SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY OF WALTER SMITH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DC APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE
|
|
- Lambert Freeman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DC APPLESEED 1111 Fourteenth Street, NW Suite 510 Washington, DC Phone Fax SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY OF WALTER SMITH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DC APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Bill , the Attorney General Partisan Election Implementation Amendment Act of 2013 INTRODUCTION In 2010, the voters of the District of Columbia amended the Home Rule Charter to provide that in 2014 they would for the first time elect the city s Attorney General. Unfortunately, in October of last year, contrary to the advice of its General Counsel and the current appointed Attorney General, the Council voted 7-6 to postpone the election until at least DC Appleseed believes the Council had no authority to postpone the election because the Council cannot override a Charter Amendment ratified by the people. DC Appleseed also believes that even if the Council did have the authority to override the Charter Amendment, it should not have done so, but instead should have respected the people s call for greater democracy. But that is now water over the dam. Further water over the dam is that it is now too late to have a primary election for Attorney General on April 1 because the time for candidates to file petitions for such a primary has long since passed, and the date for printing the ballots has also passed. Fortunately, however, it is not too late to respect the voters call for an Attorney General election in It can be done by passing the Attorney General Partisan Election Implementation Amendment Act of 2013 ( Act ), which provides for the Attorney General to be elected this year on the November ballot. That election would work the way special elections have long worked in the District: candidates could run in that election as members of parties, or not if they so choose; voters would select the candidate they most prefer; and the candidate with the most votes would become Attorney General. It might have been better to have first held a primary election and then hold a general election. But that is no longer possible. And we think it is far better to elect the Attorney General on the November ballot this year than not to elect the Attorney General at all this year. The only obstacle to this reasonable proposed solution is that at the February 10 hearing on this bill, every witness spoke in favor of it except one: the current appointed Attorney General. He
2 Page 2 of 8 testified that because the Charter Amendment requires that the Attorney General be elected on a partisan basis, there must first be a primary, and without a primary, the proposed general election would not be partisan. But as we will explain, this is wrong. Special elections in the District are required to be partisan, and the District has held them for decades. In fact, eight members of the current Council were elected at one time through a partisan special election that looked just like the election proposed for the Attorney General election this November. However, the Attorney General also testified that in any case, the proposed November election would not be partisan unless the candidates running for office were actually nominated onto the ballot by the party they represent. But this too is wrong. Candidates run as partisans all the time in this city without having the formal endorsement of their party. Again, that is the way special elections work. It is surprising that the Attorney General, who advised the Council it had the authority to postpone the election, now advises the Council it has no authority to put the election back on track. It is also surprising that the Attorney General, who told the Council it should respect the will of the voters and hold the Attorney General election in 2014, now advises the Council there is no way to do that. It is even more surprising that on February 6, the Attorney General s lawyers argued to D.C. Superior Court that it should refuse to order a primary for Attorney General because there are other ways to hold the election later this year only to testify himself to the Council four days later that the failure to hold a primary means it is now legally impermissible to hold the election this year. What makes this most surprising is that the Court accepted the Attorney General's argument based in part on the pendency of the very bill that the Attorney General now says is beyond the Council s authority. In our view, as next explained, the Attorney General is giving the Council bad advice. We say that for three reasons: (1) given that the Attorney General agrees that the Council should respect the voters call for a 2014 election, he should propose ways for the Council to accomplish that purpose; (2) the bill before the Council does accomplish that purpose and is within the Council s authority; and (3) the Attorney General s current arguments against the bill are without merit. Contrary to the Attorney General's arguments, that bill is within the Council s authority, and passing such a bill is the best way now to advance democracy and respect District voters. 1. The Attorney General Agrees that the Council Should Respect the Will of the Voters to Elect the Attorney General in When voters overwhelmingly ratified the Elected Attorney General Charter Amendment in the November 2010 referendum, the ballot stated that residents of the District of Columbia would
3 Page 3 of 8 begin voting for the Attorney General in In light of this clear language, the Attorney General agrees that voters expected that they would elect the Attorney General for the first time this year. He also agrees that the will of the people in that referendum should be respected by the Council. As the Attorney General advised the Council in his July 9, 2013, letter to Councilmember Jack Evans: The District s voters by a substantial margin supported the Charter amendment creating an elected Attorney General and did so with the justifiable expectation of voting for one in In my view, their expectations should be respected and fulfilled. 1 In light of the Attorney General s well-stated, compelling view, we believe he now could have and should have advised the Council concerning alternative ways it might have chosen to respect and fulfill the voters expectations. We believe the need for such alternative ways became even more important after the Council voted 7-6 to last October to postpone the election. Given that the stated rationales for the postponement were the need to encourage candidates to run for the office and the need to resolve the duties of the office, the Attorney General might have advised the Council how to address those concerns and meet voters expectations. But he did not do that. Instead, his office opposed a lawsuit seeking an immediate judicial order requiring a primary election for Attorney General this year and did so on the ground that there are alternative ways for getting the election back on track this year. Yet he now opposes the bill before the Council on the ground that the election cannot be put back on track this year without a primary. Thus, in the lawsuit brought by Paul Zukerberg challenging the Council s delay of the election until 2018, the Attorney General s lawyers argued that Mr. Zukerberg would not be harmed if the Court refused to order a primary election, because he could later run in the general election. The Court agreed and refused to issue an order, in part because of the pendency of the bill now before the Council: Plaintiff recognized that he could potentially be placed on the ballot during the 2014 general election and that such legislative proposals are currently under consideration. Thus, adequate compensatory or other corrective relief will be available at a later date Fortunately, the legislative proposal now being considered by the Council not only respects the will of the voters, but also addresses the concerns that led to the postponement of the election, and it meets the requirements of the Charter Amendment that the election be partisan. 1 Letter from Irvin B. Nathan, Attorney General, Dist. of Columbia, to Jack Evans, Member, Council of the Dist. of Columbia, on May the Council Postpone the Election of the Attorney General Past 2014? 1 (July 9, 2014) [hereinafter Evans Letter]. 2 Zukerberg v. D.C. Bd. of Elections & Ethics, No CA-8004-B, slip op. at 4 (D.C. Sup. Ct. Feb. 7, 2014) (citations omitted).
