AND CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT ( NAFTA ) PROCEDURAL ORDER ON TWO DISPUTED ISSUES DATED 6 FEBRUARY 2015 (English Text)
|
|
- Lucy Barnett
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE MATTER OF AN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION UNDER THE ARBITRATION RULES OF THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW 2010 ( THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES ) AND CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT ( NAFTA ) BETWEEN: LONE PINE RESOURCES INC. Claimant v. CANADA Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER ON TWO DISPUTED ISSUES DATED 6 FEBRUARY 2015 (English Text) The Tribunal: Mr David Haigh Professor Brigitte Stern V.V.Veeder (President)
2 Table of Contents (A) Introduction... 3 (B) Language(s): the Parties Respective Cases... 3 (C) The Tribunal s Power to Determine the Language(s) of the Arbitral Proceedings and to Order Translations when Necessary... 5 (D) The Tribunal s Decision on Language(s)... 6 (E) Procedural Schedule for Document Production The Parties Cases... 9 (F) The Tribunal s Power to Conduct the Arbitration (G) The Tribunal s Decision on Document Production Schedule (H) Hearing Dates and Costs
3 (A) Introduction 1. The Tribunal here addresses two matters outstanding from the first procedural meeting held by telephone conference-call on 9 January 2015: (i) the language(s) of the arbitration and (ii) this arbitration s procedural schedule regarding document production. 2. It is convenient here to consider each disputed matter in turn, based on the Parties oral submissions during the first procedural meeting and their respective written submissions of 19 and 23 January 2015, in English and French. (B) Language(s): the Parties Respective Cases 3. Claimant: In brief, it is the Claimant s case that the English language should be the language of the arbitration because the Claimant is an Anglophone company incorporated in Delaware, USA, with its Canadian operations based in Alberta staffed by Anglophones and not Francophones. The Claimant submits that the Respondent s executive branch is officially bilingual in English and French; and that the Respondent is required, as a matter of Canadian law, to communicate and provide services equally in English and French, namely by Section 22 of the Official Languages Act, R.S.C., 1958, c. 31 (4 th Supp.). The Claimant also refers to Section 133 of the Canadian Constitution Act of 1867, requiring (inter alia) Québec legislation to be printed in English and French and that persons participating in legal proceedings in Québec have the right to use English or French. Accordingly, so the Claimant concludes, the use of English could inflict no prejudice on the Respondent, whereas the Claimant would suffer significant prejudice, including increased costs and delay, from the use of French as the language of this arbitration. 4. The Claimant accepts that it is in the interests of both Parties to seek to limit the costs of translation, wherever possible. Accordingly, even with English as the language of the arbitration, the Claimant is willing to accept, that: (i) As regards documentary evidence, documents originally in French may be produced without certified translations; and (ii) As regards witness testimony, a witness may testify and be examined orally in either French or English according to the preference expressed by that witness, 3
4 provided that testimony in French will be heard with consecutive translation into English. 5. Subject to the decision of the Tribunal, the Claimant is also willing to accept, that: (i) As regards written communications from the Tribunal to the Parties, these may be issued in both French and English, including any procedural orders, decisions and awards; (ii) As regards procedural meetings (whether held in person or by telephone conference-call), these may be held in English or French with ICSID arranging for consecutive translation from French into English; and (iii) As regards written submissions and pleadings, the Respondent may submit these in French accompanied with an English translation, at the Respondent s own cost. The translation need not be certified; but any dispute over translation shall be decided by the Tribunal with power to order a certified translation at the Respondent s cost. 6. Respondent: In brief, it is the Respondent s case that the languages of the arbitration should be both English and French (as each Party may choose), with no requirement for any translation imposed on either Party. Accordingly, the Respondent accepts that documentary evidence may be adduced in its original language without translation and that a witness may testify in the language of his or her choice, whether it be English or French. 7. The Respondent notes the common ground reached between the Parties as regards documentary evidence and witness testimony (as summarised above). The Respondent also notes, however, that no consensus exists between the disputing Parties as regards the language(s) of their written pleadings and submissions, of procedural meetings and hearings and of communications to and from the Tribunal, including its procedural orders and awards. The Respondent submits that the bilingual choice of English and French as the languages of the arbitration for all matters would be fair for both disputing Parties whereas the sole choice of the English language (as primarily asserted by the Claimant) would be unfair on the Respondent, for several reasons. 4
5 8. The Respondent emphasises the central role and interest of Québec in this dispute, where the only official language is French under Article 1 of the French Language Charter (1977) RLRQ c, C-11. Further, the Respondent contends that a majority of the relevant documentation to and from the Québec Government (including the Québec licensee) was made in French, not English. Given that the Claimant advances its case under NAFTA, the Respondent notes that NAFTA was ratified in English, Spanish and French and that its three linguistic versions have equal standing under NAFTA Article As regards documentary evidence and testimony, the Respondent submits that the vast bulk of its materials will be necessarily submitted in French, given the role of the French language used in Québec legislation and by the Québec authorities. 