The Scope of the Sufficiently Close Relationship Test; How Porter v. Decatur Is Changing the Landscape of Relation Back
|
|
- Chastity Poole
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois IDC Quarterly Volume 21, Number 1 ( ) Medical Malpractice By: Dina L. Torrisi and Edna McLain HeplerBroom, LLC The Scope of the Sufficiently Close Relationship Test; How Porter v. Decatur Is Changing the Landscape of Relation Back The decision of the Illinois Supreme Court in Porter v. Decatur Mem. Hosp., on January 25, 2008, expanded the circumstances under which plaintiffs could amend their pleadings to add new claims after the expiration of the statute of limitations as codified in 735 ILCS 5/2-616(b). 227 Ill. 2d 343, 882 N.E.2d 583 (Ill. 2008). The Illinois Supreme Court adopted the sufficiently close relationship test to determine whether a new claim will relate back to an original complaint. Under that test, a new claim will be considered to have arisen out of the same transaction or occurrence and will relate back if the new allegations as compared with the timely filed allegations show that the events alleged were close in time and subject matter and led to the same injury. Porter, 227 Ill. 2d at 360, citing, In re Olympia Brewing Co., 612 F. Supp. 1370, 1373 (N.D. Ill. 1985). This new test essentially provided plaintiffs with a subjective standard that simplified and expanded the circumstances under which a plaintiff could add new claims and factual allegations after the expiration of the statute of limitations. Since its publication, several Illinois courts have interpreted and applied Porter. This articles examines a few of the decisions applying Porter, and provides practical tips regarding responding to a 2-616(b) situation. History of the Sufficiently Close Relationship Test The sufficiently close relationship test was originally enunciated by the Northern District of Illinois in the case of In re Olympia Brewing Co. Securities Litigation. 612 F. Supp (N.D. Ill. 1985). In Olympia Brewing, the Northern District addressed whether an amendment to a complaint adding a claim under the RICO Act and adding factual allegations in support of the claim would relate back to the original complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c). Id. The Northern District stated it was clear that a party could amend a pleading to include a new legal theory based on previously alleged facts, but a party could not add a new theory based on a set of facts different from the original pleading. Id. at The Olympia court provided several examples of situations where new facts or claims were found not to relate back. In these cases, the Northern District noted that the newly added claims or facts were found not to relate back because of a significant lapse in time between the new and original facts, the new and original claims were of a different character, or the new and original facts led to different injuries. Olympia Brewing, 612 F. Supp. at Cases where new claims or facts were found to relate back involved new factual allegations that were close in time or subject matter as the original complaint. Id. However, the Northern District stated that temporal proximity and consideration of the general character of the sets of factual allegations and whether the facts are all part of the events leading to the originally alleged injury are factors to consider but not dispositive. Id. at In Olympia Brewing, the Northern District found the additional facts pertinent to the new RICO allegations, then, are so closely linked to the original frauds that they are part of the Page 1 of 5
2 general fact situation originally alleged, and permitted the amendment to plaintiffs complaint. 612 F. Supp. at In 2008, the Illinois Supreme Court adopted the sufficiently close relationship test in Porter. Applying the Northern District s reasoning in Olympia, the court found that the plaintiff s new factual allegations and new claims related back to his original complaint. The case involved events during plaintiff s admission to Decatur Memorial Hospital following an automobile accident on January 12, 2001, until he underwent surgery performed two days later. Porter, 227 Ill. 2d at A physician evaluated the plaintiff in the emergency department upon admission and diagnosed him as having an incomplete spinal cord injury. He admitted Mr. Porter to the intensive care unit. Id. at 346. That physician ordered an MRI to be done once Mr. Porter was stable from a pulmonary standpoint, and he further ordered the discontinuation of the C collar and spine board upon admission to the ICU. Id. The original complaint filed on March 25, 2002, named the admitting physician as a defendant in Count I and alleged he was negligent for the discontinuation of the C collar and spine board prior to an MRI, for the discontinuation of spinal immobilization prior to fully appreciating the spinal injury, for failure to timely obtain an MRI on January 12, 2001, and for failure to appreciate decreasing blood pressure and leg function as a sign and symptom of further spinal injury. 227 Ill. 2d at 347. Count II of the original complaint named the hospital as a respondent in discovery. Id. The plaintiff s first amended complaint filed on January 6, 2003, added the hospital as a defendant and alleged that hospital personnel, including nurses, aides, attendants and others, failed to perform hourly neurological checks and to report the outcome of those checks to the attending neurosurgeon. 