Three Words and the Future of the Affordable Care Act
|
|
- Edgar Price
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Articles Faculty Scholarship 2015 Three Words and the Future of the Affordable Care Act Nicholas Bagley University of Michigan Law School, Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Health Law and Policy Commons, Insurance Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Bagley, Nicholas. "Three Words and the Future of the Affordable Care Act." J. Health Pol. Pol'y & L. 40, no. 3 (2015): This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact mlaw.repository@umich.edu.
2 Three Words and the Future of the Affordable Care Act Nicholas Bagley University of Michigan Editor s Note: JHPPL has started an ACA Scholar-Practitioner Network (ASPN). The ASPN assembles people of different backgrounds (practitioners, stakeholders, and researchers) involved in state-level health reform implementation across the United States. The newly developed ASPN website documents ACA implementation research projects to assist policy makers, researchers, and journalists in identifying and integrating scholarly work on state-level implementation of the ACA. If you would like your work included on the ASPN website, please contact web coordinator Phillip Singer at pmsinger@umich.edu. You can visit the site at //ssascholars.uchicago.edu/jhppl/. JHPPL seeks to bring this important and timely work to the fore in Report on Health Reform Implementation, a recurring special section. Thanks to funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, all essays in the section are published open access. Colleen M. Grogan Abstract As an essential part of its effort to achieve near universal coverage, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) extends sizable tax credits to most people who buy insurance on the newly established health care exchanges. Yet several lawsuits have been filed challenging the availability of those tax credits in the thirty-four states that refused to set up their own exchanges. The lawsuits are premised on a strained interpretation of the ACA that, if accepted, would make a hash of other provisions of the statute and undermine its effort to extend coverage to the uninsured. The courts should reject this latest effort to dismantle a critical feature of the ACA. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 40, No. 3, June 2015 DOI / Ó 2015 by Duke University Press
3 590 Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law Keywords Affordable Care Act, exchanges, tax credits, statutory interpretation, Halbig, King Put yourself in the shoes of my kids piano teacher. She s got a part-time job accompanying music students at the University of Michigan and stitches together the rest of her modest income from teaching and performing at church services, weddings, funerals, and the like. She doesn t get health coverage through the university she only works part-time nor is she so poor that she can go on Medicaid. Instead, she has to find coverage on the private market. Before the Affordable Care Act (ACA), however, private coverage was out of reach for her. Even without a preexisting condition, she couldn t afford to pay thousands of dollars for an individual health plan. She was barely scraping by as it was. To help people like my kids piano teacher, the ACA extends tax credits to anyone earning between one and four times the poverty level who buys a qualified health plan (26 U.S.C. x 36B(c)(1)(A)), so long as the individual is ineligible for Medicaid and doesn t have access to employer-sponsored coverage. The tax credits are substantial, averaging about $2,890 per person (Levitt, Claxton, and Damico 2014). And they are an essential part of the ACA s effort to achieve what the statute calls near-universal coverage (42 U.S.C. x 18091(2)(D)). As Jonathan H. Adler and Michael F. Cannon read the ACA, however, my kids piano teacher can t get tax credits at all. Nor should roughly 9.5 million other people scattered throughout the country (Levitt and Claxton 2014). In their view a view endorsed by a panel of the D.C. Circuit (Halbig v. Burwell, 758 F.3d 390 (D.C. Cir. 2014)) the ACA instead armed hostile state governments to thwart the ACA s effort to cover the uninsured. Their contention has assumed new urgency now that the Supreme Court has agreed to resolve the statutory dispute in King v. Burwell. Yet Adler and Cannon fail to offer persuasive reasons to adopt their peculiar interpretation of the ACA. To the contrary, the government s alternative reading makes much better sense of the statute as a whole and avoids assigning a meaning to the ACA that is blatantly at odds with what the statute aims to accomplish. The Supposed Glitch To better organize the individual and small-group insurance markets, section 1311 of the ACA instructs the states to establish health care
4 Bagley - Report on Health Reform Implementation 591 exchanges. From the consumer s perspective, the exchanges are just websites that allow for the easy comparison of health plans sold in a particular area. The hope is that the exchanges will enable price and quality competition in an unruly insurance market. Congress anticipated that the states would welcome the opportunity to establish their own exchanges (Pear 2012). Better to retain state control over health insurers than cede that authority to the federal government. Nonetheless, Congress recognized that not every state might wish to establish an exchange. In states that declined to do so, section 1321 of the ACA tells the secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish and operate the state s exchange. As it happened, the choice of whether to establish an exchange got caught up in the political furor over Obamacare. For the thirty-four states that refused to establish exchanges, the federal government had to shoulder the unexpected burden of setting up the exchanges. In Adler and Cannon s (2011) telling, that s where the ACA s supposed glitch comes in. The provision of the ACA governing the calculation of tax credits links the amount of the credit to the price of a health plan purchased on an Exchange established by the State under 1311 (26 U.S.C. x 36B(b)(2)(A)). But what about people living in states whose exchanges were established by the federal government? Literal adherence to the statutory formula would suggest that subsidies aren t available on those exchanges. My kids piano teacher would be out of luck. The Obama administration isn t buying this interpretation of the statute. In 2012 the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a rule extending tax credits to eligible individuals, whether or not their state established an exchange. That rule has now been challenged in four separate lawsuits. As Adler and Cannon see it, the rule ought to be struck down because it s inconsistent with the ACA. If they re right, tax credits that millions of people now depend on to buy health insurance would evaporate. To make their case, however, it s not enough for Adler and Cannon to show that it s possible to read the ACA as withdrawing tax credits from refusal states. If the statute is ambiguous on that point, it s black-letter law that the courts must defer to the IRS s authoritative interpretation (Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984)). Adler and Cannon instead have to demonstrate that the statute unambiguously withdraws tax credits from people in refusal states and that the IRS s contrary interpretation is downright unreasonable. They haven t come close to making such a demonstration.
