Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
|
|
- Patience Patrick
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 1 of 10 DAVID A. FAILLA and DONNA A. FAILLA, Appellants, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-MARRA CITIBANK, N.A., as Trustee for e Certificate Holders of Structured Asset Mortgage Investment II Inc., Bear Stearns Alt-A Trustee, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series , Appellee. / OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before e Court on e appeal by David A. Failla and Donna A. Failla ( Appellants Faillas ) of e order of e bankruptcy court granting Citibank, N.A. s ( Appellee Citibank ) amended motion to compel debtors to surrender real property pursuant to statement of intention. (DE 1.) The Court has carefully considered e appeal, e briefs of e parties, e entire record on appeal, and is oerwise fully advised in e premises. I. Background The facts, based upon Appellants and Appellee s statement of facts in eir appellate briefs and e appellate record, are as follows: In 2009, e Faillas defaulted on eir note and mortgage for real property and Citibank initiated a foreclosure action. The Faillas opposed e foreclosure, but en filed a chapter 7 bankruptcy case on August 31, As part of at bankruptcy proceeding, e Faillas stated ey own real property, encumbered by a mortgage. They also stated at e mortgage is a valid
2 Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 2 of 10 first mortgage lien on e property and represents an undisputed, non-contingent, liquidated and secured claim over e Faillas and e property. The Faillas stated furer at e amount ey owned pursuant to e loan exceeded e value of e property. The Faillas filed eir statement 1 of intention wi respect to e property and represented at ey would surrender e property. Thereafter, e Faillas attempted to amend eir statement of intention and sought to declare an intention to reaffirm e mortgage and loan. The amendment was untimely and invalid. Ultimately, e chapter 7 trustee abandoned e property. On December 16, 2011, e bankruptcy court issued an order discharging e debtors. Subsequently, e state court set a non-jury trial for August 21, 2013 regarding e foreclosure. The Faillas opposed Citibank s foreclosure action and have retained possession and title to e property. In response to e Faillas defense of e foreclosure action, Citibank moved e bankruptcy court to compel surrender of e property. The Faillas opposed is motion, contending at ey already surrendered e property to e bankruptcy trustee, who abandoned it. According to e Faillas, once e trustee abandoned e property, it reverted to em and ey were restored eir prepetition rights. In oer words, e Faillas claim at e surrender was properly made to e trustee, not Citibank, and at as a result of e trustee s abandonment of e property, ey are free to defend against e foreclosure. On December 19, 2014, e bankruptcy court addressed e following issues: (1) [w]hat actions or inactions, if any, are required of e [Faillas] to effectively and sufficiently perform eir Statement of Intention to surrender e property?; (2) [w]hat remedies or rights are available 1 In e bankruptcy case, e Faillas claimed a wildcard exemption and never reaffirmed e mortgage, redeemed e property or modified e loan. 2
3 Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 3 of 10 to Citibank for e [Faillas ] failure to comply wi eir obligation to perform eir Statement of Intention to surrender e Property?; and (3) [d]oes e exception language of 11 U.S.C. 521(a)(2)(B) - which states at except at noing in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of is paragraph shall alter e debtor s or trustee s rights wi regard to such property under is title, except as provide in section 362(h) - implicitly permit a debtor to lawfully defend a foreclosure action as a matter of right of such property ownership? The bankruptcy court began its analysis wi a discussion of e term surrender, which 2 is not defined in section 521(a)(2) or anywhere else in e bankruptcy code. The bankruptcy court interpreted Taylor v. AGE Fed. Credit Union (In re Taylor), 3 F.3d 1512 (11 Cir. 1993) as requiring a debtor who is unwilling to reaffirm or redeem e mortgage obligation to indicate an intent to surrender e home and tender e property to e mortgagee. The bankruptcy court also held at while e Faillas do not have to physically surrender e property to Citibank, ey could not defend against or contest e foreclosure in state court. Lastly, e bankruptcy court ruled at if e Faillas did not surrender e property, eir bankruptcy discharge would be in jeopardy. On appeal, e Faillas make e following arguments: (1) e bankruptcy court erred in finding at e Faillas were required under section 521(A)(2) of e bankruptcy code to surrender e property to Citibank as opposed to e bankruptcy trustee, as e Faillas did and (2) e bankruptcy court ignored section 554(c) and e ramifications of what an abandonment back to a debtor means. In response, Citibank asserts at section 521(a)(2) and Eleven Circuit case 2 Section 521(a)(2) addresses e debtor s statement of intention to surrender, reaffirm or redeem property in which a creditor has a secured interest. 3