9. The Respondent cites several procedural orders made by NAFTA tribunals in support of its case, including the procedural order made by the tribunal in Gami Investments v Mexico (2003) under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules As regards the language of that arbitration, it was ordered that each Party: shall make all its written submissions to the Arbitral Tribunal (including witness statements and expert reports) in either English or Spanish, and may provide translations as they see fit Documentary evidence submitted by the Parties shall be presented in its original language, provided that such language is English or Spanish Witnesses and experts may testify in their own language, provided that simultaneous translation of both is available, in a manner to be determined by the Arbitral Tribunal in consultation with the Parties 10. The Respondent submits that this and other comparable orders in other analogous arbitrations support its case and do not support the Claimant s case. (C) The Tribunal s Power to Determine the Language(s) of the Arbitral Proceedings and to Order Translations when Necessary 11. In the present case, failing an agreement between the Parties regarding the language(s) to be used in the arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal has the power to 1 Gami Investments Incorporated v Mexico, UNCITAL, Procedural Order No 1 of 31 January 2003, at Paras (The Tribunal has noted the other cases cited in the Respondent s first submissions, at footnotes 7, 9, 10 & 11; but it is unnecessary here to consider them separately). 5
6 determine such language(s) in accordance with Article 19(1) of the UNCITRAL Rules. 2 Under Article 19(2) of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the Tribunal may also order the translation of documents and exhibits. 12. In the Tribunal s view, Article 19 is consistent with NAFTA Chapter 11 and the law of Ontario as the lex loci arbitri (Ottawa being the agreed place, or seat, of this arbitration). Accordingly, the Tribunal makes this order pursuant to its powers in Articles 19(1) and (2) of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules which the Parties have agreed to incorporate into their arbitration agreement derived from NAFTA Chapter 11. The Tribunal does not understand that these powers of the Tribunal are disputed by the Parties. 13. In deciding these matters, however the Tribunal has to take both practical and legal issues into account, as set out below. The Tribunal has noted the legal materials relevant to the interpretation of Article 19 of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, particularly Caron & Caplan, The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: A Commentary, 2 nd ed. (2013) cited by both Parties. (D) The Tribunal s Decision on Language(s) 14. The Claimant can derive no assistance in this case from the primary factor usually determinative of the language of an arbitration, namely the language of the contract or treaty at issue. The Tribunal accepts the equality of the English and French languages regarding NAFTA (as submitted by the Respondent); and hence NAFTA can provide no support for the near-exclusive use of the English language in this arbitration (as asserted by the Claimant). Nor is there any assistance for either Party s case from the language of the applicable law, given that international law, unlike municipal laws, has no specific language. The Claimant can derive also little assistance from the seat of the arbitration, albeit outside Québec. Indeed, that legal factor was 2 Article 19 ( Language ) provides in its English text: 1. Subject to an agreement by the parties, the arbitral tribunal shall, promptly after its appointment, determine the language or languages to be used in the proceedings. This determination shall apply to the statement of claim, the statement of defence, and any further written statements and, if oral hearings take place, to the language or languages to be used in such hearings. 2. The arbitral tribunal may order that any documents annexed to the statement of claim or statement of defence, and any supplementary documents or exhibits submitted in the course of the proceedings, delivered in their original language, shall be accompanied by a translation into the language or languages agreed upon by the parties or determined by the arbitral tribunal. 6
7 not asserted by the Claimant as being relevant, doubtless because the Ontario Courts work in both the English and French languages. 15. In the Tribunal s view, the significant factors in this case include the central role played by Québec, as regards the territorial place of the (alleged) investment; the primary legal dealings by the (alleged) investor with the Québec authorities; and the (alleged) breach of NAFTA s Chapter 11 attributable as a fact (but not as a matter of international law) to Québec as distinct from the Canadian Federal Government in Ottawa. Given the factual significance of Québec and the consequential relevance of the French language (as opposed to English), it would be inappropriate for the language of this arbitration to be exclusively English; and, wisely, the Claimant has not attempted to advance that case. 16. Conversely, the Tribunal would not consider it appropriate to decide upon the French language as the exclusive language of this arbitration. The Claimant is a US company with its officers and the majority of its witnesses Anglophone only. It can also point to the official English text of NAFTA s Chapter 11, to its dispute against the Respondent under international law and to the language of the arbitration agreement it choose to invoke for its claim in this arbitration. Québec is not itself a Contracting Party to NAFTA, nor a named disputing Party to this arbitration. The NAFTA Free Trade Commission has made no recommendations regarding the use of French in claims against Canada, as it has for the use of Spanish in claims against Mexico, with the Commission noting only that notice of a claim against Canada may be submitted in English or French. The measure at issue in this arbitration, Bill 18, was published by the Québec legislature in French and English. This Tribunal is an international arbitration tribunal and not a Canadian federal (or Québec) court. Wisely, the Respondent has not attempted to advance that case. 17. Instead, the Parties have made serious attempts in good faith to arrive at a fair, pragmatic compromise. The Tribunal here seeks to build upon the Parties consensus with the same objectives in mind, ensuring equality of treatment for both sides without inflicting unnecessary expense or delay. 18. Accordingly, the Tribunal has decided that English and French shall both be the languages of this arbitration, as set out below: 7
