Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 2
|
|
- Charlene Matthews
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS No. 4:11-CV-628-RH/WCS OF FLORIDA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KENNETH W. DETZNER, et al., Defendants. INTERVENORS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR PERMISSIVE INTERVENTION, AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW Putative Intervenors John E. Wightman, Guillermina T. Moore, Mark E. Pionessa, and Guillermina C. Tarafa (collectively, Intervenors, pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(C(2, respectfully move this Court for leave to file a Reply Memorandum in Support of Their Motion for Permissive Intervention. Plaintiff League of Women Voters of Florida raised several new issues in its Opposition Memorandum, D.E. #73 (July 16, 2012, to which Intervenors deserve an opportunity to respond. See, e.g., id. at 10 ( Now that the deadline to file a notice of appeal has passed, it is unclear what independent interest Proposed Intervenors have in this litigation.. Intervenors further believe it would be helpful to this Court to address the substantial changes in circumstance that have occurred since they filed their original Motion, which bolster their case for permissive intervention under Eleventh Circuit precedent. The Court, upon good cause { :}
2 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75 Filed 07/23/12 Page 2 of 2 shown, may grant leave to file a Reply. N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(C(2. Intervenors proposed Reply Memorandum is attached as Exhibit 1. Certification Pursuant to Rule 7.1(B The undersigned counsel certifies that she has conferred with counsel for Defendants, who have advised that they take no position on this Motion, and that she has attempted to confer with counsel for Plaintiffs but has not yet received a response. Due to the possibility that this Court might rule on the Motion for Permissive Intervention at any time, Movants have filed the instant Motion at this time so that the Court may consider Movants proposed Reply Memorandum if it so chooses prior to issuing a ruling. Respectfully submitted, s/ Raquel A. Rodriguez Raquel A. Rodriguez Fla. Bar No rrodriguez@mcdonaldhopkins.com MCDONALD HOPKINS LLC Southeast Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 3130 Miami, FL Tel: ( Fax: ( Attorneys for Putative Intervenors CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 23, 2012, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed with the Clerk of Court via the CM/ECF system, causing a Notice of Electronic Filing to be sent to all counsel of record. s/ David Axelman David Axelman { :} 2
3 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75-1 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS No. 4:11-CV-628-RH/WCS OF FLORIDA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KENNETH W. DETZNER, et al., Defendants. INTERVENORS REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR PERMISSIVE INTERVENTION Although private groups have played an important role in helping people register to vote throughout the State of Florida, published press accounts and court records confirm that some of these groups (not including the League of Women Voters have perpetrated substantial voter registration fraud over the past several years, both in Florida and nationwide. Such fraud not only undermines society s general interest in ensuring that elections are conducted fairly (an interest which Intervenors lack standing to vindicate, see Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1, 4 (2006, but also directly threatens the individual, personal constitutional right to vote of each eligible and properly registered elector. False voter registrations allow ineligible or unregistered individuals to illegally vote, and eligible voters to improperly cast multiple votes. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that each voting elector has a personal, individual constitutional right to have his { :}
4 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75-1 Filed 07/23/12 Page 2 of 11 or her vote be given full value and effect, without being diluted or distorted by the casting of fraudulent ballots. Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 226 (1974 (emphasis added; see also Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 555 (1964 (holding that an individual s personal right to vote is denied just as effectively by debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen s vote... as by wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the franchise. Particularly given the State s recently expressed lack of interest in continuing to defend the constitutionality of Florida s new protections against third-party voter registration fraud, see Fla. Stat ; Fla. Admin. Code R. 1S (collectively, the Third-Party Registration Laws, this Court should exercise its broad discretion to allow Intervenors to protect their personal constitutional rights for themselves by obtaining a definitive adjudication from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on the constitutionality of those important protections. In the event Plaintiffs and the State reach a settlement, Intervenors either would consent to treating the preliminary injunction as a permanent injunction to facilitate entry of a final judgment and appeal, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a(2; see also id. R. 54(b, or seek to appeal any Consent Decree or other dispositive agreement or judgment. A. The League s History of Intervention in Election-Related Litigation Plaintiff League of Women Voters of Florida ( the League argues that voters who contend that the Third-Party Registration Laws are necessary to protect their fundamental constitutional right to vote should be excluded from this lawsuit, yet League of Women Voters groups throughout the nation have made a cottage industry of { :} 2
