Intel Corporation, In the Matter of
|
|
- Alvin Hancock
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Page 1 of 15 MAIN MENU SEARCH Intel Corporation, In the Matter of TAGS: Technology Hardware Competition Nonmerger LAST UPDATED: NOVEMBER 2, 2010 In the Matter of Intel Corporation, a corporation. FTC MATTER/FILE NUMBER: DOCKET NUMBER: 9341 ENFORCEMENT TYPE: Part III Administrative Complaint CASE SUMMARY The Commission filed an administrative complaint against Intel Corp., the world s leading computer chip maker, charging that the company had illegally used its dominant market position for a decade to stifle competition and strengthen its monopoly. The complaint alleged that Intel engaged in a course of conduct to shut out rivals competing microchips by cutting off their access to the marketplace. In particular, the complaint alleged that Intel unlawfully maintained its monopoly in relevant central processing unit, or CPU, markets, and sought to acquire a second monopoly in the relevant graphics markets, using a variety of unfair methods of competition. In August of 2010, Intel agreed to a settlement containing provisions that would undo the effects of Intel's past conduct, and prohibiting Intel from suppressing competition in the future. CASE TIMELINE November 2, 2010 Decision and Order (76.33 KB) Letter to Commenter Bao (132.2 KB) Letter to Commenter Behr ( KB) Letter to Commenter Bruzzone (126.3 KB) Letter to Commenter Black ( KB)
2 Page 2 of 15 Letter to Commenter David (128.1 KB) Letter to Commenter Fog ( KB) Letter to Commenter Gray ( KB) Letter to Commenter Jensen ( KB) Letter to Commenter Jones (131 KB) Letter to Commenter Kanowitz (127.8 KB) Letter to Commenter Roberts ( KB) Letter to Commenter VIA Technologies (Wenchi Chen) ( KB) PRESS RELEASE: FTC Approves Modified Intel Settlement Order August 10, 2010 Federal Register Notice: Intel Corporation; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order (82.28 KB) August 4, 2010 Agreement Containing Consent Order (21.97 KB) Decision and Order ( KB) Analysis of Proposed Consent Order & Aid Public Comment (71.08 KB) PRESS RELEASE: FTC Settles Charges of Anticompetitive Conduct Against Intel July 21, 2010 Order Extending Withdrawal of Matter From Adjudication ( KB) PRESS RELEASE: FTC Extends Order That Removed Intel Case From Adjudication June 21, 2010 Order Withdrawing Matter From Adjudication For The Purpose Of Considering A Proposed Consent Agreement ( KB) PRESS RELEASE: FTC Extends Order That Removed Intel Case From Adjudication June 11, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order on Unopposed Motion of Non-parties Hewlett-Packard Company and Robert Skitol for Extension of Time to Move To Limit or Quash Subpoena Ad Testificandum (50.95 KB) Unopposed Motion. for Extension of Time Filed by Non-parties Hewlett-Packard Company and Robert Skitol ( KB) June 9, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Second Unopposed Motion of Non-parties Hewlett-Packard Company and David Donatelli for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Ad Testificandum (49.03 KB)
3 Page 3 of 15 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Respondent s Motion to Take Deposition Pursuant to Commission Rule 3.36 ( KB) June 4, 2010 June 4, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-parties Hewlett- Packard Company and David Donatelli for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Ad Testificandum (48.47 KB) June 3, 2010 Intel Corporation's Reply to Complaint Counsel's Response to Motion for Leave to Depose the Bureau of Labor Statistics ( KB) Non-parties Hewlett-Packard Company and David Donatelli s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time ( KB) Microsoft Corporation's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Subpoenas Duces Tecum ( KB) Administrative Law Judge's Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-Party Microsoft Corporation for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum (58.49 KB) June 2, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Requiring Reply Brief (36.22 KB) June 1, 2010 Respondent's Answers and Objections to Complaint Counsel's Second Set of Requests for Admission ( KB) Respondent Intel Corporation's Second Set of Requests for Admission Issued to Complainant Federal Trade Commission (10-100) ( KB) May 28, 2010 Order on Non-Party Hewlett-Packard Company s Motion for Reconsideration and/or Modification of May 19, 2010 Order ( KB) Third Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Lenovo Group Limited to File Motion to Quash or to Limit Intel Corporation s Subpoena Duces Tecum ( KB) Order Granting Third Unopposed Motion of Non-Party Lenovo Group Limited for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (55.5 KB) Order Denying Motion of Non-Parties Hewlett-Packard Company, Jeff Groudan, Louis Kim, and Joseph Lee to Quash Subpoenas Ad Testificandum Issued by Intel Corporation ( KB) Complaint Counsel's Response to Intel's Motion for Leave to Depose the Bureau of Labor Statistics (184.7 KB)
4 Page 4 of 15 May 27, 2010 Motion of Intel Corporation Under Rule 3.36 for Leave to Take a Deposition of the Bureau of Labor Statistics Under Rule 3.33(c)(1) (4.1 MB) Memorandum in Opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company s Motion to Quash Intel s Subpoena Ad Testificandum Issued to Joseph Beyers ( KB) Memorandum in Opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company s Motion for Reconsideration and/or Modification of This Court s May 19, 2010 Order ( KB) May 25, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Requiring Expedited Response (29.43 KB) May 20, 2010 Complaint Counsel's Second Set of Requests for Admission (24-62) ( KB) Memorandum in Opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion to Quash Intel's Subpoenas Ad Testificandum Issued to Jeff Groudan, Louis Kim and Joseph Lee (Redacted Public Version) ( KB) May 19, 2010 Administrative Law Judge's Order on Non-Party Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Served by Intel Corporation ( KB) May 17, 2010 Memorandum in Opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company s Motion to Quash Intel s Subpoena Duces Tecum (6.03 MB) Administrative Law Judge's Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-Party Microsoft Corporation for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum (66.47 KB) May 14, 2010 Microsoft Corporation's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Limit or Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum ( KB) Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Second Unopposed Motion of Non-Party Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (57.42 KB) May 13, 2010 Second Unopposed Motion of Non-Party Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum ( KB) May 11, 2010
