Registration sheets listing others in attendance are on file with the Texas Department of Transportation Chief Minute Clerk.

Transcription

1 June 24, These are the minutes of the regular meeting of the Texas Transportation Commission, which was held on June 24, 2010 in Austin, Texas. The meeting was called to order by Chair Delisi. The meeting opened at 9:12 a.m. with the following commissioners present: Texas Transportation Commission: Deirdre Delisi Ted Houghton Ned Holmes Chair Commissioner Commissioner Administrative Staff: Steve Simmons, Deputy Executive Director Bob Jackson, General Counsel Roger Polson, Executive Assistant to the Deputy Executive Director Dee Hernandez, Chief Minute Clerk Registration sheets listing others in attendance are on file with the Texas Department of Transportation Chief Minute Clerk. A public notice of this meeting containing all items on the proposed agenda was filed in the Office of the Secretary of State at 4:47 p.m. on June 16, 2010, as required by Chapter 551, of the Government Code, referred to as The Open Meetings Act. ITEM 1. Approval of Minutes of the May 26, 2010 workshop and May 27, 2010 regular meeting and June 8, 2010 special meeting of the Texas Transportation Commission Commissioner Houghton made a motion, which was seconded, and the commission approved the minutes of the May 26, 2010 workshop and May 27, 2010 regular meeting and June 8, 2010 special meeting of the Texas Transportation Commission by a 3-0 vote. (Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent). ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT Authorize the securing of the services of an individual who will be responsible for advising the department and the commission on the implementation of changes that result from the independent management and organizational review of the department (MO) This item was deferred. The commission received comments from Howard Wolf. ITEM 13.c. Highway Designations (3) Hays County Redesignate the old location of RM 12 as SH 80 from approximately 4 miles west of I-35 to I-35, extend the designation of SH 21 from its current terminus concurrently with SH 80 to I-35, redesignate FM 3407 as RM 12 and designate RM 12 on a new location (MO)

2 June 24, Commissioner Houghton made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Executive Director Amadeo Saenz: In HAYS COUNTY, local officials have requested RANCH TO MARKET ROAD TPP 12 (RM 12) be designated along a new location from the terminus of FARM TO MARKET ROAD 3407 (FM 3407) north and west to RM 12, a distance of approximately 3.0 miles, and that FM 3407 be redesignated as RM 12, a distance of approximately 1.9 miles. To maintain the continuity of the state highway system, local officials further requested that the current location of RM 12 from I-35 to approximately 4.5 miles west of I-35, be redesignated as STATE HIGHWAY 80 (SH 80) and that the designation of STATE HIGHWAY 21 (SH 21) be extended concurrently along SH 80/SH 142 from its current terminus to I-35 as shown in Exhibit A. Minute Order , passed December 13, 2001, established the terms under which the Texas Department of Transportation (department) would construct an extension to FM 3407 and the City of San Marcos (city) would assume maintenance, control, and jurisdiction of portions of FM 2439 and RM 12. The terms were accepted by the city on January 14, Minute Order , passed on February 23, 2006, authorized the department to execute a pass-through toll agreement with the city for the construction of the extension to FM The extension is nearing completion and is scheduled to open to traffic in July Pursuant to Texas Transportation Code, and , the executive director has recommended this action. The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds that this designation of RM 12 and the redesignations will facilitate the flow of traffic, promote public safety, and maintain continuity of the state highway system and is necessary for the proper development and operation of the system. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that: 1. RM 12 be redesignated as SH 80 from I-35 to a location approximately 4.5 miles north and west of I RM 12 be designated on new location west of San Marcos from approximately 4.5 miles west of I-35 to the intersection of FM 3407 and FM FM 3407 be redesignated as RM 12, from FM 2439 to SH The designation of SH 21 be extended concurrently along SH 80/SH 142 from its present terminus to I IT IS UNDERSTOOD that this minute order does not supersede or otherwise modify the terms outlining the removal of portions of RM 12 and FM 2439 upon completion of the extension as described in Minute Order , dated December 13, Note: The commission received comments from City of San Marcos Mayor Susan Narvaiz.

