A New Method for Congressional Apportionment (Congress/representation/fair division/u.s. Constitution) M. L. BALINSKI AND H. P.
|
|
- Vivien Mildred Stanley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 71, No. 11, pp , November 1974 A New Method for Congressional Apportionment (Congress/representation/fair division/u.s. Constitution) M. L. BALINSKI AND H. P. YOUNG Ph.D. Program in Mathematics, Graduate School and University Center, The City University of New York, 33 West 42 Street, New York, N.Y Communicated by R. E. Gomory, August 6, 1974 ABSTRACT The problem of Congressional apportionment is explained together with a brief history of the methods used or considered for its solution. Reasons are given for rejecting the presently used method of equal proportions and for accepting a new method, the quota method, which is the unique method satisfying three essential axioms. 1. The apportionment problem The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States stipulates "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed," while Article I guarantees ". each State shall have at least one Representative" and that ".. enumeration shall be made... every years." If fractional Representatives were permitted, or if the numbers fortuitously turned out to be whole, the theoretically perfect solution could readily be calculated: the number of seats accorded to a particular State would be to the total number of seats in the House as the population of that State is to the total population of the United States. But equality in these proportions has never been achieved and clearly cannot ever be expected to be satisfied. This has caused decennial controversies over the "rounding" problem, indeed it prompted the first use of a Presidential veto by George Washington in 1792, and has led to considerable discussion concerning the specific meaning that should be attached to the phrase "according to their respective numbers." This, then, is the apportionment problem, as distinct from the districting problem (often called the "reapportionment problem"), which is that of determining geographical election districts having nearly equal populations within a State after the number of Representatives apportioned to the State is determined. The districting problem has received considerable attention in recent years due to the "one-man one-vote" Supreme Court rulings. 2. Formulation and brief history Let p (p1,..., p,) be the population of s states and h 2 0 the number of seats in the house. An apportionment for h is an s-tuple of nonnegative integers (ai,..., a,) satisfying 2 a j h. An apportionment solution is a function f, which for any p and every integer h 2 0, assigns a unique apportionment for h, at fj(ph) 2 0, Zfj (ph) h. An apportionment method M is a set of apportionment solutions f E M. (A method may yield Abbreviations: MF, method of major fractions; EP, method of equal proportions several solutions if there are "ties"; for example, if two states have the same populations, it is clear that a method has more than one solution.) The exact quota of state i in a house having h seats is q1 qt(p,h) pih/(2;pj). If qf were an integer for all i and h, the desired size of the house, at qj is clearly the "perfect solution." Otherwise, each state i should certainly receive at least as many seats as its lower quota [qjj (the largest integer less than or equal to qj) and certainly no more than its upper quota [qtl (the smallest integer greater than or equal to qt), since these result from "rounding" the exact quota qi down or up. In general, an apportionment method is said to satisfy lower quota if, for each of its solutions f, ft(p,h) _ lqj(ph) J, to satisfy upper quota if fj(p,h). [qj(p,h) 1, and to satisfy quota if it satisfies both lower and upper quota. The Vinton method of 1850 (or the Hare quota, ref. 1) was used to apportion Congress* from 1850 through It assigns, first, [qj] seats to each state i; then, it assigns one additional seat to each of the first h -218 [q11 states, ranked according to the largest fractional remainders qj - [qj]. Ties in the fractional remainders lead to multiple solutions, although, of course, the probability of this event is extremely small. Therefore, any Vinton solution satisfies quota. However, in 1881 it was discovered to possess a completely unacceptable property. Namely, in apportioning a House of 299 seats after the census of 1880 Alabama received eight seats, but in a House of 300 seats Alabama received only seven seats. This "Alabama paradox" is not an anomaly of the Vinton method. It caused Representative Littlefield of Maine to declare in 1901 "God help the State of Maine when mathematics reach for her... " after seeing Maine's delegation fluctuate up and down some six times as the House size increased from 383 to 400. An apportionment solution is said to be house monotone if f(ph + 1). f (ph) for all h and p, that is, if no state delegation can decrease as the house increases with fixed populations. An apportionment method is house monotone if all its solutions are. House monotonicity is a second seemingly essential property of any acceptable apportionment method. In 1910 Willcox (3) devised the method of major fractions (MF) which was used to apportion Congress in 1911 and (For various political reasons the apportionment of 1911' remained in force for 20 years.) The idea is simply that the quota of each state should be rounded to the nearest integer. In general, such an assignment will not necessarily arrive at an apportionment of precisely h seats. However, it is possible * Before 1850 the size of the house was not fixed in advance (2).
