Case 2:11-cr HGB-ALC Document 112 Filed 12/27/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
|
|
- Clement Hood
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 2:11-cr HGB-ALC Document 112 Filed 12/27/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * CRIMINAL NO: v. * SECTION: C DOMINICK FAZZIO * * * * GOVERNMENT S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT S MOTION TO RE-ENROLL AS COUNSEL OF RECORD May it please the Court: The United States of America hereby opposes defendant Fazzio s motion to allow reenrollment of counsel who were disqualified by this court because of a conflict of interest. The United States believes that disqualified counsel has an insurmountable and incurable conflict of interest that precludes their re-enrollment based upon the reasons below. This Honorable Court correctly determined, inter alia, that the River Birch corporate resolution bestowing a conditional financial benefit upon its employees has created a manifest and manifold conflict of interest between Fazzio and his attorneys. (Rec.doc 104). Most importantly, because of this thinly veiled effort to silence Fazzio, purchase his allegiance and deny him whatever benefits follow a cooperating defendant before bar, if Fazzio is to continue to be
2 Case 2:11-cr HGB-ALC Document 112 Filed 12/27/11 Page 2 of 9 represented by disqualified counsel, such representation subverts the interest of justice and creates a pathway for collateral attack if Fazzio is convicted. More to the point, Fazzio s disqualified counsel s convenient and transparent post-hearing representations not to partake of the River Birch indemnification resolution should be an affront to this court. This court has no jurisdiction to force River Birch to rescind or modify the indemnification resolution. Moreover, this court has no jurisdiction to force Fazzio to resign his position with River Birch or to have River Birch terminate Fazzio s employment. As of the time of this filing, River Birch and others enjoy the safe redoubt of the corporate resolution. Indeed, the River Birch indemnification resolution survives this disqualification order and there is nothing this Court can do to change that reality, other than to maintain its disqualification order.(rec Doc. 104). To tangle matters more, the flawed, reconstituted representations by Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke not to accept payment pursuant to the River Birch indemnification resolution does not preclude Fazzio from availing himself of the benefits provided by the River Birch indemnification resolution without any limitation. River Birch has coiled Fazzio in the mortal fear of losing his job and concomitant loss of income and the disqualified counsel are well-placed to enforce his silence. The United States submits that any order of this Honorable Court to enforce present assurances by disqualified counsel not to avail themselves of the indemnification would be impractical, tedious, cumbersome and legally impossible. For example, how could the Court prevent Fazzio from securing any benefit of the River Birch resolution post-trial or post-appeal of the Garner Services matter? Indeed, the United States submits Fazzio is already the beneficiary of the malignant resolution for he is still an employee of River Birch and subject to its designed -2-
3 Case 2:11-cr HGB-ALC Document 112 Filed 12/27/11 Page 3 of 9 benefits. Additionally, how could this Honorable Court effectively regulate Fazzio s benefits which could easily be disguised as raises or bonuses, but are actually attorney s fees? Most interesting, Mr. London already admitted receiving fees from River Birch and 1 sharing them with Mr. Haedicke (Rec. Doc 104-Court s Order p. 2),and Mr. London is still representing Fazzio in the River Birch matter in which he is unquestionably being paid his fees by River Birch. This situation presents an untenable dilemma because certainly Mr. London would still be communicating with River Birch due to the joint defense agreement in place. Ultimately this would result in an ongoing conflict and how could the court adequately regulate and control this representation. Further, the Court s order does not require Mr. London to return all attorney s fees paid by River Birch and shared with Mr. Haedicke. If it had, it would not have removed the taint which London, Cobb and Haedicke suffer. The United States submits that disqualified counsel is unable to purge the taint and has exacerbated the taint by sharing confidential information with River Birch attorneys as indicated in the Court s order. This would be tantamount to trying to put toothpaste back into the tube. Thus, the United States submits the damage has already been done and no amount of furtive maneuvering by Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke can restore Fazzio with their conflict-free representation. The United States further submits that it is disingenuous for Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke to now agree not to be paid or indemnified by River Birch and they would immediately cease confidential discussions with River Birch and their attorneys. This conflict was patent before this Honorable Court s Order and went wholly unrecognized by all three veteran attorneys. 1 The government advises the court that Mr. London is also representing Fazzio s wife in the River Birch matter. Mr. London has previously contacted the United States on her behalf when she was subpoenaed for documents. The United States submits this presents a further conflict. -3-
