Status-wise distribution of NHRIs

Transcription

1 CHRT OF THE STTUS OF NTIONL INSTITUTIONS // ---- CCREDITED BY THE GLOBL LLINCE OF NTIONL HUMN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS ccreditation status as of 5 ugust 2016 In accordance with the Paris Principles and the GNHRI Statute, the following classifications for accreditation are used by the GNHRI: B C Compliance with the Paris Principles; Not fully in compliance with the Paris Principles; Non-compliance with the Paris Principles. *(R): This category (accreditation with reserve) was granted where insufficient documentation was submitted to confer status; is no longer in use by the GNHRI. It is maintained only for those NHRIs which were accredited with this status before pril Summary Classification Number of reviewed institutions - status 75 B - status 32 C - no status 10 Total 117 Status-wise distribution of NHRIs status B status C Page 1 of 10 s of 5 ugust 2016

2 1. STTUS INSTITUTIONS National Institution Status Year reviewed sia and the Pacific fghanistan: Independent Human Rights 2. ustralia: ustralian Human Rights 3. India: National Human Rights 4. Indonesia: National on Human Rights (Komnas HM) 5. Jordan: National Centre for Human Rights 6. Malaysia: Human Rights (SUHKM) 7. Mongolia: National Human Rights 8. Nepal: National Human Rights 9. New Zealand: Human Rights 10. The Philippines: on Human Rights 11. Qatar: National Human Rights Committee * * 2000 March 2007 March 2012* November 2013 Special Review in March 2014 March 2014 * pril 2006 (B) March 2007 (B) * October 2010 November 2015 deferred to second 2002 pril 2008 recommended to be accredited B November 2009 * October 2010 November (R) 2003 (R) 2002 * * March 2010 recommended to be accredited B special review maintained 1999 May March 2007 deferred to Oct March 2012 (B) March 2009 * March 2010 * October 2010 November 2015 Page 2 of 10 s of 5 ugust 2016 * See relevant SC Report

3 12. National Institution Status Year reviewed Republic of Korea: National Human Rights 2004 March 2014 deferred to deferred to March 2015 March 2015 deferred to first May Samoa: Office of the Ombudsman May (R) State of Palestine: Independent for 14. March 2009 Human Rights November Timor-Leste: Provedoria for Human Rights and Justice pril 2008 November frica Burundi: nationale indépendante des droits de Cameroon: National on Human Rights and Freedoms 3. Egypt: National Council for Human Rights 4. Ghana: on Human Rights and dministrative Justice 5. Kenya: National on Human Rights 6. Malawi: Human Rights 7. Mauritania: nationale des droits de Page 3 of 10 May 2016 special review in second 1999 (B) March 2010 March 2015 deferred to first May 2016 deferred to second pril 2006 (B) October 2011 deferred to Nov deferred to deferred to November 2013 November 2013 deferred November 2015 deferred to second March March 2007 March 2012 deferred to Nov deferred to deferred to November 2013 deferred to March 2015 March 2015 deferred to first May 2016 deferred to second November 2009 (B) s of 5 ugust 2016 * See relevant SC Report

4 8. National Institution Status Year reviewed Mauritius: nationale des droits de 9. Morocco: Conseil national des droits de 10. Namibia: Office of the Ombudsman 11. Nigeria: National Human Rights 12. Rwanda: National for Human Rights 13. Sierra Leone: Human Rights 14. South frica: Human Rights 15. Tanzania: for Human Rights and Good Governance Page 4 of 10 s of 5 ugust 2016 * See relevant SC Report 2002 pril 2008 * (R) * October 2010 * November (R) pril (R) 2000 B March 2012 recommended to be accredited B; given one year to establish compliance with the Paris Principles May (R) (R) October 2011 * 16. Togo: nationale des droits de 1999 (R) 2000 deferred to 17. Uganda: Human Rights 2000 (R) pril Zambia: Human Rights 2003 (R) October Zimbabwe: Human Rights May 2016 mericas 1. rgentina: Defensoría del Pueblo 1999 October Bolivia: Defensor del Pueblo 1999 (B) 2000 March 2007 March Canada: Canadian Human Rights 1999 May Chile: Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos 5. Colombia: Defensoría del Pueblo

