ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
|
|
- Dulcie Sara Allen
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BELMONT AMENDING REGULATIONS FOR ALLOWABLE HOME SIZE IN R-1 DISTRICTS IN THE BELMONT ZONING ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 360) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. BZO SECTION AMENDED City of Belmont Ordinance No. 360 ( Belmont Zoning Ordinance ) Section is amended to read: SITE AREA, DIMENSIONS AND DENSITY LIMITATIONS (a) (c) [text unchanged] (d) ALLOWABLE GROSS FLOOR AREA. The maximum allowable Gross Floor Area (GFA) without approval of a floor area exception is the lesser of the permissible GFA in Table 4 Slope/Intensity and Table 5 Lot Size/Intensity (1) : The permissible Gross Floor Area (FA) of buildings in R-1 Districts based on slope is the greater of 1,200 sq. ft. or the product of multiplying net lot area by the Floor Area Ratio corresponding to the slope of the lot as shown in the following charttable 4 Slope/Intensity: [text of chart unchanged] TABLE 4 SLOPE/ INTENSITY The maximum permitted gross floor area in all R-1 districts is 5,000 square feet. (2) The permissible Gross Floor Area in R-1 Districts based on lot size is as shown in Table 5 Lot Size/Intensity: TABLE 5 LOT SIZE/ INTENSITY R1-District Lot Size Max Allowable GFA 10,000 sf 3,500 sf R-1A R-1B R-1C > 10,000 sf 3,500 sf sf per square foot of lot over 10,000 sf up to 5,000 sf total GFA and comply with 4.2.3(g) R-1E R-1H 10,000 sf 4,500 sf > 10,000 sf 5,000 sf and comply with 4.2.3(g) Page 1 of 8
2 (e) (f) [text unchanged] (g) New construction resulting in a GFA greater than 3,500 sq. ft. on a lot in the R- 1A, R-1B and R-1C Districts and 4,500 sq. ft. on a lot in the R-1E and R-1H Districts must comply with the setback standards in this subsection. (1) Notwithstanding section 9.6.3(b), the new construction may not extend building walls along a legal non-conforming side yard setback line. (2) Except for underfloor additions within the footprint of the existing building, new construction must comply with the setbacks in Table 6 Setbacks For Larger Residence. TABLE 6 - SETBACKS FOR LARGER RESIDENCES Setback (feet) R-1 District R-1A R-1B, R-1C R-1E R-1H Front 20 1, , Rear Side Notes: 15% lot width or 10 ft. whichever is greater 15% lot width or 10 ft. whichever is greater 20 15% lot width or 10 ft. whichever is greater Street Side Applies to 40 foot right-of-way. 2. Applies to 50 foot right-of-way. SECTION 2. BZO SECTION AMENDED City of Belmont Ordinance No. 360 ( Belmont Zoning Ordinance ) Section is amended to read: EXCEPTIONS TO SINGLE FAMILY FLOOR AREA STANDARDS. (a) (b) (c) (d) PURPOSE. Exceptions to single family floor area standards may be granted when lot size and site conditions can appropriately support larger homes, or to assist in providing required off-street garage parking. APPLICATION. Application for an exception shall be made to the Commission uponon a form provided by the Community Development Department. The application shall contain or be accompanied by all information and plans specified on the application form provided. FEE. The application shall be accompanied by a receipt showing that an application fee in accordance with the fee schedule established by resolution of the City Council payment of the application fee required by the City s fee schedule. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW REQUIRED. - All (1) Public Hearing. Aapplications for exceptions to floor area standards, except Page 2 of 8
3 administrative exceptions, shall be considered by the Planning Commission in a public hearing noticed in the manner set forth in Section (2) Findings. When approving, or conditionally approving, or denying any application for an exception, the Commission shall consider whether the findings set forth below are supported by the request. The Commission shall deny anyan application not meeting all of these findings: 1. The granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 2. The addition will not adversely affect the views or privacy of adjacent property. 3. The addition is compatible with the existing residence and neighboring properties. 4. The exception would not result in excessive grading or tree removal. (A) The granting of the exception will achieve one or more of the following: (i) (ii) (iii) provide ggreater floor area equity among property owners with different sized lots and within the same zoning district and neighborhood without the resulting Floor Area Ratio (FAR) exceeding the average FAR for properties within the same zoning district and within 300 feet from the exterior boundaries of the project site. eenable interior additions located within the confines of the existing exterior walls; aassist in providing required off-street garage parking (for existing homesresidences that currently have substandard parking). (B) The granting of the exception will not result in a substantial adverse impact to the views or privacy of adjacent property owners. (C)3). The granting of the exception will not result in significant bulk for a new homebuilding or a significant increase in building bulk for an existing existingbuilding home. (3) Criteria For Substantial Adverse Impact to Views or Privacy. The following criteria shall be used by the reviewing authority to determine whether a Floor Area Exception will have a substantial adverse impact on views or privacy: (A) Private views. A private view is an unobstructed view from a bedroom, Page 3 of 8
