Courthouse News Service
|
|
- Daniela Fletcher
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FILED 2008 Aug-12 AM 10:26 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) v. ) ) ALABAMA PLATING COMPANY, INC., ) COMPLAINT the ESTATE of JAMES M. ROWE, JR., ) and ) JAMES M. ROWE, 111, ) Defendants. Plaintiff, the United States of America ("United States"), by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States, and on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") alleges as follows: INTRODUCTION Courthouse News Service 1. This is a civil action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C et seq., as amended, for recovery of costs incurred by the United States for actions taken in response to releases and threatened
2 releases of hazardous substances at the Alabama Plating Superfund Site ("Site"), which was formerly operated by the Alabama Plating Company, Inc. ("APC") and located in Vincent, Shelby County, Alabama. The action also seeks a declaratory judgment pursuant to Section 113(g)(2) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. Section 9613(g)(2), that the defendants are liable under Section 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C , for further response costs at the Site that are not inconsistent with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan ("NCP"), 40 C.F.R. Part 300. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action and the parties pursuant to Sections 107(a) and 113(b) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. $5 9607(a) and 9613(b), and 28 U.S.C. $ and Venue is proper in this District pursuant to Section 113(b) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C (b), and 28 U.S.C (b) and (c), because the claims arose in this District and releases andlor threatened releases of hazardous substances that give rise to the United States' claims occurred in this District. DEFENDANTS 4. APC, a metal plating business that is now inactive, is a Delaware corporation authorized to do business in the State of Alabama. APC operated the Site and transacted business in Vincent, Shelby County, Alabama. 5. The Estate of James M. Rowe, Jr. is named as a defendant because James M. Rowe, Jr. Is now deceased. James M. Rowe, Jr. resided in the State of Alabama until February
3 1999, and owned property and transacted business in Vincent, Shelby County, Alabama, at times relevant to this Complaint. 6. James M. Rowe I11 resided in the State of Alabama until 1998, owned property there until May 1999, transacted business there at times relevant to this Complaint, and otherwise has sufficient minimum contacts with the State of Alabama. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS A. THE SITE. 7. The Alabama Plating Superhnd Site (the "Site") comprises several parcels: a Main Facility that includes parcels on opposite sides of the street; and a Satellite Facility. The Main Facility is located at the intersection of Highway 231 and County Road 60 in Vincent, Alabama. The Satellite Facility, situated on an approximately 27.3 acre parcel, consists of an estimated 5 acres that APC used for operations and waste disposal. On all these parcels, EPA has discovered contamination from hazardous substances consistent with that generated by APCYs manufacturing operations. 8. At times relevant to this Complaint, the real property on which the Main Facility is located was owned by James M. Rowe, Jr. However in May 1999, the property was sold, pursuant to Code ofalabama (1975 West), to the State of Alabama in order to satisfy a tax lien that was placed upon the property by the Shelby County Tax Collector's Office, for unpaid 1998 taxes. 9. APC began operating a zinc electroplating business at the Main Facility in Operations were expanded to include cadmium and copper electroplating and hot-dip galvanizing. Electroplating was discontinued at the Main Facility in March From 1971 to
4 1996, APC used the Satellite Facility at various times for facility operations, such as hot-dip galvanizing, preliminary and finishing metal cleaning, warehousing waste and finished products for both the Main and Satellite Facilities, and waste disposal in an unauthorized onsite landfill. Hot-dip galvanizing continued until 1996, when APC ceased all business and abandoned both the Main Facility and the Satellite Facility. B. JAMES M. ROWE, JR. 10. At all times during APC's operations, James M. Rowe, Jr. was the owner of the real property where the Main Facility is located. 11. At all times relevant to this Complaint, James M. Rowe, Jr. was the President of APC and the principal shareholder of APC, owning 70% of APC's stock. 12. At all times relevant to this Complaint, James M. Rowe, Jr. was an operator of the Site. He ran the day-to-day operations of both the Main and Satellite Facilities, including making the waste management decisions for both Facilities. C. JAMES M. ROWE I At times relevant to this Complaint, James M. Rowe I11 was the Vice-President of APC and a 30% shareholder of APC stock. 14. At times relevant to this Complaint, James M. Rowe I11 was an operator of the Site. He shared the authority and responsibility of running and supervising the day-to-day operations of both the Main and Satellite Facilities, including making waste management decisions for both Facilities.
