Periodic Monitoring Report 2016 Humanitarian Response Plan - Nigeria

Transcription

1 Periodic Monitoring Report 216 Humanitarian Response Plan - Nigeria Covering January to June 216 Prepared by the Inter-Sector Coordination Group for the Humanitarian Country Team NIGERIA

2 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria

3 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 FOREWORD The Humanitarian Response Plan 216 for Nigeria was readjusted to reflect the growing numbers of people who are accessible to the humanitarian community as Boko Haram are increasingly pushed out of areas by the Nigerian Armed Forces. There are an estimated 8, more recently accessible displaced people who are in need of humanitarian assistance and a further estimated 2.1 million who remain inaccessible. The population numbers and therefore the numbers in inaccessible areas are based on the 216 census and predictions of population trends. The numbers used in the Periodic Monitoring Review are based on IOMs Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) Round XI. While the DTM team reach most of the areas in the north-east, they do not have the capacity to reach all accessible areas, so numbers are under-reported. The numbers used are fluid and a snapshot based on a given time and place.

4 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AAH/ACF Action Against Hunger ECR Education Crisis Response API Adamawa Peace Initiative EiEWG Education in Emergency Working Group CA UK Christian Aid UK ERL Early Recovery and Livelihoods COOPI Cooperazione Internazionale ES Emergency Shelter CRUDAN Christian Rural and Urban Development EU European Union Association of Nigeria ICEED International Centre for Energy, Environment & EYN Ekelisiyar Yanuwa A Nigeria Development MC Mercy Corps FAO Food and Agriculture Organization NRC Norwegian Refugee Council FFP Food for Peace OXFAM OXFAM International FMoH Federal Ministry of Health SCI Save the Children International FSLVA Food Security, Livelihoods and Vulnerability Assessment TF TearFund FSWG Food Security Working Group AAH/ACF Action Against Hunger GAM Global Acute Malnutrition ADRA Adventist Development and Relief Agency GBV Gender Based Violence International AE Alternative Education GIS Geographic Information System ALIMA The Alliance for International Medical Action HCT Humanitarian Country Team AoH Arm of Hope HLP Housing, Land and Property AUN American University of Nigeria HRP Humanitarian Response Plan CA UK Christian Aid UK IDPs Internally Displaced People CCCM Camp Coordination and Camp Management IM Information Management CERF Central Emergency Response Fund IMC International Medical Corps CH Cadre Harmonise IMCI Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses CIDAR Centre for Integrated Development and INGOs International Non-Government Organizations Research CISCOPE Civil Society Coalition for Poverty Eradication IOM International Organization for Migration CMAM Community-based Management of Acute IPC Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Malnutrition COOPI Cooperazione Internazionale IRC International Rescue Committee CPSWG Child Protection Sub Working Group IYCF Infact and Young Child Feeding CTP Cash Transfer Programming L3 Level 3 DTM Displacement Tracking Matrix LGA Local Government Area ECD Early Childhood Development LNA Learning Needs Assessment ECHO European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations MoA Ministry of Agriculture

5 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS MoH Ministry of Health SEMA State Emergency Management Agency MOSS Minimum Operating Security Standards SGBVWG Sexual Gender Based Violence Working Group MoWR Ministry of Water Resources SMoH State Ministry of Health MRE Mine Risk Education SO Strategic Objective MRM Monitoring and Reporting Mechanism SPHCDA State Primary Healthcare Development Agency MSF Médecins Sans Frontières UASC Unacompany and Seperated Children MSF-F Médecins Sans Frontières France UNDP United Nations Development Programme MSF-S Médecins Sans Frontières Spain UNDSS United Nations Department of Safety and Security MUAC Mid-Upper Arm Circumference UNFPA United Nations Population Fund NEMA National Emergency Management Agency UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees NFE Non Formal Education UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund NFI Non Food Items UNOCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs NFLC Non Formal Learning Center USAID United States Agency for International Development NHRC National Human Rights Commission UXO/IED Unexploded Ordnance/ Improvised Explosive Device NPHCDA National Primary Healthcare Development WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Agency NRC Norwegian Refugee Council WFP World Food Programme NRCS Nigerian Red Cross Society WHO World Health Organization OCHA OPS OXFAM PFA PHC PLW PSS RDT RUWASSA SAM SBMC SCI SEA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Online Planning/Projects System OXFAM International Psychological First Aid Primary Health Care Pregnant and Latening Women Psychosocial Support Services Rapid Detection Test Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agency Severe Acute Malnutrition School Based Management Committee Save the Children International Sexual exploitation and Abuse

