Date Delivered: 25/02/09 In the matter between KHOLIWE NTULI Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMPOPO DIVISION, POLOKWANE
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JASPER COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JASPER COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA XXXXXXXX, vs., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.: DANIEL ORLANDO XXXX, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND OTHER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL
More information(EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION) CASE NO.: EL 428/08 ECD 928/08
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION) CASE NO.: EL 428/08 ECD 928/08 In the matter between: VUYISILE DAYIMANE PLAINTIFF And THE MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES DEFENDANT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 2014/12763 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED
More informationStandard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)
Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j), "[t]he Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories for different classes
More informationUNRWA DISPUTE TRIBUNAL
UNRWA DISPUTE TRIBUNAL Case No.: UNRWA/DT/JFO/2016/036 Judgment No.: UNRWA/DT/2017/024 Date: 11 June 2017 Original: English Before: Registry: Registrar: Judge Bana Barazi Amman Laurie McNabb KHATIB v.
More informationFORM A FILING SHEET FOR SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION JUDGMENT
FORM A FILING SHEET FOR SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION JUDGMENT PARTIES: Case Number: 1864/2008 High Court: Port Elizabeth DATE HEARD: 20 & 21 October 2009 DATE DELIVERED: 29 October 2009 JUDGE(S):
More informationG.S. 1a-1. Rule 84 Page 1
Rule 84. Forms. The following forms are sufficient under these rules and are intended to indicate the simplicity and brevity of statement which the rules contemplate: (1) Complaint on a Promissory Note.
More informationSABELO CHRISTOPHER SOFUTE JUDGMENT. 1. On 21 April 1998 in Mdantsane a collision occurred between a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (IN THE CISKEI DIVISION) CASE NO. 388/2006 In the matter between:- SABELO CHRISTOPHER SOFUTE PLAINTIFF and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT DHLODHLO ADJP: 1. On 21
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NUMBER: 20217/2013 In the matter between: GOUWS DIVAN GERHARD PLAINTIFF And ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT RATSHIBVUMO
More informationSAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy NOT REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
More informationORTHOPEDIC HOSPITALS MANAGEMENT BOARD ACT
ORTHOPEDIC HOSPITALS MANAGEMENT BOARD ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Establishment of Board of Management, etc. 1. Establishment of Orthopaedic Hospitals Management Board. 2. Composition of the Board. 3.
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G CATHERINE WILSON, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED MARCH 30, 2017
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G508412 CATHERINE WILSON, EMPLOYEE ARKANSAS HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, EMPLOYER PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS DIVISION, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA
More informationDefendant JUDGMENT. [1] The plaintiff instituted an action for divorce against the. defendant in June The parties married each other on 28 June
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO. 500743/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS BERGMANN DHAITI and NOYESSE DHAITI, -against-
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT In the matter between: Reportable Case No: 1036/2016 ROAD ACCIDENT FUND APPELLANT and KHOMOTSO POLLY MPHIRIME RESPONDENT Neutral citation: Road Accident
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Carol Luby, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 499 C.D. 2016 : Submitted: September 16, 2016 Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Valley Crest Nursing, d/b/a : Timber Ridge
More informationSAMOA ACCIDENT COMPENSATION AMENDMENT ACT. No. 7, Arrangement of Provisions
SAMOA ACCIDENT COMPENSATION AMENDMENT ACT No. 7, 2003 Arrangement of Provisions 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Change of name of the Accident Compensation Board 4. Annual Report,
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, 1 Koontz, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, 1 Koontz, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice Lacy, Keenan, and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSCOE B. STEPHENSON, JR. v. Record
More informationBenyuan Zhou, Likang Zhou and Mansoor Bayat-Shahbazi, Defendants. Thomas Ozere and Erin Durant, for the Respondent ENDORSEMENT
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO CITATION: Nkunda-Batware v. Zhou, 2016 ONSC 2942 COURT FILE NO.: 12-54505 DATE: 2016/05/02 RE: Beate Nkunda-Batware, Plaintiff AND Benyuan Zhou, Likang Zhou and Mansoor
More informationCASE NO: 74647/2010 DATE: 3/4/2014
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA) (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationFILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 10/29/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/29/2015
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 10/29/2015 04:04 PM INDEX NO. 701992/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/29/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS -------------------------------------------------------------------------)(
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/ :40 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/2016 1040 AM INDEX NO. 152848/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF 05/20/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ZOE DENISON, Plaintiff, INDEX
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN. J. S. Plaintiff and HEARD ON: 12 AUGUST 2016 DELIVERED ON: 20 DECEMBER 2016
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION,
More informationIn the matter between:
l,,;. THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) (l) (2) (3) REPORT ABLE: e / NO OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: ~/NO REVISED., ~ OJ/o;;./;i.o/
More informationF 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant.