3 June 24, ITEM 3. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION a. Ector and Midland Counties Award Transportation Development Credits to the City of Odessa (MO) Commissioner Houghton made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Public Transportation Division Director Eric Gleason: The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) desires to award 502,978 in PTN Transportation Development Credits (TDC) to the City of Odessa for a public transportation facility project. The commission adopted Minute Order on September 24, 2009, awarding 570,278 TDC to the City of Odessa for the initial phase of the public transportation facility project. The commission desires to award additional TDC to the City of Odessa to be used as the local match for the next phase of the project. The commission recognizes that state and federal law permits the substitution of TDC as the required non-federal match for capital projects. Title 43, Texas Administrative Code (TAC), 5.73 establishes a process by which TDC may be awarded at the discretion of the commission. The commission finds that this project and associated distribution of the TDC has been reviewed to ensure eligibility, overall benefit to public transportation initiatives and ability to further the goals of the department, as outlined in 43 TAC 5.72 (e). The commission finds that the project will: reduce congestion by improving reliable transit options thereby increasing levels of ridership; expand economic opportunity by increasing the level of service access; enhance safety by reducing single vehicle trips; improve air quality by reducing emissions with technological advances in the bus industry; and increase the value of the transportation assets by investing into pedestrian and bicycle streetscape improvements. Transportation Code, Chapter 455 assigns a broad spectrum of public transportation roles and missions to the Texas Department of Transportation. Transportation Code, Chapter 456 authorizes the commission to administer funds appropriated for public transportation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the executive director or the director s designee is directed to distribute TDC to the City of Odessa as outlined above, and to enter into any necessary contract.

4 June 24, b. Galveston County Award Transportation Development Credits to the City of Galveston (MO) Commissioner Holmes made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Public Transportation Division Director Eric Gleason: The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) desires to award 695,148 PTN Transportation Development Credits (TDC) to the City of Galveston to be used as the local match for fleet replacement and transit infrastructure improvements in the City of Galveston. The commission recognizes that state and federal law permits the substitution of TDC as the required non-federal match for capital projects. Title 43, Texas Administrative Code (TAC), 5.73 establishes a process by which TDC may be awarded at the discretion of the commission. The commission finds that this project and associated distribution of the TDC has been reviewed to ensure eligibility, overall benefit to public transportation initiatives and ability to further the goals of the department, as outlined in 43 TAC 5.72 (e). The commission finds that the project will: reduce congestion by improving reliable transit options thereby increasing levels of ridership; expand economic opportunity by increasing the level of service access; enhance safety by reducing single vehicle trips; improve air quality by reducing emissions with technological advances in the bus industry; and increase the value of the transportation assets by investing into pedestrian and bicycle streetscape improvements. Transportation Code, Chapter 455 assigns a broad spectrum of public transportation roles and missions to the Texas Department of Transportation. Transportation Code, Chapter 456 authorizes the commission to administer funds appropriated for public transportation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the executive director or the director s designee is directed to distribute TDC to the City of Galveston as outlined above, and to enter into any necessary contract. c. Various Counties Award federal 5303 Metropolitan Transportation Planning funds, and award transportation development credits for FY 2011 (MO) Commissioner Holmes made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Public Transportation Division Director Eric Gleason: The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) was designated by the PTN governor as the administering agency for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grant

5 June 24, program, Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5303) in a letter dated October 4, 2005; and is required to ensure that these grant funds are distributed and utilized in accordance with guidance from the FTA. Title 43, Texas Administrative Code (TAC), 31.21(c) establishes a formula through which 5303 program funds shall be distributed to the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) of the state by the Texas Department of Transportation (department). The distribution of the federal FY 2010 apportionment is shown in Exhibit A and has been calculated in accordance with the provisions of 31.21(c). The commission further recognizes that state and federal law permits the substitution of transportation development credits (TDC) as the required non-federal match for eligible projects. Title 43, Texas Administrative Code (TAC), 5.73 establishes a process by which TDC may be awarded at the discretion of the commission. The commission finds that this project and associated distribution of the TDC has been reviewed to ensure eligibility, overall benefit to public transportation initiatives and ability to further the goals of the department, as outlined in 43 TAC 5.72 (e). The commission finds that the project will: reduce congestion by including planning for transit options thereby increasing levels of ridership; expand economic opportunity by increasing the level of service access; enhance safety by promoting greater use of the transit system with professional operators; improve air quality by reducing emissions from single occupant vehicles; and increase the value of the transportation assets by promoting greater use of existing and proposed assets. Transportation Code, Chapter 455 assigns a broad spectrum of public transportation roles and missions to the department. Transportation Code, Chapter 456 authorizes the commission to administer funds appropriated for public transportation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the executive director or the director s designee is directed to proceed with the award of $6,874,926 in federal FY FTA allocations and 1,374,985 in TDC as described in Exhibit A, submit the necessary state application to the FTA, and enter into any necessary contracts in accordance with the priorities established in this minute order. Note: Exhibit A on file with minute order clerk. d. Various Counties Award state funds to public transportation providers for FY 2011 as appropriated by the 81st Texas Legislature (MO) Commissioner Holmes made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Public Transportation Division Director Eric Gleason: The General Appropriations Act enacted by the 81st Texas Legislature, Regular PTN Session, appropriated $57,482,135 for public transportation grants for small urban and nonurbanized areas of the state.