6 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria FUNDING: 279 million ($US) Required 22% of total requirement 62.8 million ($US) Received Source: Financial Tracking Service (FTS) As of 3 June 216. CONTENTS: Overview... 6 Changes in context... 8 Humanitarian context... 8 Needs analysis... 8 Response capacity... 8 Strategic Objectives: Achievements to date... 9 Strategic Objective Strategic Objective Strategic Objective Analysis Funding analysis Challenges Contingency/Preparedness Plans Analysis of achievements against funding and challenges Recommendations Sector Achievements Camp Coordination and Camp Management Emergency Shelter and Non-Food Items (NFI) Education Food Security... 3 Health Nutrition Protection Protection: Child Protection Sub- Sector Protection: Gender Based Violence Sub-Sector Water, Sanitation and Hygience Early Recovery and Livelihoods Roles and Responsibilities Hidden text OVERVIEW Key achievements toward Strategic Objectives For the first six months of Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) implementation, the humanitarian country team achieved the following: - 45,4 beneficiaires out the targeted 61,835, representing 73 per cent, were reached for non-food item (NFI) provisions - 393,487 out of 1,666,188 targeted had access to safe water. This represents 24 per cent achievement of target. - 2 per cent of targeted children, or 129, out of 63,, had access to classroom equipped with WASH facilities - Approximately 8,6 children, or 84 per cent of children, benefitted from life skills lessons in the classrooms/non formal education (NFE) centers - About 272,93 people biometrically registered, representing 68 per cent of the target - Out of the 6,3 children targeted, 3,294 (or 55 per cent) unaccompanied and separated children (UASC) identified and reached by the Child Protection Sector of 134 targeted schools benefitted from emergency preparedness activities - Out of 8 health personnel targeted, 42 (or 53 per cent) were trained on disease outbreak response and coordination. Challenges - Existing unmet needs are exacerbated by needs unfolding in newly accessible areas - Funding constraints remain a challenge for agencies to scale up and expand coverage. - Grave violation of human rights including death, injuries, sexual violence, exploitation and abuse, forced displacement and attacks on civilian sites with more robust protection mechanisms required. - Increase in disease for the most vulnerable due to rainy season. Recommendations - Shift of operational hubs to Borno to expedite response and reducing logistical costs. - Incorporate needs in newly accessible areas in the existing operational plans of sectors and agencies. - Intensify resource mobilization efforts by engaging donors, the Government of Nigeria and private sector. - Strengthen systematic information gathering, analysis and monitoring to guide needs analysis, increase accountability and advocacy for humanitarian action. - Enhance community engagement to increase feedbacking and monitoring of sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) and gender based violence (GBV) cases. - Strengthen localized contingency planning for the rainy season.

7 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 7

8 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria CHANGES IN CONTEXT Humanitarian context Out of the 7 million people in need identified for the 216 HRP, 3.9 million were targeted for the response. In Arpil through a Multi-Sector Needs Assessment, up to 8, IDPs were projected to be in newly accessible areas in Borno state. This significantly increased the caseload. As of June 216, more that 2 million people remain displaced, more than 5 per cent of whom are children. About 87per cent were displaced due to the Boko Haram insurgency. Most of the IDPs are taking temporary refugee in Borno (1.6 million), Adamawa (16,), Yobe (112,) and Gombe (27,). Needs Analysis The four affected states in Nigeria s northeast are mainly agricultural. With the huge reduction in the numbers of farms planted, the harvest, which normally occurs in late September/October will not meet the needs of the millions of people who are normally self-sufficient and food secure. Provision of security to farmers, removal of remnants of war/uxo/ieds, agricultural inputs, local shelter building materials and sources of safe drinking water are identified as urgent needs. Protection needs are essential with grave human rights violation. There are concerns for IDPs living in makeshift sites in Borno, Yobe and Adamawa located on land with poor drainage and grossly inadequate sanitation as the rainy season begins. Many people are already in critical health with high incidents of severe malnourishment, morbidity and mortality. Response Capacity The 216 Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) is focused on four (of six) states in Nigeria s north-east - Borno, Adamawa, Yobe and Gombe. OCHA has sub-offices to support coordination at the state level in three states, except Gombe. There are 27, 32, 12 and 2 humanitarian partners in Adamawa, Borno, Gombe and Yobe states, respectively. At the end of June, these partners have covered 21 LGAs in Adamawa, 23 LGAs in Borno, 11 LGAs in Gombe and 17 LGAs in Yobe. 8

9 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES: ACHIEVEMENTS TO DATE The achievement of Strategic Objectives (SO) 1, 2 and 3 are based on main activities undertaken by sectors in Nigeria s north-east. These interventions include emergency shelter/nfis, CCCM, education, WASH, protection (child protection, psychosocial support and GBV), health and early recovery. Of all the interventions, the Early Recovery Sector faced the ultimate challenge of zero-funding for the period, resulting in no achievement of the proposed intervention under SO 3. Strategic Objective 1: Deliver coordinated and integrated life- saving assistance to people affected by emergencies. Progress toward Strategic Objective Significant achievement is attained for WASH, ES/NFI, education and psychosocial interventions. NFI provisions reached 73 per cent of targeted beneficiaries. The WASH Sector reached 24 per cent of of target benefitting from access to safe water. Under the Education Sector, access to classroom WASH facilities was 2 per cent achieved and 84 per cent of children (approximately 8,6), were reached for life skills lessons in the classrooms/nfe centers. However, only four per cent of targeted vulnerable people were reached with psychosocial support. Indicators: s vs. Results to-date Number of vulnerable persons provided with psychosocial support to promote their wellbeing in thousands 253, 122% 39,821 people reached Number of IDPs with access to safe water Millions in millions 1,666,188 24% 393,487 people reached 1 Total psychosocial support services from Protection, Child Protection and GBV. 9

