IN THE COURT OF APPEAL TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CA NO. S OF 2015 CA NO. S OF 2015
|
|
- Charity Daniel
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CA NO. S OF 2015 CA NO. S OF 2015 RETURNING OFFICERS, THE CONSTITUENCIES OF: TUNAPUNA, ST. JOSEPH, LA HORQUETTA/TALPARO, SAN FERNANDO WEST, MORUGA/TABLELAND, TOCO/SANGRE GRANDE THE APPELLANTS and WAYNE MUNROE, VASANT BHARATH, BONIFACIO MAHABIR, SHEVANAND GOPEESINGH, CLIFTON DECOTEAU, BRENT SANCHO THE RESPONDENTS MAXI CUFFIE, GLENDA JENNINGS-SMITH, TERRANCE DEYALSINGH, ESMOND FORDE, FARIS AL RAWI, DR. LOVELL FRANCIS APPELLANTS THE and BONIFACIO MAHABIR, BRENT SANCHO, VASANT BHARATH, WAYNE MUNROE, SHEVANAND GOPEESINGH, CLIFTON DECOTEAU THE RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT DELIVERED IN THE WEST DIVISION, PORT OF SPAIN ON THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015 Page 1 of 8
2 PANEL: CHIEF JUSTICE ARCHIE JUSTICE OF APPEAL MENDONCA JUSTICE OF APPEAL JAMADAR APPEARANCES: MR. R. MARTINEAU SC, MRS. D. PEAKE SC, MR. R. HEFFES-DOON, MS. K. WILSON, instructed by MS. A. BISSESSAR appeared on behalf of THE APPELLANTS AND SECOND RESPONDENTS (RETURNING OFFICERS) MR. T. D. STRAKER QC, MR. A. RAMLOGAN SC leads MR. G. RAMDEEN, MR. W. STURGE, MRS. J. LUTCHMEDIAL and MR. K. SAMLAL, instructed by MR. V. DEBIDEEN appeared on behalf of THE RESPONDENTS MR. D. MENDES SC, MR. J. JEREMY SC, leads MR. M. QUAMINA, MR. K. GARCIA, MR. R. NANGA, MS. V. GOPAUL, MS. C. JULES, instructed by MS. E. ARAUJO appeared on behalf of THE APPELLANTS/FIRST RESPONDENTS Page 2 of 8
3 The Court of Appeal, Trinidad and Tobago Civil Appeals: S229, S230, S231, S232, S233, S234, S235, S236, S237, S238, S239,S240 of EXTEMPORE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Release date, Monday, 30th November, What I would like to do this morning, is to explain in summary fashion my position in these matters and why I do not agree entirely with the Hon. Chief Justice on the disposition of these appeals, and I am grateful for this opportunity to do so. Justice Mendonca and I agree (albeit for partly different reasons) that none of the appeals should be allowed, and the leave to proceed with the respective representation petitions granted by the High Court upheld. I therefore do not propose in this summary to cover the ground already traversed by Justice Mendonca, who has explained in some detail by reference to the actual applications and arguments, the reasons for dismissing these appeals. It appears to me that the main reasons for the divisions in our opinions are based on and driven by fundamental ideological and jurisprudential differences. These are related to the issue of the core purposes and functions of parliamentary elections in the Republic of TT, on the purpose and function of representation petitions, as the only means by which parliamentary elections can be voided, as well as on the purpose and function of the leave requirements to present these six petitions. It appears to me that it is these differences that have shaped our approaches to these appeals and the choices we have made in relation to our interpretation, application and selection of the law and legal principles that we have considered relevant. In my opinion the purpose and function of parliamentary elections include both process and outcome imperatives in the context of the constitutional democracy that is TT. Thus Page 3 of 8
4 while I readily agree that the objective of unequivocally determining the will of the people in their choice of a candidate for a constituency (the outcome), is a fundamental purpose of parliamentary elections, I do not accept that it is either the only or primary purpose and function of elections. In my opinion, equally if not even more important than pure outcome, is the process by which elections are conducted, and in particular, that that process be seen and known by the citizenry to be free and fair and in conformity with the core constitutional values of equality, freedom and fair participation, values that underpin the constitutional vision of democracy in TT (see in this regard the Preamble to the 1976 Republican Constitution, which by section 11 of the Interpretation Act is to be read as a part of the Constitution and as an aid to understanding and interpreting it). In law it is said that Justice must not only be done, it must also be seen to be done. This idea points to the importance and value of a fair process as compared to simply a just outcome in the conduct of litigation. The same is equally true in TT for the conduct of parliamentary elections. Thus the appellants' contention that no degree of non-compliance with the Constitution, law or rules governing parliamentary elections can be the basis for invalidating an election, unless it is shown that the result (per se) of the election would be different, is in my opinion anathema to the core constitutional values that underpin the democracy intended in TT. Such a position elevates outcome as absolutely determinative of legitimacy, and discards process as of no or little consequence. In my opinion therein lies a path to un-democratic rule - the antithesis of legitimate representative democratic governance. Indeed, such a position can fundamentally undermine the rule of law, which is another core constitutional value in TT, and is in my opinion both unreasonable and unjustifiable in the context of representation petitions that seek to invalidate parliamentary elections. True representative democracies are built on at least one fundamental premise, the consent of the governed. In my opinion, the legitimacy of this consent is at least as dependent on the process of conducting elections as it is on the outcome. Indeed, where Page 4 of 8
