DEPARTMENT OF POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY

Transcription

1 DEPARTMENT OF POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY QUARTERLY REPORTS Second Quarter 2017 Included In This Document Comprehensive Statistical Report Comparative Overview of Caseload How Complaints Were Received Complaints and Allegations by Unit Findings in Allegations Closed Sustained Allegations Policy Recommendations Days to Close All Cases Closed Days to Close Sustained Cases Investigative Hearings and Mediations Status of DPA Cases Year 2016 Status of DPA Cases Year 2017 Caseloads by Investigator Case Closures by Investigator Weighted Closures by Investigator Presented by: Paul Henderson, Interim Executive Director Prepared by: Erick Baltazar, Deputy Director Contributors: Chris Wisniewski, Erick Baltazar, Eric Ho, John Alden, Manny Fortes, Samara Marion, Linda Taylor, Donna Salazar, and Pamela Thompson

2 Paul Henderson Interim Executive Director September 6, 2017 To: Re: The Honorable Edwin Lee, Mayor The Honorable London Breed, President, San Francisco Board of Supervisors Members, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors President L. Julius Turman and Members, the San Francisco Police Commission San Francisco Police Chief William Scott San Francisco Department of Police Accountability 2017 Second Quarter Statistical Report I. INTRODUCTION A. Statistics Attached is the Department of Police Accountability s 1 (DPA) statistical report for the second quarter of The DPA received an adjusted total of 120 complaints of police misconduct or failure to take action and closed 180 complaints. The DPA sustained allegations in 14 complaints against San Francisco police officers, which is an 8% sustained rate. The DPA mediated 10 cases during the second quarter. II. ORGANIZATIONAL AND BUDGET MATTERS A. Budget On July 26, 2016, the Board of Supervisors adopted the budget for Fiscal Year (FY) , which Mayor Edwin Lee signed on August 1, The DPA s approved budget for FY is $7,770,373. Consistent with the Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee s recommendation, the budget was enhanced by $1,744,993. The enhancement included a $276,158 increase in the professional services and equipment account, which allowed for the purchase of transcription services and a vehicle for fieldwork and on call Officer- Involved shooting response. The remaining increase allowed the DPA to hire four (4) additional 8124 Investigators and one (1) 8126 Senior Investigator. 1 The Office of Citizen Complaints was renamed the Department of Police Accountability pursuant to a 2016 amendment to the City and County of San Francisco Charter.

3 B. Staffing The DPA s approved budget for fiscal year is $7,770,373 with budgeted positions. Of the budgeted positions, nine (9) 8124 Investigator positions were vacant and two (2) Clerk Typist positions were vacant. C. Technology During the second quarter, Information Systems (IS) Analyst Chris Wisniewski and IS Analyst Assistant Eric Ho assembled data for the quarterly and annual reports. They continued to distribute ios recording devices to the investigative staff and upgraded the shared query terminal computers. They also developed plans and templates for distributing new desktop computers to the staff. D. Training During the second quarter, Kathryn Olson of Change Integration Consulting, LLC, provided DPA investigators and senior investigators training on credibility assessment. SFPD Lieutenant Wilfred Williams and Officer Alberto Duarte provided DPA staff training on SFPD General Order 10.11, Body Worn Cameras. Five (5) DPA investigators attended the Internal Affairs Investigation training offered by the Alameda County Sheriff s Office. In addition, five (5) DPA investigators and one (1) DPA Attorney attended a Use of Force Training hosted by Americans for Effective Law (AELE). Lastly, eight (8) DPA investigators attended the Advanced Officer/Continuing Professional Training at the San Francisco Police Academy. III. INVESTIGATION OF CASES A. Case Inventory The DPA opened 126 new cases, with an adjusted total of 120 new cases. 2 The DPA closed 180 cases, leaving 363 cases pending at quarter end, 34 less than were pending at the close of the second quarter of Of the 363 pending cases, 197 were opened in 2017, 143 were opened in 2016, 19 were opened in 2015, two (2) were opened in 2014, one (1) was opened in 2013, and one (1) was opened in B. Caseloads and Disposition of Cases The average caseload per investigator was 24 cases compared with 28 cases during the second quarter of Of 180 total closed cases, DPA investigators closed 101 cases (56% of cases) within 270 days. The DPA s goal is to conclude investigations within 270 days. The DPA took more than a year to close 40 cases (22% of cases). 2 The adjusted total reflects cases that were withdrawn, merged, or voided based on clerical or other errors. 3 In its January 27, 2007, audit report on the DPA, the Controller s CSA division found that 16 cases per investigator was a best practice caseload for civilian oversight investigators. 2

4 One or more allegations of misconduct were sustained in 14 of the 180 closed cases, resulting in a 8% sustained rate. Of the 477 allegations investigated, 132 allegations resulted in Proper Conduct findings; 26 allegations resulted in Sustained findings; 51 allegations resulted in Unfounded findings; 48 allegations resulted in No Finding/Withdrawn dispositions; and 220 allegations resulted in Not Sustained findings. C. Chief of Police s Adjudication of DPA Sustained Cases When a sustained case warrants a suspension of ten days or more, the DPA can recommend that the Chief of Police file charges with the Police Commission. If the Chief of Police declines to file charges with the Police Commission after meeting and conferring with the DPA, the DPA can file charges on its own with the Police Commission. Alternately, the DPA can determine that a case warrants a suspension of ten days or fewer. When the DPA determines that sustained misconduct warrants no more than ten days of suspension, the Chief of Police determines whether or not to sustain the DPA s findings and what level of discipline to impose. Although the DPA recommends specific levels of discipline for each case, the Chief of Police determines if, in his opinion, the sustained allegations are merited and what level of discipline or corrective action to impose. The Chief of Police also adjudicates challenges. While police officers may appeal the Chief s discipline to the Police Commission, neither Charter section nor the Administrative Code provide for the DPA Director to appeal the Chief s decision. During the second quarter, the Chief of Police imposed discipline in seven (7) DPA sustained cases as follows: In April 2017, Chief William Scott proposed discipline in two (2) cases determined by the DPA to have sustainable allegations. The DPA s findings and recommended discipline and the Chief s proposed discipline are as follows: 1. Conduct Reflecting Discredit An officer made inappropriate comments and engaged in inappropriate behavior in violation of SFPD General Order 2.01, General Rules of Conduct; and Neglect of Duty An officer failed to comply with Department Bulletin No , Traffic Stop Data Collection Program Information. The DPA recommended a written reprimand. The Chief of Police found insufficient evidence to sustain the Conduct Reflecting Discredit allegation. The Chief of Police imposed a written reprimand and retraining for the Neglect of Duty allegation. According to the Police Commission Disciplinary Penalty and Referral Guidelines, the penalty for Class D neglect of duty is a written reprimand for a first offense. 3

5 2. Neglect of Duty An officer failed to comply with Department Bulletin No , Traffic Stop Data Collection Program Information. Based on the officer s disciplinary history, the DPA recommended a threeday suspension. The Chief of Police imposed a written reprimand and retraining. According to the Police Commission Disciplinary Penalty and Referral Guidelines, the penalty for Class D neglect of duty is a three-day suspension for a second offense. In May 2017, Chief William Scott proposed discipline in one (1) case determined by the DPA to have a sustainable allegation. The DPA s finding and recommended discipline and the Chief s proposed discipline are as follows: 1. Neglect of Duty An officer wrote an inaccurate or incomplete citation in violation of SFPD Department General Order 2.01, General Rules of Conduct, and Department Bulletin No , Correctable Violations and Proper Completion of Traffic Citations. The DPA recommended an admonishment. In concurrence with the DPA, the Chief of Police imposed an admonishment and retraining. In June 2017, Chief William Scott proposed discipline in four (4) cases determined by the DPA to have sustainable allegations. The DPA s findings and recommended discipline and the Chief s proposed discipline are as follows: 1. Neglect of Duty An officer failed to issue the complainant a Certificate of Release in violation of SFPD General Order 5.03, Investigative Detentions. The DPA recommended an admonishment. The Chief of Police imposed a written reprimand and retraining. According to the Police Commission Disciplinary Penalty and Referral Guidelines, the penalty for Class D neglect of duty is a written reprimand for a first offense. 2. Unwarranted Action An officer detained the complainant without justification in violation of SFPD General Order 5.03, Investigative Detentions. Neglect of Duty An officer failed to issue a Certificate of Release and failed to write an incident report in violation of DGO

6 The DPA recommended a one-day suspension. The Chief of Police found insufficient evidence to sustain the Unwarranted Action allegation. The Chief of Police imposed a written reprimand and retraining for the Neglect of Duty allegations. According to the Police Commission Disciplinary Penalty and Referral Guidelines, the penalty for Class D neglect of duty is a written reprimand. 3. Conduct Reflecting Discredit An officer behaved inappropriately and made inappropriate comments in violation of SFPD General Order Neglect of Duty An officer failed to write an incident report in violation of DGO Based on the officer s lack of disciplinary history, the DPA recommended an admonishment. The Chief of Police found insufficient evidence to sustain the Conduct Reflecting Discredit allegation. The Chief of Police imposed a written reprimand and retraining for the Neglect of Duty allegation. According to the Police Commission Disciplinary Penalty and Referral Guidelines, the penalty for Class D neglect of duty is a written reprimand. 4. Unwarranted Action An officer cited the complainant without cause. The DPA recommended a written reprimand. The Chief of Police imposed an admonishment and retraining. According to the Police Commission Disciplinary Penalty and Referral Guidelines, the penalty for Class D unwarranted action is a written reprimand. Neglect of Duty Another officer failed to properly supervise in violation of SFPD General Order 2.01 and the Peace Officer Field Training Manual. The DPA recommended a written reprimand and retraining. The Chief of Police imposed an admonishment and retraining. 5

7 According to the Police Commission Disciplinary Penalty and Referral Guidelines, the penalty for Class D neglect of duty is a written reprimand. IV. SECOND QUARTER COMPLAINTS OF NOTE A. San Francisco Police Handling of Alzheimer s Patient At the end of the second quarter, the DPA continued to investigate a complaint regarding a 72-year-old disabled woman who was placed on a 5150 involuntary psychiatric evaluation after San Francisco police officers responded to a physical altercation between two residents of an elder-care home. B. Officer-Involved Shootings Seven (7) officer-involved shooting investigations remained open at the end of the second quarter C. Single Room Occupancy Hotels The DPA continued to investigate one of two complaints filed in 2011 involving multiple officers regarding unlawful entries and searches of single room occupancy (SRO) hotel rooms. Other allegations in these complaints include unlawful searches of persons, unlawful detentions and arrests, failure to properly process property including laptops and cameras, failure to investigate, failure to supervise and inappropriate behavior. D. San Francisco Woman Shot and Killed by Her Ex-boyfriend The DPA continued to investigate a complaint regarding a San Francisco woman who was shot and killed by her ex-boyfriend before he fatally turned the gun on himself. The woman was shot in her home, from which there had been a series of calls for help. E. Racist and Homophobic Text Messages By Members of the San Francisco Police Department The DPA continued to investigate a complaint regarding racist and homophobic text messages by members of the San Francisco Police Department. V. STATUS OF CURRENT DPA CASES THE KEANE REPORT At the beginning of the second quarter, the investigative staff had completed intake on all but two (2) of its 2016 cases and had closed 81% of them, leaving 116 or 19% of the 2016 cases pending. 6

8 VI. LEGAL UNIT Five attorneys staff the DPA s Legal Unit under the supervision of the Executive Director. Attorneys John Alden, Ines Vargas Fraenkel and R. Manuel Fortes are trial attorneys. They also conduct sustainability reviews, review reports of sustained misconduct for legality, prepare legal opinions, and manage records requests, including subpoenas, Pitchess motions, Sunshine Ordinance requests, and Public Records Act requests. Additionally, Attorney John Alden trains investigators and provides policy analysis. Attorney Samara Marion conducts the bulk of DPA s policy work, conducts sustainability reviews, reviews sustained reports legality, prepares legal opinions, and conducts investigator trainings. The DPA s policy work is outlined in section VII. Attorney Donna Salazar coordinates DPA s mediation and outreach programs and her work is outlined in sections VIII and IX of this report. The Legal Unit reviewed, revised, and submitted nine (9) sustained reports for approval by the DPA Executive Director, each of which involved one or more sustained allegations against one or more officers. Additionally, Deputy Director Erick Baltazar reviewed, revised and submitted five (5) sustained reports for approval by the DPA Executive Director. The trial attorneys defend DPA s misconduct findings in matters investigated and determined by the DPA to prove misconduct or failure to perform a required action. They present cases to the Chief of Police when officers object to proposed discipline of up to ten days suspension. They present cases before the Police Commission when the proposed discipline is greater than 10 days suspension up through termination. DPA attorneys defended seven (7) cases at Chief s Hearings during this quarter. VII. POLICY ANALYSIS Policy work is an essential aspect of the Department of Police Accountability s mission. The San Francisco City Charter requires the DPA to present quarterly recommendations concerning SFPD s policies or practices that enhance police-community relations while ensuring effective police services. Attorneys Samara Marion and John Alden lead the DPA s policy work. During the second quarter 2017, the DPA s policy work focused primarily on the Department of Justice s Collaborative Reform Initiative involving 272 recommendations and 94 findings to improve trust between the SFPD and the community it serves. 4 The DPA participated in SFPD s Executive Sponsor Working Groups that addressed policies and practices concerning the use of force, biased policing, complaint and disciplinary processes, and community policing. In response to the DOJ s recommendations to improve the timeliness of Department General Order revisions and to discontinue using Department Bulletins as a workaround for the 4 See COPS Office An Assessment of the San Francisco Police Department. Collaborative Reform Initiative. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, page ix, 7

