Matter of East Hampton Gerard Point, LLC v Town of E. Hampton Zoning Bd. of Appeals 2019 NY Slip Op 30159(U) January 15, 2019 Supreme Court, Suffolk
|
|
- Noel Daniel
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Matter of East Hampton Gerard Point, LLC v Town of E. Hampton Zoning Bd. of Appeals 2019 NY Slip Op 30159(U) January 15, 2019 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Denise F. Molia Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's ecourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
2 [* 1] COPY Index No.: SUPREME COURT-STATE OF NEW YORK l.a.s. Part 39 - SUFFOLK COUNTY PRESENT: Hon. DENISE F. MOLIA, Justice In the Matter of the Application of EAST HAMPTON GERARD POINT, LLC, Petitioner, For a Judgment pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules - against - THE TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, Respondent. CASE DISPOSED: YES MOTION RID: 2/10/ 17 SUBMISSION DATE: 2/9/ 18 MOTION SEQUF.NCE NO.: 00 l MOT D A rrorney FOR PETITIONER Farrell Fritz, PC 50 Station Road, Building One Water Mill, New York A TIORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT East Hampton Town Attorney 159 Pantigo Road East Hampton, New York Upon the following papers filed and considered relative to this matter: Notice of Petition and Verified Petition dated January 5, 2017; Verified Answer dated March 9, 2017; Respondent's Return; Petitioner's Supplemental Return; Petitioner's Memorandum of Law; Respondent's Memorandum of Law in Opposition; Petitioner's Reply Memorandum of Law; and upon due deliberation; it is ORDERED, that the petition of East Hampton Gerard Point, LLC, pursuant to Article 78, for a Judgment annulling a deccrmination of the respondent, is denied and the petition is dismissed. The petitioner is the owner of the unimproved property located at 22 Shore Road, Amagansett, New York, also known and identified on the Suffolk County Tax Map as Lot No ("subject premises"). The instant Article 78 proceeding constitutes an appeal of the East Hampton Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") denial of petitioner's application for a Natural Resources Special Penn it ("NRSP") for a s ingle fami ly residence on an ocean front property for which no variances are required under the Town of East Hampton's Zoning Code. The petitioner has made two applications to the ZBA, seeking the same basic relief for the same parcel of land. In denying the first application submitted in 2015, the ZBA and the Town's Planning staff made a series of recommendations for preparing an application that could be approved by the respondent Board. Rather than permitting the petitioner to amend his application, the respondent advised the petitioner 1
3 [* 2] that the ZBA 's policy required the filing of a new application. The petitioner incorporated the suggestions from the first application into a second application. The instant Article 78 proceeding is an appeal of the ZBA 's denial of the second application. Although the Record of the first application is not before the Court for review, the proceedings and decision in the two applications are intermingled. fn the instant decision, the ZBA referred to, discussed and incorporated the first decision into the proceedings. In addition, the petitioner and members of the public who spoke at the hearings on the second application also referred to the hearings and decision on the first application and addressed the manner and extent to which the second application responded to the recommendations made at the hearing on the first application. The final determination of the 2016 application makes numerous, explicit references to the 20 I 5 application, rendering it a part of the administrative record upon which the Board relied and referenced in the subject determination. The record contains an acknowledgment by a member of the ZBA that the petitioner had responded positively to the concerns raised by the respondent during the initial application process. The petitioner contends that in submitting the subject application in 2016, he complied with the recommendations suggested by the Board in reviewing the in itial application as follows: Recommendation I : Reduce the size of the house - The gross floor area for the house was reduced 30.5% from 4,333 square feet to square feet; the Jot building coverage was reduced 10.9% from 14.6% to 13%, where 20% is permitted; and total lot coverage was reduced 26.5% from 30.2% to 22.2%, where 50% is permitted. Recommendation 2: Remove variances - The application met all zoning requirements, Natural Resources setbacks, and required no variances. Recommendation 3: Reduce excavation of dune - In eliminating foundations and constructing the proposed house on pilings, the excavation of the duce was reduced to a total of 20 I cubic yards. Recommendation 4: Protect the dune vegetation - The original 2015 application would have cleared 14,500 square feet and revegetated 4,000 square feet of the property. The 2016 application proposed to revegetate 12,505 square feet, increasing the vegetation of the dune by 300%, and 250% of the are cleared for the footprint of the house. W ith the house on pilings, the dune under the house would be open and untouched. Recommendation 5: Move structures landward of Coastal Erosion Hazard Area line - A ll structures were re located landward of the CEHA line. Recommendation 6: Move the structures north (landward) of the 24 foot contour line - Petitioner agreed to move all construction north of the 24 foot contour line. 2
