LAWHONS 733A - Studies in Contract Law
|
|
|
- Byron Grant
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LAWHONS 733A - Studies in Contract Law View Online Studies in Contract Law 2015 Alexander F H Loke "Cost of Cure or Difference in Market Value? Toward a Sound Choice in the Basis for Quantifying Expectation Damages (1996) 10 JCL 189, Andrew Robertson "The Reliance Basis of Proprietary Estoppel Remedies (2008) 72 Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 295., Antons Trawling Co Ltd v Smith [2003] 2 NZLR 23, 2 New Zealand Law Reports (2003). Appeal dismissed with costs. Reported by R. D. B. Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613., CLR (2016). Attorney-General of hong Kong v humphrey s Estate (Queen s Gardens) Ltd [1987] AC 144 (PC) (n.d.). Ben McFarlane and Andrew Robertson "Apocalypse Averted: Proprietary Estoppel in the House of Lords (2009) 125 LQR 535., Brian Coote "Consideration and Variations: A Different Solution (2004) 120 LQR 19, CHLOROS, A. G. AG Chloros "The Doctrine of Consideration and the Reform of the Law of Contract: A Comparative Analysis (1968) 17 ICLQ 137. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 17, no. 1 (1968): Cobbe v Yeoman s Rowe Management Ltd [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 1 WLR 1752 (n.d.). Commonwealth of Australia v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 (n.d.). Coote, B. Brian Coote "Contract Damages, Ruxley, and the Performance Interest (1997) 56 Cambridge LJ 537. Cambridge Law Journal 56, no. 3 (1997): &id=555. Crabb v Arun District Council [1976] Ch 179 (CA) (n.d.). Cur adv vult. Clark v Macourt [2013] HCA 56, CLR (2016).. Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 8, (2009) 236 CLR 272, CLR (2016). 1/5
2 Dawson, Francis. Francis Dawson "Contract as Assumption and Consideration Theory: A Reassessment of Williams v Roffey Bros (2011) 42 VUWLR 135. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, no. 42 (2011). 2&size=2&id=137.. Francis Dawson "Making Representations Good (1982) 1 Canta LR 329. The Canterbury Law Review, no. 1 (1982): Dillwyn v Llewelyn (1862) 4 De G F & J 517, 45 ER 1285 (Ch) (n.d.). Editorial Committee of the Modern Law Review. Editorial Committee of the Modern Law Review The Law Revision Committee s Sixth Interim Report (1937) 1 MLR 97. Modern Law Review, &size=2&id=105. Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ (Worldwide Salvage and Towage) Ltd (The Sea Angel) [2007] EWCA Civ 547, [2007] 2 Lloyd s Rep 517 (n.d.). FA Tamplin Steamship Co Ltd v Anglo Mexican Petroleum Products Co Ltd [1916] 2 AC 397 (n.d.). Giumelli v Giumelli [1999] HCA 10, (1999) 196 CLR 101 (n.d.). Great Britain. Law Revision Committee. Law Revision Committee Sixth Interim Report: Statute of Frauds and the Doctrine of Consideration (HMSO, London, 1937). Vol. Cmd. (Great Britain. Parliament). London: H.M.S.O., H R & S Sainsbury Ltd v Street [1972] 1 WLR 834 (n.d.). Harris, Ogus and Phillips "Contract Remedies and the Consumer Surplus (1979) 95 LQR 581., Hirji Mulji v Cheong Yue Steamship Co Ltd [1926] AC 497 (HL) (n.d.). Hogg, Martin. Martin Hogg Promises and Contract Law: Comparative Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011), Holdsworth, W. W S Holdsworth The Modern History of the Doctrine of Consideration (1923) 57 ALR 706. American Law Review 57, no. 5 (1923): &id=710. Horlock v Beal [1916] 1 AC 486 (HL) (n.d.). Howell v Coupland (1876) 1 QBD 258 (n.d.). J Lauritzen AS v Wijsmuller BV (The Super Servant Two) [1990] 1 Lloyd s Rep 1 (n.d.). 2/5
3 Joseph Line Constantine SS Line Ltd v Imperial Smelting Corp Ltd [1942] AC 154 (HL) (n.d.). K O Shatwell The Doctrine of Consideration in the Modern Law (1954) 3 SLR 289, n.d. =317. Ken Handley "Further Thoughts on Proprietary Estoppel (2010) 84 ALJ 239. ALJ, afcff911e08eefa443f89988a0&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav=tr ue&startchunk=1&endchunk=1. Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740 (CA) (n.d.). Lord Neuberger "Thoughts on the Law of Equitable Estoppel (2010) 84ALJ 225. ALJ, a3ccff911e08eefa443f89988a0&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav=t rue&startchunk=1&endchunk=1. MARCUS ROBERTS [1] Lecturer in Law, The University of Auckland. Marcus Roberts Contractual Damages and the Supreme Court - Altimarloch and the Shifting Sands of Reasonableness" (2013) 19 NZBLQ 11. NZBLQ 19 (2016) b0b611e28085de5d98fda335&tocDs=AUNZ_NZ_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav =true&startchunk=1&endchunk=1. Marlborough District Council v Altimarloch Joint Venture Ltd [2012] NZSC 11, [2012] 2 NZLR 726, 90 New Zealand Law Reports (2012). McElroy, Roy Granville. Roy Granville McElroy and Glanville L Williams Impossibility of Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1941), Metropolitan Water Board v Dick, Kerr & Co Ltd [1918] AC 119 (HL) (n.d.). Mindy Chen-Wishart "Consideration for Variation Contracts [2014] NZLJ 67. New Zealand Law Journal 2 (2014). 5BPH-MV91-F093-R19G&csi=306008&oc=00240&perma=true. National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd [1981] AC 675 (HL) (n.d.). NIXON FONG [1] Solicitor, Minter Ellison Rudd Watts, Auckland. Nixon Fong "Planet Kids v Auckland Council: A Comment on the Multi-Factorial Approach (2015) 21 NZBLQ 3. NZBLQ 21 (2016). e510f5911e5960feb5a5b726e12&tocds=aunz_nz_journals_toc&istocnav=t rue&startchunk=1&endchunk=1. Peevyhouse v Garland Coal and Mining Co 382 P 2d 109 (Okl 1962) (n.d.). Planet Kids Ltd v Auckland Council [2013] NZSC 147, [2014] 1 NZLR 149, 145 New Zealand Law Reports (2014). 3/5
4 Plimmer v The Mayor, Councillors, and Citizens of the City of Wellington (1884) 9 App Cas 699 (PC) (n.d.). Poussard v Spiers (1876) LR 1 QBD 410 (n.d.). Radford v De Froberville [1977] 1 WLR 1262 (Ch) (n.d.). Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR 1 HL 129 (n.d.). Roberts, Marcus. Marcus Roberts "Equitable Estoppel in New Zealand: Wilson Parking New Zealand Ltd v Fanshawe 136 Ltd (2015) 26 KLJ 1., n.d.. Marcus Roberts "Teat v Willcocks: Consideration and Variation Contracts Revisited (2014) 20 NZBLQ 79, n.d. 4a e4bb6fec5fe3bc7087&tocDs=AUNZ_NZ_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav= true&startchunk=1&endchunk=1.. Planet Kids: The Resurrection of the Failure of Consideration Approach to Frustration? New Zealand Universities Law Review, E650FDDB682AC FEEDC8BD?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&a mp;doc=dedupmrg &indx=1&recids=dedupmrg &reci dxs=0&elementid=0&rendermode=poppedout&displaymode=full&frb rversion=&?dscnt=1&query=any%2ccontains%2cnew+zealand+universities+l aw+review&dscnt=0&search_scope=combined_local&scp.scps=scope%3 A%28Standard_record%29%2Cscope%3A%28Combined_record%29&vid=UOA2_A&a mp;highlight=true&bulksize=10&institution=uoa&tab=search_library&am p;vl( ui0)=any&displayfield=title&displayfield=creator&dym=tru e =eng&vl(freetext0)=new%20zealand%20universities%20law%20review&from Login=true&group=GUEST&dstmp= Ruxley Electronics and Construction ltd v Forsyth [1996] 1 AC 344 (HL) (n.d.). Scanlan s New Neon Ltd v Tooheys Ltd (1943) 67 CLR 169, CLR (2016). Sidhu v Van Dyke [2014] HCA 19, [2014] 251 CLR 505 (n.d.). Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd [1982] QB 133 (Ch) (n.d.). Teat v Willcocks [2014] 3 NZLR 129, 224 New Zealand Law Reports (2014). Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18, [2009] 1 WLR 776 (n.d.). Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 (Mason CJ/Wilson J and Deane J) (n.d.). Williams v Roffey Bros Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1 (n.d.). Wilson Parking New Zealand Ltd v Fanshawe 136 Ltd [2014] NZCA 407, [2014] 3 NZLR 567, 196 New Zealand Law Reports (2014). 4/5
5 Wilson Parking New Zealand Ltd v Fanshawe 136 Ltd [2014] NZSC 173, (2014) 15 NZCPR 867 (2014). 5/5
THE FORMATION OF VARIATION CONTRACTS IN NEW ZEALAND: CONSIDERATION AND ESTOPPEL
327 THE FORMATION OF VARIATION CONTRACTS IN NEW ZEALAND: CONSIDERATION AND ESTOPPEL Marcus Roberts* This article will review the current New Zealand approach to the formation of variation contracts. In
Equitable Estoppel: Defining the Detriment
Bond Law Review Volume 11 Issue 1 Article 8 1999 Equitable Estoppel: Defining the Detriment Denis S. K Ong Bond University, denis_ong@bond.edu.au Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr
Enforcing oral agreements to develop land in English law Panesar, S. Published version deposited in CURVE March 2012
Enforcing oral agreements to develop land in English law Panesar, S. Published version deposited in CURVE March 2012 Original citation & hyperlink: Panesar, S. (2009) Enforcing oral agreements to develop
Expectation, Reliance and Detriment. What is it the essential aim of the remedy of proprietary estoppel?