4 common area, or amenity area (deck, patio, etc.) to a prominent natural feature or landmark (i.e., the San Francisco Bay or undeveloped ridgelines). A substantial adverse impact may be determined based on: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (B) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) Where the view originates (which room or amenity area); The relative value of other views that occur on site; The quality of the natural feature or landmark in the view; How much of the view is obstructed. Privacy. A substantial adverse privacy impact may be determined based on: Setbacks/Additional Setbacks; Topography; Window design; Window to window alignment; Vegetation; Location of decks, balconies, pools, and other amenity areas; Buffer strips and fencing; Location of parking and access ways; Location of entries and paths of travel; Lighting. (4) Standard for Review of Building/Addition Location. As much as practical, the resulting new construction would be located to avoid or reduce bulk, privacy and private view impacts to adjacent properties. E(e). ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTIONS.: The Director of Community Development Director may administratively approve exceptions to floor area standards for single family homes in Table 4 Slope\Intensity on lots 5,000 square feet or greater for the following types of projects provided the Director finds thatafter making the findings listed under Section D(d) (2)(1A) - (3C) and the required standards for the respective application type are met. All Floor Area Exception applications for lots below 5,000 sq. ft. in area shall be subject to Planning Commission review and approval in accordance with the provisions of Section D (1-3). (1) Garage additions. Garage additions that meet all of the following: (A) (B) The addition is 450 sq. ft. or less. There is no garage or a less than conforming two-car garage on site. Page 4 of 8
5 (C) The resulting home would not be larger than the maximum permitted home size allowed within the applicable R-1 zoning district under Table 5 Lot Size/Intensity. (2) Interior Additions. Interior additions that meet all of the following: (A) (B) (C) (D) The addition would be 500 sq. ft. or less. All added floor area will be located entirely within the confines of the exterior walls of the main structure, and will not result in the moving, extending, or addition of any exterior walls. The resulting home would not be larger than the maximum permitted home size allowed within the applicable R-1 zoning under Table 5 Lot Size/Intensity. No floor area exception for the dwelling for an interior addition has previously been approved and built on the subject property. (f) Any qualifying property for an Administrative Floor Area Exception Application which is not found to meet the criteria below and findings listed Section D (1-3), shall not be administratively approved and shall be subject to the same procedures requiring Planning Commission review. 1. Findings for a garage addition of 450 sq. ft. or less: a. The addition will not adversely affect the views or privacy of adjacent property. b. The addition is compatible with the existing residence and neighboring properties. c. The addition would not result in the removal of any protected trees or require excessive grading as described below: 300 or more cubic yards of combined cut/fill, or 2,000 or more square feet of disturbed site area d. The addition complies with required front, rear, and side yard setbacks for the applicable R-1 zoning district. Any garage addition that continues a non conforming yard setback for the dwelling or the property shall be subject to variance review and approval by the Planning Commission pursuant Section 14 (Variances), as set forth herein. e. The amount of exception requested would be used entirely for the construction of garage parking spaces for an existing residence which currently does not have a full (20 ft. x 20 ft.) two car garage. f. The exception requested will not be used for constructing or enlarging a garage (beyond a 20 ft. x 20 ft. interior clear dimension) to have more than Page 5 of 8
6 two parking spaces, nor will the exception be used to construct storage or work areas within the garage. g. The granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. h. The exception, if granted and built, will not cause the home to be larger than the maximum permitted home size allowed within the applicable R- 1 zoning district. i. No floor area exception for the dwelling for a garage addition/expansion has previously been approved and built on the subject property. j. Any administrative exception previously approved for a garage addition/expansion which has not yet been built, will be null and void upon approval of the current request. 2. Findings for interior additions of 350 sq. ft. or less: a. All added floor area will be located entirely within the confines of the exterior walls of the main structure, and will not result in the moving, extending, or addition of any exterior walls, or modifications to any roofline of the dwelling. b. The addition will not be used for construction of a secondary dwelling unit. c. The addition will not adversely affect the privacy of adjacent property. d. The exception, if granted and built, will not cause the home to be larger than the maximum permitted home size allowed within the applicable R- 1 zoning district. * e. The granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. f. The addition is compatible with the existing residence and neighboring properties. g. No floor area exception for the dwelling for an interior addition has previously been approved and built on the subject property. h. Any administrative exception previously approved for an interior addition which has not yet been built, will be null and void upon approval of the current request. i. The addition would not result in the removal of any protected trees or require excessive grading as described below: 300 or more cubic yards of combined cut/fill, or Page 6 of 8