6 June 24, The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) desires to award $28,741,067, the appropriated amount for FY Title 43, Texas Administrative Code, establishes a formula by which public transportation funds shall be distributed to the small urban and nonurbanized areas of the state. The FY 2011 allocation is shown in Exhibit A and has been calculated in accordance with the provisions of Transportation Code, Chapter 455 assigns a broad spectrum of public transportation roles and missions to the Texas Department of Transportation. Transportation Code, Chapter 456 authorizes the commission to administer funds appropriated for public transportation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the executive director or the director's designee is directed to proceed with the allocations as described in Exhibit A and to enter into the necessary contracts for the FY 2011 program of projects upon completion of all application requirements by the local public transportation operators. Note: Exhibit A on file with minute order clerk. ITEM 4. INTERNAL COMPLIANCE PROGRAM REPORT Update on the department s Internal Compliance Program. This item was presented by Deputy Executive Director Steve Simmons. ITEM 5. PROMULGATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Under Title 43, Texas Administrative Code, and the Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code, Chapter 2001: a. Final Adoption Chapter 28 Oversize and Overweight Vehicles and Loads (MO) Amendments to , Purpose, , Responsibilities, and , Permit Issuance Requirements and Procedures (Chambers County Permits); Amendments to , Applicability (Compliance); and Amendments to , Investigations and Inspections of Records and , Records (Records and Inspections) Commissioner Holmes made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Motor Carrier Division Director Carol Davis: The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds it necessary to adopt TRF amendments to , Purpose, , Responsibilities, , Permit Issuance Requirements and Procedures, , Applicability, , Investigations and Inspections of Records, and , Records, all relating to oversize and overweight vehicles and loads, to be codified under Title 43, Texas Administrative Code, Part 1.

7 June 24, The preamble and the adopted amendments, attached to this minute order as Exhibits A - D, are incorporated by reference as though set forth verbatim in this minute order, except that they are subject to technical corrections and revisions, approved by the General Counsel, necessary for compliance with state or federal law or for acceptance by the Secretary of State for filing and publication in the Texas Register. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the amendments to , , , , , and are adopted and are authorized for filing in the Office of the Secretary of State. The executive director is directed to take the necessary steps to implement the actions as ordered in this minute order, pursuant to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code, Chapter Note: Exhibits A through D on file with minute order clerk. b. Proposed Adoption (to be published in the Texas Register for public comment) (1) Chapter 6 State Infrastructure Bank (MO) Amendments to 6.1, Purpose and 6.2, Definitions, and 6.3, General Policies, the Repeal of 6.4, Applicability, New 6.4, Separate Subaccounts, and the Repeal of 6.5, Separate Subaccounts (General Provisions); Amendments to 6.11, Eligible Entities and 6.12, Eligible Properties, and New 6.13, Eligibility for Financial Assistance from General Obligation Bond Proceeds (Eligibility); Amendments to 6.21, Department Contact, 6.22, Requested Financial Assistance, and 6.23, Application Procedure, the Repeal of 6.24, Suspension of Applications, New 6.24, Limitation on Applications - Loans from General Obligation Bond Proceeds, and New 6.25, Suspension of Applications (Procedures); Amendments to 6.31, Department Action, and 6.32, Commission Action, and New 6.33 Commission Action - Loans from General Obligation Bond Proceeds (Department and Commission Action); Amendments to 6.41, Executive Director, 6.42, Performance of Work, 6.43 Design, Construction, and Procurement Standards, the Repeal of 6.44, Maintenance and Operations, and New 6.44, Design and Construction - Loans from General Obligation Bond Proceeds, the Repeal of 6.45, Financial and Credit Requirements, and New 6.45, Maintenance, the Repeal of 6.46, Other Requirements, and New 6.46, Financial and Credit Requirements (Financial Assistance Agreements) Commissioner Houghton made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Chief Financial Officer James Bass: The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds it necessary to propose CFO amendments to , 6.11, 6.12, , 6.31, 6.32, and , the repeal of 6.4, 6.5, 6.24, and , and new 6.4, 6.13, 6.24, 6.25, 6.33, and all relating to state infrastructure bank to be codified under Title 43, Texas Administrative Code, Part 1.