4 Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 4 of 10 law mandates at chapter 7 debtors not retain collateral securing a debt unless ey reaffirm or redeem e collateral, even if e debtors are current on eir payment obligations. Citibank argues at under section 521(a)(2), e duty to surrender requires relinquishment of rights to all persons having an interest in e collateral, including e secured creditor. II. Legal Standard The Court reviews e Bankruptcy Court s factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. In re Globe Manufacturing Corp., 567 F.3d 1291, 1296 (11 Cir. 2009); In re Club Assoc., 951 F.2d 1223, (11 Cir. 1992). An appellate court may affirm e lower court where e judgment entered is correct on any legal ground regardless of e grounds addressed, adopted or rejected by e lower court. Bonanni Ship Supply, Inc. v. United States, 959 F.2d 1558, 1561 (11 Cir. 1992). III. Discussion The Bankruptcy Code provides: (a) The debtor shall -... (2) if an individual debtor's schedule of assets and liabilities includes debts which are secured by property of e estate (A) wiin irty days after e date of e filing of a petition under chapter 7 of is title or on or before e date of e meeting of creditors, whichever is earlier, or wiin such additional time as e court, for cause, wiin such period fixes, file wi e clerk a statement of his intention wi respect to e retention or surrender of such property and, if applicable, specifying at such property is claimed as exempt, at e debtor intends to redeem such property, or at e debtor intends to reaffirm debts secured by such property; and (B) wiin 30 days after e first date set for e meeting of creditors under section 341(a), or wiin such additional time as e court, for cause, wiin such 30-day period fixes, perform his intention wi respect to such property, as specified by subparagraph (A) of is paragraph; 4
5 Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 5 of 10 except at noing in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of is paragraph shall alter e debtor's or e trustee's rights wi regard to such property under is title, except as provided in section 362(h); 11 U.S.C If a debtor retains nonexempt collateral under section 521(a)(2), e debtor has e options of reaffirmation, redemption or surrender. In re Plummer, 513 B.R. 135, 141 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2014); In re Steinberg, 447 B.R. 355, 357 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2011). The parties ask e Court to decide wheer e bankruptcy court erred in finding at e duty to surrender is owed solely to e lienholder as opposed to anoer entity, such as e bankruptcy trustree. Several cases have held at surrender must be made to e lienholder, but ose cases did not consider wheer e bankruptcy code allows for surrender to any oer entity, such as e bankruptcy trustee. See Taylor, 3 F.3d at 1514 n.2 ( Surrender provides at a debtor surrender e collateral to e lienholder who en disposes of it pursuant to e st requirements of state law. ); In re Pratt, 462 F.3d 14, (1 Cir. 2006) ( e most sensible connotation of surrender in e present context is at e debtor agreed to make e collateral available to e secured creditor-viz., to cede his possessory rights in e collateral-wiin 30 days of e filing of e notice of intention to surrender possession of e collateral ); Steinberg, 447 B.R. at 358 ( a debtor unwilling to reaffirm and unable to pay off e mortgage obligation is required to indicate an intent to surrender e home and to tender e property to e mortgagee. ). The Faillas rely upon In re Lair, 235 B.R. 1 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1999). In Lair, e bankruptcy court held at surrender is an option for e debtor who chooses not to use e bankruptcy alternatives of reaffirmation or redemption and to allow e debtor to instead surrender rights in e asset to e bankruptcy trustee. Id. at 65. If e bankruptcy trustee 5
6 Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 6 of 10 abandons e asset back to e debtor during e case due to a lack of equity or if e property is returned at e end of e case by operation of law, en e debtor and creditor are left to state law remedies. Id. at 13. In oer words, e debtor s surrender would have no effect on e debtor s state law rights wi respect to e creditor. Notably, Lair distinguished e Eleven Circuit case of Taylor supra. In Taylor, e Eleven Circuit rejected what was called e ride-rough option, which allowed a chapter 7 debtor to retain e collateral property and make payments wiout eier redeeming e property or reaffirming e debt. Taylor, 3 F.3d at As stated by e Eleven Circuit in Taylor, [a]llowing a debtor to retain property wiout reaffirming or redeeming gives e debtor not a fresh start but a head start since e debtor effectively converts his secured obligation from recourse to nonrecourse wi no downside risk for failing to maintain or insure e lender's collateral. Taylor, 3 F.3d at Taylor provided in a footnote at [s]urrender provides at a debtor surrender e collateral to e lienholder who en disposes of it pursuant to e requirements of state law. Id. at 1514 n.2 Lair disagreed wi Taylor, stating at e Eleven Circuit erroneously understands surrender to refer (or relate) to e debtor's relationship wi e creditor ( surrender provides at a debtor surrender e collateral to e lienholder ). Lair, at 43. Wheer secured property should be surrendered to e trustee or e secured creditor is, in is Court s view, not e critical question. Raer, e critical question is what is e legal effect of e debtor s decision to surrender e property? The Court concludes, consistent wi e bankruptcy court s determination, at once e debtor decides to surrender secured property, e debtor has abandoned any interest or claim at he may have had to e property as 6