5 Page 5 of 15 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Second Unopposed Motion of Non-party Lenovo Group Limited for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (62.3 KB) May 10, 2010 Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Served by Intel Corporation (8.27 MB) Notice of Appearance by Coleen M. Meehan, Counsel to Hewlett-Packard Company ( KB) May 7, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party Nvidia Corporation for Extension of Time to File Motion to Quash or Limit Subpoenas Ad Testificandum (53.96 KB) May 6, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Denying Complaint Counsel's Motion to Admit European Commission Decision ( KB) Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Fifth Unopposed Motion of Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company for Extension of Time To Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (52.03 KB) Non-party Nvidia Corporation's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Quash or Limit Subpoenas Ad Testificandum ( KB) Notice of Appearance by Craig Waldman, Counsel for Non-party Nvidia Corporation (104.7 KB) May 5, 2010 Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company s Fifth Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move to Limit the Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on it by Intel Corporation ( KB) Complaint Counsel's Answers and Objections to Respondent's First Set of Requests for Admission ( KB) May 4, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Fourth Unopposed Motion of Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company for Extension of Time To Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (50.25 KB) May 3, 2010 Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company s Fourth Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time ( KB) April 30, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order ( KB) Microsoft Corporation's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time To File Motion to Limit or Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum ( KB)
6 Page 6 of 15 April 29, 2010 Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (303.2 KB) Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (52.66 KB) Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company s Fifth Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move to Limit the Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on it by Complaint Counsel (161.3 KB) April 27, 2010 Third Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Lenovo Group Limited to File Motion to Quash or to Limit Complaint Counsel's Subpoena Duces Tecum ( KB) Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Lenovo Group Limited to File Motion to Quash or to Limit Intel Corporation's Subpoena Duces Tecum ( KB) April 26, 2010 Complaint Counsel's Notice of Withdrawal of its Motion to Compel Response to Document Request No. 53 Or, in the Alternative, to Strike Respondent's Affirmative Defenses (81.52 KB) Complaint Counsel's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Admit EC Decision ( KB) April 23, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. Inc. For Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (51.8 KB) April 22, 2010 Non-Party GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. Inc. Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Quash or Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum ( KB) Notice of Appearance Filed by Non-Party GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. Inc. ( KB) Stipulation Between Intel and Complaint Counsel ( KB) Administrative Law Judge s Order Regarding Stipulation Between Intel and Complaint Counsel Regarding Inadvertently Produced Documents (35.04 KB) Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Second Unopposed Motion of Non-parties One Laptop per Child Foundation and One Laptop per Child Association for Extension Of Time to File a Motion to Quash or Limit Intel Corporation's Subpoenas Duces Tecum (75.23 KB) April 21, 2010 One Laptop per Child Foundation and One Laptop per Child Association's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Quash or Limit Intel Corporation's Subpoena Duces Tecum ( KB) April 20, 2010
7 Page 7 of 15 Complaint Counsel's Motion to Compel Response to Document Request No. 53 Or, in the Alternative, to Strike Respondent's Affirmative Defenses ( KB) April 19, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motions of Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company for Extensions of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum (66.75 KB) April 16, 2010 Hewlett-Packard Company s Fourth Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time ( KB) Hewlett-Packard Company s Third Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (152.1 KB) April 15, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party Microsoft Corporation for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (78.46 KB) Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Second Unopposed Motion of Non-party Lenovo Group Limited for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (57.32 KB) Microsoft Corporation's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time To File Motion to Quash or Limit Complaint Counsel's Subpoena Duces Tecum ( KB) Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Lenovo Group Limited to File Motion to Quash or to Limit Complaint Counsel's Subpoena Duces Tecum ( KB) April 14, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order on Joint Motion and Stipulation of the Parties Regarding Reply Brief of Complaint Counsel (53.49 KB) Joint Motion Setting Due Date of April 26, 2010, for Complaint Counsel's Reply Brief on Their Motion to Admit European Commission Decision ( KB) April 12, 2010 Memorandum in Opposition to Complaint Counsel's Motion to Admit European Commission Decision (10.33 MB) April 8, 2010 Non-Party Via Technologies, Inc. s Second Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Move to Quash or Limit Intel Corporation s Subpoenas Duces Tecum to Non-Party Via Technologies, Inc. ( KB) Notice of Appearance filed by Nina Frant, Counsel for Via Technologies ( KB) Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time filed by Non-Party Hewlett-Packard (465.8 KB) Third Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time filed by Non-Party Hewlett-Packard ( KB) Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motions of Non-Party Hewlett-Packard Company for Extensions of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum (69.81 KB)
