State Constitutional Developments in 2006 By John Dinan
|
|
- Francine Wood
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 State Constitutional Developments in 2006 By John Dinan After several years during which the number of state constitutional amendments had dropped from previous levels, amendment activity increased slightly, in that the number of amendments proposed in 2006 equaled the number of amendments proposed in 2004 and 2005 combined, and the number of amendments adopted in 2006 exceeded the total for Eight states enacted amendments prohibiting legalization of same-sex marriage, and another eight states approved amendments restricting use of the eminent domain power for private purposes. Multiple states approved amendments increasing the minimum wage and regulating the use of tobacco settlement funds. Also of note were a Michigan amendment banning affirmative action, a Missouri amendment ensuring continuation of embryonic stem cell research, and a Florida amendment requiring future constitutional changes to obtain 60 percent of the popular vote. Although the 2006 elections are likely to be most remembered as the occasion when Democrats regained control of the U.S. House and Senate and a majority of state governorships, voters also passed judgment on a sizable number of constitutional amendments (166 proposed and 125 adopted), which represented an increase not only from 2005, an off-year election in most states, but also from 2004, a presidential election year. A significant number of constitutional amendments dealt with individual rights. Same-sex marriage bans continued to be proposed in response to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court s legalization of samesex marriage in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health (2003), and such bans were approved in eight states. However, voters in Arizona defeated a same-sex marriage ban, the first time such an amendment failed. Voters also approved eight constitutional amendments proposed in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court s decision in Kelo v. City of New London (2005) for the purpose of disallowing use of the eminent domain power for economic development purposes; however, voters in California rejected a more expansive measure that would have also compensated property owners for regulatory takings. Meanwhile, Michigan voters approved a constitutional amendment banning affirmative action, following the lead of California voters a decade earlier. Voters also passed judgment on numerous policy amendments. Constitutional amendments for minimum wage increases were approved in three states. Tax and expenditure limitation constitutional amendments were defeated in two states. Various tobaccorelated amendments were also placed on the ballot, and although cigarette tax increases failed in two states, amendments regulating the use of tobacco set- Table A: State Constitutional Changes by Method of Initiation: , and 2006 Number of states involved Total proposals Total adopted Percentage adopted Method of initiation All methods (a) (a)(b) Legislative proposal (a) (a) Constitutional initiative (b) Constitutional convention Constitutional commission Source: Based on surveys conducted in previous years by Janice May and updated by John Dinan for the years 2005 and Key:... Not applicable. (a) Excludes one Alabama amendment that was proposed by the legislature and appeared on the ballot but was determined by the Governor s office prior to the vote not to have received enough votes in the legislature to properly appear on the ballot, and thus even though the amendment was approved by voters in November 2006 and the vote totals were certified by the state canvassing board, the governor did not proclaim the results for the amendment and so it has not received an official amendment number. (b) These totals include one amendment approved in a first election, but not yet in a second election, in Nevada (where initiatives must be approved in two successive general elections). The Council of State Governments
2 tlement funds were approved in three states. Meanwhile, Missouri voters approved a constitutional amendment ensuring the continuation of all embryonic stem cell research permitted by federal law. Also of note were several amendments dealing with governing institutions and the constitutional amendment process itself. Colorado and South Dakota voters rejected controversial amendments that targeted the judiciary, whether by imposing judicial term limits (in Colorado) or depriving judges of immunity from citizen lawsuits (in South Dakota). Colorado voters approved an ethics reform amendment that, among other things, prevents legislators from becoming lobbyists for two years after leaving office. And Florida voters approved an amendment requiring future constitutional changes to receive 60 percent of the popular vote, making Florida and New Hampshire the only states to require a popular supermajority to approve constitutional amendments. Constitutional Amendment and Revision Methods Constitutional amendments were proposed in 2006 in 34 states, far more than the 11 states that considered amendments in the off-year election of 2005 and slightly above the 33 states that considered amendments in All told in 2006, 166 amendments were proposed and 125 were approved. This compares with 2005, when 26 amendments were proposed and 14 were approved, and with 2004, when 140 amendments were proposed and 98 were approved. Legislative Proposals and Constitutional Initiatives The 166 constitutional amendments considered by voters in 2006 were all proposed by legislatures or through the initiative process. Legislatures proposed 133 amendments, and 113 of these legislature-initiated amendments were approved, for a passage rate of 85.7 percent. 1 Thirty-three amendments were proposed by constitutional initiative, a process available in 18 states, and 11 of these initiated amendments were approved, for a passage rate of 33.3 percent. 2 Constitutional Conventions and Revision Commissions Although no constitutional conventions were held in 2006, discussions continued from previous years in Alabama and New Jersey about whether to call a convention. In Alabama, the public interest group Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform (ACCR) has been trying for several years to build support for a convention to revise Alabama s 1901 Constitution, the longest in the nation. Although proponents of a convention were unable in 2006 to persuade the legislature to submit a convention call to the people, this measure did attract more legislative support than in recent years, with 10 senators voting to move the measure out of a senate committee and seven representatives offering their support in a house committee. 3 In New Jersey, Gov. Jon Corzine has, since his election in November 2005, urged the legislature to find a way to reduce the state s property taxes, the highest in the country. He has also suggested that a constitutional convention might be necessary if the legislature fails to act. In late 2006, the governor and legislature agreed to hold a special legislative session to address the tax issue. As part of the process, the legislature established four special joint Senate/Assembly committees, including one committee charged with assessing the need for constitutional changes. This committee determined that a convention was not needed in order to bring about property tax reform, and that any constitutional changes would be minor and could be handled through the amendment process. But that does not eliminate the possibility a convention will be held. The two houses of the legislature were unable to reach agreement on a tax reform package by year s end, and the governor has continued to argue, including in his State of the State address in January 2007, that a convention remains an option in the event of legislative inaction. 