5 there is public trust and confidence in the process, outcomes are more readily accepted, even when they go against one's wishes or hopes. Relative peace and stability are the usual consequences of this acceptance. It is in this context of the consent of the governed, freely and fairly polled, that elections in democracies have true legitimacy. It is this idea of consent, freely given and fairly obtained, that underpins the notion that: "The will of the People shall be the basis of the authority (legitimacy) of government" - Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Thus the constitutional premise on which I judge the purpose and function of parliamentary elections and as a consequence the purpose and function of representation petitions, as well as the requirements for leave to present such petitions, is both outcome and process based. It is this jurisprudential, or if you prefer ideological, constitutional position that drives my interpretation and application of the law in these matters. I explicitly state my position, because no interpretative exercise is free of elements of jurisprudential bias. Ultimately, it is these core constitutional value judgments that inform and influence our interpretation and application of the law, as is indeed mandated by section 2 of the Constitution: "This Constitution is the supreme law of TT, and any other law that is inconsistent with this Constitution is void to the extent of the inconsistency." That is to say, there is a juridical imperative to read and interpret all laws, when permissible, through the lenses of relevant and applicable constitutional values. This then gives the core underpinning of and explains essentially my analysis and outcomes in these appeals. For the purpose of this summary, my positions on the following discrete issues in so far as they relate to the applications for leave are as follows: 1) Whether there is a subsisting and operative common law basis upon which parliamentary elections in TT can be invalidated. In my opinion it is not frivolous and vexatious to argue that there is such a basis. I am provisionally of the view that there is such a basis. Page 5 of 8
6 2) Whether sub-section 35(3) of the ROPA incorporates both qualitative and quantitative evaluative imperatives in the analysis of whether it appears that the acts constituting breaches of official duty did not materially affect the result of the election. In my opinion it is not frivolous and vexatious to argue that the sub-section does incorporate both qualitative and quantitative aspects. I am provisionally of the view that the sub-section does incorporate both qualitative and quantitative aspects. 3) What is the role and function of the court considering the ex parte applications for leave to present representation petitions and whether the legal threshold and test for leave to issue a representative petition, is whether the application for leave is frivolous and vexatious, or is it the judicial review test enunciated by Lord Bingham in Sharma v. Brown-Antione, that a realistic prospect of success must be shown. In my opinion it is the former. All that must be shown is that the application is not frivolous and vexatious, that it is not hopeless, or put positively, that it has some chance of success. The role and function of the court at this stage of the process is simply to weed out hopeless cases - per de la Bastide C.J. and Nelson J.A. in Chaitan v. Peters, a decision of the final court on election petitions (section 52 (4) 1976 Constitution), which in my opinion is highly persuasive on this point. 4) Whether the sufficiency requirements for stating material facts in the Statement in support of the applications for leave were met in these applications (rule 6a of the Election Proceedings Rules 2001). In my opinion they were met, both with respect to the challenges under the common law and under the statute (ROPA). 5) Whether the sufficiency/cogency requirements for verifying the material facts in the Statement in support of the applications for leave were met in these applications (rule 6b of the Election Proceedings Rules 2001). In my opinion they were met, both with respect to the challenges under the common law and under the statute (ROPA). I would therefore dismiss the appeals and direct that the following primary question, whether the returned candidates have been validly elected as members of the House of Page 6 of 8