227 Ill. 2d at 348. Approximately five months after the expiration of the statute of limitations, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint adding a new allegation of negligence against the admitting physician. The proposed amended complaint also added a third count against the hospital, alleging a radiologist was an apparent agent of the hospital and that the hospital s agents and employees failed to properly interpret a CT scan of plaintiff s cervical spine, failed to appreciate the cervical fractures revealed on the CT scan, and misread and misinterpreted the CT scan. 227 Ill. 2d at On appeal, the Illinois Supreme Court addressed whether the new allegations in the second amended complaint related back to the timely-filed claims. The Illinois Supreme Court found the third count against the hospital related back to the allegations of the original complaint. Applying the sufficiently close relationship test, the court emphasized that the timely filed first amended complaint, alleged that hospital personnel, including nurses, aides, attendants and others, failed to report the plaintiff s diminishing neurological status to the attending neurosurgeon, and as a result, his neurological injury was undiagnosed and untreated and caused him to lose neurological function in one of his legs. Porter, 227 Ill. 2d at 361 (emphasis added). It found that the new allegations in the second amended complaint concerning the radiologist s failure to interpret and correctly read the CT scan were sufficiently close in time and subject matter and resulted in the same injury as plead in the originally timely filed complaint. Id. Furthermore, the hospital was on notice from the first amended complaint that the plaintiff believed that its agents and employees were negligent for failing to notice and treat his diminishing neurological status. Porter, 227 Ill. 2d at 362. The allegations concerning the radiologist and his misreading and misinterpretation of the CT scan were simply amplifications that grew out of the earlier allegation about failing to report diminishing neurological function, both of which arose out of the same transaction or occurrence. Id. at 364. Recent Applications of Sufficiently Close Relationship Test Announced in Porter v. Decatur Memorial Hospital The most recent case to discuss and apply Porter comes from the Illinois Appellate Court for the First District, Lewandowski v. Jelenski, 401 Ill. App. 3d 893, 929 N.E.2d 114 (1st. Dist. 2010). In Lewandowski, the original complaint set forth claims against the defendant for an accounting, a constructive trust, and breach of fiduciary duty for money paid to the defendant for a joint venture to acquire and develop a parcel of property. Page 2 of 5
3 929 N.E.2d at Plaintiff subsequently amended her complaint three times prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations. Following a bench trial, the trial court allowed plaintiff to amend Count VIII of her third amended complaint for an accounting to state a cause of action for unjust enrichment to conform the pleadings to the proof. Id. The amendment was nearly one year and six months after the expiration of the statute of limitations for an unjust enrichment claim. The original claim required plaintiff to establish the existence of a fiduciary relationship, but a claim for unjust enrichment did not require the existence of a fiduciary relationship between the parties before plaintiff could recover. Lewandowski, 929 N.E.2d at 123. In fact, the trial court had found that plaintiff did not establish the existence of a fiduciary relationship between the parties. Id. However, it also found that the defendant was unjustly enriched. Id. Therefore, the only way for plaintiff to recover against the defendant was if the unjust enrichment claim was found to relate back. Following the amendment, the trial court entered judgment in plaintiff s favor as to Count VIII and ruled against the plaintiff on all remaining counts. Lewandowski, 929 N.E.2d at 118. The defendant appealed the trial court s order and argued that the claim was time-barred and did not relate back to the original complaint. On appeal, the First District applied the sufficiently close relationship test enunciated in Porter and found that the unjust enrichment claim related back to the timely third amended complaint. The Court reasoned that the plaintiff s claims from the third amended complaint were based on factual allegations that money was paid to the defendant, the money was not used for its intended purpose, and the money was never returned to the plaintiff. Lewandowski, 929 N.E.2d. at 123. The unjust enrichment claim was based on the same predicate facts, and as such, the First District found that the claim grew out of the same transaction or occurrence. Id. In the case of In Re Safeco Insurance Companies of America, the Seventh Circuit examined whether the state court certification defining the class of plaintiffs related back to the original complaint filed prior to the enactment of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). 585 F.3d 326 (7th Cir. 2009). If so, the state court certification would not constitute a new action for purposes of removal to federal court. The court looked to both Illinois and federal case law concerning relation back. The Seventh Circuit noted that Illinois relation-back doctrine was identical to the federal rule. In Re Safeco, 585 F.3d at 331. Citing Porter, the court stated An amendment will relate back to the original complaint if the amendment alleges events close in time and subject matter to those previously alleged, and if they led to the same injury. Id. at 331, citing, Porter v. Decatur Mem. Hosp., 227 Ill. App. 3d 343, 360, 882 N.E.2d 583, 593 (Ill. 2008). The Court further stated that the essential inquiry in determining whether a new claim will relate back is whether the original pleadings provided defendant with notice of the events that comprise the new claim or allegations. In Re Safeco, 585 F.3d at 331 (emphasis added). Safeco argued that it had no notice prior to the state court class certification that the plaintiffs sought to hold it liable for adjusting the claims of its affiliated companies. But, examining various pleadings filed in state court by the parties, the court concluded that the original complaint contained allegations against Safeco and its affiliated companies sufficient to put Safeco on notice that the petitioners sought to hold it liable for the use of its computer program to adjust accounts of its affiliates policyholders. Id. at 334. Therefore, the court concluded that the class definition related back to the original pre-cafa complaint. Consequently, the court affirmed the district court s decision to remand the case to state court. The In Re Safeco case suggests that the sufficiently close relationship test is only one part of the equation in determining whether an amendment will relate back. The Seventh Circuit s statement that the essential inquiry is really whether the original pleadings provided a defendant with sufficient notice of the events comprising the new claim is even more expansive than the current test enunciated in Porter. Even though In re Safeco is a federal court decision, the Illinois Supreme Court relied heavily on federal law for guidance in Porter, and it would not be surprising if Illinois courts likewise turned to federal cases such as In Re Safeco to find support for a plaintiff s amended pleading. Page 3 of 5