4 [* 3] Although the petitioner's second application addressed the concerns raised by the ZBA in the first application, the fact that some form of the recommendations were integrated into the second application does not guarantee that the changes proposed by petitioner would be sufficient to support an approval by the respondent. Following ZBA procedures, a Board member was assigned to review the petitioner's application, visit the property and report findings and recommendations to the Board. David Lys, the member charged with this assignment confirmed that the 2016 application addressed the Board's concerns regarding the initial application and also met the standards for the issuance of a Nan1ral Resources Special Permit, and recommended the granting of the application and the issuance of a NRSP. However, a majority of the Board did not find petitioner's proposed changes to be sufficient to support the ZBA's approval of the NRSP. By decision dated December 6, 2016, the ZBA denied petitio ner's application for a Natural Resources Special Permit to construct a 3,602 sq. ft. two story residence with attached garage, 1,056 sq. ft. of porches and stairs, 143 sq. ft. of walkways, a 388 sq. ft. swimming pool, a sq. ft. previous driveway, new sanitary system with retaining wall, drywe lls, to clear approximately I 1,900 sq. ft. of dune vegetation, to revegetate approximately 4,990 sq. ft. of disturbed area, and vegetate approximately 7,515 sq. ft. of sparsely vegetated area with the Town's jurisdiction of dunes and beach vegetation. Specifically, the Board determined that the project, proposed to take up the entire landward site of the dune, "will have substantial impact to the dune and beach vegetation. The sprawling design of the residence and the additional accessory structures will eliminate much of the dune and destroy beach vegetation." The Board also found that alternative designs exist for a similarly sized residence that would achieve the Town's natural resource protection objective while at the same time satisfying the development objectives of the applicant. The petitioner acknowledges that further alternatives to the application were discussed, but it appears that the primary objection to further exploration of a proposal that would be acceptable to the respondent is economical. Contending that the findings of the ZBA are based upon generalized community opposition and are not supported by evidence in the administrative record, the petitioner has indicated that he is not desirous of expending additional funds for the preparation of further amendments to his application and seeks annulment of the respondent's determination. It is well settled that in an Article 78 proceeding to review the determination of a municipal entity, the Court is " limited to determining whether the action taken by the board was illegal, arbitrary, or an abuse of discretion." Matter of Association of Friends of Sagaponack v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 287 A.D.2d 620, 731 N.Y.S.2d 851. The determination of a zoning board should be sustained upon judicial review if it has a rational basis supported by the record before the zoning board (see, Ifrah v. Utschig, 98 N.Y.2d 304, 308, 746 N.Y.S.2d 667, 669; and should not be disturbed unless the record demonstrates that the agency's action was arbitrary, unreasonable, irrational, or indicative of bad faith (see, Kabro Associates. LLC v. Town of Islip Zoning Board of Appeals, 95 A.D.3d 1118, 944 N.Y.S.2d 277). The Court of Appeals has reaffirmed the limited role of the courts in the review of decisions issued by municipal boards as fo llows: 3
5 [* 4] "As with board determinations on variances, a reviewing court is bound to examine only whether substantial evidence supports the determination of the board. Where substantial evidence exists, a court may not substitute its own judgment for that of the board, even if such a contrary determination is itself supported by the record." Retail Property Trust v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 98 N.Y.2d 190, 196 (see also, Matter of P.M.S. Ltd. v. Zoning Board, 98 N.Y.2d 683; Matter oflfrah v. Utschig, 98 N.Y.2d 304). The reason for the limited scope of judicial review was set forth by the Court of Appeals in Cowan v. Kern, 41 N.Y.2d 591 at 599, as follows: "The crux of the matter is that the responsibility for making zoning decisions has been committed primarily to quasi-legislative, quasi-administrative boards composed ofrepresentatives from the local community. Local officials generally possess the familiarity with local conditions necessary to make the often sensitive planning decisions which affect the development of their community. Absent arbitrariness, it is for the locally selected and locally responsible officials to determine where the public interest in zoning lies. (McGowan v. Cohalan, 41 N.Y.2d 434, 438, supra.) Judicial review of local zoning decision is limited; not only in our court but in all cou11s. Where there is a rational basis for the local decision, that decision should be sustained." Here, the petitioner contends that the respondent has failed to set forth any facts to support its denial of the subject application. However, the Court notes that the ZBA decision does include specific findings which are used to support the Board's determination. A review of the "Additional Findings and Conclusions" of the Board's Determination dated December 6, 2016 reveals the following, in pe1tinent parts: "While the majority of the Board finds that the proposed project is an improvement from the applicant's 2015 proposal, the majority still finds that the project as currently proposed does not promote the relevant purposes set forth in of the Town Code. Specifically, the majority finds that the proposed project does not achieve the following objectives because the sprawling residence will have significant negative impacts to the dune and beach vegetation: (I) Protection of the established character of the neighborhood; (2) Preservation of protective barrier dunes and beaches, unique vegetation, important animal habitats and other natural features significant to the community; (3) Protection of health and safety from flooding and storm dangers; and ( 4) Perpetuation and enhancement of 4