9 Department General Order approval process, 5 the DPA worked with SFPD on revising Department General Order 3.01 (Written Communication System). DPA s recommendations limit the use of Department Bulletins and require the Police Department to bring before the Police Commission revisions to the relevant Department General Order within six months of the Police Commission s approval of a Department Bulletin. On June 2, 2017, the DPA made the following written recommendations to enhance the DPA-SFPD approach to the DOJ Collaborative Approach Initiative: A. Update Department General Order 2.04 and SFPD-DPA Document Protocol The DPA recommended that SFPD assign higher level command staff with decisionmaking authority to work with the DPA to immediately revise Department General Order 2.04 (Citizen Complaints Against Officers) and SFPD-DPA s document protocol. These documents are fundamental to the complaint, investigation and disciplinary processes, establish key aspects of the roles and responsibilities of both agencies, and have not been updated for decades. Department General Order 2.04 sets forth the duties of officers for receiving, investigating and processing citizen complaints against officers and describes the Department of Police Accountability s investigative procedures and findings. DGO 2.04 has not been updated since 1994 and does not accurately reflect DPA s investigative authority and SFPD s responsibilities that were added by Proposition G on November 6, The SFPD-DPA Document Protocol as required by San Francisco Administrative Code section 96.3 similarly needs to be updated to reflect the DPA s city charter mandate to conduct performance audits of SFPD every two years. Additionally, to conduct complaint investigation, recommend discipline and perform audits, DPA needs direct and immediate electronic access to SFPD documents and databases. Revising DGO 2.04 and the Document Protocol will enhance the complaint and disciplinary process, improve the working relationship between IAD and DPA, and address DOJ Finding 64, and DOJ Recommendations 64.1, and By assigning high level 5 See e.g. DOJ Finding 72 which states, Department Bulletins are used as a workaround for the Department General Order approval process. DOJ Recommendation 72.1 states, The SFPD should present all Department Bulletins that substantively change or countermand a Department General Order to the Police Commission before implementation and publish them on their website after approval is received. Also see, DOJ Finding 75, The SFPD does not devote sufficient administrative or command-level resources to the process of creating, implementing, maintaining, and updating Department General Orders and Bulletins. The team found that Department Bulletins updating provisions within Department General Orders were repeatedly renewed to meet the two year sunset, often without receiving any substantive updates and in place of addressing the issue within the appropriate Department General Order. DOJ Recommendation 75.2 states, The Written Directives Unit should be tasked to work with subject matter experts from OCC and the Police Commission to ensure policies are adopted in a timely manner and appropriately updated. 6 DOJ Finding 64 states, The SFPD does not routinely collaborate with the Office of Citizen Complaints. The transparency of the complaint and disciplinary process is negatively affected by the working relationship between SFPD IAD and OCC. The lack of engagement undermines the effectiveness of both in fulfilling their respective 8

10 command staff with decision-making authority to work with the DPA, a more efficient and successful revision process will be accomplished. B. Implement Quarterly Meetings Between SFPD and DPA to Review Sustained Cases for Policy and Training Issues and Complaint Trends. In October 2016, the Department of Justice recommended immediate implementation of DPA s 2015 recommendation for quarterly meetings with the Police Chief and key command staff to discuss discipline, policy and training issues. The DPA recommended that SFPD assign higher level command staff with decision-making authority to work with the DPA to convene a quarterly discipline, policy and training panel that includes the Chief, Assistant Chief of Staff, Officer-in-Charge of Risk Management, the Police Academy Captain and DPA Director and DPA Policy Attorney. The DPA suggested that the quarterly meeting goals include: 1) evaluating whether any training, policy or procedure of the Department needs to be revised, added or reissued; and, 2) if so, to make written recommendations that include the manner in which the recommendations can be implemented, and a timeline for completion. In light of DOJ s recommendations to regularly review and analyze trends in complaints and employee misconduct in order to identify priorities for intervention in workforce culture, training, policy clarification and leadership development, the DPA suggested that the quarterly meetings also include a trends analysis of complaints consistent with DOJ Findings 65 and 67 and DOJ Recommendations 65.1, 65.2, and roles and responsibilities. Issues with respect to information sharing between the two entities, timeliness of complaint investigations, and basis for recommending progressive discipline potentially impede the investigative and adjudication processes, potentially eroding the overall integrity of the public complaint resource. DOJ Recommendation 64.1 states, The SFPD should convene a joint review process within 90 days of the issuance of this report, co-chaired by OCC and SFPD senior staff, to evaluate existing complaint and disciplinary processes, policies, and liaison relationships to enhance trust and legitimacy around these issues. DOJ Recommendation 64.3 states, The SFPD should work with OCC to develop standards regarding timeliness of complaint investigations, and consistency of investigative findings and practices to ensure progressive discipline is appropriately recommended. DOJ Recommendation 64.4 states, The SFPD should seek to improve interagency communications and identify ways of improving collaboration on investigative practices to ensure timely conclusion of investigations, shared information on prior complaints and finding of misconduct, and appropriate entry of discipline designed to improve the overall discipline system that holds officers to account. DOJ Recommendation 64.5 states, The SFPD should engage with OCC to ensure that the classification for complaints and their findings are reported consistently between the two agencies to ensure better transparency. DOJ Recommendation 56.6 states, The SFPD should encourage the OCC and IAD to identify obstacles that interfere with optimal complaints investigations and accountability, with a goal of implementing changes to better support their intended missions. 7 DOJ Finding 65 states, The SFPD does not sufficiently analyze Office of Citizen Complaints reports and analysis of its complaints, investigations, and case dispositions. This information is shared with the SFPD and largely available publicly on the OCC website. However, the SFPD rarely uses complaint information or aggregated data to inform change management priorities in areas such as professional conduct, community and police relations, training and policy. DOJ Recommendation 65.1 states, The SFPD should develop a department-internal priority to regularly review and analyze OCC complaint reporting to identify priorities for intervention in terms of workforce culture, training, policy clarification, or leadership development. 9

11 C. Reinstitute Meetings Between DPA and the Department s Chief of Staff toaddress the Sparks Report and DPA s Policy Recommendations. Policy work is an essential aspect of the Department of Police Accountability s mission. The San Francisco City Charter requires the DPA to present quarterly recommendations concerning SFPD s policies or practices that enhance police-community relations while ensuring effective police services. (See City Charter section (h)). The DPA provides to the Police Commission and the Police Department policy and training recommendation in its quarterly reports. The DPA also makes policy and training recommendations when appropriate at the conclusion of its complaint investigation. Additionally, the DPA makes recommendations through its participation in the Firearm Discharge Review Board, the Language Access Working Group and the Crisis Intervention Team Working Group. Police Commission Resolution No requires the Police Department and the DPA to provide a quarterly report to the Police Commission concerning the status of revisions to Department General Orders, new General Orders and DPA policy recommendations. To advance the policy work of both agencies, on March 8, 2016, the Police Department and the DPA instituted biweekly meetings between the Police Department s Chief of Staff and the DPA policy attorney to address the DPA s policy and training recommendations, Department General Order revisions, the Sparks Report and other policy-related projects. This practice enabled both agencies to work closely to complete priority projects such as the drafting of the Crisis Intervention Team Department General Order, the Use of Force General Order, the Resolution for Semiannual and Annual Reporting to the Police Commission on the Department s Collection and Analysis of Sexual Assault Kit Evidence and Reporting of Results to Sexual Assault Victims. The DPA recommends that consistent with the previous practice instituted in March 2016, the DPA policy attorney and Police Department s Chief of Staff meet the 1st and 3rd week of each month to discuss DPA policy and training recommendations, DGO revisions and the Sparks Report. Additionally, the DPA recommends that the Department modify its submission on DOJ Recommendations 66.1, 66.2, and to the Department of Justice to state that it has reopened these recommendations to conduct further work with DPA on these matters. DOJ Recommendation 65.2 states, The SFPD should raise district captains awareness of this information by requiring IAD to present a trends analysis report of OCC case activity, emerging issues, and concerns at CompStat meetings every quarter. DOJ Finding 67 states, The SFPD does not analyze trends in complaints, situations that give rise to complaints, or variations between units or peer groups in relation to complaints and misconduct. In part, this is because the SFPD does not have appropriate data systems to allow for data-led management and policing decisions. DOJ Recommendation 67.1 states, The SFPD must work to develop practices that measure, analyze, and assess trends in public complaints and employee misconduct. 8 DOJ Finding 66 states, The SFPD is not required to take action on the recommendations put forth in the Office of Citizen Complaints Sparks Report. OCC provides the Sparks Report quarterly to the Police Commission. The Sparks Report provides recommendations on policy and revisions. DOJ Recommendation 66.1 states, SFPD should meet with OCC on a quarterly basis following the release of the Sparks Report to discuss the recommendations. DOJ Recommendation 66.2 states, SFPD should require Principled Policing Bureau to review Sparks Report and direct action where appropriate. 10

12 As a participant in the Police Commission s Working Group on Tasers (Electronic Control Weapons), the DPA compiled two suggested lists of reading materials on ECWs. 9 In response to members requests for information about previous hearings before the San Francisco Police Commission on the topic of Electronic Controlled Weapons, the DPA submitted a summary covering February 17, 2010 until June 22, 2016 with links to the televised Police Commission hearings, caption notes and minutes. D. Language Access Recommendations. The Department of Police Accountability provided the following recommendations to Chief Scott in a letter dated May 8, 2017 following Chief Scott s attendance at the Language Access Working Group s meeting on April 18, The Language Access Working Group comprises domestic violence and sexual assault service providers, language access advocates, city agencies, Police Commissioner Sonia Melara and the Police Department, and meets monthly, a practice the DPA initiated in 2012 to enhance SFPD s language access services. 1. Interpreter Training For Certified Bilingual Officers. It is well established that being an interpreter requires skills and training beyond bilingualism. To ensure that certified bilingual officers receive interpreter training, Department General Order 5.20 (Language Access Services for Limited English Proficient (LEP) Persons) specifically requires the Department to provide interpreter training for certified bilingual officers on interpreting techniques, roles, terminology and ethics in accordance with confidentiality and impartiality rules. (See DGO 5.20 (II) (E).). The Department has not provided interpreter training for its certified bilingual officers, despite repeated recommendations from the Department of Police Accountability and the Language Access Working Group since DGO 5.20 s adoption in The DPA recommends that SFPD immediately develop interpreter training or alternatively, hire an outside agency to provide bilingual officer interpreter training. Interpreter training for bilingual officers should include assessment on interpretation skills to ensure information retention. 2. Re-Certification of Bilingual Officers. Language proficiency is a perishable skill. Currently, once an officer passes the Department of Human Resource s test for language proficiency, the officer is forever entitled to DOJ Recommendation 66.3 states, SFPD should provide twice-yearly reports to Police Commission on Sparks Report including whether OCC recommendation is supported and timeline for implementation or correction to existing practice and policy. 9 uggestedmaterials%20from%20dpa.pdf; uggestedmaterials%20from%20dpa.pdf 11

13 bilingual pay and is considered a qualified bilingual officer for the purposes of Department General Order The Police Department does not have any recertification requirements. The absence of a recertification procedure is inconsistent with best practices. The lack of recertification potentially jeopardizes the quality of an officer s interpretation which, in turn, can undermine the investigation and prosecution of cases and negatively impact an officer s ability to communicate with a victim, suspect, witness or community member. The DPA recommends that SFPD: Implement a system of language proficiency recertification that requires retesting of all bilingual officers every 2-3 years; Include a requirement of recertification of language proficiency in the labor contract with SFPD officers; and Either obtain DHR s assistance or hire an outside contractor to provide recertification every 2-3 years. 3. Advanced Officer and Field Officer Training and Post Certification of LEP Curriculum. Department General Order 5.20 states that the Department will provide periodic training on its LEP policies, including how to access in-person and telephone interpreters and how to work with interpreters. DGO 5.20 states that it shall conduct such trainings for new recruits, at in-service training and at roll-call at least every two years. (DGO 5.20 (III)(N). The two-hours of DGO 5.20 training for recruits is not POST certified. DGO 5.20 updates and language access issues are not included in advanced officer or field officer training. The DPA recommends that SFPD: Incorporate language access training into the Field Training program and advanced officer curriculum; Include language access issues and requirements in all training modules and written materials; and Obtain Police Officer Standard Training (POST) certification for current DGO 5.20 training. 4. Language Services at Stations. Spanish-speaking and Cantonese-speaking domestic-violence survivors have reported significant wait times for language assistance to file a report at certain stations and instances wherein LEP victims/reportees have either been sent to other stations or told to come back later. LEP victims/reportees have also reported encounters with Police Service Aides at the stations who do not use language assistance to explain wait times or when a bilingual officer will be available to take a report. LEP reportees and service providers have repeatedly shared their concerns with the Department that many stations are not welcoming or user friendly which is further exacerbated when language assistance is not readily provided. Additionally, there is no privacy in the district station lobby where reportees often need to provide sensitive information about themselves and the nature of an incident. (For further discussion of domestic violence, immigration and language access concerns involving SFPD, see the Blue Ribbon Panel on 12