4 The one constitutional revision commission operating in 2006 was the Utah Constitutional Revision Commission, the only commission that has an ongoing charge to propose constitutional amendments that are then considered by the legislature. Commission members in 2006 debated constitutional changes regarding property tax exemptions, gubernatorial succession, the veto power and the judicial rulemaking power, among other issues. Constitutional Changes Voters in 2006 were not asked to approve any new constitutions or wholesale revisions of existing constitutions. The proposed changes all took the form of constitutional amendments. Of particular importance were numerous amendments pertaining to individual rights and various public policy issues. Several notable amendments also dealt with governing institutions and the amendment process itself. Rights As in the past two years, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court s 2003 legalization of same-sex marriage continued to generate constitutional amend- 4 The Book of the States 2007
3 Table B: Substantive Changes in State Constitutions: Proposed and Adopted: , and 2006 Total proposed Total adopted Percentage adopted Subject matter Proposals of statewide applicability (a) 104 (b) Bill of Rights (c) (b)(c) Suffrage & elections Legislative branch Executive branch Judicial branch Local government Finance & taxation State & local debt State functions (a) Amendment & revision General revision proposals Miscellaneous proposals Local amendments (d) (d) Source: Based on surveys conducted in previous years by Janice May and updated by John Dinan for the years 2005 and Key: (a) Includes Delaware, where amendments do not require popular approval. (b) Includes one Nevada amendment that received approval in a first election, but not yet in a second election, as required for initiative amendments in that state. (c) Includes amendments restricting the use of eminent domain, regardless of whether these protections were actually inserted in the bill of rights or in other articles. (d) Excludes one Alabama amendment that was proposed by the legislature and appeared on the ballot but was determined by the Governor s office prior to the vote not to have received enough votes in the legislature to properly appear on the ballot, and thus even though the amendment was approved by voters in November 2006 and the vote totals were certified by the state canvassing board, the governor did not proclaim the results for the amendment and so it has not received an official amendment number. ments intended to forestall similar rulings by other state courts. Prior to 2006, 18 states had enacted constitutional provisions prohibiting same-sex marriage, and Hawaii had adopted a constitutional provision empowering the legislature to limit marriage to opposite-sex couples. Eight more states adopted same-sex marriage bans in 2006, including Alabama (in June) and Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin (all in November), bringing to 27 the number of states with constitutional provisions on the topic. Most of these 2006 measures passed easily, with Alabama and Tennessee voters providing the largest margins of victory, 81 percent to 19 percent in both states. However, South Dakota voters approved a ban by the narrowest margin to date, 52 percent to 48 percent. Moreover, Arizona voters rejected a same-sex marriage ban on a percent vote, marking the first time that such a measure has been defeated at the polls. Meanwhile, a constitutional amendment that would effectively overturn the Massachusetts Supreme Court s Goodridge decision and ban same-sex marriage in that state continued to move forward, but only after encountering significant difficulties that nearly derailed its passage. An earlier effort to submit such an amendment by legislative proposal was defeated in September 2005 when legislators failed to give the required second approval to a measure that had received initial legislative approval in March Opponents of same-sex marriage then turned to the constitutional initiative process, which in Massachusetts requires gathering signatures from 3 percent of the voters in the last gubernatorial election and then receiving the approval of 25 percent of the members of the House and Senate convened as a constitutional convention, and in successive legislative sessions. The first of these requirements was met in December 2005 with the gathering of 170,000 signatures. The second step proved more difficult. Although it was clear that the amendment enjoyed the support of the requisite number of legislators, legislative leaders employed procedural tactics to recess a Nov. 9, 2006, constitutional convention without allowing a vote. With outgoing Republican Gov. Mitt Romney urging the legislature to bring the amendment to a vote on the grounds that it was constitutionally required to do so, and incoming Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick counseling against such a vote on the grounds that it would amount to supporting discrimination, the issue was brought to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. The justices determined on Dec. 27, 2006, that they lacked the power to compel the legislature to take a vote; but they made it clear that legislators would be disregarding their constitutional duty if they adjourned without bringing the amendment to a vote. Prodded to action by the court s ruling, the The Council of State Governments 5
4 legislature assembled in constitutional convention on Jan. 2, 2007, the last day of the legislative session, and approved the amendment by the requisite 25 percent 62 members voted for it and 132 voted against it. The amendment still needs to be approved a second time, in the legislative session, again by 25 percent of legislators, before it can be placed on the November 2008 ballot. 5 Other states that could also see same-sex marriage bans on the 2008 ballot include Indiana, where legislators must give their second approval to a proposed amendment, and Florida, where proponents are working to place such an amendment on the ballot through the initiative process. 6 Voters in 2006 also considered numerous constitutional amendments intended to respond to the U.S. Supreme Court s 2005 Kelo decision holding that the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes does not violate the federal constitution. A sizable number of state legislatures in 2005 and 2006 responded to public dissatisfaction with this ruling by making statutory changes to restrict use of the eminent domain power by state and local governments, generally by prohibiting use of the power to condemn private property for economic development purposes. However, property rights advocates also sought to accomplish this goal by amending, and amendments were placed before the voters in nine states. Voters in Arizona, Idaho, Oregon and Washington also passed judgment on statutory measures seeking to restrict eminent domain and/or provide compensation for regulatory takings. Constitutional amendments restricting the use of eminent domain were approved in Louisiana (in September), and Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada (where it received the first of two required approvals), New Hampshire, North Dakota and