6 [* 5] areas of natural beauty and aesthetic values. The project, which is proposed to take up the entire landward side of the dune, will negatively impact most of the dune unnecessarily. The Board finds that alternative designs exist for a similarly sized residence that will achieve the Town's development objectives above while at the same time satisfying the objectives of the applicant. As discussed by the Planning Department in its Technical Analysis Memorandum, the sprawling design of the residence will have negative impacts to the dune and the beach vegetation." (Finding 11). "The majority of the Board finds that the proposed residence unnecessarily sprawls across the dune. This design will eliminate a large portion of the dune from the northern property line to just above the twenty-four (24') contour line. Covering such a large portion of the dune with structures, wi ll change the entire character of the neighborhood because the character of this area is defined by its dunes and beach vegetation. While the majority acknowledges that there are residences in this area that were constructed closer to the ocean, those residences were constructed prior to the 100' dune crest setback adopted by the Town in 1984 and as noted by the Planning Department, some of those residence have been moved landward. Minimizing impacts to the dune and beach vegetation is the best strategy to protect these vital natural features. In order to minimize impacts applicants should limit the area of the dune covered by structures. A smaller footprint and limited accessory structures (i.e. decking and swimming pool) is the best method to achieve these goals." (Finding 12). " In order to grant a natural resources special permit, applicant must also demonstrate the that proposed project satisfies the criteria set forth in and The majority of the board finds that the proposed project does not satisfy these criteria. As discussed above, the majority finds that the proposed project is not in harmony with the general purposes set forth in The majority also finds chat the proposed project is not in compliance with (K). The majority of the Board find that the natural characteristics of the site are such that the proposed residence may not be introduced without undue disturbance or disruption of important natural features. The majority finds that the coverage of the residence proposed, almost the width of the building envelope, will cause destruction of the dune and severely impact beach vegetation. Applicant could avoid such large scale destruction of the dune by reducing the overall footprint of the residence. It's the majority's opinion that similar gross floor area can be achieved while still maintaining the desired views of the ocean. Applicant could add a second story that will still maintain height, pyramid and story requirements, or add additional space on the first floor. While adding additional space on the first floor may also impact the 5
7 [* 6] dune, it would be confined to an area and therefore impact less of the dune." (Finding 13). "Due to their complexity, East Hampton Town Code enumerates specific standards for natural resources special permits under One of the standards found in this section, paragraph D, requires applicants to demonstrate that the proposed use is Located so that no natural resource, feature or system designated in hereof will be diminished in size, polluted, degraded or lost, or placed in peril thereof, in order to establish such structure or use. Applicant's project will clearly diminish and degrade two important features designated in Specifically, the proposed project will have substantial impact to the dune and beach vegetation. The Sprawling design of the residence and the additional accessory structures wi ll eliminate much of the dune and destroy excessive beach vegetation. While section D, does provide an exception fo a use when there is inadequate upland, applicant must demonstrate two essential criteria: (1) Alternative reasonable uses of the property do not exist; and (2) Alternative designs entailing smaller buildings or structures, reduced yard or other setbacks, or diminished or reconfigured areas of use are determined not to be effective in preventing loss of or potential damage to designated natural features, or the only such designs are found infeasible or unlawful. This project does not satisfy the above criteria, as there were a number of viable alternatives discussed at the public hearing. Specifically, applicant can reduce the size of the residence that covers the dune and minimize accessory structures beyond the 24' contour line. This alternative will limit the diminishment and degradation to the dune and the beach vegetation." (Finding 14). Under the circumstances presented, the Court finds that the findings of the respondent Board are rational and supported by the substantial evidence on the record, and are not found to be arbitrary, capricious, or erroneous as a matter of law, or an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. The foregoing constitutes the Order of this Court. Dated: January 15, 2019 HON. DENISE F. MOLIA A.J.S.C. 6
Matter of Sullivan v Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead 2018 NY Slip Op 33441(U) December 10, 2018 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number:
Matter of Sullivan v Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead 2018 NY Slip Op 33441(U) December 10, 2018 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 609514/18 Judge: Denise L. Sher Cases posted with a
More informationCalogiras v Town of Southampton Bd. of Appeals 2013 NY Slip Op 33456(U) December 5, 2013 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 07108/2013
Calogiras v Town of Southampton Bd. of Appeals 2013 NY Slip Op 33456(U) December 5, 2013 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 07108/2013 Judge: William B. Rebolini Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationMatter of Kogan v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of Southhampton 2015 NY Slip Op 32279(U) November 6, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket
Matter of Kogan v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of Southhampton 2015 NY Slip Op 32279(U) November 6, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 07049/2015 Judge: Thomas F. Whelan Cases posted
More informationMatter of Harbor Park Realty, LLC. v Modelewski 2011 NY Slip Op 33196(U) November 23, 2011 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge:
Matter of Harbor Park Realty, LLC. v Modelewski 2011 NY Slip Op 33196(U) November 23, 2011 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: 24135-10 Judge: Peter Fox Cohalan Republished from New York State Unified
More informationSchilegel v Shea 2010 NY Slip Op 32001(U) July 29, 2010 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 45122/08 Judge: Arthur G. Pitts Republished from
Schilegel v Shea 2010 NY Slip Op 32001(U) July 29, 2010 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 45122/08 Judge: Arthur G. Pitts Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.