2 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71 (1974) (save for "ties") to find a number h and to define "pseudoquotas" jt qi(p,h) such that if each state satisfying qt 1qd - > l/2 gets [qi I seats and each state satisfying qi - [i < 1/2 gets [qtj seats, then the sum of the seats apportioned is exactly h. The method of major fractions (MF) does not satisfy quota; but it is house monotone, as is easily verified. In 1921, E. V. Huntington (4) first proposed the method of equal proportions (EP) and devised an approach in which to embed this method. The permanent apportionment section of the Census Act of 18 June 1929 provided that apportionment be computed by (i) the method used in the preceding census, (ii) MF, and (iii) EP, and that all be presented to Congress. EP and MF happened to give identical results for the 1930 census. But in 1941, MF gave Arkansas and Michigan 6 and 18 seats, respectively, while EP gave them 7 and 17, respectively. Hotly contested bearings (5, 6) and other discussion led to the definitive acceptance of EP (Public Law 291, H.R. 2665) for the apportionment of 1941 and thence forth. 3. The method of equal proportions and Huntington methods Huntington's essential ideas were, firstt, (ref. 4, p. 123): "In a satisfactory apportionment between two states (pi greater than pj), we shall agree that pj/ai and pj/aj should be as nearly equal as possible; also at/pt and aj/pj; also pt/p1 and aj/aj; also pj/pt and aj/at." In particular, pt/at represents the average number of inhabitants per Congressional district in state i, and (at/pt) * 108 the average number of Representatives per million inhabitants in state i. In a perfect apportionment each of these pairs (and many others) would be equal. Second, (ref. 4, p. 124): "In a satisfactory apportionment, there should be no pair of states which is capable of being 'improved' by a transfer of a representative within the pair-the word 'improvement' being understood in the sense implied by the test [of difference] adopted " This asks for a solution that is stable in the sense that no inequality difference according to the measure chosen can be reduced by transferring one seat from one state delegation to another. Huntington advanced as the best test, or measure, of "nearly equal" the relative difference [the relative difference between x and y is (lx - yl/min(x,y)] between pt/at and pjlaj or between at/pt and aj/pj or between any of the pairs mentioned above, since all these relative differences are precisely equal. In trying various differences (7) it was found that either the test does not guarantee the existence of a stable solution or one of five distinct solutions result, one of which is EP and corresponds to the relative difference test and another of which is MF. Each of the five methods can be characterized by a ranking function r(a,p) as follows: if f(p,h) {ft(p,h) } is a solution for house size h, thenft(p,h + 1) f,(p,h) for i # k and fk(p,h + 1) fk(ph) + 1, where k is some one state satisfying r(akpk) 2 r(at,pi) for all i, is a solution for house size h + 1. Any apportionment method that is so specified by a ranking function is called a Huntington method. Clearly any Huntington method is house monotone. The five methods alluded to above are Huntington methods, and are commonly referred to as the "modern workable methods" because they avoid the Alabama paradox. Table 1 defines them by listing the measure t The citations are precise except for notational changes. A New Method for Congressional Apportionment 4603 TABLE 1. The five "modern workable methods" for Congressional apportionment Stable for test T (where pi/ai _ Ranking function Method pilai) r(a,p) Smallest divisors T,: a, - ai(pj/pi) p/a Harmonic mean T2: pi/ai - pjaj p/{ 2a(a + 1)/(2a + 1)} Equal proportions (EP) T3: pia,/pjai - 1 p/{a(a + 1 )1 1/2 Major fractions (MF) T4: a,/pj - ajpj p/(a + 1/2) Greatest divisors* T5: aj(pi/pj) - a, p/(a + 1) * Also known as the method of d'hondt. of difference or stability criterion and the associated ranking function for each. There appears to be one traditional two-phase argument for accepting EP. As stated in a report to the National Academy of Sciences (1), "there are five methods of apportionment now known which are unambiguous and should be considered... In the present state of knowledge... these [are] the only methods of apportionment avoiding the so-called Alabama paradox which require consideration at this time" (8). (2) The five methods are listed above in the order in which they tend to favor small states, the method of smallest devisors tending to most favor small state, that of greatest divisors to most favor large states. The report goes on to say EP "... is preferred... because it occupies a neutral position with respect to emphasis on larger and smaller states" (8). Thus, EP is supported because it is house-monotone, and of the known house-monotone methods it "occupies the central position among the five methods" (ref. 7, p. 103). A 1948 National Academy of Sciences Report (9) sustains EP as the best compromise with an additional argument. If the tests T2, T3, and T4 are accepted as the most natural ones of the five, then EP can be measured by them as against each of the other four methods. Clearly the method of harmonic mean is always best by T2; EP is always best by T3; MF is always best by T4; but, otherwise, EP is either (and usually) better than every method or not comparable in general by each test. Incredibly, all modern contributors and judges simply disregard the fact that EP does not satisfy quota. "Now it is a common misconception that in a good apportionment the actual assignment should not differ from the exact quota by more than one whole unit." [ref. 7, p. 94]. "The proper apportionment... may differ by several units from the number obtained by simple proportion" (8). Although the fact was recognized, the implicit inference of the examples illustrating it (7) is that the event is rare and at worse minor in magnitude. But, "... as a proper method of apportionment must meet every conceivable variation in population no matter how fantastic" (ref. 2, p. 73), consider the following two, which are very much in the tradition of the many lovely examples given by Huntington (7). If p (pi,...,ps), s 33, pi 60,272, pi i for 2 < i < 33, thus Zipi 100,000, and h 102; then qi , q ,..., q , are the exact quotas, but the unique EP solution is a, 68, a2. a3l 1, a32 a33 2. On the other hand, if s 21, pi 68,010, pi i, 2 < i < 21, thus Zips 100,000, and h 98; then q, , q ,..., q2l 1.577, are