8 Page 8 of 15 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Second Unopposed Motion of Non-Party Via Technologies, Inc. for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (65.25 KB) One Laptop Per Child Foundation and One Laptop Per Child Association s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Quash or Limit Intel Corporation s Subpoena Duces Tecum ( KB) April 6, 2010 Notice of Appearance filed by Nancy Turnblacer, Nur-ul Haq, Theodore Zang, Jr., and Trang Tran, Counsel Supporting the Complaint ( KB) April 1, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party Lenovo Group Limited for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (55.19 KB) Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Lenovo Group Limited to File Motion to Quash or to Limit Complaint Counsel's Subpoena Duces Tecum - Public (169 KB) Notice of Appearance Filed by W. Andrew Copenhaver, Counsel for Lenovo Group Limited (87.01 KB) March 31, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party Microsoft Corporation for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (56.05 KB) March 30, 2010 Microsoft Corporation's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time To File Motion to Quash or Limit Intel Corporation's Subpoena Duces Tecum - Public ( KB) Notice of Appearance Filed by Jonathan S. Kanter Counsel for Microsoft Corporation (91.5 KB) Notice of Appearance Filed by Amy W. Ray, Counsel for Microsoft Corporation (92.54 KB) Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party VIA Technologies, Inc. for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (42.77 KB) March 29, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motions of Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company for Extensions of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum (63.26 KB) viatechunoppmoeot.pdf ( KB) March 26, 2010 Notice of Withdrawal of Intel's Motion for Extension of Time and for Leave to File Overlength Memorandum In Opposition to Complaint Counsel's Motion to Admit European Commission Decision - Public (146.5 KB) Non-party Hewlett-Packard s Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time - Public ( KB) Non-party Hewlett-Packard s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time - Public ( KB) aljordconfirmbenchruling.pdf (35.22 KB)
9 Page 9 of 15 March 25, 2010 Complaint Counsel's Opposition to Intel's Request For Leave to File Overlength Memorandum - Public ( KB) March 24, 2010 Complaint Counsel's Opposition to Respondent's Motion For a Protective Order - Public ( KB) Administrative Law Judge s Order for Expedited Response (45.93 KB) March 23, 2010 Intel's Motion for Extension of Time and for Leave To File Overlength Memorandum in Opposition To Complaint Counsel's Motion to Admit European Commission Decision - Public ( KB) March 19, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company for Extension of Time (50.21 KB) March 18, 2010 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time and Proposed Order Filed by Kristofor T. Henning, Counsel for Hewlett-Packard Company - Public ( KB) Notice of Appearance Filed by Kristofor T. Henning, Counsel for Hewlett-Packard Company - Public ( KB) Notice of Appearance Filed by Victoria L. Wesner, Counsel for Hewlett-Packard - Public ( KB) March 17, 2010 Motion to Admit European Commission Decision - Public (45.13 MB) Motion of Intel Corporation for Protective Order Pursuant to Rules 3.33(b) and 3.31(d) - Public (2.74 MB) March 15, 2010 Notice of Appearance Filed by Howard M. Shapiro, Esq. of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Counsel for the Respondents ( KB) Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Oracle Corporation to File Motion to Quash or to Limit Complaint Counsel's Subpoenas Duces Tecum-Public (216.1 KB) March 12, 2010 Administrative Law Judge's Order Setting Status Conference (49.59 KB)
10 Page 10 of 15 March 11, 2010 Joint Request for Status Conference - Public ( KB) Administrative Law Judge's order Regarding First Proposed Modification to the February 2, 2010 Order Regarding Respondent's Production of Documents and Electronically Stored Information (54.18 KB) March 10, 2010 First Proposed Modification to the Order Regarding Respondent's Production of Documents and Electronically Stored Information in Response to Complaint Counsel'd First Set of Requests for Production ( KB) March 9, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party Oracle Corporation for Extension of Time to File Motion to Quash or Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum ( KB) Administrative Law Judge's Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-Parties Acer America Corporation and Gateway, Inc. For an Extension of Time to Move to Quash of Limit Subpoenas Duces Tecum (82.33 KB) March 5, 2010 Notice of Appearance Filed by James L. Hunt, Esq., of Bingham McCutchen LLP, Counsel for the Respondents ( KB) Notice of Appearance Filed by Roy T. Englert, Jr. of Robbins Russell Englert Orseck Untereiner & Sauber LLP, Counsel for the Respondents (73.65 KB) oraclecorpnoa.pdf ( KB) March 4, 2010 Administrative Law Judge s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party Oracle Corporation for Extension of Time to File Motion to Quash or to Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum (88.82 KB) March 3, 2010 Notice of Withdrawal of Non-parties Acer, Inc.'s, Acer America Corporation's, and Gateway, Inc.'s Joint Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum or in the Alternative to Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum (Federal Trade Commission Rule 3.34(c), 16 C.F.R )) - Public ( KB) Non-parties Acer America Corporation's and Gateway, Inc. s Joint Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Move to Quash or Limit the Federal Trade Commission's Subpoena Duces Tecum to Non-parties Acer America Corporation and Gateway, Inc. - Public ( KB) March 2, 2010 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Oracle Corporation To File Motion to Quash or to Limit Complaint Counsel's Subpoena Duces Tecum - Public (246.7 KB) Notice of Appearance Filed by Oracle Corporation ( KB)