10 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria Number of NFI kits delivered to households in need in thousands 61,835 73% 45,4 households reached Number of children benefitting from safe and equipped classrooms with adequate male and female WASH facilities in affected areas. 7 63, 129, 2% children reached in thousands Number of targeted children with access to life skills lessons in the classrooms/nfe centers in thousands 15, 84% 8,6 children reached Strategic Objective 2: Track and analyse risk and vulnerability, integrating findings into humanitarian and development programming. Progress toward Strategic Objective There were about 272,93 people biometrically registered, representing 68 per cent of the target. Out of the 6,3 children targeted, there were 3,294 (55 per cent) unaccompanied and separated children (UASC) identified and reached by the Child Protection Sector. Referrals for specialized GBV care recorded a two per cent attainment of target. 1

11 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 Indicators: s vs. Results to-date Number of eligible persons biometrically registered in thousands 4, 68% 272,93 people reached Number of unaccompanied and separated children (UASC) identified in 6,3 1,282 1,622 2,52 3,87 3,294 55% 3,294 UASC reached Number of referrals for specialized GBV care supported 7, specialized GBV care supported 5% Strategic Objective 3: Support vulnerable population to better cope with shocks by responding earlier to warning signals, by reducing post-crisis recovery times and by building capacity of national actors. Progress toward Strategic Objective Preparedness and resilience-building was achieved through interventions in education and health. To date, there are 159 out of 134 targeted schools that benefitted from the conduct of emergency preparedness activities. There are 42 out 8 targeted health personnel, representing 53 per cent, trained on disease outbreak response and coordination. However, there is zero achievement on early recovery-related interventions on assisting vulnerable households with sustainable shelter at places of return due to zero funding of the sector. 11

12 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria Indicators: s vs. Results to-date Number of targeted schools in conflict affected states with established SBMCs able to conduct emergency preparedness activities Hundreds 1 11 in hundreds 119% schools reached Number of health authority personnel trained on disease outbreak response and coordination % health personnel trained Number of vulnerable households assisted with sustainable habitat at places of return 21 21, 1.5 in thousands % vulnerable households reached 12

13 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 ANALYSIS Funding analysis Limited funding continues to impede efforts to reach more people with life-saving assistance. The 216 Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) seeks US$279 2 million to reach million people with life-saving interventions. By end of June 216, only 22 per cent or $62.8 million was received causing timely interventions to lag behind the increasing needs across all sectors. Funding: Required vs. Received to date (million $US) 279 million ($US) 62.8 million ($US) 22% Total Required Total Received Total Funded Unmet: million ($US) Food Security Protection Emergency Shelter & NFI Health WASH Early Recovery Required Received Education Coordination Nutrition CCCM Source: Financial Tracking Service (FTS) as of 3 June 216 Challenges The continuing push by humanitarian agencies to reach hard-to-access areas, resulted in uncovering new depths of devastation and hunger. The extent of suffering in these areas is unprecedented and expected to worsen as the rainy and lean season progresses. The access to new areas, specially in Borno state (15 sites) and Yobe (two LGAs), increased the humanitarian caseload by at least 8, individuals. Glaring humanitarian needs - food, shelter, WASH, protection and health interventions continue to be a challenge as funding requirements are not met. It is estimated that 7.3 million people are at risk of hunger, while 3 million require immediate food assistance. Spontaneuous returns, often un-informed, are taking place outside of Borno state. This poses challenges for security and availability of basic services and livelihood opportunities. IDPs demonstrated in the camps, when government food awaiting distribution did not happen in a timely manner. Should the food riots continue, they will likely increase the risk of attacks, looting and tensions, making humanitarian workers in the field more vulnerable to attacks. 2 Includes financial ask from WFP, as part of Food Security Sector, incorporated in April Including 8, people in need in newly accessible areas 13

