IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN CHARLES MITCHELL APPLICANT AND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION CHIEF FIRE OFFICER PUBLIC SERVICE EXAMINATION BOARD AND
|
|
- Ernest Simpson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN CHARLES MITCHELL APPLICANT AND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION CHIEF FIRE OFFICER PUBLIC SERVICE EXAMINATION BOARD AND TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO FIRE SERVICE EXAMINATION BOARD DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances: For the Claimant: For the Defendant: Mr. Seepersad and Ms. Bhagwandeen Mr. Singh, led by Mr. Martineau, Instructed by Ms. Chance Date of Delivery: 20 th September, 2011 JUDGMENT Page 1 of 11
2 BACKGROUND [1] The Applicant, a fire fighter, sat the Fire Service Practical Promotional Examinations in November 2006 ( the 2006 promotional examinations ) which was carried out by the Trinidad and Tobago Fire Service Examination Board (TTFSEB). The Applicant was informed by letter, dated the 2 nd July, 2007, that he was unsuccessful in the promotional examinations and the results were subsequently published by the Fire Services Examinations Board (FSEB) via Station Notice No. 13/2007 and dated the 10 th July, [2] Thereafter, on the 20 th July, 2007, the Applicant requested a review of his scores by a letter to the Chief Fire Officer (CFO), who notified him that his request should be sent to the Secretary of the Examination Board, Fire Service School Headquarters instead. The Applicant was informed by letter, dated the 11 th September, 2007, from the Secretary of the Examination Board that his review was unsuccessful. [3] On the 19 th September, 2007, the Applicant sent a letter of complaint to the Chairman of the Public Service Commission (PSC) questioning the involvement of two junior officers, Darron Dasent and Nigel Lampkin, in the 2006 promotional examinations process in light of the fact that they were also vying for the same promotion as the Applicant. In his complaint, the Applicant alleged that the results of the 2006 promotional examinations were vitiated by bias as a result of the involvement of these two officers. Page 2 of 11
3 [4] Subsequently, on the 16 th November, 2007, the Applicant made a request under the FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, CHAP. 22:02 (FOIA) to the CFO requesting access to his results. [5] By Station Notice No. 3/2008, dated the 31 st January, 2008, the PSC Examination Board adopted the results of the 2006 promotional examinations and rescinded Station Notice No. 13 of As a result of this a Pre-action Letter, dated the 12 th March, 2008, was sent to the PSC by the Applicant challenging the adoption of the said results as it was vitiated by bias and therefore illegal. A FOIA application was also sent to the PSC requesting information and a reminder letter was issued on the 18 th April, [6] Some officers who passed the 2006 promotional examinations were appointed to act in the post of Fire Sub-Officer by virtue of the Fire Service Order No. 8/2008 dated the 14 th April, The Applicant challenged these appointments alleging they were made in violation of REGULATION 154 and 155 of the PUBLIC SERVICE REGULATIONS these officers were junior to the Applicant, he was never notified that appointments were made and had no opportunity to make representations. [7] Based on the foregoing, the Applicant issued a fresh application under the FOIA by letter dated the 28 th May, 2008 and by a letter dated the 16 th June, 2008, the Applicant was supplied with the requested information. Page 3 of 11
4 [8] The Applicant filed an application for judicial review on the 1 st July, However, this application was refused by the Honourable Mr. Justice Delzin on the 24 th October, This decision was appealed on the 29 th October, The appeal was heard by the Honourable Justice of Appeal Jamadar who overturned the decision of the Honourable Mr. Justice Delzin on the 10 th November, 2008 and granted the Applicant leave to seek judicial review but limited the relief sought to the following: i. An order of certiorari to quash the decision of the Public Service Examination Board (PSEB) to adopt the result of the 2006 practical promotional examinations results which were conducted by the FSEB published in Station Notice No. 3/2008 and dated the 31 st January, 2008; and, ii. A declaration that the PSEB cannot lawfully adopt the results of the 2006 practical examinations results because it was tainted and/or vitiated by bias; iii. A declaration that the acting appointment of the fire fighters who were successful in the 2006 practical promotional examinations by the CFO and/or the PSC on the basis that such officers who were now qualified for promotional to the rank of Fire-Sub officer is illegal; iv. A declaration that the aforesaid appointments were made in violation of the procedure stipulated in REGULATION 155 of the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (AMENDMENT) (NO. 2) REGULATIONS 1998; and, v. A declaration that the Applicant has been treated unfairly contrary to the principles of natural justice. Page 4 of 11