11 Page 11 of 15 March 1, 2010 Respondent's Answers and Objections to Complaint Counsel's First Set of Requests for Admission-Public ( KB) February 17, 2010 Complaint Counsel's Notice of Appearance ( KB) Complaint Counsel's First Set of Requests for Admission ( KB) February 8, 2010 Objection to Proposed Disclosure by Intel Corporation ( KB) February 2, 2010 Administrative Law Judge's Order Regarding Respondent's Production of Documents and Electronically Stored Information in Response to Complaint Counsel's First Set of Requests for Production (37.13 KB) January 29, 2010 Stipulation Between Intel and Complaint Counsel:Regarding Respondent's Production of Documents and Electronically Stored Information in Response to Complaint Counsel's First Set of Requests for Production - Public ( KB) January 26, 2010 Notice of Intent to Disclose and Provisionally Redacted Information [Redacted Public Version] ( KB) January 19, 2010 Opinion and Order of the Commission Denying Motion For Disqualification [Redacted Public Version] ( KB) January 14, 2010 Administrative Law Judge's Scheduling Order ( KB) January 11, 2010 Notice of Appearance Filed by Counsel Supporting the Complaint ( KB) January 6, 2010 Administrative Law Judge's Order Setting Scheduling Conference (49.04 KB)
12 Page 12 of 15 January 5, 2010 Notice of Appearance Filed by Robert E. Cooper; Daniel Floyd; Micheal L. Denger and Joseph kattan of Gibson, Dunn;Crutcher LLP, Counsel for the Respondent ( KB) Notice of Appearance Filed by Darren B. Bernhard, Counsel for the Respondent-Public ( KB) December 31, 2009 Answer of Respondent Intel Corporation- Public (1.88 MB) Notice of Appearance Filed by Respondent's Counsel (62.12 KB) December 29, 2009 Notice of Appearance Filed by Counsel Supporting the Complaint ( KB) December 16, 2009 Administrative Complaint ( KB) Administrative Law Judge's Protective Order and Governing Discovery Material ( KB) Administrative Law Judge's Order Designating Administrative Law Judge (39.16 KB) Statement of Chairman Leibowitz and Commissioner Rosch Concurring and Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Rosch PRESS RELEASE: FTC Challenges Intel's Dominance of Worldwide Microprocessor Markets December 15, 2009 Motion of Intel Corporation For Disqualification of Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch (4.67 MB) Contact Stay Connected Privacy Policy FTC en español ABOUT THE FTC What We Do Our History Commissioners Bureaus & Offices
13 Page 13 of 15 Biographies Budgets Performance Office of Inspector General FOIA Careers at the FTC NEWS & EVENTS Press Releases Commission Actions Media Resources Events Calendar Speeches Audio/Video Social Media Blogs ENFORCEMENT Cases and Proceedings Premerger Notification Program Merger Review Anticompetitive Practices Rules Statutes Consumer Sentinel Network Criminal Liaison Unit POLICY Advocacy Advisory Opinions Cooperation Agreements Federal Register Notices Reports Testimony
14 Page 14 of 15 Public Comments Policy Statements International TIPS & ADVICE For Consumers Business Center Competition Guidance I WOULD LIKE TO... Submit a Consumer Complaint to the FTC File a Comment Get a Free Copy of My Credit Report List a Number on the National Do Not Call Registry Report An Antitrust Violation File Documents in Adjudicative Proceedings SITE INFORMATION Privacy Policy Website Policy No FEAR Act USA.gov Accessibility Digital Government Strategy Open Government FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Headquarters: 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC Contact Us
15 Page 15 of 15 Stay Connected with the FTC
United States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:04-cv JLT
US District Court Civil Docket as of 04/20/2007 Retrieved from the court on Tuesday, April 24, 2007 United States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:04-cv-10027-JLT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez
Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow Doc. 34 Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MARK J. GAINOR, Plaintiff,
More informationRULES OF TENNESSEE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION CHAPTER PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - CONTESTED CASES TABLE OF CONTENTS
RULES OF TENNESSEE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION CHAPTER 1220-01-02 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - CONTESTED CASES TABLE OF CONTENTS 1220-01-02-.01 Definitions 1220-01-02-.12 Pre-Hearing Conferences 1220-01-02-.02
More informationITC s Amended Section 337 Rules Streamline Investigations
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com ITC s Amended Section 337 Rules Streamline
More informationSub Docket Date Docket Code Docket Description Misc Info COSTS ASSESSED Costs Assessed
Court: Snohomish Superior Case Number: 13-1-01918-8 Sub Docket Date Docket Code Docket Description Misc Info - 08-30-2013 COSTS ASSESSED Costs Assessed 200.00 1 08-30-2013 INFORMATION ATP0001 2 08-30-2013
More informationAgreement between the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) regarding FOIA consultations, 2012
Description of document: Requested date: Released date: Posted date: Title of document Source of document: Agreement between the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
More informationTHE COURT S INVOLVEMENT WITH THE USE OF SUBPOENAE BURTON N. LIPSHIE STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP
THE COURT S INVOLVEMENT WITH THE USE OF SUBPOENAE BURTON N. LIPSHIE STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP TWO TYPES OF SUBPOENAE AD TESTIFICANDUM FOR A WITNESS TO APPEAR AND GIVE LIVE TESTIMONY DUCES TECUM FOR
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Western Alliance Bank v. Jefferson Doc. 1 1 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Western Alliance Bank, Plaintiff, :1-cv-01 JWS vs. ORDER AND OPINION Richard Jefferson, [Re: Motions at
More informationCase 1:17-cv RC Document 10-2 Filed 10/11/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. ) Civil No.