7 Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 7 of 10 against e trustee, if e trustee decides to administer e property, or against any secured creditor e debtor listed in e filed schedules as having a valid, undisputed, non-contingent and enforceable secured lien on e property. While e debtor need not physically deliver e 3 property to e secured party, e debtor is precluded from taking any action which would interfere wi e secured creditor s ability to obtain legal title to, and possession of, e property rough legal means. Defending against a foreclosure proceeding relating to e secured property would be inconsistent wi e debtor s stated intention to surrender e property wiin e meaning of 11 U.S.C. 521(a)(2). Accord Plummer, 513 B.R. at The Faillas, in reliance upon Lair, make much ado of e fact at e trustee in is case abandoned e property pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 554(c). Relying furer upon cases which state at after e trustee s abandonment, e property reverts to e debtor and stands as if no 4 bankruptcy petition was filed, e Faillas assert at because of e trustee s abandonment of e property, ey and Citibank were bo restored to eir prepetition status quo as ough no bankruptcy case had been filed. [DE 13 at 20-21]. Thus, e Faillas contend ey may now defend against e secured creditor s attempt to foreclose. This Court concludes at e Faillas misread e statements from courts relative to e restoration of rights at existed prepetition. If e Faillas position is correct, ere would be no discharge of eir personal liability on e note associated wi e mortgage on e property. Even e court in Lair recognized at 3 A debtor may have to deliver property to e trustee under 11 U.S.C. 542(a). Such a delivery was not required in is case since e trustee abandoned e property under 11 U.S.C. 554(c). 4 Dewsnup v. Timm, 908 F.2d 588, 590 (10 Cir. 1990); Kane v. Nat l Union Fire Ins. Co., 535 F.3d 380 (5 Cir. 2008). See DE 13 at 23. 7
8 Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 8 of 10 after an abandonment by e trustee, ere is a lingering federal effect of discharge. Lair, 235 B.R. at 8, 6 and 46. So, are e statements from e courts cited by e Faillas to be taken literally, or must ey be read in e context of e cases which laid e foundation for eir pronouncements? This Court concludes e latter course is e correct one. Dewsnup, cited by e Faillas, relied upon e United States Supreme Court case of Brown v. O Keefe, 300 U.S. 598, 602 (1937) and e Nin Circuit Court of Appeals case of Wallace v. Lawrence Warehouse Co., 338 F.2d 392, 394 n.1 (9 Cir. 1964) in support of its broad statement regarding reversion to prepetition legal status. Dewsnup, 908 F.2d at 590. In Brown, when discussing e legal effect of an abandonment of assets by e trustee because ey were burdensome, e Supreme Court stated e title stands as if no assignment had been made, quoting from e earlier Supreme Court case of Sessions v. Romadka, 145 U.S. 29, 52 (1892)(emphasis added). In Wallace, e Nin Circuit stated [t]he ordinary rule is at, when a trustee abandons property of e bankrupt, title reverts to e bankrupt, nunc pro tunc, so at he is treated as having owned it continuously, citing bo Brown and Sessions (emphasis added). The court in Wallace went on to state [t]his is a fiction, and a fiction is but a convenient device, invented by courts to aid em in achieving a just result. It is not a categorical imperative, to be blindly followed to a result at is unjust. Kane, also relied upon by e Faillas, cited to Lair and 5 Collier on Bankruptcy [3] (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. Sommers eds., 15 ed. Rev. 2008). Kane, 535 F.3d at Collier merely cites to Dewsnup wiout any analysis. 5 The oer cases cited by e Faillas also support e conclusion at e reversion to prepetition status after abandonment proposition only relates to title to e property. See Gasprom, Inc. v. Fateh, 500 B.R. 598, (B.A.P. 9 Cir. 2013)( These statements reflect 8
9 Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 9 of 10 Upon a review of all of e cases cited by e Faillas in support of e restore to status quo proposition, e Court concludes at e underlying principle which is being espoused is at title to e abandoned property reverts back to e debtor to e same extent as it was held prior to e filing of e bankruptcy. Any suggestion in e cases at an abandonment by e trustee has a broader or more expansive legal effect on e relationship of e parties relative to e secured property is an overstatement wi no auoritative support. Hence, is Court concludes at an abandonment of secured property by e trustee to e debtor pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 554(c) only restores title to e debtor as if no bankruptcy petition had been filed. The abandonment does not affect oer aspects of e debtor s rights and responsibilities relative to e property at flow from e bankruptcy. Just as a discharge of personal liability to pay e obligation on e note survives after abandonment of e property by e trustee, so too does e legal effect of e debtor s decision to surrender e property pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 521(c)(2). This legal effect includes a relinquishment of e debtor s interest in e secured property as against e secured creditor, as well as a prohibition against interfering or impeding e secured e unremarkable proposition at, after an abandonment of estate property, e debtor holds e same legal interest in e abandoned property at it held at e time of its bankruptcy filing. ); In re Cruseturner, 8 B.R. 581, 591 (Bankr. D. Utah 1981)( The state of e law under e former Act appears to be at title to all property abandoned by e trustee stood as if no bankruptcy had been filed, citing Brown, Sessions and Wallace); In re Jandous Elec. Constr. Corp., 96 B.R. 462, 466 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)( This legislative reference and attendant definition are in keeping wi cases under e former law which hold at title and right to property reverts to its pre-bankruptcy status. Thus, whoever had e possessory right to e property at e filing of e bankruptcy again reacquires at right. ); In re CVA General Contractors, Inc., 267 B.R. 773, 780 n.7 (Bankr. W. D. Tex. 2001)( When a trustee abandons a cause of action, e cause of action is revested in e debtor as if it was never property of e estate, citing Dewsnup); Huren v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company, No. 2:07 CV 1255, 2008 WL , at *3(W.D. La. Oct. 22, 2008)(e trustee formally abandoned e claim pursuant to 554, and e interest in e claim reverted to e debtors as ough e bankruptcy had never been filed, citing Lair, In re CVA General Contractors, Inc., and Collier on Bankruptcy). 9
