European Law Review ISSN: October EL Rev
|
|
- Elfreda Byrd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Editorial Inter-institutional Disputes and Treaty-making European Law Review ISSN: EL Rev Articles EU International Agreements through a US Lens: Different Methods of Interpretation, Tests and the Issue of Rights Szilárd Gáspár-Szilágyi Cultural Mainstreaming: The European Union s Horizontal Cultural Diversity Agenda and its Evolution Evangelia Psychogiopoulou Reconstructing the Early Warning System on Subsidiarity: The Case for Political Judgment Marco Goldoni Diplomats at the Bar: The European External Action Service before EU Courts Mauro Gatti Analysis and Reflections Implementation of EU Law through Domestic Measures after Fransson: the Court of Justice Buys Time and Non-preclusion Troubles Loom Large Filippo Fontanelli Delimiting the Harmonisation Scope of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive: Towards a Specific Competitive Intent Requirement? Comment on Anzeige Georgios Anagnostaras and Asteris Pliakos Private Enforcement of the EU Competition Rules: The Commission Wishes to Practise what it Preaches But Can it Do So? Comment on Otis Arianna Andreangeli Book Reviews EL Rev Page 1 of 5
2 Editorial Efficient, Fair and Fit for the Future? 1 Delay; EU law; EU legislative process; European Parliament; Treaties One of the more tangible changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty has been the considerable strengthening of the position of the European Parliament in the Union s institutional structure. This has been acutely felt in the area of external relations where the Parliament has not shied away from flexing its newly found muscle. The episodes of the rejection of the original SWIFT Agreement and the renegotiation of the PNR Agreement between the EU and the United States, as well as the rejection of ACTA, have left no doubt as to the significance of the Parliament s status in the area. The recent judgment of the Court of Justice in European Parliament v Council 1 provides another reminder to that effect. This case was about the agreement between the EU and Mauritius on the transfer of individuals suspected of piracy at sea by EU personnel to the Mauritius authorities and the conditions that the latter ought to meet. The Agreement was concluded in the context of the anti-piracy operation Atalanta, which the Union has been carrying out off the coast of Somalia as part of its Common Security and Defence Policy. There were two main points raised by the Parliament in its action. The first was about the conclusion of the Agreement. As it was viewed by the Council to relate exclusively to the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), it was concluded, accordingly, under art.218(6) TFEU which did not provide for any input from the Parliament. However, the Parliament argued that, as the Agreement was about the transfer of suspected pirates with a view to their prosecution, it also related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, police cooperation and development cooperation. Given that the ordinary legislative procedure applied to decisionmaking in these areas, the Parliament claimed that the Agreement should have been adopted under art.218(6)(a)(v) TFEU which provided for its consent. It is interesting that the Parliament should have chosen not to challenge the main nature of the Agreement. It accepted that the EU-Mauritius agreement was predominantly about CFSP. Instead, it was in the light of its incidental implications for the other non-cfsp policies that, in the Parliament s view, its consent was required. The Grand Chamber of the Court rejected this argument. It held that the decision-making procedure for the conclusion of international agreements in art.218 TFEU reflects the division of powers between institutions that applies internally. Therefore, the substantive legal basis of the decision concluding the agreement also determines the type of procedure applicable under art.218 TFEU. As the decision concluding the transfer Agreement with Mauritius had been adopted solely as a CFSP measure, the Agreement related exclusively to CFPS in the meaning of art.218(6) TFEU. Accordingly, the Parliament s consent was not required. The Court held that this symmetry between substantive legal basis and decision-making procedure was justified in the light of the principles of legal certainty and consistency. This conclusion is eminently sensible and entirely consistent with the logic of the choice of legal basis in general and art.218 TFEU in particular. Otherwise, there would be, in effect, no agreements which would be viewed as exclusively CFSP-related and there would be no exceptions from the Parliament s consent, the provision of Article 218(6) TFEU notwithstanding. The second issue in Parliament v Council (C-658/11) was the scope of the broader Parliament s input in treaty-making. Article 218(10) TFEU provides that the Parliament shall be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure. The Council sent the Parliament the decision concluding the agreement with Mauritius more than three months after its adoption and the signing of the agreement, and 17 days after their publication. The 1 (C-658/11) June 24, EL Rev Page 2 of 5