Case 1:17-cv-02016-RC Document 10-2 Filed 10/11/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY et al. Plaintiffs, v. Civil No. 17-02016 (RC PRESIDENTIAL
More informationInvestigations and Enforcement
Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 24.1.2 Last Revised January 26, 2007 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor Los Angeles,
More informationLEXSEE. JAMES R. HAZELWOOD, PLAINTIFF v. PATTI WEBB et al., DEFENDANTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:06CV-P107-M
Page 1 LEXSEE EX. 4 JAMES R. HAZELWOOD, PLAINTIFF v. PATTI WEBB et al., DEFENDANTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:06CV-P107-M UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
More informationBabin et al v. Breaux et al Doc. 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ORDER
Babin et al v. Breaux et al Doc. 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IRA PAUL BABIN, ET AL VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 10-368-BAJ-DLD PAM BREAUX, ET AL motions: Background ORDER
More informationADR CODE OF PROCEDURE
Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT
RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT Effective April 27, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 1 1. Authority and Applicability.... 1 2. Definitions.... 1 A. Administrative Law
More informationCompelling an Out-Of-State Witness to Give Testimony or Produce Records at a Deposition for Use in a Foreign Jurisdiction
Compelling an Out-Of-State Witness to Give Testimony or Produce Records at a Deposition for Use in a Foreign Jurisdiction INTRODUCTION This material is intended to provide the legal practitioner, legal
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. May 14, 2015
RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE May 14, 2015 INDEX PART 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 PART 2 GENERAL RULES... 2 Rule 1 How the Rules are Applied... 2 Applying the Rules... 2 Conflict with the Act... 2 Rule 2 Consequences
More informationAt Part of the Supreme Court of the. of New York, at the Courthouse thereof, 60 PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANTS.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS HEARING IS TO PUNISH JAMES GIBSON, SR. FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR REFUSING OR NEGLECTING TO OBEY A SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND AD TESTIFICANDUM AND APPEAR FOR DEPOSITION, AND SUCH PUNISHMENT
More informationStanding Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals
Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act 2002-142 Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I--PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS Subpart
More informationLOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS The following local rules of civil trial are adopted for use in non-family law civil trials
More informationInvestigations and Enforcement
Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Sections 24.21 24.29 Last Revised August 14, 2017 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. PREFACE...i
PREFACE...i CHAPTER 1: DISCOVERY: OVERVIEW AND RULES... 1 I. DEFINITION AND PURPOSE...1 II. ROLE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE IN INITIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS...2 III. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PARTIES IN PURSING
More informationCase 5:14-cv cr Document 160 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Case 5:14-cv-00117-cr Document 160 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT GROCERY MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, SNAK INTERNATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL DAIRY FOODS ASSOCIATION,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1244 UNOVA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACER INCORPORATED and ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, and Defendants, APPLE COMPUTER INC., GATEWAY INC., FUJITSU
More informationTable of Contents. See also Summary of Contents beginning on page vii.
Table of Contents See also Summary of Contents beginning on page vii. Chapter One General Discovery Duties and Obligations in Pennsylvania Courts... 1 Brian W. Waerig, Esq. I. The Scope of Discovery...
More informationU.S. District Court United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (New Haven) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:12-cv SRU
US District Court Civil Docket as of March 14, 2013 Retrieved from the court on March 26, 2013 U.S. District Court United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (New Haven) CIVIL DOCKET
More informationInitial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order. Parties
IN THE MATTER OF: Claimant(s): Respondent(s): Case Number: Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order Parties This case was filed under the American Arbitration Association Expedited Commercial Rules.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH PLAINTIFFS V. NO. 1:06cv1080-LTS-RHW STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, FORENSIC
More informationLegal Assistant Utilization May Optimize Client Services in Litigation Practice
Legal Assistant Utilization May Optimize Client Services in Litigation Practice To get the most from an experienced and trained legal assistant1 in litigation practice, an attorney may need to open their
More informationNon-Party Movant-Appellant. JR., District Attorney of New York County, and I represent Respondent in this
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM: FIRST DEPARTMENT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, -against- Respondent, New York County Criminal Court Docket No. 2011NY080152 Calendar Date:
More informationRULE 19 APPEALS TO THE CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE (Effective January 10, 2018; Rule Revision Memo 33D)
RULE 19 APPEALS TO THE CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE (Effective January 10, 2018; Rule Revision Memo 33D) Purpose Statement: The purpose of this rule is to provide a fair, efficient, and speedy administrative
More informationROBBINS,RUSSELL,ENGLERT,ORSECK,UNTEREINER &SAUBER LLP
Case 1:11-md-02296-RJS Document 2766 Filed 10/08/13 Page 1 of 6 ROBBINS,RUSSELL,ENGLERT,ORSECK,UNTEREINER &SAUBER LLP 1801 K STREET,N.W.,SUITE 411 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 PHONE (202) 775-4500 FAX (202)
More informationCase , Document 912, 03/29/2018, , Page1 of 6
Case 17-2992, Document 912, 03/29/2018, 2267585, Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-857-8500
More informationThe 100-Day Program at the ITC
The 100-Day Program at the ITC TECHNOLOGY August 9, 2016 Tuhin Ganguly gangulyt@pepperlaw.com David J. Shaw shawd@pepperlaw.com IN LIGHT OF AUDIO PROCESSING HARDWARE, IT IS NOW CLEAR THAT, WITH RESPECT
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationStevens v Cahill 2015 NY Slip Op 31956(U) October 20, 2015 Surrogate's Court, New York County Docket Number: /C Judge: Rita M.