8 June 24, The preamble and the proposed amendments, attached to this minute order as Exhibits A - F, are incorporated by reference as though set forth verbatim in this minute order, except that they are subject to technical corrections and revisions, approved by the General Counsel, necessary for compliance with state or federal law or for acceptance by the Secretary of State for filing and publication in the Texas Register. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the amendments to , 6.11, 6.12, , 6.31, 6.32, and , the repeal of 6.4, 6.5, 6.24, and , and new 6.4, 6.13, 6.24, 6.25, 6.33, and are proposed for adoption and are authorized for publication in the Texas Register for the purpose of receiving public comments. The executive director is directed to take the necessary steps to implement the actions as ordered in this minute order, pursuant to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code, Chapter Note: Exhibits A through F on file with minute order clerk. (2) Chapter 31 Public Transportation (MO) Amendments to 31.36, Section 5311 Grant Program (Federal Programs) Commissioner Houghton made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Public Transportation Division Director Eric Gleason: The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds it necessary to propose PTN amendments to 31.36, Section 5311 Grant Program, relating to federal programs to be codified under Title 43, Texas Administrative Code, Part 1. The preamble and the proposed amendments, attached to this minute order as Exhibits A and B, are incorporated by reference as though set forth verbatim in this minute order, except that they are subject to technical corrections and revisions, approved by the General Counsel, necessary for compliance with state or federal law or for acceptance by the Secretary of State for filing and publication in the Texas Register. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the amendments to are proposed for adoption and are authorized for publication in the Texas Register for the purpose of receiving public comments. The executive director is directed to take the necessary steps to implement the actions as ordered in this minute order, pursuant to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code, Chapter Note: Exhibits A and B on file with minute order clerk. Note: The commission received comments from Texas Transit Association Executive Director Jeff Heckler.

9 June 24, ITEM 6. PASS-THROUGH TOLL PROGRAM Select pass-through toll proposals submitted under the February 25, 2010 pass-through toll program call in accordance with Minute Order and authorize the executive director or designee to negotiate the financial terms of a potential pass-through toll agreement with the selected public entity proposers and solicit competitive proposals for any selected private entity proposers (MO) Commissioner Houghton made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Deputy Executive Director for Engineering Operations John Barton: Section (b), Transportation Code authorizes the Texas Department of DEO Transportation (department) to enter into an agreement with a public or private entity that provides for the payment of pass-through tolls to the entity as reimbursement for the design, development, construction, maintenance, or operations of a tolled or non-tolled facility on the state highway system by the public or private entity. A pass-through toll is a per-vehicle fee or a per-vehicle-mile fee that is determined by the number of vehicles using the facility. Title 43 Texas Administrative Code (rules) prescribe the policies and procedures governing the department s implementation of the program under Section (b), Transportation Code. Section 5.54 of the rules provides that if the Texas Transportation Commission (commission) determines that funds available for use in the program are limited, it may periodically limit the periods of time during which the department will accept proposals for pass-through toll projects to be developed and, for each specific period, prescribe conditions for submission and the costs that may be reimbursed under a pass-through agreement (agreement). On February 25, 2010 by Minute Order the commission approved a program call for highway projects to be developed on the state highway system under a pass-through toll agreement (program call). The commission further determined that (i) monies available that can be allocated among all proposals selected under the program call will be limited to an estimated total of $300 million in Category 12 funds, and (ii) only the following category of project costs will be considered as eligible for reimbursement under the program call: construction cost, exclusive of construction engineering cost, and in the case of a passthrough toll project submitted as a design-build project, the construction cost, exclusive of construction engineering costs must be broken out separately as one component of the total project cost. The cost categories of design, development (including environmental clearance, right of way acquisition, utility adjustment), financing, maintenance, and operation are specifically excluded. Pursuant to Minute Order and 5.54 of the rules, the department published in the Texas Register a notice designating a 60-day period commencing on March 12, 2010 for acceptance of proposals from both public and private entities for projects to be developed

10 June 24, under the program call. The deadline for submitting proposals was May 11, Department staff evaluated the proposals that were timely submitted under the program call using the items of consideration set forth in 5.55 of the rules and provided its analyses of the pass-through toll proposals to the commission. After considering the factors described by 5.55 of the rules and the criteria set forth in Minute Order , it is determined that the pass-through toll proposals set forth in Exhibit A represent the best value to the state for a total of approximately $300 million in authorized funds. Before the projects in the selected proposals are designed, developed, or constructed using funds administered by the department, the proposals: (1) must be included in the department s UTP, thereby identifying committed funding for the project; (2) prior to construction, must be included in the department s Statewide Transportation Improvement Program; and (3) will be subject to any and all applicable planning and environmental processes and approvals as mandated by state and federal regulations regarding such matters. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the pass-through toll proposals submitted under the current pass-through toll program call and set forth in Exhibit A are hereby selected as providing the best value to the state. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the executive director or designee is authorized to negotiate the financial terms of potential pass-through toll agreements for each of the selected pass-through toll proposals as set forth in Exhibit A. Payment of pass-through tolls will be limited to reimbursement of the department s proportional share of the actual cost of labor and materials required for construction of the project as determined by the low bid award of the construction contract, subject to limited exceptions for cost overruns and underruns of the estimated cost of construction. If negotiations are successful, the executive director shall submit to the commission a summary of the final terms of each agreement so that the commission may consider final approval of the agreement under 5.57 of its rules. If the financial terms of a pass-through toll agreement for one or more of the selected passthrough toll proposals set forth in Exhibit A cannot be successfully negotiated with the proposer(s) by August 17, 2010, the unsuccessful proposal or proposals will be rejected and the commission may, in accordance with 5.55 of the rules and the criteria set forth in Minute Order , consider selection of additional proposals that were timely submitted under the program call. Note: Exhibit A on file with minute order clerk. Note: The commission received comments from Hidalgo County Judge Rene Ramirez; City of Temple Mayor Bill Jones; Cameron County Commissioner David Garza; Cameron County Commissioner John Wood; and City of Cedar Park Assistant City Manager Sam Roberts.