More informationBorrok v Town of Southampton 2014 NY Slip Op 31412(U) May 19, 2014 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 08918/2014 Judge: Jerry Garguilo
Borrok v Town of Southampton 2014 NY Slip Op 31412(U) May 19, 2014 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 08918/2014 Judge: Jerry Garguilo Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationMatter of Haas v Wexler 2012 NY Slip Op 33151(U) February 27, 2012 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Jeffrey Arlen Spinner
2012 NY Slip Op 33151(U) February 27, 2012 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 11-32792 Judge: Jeffrey Arlen Spinner Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search
More informationCaputi v Town of Huntington 2013 NY Slip Op 30496(U) March 5, 2013 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 19803/2012 Judge: Joseph Farneti
Caputi v Town of Huntington 2013 NY Slip Op 30496(U) March 5, 2013 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 19803/2012 Judge: Joseph Farneti Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationFrow OF EAST HAMPTON,
MEMORANDUM SUPREME COURT. SUFFOLK COUNTY In the Matter of the Application of 278, LLC. formerly known as 260A LLC, Petitioner, For a Judgment Pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law & Rules, By:
More informationSavino v Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold 2015 NY Slip Op 30813(U) May 11, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 33788/2013
Savino v Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold 2015 NY Slip Op 30813(U) May 11, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 33788/2013 Judge: Jr., Andrew G. Tarantino Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationGoaring-Thomas v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 33278(U) December 18, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Judge: Eileen
Goaring-Thomas v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 33278(U) December 18, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 153394/2018 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationRaso v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Vil. of Belle Terre 2015 NY Slip Op 31592(U) July 27, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number:
Raso v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Vil. of Belle Terre 2015 NY Slip Op 31592(U) July 27, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 00435/2015 Judge: Thomas F. Whelan Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationDelliBovi v Giannadeo 2010 NY Slip Op 30735(U) April 1, 2010 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: John J.J.
DelliBovi v Giannadeo 2010 NY Slip Op 30735(U) April 1, 2010 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 0027615/2009 Judge: John J.J. Jones Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationAppellants' Reply Brief
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York. Jeff BAKER and Lori Baker, Petitioners-Appellants. v. TOWN OF ISLIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, Richard I. Scheyer, Chairman, Albert R. Morrison,
More informationGold Coach Apts. Inc. v Town of Babylon 2014 NY Slip Op 32745(U) October 9, 2014 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Jeffrey
Gold Coach Apts. Inc. v Town of Babylon 2014 NY Slip Op 32745(U) October 9, 2014 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: 2012-32259 Judge: Jeffrey Arlen Spinner Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationMatter of Woodhull Landing Realty Corp. v DeChance 2016 NY Slip Op 32137(U) August 4, 2016 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number:
Matter of Woodhull Landing Realty Corp. v DeChance 2016 NY Slip Op 32137(U) August 4, 2016 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 3140-2014 Judge: Peter H. Mayer Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationMatter of Kogel v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of Huntingon 2015 NY Slip Op 31717(U) August 7, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number:
Matter of Kogel v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of Huntingon 2015 NY Slip Op 31717(U) August 7, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 13-24850 Judge: Peter H. Mayer Cases posted with a
More informationMatter of Lachaud v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Inc. Vil. of Bellport 2013 NY Slip Op 30237(U) January 29, 2013 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket
Matter of Lachaud v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Inc. Vil. of Bellport 2013 NY Slip Op 30237(U) January 29, 2013 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: 12-18363 Judge: Peter H. Mayer Republished from New
More informationMadonia v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Inc. Vil. of Southampton 2013 NY Slip Op 31394(U) June 26, 2013 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number:
Madonia v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Inc. Vil. of Southampton 2013 NY Slip Op 31394(U) June 26, 2013 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: 2009-7122 Judge: Jeffrey Arlen Spinner Republished from New
More informationMEMORANDU SUPREME COURT, COUNTY OF NASSAU, BY: HON. BRUCE D. ALPERT. Mandalay Property Owners Association, Inc., Joseph Mazzo and Alberta Splescia,
MEMORANDU SUPREME COURT, COUNTY OF NASSAU, M IAS PART 9. Mandalay Property Owners Association, Inc., Joseph Mazzo and Alberta Splescia, BY: HON. BRUCE D. ALPERT MOTION SEQUENCE #l Petitioners, INDEX NO:
More informationMatter of Harris v Board of Appeals for the Town of Hempstead 2011 NY Slip Op 31203(U) April 25, 2011 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: /10
Matter of Harris v Board of Appeals for the Town of Hempstead 2011 NY Slip Op 31203(U) April 25, 2011 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 017764/10 Judge: Randy Sue Marber Republished from New York State
More informationKverel v Town of Southampton 2015 NY Slip Op 31656(U) August 25, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 05226/2015 Judge: William B.
Kverel v Town of Southampton 2015 NY Slip Op 31656(U) August 25, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 05226/2015 Judge: William B. Rebolini Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationEckel v Francis 2002 NY Slip Op 30114(U) August 21, 2002 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 12379/2001 Judge: William L. Jr.
Eckel v Francis 2002 NY Slip Op 30114(U) August 21, 2002 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 12379/2001 Judge: William L. Jr. Underwood Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (ZBA)
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (ZBA) Town of Freedom PO Box 227 Freedom, NH 03836 603-539-6323 INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS FOR APPLICANTS APPEALING TO ZBA SEE ALSO ZBA RULES OF PROCEDURE DATED 01/25/2011 To view
More informationOwner Information Name: Address of property applying for the variance: Telephone #: address: Mailing address if different:
Date: Village of Lawrence 196 Central Ave Lawrence, NY 11559 516-239-4600 Board of Zoning Appeals Application Owner Information Name: Address of property applying for the variance: Telephone #: Email address:
More informationArticle 14: Nonconformities
Section 14.01 Article 14: Nonconformities Purpose Within the districts established by this resolution, some lots, uses of lands or structures, or combinations thereof may exist which were lawful prior
More informationPerlbinder Holdings, LLC v Srinivasan 2013 NY Slip Op 30466(U) March 7, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Joan B.