Stevens v Cahill 2015 NY Slip Op 31956(U) October 20, 2015 Surrogate's Court, New York County Docket Number: 2013-2228/C Judge: Rita M. Mella Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationApril 3, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
April 3, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Sabrina Burroughs FOIA Officer U.S. Customs and Border Protection 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room 3.3D Washington, DC 20229-1181 Re: Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
More informationR U L E S. of the A R M E D S E R V I C E S B O A R D O F C O N T R A C T A P P E A L S
R U L E S of the A R M E D S E R V I C E S B O A R D O F C O N T R A C T A P P E A L S Approved 15 July 1963 Revised 1 May 1969 Revised 1 September 1973 Revised 30 June 1980 Revised 11 May 2011 Revised
More informationU.S. District Court District of Delaware (Wilmington) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:05-cv JJF
US District Court Civil Docket as of 01/29/2007 Retrieved from the court on Wednesday, June 06, 2007 U.S. District Court District of Delaware (Wilmington) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:05-cv-00162-JJF Hyland
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. et al Doc. 0 0 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Spencer H. Wan (CA Bar No. 0) spencer.wan@morganlewis.com One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA
More informationSTIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Filed D.C. Sl\p"~rj:)r 10 Apr: ]() P03:07 Clerk ot Court C'j'FI. STEVEN 1. ROSEN Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION v. Case No.: 09 CA 001256 B Judge Erik P. Christian
More informationU.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan (Flint) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:98-cv PVG
1 of 5 6/6/2007 3:12 PM CLOSED, PROTECTIVEORDER, TAC U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan (Flint) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:98-cv-40326-PVG EEOC v. Kellogg Co Assigned to: Judge Paul V Gadola
More informationDocket Number: 1076 ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, INC. Aaron Jay Beyer, Esquire VS.
Docket Number: 1076 ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, INC. Aaron Jay Beyer, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DICK THORNBURGH, Governor and ROBERT A. GLEASON, JR., Secretary of State and RICHARD E. ANDERSON,
More informationCase 2:14-md EEF-MBN Document 3755 Filed 08/02/16 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:14-md-02592-EEF-MBN Document 3755 Filed 08/02/16 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: XARELTO (RIVAROXABAN) * MDL 2592 PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION * *
More informationCivil Litigation Forms Library
Civil Litigation Forms Library Notice of Circumstances Giving Rise to Claim and Claim Against Governmental Subdivision, Its Officers, Employees, or Agents Notice of Claim Against State Officer, Employee,
More informationU.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv JDB
USCA Case #15-5190 Document #1561501 Filed: 07/08/2015 APPEAL,CLOSED,TYPE C Page 1 of 16 U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv 01870 JDB ASSOCIATION
More informationChapter 36 Mediation and Arbitration 2015 EDITION
Chapter 36 Mediation and Arbitration 2015 EDITION MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION SPECIAL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS DISPUTE RESOLUTION (Generally) 36.100 Policy for ORS 36.100 to 36.238 36.105 Declaration of purpose
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NON-UNION PLAN, EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED
More informationCase 1:18-cv JMF Document 379 Filed 10/15/18 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:18-cv-02921-JMF Document 379 Filed 10/15/18 Page 1 of 7 October 15, 2018 The Honorable Jesse M. Furman United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
More informationSTREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers
More informationFOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Krueger Investments LLC et al v. Cardinal Health 1 Incorporated et al Doc. 1 1 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Krueger Investments, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, d/b/a/ Eagle Pharmacy
More informationEXHIBIT J To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED
Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document62-11 Filed02/04/11 Page1 of 6 EXHIBIT J To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document62-11 Filed02/04/11
More informationDocket Number: 3654 ANGELO IAFRATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Michael D. Reed, Esquire Kenneth L. Sable, Esquire John W. Dornberger, Esquire
Docket Number: 3654 ANGELO IAFRATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Michael D. Reed, Esquire Kenneth L. Sable, Esquire John W. Dornberger, Esquire Lewis J. Baker, Esquire (Pro Hac Vice) Lewis I. Askew, Jr.,
More informationCarl Greene v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-7-2012 Carl Greene v. Philadelphia Housing Authority Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No.
More informationCase 1:06-cr AA Document 77 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:06-cr-00394-AA Document 77 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH SMITH, et al., Defendants.
