IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
|
|
- Edward Carter
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) Case No: 48112/2014 DATE: 07/11/2017 (1) REPORTABLE: NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3) REVISED In the matter between: CATHERINE PHALANE Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant JUDGMENT D S FOURIE, J: [1] The plaintiff instituted action against the defendant for damages suffered as a result of personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision that occurred on 26 June On 20 May 2015 and by agreement between the parties it was ordered (insofar it is relevant) that the issues of liability and quantum be separated and that the defendant is liable to pay 100% of the plaintiff's agreed or proven damages. The matter was allocated to me to decide the issues relating to
2 quantum. [2] During the course of the proceedings it was agreed between the parties that the defendant shall furnish the plaintiff with an undertaking in terms of section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act No 56 of It was also agreed, for reasons not relevant at this stage, that the claim for general damages be separated and postponed sine die. This will be taken care of in the draft order which I intend to make an order of Court. [3] The remaining issues relate to the plaintiff's claim for loss of earnings or earning capacity. The parties have agreed to formulate the issues as follows: (a) Whether the plaintiff is employable in the open labour market? (b) If she is indeed employable in the open labour market, what position(s) will she be able to obtain? (c) Whether the position(s) referred to above, is sustainable? (d) Contingencies remain the prerogative of the Court. It is noted that the calculation as it stands reflects the position of the plaintiff's functional unemployability. Depending on the Court's finding, alternative calculations will be obtained. [4] It should be pointed out that the defendant came to Court without any witnesses. The defendant insisted that the plaintiff is "employable with limited capacity". It was agreed between the parties that, save for the medico- legal report prepared by the plaintiff's industrial psychologist, all other reports filed by the plaintiff may be accepted as evidence. INJURIES: [5] It is common cause that the plaintiff suffered a comminuted fracture of the right supracondylar. She was referred to the George Mukhari Hospital where she was placed in traction awaiting surgery. On 4 July 2011 an open reduction and internal fixation of her right femur was performed.
3 [6] According to the orthopaedic surgeon the internal fixation (pin) has been introduced through the knee and the distal end is sitting proud to the bone and causing erosion on the patella. She needs surgery to remove the metal pin but even thereafter, taking into account her age of 33 years, she is going to develop degenerative changes in her right knee which will necessitate a knee replacement at the age of 50. [7] The plaintiff has a significant shortening of her right leg and, according to measurements it is 25 mm, but when she stands on wooden blocks to place her pelvis in a horizontal plane, it equates to 30 mm. It was reported to the orthopaedic surgeon by the plaintiff that she experiences pain in her right knee when she does a lot of walking, the right knee is relatively stiff with loss of movement and she is walking with a limp. In the long-term she has a guarded prognosis with the shortening of the leg and the change in the contour of the distal end of her right femur with damage to the knee joint. [8] According to the report of the plaintiff's clinical psychologist the plaintiff developed serious behaviour disturbances that are coloured by symptoms of a post-traumatic stress disorder with delayed onset that is aggravated by an anxiety disorder and mild depression. A serious cause for concern is her unstable mental state and psychotic-like features that seem unusual. According to this report the prognosis of a post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety are unpredictable. Not everybody recovers completely from these disorders. The symptoms may fluctuate and become worse when the subject is under stress. VIVA VOCE EVIDENCE: [9] The plaintiff testified as well as an industrial psychologist, Ms Viljoen. Pursuant to the close of the plaintiff's case, the defendant has closed its case without calling any witnesses. THE PLAINTIFF:
4 [10] The plaintiff testified that she has a Grade 11 as well as Grade C security qualification. Prior to the accident she was self-employed as a hairdresser and vendor selling chickens. She was earning approximately R per month. After the accident she was unable to continue as a hairdresser as she is unable to stand for a long period of time. She is also unable to continue as a vendor because she no longer has a relationship with the man who provided her with stock. She is unable to collect the stock herself. [11] After the accident she obtained employment as a security guard at a retail shop in Bela-Bela. This required a lot of standing and walking which she was unable to do. At some stage her employment was terminated whereafter she became unemployed. According to her she is still experiencing pain on a daily basis and she can only stand for a limited period whereafter her leg will become swollen and her back will then also become painful. VILJOEN: [12] Ms Viljoen is an industrial psychologist who prepared a comprehensive and detailed report. She testified that she had two consultations with the plaintiff and she was also provided with copies of medico-legal reports prepared by other expert witnesses. She testified that taking into account the plaintiff's limited career history, financial difficulties which prevented her from obtaining a driver's licence and completing further studies, the plaintiff would not have progressed further than a Grade C security. She also pointed out that the plaintiff's employment at the retail store was terminated for reasons not related to the accident, but subsequently she was offered a transferral to another branch of the same store which did not materialise as the plaintiff was experiencing difficulties in doing her job. This was confirmed by Mr Ngobeni, the plaintiff's superior, who informed the witness that she struggled to stand and to be on her feet for extended periods of time. According to him the plaintiff also took frequent sick leave as she indicated that she could not cope. [13] The witness also referred to the medico-legal report of Dr Moloto which she