5 592 Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law The Statutory Text When the federal government sets up an exchange on a state s behalf, it does not create some sort of federal exchange. Rather, it creates a state exchange. The text of the ACA is crisp on this point. Recall that section 1311 instructs states to establish their own exchanges. Under section 1321, when a state fails to set up the required Exchange which is to say, a state exchange under section 1311 the secretary of HHS must establish and operate such Exchange within the State (my emphasis). In other words, the backup exchange isn t established under section It is established under section 1311, just as the provision authorizing tax credits requires. The secretary merely stands in the shoes of state officials in setting up their states exchanges. Any exchange that the secretary establishes is the legal and functional equivalent of a state exchange. Adler and Cannon seem to acknowledge the force of this argument, as did the D.C. Circuit panel that invalidated the IRS rule. They nonetheless resist the implication that tax credits are available in states with federally established exchanges. Their argument hinges on the claim that Congress linked tax credits to exchanges established by the State under 1311 (my emphasis). Yes, they seem to say, a federally established exchange may be established under But they maintain that Congress used those three words by the State to signal that tax credits would be unavailable on federally established exchanges. Reading the statute as a whole, however, it quickly becomes apparent that Congress never meant those three words to bear the immense weight that Adler and Cannon would assign to them. In several places in the ACA, Congress used similar Exchange established by the State language to refer generally to exchanges including federally established exchanges. If that s so elsewhere in the statute, then why not in the provision governing the calculation of tax credits? Most obviously, the ACA limits who can buy insurance on an exchange to those who resid[e] in the State that established the Exchange (42 U.S.C. x 18032(f )(1)(A)). If Adler and Cannon were correct that Congress scrupulously distinguished between state-established exchanges and exchanges in general, then no one in a state with a federally established exchange could go on that exchange to buy a health plan. As the D.C. district court put it, The federal Exchanges would have no customers, and no purpose (Halbig v. Sebelius, No (D.D.C. 2014)). Adler and Cannon claim that the limitation on the exchange s customers is moot because it appears in a provision governing state exchanges, not in
6 Bagley - Report on Health Reform Implementation 593 the provision governing federally established exchanges. But federally established exchanges are state exchanges. And Congress could not possibly have meant for those federally established exchanges to be an empty gesture. Elsewhere, the ACA says that states have to maintain their Medicaid eligibility standards until an Exchange established by the State is up and running (42 U.S.C. x 1396a(gg)(1)). This maintenance-of-effort provision was meant to provide stopgap protection for Medicaid beneficiaries until the exchanges went live. On Adler and Cannon s telling, however, it would forbid a state that declined to establish an exchange from ever relaxing its Medicaid standards. There is zero evidence that Congress meant the ACA to freeze state Medicaid programs into perpetuity. Brushing past these statutory signals, Adler and Cannon aver that the phrase established by the State appears in a number of places in the act. But it doesn t matter how many times Congress used the phrase. The question is what Congress meant by the phrase. Its repetition is perfectly consistent with the view that Congress anticipating that nearly all the states would establish exchanges just meant to refer to exchanges in general. At a minimum, Congress s slipshod use of the by the State language gives rise to ambiguity as to what Congress meant by it. And when there s ambiguity about federal taxes, it s up to the IRS to resolve that ambiguity. Adler and Cannon nonetheless insist that Congress meant the by the State language in the tax-credit calculation to serve some distinct purpose. What purpose do they have in mind? As they see it, Congress withheld tax credits from states that declined to create their own exchanges in order to goad them into establishing exchanges. Congress was making a threat: set up your own exchanges or you ll lose out on tax credits. This claim is quite implausible. To begin with, Congress knows how to threaten states with financial consequences when it wants to. Adler and Cannon demonstrate as much by identifying a number of other bills not the ACA that contain clear language conditioning federal money on certain forms of state compliance. The absence of any such clear language in the ACA is powerful evidence that Congress never meant the availability of tax credits to depend on whether a state established an exchange. After all, there was no need to bully the states into doing what everyone assumed they would gladly do. More to the point, threats must be communicated. When Vito Corleone made the proverbial offer that can t be refused, he didn t just say sign the contract. He had Luca Brasi hold a gun to the head of a guy and assured
7 594 Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law him that either his brains or his signature would be on the contract. Without the gun, there s no threat (Bagley 2014). In the ACA, however, the threat that Congress supposedly meant to level was so well hidden that the states never noticed it. A careful report from the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute, documenting what states knew and when they knew it, has found no contemporaneous evidence that the availability of tax credits played a role in state decisions over whether to establish exchanges (Dash, Monahan, and Lucia 2013; Monahan 2014). How can Adler and Cannon say that Congress unambiguously threatened the states if the states never got the message? Their reading is anomalous for another reason. In the absence of tax credits on federally established exchanges, many healthy people would forgo coverage. Those with serious health problems, however, would likely remain in the market. The risk pools for exchange plans would become skewed toward sicker enrollees, which would in turn increase the cost of exchange plans. As costs went up, relatively healthy people would decline insurance, leading to sicker risk pools and even higher prices, which would drive away still more healthy people. In short, the exchanges would stop working. As a just-released study from the RAND Corporation explains, If the ACA s subsidies are eliminated entirely, our model predicts a near death spiral that is, sharp premium increases and drastic enrollment declines in the individual market (Eibner and Saltzman 2014: 25). Why construe the ACA to create dysfunctional exchanges when an alternative reading would avoid that result? Legislative Intent If Congress did mean to use the three words to threaten the states, it should be easy to find evidence of that threat in the legislative record. Yet there is none. Adler and Cannon themselves prove the point. Over the past few years, they ve worked tirelessly to sift through the legislative record, attentive for any hint that might support their preferred interpretation. Yet they ve found nothing. Take, for example, the letter they discuss from the eleven Texas Democrats in the House of Representatives. In the letter, the Democratic legislators implored the president not to give the states the power to create their own exchanges. In Texas, they explained, we know from experience that the dangers to the uninsured from greater state authority are real (Doggett 2010). Better by far, the legislators argued, to establish a national exchange one that Texas officials couldn t interfere with.