Perlbinder Holdings, LLC v Srinivasan 2013 NY Slip Op 30466(U) March 7, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 103231/12 Judge: Joan B. Lobis Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationAccessory Buildings (Portion pulled from Town Code Updated 2015)
Accessory Buildings (Portion pulled from Town Code Updated 2015) SECTION 1: TITLE 13 entitled Zoning, Chapter 2 entitled General Provisions, Section 13-2-10 entitled Building Location, Subsection 13.2.10(b)
More informationRRC STAFF OPINION PLEASE NOTE: THIS COMMUNICATION IS EITHER 1) ONLY THE RECOMMENDATION OF AN RRC
RRC STAFF OPINION PLEASE NOTE: THIS COMMUNICATION IS EITHER 1) ONLY THE RECOMMENDATION OF AN RRC STAFF ATTORNEY AS TO ACTION THAT THE ATTORNEY BELIEVES THE COMMISSION SHOULD TAKE ON THE CITED RULE AT ITS
More informationCountry-Wide Ins. Co. v Excel Surgery Ctr., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33351(U) December 21, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018
Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Excel Surgery Ctr., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33351(U) December 21, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652741/2018 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationMINUTES OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF SAGAPONACK IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK AND STATE OF NEW YORK
MINUTES OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF SAGAPONACK IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK AND STATE OF NEW YORK A duly held public meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of
More informationCHARLES COUNTY CRITICAL AREA PROGRAM. Comprehensive Update
CHARLES COUNTY CRITICAL AREA PROGRAM Comprehensive Update 2009 Chesapeake Bay Critical Area All lands and waters within 1,000 feet beyond the landward boundaries of state or private wetlands and the heads
More informationJakubiak v New York City Dept. of Bldgs NY Slip Op 32516(U) October 15, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge:
Jakubiak v New York City Dept. of Bldgs. 2013 NY Slip Op 32516(U) October 15, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 100744/13 Judge: Donna M. Mills Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationWildlife Preserv. Coalition of Long Is. v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation 2014 NY Slip Op 33393(U) December 30, 2014 Supreme Court,
Wildlife Preserv. Coalition of Long Is. v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation 2014 NY Slip Op 33393(U) December 30, 2014 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 14-8023 Judge: W. Gerard Asher
More informationTOWN OF GOLDEN BEACH APPLICATION FOR BUILDING REGULATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING/HEARING
BUILDING REGULATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING/HEARING Property Location: Meeting Date: Variance Hearing Dates: Advisory Board Town Council APPROVAL FROM THE BUILDING REGULATION ADVISORY BOARD IS REQUIRED
More informationMatter of Williams v New York State Off. of Temporary & Disability Assistance 2018 NY Slip Op 32960(U) November 13, 2018 Supreme Court, New York
Matter of Williams v New York State Off. of Temporary & Disability Assistance 2018 NY Slip Op 32960(U) November 13, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651343/2018 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower
More informationMatter of Perlbinder Holdings, LLC v Office of Admin. Trials and Hearings/Envtl. Control Bd NY Slip Op 32987(U) November 27, 2018 Supreme
Matter of Perlbinder Holdings, LLC v Office of Admin. Trials and Hearings/Envtl. Control Bd. 2018 NY Slip Op 32987(U) November 27, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 154639/18 Judge: Carol
More informationThe appellants, Frank Citrano, et ux., challenge an order. issued by Judge Lawrence H. Rushworth of the Circuit Court for Anne
The appellants, Frank Citrano, et ux., challenge an order issued by Judge Lawrence H. Rushworth of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, affirming the Anne Arundel County Board of Appeals s denial
More informationSPECIAL SECTIONS 500.