South Carolina (all in November). However, a more expansive amendment seeking to limit use of eminent domain and to compensate property owners for regulatory takings was rejected in California. Assorted other amendments dealing with rights also appeared on the ballot in Michigan voters approved an initiated amendment prohibiting public institutions from giving preferential treatment based on race, gender, color, ethnicity or national origin, thereby following California (in 1996) in restricting affirmative action through the constitutional initiative process. Washington voters had approved a statutory measure of this sort in In fact, Ward Connerly, the principal backer of these measures, announced plans in the aftermath of the Michigan vote to consider organizing similar campaigns in other states with the initiative procedure, including Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Wyoming and Utah. 7 Meanwhile, Rhode Island voters approved a constitutional amendment expanding suffrage rights of ex-felons by eliminating a provision denying felons the vote while on probation or parole; felons will now be disenfranchised only while in prison. Additionally, California voters rejected for the second time in two years an initiated amendment that would have required parental notification 48 hours before a minor could obtain an abortion. Oregon voters rejected a similar measure placed on the ballot as a statutory initiative. Policy Voters in 2006 considered a wide range of constitutional amendments dealing with public policy issues, many of which had been blocked in the legislature and were placed on the ballot through the initiative process. Constitutional amendments increasing the minimum wage were approved in three states Colorado, Nevada and Ohio. Arizona, Missouri and Montana voters also approved statutory minimum wage increases. Voters in two states Nebraska and Oregon considered tax-and-expenditure limitation amendments modeled after the Taxpayers Bill of Rights (TABOR) that was added to the Colorado Constitution in 1992 but then partially suspended for five years in However, voters in both states rejected these measures. (A Maine initiative that was placed on the ballot as a statutory change was also defeated.) Voters passed judgment on a number of constitutional amendments dealing with tobacco policy, regarding cigarette taxes, restrictions on smoking and the use of money from legal settlements between states and tobacco companies. Amendments to increase cigarette taxes were rejected in California (a $2.60 a pack increase) and Missouri (an 80 cents a pack increase). Statutory cigarette tax increases were approved in Arizona and South Dakota. Meanwhile, Ohio voters rejected an industry-supported amendment to restrict smoking in certain public places but permit smoking in other public places and also pre-empt local governments from banning smoking in these other places. The Ohio measure was placed on the ballot in an unsuccessful attempt to head off passage of a competing health organization-sponsored statutory measure that imposed much more stringent restrictions on smoking. Similar battles between health organization-sponsored smoking bans and industry-supported counter-measures were waged on a statutory basis in Arizona and Nevada, and in each case the health 6 The Book of the States 2007
5 organization measure won and the industry measure failed. Additionally, voters in Florida, Idaho and Louisiana approved constitutional amendments regulating use of the settlement money that these states receive from tobacco companies. The Florida measure requires a portion of the settlement money to be spent on youth anti-smoking campaigns. The Idaho measure requires most of the settlement money to be spent on health-related purposes. And the Louisiana measure, approved in September, allows a portion of the settlement money to be used for coastal conservation. 8 Education-spending amendments experienced mixed success in Voters in Colorado defeated an amendment that would have required at least 65 percent of school spending by local school districts to be dedicated to classroom instruction. But Nevada voters approved an Education First amendment requiring legislators to approve the education spending bill before approving any other spending bill. The intent was to prohibit advocates of higher spending and taxes from, in essence, holding hostage the education spending bill as a way of forcing legislators to support a tax increase, as was done in 2003 in a dispute that led to a controversial Nevada Supreme Court decision, Guinn v. Legislature (2003). 9 Amendments were also placed on the ballot regarding a variety of controversial public policy questions including gambling, drugs, stem cell research and illegal immigration. In terms of gambling, Arizona voters approved an amendment permitting charities to run bingo games, while Ohio voters rejected an amendment that would have authorized slot machines, and Rhode Island voters defeated an amendment that would have permitted the operation of a privately run casino. Regarding drug policy, a proposal to amend the Colorado constitution to legalize possession of up to an ounce of marijuana was rejected. Meanwhile, Missouri voters narrowly approved a complex amendment that supporters said was intended to permit all forms of embryonic stem cell research authorized under federal law. Arizona and Colorado voters approved several immigration-related constitutional amendments. Arizonans passed amendments declaring English the official state language, denying bail to illegal immigrants charged with committing a serious felony, and prohibiting illegal immigrants from collecting punitive damage awards in civil suits. Colorado voters passed a constitutional amendment directing the state attorney general to sue the federal government to bring about enforcement of current immigration laws. Several statutory measures targeting illegal immigration were also approved in these states. Governing Institutions Judges were the target of several amendments, including measures in Colorado and South Dakota that generated a great deal of media attention but were ultimately defeated. Colorado voters rejected an amendment that would have limited state appellate judges to serving a single 10-year term and would have taken effect retroactively, thereby forcing the removal within two years of five supreme court judges and seven appellate court judges. The amendment would have made Colorado the first state to adopt term limits for appellate judges, but it was defeated, 57 percent to 43 percent. Meanwhile, South Dakota voters rejected by a much wider margin 89 percent to 11 percent an even more controversial Jail 4 Judges amendment that would have established special grand juries to evaluate citizen lawsuits against judges and would have stripped judges of their immunity for acts that violated individual rights. Two other proposed amendments that received less national attention but would have had important political implications in Hawaii and Oregon were also defeated. Hawaii voters rejected an amendment that would have repealed the mandatory retirement age of 70 for state judges and thereby would have denied Republican Gov. Linda Lingle the opportunity to make two replacement appointments in the next few years. Oregon voters rejected an amendment intended to give increased representation to rural, more conservative regions of the state by requiring appellate judges to run for election in geographic districts and reside in those districts. 10 Legislators were targeted in various ways by three notable amendments, two of which were approved. Colorado voters approved a wide-ranging ethics reform package that applies to legislators and other public officials. It prohibits them from accepting gifts from lobbyists and from becoming lobbyists themselves within two years after leaving office. A similar two-year lobbying ban, albeit on a statutory basis, was also approved by Montana voters. Meanwhile, Oklahoma voters approved an amendment prohibiting legislators from being paid their salary while in jail on a misdemeanor conviction, in reaction to a recent case where a legislator was paid while spending a month in jail. A felony conviction would already result in their removal from office. However, voters in Oregon rejected an amendment that would have restored legislative term limits six years for representatives and eight years for senators after they were originally adopted in 1992 and took effect after 2000 but were then invalidated by the state supreme court in The Council of State Governments