5 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75-1 Filed 07/23/12 Page 3 of 11 intervening in election-related litigation, including intervening in support of state and local governments to defend campaign finance restrictions, see, e.g., Landell v. Sorell, 382 F.3d 91, 102 (2d Cir. 2002, rev d sub nom. Randall v. Sorrell, 548 U.S. 230 (2006, 1 prohibitions on corporate expenditures for ballot initiatives, see, e.g., Mont. Chamber of Comm. v. Argenbright, 226 F.3d 1049, 1052 & n.1 (9th Cir. 2000, the conduct of local school board elections, see Corning v. Donohue, 323 N.Y.S.2d 206 (App. Div. 1971, and even a state s refusal to accept an initiative petition, see Cohen v. Att y Gen., 237 N.E.2d 657, 658 (Mass The League likewise has intervened in support of the federal Government to defend its refusal to grant preclearance to state election laws under 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1973c(a, see, e.g., Florida v. United States, 820 F. Supp. 2d 85, 86 (D.D.C. 2011; as well as in litigation relating to redistricting and reapportionment, see, e.g., Thigpen v. Meyers, 231 F. Supp. 938 (W.D. Wash. 1964, 2 and other types of civil rights cases, see, e.g., Oliver v. Sch. Dist., 448 F.2d 635, 636 (6th Cir (granting League s motion to intervene in desegregation case. The League therefore is not well-positioned to ask this Court to exercise its discretion to exclude voters from participating in this case. 1 See also Vt. Right to Life Comm. v. Sorrell, 221 F.3d 376, 379 (2d Cir. 2000; Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821, 834 n.5 (D.C. Cir. 1975, aff d in part and rev d in part, 424 U.S. 1 (1976; Vannatta v. Kiesling, 899 F. Supp. 488, 491 (D. Or See also Moss v. Burkhart, 207 F. Supp. 885 (W.D. Okla (per curiam; Republican Party v. Elections Bd., 585 F. Supp. 603 (E.D. Wis. 1984, rev d 469 U.S (1984; Franklin v. Krause, 371 N.Y.S.2d 757 (Sup. Ct. 1975; Abate v. Mundt, 300 N.Y.S.2d 447, 450 (Sup. Ct { :} 3
6 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75-1 Filed 07/23/12 Page 4 of 11 B. Fundamental Fairness Further Counsels in Favor of Allowing Permissive Intervention The League s opposition to allowing Intervenors to participate in this lawsuit is even more unseemly given the overwhelming advantage Plaintiffs have enjoyed in this case. Plaintiffs amassed a legal team of a dozen attorneys from some of this nation s best-known legal institutions to litigate this matter, including the international law firm Paul, Weiss; the Brennan Center for Justice; the American Civil Liberties Union; and a Miami law firm. See Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Permissive Intervention, D.E. #73, at (July 16, 2012 (hereafter, Opp. (containing more than one page of signature blocks for Plaintiffs counsel. With their legal team enjoying a commanding four-to-one advantage over counsel for the State, Plaintiffs cannot credibly complain of undue prejudice from this Court allowing an additional attorney or two to join in if not altogether assume the defense of the Third-Party Registration Laws. C. The Impact of Recent Developments on Intervenors Request for Permissive Intervention After this Court entered its preliminary injunction of the Third-Party Registration Laws, see Order Granting Preliminary Injunction, D.E. #58 (May 31, 2012, Intervenors moved to participate in this lawsuit primarily to appeal that ruling to the Eleventh Circuit, see Bipartisan Group of Voters Motion for Permissive Intervention, D.E. #63 (June 27, Shortly after Intervenors filed that Motion, the State filed a Notice of Appeal. See Notice of Appeal, D.E. #68 (July 2, { :} 4
7 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75-1 Filed 07/23/12 Page 5 of 11 Plaintiffs state, Now that the deadline to file a notice of appeal has passed, it is unclear what independent interest Proposed Intervenors have in this litigation. Opp. at 10. Despite filing its Notice of Appeal, the State recently has made it clear that it wishes to drop its challenge to this Court s preliminary injunction, enter into a settlement with Plaintiffs, and cease its defense of the enjoined provisions (and perhaps others of the Third-Party Registration Laws. See Florida v. United States, No. 1:11-CV (D.D.C., Notice Regarding Appeal of Preliminary Injunction in LWVF v. Browning 1 (July 3, 2012 ( [T]he parties to League of Women Voters of Florida v. Browning have reached an agreement in principle.... Although Florida has appealed the preliminary injunction issued in that action to preserve its rights, the parties are working expeditiously to formalize their agreement.. Plaintiffs themselves acknowledge that they are on the eve of settlement with the State. Opp. at 6; see also id. at 11 (stating that the parties intend shortly to settle this case. Although Plaintiffs emphasize that several months have passed since they first filed this lawsuit, see Opp. at 4-6, the State only recently has signaled that it will be abrogating its responsibility to defend the constitutionality of the Third-Party Registration Laws, thus leaving Intervenors interests undefended in this lawsuit. Cf. Opp. at 2 (arguing that Intervenors interests have been adequately represented by[] Defendants. The Eleventh Circuit has held that a government entity s willingness to enter into a settlement agreement is persuasive evidence that the entity no longer is adequately representing the interests of the private parties that had been relying on it. See Clark, 168 F.3d at 462 (holding that the suggestion of settlement... shows yet another divergence { :} 5