3 Court held that the right of the Parliament to be informed under art.218(10) TFEU is an expression of the democratic principles on which the European Union is founded. 2 It pointed out that: If the Parliament is not immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure in accordance with Article 218(10) TFEU, including that preceding the conclusion of the agreement, it is not in a position to exercise the right of scrutiny which the Treaties have conferred on it in relation to the CFSP or, where appropriate, to make known its views as regards, in particular, the correct legal basis for the act concerned. The infringement of that information requirement impinges, in those circumstances, on the Parliament s performance of its duties in relation to the CFSP, and therefore constitutes an infringement of an essential procedural requirement. 3 It is staggering that the Council should have seriously argued that the time it had taken to inform the Parliament was reasonable. Be that as it may, this dispute illustrates that the institutional landscape as redrawn at Lisbon has not diminished the appetite of the relevant actors for turf wars. In fact, at the time of writing, there is another case pending where the Parliament challenged the adoption of the EU-Tanzania transfer agreement as an agreement which related exclusively to the CFSP and argued that it should have been adopted jointly under arts 37 TEU (CFSP), 82 TFEU (judicial cooperation in criminal matters) and 87 TFEU (police cooperation). 4 The process of treaty-making still provides fertile ground for inter-institutional skirmishes. By seeking to define clearer demarcation lines and to streamline decision-making within a more coherent legal framework, the Lisbon Treaty merely established a new terrain within which the Union s institutions are no less keen to protect their prerogatives than they were under the previous constitutional arrangements. [PK] 2 European Parliament v Council (C-658/11) at [81]. 3 European Parliament v Council (C-658/11) at [86]. 4 European Parliament v Council (C-263/14), pending. EL Rev Page 3 of 5
4 Articles EU International Agreements through a US Lens: Different Methods of Interpretation, Tests and the Issue of Rights Szilárd Gáspár-Szilágyi Inspired by the questions US courts and American scholarship ask when confronted with the domestic enforcement of international agreements, this article looks at the methods of interpretation and tests used by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in its direct effect analysis of international agreements, which are binding on the European Union, as well as the issue of rights and its role in the direct effect analysis. It is argued that the current case law is split when it comes to the methods of interpretation and tests used in the direct effect analysis. Moreover, the CJEU s case law is not clear on whether a primary right or the right to seek a remedy needs to be conferred by international agreements, or whether a right should be conferred at all. Cultural Mainstreaming: The European Union s Horizontal Cultural Diversity Agenda and its Evolution Evangelia Psychogiopoulou This article explores how the European Union has been confronted with cultural mainstreaming, that is the integration of cultural considerations in EU law and policies pursuant to art.167(4) TFEU. The analysis addresses the nature and scope of the cultural mainstreaming requirements imposed on the Union, enquiring, inter alia, into the interpretation of art.167(4) TFEU by the EU Courts. It subsequently probes the degree of attention afforded to art.167(4) TFEU by the European institutions, revealing two distinct phases in the accommodation of cultural concerns in EU activity. The first phase, inaugurated with the signature of the Treaty establishing the European Community, is characterised by the absence of a comprehensive strategy devised to ensure that respect for and promotion of cultural diversity is incorporated as a horizontal policy concern in EU activity. The second phase, starting in May 2005 with the adoption of the European Commission s Communication A European agenda for culture in a globalizing world and the entry into force of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions, signals the launch of more structured EU cultural mainstreaming efforts. As will be shown, these denote varied understandings of the significance of cultural diversity for the European Union. Reconstructing the Early Warning System on Subsidiarity: The Case for Political Judgment Marco Goldoni The Early Warning System (EWS) has been understood as a device for two functions: enhancing the democratic quality of EU law-making and improving subsidiarity review. After having criticised the two most common interpretations of the EWS as a deliberative exercise or as an advisory mechanism, the article proposes to look at the function of the EWS from the perspective of European integration. In this way, a different light is shed on the role of national parliaments. It is suggested that, in light of three factors (legal, practical and political), national parliaments ought to apply the EWS in a political rather than strictly formal way and they should use the EWS for protecting the constitutional essentials of their domestic orders. Diplomats at the Bar: The European External Action Service before EU Courts Mauro Gatti The European External Action Service (EEAS) is a crucial innovation of the EU institutional architecture, but some of its legal aspects remain obscure. This article investigates a particularly understudied issue: the EEAS s capacity to be a party to proceedings before EU Courts. The analysis suggests, first, that the Service has standing before the EU judges with respect to administrative issues. At the same time, the EEAS is not autonomous for the purpose of policy management and it can encounter difficulty in bringing proceedings to protect its role in the legislative process. Secondly, the practice of Union bodies relating to the EEAS is inconsistent: EU organs constantly treat the Service as a de facto institution as far as administrative issues are concerned but they are unwilling to overtly recognise its autonomy. Despite these difficulties, the EEAS s capacity to stand before EU judges is likely to favour its affirmation as an autonomous political actor. EL Rev Page 4 of 5