4 Case 2:11-cr HGB-ALC Document 112 Filed 12/27/11 Page 4 of 9 Thus, the United States submits that if Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke were honestly representing Fazzio and only Fazzio s interest, they would have advanced this remedy at the time of the hearing and proposed it as an alternative to the court and not waited for this Honorable Court to suggest it. The Supreme Court in Wheat v. United States, 486 U.S. 153 (1988) found that the right of counsel does not override the broader societal interest in the effective administration of justice or the maintenance of the public confidence in the integrity of our legal system. The Supreme Court in Wheat said thus while the right to select to be represented by one s preferred attorney is comprehended by the Sixth Amendment, the essential aim of the amendment is to guarantee an effective advocate for each criminal defendant rather to ensure that a defendant will be inexorably represented by the lawyer whom he prefers. See Wheat at 159. The United States submits that for this court to preserve the appearance of integrity of the judicial process and to further prevent counsel from tainting the trial with their conflict-ridden representation of Fazzio, it must maintain its Order disqualifying Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke, for to do otherwise would irreversibly cast doubt upon the integrity of the judicial process, especially after this Honorable Court has already ruled that Fazzio s current attorneys have potential conflicts and divided loyalties. Accordingly, counsel who have either potential or actual conflicts may be disqualified. United States v. Dockens, 253 F.3d 706, 707 (5th Cir. 2001) While this Honorable Court attempted to remediate the immutable conflicts operating between Messrs. London, Cobb, Haedicke and Fazzio by extending an invitation to counsel to abjure from their compensatory and cozy relationship with River Birch and cease communications with River Birch s counsel, this offer truly betrays the consubstantial relationship which exists -4-
5 Case 2:11-cr HGB-ALC Document 112 Filed 12/27/11 Page 5 of 9 between counsel, River Birch and River Birch s counsel. The United States submits that there is no plausible way to assure this Honorable Court that Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke s hollow averments will reverse the hands of time and thus enjoy judicial sanctification of their representation of Fazzio. To do otherwise and allow Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke to escape the justifiable disqualification by this Honorable Court, would only provoke derision and suspicion of our judicial processes and erode confidence in any outcome of this case. While it is permissible for this Honorable Court to inquire as to whom is paying Fazzio s legal services, it would be unseemly and impractical to have the Court act as a monitor to any future relationship between Messrs. London, Cobb, Haedicke and Fazzio. This would require the court to periodically require defense counsel to demonstrate the origin of their fees. The reliability of their representations would be fraught with dubiety, as River Birch has many progenitors, progeny and prongs, all with interlocking owners, directors, and officers. Simply put, the damage has been done and is irreparable and no precatory assurances can cure the defect wrought by Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke and their benefactor, River Birch. There s another matter which compounds the irreversible conflict which operated between Messrs. London, Cobb, Haedicke and the Fazzio; that s the specter of a contingency fee in a 2 criminal case. Pursuant to Louisiana Code of Professional Conduct Rule 1.5(d)(2), it is well- established that a lawyer should not enter into an arrangement or charge or collect a contingency fee for representing a defendant in a criminal case. In the Order issued by this Honorable Court on th December 9, 2011, the Court made an overture to Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke to make 2 Rule 1.5(d) A lawyer shall not enter into an agreement for, charge or collect: (2) a contingent fee for representing a defendant in a criminal case. -5-