5 D. EPA'S RESPONSE ACTIONS AT THE SITE 15. In July 1998, Alabama Department of Environmental Management ("ADEM") referred the Site to EPA's Emergency Response and Removal Branch, and recommended that the Site be considered a high priority for removal action of abandoned wastes and contaminated soil. ADEM noted that its prior investigations of the Main Facility indicated numerous areas which caused the release or posed a threat of release of hazardous substances into the environment and exposure to nearby residents from plating wastes. 16. In 1998, EPA conducted a limited emergency removal of abandoned wastes and contaminated soil at the Main Facility and determined that the Main Facility posed an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health or welfare or the environment and met the criteria for a time-critical removal action under the NCP, 40 C.F.R. Part 300. EPA also determined that hazardous conditions extended beyond the Main Facility to two adjacent properties located to the east and northeast of the parcel containing the Main Facility buildings. EPA's testing of groundwater and soil samples taken at the Main Facility revealed that, when APC abandoned the Site in 1996, it left behind sludge, soil, sediment, and/or groundwater contaminated with hazardous substances, including, but not limited to, arsenic, cyanide, cadmium, chromium, lead, and zinc. 17. To date, EPA's response activities at the Main Facility have: secured the facility to prevent trespasser access; characterized and segregated the hazardous substances found onsite; decontaminated or disposed of vats, tanks, and other containers found onsite; dismantled and disposed of buildings or structures onsite that cannot be effectively decontaminated; arranged for the offsite transportation and disposal of all containerized wastes, consolidated sludge, building
6 and site debris; and excavated and performed onsite treatement and/or arranged for offsite transport and authorized disposal of all APC contaminated soils, sediments, and onsite buried waste. 18. Also in 1998, ADEM discovered elevated and measurable levels of lead, zinc, arsenic, chromium, and other metals in soil samples taken from the Satellite Facility. In 1999, EPA secured the Satellite Facility, and determined that the Satellite Facility posed an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health or welfare or the environment and met the criteria for a time-critical removal action under the NCP, 40 C.F.R. Part 300. Accordingly, in February 1999 EPA incorporated the Satellite Facility as part of the ongoing removal action at the Main Facility. EPA response activities at the Satellite Facility have included: removal actions, installation of fencing to secure the area of concern, installation of warning signs at the retention pond that establish the pond as potentially contaminated, soil sampling and geo-probe sampling to characterize conditions onsite, and recovery, repackaging, and preparation for offsite disposal of zinc dross drums stored on the property. 19. Response activities continue at the Site, including identification and characterization of the extent and magnitude of Site-related hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants. 20. As of February 1, 2008, the United States has incurred at least $12 million in costs for response actions at the Site and continues to incur these response costs as a result of the releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances at or from the Site.
7 CERCLA LIABILITY 2 1. Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C (a), provides, in pertinent part: Notwithstanding any other provision or rule of law, and subject only to the defenses set forth in subsection (b) of this section -- (1) the owner and operator of a vessel or a facility, (2) any person who at the time of disposal of any hazardous substance owned or operated any facility at which such hazardous substances were disposed of, (3) any person who by contract, agreement, or otherwise arranged for disposal or treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by such person, by any other party or entity, at any facility... owned or operated by another party or entity and containing such hazardous substances shall be liable for -- (A) all costs of removal or remedial action incurred by the United States Government or a State... not inconsistent with the national contingency plan.... *** The amounts recoverable in an action under this section shall include interest on the amounts recoverable under subparagraphs (A) through (D). pertinent part: 22. Section 113(g)(2)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C (g)(2)(B), provides in In any such action described in this subsection [an action for recovery of costs under Section 107 of CERCLA], the court shall enter a declaratory judgment on liability for response costs or damages that will be binding on any subsequent action or actions to recover further response costs or damages.