7 Representatives (section Constitution & section 106 ROPA), shall be determined in the Representation Petitions presented by the six petitioners (sections 106 & 107 ROPA), by the court asking and answering, inter alia, the following questions (within the parameters of the grounds and material facts relied on): (i) Whether in light of the Constitution, the ROPA, the ROPA Election Rules and any other laws and by reason of any acts by a Returning Officer or any other person there have been breaches of official duty in connection with the election or otherwise or of the Election Rules; (ii) Whether in light of any such acts and breaches it appears to the court having cognizance of the primary question aforesaid, that the said acts and breaches did not materially affect the result of the election (sub-section 35 (3) ROPA), or otherwise constitute a statutory basis for declaring the election void (for example, sections 149 (4); 146; 108 (8)); and (iii) Whether in light of the Constitution, the ROPA, the ROPA Election Rules and any other laws and by reason of any acts or omissions by any Election Officer, or any other person, or in light of any other relevant and material occurrences, the election held was so irregular and/or outwith the Constitution, the ROPA, the ROPA Election Rules and any other laws, that it did not truly constitute a democratic election as the same is understood and known in TT. Thus I agree with Mendonca JA in his analysis and reliance on both qualitative and quantitative aspects of sub-section 35 (3) ROPA as the justifiable legal framework for granting leave. Clearly, I have gone further in my own analysis in so far as I am willing to accept that the common law principle of a 'non-election' is also a basis upon which leave can be granted in these petitions. All of these matters will be expanded upon in due course when the full judgment in these matters is handed down. Page 7 of 8
8 I should add in conclusion, that even though there is a quasi-inquisitorial jurisdiction conferred on the court at the hearing of these petitions, the leave granted in these petitions is not a permission to embark on an unfettered roving commission of inquiry. The only legitimate parameters are those circumscribed by the grounds and material facts contained in the petitions in light of the relief sought and the relevant law. Peter Jamadar JA 30th November, 2015 Page 8 of 8
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 52(2) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2015-03128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 52(2) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Civil Appeal 304/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND APPELLANT MARCIA AYERS-CAESAR RESPONDENT PANEL: Mendonça, CJ (Ag) Jamadar, JA
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. Between THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO. And
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. S 304 of 2017 Between THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Appellant And MARCIA AYERS-CAESAR Respondent PANEL: A. MENDONÇA,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND SUMAIR MOHAN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No: 45 of 2008 BETWEEN THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION APPELLANTS AND SUMAIR MOHAN RESPONDENT PANEL: A. Mendonça,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN SGT. TERRENCE ROY AG. CPL DAMANY BENTICK PC KENE BALDWIN AND HER WORSHIP NALINI SINGH CORONER ST. GEORGE WEST COUNTY
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal P294/2013 Claim No. CV 2012-01211 BETWEEN SGT. TERRENCE ROY AG. CPL DAMANY BENTICK PC KENE BALDWIN Appellants AND HER WORSHIP NALINI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SOCA FOR PEACE FOUNDATION AND THE REGISTRAR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2013-01845 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SOCA FOR PEACE FOUNDATION APPLICANT AND THE REGISTRAR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE RESPONDENT Before the Honourable
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Civil Appeal No. S 244 of 2015 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY SS (by her kin and Next Friend KAREN MOHAMMED), FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER UNDER
More informationJUDGMENT. From the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. before. Lord Brown Lord Wilson Sir David Keene
[2011] UKPC 31 Privy Council Appeal No 0101 of 2010 JUDGMENT Electra Daniel Administrator for the estate of George Daniel (deceased) (Appellant) v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (Respondent)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT CHAP 90:03 AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Claim No. CV 2012-00892 Civil Appeal No: 72 of 2012 IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT CHAP 90:03 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INTERPRETATION OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2015 03123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO IN THE MATTER OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT, CHAP. 2:01 REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND
More informationPUBLIC STATEMENT OF THE JUDICIARY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), CHAPTER 22:02