5 National Institution Status Year reviewed March 2012 * 6. Costa Rica: Defensoría de los Habitantes 1999 October Ecuador: Defensor del Pueblo 1999 (R) 2002 pril 2008 recommended to be accredited B; given one year to establish compliance with the Paris Principles March 2009 March El Salvador: Procuraduría para la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos pril Guatemala: Procuraduría de los Derechos Humanos 1999 (B) 2000 (R) 2002 pril Haiti: Office for the Protection of Citizens November Mexico: Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos 1999 Page 5 of 10 October 2011 pril Nicaragua: Procuraduría para la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos 13. Panama: Defensoría del Pueblo Peru: Defensoría del Pueblo 1999 March 2007 March Uruguay: Institución Nacional de Derechos May 2016 Humanos y Defensoría del Pueblo 16. Venezuela: Defensoría del Pueblo 2002 pril 2008 March 2014 special review in special review deferred to March 2015 March 2015 recommended to be accredited B; given one year to establish compliance with the Paris Principles May 2016 Recommended to be downgraded to B status. s per rticle 12 of GNHRI statute, DPV challenged the recommendation and received the required support. The recommendation is now deferred to GNHRI Bureau meeting in October 2016 Europe 1. lbania: People s dvocate 2003 (R) 2004 s of 5 ugust 2016 * See relevant SC Report

6 National Institution Status Year reviewed 2. rmenia: Human Rights Defender pril 2006 (R) October 2011 deferred to Nov deferred to 3. zerbaijan: Human Rights er (Ombudsman) 4. Bosnia and Herzegovina: Institute of Human Rights Ombudsmen Page 6 of 10 s of 5 ugust 2016 * See relevant SC Report October 2010 deferred to May 2011 recommended to be accredited B; given one year to establish compliance with the Paris Principles March 2012 (R) 2002 (R) 2003 (R) November 2009 recommended to be accredited B; given one year to establish compliance with the Paris Principles October Croatia: Ombudsman pril Denmark: Danish Institute for Human Rights 1999 (B) 7. Finland: Finnish National Human Rights Institution 8. France: nationale consultative des droits de 1999 deferred to 9. Georgia: Public Defender s Office deferred to 10. Germany: German Institute for Human Rights (R) 2002 (R) 2003 March 2015 deferred to November 2015 November Greece: National for Human Rights 2000 (R) * November 2009 * March 2010 * March 2015 deferred to first May 2016 Recommended to be downgraded to B status. s per rticle 12 of GNHRI statute, GNCHR challenged the recommendation and received the required support. The recommendation is now

7 National Institution Status Year reviewed deferred to GNHRI Bureau meeting in October Hungary: er for Fundamental Rights 13. Ireland: Irish Human Rights and Equality November Latvia: Ombudsman of the Republic of Latvia March Luxembourg: consultative des droits de (R) 2002 March 2009 * November 2009 * October 2010 November 2015 March The Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Human Rights 17. Poland: Human Rights Defender Portugal: Provedor de Justiça Russian Federation: er for Human Rights in the Russian Federation 2000 (B) (B) 20. Serbia: Protector of Citizens March 2010 March Spain: El Defensor del Pueblo Ukraine: Ukrainian Parliament er for Human Rights United Kingdom: 23. Great Britain: Equality and Human Rights pril 2008 (B) March 2009 March 2014 deferred to October 2010 special review; November Northern Ireland (UK): Human Rights (B) May Scotland: Scottish Human Rights November 2009 deferred to Mar March 2010 March 2015 B STTUS INSTITUTIONS National Institution Status Year reviewed mericas 1. Honduras: Comisionado Nacional de los Derechos Humanos B 2000 () October 2010 special Page 7 of 10 s of 5 ugust 2016 * See relevant SC Report