SPECIAL SECTIONS 500. Notwithstanding the "R3" zone designation, the lands delineated on Schedule "B" of this By-law as "R3-500" shall only be used for single-family detached dwellings in cluster development
More informationDepartment of Planning and Development
VILLAGE OF SOMERS Department of Planning and Development VARIANCE APPLICATION Owner: Mailing Address: Phone Number(s): To the Village of Somers Board of Appeals: Please take notice that the undersigned
More informationADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 112 (ZONING) OF THE 1976 CODE OF THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA
ZO-06-391 ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 112 (ZONING) OF THE 1976 CODE OF THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County, Virginia, held in the
More informationCoastal Control Construction Setback Line
Melbourne Beach, Florida - Coastal Control Construction Setback Line http://www.melbournebeachfl.org/pages/melbournebeachfl_commissi... 1 of 1 7/18/2012 9:18 AM Coastal Control Construction Setback Line
More informationDrummond v Town of Ithaca Zoning Bd. of Appeals 2017 NY Slip Op 30471(U) March 9, 2017 Supreme Court, Tompkins County Docket Number: EF
Drummond v Town of Ithaca Zoning Bd. of Appeals 2017 NY Slip Op 30471(U) March 9, 2017 Supreme Court, Tompkins County Docket Number: EF2016-0216 Judge: Eugene D. Faughnan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationBUILDING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS
155.01 Purpose 155.16 Revocation 155.02 Building Official 155.17 Permit Void 155.03 Permit Required 155.18 Restricted Residence District Map 155.04 Application 155.19 Prohibited Use 155.05 Fees 155.20
More informationAugust 8, 2017 Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC) 3030 John Anderson Drive, Ormond Beach
Page 1 of 19 GROWTH AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 123 West Indiana Avenue, DeLand, FL 32720 (386) 736-5959 PUBLIC HEARING: CASE NO: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER:
More informationCity Attorney's Synopsis
Eff.: Immediate ORDINANCE NO. AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK EXTENDING AND AMENDING AN INTERIM DEVELOPMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE WHICH TEMPORARILY PROHIBITS THE ISSUANCE OF CERTAIN
More informationEugene Racanelli Inc. v Incorporated Vil. of Babylon 2015 NY Slip Op 32492(U) December 3, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number:
Eugene Racanelli Inc. v Incorporated Vil. of Babylon 2015 NY Slip Op 32492(U) December 3, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 13433/2011 Judge: William B. Rebolini Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationMatter of Daudier v City of New York Commn NY Slip Op 30176(U) January 24, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2012
Matter of Daudier v City of New York Commn. 2013 NY Slip Op 30176(U) January 24, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 401995/2012 Judge: Geoffrey D. Wright Republished from New York State
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: December 15, 2011 512181 In the Matter of RODNEY JONES et al., Appellants, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ZONING
More informationWARRANT FOR THE 2018 SPECIAL TOWN MEETING OF THE TOWN OF OGUNQUIT
WARRANT FOR THE 2018 SPECIAL TOWN MEETING OF THE TOWN OF OGUNQUIT TO: PATRICIA L. ARNAUDIN, Chief of Police of the Town of Ogunquit, in the County of York, State of Maine: GREETINGS: In the name of the
More informationROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS
ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS MEETINGS: 2nd Thursday of each month at 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers, First Floor of City Hall. DUE DATE FOR SUBMITTALS: 2 weeks
More information263 Higbie LLC v Wexler 2015 NY Slip Op 30004(U) January 6, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: W. Gerard Asher Cases
263 Higbie LLC v Wexler 2015 NY Slip Op 30004(U) January 6, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 12-21050 Judge: W. Gerard Asher Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationREGULATIONS FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH CHEVY CHASE
REGULATIONS FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH CHEVY CHASE CHAPTER 3 BUILDING PERMITS Article 1. General Provisions Section 3-101 Definitions Section 3-102 Applicable Requirements Article 2. Village Building Permits
More informationMatter of Lauer v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles Appeals Bd NY Slip Op 30958(U) April 4, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket
Matter of Lauer v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles Appeals Bd. 213 NY Slip Op 3958(U) April 4, 213 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 4223/12 Judge: Peter H. Moulton Republished from New
More informationSuburban; Rural Town of Brookhaven Tree Preservation Ordinance. Abstract. Resource. Topic:
Land Use Law Center Gaining Ground Information Database Topic: Resource Type: State: Jurisdiction Type: Municipality: Year (adopted, written, etc.): 1989-1992 Community Type applicable to: Title: Document
More informationAtlas Union Corp. v 46 E. 82nd St. LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33394(U) December 26, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge:
Atlas Union Corp. v 46 E. 82nd St. LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33394(U) December 26, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 850289/2017 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationZONING RESOLUTION Web Version THE CITY OF NEW YORK. Article XI: Special Purpose Districts Chapter 3: Special Ocean Parkway District
ZONING RESOLUTION Web Version THE CITY OF NEW YORK THE CITY OF NEW YORK Bill de Blasio, Mayor CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Carl Weisbrod, Director Article XI: Special Purpose Districts Chapter 3: Special Ocean
More informationMatter of Skyhigh Murals-Colossal Media Inc. v Board of Stds. and Appeals of the City of N.Y NY Slip Op 30088(U) January 13, 2017 Supreme
Matter of Skyhigh Murals-Colossal Media Inc. v Board of Stds. and Appeals of the City of N.Y. 2017 NY Slip Op 30088(U) January 13, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157348/2016 Judge:
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER V RONALD M. KLINE AND RACHEL A. KLINE SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0080-V RONALD M. KLINE AND RACHEL A. KLINE SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JUNE 18, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationGoldman v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 32980(U) November 20, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Judge: Arthur F.
Goldman v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 32980(U) November 20, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150633/2018 Judge: Arthur F. Engoron Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationORDINANCE NO the Land Use Regulations of the Municipal Code of the Borough of Mantoloking;
ORDINANCE NO. 544 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER XXX, LAND USE REGULATIONS, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE BOROUGH OF MANTOLOKING, OCEAN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY. WHEREAS, the Borough of Mantoloking adopted a comprehensive
More informationMatter of New Roots Charter Sch. v Ferreira 2019 NY Slip Op 30137(U) January 16, 2019 Supreme Court, Tompkins County Docket Number: EF
Matter of New Roots Charter Sch. v Ferreira 2019 NY Slip Op 30137(U) January 16, 2019 Supreme Court, Tompkins County Docket Number: EF2018-0611 Judge: Eugene D. Faughnan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationChapter 1224: Nonconformities
1224.01 PURPOSE Within the districts established by this code, some lots, uses of lands or structures, or combinations thereof may exist which were lawful prior to the effective date or amendment of this
More informationCity of Monona 5211 Schluter Road Monona, WI Phone: (608) Fax: (608)
City of Monona 5211 Schluter Road Monona, WI 53716 Phone: (608) 222-2525 Fax: (608) 222-9225 www.mymonona.com TO: FROM: Applicant for Zoning Variance Office of City of Monona Zoning Administrator This
More informationMINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT HELD IN THE ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, 1024 HURLWOOD LANE, TUESDAY, May 20, 2014 AT 7:00 P.M.