8 RECOVERY OF RESPONSE COSTS UNDER SECTION 107(a) AND DECLARATION OF FUTURE LIABILITY 23. Paragraphs 1 through 22 are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 24. There have been "releases," "threatened releases" and "disposals" of hazardous substances at or from the Site, as those terms are defined in Sections 10 l(29) and lol(22) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C (29) and (22). 25. Cadmium, arsenic, chromium, lead, cyanide, and zinc are "hazardous substances" within the meaning of Section lol(14) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C (14). 26. At the time hazardous substances were released or disposed of at the Site, APC was an "owner" and/or "operator" within the meaning of Section 10 l(20) and a "person" within the meaning of Section 10 l(2 1) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C l(20) and (2 1). 27. At the time hazardous substances were released or disposed of at the Site, James M. Rowe, Jr. was an "owner and/or operator" within the meaning of Section 10 l(20) and a "person" within the meaning of Section lol(21) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C (20) and (21). 28. At the time hazardous substances were released or disposed of at the Site, James M. Rowe 111 was an "operator" within the meaning of Section lol(20) and a "person" within the meaning of Section 10 l(21) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. $5 960 l(20) and (2 1). 29. The Site, which contains hazardous substances, is a "facility" within the meaning of Section 101(9) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C (9). 30. EPA has undertaken various activities to control site access and to assess and respond to environmental harm and risks at the Site. These actions taken by EPA in response to releases and/or threatened releases of hazardous substances at or from the Site constitute
9 "response" actions as defined by Section 101(25) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C (25), and are not inconsistent with the NCP, 40 C.F.R. Part The United States has incurred and will continue to incur costs of removal and/or remedial actions not inconsistent with the NCP in response to the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at and from the Site, within the meaning of Sections 101(23), (24), and (25) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. $4 9601(23), (24), and (25). 32. The defendants are individually liable to the United States, in their respective capacities, as either past or current owners and/or operators of the Site, or as an owner and/or operator of the Site at the time of disposal of hazardous substances, for all response costs, including the costs of removal and remedial actions, incurred and to be incurred by the United States with respect to the Site and including all costs of enforcement and interest, pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. tj 9607(a). 33. The United States, under Section 113(g) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C (g), is entitled to a declaration of liability in its favor. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, plaintiff, the United States of America, respectfully requests that the Court: A. Enter judgment against the defendants, holding them jointly and severally liable for all costs incurred and to be incurred by the United States in response to releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances at or from the Site, including interest and costs of enforcement;
10 B. Enter a declaratory judgment in favor of the United States, declaring that the defendants are jointly and severally liable in any subsequent action(s) to recover further response costs; and C. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Respectfully submitted, RONALD J. TENPAY Assistant Attorney General Environmental ~nforcement Section Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice ALICE H. MARTIN United States Attorney Northern District of Alabama Assistant United States Attorney Bar No. ASB7291 -G69E United States Attorney's Office Northern District of Alabama Robert Vance Federal Building Fourth Avenue North Birmingham, Alabama Telephone: (205) Facsimile: (205) ed.ragland@usdoj.gov
11 Trial Attorney Environmental Enforcement Section Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) DAVIS FORSYTHE Trial Attorney Environmental Enforcement Section Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice P.O. Box Washington, D.C Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) davis. forsythe@usdoj.gov OF COUNSEL: KAREN SINGER Assistant Regional Counsel United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia
Case 2:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 09/22/11 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:11-cv-00446-REB Document 1 Filed 09/22/11 Page 1 of 13 ERIKA M. ZIMMERMAN, Oregon Bar # 055004 Environmental Enforcement Section Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department
More informationPlaintiff, Defendants.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO MALITOVSKY COOPERAGE COMPANY; MALITOVSFrY DRUM CORPORATION; Charlotte
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE United States of America, Plaintiff, vs. General Electric Company, Defendant Case No.: 06-CV-00354-PB Judge Paul J. Barbadoro ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
1 1 1 1 1 1 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP Richard Montevideo (BAR NO. ) Eric Dunn (BAR NO. ) Anton Boulevard, Fourteenth Floor Costa Mesa, California - Telephone: 1-1-0 Facsimile: 1--0 Attorneys for Plaintiff LITTLE
More informationCase 2:08-cv RTH-PJH Document 1 Filed 06/24/08 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1
Case 2:08-cv-00893-RTH-PJH Document 1 Filed 06/24/08 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
More informationUnited States v USX Corp.