3 4604 Political Science: Balinski and Young the exact quotas, but the unique EP solution is a, 60, a2 a3 1, a4... a2l 2. These are, of course, "fantastic" artificial examples. Table 2, however, contains two examples with "realistic" (possible) data for the United States "censuses of 1984", called, respectively, 1984 A and 1984 B, for which exact quotas and the EP solutions are given. In 1984 A the exact quotas and unique EP solution [written here as (qi,ai) for state i] are for California (42.960, 45), for New York (39.939, 42), and for Pennsylvania (24.974, 26); while in 1984 B they are for California (43.167, 41), for New York (39.031, 37) and for Pennsylvania (25.138, 24). This possibility surely makes EP unacceptable. As the constitutional authority Z. Chafee, Jr. pointed out, "the preservation of a respect for the law will in the long run be best obtained by the adoption of the plan which is least likely to product a sense of unfairness in those who are forced to obey legislation" (ref. 10, pp ). More generally, the following result obtains: THEOREM 1. There exists no Huntington method satisfying quota. Of the five "modern workable" methods, only one, that of smallest divisors, satisfies upper quota; and only one, that of greatest divisors, satisfies lower quota. 4. The quota method Q Given a method M, a solution restricted to h, fh, is a solution ofm for which only the values f(p,0),...,f (p,h) are specified. A completion of fh is any solution of M agreeing with fh. There may be several completions of a given f'. Given an apportionment as fj(p,h) the set of states eligible at h + 1, E(h + 1) { i; as < pi(h + 1)/2pi) } are those states that can receive an additional seat in a house h + 1 without violating upper quota. Let p* and p be the populations of some two states, and suppose that by some solution f E M, where M is house-monotone, the star-state is eligible at h for its (d* + 1)st seat and the bar-state is eligible at h for its (a + 1)st seat, but f gives the hth seat to the star-state. Then the star-state is said to have weak-priority by M over the bar-state at p*, p, a*, and a. Since both states were eligible and the star-state received the extra seat, its claim to the extra seat is certainly as good as that of the bar-state. A natural requirement for any method M is that the relative claims for an extra seat between two states should depend only upon their respective populations p* and p and current apportionments a* and a. To be precise, suppose that the star-state has weak priority by M over the bar-state, at p*, p, a*, and a. Let g E M be a solution for some population vector q, which contains a pair of states having populations p* and p, and suppose these states are, respectively, eligible for their (a* + 1)st and (a + 1)st seats at h', but that g gives the h'th seat to the bar-state rather than the star-state. Then M is said to be consistent if g"'-', the restriction of g up to h'- 1, has an extension by which the h'th seat is given to the star-state. That is, a method M is consistent if it never switches priorities at p*, p, a*, a unless the two states have equal claim to the extra seat. Clearly, any Huntington method is consistent, in fact is consistent even if the condition of eligibility is dropped. The clear and obvious question is: does there exist a consistent, house-monotone method satisfying quota? These are the three properties which, in view of "fairness" and the history of Congressional apportionment in the United States, are essential. Further, is there a unique such method, in the sense that any solution satisfying the given requirements must also be obtainable by this particular method? THEOREM 2. There exists a unique consistent, house-monotone method Q Q (p) satisfying qaota. This Q, called the quota method, is the set of all solutions so obtained recursively as follows: W(i) i(pao O. 1 _< i < s (ii) Given aj vi(ph) and E(h + 1) {i; a, < pi (h + 1)/ 2npj) },let k E E(h + 1) be some one state satisfying Pk/(ak + 1) > pj/(aj + 1) for all i E E(h + 1). Then, (Pk(p,h + 1) ak + 1, Vp(p,h + 1) a all i $ k. It is obvious that an apportionment solution satisfying quota cannot in general meet the Constitution's requirement that each state is to receive at least one seat. For example, in a house of 50 seats the 1970 exact California quota is One of the requirements habitually cited to support EP (and also applicable to the methods of smallest divisor and harmonic mean) is that it automatically provides (for h > s) at least one seat per state. This is, in fact, another weakness of EP. For, if p (108, 1, I,1) is a 50-tuple of populations, all EP solutions give f(p,.50) (1,1,..,1), in clear violation of any reasonable notion of fair division. Further, minimum requirements may be different from 1, as for example in France where the minimum number of "deputes" per "department" is 2. Therefore, minimum requirements must be explicitly recognized. To this end the various definitions previously stated need to be generalized (the same words will be used to avoid a repetitive qualifier such as "generalized.", since this can cause no confusion). Let r (r,,,r,), where ri is the minimum number of representatives permitted in state i, be the requirement vector. A house size h is said to be feasible if h _ 2 ri h. An apportionment solution is a function f(p,r) which for any p,r and every feasible h assigns an s-tuple of integers as f(p,r,h), 1 _ i. s, satisfying as _ ri and Mai h. An apportionment method M, is, for each p,r, a set of apportionment solutions f (p,r) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71 (1974) E M (p,r). Let I {I, Is} be the set of all states. If phi! (2;ip). ri, then state i deserves in a house of size h at most ri seats, while it is required to receive at least rj. Thus, it should receive exactly rj seats. When these states are eliminated from consideration, the number of seats each of the remaining states deserves may be determined, and so on. Define, then, for any h, Jo I, ho h, J i E Jo; piho/(yjopj) > ri}, and h, ho - Xjoj, ri. Any state i E J, deserves pjh,/(zt1p1) seats, so if ri is at least this large then i should receive exactly ri seats. Let J2 i E J,; pih,/(2 j,p1) > rj}, h2 h, - 2sl-2 ri, and continue. This produces a nested sequencei Jo D Ji D D J. and h ho > h,>... > h. such that either J,, p or qj(p,r,h) pih,2/(tjspj) > ri for all i C JU. J, 1., (p,r,h) is called the slack set at h since any other state Z J,, should receive exactly ri seats. Define, therefore,