5 took into account. Dr Moloto is an orthopaedic surgeon who prepared a medicolegal report at the request of the defendant. According to that report, as referred to by the witness, the doctor was of the view that the injury which the plaintiff had sustained has not affected her ability to work, but "in future her right knee may limit her work to sedentary type". According to the witness the plaintiff is not suitably qualified, neither has she the necessary experience, to perform sedentary work such as a receptionist, administrative clerk or control room operator. Taking also into account her psychological disadvantage, the witness was of the view that the plaintiff should be regarded as functionally unemployable as a result of the accident. [14] This view was put to the test in cross-examination. The witness was challenged to explain why the plaintiff is regarded as functionally unemployable, whereas she was in fact employed as a security guard. The witness again deferred to the opinion of Dr Moloto who, according to his report, is of the view that the right knee injury may limit the plaintiff to sedentary type of work. This residual work capacity is, according to the witness, not within her current or potential competency framework. This means that the plaintiff is for all intents and purposes unemployable. DISCUSSION: [15] I have had the opportunity to see and hear the plaintiff and Ms Viljoen in the witness box. The plaintiff's evidence was not seriously challenged and I have no reason to reject any part thereof. Ms Viljoen prepared a detailed report referring in a balanced way to many other medico-legal reports which she took into account. She was well prepared and stood her ground well in cross-examination. She appeared to be determined and testified with confidence. I never gained the impression that she was biased in any way. Her opinion that the plaintiff should be regarded as functionally unemployable is well-founded, bearing in mind that she also deferred to the opinion of the defendant's orthopaedic surgeon that the knee injury may limit the plaintiff to sedentary type of work. Her view that the plaintiff is not suitably qualified for this kind of work goes unchallenged. I
6 therefore accept, without hesitation, that the plaintiff is functionally unemployable. [16] Counsel for the defendant indicated during argument that if I would come to the conclusion that the plaintiff is functionally unemployable, the actuarial calculation prepared on this basis can be accepted as correct, save for the question as to what percentage contingency deduction should be applied for future loss of income. The actuarial calculation dated 18 October 2017 indicates that the plaintiffs past loss of income amounts to R after a 5% contingency has been applied. Both parties accept this deduction to be appropriate. The amount calculated for future loss of earnings amounts to R before any contingencies have been applied. Plaintiff's counsel suggested a 15% deduction, whereas defendant's counsel argued for 30%. [17] Contingencies are the hazards of life that normally beset the lives and circumstances of ordinary people (AA Mutual Ins Co v Van Jaarsveld reported in Corbett & Buchanan, The Quantum of Damages, Vol II 360 at 367) and should therefore, by its very nature, be a process of subjective impression or estimation rather than objective calculation (Shield Ins Co Ltd v Booysen 1979 (3) SA 953 (A) at 965G-H). Contingencies for which allowance should be made, would usually include the following: (a) the possibility of illness which would have occurred in any event; (b) inflation or deflation of the value of money in future; and (c) other risks of life such as accidents or even death, which would have become a reality, sooner or later, in any event (Corbett, The Quantum of Damages, Vol I, p 51). [18] In the Quantum Yearbook (by Robert Koch, 2017 Edition, p 126) the learned author points out that there are no fixed rules as regards general contingencies. However, he suggests the following guidelines: "Sliding scale: Yz% per year to retirement age, i.e. 25% for a child, 20% for a youth and 10% in the middle age
7 Normal contingencies: The RAF usually agrees to deductions of 5% for past loss and 15% for future loss, the so-called normal contingencies." [19] I accept that this approach is only a guideline as contingencies, by its very nature, is a process of subjective impression or estimation rather than objective calculation. In the present matter it is common cause that the plaintiff is 33 years old and would have retired, but for the accident, at age 65. This means that the "relevant period of risk" for purposes of determining a contingency deduction is 32 years. Taking into account that the plaintiff is neither a youth, nor a person in her middle age, it appears to me that a 15% contingency deduction for future loss would be fair and reasonable. The total net loss therefore amounts to R calculated as follows: (a) Past loss with a 5% contingency deduction as calculated by the actuary (b) Future loss as calculated by the actuary Less 15% contingency deduction R R R R [20] This means that a total amount of R should be awarded to the plaintiff for past and future loss of earnings. This amount will be reflected in the draft order which I intend to make an order of Court. The certificate for future medical expenses as well as the separation and postponement of the claim for general damages will also be taken care of in the draft order. ORDER: In the result I grant the following order: The draft order attached hereto and marked "X", is made an order of Court.