1995 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-23-1995 United States v USX Corp. Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 94-5681 Follow this and additional works
More informationUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 2 IN THE MATTER OF: Ringwood Mines/Landfill Superfund Site and Borough of Ringwood, Passaic County, New Jersey, Respondent. UNILATERAL ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationU.S. v. 718 W. Wilson Ave., Glendale, Cal., 91203
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Fall 2011 Case Summaries U.S. v. 718 W. Wilson Ave., Glendale, Cal., 91203 Matt Jennings Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr
More informationSTATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL In the Matter of: ROMIC ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 2081 Bay Road East Palo Alto, California 94303-1316
More informationEnvironmental Questionnaire
BUSINESS/BORROWER INFORMATION 1. List all locations of the applicant's business. (State whether the applicant is the owner or lessee of any premises.) 2. Describe briefly the nature of the applicant's
More informationCitizens Suit Remedies Can Expand Contaminated Site
[2,300 words] Citizens Suit Remedies Can Expand Contaminated Site Exposures By Reed W. Neuman Mr. Neuman is a Partner at O Connor & Hannan LLP in Washington. His e-mail is RNeuman@oconnorhannan.com. Property
More informationCommonwealth of Pennsylvania D v. Beazer East Inc
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-2-2014 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania D v. Beazer East Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket
More informationCase 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 2:14-cv-00324-JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BRUNS DANIEL KIDD, Plaintiff, v. Case No. THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and RELIANCE WORLDWIDE
More informationNo. 94 C 2854 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Agricultural Excess & Surplus Insurance Co. v. A.B.D. Tank & Pump Co., 878 F. Supp. 1091 (1995) No. 94 C 2854 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS NORDBERG, District Judge.
More informationLIBRARY. CERCLA Case Law Developments ENVIRONMENTAL COST RECOVERY & LENDER LIABILITY UPDATE. Full Article
ENVIRONMENTAL COST RECOVERY & LENDER LIABILITY UPDATE As a service to Jenner & Block's clients and the greater legal community, the Firm's Environmental, Energy and Natural Resources Law practice maintains
More informationAssessing Costs under CERCLA: Sixth Circuit Requires Specificity in Complaints Seeking Prejudgment Interest. United States v. Consolidation Coal Co.
Journal of Environmental and Sustainability Law Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review Volume 11 Issue 3 2003-2004 Article 6 2004 Assessing Costs under CERCLA: Sixth Circuit Requires Specificity
More informationNotwithstanding a pair of recent
Preserving Claims to Recoup Response Costs During Brownfields Redevelopment Part I By Mark Coldiron and Ivan London Notwithstanding a pair of recent U.S. Supreme Court cases, the contours of cost recovery
More informationChapter VIII SUPERFUND LAWS. In the aftermath of Love Canal and other revelations of the improper disposal of
Chapter VIII SUPERFUND LAWS In the aftermath of Love Canal and other revelations of the improper disposal of hazardous substances, the federal and state governments enacted the Superfund laws to address
More informationLINCOLN COUNTY, WV ORDINANCE NO
LINCOLN COUNTY, WV ORDINANCE NO. 2017- AN ORDINANCE DECLARING, PROHIBITING, AND ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR INVESTIGATING AND ABATING ANY PUBLIC NUISANCE WITHIN OR ADVERSELY AFFECTING LINCOLN COUNTY, WEST
More informationLIMITED OBJECTIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL TO DEBTORS JOINT PLAN
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------x : Chapter 11 In re : : Case No. 09-50026 (REG) MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f/k/a
More informationand the Transboundary Application of CERCLA:
American Bar Association Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Section Toxic Torts and Environmental Law Committee Reaching Across the 49 th Parallel: The Origins and Transformation of Canada/U.S. Environmental
More informationThe PCS Nitrogen Case: A Chilling Effect on Prospective Contaminated Land Purchases
Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review Volume 41 Issue 3 Electronic Supplement Article 4 3-13-2014 The PCS Nitrogen Case: A Chilling Effect on Prospective Contaminated Land Purchases Kellie Fisher
More informationMEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND REGION 6 OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
I. Purpose MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND REGION 6 OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality
More informationUNITED STATES V. ATLANTIC RESEARCH: OF SETTLEMENT AND VOLUNTARILY INCURRED COSTS
UNITED STATES V. ATLANTIC RESEARCH: OF SETTLEMENT AND VOLUNTARILY INCURRED COSTS Mark Yeboah* INTRODUCTION In 1980, Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