8 (i) The Tribunal s award(s) shall be in English and French, both texts to be of equal standing; and the Tribunal may there cite the Parties written submissions in their original language (i.e. English or French) without translation; (ii) The Tribunal s procedural orders may be in English or French, as the Tribunal may decide, without translation. (It has decided, without prejudice to this order, that this procedural order shall be issued in English; and it is likely that most orders will be issued by the Tribunal in English only); (iii) Correspondence by any Party to the Tribunal (including ICSID) and by the Tribunal (including ICSID) to the Parties may be made in either English or French, as each Party and the Tribunal (including ICSID) may respectively decide, without translation; (iv) Document production between the Parties (pursuant to requests inter se) shall take place in the original language of the documentation, without the producing Party being required to provide any translations of documents produced to the requesting Party; (v) Each Party may choose whether to submit its written pleadings, including memorials, briefs and other written submissions, in English or French, without being required to produce any translation (although it may do so voluntarily, if it so wishes, in the form of an uncertified and unofficial translation as a matter of professional courtesy - which the Tribunal would encourage, at least as regards the Parties memorials); (vi) Each Party may submit its documentary evidence to the other Party and the Tribunal in the original language (provided it is in French or English), without any translation; but with English or French certified translations if the original language is other than English or French; (vii) Each Party may submit its written factual testimony and written expert testimony in French or English, without any translation; (viii) Procedural meetings with the Parties by telephone conference-call shall take place in French or English, as each member of the Tribunal and each Party may choose, without translation unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal; and such 8
9 meetings shall be recorded by ICSID, with recordings made available to the Parties. (For procedural meetings taking place with the Parties in person, see subparagraphs x, xi and xii below); (ix) At the oral hearing(s), any factual or expert witness may testify orally in French or English, as he or she may choose; (x) At the oral hearing(s) and procedural meetings in person, each Party s legal representatives may address its oral submissions to the Tribunal, in English or French, as it may choose; (xi) All oral hearings and procedural meetings in person shall take place in English or French (as set out above), with simultaneous interpretation of all oral submissions, oral testimony and oral exchanges with the Tribunal, with the costs of such translation to form part of the costs of the arbitration under Article 40 of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; (xii) There shall be English and French verbatim transcripts of all oral hearings and procedural meetings in person, both texts to be of equal standing (subject to correction by order of the Tribunal); and (xiii) This order is made without prejudice to the Tribunal s eventual order(s) on costs under Articles 40 and 42 of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. (In the event of unforeseen practical difficulties in performing this procedural order, whether by any Party, ICSID or the Tribunal, the Tribunal reserves the right to modify its terms upon application by any Party or upon its own initiative). 19. With the Tribunal s decision, the Parties are requested to complete their joint draft of the First Procedural Order as regards the languages of the arbitration, a soon as practicable. (E) Procedural Schedule for Document Production The Parties Cases 20. This matter encompasses a limited dispute between the Parties relating to the timing of document production. The Claimant submits that the Parties should simultaneously exchange requests for document production after the first exchange of substantive written pleadings (i.e. the Claimant s Memorial and the Respondent s Counter- 9
10 Memorial, but before the Claimant s Reply Memorial and the Respondent s Rejoinder Memorial). The Respondent submits that document production should take place earlier, after the Respondent s Response (to the Claimant s Notice of Arbitration) but before the Claimant s Memorial. Both Parties emphasise, albeit to different effect, the practical, efficient and fair characteristics of their respective proposals. (F) The Tribunal s Power to Conduct the Arbitration 21. It is not disputed that the Tribunal has the power to decide this matter pursuant to Article 17(1) of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. It provides (inter alia) that: The arbitral tribunal may conduct the arbitration in such manner as it considers appropriate, provided that the parties are treated with equality and that at an appropriate stage of the proceedings each party is given a reasonable opportunity of presenting its case. The arbitral tribunal, in exercising its discretion, shall conduct the proceedings so as to avoid unnecessary delay and expense and to provide a fair and efficient process for resolving the parties dispute. (G) The Tribunal s Decision on Document Production Schedule 22. In exercising its discretion under Article 17(1), for the most part, the Tribunal is persuaded by the case advanced by the Claimant, based on procedural efficiency. Inevitably (given the requirements of Article 20(4) of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules), the Claimant s Memorial will be accompanied by many documents sought by the Respondent and the same observation applies mutatis mutandis (by virtue of Article 21(4) of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules) to documents sought by the Claimant accompanying the Respondent s Counter-Memorial. This should also be the result if requests for document production are made to the Claimant and the Respondent before their respective written pleading (as both Parties are free to agree, without order from the Tribunal). In these circumstances, the Party receiving the other s pleading can assess more accurately what remains outstanding as regards the other s voluntary document production submitted with that pleading in formulating its definitive requests for document production, such as may be likely to involve the Tribunal as regards disputed requests. 10