8 DS FOURIE JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT PRETORIA Date: 7 th November 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA On this the 7 th of November 2017, before His Lordship, Mr Justice Fourie,J CASE NO.: 48112/2014 In the matter between: CM PHALANE Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant DRAFT COURT ORDER 1. The Defendant is ordered to pay an amount of R 889, (EIGHT EIGHT NINE ZERO SIX ONE RAND) in respect of Loss of Earnings, which amount shall be paid within 14 days to the credit of the trust account of the Plaintiff's Attorneys of record, Savage Jooste & Adams Inc, Pretoria, whose trust account details are as follows: Nedbank name : NEDCOR ARCADIA Account type : TRUST ACCOUNT
9 Branch code : Account no : [ ] Reference no : Mr Makole / KP12 2. The Defendant is ordered to furnish the Plaintiff with an Undertaking in terms of Section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act, No 56 of 1996, to compensate Plaintiff for 100% of the cost of future accommodation in a hospital or nursing home or treatment of or rendering of a service or supplying of goods to Plaintiff resulting from injuries sustained by her as a result of an accident that occurred on 26 June The issue of General Damages is separated from the other issues in terms of Rule 33(4) and postponed sine die. 4. The Defendant is ordered to pay the Plaintiff's costs of suit, subject to the discretion of the Taxing Master, on the Party-and-Party High Court Scale, which costs include (but not be limited to): 4.1. The costs of attending to the examinations and obtaining the medicolegal reports, addendum reports (if any), RAF4 reports (where applicable), Joint Minutes (if any), as well as the qualifying, preparation, reservation and attendance fees (if any), of the following experts: Dr JJ van Niekerk (Orthopaedic Surgeon) and RAF4; Dr L Berkowitz (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon) and RAF4; Dr DL Kirsten (Pulmonologist); Dr DG Maluleke (Clinical Psychologist); Ms van Wyk [Anneke Greeff] (Occupational Therapist); Ms Viljoen [Kobus Prinsloo] (Industrial Psychologist); Mr Whittaker [Algorithm] (Actuary). 4.2 The cost of senior-junior counsel, including her preparation and day fee of 1 November 2017.