Expectation, Reliance and Detriment. What is it the essential aim of the remedy of proprietary estoppel? Elizabeth Fitzgerald discusses this controversial topic in the wake of the recent decision of the
"FRUSTRATION" IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
593 "FRUSTRATION" IN THE COURT OF APPEAL David McLauchlan * This article discusses the decision of the New Zealand Court of Appeal in Planet Kids Ltd v Auckland Council [2012] NZCA 562, [2013] 1 NZLR 485.
CASE NOTE RUXLEY ELECTRONICS AND CONSTRUCTION LTD V FORSYTH
CASE NOTE RUXLEY ELECTRONICS AND CONSTRUCTION LTD V FORSYTH LADDINGFORD ENCLOSURES LTD V FORSYTH I. INTRODUCTION Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v F orsyth 1 ("Ruxley") is a recent House of Lords
ESTOPPEL in PROPERTY CASES PRINCIPLES and DEVELOPMENTS. Dr Simon Blount*
1 ESTOPPEL in PROPERTY CASES PRINCIPLES and DEVELOPMENTS Dr Simon Blount* Equity is concerned with good conscience, not a sentimental urge to render sinners virtuous. 1 COMMON LAW AND EQUITABLE ESTOPPELS
Coventry University Repository for the Virtual Environment (CURVE)
Coventry University Coventry University Repository for the Virtual Environment (CURVE) Author names: Panesar, S. and Foster, S.H. Title: Administrative law: the role of estoppel in planning law Article
Conveyancing and property
Editor: Peter Butt THREE MOOT POINTS Editorial introduction: We begin this month s column with three moot points two contributed by a reader, and one by the Editor. Any comments on the issues raised would
Equitable Estoppel: Defining the Detriment - A Rejoinder
Bond Law Review Volume 12 Issue 1 Article 5 2000 Equitable Estoppel: Defining the Detriment - A Rejoinder Denis S. K Ong Bond University, denis_ong@bond.edu.au Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr
Waiver, Estoppel and Election in the context of adjudication applications
1 Waiver, Estoppel and Election in the context of adjudication applications Adjudication Forum 13 November 2012 Max Tonkin The Pareto Principal Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto observed in 1906 that 80%
EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL IN THE 21 ST CENTURY: REVISITING THE LESSONS OF WALTONS STORES V MAHER DANIEL BRIAN HARRIS*
EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL IN THE 21 ST CENTURY: REVISITING THE LESSONS OF WALTONS STORES V MAHER DANIEL BRIAN HARRIS* 1 * Acknowledgement: this thesis is dedicated to Jasmine Chia, and?, who were both immensely
UNCONSCIONABILITY IN ESTOPPEL: TRIABLE ISSUE OR FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLE?
UNCONSCIONABILITY IN ESTOPPEL: TRIABLE ISSUE OR FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLE? THE HON JUSTICE K R HANDLEY AO* This lecture reviews the role of unconscionability in estoppel by conduct. Estoppel by deed and by
EQUITABLE INTERESTS IN LAND ARISING FROM ESTOPPEL. College of Law, Sydney. 9 March Edmund Finnane 1
EQUITABLE INTERESTS IN LAND ARISING FROM ESTOPPEL College of Law, Sydney 9 March 2010 Edmund Finnane 1 Introduction 1. Bryson JA said in Khoury & Anor v Khouri 2 : It must be obvious to anyone with any
The plaintiff must show that his loss was one which resulted from a breach of contract by the defendant (a direct causal link).