4 Page 4 of 8 2. The Proposed Bill is Within the Council s Authority and is the Best Way Now to Respect the Will of the Voters. The concerns that led to the postponement of the Attorney General election have already been addressed, or would be addressed by the proposed legislation. Although there were debates about the Attorney General s duties last year, those duties were fully resolved in the legislation the Council passed last October. And the concern about the lack of available candidates would be addressed in two ways by the proposed legislation. First, it would greatly expand the field of eligible, qualified candidates by allowing District government lawyers to run for the office. Second, it would make clear this spring that an election for the office will occur in November, giving eligible candidates ample time to prepare for the election. The proposed bill also addresses the requirement of the District Charter that The Attorney General for the District of Columbia shall be elected on a partisan basis by the registered qualified electors of the District. 3 The Act now before the Council permits candidates to gain ballot access by collecting signatures and then run as partisans, just as in a special election. Under District law, partisan elections are currently conducted in two ways: a general election following party primaries, and a special election without a primary. Special elections are used to fill vacancies on the Council, and those elections must be partisan to meet the Charter s requirement that [t]he Council... shall consist of 13 members elected on a partisan basis. 4 In fact, eight current members of the Council were at one time elected on a partisan basis in a special election. Since the Attorney General election under the proposed Act would effectively be conducted in the same manner as a partisan special election for Council, it logically follows that the Attorney General election would be partisan under the Charter as well. Special elections (and the proposed Attorney General election) are also partisan for purposes of federal law, specifically the Hatch Act, which limits participation in partisan political activity by federal employees. Under the Hatch Act, partisan political office is defined as any office for which any candidate is nominated or elected as representing a party This has been interpreted to expressly encompass[] offices for which candidates are either nominated as representing a party or elected as representing a party. 6 And the term elected as representing a party has not been interpreted by the courts to require formal endorsement or election by a party. 7 Any doubt that about how this law would apply to the District can be removed by the fact that the U.S. Office of 3 D.C. Code (a). 4 Id (b)(1). 5 5 U.S.C. 7322(2). 6 McEntee v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 404 F.2d 1320, 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2005). 7 Id.
5 Page 5 of 8 Special Counsel has specifically determined that the District s special elections for Council are partisan. 8 Accordingly, since partisan elections can and do occur without a primary in a number of contexts, including under both the District Charter and federal law, the Council clearly has authority to pattern the Attorney General election after Council special elections and thereby comply with the requirement that the Attorney General election be partisan. This is now the best way to get the election back on track and comply with the will of the voters to elect the Attorney General in The Attorney General s Opposition to the Bill is Not Persuasive. Notwithstanding all of the above, the Attorney General now belatedly contends that the Council has no authority to provide for the election of the Attorney General this November. This is so, he says, because that election could not be deemed partisan within the meaning of the Charter. In his February 10 testimony before the Council, the Attorney General made essentially five points in support of his position and, in our view, all five of them are mistaken. First, the Attorney General wrongly argues that the word partisan necessarily requires that a primary be held. But this is not correct. As mentioned earlier, the District can and does hold partisan election when it elects Councilmembers through special elections. And under the circumstances now presented where a primary is no longer possible it is perfectly appropriate for the Council to hold such a partisan election for Attorney General. In fact, it is the only practical way now to accomplish what the Attorney General says he favors respecting he will of the voters by electing the Attorney General in Second, the Attorney General says that in any case, [w]that makes an election partisan is the selection and endorsement by a political party, whether or not that is done by a closed primary He says that this view is supported by the federal Hatch Act requirement that partisan political office refers to any Office for which any candidate is nominated or elected as representing a party In short, he testified, it does not make it a partisan election when a candidate chooses which party he or she likes; it becomes partisan when the party chooses which candidates it likes. 11 But this is not so. In the District, candidates for Council in special elections do not have to be first endorsed by their party in order to run in a partisan election. And contrary to what the Attorney General says about the federal Hatch Act, the courts have made clear that the Attorney 8 Press Release, U.S. Office of Spec. Counsel, Federal Employee Violates Hatch Act Through Twitter (Feb. 4, 2014), 9 Statement of Irvin B. Nathan, Attorney Gen. for the Dist. of Columbia, Before the Committee of the Whole on Bill , the Attorney General Partisan Election Implementation Amendment Act of (Feb. 10, [hereinafter Nathan Testimony]. 10 Id. at 7 (citing 5 U.S.C. Section 7322(2)). 11 Id. at 12.