PUBLIC STATEMENT OF THE JUDICIARY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), CHAPTER 22:02 In Compliance with sections 7, 8 and 9 of the Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA ), Chapter 22:02
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY- SAN FERNANDO AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY- SAN FERNANDO Claim No: CV2016-01485 VIJAY SINGH Applicant/Intended Claimant AND THE OMBUDSMAN Respondent/Intended Defendant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between NIXON CALLENDER JILLIAN BEDEAU-CALLENDER AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. 2013-01906 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between NIXON CALLENDER JILLIAN BEDEAU-CALLENDER Claimants AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 203 of 2011 BETWEEN THE POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION Appellant AND ABZAL MOHAMMED Respondent PANEL: N. Bereaux, J.A. G. Smith, J.A.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY AND FISHERMEN AND FRIENDS OF THE SEA BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 199 of 2008 BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT AND FISHERMEN AND FRIENDS OF THE SEA RESPONDENT Civil Appeal No.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN DEVANT MAHARAJ AND NATIONAL ENERGY CORPORATION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 115 of 2011 Claim No. CV2010-00242 BETWEEN DEVANT MAHARAJ APPELLANT AND NATIONAL ENERGY CORPORATION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN REAL TIME SYSTEMS LIMITED APPELLANT/CLAIMANT AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Civil Appeal No. 238 of 2011 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN REAL TIME SYSTEMS LIMITED APPELLANT/CLAIMANT AND RENRAW INVESTMENTS LIMITED, CCAM AND COMPANY LIMITED, AND AUSTIN
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN [1] GENERAL AVIATION SERVICES LTD. [2] SILVANUS ERNEST.
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SAINT LUCIA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL HCVAP 2012/006 BETWEEN [1] GENERAL AVIATION SERVICES LTD. [2] SILVANUS ERNEST and Appellants [1] THE DIRECTOR
More informationREPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI ELECTION PETITION NO. 1 OF 2017
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI ELECTION PETITION NO. 1 OF 2017 (Coram: Maraga: CJ & President, Mwilu; DCJ & V-P, Ibrahim, Ojwang, Wanjala, Njoki & Lenaola, SCJJ) BETWEEN H.E
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO SELWIN RILEY. And. WINSTON CUFFIE (Trading as Forsis) ***********************
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-04837 SELWIN RILEY And WINSTON CUFFIE (Trading as Forsis) CLAIMANT DEFENDANT *********************** Before Master Patricia Sobion Awai Appearances:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN RUBY THOMPSON-BODDIE LENORE HARRIS AND THE CABINET OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE C.V. 2011/2027 BETWEEN RUBY THOMPSON-BODDIE LENORE HARRIS APPLICANTS AND THE CABINET OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO RESPONDENTS BEFORE THE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL PORT OF SPAIN IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT CHAP 7:08. And
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CA NO. P050 2018 CLAIM NO. C 2017. 03452 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL PORT OF SPAIN IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT CHAP 7:08 And IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2010 01117 BETWEEN CRISTAL ROBERTS First Claimant ISAIAH JABARI EMMANUEL ROBERTS (by his next of kin and next friend Ronald Roberts)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN AND MYRTLE DOROTHY PARTAP MYRTLE DORTOTHY PARTAP
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL PORT OF SPAIN Civ. App. No. S051 of 2017 CV No. 2013-04212 BETWEEN CRISTOP LIMITED Appellant/Plaintiff AND MYRTLE DOROTHY PARTAP First Respondent/Defendant
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL MARTINUS FRANCOIS. and
SAINT LUCIA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2003 BETWEEN: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL MARTINUS FRANCOIS and Applicant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent Before: The Hon. Mr. Adrian D. Saunders The Hon. Mr. Brian Alleyne,
More informationREPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO Claim No. CV2015-03939 BETWEEN RAVENDRA KEMAT BRIDGLAL Claimant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN 1) RAIN FOREST RESORTS LIMITED. THE NATIONAL GAS COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Respondent
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Civil Appeal No. P186 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. P190 of 2016 CV No. 04374 of 2015 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN 1) RAIN FOREST RESORTS LIMITED 2) SUPER INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PRIMNATH GEELAL AND DHAMRAJIE GEELAL AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2015-02943 BETWEEN PRIMNATH GEELAL AND DHAMRAJIE GEELAL Claimants AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before