8 Bagley - Report on Health Reform Implementation 595 Adler and Cannon assert that the legislators were voicing concerns that Texas citizens might not get tax credits. Yet the letter says not one word about tax credits. Not one. The absence of any mention of tax credits is the dog that didn t bark in the night a clue that the legislators had no inkling of any supposed threat. The legislators were voicing concerns about obstruction from Texas officials, not about the loss of tax credits from the federal government. And they were right to be worried. Texas not only declined to establish its own exchange. It also announced that it wouldn t enforce the ACA s insurance rules (Luthra 2013), imposed onerous training requirements on the navigators who help people buy insurance (Aaronson 2014), and refused to expand Medicaid (Ramshaw 2012). What else do Adler and Cannon point to? After the ACAwas signed into law, the House of Representatives passed the Reconciliation Act to make a few changes. Among those changes, the House clarified that territories were to be treated as states if they chose to establish exchanges. It strains credulity, Adler and Cannon assert in an amicus brief they submitted to the D.C. Circuit, that Congress... would notice and remedy the bill s failure to authorize [tax credits] in territorial Exchanges, but would not notice its failure to authorize them in federal Exchanges (Brief of Amici Curiae Jonathan H. Adler and Michael F. Cannon, Halbig v. Burwell, No (D.C. Cir. 2014)). But it doesn t strain credulity at all. It s only natural that Congress wouldn t notice much less assign significance to three innocuous words in a dense, hard-to-follow statutory formula. What is truly inconceivable is that Congress would extend tax credits to territorial exchanges but without so much as a whisper deliberately refuse to extend them to federal exchanges. Finally, Adler and Cannon trace the drafting history of the ACA in an effort to support their view that Congress meant that three-word phrase, by the State, to do important work. All they demonstrate, however, is that Congress kept using the phrase during the frantic negotiations over the ACA. At the time, however, everyone thought that the exchanges would be established by the states. Not a shred of evidence supports Adler and Cannon s conjecture that Senate leaders and White House officials engineered the insertion of the phrase in the tax-credit calculation in order to strip tax credits from the citizens of refusal states. I could go on. I ve made my point, however. In poring through the legislative history, Adler and Cannon have committed the cardinal sin of looking over a crowd to pick out their friends. Only here, they have no friends.
9 596 Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law Conclusion Adler and Cannon have offered a strained interpretation of the ACA that, if accepted, would make a hash of other provisions of the statute and undermine its stated purpose of extending insurance to nearly all Americans. The more natural reading one that makes far better sense of the statute as a whole is that tax credits are available in both the states that established exchanges and those that did not. On this view, the by the State language just reflects Congress s assumption, unchallenged at the time, that the states would establish their own exchanges. But even if you think that Adler and Cannon s claim is plausible, maybe even attractive, the contrary interpretation offered by the government is at least reasonable. That brings me to the aspect of their argument that troubles me the most: their unyielding conviction that they ve identified the only possible construction of the ACA. Nowhere do they so much as acknowledge the possibility that maybe, just maybe, they re wrong. That s because they can t admit to doubt. Because of the deference extended to agency interpretation, doubt means they lose. But their unwillingness even to acknowledge ambiguity reflects an important difference between legal advocacy and neutral interpretation. To be clear, Adler and Cannon deserve immense credit for their lawyerly ingenuity: they ve constructed a facially plausible argument in support of an exceedingly strange interpretation of the ACA. But the courts would violate their obligation of fidelity in statutory construction if they mistook that ingenuity for genuine obeisance to congressional will. The latest challenge to the ACA is political activism masquerading as statutory restraint. n n n Nicholas Bagley is assistant professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School. He teaches and writes in the areas of health law, administrative law, and regulatory theory. His work has appeared in the Harvard Law Review, the Columbia Law Review, the New England Journal of Medicine, and this journal. Prior to joining the faculty at Michigan, he was an attorney with the Appellate Staff in the Civil Division at the US Department of Justice. He holds a JD from New York University Law School.