5 Analysis and Reflections Implementation of EU Law through Domestic Measures after Fransson: the Court of Justice Buys Time and Non-preclusion Troubles Loom Large Filippo Fontanelli In 2014, the Court came to terms with the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights to domestic measures in the wake of Fransson. The five cases discussed here provide an overview of the Court s subsequent interpretation of the implementation link between EU law and national measures, required for the Charter to apply. Arguably, the Court is playing by ear and eludes the real legal riddle: how to determine with certainty the application of EU law at large in a specific case. Because the application of the Charter depends on the application of EU law, this issue deserves more attention. In particular, the precise notion of the application of EU law could help to identify non-preclusion cases, i.e. those in which EU law applies to, but does not prohibit, domestic measures. Only in these cases does the Charter have added value as an autonomous standard of review. Delimiting the Harmonisation Scope of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive: Towards a Specific Competitive Intent Requirement? Comment on Anzeige Georgios Anagnostaras and Asteris Pliakos Nine years after its adoption, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive continues to give rise to controversy as concerns its scope of application and the national laws that are covered by its provisions. The recent Anzeige ruling suggests that the existence of a specific competitive intent is required in order to bring a commercial representation within the personal scope of the Directive. However, this essentially allows the national legislature to impose more restrictive requirements on advertising in the written media than those allowed by the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive s provisions. The ruling also seems to provide some interesting clarification on the relationship between the Directive and EU legislation on audiovisual media services, authorising in principle the imposition of more restrictive advertising obligations on national broadcasters based on the minimum harmonisation clause of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive. Private Enforcement of the EU Competition Rules: The Commission Wishes to Practise what it Preaches But Can it Do So? Comment on Otis Arianna Andreangeli Following the 2007 Commission decision on the Escalators and Elevators cartel, the EU Commission, on behalf of the European Union, lodged an action for competition damages, relying on its own infringement decision to prove that the defendant had breached art.101 TFEU. This case comment will consider whether the fact that the decision itself enjoyed binding legal effects on the domestic court as regards the finding of an infringement, according to art.16 of Council Regulation 1/2003, allowed the Commission to act as judge in its own cause. It will also examine whether the proceedings remained consistent with the principle of equality of arms, given the Commission s involvement as investigator. Book Reviews Tables Index EL Rev Page 5 of 5
List of topics for papers
General information List of topics for papers The paper has to consist of 5 000-6 000 words (including footnotes). Please consider the formatting requirements. The deadline for submission will generally
More informationPUBLIC LIMITE EN COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION. Brusels,19December2013 (OR.en) 18031/13 LIMITE. InterinstitutionalFile: 2012/0011(COD)
ConseilUE COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION Brusels,19December2013 (OR.en) InterinstitutionalFile: 2012/0011(COD) PUBLIC 18031/13 LIMITE DOCUMENTPARTIALLY ACCESSIBLETOTHEPUBLIC (22.01.2014) JUR658 JAI1167 DAPIX160
More informationRecent Developments in EU Public Law. Scottish Public Law Group Annual Summer Conference 9 June 2014
Recent Developments in EU Public Law Scottish Public Law Group Annual Summer Conference 9 June 2014 Presentation overview 1. Application and Interpretation of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights When
More informationTHE EU CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS; AN INDISPENSABLE INSTRUMENT IN THE FIELD OF ASYLUM
THE EU CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS; AN INDISPENSABLE INSTRUMENT IN THE FIELD OF ASYLUM January 2017 INTRODUCTION The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU was first drawn up in 1999-2000 with the original
More information4 Sources of EU law A. Introduction
30 4 Sources of EU law A. Introduction The European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Case 6/64 Costa v ENEL held that: By contrast with ordinary international treaties, the EEC Treaty hast created its own legal
More informationEUROPEAN UNION LAW Second Edition
