tlnitcd ~tatcs ~cnatc WASHINGTON, DC 20510

Transcription

1 tlnitcd ~tatcs ~cnatc WASHINGTON, DC March 1, 2019 The Honorable Andrew Wheeler Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC Dear Administrator Wheeler, I write to express deep concern about reports of unaddressed conflicts of interest and the excessive influence of polluting industries at the Environmental Protectioµ Agency (EPA). I am today seeking information on key offices at the agency that are presently led by senior officials who have long records of working on behalf of the polluters they are now charged with overseeing. 1 These officials are David Dunlap, a former Koch Industries official, and now the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Research and Development in the EPA's Office of Research and Development, and Bill Wehrum, a former coal lobbyist, who is now the Assistant Administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation. ' The agency's Office of Research and Development (ORD), is "the scientific research arm of [the] EPA, whose leading-edge research helps provide the solid underpinning of science and technology for the Agency" and "provides the foundation for credible decision-making to safeguard huiilfln health and ecosystems from environmental pollutants." 2 The Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) "develops national programs, policies, and regulations for controlling air pollution and radiation exposure" and "is responsible for administering the Clean Air Act, the Atomic Energy Act, the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land Withdrawal Act, and other applicable environmental laws."3 Both of these offices serve a crucial role in supporting the EPA's mission to "protect human health and the environment."4 However, the current senior leadership of both of these offices appear to be severely compromised by their previous work on behalf of polluters who continue to have significant interests at stake in EPA actions. Politico, "Former Koch official runs EPA chemical research," Annie Snider, February 4, 2019, Politico, "Documents detail multimillion-dollar ties involving EPA official, secretive industry group," Zack Colman and Alex Guillen, February 20, 2019, 14f-1646-d88f-al cf-5f46b7bd0000&nrid=ooooo 156-5b08-d9ce-a757fba8249bOOOO&nlid= Environmental Protection Agency, "About the Office of Research and Development (ORD): What We Do," 3 Environmental Protection Agency, "About the Office of Air and Radiation (OAR): What We Do," https :// 4 Environmental Protection Agency, "About the EPA," 1

2 Concerns about Mr. Dunlap's Conflicts of Interest Mr. Dunlap joined the Agency as Deputy Assistant Administrator of the Office of Research and Development in September 2018, and has played a prominent role in the "research that will shape how the government regulates a class of toxic chemicals contaminating millions of Americans' drinking water." 5 But Mr. Dunlap has an extraordinary conflict of interest: prior to joining the agency, he worked as the Director of Policy & Regulatory Affairs at Koch Industries for eight years. 6 In this role, Dunlap was considered the company's "lead expert on water and chemical regulations" and sought to help private entities "limit regulatory restrictions and liability for cleanups." 7 Public disclosures in 2018 indicate that Koch Industries spent at least $90,000 on policies affecting chemical regulations, 8 and decisions made by Mr. Dunlap at the EPA have "major financial repercussions for his former employer." 9 Since joining the EPA, Dunlap has played a key role in Agency decision-making on the regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). Categorized as "contaminants of emerging concern," these toxic compounds have been found to have a "toxicity, mobility and bioaccumulation potential... [that can] result in potential adverse effects on the environment and human health." 10 Exposure to either or both of these PFAS chemicals has been associated with high cholesterol, increased liver enzymes, decreased vaccination response, thyroid disorders, pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia, cancer, and more. 11 Communities in Massachusetts and across the country have been struggling to test and clean up local water supplies contaminated with these PFAS chemicals. 12 Georgia-Pacific - a subsidiary of Koch Industries - is currently facing a federal class action lawsuit from residents in Parchment, Michigan who are seeking financial compensation and funding after the city's municipal drinking water was allegedly contaminated by a manufacturing plant that the company partially operat~d from 2000 to Georgia-Pacific has previously conceded that the paper products created at the factory contained PFAS. 14 Politico, "Former Koch official runs EPA chemical research," Annie Snider, February 4, 2019, 6 David Dunlap Linkedin page, 7 Politico, "Former Koch official runs EPA chemical research," Annie Snider, February 4, 2019, 8 Ibid 9 Ibid 10 Environmental Protection Agency, "Technical Fact Sheet - Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)," contaminants pfos pfoa O.pdf. 11 Ibid 12 Mass Live, "US Senators ask EPA for 'urgent action' on water contamination in Westefield, elsewhere,'' Hope Tremblay, April 18, 2018, senators ask epa for urgent.html 13 MLive, "Lawsuit alleges 3M and Georgia-Pacific caused Parchment PFAS emergency," November 1, 2018, Malachi Barrett, l l /3m and georgia-pacific sued fo.html 14 MLive, "Georgia-Pacific says it used paper containing PF AS at Parchment plant," October 4, 2018, Malachi Barrett, O/pfas parchment georgia-pacific.html 5