7 2,000 or more square feet of disturbed site area F. EFFECT - An exception to floor area standards shall become effective 10 days following the date on which the request is granted unless subject to an appeal. An exception which has been the subject of an Appeal to the Council or review by the Council shall become effective 3 days following the date on which the exception is granted by the Council. (g)g. (h)h. (i)i. (j)j. LAPSE OF RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA EXCEPTION AND EXTENSION OF TIME - An exception shall lapse and shall become null and void one year following the date on which it became effective, unless prior to the expiration of one year, a building permit is issued by the Building Official and construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion on the sight, or a certificate of occupancy is issued by the Building Official for the site which was the subject of the Exception application. Extensions of time shall be governed by Section REVOCATION - An exception shall be deemed null and void upon a finding by the Zoning Administrator that the property for which such exception has been granted is in violation of any applicable provision of this Ordinance, or that there has been failure to comply with any condition or conditions imposed in the granting of such exception. NOTICE OF HEARING - All exceptions considered by the Planning Commission shall be subject to the noticing requirements of Section 11. NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS - Notice of administrative approvals shall be mailed to the Planning Commission and City Council, and to all property owners within 300 feet of the property which is subject to the approval, stating the opportunity to file a written appeal. Notice to the Council and Commission may be provided by . SECTION 3. FINDINGS (a) The amendments to the Belmont Zoning Ordinance adopted herein are required to achieve the objectives of the Zoning Plan and the General Plan for the City. (b) The amendments support the protection and promotion of the comfort, convenience, and general welfare of the community, and fulfill the General Community Goals and Policies of the General Plan. SECTION 4. CEQA On April 28, 2015, the City Council approved a negative declaration in conjunction with the Belmont Text Amendments Project which consists of various modifications to the Belmont Zoning Ordinance and Tree Ordinance and related design criteria and guidelines that primarily affect single family homes and second units (the Original Project ). The negative declaration together with the initial study are incorporated herein by reference. The City Council introduced substantially new amendments, including this ordinance, to address concerns with the previous amendments (the Modified Project ). The City has caused to be prepared an Addendum to the Negative Declaration (the November 2016 Addendum ), in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, to determine whether the changes proposed to the Original Project could result in Page 7 of 8
8 any of the circumstances requiring that a subsequent or supplemental EIR be prepared under Public Resources Code Section (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162). On, the City Council adopted Resolution 2016-, incorporated herein by reference, determining that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required for the Modified Project. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days after its adoption. SECTION 6. PUBLICATION AND POSTING The City Clerk has caused to be published a summary of this ordinance, prepared by the City Attorney under Government Code Section 36933, subdivision (c), once, in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in San Mateo County and circulated in the City of Belmont, at least five days before the date of adoption. A certified copy of the full text of the ordinance was posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days before this date of adoption. Within 15 days after adoption of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause the summary of this ordinance to be published again with the names of those City Council members voting for and against the ordinance; and the City Clerk shall post in the office of the City Clerk a certified copy of the full text of this adopted ordinance with the names of those City Council members voting for and against the ordinance. * * * The City Council of the City of Belmont, California introduced the foregoing ordinance, on July 14, 2015 November 922, 2016 and adopted the ordinance at a regular meeting held on, 2016 by the following vote: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Page 8 of 8
ORDINANCE NO. 91. The Town Council of the Town of Yucca Valley, California, does ordain as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8, DIVISION 3, CHAPTER 3, OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE TOWN
More informationCity Attorney's Synopsis
Eff.: Immediate ORDINANCE NO. AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK EXTENDING AND AMENDING AN INTERIM DEVELOPMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE WHICH TEMPORARILY PROHIBITS THE ISSUANCE OF CERTAIN
More informationORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