14 Transparency, Accountability, and Fairness in Law Enforcement (July 2016), pages 20-21). The DPA recommends that SFPD: Provide easily accessible information in multiple languages at each station that explains procedures such as how an LEP individual can file a report, talk with a bilingual officer, and obtain other police services; Prominently post that language services are free and available and include this information in district station newsletters; Require stations to identify the top language needs of the community in which the station is located and provide an incentive system so that stations are able to staff the stations with bilingual officers and Police Services Aides who speak the languages most needed; In each station and to the public, prominently post when bilingual officers and Police Service Aides are available and the language they speak; Conduct an audit using LEP reportees to evaluate the effectiveness of language access at all of the stations and implement improved accessibility where needed. 5. Dispatching Bilingual Officers to the Scene. Department General Order 5.20 states that officers "shall provide oral interpretation services to LEP persons they encounter in the following order of preference unless deviations are required to respond to exigent circumstances." The priority is direct communication by a qualified bilingual officer, followed by a qualified civilian interpreter and last by a telephone interpreter. (DGO 5.20 (III)(D) Order of Preference.) Department General Order 5.20 requires SFPD s Language Access Liaison Officer to work in conjunction with Department of Emergency Management (DEM) to establish a system that immediately identifies LEP calls and promptly dispatches language assistance, preferably with a bilingual officer speaking the needed language. (DGO 5.20 (III)(O)(1)(5). In 2009, the Department of Police Accountability recommended a communication system that would enable 911 dispatchers to immediately identify the location and availability of bilingual officers to respond to LEP calls for service. For several years, the DPA in partnership with the Language Access Working Group worked with SFPD and the Department of Emergency Management to design and implement such a system. Although this system was to become operational in April 2013, it has never been fully implemented. When DEM dispatchers identify a LEP caller, instead of relying upon the system that identifies an available certified bilingual officer, many dispatchers continue to put out a request for a bilingual officer and wait for a volunteer to respond. This approach is inefficient and does not comply with the system of dispatching available bilingual officers immediately as required under DGO The DPA recommends that SFPD: Work with DEM to fully implement the dispatch procedure in which dispatchers identify and dispatch immediately an available bilingual officer to respond to a LEP call for service. Explain the new dispatch procedure to SFPD officers through a Department Bulletin. Once implemented, monitor compliance under the new procedure through an audit. 13

15 6. LEP Data Collection and Analysis. Department General Order 5.20 states that officers "shall provide oral interpretation services to LEP persons they encounter in the following order of preference unless deviations are required to respond to exigent circumstances." The priority is direct communication by a qualified bilingual officer, followed by a qualified civilian interpreter and last by a telephone interpreter. (DGO 5.20 (II I)(D) Order of Preference.) DGO 5.20 requires the Department to collect and report on data including the number of calls for service, contacts and investigations involving LEP persons where an incident report was required and the manner in which interpretation services were provided. (DGO 5.20 (III)(O)(2-3)). The Department of Police Accountability in partnership with Language Access Working Group recommended and worked with SFPD to add LEP data collection to the incident report writing system. This data collection will enable the Department to assess language needs and analyze the extent to which language services are being provided by bilingual officers, civilians or telephone interpreters. Mandatory LEP data collection was announced on February 26, 2016 via a Department A Bulletin ( LEP Data Collection Crime Data Warehouse) and became effective on March 16, The Department has accumulated over a year s worth of LEP data though not yet reported publicly upon this data. Upon the recommendation of the Department of Police Accountability and in partnership with the Language Access Working Group, in 2016 the Department required all officers to view the training video Detecting and Overcoming Language Barriers and to complete an on-line survey about language access services and training. SFPD has not yet analyzed and reported upon this data. The DPA recommends that SFPD: Analyze and report upon the LEP data collected through the Crime Data Warehouse from March Analyze and report upon the data collected through the on-line survey about language access services and training. VIII. MEDIATION During the second quarter of 2017, the DPA mediated 10 cases compared to 13 cases in In 2017, the rate of officers declining mediation rose slightly to 6% of officers, or three officers of forty-eight offered mediation, compared with 5% in The Mediation Coordinator continues to document the numbers and circumstances of officers who decline to meet. The responses indicate that officers decline due to the circumstances of particular cases and/or complainant rather than a reluctance to participate in the program. The DPA s Mediation Coordinator Donna Salazar attended sessions of the American Bar Association Alternative Dispute Resolution Section on police-community relations. She also attended a program offered by Peninsula Conflict Resolution Services regarding ADR methods employed in improving relations in communities and attended the Community Boards Peacemaker Awards. The Mediation Program continues to provide a forum for officers and 14

16 civilians to have frank discussions regarding complaints, as well as providing an educational experience for all participants. IX. OUTREACH The DPA engaged in the following outreach activities: The DPA Director attended Police Commission Community Meetings and gave regular updates regarding the work of the DPA. Attorney Ines Fraenkel participated in a panel before a youth group addressing concerns regarding youth rights when interacting with police. Attorneys Marion and Salazar made a presentation to residents and staff members of the Hospitality House in the Tenderloin District. Ms. Salazar attended a meeting of the Justice Committee of Glide Memorial Church and provided the Committee with brochures. She also attended planning meetings with Mo Magic and other providers in preparation for the Back to school event in August. The DPA staffed an informational table at an Operation Homeless Connect event. X. CONCLUSION The DPA remained committed to its mission to investigate civilian complaints of police misconduct or failure to perform duties promptly, fairly, and impartially. The DPA continued to focus its community outreach efforts and policy work on addressing the concerns of the public for greater transparency. Respectfully submitted, Paul Henderson Interim Executive Director 15

17 COMPREHENSIVE STATISTICAL REPORT SECOND QUARTER ST APR MAY JUN 2ND 3RD 4TH YTD CASES OPENED Cases Opened Merged/Voided ADJUSTED TOTAL CASES CLOSED, BY YEAR CASE WAS FILED TOTAL CASES PENDING, BY YEAR CASE WAS FILED TOTAL CASES OUTSIDE OCC JURISDICTION CASES SUSTAINED

18 COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW OF CASELOAD SECOND QUARTER 2015 SECOND QUARTER CASES OPENED 1st Quarter April May June nd Quarter rd Quarter 4th Quarter YTD TOTAL CASES CLOSED 1st Quarter April May June nd Quarter rd Quarter 4th Quarter YTD TOTAL CASES PENDING January February March April May June July August September October November December CASES SUSTAINED 1st Quarter April May June nd Quarter rd Quarter 4th Quarter YTD TOTAL

19 HOW COMPLAINTS WERE RECEIVED SECOND QUARTER 2017 MONTH N PERSON LETTER MAIL ONLINE OTHER PHONE SFPD TOTALS January February March ST QUARTER April May June ND QUARTER July August September 3RD QUARTER October November December 4TH QUARTER YTD TOTAL

20 COMPLAINTS AND ALLEGATIONS BY UNIT SECOND QUARTER 2017 TOTAL COMPLAINTS ALLEGATION TYPES TOTAL ALLEGATION OFFICERS INVOLVED SFPD UNIT NAME UF UA CRD ND RS SS D PRO POL TF 2L LEGAL DIVISION A CENTRAL STATION B SOUTHERN STATION C BAYVIEW STATION D MISSION STATION E NORTHERN STATION F PARK STATION G RICHMOND STATION H INGLESIDE STATION I TARAVAL STATION J TENDERLOIN TASK FORCE M MUNI DIVISION B ENFORCEMENT & INVESTIGATION (SOLOS T CRIME PREVENTION COMPANY A INVESTIGATIONS BUREAU T JUVENILE DIVISION AB AIRPORT BUREAU UK UNKNOWN ASSIGNMENT DEFINITION OF ALLEGATION TYPES UF Unnecessary Force UA Unwarranted Action CRD Conduct Reflecting Discredit ND Neglect of Duty RS Racial Slur SS Sexual Slur D Discourtesy PRO Procedure POL Policy TF Training Failure

21 COMPLAINTS AND ALLEGATIONS BY UNIT SECOND QUARTER 2016 TOTAL COMPLAINTS ALLEGATION TYPES TOTAL ALLEGATION S OFFICERS INVOLVED SFPD UNIT NAME UF UA CRD ND RS SS D PRO POL TF 2P PERSONNEL A CENTRAL STATION B SOUTHERN STATION C BAYVIEW STATION D MISSION STATION E NORTHERN STATION F PARK STATION G RICHMOND STATION H INGLESIDE STATION I TARAVAL STATION J TENDERLOIN TASK FORCE M MUNI DIVISION K SPECIAL MOTORCYCLE T CRIME PREVENTION COMPANY A INVESTIGATIONS BUREAU T JUVENILE DIVISION AB AIRPORT BUREAU UK UNKNOWN ASSIGNMENT TOTALS DEFINITION OF ALLEGATION TYPES UF Unnecessary Force UA Unwarranted Action CRD Conduct Reflecting Discredit ND Neglect of Duty RS Racial Slur SS Sexual Slur D Discourtesy PRO Procedure POL Policy TF Training Failure 4

22 40% YTD Total Allegations Received SECOND QUARTER % 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Unnecessary Force Unwarranted Action Conduct Reflecting Discredit Neglect of Duty Racial Slur Sexual Slur Discourtesy

23 FINDINGS IN ALLEGATIONS CLOSED SECOND QUARTER 2017 NO FINDING ALLEGATION TYPES SUBTOTAL TOTAL UF UA CRD ND RS SS D POL/PRO TF 1st Quarter April May June rd Quarter 4th Quarter YTD TOTAL NO FINDING/WITHDRAWN ALLEGATION TYPES SUBTOTAL TOTAL UF UA CRD ND RS SS D POL/PRO TF 1st Quarter April May June rd Quarter 4th Quarter YTD TOTAL NOT SUSTAINED ALLEGATION TYPES SUBTOTAL TOTAL UF UA CRD ND RS SS D POL/PRO TF 1st Quarter April May June rd Quarter 4th Quarter YTD TOTAL DEFINITION OF ALLEGATION TYPES UF Unnecessary Force UA Unwarranted Action CRD Conduct Reflecting Discredit ND Neglect of Duty RS Racial Slur SS Sexual Slur D Discourtesy PRO Procedure POL Policy TF Training Failure

24 FINDINGS IN ALLEGATIONS CLOSED SECOND QUARTER 2017 PROPER CONDUCT ALLEGATION TYPES SUBTOTAL TOTAL UF UA CRD ND RS SS D POL/PRO TF 1st Quarter April May June rd Quarter 4th Quarter YTD TOTAL SUSTAINED ALLEGATION TYPES SUBTOTAL TOTAL UF UA CRD ND RS SS D POL/PRO TF 1st Quarter April May June rd Quarter 4th Quarter YTD TOTAL UNFOUNDED ALLEGATION TYPES SUBTOTAL TOTAL UF UA CRD ND RS SS D POL/PRO TF 1st Quarter April May June rd Quarter 4th Quarter YTD TOTAL DEFINITION OF ALLEGATION TYPES UF Unnecessary Force UA Unwarranted Action CRD Conduct Reflecting Discredit ND Neglect of Duty RS Racial Slur SS Sexual Slur D Discourtesy PRO Procedure POL Policy TF Training Failure

25 POLICY RECOMMENDATION 2 nd QUARTER 2017 Case Type of Allegation Policy Recommendation No. #1 Neglect of Duty The complainant stated that the officers did not provide a copy of the search warrant after searching the complainant s home. Names officers stated that because the court had ordered the search warrant sealed, they did not believe they should leave a copy of the warrant. The SFPD Search Warrant Manual specifies, Once entry is made into the location, the officer(s) should show the original search warrant to the occupant(s), then give the occupants(s) a copy. Department General Order 3.02 defines should as recommended in contrast to shall which is mandatory. means that it is required. Neither the Search Warrant Manual nor Department General Order 5.16 address officers responsibilities when the court has ordered a search warrant sealed. The Department of Police Accountability recommends updating both the Search Warrant Manual and Department General Order 5.16 to address procedures and responsibilities when serving a search warrant that the court has ordered sealed. 1

26 POLICY RECOMMENDATION 2 nd QUARTER 2017 Case Type of Allegation Policy Recommendation No. #2 Neglect of Duty The complainant stated the named officers refused to release the complainant s scooter to him after he was arrested. The named officer stated that there was ambiguity as to the ownership of the scooter. When the complainant could not provide documentation of ownership, the named officers referred the complainant to the SFPD Legal Division. Department records showed that the scooter remains with SFPD and that there is no hold on the property. DGO 6.15 on property processing does not address the type or form of proof of ownership for release property, who makes the determination, and the chain of command for appeal when release of the property has been denied. The Department of Police Accountability recommends that DGO 6.15 be updated to address the return of property, including criteria for establishing ownership, how to request the return of property, notification of the decision to return property, and review of any denial to release property. The Department of Police Accountability also recommends that the public be provided information about the Police Department s procedures for obtaining the release of property. 1

27 POLICY RECOMMENDATION 2 nd QUARTER 2017 Case Type of Allegation Policy Recommendation No. #3 Neglect of Duty The complainant filed a complaint with the Department of Police Accountability concerning an allegation of an officer s off duty conduct. The San Francisco City Charter 4.127, in effect at the time, stated: The Office of Citizen Complaints shall investigate all complaints of police misconduct, or that a member of the Police Department has not properly performed a duty, except those complaints which on their face clearly indicate that the acts complained of were proper and those complaints lodged by other members of the Police Department. The current City Charter 4.136, states: DPA shall promptly, fairly, and impartially investigate all complaints regarding police use of force, misconduct or allegations that a member of the Police Department has not properly performed a duty, except those complaints which on their face clearly indicate that the acts complained of were proper and those complaints lodged by other members of the Police Department. The City Charter grants the OCC (now the DPA) the power to investigate complaints against police misconduct and refers to member[s] of the Police Department. The charter does not distinguish between on duty and off duty conduct. The Department of Police Accountability recommends that DGO 2.04 be updated and amended to reflect DPA s jurisdiction as provided by City Charter

28 YTD Total Findings SECOND QUARTER % 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% No Finding No Finding/ Withdrawn Not Sustained Proper Conduct Sustained Unfounded

29 Days to Close Cases Closed SECOND QUARTER % 39 22% 71 39% within to % % 38 28% 71 51% within to %

30 80% Days to Close Cases Closed SECOND QUARTER % 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% within to

31 300 Cases Closed Average Days to Close SECOND QUARTER

32 Days to Close Cases Sustained SECOND QUARTER % % within to % % within to %

33 90% Days to Close Cases Sustained SECOND QUARTER % 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% within to

34 400 Sustained Cases Average Days to Close SECOND QUARTER

35 INVESTIGATIVE HEARINGS AND MEDIATIONS SECOND QUARTER 2017 INVESTIGATIVE HEARINGS 1ST APR MAY JUN 2ND 3RD 4TH YTD Requests for Hearing Hearings Granted Requests Denied Hearings Pending* Hearings Held Reopened MEDIATIONS 1ST APR MAY JUN 2ND 3RD 4TH YTD New Eligible Cases Cases Mediated ** Officer Ineligible Officers Offered Officers Declined ** Complainants Offered Complainants Declined** Cases Returned Mediations Pending ** * Number may include hearings granted/carried over from previous periods. ** Number may include cases carried over from previous periods.