8 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75-1 Filed 07/23/12 Page 6 of 11 of interests between the government official defendants and private parties seeking to intervene as defendants. In light of the State s settlement discussions with the League, the proposed interveners intend to pursue their favored result with greater zeal than the [State]. A greater willingness to compromise can impede a party from adequately representing the interests of a nonparty. Id. Numerous other considerations bolster this point. For example, the State represents the interests of all [of its] citizens, including the members of Plaintiff League. Clark, 168 F.3d at 461. Thus, the State necessarily represents interests adverse to the proposed intervenors; after all, both the [League s members] and the proposed defendant-intervenors are [Florida] citizens. Id. The State cannot adequately represent the proposed [intervenors] while simultaneously representing the plaintiffs interests. Id. Likewise, in representing what it perceives to be the general public interest, the State necessarily must balance a range of interests likely to diverge from those of the Intervenors, including the overall fairness of the election system... and the social and political divisiveness of the election issue. Meek v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 985 F.2d 1471, 1478 (11th Cir. 1993, overruled in part on other grounds, Dillard v. Chilton Cnty. Comm n, 495 F.3d 1324, (11th Cir Furthermore, the State presently is involved in a substantial amount of litigation relating to the upcoming election. See, e.g., Arcia v. Detzner, No. 1:12-CV WJZ (S.D. Fla. filed June 19, 2012 (challenging Florida s decision to remove ineligible noncitizens from its voter registration rolls under 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the { :} 6
9 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75-1 Filed 07/23/12 Page 7 of 11 National Voter Registration Act (NVRA. 3 As the Eleventh Circuit has noted, the State has a duty to consider the expense of litigating all of these lawsuits, and therefore cannot focus on protecting Intervenors interests. Clark, 168 F.3d at ; see also Meek, 985 F.2d at 1478 (allowing intervention in part because the governmental litigant was required to consider... the expense of litigation, which would limit its ability to adequately represent the interests of private putative intervenors. Additionally, the Attorney General and Governor are undisputedly elected officials, and like all elected officials they have an interest in remaining politically popular and effective leaders. Clark, 168 F.3d at 462 (quotation marks omitted; accord Meek, 985 F.2d at And the Secretary of State is appointed by the Governor. Their judgment regarding this case therefore is likely to be guided by political and public relations considerations beyond its merits and Intervenors interests. Id. Thus, this Court should exercise its broad discretion to allow Intervenors to participate in this lawsuit to ensure that the critical constitutional issues implicated in this Court s ruling are fully and fairly litigated before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. 3 See also United States v. Detzner, No. 4:12-CV RH-CAS (N.D. Fla. filed June 12, 2012 (challenging Florida s decision to remove ineligible non-citizens from its voter registration rolls under the NVRA; Florida Dep t of State v. Dep t of Homeland Security, No. 1:12-CV JDB (D.D.C. filed June 11, 2012 (regarding DHS s refusal to grant the State of Florida access to its alien registration database to confirm the citizenship of people on Florida s voter registration rolls; Mi Familia Vota Education Fund v. Detzner, No. 8:12-CV JDW-MAP (M.D. Fla. filed June 8, 2012 (challenging Florida s decision to remove ineligible non-citizens from its voter registration rolls in its five covered jurisdictions under 5 of the Voting Rights Act; Florida v. United States, No. 1:11-CV CKK-MG-ESH (D.D.C. filed Aug. 1, 2011 (regarding DOJ s refusal to grant preclearance of changes in Florida s third-party voter registration statute. { :} 7