6 Amendment Process In a development that will make it more difficult to secure future constitutional changes, Florida voters in 2006 approved an amendment, by a 58 percent to 42 percent vote, that requires constitutional amendments or revisions to receive 60 percent of the popular vote. An existing provision requiring amendments imposing new state taxes or fees to receive two-thirds of the vote was unchanged. The measure was backed by business groups and was opposed by liberal groups as well as by some conservatives who feared that the new requirement would make it more difficult to use the amendment process to overturn controversial state supreme court decisions, such as the Florida Supreme Court s Bush v. Holmes (2006) ruling striking down a school voucher program. 11 Florida becomes only the second state to require a supermajority of the people to approve constitutional amendments, joining New Hampshire, which requires a two-thirds vote. Five states require approval by a majority voting in the entire election, rather than on the particular question. Trends Several trends emerge from a review of state constitutional developments in Regarding the methods of state constitutional change, legislativeinitiated and citizen-initiated amendments continue to be the dominant mechanisms, and were in fact the exclusive means by which constitutional changes were proposed this year, as was the case last year. Yet another year passed, therefore, without a constitutional convention, although momentum continued to build for calling a convention in Alabama, and discussion continued in New Jersey about a possible convention to reform the tax system. Several types of amendments appeared on multiple state ballots in 2006 and are likely to reappear over the next several years. Judicial decisions such as the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court s Goodridge ruling and the U.S. Supreme Court s Kelo ruling are likely to generate continuing state constitutional responses in the form of bans on same-sex marriage and limits on use of eminent domain for economic development purposes. Public policy issues that are believed to be attracting insufficient attention in the legislative process are also likely to continue generating constitutional amendments, often through the initiative process. Judging from the results in 2006, amendments increasing the minimum wage, restricting illegal immigration and banning affirmative action were all successful and can be expected to return to state ballots in coming years. Although the success rate of tobacco-related amendments was mixed this year, there is good reason to expect more of these amendments to be proposed in future years, especially for the purpose of regulating the use of tobacco settlement funds, and if this year s results are a good indication, they will stand a good chance of passage. On the other hand, tax-and-expenditure limitation amendments are likely to continue to be proposed; but the partial suspension of Colorado s TABOR provision in 2005, followed by the defeat of similar amendments in 2006, could signal that these measures may encounter difficulty in coming years. Notes 1 Excluded from these totals is an Alabama amendment dealing with the selection of members of the Macon County Board of Education. After the amendment had been certified and placed on the ballot, the governor s office determined that it had not received a sufficient number of legislative votes to be properly placed on the ballot; therefore, although the state canvassing board certified after the November 2006 election that the amendment had been approved, the governor s office did not proclaim the results, and it has not been deemed a valid amendment. 2 Included in these totals is a Nevada amendment restricting use of the eminent domain power for private purposes. This measure was approved by voters in November 2006, but because initiated amendments in Nevada are required to be approved by voters in two successive general elections, it must be approved again in November 2008 before it can take effect. 3 David White, Senate panel backs bill to allow vote on constitutional convention, Birmingham News, February 22, 2006, 1B. 4 John P. McAlpin, Corzine: Tax reform must stay top priority, Bergen County Record, January 10, 2007, A1. 5 Frank Phillips and Lisa Wangsness, Same sex marriage ban advances, Boston Globe, January 3, 2007, A1. 6 Cheryl Wetzstein, Gay marriage ballot measures running their course, The Washington Times, January 7, 2007, A2. 7 Leslie Fulbright, Connerly gearing up for wider crusade, San Francisco Chronicle, December 14, 2006, A1. 8 These tobacco-related amendments are discussed in Richard Craver, Tobacco outcomes vary, Winston-Salem Journal, November 9, 2006, D1. 9 Ed Vogel, Question 1: Education First, Las Vegas Review-Journal, October 19, 2006, 43DD. 10 These amendments are discussed in Valerie Richardson, Ballot measures propose limits on judicial authority, The Washington Times, October 24, 2006, A4. 11 Gary Fineout, Constitution just got harder to tinker with, Miami Herald, November 8, 2006 (Netscape version). About the Author John Dinan is associate professor of political science at Wake Forest University. He is the author of The American State Constitutional Tradition and The Virginia State Constitution: A Reference Guide, among other books and articles on. The Book of the States 2007
State Constitutional Developments in 2016
State Constitutional Developments in 2016 By John Dinan STATE CONSTITUTIONS Several state constitutional amendments on the ballot in 2016 attracted significant attention. Voters approved citizen-initiated
More informationTestimony on Senate Bill 125
Testimony on Senate Bill 125 by Daniel Diorio, Senior Policy Specialist, Elections and Redistricting Program National Conference of State Legislatures March 7, 2016 Good afternoon Mister Chairman and members
More informationMatthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research
Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research Arkansas (reelection) Georgia (reelection) Idaho (reelection) Kentucky (reelection) Michigan (partisan nomination - reelection) Minnesota (reelection) Mississippi
More informationShould Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund
Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? 1 Politicians are drawing their own voting maps to manipulate elections and keep themselves and their party in power. 2 3 -The U.S. Constitution requires that the
More informationCampaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).