6 Page 6 of 8 General s view of that Act is wrong. As the United States Court of Appeals expressly held in McEntee v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the term elected as representing a party in the Hatch Act does not require formal endorsement or selection by a party. 12 Thus, even if the Attorney General is correct that the Charter does not require special elections to be partisan, they are clearly conducted as partisan elections. Third, the Attorney General argues that the relevant District judicial precedents demonstrate that the November election proposed for Attorney General would not be partisan. In fact, the two precedents he cites actually show just the opposite. He first cites a 1969 case, Boone v. Taylor, in which the D.C. Court of Appeals reviewed the requirements for a nonpartisan election for the D.C. School Board. In that case, the Court held that nonpartisan means that candidates for the Board not be nominated by political parties or file for election under a party designation. 13 The Court further explained that this means that the Board of Elections must prohibit in the general election the designation on the ballot of any reference to political parties by words, symbols, etc. 14 The other case cited by the Attorney General makes essentially the same point. That case, Hawkins v. Butler-Truesdale, reaffirms the determination in the Boone case that a nonpartisan election requires that candidates... not be nominates by political parties or file for election under party designation. 15 Under these standards, because the election being proposed by the current bill expressly permits candidates to file for election under a party designation and be labeled as such on the ballot, that election is clearly partisan within the meaning of the judicial precedents. Fourth, the Attorney General points to the legislative history of the Charter Amendment indicating that that the Councilmember who originally proposed the amendment making the election partisan indicated that this would create a primary election. But as the Attorney General himself said in his advice to Councilmember Evans concerning the postponement of the election, for two reasons this history is legally insufficient to mandate that a primary be held. First, the Attorney General said in that letter that a view expressed by one Councilmember does not establish how other Councilmembers interpreted the language. 16 Second, and more significantly we think, in that letter, the Attorney General said it was important that the Council knew how to set a mandatory deadline for the Attorney General election in the legislation but did not do so. 17 So too here: the Council knew how to expressly require a primary election for Attorney General in the legislation, but F.2d at Boone v. Taylor, 256 A.2d 411, 413 (D.C. 1969). 14 Id. 15 Hawkins v. Butler-Truesdale, 584 A.2d 1241, 1243 (D.C. 1990). 16 Evans Letter at Id.
7 Page 7 of 8 did not do so. Instead, it provided only that the election be partisan, leaving the Council discretion later concerning how to make it partisan. 18 Finally, the Attorney General argues that [i]f this bill were to become law, it would likely be held by a court to violate... the Charter But the reasons he says this are the reasons just discussed, and it is clear to us that the Attorney General has misread the law. He furthermore underestimates the discretion the Council has in implementing the partisan requirement of the referendum and the great deference a court would give the Council in doing so. The fact is that the Council has broad authority over election law that Congress granted it in the Home Rule Act. Section 752 provides that notwithstanding any other of provision of [the Home Rule Act] or of any other law, the Council has the authority to enact any act or resolution with respect matters involving or relating to elections in the District. 20 Through this provision, Congress intended to give the Council authority to legislative on substantive matters regarding elections (and not merely to establish procedures). 21 Consistent with this, the Council has the authority to legislate the process by which the partisan Attorney General election shall take place. Moreover, the suggestion by the Attorney General that a court would likely determine that the proposed Attorney General election violates the Charter was just refuted by what the Superior Court did in response to Paul Zukerberg s challenge to the postponement of the election until In that case, Mr. Zukerberg argued that the language in the Council s legislation providing that the election would occur after January 1, 2014 could not be reconciled with the Council s later determination to postpone the election until But the Court rejected that view, stating that its responsibility was to defer to the Council s construction of the language and to uphold the later postponement unless it was clear and manifest that the later action was incompatible with the earlier legislation. 22 Under that same standard, it is inconceivable that a Court would reject the Council s implementation of the partisan requirement in the current bill. Plainly, the Council s proposal to hold a partisan election patterned after partisan special elections for Council is not clearly and manifestly precluded by the language of the referendum. As a result, even if this issue came before a Court which seems quite unlikely the Court would defer to the Council s determination to hold a November partisan election for Attorney General. 18 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants Motion to Dismiss and In Opposition to Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Injunction at 29, Zukerberg v. D.C. Bd. of Elections & Ethics, No CA-8004-B (D.C. Sup. Ct. Jan. 10, 2014). 19 Nathan Testimony at D.C. Code (emphasis added). 21 Jackson v. D.C. Bd. of Elections & Ethics, 999 A.2d 89, 114 (D.C. 2010). 22 Zukerberg, No CA-8004-B, slip op. at 5 6.