10 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75-1 Filed 07/23/12 Page 8 of 11 In the event Plaintiffs and the State reach a settlement, Intervenors either would consent to entry of a final judgment to facilitate appeal by treating the preliminary injunction as a permanent injunction, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a(2; see also id. R. 54(b, or seek to appeal any Consent Decree or other dispositive agreement or judgment. Petitioners would have standing to appeal, see Opp. at 10-11, because the Third-Party Registration Laws at issue help protect against fraudulent voter registrations which facilitate the unconstitutional dilution of Intervenors votes. Anderson, 417 U.S. at 226; Reynolds, 377 U.S. at 555. Plaintiffs maintain that Intervenors would lack standing to defend the constitutionality of the Third-Party Registration Laws in the Eleventh Circuit, because they have only a generalized concern about those statutes, rather than a direct and substantial interest in them. Opp. at 11 (citing Lance v. Coffman, 549 U.S. 437, 439 (2007. Plaintiffs reliance on the U.S. Supreme Court s ruling in Lance, however, simply underscores Intervenors point. The Eleventh Circuit discussed that case throughout its ruling in Dillard v. Chilton Cnty. Comm n, 495 F.3d 1324, 1333 (11th Cir (per curiam (emphasis added, in which it expressly distinguished between litigants such as Intervenors who allege concrete and personalized injuries in the form... of vote dilution on the one hand, and those who wish to pursue mere generalized grievances on the other. The court held that the putative intervenors in Dillard lacked standing to intervene precisely because they expressly disclaim[ed] any injury based on vote dilution or other concrete harms. Id. at Thus, under binding Eleventh { :} 8
11 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75-1 Filed 07/23/12 Page 9 of 11 Circuit precedent, Intervenors constitutional claims are concrete and personalized, rather than mere generalized grievances. Id. D. The Timing of the Motion to Intervene Will Not Prejudice Plaintiffs Plaintiffs also argue that this Court should deny Intervenors motion to participate in this lawsuit because Intervenors filed that motion only recently, after the lawsuit had been pending for several months. Opp. at 2. As Plaintiffs acknowledge, the central focus of the timeliness inquiry is whether allowing intervention at a particular point in time will unduly prejudice the existing parties to the lawsuit. Opp. at 4; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(c ( [T]he court must consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the original parties rights.. Plaintiffs contend that they would be substantially prejudiced by intervention at this late date. Opp. at 2. They fail to identify any particular way in which they would be any worse off, however, by the Court allowing Intervenors to join this case now, rather than at its outset. Under either scenario, Plaintiffs would have been free to negotiate and attempt to settle their claims against the State. Although Intervenors participation will frustrate Plaintiffs attempts to secure victory without allowing the Eleventh Circuit to consider their arguments and theories, that does not constitute prejudice arising from the allegedly late timing of intervention; Intervenors would have sought such appellate review, even had they intervened at the outset of this case. Thus, that consideration is irrelevant to this Court s intervention ruling. See Stallworth v. Monsanto, 558 F.2d 257, { :} 9
12 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75-1 Filed 07/23/12 Page 10 of (5th Cir ( [T]he prejudice to the original parties to the litigation that is relevant to the question of timeliness is only that prejudice which would result from the would-be intervenor s failure to request intervention as soon as he knew or reasonably should have known about his interest in the action. (emphasis added; accord Meek, 985 F.2d at Furthermore, if this Court grants this Motion for permissive intervention, the focus of future proceedings is likely to be at the appellate level, where this case has not yet commenced in earnest. Thus, this Court should not deny intervention on timeliness grounds. CONCLUSION For these reasons, Intervenors respectfully request that this Court grant their Motion for Permissive Intervention. Respectfully submitted, s/ Raquel A. Rodriguez Raquel A. Rodriguez Fla. Bar No rrodriguez@mcdonaldhopkins.com MCDONALD HOPKINS LLC Southeast Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 3130 Miami, FL Tel: ( Fax: ( Attorneys for Putative Intervenors 4 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir (en banc, the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to October 1, { :} 10
13 Case 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 75-1 Filed 07/23/12 Page 11 of 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 23, 2012, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed with the Clerk of Court via the CM/ECF system, causing a Notice of Electronic Filing to be sent to all counsel of record. s/ David Axelman David Axelman { :} 11
Case 8:12-cv JDW-MAP Document 29 Filed 09/11/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID 485 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:12-cv-01294-JDW-MAP Document 29 Filed 09/11/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID 485 MI FAMILIA VOTA EDUCATION FUND, as an organization; MURAT LIMAGE; PAMELA GOMEZ, Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE
More informationCase 1:12-cv WJZ Document 68 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2012 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:12-cv-22282-WJZ Document 68 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2012 Page 1 of 7 KARLA VANESSA ARCIA, et al., v. Plaintiffs, KEN DETZNER, in his official capacity as Florida Secretary of State, Defendant.