4 Suggested Practice Tips to Avoid Porter Pitfalls The above cases demonstrate a liberal trend in which courts applying the sufficiently close relationship test have found that new claims or allegations related back to timely filed complaints. These cases also demonstrate it is relatively easy for a plaintiff to argue a new claim or allegation grew out of the same transaction or occurrence as the timely filed complaint because the test allows for subjectivity and no one factor, i.e., temporal proximity, is dispositive. It is too easy to characterize these cases as examples of the plaintiff-friendly nature of the judiciary. Instead, what these cases should signal is caution on the part of the defense bar to not only scrutinize carefully every motion for leave to amend a complaint, but also how plaintiff s cause of action is pled from the outset. Consider that the Illinois Supreme Court in Porter stated that Decatur Memorial Hospital was on notice that the conduct of the radiologist could form the basis of a new claim of negligence based on the fact that the first amended complaint concerned the conduct of hospital personnel, including nurses, aides, attendants and others. It was the and others language that was said to put the hospital on notice that the conduct of any agent or employee, including the radiologist, could be at issue. How many complaints have defense attorneys seen where similar language is used, and how many times has such language been allowed to stand? After Porter and its progeny, practitioners may want to challenge a plaintiff s complaint with such broad language. For example, consider filing a motion to dismiss or to strike generic allegations pertaining to others or for otherwise negligent actions. Another option is to seek a bill of particulars so that a defendant can be put on notice of specific allegations. In addition to pleadings, defense attorneys may alter their strategy during the discovery phase. For example, for those defending a hospital, thorough analysis is essential before pointing the finger at an individual physician who treated a plaintiff during a hospital admission, but who was not named as a party prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations. Porter suggests that, depending on how the original claim was pleaded, a hospital could potentially be held liable for the conduct of any individual who came in contact with the plaintiff during his or her admission even if that individual was not an actual agent or employee of the hospital. According to Porter, even after a statute of limitations has expired, a plaintiff may be able to successfully amend a complaint under 2-616(b) to state a claim against an individual physician by imputing the conduct of the alleged apparent agent to the hospital. While not adding a new defendant to the complaint, the plaintiff avoids this legal hurdle by characterizing the individual s conduct as a new claim against the hospital. Finally, defense counsel must be diligent in forcing a plaintiff to disclose all potential opinions and theories prior to any expert depositions. In Porter, the basis for the allegation that the CT scan had been misread and misinterpreted came from the deposition testimony of a plaintiff s expert taken a year after the expiration of the statute of limitations. The best way to avoid a 2-616(b) situation is to fully understand Porter and its progeny. Recent 2-616(b) cases have demonstrated a general trend favoring plaintiffs arguments that amended claims relate back to the original complaint. However, with careful forethought and practice, some of these unjust outcomes may be prevented. About the Authors Dina L. Torrisi is a partner at HeplerBroom, LLC. Ms. Torrisi focuses her practice in the area of professional liability defense and general negligence. She has extensive litigation experience in defending hospitals, physicians and nurses. Ms. Torrisi received her B.S. from University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, and her J.D. from The John Marshall Law School. She is admitted to the bars of Illinois, the Northern District of Illinois, and the U.S. Supreme Court. Ms. Torrisi is a member of the Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel and Illinois Association of Healthcare Attorneys. She is also an Arbitrator for the Cook County Mandatory Arbitration Program. Page 4 of 5
5 Edna McLain is an associate attorney of HeplerBroom, LLC. Ms. McLain graduated from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, in 1991, with a Bachelor of Arts degree in English, and she received her Juris Doctorate from the Saint Louis University School of Law in She is admitted to the bars of Illinois, Missouri and Wisconsin and the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Illinois. Ms. McLain focuses her practice in the areas of medical malpractice, insurance defense and toxic torts. She is a member of the Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel. About the IDC The Illinois Association Defense Trial Counsel (IDC) is the premier association of attorneys in Illinois who devote a substantial portion their practice to the representation of business, corporate, insurance, professional and other individual defendants in civil litigation. For more information on the IDC, visit us on the web at Statements or expression of opinions in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the association. IDC Quarterly, Volume 21, Number Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel, PO Box 3144, Springfield, IL , , idc@iadtc.org Page 5 of 5
Clash of the Titans: The Interaction of the Wrongful Death Act, Statute of Repose, Statute of Limitations and the Discovery Rule
Medical Malpractice Update Edna L. McLain and Zeke N. Katz HeplerBroom LLC, Chicago Clash of the Titans: The Interaction of the Wrongful Death Act, Statute of Repose, Statute of Limitations and the Discovery
More informationHow to Be Thankful When Settling a Wrongful Death Claim
Medical Malpractice Update Edna L. McLain and Tammera E. Banasek HeplerBroom LLC, Chicago How to Be Thankful When Settling a Wrongful Death Claim T is the season for celebration and giving thanks, and
More informationIllinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 3 (24.3.