Exhibit E.1 Alabama Alabama Secretary of State Mandatory Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily). PAC (annually), Debts. A filing threshold of $1,000 for all candidates for office, from statewide
More informationState Constitutional Developments in 2014
State Constitutional Developments in 2014 By John Dinan STATE CONSTITUTIONS Although constitutional amendment activity was lower in 2014 than in recent even-numbered years, several of the 72 approved amendments
More informationState Constitutional Developments in 2010
State Constitutional Developments in 2010 By John Dinan None of the 116 constitutional amendments enacted in 2010 attracted as much attention as California s 2008 same-sex marriage ban or other high-profile
More informationThe Electoral College And
The Electoral College And National Popular Vote Plan State Population 2010 House Apportionment Senate Number of Electors California 37,341,989 53 2 55 Texas 25,268,418 36 2 38 New York 19,421,055 27 2
More informationKey Measures Alaska. Marijuana legalization: FAILED Arizona. Illegal immigrants: APPROVED California. Stem cell bond: APPROVED
Initiative & Referendum Institute at USC 12/29/04 BALLOTWATCH Important Facts 162 measures, 67% approved. All 11 marriage amendments passed. 2004 ELECTION SUMMARY Voters in 34 states faced 162 ballot propositions
More informationOf the People, By the People, For the People
January 2010 Of the People, By the People, For the People A 2010 Report Card on Statewide Voter Initiative Rights Executive Summary For over a century, the initiative and referendum process has given voters
More informationPERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No
PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES State Member Conference Call Vote Member Electronic Vote/ Email Board of Directors Conference Call Vote Board of Directors Electronic Vote/ Email
More informationNORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office Kory Goldsmith, Interim Legislative Services Officer Research Division 300 N. Salisbury Street, Suite 545 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Tel. 919-733-2578
More informationState Constitutional Developments in 2008 By John Dinan
State Constitutional Developments in 2008 By John Dinan Fewer state constitutional amendments were proposed and approved in 2008 than in recent evennumbered years. Several amendments, however, generated
More informationThe remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.
ills and ill Processing 3-17 Referral of ills The first major step in the legislative process is to introduce a bill; the second is to have it heard by a committee. ut how does legislation get from one
More informationBackground Information on Redistricting
Redistricting in New York State Citizens Union/League of Women Voters of New York State Background Information on Redistricting What is redistricting? Redistricting determines the lines of state legislative
More informationNational State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1
National State Law Survey: Limitations 1 Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware DC Florida Georgia Hawaii limitations Trafficking and CSEC within 3 limit for sex trafficking,
More informationRedistricting in Michigan
Dr. Martha Sloan of the Copper Country League of Women Voters Redistricting in Michigan Should Politicians Choose their Voters? Politicians are drawing their own voting maps to manipulate elections and
More information2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State
2016 Voter s by Alabama 10/24/2016 https://www.alabamavotes.gov/electioninfo.aspx?m=vote rs Alaska 10/9/2016 (Election Day registration permitted for purpose of voting for president and Vice President
More informationMillions to the Polls
Millions to the Polls PRACTICAL POLICIES TO FULFILL THE FREEDOM TO VOTE FOR ALL AMERICANS THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR FORMERLY INCARCERATED PERSONS j. mijin cha & liz kennedy THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR FORMERLY INCARCERATED
More information2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview
2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview ʺIn Clinton, the superdelegates have a candidate who fits their recent mold and the last two elections have been very close. This year is a bad year for Republicans.
More information530 East Montecito Street, Santa Barbara, CA
11/7/17 Ohio: The Ohio legislature has passed O.R.C. 5741.01 (I). This legislation provides tax collection on out-of-state retailers who enter into agreements with one or more residents of Ohio under which
More informationCITIZENS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN IS A 501(C) 3) TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATION
Citizens Research Council of Michigan 625 SHELBY STREET, SUITE 1B, DETROIT, Ml 48226,3220 (313) 961-5377 FAX (313) 9614)648 1502 MICHIGAN NATIONAL TOWER, LANSING, Ml 48933-1738 (517) 485-9444 FAX (547)
More informationOffender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012
Offender Population Forecasts House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012 Crimes per 100,000 population VIRGINIA TRENDS In 2010, Virginia recorded its lowest violent crime rate over
More informationPOLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS. OUT-OF- STATE DONORS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Initiatives California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 3-13-2015 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS. OUT-OF- STATE DONORS.
More informationChronology of Successful and Unsuccessful Merit Selection Ballot Measures
Chronology of Successful and Unsuccessful Merit Selection Ballot Measures (NOTE: Unsuccessful efforts are in italics. Chronology does not include constitutional amendments authorizing merit selection for
More informationSwarthmore College Alumni Association Constitution and Bylaws. The name of this Association shall be Swarthmore College Alumni Association.