More informationCase 4:16-cv MW-CAS Document 18 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 4:16-cv-00626-MW-CAS Document 18 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Tallahassee Division FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Plaintiff, v. Case
More informationCase 1:12-cv WJZ Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/26/2012 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:12-cv-22282-WJZ Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/26/2012 Page 1 of 2 KARLA VANESSA ARCIA, an individual, MELANDE ANTOINE, an individual, VEYEYO, a civic organization based in Miami-Dade County,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Case 4:12-cv-00285-RH-CAS Document 28 Filed 06/26/12 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:12-cv UATC-MCR Document 24 Filed 09/10/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID 632
Case 3:12-cv-00852-UATC-MCR Document 24 Filed 09/10/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID 632 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CONGRESSWOMAN CORRINE ) BROWN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 0:16-cv BB Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:16-cv-61474-BB Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2016 Page 1 of 5 ANDREA BELLITTO and AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS UNION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA v. Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP), as an organization and representative of its
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW
Case 1:16-cv-01274-LCB-JLW Document 104 Filed 04/04/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW N.C. STATE CONFERENCE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION REPUBLICAN PARTY OF OHIO : OF OHIO, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : Case No. 2:08-cv--00913 v. : : JENNIFER BRUNNER :
More informationCase 5:14-cv FB Document 13 Filed 05/21/14 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case :14-cv-0028-FB Document 13 Filed 0/21/14 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION ALAMO BREWING CO., LLC, v. Plaintiff, OLD 300 BREWING, LLC dba TEXIAN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION. Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION FILE. v. ) NO.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION COMMON CAUSE/GEORGIA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION FILE. v. ) NO. 4:05-CV-201-HLM ) MS. EVON BILLUPS, Superintendent
More informationCase 4:11-cv RH-CAS Document 80 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 7
Case 4:11-cv-00628-RH-CAS Document 80 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA, FLORIDA
More informationCase 1:06-cv LFO Document 18 Filed 04/17/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:06-cv-00614-LFO Document 18 Filed 04/17/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) THE CHRISTIAN CIVIC LEAGUE ) OF MAINE, INC. ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case 1:16-cv-01274-LCB-JLW Document 33 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA NAACP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 4:12cv285-RH/CAS
Case 4:12-cv-00285-RH-CAS Document 34 Filed 06/28/12 Page 1 of 11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationCase 4:15-cv MW-CAS Document 20 Filed 09/01/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Case 4:15-cv-00398-MW-CAS Document 20 Filed 09/01/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION CONGRESSWOMAN CORRINE BROWN, vs. Plaintiff, KEN DETZNER,
More informationCase 1:12-cv WJZ Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2012 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:12-cv-22282-WJZ Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2012 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 12-22282-CIV-ZLOCH KARLA VANESSA ARCIA, et al. vs.
More informationCase 0:16-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2016 Page 1 of 10
Case 0:16-cv-61474-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2016 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION ANDREA BELLITTO and )
More informationAdams, in her Official capacity as Chairman of the Moore BOE, Carolyn M. McDermott, in her Official capacity as Secretary of the Moore BOE; William R.
Case 1:16-cv-01274-LCB-JLW Document 63 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW NORTH CAROLINA STATE
More informationCase 1:14-cv JRH-BKE Document 17-1 Filed 04/30/14 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-00097-JRH-BKE Document 17-1 Filed 04/30/14 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION HENRY D. HOWARD, et al., v. Plaintiffs, AUGUSTA-RICHMOND
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Case 4:18-cv-00520-MW-MJF Document 87 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF FLORIDA, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No.
Case: 17-10135 Document: 00513935913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. THOMAS E. PRICE, Secretary
More informationMOTION F'OR JOINDER OF PLAINTIFF'S.APPELLEES AND PUTATIVE PLAINTIF'F.APPELLEE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF NEVADA
Case: 12-16882 10/24/2012 ID: 8375643 DktEntry: 23 Page: 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR TI{E NINTH CIRCUIT \ryendy TOWNLEY, et al., V Plaintiffs - Appellees, ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW
Case 1:16-cv-01274-LCB-JLW Document 71 Filed 04/28/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW N.C. STATE CONFERENCE
More informationCase 1:11-cv CKK-MG-ESH Document 10 Filed 08/30/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 10 Filed 08/30/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF FLORIDA Office of the Secretary of State 500 S. Bronough Street
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Judge Carr
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION THE SANDUSKY COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY, et al., vs. Plaintiff, J. KENNETH BLACKWELL, Secretary of State, Defendant.