6 Case 2:11-cr HGB-ALC Document 112 Filed 12/27/11 Page 6 of 9 averments which would purge them of their tainted representation of Fazzio. Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke wasted no time and in accepting the Court s invitation and asserted...unless th this court s December 9 order is later vacated or modified, they will not be paid or indemnified by River Birch for work on the defense of Mr. Fazzio. Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke further aver that this is their only option, as the Court s second overture is violative of Louisiana Law. See, Rec. Doc 108, pg 2. Counsel s assertion is pure illusion. Any attempt to accept indemnification from any source would be the function of a contingency fee arrangement, as the services which are to be indemnified would, by virtue of any definition of indemnification, have to have been rendered before the indemnification. Moreover, the indemnitor would have to agree to pay for the services if they are rendered and after the fact. Thus, the United States observes that while this Honorable Court had the best of intentions, it submits there is no way to comply with the Rules of Professional Conduct by allowing Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke to reenroll as counsel for Fazzio. Whoever is to represent Mr. Fazzio has to be paid in advance, without any warranty of indemnification from any third party and be unaffiliated with Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke. In the final analysis, the United States reminds this Honorable Court that Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke have had confidential communications with their benefactor, River Birch and or their attorneys about Fazzio s representation. They have been paid by River Birch for representing Fazzio. Fazzio is a current employee of River Birch and enjoys the emoluments of his employment, namely the corporate resolution promising indemnification for his attorney s fees. To put it quite plainly, he is gagged and shackled, and Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke s alacrity in seeking re-enrollment of this case is a product of not pursuing justice, but -6-
7 Case 2:11-cr HGB-ALC Document 112 Filed 12/27/11 Page 7 of 9 to perpetuate Fazzio s subservience to River Birch and its principals. As this Honorable Court correctly noted, it would not inure to Fazzio s benefit if he decided to cooperate with the United States in this case. The colloquy with the court is very revealing and portends the irreparable damage to the judicial process if Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke are allowed to re-enroll in this case. The United States submits that the evidence of guilt in this case is overwhelming and therefore, it is likely in Fazzio s best interest to pursue meaningful, conflict-free discussions to limit his criminal liability. But if Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke are allowed to re-enroll, Fazzio s fate will be decided upon the altar of company loyalty, not the fair, conflict-free administration of justice. A fair trial is Fazzio s right and the Government welcomes that avenue as well but only with the assurance that the conviction will not be reversed because the appeals process exposes the utter inappropriateness of the London Cobb Haedicke relationship. Accordingly, the United States submits that the only remedy available to Fazzio is for this Honorable Court to deny Messrs, London, Cobb and Haedicke s motion to re-enroll and to require new counsel, whoever Fazzio selects, to be liberated from any Fazzio-related contacts - past, present or future - with Messrs, London, Cobb, Haedicke, River Birch or River Birch s attorneys. Moreover, new counsel should be required to affirm to this Honorable Court that they have not and will not have contact with Messrs, London, Cobb, Haedicke, River Birch or River Birch s counsel and that whatever attorneys fees he or she charges are to be derived from Fazzio only. WHEREFORE, the United States of America prays that Messrs. London, Cobb and Haedicke s Motion to Re-Enroll as Counsel of Record be DENIED and that this Honorable Court -7-
8 Case 2:11-cr HGB-ALC Document 112 Filed 12/27/11 Page 8 of 9 direct the appropriate Unites States Magistrate to conduct a hearing to determine conflict-free counsel to represent Dominick Fazzio in this matter. Respectfully submitted, JIM LETTEN UNITED STATES ATTORNEY /s/ James R. Mann JAMES R. MANN (20513) Assistant United States Attorney 650 Poydras Street, Suite 1600 New Orleans, Louisiana Telephone: (504) /s/ Salvador Perricone SALVADOR PERRICONE (10515) Assistant United States Attorney 650 Poydras Street, Suite 1600 New Orleans, Louisiana Telephone: (504) /s/gregory Kennedy GREGORY KENNEDY (20896) Assistant United States Attorney 650 Poydras Street, Suite 1600 New Orleans, Louisiana Telephone: (504)
9 Case 2:11-cr HGB-ALC Document 112 Filed 12/27/11 Page 9 of 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December 27, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing to all counsel of record. Also, we have mailed a copy postage prepaid to Steve London at his mailing address of 2950 Energy Center, 1100 Poydras Street /s/ James R. Mann JAMES R. MANN Assistant United States Attorney -9-
Case 2:07-cr EEF-ALC Document 152 Filed 10/03/2008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:07-cr-00103-EEF-ALC Document 152 Filed 10/03/2008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * CRIMINAL NO. 07-103 v. * SECTION: L JAMES PERDIGAO
More informationCase 2:07-cr EEF-ALC Document 204 Filed 12/02/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:07-cr-00103-EEF-ALC Document 204 Filed 12/02/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * CRIMINAL DOCKET NO. 07-103 v. * SECTION: L JAMES
More informationCase 2:11-cr HH-FHS Document 133 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:11-cr-00299-HH-FHS Document 133 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * CRIMINAL NO. 11-CR-299 v. * SECTION: HH AARON F.