11 June 24, ITEM 7. UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Amend the 2010 Unified Transportation Program (MO) Commissioner Holmes made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Deputy Executive Director for Engineering Operations John Barton: The UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (UTP) of the Texas Department AEO of Transportation (department) is an 11-year plan that authorizes project planning and development, and is submitted to the Texas Transportation Commission (commission) for approval. To align the UTP with the budget strategies outlined in the Strategic Plan, the department has developed the UTP as one document instead of two documents as in previous years. The UTP contains all of the department's funding categories which enhance the transportation system. Transportation Code, requires the commission to plan and make policies for the location, construction, and maintenance of a comprehensive system of state highways and public roads. Transportation Code, requires the commission to lay out, construct, maintain, and operate a modem state highway system, with emphasis on the construction of controlled access highways, and to plan for future highways. Pursuant to Transportation Code, , the department conducted a public hearing on November 19, 2009, to receive testimony concerning the highway project selection process and the relative importance of the various criteria which the commission uses for project selection decisions. Minute Order , dated January 28, 2010, approved the project selection process. The commission approved the 2010 UTP in Minute Order , dated April 29, The 2010 UTP includes approximately $68 million in undistributed funds in FY Category 10 to be used for project cost overruns. The commission desires to allocate the $68 million of undistributed FY Category 10 funds to supplemental mobility and rehabilitation programs and authorize additional mobility and rehabilitation projects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the 2010 UTP is amended to reduce the undistributed funds in FY 2010 Category 10 by $68 million and authorize $68 million of additional mobility and rehabilitation projects through supplemental mobility and rehabilitation programs as shown in Exhibits A and B. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the executive director is hereby authorized to proceed with project development and contract awards for the projects described in Exhibits A and B, subject to the applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and procedures. Note: Exhibits A and B on file with minute order clerk.

12 June 24, ITEM 8. STRATEGIC PLAN Adopt final Strategic Plan for official submission to the Legislative Budget Board and Governor s Office (MO) Commissioner Houghton made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Strategic Policy and Performance Special Assistant Mary Meyland: Texas Government Code, Chapter 2056, requires that each state agency prepare a SPP five-year strategic plan every biennium. The Texas Governor s Office and the Legislative Budget Board require certain items to be covered in the plan. The strategic plan represents the commitment by the Texas Department of Transportation to provide for the safe and productive movement of people and goods. The vision, mission, philosophy, goals, objectives, strategies, and measures contained in this plan focus on delivering the high quality, aesthetic and accessible transportation systems expected by the ultimate users of those systems. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the Texas Transportation Commission that the document entitled Agency Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years , as shown in Exhibit A, is adopted and approved for submission to the Governor s Office, the Legislative Budget Board and other required officials. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the executive director or his designee is authorized to approve alterations to the plan if any such alterations are requested by the Legislative Budget Board. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the executive director or his designee shall proceed with the publication and distribution to the public of the primary text of the plan as a separate document to present the agency s goals, objectives, strategies, and performance measures for more general public use. Note: Exhibit A on file with minute order clerk. ITEM 9. REGIONAL MOBILITY AUTHORITY Bexar County Authorize the department to fund a portion of pre-development and development costs incurred by the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority (ARMA) in connection with the ARMA's construction of the US 281-Loop 1604 interchange project, and authorize the executive director to enter into an amendment to the project agreement with the ARMA (MO) This item was deferred.