1. CAUSATION The plaintiff must show that his loss was one which resulted from a breach of contract by the defendant (a direct causal link). An act of the defendant in a sequence of events leading to a
PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL. Recent Developments in England and Wales
110 Singapore Academy of Law Journal (2010) 22 SAcLJ PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL Recent Developments in England and Wales This article analyses the contrasting reasoning and outcomes in two cases concerning proprietary
WESTLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL Appellant. PETER CHARLES YORK First Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA774/2013 [2014] NZCA 59 BETWEEN AND WESTLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL Appellant PETER CHARLES YORK First Respondent ALPINE GLACIER MOTEL LIMITED Second Respondent Hearing:
UWE has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material.
Singh, L. (2015) The United Nation Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods 1980 (CISG) An examination of the buyers remedy of avoidance under the CISG: How is the remedy interpreted,
Introduction. Doug Tennent
Equitable Estoppel and the Censure of Unconscionable Conduct: Can this principle be extended to hold politicians accountable for their unfulfilled political promises? Doug Tennent That this nation under
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Giumelli v Giumelli [1999] HCA 10; 196 CLR 101; 73 ALJR 547 (3 December 1999) Last Updated: 24 March 1999 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA GLEESON CJ, McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY AND CALLINAN JJ GIOVANNI GIUMELLI & ANOR
IN DEFENCE OF THE RELIANCE THEORY OF EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL
Darryn Jensen * IN DEFENCE OF THE RELIANCE THEORY OF EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL T he High Court judgments in Waltons Stores (Interstate) Limited v ~aher' presented equitable estoppel as a doctrine concerned with
THE DECISION OF the Court of Appeal in Jennings v Rice1 signalled
16 The Role of Expectation in the Determination of Proprietary Estoppel Remedies JOHN MEE * I. INTRODUCTION THE DECISION OF the Court of Appeal in Jennings v Rice1 signalled an important shift in the approach
FRUSTRATION OF CONTRACT
CASES: FRUSTRATION OF CONTRACT FRUSTRATION OF CONTRACT DAVIS CONTRACTORS LTD. v. FAREHAM URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL The doctrine of frustration of contract has always been a source of iov ", to the academic
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND oo000oo BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER JUDGMENT
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. CV 2007-1149 BETWEEN PAUL DE FOUR CLAIMANT AND GAIL RAHIM DEFENDANT -----------------oo000oo-------------------- BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
Section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989
Section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 Katie Hooper St John s Chambers Friday, 17 th June 2011 Section 2: Contracts for the sale etc of land to be made by signed writing SS
The Performance Interest in New Zealand s Law of Contract
The Performance Interest in New Zealand s Law of Contract A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Bachelor of Laws (with Honours) University of Otago 2014 James Brownlee Watson
UNILATERAL MISTAKE IN THE ENGLISH COURTS: REASSERTING THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH
Singapore Journal of Legal Studies [2009] 226 234 UNILATERAL MISTAKE IN THE ENGLISH COURTS: REASSERTING THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH Statoil A.S.A. v. Louis Dreyfus Energy Services L.P. (The Harriette N )
In 2003 David was appointed Queen s Counsel. He continues to practise at the bar, with chambers in Wellington and Auckland.
David Goddard QC Thorndon Chambers PO Box 1530 Wellington 6140 NEW ZEALAND Level 6 10 Customhouse Quay CURRICULUM VITAE Tel: +64 4 499 6040 DDI: +64 4 460 0637 Fax: +64 4 499 6118 e-mail: david.goddard@chambers.co.nz
EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF PROPRIETARY REMEDIES TO RECOVERY OF PURE PROFITS FROM SUCCESSFUL INVESTMENT OF BRIBES: THE ENDGAME IN LISTER V STUBBS
EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF PROPRIETARY REMEDIES TO RECOVERY OF PURE PROFITS FROM SUCCESSFUL INVESTMENT OF BRIBES: THE ENDGAME IN LISTER V STUBBS Mohsin Hingun and Aiman Nariman Mohd Sulaiman Assoc Professor,
MALCOLM JAMES BEATTIE First Appellant
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA773/2013 [2014] NZCA 184 BETWEEN MALCOLM JAMES BEATTIE First Appellant ANTHONY JOSEPH REGAN Second Appellant CT NZ GROUP LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS CARTAN GLOBAL