More informationTitle 27A. Environment and Natural Resources Chapter 4: Emergency Response Notification Article I: Oklahoma Emergency Response Act
Title 27A. Environment and Natural Resources Chapter 4: Emergency Response Notification Article I: Oklahoma Emergency Response Act 4-1-101. Short Title - Purpose A. This article shall be known and may
More informationColorado s Hazardous Waste Program: Current Activities and Issues
University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getting a Handle on Hazardous Waste Control (Summer Conference, June 9-10) Getches-Wilkinson Center Conferences, Workshops, and Hot Topics
More informationJournal of Environmental and Sustainability Law
Journal of Environmental and Sustainability Law Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review Volume 13 Issue 3 Summer 2006 Article 3 2006 The Government Always Wins: The Government can now Recover Certain
More informationthejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com
Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION TADDRICK MINGO v. Plaintiff, SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS,
More informationTITLE 42, CHAPTER 103 COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA) EMERGENCY RESPONSE & NOTIFICATION PROVISIONS
TITLE 42, CHAPTER 103 COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA) EMERGENCY RESPONSE & NOTIFICATION PROVISIONS Sec. 9602. Sec. 9603. Sec. 9604. Sec. 9605. Designation
More informationCase: 1:17-cv DCN Doc #: 14 Filed: 03/02/17 1 of 19. PageID #: 69
Case: 1:17-cv-00103-DCN Doc #: 14 Filed: 03/02/17 1 of 19. PageID #: 69 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TOBIAS MOONEYHAM and DEREK SLEVE, individually
More informationArticle 7. Department of Environmental Quality. Part 1. General Provisions.
Article 7. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Part 1. General Provisions. 143B-275 through 143B-279: Repealed by Session Laws 1989, c. 727, s. 2. Article 7. Department of Environmental Quality.
More informationCase 2:16-cv KOB Document 1 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:16-cv-01583-KOB Document 1 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 17 FILED 2016 Sep-26 PM 03:44 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1
Case: 1:18-cv-04861 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MARY NISI, On behalf of herself and the class
More informationCase MFW Doc 416 Filed 03/29/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 18-10248-MFW Doc 416 Filed 03/29/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: THE BON-TON STORES, INC., et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 18-10248
More informationLIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT This LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT is entered into as of the day of, 2008, by Equilon Enterprises LLC d/b/a Shell Oil Products US ("Indemnitor") and
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 43 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:18-cv-04230 Document 1 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 43 PageID #: 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ariadne Panagopoulou (AP-2202 Pardalis & Nohavicka, LLP
More informationJournal of Environmental and Sustainability Law
Journal of Environmental and Sustainability Law Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review Volume 14 Issue 3 Summer 2007 Article 5 2007 Reimbursement for Voluntarily Cleaning up Your Mess? The Seventh
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION IP CO., LLC, d/b/a Intus IQ Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION FILE v. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY; INGERSOLL-RAND SCHLAGE LOCK HOLDING
More informationToxic Torts Recent Relevant Decisions. Rhon E. Jones Beasley, Allen Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.
Toxic Torts Recent Relevant Decisions Rhon E. Jones Beasley, Allen Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C. I. Introduction Toxic tort litigation is a costly and complex type of legal work that is usually achieved
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1219 Document #1609250 Filed: 04/18/2016 Page 1 of 16 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) UTILITY SOLID WASTE ACTIVITIES
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,
Case :-cv-0-odw-dtb Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN Chief, Civil Division ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE Chief, General Civil Section
More informationG.S Page 1
143-215.3. General powers of Commission and Department; auxiliary powers. (a) Additional Powers. In addition to the specific powers prescribed elsewhere in this Article, and for the purpose of carrying
More informationSupreme Court Clarifies Rights of PRPs to Recover Cleanup Costs from Other PRPs, and the United States
ENVIRONMENTAL NEWS JUNE 13, 2007 Supreme Court Clarifies Rights of PRPs to Recover Cleanup Costs from Other PRPs, and the United States By Steven Jones Putting an end to two-and-a-half years of uncertainty
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE. The 45-day comment periods for the EAW and the draft RCRA permit run from April 30 through June 15, 2012.