More informationCase 1:10-cv JDB Document 26 Filed 09/02/10 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:10-cv-00561-JDB Document 26 Filed 09/02/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEPHEN LAROQUE, ANTHONY CUOMO, JOHN NIX, KLAY NORTHRUP, LEE RAYNOR, and KINSTON
More informationCase: 2:12-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858
Case: 2:12-cv-00636-PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OBAMA FOR AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ) INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ) PROJECT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellees, ) ) v. ) No. 17-1351 ) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., ) ) Defendants-Appellants.
More informationCase 1:17-cv MJG Document 146 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:17-cv-02459-MJG Document 146 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BROCK STONE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case 1:17-cv-02459-MJG DONALD J. TRUMP,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 372 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE ) BLACK CAUCUS, et al.,
More informationCase: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 84 Filed: 10/17/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 23383
Case: 2:16-cv-00303-GCS-EPD Doc #: 84 Filed: 10/17/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 23383 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, NORTHEAST
More informationCase 1:13-cv KMW Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2014 Page 1 of CFPB-0002 Document 76-A Filed 03/19/2014 Page 1 of 16
Case 113-cv-21189-KMW Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2014 Page 1 of 16 2014-CFPB-0002 Document 76-A Filed 03/19/2014 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
More informationCase 1:12-cv HH-BB-WJ Document 41 Filed 02/23/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:12-cv-00140-HH-BB-WJ Document 41 Filed 02/23/12 Page 1 of 8 CLAUDETTE CHAVEZ-HANKINS, PAUL PACHECO, and MIGUEL VEGA, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Plaintiffs,
More informationNos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Case: 12-4070 Document: 006111428230 Filed: 09/10/2012 Page: 1 (1 of 30) Nos. 12-4069, 12-4070 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1,
More informationCase 5:16-cv EJD Document 22 Filed 12/13/16 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-00-ejd Document Filed // Page of Brian Selden SBN Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 0 Telephone: +.0.. Facsimile: +.0..00 Chad Readler Pro hac application pending John H. McConnell Boulevard,
More informationCase 4:16-cv MW-CAS Document 26 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 4:16-cv-00626-MW-CAS Document 26 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Tallahassee Division FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Plaintiff, v. Case
More informationCase 2:11-cv SLB Document 96 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:11-cv-02746-SLB Document 96 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 8 FILED 2011 Sep-30 PM 03:17 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More informationCase 1:18-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case 1:18-cv-00011-ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
FILED 2006 May-12 PM 01:56 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION RICHARD GOODEN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-01397-TCB Document 20 Filed 04/28/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE OF * THE NAACP, et al.,
More informationUnited States District Court
0 0 JOHN DOE, et al., v. KAMALA HARRIS, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, Defendants. NO. C- TEH ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE This case
More informationCase 1:12-cv WJZ Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2012 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:12-cv-22282-WJZ Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2012 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION KARLA VANESSA ARCIA, an individual,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv DLG.
Case: 14-11084 Date Filed: 12/19/2014 Page: 1 of 16 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-11084 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv-22737-DLG AARON CAMACHO
More informationCase 5:06-cv FL Document 35 Filed 01/25/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case 5:06-cv-00462-FL Document 35 Filed 01/25/2007 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION Civil Action No. 5:06-CV-00462-FL RICHARD
More informationCase 2:17-cv WB Document 41 Filed 12/08/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-04540-WB Document 41 Filed 12/08/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document 122 Filed in TXSD on 12/17/13 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 122 Filed in TXSD on 12/17/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION Plaintiffs, TEXAS
More informationCase 0:12-cv RNS Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:12-cv-61959-RNS Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2013 Page 1 of 9 ZENOVIDA LOVE, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 12-61959-Civ-SCOLA vs. Plaintiffs,
More informationCase: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 42 Filed: 12/23/13 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 781
Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 42 Filed: 12/23/13 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 781 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:17-cv CKK Document 48 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01320-CKK Document 48 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-1320
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Summit County Democratic Central : And Executive Committee, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Case No. 5:04-cv-2165 : v. :
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. V. No. 3:15-cv-818-D-BN