More informationCase Document 2473 Filed in TXSB on 08/28/13 Page 1 of 4
Case 12-36187 Document 2473 Filed in TXSB on 08/28/13 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: ATP OIL & GAS CORPORATION, DEBTOR CHAPTER
More informationCase 1:17-cr ABJ Document 79 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cr-00201-ABJ Document 79 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Crim. No. 17-201-1 (ABJ) PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR.,
More informationCase 2:04-cv JTM-DEK Document 59-4 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:04-cv-01052-JTM-DEK Document 59-4 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ************************************** FRANK G. SAMPSON * * CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 1:17-cr DDD-JPM Document 38 Filed 02/09/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 134 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 1:17-cr-00204-DDD-JPM Document 38 Filed 02/09/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 134 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * CRIMINAL NO. 17-CR-00204
More informationCase 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1085 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 6:13-cr-00099-JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1085 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JAMES FIDEL SOTOLONGO, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ /30/ :11 03:00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2015
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/2015 10/30/2015 05:11 03:00 PM INDEX NO. 507018/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2015 10/30/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationAMENDED & RESTATED BY-LAWS OF EZENIA! INC. (hereinafter called the Corporation ) ARTICLE I OFFICES
AMENDED & RESTATED BY-LAWS OF EZENIA! INC. (f/k/a VIDEOSERVER INC.) (hereinafter called the Corporation ) ARTICLE I OFFICES The registered office of the Corporation in the State of Delaware shall be located
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA : : : : : : : : : : PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ULISES MENDOZA, v. STATE OF GEORGIA, Petitioner, Respondent. Case No. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS COMES NOW, Petitioner, by and through undersigned
More informationAGREEMENT FOR LOAN AND TEMPORARY DISPLAY OF ARTWORK
AGREEMENT FOR LOAN AND TEMPORARY DISPLAY OF ARTWORK THIS AGREEMENT FOR LOAN AND TEMPORARY DISPLAY OF ARTWORK ( AGREEMENT ) is made and entered into this TH day of, 2014 by and between (the ARTIST ) whose
More informationSUPREME COURT STATE OF LOUISIANA DOCKET NO. 06 CC 2378 WALTER BORG, M.D. Versus
SUPREME COURT STATE OF LOUISIANA _ DOCKET NO. 06 CC 2378 WALTER BORG, M.D. Plaintiff-Appellee Versus DOUGLAS W. COOK, M.D., PALMETTO ADDICTION RECOVERY CENTER, INC, DENEAN JAMES, BCSAC, JOHN COLALUCA,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:00-mc-00005-DPH Doc # 1380 Filed 02/08/18 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 22536 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: Settlement Facility Dow Corning Trust Case No. 00-CV-00005
More informationCase Doc 964 Filed 07/13/16 Entered 07/13/16 07:50:46 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION In re: ) ) Case No. 16-10083-399 NORANDA ALUMINUM, INC. et al., ) Chapter 11 ) Jointly Administered Debtors.
More informationAGREEMENT FOR SHARED FIRE PERSONNEL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITIES OF PIEDMONT AND ALBANY
AGREEMENT FOR SHARED FIRE PERSONNEL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITIES OF PIEDMONT AND ALBANY This Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of, 2012, by and between the City of Piedmont, a municipal corporation
More informationWILLIAM MARSH RICE UNIVERSITY SPONSORED COURSE AGREEMENT. Comp 410/539. Agreement No.
WILLIAM MARSH RICE UNIVERSITY SPONSORED COURSE AGREEMENT Comp 410/539 Agreement No. THIS SPONSORED COURSE AGREEMENT, dated as of ( Agreement ), is made and entered into by and between with a principal
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ERIC GREITENS, v. Petitioner, STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. Attorney General JOSHUA D. HAWLEY, Respondent. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI Case No. Division 18AC-CC00143
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:13-cr-20371-VAR-LJM Doc # 69 Filed 04/28/14 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 961 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-1 DOREEN M. HENDRICKSON,
More informationBYLAWS VITAL FOR COLORADO. (a Colorado Nonprofit Corporation) Effective: August 7, 2013
BYLAWS OF VITAL FOR COLORADO (a Colorado Nonprofit Corporation) Effective: August 7, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Article I. Offices... 1 1. Business Offices... 1 2. Registered Office... 1 Article II. No
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 3:12-CR-107 ) v. ) JUDGES PHILLIPS/SHIRLEY ) MICHAEL R. WALLI, ) MEGAN RICE, and )
More informationCase 5:15-cr DAE Document 173 Filed 12/20/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:15-cr-00820-DAE Document 173 Filed 12/20/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No: SA-15-CR-820-DAE
More informationSECTION 1. MEMBERSHIP. There shall be two classes of members: Class A Members and Class B Members (collectively referred to as the "Members").
SECTION 1. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS. The Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Walton Meadows Subdivision, affecting property located in the City of Pontiac,
More informationCase 1:18-mj KMW Document 7 Filed 04/13/18 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:18-mj-03161-KMW Document 7 Filed 04/13/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In the Matter of Search Warrants Executed on April 9, 2018 Michael D. Cohen, Plaintiff,
More informationRESTATED BYLAWS OF ARTICLE I NAME AND PURPOSE
Adopted on September 16, 2017 RESTATED BYLAWS OF UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ROWE CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER, INC. ARTICLE I NAME AND PURPOSE Section 1. The name of this corporation shall be Unitarian Universalist
More informationCase 2:11-cr MLCF-ALC Document 48 Filed 06/05/13 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA V. NO.