Swarthmore College Alumni Association Constitution and Bylaws Constitution Article 1 Name The name of this Association shall be Swarthmore College Alumni Association. Article II Objects Objectives The
More informationAmerican Government. Workbook
American Government Workbook WALCH PUBLISHING Table of Contents To the Student............................. vii Unit 1: What Is Government? Activity 1 Monarchs of Europe...................... 1 Activity
More informationAppendix: Legal Boundaries Between the Juvenile and Criminal. Justice Systems in the United States. Patrick Griffin
Appendix: Legal Boundaries Between the Juvenile and Criminal Justice Systems in the United States Patrick Griffin In responding to law-violating behavior, every U.S. state 1 distinguishes between juveniles
More informationMEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS
Knowledge Management Office MEMORANDUM Re: Ref. No.: By: Date: Regulation of Retired Judges Serving as Arbitrators and Mediators IS 98.0561 Jerry Nagle, Colleen Danos, and Anne Endress Skove October 22,
More informationComplying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes
Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes Tyrus H. Thompson (Ty) Vice President and Deputy General Counsel Director and Member Legal Services Office of General Counsel National Rural Electric
More information2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS
2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS MANUAL ADOPTED AT LAS VEGAS, NEVADA July 2008 Affix to inside front cover of your 2005 Constitution CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES Constitution
More informationF R O M S TAT E T O S TAT E Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Americans and State Legislation
F R O M S TAT E T O S TAT E 2 0 0 7 Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Americans and State Legislation A Report by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation December 2007 F R O M S TAT E T O S TAT E 2
More information7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents
Legislative Documents 7-45 Electronic Access to Legislative Documents Paper is no longer the only medium through which the public can gain access to legislative documents. State legislatures are using
More informationThe Evolution of US Electoral Methods. Michael E. DeGolyer Professor, Government & International Studies Hong Kong Baptist University
The Evolution of US Electoral Methods Michael E. DeGolyer Professor, Government & International Studies Hong Kong Baptist University Evolution of the Right to Vote A. States have traditionally had primary
More informationDelegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules
Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules About 4,051 pledged About 712 unpledged 2472 delegates Images from: https://ballotpedia.org/presidential_election,_2016 On the news I hear about super
More informationCampaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits
Campaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits Wendy Underhill Program Manager Elections National Conference of State Legislatures prepared for Oregon s Joint Interim Task Force on
More informationDecember 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote
STATE OF VERMONT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STATE HOUSE 115 STATE STREET MONTPELIER, VT 05633-5201 December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote To Members
More informationTELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES
TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; June 26, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES 2003-R-0469 By: Kevin E. McCarthy, Principal Analyst
More informationVOTING WHILE TRANS: PREPARING FOR THE NEW VOTER ID LAWS August 2012
VOTING WHILE TRANS: PREPARING FOR THE NEW VOTER ID LAWS August 2012 Regardless of whether you have ever had trouble voting in the past, this year new laws in dozens of states will make it harder for many
More informationTHE STATE OF VOTING IN 2014
at New York University School of Law THE STATE OF VOTING IN 2014 By Wendy Weiser and Erik Opsal Executive Summary As we approach the 2014 election, America is still in the midst of a high-pitched and often
More informationState Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010
ALABAMA: G X X X de novo District, Probate, s ALASKA: ARIZONA: ARKANSAS: de novo or on the de novo (if no ) G O X X de novo CALIFORNIA: COLORADO: District Court, Justice of the Peace,, County, District,
More informationMore State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case
[Type here] 6171 Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 20112 202 789.2004 tel. or 703 580.7267 703 580.6258 fax Info@electiondataservices.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: December 22, 2015 Contact: Kimball
More informationDemocratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary
Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, and s Chronologically http://www.thegreenpapers.com/p08/events.phtml?s=c 1 of 9 5/29/2007 2:23 PM Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, and s Chronologically Disclaimer: These
More informationCommittee Consideration of Bills
Committee Procedures 4-79 Committee Consideration of ills It is not possible for all legislative business to be conducted by the full membership; some division of labor is essential. Legislative committees
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS20273 Updated January 17, 2001 The Electoral College: How it Works in Contemporary Presidential Elections Thomas H. Neale Analyst, American
More informationACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health
1 ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1 Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health LAWS ALABAMA http://www.legislature.state.al.us/codeofalabama/1975/coatoc.htm RULES ALABAMA http://www.alabamaadministrativecode.state.al.us/alabama.html
More informationWhy a State Should Adopt an Article V Application for A Convention of States if It Has Already Adopted a Balanced Budget Amendment Application
CONVENTIONOFSTATES.COM Why a State Should Adopt an Article V Application for A Convention of States if It Has Already Adopted a Balanced Budget Amendment Application By Michael Farris, JD, LLM Article
More informationDepartment of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session HB 52 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE House Bill 52 Judiciary (Delegate Smigiel) Regulated Firearms - License Issued by Delaware, Pennsylvania,
More informationCIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement Youth Voter Increases in 2006 By Mark Hugo Lopez, Karlo Barrios Marcelo, and Emily Hoban Kirby 1 June 2007 For the
More informationRed, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?
1 What are the colors of our flag? Red, white, and blue 2 What do the stars on the flag mean? One for each state 3 How many stars are there on our flag? There are 50 stars on our flag. 4 What color are
More information28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS CHAPTER 6 - BANKRUPTCY JUDGES 152. Appointment of bankruptcy judges (a) (1) Each bankruptcy judge to be appointed for a judicial
More informationHAWAII: A law passed this year allows voters to share a digital image of one's own marked ballot.