11 23. There is another important factor. In the event of a dispute over document production, the Tribunal would need to understand the relevant issues and the materiality of the requested documentation. In this case, the Tribunal considers that it cannot fairly decide such disputes without first studying the Parties Memorial and Counter-Memorial. If the Tribunal were called upon to decide such a dispute prematurely (i.e. before these written pleadings), it would make the Tribunal s task much more difficult, if not impossible, with an inherent risk of error. The Tribunal does not consider that the Claimant s Notice and the Respondent s Response can remove such difficulties. 24. Accordingly, the Tribunal decides that, whilst requests for document production can be made in advance of the Parties Memorial and Counter-Memorial (even now, as is the case), the stage of document production and the Tribunal s involvement over disputed requests shall take place after the Respondent s Counter-Memorial and before the Claimant s Reply Memorial, with the Parties simultaneous requests for the production of documents. 25. Given the high level of co-operation between the Parties in this arbitration, the Tribunal is content to leave the Parties to work out the time-tabling consequences of the Tribunal s decision and to complete accordingly their joint draft of the first procedural order, as soon as practicable. 26. In this regard, the Tribunal notes sympathetically the Respondent s submission that its burden on document production may be significantly greater than the burden resting on the Claimant and that it would require sufficient time to discharge its burden in meeting the Claimant s requests for document production. The Tribunal also notes, with equal sympathy, the Claimant s submission that it will need sufficient time to review the Respondent s Counter-Memorial and accompanying materials, so as to make appropriately focused and targeted document production requests. The Parties should allow for document production to be completed satisfactorily without any risk of delay or disruption to the overall procedural timetable, including, especially, the dates for the hearing. The Tribunal notes that the Claimant s current estimate of 11 weeks from the Respondent s Counter-Memorial to final production (including the Tribunal s involvement) may not suffice in this particular case. 11
12 (H) Heoring Dates and Costs 27. The Tribunal does not here decide the dates of the hearing, estimated by the Claimant at 5 days from 5 to 9 September 2016 and by the Respondent at 10 days from 12 to 23 September The Tribunal notes that the Claimant is agreeable to the Respondent's proposal to reserve 10 days, subject to the Tribunal's decision. ln the circumstances, the hearing dates will be fixed for not more than 10 days in or about September 2OL6. The Tribunal will decide specific hearing dates by separate correspondence with the Parties. 28. The Tribunal reserves to a later order or award all issues as to costs occasioned by the parties' procedural applications as here decided, reserving in full its jurisdiction and powers to do so under Articles 40 and 42 of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules' Dated: 6 February 2015 Signed: [Signed] (V.V.Veeder on behalf of the Tribunal) t2
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES BETWEEN: LONE PINE RESOURCES INC. AND Claimant GOVERNMENT OF CANADA Respondent
More informationRULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND PRIVATE PARTIES
RULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND PRIVATE PARTIES Effective March 23, 2001 Scope of Application and Definitions Article 1 1. These Rules shall govern an arbitration
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Claimant. Respondent. (ICSID Case No. ARB/xx/xxx) [DRAFT] PROCEDURAL ORDER NO.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Claimant v. Respondent (ICSID Case No. ARB/xx/xxx) [DRAFT] PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. [1] Members of the Tribunal [ ], President of the Tribunal [ ],
More informationDIALOGUE CANADA. Proposed Bill to amend the City of Ottawa Act, City of Ottawa Act, 1999 Proposed Bill Notes
DIALOGUE CANADA Proposed Bill to amend the City of Ottawa Act, 1999 City of Ottawa Act, 1999 Proposed Bill Notes Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of the Province
More informationPCA Case No
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC- CENTRAL AMERICA-UNITED STATES FREE TRADE AGREEMENT, SIGNED ON AUGUST 5, 2004 ( CAFTA-DR ) - and - THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (AS ADOPTED
More informationRULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATION. of the Finland Chamber of Commerce
RULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATION of the Finland Chamber of Commerce RULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATION of the Finland Chamber of Commerce The English text prevails over other language versions. TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationProcedural Order (PO) No.1
NAFTA Chapter 11/UNCITRAL Cattle Cases Consolidated Canadian Claims v United States of America October 20, 2006 Procedural Order (PO) No.1 This PO puts on record the results of the discussion and agreement
More informationBurimi S.R.L. and Eagle Games SH.A. Claimants. Republic of Albania Respondent. ICSID Case No. ARB/11/18
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Burimi S.R.L. and Eagle Games SH.A. Claimants v. Republic of Albania Respondent ICSID Case No. ARB/11/18 Procedural Order No. 1 and Decision on
More informationPCA CASE NO
PCA CASE NO. 2011-17 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER A. THE TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BOLIVIA CONCERNING THE ENCOURAGEMENT
More informationPROCEDURAL ORDER No. 2 (Revised) May 31, Glamis Gold, Ltd., Claimant v. The United States of America, Respondent
PROCEDURAL ORDER No. 2 (Revised) May 31, 2005 Glamis Gold, Ltd., Claimant v. The United States of America, Respondent An Arbitration Under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA),
More informationDAVID AVEN ET AL. V. THE REPUBLIC OF COSTA RICA (UNCT/15/3) PROCEDURAL ORDER NO 2. On the Respondent s Request for Bifurcation
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 10 OF THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC-CENTRAL AMERICA-UNITED STATES FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (2010) DAVID AVEN ET AL. V. THE
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES BETWEEN: MERRILL & RING, L.P. ( Merrill & Ring ) Investor AND GOVERNMENT
More informationDOCUMENT PRODUCTION IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION - IS IT A BENEFICIAL EXERCISE?