13 June 24, ITEM 10. TOLL ROAD PROJECTS Accept the Report of Actual Traffic and Revenue for the Central Texas Turnpike System (MO) Commissioner Holmes made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was presented by Texas Turnpike Authority Division Director Mark Tomlinson: Transportation Code, Chapter 228 and other applicable law authorizes the Texas TTA Transportation Commission (commission) to issue toll revenue bonds, bond anticipation notes, and other obligations to finance turnpike projects on the state highway system, and to enter into trust agreements and indentures of trust governing matters relating to the issuance of such obligations. The commission has previously issued $2,199,993, in obligations to finance a portion of the costs of the Central Texas Turnpike System (System), a turnpike project composed initially of the SH 130, SH 45, and Loop 1 project elements (2002 Project), pursuant to an Indenture of Trust and four supplemental indentures. The Indenture of Trust dated July 15, 2002 (Indenture), prescribes the terms, provisions and covenants related to the issuance of turnpike revenue bonds and obligations to finance a portion of the costs of the 2002 Project. Section 501(c) of the Indenture covenants that for the first five full years of operation of the 2002 Project, the commission will provide to the Trustee a report showing the traffic and revenue of the system for the previous quarter. Pursuant to Minute Order , dated September 27, 2007, the 2002 Project was declared Substantially Complete as defined within the Indenture. A report of actual traffic and revenue for the required period, attached as Exhibit A, has been prepared in accordance with Section 501(c) of the Indenture of Trust. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the report of actual traffic and revenue attached as Exhibit A is accepted. Note: Exhibit A on file with minute order clerk. ITEM 11. OBLIGATION LIMIT REPORT Status report on the FY 2010 Obligation Limit, the actual obligations utilized through the current month, proposed remaining highway maintenance and construction contract letting for the fiscal year and an update on motor fuel tax receipts. This item was presented by Finance Division Director Brian Ragland.

14 June 24, ITEM 12. CONTRACTS a. Award or Reject Highway Improvement Contracts (1) Highway Maintenance and Department Building Construction (see attached itemized list) (MO) Commissioner Holmes made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was recommended by staff and presented by Construction Division Director Russel Lenz: Pursuant to Transportation Code, Chapter 223, Subchapter A, and Title 43, Texas CST Administrative Code, Chapter 9, Subchapter B, the Texas Department of Transportation (department) solicited and received sealed competitive bid proposals for maintenance of the State Highway System, which were publicly opened and read on June 3 and 4, Pursuant to cited code provisions highway maintenance contract bids on a project may be accepted or rejected, but if accepted must be awarded to the lowest bidder. An award is conditional in the event it is subject to Federal Highway Administration concurrence, third party funding or concurrence, and other conditions listed in the contract or an exhibit to this order. The department recommends that the Texas Transportation Commission (commission) respectively award to the lowest bidder or reject, as indicated, those highway maintenance and department building construction contracts, with an engineer s estimated cost of $300,000 or more, identified on attached Exhibit A to this order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the contracts described in Exhibit A be and are hereby respectively awarded to the lowest bidder or rejected as indicated therein. If a contractual requirement of award is not satisfied within the prescribed time limit, including any extension of time allowed by the executive director or the director s designee, by reason of the action or inaction of the successful low bidder on any contract, including, but not limited to, disadvantaged business/historically underutilized business participation, the contract is automatically in default and the executive director is authorized and directed to retain and deposit the related contract proposal guaranty to the credit of the State Highway Fund and to readvertise that project for competitive bids at the earliest practical subsequent date. If a condition of award is not satisfied, including, but not limited to, reason of nonconcurrence of the Federal Highway Administration, the failure of a third party to fund or concur, or failure to meet other conditions in the contract or an exhibit to this order, the respective award is voided and the department will return the bid guaranty. Note: Exhibit A on file with minute order clerk.

15 June 24, (2) Highway and Transportation Enhancement Building Construction (see attached itemized list) (MO) Commissioner Houghton made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute order by a vote of 3 0 rejecting Project No in Lamb County. Commissioner Underwood and Meadows were absent. This item was recommended by staff and presented by Construction Division Director Russel Lenz: Pursuant to Transportation Code, Chapter 223, Subchapter A, and Title 43, Texas CST Administrative Code, Chapter 9, Subchapter B, the Texas Department of Transportation (department) solicited and received sealed competitive bid proposals for improvement of the State Highway System, which were publicly opened and read on June 3 and 4, 2010 as well as the Fort Bend County, Job Number 3203, Houston District deferred contract from the May 27, 2010 Commission meeting. Pursuant to cited code provisions highway improvement contract bids on a project may be accepted or rejected, but if accepted must be awarded to the lowest bidder. An award is conditional in the event it is subject to Federal Highway Administration concurrence, third party funding or concurrence, and other conditions listed in the contract or an exhibit to this order. The department recommends that the commission respectively award to the lowest bidder or reject, as indicated, those highway and transportation enhancement building construction contracts identified on attached Exhibit A to this order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the contracts described in Exhibit A be and are hereby respectively awarded to the lowest bidder or rejected as indicated therein. If a contractual requirement of award is not satisfied within the prescribed time limit, including any extension of time allowed by the executive director or the director s designee, by reason of the action or inaction of the successful low bidder on any contract, including, but not limited to, disadvantaged business/historically underutilized business participation, the contract is automatically in default and the executive director is authorized and directed to retain and deposit the related contract proposal guaranty to the credit of the State Highway Fund and to readvertise that project for competitive bids at the earliest practical subsequent date. If a condition of award is not satisfied, including, but not limited to, reason of nonconcurrence of the Federal Highway Administration, the failure of a third party to fund or concur, or failure to meet other conditions in the contract or an exhibit to this order, the respective award is voided and the department will return the bid guaranty. Note: Exhibit B on file with minute order clerk.