3 Recently released documents have indicated that Mr. Dunlap was involved in at least nine PFAS related meetings in his first six weeks at the EPA. 15 Two weeks ago, the PFAS Action Plan 16 that was formed based on the ORD's research-was released. This plan lacks concrete, enforceable steps and a clear deadline for a regulatory determination, which would allow the agency to delay rulemaking for years. 17 As a result, Georgia Pacific and other companies that use or have used these chemicals can stand to benefit. Concerns about Mr. Wehrum's Conflicts of Interest Mr. Wehrum was nominated as Assistant Administrator of the Office of Air and Radiation in September 2017, and confirmed two months later. Prior to his nomination, Mr. Wehrum spent ten years as a partner at Hunton Andrews Kurth, a law firm that represents clients that include "most major industrial groups that are affected by air quality regulations" and raises frequent court challenges to EPA regulations. 18 He served as the firm's head of administrative law, representing a number of polluting companies, including an entity called the Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG). Documents released to Politico reveal that this group includes "twenty-five power companies and six industry trade groups [that] agreed to pay the firm a total of $8.2 million in 2017 alone...less than three months before Trump tapped Wehrum for his EPA post." 19 Nearly a third of the group's funding from power companies came from just three organizations: Duke Energy Corporation ($726,108), Southern Company Services ($663,453), and American Electric Power ($555,395).20 These documents also indicated that, just months before his nomination by President Trump, Mr. Wehrum met with the UARG in June 2017 to discuss how to "limit the adverse effects of such overly-broad Agency actions" taken during the Obama Administration.21 Since joining the agency, Mr. Wehrum has taken numerous actions that appear to align with his previous clients' priorities rather than the interests of the public. For example, one of the ' in documents from the June 2017 meetings that Wehrum hosted with UARG priorities outlinea representatives22 was a change to the Obama era rules that called for limits on mercury emissions 15 Politico, "Former Koch official runs EPA chemical research," Annie Snider, February 4, 2019, 16 Environmental Protection Agency, "EPA's PFAS Action Plan," 17 New York Times, "E.P.A. will study limits on cancer-linked chemicals. Critics Say the Plan Delays Action.," Coral Davenport, February 14, 2019, 4/climate/epa-chemical-plan-pfas.html 18 Hunton Andrews Kurth, "Air," 19 Politico, "Documents detail multimillion-dollar ties involving EPA official, secretive industry group," Zack Colman and Alex Guillen, February 20, 2019, 14f-1646-d88f-al cf-5f46b7bdoooo&nrid=ooooo 1565b08-d9ce-a757-tba8249bOOOO&nlid= Ibid 2 1 UARG Policy Committee Introduction to Workshop Materials, https ://static. politico.com/59if 4119e cde9 8d e8bbb54/uti I ity-air-regulatory-group. pdf 22 Politico, "Documents detail multimillion-dollar ties involving EPA official, secretive industry group," Zack Colman and Alex Guillen, February 20, 2019, l 19l258?nname=playbook&nid=OOOOO14f-1646-d88f-al cf-5f46b7bdoooo&nrid=ooooo 1565b08-d9ce-a757-tba8249bOOOO&nlid=6303 J 8.