Crespin v. Stephens Doc. 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JEREMY CRESPIN (TDCJ No. 1807429), Petitioner, V. No. 3:15-cv-818-D-BN WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director
More informationVOTING RIGHTS. Haynes v. Wells, 538 S.E.2d 430 (Ga. 2000)
VOTING RIGHTS Haynes v. Wells, 538 S.E.2d 430 (Ga. 2000) Voting Rights: School Boards Under Georgia law, to qualify as a candidate for a school board, at the time at which he or she declares his or her
More informationCASE NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-35967, 02/12/2016, ID: 9864857, DktEntry: 27, Page 1 of 14 CASE NO. 15-35967 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RAVALLI COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE, GALLATIN COUNTY REPUBLICAN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division. v. Case No. 3:08cv709
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MCCAIN-PALIN, 2008, INC. Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:08cv709 JEAN CUNNINGHAM, et al., Defendants. REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
More informationGREENBERG TRAURIG MEMORANDUM. Fred Baggett, Esq. John Londot, Esq. Hope Keating, Esq. Michael Moody, Esq. Date: December 15, 2014
GREENBERG TRAURIG MEMORANDUM To: From: FACC Fred Baggett, Esq. John Londot, Esq. Hope Keating, Esq. Michael Moody, Esq. Re: Addendum to July 1, 2014 Memorandum Background On July 1, 2014 our firm provided
More informationMISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE SUPPLEMENT TO ELECTION FRAUD REPORT OF COMPLAINANT SHAUN MCCUTCHEON, CHAIR OF THE CONSERVATIVE ACTION FUND
MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE ) IN RE 2014 MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN ) PRIMARY ELECTION FOR U.S. SENATE ) ) SHAUN McCUTCHEON, CHAIRMAN OF ) THE CONSERVATIVE ACTION FUND, ) ) Complainant. ) ) SUPPLEMENT TO
More information8:13-cv JFB-TDT Doc # 51 Filed: 10/08/13 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1162 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
8:13-cv-00215-JFB-TDT Doc # 51 Filed: 10/08/13 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1162 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ACTIVISION TV, INC., Plaintiff, v. PINNACLE BANCORP, INC.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Judge Carr
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OHIO, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, J. KENNETH BLACKWELL, Secretary of State, Defendant. Case
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. L.T. Nos. 1D , 2012-CA , 2012-CA-00490
Filing # 21103756 Electronically Filed 12/01/2014 11:55:43 PM RECEIVED, 12/1/2014 23:58:46, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS
More informationCase 4:18-cv O Document 74 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID 879
Case 4:18-cv-00167-O Document 74 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID 879 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION TEXAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES
More informationUnited States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:16-cv-00731-ALM Document 98 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 4746 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION STATE OF NEVADA, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
More informationCase 6:13-cv JA-DAB Document 21 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 330
Case 6:13-cv-01860-JA-DAB Document 21 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 330 WILLIAM EVERETT WARINNER, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv UU.
Case: 12-13402 Date Filed: (1 of 10) 03/22/2013 Page: 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-13402 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-21203-UU [DO NOT PUBLISH]
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al., Defendants. 1:13CV861 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
More informationCase 0:12-cv WJZ Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2012 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:1-cv-61735-WJZ Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 1/13/01 Page 1 of 5 BROWARD BULLDOG, INC., a Florida corporation not for profit, and DAN CHRISTENSEN, founder, operator and editor of the BrowardBulldog.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No
Case: 10-56971, 04/22/2015, ID: 9504505, DktEntry: 238-1, Page 1 of 21 (1 of 36) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No. 10-56971 Plaintiffs-Appellants,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:
Case 9:18-cv-81345-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2018 Page 1 of 4 JOHN DOE, vs. Plaintiff, RICHARD L. SWEARINGEN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Florida Department of Law
More informationCase 3:17-cv WHO Document 108 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-00-who Document 0 Filed 0// Page of 0 0 CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General BRIAN STRETCH United States Attorney JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Director STEPHEN J. BUCKINGHAM (Md. Bar)
More informationMemorandum. Florida County Court Clerks. National Center for Lesbian Rights and Equality Florida. Date: December 23, 2014
Memorandum To: From: Florida County Court Clerks National Center for Lesbian Rights and Equality Florida Date: December 23, 2014 Re: Duties of Florida County Court Clerks Regarding Issuance of Marriage
More informationCase 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil No.
Case 1:12-cv-00960 Document 1 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 17 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 500 S. Bronough Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
More informationCase 1:10-cv JDB Document 9-1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-00651-JDB Document 9-1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHELBY COUNTY, ALABAMA 201 West College Street Columbiana, AL 35051 Plaintiffs,
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. SUSAN WATERS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees.