16 June 24, ITEM 13. ROUTINE MINUTE ORDERS Commissioner Holmes made a motion, which was seconded and the commission approved the following minute orders by a vote of 3 0 with the exception of 13.c.(3) which was taken separately. This item was presented by Executive Director Amadeo Saenz: a. Donations to the Department (1) Bryan District Consider a donation from College Station Marketplace, LP to construct an acceleration lane on the northbound frontage north of the turn-around north of SH40 (MO) This minute order considers a donation to the Texas Department of Transportation GSD (department) from College Station Marketplace, LP of approximately $250,000 in construction funds for the construction of an acceleration lane on the northbound frontage road north of the turnaround north of SH 40. The department has determined that acceptance of the donation is in the best interest and welfare of the traveling public and will provide a significant public benefit. Transportation Code, , authorizes the department to accept a donation in any form, including realty, personalty, money, materials, and services, for the purpose of carrying out its functions and duties. Government Code, Chapter 575, requires the governing board of a state agency to acknowledge the acceptance of a donation valued at $500 or more by majority vote at an open meeting, not later than the 60th day after the date the donation is accepted. It also prohibits a state agency from accepting a donation from a person who is a party to a contested case before the agency until the 30th day after the date the decision in the case becomes final. The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) has adopted 43 TAC , which relate to the department s acceptance of donations. Section prohibits acceptance of a gift or donation when the donor is subject to department regulation or oversight or when the donor is interested in or likely to become interested in any contract, purchase, payment, or claim with or against the department, except as provided by that section. It also provides that the commission may approve the acceptance of a donation, notwithstanding the foregoing proscriptions in the rules, if it determines that acceptance would provide a significant public benefit and would not influence or reasonably appear to influence the department in the performance of its duties. The commission finds that the donation furthers the department s responsibilities and that the donor is not a party to a contested case before the department and has not been a party to a contested case before the department during the last 30 days. The commission also finds that the donor is not subject to department regulation or oversight, and that this donation will not influence or reasonably appear to influence the department in the performance of its duties. The commission also finds that the donor is not interested in or likely to become interested in any contract, purchase, payment, or claim with or against the department.

17 June 24, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the donation of approximately $250,000 from College Station Marketplace, LP is accepted. The executive director or the executive director s designee is authorized to execute all necessary documents under 43 TAC to effect the acknowledgement of the donation. (2) Construction Division Acknowledges a donation from the Texas Asphalt Pavement Association for department employee s travel expenses to participate and speak at the Texas Asphalt Pavement Association Annual Mid-Year Meeting. The meeting was held in Albuquerque, New Mexico from June 8 10, 2010 (MO) This minute order acknowledges a donation of approximately $1, from the GSD Texas Asphalt Pavement Association (TxAPA) for a Texas Department of Transportation (department) employee s travel expenses to participate and speak at the TxAPA Mid-Year Annual Meeting that was held in Albuquerque, New Mexico, June 8 10, The department has determined that acceptance of the donation is in the best interest and welfare of the traveling public and will provide a significant public benefit. Transportation Code, , authorizes the department to accept a donation in any form, including realty, personalty, money, materials, and services, for the purpose of carrying out its functions and duties. Government Code, Chapter 575, requires the governing board of a state agency to acknowledge the acceptance of a donation valued at $500 or more by majority vote at an open meeting, not later than the 60th day after the date the donation is accepted. It also prohibits a state agency from accepting a donation from a person who is a party to a contested case before the agency until the 30th day after the date the decision in the case becomes final. The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) has adopted 43 TAC , which relate to the department s acceptance of donations. Section prohibits acceptance of a gift or donation when the donor is subject to department regulation or oversight or when the donor is interested in or likely to become interested in any contract, purchase, payment, or claim with or against the department, except as provided by that section. It also provides that the commission may approve the acceptance of a donation, notwithstanding the foregoing proscriptions in the rules, if it determines that acceptance would provide a significant public benefit and would not influence or reasonably appear to influence the department in the performance of its duties. The commission finds that the donation furthers the department s responsibilities and that the donor is not a party to a contested case before the department and has not been a party to a contested case before the department during the last 30 days. The commission also finds that the donor is not subject to department regulation or oversight, and that this donation will not influence or reasonably appear to influence the department in the performance of its duties. The commission also finds that the donor is not interested in or likely to become interested in any contract, purchase, payment, or claim with or against the department.