8 Page 8 of 10 review; recommended to be accredited B; given one year to establish compliance with the Paris Principles October 2011 B May 2016 B sia and the Pacific 1. Bahrain: National Institution for Human Rights B May 2016 B 2. Bangladesh: National Human Rights B B March 2015 B 3. Iraq: High for Human Rights B March 2015 B 4. Sri Lanka: Human Rights B 2000 March Maldives: Human Rights B pril 2008 March 2010 November 2015 B 6. Myanmar: Myanmar National Human Rights B 7. Oman: National Human Rights B November Thailand: National Human Rights B 2004 March 2014 March 2014 deferred to recommended to be accredited B; given one year to establish compliance with the Paris Principles November 2015 B Central sia 1. Kazakhstan: The er for Human Rights B March Kyrgyzstan: The Ombudsman B March Tajikistan: The Human Rights Ombudsman B March 2012 frica 1. lgeria: nationale des droits de B 2000 (R) 2002 (R) 2003 March 2009 B March deferred to Oct October 2010 B 2. Chad: nationale des droits de B 2000 (R) (R) 2003 (R) November 2009 B 3. Congo: nationale des droits de B October Côte d Ivoire: nationale des droits de B May 2016 B 5. Libya: National Council for Civil Liberties and Human B - B Rights 6. Mali: nationale des droits de B March Senegal: Comité sénégalais des droits de B 2000 * October 2010 deferred to deferred to Oct s of 5 ugust 2016 * See relevant SC Report

9 8. Tunisia: Comité supérieur des droits de et des libertés fondamentales October 2011 recommended to be accredited B; given one year to establish compliance with the Paris Principles B B November Ethiopia: Ethiopian Human Rights B November 2013 Europe 1. ustria: The ustrian Ombudsman Board B Bulgaria: for Protection gainst B October 2011 Discrimination 3. Bulgaria: The Ombudsman B October Cyprus: er for dministration and Human B November 2015 B Rights 5. Macedonia: The Ombudsman B October Moldova: Human Rights Centre B November Montenegro: Protector of Human Rights and B May 2016 B Freedoms 8. Norway: Norwegian Centre for Human Rights B 2003 (R) 2004 (R) 2005 (R) pril 2006 deferred to Oct October 2011 recommended to be accredited B; given one year to establish compliance with the Paris Principles B 9. Slovakia: National Centre for Human Rights B 2002 C March 2012 ccreditation lapsed due to non-submission of documentation March 2014 B 10. Slovenia: Human Rights Ombudsman B 2000 March Sweden: Equality Ombudsman B C INSTITUTIONS frica 1. Benin: béninoise des droits de C Madagascar: nationale des droits de C 2000 (R) 2002 (R) 2003 (R) pril 2006 status withdrawn C mericas 1. ntigua and Barbuda: Office of the Ombudsman C 2. Barbados: Office of the Ombudsman C 3. Puerto Rico: Oficina del Procurador del Ciudadano del Estado Libre sociado de Puerto Rico sia and the Pacific C March 2007 Page 9 of 10 s of 5 ugust 2016 * See relevant SC Report

10 1. Hong Kong Special dministrative Region of China: Equal Opportunities C Iran: islamique des droits de C 2000 Europe 1. Romania: Romanian Institute for Human Rights C 2. Switzerland: fédérale pour les questions féminines 3. Switzerland: Federal gainst Racism C SUSPENDED INSTITUTIONS March 2007 C March (B) March 2010 C sia and the Pacific Fiji: Human Rights frica Niger: nationale des droits de et des libertés fondamentales mericas Paraguay: Defensoría del Pueblo Suspended Note: resigned from the GNHRI on 2 pril 2007 Removed Note: The CNDHLF was dissolved in February 2010 Suspended Note: resigned from the GNHRI on 10 July () March 2007 accreditation suspended; documents to be submitted at session of Oct pril 2007 resigns from the G March 2010 the CNDHLF is removed as per its dissolution in February March 2014 March 2014 deferred to October 2014 suspended INSTITUTIONS WHOSE CCREDITTION HS LPSED frica Burkina Faso: nationale des droits de 2002 (R) 2003 (R) 2005 B March 2012 ccreditation lapsed due to nonsubmission of documentation DISSOLVED INSTITUTIONS Europe Belgium: The Centre for Equal Opportunities and Opposition to Racism December 2014 The institution had been transformed into two separate institutions : The Interfederal Centre for Equal Opportunities and Opposition to Discrimination and Racism; The Federal Centre for the nalysis of Migration Flows Page 10 of 10 s of 5 ugust 2016 * See relevant SC Report