More informationJUDGMENT. Attorney General (Appellant) v Dumas (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)
Hilary Term [2017] UKPC 12 Privy Council Appeal No 0069 of 2015 JUDGMENT Attorney General (Appellant) v Dumas (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago) From the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and
More informationREPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY SAN FERNANDO NO. S 1950 OF 2003 BETWEEN CHRISTOPHER LA BORDE Plaintiff AND NATIONAL LOTTERIES CONTROL BOARD Defendant Before: The
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE San Fernando BETWEEN. KALAWATIE GODEK also referred to as Jenny Godek
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2017-00494 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE San Fernando BETWEEN KALAWATIE GODEK also referred to as Jenny Godek CLAIMANT AND THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER (HEAD OF THE TRINIDAD
More informationJUDGMENT. Republic Bank Limited (Appellant) v Lochan and another (Respondents) (Trinidad and Tobago)
Trinity Term [2015] UKPC 26 Privy Council Appeal No 0087 of 2014 JUDGMENT Republic Bank Limited (Appellant) v Lochan and another (Respondents) (Trinidad and Tobago) From the Court of Appeal of the Republic
More informationIn the High Court of Justice. Between. Devant Maharaj. And. The Ministry of Local Government
Trinidad and Tobago In the High Court of Justice Claim No. CV 2008-04746 Between Devant Maharaj Applicant And The Ministry of Local Government Respondent Before The Honourable Mr. Justice Devindra Rampersad
More informationJUDGMENT. From the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. before. Lady Hale Lord Reed Lord Kerr Lord Wilson Lord Sumption
[2018] UKPC 23 Privy Council Appeal No 0063 of 2018 JUDGMENT The Honourable Chief Justice of Trinidad and Tobago Mr Justice Ivor Archie O.R.T.T. (Appellant) v The Law Association of Trinidad and Tobago
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Sub-Registry, San Fernando. VSN INVESTMENTS LIMITED Claimant AND. SEASONS LIMITED (In Receivership)
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Sub-Registry, San Fernando CV. NO. 2006-01349 BETWEEN VSN INVESTMENTS LIMITED Claimant AND SEASONS LIMITED (In Receivership) Defendant BEFORE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN IN THE MATTER OF THE PARTITION ORDINANCE CHAPTER 27 NO. 14 AND. RAWTI also called RAWTI ROOPNARINE KUMAR ROOPNARINE AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No: 52 of 2012 BETWEEN IN THE MATTER OF THE PARTITION ORDINANCE CHAPTER 27 NO. 14 AND In The matter of All and Singular that certain
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. And. HER WORSHIP SENIOR MAGISTRATE MRS. INDRA RAMOO-HAYNES Defendant
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2012-00707 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between ALVIN And AHYEW Claimant HER WORSHIP SENIOR MAGISTRATE MRS. INDRA RAMOO-HAYNES Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 113 of 2009 BETWEEN ANTONIO WEBSTER APPELLANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO RESPONDENT Civil Appeal No. 120 of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN CHARLES MITCHELL APPLICANT AND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION CHIEF FIRE OFFICER PUBLIC SERVICE EXAMINATION BOARD AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-02391 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN CHARLES MITCHELL APPLICANT AND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION CHIEF FIRE OFFICER PUBLIC SERVICE EXAMINATION BOARD AND TRINIDAD
More informationBETWEEN AND HER WORSHIP SENIOR MAGISTRATE EJENNY ESPINET THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS. Before the Honourable Mme Justice Jacqueline Wilson
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2017-01642 BETWEEN NORTHERN CONSTRUCTION LIMITED MARITIME GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AMRITH MAHARAJ ISHWAR GALBARANSINGH SADIQ BAKSH BRIAN KUEI TUNG STEVE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO RPL (1991) LIMITED TEXACO (TRINIDAD) LIMITED JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO H.C.A. NO. S-807 OF 2003 BETWEEN RPL (1991) LIMITED PLAINTIFF AND TEXACO (TRINIDAD) LIMITED DEFENDANT Before the
More informationIN THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Appellate Jurisdiction ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BARBADOS
[2011] CCJ 14 (AJ) IN THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Appellate Jurisdiction ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BARBADOS CCJ Application No AL 7 of 2011 BB Civil Appeal No 25 of 2007 BETWEEN BARBADOS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND SOUTHERN SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY LIMITED DECISION
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2009-04568 BETWEEN LYDIA SUMINTRA BICKRAM Claimant AND SOUTHERN SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY LIMITED Defendant Before: Master Margaret Y Mohammed