5 [9] By a Fixed Date Claim Form filed on the 17 th November, 2008, the Applicant sought the following reliefs: i. A declaration that the Fire-sub officer practical examinations held in October/December 2006 by the Trinidad and Tobago Fire Services Examinations Board were unfair and illegal and the results of the same are null and void and of no legal effect; ii. iii. An order of certiorari to quash the decision of the Public Service Examination Board (PSEB) to adopt the result of the 2006 practical promotional examinations results which were conducted by the Fire Services Examinations Board (FSEB) published in Station Notice No. 3/2008 and dated the 31 st January, 2008; and, A declaration that the PSEB cannot lawfully adopt the results of the 2006 practical examinations results because it was tainted and/or vitiated by bias. [10] The relief sought at sub-paragraph (i) in the Applicant s Claim Form was not part of the relief allowed by Jamadar JA and will not be considered. In addition, the Claimant did not claim the reliefs relating to the acting appointments, which were allowed by Jamadar JA although in the Applicant s submissions filed on the 16 th September, 2009 the reliefs were addressed. Since these reliefs do not form part of the Applicant s Fixed Date Claim they will not be considered. Page 5 of 11
6 ISSUES [11] The issues for consideration by the Court are as follows: i. Whether the Public Service Commission was entitled to adopt the results of the Fire Service Promotional Examinations Board; and, ii. Whether the results of the 2006 promotional examinations were tainted or vitiated by bias. ANALYSIS Whether the Public Service Commission was entitled to adopt the results of the Fire Service Promotional Examinations Board [12] The Applicant is challenging the decision of the PSEB to adopt the results of the 2006 promotional examinations on the following grounds: i. The results were a nullity in law and therefore could not be adopted; ii. iii. The PSEB was under a duty to set and mark the examination papers for the promotion of fire officers; The adoption was an unlawful attempt to negate the decision of the Privy Council in Cooper and Balbosa v Director of Personnel Administration and Police Service Commission, PCA No. 47/2005, and to allow the results which were nullified in the consequence of that decision, to operate as if those results were lawful; Page 6 of 11
7 iv. The PSC had no jurisdiction or authority to adopt the unlawful results; v. The candidates at the 2006 promotional examinations were not lawfully examined and so would be deemed as having taken no examination with the consequence that they had no results; vi. The adoption of the results of the 2006 promotional examinations by the PSC did not remove the taint of unconstitutionality from the results of that examination; and, vii. The procedure followed by the PSC to determine who passed the 2006 promotional examinations was not supported by the PUBLIC SERVICE REGULATIONS or by any act of Parliament and was therefore unlawful. [13] The procedure as to how the PSEB adopted the results of examinations conducted by the FSEB was explained by Dawn Harding in her affidavit of 20 th April, 2009 filed on behalf of the Defendant, where she stated: The 2006 practical examinations were conducted by the [FSEB]... established under the Fire Services Act. However, on July 6, 2006 the Privy Council delivered its advice in Cooper v DPA [supra]. According to this advice, promotional examinations set and marked by an Examinations Board appointed by the [PSC] was to have ultimate control of the settling and marking of the examination paper by the Board. The Commission having received the advice of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and having the same considered the same, chose to use the [FSEB] and its Page 7 of 11
8 results for the 2006 promotional examinations... and adopted those results assuming ultimate responsibility and control thereof... [14] In Cooper v DPA (supra), the appellants were two police officers who took promotional examinations which were conducted by a Cabinet-appointed Board. The constitutionality of this Board and the conduct of the promotional examinations were called into question. The Privy Council held that the sole responsibility for the conduct of promotional examinations in the Police Service rested with the Police Service Commission and the manner in which this commission chose to discharge its duties are to be determined by the commission alone. The Committee also added that it was within the purview of the Police Service Commission or the Public Service Commission to utilize the services of the Board appointed by the Cabinet with the underlying principle that no interference by the Executive is exercised. This was highlighted at paragraphs of the decision, as follows: The appointment of a Public Service Examination Board by the cabinet, for the commissions to use if they chose to do so is not in itself objectionable. The advantages of using such a centralized body are obvious, and in practice the commissions may well be content to continue to make use of them... It is for the Commission to exercise its own initiative in this matter, free from influence or interference by the executive. [15] Further, in the local decision of Imtiaz Mohammed v The Public Service Commission, The Public Service Examinations Board and The Trinidad and Tobago Fire Service Examinations Board, C.V , Dean- Page 8 of 11