More informationRULES OF THE TENNESSEE CLAIMS COMMISSION CHAPTER RULES OF PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS
RULES OF THE TENNESSEE CLAIMS COMMISSION CHAPTER-0310-1-1 RULES OF PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS 0310-1-1-.01 Applicability of Tennessee Rules 0310-1-1-.03 En Banc Hearings of Civil Procedure and Correlation
More informationR in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers
R-17-0010 in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers R-17-0010 was a rule petition filed by the Supreme Court s Committee on Civil Justice Reform in January 2017. The Supreme Court s Order in R-17-0010,
More informationCh. 493 SERVICE AND USE OF LEGAL PROCESS CHAPTER 493. SERVICE, ACCEPTANCE, AND USE OF LEGAL PROCESS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Ch. 493 SERVICE AND USE OF LEGAL PROCESS 67 493.1 CHAPTER 493. SERVICE, ACCEPTANCE, AND USE OF LEGAL PROCESS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Sec. 493.1. Purpose and policy. 493.2. Definitions. 493.3. Service of
More informationCase 2:14-cv GMN-CWH Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-00-gmn-cwh Document Filed 0// Page of JONATHAN E. NUECHTERLEIN General Counsel LESLIE RICE MELMAN Assistant General Counsel for Litigation IMAD D. ABYAD Attorney FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 00 Pennsylvania
More informationLegal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION. Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena.
A. Motion to Quash Assignment Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena. Recently you prepared a subpoena. Look at the front of the subpoena where it tells you how to oppose a subpoena.
More informationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules
District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility Board Rules Adopted June 23, 1983 Effective July 1, 1983 This edition represents a complete revision of the Board Rules. All previous
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NORTH ATLANTIC OPERATING COMPANY, INC.; and NATIONAL TOBACCO COMPANY, L.P., Petitioner, v. C.A. No. 18-mc-154-LPS DUNHUANG GROUP D/BA/ DHGATE,
More informationUnited States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14-cv LTS
US District Court Civil Docket as of October 2, 2015 Retrieved from the court on October 2, 2015 United States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14-cv-12949-LTS
More informationU.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Tampa) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:01-cv RAL
1 of 14 7/25/2007 1:49 PM CLOSED, EAJ, SL DOC U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Tampa) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:01-cv-00379-RAL EEOC v. Norstan Apparel Assigned to: Judge Richard A. Lazzara
More informationNebraska Civil Practice & Procedure Manual
Nebraska Civil Practice & Procedure Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Case Analysis, Screening & Preparation...17 I. Introduction: Case Analysis, Screening and Initial Preparation...23 II. Questions of Ethics,
More informationCislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs
Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs The following is a list of procedural Tasks and Deadlines for actions in the Central District of California
More informationUnited States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cv GAO
US District Court Civil Docket as of August 3, 2016 Retrieved from the court on August 3, 2016 United States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cv-13295-GAO
More informationChapter 36 Mediation and Arbitration 2013 EDITION Declaration of purpose of ORS to
Chapter 36 Mediation and Arbitration 2013 EDITION MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION SPECIAL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS DISPUTE RESOLUTION (Generally) 36.100 Policy for ORS 36.100 to 36.238 36.105 Declaration of purpose
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Steven J. HATFILL, M.D., Plaintiff Civil No. 1:03-CV-01793 (RBW v. Attorney General John ASHCROFT, Timothy BERES, Daryl DARNELL, Van HARP,
More informationU.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (Miami) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cv MGC
US District Court Civil Docket as of October 4, 2016 Retrieved from the court on October 4, 2016 U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (Miami) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cv-21740-MGC Wrigley
More informationPierce County Ethics Commission Administrative Procedures (Promulgated pursuant to Pierce County Code Ch. 3.12) Revised December 13, 2017
(Promulgated pursuant to Pierce County Code Ch. 3.12) Revised December 13, 2017 I. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES 1.1 Description of Organization The Pierce County Ethics Commission ("Commission") was established
More informationUnited States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:99-cv RBS
US District Court Civil Docket as of 04/04/2003 United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:99-cv-04981-RBS RAVENS, et al v. REPUBLIC NEW YORK,
More informationAntitrust Enforcement Under President Obama: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Stacey Anne Mahoney *
DISCLAIMER: This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express
More informationUnited States District Court Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.0 (Chicago) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:04-cv-05273
1 of 13 5/25/2007 2:34 PM CASREF, CLOSED, DENLOW United States District Court Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.0 (Chicago) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:04-cv-05273 EEOC v. Cracker Barrel
More informationU.S. District Court Western District of Tennessee (Memphis) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:04-cv SHM-tmp
1 of 16 6/7/2007 4:13 PM CLOSED U.S. District Court Western District of Tennessee (Memphis) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:04-cv-02730-SHM-tmp Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cleveland Construction,
More informationU.S. District Court Eastern District of California - Live System (Fresno) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv OWW-DLB
1 of 36 8/3/2009 5:30 PM U.S. District Court Eastern District of California - Live System (Fresno) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-DLB CIVIL Jadwin v. County of Kern, et al. Assigned to: Judge
More informationARTICLE 5.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS. K.S.A through shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas
ARTICLE.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS December, 00-0. Title. K.S.A. -0 through - - shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas administrative procedure act. History: L., ch., ; July,.
More informationCase 1:05-cr RBW Document 387 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 10 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:05-cr-00394-RBW Document 387 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 10 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) CR. NO. 05-394 (RBW) v. ) ) I. LEWIS LIBBY,
More informationMOTIONS PRACTICE BEFORE THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD AND THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION By Ernest C. Hadley and Sarah S.