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT HELD IN THE ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, 1024 HURLWOOD LANE, TUESDAY, May 20, 2014 AT 7:00 P.M. Present: Chair Mark Vandergeest Members Staff: Director of
More informationChapter 503 Zoning Administration
Chapter 503 Zoning Administration 503.01 Planning and Zoning Department The Rice County Board of Commissioners hereby establishes the Planning and Zoning Department, for which the Board may appoint a Director
More informationMatter of Van Wagner Communications, LLC v Board of Standards 2014 NY Slip Op 30271(U) January 28, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Matter of Van Wagner Communications, LLC v Board of Standards 2014 NY Slip Op 30271(U) January 28, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 100418/13 Judge: Donna M. Mills Cases posted with a
More informationZBA REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 24 January 2018
ZBA REGULAR MEETING MINUTES 24 January 2018 The Westbrook Zoning Board of Appeals met on Wednesday, January 24, 2018, in the Multi-Media Room of the Teresa Mulvey Municipal Center located at 866 Boston
More informationMINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF ATLANTIC BEACH BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING 65 THE PLAZA, ATLANTIC BEACH, NY DECEMBER 21, 2017
Meeting #12 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF ATLANTIC BEACH BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING 65 THE PLAZA, ATLANTIC BEACH, NY 11509 CALL TO ORDER DECEMBER 21, 2017 At 8:00 PM called the meeting to order.
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 21, 2018 DATE: April 13, 2018 SUBJECT: SP #362, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT for the addition of approximately 1,760 square feet of new gross
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 01-07-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION 9.5-4 "DEFINITIONS," SECTION 9.5-281 "MINIMUM YARDS," SECTION 9.5-286 "SHORELINE SETBACK," AND SECTION 9.5-233 "VARIANCES;"
More informationCohan v Movtady 2012 NY Slip Op 33256(U) January 24, 2012 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 2845/11 Judge: Denise L. Sher Cases posted with a
Cohan v Movtady 2012 NY Slip Op 33256(U) January 24, 2012 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 2845/11 Judge: Denise L. Sher Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are
More informationCRYSTAL CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0167-V CRYSTAL CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC FOURTH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationTOWN OF NEWBURY CHAPTER 95 WETLANDS BYLAW. Approved by the Attorney General November 1, 2005
TOWN OF NEWBURY CHAPTER 95 WETLANDS BYLAW Approved by the Attorney General November 1, 2005 Newbury Conservation Commission 25 High Road Newbury, MA 01951 Tel. (978) 462-1372 Fax (978) 465-3064 Table of
More informationMayor of the City of N.Y. v Council of the City of N.Y NY Slip Op 31802(U) August 2, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /12
Mayor of the City of N.Y. v Council of the City of N.Y. 2013 NY Slip Op 31802(U) August 2, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 451369/12 Judge: Geoffrey D. Wright Republished from New York State
More informationPavasaris v Incorporated Vil. of Saltaire 2016 NY Slip Op 31864(U) July 25, 2016 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Peter
Pavasaris v Incorporated Vil. of Saltaire 2016 NY Slip Op 31864(U) July 25, 2016 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 12927-2014 Judge: Peter H. Mayer Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationCountry-Wide Ins. Co. v TC Acupuncture, P.C NY Slip Op 32290(U) November 24, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015
Country-Wide Ins. Co. v TC Acupuncture, P.C. 2015 NY Slip Op 32290(U) November 24, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652747/2015 Judge: Joan B. Lobis Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationbwj MEMORANDUM SUPREME COURT, COUNTY OF NASSAU, IAS PART 4 HON. BRUCE D. ALPERT In the Matter of the Application of Petitioner
bwj MEMORANDUM SUPREME COURT, COUNTY OF NASSAU, IAS PART 4 In the Matter of the Application of BY: HON. BRUCE D. ALPERT JOSA TO, INC. Petitioner For an Order Pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice
More informationORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BELMONT AMENDING REGULATIONS FOR ALLOWABLE HOME SIZE IN R-1 DISTRICTS IN THE BELMONT ZONING ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 360) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT
More informationMatter of Rich v Bralower 2010 NY Slip Op 32091(U) July 27, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Daniel R.