8 Page 8 of 8 CONCLUSION Four years ago, voters overwhelmingly ratified a Charter Amendment and since then have justifiably expected to elect the Attorney General for the first time in There is strong support, including from the Attorney General, that the Council, consistent with its tradition of championing D.C. democracy, should respect the people s will and restore the election to The only practical way to accomplish this in the limited time available is to provide for an election in November of this year, with candidates running as members of parties and getting ballot access by petition, just as is regularly done in partisan special elections. Only the Attorney General has raised concerns with this approach, and fortunately, his concerns are without merit. The Council would be acting well within its authority to establish a partisan Attorney General election this year by passing this Act. We strongly urge it to do so.
Hatch Act: Candidacy for Office by Federal Employees in the Executive Branch
Hatch Act: Candidacy for Office by Federal Employees in the Executive Branch Jack Maskell Legislative Attorney July 8, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43630 Summary The federal
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL NO. 4:86CV00291
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL NO. 4:86CV00291 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, ET AL., Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM
More informationCase 1:10-cv JDB Document 26 Filed 09/02/10 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:10-cv-00561-JDB Document 26 Filed 09/02/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEPHEN LAROQUE, ANTHONY CUOMO, JOHN NIX, KLAY NORTHRUP, LEE RAYNOR, and KINSTON
More informationAfter the Blanket Primary Reforming Washington's Primary Election Sytem
POLICY BRIEF After the Blanket Primary Reforming Washington's Primary Election Sytem By Richard Derham Research Fellow November 2003 P.O. Box 3643, Seattle, WA 98124-3643 888-WPC-9272 www.washingtonpolicy.org
More informationNo United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case: 09-35860 10/14/2010 Page: 1 of 16 ID: 7508761 DktEntry: 41-1 No. 09-35860 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Kenneth Kirk, Carl Ekstrom, and Michael Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellants
More informationCase 5:06-cv FL Document 35 Filed 01/25/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 5:06-cv-00462-FL Document 35 Filed 01/25/2007 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION Civil Action No. 5:06-CV-00462-FL RICHARD
More informationTENTATIVE CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk TENTATIVE CALENDAR OF EVENTS PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION JUNE 7, 2016 IMPORTANT NOTICE All documents are to be filed with and duties performed by the
More informationCase 1:14-cv CKK Document 1 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-01435-CKK Document 1 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHELLE KOPLITZ * 812 L Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20002 * Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:18-cr AJT Document 57 Filed 03/01/19 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 363
Case 118-cr-00457-AJT Document 57 Filed 03/01/19 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 363 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Case
More informationTitle 21-A: ELECTIONS
Title 21-A: ELECTIONS Chapter 7: ELECTION OFFICIALS Table of Contents Section 501. WARDENS AND WARD CLERKS... 3 Section 502. DUTIES AND VACANCIES -- WARDEN AND WARD CLERK... 3 Section 503. ELECTION CLERKS...
More informationIn The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division
In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division Libertarian Party of Ohio, Plaintiff, vs. Jennifer Brunner, Case No. 2:08-cv-555 Judge Sargus Defendant. I. Introduction
More informationIN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 14-cv-222 PAUL ZUKERBERG,
IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 14-cv-222 PAUL ZUKERBERG, v. Appellant/Plaintiff, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, and COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellees/Defendants.
More informationCIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV- COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF COMPLAINT
Case 1:16-cv-00452-TCB Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION COMMON CAUSE and GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE OF
More informationMUNICIPAL CONSOLIDATION
MUNICIPAL CONSOLIDATION Municipal Consolidation Act N.J.S.A. 40:43-66.35 et seq. Sparsely Populated Municipal Consolidation Law N.J.S.A. 40:43-66.78 et seq. Local Option Municipal Consolidation N.J.S.A.