10 4.3 The reasonable costs of transportation calculated at the AA rate and reasonable accommodation of the Plaintiff to attend the medico-legal examinations for both the Plaintiff and Defendant; 4.4 The cost of preparation of four trial bundles as per the Gauteng High Court Directives. 5. No interest will be payable on the capital sum, provided payment is made 14 days after the Court Order. Should payment not be made timeously, the Defendant will pay interest at the applicable mora interest rate per annum from due date to date of payment. 6. The party and party costs are payable within 14 days after receipt by the Defendant's attorneys of the stamped allocator, thereafter interest will be charged at the applicable mora interest rate per annum from date of the stamped allocator to date of payment. 7. The Plaintiff entered into a Contingency Fees agreement, signed on 21 May BY ORDER REGISTRAR For Plaintiff: Adv M van Rooyen (Instructed by Savage Jooste & Adams: ) For Defendant: Adv F Matika Date: 7 th November 2017
11 X IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA On this the 7 th of November 2017, before His Lordship, Mr Justice Fourie,J CASE NO.: 48112/2014 In the matter between: CM PHALANE Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant DRAFT COURT ORDER 1. The Defendant is ordered to pay an amount of R 889, (EIGHT EIGHT NINE ZERO SIX ONE RAND) in respect of Loss of Earnings, which amount shall be paid within 14 days to the credit of the trust account of the Plaintiff's Attorneys of record, Savage Jooste & Adams Inc, Pretoria, whose trust account details are as follows: Nedbank name : NEDCOR ARCADIA Account type : TRUST ACCOUNT Branch code : Account no : Reference no : Mr Makole / KP12 2. The Defendant is ordered to furnish the Plaintiff with an Undertaking in terms of Section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act, No 56 of 1996, to compensate Plaintiff for 100% of the cost of future accommodation in a hospital or nursing
12 home or treatment of or rendering of a service or supplying of goods to Plaintiff resulting from injuries sustained by her as a result of an accident that occurred on 26 June The issue of General Damages is separated from the other issues in terms of Rule 33(4) and postponed sine die. 4. The Defendant is ordered to pay the Plaintiff's costs of suit, subject to the discretion of the Taxing Master, on the Party-and-Party High Court Scale, which costs include (but not be limited to): 4.1. The costs of attending to the examinations and obtaining the medicolegal reports, addendum reports (if any), RAF4 reports (where applicable), Joint Minutes (if any), as well as the qualifying, preparation, reservation and attendance fees (if any), of the following experts: Dr JJ van Niekerk (Orthopaedic Surgeon) and RAF4; Dr L Berkowitz (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon) and RAF4; Dr DL Kirsten (Pulmonologist); Dr DG Maluleke (Clinical Psychologist); Ms van Wyk [Anneke Greeff] (Occupational Therapist); Ms Viljoen [Kobus Prinsloo] (Industrial Psychologist); Mr Whittaker [Algorithm] (Actuary). 4.2 The cost of senior-junior counsel, including her preparation and day fee of 1 November The reasonable costs of transportation calculated at the AA rate and reasonable accommodation of the Plaintiff to attend the medico-legal examinations for both the Plaintiff and Defendant; 4.4 The cost of preparation of four trial bundles as per the Gauteng High Court Directives.
13 5. No interest will be payable on the capital sum, provided payment is made 14 days after the Court Order. Should payment not be made timeously, the Defendant will pay interest at the applicable mora interest rate per annum from due date to date of payment. 6. The party and party costs are payable within 14 days after receipt by the Defendant's attorneys of the stamped allocator, thereafter interest will be charged at the applicable mora interest rate per annum from date of the stamped allocator to date of payment. 7. The Plaintiff entered into a Contingency Fees agreement, signed on 21 May BY ORDER REGISTRAR For Plaintiff: Adv M van Rooyen (Instructed by Savage Jooste & Adams: ) For Defendant: Adv F Matika
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 44981/2013 (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED...... SIGNATURE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG,
More informationSOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 29295/08 (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED...... DATE SIGNATURE In the matter between:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA)
REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA) CASE NO: 77426/2009 DATE: 18/03/2013 In the matter between: RADEBE, JULIA obo TD PLAINTIFF and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA Case Number: 4951/2014 NOT REPORTABLE NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES REVISED
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationPATRICIA JULIANA VAN DER WESTHUIZEN JUDGMENT. [1] The plaintiff was a rear seat passenger in a motor vehicle which was involved
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH Case No.: 1024/2013 Date Heard: 23 October 2014 Date Delivered: 4 November 2014 In the matter between: PATRICIA JULIANA VAN
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Reportable: NO Of Interest to other Judges: NO Circulate to Magistrates: NO Case No. : 5897/2017 In the matter between:- MESA FRANCIS HALE Plaintiff
More informationF T M...Plaintiff. ROAD ACCIDENT FUND...Defendant JUDGMENT. [1] The plaintiff, who was born on 5 March 1993 and presently 18 years of age,
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG In the matter
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMPOPO DIVISION, POLOKWANE
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF
More informationIn the matter between:
l,,;. THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) (l) (2) (3) REPORT ABLE: e / NO OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: ~/NO REVISED., ~ OJ/o;;./;i.o/
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy. Please note also that this is a corrected version
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA MESHAKE: NTHABISENG EMILY J U D G M E N T
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA /ES (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA /ES (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT (JOHANNESBURG) ALFRED KGOMO on behalf of L M K
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH
More informationROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT,
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NUMBER: 42384/14
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF
More informationPlaintiff JUDGMENT. was the driver of a motorcycle which the collided with a motor vehicle, driven at the time by a Mrs
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION,
More information[1] This is an action arising from injuries the plaintiff sustained on 17 January 2013 in Bloemfontein in a motor vehicle collision.