PUBLIC NOTICE The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) invites public comments on an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the North Star Lake Sediment Remediation project to be conducted by
More informationCase KJC Doc 172 Filed 08/02/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11
Case 16-11247-KJC Doc 172 Filed 08/02/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: INTERVENTION ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC., et al., Debtors. 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 16-11247
More informationCITY OF FORTUNA, Defendant. /
0 Jack Silver, Esq. SBN#0 Kimberly Burr, Esq. SBN#0 Northern California Environmental Defense Center 0 Occidental Road Sebastopol, CA Telephone: (0)- Facsimile : (0) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiff Northern
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 1:16-cv-00065 Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION PRAXAIR, INC., PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC. Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 03-C-949. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the STATE OF WISCONSIN v. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 03-C-949 P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY, et al., Defendants.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. v. No DRH. MEMORANDUM and ORDER. I. Introduction and Background
Blue Tee Corp. v. Xtra Intermodal, Inc. et al Doc. 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BLUE TEE CORP. and GOLD FIELDS MINING, INC., Plaintiffs, v. No. 13-0830-DRH
More informationDETERMINING DAMAGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CASES IN THE WORLD AFTER BURLINGTON NORTHERN
DETERMINING DAMAGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CASES IN THE WORLD AFTER BURLINGTON NORTHERN By Diana L. Buongiorno and Denns M. Toft In 2009, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Burlington Northern
More informationCase 4:13-cv JMM Document 1 Filed 06/13/13 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Case 4:13-cv-00355-JMM Document 1 Filed 06/13/13 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF ARKANSAS, v. Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EXXONMOBIL
More informationPolicy Issues at Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Frequently Asked State Questions August 2010
Introduction The Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Managers (ASTSWMO) Federal Facilities Research Center s State Federal Coordination Focus Group developed this paper in response to a number
More informationSOLID WASTE CODE APACHE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
SOLID WASTE CODE APACHE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA 600 SOLID WASTE 601 DEFINITIONS 602 FINDINGS OF THE APACHE TRIBE A) Solid waste B) Environment and health C) Importation of Waste 603 OBJECTIVES AND POLICY OF
More informationCase 2:17-cv SGC Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:17-cv-01270-SGC Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 1 of 11 FILED 2017 Jul-28 PM 01:58 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MICOBA LLC Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY
More informationCOLUMBUS, NEBRASKA CITY CODE
COLUMBUS, NEBRASKA CITY CODE Columbus, Nebraska City Code COLUMBUS, NEBRASKA CITY CODE City Code adopted by Ordinance No. 05-47, passed 9-19-05, effective 10-4-05 Published by: American Legal Publishing
More informationThe Permissibility of Actions for Response Costs Arising After the Commencement of a RCRA Citizen Suit: A Post-Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.
University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 1997 Issue 1 Article 22 The Permissibility of Actions for Response Costs Arising After the Commencement of a RCRA Citizen Suit: A Post-Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.