10 Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2015 Page 10 of 10 creditor s efforts to take possession of e property by available legal means. Plummer, 513 B.R. at To hold oerwise would permit e debtor to use e fiction... invented by courts to... be blindly followed to a result at is unjust. Wallace, 338 F.2d at 394 n.1. For e foregoing reasons, e Court finds at e bankruptcy court did not err in granting e amended motion to compel debtors to surrender real property pursuant to e statement of intention. IV. Conclusion Based upon e foregoing, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED at e decision on appeal of e bankruptcy court is AFFIRMED. This case is CLOSED, and all pending motions are DENIED as moot. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, rd Florida, is 23 day of November, KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10
Case 9:12-cv KAM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2013 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:12-cv-80792-KAM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2013 Page 1 of 7 JOHN PINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 12-80792-Civ-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN vs. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 5:11-cv JPB Document 12 Filed 04/23/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 163
Case 5:11-cv-00160-JPB Document 12 Filed 04/23/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 163 MARTIN P. SHEEHAN, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellant, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
More informationCase 4:16-cv JLH Document 40 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Case 4:16-cv-00935-JLH Document 40 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION IN RE: SQUIRE COURT PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SQUIRE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN RE: GARY M. IULIANO and REBECCA L. CROWE-IULIANO V. JOHN BROOK, TRUSTEE, Appellant, v. Case No. 8:11-cv-193-T-JSM GARY M. IULIANO
More informationDebtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEBTOR S MOTION TO APPROVE DEBTOR S SALE OF REAL PROPERTY UNDER SECTION 363 AND FOR OTHER RELIEF
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: EDWARD MEJIA, FOR PUBLICATION Case No. 16-11019 (MG) Chapter 7 Debtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEBTOR S MOTION TO APPROVE
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT
FILED U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit BAP Appeal No. 12-100 Docket No. 33 Filed: 07/22/2013 Page: July 1 of 22, 6 2013 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL
More informationCase: HRT Doc#:79 Filed:08/13/14 Entered:08/13/14 15:27:11 Page1 of 11
Case:11-39881-HRT Doc#:79 Filed:08/13/14 Entered:08/13/14 15:27:11 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATED BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Howard R. Tallman In re: LISA KAY BRUMFIEL, Debtor.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Mulhern et al v. Grigsby Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JOHN MULHERN, et al., Appellants, v. Case No. RWT 13-cv-2376 NANCY SPENCER GRIGSBY, Chapter 13 Trustee
More informationCase 2:15-cv MJP Document 10 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-0-mjp Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 PENNY D. GOUDELOCK, CASE NO. C--MJP v. Appellant, ORDER AFFIRMING BANKRUPTCY COURT
More informationCase 9:14-cv KAM Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2015 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:14-cv-81184-KAM Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2015 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 14-81184-CIV-MARRA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Skytop Meadow Community : Association, Inc. : : v. : No. 276 C.D. 2017 : Submitted: June 16, 2017 Christopher Paige and Michele : Anna Paige, : Appellants : BEFORE:
More informationCase 0:06-cv KAM Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:06-cv-60557-KAM Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 06-60557-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON LIZ ORDONEZ-DAWES, v. Plaintiff,
More informationGebhart v. Gaughan: Clarifying the Homestead Exemption as to Post-Petition Appreciation
Golden Gate University Law Review Volume 41 Issue 3 Ninth Circuit Survey Article 6 May 2011 Gebhart v. Gaughan: Clarifying the Homestead Exemption as to Post-Petition Appreciation Natalie R. Barker Follow
More information2015 YEAR IN REVIEW INTERESTING BAP CASES
2015 YEAR IN REVIEW INTERESTING BAP CASES STUDENT LOANS In re Christ()If 2015 WL 1396630 Unpublished but important The Debtor applied for admission to Meridian in 2002. Meridian is a for profit entity.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Lane, et al v. Capital Acquisitions, et al Doc. 217 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 04-60602-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON RICHARD LANE and FAITH LANE, v. Plaintiffs, CAPITAL ACQUISITIONS
More informationCase 0:06-cv JIC Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:06-cv-61337-JIC Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2013 Page 1 of 10 KEITH TAYLOR, v. Plaintiff, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Wenegieme v. Macco et al Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK N o 17-CV-1218 (JFB) CELESTINE WENEGIEME, Appellant, VERSUS MICHAEL J. MACCO, ET AL., MEMORANDUM AND ORDER January