STATES WHERE BALLOT SELFIES ARE ALLOWED CONNECTICUT: No law bans ballot selfies, according to Patrick Gallahue, a spokesman for Secretary of State Denise Merrill. But election moderators have discretion
More informationTHE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE
THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE STATE RENEWAL Additional information ALABAMA Judgment good for 20 years if renewed ALASKA ARIZONA (foreign judgment 4 years)
More informationNumber of Bills Passed Per Issue
04 State Legislative Summary: January through July The 04 legislative session across the fifty states was another active one with 63 bills introduced and 3 enacted or vetoed pertaining to new or updated
More informationVOL. XV No. 12 Dec. 3, 2018
VOL. XV No. 12 Dec. 3, 2018 Election Update CSBS Fintech Lawsuit Seattle Releases Public Bank Feasibility Study Appraisal Thresholds Raised ALEC States and Nation Policy Summit Council of State Governments
More informationBALLOTWATCH E LECTION 2018 PREVIEW. Initiative & Referendum Institute No. 1 October. Overview. November: 158 propositions
Initiative & Referendum Institute (Updated October 7) BALLOTWATCH Overview November: 158 propositions in 37 states, including 63 initiatives, 2 referendums, and 84 legislative measures. Most active states:
More informationLimitations on Contributions to Political Committees
Limitations on Contributions to Committees Term for PAC Individual PAC Corporate/Union PAC Party PAC PAC PAC Transfers Alabama 10-2A-70.2 $500/election Alaska 15.13.070 Group $500/year Only 10% of a PAC's
More informationDepartment of Justice
Department of Justice ADVANCE FOR RELEASE AT 5 P.M. EST BJS SUNDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1995 202/307-0784 STATE AND FEDERAL PRISONS REPORT RECORD GROWTH DURING LAST 12 MONTHS WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The number of
More informationINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
Gender Parity Index INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY - 2017 State of Women's Representation Page 1 INTRODUCTION As a result of the 2016 elections, progress towards gender parity stalled. Beyond Hillary Clinton
More informationNOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018
NOTICE TO MEMBERS No. 2018-004 January 2, 2018 Trading by U.S. Residents Canadian Derivatives Clearing Corporation (CDCC) maintains registrations with various U.S. state securities regulatory authorities
More informationSTATUS OF 2002 REED ACT DISTRIBUTION BY STATE
STATUS OF 2002 REED ACT DISTRIBUTION BY STATE Revised January 2003 State State Reed Act Reed Act Funds Appropriated* (as of November 2002) Comments on State s Reed Act Activity Alabama $110,623,477 $16,650,000
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS20273 Updated September 8, 2003 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Electoral College: How It Works in Contemporary Presidential Elections Thomas H. Neale Government and
More informationJudicial Selection in the States
Judicial S in the States Appellate and General Jurisdiction Courts Initial S, Retention, and Term Length INITIAL Alabama Supreme Court X 6 Re- (6 year term) Court of Civil App. X 6 Re- (6 year term) Court
More informationInitiative and Referendum Direct Democracy for State Residents
Initiative and Referendum Direct Democracy for State Residents August 2009 Initiative and Referendum Direct Democracy for State Residents A Publication of the Research Division of NACo s County Services
More informationLobbying: 10 Answers you need to know Venable LLP
Lobbying: 10 Answers you need to know 2013 Venable LLP 1 Faculty Ronald M. Jacobs Co-chair, political law practice, Venable LLP, Washington, DC Government and campaign experience Counsel to corporations,
More informationCampaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30
Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30 Current Events, Recent Polls, & Review Background influences on campaigns Presidential
More informationSoybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order to Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/06/08 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/08-507, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing
More informationBranches of Government
What is a congressional standing committee? Both houses of Congress have permanent committees that essentially act as subject matter experts on legislation. Both the Senate and House have similar committees.
More informationCase 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5 Michele D. Ross Reed Smith LLP 1301 K Street NW Suite 1000 East Tower Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: 202 414-9297 Fax: 202 414-9299 Email:
More informationJudicial Ethics Advisory Committees by State Links at
Judicial Ethics Advisory s by State Links at www.ajs.org/ethics/eth_advis_comm_links.asp Authority Composition Effect of Opinions Website Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission* Commission Rule 17 9 members:
More informationTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES. by Andrew L. Roth
THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES by Andrew L. Roth INTRODUCTION The following pages provide a statistical profile of California's state legislature. The data are intended to suggest who
More informationRates of Compensation for Court-Appointed Counsel in Capital Cases at Trial A State-By-State Overview, 1999 November 1999
Rates of Compensation for Court-Appointed Counsel in Capital Cases at Trial A State-By-State Overview, 1999 Prepared for: Prepared by: The American Bar Association Bar Information Program Marea L. Beeman
More informationRhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide
Rhoads Online Appointment Rules Handy Guide ALABAMA Yes (15) DOI date approved 27-7-30 ALASKA Appointments not filed with DOI. Record producer appointment in SIC register within 30 days of effective date.
More informationOfficial Voter Information for General Election Statute Titles
Official Voter Information for General Election Statute Titles Alabama 17-6-46. Voting instruction posters. Alaska Sec. 15.15.070. Public notice of election required Sec. 15.58.010. Election pamphlet Sec.
More informationAffordable Care Act: A strategy for effective implementation
Affordable Care Act: A strategy for effective implementation U.S. PIRG October 12, 2012 2012 Budget: $26 Objective 1972 Universal coverage 2010 Affordable Care Act enacted Coverage for 95% of all Americans
More informationRestoring Voting Rights to Former Felons. RestORING VOTING RIGHTS th Street, SE Suite 202 Washington, D.C
Project Vote is the leading technical assistance and direct service provider to the voter engagement and civic participation community. Since its founding in 1982, Project Vote has provided professional
More informationIn the Margins Political Victory in the Context of Technology Error, Residual Votes, and Incident Reports in 2004
In the Margins Political Victory in the Context of Technology Error, Residual Votes, and Incident Reports in 2004 Dr. Philip N. Howard Assistant Professor, Department of Communication University of Washington
More informationENACTED ALL-FELONS DNA DATABASE LEGISLATION
ENACTED ALL-FELONS DNA DATABASE LEGISLATION ALABAMA Senate Bill 100 SPONSOR: Senator Lowell Barron (D) Enacted May 1994 (334) 242-7858 Provides for the collection of DNA samples from all convicted felons.