More informationCase3:14-cv Document1 Filed09/03/14 Page1 of 8
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 SAM HIRSCH Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division MARK SABATH (Mass. Bar No. Senior Attorney Environmental Enforcement Section
More informationCenterior Service Company v. Acme Scrap Iron & (and) Metal Corporation: Cost Recovery or Contribution in the Sixth Circuit
Volume 11 Issue 1 Article 6 2000 Centerior Service Company v. Acme Scrap Iron & (and) Metal Corporation: Cost Recovery or Contribution in the Sixth Circuit Stephanie DiVittore Follow this and additional
More informationCHAPTER 3 POLICE REGULATIONS 330. NUISANCE
CHAPTER 3 POLICE REGULATIONS 330. NUISANCE Section 330.01. Public Nuisance Defined. Whoever by an act or failure to perform a legal duty intentionally does any of the following is guilty of maintaining
More informationCase JMC-7A Doc 2929 Filed 09/13/18 EOD 09/13/18 15:09:05 Pg 1 of 9
Case 16-07207-JMC-7A Doc 2929 Filed 09/13/18 EOD 09/13/18 15:09:05 Pg 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION IN RE: ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC., et
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
A S K FINANCIAL LLP Joseph L. Steinfeld, Jr., Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) John T. Siegler, Esq. Karen M. Scheibe,, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 2600 Eagan Woods Drive, Suite 400 St. Paul, MN 55121 Telephone:
More informationWASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT
Permit No.: 1 WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT COMPANY NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: FACILITY ADDRESS: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S): 7 The above Industrial User is authorized to discharge industrial wastewater to the
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2006 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus
More informationCase 1:07-cv Document 130 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 29
Case 1:07-cv-03169 Document 130 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07 C 3169 )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Case No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Case 1:17-cv-00346 Document 1 Filed 04/12/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationCase 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
Case 3:14-cv-02223-L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHER DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION Plaintiff,
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv-00296 VEOLIA WATER SOLUTIONS & TECHNOLOGIES SUPPORT, v. Plaintiff, SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Aloft Media LLC v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al Doc. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALOFT MEDIA, LLC, v. Plaintiff, YAHOO!, INC., AT&T, INC., and AOL LLC,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE 1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 650 Washington, DC 20006, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. JOHN F. KERRY, in
More informationCase 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Case 2:14-cv-00945 Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION TRAXXAS LP v. Plaintiff, HOBBY PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
More informationCase JMC-7A Doc 2874 Filed 09/10/18 EOD 09/10/18 15:45:25 Pg 1 of 7
Case 16-07207-JMC-7A Doc 2874 Filed 09/10/18 EOD 09/10/18 15:45:25 Pg 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION IN RE: ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC., et
More informationCase JMC-7A Doc 2891 Filed 09/12/18 EOD 09/12/18 14:19:22 Pg 1 of 7
Case 16-07207-JMC-7A Doc 2891 Filed 09/12/18 EOD 09/12/18 14:19:22 Pg 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION IN RE: ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC., et
More informationUSA v. EI DuPont de Nemours
2005 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-22-2005 USA v. EI DuPont de Nemours Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 04-4546 Follow this
More informationCase: CJP Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/16 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Case: 16-01052-CJP Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/21/16 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In re: GT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al., Reorganized Debtors.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: JOHN M. BEGAKIS (Bar No. ) john@altviewlawgroup.com JASON W. BROOKS (Bar No. ) Jason@altviewlawgroup.com ALTVIEW LAW GROUP, LLP 00 Wilshire Boulevard,
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01392 Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MICOBA LLC Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY
More informationCase 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-0-mej Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Andrea Gothing, SBN: 0 AGothing@RobinsKaplan.com Seth A. Northrop, SBN: 0 SNorthrup@RobinsKaplan.com Li Zhu, SBN: 00 LZhu@RobinsKaplan.com 0 W. El Camino
More informationCase 3:10-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:10-cv-00585-HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGIlIMoI... ~--,::--;;;(g~-=~~ Richmond Division _:Ig- VERNON E. GILLUM, JR.;
More informationS04Q2099. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY v. LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC. The first question certified by the Eleventh Circuit in this case is whether