More informationCase CMG Doc 194 Filed 09/30/16 Entered 09/30/16 16:05:35 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8
Document Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY United States Courthouse 402 East State Street, Room 255 Trenton, New Jersey 08608 Hon. Christine M. Gravelle 609-858-9370 United
More informationCase 3:16-cv GTS Document 14 Filed 09/11/17 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:16-cv-01372-GTS Document 14 Filed 09/11/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KEVIN J. KOHOUT; and SUSAN R. KOHOUT, v. Appellants, 3:16-CV-1372 (GTS) NATIONSTAR
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
THE HONORABLE KAREN A. OVERSTREET Chapter UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 In Re: COURT REPORTING INSTITUTE, INC., Debtor. BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF COURT REPORTING
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Case: 14-1341 Document: 31 Filed: 04/11/2014 Page: 1 APRIL DEBOER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT -vs- 6 Cir #14-1341 ED Mi #12-civ-10285 RICHARD SNYDER,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 15-1967 Bayer CropScience, LLC; Bayer CropScience, Inc; Bayer AG; Bayer CropScience, NV; Bayer Aventis Cropscience USA Holding, Now known as Starlink
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2007 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-28-2007 In Re: Rocco Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-2438 Follow this and additional
More informationRBK Doc#: 248 Filed: 01/20/11 Entered: 01/20/11 15:19:23 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA O R D E R
10-60593-RBK Doc#: 248 Filed: 01/20/11 Entered: 01/20/11 15:19:23 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA In re BLACK BULL GOLF CLUB, INC, Case No. 10-60537-7 Debtor. In
More informationCase 1:17-cv DPG Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:17-cv-20713-DPG Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 17-cv-20713-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES RICHARD KURZBAN, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 0:08-cv KAM Document 221 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:08-cv-61199-KAM Document 221 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 6 RANDY BORCHARDT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, et al., plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCase tmb7 Doc 16 Filed 12/05/13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ) ) ) ) ) ) MOTION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Michael Fuller, Oregon Bar No. 09357 Trial Attorney for Ms. Hunt OlsenDaines, PC PO Box 2316 Portland, Oregon 97208 Michael@UnderdogLawBlog.com Mobile 503-201-4570 Fax 503-362-1375
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: June 16, 2015 Decided: August 4, 2015) Docket No.
14 3381 bk City of Concord, N.H. v. Northern New England Telephone Operations LLC (In re Northern New England Telephone Operations LLC) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 18-20026 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 5, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL
More informationCase 9:16-cv KAM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2017 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:16-cv-81973-KAM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2017 Page 1 of 13 MIGUEL RIOS AND SHIRLEY H. RIOS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-81973-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN
More informationCase 3:17-cv PGS Document 16 Filed 03/22/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 308
In Re: FRANK and DAWN HACKLER, Civil Action No.: 17-cv-6589 (PGS) FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 3:17-cv-06589-PGS Document 16 Filed 03/22/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 308 municipal liens. Id. The tax
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
In re: GEORGE ARMANDO CASTRO, formerly doing business as Boxing To The Bone, formerly doing business as Castro By Design Real Estate & Inv., also known as George Castro Soria, and MARIA CONCEPCION CASTRO,
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued March 19, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00813-CV STEVEN STEPTOE AND PATRICIA CARBALLO, Appellants V. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee On Appeal
More informationCase 8:12-cv GLS Document 19 Filed 05/15/13 Page 1 of 12. Appellee. MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER. I. Introduction
Case 8:12-cv-01636-GLS Document 19 Filed 05/15/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF CLINTON et al., v. Appellants, 8:12-cv-1636 (GLS) WAREHOUSE AT VAN BUREN
More informationIn Re: Stergios Messina
2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-6-2012 In Re: Stergios Messina Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 11-1426 Follow this and additional
More informationFile Name: 12b0002n.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) )
By order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8013-1(b). See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8010-1(c). File
More informationCase jrs Doc 273 Filed 03/23/17 Entered 03/23/17 11:18:05 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10
Document Page 1 of 10 IT IS ORDERED as set forth below: Date: March 23, 2017 James R. Sacca U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
More informationPRESENT: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ., and Russell and Lacy, S.JJ.