4 Proc. Nat. A cad. Sci. USA 71 (1974) A New Method for Congressional Apportionment 4605 TABLE 2. Apportionments of 435 seats by the method of equal roportin and the quota method for 1970, 1984A and 984B. Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Totals A 1984 B p q EP Q p q EP Q p q EP Q 3,475, ,659, ,608, , , , ,787, ,184, ,885, ,942, ,176, ,948, ,098, ,839, ,944, ,226, ,664, ,410, ,050, ,158, ,438, , , , ,855, ,081, ,671, ,627, ,112, ,053, , , , , , , ,184, ,947, ,290, ,228, ,610, ,570, ,846, ,161, ,958, ,265, ,675, , ,246, ,657, ,465, ,672, ,140, ,968, ,006, ,078, ,298, ,953, ,131, ,978, ,726, ,085, ,086, ,937, ,438, ,489, ,833, ,129, ,003, ,233, ,679, ,421, ,718, ,123, ,108, , , , ,496, ,643, ,834, , , , , , , ,208, ,573, ,676, ,026, ,182, ,313, ,338, ,303, ,842, ,125, ,614, ,552, , , , ,730, ,437, ,735, ,585, ,675, ,901, ,110, ,182, ,385, ,884, ,696, ,779, , ,131, ,316, ,617, ,674, ,905, , , , ,961, ,133, ,031, ,298, ,176, ,228, ,067, ,197, ,360, , , , ,690, ,098, ,026, ,443, ,648, ,519, ,763, ,691, ,854, ,447, ,631, ,519, , , , ,053, ,138, ,138, p populations; q exact quotas; EP equal proportions solution; Q quota solution with minimum requirements. the lower quota l(p,r,h) of state i to be rj if i Z.J,,(p,r,h) and jq(p,r,h) J otherwise; and the upper quota ui(p,r,h) of state i to be max{rj, [pjh/1pji1 } if i Z.J,,(p,r,h) and [pih/(2lpj) 1 otherwise. An apportionment method is said to satisfy quota if for every solution f(p,r), l(p,r,h) < ft(p,r,h) < ut(p,r,h). This generalized definition of a method satisfying quota results simply from the necessity of guaranteeing to each state i at least ri seats. The upper quota is not changed by imposing requirements, except for the case where a state's requirement exceeds its upper quota. An apportionment method M(p,r) is house-monotone if for every solution f(p,r) E M(p,r), f(p,r,h + 1) _ f(p,r,h). An apportionment method M(p,r) is consistent if it satisfies precisely the same definition as that given earlier. The require-
5 4606 Political Science: Balinski and Young ments in a problem p, r are said to be unbiased if pi. pj implies pj/ri _ p1/rj. That is, if state i is larger than or equal to state j, then state i's minimum allocation does not give it an advantage over state j's minimum allocation. THEOREM 3. There exists a unique consistent, house-monotone method for unbiased requirements Q Q(p,r) satisfying quota. Any solution Q of the quota method Q is obtained recursively for unbiased requirements as follows [if the requirements are biased the theorem obtains, but the method is slightly more complicated because E(h + 1) must be replaced by E(h + 1) n.j,, (p,r,h + 1) ]: (i) (pj(p,r~h) ri, 1 :! i S5 s (ii) h _ h. Given as.ri(p,r,h) and E(h + 1) {i; aj < pi(h + W)/(Zp1)}, let k E E(h + 1) be some one state satisfying pk/(ak + 1) _ pi/(aj + 1) for-all i E E(h + 1). Then, (Pk(pr,h + 1) ak+ 1 #Pi(p,r,h + 1) a for all i 5 k. The unique solutions of Q Q(p,r), wherer (1,,1) and p (the apportionment populations) are given by the censuses of 1970, 1984 A, and 1984 B, are displayed, together with the unique equal proportion solutions, in Table Conclusion The virtue of the quota method is that it unites the two basic apportionment principles-house-monotonicity and quotainto a single method. It replaces Huntington's artificial "measures of inequality" with a more fundamental measure of fairness, the exact quota, and does this without introducing the Alabama paradox. Moreover, subject to mathematical consistency, it is the only apportionment method with these two properties. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71 (1974) Therefore, Congress should consider replacing Public Law 291, H.R with a law declaring that, from the apportionment act of 1981 on, the quota method Q be used to deternine the distribution of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. This work was supported by the Army Research Office under Contract no. DA ARO(D) Hoag, C. G. & Hallet, G. H. (1926) in Proportional Representation (The MacMillan Company, New York), pp Schmeckebier, L. F. (1941) Congressional Apportionment (The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.). 3. Willcox, W. F. (1916) Amer. Econ. Rev. VI, Supplement, Huntington, E. V. (1921) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 7, Hearings before the Committee on the Census, (1940), House of Representatives, 76th Congress, Third Session, on the Apportionment of Representatives in Congress, 27, 28 February and 1, 5 March, Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Commerce, (1941), United States Senate, 77th Congress, First Session on H.R. 2665, 27,28 February and 1 March Huntington, E. V. (1928) Amer. Math. Soc. Trams. 30, Bliss, G. A., Brown, E. W., Eisenhart, L. P. & Pearl, R. (1929) Report to the President of the National Academy of Sciences, 9 February 1929 (in Hearings before the Committee on the Census, (1940), House of Representatives, 76th Congress, Third Session, on the Apportionment of Representatives in Congress, 27, 28 February and 1, 5 March, 1940, pp Morse, M., von Neumann, J. & Eisenhart, L. P. (1948) Report to the President of the National Academy of Sciences, 28 May 194S. 10. Chafee, Z., Jr. (1929) Harvard Law Rev. XLI,
Apportionment. Seven Roads to Fairness. NCTM Regional Conference. November 13, 2014 Richmond, VA. William L. Bowdish
Apportionment Seven Roads to Fairness NCTM Regional Conference November 13, 2014 Richmond, VA William L. Bowdish Mathematics Department (Retired) Sharon High School Sharon, Massachusetts 02067 bilbowdish@gmail.com
More informationRounding decimals or fractions to whole numbers might seem to be one of the most boring subjects ever.