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 7, 2005 S04Q2099. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY v. LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC. FLETCHER, Chief Justice. The first question certified by the Eleventh Circuit in
More informationThe Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, ordains that this Ordinance is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 617 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 617.4) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 617 REGULATING UNDERGROUND TANK SYSTEMS CONTAINING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES The Board of Supervisors
More informationLIBRARY. CERCLA Case Law Developments ENVIRONMENTAL COST RECOVERY & LENDER LIABILITY UPDATE. Full Article
ENVIRONMENTAL COST RECOVERY & LENDER LIABILITY UPDATE As a service to Jenner & Block's clients and the greater legal community, the Firm's Environmental, Energy and Natural Resources Law practice maintains
More informationCourthouse News Service
-\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA PICTURE PATENTS, LLC, ) ) \.L Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. j.'o&cv o?&>4' MONUMENT REALTY LLC, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8 AND THE STATE OF UTAH AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
IN THE MATTER OF: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8 AND THE STATE OF UTAH AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs FEDERAL FACILITY
More informationCase 2:14-bk Doc 129 Filed 02/14/14 Entered 02/14/14 15:44:27 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7
Document Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA In re ) Chapter 11 ) FREEDOM INDUSTRIES, INC. ) ) Case No. 2:14-bk-20017 ) Debtor. ) ) APPLICATION TO EMPLOY AND RETAIN
More informationCHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1376
CHAPTER 2001-134 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1376 An act relating to mining; amending s. 378.035, F.S.; reserving certain funds in the Nonmandatory Land Reclamation
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO ELIEZER CRUZ APONTE and MAGDALENA CARABALLO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, PLAINTIFFS VS. CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM
More informationCase 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-00636-REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5 Lane M. Chitwood, ISB No. 8577 lchitwood@parsonsbehle.com Peter M. Midgley, ISB No. 6913 pmidgley@parsonsbehle.com John N. Zarian, ISB No. 7390
More information2.2. Describes procedures for coordination between ATSDR and DON.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND DISEASE REGISTRY PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF NAVY (DON) ON PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIVITIES AT MARINE CORP BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
More informationFIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs, Eliezer Cruz Aponte and Magdalena Caraballo ( Plaintiffs ), individually
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO ELIEZER CRUZ APONTE and MAGDALENA CARABALLO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, PLAINTIFFS VS. CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM
More informationTITLE 58. WATERS AND WATER SUPPLY CHAPTER 10B. HAZARDOUS DISCHARGE SITE REMEDIATION
TITLE 58. WATERS AND WATER SUPPLY CHAPTER 10B. HAZARDOUS DISCHARGE SITE REMEDIATION ***THIS SECTION IS CURRENT THROUGH NEW JERSEY 215 th LEGISLATURE*** ***FIRST ANNUAL SESSION, P.L. 2018 CHAPTER 4 AND
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:15-cv-06177 Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------- )( ABU ASHRAF, on behalf
More information1 HB By Representative Johnson (R) 4 RFD: Public Safety and Homeland Security. 5 First Read: 09-APR-15. Page 0
1 HB458 2 165874-2 3 By Representative Johnson (R) 4 RFD: Public Safety and Homeland Security 5 First Read: 09-APR-15 Page 0 1 165874-2:n:04/09/2015:JET/agb LRS2015-956R1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SYNOPSIS: Under
More informationCase 4:11-cv Document 163 Filed in TXSD on 08/17/18 Page 1 of 103
Case 4:11-cv-01814 Document 163 Filed in TXSD on 08/17/18 Page 1 of 103 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, VS. CIVIL
More informationscc Doc 697 Filed 08/16/12 Entered 08/16/12 10:23:11 Main Document Pg 1 of 11
Pg 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- x In re: : Chapter 11 : GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC.,
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-06654 Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Ernest Moore, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, -v- 33 Union
More informationSolving the CERCLA Statute of Limitations and Preemption Puzzles
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Solving the CERCLA Statute of Limitations and Preemption Puzzles Lessons From Recent Decisions for Timing in Superfund and Environmental Litigation
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.:
J. MARTIN WAGNER (DCB #0 MARCELLO MOLLO Earthjustice th Street, th Floor Oakland, CA Tel: ( 0-00 Fax: ( 0-0 Counsel for Plaintiffs Basel Action Network, a Sub-Project of the Tides Center; and Sierra Club
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. BEATRICE JEAN, and other similarly situated individuals, v. Plaintiff(s, NEW NATIONAL LLC d/b/a National Hotel, Defendant.
More information~*~ Constitution. Asset Resolution Limited ACN
~*~ Constitution Asset Resolution Limited ACN 159 827 871 Constitution Preliminary 7 1. Defined terms 7 2. Interpretation 8 3. Replaceable rules 9 Shares 9 4. Rights 9 5. Issue of Shares 9 6. Commission
More information