14 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria While a decision to move the centre of gravity to Maiduguri was made, this will cause logistical problems and safety issues for the UN agencies and NGOs. No accommodation that meets MORSS standards has been identified. The increasing numbers of humanitarian workers arriving is pushing costs while the demand is reducing the number of options for accommodation. UNDSS does not have the capacity to deal with the Level 5 security situation. Contingency/Preparedness Plans With the possibility of flooding during the rainy season state-level initiated flood response preparedness plans were addressed. Health, WASH & CCCM/shelter co-leads in Borno state identified top priority preparedness and response actions especially in IDP camps. Insufficient preparedness interventions increase the risk of a cholera outbreak. With increasing numbers of LGAs becoming partialy or fully accessible, more people are in need of humanitarian assistance. The sector working groups updated their plans to include specific priority interventions in the newly accessible areas to benefit up to 8, individuals. These plans are used for operational prioritization and as a donor advocacy tool for extra support. The additional key priorities, subject to finalization, would increase the financial ask for the 216 HRP to run up to the end of the year. Correspondingly, selected humanitarian agencies began to organize themselves and declare an internal Level 3 (L3) emergency in their respective organizations. This approach aims to scale up efforts in response to the increasingly worsening needs in the northeast as well strengthen coordination at both field and federal level. This complements the decision of the HCT to move the center of gravity to Maiduguri in Borno state where about 1.6 million IDPs are located (DTM X, June 216). Analysis of achievements, against funding and challenges Out of the HRP total requirement of $279 million, 22 per cent is funded or approximately $62.8 million, leaving $216.5 million unmet. The Humanitarian Country Team is deeply concerned that the insufficient funds cannot meet the enourmous humanitarian needs. While Nutrition, ES/NFI, CCCM and WASH Sectors received funding of 5per cent, 43per cent, 34per cent and 23per cent respectively, Food Security, Health, Education and Protection Sectors received less than 2per cent of the necessary funding. The Early Recovery and Livelihoods (ERL) Sector had zero- per cent achievement due to lack of funding. This level of achievement is highly dependent on funding to support scale up and expansion. Humanitarian access is also key to reaching the people in need. The humanitarian community is strengthening its engagement with the Government to gain humanitarian access facilitated by dialogue through the Civil Military Coordinator. However, the challenge is differentiating humanitairan action and maintaining its civilian character as areas outside Maiduguri can only be accessed with military escorts. To ensure that needs in newly accessible areas, outside Maiduguri in Borno State, are addressed, the establishment of humanitarian hubs are underway. Nonetheless, financial resources and infrastructure support are needed to establish these hubs as soon as possible. Recommendations The Humanitarian Country Team (HCT) continues to create opportunities to engage the Government and donors to increase the profile of the Nigeria s northeast situation in order to draw more support. A decision was taken by the HCT to move the center of gravity to Maiduguri, the capital of Borno state. A number of UN agencies and INGOs started to declare an internal L3 to scale up capacity for response and coordination. While significant presence is moved to Maiduguri, a scale reflecting the required level of response and attention is called for the other states (Adamawa, Yobe and Gombe). Abuja teams (UN and INGOs) need to maintain a minimum capacity to support field operations, integrate inter-state and inter-sector priorities and continue engagement with the federal government, donors and other stakeholders. The Borno state level forum mirroring the HCT should be treated separately from the federal level forum. The Borno humanitarian team needs to have authority to decide on immediate operational concerns while leaving strategic decisions to the HCT in Abuja. The humanitarian community will continue to mobilize resources to address needs. To ensure that the requirements are supported by an objective analysis of needs, the sectors have begun to initiate scale up plans to include the 14

15 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 newly accessible areas. Correspondingly, the sectors recognize the need for systematic information gathering, analysis and reporting to ensure sound basis for the response and increase transparency and accountability to affected populations. Community engagement needs to be improved so that communities feel some ownership over their lives, contribute to identifying needs, recognize, report and address SEA and GBV cases. The situation in the northeast requires sensitization for government officials on SEA and GBV. This ensures the welfare of the community is prioritised by government officials in charge of IDP affairs. The code of conduct on SEA needs to be also strictly adhered to by humanitarian workers. The coordinated humanitarian response through international resources is supplementary to the government s own resource outlays, set aside for the populations affected by the Boko Haram insurgency. It is therefore essential that the two support streams work together transparently, to ensure complementarities are realized. The HCT continues to request for a predictable relationship with government through a dedicated leadership focal point. This will enable joint planning and response, at all levels. 15

16 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENT SECTOR OVERVIEW COORDINATOR: National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) Co Lead: International Organisation for Migration (IOM) NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN NEED, AND 625, IN NEED 4, 272,93 34% Covered of US$ 4.5 million required people in need targeted for the response 64% 68% CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THROUGH JUNE in thousands people reached TOTAL PEOPLE BY SEX 83,44 girls 83,15 boys 64,58 women 35,885 men 3,42 elderly women 3,13 elderly men The CCCM Sector received about $1.5 million, 34 per cent of the $4.5 million required by the sector. CCCM mechanisms ensured that services are delivered efficiently and that populations of concern are protected in camp or camp-like settings. The CCCM Sector advocated for assistance in line with international minimum standards and for assistance and interventions to take into consideration cross-cutting issues such as gender, environment and the do no harm principle. The sector is currently providing site facilitation support in 21 camps in Borno (14 formal and seven informal) and eight camps in Adamawa (four formal and four informal). The camps site facilitators are working to support NEMA in addressing the issues on camp management/provision of services and also data collection and incident reporting. In February 216, the voluntary relocation process of displaced people from the Government College Camp in Maiduguri was completed. Relocation of 3,896 individuals (1,83 households) to Bakassi II Camp was completed and more than 2 emergency shelters were constructed to absorb these and other IDPs relocated from schools, as Borno state authorities moved to reopen educational facilities for children. These activities continued over the month of June and over 9, individuals in total were relocated to Bakassi II Camp and contributing to the closure of four camps based in schools. Representatives of the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), the respective State Emergency Management Agencies (SEMA) and sector partners have been collecting information on the locations of displaced people and their needs. They cover IDPs in camps, camp-like sites and host communities. Their findings are 2 Number of projects in 216 Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP)* 8 PARTNERS** 1project funded. 1project not yet funded. * Based on projects in the OPS submitted for appeal ** Based on Who does What Where (3Ws) 16