9 Armorer J., ruling on similar arguments raised by the Applicant herein, stated that it was within the powers of the PSC to make use of an examination board appointed by the Minister of National Security and opined at p. 9:... the appointment of an examination board by the Minister of National Security is not objectionable per se. The illegality would arise where the Commission permits the examination board to be used as an instrument of interference by the executive. [16] The Court finds that it was within the power of the PSC to use the FSEB established under the FIRE SERVICE ACT, CHAP. 35:50 and that there was no evidence to suggest that the PSC was influenced by the Executive in its decision to adopt the results of the 2006 promotional examinations. As such the results of the promotional examinations were lawfully adopted by the PSC having exercised their own initiative, free from influences or interference by the Executive. Whether the results of the Examination were tainted or vitiated by bias [17] The Applicant contended that fire officers Darron Dasent and Nigel Lampkin were not entitled to be participants in the conduct of the 2006 promotional examinations; they were not members of the examinations board and the appointment of these two officers to participate in the assessment was an abuse of power as they were in contest with the other examinees including the Claimant. Therefore, the results of the promotional examination were tainted by bias. Page 9 of 11
10 [18] Officer Dasent and Lampkin testified that they did not in any way supervise the 2006 promotional examinations instead they assisted in the evaluation of candidates in the First Aid component of the 2006 promotional examinations and were supervised by Mr. Horace Leach, an examiner for the practical examination to the rank of Fire-Sub officer. For this component of the promotional examination the Applicant was successful, therefore a claim for bias cannot succeed. Further, under cross examination, the Applicant admitted that although he knew of the Officers involvement in the promotional examinations since 2006, he did not make a complaint until September 2007 some nine (9) months after. It is trite law that an allegation of bias must be made at the earliest opportunity. [19] When questioned under cross examination as to why his review letter of 20 th July, 2007 did not complain about the involvement of the officers in the promotional examinations, the Applicant responded that he knew he had passed that component so he just wanted a review. It was noted in Amjad v Steadman-Bryne (2007) 1 WLR 2484, that the courts do not look favourably upon complaints of vitiating bias where the applicant took his chance on the outcome and upon finding it disadvantageous sought to rely on it. Further in R v Sussex Justices ex parte McCarthy [1924] 1 K.B. 256, the court held that in circumstances where a conviction is to be quashed on the basis that a person acting in an advisory capacity was so related to the case as to be incapable of being partial, the conviction would not be quashed where it can be shown that the applicant was aware of this point but refrained from making it and upon the conviction being recorded thereafter sought to take the point. Page 10 of 11
11 [20] The Court therefore finds that there was no instance of bias and in any event the Applicant was aware of the officers involvement yet made no complaints, even when he saw them physically participating in the 2006 promotional examinations. As such he is deemed to have waived his right to thereafter complain based on the foregoing authorities. CONCLUSION [21] In the circumstances, the Claimant s claim is hereby dismissed. [22] On the issue of costs, a costs budget in the sum of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) had been set by Delzin J. (as he then was) on the 20 th March, However, there were only two issues to be determined by the Court. Although both were decided against the Claimant, the issues were fairly straight-forward and so I consider that the award of $150, against him to be oppressive. I therefore vary the Order by reducing same by 40% of the budgeted costs. In the circumstances, I order that the Claimant pay to the Defendants 60% of the budgeted costs, that is to say the sum of ninety thousand dollars ($90,000.00). JOAN CHARLES JUDGE Page 11 of 11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2009-02708 BETWEEN SYDNEY ORR APPLICANT AND THE POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice A. des Vignes
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SEUKERAN SINGH CLAIMANT AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-04470 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SEUKERAN SINGH CLAIMANT AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances: For