MOTIONS PRACTICE BEFORE THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD AND THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION By Ernest C. Hadley and Sarah S. Tuck TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE CHAPTER ONE - FEDERAL RULES OF
More informationU.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Tampa) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:04-cv SCB-TBM
Page 1 of 13 CLOSED U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Tampa) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:04-cv-02155-SCB-TBM United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rooms To Go, Inc. Assigned
More informationCase 1:16-cv TSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT A
Case 1:16-cv-02470-TSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT A Case 1:16-cv-02470-TSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 2 of 6 July 10, 2013 U.S. Customs and Border Protection FOIA Division 799
More informationRED FLAGS From Litigation Related Public Records Requests
Washington Cities Insurance Authority RED FLAGS From Litigation Related Public Records Requests October 5, 2011 9:30 am Noon Coeur d Alene, Idaho Today s Presenters Jeff Myers, Attorney Law, Lyman Daniels,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/06/ :01 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/07/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK 120 EAST 56TH STREET, L.L.C., Plaintiff, -against- ASANDA, INC. and GENE FRISCO, Index No. 654862/2016 AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH
More informationIN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.
NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION -CVD-, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. ) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard
More informationTHE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSE SUSPENSION HEARINGS TITLE 1, PART 7 CHAPTER 159 (Effective January 20, 2009) TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL...
More informationThe Justices of the Peace Act, 1988
Consolidated to July 19, 2010 1 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, 1988 c. J-5.1 The Justices of the Peace Act, 1988 being Chapter J-5.1 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1988-89 (effective May 1, 1989) as amended
More informationU.S. District Court District of Oregon (Portland) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:01-cv PK
1 of 25 6/1/2007 2:43 PM PROTECTIVE ORD, TERMINATED U.S. District Court District of Oregon (Portland) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:01-cv-01136-PK Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al v. Qwest Communications
More informationGovernment & Global Trade Post-Inauguration Webinar Series
Government & Global Trade Post-Inauguration Webinar Series The New Administration s Impact on Antitrust Law Christopher J. Kelly Donald C. Klawiter Carolyn P. Osolinik June 4, 2009 Partner Partner Partner
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. District Of Columbia District Court Case No. 1:07-mc RJL TROLLINGER et al v. TYSON FOODS, INC.
PlainSite Legal Document District Of Columbia District Court Case No. 1:07-mc-00341-RJL TROLLINGER et al v. TYSON FOODS, INC. Document 13 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation
More informationUnited States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:00-cv RGS
US District Court Civil Docket as of 10/15/2002 Retrieved from the court on Wednesday, August 03, 2005 United States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:00-cv-10861-RGS
More informationCALIFORNIA YACHT BROKERS ASSOCIATION
CALIFORNIA YACHT BROKERS ASSOCIATION The California Yacht Brokers Association was established on January 29, 1975 as a non-profit, unincorporated association of yacht brokers, salespersons and others dedicated
More informationLOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL
DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL Rule Effective Chapter 1. Felony Cases 800. Pretrial Motions in Felony Cases 01/01/13 805. Motions in Capital Cases 07/01/09 806. Subpoena Duces Tecum 07/01/12 Chapter 2. Misdemeanor
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CW **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CW 06-266 LARRY L. FINDLEY, JR. VERSUS BILLIE FINDLEY ********** SUPERVISORY WRITS FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO.
More informationData Protection Policy
Data Protection Policy Co-ordinator Will Taylor Date of Completion June 2017 Date of adoption by Governors June 2017 Date to be reviewed June 2019 Introduction The new Data Protection Act 1998 (EU Directive
More informationState of Wyoming Office of Administrative Hearings
State of Wyoming Office of Administrative Hearings MATTHEW H. MEAD 2020 CAREY AVENUE, FIFTH FLOOR GOVERNOR CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82002-0270 (307) 777-6660 DEBORAH BAUMER FAX (307) 777-5269 DIRECTOR Summary
More informationU.S. District Court District of Maryland (Greenbelt) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:05-cv RWT
of 21 3/19/2008 1:26 PM CASREF, CLOSED, MAG-D, MAG-S U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Greenbelt) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:05-cv-00287-RWT U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lockheed
More informationThe Antitrust Investigation
The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio State Law Journal (Moritz College of Law) Ohio State Law Journal: Volume 29, Issue 1 (1968) 1968 The Antitrust Investigation Steinhouse, Carl L.
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Maureen K. Ohlhausen Noah Joshua Phillips Rohit Chopra Rebecca Kelly Slaughter
162-3197 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS: Joseph J. Simons, Chairman Maureen K. Ohlhausen Noah Joshua Phillips Rohit Chopra Rebecca Kelly Slaughter In the Matter
More informationPART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS
PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS What this Part is about: This Part is designed to resolve issues and questions arising in the course of a Court action. It includes rules describing how applications
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Case 4:11-mc-00073-RH-CAS Document 71 Filed 11/20/12 Page 1 of 5 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION In re Application of: The REPULIC
More informationAntitrust Enforcement in the Trump Administration: What's Happened and What's Next?
WEBINAR Antitrust Enforcement in the Trump Administration: What's Happened and What's Next? FEBRUARY 7, 2019 Speakers: Lee Greenfield, Perry Lange, Hartmut Schneider and Nicole Callan Webinar Guidelines
More information