17 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 published on a bi-monthly basis in the DTM report, which now covers 13 4 states. The DTM, Round X reported 2,66,783 people displaced in Nigeria. The data collection tools include, but are not limited to, baseline assessment at LGA/ward level, site assessment (bi-monthy) and the CCCM Site Tracker tool, which has a GIS web map component (weekly). As part of the sector capacity building support to government authorities and local partners, the sector concluded a learning needs assessment (LNA) in preparedness and response to the humanitarian crisis in 13 states across the north-east, north-central, and north-west regions of Nigeria. The LNA showed that there are high needs within NEMA and SEMA offices for training in thematic topics, namely SPHERE Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response, psychological first aid (PFA), protection and gender-based violence prevention and response, emergency shelter, CCCM, and information management. The sector is developing and carrying out training sessions over the past few months. A total of 264 NEMA and SEMA staff as well as Red Cross and local partners working in displacement situation were trained in PFA, CCCM with emphasis on camp management, and SPHERE from May to July 216. Moreover, 32 NEMA, SEMA, and local partner s staff completed a training of trainers in CCCM with focus on camp management. In addition, seven training sessions on topics namely SPHERE, emergency shelter and protection in CCCM will take place between August and September 216. Continous revision of site plan of Bakassi II Camp has been taking place to sort out constraints related to low land and possibility of floods during the rainy season. Drainage works will mitigate the risk of floods and damage to the newly constructed shelters in the camp. Similar types of assessment are planed for other camps prone to floods. Site plans to decongest several camps have been produced by sector members. Those include Farm Centre, Bakassi II, Konduga Primary School, Fariye, Muna Garage 2/8, etc. Plans for other camps are foreseen, especially in Bama General Hospital, Dikwa, Muna Garage, El Badawe and others. Changes in Context After the UN Joint Assessment exercise of April 216 in the newly accessible areas, the sector made specific recommendations to improve the quality of management and services in camps managed by the Nigerian Army in several locations outside Maiduguri, These recommendations, to be implemented in the short, medium and long term, acknowledged the security constraints and the low capacity of humanitarian actors to directly deliver assistance and place personnel in the concerned areas, enphasizing the roles of the Government, the army, the National Red Cross Society and civil society organizations, while in practice increasing the support on training and capacity building for NEMA, SEMA, NRCS and NGOs. Sector Performance All the indicators for the CCCM Sector are on track to be achieved. However, as of the end of June, the number or sites receiving site facilitation has not increased, mainly due to funding constraints, and the total number achieved might not be reached by the end of the year. An increasing number of actors are delivering e-shelters and refinforced emergency shelters in host communities, approaching the target indicated in the HRP. Challenges Human resources for sector coordination are limited: coordinators, information management officers and site planners require at least $4,/year Many IDP small communal settings in need of camp management in metropolitan areas not yet considered as sites Difficulty in reporting activities due to low rate of updates received from partners. Limited funding for emergency senior staff is putting pressure on agencies. 4 Adamawa, Bauchi, Benue, Borno, FCT (Abuja), Gombe, Kaduna, Kano, Nasarawa, Plateau, Taraba, Yobe & Zamfar 17

18 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria Only 22 per cent of targeted population has been reached with NFI kits and only 45 per cent with shelter. Needs for both remain critical for both. Population in new accessible areas not included in HRP. Additional funding for CCCM would be needed amounting to additional $1 million, to complement requirements for ES/NFI estimated at $19 million. Actions to be taken Improvement on quality and crosscheck of inputs in the 4W matrix and production of maps of interventions at LGA level Increased coordination with other pertinent sectors WG (i. e. WASH for drainage and care and maintenance; logistics for air services issues) Development of Contingency Plan capacity Analysis of achievements and gaps in HRP, as baseline, plus newly accessible areas Preparation in Adamawa for Nigerian refugees returning from Cameroon and other countries Flash site profile updates for locations assessed for the first time Development of CCCM Multi Sector Tracker for activities and gaps in camps Deployment of dedicated sector co-coordinator in Borno PROGRESS TOWARDS SECTOR OBJECTIVES CCCM OBJECTIVE 1: Track and monitor displacement and mobility, including sex and age disaggregated data and information on needs and gaps, in order to establish a comprehensive profile of the displaced population. Relates to SO3 Number of assessment reports published capturing displacement data % reached Number of eligible persons biometrically registered 4 4, 272, in thousands 68% people reached 18