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-03158 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND REPUBLIC BANK LIMITED PC KAREN RAMSEY #13191 PC KERN PHILLIPS #16295 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-04598 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN THE OWNERS OF THE VESSEL ALAM SELARAS Claimant AND THE OWNERS OF THE VESSEL DIAMOND CAY Defendant Before The Hon. Madam
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN LENNOX OFFSHORE SERVICES LIMITED AND DECISION
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO: CV2010-00536 BETWEEN LENNOX OFFSHORE SERVICES LIMITED AND CLAIMANT HALIBURTON TRINIDAD LIMITED DEFENDANT DECISION Before the Honourable
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2009-02708 BETWEEN SYDNEY ORR APPLICANT AND THE POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice A. des Vignes
More informationJUDGMENT. Zakrzewski (Respondent) v The Regional Court in Lodz, Poland (Appellant)
Hilary Term [2013] UKSC 2 On appeal from: [2012] EWHC 173 JUDGMENT Zakrzewski (Respondent) v The Regional Court in Lodz, Poland (Appellant) before Lord Neuberger, President Lord Kerr Lord Clarke Lord Wilson
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN CHANDRAGUPTA MAHARAJ MAIANTEE MAHARAJ AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. Cv.2011-00647 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN CHANDRAGUPTA MAHARAJ MAIANTEE MAHARAJ AND Claimants NIGEL STELLA JOSEPH GENTLE Defendants BEFORE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DONALDSON-HONEYWELL
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV: 2013-04300 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN LAKHPATIYA BARRAN (also called DOWLATIAH BARRAN) CLAIMANT AND BALMATI BARRAN RAJINDRA BARRAN MAHENDRA BARRAN FIRST DEFENDANT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2009-01581 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION WITHOUT NOTICE FOR LEAVE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN RBC FINANCIAL (CARIBBEAN) LIMITED AND THE REGISTRATION, RECOGNITION AND CERTIFICATION BOARD
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2017-00827 BETWEEN RBC FINANCIAL (CARIBBEAN) LIMITED Claimant AND THE REGISTRATION, RECOGNITION AND CERTIFICATION BOARD Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. San Fernando BETWEEN MCLEOD RICHARDSON AND AVRIL GEORGE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE San Fernando Claim No. CV2017-01755 BETWEEN MCLEOD RICHARDSON Claimant AND AVRIL GEORGE Defendant Before Her Honour Madam Justice Eleanor J.
More informationSESSION VOLUME 1
THE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES OFFICIAL REPORT IN THE THIRD SESSION OF THE ELEVENTH PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO WHICH OPENED ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2015 SESSION 2017 2018 VOLUME 1 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
More informationBefore the Honourable Mr Justice Myers (Acting) Dr Charles Seepersad and Mr Mark Seepersad instructed by Mr Gerald Ramdeen for the Applicant
TRINIDAD TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HCA No. 2472 of 2003 IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 4 5 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD TOBAGO ACT No 4 OF 1976 IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 87 OF THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN KENNY GOPAUL AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. Leads Ms Allison Douglas Instructed by Ms. Kerry Ann Oliverie
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2012-04089 BETWEEN KENNY GOPAUL CLAIMANT AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 31 (1) (A) OF THE GRENADA CONSTITUTION ORDER 1973 AND
GRENADA CIVIL APPEAL NO.34 OF 2006 BETWEEN: BETWEEN: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 31 (1) (A) OF THE GRENADA CONSTITUTION ORDER 1973 AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 37(1)(b) OF THE GRENADA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL SUBMISSIONS
BARBADOS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO.: 10 OF 2006 BETWEEN: SYSTEM SALES LTD. APPELLANT AND ARLETTA O. BROWNE-OXLEY (Executrix of the Estate of Glenfield DaCosta Suttle,
More informationIN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN MAY JOSEPHINE HUMPHREY AND
IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 198 of 2011 BETWEEN MAY JOSEPHINE HUMPHREY Appellant AND TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO NATIONAL PETROLEUM MARKETING COMPANY LIMITED
More informationIN THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION. Russian Federation Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union
IN THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION Russian Federation Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union WT/DS475 Third Party Submission by Norway Geneva 10 March
More informationJUDGMENT. Seepersad (a minor) (Appellant) v Ayers-Caesar and others (Respondents)
Hilary Term [2019] UKPC 7 Privy Council Appeal No 0097 of 2016 JUDGMENT Seepersad (a minor) (Appellant) v Ayers-Caesar and others (Respondents) From the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SANJEEV RAMGARIB AND HER WORSHIP MAGISTRATE REHANNA HOSEIN