More informationChronology of Successful and Unsuccessful Merit Selection Ballot Measures
Chronology of Successful and Unsuccessful Merit Selection Ballot Measures (NOTE: Unsuccessful efforts are in italics. Chronology does not include constitutional amendments authorizing merit selection for
More informationFlorida Voters Support Local Minimum Wages and Believe the Florida Constitution Gives Cities the Power to Raise Wages
FACT SHEET FEBRUARY 2018 Florida Voters Support Local Minimum Wages and Believe the Florida Constitution Gives Cities the Power to Raise Wages The Florida Supreme Court is considering hearing a case that
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:18-cv-12354-VAR-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 07/27/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER GRAVELINE, WILLARD H. JOHNSON,
More informationCASE NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-35967, 02/12/2016, ID: 9864857, DktEntry: 27, Page 1 of 14 CASE NO. 15-35967 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RAVALLI COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE, GALLATIN COUNTY REPUBLICAN
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Now comes Plaintiff, the Rhode Island Affiliate, American Civil Liberties Union
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC SUPERIOR COURT RHODE ISLAND AFFILIATE, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION Plaintiff, v. RHODE ISLAND BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JOHN A. DALUZ, in his capacity as Chairman of the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 3 Filed: 09/26/13 Page: 1 of 11 PAGEID #: 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al. Plaintiffs, Case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case 1:17-cv-01113 Document 2 Filed 12/12/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY; CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY; DURHAM
More informationCase 2:16-cv DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30
Case 2:16-cv-00038-DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30 Marcus R. Mumford (12737) MUMFORD PC 405 South Main Street, Suite 975 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 428-2000 Email: mrm@mumfordpc.com
More informationCase: 2:12-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858
Case: 2:12-cv-00636-PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OBAMA FOR AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationLevy County Candidate Handbook
Levy County Candidate Handbook 2015-2016 1 To those interested in running for local office: This information has been compiled for those interested in running for elected office in Levy County. It is designed
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:12-cv GCM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:12-cv-00192-GCM NORTH CAROLINA CONSTITUTION ) PARTY, AL PISANO, NORTH ) CAROLINA GREEN PARTY, and ) NICHOLAS
More informationPREAMBLE. Section 10. NAME. The name of the County, as it operates under this Charter, shall continue to be Washington County.
PREAMBLE We, the people of Washington County, Oregon, in recognition of the dual role of the County, as a political subdivision of the State of Oregon (State)and as a unit of local government, and in order
More informationCALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 2 VOTING, INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM, AND RECALL
SECTION 1. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their protection, security, and benefit, and they have the right to alter or reform it when the public good may require.
More informationPart Description 1 10 pages 2 Exhibit Consent Decree 3 Affidavit Knedler 4 Affidavit Harris 5 Affidavit Earl 6 Affidavit Redpath
Libertarian Party of Ohio et al v. Husted, Docket No. 2:13-cv-00953 (S.D. Ohio Sept 25, 2013), Court Docket Part Description 1 10 pages 2 Exhibit Consent Decree 3 Affidavit Knedler 4 Affidavit Harris 5
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case: 18-15068, 04/10/2018, ID: 10831190, DktEntry: 137-2, Page 1 of 15 Nos. 18-15068, 18-15069, 18-15070, 18-15071, 18-15072, 18-15128, 18-15133, 18-15134 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No
Case: 09-2227 Document: 00319762032 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2009 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 09-2227 CHUCK BALDWIN, DARRELL R. CASTLE, WESLEY THOMPSON, JAMES E. PANYARD,
More informationTENTATIVE CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk TENTATIVE CALENDAR OF PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 3, 2020 IMPORTANT NOTICE All documents are to be filed with and duties performed by the Registrar-Recorder/County
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Substitute Nomination Certificate : of Chris Ross as Republican Candidate : for the Pennsylvania House of : Representatives in the 158th Legislative : District
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case 1:17-cv-01113-CCE-JEP Document 45 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationBYLAWS OF THE TENNESSEE REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY
ARTICLE I BYLAWS OF THE TENNESSEE REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY Name and Jurisdiction SECTION 1.01. Name. The name of the organization shall be the TENNESSEE REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY (the TRA). SECTION 1.02. Jurisdiction.
More informationMARTIN C. MANION, SR. and ) LOUIS WITTMER ) ) Petitioner-Objectors, ) Docket No G 03 ) v. ) ) TIMOTHY GOODCASE, ) ) Respondent-Candidate.
BEFORE THE DULY CONSTITUTED ELECTORAL BOARD FOR THE HEARING AND PASSING UPON OBJECTIONS TO THE NOMINATION PAPERS FOR CANDIDATES FOR THE OFFICE OF COUNTY BOARD MEMBER IN DISTRICT 2 IN THE COUNTY OF DUPAGE
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION 500 Indiana Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION 500 Indiana Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 ) [Various Tenants] ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) Case No. ) [Landord] ) ) Defendant ) ) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND BRIAN MONTEIRO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF EAST PROVIDENCE, ) EAST PROVIDENCE CANVASSING AUTHORITY, ) C.A. No. 09- MARYANN CALLAHAN,
More informationCase 1:12-cv RWZ Document 21 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:12-cv-12016-RWZ Document 21 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS John Doe Growers 1-7, and John Doe B Pool Grower 1 on behalf of Themselves and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:12-cv-00042-WKW-CSC Document 64 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JILL STEIN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )
More informationIC Chapter Election of School Board Members in East Chicago
IC 20-23-17.2 Chapter 17.2. Election of School Board Members in East Chicago IC 20-23-17.2-1 Applicability of chapter Sec. 1. This chapter applies to a school corporation located in a city that has a population
More informationTENTATIVE CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk TENTATIVE CALENDAR OF STATEWIDE DIRECT PRIMARY ELECTION JUNE 5, 2018 IMPORTANT NOTICE All documents are to be filed with and duties performed by the Registrar-Recorder/County
More information247 F.R.D. 27 (D.D.C.