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV NO. 2010-04129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY OFFICER COMPLAINTS DIVISION TO INSTITUTE TWO DISCIPLINARY CHARGES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PHILLIP QUASHIE CLAIMANT AND THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER PROPOSED DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2009-02981 BETWEEN PHILLIP QUASHIE CLAIMANT AND THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER PROPOSED DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN KENNY GOPAUL AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. Leads Ms Allison Douglas Instructed by Ms. Kerry Ann Oliverie
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2012-04089 BETWEEN KENNY GOPAUL CLAIMANT AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND SUMAIR MOHAN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No: 45 of 2008 BETWEEN THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION APPELLANTS AND SUMAIR MOHAN RESPONDENT PANEL: A. Mendonça,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF And
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No.: CV2008-03639 IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 And IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY STEVE FERGUSON AND ISHWAR
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. 2011/4632 BETWEEN VERNON BARNETT CLAIMANT AND THE PROMOTION ADVISORY BOARD THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-03158 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND REPUBLIC BANK LIMITED PC KAREN RAMSEY #13191 PC KERN PHILLIPS #16295 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between ROBERTO CHARLES AND SHASTRI PRABHUDIAL
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-02739 Between ROBERTO CHARLES BHAMINI MATABADAL Claimants AND SHASTRI PRABHUDIAL Defendant Before The Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY- SAN FERNANDO AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY- SAN FERNANDO Claim No: CV2016-01485 VIJAY SINGH Applicant/Intended Claimant AND THE OMBUDSMAN Respondent/Intended Defendant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN BRIAN MOORE. And PUBLIC SERVICES CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2010-03257 BETWEEN BRIAN MOORE Claimant And PUBLIC SERVICES CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED Defendant Before the Honourable
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-04009 IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry-Tobago) BETWEEN AND. Ms. D. Christopher-Noel; Mr. R. Singh and Ms. G. Jackman instructed by Ms. F.
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV. No.2009-02631 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry-Tobago) BETWEEN VERNON AND REID Claimant HER WORSHIP THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE JOAN GILL Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between PAUL CHOTALAL. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. C.V. 2014-00155 Between PAUL CHOTALAL Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendants Before the Honourable
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between IAN GREEN AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-02467 Between IAN GREEN Claimant AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Defendant Before The Honourable Mr. Justice Frank Seepersad
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. #2009/1536 BETWEEN JEFFREY JOHN CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. 2010-2764 BETWEEN VISHNU CHATLANI 1 st Claimant PREETI CHATLANI 2 nd Claimant AND LA FORTRESSE COMPANY LIMITED 1 st Defendant D.T.L. PROPERTY DEVELOPERS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE JUDITH JONES
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2014-02620 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TERRENCE AND CHARLES Claimant CHIEF OF THE DEFENCE STAFF First Defendant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Second
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY FELIX JAMES FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. 2009-00439 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY FELIX JAMES FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER UNDER PART 56 OF THE CIVIL PROCEEDING RULES (1998)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. And. HER WORSHIP SENIOR MAGISTRATE MRS. INDRA RAMOO-HAYNES Defendant
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2012-00707 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between ALVIN And AHYEW Claimant HER WORSHIP SENIOR MAGISTRATE MRS. INDRA RAMOO-HAYNES Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More information----- Before the Honourable Madam Justice Michelle Arana J U D G M E N T
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2012 CLAIM NO. 842 OF 2010 ANDREA LORD CLAIMANT BETWEEN AND BELIZE ADVISORY COUNCIL DEFENDANT ----- Before the Honourable Madam Justice Michelle Arana Mr. Godfrey Smith,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND THE MINISTEROF LABOUR AND SMALL AND MICRO ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2006-03499 BETWEEN NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED APPLICANT AND THE MINISTEROF LABOUR AND SMALL AND MICRO ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE San Fernando BETWEEN. KALAWATIE GODEK also referred to as Jenny Godek