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 3 (24.3.12) Evidence and Practice Tips Joseph G. Feehan and Brad W. Keller
More informationDoes the Discovery Rule Apply to Claims Brought Under the Wrongful Death Act or Pursuant to the Survival Act?
Supreme Court Watch M. Elizabeth D. Kellett HeplerBroom LLC, Edwardsville Does the Discovery Rule Apply to Claims Brought Under the Wrongful Death Act or Pursuant to the Survival Act? Moon v. Rhode, No.
More informationDual Sole Proximate Causes: Asserting an Effective Oxymoronic Defense
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 20, Number 4 (20.4.22) Feature Article By Lindsay Drecoll Brown Cassiday Schade LLP Dual
More informationIllinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel P.O. Box 7288, Springfield, IL IDC Quarterly Vol. 16, No. 2 ( ) Medical Malpractice
Medical Malpractice By: Edward J. Aucoin, Jr. Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered Chicago First District Explains Requirements for Claims of Fraudulent Concealment Under 735 5/13-215 and Reaffirms Requirements
More informationAppellate Court Addresses Issue of First Impression Concerning Apparent Agency, Consent Forms and a Non-English Speaking Patient
Health Law Roger R. Clayton, Mark D. Hansen and J. Matthew Thompson Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Appellate Court Addresses Issue of First Impression Concerning Apparent Agency, Consent
More informationManifestation Dates: The Moving Target of Repetitive Trauma Cases
Feature Article R. Mark Cosimini Rusin & Maciorowski, Ltd., Champaign Manifestation Dates: The Moving Target of Repetitive Trauma Cases The Illinois Appellate Court Fifth District, Workers Compensation
More informationDon t Forget the Immunity Offered by the Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 21, Number 1 (21.1.30) Property Insurance By: Tracy E. Stevenson Robbins, Salomon & Patt,
More informationTHE MINOR LEAGUE: TAKING CARE OF JUNIOR SETTLEMENT AND CLOSURE OF MINOR S CLAIMS
THE MINOR LEAGUE: TAKING CARE OF JUNIOR SETTLEMENT AND CLOSURE OF MINOR S CLAIMS Presented and Prepared by: Joseph K. Guyette jguyette@heylroyster.com Champaign, Illinois 217.344.0060 Heyl, Royster, Voelker
More informationAdmissibility of Statements under Illinois Rule of Evidence 408: Control Solutions, LLC v. Elecsys
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 4 (24.4.21) Evidence and Practice Tips Joseph G. Feehan and Brad W. Keller
More informationEvidence and Practice Tips By: Joseph G. Feehan and Brad W. Keller Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 1 (24.1.47) Evidence and Practice Tips By: Joseph G. Feehan and Brad W. Keller
More informationJustice Delayed is Justice Denied: The Northern District of Illinois Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Program
Civil Practice and Procedure Donald Patrick Eckler Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered, Chicago Michael P. Sever Foran Glennon Palandech Ponzi & Rudloff, P.C., Chicago Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: The
More informationThe Necessity of Analyzing All Amendments for Lack of Timeliness Under the Relation Back Doctrine of 735 ILCS 5/2-616(b)
The Necessity of Analyzing All Amendments for Lack of Timeliness Under the Relation Back Doctrine of 735 ILCS 5/2-616(b) By: Edward M. Wagner and Kingshuk Roy Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Urbana The
More informationDo Consumers Have Private Remedies for Violations of the Reporting Requirements Under the Rules of the Consumer Product Safety Act?