Apportionment Rounding decimals or fractions to whole numbers might seem to be one of the most boring subjects ever. However, as we will see, the method used in rounding can be of great significance. Some
More information12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment
12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment Group Activities 12C Apportionment 1. A college offers tutoring in Math, English, Chemistry, and Biology. The number of students enrolled in each subject is listed
More informationChapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS
12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS Group Activities 12C Apportionment 1. A college offers tutoring in Math, English, Chemistry, and Biology. The number of students enrolled in each subject
More informationMatthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research
Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research Arkansas (reelection) Georgia (reelection) Idaho (reelection) Kentucky (reelection) Michigan (partisan nomination - reelection) Minnesota (reelection) Mississippi
More information2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State
2016 Voter s by Alabama 10/24/2016 https://www.alabamavotes.gov/electioninfo.aspx?m=vote rs Alaska 10/9/2016 (Election Day registration permitted for purpose of voting for president and Vice President
More informationDelegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules
Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules About 4,051 pledged About 712 unpledged 2472 delegates Images from: https://ballotpedia.org/presidential_election,_2016 On the news I hear about super
More informationPERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No
PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES State Member Conference Call Vote Member Electronic Vote/ Email Board of Directors Conference Call Vote Board of Directors Electronic Vote/ Email
More informationShould Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund
Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? 1 Politicians are drawing their own voting maps to manipulate elections and keep themselves and their party in power. 2 3 -The U.S. Constitution requires that the
More informationFUNDING FOR HOME HEATING IN RECONCILIATION BILL? RIGHT IDEA, WRONG VEHICLE by Aviva Aron-Dine and Martha Coven
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org December 9, 2005 FUNDING FOR HOME HEATING IN RECONCILIATION BILL? RIGHT IDEA, WRONG
More informationFEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/03/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-01963, and on FDsys.gov 6715-01-U FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
More informationIf you have questions, please or call
SCCE's 17th Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute: CLE Approvals By State The SCCE submitted sessions deemed eligible for general CLE credits and legal ethics CLE credits to most states with CLE requirements
More informationFederal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs
Federal Rate of Return FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs Texas has historically been, and continues to be, the biggest donor to other states when it comes to federal highway
More informationRegulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2008
Regulating Elections: Districts 17.251/252 Fall 2008 Major ways that congressional elections are regulated The Constitution Basic stuff (age, apportionment, states given lots of autonomy) Federalism key
More informationNew Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020
[Type here] Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 0 0.00 tel. or 0 0. 0 0. fax Info@electiondataservices.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: December, 0 Contact: Kimball W. Brace Tel.: (0) 00 or (0) 0- Email:
More informationMEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS
Knowledge Management Office MEMORANDUM Re: Ref. No.: By: Date: Regulation of Retired Judges Serving as Arbitrators and Mediators IS 98.0561 Jerry Nagle, Colleen Danos, and Anne Endress Skove October 22,
More informationACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health
1 ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1 Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health LAWS ALABAMA http://www.legislature.state.al.us/codeofalabama/1975/coatoc.htm RULES ALABAMA http://www.alabamaadministrativecode.state.al.us/alabama.html
More informationThe House of Representatives Apportionment Formula: An Analysis of Proposals for Change and Their Impact on States
The House of Representatives Apportionment Formula: An Analysis of Proposals for Change and Their Impact on States Royce Crocker Specialist in American National Government August 26, 2010 Congressional
More informationINSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY
INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY Harry S Truman School of Public Affairs University of Missouri ANALYSIS OF STATE REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Andrew Wesemann and Brian Dabson Summary This report analyzes state
More informationThe Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.
The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance. Privilege and Communication Between Professionals Summary of Research Findings Question Addressed: Which jurisdictions
More informationAmerican Government. Workbook
American Government Workbook WALCH PUBLISHING Table of Contents To the Student............................. vii Unit 1: What Is Government? Activity 1 Monarchs of Europe...................... 1 Activity
More informationNational State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1
National State Law Survey: Limitations 1 Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware DC Florida Georgia Hawaii limitations Trafficking and CSEC within 3 limit for sex trafficking,
More informationLimitations on Contributions to Political Committees
Limitations on Contributions to Committees Term for PAC Individual PAC Corporate/Union PAC Party PAC PAC PAC Transfers Alabama 10-2A-70.2 $500/election Alaska 15.13.070 Group $500/year Only 10% of a PAC's
More informationName Chapter 14 Apportionment. 1. What was the Great Compromise in 1787? Populations of 15 states in 1790 as in your book on page 506:
Name Chapter 14 Apportionment 1. What was the Great Compromise in 1787? Populations of 15 states in 1790 as in your book on page 506: State Population Number Number Number Number Virginia 630,560 Massachusetts
More informationNew Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge
67 Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 202 202 789.2004 tel. or 703 580.7267 703 580.6258 fax Info@electiondataservices.com EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:0 P.M. EST, SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 200 Date: September 26, 200
More informationNotice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code
Notice Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2009 Classification Code N 4520.201 Date March 25, 2009 Office of Primary Interest HCFB-1 1. What is the purpose of this
More informationMore State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case
[Type here] 6171 Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 20112 202 789.2004 tel. or 703 580.7267 703 580.6258 fax Info@electiondataservices.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: December 22, 2015 Contact: Kimball
More information2018 Constituent Society Delegate Apportionment
Memo to: From: Executive Directors State Medical Associations James L. Madara, MD Date: February 1, Subject: Constituent Society Apportionment I am pleased to provide delegate apportionment figures for.
More informationWYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Wednesday, December 19, 2018 Contact: Dr. Wenlin Liu, Chief Economist WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY CHEYENNE -- Wyoming s total resident population contracted to 577,737 in
More information2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA
Southern Tier East Census Monograph Series Report 11-1 January 2011 2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA The United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 2, requires a decennial census for the
More informationDemocratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary
Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, and s Chronologically http://www.thegreenpapers.com/p08/events.phtml?s=c 1 of 9 5/29/2007 2:23 PM Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, and s Chronologically Disclaimer: These
More informationBylaws of the. Student Membership
Bylaws of the American Meat Science Association Student Membership American Meat Science Association Articles I. Name and Purpose 1.1. Name 1.2. Purpose 1.3. Affiliation II. Membership 2.1. Eligibility
More informationRegistered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010
Topic: Registered Agents Question by: Kristyne Tanaka Jurisdiction: Hawaii Date: 27 October 2010 Jurisdiction Question(s) Does your State allow registered agents to resign from a dissolved entity? For
More informationThe remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.
ills and ill Processing 3-17 Referral of ills The first major step in the legislative process is to introduce a bill; the second is to have it heard by a committee. ut how does legislation get from one
More informationProportional (Mis)representation: The Mathematics of Apportionment
Proportional (Mis)representation: The Mathematics of Apportionment Vicki Powers Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science Emory University Kennesaw College Infinite Horizon Series Sept. 27, 2012 What is
More informationCase 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5 Michele D. Ross Reed Smith LLP 1301 K Street NW Suite 1000 East Tower Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: 202 414-9297 Fax: 202 414-9299 Email:
More informationRhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide
Rhoads Online Appointment Rules Handy Guide ALABAMA Yes (15) DOI date approved 27-7-30 ALASKA Appointments not filed with DOI. Record producer appointment in SIC register within 30 days of effective date.
More informationSTATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE
STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE THE PROBLEM: Federal child labor laws limit the kinds of work for which kids under age 18 can be employed. But as with OSHA, federal
More informationTHE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE
THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE STATE RENEWAL Additional information ALABAMA Judgment good for 20 years if renewed ALASKA ARIZONA (foreign judgment 4 years)
More informationElder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs
Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs Overview Financial crimes and exploitation can involve the illegal or improper
More informationCampaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).
Exhibit E.1 Alabama Alabama Secretary of State Mandatory Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily). PAC (annually), Debts. A filing threshold of $1,000 for all candidates for office, from statewide
More informationState Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010
ALABAMA: G X X X de novo District, Probate, s ALASKA: ARIZONA: ARKANSAS: de novo or on the de novo (if no ) G O X X de novo CALIFORNIA: COLORADO: District Court, Justice of the Peace,, County, District,
More informationThe Electoral College And
The Electoral College And National Popular Vote Plan State Population 2010 House Apportionment Senate Number of Electors California 37,341,989 53 2 55 Texas 25,268,418 36 2 38 New York 19,421,055 27 2
More informationWomen in Federal and State-level Judgeships
Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships A Report of the Center for Women in Government & Civil Society, Rockefeller College of Public Affairs & Policy, University at Albany, State University of New
More informationRed, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?
1 What are the colors of our flag? Red, white, and blue 2 What do the stars on the flag mean? One for each state 3 How many stars are there on our flag? There are 50 stars on our flag. 4 What color are
More informationRegulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2012
Regulating Elections: Districts 17.251/252 Fall 2012 Throat Clearing Preferences The Black Box of Rules Outcomes Major ways that congressional elections are regulated The Constitution Basic stuff (age,
More informationWe re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge
Citizens for Tax Justice 202-626-3780 September 23, 2003 (9 pp.) Contact: Bob McIntyre We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing
More informationState Complaint Information
State Complaint Information Each state expects the student to exhaust the University's grievance process before bringing the matter to the state. Complaints to states should be made only if the individual
More informationBackground Information on Redistricting
Redistricting in New York State Citizens Union/League of Women Voters of New York State Background Information on Redistricting What is redistricting? Redistricting determines the lines of state legislative
More informationDecember 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote
STATE OF VERMONT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STATE HOUSE 115 STATE STREET MONTPELIER, VT 05633-5201 December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote To Members
More informationFor jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?