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO.: 3890/2015 In the matter between: JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSKEI DIVISION) CASE NO.: 978/06 JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSKEI DIVISION) CASE NO.: 978/06 In the matter between: AKHONA NTSONTSOYI Plaintiff And ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant JUDGMENT PAKADE, J.: BACKGROUND: [1] The plaintiff
More informationFORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT JONATHAN ELROY MULLER PLAINTIFF ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT
FORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT PARTIES: JONATHAN ELROY MULLER PLAINTIFF and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT Case Number: 2473/05 High Court: SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION Date Heard: 14,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED Case number: 06771/2015..... In the matter between: MBATHA
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF
More informationCASE NO: 74647/2010 DATE: 3/4/2014
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA) (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT JOHANNESBURG
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT
More informationFORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT
FORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT ECJ NO: 021/2006 PARTIES: DALEEN SMIT AND THE ROAD ACCIDENT FUND REFERENCE NUMBERS Registrar: 277/05 DATE HEARD: 15 FEBRUARY 2006 DATE DELIVERED: 23 FEBRUARY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) T M KGOPYANE PLAINTIFF ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationSAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy NOT REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
More information[1] The plaintiff, an adult male, has instituted a damages action against the
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 09479/2013 (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED...... SIGNATURE
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) In the matter between: S. N. H. Plaintiff JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) HOWARD ROMEO QUINTON TOBIAS...Plaintiff. ROAD ACCIDENT FUND...
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC
More informationNEW SECTIONS AND REGULATIONS OF THE RAF ACT SINCE 1 AUGUST 2008 CHALLENGED:
CHALLENGED: Section 17(1)(b) 17(1A)(a) & (b) NEW SECTIONS AND REGULATIONS OF THE RAF ACT SINCE 1 AUGUST 2008 Explanation General damages: only payable for serious injuries 1. The assessment of a serious
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) First Plaintiff. Second Plaintiff JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA BISHO CASE NO. 1709/04. In the matter between: SINDILE VUKUBI. Plaintiff. and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA BISHO CASE NO. 1709/04 In the matter between: SINDILE VUKUBI Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant J U D G M E N T SANGONI J: 1] It was on 5 September 1999 when a
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT. PRETORIA /ES (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT. PRETORIA /ES (REPUBLIC
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG
More informationBenyuan Zhou, Likang Zhou and Mansoor Bayat-Shahbazi, Defendants. Thomas Ozere and Erin Durant, for the Respondent ENDORSEMENT
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO CITATION: Nkunda-Batware v. Zhou, 2016 ONSC 2942 COURT FILE NO.: 12-54505 DATE: 2016/05/02 RE: Beate Nkunda-Batware, Plaintiff AND Benyuan Zhou, Likang Zhou and Mansoor
More informationTHE_HIGH COURT OP SWAZILAND
IN THE_HIGH COURT OP SWAZILAND In the matter between: JOSE FERREIRA RAMOS Plaintiff and SWAZILAND ROYAL INSURANCE CORPORATION Defendant C O R A M F. X. ROONEY FOR P. COETSEE For Plaintiff P. FLYNN For
More information[2] The following were placed on record as common cause; [2.1] The Plaintiff is the person mentioned at. paragraph 1 of the Particulars of claim.
2 there driven by Mr Masala Mulaudzi, alternatively Mrs Sarah Ratombo, knocked down the plaintiff. At the time of collision the plaintiff was a pedestrian. I then ordered to that effect. [2] The following
More informationJUDGMENT. numbers DRF 631 EC and the insured vehicle registered VHC 667 GP was driven by
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN Case no: 2802/2010 Date heard: 7.11.2011 Date delivered: 17.5.2012 In the matter between: SIYANDA BULELANI MAJOLA Plaintiff vs ROAD ACCIDENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) THE REGISTRAR OF THE HEAL TH PROFESSIONS COUNCIL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: Y,E'S/ ) (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: Y,Ji.S@ (3) REVISED f DATE /4 /tr r ;}c,1"1 ~--+----
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA) JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA) (1) REPORTABLE: YES (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/N^ CASE NO: 24142/2011 vi \\r^\^oi2 (3) REVISED. iuj.qa.la.