Case 2:11-cr-00048-MLCF-ALC Document 48 Filed 06/05/13 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL ACTION V. NO. 11-48 HENRY M. MOUTON SECTION
More information2:16-cv NGE-EAS Doc # 27 Filed 03/14/17 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 626 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:16-cv-14183-NGE-EAS Doc # 27 Filed 03/14/17 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 626 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Petitioner, Case No.16-14183
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS SALT LAKE EDUCATION FOUNDATION A UTAH NONPROFIT CORPORATION
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF SALT LAKE EDUCATION FOUNDATION A UTAH NONPROFIT CORPORATION TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I OFFICES...1 ARTICLE II MEMBERS...1 Section 2.1. Members...1 Section 2.2. Associates...1
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. v. Case Number: 3:16-cr-93-J-32-JRK
Case 3:16-cr-00093-TJC-JRK Document 282 Filed 01/22/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 14037 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA v. Case Number: 3:16-cr-93-J-32-JRK CORRINE
More informationCase 3:15-cv RGJ-KLH Document 38 Filed 11/25/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 257 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 3:15-cv-02907-RGJ-KLH Document 38 Filed 11/25/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 257 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JOSEPH HENDERSON, SR. * CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:15CV02907 * VERSUS
More informationCase: 1:06-cv Document #: 319 Filed: 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:5492
Case: 1:06-cv-04481 Document #: 319 Filed: 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:5492 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DR. LEONARD E. SALTZMAN, ) BRAD
More informationSOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT 1. General 1.1 This software license agreement ( Agreement ) is a legal agreement between you ( Licensee ) and Phase One A/S, (CVR no. 17889699), Roskildevej 39, 2000 Frederiksberg
More informationBYLAWS OF THE UNITED VETERANS COMMITTEE OF COLORADO FOUNDATION. Article I CORPORATE PURPOSE
BYLAWS OF THE UNITED VETERANS COMMITTEE OF COLORADO FOUNDATION Article I CORPORATE PURPOSE Section I.1 Name. The Corporation shall be known as The United Veterans Committee of Colorado Foundation. Section
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, vs. STEVEN DALE GREEN, DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT
More informationSYMPTOM MEDIA INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIPTION TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
SYMPTOM MEDIA INDIVIDUAL SUBSCRIPTION TERMS AND CONDITIONS: 1. Grant of License. 1.1 Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Licensor (Symptom Media) hereby grants to Licensee (Authorized User), a limited,
More informationSIXTH AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF NYSE REGULATION, INC. ARTICLE I OFFICES ARTICLE II MEETINGS OF MEMBERS
SIXTH AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF NYSE REGULATION, INC. ARTICLE I OFFICES SECTION 1. REGISTERED OFFICE -- The registered office of NYSE Regulation, Inc. (the Corporation ) shall be established and maintained
More informationTY CLEVENGER 21 Bennett Avenue #62 New York, New York 10033
TY CLEVENGER 21 Bennett Avenue #62 New York, New York 10033 telephone: 979.985.5289 tyclevenger@yahoo.com facsimile: 979.530.9523 Texas Bar No. 24034380 October 24, 2015 Mr. Joseph St. Amant, Senior Conference
More informationSERVICE AGREEMENT XX-XXXX-XXX-XX
SERVICE AGREEMENT XX-XXXX-XXX-XX This Service Agreement ( Agreement ) in entered into by and between Missouri Foundation for Health ( Foundation ) and ( Contractor ). WHEREAS, Foundation desires the services
More informationELEVENTH AMENDED AND RESTATED OPERATING AGREEMENT NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC
ELEVENTH AMENDED AND RESTATED OPERATING AGREEMENT OF NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC This Eleventh Amended and Restated Operating Agreement (this Agreement ) of New York Stock Exchange LLC (the Company ) is
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC. (Amended and Restated as of September 10, 2013) Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein (including the Rules)
More informationAPPELLATE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
E-Filed Document Sep 23 2015 13:42:39 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Trial Court Nos. 2006-109; 2006-157 / No. 2015-CA-00502-C0A NEDRA PITTMAN, Petitioner
More informationBRENNAN ESTATES HOMEOWNERS MAINTENANCE CORPORATION BYLAWS ARTICLE I - MEMBERS
BRENNAN ESTATES HOMEOWNERS MAINTENANCE CORPORATION BYLAWS ARTICLE I - MEMBERS Section 1. Conditions of Membership The members of the corporation shall be those persons who, from time to time, are owners
More informationCase Document 371 Filed in TXSB on 09/17/12 Page 1 of 4
Case 12-36187 Document 371 Filed in TXSB on 09/17/12 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: * * ATP OIL & GAS CORPORATION * CASE NO.