PRESENT: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ., and Russell and Lacy, S.JJ. ROBIN M. KOCHER OPINION BY v. Record No. 100399 SENIOR JUSTICE CHARLES S. RUSSELL June 9, 2011 RICHARD EUGENE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 23, 2014 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 23, 2014 Session WILLIAM D. STALKER, ET AL. v. DAVID R. NUTTER, ET AL. Appeal from e Chancery Court for Sumner County No. 2008C1 Tom E. Gray, Chancellor
More informationCase Doc 83 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 13. IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Baltimore Division)
Entered: February 7th, 2018 Signed: February 7th, 2018 Case 16-13521 Doc 83 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Baltimore Division) In re: )
More informationCase tnw Doc 41 Filed 03/21/16 Entered 03/22/16 09:16:29 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8 JEREMEY C. ROY CASE NO
Document Page 1 of 8 IN RE: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LEXINGTON DIVISION JEREMEY C. ROY CASE NO. 15-51217 DEBTOR HIJ INDUSTRIES, INC., formerly known as JOMCO, INC. PLAINTIFF
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0062p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN RE: SUSAN G. BROWN, Debtor. SUSAN G. BROWN,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 7, 2006 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 7, 2006 Session CARLTON J. DITTO v. DELAWARE SAVINGS BANK, ET AL. Appeal from e Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 03-1234 Howell N. Peoples,
More informationCase: 3:14-cv slc Document #: 77 Filed: 04/27/15 Page 1 of 8
Case: 3:14-cv-00734-slc Document #: 77 Filed: 04/27/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN WOODMAN S FOOD MARKET, INC., v. Plaintiff, THE CLOROX COMPANY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-40864 Document: 00513409468 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT In the matter of: EDWARD MANDEL Debtor United States Court of Appeals Fifth
More informationBAP Appeal No Docket No. 31 Filed: 07/24/2015 Page: 2 of 12 1 this appeal have been squarely resolved in the Trierweiler decisions from both thi
FILED U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit BAP Appeal No. 15-4 Docket No. 31 Filed: 07/24/2015 Page: 1 of 12 July 24, 2015 UNPUBLISHED Blaine F. Bates Clerk UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KERMAS A. PATTERSON CASE NO DEBTOR CHAPTER 13
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KERMAS A. PATTERSON CASE NO. 18-10443 DEBTOR CHAPTER 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEBTOR'S OBJECTION TO CLAIM OF FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE
More informationCase 0:14-cv WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:14-cv-60975-WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 WENDY GRAVE and JOSEPH GRAVE, vs. Plaintiffs, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationCase 5:07-cv F Document 7 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 5:07-cv-00262-F Document 7 Filed 09/26/2007 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:07-CV-00262-F KIDDCO, INC., ) Appellant, ) )
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DOUGLAS BURKE, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant/ Garnishor-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED August 5, 2010 v No. 290590 Wayne Circuit Court UNITED AMERICAN ACQUISITIONS AND LC No. 04-433025-CZ
More informationCase 6:17-cv FPG Document 12 Filed 07/18/18 Page 1 of 12
Case 6:17-cv-06808-FPG Document 12 Filed 07/18/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSEPH M. HAMPTON & BRENDA S. HAMPTON, v. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Case # 17-CV-6808-FPG
More informationV. JURISDICTION AND AUTHORITY OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT
V. JURISDICTION AND AUTHORITY OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT As originally enacted, the Code gave bankruptcy courts pervasive jurisdiction, despite the fact that bankruptcy judges do not enjoy the protections
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 13-50020 Document: 00512466811 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/10/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Summary Calendar In the Matter of: BRADLEY L. CROFT Debtor ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationIn Re: Victor Mondelli
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-6-2014 In Re: Victor Mondelli Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket 13-2171 Follow this and additional
More informationRosa Aliberti, J.D. Candidate 2016
Whether Undistributed Chapter 13 Payment Plan Funds Held By a Chapter 13 Trustee Should Be Distributed to the Debtor or the Debtor s Creditors TEXT HERE 2015 Volume VII No. 1 Whether Undistributed Chapter
More informationCase Doc 88 Filed 03/23/15 Entered 03/23/15 17:17:34 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7
Document Page 1 of 7 In re: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DIVISION, DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Paul R. Sagendorph, II Debtor Chapter 13 Case No. 14-41675-MSH BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF THE NATIONAL
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
2018 BNH 009 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In re: Darlene Marie Vertullo, Debtor Bk. No. 18-10552-BAH Chapter 13 Darlene Marie Vertullo Pro Se Leonard G. Deming, II, Esq. Attorney
More informationUS Bank NA v. Maury Rosenberg
2018 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-31-2018 US Bank NA v. Maury Rosenberg Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2018
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CONNIE CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED December 13, 2016 v No. 328019 Kalamazoo Circuit Court EARL BURHANS, D.O., and WESTSIDE LC No. 2012-000610-NO FAMILY MEDICAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 18-20026 Document: 00514629339 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/05/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Summary Calendar DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO: 8:12-cv-251-T-26TGW O R D E R
Case 8:12-cv-00251-RAL-TGW Document 26 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID 203 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION LUCIANA DE OLIVEIRA, on behalf of herself and ose similarly
More informationCase acs Doc 52 Filed 08/20/15 Entered 08/20/15 16:11:30 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Case 14-34747-acs Doc 52 Filed 08/20/15 Entered 08/20/15 16:11:30 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY In re: ) ) CLIFFORD J. AUSMUS ) CASE NO. 14-34747 ) CHAPTER 7
More informationlaw and fact are reviewed de novo. In Re Cox. 493 F.3d n. 9 (11th Cir.