.c 1 1 1 ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 1 (ZONING), ARTICLE III (DISTRICTS AND DISTRICT REGULATIONS), DIVISION (R-, R-, R-., R-, R-, R-1, R-, R-, R-0 SINGLE- FAMILY
More informationZONING RESOLUTION Web Version THE CITY OF NEW YORK. Article XI: Special Purpose Districts Chapter 3: Special Ocean Parkway District
ZONING RESOLUTION Web Version THE CITY OF NEW YORK THE CITY OF NEW YORK Bill de Blasio, Mayor CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Carl Weisbrod, Director Article XI: Special Purpose Districts Chapter 3: Special Ocean
More informationORDINANCE NUMBER 1255
ORDINANCE NUMBER 1255 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 19.50 AND 19.61 OF THE ZONING CODE TO EXTEND THE APPROVAL PERIOD
More informationAttachment 2. Planning Commission Resolution No Recommending a Zone Text Amendment
Attachment 2 Planning Commission Resolution No. 1785 Recommending a Zone Text Amendment RESOLUTION NO. 1785 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF
More informationExecutive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment Initiation INITIATION HEARING DATE: MAY 24, 2018
Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment Initiation INITIATION HEARING DATE: MAY 24, 2018 Project Name: Obstructions in Required Setbacks, Yards, and Usable Open Space Case Number: 2018-001876PCA
More informationTOWN OF NAPLES NAPLES MINIMUM LOT SIZE ORDINANCE. Naples Lot Size Ordinance for the Town of Naples, Maine Attested by Town Clerk
Adopted March, 1975 Revised November 29, 1988 Revised March 10, 1990 Revised June 27, 1998 at Town Meeting Revised November 2, 1999 Revised June 8, 2001 Revised June 11, 2002 TOWN OF NAPLES NAPLES MINIMUM
More informationCity of Calistoga Staff Report
City of Calistoga Staff Report TO Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM Erik V. Lundquist, Senior Planner DATE November 15, 2016 SUBJECT Second Reading of Ordinance No. 726 APPROVAL FOR FORWARDING: Dylan
More information#962 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OFTHE BOROUGH OF OCEANPORT, MONMOUTH COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY TO ESTABLISH THE RMW ZONE DISTRICT
#962 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OFTHE BOROUGH OF OCEANPORT, MONMOUTH COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY TO ESTABLISH THE RMW ZONE DISTRICT 1. Section 390-5, entitled Designation of Zones of Article
More information209/213 South Seventh Street Substandard Lot Variance
209/213 South Seventh Street Substandard Lot Variance Background: Steven Schmidt owns both parcels, 209 & 213 South Seventh Street. Steven Schmidt is looking to move 209 South Seventh Street s property
More information(JULY 2000 EDITION, Pub. by City of LA) Rev. 9/13/
Sec. 12.24 SEC. 12.24 -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND OTHER SIMILAR QUASI- JUDICIAL APPROVALS. (Amended by Ord. No. 173,268, Eff. 7/1/00.) A. Applicability. This section shall apply to the conditional use
More informationHeritage Commercial Residential Zone (C4)
26-1 9.4. Heritage Commercial Residential Zone (C4) 9.4.1. Permitted Uses Bylaws No. The following uses are permitted in a C4 Zone: 34-93, 180-2003 63-2012.1 Arts schools. 3-2015.2 Art galleries..3 Lodging
More informationADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 112 (ZONING) OF THE 1976 CODE OF THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA
ZO-06-391 ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 112 (ZONING) OF THE 1976 CODE OF THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County, Virginia, held in the
More informationORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 5715 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SONOMA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE SONOMA COUNTY CODE TO ESTABLISH USE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS
More informationCHAPTER NONCONFORMITIES SECTION GENERALLY Intent and Purpose
CHAPTER 1200. NONCONFORMITIES SECTION 1201. GENERALLY 1201.1. Intent and Purpose The intent and purpose of this section is to protect the property rights of owners or operators of nonconforming uses, structures,
More informationArticle 14: Nonconformities
Section 14.01 Article 14: Nonconformities Purpose Within the districts established by this resolution, some lots, uses of lands or structures, or combinations thereof may exist which were lawful prior
More informationEDGEWATER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RESOLUTION NO. BOA
EDGEWATER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RESOLUTION NO. BOA 2015 02 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE MAXIMUM REAR YARD FENCE HEIGHT OF SIX FEET (6 ), IMPOSED BY EDGEWATER
More informationNONCONFORMING USES, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR LOTS
NONCONFORMING USES, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR LOTS 7.1 NONCONFORMING USES 7.1.1 Any lawful use of the land, buildings or structures existing as of the date of adoption of these Regulations and located in
More informationORDINANCE NO. NORTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
ORDINANCE NO. NORTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF NORTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP, SPECIFICALLY CHAPTER 140, KNOWN AS THE NORTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE, FOR THE
More information- CODE OF ORDINANCES Chapter 14 - PLANNING ARTICLE II. - RESIDENTIAL FENCE REGULATIONS
Sec. 14-21. - Short title. Sec. 14-22. - Definitions. Sec. 14-23. - Purpose. Sec. 14-24. - Scope. Sec. 14-25. - Permit requirements. Sec. 14-26. - Fence types, dimensions and specifications. Sec. 14-27.