EUROPEAN UNION LAW Second Edition Alina Kaczorowska IJ Routledge JQ^^ TaylorSiFrancisGroup LONDON AND NEW YORK DETAILED COfSlTEIMTS Preface Guide to the Companion Website Tables of Equivalences Tables
More informationThe EU as an actor in International Law. Lund, 7 September 2017 Eduardo Gill-Pedro
The EU as an actor in International Law Lund, 7 September 2017 Eduardo Gill-Pedro Overview The self understanding of the EU as an International Organisation Legal personality of the EU Legal capacity of
More information"FOR A EUROPE OF REGIONS AND CITIES: THE VIEW OF YOUNG PEOPLE" 1 April 2014 Committee of the Regions
"FOR A EUROPE OF REGIONS AND CITIES: THE VIEW OF YOUNG PEOPLE" 1 April 2014 Committee of the Regions Workshop (3): How should the CoR fit into the EU's institutional architecture in future? By Ian GOROG,
More informationThe Post-Legislative Powers of the Commission. Delegated and Implementing Acts
The Post-Legislative Powers of the Commission Delegated and Implementing Acts 1 The New Institutional Context A basic act is established by the Legislator Subsequent decisions are needed Intervention of
More informationExternal Relations of the European Union
^ Aj379777 External Relations of the European Union Legal and Constitutional Foundations PIET EECKHOUT OXPORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents Table of Cases Table of Legislation xv xxxv 1. Introduction 1 Constitutional
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 23.12.2003 COM(2003) 827 final 2003/0326 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION conferring jurisdiction on the Court of Justice in disputes relating to the
More information8866/06 IS/np 1 DG H 2B EN
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 2 May 2006 8866/06 Interinstitutional File: 2005/0127 (COD) DROIPEN 31 PI 27 CODEC 405 PROPOSAL from: Commission dated: 27 April 2006 Subject: Amended proposal for
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 3 P a g e
Opinion 1/2016 Preliminary Opinion on the agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection
More informationI. Introduction. 5 Official Journal of the European Union C 115/13, Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the European Union,
I. Introduction The Mutual Assistance and Solidarity Clauses were formally introduced by the Lisbon Treaty in December 2009 and are now enshrined in Title V, Chapter II, Section 2 Provisions on the common
More informationTHE EU SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL PROTECTION AFTER THE TREATY OF LISBON: A FIRST EVALUATION *
1 THE EU SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL PROTECTION AFTER THE TREATY OF LISBON: A FIRST EVALUATION * Vassilios Skouris Excellencies, Dear colleagues, Ladies and gentlemen, Allow me first of all to express my grateful
More informationOperation Sophia Before and After UN Security Council Resolution No 2240 (2015) Mireia Estrada-Cañamares *
Insight Operation Sophia Before and After UN Security Council Resolution No 2240 (2015) Mireia Estrada-Cañamares * ABSTRACT: The Insight focuses on the Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP)
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.4.2011 COM(2011) 175 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL On the implementation since 2007 of the Council Framework Decision
More information14284/16 PL/mz 1 DG B 1C
Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 November 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2008/0140 (CNS) 14284/16 REPORT From: To: Presidency SOC 687 ANTIDISCRIM 66 JAI 929 MI 701 FREMP 182 Permanent
More informationCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2010/18/EU
18.3.2010 Official Journal of the European Union L 68/13 DIRECTIVES COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE,
More informationEN Official Journal of the European Union L 157/ 45. DIRECTIVE 2004/48/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004
30.4.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 157/ 45 DIRECTIVE 2004/48/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (Text
More informationCommittee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. on the Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union ( ) (2011/2069(INI))
EUROPEAN PARLIAMT 2009-2014 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 11.7.2012 2011/2069(INI) DRAFT REPORT on the Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union (2010-2011) (2011/2069(INI))
More informationSJ DIR 4 EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 18 November 2015 (OR. en) 2011/0901 B (COD) PE-CONS 62/15 JUR 692 COUR 47 INST 378 CODEC 1434
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 18 November 2015 (OR. en) 2011/0901 B (COD) PE-CONS 62/15 JUR 692 COUR 47 INST 378 CODEC 1434 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: REGULATION
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 27 September /12 PI 113 COUR 66 WORKING DOCUMENT
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 27 September 2012 14268/12 PI 113 COUR 66 WORKING DOCUMENT from: Presidency to: Delegations No. prev. doc.: 17539/11 PI 168 COUR 71 Subject: Draft agreement on a
More informationAdvisory Committee on Enforcement
E WIPO/ACE/12/8 REV. ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2017 Advisory Committee on Enforcement Twelfth Session Geneva, September 4 to 6, 2017 THE WORK OF THE HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 February 2010 (OR. en) 16945/09 SOC 754. LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS Subject:
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 9 February 2010 (OR. en) 16945/09 SOC 754 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS Subject: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental
More informationANNEX II COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 22 July 2009 (OR. en) 10088/09 COSDP 476 PESC 668 COAFR 182 CONUN 52 SOMALIA 22
ANNEX II COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 22 July 2009 (OR. en) 10088/09 COSDP 476 PESC 668 COAFR 182 CONUN 52 SOMALIA 22 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS Subject : Council Decision on the
More information8118/16 SH/NC/ra DGD 2
Council of the European Union Brussels, 30 May 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2016/0060 (CNS) 8118/16 JUSTCIV 71 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: COUNCIL REGULATION implementing enhanced
More informationBREXIT POTENTIAL ISSUES FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LAW LITIGATION IN NORTHERN IRELAND. or How to Survive Without EU Law As We Know It
BREXIT POTENTIAL ISSUES FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LAW LITIGATION IN NORTHERN IRELAND or How to Survive Without EU Law As We Know It Law Society of Northern Ireland and Irish Centre for European Law Belfast,
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular points (a) and (b) of Article 79(2) thereof,
21.5.2016 L 132/21 DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/801 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 May 2016 on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies,
More information1. Judgment of the Court of 17 March 2016 C-286/14, EP, supported by Council v Commission (Connecting Europe Facility)
Recent case law of the Court of Justice on delegated and implementing acts 1. Judgment of the Court of 17 March 2016 C-286/14, EP, supported by Council v Commission (Connecting Europe Facility) Keywords:
More informationCover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation
Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/30219 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Wilman, F.G. Title: The vigilance of individuals : how, when and why the EU legislates
More informationReport of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (Luxembourg, May 1995)
Report of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (Luxembourg, May 1995) Caption: In May 1995, the Court of Justice of the European Communities publishes a report on several aspects of the application
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
24.4.2015 L 106/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES COUNCIL DIRECTIVE (EU) 2015/637 of 20 April 2015 on the coordination and cooperation measures to facilitate consular protection for unrepresented citizens
More informationCOMPETITION LAW REGULATION OF HUNGAROPHARMA GYÓGYSZERKERESKEDELMI ZÁRTKÖRŰEN MŰKÖDŐ RÉSZVÉNYTÁRSASÁG
COMPETITION LAW REGULATION OF HUNGAROPHARMA GYÓGYSZERKERESKEDELMI ZÁRTKÖRŰEN MŰKÖDŐ RÉSZVÉNYTÁRSASÁG EXTRACT FOR EXTERNAL USE Effective as of 15 January 2017 2 I. Preamble 1. The aim of this Regulation
More informationInfringement Proceedings & References to the Court of Justice of the EU. Adam Weiss The AIRE Centre
Infringement Proceedings & References to the Court of Justice of the EU Adam Weiss The AIRE Centre 1 Objective Empower you to make complaints to the European Commission which are likely to lead to infringement
More informationHerbert Smith Freehills Insights membership, each of which provide to a greater or
COMPETITION REGULATION & TRADE BRIEFING FUTURE UK TRADE RELATIONS WITH THE EU AND WITH THIRD COUNTRIES AUGUST 2016 London As an EU member state the UK is currently part of the EU internal market, which
More information3. The attention of Convention members is drawn in particular to the following amendments proposed by the Praesidium:
THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION THE SECRETARIAT Brussels, 12 May 2003 (15.05) (OR. fr) CONV 734/03 COVER NOTE from : to: Subject : Praesidium Convention Articles on the Court of Justice and the High Court 1. Members
More informationData Protection Bill, House of Lords second reading Information Commissioner s briefing
Data Protection Bill, House of Lords second reading Information Commissioner s briefing Introduction... 2 Overview... 2 Derogations... 4 Commissioner s part-by- part commentary on the Bill... 5 Part one:
More informationThe EU Charter, Environmental Protection, and Judicial Remedies
7 December 2016 The EU Charter, Environmental Protection, and Judicial Remedies Dr Angela Ward Référendaire, Court of Justice of the EU Visiting Professor; Birkbeck College, University of London The first
More informationSummary Contents. Introduction: European Constitutional Law. lxiii
Summary Contents Introduction: European Constitutional Law lxiii Part I Constitutional Foundations 1 1 Constitutional History: From Paris to Lisbon 3 2 Constitutional Nature: A Federation of States 43
More informationTHE LISBON TREATY AND EU SPORTS POLICY
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES CULTURE AND EDUCATION THE LISBON TREATY AND EU SPORTS POLICY STUDY This document was requested by the European
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
4.11.2016 L 297/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/1919 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 26 October 2016 on legal aid for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings
More information10 th Congress of the IASAJ Sydney March 2010.