Orcutt v. Crawford Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION BRUCE ORCUTT, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 8:10-CV-1925-T-17 JIMMIE M. CRAWFORD, Appellee. ORDER This cause is
More informationCase: Document: 76-1 Page: 1 08/02/ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, 2011
Case: - Document: - Page: 0/0/0 0 0 0 0 --bk In re: Association of Graphic Communications, Inc. Super Nova 0 LLC v. Ian J. Gazes UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 0 (Argued:
More information_._..._------_._ _.._... _..._..._}(
Case 1:12-cv-02626-KBF Document 20 Filed 11/05/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------.---------------_..._.-..---------------_.}( SDM' DOCUMENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 4:15-cv-00009-RLY-WGH Document 13 Filed 08/10/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 383 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION LEE GROUP HOLDING COMPANY, LLC.; LESTER L.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 2:16-cv-02814-JFB Document 9 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 223 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK N o 16-CV-2814 (JFB) RAYMOND A. TOWNSEND, Appellant, VERSUS GERALYN
More informationPUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff - Appellant, No
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit February 22, 2008 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT In re: CHRISTOPHER LEE HABERMAN, also known
More informationOPINION DENYING RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION In re: DENNIS LOHMEIER, Case No. 00-22251 Chapter 7 Hon. Walter Shapero Debtor. DENNIS A. LOHMEIER, Plaintiff, vs.
More informationBANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL
By order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8024-1(b). See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8014-1(c). File
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before TYMKOVICH, BALDOCK, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit December 3, 2007 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT In re: LOG FURNITURE, INC., CARI ALLEN, Debtor.
More information522(f): Forward to the Past or Back to the Future? Recent jurisprudence has provided a division of the authority in the state
522(f): Forward to the Past or Back to the Future? Recent jurisprudence has provided a division of the authority in the state of Florida regarding the avoidance of judgment liens against exempt property.
More informationPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO 28 U.S.C. 157 AND 158 IN RESPONSE TO STERN v. MARSHALL, 131 S. Ct (2011)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO 28 U.S.C. 157 AND 158 IN RESPONSE TO STERN v. MARSHALL, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011) Approved by the National Bankruptcy Conference 2012 Annual Meeting November 9, 2012 Proposed Amendments
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. Nos ; Non-Argument Calendar
Case: 14-10826 Date Filed: 09/11/2014 Page: 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nos. 14-10826; 14-11149 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-02197-JDW, Bkcy
More informationCase 9:13-cv KAM Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/17/2014 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:13-cv-80725-KAM Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/17/2014 Page 1 of 6 CURTIS J. JACKSON, III, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 13-80725-CIV-MARRA vs. Plaintiff,
More informationBankruptcy Circuit Update Featuring cases from September 2018
Bankruptcy Circuit Update Featuring cases from September 2018 We will be convening our next section-wide conference call on Friday, November 30th, at 3:30 E.S.T./12:30 P.S.T. to present and discuss notable
More informationMEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER. This contested matter is before the Court for decision upon motion of Clarkson University
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: JAMES P. ENGELS, Chapter 13 Case No.: 12-60503 Debtor. APPEARANCES: BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC Attorney for Movant One Lincoln Center
More informationFile Name: 15b0001n.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) )
By order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8013-1(b. See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8010-1(c. File Name:
More informationThe Proposed National Chapter 13 Plan And Related Proposed Amendments to Bankruptcy Rules
The Proposed National Chapter 13 Plan And Related Proposed Amendments to Bankruptcy Rules Presented by: Hon. William Houston Brown United States Bankruptcy Judge, Retired williamhoustonbr@comcast.net and
More informationCase Document 533 Filed in TXSB on 09/26/18 Page 1 of 11
Case 18-33836 Document 533 Filed in TXSB on 09/26/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: Chapter 11 NEIGHBORS LEGACY HOLDINGS,
More informationCase DMW Doc 47 Filed 07/10/18 Entered 07/10/18 15:55:44 Page 1 of 9