10 Bagley - Report on Health Reform Implementation 597 References Aaronson, Becca Texas Finalizes Rules for Health Care Navigators. Texas Tribune, January 21. Adler, Jonathan H., and Michael F. Cannon Another ObamaCare Glitch. Wall Street Journal, November 16. Bagley, Nicholas Halbig Said It Was Applying the Law as Written: Don t Believe It. Incidental Economist (blog), July 23. theincidentaleconomist.com /wordpress/halbig-said-it-was-applying-the-law-as-written-dont-believe-it. Dash, Sarah, Christine Monahan, and Kevin Lucia Implementing the Affordable Care Act: State Decisions about Health Insurance Exchange Establishment. Washington, DC: Center on Health Insurance Reforms, Georgetown University Health Policy Institute. georgetown.box.com/shared/static/pfmjd22ofj 03z7qes8w3.pdf. Doggett, Lloyd U.S. Rep. Doggett: Settling for Second-Rate Health Care Doesn t Serve Texans. My Harlingen News, January 11. Eibner, Christine, and Evan Saltzman Assessing Alternative Modifications to the Affordable Care Act: Impact on Individual Market Premiums and Insurance Coverage. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. /research_reports/rr700/rr708/rand_rr708.pdf. Levitt, Larry, and Gary Claxton The Potential Side Effects of Halbig. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, July 31. kff.org/health-reform/perspective/the -potential-side-effects-of-halbig. Levitt, Larry, Gary Claxton, and Anthony Damico How Much Financial Assistance Are People Receiving under the Affordable Care Act? Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, March 27. kff.org/health-reform/issue-brief/how-much-financial -assistance-are-people-receiving-under-the-affordable-care-act. Luthra, Shefali States to Feds: We Won t Enforce Insurance Reforms. Texas Tribune, August 7. Monahan, Christine Halbig v. Sebelius and State Motivations to Opt for Federally Run Exchanges. CHIRblog, Center on Health Insurance Reforms, Georgetown University Health Policy Institute, February. 11. chirblog.org/halbig -v-sebelius-and-state-motivations-to-opt-for-federally-run-exchanges. Pear, Robert U.S. Officials Brace for Huge Task of Operating Health Exchanges. New York Times, August 4. Ramshaw, Emily Perry: TX Won t Implement Key Elements of Health Reform. Texas Tribune, July9.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law The material presented here has been accepted for publication in a future issue of JHPPL and is under the copyright of Duke University Press. It has not gone
More informationKing v. Burwell: Desperately Seeking Ambiguity in Clear Statutory Text
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law King v. Burwell: Desperately Seeking Ambiguity in Clear Statutory Text Jonathan H. Adler Case Western Reserve University Michael F. Cannon Cato Institute Editor
More informationThe American Health Care Act: Overview
The American Health Care Act: Overview The Congressional Republican leadership has unveiled its long-awaited ObamaCare Repeal Bill. While it has several good elements, it does not live up to the GOP leadership
More information1. The Obama Administration unilaterally granted a one-year delay on all Obamacare health insurance requirements.
THE LEGAL LIMIT: THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION S ATTEMPTS TO EXPAND FEDERAL POWER Report No. 2: The Administration s Lawless Acts on Obamacare and Continued Court Challenges to Obamacare By U.S. Senator Ted
More informationLECTURE. King v. Burwell and the Rule of Law. Key Points. The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch
LECTURE No. 1261 March 4, 2015 King v. Burwell and the Rule of Law The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch Abstract: From the early days of the Republic, a core component of our constitutional character has been
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 14-114 In the Supreme Court of the United States DAVID KING, ET AL., v. Petitioners, SYLVIA BURWELL, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
More informationStatement on the U.S. Government Shutdown. Delivered 2 October 2013, White House, Washington, D.C.
Barack Obama Statement on the U.S. Government Shutdown Delivered 2 October 2013, White House, Washington, D.C. AUTHENTICITY CERTIFIED: Text version below transcribed directly from audio Good morning, everybody.
More informationCOMMENTARY. By Ilya Shapiro. This article appeared on National Review (Online) on December 23, 2015.
President Obama s Top Ten Constitutional Violations of 2015 Cato Institute http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/president-obamas-top-ten... 1 of 5 1/24/2016 3:18 AM COMMENTARY By Ilya Shapiro This
More informationUpdate on Legal Challenges to Reform. Will the Supreme Court Upend the ACA? 12/18/2014. The Federally Facilitated Exchange
Update on Legal Challenges to Reform State of Reform Washington January 8, 2015 Eric J. Neiman Williams Kastner eneiman@williamskastner.com Stephen D. Rose Garvey Shubert Barer srose@gsblaw.com Sallie
More informationThe Threat Continues. Medicaid, the Budget, and Deficit Reduction: The Bottom Line: Our Message on Medicaid and the Super Committee Process
Medicaid, the Budget, and Deficit Reduction: The Threat Continues From Families USA August 2011 We averted default on the national debt when, in exchange for an increase in the debt ceiling, Congress passed,
More informationStatus of Health Reform Bills Moving Through Congress
POLICY PRIMER ON HEALTH REFORM What is the Status of the Health Reform Bills? On November 7, the House of Representatives approved H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, putting major health
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 14-114 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States DAVID KING, ET AL., v. Petitioners, SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the
More informationMedia Guide. The Supreme Court and the Health Care Case
Media Guide The Supreme Court and the Health Care Case Media briefing, presented by SCOTUSblog and Bloomberg Law, at the National Press Club, February 16, 2012. This media guide was prepared by Lyle Denniston
More informationThis presentation is the third in DPH s post election series of presentation on the postelection
This presentation is the third in DPH s post election series of presentation on the postelection environment. 1 2 What we know now is that no changes have been implemented as of yet. We do not know what
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JACQUELINE HALBIG, et al., v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:13-cv-00623-PLF KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, et al., Defendants. BRIEF OF JONATHAN H. ADLER AND MICHAEL
More informationAFFORDABLE HEALTH CHOICES ACT
1 THE CAPPS ABORTION AMENDMENT TO AFFORDABLE HEALTH CHOICES ACT INTRODUCTION The Capps Amendment to the America s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 (H.R. 3200) is a direct attempt to bypass the Hyde
More informationNew Directions in Health Policy: The Affordable Care Act and Medicare Reform*
New Directions in Health Policy: The Affordable Care Act and Medicare Reform* Presented By: Colin T. Roskey, Esq. For HCCA East Central Regional Conference October 11, 2013 * AND A GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN
More informationFrom The Collected Works of Milton Friedman, compiled and edited by Robert Leeson and Charles G. Palm.
