RACIAL DISCRIMINATION

Transcription

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION John Chief AJ Huffer Native American Enrollment Number #1022 Case No Plaintiff V Illinois Department of Natural Recourses, Marc Miller, Michael J Stevens, and Julia Lawrence, et.al Defendants RACIAL DISCRIMINATION Now comes the Plaintiff, Native American John Chief AJ Huffer requesting this Honorable District Court to grant relief from oppression for the following reasons: PRECEDENT Back in June of 1983 the suppression of the Native American Plaintiff by the State of Illinois Department of Transportation became so severe that Plaintiff went to the United States District Court in Springfield, IL for relief. By Federal Judge J. Waldo Ackerman the Plaintiff received a T.R.O. on June 27, 1983 and ten days later a P.R.O. against the State of Illinois, Case

2 No (News Clipping June 28,1983 attached as EXHIBIT 1 I For the past three years Defendants have made false promises of helping the Plaintiff to have the Illinois Native American Tribal manufactured hunting BOW approved for deer hunting in Illinois. In reality the Defendants have blocked the Plaintiff in many ways. Again a Department of the State of Illinois suppression the Native American Plaintiff. II The Plaintiff was informed by the Defendants that it would be necessary to have the Illinois Legislators pass a modification to the Illinois Wild Life code. The Plaintiff achieved this in an open House Hearing any archery device of 40# pull with a 28 arrow would be legal was passed only to be modified in a closed meeting of the Defendants to be for fishing only. This was the first hoop the Defendants caused the Plaintiff to dance through, which was promptly blocked. (Copy of House Bill HB0172 ATTACHED EXHIBIT A III Next the Defendants informed the Plaintiff that is was up to the Plaintiff to prove the Native American BOW has enough power to harvest deer in a humane manner. The Defendants suggested an engineers report of the power of the Native American BOW.

3 The Plaintiff obtained two (2 engineers reports that the Native American BOW is in the power range of now legal long bows and recurve bows. Also the Plaintiff posted on Public Social Media several Videos of deer, boar, bears, and moose being harvested by the Native American BOW. All of the information, Videos and engineers report was published and sent to the Defendants. This turned out only to be another hoop that the Defendants caused the Plaintiff to dance through to no avail. Proof of power of Native American bow published (Two Engineer s Reports attached as EXHIBIT B IV The Plaintiff again went to the Legislators to pass a Illinois Wild Life code to include the Native American BOW. Another open hearing was held and the Defendants objected to including the Native American product along with Anglo Saxon produced deer hunting products. The Defendants veiled excuse was the that the size of the Illinois deer heard was down in numbers. When the Defendants has introduced Apex predators to reduce the size of the deer heard. The Defendants has not stopped all other BOWS from being used in a down deer heard size, just blocking the Native American BOW. Now bows made in China or Iowa but only the Native American made bow in Illinois to be affected by a down deer size. The Native American plaintiff singled out and suppressed. V Next the Defendants told the Plaintiff that He must summit a written formal request to have a HUNTING EQUIPMENT COMMITTEE consider the Native American Bow. This the Plaintiff did so at once. After several months went by the Defendants inform the Plaintiff that the so called committee was to busy to consider the

4 Native American BOW. (Formal request to IL HUNTING EQUIPMENT COMMITTEE, JAN 9, 2014 attached as EXHIBIT C VI Now here is the RACIAL DISCRIMINATION. The Defendants has not required any other BOW manufacture to go through the Illinois Legislators to have their product approved. The Defendants has not required any other BOW manufacture to prove the power of their product. The Defendants has not required any other BOW maker to summit to a HUNTING EQUIPMENT COMMITTEE, only the Native American has been singled out to suppress. Durning the past three (3years BOW manufactures have taken in millions of dollars selling the deer hunting products unhindered by the Defendants. The Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income due to the Defendants discrimination during the past three (3 years of over Five Million Dollars. VII WHEREFORE: The plaintiff prays this Honorable Court for immediate relief from the DISCRIMINATION and SUPPRESSION of the Defendants and Five Million dollars in damages. The Plaintiff prays this Honorable Court to levy punitive damages against the Defendants and require the Defendants to answer this pleading within thirty (30 days of being served. Respectfully submitted this Day of, John Chief AJ Huffer, Pre se

5 POB 131 Tuscola, IL ( cell GREAT TRIBAL SEAL