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 19, Number 4 (19.4.50) Product Liability By: James W. Ozog and Staci A. Williamson* Wiedner
More informationAn Outside Bet: Reduction in the Amount of Recovery in Medical Malpractice Cases
Civil Practice and Procedure Donald Patrick Eckler and Matthew A. Reddy Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered, Chicago An Outside Bet: Reduction in the Amount of Recovery in Medical Malpractice Cases Defense practitioners
More informationThree Recent Appellate Court Jurisdictional Rulings Should Give Practitioners Pause When Filing Reviews
Workers Compensation Report Brad A. Elward, Brad A. Antonacci and Dana Hughes Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Three Recent Appellate Court Jurisdictional Rulings Should Give Practitioners
More informationIsn t Every Party Entitled to be Represented by its Own Attorney? Take Note of Gapinski v. Gujrati
Health Law Roger R. Clayton, Mark D. Hansen and J. Matthew Thompson Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Isn t Every Party Entitled to be Represented by its Own Attorney? Take Note of Gapinski
More informationRecent Decisions. Borrowed Employee s Remedy Limited by Workers Compensation Act
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 22, Number 4 (22.4.23) Recent Decisions By: Stacy Dolan Fulco and Katherine K. Haussermann
More informationMALICIOUS PROSECUTION CLAIMS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AS TO WHEN COVERAGE IS TRIGGERED
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CLAIMS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AS TO WHEN COVERAGE IS TRIGGERED Presented and Prepared by: John P. Heil, Jr. jheil@heylroyster.com Peoria, Illinois 309.676.0400 Heyl, Royster, Voelker
More informationStatute Of Limitations
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 18, Number 4 (18.4.10) Recent Decisions By: Stacy Dolan Fulco* Cremer, Shaughnessy, Spina,
More informationPublic Act : An Unconstitutional Violation of the Inviolate Right to Trial By Jury?
Feature Article Michael L. Resis and Britta Sahltrom SmithAmundsen LLC, Chicago Terry A. Fox Kelley Kronenberg, Chicago John D. Hackett Cassiday Schade LLP, Chicago Public Act 98-1132: An Unconstitutional
More informationDefining the Retained Control Exception: An Update on 414
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 19, Number 3 (19.3.30) Feature Article By: Kingshuk K. Roy Purcell & Wardrope, Chtd.
More informationThe First District Revisits Rule 304(a) Requirements and the Supreme Court Changes Citation Formats
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 21, Number 3 (21.3.32) Appellate Practice Corner By: Brad A. Elward Heyl, Royster, Voelker
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 09-8002 LORIE J. MARSHALL AND DEBRA RAMIREZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs-Respondents, H&R
More informationAre the IPI Instructions on Construction Negligence an Accurate Statement of Illinois Law?
Feature Article Judge Donald J. O Brien, Jr. (ret.) * Johnson & Bell, Ltd., Chicago Are the IPI Instructions on Construction Negligence an Accurate Statement of Illinois Law? The current version of the
More informationWilson v. Clark Its Use and its Ramifications
Feature Article Circuit Judge Donald J. O Brien, Jr. (Ret.) Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Charles P. Rantis Johnson & Bell, Ltd., Chicago Wilson v. Clark Its Use and its Ramifications Expert witness
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
2014 IL 115997 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket Nos. 115997, 116009 cons.) In re ESTATE OF PERRY C. POWELL (a/k/a Perry Smith, Jr.), a Disabled Person (Robert F. Harris, Cook County
More informationEXAM NO. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW FINAL EXAMINATION
EXAM NO. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW FINAL EXAMINATION CIVIL PROCEDURE () TUESDAY, MAY 16 PROFESSOR AMAR (3 HOURS) I. This is an open-book exam. You may consult any books, notes
More informationSettlement Apportionment and Setoff in Illinois
Feature Article Quinn P. Donnelly and Brian T. Henry Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered, Chicago Settlement Apportionment and Setoff in Illinois During the course of a lawsuit, counsel for each party evaluates
More informationWorkers Compensation: Never Pay Judgment Interest if You are Not Facing a Section 19(g) Judgment
Feature Article Brad A. Elward Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Workers Compensation: Never Pay Judgment Interest if You are Not Facing a Section 19(g) Judgment The past 18 months have seen
More informationLAMAR F. JOST Partner P F
Partner jost@wtotrial.com P 303.244.1905 F 303.244.1879 EDUCATION University of Wyoming College of Law, J.D., 2002 Order of the Coif Wyoming Law Review, Comment Editor University of Wyoming, B.S., 1999,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D & 5D06-874
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2007 CORINA CHRISTENSEN, INDIVIDUALLY, etc., et al., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D06-390 & 5D06-874 EVERETT C. COOPER, M.D.,
More informationUsing Supreme Court Rule 219(e) to Discourage Abuse of Voluntary Dismissal Statute
Legal Ethics Gretchen Harris Sperry Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Chicago Using Supreme Court Rule 219(e) to Discourage Abuse of Voluntary Dismissal Statute In recognition of the principle that a plaintiff
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Schrempf, Kelly, Napp & Darr, Ltd. v. Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust Fund, 2015 IL App (5th) 130413 Appellate Court Caption SCHREMPF, KELLY, NAPP AND DARR,
More informationLoss of a Chance. What is it and what does it mean in medical malpractice cases?