Case 18-00272-5-DMW Doc 47 Filed 07/10/18 Entered 07/10/18 15:55:44 Page 1 of 9 SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 10 day of July, 2018. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NEW BERN
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: * SHANE THOMAS * fdba TASTY CDS, fdba TASTY TRENDS, * CHAPTER 13 fdba SPUN OUT * * CASE NO:. 1-06-bk-00493MDF * MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationCase 1:08-cv SJM Document 26 Filed 04/07/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:08-cv-00323-SJM Document 26 Filed 04/07/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS; ALLEGHENY DEFENSE
More information2017 PA Super 256. Appeal from the Order Entered August 3, 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Civil Division at No(s): GD
2017 PA Super 256 ENTERPRISE BANK Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. FRAZIER FAMILY L.P., A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Appellee No. 1171 WDA 2016 Appeal from the Order Entered August
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. LINDA HORTON, Case No Chapter 13 Hon. Marci B.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: LINDA HORTON, Case No. 03-61750 Chapter 13 Debtor. Hon. Marci B. McIvor / OPINION REGARDING CREDITOR S MOTION FOR RELIEF
More informationUSDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv TLS document 12 filed 06/26/15 page 1 of 13
USDC IN/ND case 1:14-cv-00098-TLS document 12 filed 06/26/15 page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION ARLINGTON CAPITAL LLC, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) CAUSE
More informationCase 9:16-cv KAM Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/20/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:16-cv-81924-KAM Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/20/2017 Page 1 of 8 STEVEN R. GRANT, Plaintiff, vs. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
More informationANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ABOUT ARBITRATION IN BANKRUPTCY. by Corali Lopez-Castro 1 Mindy Y. Kubs
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ABOUT ARBITRATION IN BANKRUPTCY by Corali Lopez-Castro 1 Mindy Y. Kubs 1. Does a Bankruptcy Court have discretion to deny enforcement of a contractual arbitration provision? Answer:
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 17-3762 In re: ANN MILLER, Debtor GARY F. SEITZ, Trustee v. Ann Miller, Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
2016 BNH 008 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In re: Bk. No. 15-11359-BAH Chapter 7 Licka Hosch, Debtor Mark Cornell, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff v. Adv. No. 15-1091-BAH Envoy
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 25, 2011 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 25, 2011 Session BANCORPSOUTH BANK v. 51 CONCRETE, LLC & THOMPSON MACHINERY COMMERCE CORPORATION Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC., et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 12-43166 (Jointly Administered) Judge Thomas
More informationUnited States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:05-cv-00363-MHS-DDB Document 16 Filed 12/05/05 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 441 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION RA INVESTMENT I, LLC, ET AL. vs. Case No. 4:05CV363
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Main Document Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: * VIOLET EMILY KANOFF * CHAPTER 13 a/k/a VIOLET SOUDERS * a/k/a VIOLET S ON WALNUT * a/k/a
More informationCase 1:15-cv KBJ Document 16 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00875-KBJ Document 16 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATASHA DALLEY, Plaintiff, v. No. 15 cv-0875 (KBJ MITCHELL RUBENSTEIN & ASSOCIATES,
More informationof the Magistrate Judge within 14 days after being served with a copy of the Report and ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Case 1:13-cv-00052-LY Document 32 Filed 07/15/13 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 2013 JUL 15 P11 14: [ AUSTIN DIVISION JERRENE L'AMOREAUX AND CLARKE F.
More informationCase LSS Doc 322 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 14-10791-LSS Doc 322 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: DYNAVOX, INC., et al., 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 14-10791 (LSS) Debtors. (Jointly
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE. In Re: ) ) Chapter 13 Hyegu Cho and ) Case No.: Jen Chinkyung Cho, ) ) Debtors.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE In Re: ) ) Chapter 13 Hyegu Cho and ) Case No.: 15-20638 Jen Chinkyung Cho, ) ) Debtors. ) ) AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION 1 I. INTRODUCTION. This matter
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
McPhail v. LYFT, INC. Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION JENNIFER MCPHAIL A-14-CA-829-LY LYFT, INC. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ANDREA BRICHANT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 3:12-cv-0285 ) Judge Aleta A. Trauger v. ) ) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and MORTGAGE
More information