36 Status of DPA Cases Year 2016 Intake Done, Case Pending % Year 2016 as of 06/30/2017 Intake In Process 2 0.3% Intake Done, Case Pending % Year 2015 as of 06/30/16 Case Closed % Case Closed %

37 Status of DPA Cases Year 2016 as of 06/30/ % 90% % 70% % % 40% % 20% % 0 0% 2007 (as of 6/30/2008) 2008 (as of 6/30/2009) 2009 (as of 6/30/2010) 2010 (as of 6/30/2011) 2011 (as of 6/30/2012) 2012 (as of 6/30/2013) 2013 (as of 6/30/2014) 2014 (as of 6/30/2015) 2015 (as of 6/30/2016) 2016 (as of 6/30/2017 Case Closed Intake Done, Case Pending Intake In Process Case Closed (%) Intake Done, Case Pending (%) Intake In Process (%)

38 STATUS OF OCC COMPLAINTS - YEAR 2016 as of 06/30/2017 DEPARTMENT OF POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /04/ /20/ /31/ /31/ INFO ONLY INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /04/ /15/ /10/ /17/ CLOSED UNNECESSARY FORCE/USE OF PROFANITY /05/ /09/ PENDING INAPP COMMENTS AND BEHAVIOR/TIGHT CUFFS/NO STAR NUMBER PROVIDED /06/ /29/ /31/ /31/ MEDIATED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/PROFANITY /07/ /12/ /22/ /25/ CLOSED OFFICER(S) WOULD NOT TAKE A REPORT /07/ /25/ /26/ /26/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /07/ /22/ /22/ /25/ WITHDRAWN INAPPROPRIATE OFF-DUTY CONDUCT /08/ /08/ /18/ /18/ MEDIATED DETENTION AT GUNPOINT /11/ /20/ /17/ /22/ CLOSED FAILURE TO SERVE R/O /09/ /20/ /04/ /04/ CLOSED ENTERING A RESIDENCE /11/ /28/ /17/ /12/ CLOSED SEARCH WITHOUT CAUSE/MISREPRESENTING THE TRUTH /11/ /20/ /21/ /23/ CLOSED UNWARRANTED ARREST /12/ /13/ /13/ /13/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE SPEECH/ACTIONS /13/ /01/ /21/ /17/ CLOSED DETENTION AND ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE/HARASSING THE COMP /13/ /24/ /19/ /29/ SUSTAINED DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE 12/29/ /13/ /29/ /05/ /08/ SUSTAINED FAILURE TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE/INACCURATE REPORT 12/14/ /10/ /25/ /05/ /08/ SUSTAINED OFFICERS TOOK BICYCLE FROM JUVENILE, PUT IN DUMPSTER 12/08/ /13/ /03/ /24/ /31/ SUSTAINED USED PROFANE LANGUAGE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR 11/03/ /15/ /15/ /15/ /19/ INFO ONLY POLICE SPRAYING CHEMICALS AT MNC SHELTER /14/ /20/ /04/ /04/ CLOSED POLICE SEARCHED RESIDENCE WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR OFFICERS DETAINED/SEARCHED/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS & /19/ /25/ /20/ /26/ WITHDRAWN BEHAVIOR /15/ /05/ /15/ /19/ CLOSED OFFICERS DID NOT ARREST COMPLAINANT'S ATTACKER/ DID NOT GIVE POLICE REPORT NUMBER /19/ /25/ /24/ /31/ CLOSED OFFICERS DETAINED, UNNECESSARY FORCE, INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR & COMMENTS /16/ /11/ /25/ /20/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /18/ /28/ /28/ /01/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /21/ /19/ /08/ /09/ CLOSED FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/ARREST W-O CAUSE/BEHAVED INAPPROPRIATELY/PROFANITY

39 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /22/ /27/ /01/ /05/ SUSTAINED EXCESSIVE FORCE DURING ARREST? 01/06/ /25/ /26/ /31/ /06/ MEDIATED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /25/ /26/ /26/ /26/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /25/ /02/ /24/ /30/ CLOSED DISCOURTEOUS /25/ /02/ /18/ /16/ SUSTAINED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION 12/19/ /20/ /08/ /12/ /21/ SUSTAINED UNWARRANTED CITATION 12/22/ /12/ /19/ /07/ /13/ SUSTAINED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/EXCESSIVE FORCE 12/14/ /27/ /11/ /05/ /12/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND HARRASSMENT /27/ /04/ /10/ /27/ CLOSED DETENTION/CITE /28/ /29/ /22/ /23/ CLOSED 5150 W/O JUSTIFICATION /28/ /29/ /29/ /01/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /29/ /23/ /17/ /31/ WITHDRAWN ARREST/STEPPED ON PHONE /29/ /09/ /08/ /08/ CLOSED TOLD COMP SHE COULD NOT CALL 911/FAILED TO INVESTIGATE OR TAKE REPORT /29/ /29/ /29/ /01/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /29/ /16/ /16/ /16/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /29/ /29/ /18/ /08/ MEDIATED FAILED TO CONTACT COMP AFTER HOMICIDE/REWARD POSTERS /01/ /01/ /25/ /29/ CLOSED HARASSMENT/THREATS ILLEGAL SEARCH /01/ /01/ /27/ /29/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /02/ /03/ /17/ /18/ CLOSED TOWING A BOAT/TREASURE ISLAND /02/ /08/ /22/ /28/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /02/ /02/ /13/ /13/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /02/ /17/ /24/ /17/ CLOSED CITATION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION AND AGRESSIVENESS /03/ /09/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /02/ /25/ /19/ /21/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /03/ /22/ /10/ /17/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /03/ /22/ /30/ /30/ SUSTAINED DISPLAYING A WEAPON WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION 01/31/ /04/ /09/ /18/ /19/ SUSTAINED UNNECESSARY FORCE/USE OF PROFANITY/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/INTIMIDATION 01/20/ /05/ /05/ /09/ /09/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /05/ /11/ /10/ /10/ WITHDRAWN INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR

40 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /08/ /11/ /19/ /04/ SUSTAINED SEXUAL SLUR/INAPPROPRIATE CONDUCT 11/04/ /09/ /09/ /16/ /16/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /10/ /24/ /24/ /20/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/DETENTION /10/ /10/ /09/ /17/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /08/ /16/ /16/ /16/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /08/ /09/ /20/ /10/ CLOSED UNNECESSARY FORCE /06/ /06/ /18/ /18/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /11/ /01/ /09/ /09/ INFO ONLY HARASSING THE COMPLAINANT /12/ /17/ /27/ /30/ CLOSED DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/TOW WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /12/ /08/ /06/ /20/ CLOSED DETENTION/CITATION/ARREST/UNNECESSARY FORCE /10/ /24/ /25/ /26/ CLOSED UNLAWFUL DETENTION/USE OF FORCE /10/ /16/ /28/ /03/ SUSTAINED DETENTION/SEARCH/RACIAL SLUR/TOW 11/03/ /13/ /01/ /20/ /12/ SUSTAINED TRAFFIC STOP/TOWED VEHICLE /16/ /08/ /08/ /15/ CLOSED FAILED TO INVESTIGATE /16/ /24/ /26/ /25/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND COMMENTS /14/ /22/ /23/ /23/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /16/ /08/ /08/ /29/ CLOSED FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /16/ /22/ /23/ /23/ INFO ONLY BIAS BY JUDGE /15/ /29/ /29/ /29/ WITHDRAWN VEHICLE KEY LEFT IN TOWED CAR /16/ /24/ /10/ /24/ CLOSED ARREST/FORCE/TIGHT CUFFS /16/ /22/ /22/ /25/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /17/ /07/ /12/ /11/ SUSTAINED USE OF FORCE/ISSUED CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS AND BEHAVIOR 01/12/ /18/ /10/ /24/ /08/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/BIASED POLICING /18/ /15/ PENDING ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE /18/ /25/ /07/ /29/ CLOSED DETENTION/ARREST/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/UNNECESSARY FORCE/FALSE CHARGE /18/ /16/ /26/ /31/ CLOSED DETENTION/SEARCH/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /18/ /28/ /28/ /19/ CLOSED DETENTION/PROPERTY SEARCH/BIASED POLICING/INAP COMMENTS/FAILURE TO ID /12/ /01/ /11/ /13/ SUSTAINED FORCE 01/13/ /23/ /01/ /10/ /14/ SUSTAINED FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE

41 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /24/ /08/ /06/ /23/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /24/ /09/ /09/ /23/ SUSTAINED RETALIATORY ARREST/VANDALIZED COMP'S PROPERTY/DISCOURTESY 01/24/ /22/ /10/ /10/ /10/ MERGED FAILED TO NOTIFY OWNER BEFORE TOW /22/ /04/ /28/ /29/ CLOSED HARASSING THE COMPLAINANT /25/ /15/ /01/ /19/ CLOSED UF FOLLOWING SHOPLIFTING ARREST /25/ /08/ /27/ /17/ CLOSED UNWARRANTED CITE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /24/ /29/ /29/ /29/ MERGED DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/ARREST/UNNECESSARY FORCE/SEARCH WITHOUT CAUSE /16/ /25/ PENDING TOWING A VEHICLE W/O JUSTIFICATION /24/ /29/ PENDING ISSUED CITATION/PROFANITY/UNNECESSARY FORCE/MISREPRESENT TRUTH /26/ /26/ /26/ /26/ CLOSED CITATION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /26/ /14/ /07/ /24/ CLOSED OFFICER ISSUED A CITATION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /26/ /17/ /14/ /10/ SUSTAINED OFFICERS 5150'D COMPLAINANT WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/MISSING ID FROM INCIDENT/ OFFICER MADE INAPPROPRIATE COMMENT 05/10/ /29/ /03/ /08/ /11/ MEDIATED FAILURE TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE /29/ /02/ /02/ /28/ CLOSED FAILURE TO PROPERLY PROCESS PROPERTY /29/ /21/ /19/ /30/ CLOSED UNNECESSARY FORCE /26/ /11/ /11/ /15/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /02/ /17/ /27/ /05/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /02/ /02/ /08/ /15/ MEDIATED RUDE COMMENTS /04/ /16/ /09/ /10/ CLOSED VEHICLE SEARCH WITHOUT CAUSE/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /02/ /11/ /11/ /15/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /04/ /23/ /06/ /15/ CLOSED INACCURATE CITATION /07/ /21/ /03/ /03/ SUSTAINED FORCE/INTERFERING WITH ONLOOKERS 03/03/ /07/ /09/ /28/ /01/ SUSTAINED FORCE/INTERFERING WITH ONLOOKERS 03/01/ /28/ /20/ /15/ /19/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /08/ /09/ /09/ /09/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /08/ /28/ /07/ /28/ CLOSED FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /29/ /29/ /29/ /16/ MERGED FORCE/INAPP COMMENTS/DETENTION /03/ /24/ /13/ /07/ SUSTAINED CITE/RETALIATION/COMMENTS/NO NAME/CURSING 02/07/2017

42 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /09/ /10/ /10/ /12/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /10/ /10/ /12/ /25/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /10/ /24/ /24/ /24/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR /10/ /14/ /12/ /25/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /11/ /11/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /15/ /23/ /29/ /25/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /15/ /15/ /15/ /16/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /15/ /15/ /15/ /16/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /16/ /01/ /05/ /23/ CLOSED UNNECESSARY FORCE AND PROFANITY /15/ /15/ /15/ /16/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /17/ /17/ /17/ /18/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /16/ /21/ /19/ /06/ SUSTAINED POSTED INAPPROPRIATE FACEBOOK MESSAGE 12/07/ /17/ /21/ /03/ /08/ SUSTAINED SEARCH WITHOUT CAUSE/PROPERTY SEIZURE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /14/ /14/ /14/ /18/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /18/ /21/ /08/ /17/ CLOSED RUDE ATTITUDE OR DEMEANOR /18/ /21/ /03/ /25/ MEDIATED DRIVING IMPROPERLY /18/ /21/ /11/ /11/ CLOSED FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /18/ /04/ /17/ /17/ CLOSED DRIVING IMPROPERLY /21/ /24/ /17/ /30/ MEDIATED MISREPRESENTING THE TRUTH /11/ /22/ /21/ /28/ SUSTAINED FAILED TO WRITE AN INCIDENT REPORT/PROPERLY INVESTIGATE 03/02/ /21/ /07/ /06/ /27/ CLOSED OFFICER FAILED TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE/FAILED TO CALL COMP /22/ /28/ PENDING ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE /22/ /28/ PENDING ISSUING AN INVALID ORDER/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /22/ /29/ /12/ /18/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /21/ /31/ /23/ /30/ MEDIATED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS AND BEHAVIOR /21/ /31/ PENDING CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE AND INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS /21/ /12/ /11/ /18/ CLOSED DETENTION/SEARCH/THREATENED /25/ /28/ /13/ /27/ WITHDRAWN FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /25/ /25/ /07/ /13/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY

43 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /17/ /15/ /09/ /13/ CLOSED FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /18/ /13/ /09/ /19/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /25/ /28/ /28/ /12/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /28/ /10/ /23/ /30/ MEDIATED NEGLECT OF DUTY/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /28/ /28/ /27/ /30/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /26/ /18/ /14/ /23/ SUSTAINED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/DAMAGING PROPERTY 02/23/ /26/ /19/ /09/ /17/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /29/ /29/ /16/ /30/ MEDIATED PROFANITY/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR & COMMENTS /29/ /29/ /29/ /01/ MERGED ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE /31/ /22/ /16/ /29/ CLOSED RUDE COMMENTS/DISCRIMINATION/UNNECESSARY FORCE /04/ /05/ /07/ /07/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /02/ /02/ /06/ /06/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /03/ /24/ /08/ /24/ INFO ONLY FAILED TO RESPOND TO NOISE COMPLAINT /07/ /12/ /15/ /19/ CLOSED FAILURE TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE /08/ /11/ /04/ /10/ WITHDRAWN DETENTION/ARREST /04/ /21/ /26/ /29/ INFO ONLY FAILED TO PROCESS PROPERTY /07/ /31/ PENDING ARREST/UNNECESSARY FORCE/FAILED TO PROCESS PROPERTY /25/ /22/ /10/ /21/ SUSTAINED DETAINED/TURNED OVER TO ICE 11/21/ /07/ /08/ /08/ /30/ CLOSED INFORMATION ONLY /08/ /13/ /22/ /12/ CLOSED UNWARRANTED CITE /05/ /08/ /08/ /11/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /08/ /10/ /26/ /27/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE REMARKS/UNWARRANTED ACTION /11/ /27/ /02/ /09/ CLOSED DETAINED WITHOUT CAUSE/TOW WITHOUT CAUSE/FAILURE TO WRITE REPORT /07/ /22/ PENDING EXCESSIVE FORCE /11/ /02/ /24/ /26/ CLOSED EXCESSIVE FORCE /10/ /05/ /09/ /14/ CLOSED FORCE/DETENTION/THREATS /12/ /15/ /15/ /18/ INFO ONLY INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS /13/ /06/ /13/ /19/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS /13/ /14/ /21/ /22/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY

44 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /12/ /11/ /24/ /31/ CLOSED DETENTION AND CITE/PROFANITY/SEXUAL SLURS/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /13/ /18/ /13/ /25/ CLOSED POLICE CAR PARKED ON MUNI RAILWAY TRACKS BLOCKING TRAFFIC /13/ /16/ /28/ /28/ SUSTAINED THREATS/RIGHTS OF ONLOOKER 03/29/ /13/ /18/ /07/ /15/ CLOSED PROFANITY/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /13/ /18/ /08/ /17/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE A REPORT /14/ /26/ /17/ /30/ CLOSED WARRANT ERRONEOUSLY PLACED IN COMP'S RECORD /14/ /18/ /18/ /19/ INFO ONLY NEGLECT OF DUTY /15/ /19/ /19/ /27/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/WRITE AN INCIDENT REPORT /15/ /19/ /19/ /20/ INFO ONLY COMP FAXED A RAMBLING NOTICE /15/ /20/ /21/ /12/ MEDIATED CITATION/BIASED POLICING /13/ /18/ /12/ /25/ CLOSED CITE/PAPER CUT /16/ /27/ /27/ /29/ INFO ONLY ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE /17/ /19/ /02/ /08/ CLOSED FAILURE TO WRITE A REPORT /14/ /22/ /28/ /29/ WITHDRAWN DISCLOSING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION /18/ /04/ /31/ /03/ CLOSED UNNECESSARY FORCE /20/ /19/ /16/ /20/ CLOSED DETENTION/RACIAL SLUR/ARREST/FORCE /19/ /21/ PENDING DETENTION/UNNECESSARY FORCE /20/ /01/ /05/ /08/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /20/ /28/ /21/ /21/ CLOSED UNLAWFUL SEARCH/UNNECESSARY FORCE DURING ARREST AND AT STATION /21/ /21/ /07/ /26/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /22/ /23/ /30/ /18/ CLOSED FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /25/ /25/ /06/ /30/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /25/ /25/ /06/ /28/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /25/ /25/ /02/ /17/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR /25/ /06/ /07/ /22/ CLOSED CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /26/ /28/ /08/ /31/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /26/ /13/ /20/ /28/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /27/ /02/ /02/ /28/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE THE REQUIRED ACTION /28/ /29/ /15/ /17/ CLOSED UNWARRANTED ARREST

45 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /29/ /31/ PENDING CALLED EMT OVER OBJECTION/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENT /29/ /29/ /03/ /19/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE A REPORT/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /29/ /19/ /14/ /28/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE A REPORT /29/ /09/ /01/ /09/ CLOSED INVALID ORDER/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /03/ /13/ /14/ /25/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /02/ /16/ /13/ /28/ WITHDRAWN THREATENING/HARASSING BEHAVIOR /03/ /16/ /24/ /14/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/BIASED POLICING /03/ /12/ PENDING ARREST/INTERFERED WITH ONLOOKERS/TIGHT CUFFS /03/ /17/ PENDING DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /04/ /12/ /19/ /28/ SUSTAINED INACCURATE REPORT 06/29/ /04/ /13/ /24/ /05/ MEDIATED CITATION /04/ /10/ /08/ /17/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /05/ /16/ /29/ /19/ SUSTAINED DETENTION AND ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE 01/19/ /05/ /13/ /09/ /29/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/DETENTION /05/ /06/ /06/ /28/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /05/ /10/ /10/ /24/ MEDIATED FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /05/ /14/ /06/ /10/ CLOSED DETENTION/BIASED POLICING /06/ /27/ /28/ /10/ SUSTAINED HARSH LANGUAGE/BEHAVIOR 04/07/ /06/ /18/ /05/ /23/ CLOSED UNNECESSARY FORCE /06/ /17/ /06/ /27/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR /04/ /17/ /31/ /02/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /09/ /11/ /27/ /31/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE /09/ /11/ /09/ /25/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /09/ /11/ /12/ /16/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/FAILURE TO WRITE REPORT /10/ /24/ /31/ /23/ SUSTAINED BIASED POLICING/INTIMDATING BEHAVIOR/UNNECESSARY FORCE 02/23/ /11/ /24/ /27/ /14/ CLOSED FAILURE TO WRITE AN ACCURATE REPORT /12/ /12/ /18/ /07/ INFO ONLY INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /11/ /13/ /13/ /30/ INFO ONLY INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /13/ /08/ /08/ /10/ SUSTAINED UNNECESSARY FORCE/DETENTION 05/11/2017

46 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /13/ /08/ /10/ /29/ CLOSED CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/RACIAL PROFILING /13/ /17/ /01/ /12/ MEDIATED HARSSMENT/FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE/BIASED POLICING /13/ /24/ /10/ /12/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /13/ /24/ /07/ /24/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /16/ /03/ /28/ /01/ SUSTAINED PROFANITY AND DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION 05/01/ /16/ /23/ PENDING ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE /16/ /13/ /06/ /13/ CLOSED FALSE CHARGES /16/ /24/ /24/ /28/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /16/ /31/ /18/ /07/ CLOSED FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /18/ /26/ /14/ /17/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /18/ /13/ /23/ /26/ CLOSED OFFICERS CHASED, BEAT MAN WITH BATONS /19/ /26/ /08/ /28/ CLOSED FAILED TO RESPOND TO ROBBERY REPORT /04/ /10/ /21/ /23/ CLOSED DETENTION/FORCE/BIASED POLICING /20/ /30/ /05/ /23/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR /19/ /26/ /28/ /01/ CLOSED UNWARRANTED CITE /19/ /23/ /24/ /14/ CLOSED UNWARRANTED ARREST /19/ /10/ /09/ /17/ MEDIATED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /20/ /23/ /23/ /30/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /21/ /23/ /23/ /30/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /21/ /09/ /18/ /08/ CLOSED CITE/BEHAVIOR /23/ /26/ /30/ /29/ CLOSED STRIP SEARCH WITHOUT CAUSE /25/ /08/ /06/ /09/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE, RACIST COMMENT/BEHAVIOR /23/ /27/ /27/ /14/ CLOSED SHOPPING WHILE ON DUTY /20/ /07/ /01/ /01/ MEDIATED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS /24/ /31/ PENDING UNNECESSARY FORCE /25/ /25/ /25/ /30/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /26/ /02/ /13/ /24/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /26/ /27/ /13/ /24/ INFO ONLY INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /27/ /01/ /30/ /02/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /27/ /03/ /20/ /26/ CLOSED CITATION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION

47 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /01/ /01/ /13/ /25/ CLOSED FAILURE TO WRITE A REPORT/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /27/ /22/ /18/ /20/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE & INTIMIDATING BEHAVIOR /28/ /27/ /22/ /23/ CLOSED IMPROPER DRIVING /30/ /23/ /24/ /25/ SUSTAINED WRITING AN INACCURATE CITATION/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /01/ /16/ /30/ /02/ MEDIATED DETENTION/FORCE/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/BIASED POLCING /02/ /29/ /05/ /13/ CLOSED CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /01/ /23/ /07/ /17/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /02/ /22/ /17/ /23/ CLOSED WRITING AN INACCURATE INCIDENT REPORT /06/ /10/ PENDING ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE /06/ /09/ /08/ /15/ MEDIATED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /06/ /15/ /23/ /09/ SUSTAINED CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE 03/20/ /07/ /26/ /26/ /26/ CLOSED FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /31/ /21/ /12/ /18/ CLOSED FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /03/ /24/ /05/ /13/ CLOSED DETENTION/HANDCUFF/SEARCHING/HARASSMENT /07/ /28/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /09/ /21/ PENDING DETENTION/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /10/ /10/ /21/ /12/ MEDIATED FAILURE TO PROMPTLY RESPOND TO SCENE/PROPERLY INVESTIGATE /10/ /28/ /25/ /03/ CLOSED ENTERING/SEARCHING RESIDENCE WITHOUT CAUSE /13/ /15/ /07/ /23/ CLOSED BEHAVED & SPOKE INAPPROPRIATELY /13/ /16/ /17/ /17/ CLOSED FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /13/ /17/ /22/ /23/ CLOSED BEHAVED & SPOKE INAPPROPRIATELY/FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /09/ /09/ /09/ /24/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /10/ /23/ /04/ /04/ MEDIATED INACCURATE COLLISION REPORT /13/ /14/ /26/ /01/ CLOSED DETENTION/ARREST/COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR/SS /13/ /06/ /20/ /25/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR /14/ /17/ /06/ /23/ CLOSED CITATION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /14/ /24/ /16/ /17/ MEDIATED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /14/ /30/ /09/ /23/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /14/ /13/ /07/ /23/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /16/ /17/ /27/ /22/ SUSTAINED TRAFFIC CITE BY PLAIN CLOTHES 03/24/2017

48 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /17/ /20/ /11/ /12/ MEDIATED INVALID ORDER/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /16/ /17/ /17/ /26/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /17/ /20/ /31/ /04/ CLOSED 5150 WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /19/ /23/ /23/ /05/ SUSTAINED HARASSMENT/SEXUAL SLUR 01/06/ /15/ /06/ /06/ /16/ SUSTAINED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION 02/16/ /20/ /27/ /26/ /31/ CLOSED DID NOT CITE DRIVER FOR NOT HAVING DRIVER'S LICENSE /21/ PENDING WRONGFULLY ARRESTED/ISSUED A CITATION /22/ /20/ /23/ /23/ CLOSED USE OF FORCE/DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /23/ /11/ /23/ /14/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /23/ /05/ /09/ /13/ MEDIATED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /24/ /30/ /09/ /09/ SUSTAINED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/FAILURE TO TAKE REPORT 06/09/ /24/ /06/ /24/ /26/ CLOSED BIASED POLICING/INACCURATE INCIDENT REPORT /27/ /29/ /09/ /23/ CLOSED USE OF UNNECESSARY FORCE DURING ARREST /27/ /29/ /02/ /03/ CLOSED USE OF UNNECESSARY FORCE DURING DETENTION /23/ /06/ /09/ /19/ CLOSED CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /28/ /12/ /10/ /19/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /28/ /20/ /05/ /21/ SUSTAINED TRAFFIC CITE/FAILING TO ABIDE BY GO ON PLAIN CLOTHES 06/21/ /28/ /30/ /13/ /28/ WITHDRAWN PROFANE LANGUAGE /28/ /01/ /01/ /01/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO ENFORCE LAW /28/ /01/ /23/ /26/ SUSTAINED PROPERTY PROCESSING 06/26/ /28/ /01/ /31/ /05/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /29/ /30/ /12/ /25/ CLOSED FAILED TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE /30/ /22/ /24/ /09/ SUSTAINED TRAFFIC STOP/CITATION/BIASED POLICING /01/ /21/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /01/ /28/ /14/ /12/ SUSTAINED TRAFFIC STOP/CITE WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION 01/12/ /05/ /06/ PENDING FAILURE TO MAKE CITIZEN'S ARREST /05/ /08/ /26/ /26/ CLOSED ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE/MISREPRESENTING TRUTH (PERJURY) /29/ /26/ /20/ /20/ CLOSED ACCEPTING A FALSE REPORT/FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /01/ /26/ /04/ /17/ WITHDRAWN FAILED TO DRIVE PROPERLY /05/ /14/ /27/ /14/ CLOSED ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE

49 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /05/ /12/ /22/ /25/ CLOSED CITATION AND BIASED POLICING DUE TO RACE /07/ /07/ /21/ /21/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /07/ /15/ /15/ /22/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /07/ /08/ /26/ /17/ CLOSED MULTIPLE ARRESTS /11/ /21/ /21/ /22/ CLOSED BEHAVED AND SPOKE INAPPROPRIATELY /12/ /07/ /02/ /17/ CLOSED FAILURE TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE/THREATENED THE COMPLAINANT /12/ /09/ /31/ /20/ SUSTAINED FAILED TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE 06/20/ /13/ /15/ /07/ /03/ SUSTAINED DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /13/ /25/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR & ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE/USE OF FORCE /14/ /14/ /14/ /22/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /14/ /20/ /28/ /30/ CLOSED CITED WITHOUT CAUSE /15/ /29/ /31/ /05/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /15/ /01/ /05/ /13/ CLOSED FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /15/ /26/ /15/ /19/ CLOSED POURED BEER ONTO COMPLAINANT/RUDE COMMENTS /18/ /08/ /31/ /19/ CLOSED GRABBED AND CONDUCTED SELVES INAPPROPRIATELY /18/ /27/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /18/ /03/ /30/ PENDING MISUSE OF POLICE AUTHORITY /14/ /25/ /19/ /25/ MEDIATED SLOW RESPONSE AND FAILURE TO ARREST ATTACKER /05/ /26/ /18/ /08/ CLOSED FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE ILLEGAL FIREWORKS /15/ /27/ /09/ /09/ CLOSED FALSE CHARGES AND TESTIMONY /19/ /27/ PENDING UNLAWFUL SEIZURE /19/ /22/ /22/ /12/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /19/ /05/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /06/ /27/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS TO A BYSTANDER /20/ /22/ /26/ /17/ CLOSED FAILURE TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE /20/ /22/ PENDING BIASED POLICING/UNLAWFUL DETENTION /22/ /29/ /28/ /28/ CLOSED FAILURE TO COMPLY W/ /22/ /01/ PENDING USE OF FORCE/BIASED POLICING /22/ /12/ /03/ /10/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR /22/ /12/ /19/ /31/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO RETURN PROPERTY

50 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /25/ /26/ /21/ /28/ SUSTAINED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR 06/29/ /19/ /02/ /30/ /02/ MEDIATED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /22/ /02/ /02/ /17/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /26/ /15/ PENDING ENTERING A RESIDENCE WITHOUT CAUSE /27/ /15/ /09/ /14/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /27/ /27/ /01/ /17/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /27/ /04/ /14/ /25/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS /05/ /03/ /03/ /03/ MERGED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /28/ /15/ /18/ /19/ CLOSED OFFICERS HARASSED HOMELESS MAN ON SIDEWALK /29/ /15/ /27/ /27/ CLOSED FALSE CHARGES AND TESTIMONY /01/ /10/ /01/ /02/ WITHDRAWN FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /01/ /10/ /06/ /13/ CLOSED ARREST /02/ /17/ /01/ /14/ CLOSED INAPP BEH DURING FST & DUI ARREST/FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /27/ /16/ /27/ /29/ CLOSED FAILED TO PROPERLY IDENTIFY /03/ /22/ PENDING ARREST /03/ /05/ PENDING DETENTION DUE TO BIAS /03/ /08/ PENDING MENTAL HEALTH DETENTION /04/ /05/ /05/ /17/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /04/ /15/ /15/ /17/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /04/ /23/ PENDING FAILURE TO PROCESS PROPERTY /04/ /09/ PENDING CITE/INTIMIDATING BEHAVIOR/WRONG LOCATION ON CITE /05/ /09/ PENDING DETENTION/SEARCH/CITATION /05/ /24/ PENDING UNNECESSARY FORCE/DETENTION OF MINOR /06/ /12/ /12/ /17/ WITHDRAWN FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /08/ /25/ PENDING ENTERING A RESIDENCE WITHOUT CAUSE/SEARCH/ARREST /08/ /26/ PENDING BIASED POLICING/UNLAWFUL DETENTION /08/ /26/ /14/ /25/ MEDIATED FAILURE TO ENFORCE RESTRAINING ORDER /09/ /12/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /10/ /09/ PENDING SEARCH OF RESIDENCE WITHOUT CAUSE/FAILURE TO PROPERLY PROCESS PROPERTY /10/ /23/ PENDING FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE/INVALID ORDER

51 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /10/ /07/ PENDING 5150 DETENTION OF DISABLED ELDER, REMOVAL FROM CARE FACILITY /11/ /16/ /20/ /20/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/ISSUING A CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE/WRITING AN INACCURATE REPORT /11/ /12/ /27/ /29/ CLOSED MISUSE OF COMPUTER/CLETS /08/ /29/ PENDING SEARCH OF RESIDENCE/PROPERTY DAMAGE/CASH SEIZURE /12/ /22/ /23/ PENDING ISSUING A CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /15/ /29/ PENDING LEG SWEEP AND RUDE BEHAVIOR /15/ /15/ /16/ /17/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /15/ /29/ /29/ /30/ CLOSED FAILED TO RESPOND TO SCENE/FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /15/ /30/ PENDING THREATS/HARASSMENT/ARREST /16/ /24/ PENDING ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE/SEARCH WITHOUT CAUSE/HARRASSMENT /16/ /13/ PENDING IMPROPER DRIVING /17/ /12/ /09/ /14/ CLOSED USED PROFANE LANGUAGE /17/ /17/ /26/ /31/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /16/ /22/ /22/ /31/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /17/ /09/ PENDING FAILED TO MAKE AN ARREST /18/ /08/ PENDING CITATION/INAPPRORIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS /16/ /31/ /20/ /11/ INFO ONLY CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /22/ /29/ /21/ /08/ INFO ONLY FAILED TO RESPOND TO NOISE REPORT /23/ /24/ /13/ /28/ CLOSED THREATENED TO ARREST /22/ /23/ /25/ /19/ CLOSED FAILED TO RESPOND TO SCENE /23/ /24/ /24/ /31/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /24/ /24/ /26/ /31/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /26/ /30/ PENDING SEARCH W-O CAUSE/FAILURE TO PROCESS PROPERTY/PROFANITY /26/ /30/ /27/ /30/ MEDIATED FAILED TO WRITE AN INCIDENT REPORT AND LACKED EMPATHY, NO APOLOGY /29/ /30/ /30/ /21/ CLOSED CITATION W-O CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS/PROFANITY /29/ /04/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION - RE: A BURLARIZED CAR /29/ /12/ /08/ /10/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /29/ /14/ /06/ /11/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /29/ /30/ /30/ /02/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /30/ /27/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /16/ /30/ /13/ /28/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND COMMENTS/BIASED POLICING

52 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /30/ /27/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND COMMENTS /31/ /01/ /06/ PENDING 5150 DETENTION /31/ /06/ /05/ /12/ CLOSED FAILED TO REPLY TO S /01/ /01/ /20/ /26/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND COMMENTS /31/ /14/ /11/ /13/ CLOSED UNSAFE DRIVING /01/ /15/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /31/ /01/ /15/ /19/ CLOSED CITING AND TOWING A CAR WITHOUT CAUSE /10/ /09/ /05/ /17/ CLOSED TWO-YEAR DELAY OF INCIDENT REPORT RELEASE /01/ /13/ /25/ /27/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /02/ /21/ /30/ /31/ WITHDRAWN UF DURING OIS/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /06/ /07/ PENDING DETENTION/ARREST/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /06/ /06/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /06/ /07/ PENDING CITATION/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/INTERFERING WITH RIGHTS OF ONLOOKERS /07/ /07/ PENDING DETENTION/BEHAVIOR/FORCE /08/ /12/ PENDING INACCURATE TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT /09/ /14/ PENDING USE OF FORCE/TOW /09/ /28/ /03/ /17/ CLOSED REFUSED TO TAKE REPORT AND RUDE PHONE MANNERS /09/ /12/ /29/ /12/ CLOSED FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE STALKING AND HACKING /09/ /04/ PENDING INACCURATE INCIDENT REPORT/FAILED TO ACCOMMODATE DISABILITY /12/ /27/ PENDING USE OF FORCE DURING ARREST /09/ /16/ PENDING FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /10/ /19/ /21/ /11/ WITHDRAWN CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR-COMMENTS /11/ /22/ /02/ /17/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /11/ /20/ /30/ /11/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /12/ /29/ /19/ /19/ CLOSED FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /14/ /20/ /20/ /23/ MERGED MISUSE OF POLICE AUTHORITY /14/ /06/ /13/ /28/ MEDIATED DETENTION/SEARCH /14/ /03/ PENDING MISREPRESENTING THE TRUTH /16/ /22/ /26/ /27/ CLOSED DID NOT RESPOND IN TIMELY MANNER/FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /16/ /03/ /09/ /28/ CLOSED UF ON COMP'S SON AT STATION /16/ /23/ /03/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION

53 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /16/ /23/ /30/ /31/ CLOSED FAILURE TO DRIVE PROPERLY /16/ /30/ /30/ /31/ CLOSED ENTRY/BIASED POLICING /19/ /05/ /31/ /06/ CLOSED BARRING VISITATION BY COMP AT HOSPITAL/HUSBAND BEATEN /22/ /22/ /18/ /19/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /23/ /28/ PENDING DETENTION WITHOUT CAUSE/UNNECESSARY FORCE /23/ /13/ /17/ /25/ INFO ONLY HARASSMENT/MISUSE OF POLICE AUTHORITY /23/ /19/ PENDING DETAINING AT GUNPOINT /23/ /01/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /26/ /06/ PENDING INAPPRORIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS AND INACCURATE/INCOMPLETE REPORT /26/ /29/ /03/ /11/ INFO ONLY PULLED WEAPON AND CHASED INTO STREET /27/ /27/ /11/ /12/ CLOSED KNOCKED ON CAR WINDOW AND SCARED THE DOG /27/ /14/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /28/ /30/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /28/ /29/ /10/ /12/ CLOSED DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /29/ /18/ /12/ /13/ MEDIATED DISMISSIVE AND FAILED TO INVESTIGATE /29/ /18/ /28/ /31/ MERGED RUDE/DISMISSIVE/FAILED TO INVESTIGATE /29/ /04/ /07/ /23/ CLOSED CONFRONTATIONAL/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS AND BEHAVED IN AN INAPPROPRIATE MANNER /24/ /07/ /08/ /09/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /29/ /14/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /29/ /05/ /08/ /08/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/CLETS MISUSE /30/ /14/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /30/ /14/ /26/ /29/ CLOSED ISSUING A CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /03/ /14/ /27/ /02/ SUSTAINED ISSUING A CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE 03/02/ /04/ /26/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /03/ /18/ /07/ /23/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/THREATENING COMP /02/ /11/ /04/ /17/ CLOSED CITE WITHOUT CAUSE /03/ /14/ /08/ /13/ CLOSED FAILURE TO PROVIDE REPORT TO VICTIM /04/ /02/ /14/ /15/ CLOSED DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /04/ /04/ /07/ /13/ CLOSED CITATION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /05/ /26/ PENDING ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE/FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /05/ /04/ PENDING RUDE TREATMENT OF A VICTIM/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION

54 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /04/ /07/ PENDING REFUSED TO TAKE A REPORT /07/ /14/ PENDING PROPERTY NOT RETURNED UPON RELEASE FROM CUSTODY /29/ /19/ PENDING 5150 AND MISSING PROPERTY /07/ /20/ PENDING YELLING/BEATING AND ARRESTING AN ONLOOKER /07/ /01/ /23/ /08/ WITHDRAWN DISPLAYING A WEAPON WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /04/ /19/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /12/ /24/ /02/ /17/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /12/ /14/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /12/ /14/ /17/ /17/ CLOSED FAILURE TO WRITE INCIDENT REPORT /13/ /13/ /09/ /12/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /13/ /17/ /05/ /08/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS /13/ /20/ /05/ /18/ MEDIATED CITE WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND COMMENTS /13/ /03/ /07/ /23/ SUSTAINED CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/INACCURATE CITATION/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /07/ /01/ /04/ /17/ CLOSED CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE 03/24/ /14/ /23/ /27/ /08/ CLOSED RUDE BEHAVIOR/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /14/ /14/ PENDING OIS/LETHAL FORCE /17/ /19/ /30/ /10/ CLOSED DRIVING IMPROPERLY /17/ /19/ /02/ /19/ CLOSED DETENTION/ARREST/UF/BIASED POLICING/COMMENTS /18/ /08/ PENDING DRAWN GUN/DETENTION/HANDCUFFING /18/ /28/ /28/ /17/ CLOSED RUDE AND DID NOT HELP /17/ /16/ PENDING COMP INJURED DURING UF /21/ /27/ /13/ /28/ INFO ONLY SEARCH RESIDENCE WITHOUT CAUSE /17/ /03/ /23/ /29/ CLOSED DRIVING IMPROPERLY /21/ /27/ PENDING MISUSE OF POLICE AUTHORITY/INTIMIDATING BEHAVIOR /21/ /25/ /13/ /28/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /24/ /14/ PENDING SEARCH/CITE/FAILURE TO PROCESS PROPERTY/SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT /21/ /07/ /05/ /08/ SUSTAINED DETENTION/PROFANITY/FAILED TO STATE REASON/TIGHT HANDCUFFS /24/ /14/ PENDING USE OF FORCE /24/ /14/ PENDING LAUGHED AT COMPLAINANT'S INJURIES AND FAILED TO INVESTIGATE A BATTERY /26/ /26/ /06/ /08/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO PROMPTLY RESPOND TO THE SCENE /25/ /25/ /25/ /02/ MERGED MERGED