Loss of a Chance What is it and what does it mean in medical malpractice cases? Walter C. Morrison IV Gainsburgh, Benjamin, David, Meunier & Warshauer, LLC I. Introduction Kramer walks in to your office
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOYCE KAPP, as Next Friend of ELIZABETH JOHNSON, UNPUBLISHED March 6, 2001 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 216020 Kent Circuit Court MARK A. EVENHOUSE, M.D. and LAURELS LC
More informationIn the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District DAWN STEVENSON, v. Respondent, AQUILA FOREIGN QUALIFICATIONS CORP., Appellant. WD72214 OPINION FILED: December 21, 2010 Appeal from the Circuit Court of
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE MARCH 18, 2003 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE MARCH 18, 2003 Session JESSE RANDALL FITTS, JR., ET AL. v. DR. DONALD ARMS d/b/a McMINNVILLE ORTHOPEDIC CLINIC, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court
More informationI N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT Douglas E. Sakaguchi Jerome W. McKeever Pfeifer Morgan & Stesiak South Bend, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE SAINT JOSEPH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Robert J. Palmer May Oberfell Lorber
More informationDirect Appeal of Final Judgments to the Illinois Supreme Court
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 21, Number 1 (21.1.20) Appellate Practice Corner By: Brad A. Elward Heyl, Royster, Voelker
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ELMA BOGUS, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT BOGUS, UNPUBLISHED January 24, 2006 Plaintiff-Appellant, V No. 262531 LC No. 03-319085-NH MARK SAWKA, M.D.,
More informatione1b.j oj!ilicitnumd em g~dmj tfre 28tft dmj oj 9)~, 2017.
VIRGINIA: :In tfre Supwm &wtt oj VVuJinia field at tfre Supwm &wtt 9Juilditu; in tik e1b.j oj!ilicitnumd em g~dmj tfre 28tft dmj oj 9)~, 2017. Carlena Chapple-Brooks, Appellant, against Record No. 161812
More informationDAN S STIMULUS PLAN: CASE LAW UPDATE
DAN S STIMULUS PLAN: CASE LAW UPDATE Presented and Prepared by: Daniel R. Simmons dsimmons@heylroyster.com Springfield, Illinois 217.522.8822 The cases and materials presented here are in summary and outline
More informationHandling Cases Involving Minors
Handling Cases Involving Minors by Miranda L. Soucie Introduction In Illinois, every minor 1 involved in litigation is a ward of the court. 2 As a matter of public policy, the rights of minors are generally
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION DOUGLAS STOWE, Individually, and STEPHANIE JACKSON as Guardian and Next Friend of WYATT STOWE, a Minor Child, Plaintiffs,
More informationEVIDENCE ISSUES IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES
EVIDENCE ISSUES IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES Catherine Eagles, Senior Resident Superior Court Judge (August 2009) (slightly revised by the School of Government to include changes made by Session Law 2011-400)
More informationRecent Decisions COLLATERAL SOURCE RULE
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 17, Number 3 (17.3.45) Recent Decisions By: Stacy Dolan Fulco* Cremer, Kopon, Shaughnessy
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CV-3. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (Hon. Peter H. Wolf, Trial Judge)
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationProvider-Patient Voluntary Arbitration Agreement
I. Agreement to Arbitrate Provider-Patient Voluntary Arbitration Agreement The parties to this Provider-Patient Voluntary Arbitration Agreement ( Arbitration Agreement ) are (insert name of physician)
More information2017 IL App (5th) IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE 2017 IL App (5th) 160478 Decision filed 12/08/17. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-16-0478 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of the same.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 12, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 12, 2005 Session RHONDA D. DUNCAN v. ROSE M. LLOYD, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 01C-1459 Walter C. Kurtz,
More informationWHEN DOES A LOST-OPPORTUNITY CLAIM EXIST? While the second sentence of MCL a(2) provides a causation standard
WHEN DOES A LOST-OPPORTUNITY CLAIM EXIST? While the second sentence of MCL 600.2912a(2) provides a causation standard for medical malpractice claims alleging loss of opportunity to survive or achieve a
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 39 Filed: 07/10/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:149
Case: 1:16-cv-04921 Document #: 39 Filed: 07/10/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:149 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TASHA BANKS, vs. Plaintiff, DR. JOHN SANTANIELLO,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LISA DELK, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED April 26, 2011 v No. 295857 Wayne Circuit Court STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE LC No. 07-727377-NF INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
More informationFor the Record: Preserving Issues for Appeal
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 4 (24.4.9) Appellate Practice Corner Scott L. Howie Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered,
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND
LC0 00 -- S STATE OF RHODE ISLAND IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 00 A N A C T RELATING TO COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE Introduced By: Senators Polisena, Roberts, Sosnowski,
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEBORAH A. DENT, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATES OF HELEN M. FOLLONI AND LAWRENCE F. FOLLONI EXETER HOSPITAL, INC.