19 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 CCCM OBJECTIVE 2: Support coordination and management of displacement (both camp and out-ofcamp ) to ensure that minimum standards are upheld, with community participation and engagement, through training and on-site facilitation support. Relates to S1 & SO3 Capacity building trainings held on CCCM for national authorities, local actors and CCCM actors % Percentage of trainings conducted Number of sites (both camp and out-of-camp ) receiving site facilitation support from roving teams % sites reached CCCM OBJECTIVE 3: Support decongestion and upgrade in formal and informal camps, including site planning and improvements where required. Relates to SO1 Number of formal and informal camps assessed for viability % Camps reached Number of formal and informal camps improved through site planning, infrastructure and/or basic engineering works 19

20 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria % Camps reached 2

21 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 EMERGENCY SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS (NFI) SECTOR OVERVIEW COORDINATOR: National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) CO LEAD: International Organisation for Migration (IOM) NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN NEED, 1,6, IN NEED 926,857 38,289 43% Covered of $27.7 million required people in need targeted for the response 58% 41% people reached. 1 6 Projects funded. CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THROUGH JUNE TOTAL PEOPLE 11,873 girls 98,284 boys ,593 women in thousands 67,334 12,888 elderly men April May June women 13,317 elderly men Number of projects in 216 Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP)* 7 PARTNERS** 4 projects not yet funded. * Based on projects in the OPS submitted for appeal ** Based on who does, What, Where (3Ws) The provision of direct assistance as shelter or NFIs reduced overcrowding in existing camps and host community areas by providing habitable and covered living space. This ensures privacy, dignity and creates conducive environment for the provision of protection services while maintaining minimum SPHERE standards and appropriate site planning. This minimizes health hazards emanating from lack of proper hygiene. Changes in Context After the UN Joint Assessment exercise of April 216 in the newly accessible areas, the sector made specific recommendations to improve the quality of services and management in camps managed by the Nigerian Army in several locations outside Maiduguri. These recommendations, to be implemented in the short, medium and long term, acknowledged the security constraints and the low capacity of humanitarian actors to directly deliver assistance and place personnel in the concerned areas, enphasizing the roles to be played by the Government, the Army, the National Red Cross Society and Civil Society Organizations, while in practice increasing the support on trainings and capacity building for NEMA, SEMA, NRCS and NGOs. Sector Performance Of the 1.6 million individuals in need of shelter or NFIs, 926, were prioritized by the sector. At the end of June around 7,356 individuals received emergency shelter assistance by different sectors. Limited resources allocated to the shelter response, in addition to limited humanitarian access are presenting bottlenecks in the overall response. As of 2 May, only 45 per cent of the shelter assistance pledged funds was received against the HRP. Only 22 per cent of the targeted population was reached with NFIs kit by the sector partners. 21

22 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria Of the five indicators measured by the Emergency Shelter and NFI Sectors, all are on track to be achieved by the end of the year. Challenges Difficulty in reporting activities due to low rate of updates received from partners Limited funding for emergency senior staff is putting pressure on agencies Only 22 per cent of targeted population has been reached with NFI kits and only 45 per cent with shelter needs remain critical for both Population in new accessible areas not included in HRP. Additional funding required for emergency response is above $2 million, (5 per cent for CCCM) Over $3 million is required for overall response in remaining months of 216 Human resources for sector coordination are limited: coordinators, information management officers and site planners require at least $4,/year. However, funding for sector coordination is not forthcocming. Actions to be taken Activation of Sector Technical Working Group in Borno for ad hoc needs (i. e. Bama e-shelter, drainage in camps) Improvement on quality and crosscheck of inputs in the 4W matrix and production of maps of interventions at LGA level Development of Contingency Plan capacity Analysis of achievements and gaps in HRP, as baseline, plus newly accessible areas Preparation in Adamawa for Nigerian refugees returning from Cameroon and other countries Deployment of a dedicated sector co-coordinator in Borno. PROGRESS TOWARDS SECTOR OBJECTIVES ES/NFI OBJECTIVE 1: Ensure sufficient and flexible supply and targeted delivery of minimum standard emergency shelter and NFI kits (including assessment, distribution and post-distribution monitoring) to people in need, including displaced people in host communities. Relates to SO1 Number of NFI kits delivered to households in need. 61,835 45, in thousands 73% households reached Number of e-shelter/ shelter repair kits delivered to households in need (including people in host communities) 22

23 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June ,22 6, in thousands 19% households reached Number of post-distribution monitoring reports shared with the sector and information programming % reports produced ES/NFI OBJECTIVE 2: Deliver reinforced emergency shelter to upgrade and decongest formal and informal camps to minimum standards. Relates to SO1 Number of reinforced e-shelters constructed in formal and informal camps in thousands 8, 32% 2,528 e-shelters reached 23

24 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria ES/NFI OBJECTIVE 3: Deliver locally appropriate shelter solutions for vulnerable IDPs in need both in host communities and returning to their communities of origin. Relates to SO1 Number of reinforced e-shelters constructed / shelters repaired in host and return communities 13 13, 4, in thousands 38% shelters reached 24