More informationCB District Central Business
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF INYO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHATER 18.44, ENTITLED CB DISTRICT - CENTRAL BUSINESS, TO THE INYO COUNTY CODE. The Board of Supervisors
More informationORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Menlo Park does ordain as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1028 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENLO PARK, AMENDING CHAPTER 16.02 (GENERAL PROVISIONS), CHAPTER 16.68 (BUILDINGS), CHAPTER 16.80 (NONCONFORMING USES AND BUILDINGS), AND
More informationAccessory Buildings (Portion pulled from Town Code Updated 2015)
Accessory Buildings (Portion pulled from Town Code Updated 2015) SECTION 1: TITLE 13 entitled Zoning, Chapter 2 entitled General Provisions, Section 13-2-10 entitled Building Location, Subsection 13.2.10(b)
More informationSTAFF REPORT FROM: BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ~
TO: STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ~ SUBJECT: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 14-04 AMENDING GROVER BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
More informationSECTION 824 "R-1-B" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
SECTION 824 "R-1-B" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT The "R-1-B" District is intended to provide for the development of single family residential homes at urban standards on lots not less than twelve
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of December 9, 2006 DATE: December 6, 2006 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT REVISED ORDINANCE SUBJECT: Amendment to Section 36. Administration and Procedures
More informationORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER ( PARKING AND
ORDINANCE NO. 6 4 3 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION 14. 32.450 OF CHAPTER 14. 32 ( PARKING AND STOPPING) OF TITLE 14 ( TRAFFIC) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PREFERENTIAL
More informationORDINANCE NO. 17_3_9_9_2_
I - ----,--.- ORDINANCE NO. 17_3_9_9_2_ An Ordinance amending Sections 11.5.7, 12.03, 12.04, 12.21, 12.22, 12.24, 12.32, 12.36, 14.00, 16.05 and 98.0403.2 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to make technical
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Rowena Genilo-Concepcion, Interim Director of Planning
TO: ATTENTION: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Jeffrey L. Stewart, City Manager Rowena Genilo-Concepcion, Interim Director of Planning Public Hearing to Consider Zoning Ordinance
More informationHONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND PLANNING COMMISSION ED GALLAGHER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PASO ROBLES COLLISION CENTER)
TO: FROM: SUBJECT: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND PLANNING COMMISSION ED GALLAGHER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 12-011 (PASO ROBLES COLLISION CENTER) DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 2012 Needs: Facts:
More informationPublic hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code
CITY OF MARTINEZ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA December 4, 2013 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Don Salts, Deputy Public Works Director Mercy G. Cabral, Deputy City Clerk Public hearing to adopt Ordinance
More informationAGENDA ITEM E-1 Community Development
AGENDA ITEM E-1 Community Development STAFF REPORT City Council Meeting Date: 11/14/2017 Staff Report Number: 17-277-CC Consent Calendar: Waive the reading and adopt an ordinance approving the Amendment
More informationBUILDING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS
155.01 Purpose 155.16 Revocation 155.02 Building Official 155.17 Permit Void 155.03 Permit Required 155.18 Restricted Residence District Map 155.04 Application 155.19 Prohibited Use 155.05 Fees 155.20
More informationBE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS:
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, SO AS TO AMEND A PORTION OF
More informationMINUTES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2018 CORTE MADERA TOWN HALL CORTE MADERA
MINUTES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2018 CORTE MADERA TOWN HALL CORTE MADERA COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Chair Peter Chase Vice-Chair Phyllis Metcalfe Commissioner Bob Bundy
More informationNOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. 504 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING INTERIM ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS RELATING TO THE GENERAL BUSINESS (GB) AND CENTRAL BUSINESS (CBD) ZONING DISTRICTS; MAKING
More informationChapter 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES
Chapter 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES CHAPTER 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES Section 901 Applicability Prior to undertaking any development or use of land in unincorporated Polk County, a development
More informationARTICLE 15 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE AND ENFORCEMENT
ARTICLE 15 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE AND ENFORCEMENT Section 1501 Brule County Zoning Administrator An administrative official who shall be known as the Zoning Administrator and who shall be designated
More informationStaff Report TO: FROM: RE: Chesapeake Board of Zoning Appeals Dale Ware, AICP, CZA Application # ZON-BZA-2017-00022 1430 Oleander Avenue Hearing Date: September 28, 2017 Application # ZON-BZA-2017-00022
More informationUNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE City of Richmond, TX Page 1 CHAPTER 6 ADMINISTRATION ARTICLE 6.3 PERMITS AND PROCEDURES Division 6.3.100 Required Permits and Approvals Sec. 6.3.101 Approvals and Permits
More informationNOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING CHAPTER 14.32 (PARKING AND STOPPING) TO ADD SECTION 14.32.206 (PARKING OVERSIZED VEHICLES RESTRICTED); TO AMEND SECTION 14.32.205 (LIMITATION
More informationFROM: General Manager, Planning and Development FILE: (Kwomais Point Park)
CORPORATE REPORT NO: R186 COUNCIL DATE: September 14, 2015 REGULAR COUNCIL TO: Mayor & Council DATE: September 14, 2015 FROM: General Manager, Planning and Development FILE: 6520-20 (Kwomais Point Park)
More informationO2-CD Zoning. B1-CD Zoning. O2-CD Zoning. RZ-1: Technical Data Sheet CHARLOTTE ETJ LIMITS 75' CLASS C RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT, LEFT IN ACCESS POINT
SITE PROPERTY LINE VICINITY MAP --Proposed Uses: On the portion of the Site zoned O-2(CD): a health institution (hospital), medical and general offices, and medical, dental and optical laboratory uses
More informationCity of Hemet PLANNING DIVISION 445 E. Florida Avenue, Hemet, CA (951)
City of Hemet PLANNING DIVISION 445 E. Florida Avenue, Hemet, CA 92543 (951) 765-2375 www.cityofhemet.org Application No.: Date Received: Received By: Planner Assigned: Concurrent Projects: PLANNING APPLICATION
More informationCITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No "...
CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO. 11302 A by-law to amend "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942." As amended by Bylaw No: 15501, 10/18/04; 17706, 07/26/12... THIS IS A CONSOLIDATED BYLAW PREPARED BY THE CITY OF
More informationTHE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. 184827 An ordinance amending Sections 12.04, 12.32, 13.20, and 16.05 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code in order to establish a HCR Hillside Construction Regulation supplemental use district
More informationARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE
ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE 7.1 GENERAL AMENDMENTS 7-1 7.1.1 Authority 7-1 7.1.2 Proposal to Amend 7-1 7.1.3 Application and Fee 7-1 7.1.4 Referral for Advisory Opinion 7-1 7.1.5 Public Hearing Notice
More informationAN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PROVIDING FOR LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING REGULATIONS AND RELATED FUNCTIONS.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PROVIDING FOR LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING REGULATIONS AND RELATED FUNCTIONS. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, do ordain
More informationCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Village of Bensenville VILLAGE HALL September 25, :00 PM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Village of Bensenville VILLAGE HALL September 25, 2017 6:00 PM I. Call Meeting to Order II. III. IV. Roll Call and Quorum Pledge of Allegiance Public Comment V. Approval
More informationEmbassy Park Architectural Control Committee, ACC. Memo on fencing procedures and requirements
Embassy Park Architectural Control Committee, ACC Memo on fencing procedures and requirements Due to the high number of inquiries on fencing requirements and request, the following memo of understanding
More informationORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS HEREBY ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE NO. 14-0- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS AMENDING THE BEVERLY HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC NOTICING OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL
More informationCommunity Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)
Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 AGENDA ITEM 7.B: PL17-0123 HOTEL
More informationExecutive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment INITIATION HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2017 ADOPTION HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2017
Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment INITIATION HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2017 ADOPTION HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 Project Name: Case Number: Initiated by: Staff Contact: Reviewed by: Recommendation:
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF HALDIMAND COUNTY. By-law No1441/14
THE CORPORATION OF HALDIMAND COUNTY By-law No1441/14 Being a By-Law to establish Development Charges on Lands within The Corporation of Haldimand County WHEREAS Section 2(1) of the Development Charges
More information: FENCE STANDARDS:
10-1-33: FENCE STANDARDS: No person shall construct, erect, install, place, or replace any fence in the city not in compliance with the terms and conditions of this title and the international residential
More informationUp Previous Next Main Collapse Search Print Title 23 ZONING
Up Previous Next Main Collapse Search Print Chapter 23.105 SPECIFIC PLAN 5 Note * Prior ordinance history: Ordinances 86 O 118, 88 O 118 and 90 O 101. 23.105.010 Location. This specific plan shall encompass
More informationCHAPTER USES 1
CHAPTER 29.06 - USES 1 Sections: 29.06.010 Uses 29.06.020 Prohibited Uses 29.06.030 Application Required 29.06.040 Permitted Uses 29.06.050 Standards and Criteria for Permitted Use 29.06.060 Conditional
More informationThe Board of Supervisors of the County of Shasta ordains as follows:
Page 1 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. SCC 2018- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SHASTA AMENDING THE SHASTA COUNTY CODE TITLE 17 ZONING PLAN AND TITLE 15 SUBDIVISIONS SECTION 1 The Board of
More informationSPECIAL SECTIONS 500.
SPECIAL SECTIONS 500. Notwithstanding the "R3" zone designation, the lands delineated on Schedule "B" of this By-law as "R3-500" shall only be used for single-family detached dwellings in cluster development
More informationTECHNICAL DATA SHEET - MUDD DEVELOPMENT AREA RZ1 SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA DEVELOPMENT AREA A DEVELOPMENT AREA B
TECHNICAL DATA SHEET - MUDD AREA SITE DATA Acreage: ± 2.57 acres Tax Parcel #s: 155-012-09;- 10 & -12 Existing Zoning: O-2 Proposed Zoning: MUDD-O Existing Uses: Medical and professional offices uses.
More informationCITY OF MODESTO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT NOTICE OF FIELD TRIP THURSDAY, JANUARY 24, :00 AM 1010 TENTH STREET LOBBY (MAIN LEVEL/NEAR STAIRS)
CITY OF MODESTO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT NOTICE OF FIELD TRIP THURSDAY, JANUARY 24, 2019 9:00 AM 1010 TENTH STREET LOBBY (MAIN LEVEL/NEAR STAIRS) I. II. ROLL CALL FIELD TRIP There will be a field trip
More informationNotice of Public Hearings and Public Meetings to Consider General Plan or Modifications.
CHAPTER 29.03 - Notice 1 Sections: 29.03.010 Notice Required 29.03.020 Applicant Notice 29.03.030 Notice of Intent to Prepare a General Plan or Comprehensive General Plan Amendments 29.03.040 Notice of
More informationORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF
ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN THE
More informationORDINANCE NO Ordinance No Page 1 of 7. Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is struck through.