More informationMillions to the Polls
Millions to the Polls PRACTICAL POLICIES TO FULFILL THE FREEDOM TO VOTE FOR ALL AMERICANS VOTER LIST MAINTENANCE & WRONGFUL CHALLENGES TO VOTER ELIGIBILITY j. mijin cha & liz kennedy VOTER LIST MAINTENANCE
More informationU.S. Sentencing Commission 2014 Drug Guidelines Amendment Retroactivity Data Report
U.S. Sentencing Commission 2014 Drug Guidelines Amendment Retroactivity Data Report October 2017 Introduction As part of its ongoing mission, the United States Sentencing Commission provides Congress,
More informationWho has been publicly accused?
1 In the most exhaustive accounting of its kind to date, this study shows that a total of at least 138 government officials in both elected and appointed positions, have been publicly reported for sexual
More informationBy John G. Matsusaka
2012 Ballot Propositions By John G. Matsusaka Voters decided 186 ballot propositions in 39 states in 2012, approving 63 percent of them. The electorate swung to the left on some issues, with potential
More information12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment
12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment Group Activities 12C Apportionment 1. A college offers tutoring in Math, English, Chemistry, and Biology. The number of students enrolled in each subject is listed
More informationClass Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008
Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008 United States Supreme Court North Carolina Supreme Court Refunds of Unconstitutional
More informationNational Latino Peace Officers Association
National Latino Peace Officers Association Bylaws & SOP Changes: Vote for ADD STANDARD X Posting on Facebook, Instagram, text message and etc.. shall be in compliance to STANDARD II - MISSION NATIONAL
More informationSMALL STATES FIRST; LARGE STATES LAST; WITH A SPORTS PLAYOFF SYSTEM
14. REFORMING THE PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES: SMALL STATES FIRST; LARGE STATES LAST; WITH A SPORTS PLAYOFF SYSTEM The calendar of presidential primary elections currently in use in the United States is a most
More informationU.S. Sentencing Commission Preliminary Crack Retroactivity Data Report Fair Sentencing Act
U.S. Sentencing Commission Preliminary Crack Retroactivity Data Report Fair Sentencing Act July 2013 Data Introduction As part of its ongoing mission, the United States Sentencing Commission provides Congress,
More informationNew Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020
[Type here] Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 0 0.00 tel. or 0 0. 0 0. fax Info@electiondataservices.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: December, 0 Contact: Kimball W. Brace Tel.: (0) 00 or (0) 0- Email:
More informationThe Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.
The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance. Privilege and Communication Between Professionals Summary of Research Findings Question Addressed: Which jurisdictions
More informationDETAILED CODE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MEMBER DATA
FORMAT SUMMARY FOR MEMBER DATA Variable Congress Office Identification number Name (Last, First, Middle) District/class State (postal abbr.) State code (ICPSR) Party (1 letter abbr.) Party code Chamber
More informationOregon enacts statute to make improper patent license demands a violation of its unlawful trade practices law
ebook Patent Troll Watch Written by Philip C. Swain March 14, 2016 States Are Pushing Patent Trolls Away from the Legal Line Washington passes a Patent Troll Prevention Act In December, 2015, the Washington
More informationTHE JUDICIAL BRANCH. Article III. The Role of the Federal Court
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH Section I Courts, Term of Office Section II Jurisdiction o Scope of Judicial Power o Supreme Court o Trial by Jury Section III Treason o Definition Punishment Article III The Role of
More informationState-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools
State-by-State Chart of -Specific s and Prosecutorial Tools 34 States, 2 Territories, and the Federal Government have -Specific Criminal s Last updated August 2017 -Specific Criminal? Each state or territory,
More informationElection Notice. Notice of SFAB Election and Ballots. October 20, Ballot Due Date: November 20, Executive Summary.
Election Notice Notice of SFAB Election and Ballots Ballot Due Date: November 20, 2017 October 20, 2017 Suggested Routing Executive Representatives Senior Management Executive Summary The purpose of this
More informationPharmacy Law Update. Brian E. Dickerson. Partner FisherBroyles, LLP Attorneys at Law
Pharmacy Law Update Brian E. Dickerson Partner FisherBroyles, LLP Attorneys at Law Disclosures Brian E. Dickerson declare(s) no conflicts of interest, real or apparent, and no financial interests in any
More informationLEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION: OTHER PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS
Table 3.10 LEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION: OTHER PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS Alabama..., although annual appropriation to certain positions may be so allocated. Alaska... Senators receive up to $20,000/y and representatives
More informationCIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws
FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws By Emily Hoban Kirby and Mark Hugo Lopez 1 June 2004 Recent voting
More information2008 Voter Turnout Brief
2008 Voter Turnout Brief Prepared by George Pillsbury Nonprofit Voter Engagement Network, www.nonprofitvote.org Voter Turnout Nears Most Recent High in 1960 Primary Source: United States Election Project
More informationAuthority to Formulate and Approve State Education Standards (Working Document) January 26, 2011
Authority to Formulate and Approve State Education Standards (Working Document) January 26, 2011 It is a primary role of every legislature to write state statutes through legislation. Ultimately, the legislature
More informationFederal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs
Federal Rate of Return FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs Texas has historically been, and continues to be, the biggest donor to other states when it comes to federal highway
More information