Interview. Tolerant of Nuts: Milton Friedman on His Chicago Days. Interviewed by Jason Hirschman. Whip at the University of Chicago, 20 October 1993, pp. 8-9. Used with permission of the Special Collections
More informationAugust 29, VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION
August 29, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION www.regulations.gov Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals Department of Health & Human Services 5201 Leesburg Pike Suite 1300 Falls Church, VA 22042 RE: Medicare
More informationPolicy and Political Implications of the Supreme Court Case on the Affordable Care Act Kaiser Family Foundation March 14, 2012
Transcript provided by the 1 (Tip: Click on the binocular icon to search this document) Policy and Political Implications of the Supreme Court Case on the March 14, 2012 2 [START RECORDING] DREW ALTMAN:
More informationImpact of the Election on the ACA
Impact of the Election on the ACA Presented by Kent Borgman Copyright 2016 American Fidelity Administrative Services, LLC Objectives We will attempt to answer the following questions: How easy is it to
More informationNo [ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 25, 2014] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 14-5018 [ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 25, 2014] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT JACQUELINE HALBIG, et al., v. Plaintiffs Appellants, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS,
More informationAn Update on Health Reform. Jessica Waltman Senior Vice President of Government Affairs, National Association of Health Underwriters March 3-4, 2015
An Update on Health Reform Jessica Waltman Senior Vice President of Government Affairs, National Association of Health Underwriters March 3-4, 2015 2014 is brought great changes to the world of health
More informationdecision in USA v. Emerson. Those of you who have been following this case or caught the
Back to my web page http://www.claytoncramer.com The Emerson Decision: What It Means For Gun Owners On October 16, 2001, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down an historic decision in USA
More informationCase 4:18-cv O Document 121 Filed 06/14/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1779
Case 4:18-cv-00167-O Document 121 Filed 06/14/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1779 TEXAS, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION v. Plaintiffs, UNITED
More informationA Spring Cheat Sheet
A Spring Cheat Sheet Welcome back, friends. While the next stretch likely won t have the drama of the American Health Care Act (AHCA), there will be plenty happening. There are deadlines that require decisive
More informationIntersection between Policy and Politics
Intersection between Policy and Politics Michael M. Hash, Principal Health Policy Alternatives Washington, DC ADEA 2008 Advocacy Day Thank you for inviting me. Well, after months of what has seemed like
More informationVoting Criteria April
Voting Criteria 21-301 2018 30 April 1 Evaluating voting methods In the last session, we learned about different voting methods. In this session, we will focus on the criteria we use to evaluate whether
More informationAn Update on ACA Repeal and Replace Efforts
An Update on ACA Repeal and Replace Efforts Copyright 2017 American Fidelity Administrative Services, LLC Agenda The latest news How did we get here? What was passed? What could happen next? What this
More informationThe Human Needs Report
July 24, 2017 The Human Needs Report IN THIS EDITION HEALTH CARE: BUDGET & APPROPRIATIONS: Senate GOP Push Repeal Bill Vote this Week House Budget Committee Passes FY18 Budget FY18 Appropriations Process
More informationAN INMATES GUIDE TO. Habeas Corpus. Includes the 11 things you must know about the habeas system
AN INMATES GUIDE TO Habeas Corpus Includes the 11 things you must know about the habeas system by Walter M. Reaves, Jr. i DISCLAIMER This guide has been prepared as an aid to those who have an interest
More informationThe 2014 Election in Aiken County: Popularity of Six Key Provisions in the Affordable Care Act
The 2014 Election in Aiken County: Popularity of Six Key Provisions in the Affordable Care Act A Public Service Report The USC Aiken Social Science and Business Research Lab Robert E. Botsch, Director
More information2:12 Blair Miller -- Denver7: What concerns have you brought to the table in those working groups?
FULL TRANSCRIPT INTERVIEW: DENVER7 S BLAIR MILLER AND SEN. CORY GARDNER (R-CO) SUBJECT: SENATE HEALTH CARE BILL AND OTTO WARMBIER DATE: JUNE 21, 2017 10 A.M. MT 1:05 : All right well let s get started
More informationDraft Senate Health Bill Finally Revealed Vote Could Take Place as Early Next Week
Draft Senate Health Bill Finally Revealed Vote Could Take Place as Early Next Week Introduction On June 22, 2017, Republican Senators released a discussion draft of the Better Care Reconciliation Act (BCRA).