Bruce C. HUBBARD et al., Plaintiffs, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. Civil Action No. 03 1062 (RJL/JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia.
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. The Recall Process
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction The Recall Process When Are Elected Officials Eligible to be Recalled? How Are Recall Proceedings Started? What Happens Next? Petition Forms Approval of Form for Circulation
More informationCase 1:08-cv AT-HBP Document 447 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:08-cv-01034-AT-HBP Document 447 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X DAVID FLOYD, et al., Plaintiffs, 08 Civ. 1034 (AT) -against- THE CITY OF NEW
More informationCase 2:18-cv DDC-TJJ Document 22 Filed 11/01/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:18-cv-02572-DDC-TJJ Document 22 Filed 11/01/18 Page 1 of 10 ALEJANDRO RANGEL-LOPEZ AND LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, KANSAS, Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
More informationU.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit January 25, 2006 Related Index Numbers. Appeal from the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio
Jacob WINKELMAN, a minor, by and through his parents and legal guardians, Jeff and Sandee WINKELMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PARMA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appelle U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth
More informationState Candidate s Manual: Individual Electors
State Candidate s Manual: Individual Electors Published by phone 503 986 1518 Elections Division fax 503 373 7414 141 State Capitol tty 503 986 1521 Salem OR 97310-0722 web www.sos.state.or.us 2006 Secretary
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. This matter is before the Court on Defendants' motion (doc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IVOR VAN HEERDEN VERSUS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE CIVIL ACTION NO.10-155-JJB-CN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : VERIFIED COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA and DARRYL BONNER, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES JUDD, KIMBERLY BOWERS, and DON PALMER,
More informationCase 1:10-cv ESH -TBG -HHK Document 51 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-01062-ESH -TBG -HHK Document 51 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF GEORGIA, v. Plaintiff, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. in his official
More informationCivic Betterment Party. Village of Glen Ellyn. Statement of Principles and Procedures For Nominating Candidates for Elective Office ("Bylaws")
Last Amended: December 1, 2012 Civic Betterment Party Village of Glen Ellyn Statement of Principles and Procedures For Nominating Candidates for Elective Office ("Bylaws") Mission Statement It is the mission
More informationHow to Fill a Vacancy
How to Fill a Vacancy Ventura County Elections Division MARK A. LUNN Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters 800 South Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA 9009-00 (805) 654-664 venturavote.org Revised 0//7 Contents
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS. ROBERT WALTER SHAFFER, JR; SHAFFER, GOLD & RUBAUM, LLP, Petitioners,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS ROBERT WALTER SHAFFER, JR; SHAFFER, GOLD & RUBAUM, LLP, Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA
More informationSUMMARY OF PLEADINGS, DOCUMENTS AND INVESTIGATION
: JAMES LIABRAATEN : BEFORE THE : SCHOOL ETHICS COMMISSION v. : : PETER EMERY, : WEST MORRIS REGIONAL BOARD : Docket No. C14-08 OF EDUCATION : PROBABLE CAUSE NOTICE MORRIS COUNTY : : This matter arises
More informationBefore the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Emergency. Preliminary Injunction. (Doc. 2.) The Court heard oral
Case 4:16-cv-0069-WTM-GRS Document 16 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLES' AGENDA, INC.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-04776-LMM Document 13-1 Filed 10/22/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION RHONDA J. MARTIN, DANA BOWERS, JASMINE CLARK,
More informationCase 5:13-cr DDC Document 517 Filed 11/19/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 5:13-cr-40060-DDC Document 517 Filed 11/19/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALBERT DEWAYNE BANKS (01) CHARLES FOSTER
More information6. establishes an in-district residency requirement for petitioning, write-in, and minor party candidates;
PA 15-224 ssb 1051 Government Administration and Elections Committee Appropriations Committee AN ACT STRENGTHENING THE STATE'S ELECTIONS SUMMARY: This act modifies state election laws affecting, among
More informationLAMAR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY STAFF SENATE BYLAWS
LAMAR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY STAFF SENATE BYLAWS ARTICLE I- NAME, FUNCTION, AND DELIBERATION OF ISSUES Section 1. Name. The name of this organization shall be Lamar Institute of Technology Staff Senate.