DOCUMENT PRODUCTION IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION - IS IT A BENEFICIAL EXERCISE? Peter Schradieck Attorney-at-Law, Partner and Head of Dispute Resolution Plesner, Denmark 1 INTRODUCTION As a general rule,
More informationPage 1 of 17 Attorney General International Commercial Arbitration Act (R.S.N.B. 2011, c. 176) Act current to March 7, 2012 2011, c.176 International Commercial Arbitration Act Deposited May 13, 2011 Definitions
More informationPoštová banka, a.s. and ISTROKAPITAL SE v. Hellenic Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/8) Procedural Order No. 1
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Poštová banka, a.s. and ISTROKAPITAL SE v. Hellenic Republic PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 1 Eduardo Zuleta, President of the Tribunal Brigitte Stern,
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to January 1, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT ( NAFTA ) AND THE 1976 UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT ( NAFTA ) AND THE 1976 UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES between RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC. Claimant and GOVERNMENT
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE & FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE & FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE October 2015 RULES OF PROCEDURE Table of Contents RULE 1 INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION... 4 1.01 DEFINITIONS... 4 1.02 GENERAL
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES IN THE ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NAFTA AND THE ICSID CONVENTION BETWEEN:
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES IN THE ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NAFTA AND THE ICSID CONVENTION BETWEEN: MOBIL INVESTMENTS CANADA INC. Claimant AND GOVERNMENT OF
More information(ICSID Case. No. UNCT/18/3) PROCEDURAL ORDER No. 1
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS BETWEEN THE CARIBBEAN COMMUNITY AND THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION
More informationTHE LMAA TERMS (2006)
THE LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATORS ASSOCIATION THE LMAA TERMS (2006) Effective for appointments on and after 1st January 2006 THE LMAA TERMS (2006) PRELIMINARY 1. These Terms may be referred to as the LMAA
More informationCHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A: Investment
CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT Section A: Investment ARTICLE 9.1: DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this Chapter: (d) covered investment means, with respect to a Party, an investment in its territory of an investor
More informationPROCEDURAL ORDER NO 1. Daniel Bethlehem, Presiding Arbitrator Mark Kantor, Arbitrator Raúl E. Vinuesa, Arbitrator
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 10 OF THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC-CENTRAL AMERICA-UNITED STATES FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (2010) SPENCE INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS,
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ICDR) Independent Review Panel CASE #
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ICDR) Independent Review Panel CASE # 50 2013 001083 In the matter of an Independent Review Process pursuant to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
More informationRule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL Introduction Definitions General Principles
Rule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL 8401. Introduction (1) The Rules of Practice and Procedure (the Rules of Procedure ) set out the rules that govern the conduct of IIROC s enforcement proceedings
More informationConsolidated text PROJET DE LOI ENTITLED. The Arbitration (Guernsey) Law, 2016 * [CONSOLIDATED TEXT] NOTE
PROJET DE LOI ENTITLED The Arbitration (Guernsey) Law, 2016 * [CONSOLIDATED TEXT] NOTE This consolidated version of the enactment incorporates all amendments listed in the footnote below. It has been prepared
More informationPCA Case No
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BOLIVIA FOR THE PROMOTION AND
More informationTHE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT. Before the Tribunal constituted by. Mr Christopher Jeans QC, President; Mr David Goddard QC, member; and
IN THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CSAT APL/37(No.1) Between IRMA MATUS Applicant and THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT Respondent Before the Tribunal constituted by Mr Christopher Jeans QC,
More informationOfficial Languages Act. Annotated version
Official Languages Act Annotated version FOREWORD The current Official Languages Act came into force on September 15, 1988. The legal framework of the Act is closely attuned to Canadian realities and traditions
More informationREQUEST FOR ARBITRATION
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE ARBITRATION RULES OF THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION BETWEEN: [NAME OF CLAIMANT] (CLAIMANT) -AND- [NAME OF RESPONDENT] (RESPONDENT) REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Unión Fenosa Gas, S.A. Arab Republic of Egypt. (ICSID Case No.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Unión Fenosa Gas, S.A. v. Arab Republic of Egypt PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 5 The Tribunal V.V. Veeder, President of the Tribunal J. William Rowley,
More informationMarvin Roy Feldman Karpa. United Mexican States. (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/1) Interim Decision on. Preliminary Jurisdictional Issues
Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/1) Interim Decision on Preliminary Jurisdictional Issues I. Procedural Background 1. On April 30, 1999, Mr. Marvin Roy Feldman
More informationARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL
ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE RULES AS PART OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT PAGES 1.1 Application... 1 1.2 Scope... 1 II. TRIBUNALS AND ADMINISTRATION 2.1 Name
More informationADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE
ADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE Parties who agree to arbitrate under the Rules may use the following clause in their agreement: ADRIC Arbitration