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2015 00266 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SANJEEV RAMGARIB Applicant AND HER WORSHIP MAGISTRATE REHANNA HOSEIN Respondent Before the Honourable Mr Justice Ronnie
More informationTREVINO v. TEXAS. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas
562 OCTOBER TERM, 1991 TREVINO v. TEXAS on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas No. 91 6751. Decided April 6, 1992 Before jury selection began in petitioner Trevino
More informationIN THE MATTER OF CLICO INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED. (In Compulsory Liquidation) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, CHAP 81:01
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2010-01442 IN THE MATTER OF CLICO INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED (In Compulsory Liquidation) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, CHAP 81:01
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN MOHANLAL RAMCHARAN AND CARLYLE AMBROSE SERRANO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-02646 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN MOHANLAL RAMCHARAN AND Claimant CARLYLE AMBROSE SERRANO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE JUDITH JONES Appearances:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER RAJKUMAR
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO HCA: No.S-1452 of 2003 HCA: 2544 of 2003 (POS) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN CURTIS GABRIEL Plaintiff AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE INTEGRITY IN PUBLIC LIFE ACT, 2000 AS AMENDED AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO H.C.A. 1735 of 2005 1002 OF 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE INTEGRITY IN PUBLIC LIFE ACT, 2000 AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARAGRAPHS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2015-03190 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY RAJAEE ALI (A PERSON INCARCERATED AT THE PORT OF SPAIN PRISON) FOR AN ADMINISTARTIVE
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Between: Date: 20120215 Docket: CA039639 Ingrid Andrea Franzke And Appellant (Petitioner) Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal Respondent (Defendant) Before: The Honourable
More informationSENATE OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO ORDER PAPER
1. PRAYERS SENATE OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO ORDER PAPER 2. OATH OR AFFIRMATION ELEVENTH SITTING, FOURTH SESSION (2018/2019) ELEVENTH PARLIAMENT MONDAY JANUARY 21, 2019 AT 1:30 P.M. 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS
More informationLegal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 52, No. 50, 18th April, 2013
Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 52, No. 50, 18th April, 2013 No. 9 of 2013 Third Session Tenth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BILL
More informationIt is most unusual and judicially improper for a Court to publish its judgment in the public media
Re: Systems Sales It is most unusual and judicially improper for a Court to publish its judgment in the public media before it has been delivered and communicated to the litigants and their legal representatives.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND DR. WAYNE KUBLALSINGH AND OTHERS
IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. P018 of 2014 BETWEEN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND APPELLANT DR. WAYNE KUBLALSINGH AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN RYAN RENO MAHABIR AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2015-03229 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN RYAN RENO MAHABIR AND Claimant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before The Hon. Madam Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION. CCP (Co.) No. 8 of 2008 COMPANY PETITION NO. 215 OF 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION CCP (Co.) No. 8 of 2008 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 215 OF 2005 Reserved on: 26-11-2010 Date of pronouncement : 18-01-2011 M/s Sanjay Cold Storage..Petitioner
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY LIBERTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD (In Liquidation) AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 91 of 2015 Claim No. CV 04515 of 2009 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY LIBERTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD (In Liquidation) AND ORDER
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. and. BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS ELECTRICITY CORPORATION Respondent
TERRITORY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL HCVAP 2008/010 BETWEEN: BRYON SMITH Appellant and BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS ELECTRICITY CORPORATION Respondent Before: The Hon. Mr. Hugh A. Rawlins The
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry, Tobago) BETWEEN SETH QUASHIE. And
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry, Tobago) Claim No. CV2013-4226 BETWEEN SETH QUASHIE And Claimant THE TOBAGO HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY Defendant Before the Honourable Mr.