10 th Congress of the IASAJ Sydney March 2010. REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS OF GOVERNMENT BY ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS AND TRIBUNALS. THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Aindrias Ó Caoimh 1 This
More informationECN RECOMMENDATION ON COMMITMENT PROCEDURES
ECN RECOMMENDATION ON COMMITMENT PROCEDURES By the present Recommendation the ECN Competition Authorities (the Authorities) express their common views on the need for making commitments binding and enforceable
More informationECN RECOMMENDATION ON THE POWER TO ADOPT INTERIM MEASURES
ECN RECOMMENDATION ON THE POWER TO ADOPT INTERIM MEASURES By the present Recommendation the ECN Competition Authorities (the Authorities) express their common views on the power to adopt interim measures.
More informationL 33/10 Official Journal of the European Union DIRECTIVES
L 33/10 Official Journal of the European Union 3.2.2009 DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE 2008/122/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 14 January 2009 on the protection of consumers in respect of certain
More informationTHE HIGH COURT COMMERCIAL
THE HIGH COURT COMMERCIAL [2016 No. 4809 P.] BETWEEN THE DATA PROTECTION COMMISSIONER PLAINTIFF AND FACEBOOK IRELAND LIMITED AND MAXIMILLIAN SCHREMS DEFENDANTS Executive Summary of the Judgment 3 rd October,
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS
26.5.2016 L 138/1 I (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS REGULATION (EU) 2016/796 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Railways and repealing Regulation
More informationEuropean Environmental Law: After Lisbon, 4th edn
222 BOOKS European Environmental Law: After Lisbon, 4th edn Jan H Jans and Hans H B Vedder Europa Law Publishing, 2012; v xvi + 560 pages; 52, $90 (softback); ISBN 978 9 089 52106 4. Despite the ongoing
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 29.6.2017 COM(2017) 366 final 2017/0151 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, at the sixth session of the Meeting
More informationInformation Notice. Information Notice. Reference: ComReg 17/49
Information Notice Response to Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation Consultation on Proposed European Directive Empowering National Competition Authorities to be more Effective Information Notice
More informationThe Court of Justice. Composition, jurisdiction and procedures
The Court of Justice Composition, jurisdiction and procedures To build Europe, certain States (now 28 in number) concluded treaties establishing first the European Communities and then the European Union,
More informationProposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Strasbourg, 11.6.2013 COM(2013) 404 final 2013/0185 (COD) C7-0170/13 Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on certain rules governing actions for damages
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 24 February 2016 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 February 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0081 (COD) 14958/15 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: MIGR 70 RECH 303 EDUC 318 SOC 708 CODEC
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28 and Article 31(1) thereof,
27.6.2014 L 188/73 COUNCIL DECISION 2014/401/CFSP of 26 June 2014 on the European Union Satellite Centre and repealing Joint Action 2001/555/CFSP on the establishment of a European Union Satellite Centre
More informationQuestionnaire 2. HCCH Judgments Project
Questionnaire 2 HCCH Judgments Project Introduction 1) An important current project of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) is the development of a convention on the recognition and
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 13 April 2015 (OR. en) Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union
Council of the European Union Brussels, 13 April 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2015/0073 (NLE) 7906/15 COTRA 5 CDN 1 PROPOSAL From: date of receipt: 13 April 2015 To: No. Cion doc.: Subject: Secretary-General
More informationAmended proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. laying down standards for the reception of asylum seekers.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 1.6.2011 COM(2011) 320 final 2008/0244 (COD) Amended proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL laying down standards for the reception of asylum
More informationPROPOSAL The High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 25 March 2010 8029/10 POLG 43 INST 93 PROPOSAL from: The High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to: Council dated: 25 March 2010 Subject: Draft
More informationREGULATION (EU) No 649/2012 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 July 2012 concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals
L 201/60 Official Journal of the European Union 27.7.2012 REGULATION (EU) No 649/2012 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 July 2012 concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 5.6.2018 COM(2018) 451 final 2018/0238 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising Member States to ratify, in the interest of the European Union, the Protocol amending
More informationIntra-EU Investment Treaties and EU Law Inaugural Conference of EFILA
Intra-EU Investment Treaties and EU Law Inaugural Conference of EFILA Markus Burgstaller 23 January 2015 Three selected arguments from an EU law perspective Article 18 TFEU: "Within the scope of application
More informationSpeech before LIBE Committee