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2017-00494 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE San Fernando BETWEEN KALAWATIE GODEK also referred to as Jenny Godek CLAIMANT AND THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER (HEAD OF THE TRINIDAD
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2016-03157 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO PART 56.3 OF THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS RULES, 1998
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO P.C. SAMAD P.C. PIERRE THIRD DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO: CV2007-04365 BETWEEN NIGEL APARBALL ROHIT APARBALL NEIL APARBALL BATCHYA APARBALL CLAIMANTS And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2009-01937 BETWEEN PETER LEWIS CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice A. des
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2017-02046 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO RAPHAEL MOHAMMED AND THE COMMISSIONER OF PRISONS CLAIMANT FIRST DEFENDANT AND THE ATTORNEY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE RODNEY KHADAROO AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO: CV2011-04757 BETWEEN RODNEY KHADAROO AND CLAIMANT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Madam
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2017-01240 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN P.C. CURTIS APPLEWHITE AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. #2010-04494 BETWEEN P.C. CURTIS APPLEWHITE Claimant AND THE POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION BASDEO MULCHAN LLOYD CROSBY Defendants BEFORE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2009-01581 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION WITHOUT NOTICE FOR LEAVE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND PINKEY ALGOO ROOCHAN ALGOO RAJDAI ALGOO MEERA ALGOO AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2014-04731 BETWEEN KRISENDAYE BALGOBIN RAMPERSAD BALGOBIN Claimants AND PINKEY ALGOO ROOCHAN ALGOO RAJDAI ALGOO MEERA ALGOO First
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER REASONS
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. Cv. 2010-03934 BETWEEN RANDY CHARLES CLAIMANT AND MARION PHILLIPS DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES Ms.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN BALLIRAM ROOPNARINE. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2007-04461 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN BALLIRAM ROOPNARINE Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before Hon. Madame Justice C. Pemberton
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 203 of 2011 BETWEEN THE POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION Appellant AND ABZAL MOHAMMED Respondent PANEL: N. Bereaux, J.A. G. Smith, J.A.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND AND BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2009-01582 IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2013-004233 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT CHAPTER 35:01 AND
More informationJUDGMENT. Gopichand Ganga and others (Appellant) v Commissioner of Police/Police Service Commission (Respondent)
[2011] UKPC 28 Privy Council Appeal No 0046 of 2010 JUDGMENT Gopichand Ganga and others (Appellant) v Commissioner of Police/Police Service Commission (Respondent) From the Court of Appeal of the Republic
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL H.M.B HOLDINGS LIMITED. and
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2002 BETWEEN: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL H.M.B HOLDINGS LIMITED and Applicant/Respondent THE CABINET OF ANTIGUA and BARBUDA THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR ANTIGUA and BARBUDA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between NIXON CALLENDER JILLIAN BEDEAU-CALLENDER AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. 2013-01906 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between NIXON CALLENDER JILLIAN BEDEAU-CALLENDER Claimants AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 52(2) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2015-03128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 52(2) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN NIGEL MORALES CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-02133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN NIGEL MORALES CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. CV2018-00517 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION BY WINSTON SUTTON (THE SUBJECT OF A WARRANT OF ARREST) FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF REFSERV LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT CHAPTER 81:01 BETWEEN RAJANAND BHIMULL AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-03563 IN THE MATTER OF REFSERV LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT CHAPTER 81:01 BETWEEN RAJANAND BHIMULL Claimant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN RBC FINANCIAL (CARIBBEAN) LIMITED AND THE REGISTRATION, RECOGNITION AND CERTIFICATION BOARD