More informationRecall of County Commissioners
M E M O R A N D U M TO: 2016 Pinellas County Charter Review Commission FROM: Wade C. Vose, Esq., General Counsel DATE: SUBJECT: Preliminary Legal Analysis of Proposed Recall Provision Relating to County
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before TYMKOVICH, HOLLOWAY, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.
FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit MASCARENAS ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT August 14, 2012 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Nominating Petition of Barbara : May for Judge of the Common Pleas : Court of Montgomery County, : No. 143 M.D. 2009 Pennsylvania : : Objection of: Brian
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Reading City Council, : Appellant : : v. : : No. 29 C.D. 2012 City of Reading Charter Board : Argued: September 10, 2012 BEFORE: HONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER,
More informationRules of the Michigan Democratic Party [ 2018 ]
Rules of the Michigan Democratic Party [ 2018 ] PREAMBLE 2 ARTICLE 1. STATUTORY PROVISIONS 2 ARTICLE 2. POLICY 2 ARTICLE 3: MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY MEMBERSHIP 4 ARTICLE 7: STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OFFICERS
More informationCITY OF LOS ANGELES ORDINANCE INITIATIVE, REFERENDUM, RECALL & CHARTER AMENDMENT PETITION HANDBOOK
CITY OF LOS ANGELES ORDINANCE INITIATIVE, REFERENDUM, RECALL & CHARTER AMENDMENT PETITION HANDBOOK Prepared by the Election Division Office of the City Clerk Frank T. Martinez, City Clerk Revised as of
More information79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 3131 SUMMARY
Sponsored by Representative PARRISH th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY-- Regular Session House Bill SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez
King v. Allstate Insurance Company Doc. 242 Civil Action No. 11-cv-00103-WJM-BNB IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez DENNIS W. KING, Colorado resident
More informationCase 6:15-cv AA Document 440 Filed 11/20/18 Page 1 of 10
Case 6:15-cv-01517-AA Document 440 Filed 11/20/18 Page 1 of 10 JEFFREY BOSSERT CLARK Assistant Attorney General JEFFREY H. WOOD Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources
More informationThe University of British Columbia Enrolment Services. Regulations for Elections to the Board of Governors and the Senates Effective: 15 October 2013
The University of British Columbia Enrolment Services Regulations for Elections to the Board of Governors and the Senates Effective: 15 October 2013 1) General a. This document governs the election of
More informationRE: Advisory Opinion Request (Connecticut Democratic State Central Committee)
October 14, 2014 Adav Noti Acting Associate General Counsel Federal Election Commission 999 E St. NW Washington, DC 20463 RE: Advisory Opinion Request 2014-16 (Connecticut Democratic State Central Committee)
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CITIZENS PROTECTING MICHIGAN S CONSTITUTION, JOSEPH SPYKE, and JEANNE DAUNT, Plaintiffs, Case No. v. SECRETARY OF STATE, and MICHIGAN BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS,
More informationCase 1:18-cv TJK Document 16 Filed 11/15/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA : : : : : Plaintiffs,
Case 118-cv-02610-TJK Document 16 Filed 11/15/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and ABILIO JAMES ACOSTA, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION
More informationprohibited expenditures and contributions under , , & of the
August 8, 2018 District Attorney Nico LaHood Bexar County District Attorney s Office 101 W Nueva St, San Antonio, TX 78205 by Hand Delivery Attorney General Ken Paxton Texas Attorney General s Office 300
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIAMS et al v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC. Doc. 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANKIE WILLIAMS, et al. : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : SECURITAS SECURITY
More informationCharter of the. As amended by the Washington State Democratic Convention on June 16, Preamble
Charter of the Democratic Party of the State of Washington As amended by the Washington State Democratic Convention on June, 1 1 Preamble We, the Democrats of the State of Washington, believe in the concepts
More informationDavid Schatten v. Weichert Realtors
2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-27-2010 David Schatten v. Weichert Realtors Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 09-4678
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ) ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM ) NOW et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 08-CV-4084-NKL
More informationFactors That May Weigh In Favor Of, Or Against, Patentability
CLIENT MEMORANDUM U.S. PATENT OFFICE PUBLISHES GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING WHETHER PROCESS CLAIMS COVER ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER IN THE WAKE OF THE SUPREME COURT S BILSKI DECISION The United States Patent
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:05-cv-05030 Document 133 Filed 01/31/2008 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KIMBERLY WILLIAMS-ELLIS, ) on behalf of herself and all others
More informationCase4:09-cv CW Document16 Filed06/04/09 Page1 of 16
Case:0-cv-0-CW Document Filed0/0/0 Page of 0 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California SARA J. DRAKE Supervising Deputy Attorney General PETER H. KAUFMAN Deputy Attorney General State Bar No.
More informationARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY DEMOCRATIC CLUB OF SAN FRANCISCO
ARTICLE I. NAME. ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY DEMOCRATIC CLUB OF SAN FRANCISCO The name of this unincorporated association is the City Democratic Club of San Francisco, hereinafter called "club".