More informationHealth Care Reform Where Will We Be at the End of 2012? Penn-Ohio Regional Health Care Alliance
Health Care Reform Where Will We Be at the End of 2012? Penn-Ohio Regional Health Care Alliance Crystal Kuntz, Senior Director Government Policy Coventry Health Care February 23, 2012 Overview of Presentation
More informationStudent Choice IN YOUR STATE. A Lobbying Guide ABOUT THE HSUS. [ Promote Cruelty-Free Research ]
[ Promote Cruelty-Free Research ] ABOUT THE HSUS The HSUS is the nation s largest and most powerful animal protection organization, backed by 10.5 million Americans, or one in every 30. Established in
More informationPresented by: Jeff Bush
Presented by: Jeff Bush Sponsored by: The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author and presenter and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the sponsoring
More informationWhat are term limits and why were they started?
What are term limits and why were they started? The top government office of the United States is the presidency. You probably already know that we elect a president every four years. This four-year period
More informationHealth Care Under the Trump Administration & 115 th Congress
Simply Unpredictable Health Care Under the Trump Administration & 115 th Congress WATES What Are the Experts Saying? Trust the Experts at Wolters Kluwer March 8, 2017 Our Moderators Jenna Ellis, Esq Legal
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 545 U. S. (2005) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 03 1234 MID-CON FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. DAVID KING, et al.,
Appeal: 14-1158 Doc: 36-1 Filed: 03/20/2014 Pg: 1 of 59 Total Pages:(1 of 60) No. 14-1158 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DAVID KING, et al., v. Plaintiffs-Appellants, KATHLEEN
More informationPhil 108, April 24, 2014 Climate Change
Phil 108, April 24, 2014 Climate Change The problem of inefficiency: Emissions of greenhouse gases involve a (negative) externality. Roughly: a harm or cost that isn t paid for. For example, when I pay
More informationAARP Maine Member Survey on the Health Care Reform Plan in the House of Representatives..
AARP Maine Member Survey on the Health Care Reform Plan in the House of Representatives.. November 2009 AARP Maine Member Survey on the Health Care Reform Plan in the House of Representatives Copyright
More information2018 ELECTIONS KAISER HEALTH NEWS Midterm Election Boosts Medicaid Expansion, But Challenges Remain By Phil Galewitz NOVEMBER 8, 2018
2018 ELECTIONS KAISER HEALTH NEWS Midterm Election Boosts Medicaid Expansion, But Challenges Remain By Phil Galewitz NOVEMBER 8, 2018 (Lydia Zuraw/KHN illustration; Getty Images) Medicaid which has been
More informationLEGISLATING HEALTH CARE REFORM
Overview of the Legislative Process LEGISLATING HEALTH CARE REFORM The need for changes to the health care system in the United States was over a decade in the making. In 1993, President Clinton set up
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL ) ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 01-498 (RWR) ) OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ) TRADE REPRESENTATIVE,
More informationAARP Minnesota Member Survey on the Health Care Reform Plan in the House of Representatives..
AARP Minnesota Member Survey on the Health Care Reform Plan in the House of Representatives.. November 2009 AARP Minnesota Member Survey on the Health Care Reform Plan in the House of Representatives Copyright
More informationAffordable Care Act & Legislative Update
Affordable Care Act & Legislative Update April 19, 2016 Laura Appel, Senior Vice President, Strategic Initiatives Dave Finkbeiner, Senior Vice President, Advocacy 1 2010 But before a single Michigan resident
More informationBlues Public Policy Brief *Customer Edition* February 24, 2012
Blues Public Policy Brief *Customer Edition* February 24, 2012 FEDERAL NEWS Congress Passes Payroll Tax Bill with SGR Fix Last week, both the House and the Senate approved a conference report for H.R.
More informationFederal Rule of Evidence 408 and Criminal Cases
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2011 Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and Criminal Cases Stephen A. Saltzburg George Washington University Law School, SSALTZ@law.gwu.edu Follow
More informationAndrew Blowers There is basically then, from what you re saying, a fairly well defined scientific method?
Earth in crisis: environmental policy in an international context The Impact of Science AUDIO MONTAGE: Headlines on climate change science and policy The problem of climate change is both scientific and
More informationOSH-Related Cases Applying the Chevron Doctrine 2017 CONN MACIEL CAREY LLP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
OSH-Related Cases Applying the Chevron Doctrine Courts Role in Interpreting Admin. Rules S.Ct. and other fed. courts have started taking a dim view of judicial deference doctrines New appeal to Courts
More informationHealth Care Reform & the 2012 Election
Health Care Reform & the 2012 Election Chad Moore Director of Operations Children s Mercy Pediatric Care Network Agenda CMPCN (Who We Are, What We Do) Has anything happened in health care since 2008? How
More informationHEALTH CARE AND CONSTITUTIONAL CHAOS: WHY THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD UPHOLD THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
64 STAN. L. REV. ONLINE 139 May 29, 2012 HEALTH CARE AND CONSTITUTIONAL CHAOS: WHY THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD UPHOLD THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT Eric Segall* & Aaron E. Carroll** The Supreme Court s decision
More informationRobert's Rules: What You Should Know
Robert's Rules: What You Should Know Robert's Rules do help you run an effective meeting. And you don't have to know a whole book's worth of details just a few key concepts. If you ve ever been tempted
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
Nos. 13-354 & 13-356 In the Supreme Court of the United States KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS. CONESTOGA
More informationThe majority and the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) have. altered a federal statute by deleting three words ( to the Commission ) from the
Case 14-4626, Document 140, 09/10/2015, 1594805, Page1 of 13 DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The majority and the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) have altered a federal statute by
More informationShould universal care advocates bite their tongues on single-payer?