25 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 EDUCATION SECTOR OVERVIEW COORDINATOR: MINISTRY OF EDUCATION CO LEAD: UNICEF NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN NEED, AND 1,, IN NEED 63, 173,357 14% Covered of $16.6 million required 63% people in need targeted for the response 27% people reached out of 63, targeted for the response 11 1 Project funded. CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THROUGH JUNE in thousands TOTAL CHILDREN 84,468 Girls 88,889 Boys Number of projects in 216 Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP)* 6 PARTNERS** 1 Projects not yet funded. * Based on projects in the OPS submitted for appeal ** Based on Who, does What, Where (3Ws) With the sector interventions, about 128,957 (64,897B/64,6G) school-aged, conflict-affected children have been enrolled into school. About 173,357 (88,889B/84,468G) children benefitted from the distribution of educational materials including emergency classroom supplies and kits. Based on the 216 Education Sector HRP targets, 28 per cent of targeted conflict-affected school-aged children were reached with educational materials. About 26 per cent of school going children targeted received access to education. Changes in Context Among the returnees from Cameroon in Fufore Camp, Adamawa 9 per cent never attended school prior to the insurgency. The number of children currently in need of humanitarian response in the north east increased by at least 25 per cent with the return of 67, Nigerians from Cameroon and a further 25, children in newly accessible areas. The destruction of virtually all school infrastructure and supporting WASH facilities in the newly accessible and return areas mean that safe learning spaces (permanent/semi-permanent/temporary) need to be urgently constructed. Teachers who might be available to support education within the newly accessible areas are likely to be in need psychological first aid themselves. Sector Performance Among the 68-membered organizations that constitute the Education in Emergencies Working Group (EiEWG), sector performance reported (access: 26 per cent of target; quality: 28 per cent) was directly related to operational presence, capacity and funding availability. The non-funding of the Education Sector under the 216 HRP left six partners restricted by donor funding. A total of 11 sector partners submitted project sheets that indicated key activities and caseload coverage that were planned towards response achievement for the sector. Among these six contributing partners, operational presence demanded by donors beyond Borno, Adamawa and Yobe, included Bauchi and Gombe where the humanitarian needs are not as severe as the three most critical states. 25

26 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria Challenges Poor sector funding resulted in limited education partner operational ground presence and grossly reduced the scale of education response in accessible areas. The additional education access needs that exist in newly accessible areas further challenges the humanitarian response to children denied of their rights to education for more than two years. Teacher availability remained a constraint as many teachers did not return to their profession while state educational authorities are unwilling to take new teachers onto their payroll. Available teachers are largely untrained to address psychosocial and emerging needs that have arisen. It is imperative that children are supported to cope psychologically and achieve academically inspite of the effects of insurgency. The unavailability of teaching resource and learning materials and arrangements for catch up classes further present as challenges to the Education Sector response. Actions to be taken Education Sector response funding must be prioritized especially because community education can no longer wait while conflict-affected children remain continually denied of their rights after over two years of missed education. Education is lifesaving as it incorporates new learning opportunities that empower children to cope with trauma and the additional needs that have arisen as a result of the impact of insurgency. Security concerns must be addressed to encourage confidence for parents to send their children to school. This also includes the establishment of early warning systems and the introduction of community-driven protective initiatives that would promote ownership and sustainability. Non-availability of teahers determine school attendance. Volunteer teachers should be recruited after update training has been provided to enable them address gaps in education supply to address catch-up on missed years of schooling. Teachers also traumatized by the insurgency must be supported through key peer coping efforts. Provision of teaching and learning materials to support education delivery remains an urgent need. Recommendations The indicator that specifies the percentage of non-formal learning centers (NFLC)/ alternative education (AEs) established to meet or surpass criteria for safe, quality and relevant NFLCs is difficult to monitor with the 5Ws and should be removed. The inclusion of an indicator that is able to measure early childhood development (ECD) needs through provision of ECD kits/materials should be included. In addition, an indicator to measure materials provided to support sports and recreation which in turn promote psychosocial support (PSS) should be included. PROGRESS TOWARDS SECTOR OBJECTIVES Formal and non-formal education actors strongly supported the achievement of SO1. They reached conflict affected children beyond the provision of pedagogic materials and access to education, but also through improvement of education quality through the promotion of child-friendly environments to assure that children attend and remain in school. To-date, achievements are recorded at reaching 35,537 learners (2,33B/15,54G) including 48 (24B/24G) special needs learners in Damaturu and Potiskum LGAs of Yobe state; 1,2 (772B/23G) learners from Jere LGA of Borno state and 7,252 (377B/4175G) learners in Fufore, Girie, Numan, Shelleng, Song, Yola-North, Yola- South LGAs. Adamawa state benefited from access to 125 gender and special needs-sensitive WASH facilities. These facilities were constructed with key consideration for GBV-related protection issues. At least 173,357 (88,889B/84,468G) school-aged conflict-affected children were reached through enrolment (128,957; 64,897B/64,6G) into age-appropriate learning institutions; 173,673 school bags provided and equipped with classroom supplies, and 2,758 school-in-a-box kits to support 44 non-formal learning and alternative education centers were established. Additionally, 167 equipped (blackboards and mats) temporary learning spaces were provided to support formal (128) and non-formal (39) education. There are 1,14 teachers utilizing new skills and capacity in pedagogy, classroom methodology and school emergency preparedness and response. In Borno, 1,2 (772B/23G) learners benefitted from catch-up classes provided by 42 (18M/24F) volunteer teachers who received hardship allowances. 26