4 from power plants. 23 The EPA proposed this change on December 27, 2018, just a month after Mr. Wehrum was confirmed. The proposal cites the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, an office that falls under OAR. 24 The Washington Post also reported that - without consulting with ethics officials - Mr. Wehrum met with some of his former clients in December 2017 to discuss the agency's rollback of environmental rules. 25 Days later, Mr. Wehrum also participated in the drafting of an agency memo on "New Source Review Preconstruction Permitting Requirements." The findings of this memo -which concluded that the agency "would not be 'second guessing' companies' projections about how much their expanded operations might increase pollution" could benefit the litigation efforts of DTE Energy Company, another one of his former clients. 26 Conclusion I have numerous concerns about Mr. Dunlap's and Mr. Wehrum's compliance, or lack thereof, with both the spirit and letter of federal ethics requirements. Despite his years of work in the chemical industry and on behalf of the Koch Industries, Mr. Dunlap's ethics agreement only bars him from "participating in any particular matter involving specific parties" related to Koch Industries and formaldehyde related issues. 27 This means that despite Koch Industries extensive legal and financial interests in EPA decisions about PFAS chemicals, Mr. Dunlap is not prohibited from involvement in EPA PFAS policies that could have significant impacts on the company. In Mr. Wehrum's case, he has recused himself from decisions related to Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Research Services, Inc., and Salt River Project but not from decisions related to any of the other UARG member companies. 28 He has wiggled through narrow loopholes by asserting that UARG's status as a "legal entity" means that he worked on behalf of the group and not its individual members. 29 In addition, while federal regulations prevent Mr. "\. Ibid Environmental Protection Agency, "Organization Chart for EPA's Office of Air and Radiation," Environmental Protection Agency, "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units - Reconsideration of Supplemental Finding and Residual Risk and Technology Review," December 27, 2018, l 8wdisc.pdf 25 Washington Post, "Invite form for William Wehrum, from his former law firm," January 29, 2019, note.html?questionld=9e918d9c-b85c-454c-9f652aae769115e I &utm term=.f54d86d 1b5c8 26 Washington Post, "EPA regulator skirts the line between former clients and current job," Juliet Eilperin, February 25, 2019, https ://www. wash ingtonpost.corn/national/health-science/ epa-regulator-skirts-the-line-between-formercl ients-and-current-j ob/20 l 9/02/24/b826b5fa l l e9-a400-e48 l bt264fdc story.html?utm term=.ed 13e5cef Politico, "Former Koch official runs EPA chemical research," Annie Snider, February 4, 2019, l 9/02/04/former-koch-official-runs-epa-chemical-research William L. Wehrum, "Memorandum: Recusal Statement," https ://static.po1itico. corn/c 1/99/4eea0987 4bf382d124 fl /bill-wehrum-recusal-statement. pd f 29 Politico, "Documents detail multimillion-dollar ties involving EPA official, secretive industry group," Zack Colman and Alex Guillen, February 20, 2019, ?nname=playbook&nid=OOOOO 14f-1646-d88f-a I cf-5f46b7bdoooo&nrid=ooooo l 565b08-d9ce-a757-tba8249b0000&nlid=