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationv. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE CYNTHIA D. KINSER APRIL 19, 2002 PETER KLARA, M.D., ET AL.
Present: All the Justices JANICE WASHBURN v. Record No. 011034 OPINION BY JUSTICE CYNTHIA D. KINSER APRIL 19, 2002 PETER KLARA, M.D., ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK Joseph A. Leafe,
More informationThe Illinois Supreme Court Introduces New Element of Compensable Damages: Shortened Life Expectancy
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 18, Number 4 (18.4.52) Feature Article By: Brian T. Gravdal SmithAmundsen LLC The Illinois
More informationIn The. Court of Appeals. Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont NO CV. CHRISTUS ST. ELIZABETH HOSPITAL, Appellant
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont NO. 09-12-00490-CV CHRISTUS ST. ELIZABETH HOSPITAL, Appellant V. DOROTHY GUILLORY, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Jefferson
More informationRecent Appellate Court Cases Touch on a Diverse Range of Topics
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 20, Number 1 (20.1.17) Workers Compensation Report By:Brad A. Elward Heyl, Royster, Voelker
More informationPage 1 of 5 Public Act 097-1145 HB5151 Enrolled LRB097 18657 AJO 63891 b AN ACT concerning civil law. Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, represented in the General Assembly: Section
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: JANUARY 8, 2016; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2012-CA-001882-MR ESTATE OF PATRICIA CLARK APPELLANT APPEAL FROM HOPKINS CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT FRANK BELLEZZA, Appellant, v. JAMES MENENDEZ and CRARY BUCHANAN, P.A., Appellees. No. 4D17-3277 [March 6, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit
More informationEssentials of Demonstrative Evidence
Feature Article Hon. Donald J. O Brien, Jr. (Ret.) Charles P. Rantis Johnson & Bell, Ltd., Chicago Essentials of Demonstrative Evidence Presentation of evidence at trial is constantly evolving. In this
More informationTort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records
Tort Reform 2011 Medical Malpractice Changes (SB 33; S.L. 2011 400) o Enhanced Special Pleading Requirement (Rule 9(j)) Rule 9(j) of the Rules of Civil Procedure now requires medical malpractice complaints
More informationFLORIDA BAR ETHICS OPINION OPINION 02-4 April 2, Advisory ethics opinions are not binding.
FLORIDA BAR ETHICS OPINION OPINION 02-4 April 2, 2004 Advisory ethics opinions are not binding. When the lawyer in a personal injury case is in possession of settlement funds against which third persons
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice. April 18, 1997
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice SHIRLEY DICKERSON v. Record No. 961531 OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSCOE B. STEPHENSON, JR. NASROLLAH FATEHI,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SPECTRUM HEALTH HOSPITALS, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED February 21, 2017 v No. 329907 Kent Circuit Court FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, LC No. 15-000926-AV Defendant-Appellee.