27 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 EDUCATION OBJECTIVE 1: Provide access to inclusive and protective learning including safe classrooms, with WASH facilities, trained teachers and learning materials for conflict-affected children aged Relates to SO1 Number of children benefitting from safe and equipped classrooms with adequate male and female WASH facilities in affected areas. 7 63, 129, in thousands targeted conflict-affected children benefiting from learning supplies 1% 5, 2% children reached 175, 5% 23% 25% 31% 33% 35% 35% children reached % 2% Number of learners enrolled in non-formal learning centers (NFLCs) and alternative education (AE) 6 3, , in thousands 169% children reached EDUCATION OBJECTIVE 2: Improve the ability of conflict- affected children aged 3 17 to cope in an emergency through relevant learning, life skills and psychosocial first-aid. Relates to SO3 There are 1,899 teachers and non-formal education facilitators who benefitted from capacity building for psychological first aid (PFA) and PSS, and social emotional learning. Among these instructors, life skills training was provided to 29 (176M/124F) to support stepdown training to learners, empowering them to deal with emerging issues. The development of a relevant national curriculum that captures new learning needs was initiated by the EIEWGN and is led by designated agencies for emergency and education curriculum development. 27

28 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria emergency affected learning spaces/ schools in target areas incorporating psychosocial support 1% % 68% 5% 82% schools reached % % % % % Number of targeted conflict-affected children benefitting from psychological first aid , 129, in thousands 84% children reached Number of targeted children with access to life skills lessons in the classrooms/nfe centers 15 15, 8, in thousands 84% children reached EDUCATION OBJECTIVE 3: Restore and protect learning in conflict affected states through community advocacy, mobilization. Relates to SO1 & SO2 There are 159 school based-management committees (SBMCs) established in schools, IDP camps and host communities. Members of the SBMCs total 1,385 (12M/383F), with the following breakdown: Gombe 234 (172M/62F), 85 (71M/14F) in Yobe, 26 (8M/8F) in Adamawa and 86 (533M/273F) in Borno. They acquired enhanced capacity in fulfilling their roles and responsibilities in school protection and school governance. 28

29 Nigeria PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT January to June 216 Number targeted schools in conflict affected states with established SBMCs that are able to conduct emergency preparedness activities Hundreds 1 11 in hundreds 119% schools reached affected teachers/caregivers and facilitators receiving psychosocial support 1% % 22% 22% people reached % NFLC/AEs established that meet or surpass criteria for safe, quality and relevant NFLCs 1% 79% 88% % 88% NFLC/AEs reached % 29

30 January to June 216 PERIODIC MONITORING REPORT Nigeria FOOD SECURITY SECTOR OVERVIEW COORDINATOR: MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE (MoA) CO LEAD: UNITED NATIONS FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION (FAO) NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN NEED, AND 3,9, IN NEED 1,5, 61,121 15% Covered of $ 12.8 millio required Millions % people in need targeted for the response CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THROUGH JUNE in millions 4% people reached. TOTAL PEOPLE BY SEX 129,13 girls 134,278 boys 148,774 women 148,18 men 22,237 elderly women 18,639 elderly men 12 PARTNERS** 17 9 Projects funded Number of projects in 216 Humanitarian 8Projects not Response Plan (HRP)* yet funded * Based on projects in the OPS submitted for appeal ** Based on Who does, What, Where (3Ws) Changes in Context A Cadre Harmonise (CH) Assessment was conducted in March 216, which generated relaible statistics and data on the level of food insecurity in Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states during the lean season from January to March 216, to inform partner planning and programming processes. The CH was spefically aimed at updating the food security status in the three affected states from January through to March 216. From the analysis, about 3,24,239 million people were classified in the IPC Phase of 3 to 5, (in crisis to famine-like conditions). Sector Performance Food secuirity co-ordination is functioning well at federal and state level, which enhanced a timely response to the needs of the affected population, as well as improved co-ordination, collaboration and synergy amongst partners.) Critical food assistance (cash and in-kind) are provided by partners to address the immediate needs of the IDPs and host communities in Borno, Yobe, Gombe and Adamawa states. A Cash Transfer Programme (CTP) symposium was held in April 216, in partnership with FAO and OCHA. This symposium highlighted a number of strategic recommendations to streamline cash transfer programmes and interventions across different working groups. Its recommendations and framework for operating cash/voucher schemes are available for all FSS partners and other sectors A Food Security Taskforce, under the FSWG, was set up to look into the strategic recommendations of the cash symposium towards operationalizing these recommendations. The taskforce reports to the food 3