18 June 24, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the donation of approximately $1, from the TxAPA is acknowledged. The executive director or the executive director s designee is authorized to execute all necessary documents under 43 TAC to effect the acknowledgement of the donation. (3) General Services Division Consider a donation from the Associated General Contractors (AGC) of Texas for department employee s travel expenses to speak and participate at the 2010 Administrative Conference. The meeting will be held in South Padre Island, Texas from July 16 17, 2010 (MO) This minute order considers a donation of approximately $1, from the GSD Associated General Contractors (AGC) of Texas for a Texas Department of Transportation (department) employee s travel expenses to participate in the 2010 Administrative Conference in South Padre Island, Texas, July 16 17, The department has determined that acceptance of the donation is in the best interest and welfare of the traveling public and will provide a significant public benefit. Transportation Code, , authorizes the department to accept a donation in any form, including realty, personalty, money, materials, and services, for the purpose of carrying out its functions and duties. Government Code, Chapter 575, requires the governing board of a state agency to acknowledge the acceptance of a donation valued at $500 or more by majority vote at an open meeting, not later than the 60th day after the date the donation is accepted. It also prohibits a state agency from accepting a donation from a person who is a party to a contested case before the agency until the 30th day after the date the decision in the case becomes final. The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) has adopted 43 TAC , which relate to the department s acceptance of donations. Section prohibits acceptance of a gift or donation when the donor is subject to department regulation or oversight or when the donor is interested in or likely to become interested in any contract, purchase, payment, or claim with or against the department, except as provided by that section. It also provides that the commission may approve the acceptance of a donation, notwithstanding the foregoing proscriptions in the rules, if it determines that acceptance would provide a significant public benefit and would not influence or reasonably appear to influence the department in the performance of its duties. The commission finds that the donation furthers the department s responsibilities and that the donor is not a party to a contested case before the department and has not been a party to a contested case before the department during the last 30 days. The commission also finds that the donor is not subject to department regulation or oversight, and that this donation will not influence or reasonably appear to influence the department in the performance of its duties. The commission also finds that the donor is not interested in or likely to become interested in any contract, purchase, payment, or claim with or against the department.

19 June 24, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the donation of approximately $1, from the AGC is accepted. The executive director or the executive director s designee is authorized to execute all necessary documents under 43 TAC to effect the acknowledgement of the donation. (4) General Services Division Acknowledge a donation from the US Environmental Protection Agency, through the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality for department employees travel expenses to participate in the 2010 Transportation Research Board Environmental and Energy Research Conference in Richmond, Virginia on June 6-9, 2010 (MO) This minute order acknowledges a donation of approximately $1,100 to the Texas GSD Department of Transportation (department) from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), through the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality for a department employee s travel expenses to participate in the 2010 Transportation Research Board Environmental and Energy Research Conference in Richmond, Virginia, June 6 9, The department has determined that acceptance of the donation is in the best interest and welfare of the traveling public and will provide a significant public benefit. Transportation Code, , authorizes the department to accept a donation in any form, including realty, personalty, money, materials, and services, for the purpose of carrying out its functions and duties. Government Code, Chapter 575, requires the governing board of a state agency to acknowledge the acceptance of a donation valued at $500 or more by majority vote at an open meeting, not later than the 60th day after the date the donation is accepted. It also prohibits a state agency from accepting a donation from a person who is a party to a contested case before the agency until the 30th day after the date the decision in the case becomes final. The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) has adopted 43 TAC , which relate to the department s acceptance of donations. Section prohibits acceptance of a gift or donation when the donor is subject to department regulation or oversight or when the donor is interested in or likely to become interested in any contract, purchase, payment, or claim with or against the department, except as provided by that section. It also provides that the commission may approve the acceptance of a donation, notwithstanding the foregoing proscriptions in the rules, if it determines that acceptance would provide a significant public benefit and would not influence or reasonably appear to influence the department in the performance of its duties. The commission finds that the donation furthers the department s responsibilities and that the donor is not a party to a contested case before the department and has not been a party to a contested case before the department during the last 30 days. The commission also finds that acceptance would provide a significant public benefit and would not influence or reasonably appear to influence the department in the performance of its duties.