More informationLegal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 51, No. 46, 15th March, 2012
Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 51, No. 46, 15th March, 2012 No. 3 of 2012 Second Session Tenth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BILL
More informationTransparency in Election Administration
A Guide Transparency in Election Administration This Guide has been developed to provide information on implementing transparency principles in the electoral process. It is intended to serve as a basis
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2012 CLAIM NO. 109 of 2012 YOLANDA SCHAKRON MOSES SULPH 1 st CLAIMANT/APPLICANT 2 nd CLAIMANT/APPLICANT AND NOREEN FAIRWEATHER 1 st DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT (Returning
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. BETWEEN MYRTLE CREVELLE, (ADMINISTRATRIX AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF CLYDE CREVELLE (deceased)) Appellant AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIV. APP. NO. 45 OF 2007 HCA NO. 117 OF 2003 BETWEEN MYRTLE CREVELLE, (ADMINISTRATRIX AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF CLYDE CREVELLE (deceased)) Appellant AND THE ATTORNEY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA110/05. William Young P, Arnold and Ellen France JJ
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA110/05 BETWEEN AND PRIME COMMERCIAL LIMITED Appellant WOOL BOARD DISESTABLISHMENT COMPANY LIMITED Respondent Hearing: 25 July 2006 Court: Counsel: William Young
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO APPELLANT/DEFENDANT AND MIGUEL REGIS CLAIMANT/RESPONDENT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 79 of 2011 CV No 2010-05237 BETWEEN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO APPELLANT/DEFENDANT AND MIGUEL REGIS CLAIMANT/RESPONDENT
More informationTHE POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT, Arrangement of Sections PART II THE POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY
THE POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT, 2006 Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3 Act inconsistent with Constitution 4. Interpretation PART II THE POLICE COMPLAINTS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 IN THE MATTER OF: ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA &
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN FRANCIS VINCENT AND
IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-01217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN FRANCIS VINCENT AND Claimant Before: Master Alexander MERLENE VINCENT First Defendant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD
More informationGRENADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) AND
'. GRENADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. GDAHCV2010/0551 BETWEEN: KERTBRIZAN AND Applicant DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2013-004233 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT CHAPTER 35:01 AND
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2010
CLAIM NO. 846 OF 2010 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2010 BETWEEN: 1. BELIZEANS FOR JUSTICE 1 st Claimant 2. CITIZENS ORGANISED FOR LIBERTY THROUGH ACTION (COLA) 2 nd Claimant AND THE PRIME MINISTER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE JUDITH JONES
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2014-02620 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TERRENCE AND CHARLES Claimant CHIEF OF THE DEFENCE STAFF First Defendant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Second
More informationIn the High Court of Justice. Shane Williams Dyer. And. Jermain Roachford, Marlon Dorwich
In the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago In the High Court of Justice CV2008-04742 Between Shane Williams Dyer And Plaintiff Jermain Roachford, Marlon Dorwich Defendants Before The Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV NO. 2014-02019 IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT CHAPTER 7:08 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between DOREEN ALEXANDER-DURITY. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. 2013-01303 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between DOREEN ALEXANDER-DURITY Applicant/Intended Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Respondent/Intended
More informationArticle 11. Initiation and Subsequent Investigation
1 ARTICLE 11... 1 1.1 Text of Article 11... 1 1.2 General... 3 1.2.1 Anti-Dumping Agreement... 3 1.3 Article 11.2... 3 1.3.1 "caused by subsidized imports"... 3 1.3.2 "sufficient evidence"... 4 1.3.3 Relationship
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Civil Appeal No. P-186 of 2016 Claim No. CV 04374 of 2015 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. P- 190 of 2016 Claim No. CV 04374 of 2015 BETWEEN RAIN FOREST RESORTS LIMITED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2018-00680 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO MAKE A CLAIM FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO PART 56.3 OF THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
More informationJUDGMENT. Gopichand Ganga and others (Appellant) v Commissioner of Police/Police Service Commission (Respondent)
[2011] UKPC 28 Privy Council Appeal No 0046 of 2010 JUDGMENT Gopichand Ganga and others (Appellant) v Commissioner of Police/Police Service Commission (Respondent) From the Court of Appeal of the Republic
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D RENEE FRANCIS MARIE FRANCIS. and KENNETH JAMES LUCIA JAMES. 1994: November 30; December 7.
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D. 1994 Suit No. 586 of 1994 BETWEEN: RENEE FRANCIS MARIE FRANCIS and Petitioners KENNETH JAMES LUCIA JAMES Respondents APPEARANCES: Mr. C. Landers for
More informationTHE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE Disciplinary Procedure Rules
THE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE Disciplinary Procedure Rules Part 1 General Authority and Purpose 1.1 These Rules are made pursuant to The Chartered Insurance Institute Disciplinary Regulations 2015.
More information