5 Wehrum from working with his former clients, he is still able to work directly on regulations and policies - like weakening clean air law policies and enforcement - that could benefit these former clients. On January 28, 2017, the Trump Administration announced Executive Order 13770, which aims to minimize conflicts of interest amongst executive branch appointees. 30 However, the White House has repeatedly weakened this order by granting ethics waivers to former lobbyists and corporate lawyers. 31 As of January 24, 2019, Mr. Dunlap and Mr. Wehrum have not received any such waivers. 32 Despite his pledge to "drain the swamp," President Trump has expanded the influence of the fossil fuel industry under his Administration by nominating and appointing numerous former lobbyists and corporate advocates to senior positions at the EPA. When individuals like Mr. Dunlap and Mr. Wehrum are put into positions that provide them with the power to influence environmental policies and impact the lives of millions of Americans, it is clear that this Administration cares more about serving the fossil fuel industry than it does about the health and wellbeing of the American people. I request that you answer the following questions by March 12, Questions regarding Mr. Dunlap 1. Did Environmental Protection Agency ethics officials make any ethics determinations regarding Mr. Dunlap's participation in meetings, decisions, or any other actions on the following topics or companies? a. PF AS, PFOA, or PFOS b. Georgia Pacific " c. Koch Industries If so, please provide copies of any determinations, ethics guidance, or ethics advice regarding Mr. Dunlap's activities, or, ifthe determinations, guidance, or advice was communicated orally and not otherwise documented, a detailed description of any determinations, guidance, or advice communicated to Mr. Dunlap or his staff. 2. Did you or other ethics officials at the Environmental Protection Agency provide Mr. Dunlap authorizations or ethics waivers regarding his participation in meetings, decisions, or any other actions related to Koch Industries or Georgia Pacific White House, "Executive Order: Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Appointees," January 28, 2017, 31 Associated Press, "What swamp? Lobbyists get ethics waivers to work for Trump," Michael Biesecker, Juliet Linderman, and Richard Lardner, March 8, 2018, 32 White House, "Disclosures: Ethics Pledge Waivers," 30

6 representatives or EPA officials on the topics of PF AS or company liabilities for cleanups? If so, please provide copies of those authorizations or waivers. If not, please describe why the Agency does not believe authorizations or waivers were necessary or warranted. 3. What are Mr. Dunlap's specific responsibilities with regard to PFAS/PFOA/PFOS regulation at EPA? a. Please provide a copy of any meeting materials, calendar information, or other documents and other information on Mr. Dunlap activities with regard to PFOA/PF AS regulation. Questions regarding Mr. Wehrum 1. Did Environmental Protection Agency ethics officials make any ethics determinations regarding Mr. Wehrum' s participation in meetings or any other activity related to the following companies or industry groups: Duke Energy Corporation, Southern Company Services, American Electric Power, Dynergy, Inc., Dominion Energy, Inc., Luminant, FirstEnergy, DTE Energy, LG&E and KU Energy, Ameren, We Energies, Kansas City Power & Light, Salt River Project, Consumers Energy, NiSource, Oglethorpe Power, Pinnacle West, South Carolina Electric & Gas, Tucson Electric, Tri-State Generation & Transmission Association, Inc., Ohio Valley Electric, Eversource Energy, Minnesota Power, Wabash Valley Power, Otter Tail Power, Tennessee Valley Authority, Edison Electric Institute, Nationall Rural Electric Cooperation Association, American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, American Public _P()wer Association, National Mining Association? If so, pl~ase provide copies of any determinations, ethics guidance, or ethics advice regarding Mr. Wehrum's activities, or, ifthe determinations, guidance, or advice was communicated orally and not otherwise documented, a detailed description of any determinations, guidance, or advice communicated to Mr. Wehrum or his staff. 2. Did you or other ethics officials at the Environmental Protection Agency provide Mr. Wehrum authorizations or ethics waivers regarding his participation in meetings or any other activity related to any member of the Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) or EPA officials on the topics of mercury regulations or New Source review? If so, please provide copies of those authorizations or waivers. If not, please describe why the Agency does not believe authorizations or waivers were necessary or warranted. 3. Did the EPA Office of General Counsel or any EPA ethics official clear Mr. Wehrum to hold the December 2017 meeting with his formal clients?

7 a. If yes, please provide a copy of any s or written materials that discuss the deliberation of this decision. b. If no, were there any discussions with Mr. Wehrurn on whether he should be participating in those types of meetings moving forward? Sincerely, arr en United St tes Senator ' '