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. REINA LOPEZ, v. Plaintiff-Respondent, MICHELLE LARSEN, and Defendant-Appellant,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS THERESA BAILEY, a/k/a THERESA LONG, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of CHRISTAL BAILEY, UNPUBLISHED August 8, 2006 Plaintiff-Appellee, v
More informationIllinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel P.O. Box 7288, Springfield, IL IDC Quarterly Vol. 16, No. 3 ( ) Medical Malpractice
Medical Malpractice By: Edward J. Aucoin, Jr. Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered Chicago Illinois Supreme Court s Decision in York v. Rush a Mixed Blessing? My favorite adage has always been be careful what
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS VALERIE DUBE and DENNIS DUBE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED May 16, 2006 v No. 265887 Wayne Circuit Court ST. JOHN HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER, LC No. 03-338048 NH
More informationProduct Liability Case Evaluation and Trial Strategy Considerations
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 22, Number 4 (22.4.5) Feature Article By: Charles P. Rantis Johnson & Bell, Ltd., Chicago
More informationADR QUARTERLY. COURT-ANNEXED ADR PROGRAM 18 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DuPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS 18 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT SUMMER 2006
COURT-ANNEXED ADR PROGRAM 18 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DuPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS ANN B. JORGENSEN HOLLIS L. WEBSTER CHIEF JUDGE PRESIDING JUDGE LAW DIVISION KENNETH A. ABRAHAM LORETTA K. GLENNY SUPERVISING JUDGE
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 97-CV-110. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationWHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ARBITRATION
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ARBITRATION Presented and Prepared by: Scott G. Salemi ssalemi@heylroyster.com Rockford, Illinois 815.963.4454 Prepared with the Assistance of: Bhavika D. Amin bamin@heylroyster.com
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 5, 2002 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 5, 2002 Session MARY B. HARRIS v. STEVEN R. ABRAM, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 00C-3570 Marietta Shipley, Judge
More informationerdict CELEBRATING 60 YEARS
Vwww.gtla.org erdict SPRING 2016 THE JOURNAL OF THE GEORGIA TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION CELEBRATING 60 YEARS LAW PRACTICE AND CLOUD COMPUTING: STAYING ETHICAL IN A DIGITAL WORLD WHAT IS THE PLAINTIFF S BURDEN
More informationBlumenthal v. Brewer: Supreme Court Rule 304(a) Finding Not Enough for Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate Practice Corner Scott L. Howie Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered, Chicago Blumenthal v. Brewer: Supreme Court Rule 304(a) Finding Not Enough for Appellate Jurisdiction An entire volume could be written
More informationIndiana Rejoins Minority Permitting Negligent Hiring Claims Even Where Respondeat Superior is Admitted
www.pavlacklawfirm.com September 30 2016 by: Colin E. Flora Associate Civil Litigation Attorney Indiana Rejoins Minority Permitting Negligent Hiring Claims Even Where Respondeat Superior is Admitted This
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
2013 IL 114044 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 114044) COLLEEN BJORK, Appellant, v. FRANK P. O MEARA, Appellee. Opinion filed January 25, 2013. JUSTICE FREEMAN delivered the judgment
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Filed 5/25/16 Pickett v. Olympia Medical Center CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
More informationI N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Eric A. Frey Frey Law Firm Terre Haute, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE John D. Nell Jere A. Rosebrock Wooden McLaughlin, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
More informationv No Saginaw Circuit Court GERALD SCHELL, M.D., and SAGINAW LC No NH VALLEY NEUROSURGERY, PLLC,
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S STACEY WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED August 3, 2017 v No. 329640 Saginaw Circuit Court GERALD SCHELL, M.D., and SAGINAW LC No. 11-013778-NH
More informationWright, Berger, Beachley,
Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL15-18272 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1471 September Term, 2017 KEISHA TOUSSAINT v. DOCTORS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL Wright,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2015 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2015 Session CLIFFORD SWEARENGEN v. DMC-MEMPHIS, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-0057-2011 John R. McCarroll,
More informationCommonwealth Of Kentucky. Court of Appeals
RENDERED: August 29, 2003; 2:00 p.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2002-CA-001637-MR SHAWN SHOFNER and STEPHANIE SHOFNER, Individually, and as the Administratrix of
More informationCertiorari not Applied for COUNSEL
1 DIAZ V. FEIL, 1994-NMCA-108, 118 N.M. 385, 881 P.2d 745 (Ct. App. 1994) CELIA DIAZ and RAMON DIAZ, SR., Individually and as Guardians and Next Friends of RAMON DIAZ, JR., Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. PAUL
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOHN ZAINEA and MARIE ZAINEA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED December 1, 2005 and BLUE CARE NETWORK, Intervening-Plaintiff, v No. 256262 Wayne Circuit Court ANDREW
More informationDaniella Araoz v. USA
2009 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-29-2009 Daniella Araoz v. USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 08-2248 Follow this and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Defendants. Case No. 07-cv-296-DRH MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Hunter v. Amin et al Doc. 32 ELISHA HUNTER, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Stanley Bell, deceased, v. Plaintiff, HETAL AMIN, M.D., et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BETHANY BRABANT, Conservator of the Estate of MELISSA BRABANT, a Minor, and the Estate of DAVID BRABANT, a Minor, UNPUBLISHED December 20, 2005 Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 04-0018 BILLY BROUSSARD, ET AL. VERSUS JOHN S. JESTER, M.D. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF VERMILION, NO. 77611
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 18, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 18, 2005 Session BERNICE WALTON WOODLAND AND JOHN L. WOODLAND v. GLORIA J. THORNTON An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Fayette County No. 4390 Jon
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2013-0451, Tara Carver v. Leigh F. Wheeler, M.D. & a., the court on May 7, 2014, issued the following order: The plaintiff, Tara Carver, appeals the
More informationGalvan v. Krueger International, Inc. et al Doc. 114
Galvan v. Krueger International, Inc. et al Doc. 114 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN GALVAN, Plaintiff, v. No. 07 C 607 KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Wisconsin
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 08-885 HARRY JOHN WALSH, JR. VERSUS JASON MORRIS, M.D., ET AL. ************ APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
More information