FEDERAL COURTS SYLLABUS. Spring Semester 2018 (202) Hazel Hall John C. Massaro (202)

Transcription

1 FEDERAL COURTS SYLLABUS Law James L. Cooper Spring Semester 2018 (202) Mondays 9:00 a.m. to 11:40 a.m. Hazel Hall John C. Massaro (202) This course focuses on the scope and authority of the United States federal courts, including the role of the federal courts in our larger federal system of government. Schedule Our class will meet every Monday morning for two hours and forty minutes (with a ten minute break). The attached Schedule is our best attempt with the information we have now to outline the days on which we ll meet and the topics we hope to cover. Experience teaches that our plans will change to accommodate the speed at which we are able to work through this material and the intervention of the outside world, including our litigation schedules. We already are aware of a conflict on February 19 and we will do our best to advise you ahead of time of any other changes we foresee. Materials We will use Fallon, Manning, Meltzer & Shapiro, Hart & Wechsler s The Federal Courts and the Federal System, (Seventh Ed. 2015) and the corresponding supplement. We may add to these materials as needed with cases, statutes and the like depending on developments in the law and the scope of our course coverage. U.S. Code sections are not generally included in the casebook, but are available in many places including Be advised that the reading for this course is significant and dense, though rewarding and (we think) relevant to litigation practice. 1

2 Communications Because we both are active litigators in our other lives, we anticipate that most of our class-wide communications outside of the classroom will be through . We are available to meet with you in-person before and after class and by appointment either on campus or at our law firm offices. If you have questions that arise outside of class or if you wish to arrange a time to speak with us in person or by phone, please contact both of us by . Course Structure Our general approach this year will be as follows: 1. For most classes, we will have two students who are responsible for being the student leaders of the discussion. John and James will direct, participate in and oversee the discussion. Student leaders, however, will be responsible for: (a) distributing to the class an outline of the material to be covered in that class by at least the Sunday before class at 4:00 p.m. In addition to the outline, which can be joint, each discussion leader should circulate a provocative proposition which you think you can reasonably defend. For example, it could be that a case was wrongly decided, or correctly decided but wrongly reasoned, etc., but it should be something that is not already a focus of the book. (b) critiquing, responding and providing additional background during our class-wide discussion of material. What we are hoping to achieve with this process is to ensure that we have at least two members of the class who have focused on the material for class more intensely than otherwise would typically occur, and that you will gain some modest experience on your feet in class which will help when you practice law. Our use of the student discussion-leader protocol does not suggest we intend to relieve everyone else from reading the material for each class. Your performance as a student discussion leader, combined with your overall participation in class throughout the rest of the semester (i.e., the classes when you are not a discussion leader) will account for 35 percent of your final grade. 2

3 2. We will have a final exam. It will consist of multiple choice questions and you will have up to two hours to take it. Your score on the exam will account for 65 percent of your final grade. 3

4 CLASS SCHEDULE AND AGENDA Class 1: January 22 Introduction to the Class U.S. Constitution pp. xcv-cx (read Art. III carefully, scan the rest) Background and History of Federal Courts pp Fundamentals of Federal Justiciability -- Standing pp. 59 (beginning with Marbury) - 81; 103 (beginning with Allen) Class 2: January 29 Fundamentals of Federal Justiciability -- Mootness pp Political Questions pp

5 Class 3: February 5 Federal Question Jurisdiction -- Constitutional Scope pp Statutory Scope pp ; 28 U.S.C Declaratory Judgments pp Class 4: February 12 Diversity Jurisdiction -- The Basics of Diversity; Complete Diversity pp ; 28 U.S.C. 1332; 28 U.S.C. 1335; 1367, Corporations and Associations pp Jurisdictional Amount pp Supplemental Jurisdiction -- Fed Question pp Diversity pp ; 28 U.S.C

6 Class 5: TBD Class Actions and Coordination pp and additional reading TBA Class 6: February 26 Challenging Official Action -- Suits against the US or Federal Officers pp Suits against States pp Class 7: March 5 Challenging Official Action -- Suits against States (con t) and State Officers pp March No Class - GMU Spring Break Class 8: March 19 Challenging Official Action -- Civil Rights Actions ( 1983 and Bivens) pp ; ; 42 U.S.C Official Immunities pp March TBD -- Instructors Kids Spring Break 6

7 Class 9: April 2 Congressional Control -- of Federal Jurisdiction pp ; of State Court Jurisidiction pp Law Applied in District Court -- Readings TBD. Class 10: April 9 Limitations of Federal Jurisdiction -- Injunctions pp Abstention pp

8 Class 11: April 16 Limitations of Federal Jurisdiction -- Equitable Restraint pp ; Supreme Court Jurisdiction -- Original Jurisdiction 28 U.S.C. 1251; pp Class 12: April 23 Appellate Review -- Supreme Court Review of State Cases pp ; ; U.S.C. 1257, 1651 Class 13: April 30 Collateral Review -- Habeas and Executive Detention pp ; 28 U.S.C. 2241,