FANSHAWE 136 LIMITED First Respondent. Ellen France, Randerson and White JJ
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA24/2014 [2014] NZCA 407 BETWEEN AND WILSON PARKING NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Appellant FANSHAWE 136 LIMITED First Respondent 136 FANSHAWE LIMITED Second Respondent FANSHAWE
Unconscionability and proprietary estoppel remedies
'l 18 Unconscionability and proprietary estoppel remedies ANDREW ROBERTSON.. A. Introduction In recent years both courts and scholars have embraced the idea that the notion of unconscionability has a role
17th Annual International Maritime Law Arbitration Moot In the matter of arbitration under the MLAANZ Arbitration Rules COUNSEL
17th Annual International Maritime Law Arbitration Moot In the matter of arbitration under the MLAANZ Arbitration Rules UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND MEMORANDUM FOR RESPONDENT CLAIMANT Zeus Shipping and Trading
UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON BOLTON LAW SCHOOL LLB (LAW) WITH FOUNDATION SEMESTER 2 EXAMINATION 2017/18 CORE LEGAL PRINCIPLES SEVEN KEY AREAS
UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON TW11 BOLTON LAW SCHOOL LLB (LAW) WITH FOUNDATION SEMESTER 2 EXAMINATION 2017/18 CORE LEGAL PRINCIPLES SEVEN KEY AREAS MODULE NO: LAW3505 Date: Wednesday 23 rd May 2018 Time: 10.00
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES AFFECTING PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
302 UNSW Law Journal Volume 29(3) CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES AFFECTING PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS A R BLACKSHIELD The reason why parliaments cannot bind their successors, said Dicey (quoting Alpheus Todd),
RIGHTS TO TERMINATE A COMMERCIAL CONTRACT SUCCESSFUL USE AND LIABILITY FOR MISUSE. David Thomas QC and Matthew Finn Keating Chambers.
RIGHTS TO TERMINATE A COMMERCIAL CONTRACT SUCCESSFUL USE AND LIABILITY FOR MISUSE David Thomas QC and Matthew Finn Keating Chambers 18 January 2018 INTRODUCTION It is often the case that one party to a
Consideration sits alongside, offer and acceptance to form a legally binding contract.
CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG Consideration and Estoppel Refer to Richards Law of Contract Chapter 3 A Introduction Background and function Consideration sits alongside, offer and acceptance to form a legally
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Forsyth & Ors v Big Gold Corporation Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2017] QSC 314 PARTIES: FILE NO/S: No 9817 of 2016 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ALEXANDER CAMERON FORSYTH (first plaintiff)
Will Barkerʼs 1015LAW Revision
Will Barkerʼs 1015LAW Revision Discharge by Performance 2 Discharge by Subsequent Agreement 5 Discharge by Frustration 6 Discharge by Breach 8 Termination for Repudiation 10 Restrictions on the Right to
The clause (ACAS Form COT-3) provided:
THE CONSTRUCTION OF COMPROMISE AGREEMENTS The leading case is Bank of Credit and Commerce International SAI v Ali [2001] UKHL 8; [2002] 1 AC 251. It was also an extreme case where the majority of the House
17TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LAW ARBITRATION MOOT COMPETITION 2016
17TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LAW ARBITRATION MOOT COMPETITION 2016 King s College London Claimant s Memorandum Claimant: Respondent: Zeus Shipping and Trading Company Hestia Industries Team No: 16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2015] NZHC JAMES HARDIE NEW ZEALAND Second Plaintiff
![IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2015] NZHC JAMES HARDIE NEW ZEALAND Second Plaintiff](/thumbs/91/107492014.jpg "IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2015] NZHC JAMES HARDIE NEW ZEALAND Second Plaintiff")
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2014-404-002481 [2015] NZHC 2098 BETWEEN AND AND AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Plaintiff JAMES HARDIE NEW ZEALAND Second Plaintiff WEATHERTIGHT HOMES
Andrew Dyson, James Goudkamp, Frederick Wilmot-Smith Thinking in terms of contract defences
Andrew Dyson, James Goudkamp, Frederick Wilmot-Smith Thinking in terms of contract defences Book section (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Originally published in: Dyson, Andrew and Goudkamp,
ADVANCED CONTRACT LAW SUMMARY
ADVANCED CONTRACT LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL PTY LTD CONTENTS CASE LIST... 6 1. INTRODUCTION... 8 1.1 TERMINOLOGY... 8 2. IMMEDIATE DUTY TO PERFORM CONTRACT... 9 3. CONTINGENT CONDITIONS... 10 3.1 THE NATURE
WILLIAMS V ROFFEY BROS. & NICHOLLS (CONTRACTORS) LTD [COURT OF APPEAL] [1991] 1 QB 1. HEARING-DATES: 2, 3, 23 November 1989.