SPEECH/10/235 Cecilia Malmström Member of the European Commission responsible for Home Affairs Speech before LIBE Committee The Committee on Civil liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) of the European
More informationJoint Select Committee on Human Rights Inquiry into the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill. The Law Society of Scotland s Response
Joint Select Committee on Human Rights Inquiry into the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill The Law Society of Scotland s Response November 2017 Introduction The Law Society of Scotland is the professional
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.6.2016 COM(2016) 434 final 2016/0198 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1030/2002 laying
More informationAMENDMENTS TO THE TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION AND TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY
C 306/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.12.2007 HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: AMENDMENTS TO THE TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION AND TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY Article 1 The Treaty
More informationInfluence of EU Law on National Procedural Rules
Influence of EU Law on National Procedural Rules ETJN-Seminar on EU Institutional Law 16/17 June 2014, Ljubljana Speaker: Dr. Kathrin Petersen, Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy, Germany
More informationOpinion 6/2015. A further step towards comprehensive EU data protection
Opinion 6/2015 A further step towards comprehensive EU data protection EDPS recommendations on the Directive for data protection in the police and justice sectors 28 October 2015 1 P a g e The European
More informationImplementation of the Damages Directive across the EU
Implementation of the Damages Directive across the EU February 2017 The Damages Directive 1, which seeks to promote and harmonise the private enforcement of EU competition law before national courts across
More information(Text with EEA relevance) (2010/C 122 E/03)
C 122 E/38 Official Journal of the European Union 11.5.2010 POSITION (EU) No 6/2010 OF THE COUNCIL AT FIRST READING with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
21.5.2016 L 132/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/800 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 May 2016 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons
More informationJurisdictional control and the Constitutional court in the Tunisian Constitution
Jurisdictional control and the Constitutional court in the Tunisian Constitution Xavier PHILIPPE The introduction of a true Constitutional Court in the Tunisian Constitution of 27 January 2014 constitutes
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
5.12.2014 L 349/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE 2014/104/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 12 May 2015 (OR. en)
Conseil UE Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 May 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0305 (COD) 8592/15 LIMITE OPINION OF THE LEGAL SERVICE 1 From: To: Subject: Legal Service COREPER PUBLIC
More information6256/16 KR/tt 1 DG D 2C LIMITE EN
Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 February 2016 (OR. en) 6256/16 LIMITE FREMP 35 JAI 109 COHOM 18 NOTE From: To: Subject: Presidency Delegations Coherence and consistency between internal and
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 24 November /09 SOC 699
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 24 November 2009 15994/09 SOC 699 REPORT from : Permanent Representatives Committee (Part I) to : COUNCIL (EPSCO) No. Cion prop. : 12761/09 SOC 477 No. prev. doc.:
More informationEuropean Law Review ISSN: April EL Rev
European Law Review ISSN: 0307 5400 EL Rev 2012 2 Editorial And those who look only to the past or the present are certain to miss the future Articles A Proportionate Response to Proportionality in the
More informationDelegations will find the text of this Resolution in annex II and are invited to present their comments at the COPEN meeting of 28 May 2014.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 20 May 2014 9968/14 COPEN 153 EUROJUST 99 EJN 57 NOTE from: to: Subject: Presidency Delegations Issues of proportionality and fundamental rights in the context of
More informationEU Data Protection Law - Current State and Future Perspectives
High Level Conference: "Ethical Dimensions of Data Protection and Privacy" Centre for Ethics, University of Tartu / Data Protection Inspectorate Tallinn, Estonia, 9 January 2013 EU Data Protection Law
More informationPolicy Paper on the Future of EU Youth Policy Development
Policy Paper on the Future of EU Youth Policy Development Adopted by the European Youth Forum / Forum Jeunesse de l Union européenne / Forum des Organisations européennes de la Jeunesse Council of Members,
More informationLEGAL BASIS OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS
PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION Protection of personal data and respect for private life are important fundamental rights. The European Parliament has always insisted on the need to strike a balance between enhancing
More informationTHE HIGH COURT RECORD NUMBER 2017/781 P. JOLYON MAUGHAM, STEVEN AGNEW JONATHAN BARTLEY and KEITH TAYLOR -AND- IRELAND and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BETWEEN: THE HIGH COURT RECORD NUMBER 2017/781 P JOLYON MAUGHAM, STEVEN AGNEW JONATHAN BARTLEY and KEITH TAYLOR -AND- IRELAND and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANT STATEMENT OF CLAIM Delivered