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :0-cv-0-SRB Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 United States of America, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Plaintiff, State of Arizona; and Janice K. Brewer, Governor of
More informationAPPLICABILITY OF 18 U.S.C. 207(c) TO THE BRIEFING AND ARGUING OF CASES IN WHICH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE REPRESENTS A PARTY
APPLICABILITY OF 18 U.S.C. 207(c) TO THE BRIEFING AND ARGUING OF CASES IN WHICH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE REPRESENTS A PARTY Section 207(c) of title 18 forbids a former senior employee of the Department
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Norfolk Division. Plaintiff, Defendants. MEMORANDUM FINAL ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division FILED AUG 2 2 2012 PROJECT VOTE/VOTING FOR AMERICA, INC., CLERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT NORFOLK. VA Plaintiff, v. CIVIL No. 2:10cv75
More informationBulk of Wells Fargo Shareholder Derivative Suit Survives Motions to Dismiss
December 4, 2017 Bulk of Wells Fargo Shareholder Derivative Suit Survives Motions to Dismiss On October 4, 2017, in In re Wells Fargo & Company Shareholder Derivative Litigation, which concerns alleged
More information2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 11/03/14 Entry Number 27 Page 1 of 13
2:14-cv-04010-RMG Date Filed 11/03/14 Entry Number 27 Page 1 of 13 Colleen Therese Condon and Anne Nichols Bleckley, Plaintiffs, v. Nimrata (Nikki Randhawa Haley, in her official capacity as Governor of
More informationJ S - 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE NO. CV JST (FMOx) GLOBAL DÉCOR, INC. and THOMAS H. WOLF.
Case :-cv-00-jls-fmo Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 0 GLOBAL DÉCOR, INC. and THOMAS H. WOLF vs. Plaintiffs, THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL
More informationCase 1:12-cv JLK Document 70-1 Filed 03/16/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-01123-JLK Document 70-1 Filed 03/16/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge John L. Kane Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-1123 WILLIAM
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NO D VICTOR DIMAIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NO. 08-13241-D VICTOR DIMAIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE Defendant/Appellee. APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE UNITED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Case No.
2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 1 Filed 05/12/14 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EDERL EDNA MOORE, and TIARA WILLIS-PITTMAN, v.
More informationCase 1:13-cv EGS Document 89 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:13-cv-01363-EGS Document 89 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 13-CV-1363 (EGS) U.S. DEPARTMENT
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR STONE COUNTY, WISCONSIN
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR STONE COUNTY, WISCONSIN CAREY KLEINMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STONE COUNTY MUNICIPAL CLERKS, WISCONSIN GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD, Defendants REPLY BRIEF OF DEFENDANT, STONE
More informationBYLAWS OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY YOUNG DEMOCRATS OF CALIFORNIA
1 BYLAWS OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY YOUNG DEMOCRATS OF CALIFORNIA PREAMBLE The Sacramento County Young Democrats pledge to pursue the ideas of liberty, justice, and freedom for all regardless of race, religion,
More informationCITY OF TANGENT CHARTER 1982 REVISED 1992
CITY OF TANGENT CHARTER 1982 REVISED 1992 To provide for the government of the City of Tangent, Linn County, Oregon. This charter is created for the government of the City of Tangent based on citizen involvement,
More informationCivil Action: County of Burlington, and State of New Jersey, and Plaintiff Pro Se Frederick John LaVergne, residing at
Edward Forchion 1020 Hanover Boulevard Browns Mills, New Jersey 08015 Telephone: (818) 450-7597 Plaintiff Pro Se Frederick John LaVergne 312 Walnut Street Delanco, New Jersey 08075 Telephone: (856) 313-7003
More informationCase: , 01/02/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 43-1, Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 16-55470, 01/02/2018, ID: 10708808, DktEntry: 43-1, Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED JAN 02 2018 (1 of 14) MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT
More informationCase 1:10-cv JSR Document 18 Filed 09/30/10 Page 1 of CIV 6923 (JSR) ECF Case. Plaintiffs,
Case 1:10-cv-06923-JSR Document 18 Filed 09/30/10 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X CONSERVATIVE PARTY
More informationGENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT RUNNING FOR PUBLIC OFFICE
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT RUNNING FOR PUBLIC OFFICE Please note that the information contained in this document is subject to change without notice in the event of the passage of amendatory legislation.
More informationA Nonprofit s Guide to Lobbying and Political Activity
A Nonprofit s Guide to Lobbying and Political Activity 2017 D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center This guide is for informational purposes only. You should not rely on this guide as a substitute for, nor does it constitute,
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 07-613 In the Supreme Court of the United States D.P. ON BEHALF OF E.P., D.P., AND K.P.; AND L.P. ON BEHALF OF E.P., D.P., AND K.P., Petitioners, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, Respondent.
More information