F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Interrogatories from Plaintiff to Defendant 1. Please
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) HOWARD ROMEO QUINTON TOBIAS...Plaintiff. ROAD ACCIDENT FUND...
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA CASEY PIGOTT SHERRIAN PIGOTT. and VELELOMA POTTER VERNON POTTER
CLAIM NO: ANUHCV 2010/0423 BETWEEN: THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA CASEY PIGOTT SHERRIAN PIGOTT Claimants and VELELOMA POTTER VERNON POTTER Defendants
More informationConducting Agreement
Conducting Agreement THIS CONDUCTING AGREEMENT made at this day of 200 BETWEEN DR. DAYAWAN HOSPITAL AND CLINIC, a partnership firm having address at,, hereinafter called THE OWNERS (which expression shall
More informationUninsured/Underinsured Motorist (UM) Herniated Discs Total $ Outcome Case Type Subcategory Facts
Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist (UM) Herniated Discs Total $ Outcome Case Type Subcategory Facts $ - Defense MVA Rear-end $ 12,500.00 Plaintiff MVA Rear-end Plaintiff alleged that she suffered a herniated
More informationMIB Untraced Drivers Agreement
MIB Untraced Drivers Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is made on the 28 th February 2017 between the SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT ( the Secretary of State ) and the MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU ( MIB ), whose registered
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT. PRETORIA /ES (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT. PRETORIA /ES (REPUBLIC
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) M.F. A. NO. 90/2005
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) M.F. A. NO. 90/2005 United India Insurance Company Ltd.. Sri Shital Das -Vs- Petitioner Respondent For the petitioner:
More informationIN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO CV BETWEEN. FLORIDA SPANN Claimant AND
IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO CV 2011-00140 BETWEEN FLORIDA SPANN Claimant AND ROOPLAL BALKISSOON First Defendant AVION BALKISSOON Second Defendant THE NEW
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA) JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA) (1) REPORTABLE: YES (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/N^ CASE NO: 24142/2011 vi \\r^\^oi2 (3) REVISED. iuj.qa.la.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS RACHEL M. KALLMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED November 26, 2013 v No. 312457 Ingham Circuit Court JASON F. WHITAKER, LC No. 10-000247-NI Defendant-Appellee. Before:
More informationKramer v MABSTOA 2013 NY Slip Op 33390(U) December 20, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Donna M.
Kramer v MABSTOA 2013 NY Slip Op 33390(U) December 20, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 104564/10 Judge: Donna M. Mills Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationSAMPLE BRIEF IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY LARRY ARMSTRONG, ) ) Appellee, ) Court of Appeals No. 2016-1111 ) ) -vs. ) Trial Court No. 2016-2222 ) JOHN ELLINGTON, ) ) Appellant.
More informationCHAPTER: 69:02 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FUND
CHAPTER: 69:02 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FUND Part:I Preliminary ss 12 SECTION 1. Short title 2. Interpretation ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I Preliminary PART II Establishment of Fund 3. Continuance of Motor
More informationSubmitted January 24, 2019 Decided. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, Docket No. L
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F SHARON T. LINDLE, EMPLOYEE BEVERLY HEALTH & REHAB CENTER, EMPLOYER
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F311978 SHARON T. LINDLE, EMPLOYEE BEVERLY HEALTH & REHAB CENTER, EMPLOYER AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FRANCIS MAURICE. and (1) CLARENCE MAN GAL (2) NIER SAMUEL (3) RUTH DUBOIS (4) EVIS NAITRAM (5) JOHN ALEXANDER JUDGEMENT
SAINT LUCIA CLAIM NO. SLUHCV 200510176 BETWEEN: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FRANCIS MAURICE and (1) CLARENCE MAN GAL (2) NIER SAMUEL (3) RUTH DUBOIS (4) EVIS NAITRAM (5) JOHN ALEXANDER ClaimanURespondent
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 15-1185 JUDE BROUSSARD AND RACHEL GREMILLION BROUSSARD VERSUS LAFAYETTE PHYSICAL REHABILITATION HOSPITAL, LLC ************ APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE September 19, 2003 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE September 19, 2003 Session SHARON A. BATTLE v. METHODIST MEDICAL CENTER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for
More informationJ U D G M E N T : 9 J U N E [1] In these proceedings Applicant seeks an order against Respondent, his former
THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: C AS E N O : 1 4 7 8 8 / 2 0 1 3 CLIVE AMOS DARRIES Applicant Versus JAMES EDWARD
More information