Topic: Question by: : Rejected Filings due to Punctuation Errors Regina Goff Kansas Date: March 20, 2014 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware
More informationElection Year Restrictions on Mass Mailings by Members of Congress: How H.R Would Change Current Law
Election Year Restrictions on Mass Mailings by Members of Congress: How H.R. 2056 Would Change Current Law Matthew Eric Glassman Analyst on the Congress August 20, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS
More informationNOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018
NOTICE TO MEMBERS No. 2018-004 January 2, 2018 Trading by U.S. Residents Canadian Derivatives Clearing Corporation (CDCC) maintains registrations with various U.S. state securities regulatory authorities
More informationRevised December 10, 2007
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Revised December 10, 2007 PRESIDENT S VETOES COULD CAUSE HALF A MILLION LOW-INCOME PREGNANT
More informationComponents of Population Change by State
IOWA POPULATION REPORTS Components of 2000-2009 Population Change by State April 2010 Liesl Eathington Department of Economics Iowa State University Iowa s Rate of Population Growth Ranks 43rd Among All
More informationSurvey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers
Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers Alabama Ala. Code 5-17-4(10) To exercise incidental powers as necessary to enable it to carry on effectively the purposes for which it is incorporated
More information2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS
2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS MANUAL ADOPTED AT LAS VEGAS, NEVADA July 2008 Affix to inside front cover of your 2005 Constitution CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES Constitution
More informationDATA BREACH CLAIMS IN THE US: An Overview of First Party Breach Requirements
State Governing Statutes 1st Party Breach Notification Notes Alabama No Law Alaska 45-48-10 Notification must be made "in the most expeditious time possible and without unreasonable delay" unless it will
More information7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents
Legislative Documents 7-45 Electronic Access to Legislative Documents Paper is no longer the only medium through which the public can gain access to legislative documents. State legislatures are using
More informationLAST WORDS ON THE APPORTIONMENT PROBLEM
LAST WORDS ON THE APPORTIONMENT PROBLEM WALnhR F. Wnw.cox* This paper has been prepared in response to the editor's request for "a review of the methods of congressional reapportionment addressed to the
More informationMap of the Foreign Born Population of the United States, 1900
Introduction According to the 1900 census, the population of the United States was then 76.3 million. Nearly 14 percent of the population approximately 10.4 million people was born outside of the United
More informationNORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office Kory Goldsmith, Interim Legislative Services Officer Research Division 300 N. Salisbury Street, Suite 545 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Tel. 919-733-2578
More informationOverall, in our view, this is where the race stands with Newt Gingrich still an active candidate:
To: Interested Parties From: Nick Ryan, RWB Executive Director Re: Our Analysis of the Status of RNC Convention Delegates Date: March 22, 2012 With 33 jurisdictions having voted so far, we thought this
More informationSTATUS OF 2002 REED ACT DISTRIBUTION BY STATE
STATUS OF 2002 REED ACT DISTRIBUTION BY STATE Revised January 2003 State State Reed Act Reed Act Funds Appropriated* (as of November 2002) Comments on State s Reed Act Activity Alabama $110,623,477 $16,650,000
More informationThe Congressional Apportionment Problem Based on the Census : Basic Divisor Methods
Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Congressional Apportionment Open Educational Resources and Data 10-2015 The Congressional Apportionment Problem Based on the Census
More informationAccountability-Sanctions
Accountability-Sanctions Education Commission of the States 700 Broadway, Suite 801 Denver, CO 80203-3460 303.299.3600 Fax: 303.296.8332 www.ecs.org Student Accountability Initiatives By Michael Colasanti
More informationMATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics
MATH 1340 Mathematics & Politics Lecture 13 July 9, 2015 Slides prepared by Iian Smythe for MATH 1340, Summer 2015, at Cornell University 1 Apportionment A survey 2 All legislative Powers herein granted
More informationDecision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017
United States s Arlington, Texas The Economic Indices for the U.S. s have increased in the past 12 months. The Middle Atlantic Division had the highest score of all the s, with an score of 114 for. The
More informationHow Many Illegal Aliens Currently Live in the United States?
How Many Illegal Aliens Currently Live in the United States? OCTOBER 2017 As of 2017, FAIR estimates that there are approximately 12.5 million illegal aliens residing in the United States. This number
More informationLaws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015
Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015 State Statute Year Statute Alabama* Ala. Information Technology Policy 685-00 (Applicable to certain Executive
More informationFranklin D. Roosevelt. Pertaining to the. Campaign of 1928
Franklin D. Roosevelt Pa~ers Pertaining to the Campaign of 1928 Accession Numbers: Ms 41-61, Ms 46-64, Ms.48-21, Ms 55-1 The papers were presented to the Library in November of 19L,0 by Franklin D. Roosevelt.
More informationAmerica is facing an epidemic of the working hungry. Hunger Free America s analysis of federal data has determined:
Key Findings: America is facing an epidemic of the working hungry. Hunger Free America s analysis of federal data has determined: Approximately 16 million American adults lived in food insecure households
More informationTELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES
TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; June 26, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES 2003-R-0469 By: Kevin E. McCarthy, Principal Analyst
More informationElection Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 8, Nomination Deadline: October 9, 2017.