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH ARICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH ARICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA CASEY PIGOTT SHERRIAN PIGOTT. and VELELOMA POTTER VERNON POTTER
CLAIM NO: ANUHCV 2010/0423 BETWEEN: THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA CASEY PIGOTT SHERRIAN PIGOTT Claimants and VELELOMA POTTER VERNON POTTER Defendants
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON LOCAL DIVISION EASTERN CAPE)
Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON LOCAL DIVISION EASTERN CAPE) Case No: EL 321/08 ECD 721/08 Date Heard: 16/03/11 Date Delivered: 30/06/11 In the matter between NTOMBIZANDILE NDABA
More informationTLOTLEGO TLAMELO MABALE JUDGMENT
IN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT (MAFIKENG) CASE NO.: 1285/2011 In the matter between: TLOTLEGO TLAMELO MABALE PLAINTIFF and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT LANDMAN J: [1] The plaintiff is Tlotlego Tlamelo
More informationJACOBUS FREDERICK DE BRUIN THE ROAD ACCIDENT FUND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) In the matter between: Case No.: 2056/2008 Date heard: 2 February 2010 Date delivered: 11 May 2010 JACOBUS FREDERICK DE BRUIN Plaintiff and
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PH INASHAKA MISHACK RATSH IKOMBO JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH) JONATHAN WAYNE MULLINS JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 2014/12763 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN. J. S. Plaintiff and HEARD ON: 12 AUGUST 2016 DELIVERED ON: 20 DECEMBER 2016
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More information1. This is a claim by the Plaintiff, an erstwhile client against a firm of. attorneys, Ronald Bobroff & Partners Incorporated, for damages
1 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 12/3663 (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED... DATE... SIGNATURE In the matter between:
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationGEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No February 27, 1998 FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: All the Justices GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No. 970867 February 27, 1998 CLAUDE F. DANCY FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Code 65.2-503
More informationM. P. obo S. P. Plaintiff FOR HEALTH, EASTERN CAPE, PROVINCE JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION CASE NO: 120/2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION CASE NO: 120/2006 In the matter between: ONALENNA WILLEM PELO PLAINTIFF and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT FOR THE PLAINTIFF : ADV C ZWIEGELAAR
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA)
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH AND SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) MPUTI SEHLABANE...PLAINTIFF ROAD ACCIDENT FUND...
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH AND SOUTH
More informationSAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND [1] GARY TRUBBIE DE FREITAS [2] MICHAEL EMMONS
CLAIM NO: SVGHCV2010/0303 SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: ANDY BUTE AND [1] GARY TRUBBIE DE FREITAS [2] MICHAEL EMMONS Claimant Defendants Appearances: Ms. Suzanne
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA DIVISION)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NUMBER: 20217/2013 In the matter between: GOUWS DIVAN GERHARD PLAINTIFF And ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT RATSHIBVUMO
More informationJUDGMENT. [1] The plaintiff a 39 year old male instituted an action against the Road
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU NATAL, PIETERMARITZBURG CASE NO: 441/2003 In the matter between: CASSIM MAHOMED SARDIWALLA NO PLAINTIFF (In his capacity as Administrator/ Executor of Estate
More information(3;)c\~~,i.Ji_..,~ DATE ~ - ;... <'
CASE N0:768/2013 DELETE WHJCHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: vpo (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: y(ino (3;)c\~~,i.Ji_..,~ DATE ~ - ;....