ORDINANCE NO. 1170 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OKEECHOBEE, FLORIDA; AMENDING PART II OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, SUBPART B-LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 78-DEVELOPMENT
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER V RONALD M. KLINE AND RACHEL A. KLINE SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0080-V RONALD M. KLINE AND RACHEL A. KLINE SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JUNE 18, 2015 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationMEETING OF THE FEBRUARY 25, 2014 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING NO. 2 PAGE NO. 1
PAGE NO. 1 ADEQUATE NOTICE OF THIS MEETING HAS BEEN PROVIDED AS IS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 231, PUBLIC LAW 1975 AND BY RESOLUTION 2004-8, WITH THE REQUEST OF THE HOME NEWS AND TRIBUNE AND THE SENTINEL NEWSPAPERS
More informationCHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
CHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 870 SOUTH MAIN ST. PO BOX 70 CHEBOYGAN, MI 49721 PHONE: (231)627-8489 FAX: (231)627-3646 CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF
More informationFRANKLIN TOWNSHIP YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO
FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO. 2018-3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 2006-1, AS AMENDED) TO REPLACE SECTION 205, PERTAINING TO STEEP
More informationo for a variance as stated on attached Form 3
Florence County Planning Department 518 S. Irby Street, Florence, S.C. 29501 Office (843)676-8600 Toll-free (866)258-9232 Fax (843)676-8667 Toll-free (866)259-2068 Florence County Board of Zoning Appeals
More informationSUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD AGENDA
SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD AGENDA Thursday, 9:00 A.M. August 30, 2018 Hearing Room No. 2 Churchill Building, 10019-103 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB Hearing Date: Thursday, August 30, 2018 2 SUBDIVISION
More informationDIVISION 21. OVERLAY DISTRICTS
JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 491 SESS: 2 OUTPUT: Tue Jul 29 14:00:46 2003 /first/pubdocs/mcc/3/10256_takes 59-444 DIVISION 21. OVERLAY DISTRICTS Sec. 59-440. General. The provisions of this division 21 apply
More informationAppendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance
Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 11-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 1860-18,
More informationCITY OF NORTH RIDGEVILLE BOARD OF ZONING AND BUILDING APPEALS Procedure for filing an Appeal, Conditional Use, Variances or Home Occupation Approvals
CITY OF NORTH RIDGEVILLE BOARD OF ZONING AND BUILDING APPEALS Procedure for filing an Appeal, Conditional Use, Variances or Home Occupation Approvals An appeal(s) from the decision of the Administrative
More informationCHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
CHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 870 SOUTH MAIN ST. PO BOX 70 CHEBOYGAN, MI 49721 PHONE: (231)627-8489 FAX: (231)627-3646 CHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING & PUBLIC HEARING WEDNESDAY, MAY
More informationOFFICE CONSOLIDATION FENCE BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER By-Law Number Date Passed Section Amended
OFFICE CONSOLIDATION FENCE BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER 119-05 Passed by Council on November 28, 2005 Amendments: By-Law Number Date Passed Section Amended 55-07 April 23, 2007 Delete Private Swimming Pool Definition
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 21, 2018 DATE: April 13, 2018 SUBJECT: SP #362, SITE PLAN AMENDMENT for the addition of approximately 1,760 square feet of new gross
More informationCITY OF DELAND FLORIDA REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION MAY Attachments for Acres X Ordinance. Approved by.
Department Planning Subject Z1407 Rezoning Located at the NW Corner of Boston Ave CITY OF DELAND FLORIDA REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION MAY 19 2014 Attachments for 48 63 Acres X Ordinance X Staff Report
More informationTable of Contents. Title 1: Administration. Table of Contents. gwinnettcounty Unified Development Ordinance Updated July 2015
Title 1: Administration Chapter 100. General Provisions. Section 100-10. Title. 1 Section 100-20. Purpose. 1 Section 100-30. Authority. 2 Section 100-40. Jurisdiction. 2 Section 100-50. Application of
More informationBOROUGH OF INTERLAKEN MINUTES- PLANNING BOARD JANUARY 22, :30 P.M. BOROUGH HALL, 100 GRASSMERE AVENUE
BOROUGH OF INTERLAKEN MINUTES- PLANNING BOARD JANUARY 22, 2018 7:30 P.M. BOROUGH HALL, 100 GRASSMERE AVENUE A meeting of the PLANNING BOARD of the Borough of Interlaken, Monmouth County, New Jersey was
More informationDRAFT. City of Falls Church. Meeting Date:
1 2 DRAFT City of Falls Church Meeting Date: XX-XX-2011 Title: Ordinance To Amend Chapter 48, Zoning, Of The Code Of The City Of Falls Church, Virginia, In Order To Shift Authority For Review And Approval
More informationCITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 2325
CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 2325 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SNOHOMISH, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY S DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SMC SECTION 14.100.020 - DEFINITIONS; REPEALING
More informationCORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ESQUIMALT PARKING BYLAW 1992 BYLAW NO. 2011
CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ESQUIMALT PARKING BYLAW 1992 BYLAW NO. 2011 MAY, 2003 Consolidated for convenience. In case of discrepancy the original Bylaw or Amending Bylaws must be consulted. PARKING
More informationVARIANCE APPLICATION Type A B C (circle one)
Baker City Hall File No. 1655 First Street, Suites 105/106 Applicant P.O. Box 650 Received by Baker City, OR 97814 Date (541) 524 2030 / 2028 Accepted as Complete by FAX (541) 524 2049 Date Accepted as
More informationTownship of East Zorra-Tavistock Zoning By-Law Number
SECTION 7.0 GENERAL AGRICULTURAL ZONE (A2) Page 7-1 7.1 USES PERMITTED No person shall within any A2 Zone use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure for any purpose except one or more
More informationCity of Grass Valley ilw_:. [:] Agenda Action Sheet. Joe C. Heckel, Community Development Direct Thomas Last, Planning Director
I City of Grass Valley ilw_:. [:] Agenda Action Sheet iis4 A Council Meeting Date: February 8, 2011 Date Prepared: January 31, 2011 Prepared by: Title: Agenda: Joe C. Heckel, Community Development Direct
More informationTOWNSHIP OF CLARK Ordinance No. Adopted. Introduced: January 20, 2015 Public Hearing: February 17, Motion: O Connor Motion:
TOWNSHIP OF CLARK Ordinance No. Adopted Introduced: January 20, 2015 Public Hearing: February 17, 2015 Motion: O Connor Motion: Seconded: Hund Seconded: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND VARIOUS ARTICLES OF CHAPTER
More information3620 PARK RD. MULTI-FAMILY REZONING PETITION No RZ-1 SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA VICINITY MAP NTS TECHNICAL DATA SHEET CHARLOTTE SITE PARK RD.
SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA ACREAGE: ± 2.22 ACRES TAX PARCEL #S: 49-44-37 EXIING ZONING: R-4 PROPOSED ZONING: UR-2(CD) EXIING USES: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, VACANT PROPOSED USES: 20 SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED
More informationARTICLE 16 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS
ARTICLE 16 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS SECTION 1601 PURPOSE The provisions of this Article are intended to permit and encourage innovations in residential development through permitting a greater
More informationColumbia Pike Special Revitalization District - Form Based Code
II. Administration A. By-Right FBC Applications The Zoning Administrator is authorized to approve applications for DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS smaller than 40,000 square feet, consisting only of new structures
More information2018 MEETING DATES AND FILING DEADLINES
2018 MEETING DATES AND FILING DEADLINES Meeting Date Filing Deadline February 26 January 26 March 26 February 23 April 23 March 23 May 21 April 20 June 25 May 25 July 23 June 22 August 27 July 27 September
More informationORDINANCE # NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of American Canyon as follows:
ORDINANCE # 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O F AMERICAN CANYON RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE COTTAGE FOOD ORDINANCE CONSISTING OF AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.04.030
More informationORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Chapter 51A, Dallas Development Code: Ordinance No , as
9-23-14 ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Chapter 51A, Dallas Development Code: Ordinance No. 19455, as amended, of the Dallas City Code by amending Section 51A-4.505, conservation districts; providing
More informationALPHABETICAL ORDINANCES
ZONING 31-37 07/17/37 : An Ordinance districting and zoning the Town of Cocoa Beach, for the purpose of regulating the location of trades, industries, apartment houses, dwellings and other uses of property
More informationCOUNTY OF OAKLAND CITY OF NOVI ORDINANCE NO. 03- TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE (Planned Rezoning Overlay)
1-26-04 STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF OAKLAND CITY OF NOVI ORDINANCE NO. 03- TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE (Planned Rezoning Overlay) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY OF NOVI ZONING ORDINANCE, AS PREVIOUSLY
More informationThe Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside Ordains as Follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 555 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 555.19) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 555 IMPLEMENTING THE SURFACE MINING AND RECLAMATION ACT OF 1975 The Board of Supervisors of
More informationROBERT W. WOJCIK AND DEBORAH A. WOJCIK
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER 2015-0258-V ROBERT W. WOJCIK AND DEBORAH A. WOJCIK THIRD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JANUARY 7, 2016 ORDERED BY: DOUGLAS CLARK HOLLMANN ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationCITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 02C-09
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 02C-09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WASHINGTON AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 99C-13 TITLED CITY OF MERCER ISLAND UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND CODIFIED AT
More informationBOARD OF COMMISSIONERS GLYNN COUNTY BRUNSWICK, GEORGIA DRAFT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS GLYNN COUNTY BRUNSWICK, GEORGIA Reading and Adoption
More informationWHEREAS, on May 29,2002, June 3,2002, June 19,2002, July 10,2002, August 14,
ORDNANCE NO. 1416 AN ORDNANCE OF THE CTY OF LAGUNA BEACH AMENDNG MUNCPAL CODE CHAPTERS 25.05, 25.08, 25.10, 25.12, 25.14, 25.43. 25.44,25.50,25.51,25.52, and 25.56 WHEREAS, on May 29,2002, June 3,2002,
More information