More informationCHAPTER EIGHT INVESTMENT. Section A Investment. 1. This Chapter shall apply to measures adopted or maintained by a Party relating to:
CHAPTER EIGHT INVESTMENT Section A Investment Article 801: Scope and Coverage 1. This Chapter shall apply to measures adopted or maintained by a Party relating to: investors of the other Party; covered
More informationTHE RENCO GROUP, INC. V. REPUBLIC OF PERU (UNCT/13/1) PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 1
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 10 OF THE UNITED STATES - PERU TRADE PROMOTION AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (2010) THE RENCO GROUP, INC. V. REPUBLIC OF PERU (UNCT/13/1)
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Carnegie Minerals (Gambia) Limited. Republic of The Gambia
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Carnegie Minerals (Gambia) Limited v. Republic of The Gambia (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/19) Annulment Proceeding PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 1 Members of
More informationPCA Case No
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC- CENTRAL AMERICA-UNITED STATES FREE TRADE AGREEMENT, SIGNED ON AUGUST 5, 2004 ( CAFTA-DR ) and THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (AS ADOPTED IN
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Sanum Investments Limited. Lao People's Democratic Republic (ADHOC/17/1)
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Sanum Investments Limited v. Lao People's Democratic Republic PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 1 Members of the Tribunal Ms. Jean Kalicki, President of the
More informationTHE COURTS ACT. Rules made by the Chief Justice, after consultation with the Rules Committee and the Judges, under section 198 of the Courts Act
THE COURTS ACT Rules made by the Chief Justice, after consultation with the Rules Committee and the Judges, under section 198 of the Courts Act 1. Title These rules may be cited as the Supreme Court (International
More informationProcedural Order No. 3
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BEFORE A TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNITED STATES-DOMINICAN REPUBLIC- CENTRAL AMERICA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT, SIGNED AUGUST 5, 2004 ( CAFTA-DR ) - and - THE
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. ACP Axos Capital GmbH. Republic of Kosovo. (ICSID Case No. ARB/15/22)
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES ACP Axos Capital GmbH v. Republic of Kosovo PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 1 Members of the Tribunal Mr. Philippe Pinsolle, President of the Tribunal Dr.
More informationNOTICE OF ARBITRATION
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE HONK KONG INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE ADMINISTERED ARBITRATION RULES BETWEEN: [NAME OF CLAIMANT] (CLAIMANT) -AND- [NAME OF RESPONDENT] (RESPONDENT) NOTICE
More informationModel Rules on Arbitral Procedure 1958
Model Rules on Arbitral Procedure 1958 Text adopted by the International Law Commission at its tenth session, in 1958, and submitted to the General Assembly as a part of the Commission s report covering
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Lao Holdings N.V. Lao People's Democratic Republic. (ICSID Case No.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Lao Holdings N.V. v. Lao People's Democratic Republic PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 1 (REVISED) Members of the Tribunal Ms. Jean Kalicki, President of
More informationSOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION General Division Employment Insurance
Citation: T. H. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission, 2014 SSTGDEI 70 Appeal #: GE-13-2240 BETWEEN: T. H. Appellant Claimant and Canada Employment Insurance Commission Respondent SOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013)
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) 1. Scope of Application and Interpretation 1.1 Where parties have agreed to refer their disputes
More informationNOTICE OF ARBITRATION
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE BETWEEN: [NAME OF CLAIMANT] (CLAIMANT) -AND- [NAME OF RESPONDENT] (RESPONDENT) NOTICE OF ARBITRATION
More informationCHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A
CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT Section A Article 9.1: Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter: Centre means the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) established by the ICSID Convention;
More informationORDER IN RESPONSE TO A PETITION FOR TRANSPARENCY AND PARTICIPATION AS AMICUS CURIAE
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES WASHINGTON, D.C. In the proceedings between Aguas Argentinas, S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A. and Vivendi Universal,
More informationRULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATIONS
2017 RULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATIONS MODEL ARBITRATION CLAUSE Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or in connection with this contract, or the breach, termination or invalidity thereof, shall
More informationPART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS
PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS What this Part is about: This Part is designed to resolve issues and questions arising in the course of a Court action. It includes rules describing how applications
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES ) STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (Hong Kong) LIMITED, ) Applicant, ) ) ICSID Case No. ARB/10/20 v. ) ) TANZANIAN ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY ) LIMITED )
More informationInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Washington, D.C. In the proceedings between
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Washington, D.C. In the proceedings between Aguas Argentinas, S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A. and Vivendi Universal,
More informationExplanatory Report to the European Convention on Information on Foreign Law
Explanatory Report to the European Convention on Information on Foreign Law London, 7.VI.1968 European Treaty Series - No. 62 Introduction I. The European Convention on information on foreign law was prepared,