More information(EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION) CASE NO.: EL 428/08 ECD 928/08
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION) CASE NO.: EL 428/08 ECD 928/08 In the matter between: VUYISILE DAYIMANE PLAINTIFF And THE MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES DEFENDANT
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
1 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 33599/2015 (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED Date: WHG
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. BETWEEN: WILLIAM BING MALONE (by his next friend Orpha Malone) and JEROME MICHAEL
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT VIRGIN ISLANDS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. BVIHCV 2004/0058 BETWEEN: WILLIAM BING MALONE (by his next friend Orpha Malone) and JEROME MICHAEL Claimant Defendant
More informationSABELO CHRISTOPHER SOFUTE JUDGMENT. 1. On 21 April 1998 in Mdantsane a collision occurred between a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (IN THE CISKEI DIVISION) CASE NO. 388/2006 In the matter between:- SABELO CHRISTOPHER SOFUTE PLAINTIFF and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT DHLODHLO ADJP: 1. On 21
More informationJUDGMENT. [1] The plaintiff claims payment of R ,00 against the defendant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT: MTHATHA) CASE NO: 09/2008 In the matter between: MXOLISI MNGANI Plaintiff And ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant JUDGMENT NHLANGULELA J: [1] The plaintiff
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Reportable: YESINO Of Interest to other Judges: YESINO Circulate to Magistrates: YES/NO Case number: 5428/2015 In the matter between:
More informationCASE NUMBER: 58643/08 D E L E T E W 0) REPORTABLE: YESINO (3) REVISED. S DATE SIGNATURE TURI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT. PRETORIA CASE NUMBER: 58643/08 In the matter between CHARMAIN VAN DYK D E L E T E W ^^^^^S^OT^PUCA^TE 0) REPORTABLE: YESINO ( 2 )O^Wf T O O T
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA BOLAWANE SARAH MOKOENA
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between:- Case No. 2372/2009 BOLAWANE SARAH MOKOENA Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant HEARD ON: 22 OCTOBER 2010 JUDGMENT
More informationNKASHA ZENOBIA TSAKANI... Plaintiff. ROAD ACCIDENT FUND... Defendant. Obo HLULANI MAGALELA WILSON BALOYI...First Plaintiff
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy NOT REPORTABLE IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT,
More informationHIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) Not Reportable Not of interest to other Judges CASE NO: 4945/2016 In the matter between: S'MANGALISO HENDRY NGWENY A Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT
More information~.,.z;.;:~ ) A ~--
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA ( 1 J REPORT ABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO ~.,.z;.;:~1... 13) A ~-- DATE SIGNATURE CASE NO:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION,
More information13 September :... DATE
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy. IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley)
Reportable: YES / NO Circulate to Judges: YES / NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES / NO Circulate to Regional Magistrates: YES / NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley)
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 33118/2010. In the matter between:
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationNot Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION) Case No: EL 74/07 ECD 174/07 Date Delivered: 25/02/09
Not Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION) Case No: EL 74/07 ECD 174/07 Date Delivered: 25/02/09 In the matter between KHOLIWE NTULI Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT
More informationFORM A FILING SHEET FOR SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION JUDGMENT
FORM A FILING SHEET FOR SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION JUDGMENT PARTIES: ALLAN KLEIN V ROAD ACCIDENT FUND NOT REPORTABLE Case Number: 3050/06 High Court: SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION DATE HEARD:
More information(EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO.: 868/2010 DELIVERED: 20 SEPTEMBER 2013 THE ROAD ACCIDENT FUND JUDGMENT
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO.: 868/2010 HEARD: 9 SEPTEMBER 2013 DELIVERED: 20 SEPTEMBER 2013 In the matter between: THANDISILE JOHNSON TOBI PLAINTIFF and THE
More informationHILMER WALTER OSTLING N.O.
In the High Court of South Africa (South Eastern Cape Local Division) (Port Elizabeth High Court) Case No 565/07 Delivered: In the matter between HILMER WALTER OSTLING N.O. Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FRANCIS MAURICE. and (1) CLARENCE MAN GAL (2) NIER SAMUEL (3) RUTH DUBOIS (4) EVIS NAITRAM (5) JOHN ALEXANDER JUDGEMENT
SAINT LUCIA CLAIM NO. SLUHCV 200510176 BETWEEN: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FRANCIS MAURICE and (1) CLARENCE MAN GAL (2) NIER SAMUEL (3) RUTH DUBOIS (4) EVIS NAITRAM (5) JOHN ALEXANDER ClaimanURespondent
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Attorney for Defendant, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LIMITED JURISDICTION 0. v. Plaintiff, Defendant. Case No.: CUD- DEFENDANT S SUPPLEMENTAL TRIAL BRIEF: TIMING
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Brian McTague, : Petitioner : : v. : : Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Frank Martz Coach : Company), : No. 1485 C.D. 2008 Respondent : Submitted: December
More information