More informationBYLAWS OF IMMERSIVE TECH, INC. ARTICLE I CORPORATE OFFICES
BYLAWS OF IMMERSIVE TECH, INC. ARTICLE I CORPORATE OFFICES 1.1. Offices In addition to the corporation's registered office set forth in the certificate of incorporation, the Board of Directors may at any
More informationSEVENTH AMENDED AND RESTATED OPERATING AGREEMENT NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC
SEVENTH AMENDED AND RESTATED OPERATING AGREEMENT OF NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC This Seventh Amended and Restated Operating Agreement (this Agreement ) of New York Stock Exchange LLC (the Company ) is
More informationCase 1:16-bk NWW Doc 336 Filed 03/24/16 Entered 03/24/16 12:28:00 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6
Case 1:16-bk-10272-NWW Doc 336 Filed 03/24/16 Entered 03/24/16 12:28:00 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA DIVISION IN RE: ) ) NEW BEGINNINGS
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS of STARTINGBLOC NFP an Illinois corporation ARTICLE I NAME, PURPOSES, LOCATION, CORPORATE SEAL, FISCAL YEAR AND MEMBERS
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS of STARTINGBLOC NFP an Illinois corporation ARTICLE I NAME, PURPOSES, LOCATION, CORPORATE SEAL, FISCAL YEAR AND MEMBERS 1.1 Name and Purposes. The name and purposes of the corporation
More informationTRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT
TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is effective as of (hereinafter the Effective Date ) by and between the Computer Measurement Group, Inc. ( CMG ), having its principal place of business at P.O.
More informationCase 1:19-cv PAB-KMT Document 9 Filed 01/28/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:19-cv-00027-PAB-KMT Document 9 Filed 01/28/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 19-cv-00027-PAB-KMT Cheryl-Lee Ellen Berreth
More informationBylaws of Northern ICE Fastpitch Association
of Article 1 Offices Section 1. Principal Office The principal office of the corporation is located in Lake County, State of Illinois. Section 2. Change of Address The designation of the county or state
More information- 1 - DISTRICT 29A NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS ***************************************** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
- 1 - No. DISTRICT 29A NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS ***************************************** STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, vs. Plaintiff, BROOKE MCFADDEN COVINGTON, SARAH COVINGTON ANDERSON, and JUSTIN
More informationTo distribute property to qualified charitable organizations or for charitable purposes; and
The purpose of Wichita Community Foundation ( the Foundation ) is to receive and accept property to be administered exclusively for charitable purposes, primarily in or for the benefit of the community
More informationBYLAWS THE KANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN BAR ASSOCIATION. a Missouri Nonprofit Corporation. 501(c)(6) Business League
BYLAWS OF THE KANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN BAR ASSOCIATION a Missouri Nonprofit Corporation 501(c)(6) Business League TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I Purposes and Limitations...1 ARTICLE II Members...2 Section
More informationCase 6:18-cr RBD-DCI Document 59 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 393 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Case 6:18-cr-00043-RBD-DCI Document 59 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 393 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI
More informationAGREEMENT FOR LIMITED ACCESS TO DATA
AGREEMENT FOR LIMITED ACCESS TO DATA This Agreement for Limited Access to Data ( this Agreement ) is made and entered into on this day of, 20, by and between the Memphis Area Association of REALTORS, Inc.