Should universal care advocates bite their tongues on single-payer? Original Reporting By Mike Alberti Health care June 8, 2011 It was not so long ago that a universal, single-payer health insurance program
More informationAmendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationCase 1:05-cv RMC Document 35 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:05-cv-02345-RMC Document 35 Filed 04/19/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TEMBEC INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Civil Action No. 05-2345 (RMC UNITED STATES
More informationFrances Kunreuther. To be clear about what I mean by this, I plan to cover four areas:
In preparation for the 2007 Minnesota Legislative Session, the Minnesota Council of Nonprofit s Policy Day brought together nonprofit leaders and advocates to understand actions that organizations can
More informationECONOMICS U$A 21 ST CENTURY EDITION PROGRAM #11 REDUCING POVERTY Annenberg Foundation & Educational Film Center
ECONOMICS U$A 21 ST CENTURY EDITION PROGRAM #11 REDUCING POVERTY ECONOMICS U$A: 21 ST CENTURY EDITION PROGRAM #11 REDUCING POVERTY (MUSIC PLAYS) NARRATOR: FUNDING FOR THIS PROGRAM IS PROVIDED BY ANNENBERG
More informationKing v. Burwell and the Rise of the Administrative State
Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law From the SelectedWorks of Ronald D. Rotunda 2015 King v. Burwell and the Rise of the Administrative State Ronald D. Rotunda Available at: https://works.bepress.com/ronald_rotunda/271/
More informationGovernment Affairs Update Eastern Region Conference June 5, Neil Reichenberg Executive Director IPMA-HR
Government Affairs Update Eastern Region Conference June 5, 2017 Neil Reichenberg Executive Director IPMA-HR Overview Republicans control the executive/legislative branches of the federal government but
More informationCase: Document: 39-2 Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 1. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0580n.06. Case No.
Case: 13-2456 Document: 39-2 Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 1 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0580n.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re SETTLEMENT FACILITY DOW
More informationUNTANGLING THE KNOTS What s Possible for Health Reform Efforts
UNTANGLING THE KNOTS What s Possible for Health Reform Efforts Post-Election ACA Update January 30, 2017 Kathryn Bakich Senior Vice President, National Director Health Care Compliance NCPERS 2017 Legislative
More informationCase 1:16-cv ESH Document 75 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-00745-ESH Document 75 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER, and
More informationBill of Rights. 1. Meet the Source (2:58) Interview with Whitman Ridgway (Professor, University of Maryland, College Park)
Interview with Whitman Ridgway (Professor, University of Maryland, College Park) Bill of Rights 1. Meet the Source (2:58) Well, the Bill of Rights, in my opinion, is a very remarkable document because
More informationLarge Group Lesson. Introduction Video This teaching time will introduce the children to what they are learning for the day.
Lesson 1 Large Group Lesson What Is The Purpose Of These Activities What Is The Purpose Of These Activities? Lesson 1 Main Point: I Worship God When I Am Thankful Bible Story: Song of Moses and Miriam
More informationLobby? You? Yes, Your Nonprofit Organization Can!
Lobby? You? Yes, Your Nonprofit Organization Can! CAN YOUR NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION LOBBY? Of course it can. It should, and it s easy. Anyone who can make a phone call or write a letter can lobby. If you
More informationHMPRG s Chicago Forum for Justice in Health Policy: Ensuring the Health of Non-Citizens
HMPRG s Chicago Forum for Justice in Health Policy: Ensuring the Health of Non-Citizens Andrea Kovach, Attorney, Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law The Shriver Center The Sargent Shriver National
More informationFrom The Collected Works of Milton Friedman, compiled and edited by Robert Leeson and Charles G. Palm.
The Political Clout of the Elderly. San Francisco, California: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy, 1988. Luncheon address at the national forum, Social Security 2010: Making the System Work Today
More informationACA Roundtable. Western Pension & Benefits Council, Seattle Chapter. March 21, 2017
Western Pension & Benefits Council, Seattle Chapter ACA Roundtable March 21, 2017 Mikel T. Gray, Milliman Melanie Curtice, Perkins Coie Jodi Glandon, Weyerhaeuser Company Perkins Coie LLP 2015 Federal
More informationSupreme Court Decision What s Next
Supreme Court Decision What s Next June 3, 2015 Provided by Avalere Disclaimer Organizations may not re use material presented at this AMCP webinar for commercial purposes without the written consent of
More informationPolitics and Health Care
Politics and Health Care John Coleman Department of Political Science UW-Madison Founder s Day, Milwaukee Wisconsin Alumni Association May 5, 2009 Health Care Concerns Access Uninsured and underinsured
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2006 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-14-2006 USA v. Marshall Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-2549 Follow this and additional
More informationNational Health Care Reform: Where Do We Go From Here?
National Health Care Reform: Where Do We Go From Here? Karen Davis, President Rachel Nuzum, Senior Policy Director The Commonwealth Fund Qualis Safety Net Medical Home Initiative March 23, 2010 kd@cmwf.org
More informationOVERVIEW KEY FINDINGS. March 2017
March 2017 Working-Class Voters Reject ACA Repeal, Are Less Likely to Support Politicians Who Vote for It More than 350 face-to-face conversations with working-class Ohioans reveal that 55 percent think
More informationWhy Monetary Freedom Matters Ron Paul
Why Monetary Freedom Matters Ron Paul I ve thought about and have written about the Federal Reserve for a long time. I became fascinated with the monetary issue in the 1960s, having come across the Austrian
More informationLegal Challenges to the Affordable Care Act
Legal Challenges to the Affordable Care Act Introduction and Overview More than 20 separate legal challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ( ACA ) have been filed in federal district
More informationNotes for Remarks by. Andrew J. Kriegler. President & CEO. IIROC Annual Conference. Montreal October 24, 2018
Notes for Remarks by Andrew J. Kriegler President & CEO IIROC Annual Conference Montreal October 24, 2018 Check against delivery 1 Welcome. It is wonderful to see you here today, especially at a time of
More informationHow Philly Works Did Your Provisional Ballot Count?