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2017-00827 BETWEEN RBC FINANCIAL (CARIBBEAN) LIMITED Claimant AND THE REGISTRATION, RECOGNITION AND CERTIFICATION BOARD Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND RULING. that he was a prison officer and that on the 17 th June, 2006, he reported for duty at the
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. 2010/2501 BETWEEN ELIAS ALEXANDER Claimant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN RUBY THOMPSON-BODDIE LENORE HARRIS AND THE CABINET OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE C.V. 2011/2027 BETWEEN RUBY THOMPSON-BODDIE LENORE HARRIS APPLICANTS AND THE CABINET OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO RESPONDENTS BEFORE THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between DOREEN ALEXANDER-DURITY. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. 2013-01303 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between DOREEN ALEXANDER-DURITY Applicant/Intended Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Respondent/Intended
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ROY THOMPSON LENNOX CLARKE AND. Before the Honourable Madam Justice Eleanor J. Donaldson-Honeywell
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No: CV2016-01437 BETWEEN ROY THOMPSON LENNOX CLARKE AND Claimants THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Defendant Before the Honourable Madam
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D.2009 BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CLAIMANT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D.2009 CLAIM NO: 317 OF 2009 BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CLAIMANT OF BELIZE APPLICANT AND 1.BELIZE TELEMEDIA LTD 2.BELIZE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT LTD. 1 ST DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO BETWEEN. CURTIS LACKHANSINGH Claimant AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2007-00687 BETWEEN CURTIS LACKHANSINGH Claimant AND P. C. HAREWOOD No. 3831 AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendants Before
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-01631 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN 1. EON HEWITT, LINUS PHILLIP, AINSLEY CAESAR and KELVIN PIERRE on behalf of themselves and on behalf of the ASSOCIATION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND ERROL BOODRAM TRADING AS PRICE RIGHT FURNITURE FACTORY
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2008-00409 DEVANAND NARINE BETWEEN Claimant AND ERROL BOODRAM TRADING AS PRICE RIGHT FURNITURE FACTORY Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. and. BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS ELECTRICITY CORPORATION Respondent
TERRITORY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL HCVAP 2008/010 BETWEEN: BRYON SMITH Appellant and BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS ELECTRICITY CORPORATION Respondent Before: The Hon. Mr. Hugh A. Rawlins The
More informationRuling On the Application to Strike Out the Re-Amended Claim Form and Statement of Case
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO In the High Court of Justice Claim No. CV2015-01091 CHANTAL RIGUAD Claimant AND ANTHONY LAMBERT Defendant Appearances: Claimant: Defendant: Alexia Romero instructed
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. And
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV No. 2011-00818 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between SURESH PATEL Claimant And THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Dated 25 th June, 2013 Before the Honourable Mr.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2011 Claim No: 386 ( NINA SOMKHISHVILI Claimant/Respondent ( BETWEEN ( AND ( ( NIGG, CHRISTINGER & PARTNER Defendants/Applicants (YOSIF SHALOLASHVILI ( PALOR COMPANY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-04598 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN THE OWNERS OF THE VESSEL ALAM SELARAS Claimant AND THE OWNERS OF THE VESSEL DIAMOND CAY Defendant Before The Hon. Madam
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN REPUBLIC BANK OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO. Alvin Pariaghsingh appearing Mr. Beharry instructed by Anand Beharrylal
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No: CV: 2009-02354 BETWEEN LUTCHMAN LOCHAN TARADATH LOCHAN AND ASHKARAN JAGPERSAD REPUBLIC BANK OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO First Claimant
More informationSamuel G. Momanyi v Attorney General & another [2012] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Petition 341 of 2011 SAMUEL G. MOMANYI..PETITIONER VERSUS THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL..... 1ST RESPONDENT SDV TRANSAMI KENYA LTD....2ND
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. 2007/02055 BETWEEN THE NATIONAL INSURANCE BOARD OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CLAIMANT AND THE NATIONAL INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. ANDERSON CORNEAL PC NO Appellant AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Mag. App. No. S 046 of 2017 BETWEEN ANDERSON CORNEAL PC NO. 15629 Appellant AND BALRAJ BHAGWANDEEN Respondent Panel: A. Yorke-Soo Hon, J.A. M.