More informationTHE ACADEMIC MAGNET FOUNDATION BYLAWS ARTICLE I. Name and Offices
THE ACADEMIC MAGNET FOUNDATION BYLAWS ARTICLE I Name and Offices Section 1.1 NAME. The name of this Corporation shall be THE ACADEMIC MAGNET FOUNDATION Section 1.2 CORPORATE OFFICES. The principal office
More informationCase: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-3766 NAPERVILLE SMART METER AWARENESS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NAPERVILLE, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District
More informationSaaS Software Escrow Agreement [Agreement Number EL ]
SaaS Software Escrow Agreement [Agreement Number EL ] This Escrow Agreement ( Agreement ) is made on [INSERT DATE] by and among: 1) [Depositor Name, registered company number ######] located at [registered
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF COLORADO CHAUTAUQUA ASSOCIATION
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF COLORADO CHAUTAUQUA ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I Offices The principal and registered office of the Colorado Chautauqua Association (the "Association") required by the Colorado
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Sep 15 2015 14:14:52 2015-CP-00265-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMOTHY BURNS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00265-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationCase 2:19-cr JLS Document 57 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:19-cr-00064-JLS Document 57 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : CRIMINAL NO. 19-64 JOHN DOUGHERTY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-40238 Document: 00512980287 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT STATE OF TEXAS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellees, ) Case Number: 15-40238
More informationCHAPTER II INCORPORATION AND CAPITAL OF REGIONAL RURAL BANKS
CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY THE REGIONAL RURAL BANKS ACT, 1976 ACT NO. 21 OF 1976 [9th February, 1976.] An Act to provide for the incorporation, regulation and winding up of Regional Rural Banks with a view
More informationENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WASHINGTON INTERCONNECTION
ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WASHINGTON INTERCONNECTION This ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT ( E&C Agreement ), entered into this day of, 20, by and between PacifiCorp Transmission Services
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case: 14-80121 09/11/2014 ID: 9236871 DktEntry: 4 Page: 1 of 13 Docket No. 14-80121 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit MICHAEL A. COBB, v. CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA, IN RE: CITY OF
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORPHANS COURT DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORPHANS COURT DIVISION IN RE: ESTATE OF, A minor NO. PRELIMINARY DECREE AND NOW, this day of, 20, upon consideration of the attached Petition
More information8:17-cr LSC-SMB Doc # 46 Filed: 02/23/18 Page 1 of 10 - Page ID # 81 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
8:17-cr-00379-LSC-SMB Doc # 46 Filed: 02/23/18 Page 1 of 10 - Page ID # 81 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA Plaintiff, vs. CHRISTOPHER H. FREEMONT,
More informationTHE REGIONAL RURAL BANKS ACT, 1976 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. THE REGIONAL RURAL BANKS ACT, 1976 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY CHAPTER II INCORPORATION AND CAPITAL OF REGIONAL RURAL
More informationBYLAWS OF MINNESOTA EROSION CONTROL ASSOCIATION
BYLAWS OF MINNESOTA EROSION CONTROL ASSOCIATION INDEX Article I. Office Principal Office; Change of Address; Other Offices 1 Article II. Nonprofit Purposes IRC Section 501 (c) (3) Purposes; Specific Objectives
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS ONLINE TRUST ALLIANCE
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF ONLINE TRUST ALLIANCE Incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington Effective September 1, 2012 AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF ONLINE TRUST ALLIANCE Incorporated
More informationThe Companies Act Company Limited by Shares
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares Articles of Association of PEEBLES RFC LIMITED (Trading as Peebles Rugby ) rms:26.05.16 The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares Articles of Association
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF NORTH TEXAS CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON PLANNED GIVING ARTICLE ONE NAME, PURPOSES, POWERS AND OFFICES
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF NORTH TEXAS CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON PLANNED GIVING ARTICLE ONE NAME, PURPOSES, POWERS AND OFFICES Section 1.1. Name. The name of this corporation is The North
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES and CHARLES H. BROWN Appellants. RENASANT BANK Appellee
E-Filed Document Aug 30 2017 17:21:30 2016-CA-01448-COA Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-01448 BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES and CHARLES H. BROWN Appellants v. RENASANT BANK Appellee
More informationIF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THESE TERMS, DO NOT DOWNLOAD, INSTALL OR USE BSC.
Bitvise SSH Client End User License Agreement Bitvise Limited, a Texas corporation with its principal office at 4105 Lombardy Court, Colleyville, Texas 76034, USA, ("Bitvise"), develops a Windows SSH client
More informationSCHAUMBURG COMMUNITY CONSOLIATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 54 PERFORMANCE-BASED ADMINISTRATOR CONTRACT (July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2021)
SCHAUMBURG COMMUNITY CONSOLIATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 54 PERFORMANCE-BASED ADMINISTRATOR CONTRACT (July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2021) THIS CONTRACT is made and entered as of the dates written below, by and
More informationWESTERN FOREST PRODUCTS INC. BYLAW N0. 1 A BYLAW RELATING GENERALLY TO THE CONDUCT OF THE AFFAIRS OF THE CORPORATION PART 1 INTERPRETATION
WESTERN FOREST PRODUCTS INC. BYLAW N0. 1 A BYLAW RELATING GENERALLY TO THE CONDUCT OF THE AFFAIRS OF THE CORPORATION PART 1 INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions In this bylaw and all other bylaws of the Corporation,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION LEXINGTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case: 5:17-cr-00121-KKC Doc #: 26 Filed: 06/28/18 Page: 1 of 8 - Page ID#: 117 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION LEXINGTON CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:17-CR-121-KKC UNITED
More informationLEHIGH-NORTHAMPTON AIRPORT AUTHORITY BYLAWS
LEHIGH-NORTHAMPTON AIRPORT AUTHORITY BYLAWS ARTICLE I - OFFICES Revised and Adopted December 23, 1997 Amended June 25, 2002 Amended September 24, 2002 Amended April 26, 2011 Amended January 24, 2012 Amended
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO. 653645/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------
More informationVALERO ENERGY CORPORATION BYLAWS
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION BYLAWS (Amended and Restated effective as of May 12, 2016) ARTICLE I. MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS Section 1. Date, Time and Location of Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of stockholders
More informationMotion to Correct Errors; and Formal Request for Findings of Fact of Conclusions of Law
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Cause No.: 04-CV-722-CVE-PJC Raymond G. CHAPMAN, individually, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Petitioners,
More information2:13-cv VAR-RSW Doc # 32 Filed 11/20/14 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 586 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
2:13-cv-12217-VAR-RSW Doc # 32 Filed 11/20/14 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 586 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 2:13-cv-12217-VAR-RSW v.
More informationENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT
ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT THIS ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made and entered into this day of, 2009, by and between the PacifiCorp Transmission Services, ( Transmission
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
Case: 11-31097 Document: 00512220659 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 11-31097 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus KENNETH
More informationCase 2:10-cv RLH -GWF Document 127 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 10
Case :0-cv-0-RLH -GWF Document Filed 0// Page of 0 SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 shawn@manganolaw.com SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 0 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 0 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 Tel: (0) 0-0
More informationBylaws of the Center for Watershed Protection As Amended through February 28, 2010
SECTION 1: PRINCIPAL OFFICE Bylaws of the Center for Watershed Protection As Amended through February 28, 2010 ARTICLE 1: OFFICES The principal office of the corporation is located in Howard County, State
More informationAGREEMENT NO CHARITABLE PLEDGE AGREEMENT
BEVERLY HILLS STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: July 5, 2016 To: Honorable Mayor & ity ouncil From: Nancy Hunt-offey, Assistant Director of ommunity Services Subject: Attachment: Request by Resnick Foundation
More informationLiverpool Victoria Friendly Society Limited RULES
Liverpool Victoria Friendly Society Limited RULES As approved at the Annual General Meeting held on 21 May 2009 and registered by the Financial Services Authority on 3 June 2009 Effective from: 3 June
More informationCase 1:10-cr RDB Document 54 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:10-cr-00181-RDB Document 54 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * * v. * * THOMAS ANDREWS DRAKE,
More informationBYLAWS COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF MOUNTAIN/PLAINS STATES (CHAMPS)
BYLAWS OF COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF MOUNTAIN/PLAINS STATES (CHAMPS) Adopted by CHAMPS Board Members February 19, 1985 Amended March 21, 1987 Amended July 24, 1987 Amended October 16, 1990 Amended
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al Doc. 475 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ARTHUR NADEL, SCOOP CAPITAL, LLC, SCOOP MANAGEMENT, INC. Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
More informationCase 2:10-cr MHT-WC Document 1869 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT-WC Document 1869 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CASE
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DATE OF REPORT August 7, 2003 (Date of Earliest
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:10-cr-20403-NGE-MKM Doc # 296 Filed 03/26/13 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 4615 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds
More informationCase 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 833 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT -WC Document 833 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR. NO. 2:10cr186-MHT
More informationBY-LAWS [MANAGER CORP.] (hereinafter called the "Corporation") ARTICLE I OFFICES. Section 1. Registered Office. The registered office of the
BY-LAWS OF [MANAGER CORP.] (hereinafter called the "Corporation") ARTICLE I OFFICES Section 1. Registered Office. The registered office of the Corporation shall be in the City of [To Come], County of [To
More informationIF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THESE TERMS, DO NOT DOWNLOAD, INSTALL OR USE BSC.
Bitvise SSH Client End User License Agreement Bitvise Limited, a Texas corporation with its principal office at 4105 Lombardy Ct, Colleyville, Texas 76034, USA, ("Bitvise"), develops a Windows SSH client
More informationCase 2:05-cr RBP-TMP Document 1117 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:05-cr-00061-RBP-TMP Document 1117 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Case Nos.
More informationEXHIBIT "B" ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION MEADOW RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC.
EXHIBIT "B" ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF MEADOW RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. Original: Written and executed 9 March 1984 Recorded with Sarasota County Clerk of Court 30 March 1984 (OR 1667 PG0752) Amendments:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON
- - 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON Pain Management Technologies, Inc., ) 0 Home Ave., Bldg. A ) Case No. Akron, Ohio 0, ) ) Judge Plaintiff,
More information