More informationDecision on the Respondent s Application for Bifurcation
PCA CASE NO. 2016-7 In The Matter Of An Arbitration Before A Tribunal Constituted In Accordance With The Agreement Between The Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland And
More informationSINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC)
GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC) Written By S. Ravi Shankar Advocate on Record - Supreme Court of India National President of Arbitration Bar of India
More informationDUBAI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE RULES 2007 AS OF 22 ND FEBRUARY Introductory Provisions. Article (1) Definitions
DUBAI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE RULES 2007 AS OF 22 ND FEBRUARY 2011 Introductory Provisions Article (1) Definitions 1.1 The following words and phrases shall have the meaning assigned thereto unless
More informationTHE LAW SOCIETY CONVEYANCING ARBITRATION RULES
THE LAW SOCIETY CONVEYANCING ARBITRATION RULES (For disputes arising under the Contract for Sale of Land 2005 Edition) Preamble The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales resolved at a meeting on
More information/...1 PRIVATE ARBITRATION KIT
1007453/...1 PRIVATE ARBITRATION KIT Introduction This document contains Guidelines, Rules and a Model Agreement in respect of private arbitrations. It is designed to assist practitioners when referring
More informationA Case Study in Litigation in Support of Arbitration: China, England, and The Turks and Caicos Islands
This article was published in slightly different form in the September 2005 issue of Mealey s International Arbitration Report. A Case Study in Litigation in Support of Arbitration: China, England, and
More informationREQUEST FOR ARBITRATION
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE RULES OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ARBITRATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BETWEEN: [NAME OF CLAIMANT] (CLAIMANT) -AND- [NAME OF RESPONDENT] (RESPONDENT)
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Lion Mexico Consolidated L.P. v. United Mexican States (lcsid Case No. ARB(AF)115/2) PROCEDURAL ORDER NO.4 (on the Organization of the Hearing
More informationthe other Party has otherwise failed to carry out its obligations under this Agreement; or
CHAPTER TWENTY DISPUTE SETTLEMENT ARTICLE 20.1: COOPERATION The Parties shall at all times endeavor to agree on the interpretation and application of this Agreement, and shall make every attempt through
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Financial Services Tribunal Tribunal des services financiers RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL Ce document est également disponible en français TABLE
More informationRESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION [NOTE: OR RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION AND COUNTERCLAIMS, IF
ARBITRATION NO. [INSERT CASE NUMBER AS PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRAR OF THE LCIA COURT] IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER ARBITRATION RULES OF LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION BETWEEN: [NAME OF
More informationPROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR HEARINGS BEFORE THE MINING AND LANDS COMMISSIONER
PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR HEARINGS BEFORE THE MINING AND LANDS COMMISSIONER Office of the Mining and Lands Commissioner Box 330, 24th Floor, 700 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M5G 126 Table of Contents PROCEDURAL
More informationPARTIAL DISSENTING OPINION
MOBIL INVESTMENTS CANADA INC. & MURPHY OIL CORPORATION v. GOVERNMENT OF CANADA ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4 PARTIAL DISSENTING OPINION PROFESSOR PHILIPPE SANDS Q.C. 1. The Tribunal has had little difficulty
More informationMARITIME ARBITRATION RULES SOCIETY OF MARITIME ARBITRATORS, INC.
MARITIME ARBITRATION RULES SOCIETY OF MARITIME ARBITRATORS, INC. These Rules apply to contracts entered into on or after March 14, 2018 P R E A M B L E INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF RULES The powers
More information112th Session Judgment No. 3086
Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal Registry s translation, the French text alone being authoritative. 112th Session
More informationCANFOR CORPORATION AND TERMINAL FOREST PRODUCTS LTD., Claimants/Investors, -and- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent/Party.
IN THE CONSOLIDATED ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 1126 OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES BETWEEN CANFOR CORPORATION AND TERMINAL FOREST PRODUCTS LTD., -and-
More informationGuidelines on Evidence
China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Guidelines on Evidence Preamble The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission ( CIETAC ) adopts these Guidelines on Evidence
More informationWIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES
APPENDIX 3.17 WIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES (as from 1 October 2002) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Abbreviated Expressions Article 1 In these Rules: Arbitration Agreement means
More informationADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTION NO. 2008/6. The Special Representative of the Secretary-General,
UNITED NATIONS United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo UNMIK NATIONS UNIES Mission d Administration Intérimaire des Nations Unies au Kosovo UNMIK/AD/2008/6 11 June 2008 ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTION
More informationPCA Case No
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC- CENTRAL AMERICA-UNITED STATES FREE TRADE AGREEMENT, SIGNED ON AUGUST 5, 2004 ( CAFTA-DR ) and THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (AS ADOPTED IN
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONFERENCE OF THE STATES PARTIES TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION
RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONFERENCE OF THE STATES PARTIES TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION UNITED NATIONS United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Vienna Rules of Procedure for the
More informationCHAPTER 4 THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT. Arrangement of Sections.