Matter of Rich v Bralower 2010 NY Slip Op 32091(U) July 27, 2010 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 004245/10 Judge: Daniel R. Palmieri Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationCarreras v. Dep t of Environmental Protection OATH Index No. 3032/09 (July 23, 2009)
Carreras v. Dep t of Environmental Protection OATH Index No. 3032/09 (July 23, 2009) Department s denial of variance application was not an abuse of discretion where applicant did not propose adequate
More informationMatter of Teboul v State of New York Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2006 NY Slip Op 30787(U) October 18, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County
Matter of Teboul v State of New York Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2006 NY Slip Op 30787(U) October 18, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 110745/05 Judge: Carol R. Edmead Cases posted
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 16, 2016 521535 In the Matter of SEAN MENON et al., Respondents, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NEW YORK
More informationMatter of DiMattia v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 33033(U) October 4, 2018 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: 85126/2018 Judge: Thomas
Matter of DiMattia v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 33033(U) October 4, 2018 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: 85126/2018 Judge: Thomas P. Aliotta Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationMatter of Steinberg-Fisher v North Shore Towers Apts., Inc NY Slip Op 33107(U) August 21, 2014 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number:
Matter of Steinberg-Fisher v North Shore Towers Apts., Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 33107(U) August 21, 2014 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 7466/2014 Judge: Thomas D. Raffaele Cases posted with a
More information302 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
302 CMR 3.00: SCENIC AND RECREATIONAL RIVERS ORDERS Section 3.01: Authority 3.02: Definitions 3.03: Advisory Committees 3.04: Classification of Rivers and Streams 3.05: Preliminary Informational Meetings
More informationPetitioner Yvonne Harris brings this Rule 80B appeal from a decision of the
STATE OF MAINE YORK, SS. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-14-24 YVONNE HARRIS Appellant, v. ORDER TOWN OF YORK, MAINE, and AMBER HARRISON Respondents. I. Background A. Procedural Posture Petitioner
More informationBuilding Code TITLE 15. City Uniform Dwelling Code Reserved for Future Use
TITLE 15 Building Code Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 City Uniform Dwelling Code Reserved for Future Use Swimming Pool Code Regulation of Retention and/or Detention Ponds Regulation
More informationMatter of AAC Auto Serv. v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs NY Slip Op 30238(U) January 22, 2016 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number:
Matter of AAC Auto Serv. v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs. 2016 NY Slip Op 30238(U) January 22, 2016 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: 260997/2014 Judge: Alison Y. Tuitt Cases posted with
More informationROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS
ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS The Board of Zoning and Building Appeals meetings are held on the 2nd Thursday of each month at 7:00 P.M. Submittals must
More informationZoning Ordinances of the Village of Sugar Bush Knolls, Ohio
Zoning Ordinances of the Village of Sugar Bush Knolls, Ohio 100.00 GENERAL PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS 101.00 DEFINITIONS 102.00 GENERAL 103.00 PERMITTED USES 105.00 LOT AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS 106.00 PLANNING
More informationMatter of Romanoff v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2011 NY Slip Op 31342(U) May 19, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket
Matter of Romanoff v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2011 NY Slip Op 31342(U) May 19, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 109708/2010 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Republished
More informationA more in depth look at Special Use Permits. Produced in the Ontario County Planning Department. 2006
A more in depth look at Special Use Permits Special Use Permit NYS Law* 274-b. Approval of special use permits. 1. Definition of special use permit. As used in this section the term "special use permit"
More informationPresent: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons and Agee, JJ., and Russell, S.J.
Present: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons and Agee, JJ., and Russell, S.J. DONALD H. COCHRAN, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 030982 SENIOR JUSTICE CHARLES S. RUSSELL April 23, 2004 FAIRFAX
More informationTown of Huntington v Braun 2011 NY Slip Op 31156(U) April 20, 2011 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Peter Fox Cohalan
Town of Huntington v Braun 2011 NY Slip Op 31156(U) April 20, 2011 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 36390-09 Judge: Peter Fox Cohalan Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More information1. Appellant(s)/Owner(s) Name: 2. Address: Phone #:
KC/of-variance-2_app.doc INC. VILLAGE OF OLD FIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Return all required information to Inc. Village of Old Field - Village Clerk 207 Old Field Road P.O. Box 2724 Setauket, New York
More informationMemo. To: John Callahan From: Michael D. Zarin, Esq. Meredith Black, Esq. Client: FASNY Re: Miscellaneous Zoning Issues Date: December 6, 2012
Memo To: John Callahan From: Michael D. Zarin, Esq. Meredith Black, Esq. Client: FASNY Re: Miscellaneous Zoning Issues Date: December 6, 2012 This Memorandum addresses several zoning issues raised by various
More informationKureha Am., LLC (U.S.A.) v Mercer Tech., Inc. (U.S.A.) 2016 NY Slip Op 30361(U) February 23, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Kureha Am., LLC (U.S.A.) v Mercer Tech., Inc. (U.S.A.) 2016 NY Slip Op 30361(U) February 23, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653783/15 Judge: Kathryn E. Freed Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationMatter of Grossbard v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2015 NY Slip Op 32045(U) January 12, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County
Matter of Grossbard v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2015 NY Slip Op 32045(U) January 12, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 100497/14 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted
More informationAPPLICATION NUMBER A REQUEST FOR
APPLICATION NUMBER 5255 A REQUEST FOR SIDE YARD, TOTAL COMBINED SIDE YARD, AND FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCES TO ALLOW ADDITIONS AND RENOVATIONS TO A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE WITHIN FIVE-FEET OF A SIDE PROPERTY LINE,
More information