More informationPROVISIONAL AGREEMENT RESULTING FROM INTERINSTITUTIONAL NEGOTIATIONS
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 11.7.2017 PROVISIONAL AGREEMT RESULTING FROM INTERINSTITUTIONAL NEGOTIATIONS Subject: Proposal for a regulation of
More informationthe invitation by the EU to Montenegro to participate in the EU-led operation,
8.4.2010 Official Journal of the European Union L 88/3 AGREEMENT between the European Union and Montenegro on the participation of Montenegro in the European Union military operation to contribute to the
More informationAssessing the Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on EU-South Africa relations
Assessing the Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on EU-South Africa relations Submitted by ECDPM, Maastricht (Netherlands), 7 May 2010 The Lisbon Treaty, which came into force on 1 December 2009, represents the
More informationRECEPTION OF MIGRANTS: MATERIAL AND PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES FOR SETTLED MIGRANTS. Intervention by Christoph Grabenwarter
RECEPTION OF MIGRANTS: MATERIAL AND PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES FOR SETTLED MIGRANTS Intervention by Christoph Grabenwarter Opening of the Judicial Year Seminar 27 January 2017 A. Introduction Europe is the
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 172 thereof,
L 150/72 Official Journal of the European Union 20.5.2014 REGULATION (EU) No 512/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 setting up the
More informationTEXTS ADOPTED. European Parliament resolution of 17 May 2017 on the situation in Hungary (2017/2656(RSP))
European Parliament 2014-2019 TEXTS ADOPTED P8_TA(2017)0216 Situation in Hungary European Parliament resolution of 17 May 2017 on the situation in Hungary (2017/2656(RSP)) The European Parliament, having
More information(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS
11.12.2015 L 327/1 I (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS REGULATION (EU) 2015/2283 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 25 November 2015 on novel foods, amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the
More informationProposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.3.2010 COM(2010) 82 final 2010/0050 (COD) C7-0072/10 Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the right to interpretation and translation
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 13 November 2003 (Or. fr) 14766/03 Interinstitutional File: 2003/0273 (CNS) FRONT 158 COMIX 690
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 13 November 2003 (Or. fr) 14766/03 Interinstitutional File: 2003/0273 (CNS) FRONT 158 COMIX 690 COVER NOTE from : Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed
More information11261/2/09 REV 2 TT/NC/ks DG I
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 5 March 2010 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2008/0002 (COD) 11261/2/09 REV 2 DLEG 51 CODEC 893 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: Position of the Council
More informationChaudfontaine Group Seminar 2015
Chaudfontaine Group Seminar 2015 Sensitive trade control and sanctions: implementing embargoes and penalties in case of violations Ilaria Anna Colussi, University of Liège SANCTIONS IN TRADE CONTEXT In
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION. 27th ANNUAL REPORT ON MONITORING THE APPLICATION OF EU LAW (2009) SEC(2010) 1143 SEC(2010) 1144
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 1.10.2010 COM(2010) 538 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION 27th ANNUAL REPORT ON MONITORING THE APPLICATION OF EU LAW (2009) SEC(2010) 1143 SEC(2010) 1144 EN EN REPORT
More informationDIRECTIVE 2014/57/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 on criminal sanctions for market abuse (market abuse directive)
12.6.2014 Official Journal of the European Union L 173/179 DIRECTIVE 2014/57/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 on criminal sanctions for market abuse (market abuse directive)
More informationL 346/42 Official Journal of the European Union
L 346/42 Official Journal of the European Union 23.12.2009 COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) No 1286/2009 of 22 December 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed
More informationPE-CONS 80/14 DGG 3B EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 24 October 2014 (OR. en) 2013/0185 (COD) PE-CONS 80/14 RC 8 JUSTCIV 80 CODEC 961
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 24 October 2014 (OR. en) 2013/0185 (COD) PE-CONS 80/14 RC 8 JUSTCIV 80 CODEC 961 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: DIRECTIVE OF THE
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent {SEC(2010) 796} {SEC(2010) 797}
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, COM(2010) XXX 2010/xxxx (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent {SEC(2010) 796} {SEC(2010) 797}
More informationAMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft report Tadeusz Zwiefka (PE v02-00)
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Legal Affairs 2018/2079(INL) 19.10.2018 AMDMTS 1-78 Draft report Tadeusz Zwiefka (PE627.896v02-00) Expedited settlement of commercial disputes (2018/2079(INL))
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 78(3) thereof,
L 248/80 COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2015/1601 of 22 September 2015 establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
More information