More informationTHE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, Explanatory Note (These notes form no part of the Bill but are intended only to indicate its general purport)
THE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2014 Explanatory Note (These notes form no part of the Bill but are intended only to indicate its general purport) This Bill seeks to amend the Constitution to limit
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
THE REPULIC OF TINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2013-04254 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE In the matter of the Judicial Review Act Chapter 7:08 And In the matter of an application for judicial review of the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between STEPHEN LORENZO LODAI. And NAGICO INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED. (formerly known as GTM INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED)
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. C.V. 2014-01715 Between STEPHEN LORENZO LODAI Claimant And NAGICO INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (formerly known as GTM INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationJUDGMENT. Honourable Attorney General and another (Appellants) v Isaac (Respondent) (Antigua and Barbuda)
Easter Term [2018] UKPC 11 Privy Council Appeal No 0077 of 2016 JUDGMENT Honourable Attorney General and another (Appellants) v Isaac (Respondent) (Antigua and Barbuda) From the Court of Appeal of the
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY
STATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY In the Matter of Louis Joseph Re Junior CPA Certificate No. 07349 STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER Board File 2016-288 The Minnesota Board of Accountancy ("Board")
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 113 of 2009 BETWEEN ANTONIO WEBSTER APPELLANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO RESPONDENT Civil Appeal No. 120 of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT 2000 AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO H.C.A. NO. 1688 OF 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY THE NATIONAL LOTTERIES CONTROL BOARD FOR LEAVE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT CH.7:08 OF THE LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2010-02389 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT CH.7:08 OF THE LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND IN THE MATTER OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY RYAN RAMPERSAD FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW AND
IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. 2015-01543 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY RYAN RAMPERSAD FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW AND IN THE MATTER OF THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND. NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SELF HELP LIMITED Defendant JUDGMENT
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2012-00541 BETWEEN NICON & ASSOCIATES LIMITED Claimant AND NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SELF HELP LIMITED Defendant Before the Honourable Mr.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL WHITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED. and DCG PROPERTIES LIMITED. 2011: July 25, 26; September 26.
SAINT LUCIA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL HCVAP 2010/022 BETWEEN: WHITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED and DCG PROPERTIES LIMITED Before: The Hon. Mr. Hugh A. Rawlins The Hon. Mde. Ola Mae Edwards The Hon. Mde.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF POLLY GANGA DECEASED WHO DIED ON THE 6 TH JUNE, 2001 BETWEEN VERNON GANGA AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2009-00374 IN THE MATTER OF PART 71 OF THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS RULES 1998 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF POLLY GANGA DECEASED WHO DIED ON
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ROMATI MARAJ CLAIMANT AND ASHAN ALI TIMMY ASHMIR ALI DEFENDANTS
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-00686 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ROMATI MARAJ CLAIMANT AND ASHAN ALI TIMMY ASHMIR ALI DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between KERRON MURPHY. And TRAVIS CHARTER. Trading as AJ S AUTO SUPPLIES. Oral Judgment
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2013-02107 Between KERRON MURPHY Claimant And TRAVIS CHARTER Trading as AJ S AUTO SUPPLIES Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between CHRISTOPHER LUCKY AND. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2012-00224 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between CHRISTOPHER LUCKY AND Claimant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. By way of her Lawful Attorney Kenneth Antoine. And
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2013-04883 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between SYBIL CHIN SLICK By way of her Lawful Attorney Kenneth Antoine Claimant GAIL HICKS And Defendant Before the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE GARY LEGGE AND MAUREEN LEGGE. Between CHRIS RAMSAWACK AND WESTERN SHIP AND RIG SUPPLIES LIMITED
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV No. 2013-00249 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE GARY LEGGE 1 st Claimant AND MAUREEN LEGGE 2 nd Claimant Between CHRIS RAMSAWACK 1 st Defendant AND WESTERN SHIP AND RIG
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. (POLICE CONSTABLE) EDGAR BAIRD THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendants.