How Philly Works Did Your Provisional Ballot Count? The presidential election is long over. Barack Obama and Mitt Romney have mended fences at the White House. But it wasn t until today that 27,355 Philadelphians
More informationThe State of State Legislatures OAS Episode 25 Jan. 10, 2018
The Our American States podcast produced by the National Conference of State Legislatures is where you hear compelling conversations that tell the story of America s state legislatures, the people in them,
More informationThe George Washington University Law School
The George Washington University Law School Access to the Media 1967 to 2007 and Beyond: A Symposium Honoring Jerome A. Barron s Path-Breaking Article Introductory Remarks by The Honorable Stephen G. Breyer
More information2015 Key Issue Briefs
ADVOCACY 2015: Bills monitored during the Idaho Legislative Session AAUW Idaho's Vice President, Public Policy, is Gayle Wilde. Wilde and Sylvia Chariton served as 2014-15 co-captains of the AAUW Idaho
More informationChurch Litigation Update Conference Forum
Church Litigation Update 2014 Conference Forum Disclaimer The material in this update is provided as general information and education. It should not be construed as, and does not constitute, legal advice
More informationPublic Charge: When is it safe for immigrants to use public benefits? 2. Overview of Public Charge. 1. Highlights of the Public Charge Guidance
Public Charge: RECEIPT OF BENEFITS IN WASHINGTON STATE When is it safe for immigrants to use public benefits? This publication explains the U.S. government s published guidance on the public charge rules,
More informationpreserving individual freedom is government s primary responsibility, even if it prevents government from achieving some other noble goal?
BOOK NOTES What It Means To Be a Libertarian (Charles Murray) - Human happiness requires freedom and that freedom requires limited government. - When did you last hear a leading Republican or Democratic
More informationMedia Ethics, Class 3: What is The Media Doing, What should they do?
Media Ethics, Class 3: What is The Media Doing, What should they do? Today: A. Review B. Chomsky (the movie) A. Review Philosophy, and the accumulation of knowledge generally, is a collective undertaking
More informationOffice of the General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel 3211 FOURTH STREET NE WASHINGTON DC 20017-1194 202-541-3300 FAX 202-541-3337 LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND CORRESPONDING
More informationHealthcare 411: What You Need to Know About How the New Law Affects YOUR Business and How NFIB is Fighting For YOU! July 28, 2010
Healthcare 411: What You Need to Know About How the New Law Affects YOUR Business and How NFIB is Fighting For YOU! July 28, 2010 Amanda Austin, Director of Federal Public Policy for NFIB. Karen Harned,
More informationTrump s Public-Charge Rule Is a One-Two Punch Against Immigrants and Public Assistance Jonathan Blitzer
https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/trumps-public-charge-rule-is-a-one-twopunch-against-immigrants-and-public-assistance Trump s Public-Charge Rule Is a One-Two Punch Against Immigrants and Public
More informationAssumption & Jurisdiction - Howard Freeman
Assumption & Jurisdiction - Howard Freeman Assumption: A friend of my father s was visiting at that time, and he said, well, you follow logic, both courses are logical. He said, does 3 plus 8 plus 5 make
More informationEnvironmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp.: Administrative and Procedural Tools in Environmental Law. by Ryan Petersen *
Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp.: Administrative and Procedural Tools in Environmental Law by Ryan Petersen * On November 2, 2006 the U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in a case with important
More informationIn re Rodolfo AVILA-PEREZ, Respondent
In re Rodolfo AVILA-PEREZ, Respondent File A96 035 732 - Houston Decided February 9, 2007 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Section 201(f)(1)
More informationDebates and the Race for the White House Script
Debates and the Race for the White House Script SHOT / TITLE DESCRIPTION 1. 00:00 Animated Open Animated Open 2. 00:07 Barack Obama and John McCain convention footage THE DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN PARTY
More informationHealth Care Reform: The Sequel
Health Care Reform: The Sequel Katy Spangler Senior Vice President, Health Policy January 10, 2017 Political Landscape New Congress U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate Republicans 241 Democrats 48
More informationThe Future of Healthcare in Today and Tomorrow's Political Climate. Mark Shore President Atlas Consulting Services, LLC
The Future of Healthcare in Today and Tomorrow's Political Climate Mark Shore President Atlas Consulting Services, LLC www.atlasconsultingllc.com Agenda Political process ACA vs Alternatives What happens
More informationComments to the Board - External Table of Contents August 18, 2016 Board Meeting
Comments to the Board - External Table of Contents August 18, 2016 Board Meeting FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Section 1332 Waiver Comments Advancement Project, August 16, 2016 Peggy Elwell, August 17, 2016
More informationDAVID H. SOUTER, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, U.S. SUPREME COURT (RET.) JUSTICE DAVID H. SOUTER: I m here to speak this evening because
DAVID H. SOUTER, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, U.S. SUPREME COURT (RET.) Remarks on Civic Education American Bar Association Opening Assembly August 1, 2009, Chicago, Illinois JUSTICE DAVID H. SOUTER: I m here to
More information