55 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /25/ /28/ /22/ /31/ CLOSED HANDCUFFED/TOWED /27/ /01/ PENDING ENTRY WITHOUT WARRANT /27/ /21/ PENDING IMPROPER SEARCH/FAILURE TO PROPERLY PROCESS PROPERTY /28/ /31/ /18/ /20/ CLOSED FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /27/ /01/ /03/ /03/ WITHDRAWN BEATING UP THE COMPLAINANT /13/ /09/ PENDING YELLED AT BICYCLIST/INVALID ORDER/FAILURE TO ENFORCE VEHICE CODE /18/ /11/ PENDING REFUSED TO HELP SECURITY GUARDS WITH TRESPASSER /21/ /14/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE BATTERY REPORT AND FORCE ON ELDERLY PERSON /28/ /31/ /17/ /18/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/ACTIONS /28/ /01/ /06/ /23/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /31/ /23/ PENDING RACIAL BIAS/HARASSMENT /31/ /22/ PENDING HARASING/INTIMIDATING AND THREATENING BEHAVIOR /31/ /02/ PENDING HARRASSING/DETENTION AND ARREST WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /02/ /10/ /23/ /08/ INFO ONLY INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /03/ /29/ PENDING ISSUED INACCURATE CITATION /03/ /23/ /27/ /29/ MEDIATED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /03/ /06/ PENDING DETAINED/CITATION/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR/BIASED POLICING /03/ /30/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /04/ /08/ /30/ /31/ CLOSED FAILED TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE /07/ /07/ /23/ /08/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /30/ /16/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/THREATENING BEHAVIOR /01/ /30/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /28/ /23/ PENDING NEGLECT OF DUTY/INTERFERED WITH ONLOOKERS/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /03/ /23/ /12/ /12/ CLOSED UNLAWFUL ORDER/FAILED TO PROVIDE NAME/BADGE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /08/ /14/ /29/ /31/ CLOSED INFORMATION ONLY /09/ /07/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/BIASED POLICING /07/ /20/ /27/ /17/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR /08/ /26/ /20/ /20/ CLOSED FAILED TO RECEIVE A PRIVATE PERSON'S ARREST /10/ /16/ PENDING INVALID SEARCH WARRANT/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /10/ /16/ PENDING DETENTION WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /15/ /16/ /20/ /25/ CLOSED STANDING AROUND NOT DOING ANYTHING

56 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /09/ /28/ PENDING RECORDING WITHOUT PERMISSION /15/ /15/ /15/ /17/ CLOSED INFORMATION ONLY /15/ /09/ PENDING UNNECESSARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DURING SCHOOL DROPOFF /16/ /18/ /06/ /13/ CLOSED OFFICER BROKE DAUGHTER'S HIP /15/ /29/ /29/ /08/ INFO ONLY FAILED TO UPDATE DMV RECORD /16/ /16/ /16/ /07/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /17/ /23/ /27/ /08/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /18/ /28/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE AN INCIDENT REPORT /18/ /28/ PENDING SEXUALLY DEROGATORY COMMENT AND HIT YOUTH /18/ /29/ /30/ /31/ CLOSED EXCESSIVE FORCE/THREATENING COMP/ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE /21/ /23/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR/PROFANITY/THREATS /21/ /23/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS /21/ /28/ /27/ /14/ WITHDRAWN FORCED OUT OF HIS HOUSE /22/ /29/ PENDING INAPPROPIATE BEHAVIOR /22/ /01/ PENDING VIOLENT ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE/HANDCUFING/NO HATE CRIME REPORT /21/ /24/ /08/ /08/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE THREATENING BEHAVIOR & COMMENTS /22/ /29/ /01/ /23/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /22/ /01/ /28/ /14/ CLOSED 5150 DETENTION /21/ /07/ /23/ /14/ INFO ONLY DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /23/ /23/ /02/ /08/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /29/ /05/ PENDING FAILURE TO PROVIDE LANGUAGE ACCESS/ARREST/CITATION /30/ /30/ /13/ /28/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /30/ /11/ /30/ /18/ CLOSED FAILURE TO PROVIDE NAME AND STAR/RUDE /02/ /06/ PENDING IO-2-THE COMPLAINANT IS IRRATIONAL BUT STATES AN ACTUAL POLICE CONTACT /02/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /05/ /27/ PENDING ARREST/SEIZURE OF CASH /05/ /20/ PENDING DETENTION/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /05/ /17/ /16/ /30/ CLOSED FAILED TO PRESERVE COMP'S RIGHTS AS CRIME VICTIM /05/ /08/ /09/ /13/ CLOSED DETENTION/SEARCH/ARREST /06/ /19/ PENDING FAILURE TO ENFORCE PARKING VIOLATIONS BY UBER /07/ /12/ PENDING UNLAWFUL DETENTION/SEARCH/HARRASSMENT/RUDE DEMEANOR

57 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /07/ /14/ PENDING WITHHOLDING PROPERTY/RETALIATORY CONDUCT /07/ /14/ PENDING TIGHT HANDCUFFS/RUDE COMMENTS/SEXUALLY DEROGATORY COMMENT /08/ /11/ /23/ /30/ CLOSED FAILURE TO PROMPTLY RESPOND TO AN INCIDENT /08/ /13/ /02/ /03/ CLOSED THE OFFICER HARASSED THE COMPLAINANT /09/ /20/ PENDING FAILURE TO IDENTIFY HIMSELF/USE OF FORCE /12/ /16/ PENDING FAILED TO FOLLOW RULES OF THE ROAD/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /12/ /15/ PENDING DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /12/ /09/ /20/ /20/ MEDIATED LACK OF ENFORCEMENT REGARDING HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT /13/ /13/ PENDING CITATION/BIASED POLICING DUE TO RACE /14/ /14/ /19/ /28/ INFO ONLY CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /14/ /19/ PENDING CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR & COMMENTS /15/ /06/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /15/ /11/ PENDING CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND COMMENTS/BIASED POLICING /09/ /24/ PENDING FAILED TO SUPERVISE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /12/ /11/ /03/ /23/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /16/ /22/ /13/ /19/ CLOSED BIASED POLICING/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /16/ /29/ /13/ /13/ CLOSED HARASSMENT CULMINATING IN TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT/TOW /16/ /19/ /09/ /23/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO WRITE AN INCIDENT REPORT/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /19/ /09/ /13/ /14/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO WRITE AN INCIDENT REPORT /20/ /10/ /26/ /26/ CLOSED FAILURE TO WRITE AN INCIDENT REPORT /20/ /17/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENT/RACIAL BIAS /19/ /10/ /30/ /31/ INFO ONLY DRIVING IMPROPERLY/RUDE ATTITUDE OR DEMEANOR /18/ /03/ /04/ /12/ INFO ONLY IO /19/ /15/ PENDING ARRESTED/NO MIRANDA RIGHTS AND ASSAULTED /22/ /28/ /27/ /14/ CLOSED DUI ARREST /22/ /23/ /05/ /12/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY SFSD /27/ /30/ PENDING CITE WITHOUT CAUSE/PARK IN BUS ZONE/SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT/FAILURE TO ANSWER /23/ /07/ PENDING ARREST/NO REPORT OR MEDICAL/INAPP BEHAVIIOR /28/ /30/ /30/ /12/ INFO ONLY IMPROPER DRIVING /28/ /30/ /30/ /12/ INFO ONLY BEHAVIOR /29/ /29/ /29/ /12/ INFO ONLY IO-1

58 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /28/ /17/ PENDING ARREST, SEXUAL SLUR, USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE /28/ /11/ /03/ /23/ INFO ONLY RUDE/DISCOURTEOUS BEHAVIOR /29/ /29/ /29/ /10/ INFO ONLY CARS DO NOT STOP AT AN INTERSECTION /30/ /10/ /31/ /31/ INFO ONLY IO /30/ /11/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS AND TREATMENT DURING ARREST /31/ /17/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION

59 Status of DPA Cases Year 2017 Intake in Process 37 13% Year 2017 as of 6/30/17 Case Closed 90 31% Intake Done, Case Pending % Intake in Process 27 9% Year 2016 as of 06/30/17 Case Closed 57 18% Intake Done, Case Pending %

60 600 Status of DPA Cases Year 2017 as of 06/30/17 80% 70% % % % 30% % % % Case Closed Intake Done, Case Pending Intake in Process Case Closed (%) Intake Done, Case Pending (%) Intake in Process (%)

61 STATUS OF OCC COMPLAINTS - YEAR 2017 as of 06/30/2017 DEPARTMENT OF POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /03/ /19/ /22/ /23/ CLOSED DISCOURTEOUS TREATMENT/SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT /02/ /02/ /05/ /12/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /03/ /17/ PENDING ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE AND USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE /03/ /03/ /19/ /20/ CLOSED HARASSMENT DURING TRAFFIC STOP /05/ /20/ PENDING ARRESTED WITHOUT CAUSE/FAILED TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE /05/ /19/ PENDING UA /06/ /09/ /26/ /27/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO STOP PEOPLE SPREADING DISEASE ONTO COMP /06/ /23/ PENDING DRIVING IMPROPERLY /06/ /23/ PENDING HARRASSMENT DURING TRAFFIC STOP /06/ /14/ PENDING OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING /06/ /06/ /19/ /20/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /09/ /19/ /27/ /04/ WITHDRAWN INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR DURING CALL TO STATION /12/ /16/ /16/ /20/ CLOSED TOWED A VEHICLE WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /22/ /06/ /23/ /24/ MEDIATED CITED FOR LACK OF INSURANCE /12/ /09/ PENDING FALSE INFORMATION IN POLICE REPORT/ARREST/BIAS /01/ /24/ /20/ /20/ MEDIATED ENTRY/SEARCH/COMMENTS & BEHAVIOR /05/ PENDING DISPOSED OF PROPERTY/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /09/ /24/ /04/ /04/ MEDIATED FAILED TO MAKE ARREST /18/ /10/ PENDING MISUSE OF AUTHORITY /16/ /10/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR/BIASED POLICING /17/ /06/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /18/ /08/ /26/ /26/ CLOSED DRIVING IMPROPERLY /23/ /21/ PENDING USE OF FORCE /20/ /31/ PENDING USE OF FORCE /23/ /02/ PENDING UNNECESSARY FORCE /20/ /02/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS/USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE/ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE

62 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /30/ /31/ /01/ /03/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /23/ /06/ PENDING SEARCHED BAG WITHOUT CONSENT /10/ /06/ PENDING SFPD CAR PARKED ON A HILL WITHOUT CURBING WHEELS /24/ /05/ PENDING OFFICERS REPEATEDLY HARASSING COMPLAINANT'S PATRONS /26/ /08/ PENDING SEARCHED HOME WITHOUT CAUSE/UNNECESSARY FORCE /31/ /09/ /13/ /15/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /26/ /24/ /13/ /13/ CLOSED YELLING DURING A TRAFFIC STOP /26/ /17/ /13/ /17/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /27/ /01/ /09/ /13/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND COMMENTS /27/ /02/ /23/ /26/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /25/ /02/ PENDING LEFT ENTRYWAY GATE OPEN, ENDANGERING COMPLAINANT /25/ /14/ PENDING FAILED TO LOCATE MAN IN MEDICAL DISTRESS /30/ /31/ PENDING FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /30/ /01/ /22/ /23/ MERGED FAILURE TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE/UF /30/ /17/ PENDING CITATION/SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS /31/ /24/ PENDING FORCE/DETENTION /31/ /07/ PENDING FAILURE TO PROCESS PROPERTY /31/ /01/ PENDING ISSUING AN INVALID ORDER /01/ /22/ PENDING DRIVING IMPROPERLY /01/ /06/ PENDING USE OF FORCE AND FAILURE TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE /02/ /13/ /15/ /21/ CLOSED FAILURE TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE /02/ /02/ PENDING FAILURE TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE /02/ /06/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND OR COMMENTS /01/ /22/ /19/ /19/ CLOSED COMMENT/BEHAVIOR /01/ /09/ PENDING USE OF FORCE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /01/ /24/ /26/ /26/ CLOSED FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /01/ /08/ PENDING FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /23/ /07/ /08/ /14/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /03/ /14/ /24/ /30/ CLOSED RETALIATION/ISSUED CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE

63 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /02/ /13/ /14/ /14/ MEDIATED FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /03/ /08/ /01/ /01/ MEDIATED FAILED TO INVESTIGATE /03/ /03/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /03/ /07/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /04/ /02/ /25/ /06/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /06/ /06/ /14/ /14/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /21/ /21/ /29/ /30/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /07/ /09/ /09/ /15/ INFO ONLY UNNECESSARY FORCE/DETENTION /06/ /06/ PENDING DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /07/ /30/ PENDING DETENTION AND SEARCH /08/ /29/ PENDING FAILURE TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /10/ /21/ PENDING FAILURE TO RESPOND PROMPTLY TO THE SCENE /10/ /21/ PENDING CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /10/ /10/ /29/ /30/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENT /10/ /14/ /27/ /29/ CLOSED UNNECESSARY FORCE/FOURTH AMENDMENT /13/ /28/ PENDING FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /12/ /08/ PENDING REFUSING TO TAKE A REPORT /14/ /24/ PENDING FAILED TO MAKE AN ARREST /13/ /07/ /15/ /19/ INFO ONLY UA /14/ /01/ PENDING FAILURE TO WRITE INCIDENT REPORT/PROVIDE REQUIRED INFO /14/ /24/ /24/ /19/ WITHDRAWN TOO MANY OFFICERS ON SCENE AND RUDE /14/ /13/ /08/ /08/ INFO ONLY INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/RETALIATORY CONDUCT /15/ /10/ /11/ /12/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /18/ /01/ PENDING ARREST/FAILURE TO PROCESS PROPERTY /16/ /14/ PENDING CITATION/BIASED POLICING /10/ /30/ PENDING ARREST/BIASED POLICING /17/ /02/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/DISPLAY WEAPON /17/ /08/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /17/ /08/ PENDING FAILURE TO MAKE AN ARREST