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE NO. CV 2009-00642 BETWEEN OTIS JOBE Claimant AND (POLICE CONSTABLE) EDGAR BAIRD THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendants BEFORE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN GORDON WINTER COMPANY LIMITED AND THE NATIONAL GAS COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. #2012/1981 BETWEEN GORDON WINTER COMPANY LIMITED CLAIMANT AND THE NATIONAL GAS COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. PAN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED Defendant
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-003645 BETWEEN MAHARAJ 2002 LIMITED Claimant AND PAN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED Defendant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between KERN COOKE. And POLICE CONSTABLE ADRIAN TOUSSAINT. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO.
IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. C.V. 2015-00531 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between KERN COOKE And POLICE CONSTABLE ADRIAN TOUSSAINT And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claimant
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA ACCRA-AD 2016
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA ACCRA-AD 2016 BETWEEN Suit No: 1. ABU RAMADAN H/NO. 27 4 TH ABEKA KWAME STREET ABEKA-LAPAZ, ACCRA 2. EVANS NIMAKO H/NO. AP174 APLAKU-ISRAEL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Civil Appeal 304/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND APPELLANT MARCIA AYERS-CAESAR RESPONDENT PANEL: Mendonça, CJ (Ag) Jamadar, JA
More informationIN THE MATTER OF CLICO INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED. (In Compulsory Liquidation) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, CHAP 81:01
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2010-01442 IN THE MATTER OF CLICO INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED (In Compulsory Liquidation) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, CHAP 81:01
More informationIN THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Appellate Jurisdiction ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BARBADOS
[2011] CCJ 14 (AJ) IN THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Appellate Jurisdiction ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BARBADOS CCJ Application No AL 7 of 2011 BB Civil Appeal No 25 of 2007 BETWEEN BARBADOS
More informationJUDGMENT REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV BETWEEN D. C. DEVELOPERS LIMITED. Claimant AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2006-02313 BETWEEN D. C. DEVELOPERS LIMITED AND Claimant MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS LIMITED Defendant Before The Honourable Mr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2018-00680 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO MAKE A CLAIM FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO PART 56.3 OF THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. Between THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO. And
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. S 304 of 2017 Between THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Appellant And MARCIA AYERS-CAESAR Respondent PANEL: A. MENDONÇA,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. RAMOLA RAMESAR (the legal personal representative of Rachel Ramesar Otherwise Rachel Chinibas, deceased) AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HCA No. 2657 of 1997 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF BHADASE SAGAN MARAJ (deceased) BETWEEN RAMOLA RAMESAR (the legal personal representative
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2009
CLAIM NO. 743 OF 2009 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2009 BETWEEN BCB HOLDINGS LIMITED First Claimant/Respondent THE BELIZE BANK LIMITED Second Claimant/Respondent AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BELIZE
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA
. t! ~ CLAIM NO: ANUHCV2010/0406 THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITION OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA SECTION 9(1) AND IN THE MATTER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DONALDSON-HONEYWELL
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV: 2013-04300 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN LAKHPATIYA BARRAN (also called DOWLATIAH BARRAN) CLAIMANT AND BALMATI BARRAN RAJINDRA BARRAN MAHENDRA BARRAN FIRST DEFENDANT
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY. CPA Certificate No Board File
STATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY In the Matter of STIPULATION AND David Reed Medernach CONSENT ORDER CPA Certificate No. 06544 Board File 2018-446 The Minnesota Board of Accountancy ("Board") is
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN BEFORE THE WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION
STATE OF WISCONSIN BEFORE THE WISCONSIN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOHNNY L. WADE, Complainant, Case 312 vs. No. 46107 MP-2511 Decision WISCONSIN DISTRICT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AARON SAMUEL AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2016-00258 BETWEEN AARON SAMUEL AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claimant Defendant Before the Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN VICARDO GONSALVES CLAIMANT AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-00349 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN VICARDO GONSALVES CLAIMANT AND CHAN PERSAD DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances: For the Claimant:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between FIDEL RAMPERSAD RAJ KAMAL REDDY AVUTHU RYAN RICHARDSON VISHAM BHIMULL SHAUN LYNCH AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No: CV 2014 01330 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between FIDEL RAMPERSAD RAJ KAMAL REDDY AVUTHU RYAN RICHARDSON VISHAM BHIMULL SHAUN LYNCH AND Claimants MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS
More information