Election Notice FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election Nomination Deadline: October 9, 2017 September 8, 2017 Suggested Routing Executive Representatives Senior Management Executive Summary The purpose
More informationCIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws
FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws By Emily Hoban Kirby and Mark Hugo Lopez 1 June 2004 Recent voting
More information2016 us election results
1 of 6 11/12/2016 7:35 PM 2016 us election results All News Images Videos Shopping More Search tools About 243,000,000 results (0.86 seconds) 2 WA OR NV CA AK MT ID WY UT CO AZ NM ND MN SD WI NY MI NE
More informationNational Latino Peace Officers Association
National Latino Peace Officers Association Bylaws & SOP Changes: Vote for ADD STANDARD X Posting on Facebook, Instagram, text message and etc.. shall be in compliance to STANDARD II - MISSION NATIONAL
More informationUnion Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015
January 21 Union Byte 21 By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 4 Washington, DC 29 tel: 22-293-38 fax: 22-88-136 www.cepr.net Cherrie
More informationCommittee Consideration of Bills
Committee Procedures 4-79 Committee Consideration of ills It is not possible for all legislative business to be conducted by the full membership; some division of labor is essential. Legislative committees
More informationUNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933
Item 1. Issuer s Identity UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 Name of Issuer Previous Name(s) None Entity Type
More informationADVANCEMENT, JURISDICTION-BY-JURISDICTION
, JURISDICTION-B-JURISDICTION Jurisdictions that make advancement statutorily mandatory subject to opt-out or limitation. EXPRESSL MANDATOR 1 Minnesota 302A. 521, Subd. 3 North Dakota 10-19.1-91 4. Ohio
More informationFair Division in Theory and Practice
Fair Division in Theory and Practice Ron Cytron (Computer Science) Maggie Penn (Political Science) Lecture 3: Apportionment 1 Fair representation We would like to allocate seats proportionally to the 50
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS20273 Updated September 8, 2003 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Electoral College: How It Works in Contemporary Presidential Elections Thomas H. Neale Government and
More informationat New York University School of Law A 50 state guide to redistricting
at New York University School of Law A 50 state guide to redistricting ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public
More informationParties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12
Parties and Elections Selections from Chapters 11 & 12 Party Eras in American History Party Eras Historical periods in which a majority of voters cling to the party in power Critical Election An electoral
More informationTable 3.10 LEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION: OTHER PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS
Table 3.10 LEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION: OTHER PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS Alabama... ne, although annual appropriation to certain positions may be so allocated.,, Alaska... Senators receive $10,000/y and Representatives
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS20273 Updated January 17, 2001 The Electoral College: How it Works in Contemporary Presidential Elections Thomas H. Neale Analyst, American
More informationChapter 4 The Mathematics of Apportionment
Quesions on Homework on Voting Methods? Chapter 4 The Mathematics of Apportionment How many representatives should each state have? For California: = 52.59 For Ohio = 16.29 in 2000 census = 17.58 18 Districts
More informationACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/23/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-03495, and on FDsys.gov 4191-02U SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
More informationState-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools
State-by-State Chart of -Specific s and Prosecutorial Tools 34 States, 2 Territories, and the Federal Government have -Specific Criminal s Last updated August 2017 -Specific Criminal? Each state or territory,
More informationRedistricting in Michigan
Dr. Martha Sloan of the Copper Country League of Women Voters Redistricting in Michigan Should Politicians Choose their Voters? Politicians are drawing their own voting maps to manipulate elections and
More informationadditional amount is paid purchase greater amount. coverage with option to State provides $30,000 State pays 15K policy; by legislator. S.P. O.P.
Table 3.10 LEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION: OTHER PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS Alabama..., although annual appropriation to certain positions may be so allocated.,, Alaska... Senators receive $20,000/year or $10,00/year
More informationDepartment of Justice
Department of Justice ADVANCE FOR RELEASE AT 5 P.M. EST BJS SUNDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1995 202/307-0784 STATE AND FEDERAL PRISONS REPORT RECORD GROWTH DURING LAST 12 MONTHS WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The number of
More informationRepresentational Bias in the 2012 Electorate
Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate by Vanessa Perez, Ph.D. January 2015 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3 4 2 Methodology 5 3 Continuing Disparities in the and Voting Populations 6-10 4 National
More informationTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY THURGOOD MARSHALL SCHOOL OF LAW LIBRARY LOCATION GUIDE July 2018
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY THURGOOD MARSHALL SCHOOL OF LAW LIBRARY LOCATION GUIDE July 2018 ITEMS LOCATION ITEMS LOCATION Administrative Decisions Under Immigration and 116 Board of Tax Appeal Reports 115
More informationSome Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: December 20, 2017 Contact: Kimball W. Brace 6171 Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 20112 202 789.2004 tel. or 703 580.7267 703 580.6258 fax Info@electiondataservices.com Tel.:
More informationDepartment of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session HB 52 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE House Bill 52 Judiciary (Delegate Smigiel) Regulated Firearms - License Issued by Delaware, Pennsylvania,
More informationLEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION: OTHER PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS
Table 3.10 LEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION: OTHER PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS Alabama..., although annual appropriation to certain positions may be so allocated. Alaska... Senators receive up to $20,000/y and representatives
More informationElection Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 7, Executive Summary. Suggested Routing
Election Notice FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election Nomination Deadline: October 7, 2016 Executive Summary The purpose of this Notice is to inform FINRA Small Firm members 1 of the upcoming Small
More informationASSOCIATES OF VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. BYLAWS (A Nonprofit Corporation)
Article I Name The name of the corporation is Associates of Vietnam Veterans of America, Inc., as prescribed by the Articles of Incorporation, hereinafter referred to as the Corporation. Article II Purposes
More information