No. 15-1452 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT SUSAN WATERS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees. v. PETE RICKETTS, in his official capacity as Governor of Nebraska, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 38 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) )
More informationCase: 3:18-cv jdp Document #: 41 Filed: 01/16/19 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Case: 3:18-cv-00763-jdp Document #: 41 Filed: 01/16/19 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN WILLIAM WHITFORD, et al. Plaintiffs, v. BEVERLY R. GILL, et al., Case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION THE OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY, : Case No. C2:04-1055 : Plaintiff, : Judge Marbley : Magistrate Judge Kemp vs. : : J. KENNETH BLACKWELL,
More informationNOV?6 'M. CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No.: V S. JENNIFER -L:" BRUNER, SECRETARY OF STATE, ET AL.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO EX RE. DANA SKAGGS, ET AL., Case No.: 08-2206 V S. RELATORSS, JENNIFER -L:" BRUNER, SECRETARY OF STATE, ET AL., AND RESPONDENTS OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY 341 FULTON
More informationCASE NO E UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. HON. TOM PARKER, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama,
Case: 16-16319 Date Filed: 10/25/2016 Page: 1 of 11 CASE NO. 16-16319-E UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT HON. TOM PARKER, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama, v. Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-05102-AT Document 44 Filed 11/09/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMMON CAUSE GEORGIA, as an ) organization, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationPart Description 1 10 pages 2 Exhibit Consent Decree 3 Affidavit Knedler 4 Affidavit Harris 5 Affidavit Earl 6 Affidavit Redpath
Libertarian Party of Ohio et al v. Husted, Docket No. 2:13-cv-00953 (S.D. Ohio Sept 25, 2013), Court Docket Part Description 1 10 pages 2 Exhibit Consent Decree 3 Affidavit Knedler 4 Affidavit Harris 5
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 4:16-cv-00626-MW-CAS Document 33 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 4:16-cv-626-MW-
More informationCase 0:06-cv JIC Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:06-cv-61337-JIC Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2013 Page 1 of 10 KEITH TAYLOR, v. Plaintiff, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationCase 1:12-cv WJZ Document 82 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/26/2012 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:12-cv-22282-WJZ Document 82 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/26/2012 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI CIVIL DIVISION Case No. 1:12-cv-22282-WJZ Honorable Judge
More informationCase 1:12-cv UU Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/30/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:12-cv-23300-UU Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/30/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATRICE BAKER and LAURENT LAMOTHE Case No. 12-cv-23300-UU Plaintiffs,
More informationCase: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/27/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No.
Case: 17-10135 Document: 00513891415 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/27/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. THOMAS PRICE, M.D., Secretary
More informationCase 1:18-cv ABJ Document 18 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Case 1:18-cv-00011-ABJ Document 18 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN,
More informationCase 7:16-cv O Document 69 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1796
Case 7:16-cv-00108-O Document 69 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1796 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE, INC. et al.,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Document: 19315704 Case: 15-15234 Date Filed: 12/22/2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAMEKA K. EVANS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-15234 GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case 1:17-cv-01597-CKK Document 97 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 1, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-cv-1597 (CKK) DONALD J. TRUMP,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION BAYSHORE ON THE BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION STATE ex rel. SKAGGS, et al. v. Relators, JENNIFER L. BRUNNER SECRETARY OF STATE OF OHIO, et al., Respondents. Case
More informationSnell & Wilmer IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-0-ckj Document Filed // Page of One Arizona Center, 00 E. Van Buren, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 00-0..000 0 Brett W. Johnson (# ) Eric H. Spencer (# 00) SNELL & WILMER One Arizona Center 00 E.
More informationCase 1:10-cv ESH -TBG -HHK Document 51 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-01062-ESH -TBG -HHK Document 51 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF GEORGIA, v. Plaintiff, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. in his official
More informationCase 4:16-cv Y Document 52 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID 678
Case 4:16-cv-00810-Y Document 52 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID 678 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION 20/20 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. VS. Civil No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No USDC No. 2:13-cv-00193
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-41126 USDC No. 2:13-cv-00193 IN RE: STATE OF TEXAS, RICK PERRY, in his Official Capacity as Governor of Texas, JOHN STEEN, in his Official
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION
Case 4:05-cv-00201-HLM Document 60-2 Filed 11/10/2005 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION COMMON CAUSE / GEORGIA, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. VALERIE SOTO, as Guardian Ad Litem of Y.D., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Case: 17-16705, 11/22/2017, ID: 10665607, DktEntry: 15, Page 1 of 20 No. 17-16705 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VALERIE SOTO, as Guardian Ad Litem of Y.D., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Anita Rios, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : 3:04CV7724 v. : : Judge Carr J. Kenneth Blackwell, : Defendant. : : : MOTION TO INTERVENE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 4:18-cv-00524-WS-CAS Document 1 Filed 11/12/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA VOTEVETS ACTION FUND; DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE; and DSCC a/k/a DEMOCRATIC
More information