CHAPTER 4 THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT. Arrangement of Sections. Section 1. Application. 2. Interpretation. PART I PRELIMINARY. PART II ARBITRATION. 3. Form of arbitration agreement. 4. Waiver
More informationThe Rules of the Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Serbia
The Rules of the Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Serbia ( Official Journal of the Republic of Serbia, no. 2/2014) I GENERAL PROVISIONS Definition and Status
More informationIntroductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario
Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario Table of Contents INTRODUCTION This guide contains an overview of the Canadian legal system and court structure as well as key procedural and substantive
More informationArbitration Act of. of Barbados. (Barbade)
Arbitration Act of Barbados (Barbade) INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION ACT, 2007-45 BARBADOS I assent C. STRAUGHN HUSBANDSS Govemor- General 20th December, 2007. An Act to make provision for international
More informationANSWER TO THE NOTICE OF ARBITRATION [NOTE: OR ANSWER TO THE NOTICE OF ARBITRATION AND COUNTERCLAIMS, IF
ARBITRATION NO. [INSERT CASE NUMBER AS PROVIDED BY THE HKIAC] IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE HONK KONG INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE ADMINISTERED ARBITRATION RULES BETWEEN: [NAME OF CLAIMANT]
More informationStatute and Rules of Procedure
ICSC/1/Rev.2 International Civil Service Commission Statute and Rules of Procedure United Nations New York, 2018 1 CONTENTS Introductory note................................................ 3 Chapter STATUTE
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES IN THE PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES IN THE PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN Transglobal Green Energy, LLC and Transglobal Green Panama, S.A. v. Republic of Panama First Session of the Arbitral
More informationIslamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13) Procedural Order No. 2
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13) Procedural Order No. 2 Introduction In this Procedural Order, the Tribunal addresses the request of
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL 2011 Edition RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK MADE UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE STATUTE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationUniform Arbitration Act
2-1 Uniform Law Conference of Canada Uniform Act 2-2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTORY MATTERS 1 Definitions 2 Application of Act 3 Contracting out 4 Waiver of right to object 5 agreements COURT INTERVENTION
More informationTerms of Reference ( TOR ).
Terms of Reference. An Arbitrator s Perspective Karen Mills Chartered Arbitrator KarimSyah Law Firm, Jakarta One of the features which sets ICC arbitration references apart from other arbitration procedures,
More informationLanguage Rights in the Northern and Western Canadian regions
Language Rights in the Northern and Western Canadian regions Note: This table is intended as an overview (not exhaustive) of language rights in the northern and western Canadian regions, and does not constitute
More informationCOMMERCE GROUP CORP. SAN SEBASTIAN GOLD MINES, INC. REPUBLIC OF EL SALVADOR REJOINDER REPUBLIC OF EL SALVADOR S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION.
In The Matter Of An Arbitration Under The Arbitration Rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ICSID Case No. ARB/09/17 COMMERCE GROUP CORP. and SAN SEBASTIAN GOLD MINES,
More informationSaudi Center for Commercial Arbitration King Fahad Branch Rd, Al Mutamarat, Riyadh, KSA PO Box 3758, Riyadh Tel:
SCCA Arbitration Rules Shaaban 1437 - May 2016 Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration King Fahad Branch Rd, Al Mutamarat, Riyadh, KSA PO Box 3758, Riyadh 11481 Tel: 920003625 info@sadr.org www.sadr.org
More informationFILM AND TELEVISION CO-PRODUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES
FILM AND TELEVISION CO-PRODUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES Signed April 8, 1991 in Ottawa FILM AND TELEVISION CO-PRODUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN
More informationEUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE Guidelines for Examination Part E - Guidelines on General Procedural Matters Amended in December, 2007
EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE Guidelines for Examination Part E - Guidelines on General Procedural Matters Amended in December, 2007 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS 1. Communications
More informationI. Purpose. II. Definitions. III. Place and date of meetings. Rule 1. Rule 2. Rule 3
Rules of procedure for sessions of the Executive Body for the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution as adopted by decision 2010/9 and amended by decision 2013/1 I. Purpose Rule 1 These rules
More informationPART I ARBITRATION - CHAPTER I
INDIAN BARE ACTS THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 No.26 of 1996 [16th August, 1996] An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to domestic arbitration, international commercial arbitration
More informationSCC Practice: Emergency Arbitrator Decisions
1(26) SCC Practice: Emergency Arbitrator Decisions 1 January 2010 31 December 2013 By Johan Lundstedt 1 I. Introduction The Emergency Arbitrator mechanism aims to enable parties to seek interim measures
More informationDownloaded on April 16, Region. Sub Subject Conventions Reference Number
Downloaded on April 16, 2019 Convention, Supplementary to the Warsaw Convention, for the Unification of Certains Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air Performed by a Person Other than the Contracting
More informationSource: BOOK: International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, J. Paulsson (ed.), Suppl. 30 (January/2000)
Source: BOOK: International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, J. Paulsson (ed.), Suppl. 30 (January/2000) The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (No. 26 of 1996), [16th August 1996] India An Act
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) CONTENTS
CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope of Application and Interpretation 1 Rule 2 Notice, Calculation of Periods of Time 3 Rule 3 Notice of Arbitration 4 Rule 4 Response to Notice of Arbitration 6 Rule 5 Expedited Procedure
More informationArbitration rules. International Chamber of Commerce. The world business organization
Arbitration and adr rules International Chamber of Commerce The world business organization International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) 38, Cours Albert 1er, 75008 Paris, France www.iccwbo.org ICC 2001, 2011
More informationCASES. Cambridge University Press ICSID Reports, Volume 13 Edited by Karen Lee Excerpt More information
CASES www.cambridge.org LINK-TRADING v. MOLDOVA 3 Jurisdiction Locus standi United States Moldova Bilateral Investment Protection Treaty, 1993 Article VI(8) Consent to arbitration Articles I(2) and VI(3)
More information