64 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /21/ /06/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /17/ /17/ PENDING DRIVING IMPROPERLY IN A CROSSWALK /12/ /30/ PENDING RUDE/DOUBLE-PARKING CITATION /22/ /01/ /03/ /03/ CLOSED FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /22/ /10/ PENDING ENGAGED IN BIASED POLICING DUE TO RACE /22/ /22/ PENDING UNNECESSARY FORCE/4TH AMENDMENT /23/ /02/ PENDING BIASED POLICING BASED ON AGE/ETHNICITY /24/ /10/ /13/ /14/ INFO ONLY RUDE BEHAVIOR /21/ /13/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/APPROACHED COMP AT WORK FOR NO REASON /27/ /28/ /01/ /14/ INFO ONLY IO /27/ /28/ /25/ /26/ INFO ONLY POLICE DID NOT RESPOND WHEN HE CALLED /21/ /03/ PENDING /01/ PENDING ENTERED/SEARCHED PREMISES WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/WEAPONS DRAWN WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR RACIALLY DEROGATORY COMMENT/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /01/ /01/ /04/ /04/ MEDIATED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /01/ /01/ /01/ /01/ MERGED ARREST IN THERAPY OFFICE /01/ /01/ PENDING THREAT/FORCE /01/ /06/ /01/ /01/ CLOSED UNWARRANTED CITATION /02/ /09/ /09/ /14/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /03/ /03/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /02/ /07/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /19/ /31/ PENDING DETENTION/DRIVING IMPROPERLY/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /03/ /22/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE A REPORT /06/ /09/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /07/ /08/ PENDING FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /08/ /07/ PENDING UA /03/ /22/ /19/ /20/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /07/ /24/ /08/ /29/ CLOSED DISCOURTESY /05/ /16/ PENDING HARASSING THE COMPLAINANT /08/ /30/ /30/ /31/ MEDIATED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION

65 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /08/ /07/ /11/ /12/ WITHDRAWN DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATOIN /09/ /16/ PENDING TOWED VEHICLE/BIASED POLICING-RACE/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/BEHAVIOR /10/ /03/ PENDING THREATS AGAINST COMP /13/ /20/ /22/ /30/ INFO ONLY I01 PARK RANGER/USE OF FORCE /13/ /13/ /24/ /30/ INFO ONLY SURVIELANCE /12/ /03/ PENDING RUDE AND DID NOT TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /13/ /13/ PENDING CITE WITHOUT CAUSE/BIASED POLICING /13/ /04/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /13/ /27/ PENDING THREAT OF BODILY HARM, THROWN OUT OF STATION /08/ /17/ /15/ /15/ CLOSED HARASSMENT AND INTIMIDATION FOR PERSONAL GAIN OF COLLEAGUE /08/ /13/ /02/ /02/ CLOSED RUDE ATTITUDE ON PHONE /07/ PENDING TAZER USED ON SHOPLIFTER /07/ PENDING HARASSING AN ELDER /13/ /14/ PENDING Q2 FAILED TO PROVIDE NAME AND STAR NUMBER /14/ /03/ PENDING Q2 RUDE, UNSYMPATHETIC, DEMEANING, UNCARING DURING INVESTIGATION /14/ /13/ PENDING FALSE ARREST /15/ /03/ PENDING BIASED POLICING/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR & COMMENTS/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /13/ /13/ /16/ /29/ INFO ONLY IO /16/ /28/ PENDING /16/ /28/ PENDING ISSUING AN INVALID ORDER/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND COMMENTS TRAFFIC STOP DETENTION/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND COMMENTS /14/ /14/ /08/ /09/ CLOSED PD LAUGHED AT COMP WHEN TAKING HER TO ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL /16/ /14/ PENDING COMP WENT TO STATION, WAS QUESTIONED INAPPROPRIATELY /14/ /30/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS DURING CITATION /17/ /22/ PENDING UNLAWFUL DETENTION /20/ /20/ /20/ /30/ INFO ONLY RAISES MATTERS NOT RATIONALLY WITHIN THE DPA JURISDICTION /20/ /20/ /14/ /14/ INFO ONLY MATTER NOT RATIONALLY WITHIN DPA JURISDICTION /18/ /09/ PENDING FAILURE TO ARREST OR INVESTIGATE /21/ /27/ PENDING TICKETED UBER DRIVER BUT WOULD NOT LET HIM EXPLAIN /22/ /07/ PENDING EXCESSIVE FORCE DURING ARREST

66 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /22/ /25/ /25/ /26/ INFO ONLY INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /22/ /27/ /29/ /30/ CLOSED DRIVING IMPROPERLY /23/ /23/ /19/ /19/ WITHDRAWN BEHAVED INAPPROPRIATELY /23/ /17/ PENDING MISREPRESENTING THE TRUTH /23/ /20/ PENDING UNNECESSARY FORCE /24/ /24/ /23/ /24/ MEDIATED CONDUCT REFLECTING DISCREDIT /24/ /28/ /29/ /30/ INFO ONLY DRIVING IMPROPERLY /27/ /03/ PENDING DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DGO /26/ /14/ PENDING IMPROPER DRIVING /25/ /17/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS & BEHAVIOR/UNLAWFUL ORDER /27/ /13/ PENDING SEARCHING WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /28/ /28/ /28/ /30/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /28/ /03/ PENDING CITATION/HANDCUFFING WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /29/ /30/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /29/ /08/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /29/ /21/ PENDING UNNECESSARY FORCE /30/ /30/ /07/ /15/ INFO ONLY RACIAL SLUR /31/ /11/ PENDING THE OFFICER DID NOT MAKE ARREST /31/ /10/ /10/ /12/ INFO ONLY RUDE AND REFUSED TO TAKE A REPORT /31/ /11/ PENDING DETENTION /03/ PENDING UNWARRANTED CITES /03/ /28/ /28/ /28/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENT /03/ /03/ /28/ /28/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /04/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /04/ /04/ /13/ /14/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /06/ /08/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /05/ /07/ /12/ /14/ MERGED INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /05/ /07/ /11/ /11/ INFO ONLY OFFICER BEHAVED AND SPOKE INAPPROPRIATELY /07/ /10/ PENDING OFFICER BEHAVED AND SPOKE INAPPROPRIATELY

67 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /10/ /10/ /15/ /15/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE STATEMENTS/DETAINED WITHOUT CAUSE /10/ /13/ /14/ /14/ WITHDRAWN CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /11/ /13/ /12/ /12/ MERGED FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /10/ /05/ PENDING DETENTION /11/ /13/ /14/ /14/ INFO ONLY INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /12/ /03/ /03/ /26/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /13/ /13/ /15/ /15/ CLOSED NEGLECT OF DUTY /12/ /24/ PENDING Q2S SEEN GRABBING A MAN, THROWING TO STREET, SPIT SHIELD, /12/ /21/ /21/ /24/ CLOSED PARKING CITATION /13/ /15/ /26/ /26/ CLOSED INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /14/ /18/ /18/ /19/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /17/ /17/ /19/ /19/ INFO ONLY CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /18/ /05/ PENDING DRIVING IMPROPERLY/LAUGHING /14/ /17/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS /18/ /07/ PENDING FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE AND WRITE AN INCIDENT REPORT /20/ /02/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /21/ /12/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/FAILURE TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE /21/ /01/ PENDING RUDE/INTIMIDATING BEHAVIOR/FAILURE TO PROVIDE NAME OR BADGE NUMBER /20/ /26/ /22/ /23/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DGO 2.01 SECTION /21/ /01/ PENDING TOWING A VEHICLE WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /21/ /04/ /06/ /08/ CLOSED FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /18/ /23/ PENDING DETENTION/FAILURE TO PROCESS PROPERTY /10/ /10/ /15/ /15/ CLOSED THE OFFICER ENGAGED IN SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT/THE OFFICER WROTE AN INACCURATE CITATION /26/ /26/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /26/ /17/ PENDING FAILURE TO WRITE A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE INCIDENT REPORT /28/ /05/ /08/ /08/ MERGED DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/SEARCH WITHOUT CAUSE/FAILED TO MIRANDIZE /27/ /10/ /10/ /23/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /27/ /31/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /27/ /31/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/WRITE A REPORT

68 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /27/ /31/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/WRITE A REPORT /28/ /17/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /25/ /23/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /27/ /12/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /01/ /01/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE A REPORT /01/ /02/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS/CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /01/ /03/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /02/ /02/ PENDING TIGHT HANDCUFFS /03/ PENDING HARASSMENT /03/ /06/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /03/ PENDING UNNECESSARY FORCE /09/ /11/ PENDING DETAINED WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /10/ /18/ PENDING UNNECESSARY FORCE/INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS AND BEHAVIOR /12/ /15/ PENDING NEGLECT OF DUTY /12/ /12/ /30/ /30/ CLOSED RACIAL SLUR /12/ /12/ PENDING NEGLECT OF DUTY /15/ /02/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/ /16/ /26/ PENDING TRAFFIC INFRACTION /16/ /26/ PENDING UNWARRANTED VIOLATION/VEHICLE SEARCH/FORCE /16/ /26/ PENDING CITATION/PROFILING /15/ /23/ PENDING CITATION FOR BIKE LANE, Q2 THREW CITE AT DRIVER /15/ /16/ PENDING Q2'S DID NOTHING WITH COMP'S REPORT OF A DEATH THREAT /12/ /02/ PENDING UNAUTHORIZED USE OF CLETS /10/ /29/ PENDING CITATION/IMPROPER DRIVING/HARASSMENT OF RIDESHARE DRIVER /11/ PENDING SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF VEHICLE CODE/FAILURE TO RESPOND /17/ /21/ PENDING FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DGO 5.03/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /17/ /21/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION/INACCURATE REPORT /17/ /07/ PENDING DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/BEHAVIOR /19/ /01/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR & COMMENTS/INACCURATE REPORT

69 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /19/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /19/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /22/ /25/ PENDING HARASSING THE COMPLAINANT /22/ /25/ PENDING BEHAVED INAPPROPRIATELY /22/ /30/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /19/ PENDING 5150 DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION /19/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS/SEARCH /22/ PENDING FAILURE TO TAKE POLICE REPORT/FAILURE TO RESPOND /22/ /12/ /27/ /27/ CLOSED FAILURE TO WRITE INCIDENT REPORT /23/ /23/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR/COMMENTS /21/ /07/ PENDING FAILED TO ARREST/INVESTIGATE/INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE/BEHAVIOR /23/ /24/ PENDING ISSUING A CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /24/ /24/ PENDING DISCHARGING A FIREARM (DOG) /25/ /09/ PENDING DETENTION /25/ /05/ PENDING FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /25/ /07/ PENDING INACCURATE CITATION/FAILURE TO PROPERLY PROCESS PROPERTY /26/ /31/ /07/ /13/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO TAKE A REPORT/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR AND, OR COMMENTS /26/ /31/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /09/ PENDING FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DGO 5.20/FAILURE TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /30/ /13/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /31/ /31/ /05/ /13/ INFO ONLY UNKNOWN ASSIGNMENT /31/ /26/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /31/ /05/ PENDING FAILED TO RECEIVE A POLICE REPORT /05/ /05/ PENDING CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /27/ /26/ PENDING CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /08/ /08/ PENDING EXCESSIVE FORCE/INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /06/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /08/ PENDING MISSING PROPERTY DURING ARREST /05/ PENDING CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /08/ /26/ PENDING CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE

70 Case Received Intake Done Days Elapsed Review Done Days Elapsed Closed Days Elapsed Total Days/Status Synopsis of Case Sent to MCD /07/ /23/ /23/ /23/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /08/ /19/ /19/ /20/ INFO ONLY UNNECESSARY AND EXCESSIVE FORCE /09/ /22/ PENDING EXCESSIVE FORCE /12/ PENDING FAILURE TO WRITE REPORT /12/ /21/ PENDING ASKING IMMIGRATION STATUS/ RACIALLY DEROGATORY BEHAVIOR /12/ /12/ PENDING DETENTION/BIASED POLICING DUE TO RACE /16/ PENDING FAILURE TO PROMPTLY RESPOND TO THE SCENE /14/ PENDING FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /04/ /21/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR /19/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR COMMENTS /19/ /20/ /23/ /23/ INFO ONLY FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /20/ /20/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE ACTIONS/COMMENTS /20/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS /19/ PENDING DRIVING IMPROPERLY /21/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE WRITE REPORT /23/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /23/ /30/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /24/ PENDING RUDE TOWARD COMP /26/ /29/ PENDING NEGLECT OF DUTY /27/ PENDING DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/UNNECESSARY FORCE /27/ PENDING ISSUED CITATION WITHOUT CAUSE /26/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENT /27/ PENDING ARREST WITHOUT CAUSE/INTERFERING WITH RIGHTS OF ONLOOKER /27/ PENDING FAILED TO TAKE REQUIRED ACTION /30/ /30/ /30/ /30/ INFO ONLY INFORMATION ONLY /27/ PENDING DETENTION WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION/BEHAVING INAPPROPRIATELY /30/ PENDING FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE /30/ PENDING INAPPROPRIATE COMMENT /30/ PENDING DETAINED WITHOUT CAUSE AT RETAIL STORE, TAKEN TO SFGH

71 DPA Caseloads by Investigator as of 6/30/2017 Average Caseload: 24 Average Caseload: SECOND QUARTER SECOND QUARTER

72 DPA Caseloads by Investigator as of 6/30/ AVERAGE AVERAGE

73 Average Case Closures by Number: 10 Average Case Closures by Number: DPA Case Closures by Investigator as of 6/30/ SECOND QUARTER SECOND QUARTER

74 DPA Case Closures by Investigator as of 6/30/ AVERAGE AVERAGE

75 Average Case Closures by Weight: Average Case Closures by Weight: DPA Weighted Closures Second Quarter 2017 by Investigator SECOND QUARTER SECOND QUARTER

76 DPA Weighted Closures by Investigator as of 6/30/ AVERAGE AVERAGE

77 DPA Sustained Cases Second Quarter 2017 by Investigator Average Sustained Cases: SECOND QUARTER SECOND QUARTER Average Sustained Cases:

78 DPA Sustained Cases Second Quarter 2017 by Investigator AVERAGE AVERAGE