![WILLIAMS V ROFFEY BROS. & NICHOLLS (CONTRACTORS) LTD [COURT OF APPEAL] [1991] 1 QB 1. HEARING-DATES: 2, 3, 23 November 1989.](/thumbs/92/110479918.jpg "WILLIAMS V ROFFEY BROS. & NICHOLLS (CONTRACTORS) LTD [COURT OF APPEAL] [1991] 1 QB 1. HEARING-DATES: 2, 3, 23 November 1989.")
CATCHWORDS: WILLIAMS V ROFFEY BROS. & NICHOLLS (CONTRACTORS) LTD [COURT OF APPEAL] [1991] 1 QB 1 HEARING-DATES: 2, 3, 23 November 1989 23 November 1989 Contract - Consideration - Performance of existing
UNIT 2 - CONTRACT LAW. Suggested Answers January 2009
Note to Candidates and Tutors: UNIT 2 - CONTRACT LAW Suggested Answers January 2009 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students should
IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW RULE AGAINST PENALTIES
305 IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW RULE AGAINST PENALTIES Jessica Palmer * Whether a contractual term is penal and therefore unenforceable has usually been determined by distinguishing it from stipulations that
Reasonableness and withholding consent to an assignment of contractual rights
Investing in Infrastructure International Best Legal Practice in Project and Construction Agreements January 2016 Damian McNair Partner, Legal M: +61 421 899 231 E: damian.mcnair@au.pwc.com Reasonableness
David McLauchlan Publications
David McLauchlan Publications 1972 2018 1. Books The Parol Evidence Rule, Professional Publications Ltd, 1976, xi + 150 pp The Contractual Remedies Act 1979, Sweet & Maxwell (NZ) Ltd, 1981, xxii + 217
TIME TO REVISIT FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN THE UK? GROUP JOSI REINSURANCE CO V UGIC
705 TIME TO REVISIT FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN THE UK? GROUP JOSI REINSURANCE CO V UGIC Christopher D Bougen * There has been much debate in the United Kingdom over the last decade on whether the discretionary
Consideration is Dead! Long Live Consideration! Richcraft Homes Ltd. v Urbandale Corporation and the Zombie-Theory of Contract Law
Consideration is Dead! Long Live Consideration! Richcraft Homes Ltd. v Urbandale Corporation and the Zombie-Theory of Contract Law Jason MacLean, Assistant Professor, University of Saskatchewan College
Davies v Davies. The story of the Cowshed Cinderella
Davies v Davies or The story of the Cowshed Cinderella 'Cowshed Cinderella' wins 1.3m from her parents after being made to milk cows while her sisters partied Davies v Davies 1 in a far away country known
THE UNCERTAIN DOCTRINE OF PART PERFORMANCE
37 THE UNCERTAIN DOCTRINE OF PART PERFORMANCE Susy Frankel * This article is about the doctrine of part performance and its application in New Zealand's law of contract. In order to be enforceable contracts
408 Law Quarterly Review [Vol. 125
408 Law Quarterly Review [Vol. 125 disposition of its own, then to give it priority would have upheld the policy of the Land Registration Act 2002. Without either, there is no reason why s.29 should come
Supplementary submission on the Patents Bill
New Zealand Law Society/. 3/! Supplementary submission on the Patents Bill This supplementary submission by the New Zealand Law Society (the NZLS) on the Patents Bill 1.1. addresses the implications of
Enforceability of take-or-pay provisions in English law contracts resolved
Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1164554 Enforceability of take-or-pay provisions in English law contracts resolved Ben Holland is a partner in the
Rylands v Fletcher - Water escaped from a reservoir on the defendant s land causing the flooding of a mine on neighbouring land.
CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG The Rylands and Fletcher Rule Refer to Elliott & Quinn Tort Law 7 th Edition Chapters 10 & 11 The Rule in Rylands v Fletcher I A Introductory Issues It is a Strict Liability
Case Note. PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL AS A LAST RESORT Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] 2 AC 415; [2013] 3 WLR 1
![Case Note. PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL AS A LAST RESORT Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] 2 AC 415; [2013] 3 WLR 1](/thumbs/81/82962533.jpg "Case Note. PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL AS A LAST RESORT Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] 2 AC 415; [2013] 3 WLR 1")
(2014) 26 SAcLJ Piercing the Corporate Veil as a Last Resort 249 Case Note PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL AS A LAST RESORT Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] 2 AC 415; [2013] 3 WLR 1 This
WEEK 4-6: REMEDIES FOR BREACH
WEEK 4-6: REMEDIES FOR BREACH Overview of Remedies for breach (weeks 4-6) Damages Specific performance/injunction Liquidated damages/penalties Restitution/Action for debt Week 4: Remedies Damages (measures
REMOTENESS OF CONTRACTUAL DAMAGES
The Denning Law Journal Vol 21 2009 pp 173-179 CASE COMMENTARY REMOTENESS OF CONTRACTUAL DAMAGES Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc (The Achilleas ) [2008] 2 Lloyd's Rep 275 John Halladay
ARE ALL ESTOPPELS ALIKE? Timothy Fancourt QC. Falcon Chambers
ARE ALL ESTOPPELS ALIKE? Timothy Fancourt QC Falcon Chambers 1. Tempting as it is to characterise estoppel generally as equitable intervention to prevent a party from resiling from an assurance where it
LAW OF CONTRACT. LPAB Summer 2016/2017 Week 11. Alex Kuklik
LAW OF CONTRACT LPAB Summer 2016/2017 Week 11 Alex Kuklik Remedies Lecture 11 (1) Damages Text: Radan & Gooley, Chapter 29 (a) Common law damages Text: Radan & Gooley, Chapter 22 *Johnson v Perez (1988)
EQUITY NOTES. Equity has the capacity to develop new rights and remedies for the benefit of plaintiffs
EQUITY NOTES THE HISTORY AND NATURE OF EQUITY Equity has the capacity to develop new rights and remedies for the benefit of plaintiffs Pilmer v Duke Group 2001 Kirby J: The list of persons owing fiduciary
Jurisdictional Choices in Maritime Actions
Bond Law Review Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 1 12-1-1990 Jurisdictional Choices in Maritime Actions Michael D. White Recommended Citation White, Michael D. (1990) "Jurisdictional Choices in Maritime Actions,"
Appellant. Ellen France P, Harrison and Wild JJ. R B Lange for Appellant A R Galbraith QC and J G Collinge for Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA307/2013 [2015] NZCA 20 BETWEEN AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Appellant GREEN & MCCAHILL HOLDINGS LIMITED Respondent Hearing: 21 October 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Ellen
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Zen Ridgeway Pty Ltd v Adams & Anor [2009] QSC 117 PARTIES: FILE NO/S: 4565/09 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ZEN RIDGEWAY PTY LTD as trustee for THE LEE FAMILY TRUST ACN 109
Solène Rowan Cost of cure damages and the relevance of the injured promisee's intention to cure
Solène Rowan Cost of cure damages and the relevance of the injured promisee's intention to cure Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Rowan, Solene (2017) Cost of cure damages and the
INTRODUCTION. The Principle of Estoppel
PART VIII ESTOPPEL I INTRODUCTION A The Principle of Estoppel An estoppel is a principle that prevents a party from asserting a contrary position to that which has already been established. An estoppel
UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA TEAM NO. 20
17 TH I N T E R N A T I O N A L M A R I T I M E L A W A R B I T R A T I O N M O O T, 2016 UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA TEAM NO. 20 MEMORANDUM FOR CLAIMANT ON BEHALF OF ZEUS SHIPPING AND TRADING COMPANY CLAIMANT
RHYS MICHAEL CULLEN Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. White, Keane and MacKenzie JJ
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA769/2013 [2014] NZCA 325 BETWEEN AND RHYS MICHAEL CULLEN Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 16 June 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: White, Keane and MacKenzie
Equity s New Child: The Birth of the Family Proprietary Estoppel
Equity s New Child: The Birth of the Family Proprietary Estoppel Zi Xiang Tan (Warren) * Introduction Much ink has been spilled in recent years on the common intention constructive trust ( CICT ) and the
Topic Pleading and Joinder of claims and parties, Representative and Class Actions 1) Res Judicata (Colbran )
WEEK 3 Topic Pleading and Joinder of claims and parties, Representative and Class Actions 1) Res Judicata (Colbran 363-370) Res judicata is a type of plea made in court that precludes the relitgation of
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI [2017] NZWHT AUCKLAND 2. MARCO EDWARDES AND CHARLOTTE RONA EDWARDES Claimant
![IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI [2017] NZWHT AUCKLAND 2. MARCO EDWARDES AND CHARLOTTE RONA EDWARDES Claimant](/thumbs/94/119693200.jpg "IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI [2017] NZWHT AUCKLAND 2. MARCO EDWARDES AND CHARLOTTE RONA EDWARDES Claimant")
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2016-100-0006 [2017] NZWHT AUCKL 2 BETWEEN MARCO EDWARDES CHARLOTTE RONA EDWARDES Claimant ARCHITECTURAL EDGE LIMITED First Respondent (Removed) SALLY BROWN SMITH
FURTHER ASSURANCES BOILERPLATE CLAUSE
FURTHER ASSURANCES BOILERPLATE CLAUSE Need to know A further assurances clause evidences the agreement of the contracting parties to do everything necessary to complete the transactions contemplated by
Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Williams, Venning and Mander JJ. A G V Rogers, M H McIvor and J Kim for Appellant M H Cooke for Respondent
ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF APPELLANT PURSUANT TO S 200 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR
SONSRAM TRUSTEE LIMITED First Appellant. HARRISON GRIERSON CONSULTANTS LIMITED Respondent. Harrison, Venning and Simon France JJ
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA182/2016 [2017] NZCA 264 BETWEEN SONSRAM TRUSTEE LIMITED First Appellant ARJUN SAMI Second Appellant AND HARRISON GRIERSON CONSULTANTS LIMITED Respondent Hearing:
Comparative analysis of aspects of damages: consequential loss and classification
626 Comparative analysis of aspects of damages: consequential loss and classification Maree Chetwin 1 1 College of Business & Economics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand Email: maree.chetwin@canterbury.ac.nz
THE FACTORS ACT, 1892
89 THE FACTORS ACT, 1892 56 Vic. No.8 Amended by Statute Law Revision Act of 1908, 8 Edw. 7 No. 18 An Act to Amend the Law relating to Factors [Assented to 23 August 1892] 1. Short title. This Act may
Unconscionability in Canadian Contract Law
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Law Reviews 7-1-1992
THE LAW OF CONTRIBUTION AN EQUITABLE DOCTRINE OR PART OF THE LAW OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT?
471 THE LAW OF CONTRIBUTION AN EQUITABLE DOCTRINE OR PART OF THE LAW OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT? Victoria Stace * This article looks at the changes made to the equitable doctrine of contribution by the New Zealand
International contracts and the choice of law in New Zealand
651 International contracts and the choice of law in New Zealand Dr N Richardson Senior Lecturer in Law University of Canterbury New Zealand Introduction An international contract is a contract that has
Commercial Law 2013 Exam Notes. Actual Authority Agency relationship already exists, question is the extent of an agent s authority
Commercial Law 2013 Exam Notes Actual Authority Agency relationship already exists, question is the extent of an agent s Actual Express Authority Can be created by a written contract or spoken words Consent
Defences in Contract. Edited by. Andrew Dyson James Goudkamp and Frederick Wilmot-Smith
Defences in Contract Edited by Andrew Dyson James Goudkamp and Frederick Wilmot-Smith OXFORD AND PORTLAND, OREGON 2017 Hart Publishing An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Hart Publishing Ltd Kemp House
HOT TOPICS FOR FINANCE LAWYERS. Jersey Chancery Bar Conference Thursday 16 th October Catherine Gibaud QC
HOT TOPICS FOR FINANCE LAWYERS Jersey Chancery Bar Conference Thursday 16 th October 2014 Catherine Gibaud QC HOT TOPICS FOR FINANCE LAWYERS Catherine Gibaud QC Rewriting History when can non-reliance
Contracts Final Exam Notes Formation of a contract What is a contract MUST Offer REASONABLE PERSON Acceptance
Contracts Final Exam Notes Formation of a contract What is a contract - Binding promise between two or more parties, reliant upon several important factors - Offer - Acceptance - Consideration - Certainty
PASTORAL AND GRAZING LEASES AND NATIVE TITLE
PASTORAL AND GRAZING LEASES AND NATIVE TITLE Graham Hiley QC The background jurisprudence in Mabo No 2, Wik and the Native Title Amendment Act 1998 concerning the extinguishment of native title on leases,
INTRODUCTION TIME TO MAKE DEFECTIVE CLAIMS
DEFECTIVE WORK DEFECTIVE WORK CLAIMS Jim Doyle Doyles Construction Lawyers INTRODUCTION A defective work claim is the most common claim made by owners. Unless otherwise stated in the contract, defective
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Re Queensland Police Credit Union Ltd [2013] QSC 273 PARTIES: FILE NO/S: BS 3893 of 2013 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: QUEENSLAND POLICE CREDIT UNION LIMITED
JUDGMENT. BPE Solicitors and another (Respondents) v Gabriel (Appellant)
Trinity Term [2015] UKSC 39 On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 1513 JUDGMENT BPE Solicitors and another (Respondents) v Gabriel (Appellant) before Lord Mance Lord Sumption Lord Carnwath Lord Toulson Lord
PERPETUAL TRUST LIMITED First Respondent. Randerson, Stevens and Venning JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT REASONS OF THE COURT. (Given by Stevens J)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA367/2012 [2013] NZCA 506 BETWEEN AND AND GIBBSTON DOWNS WINES LIMITED AND RFD FINANCE NO 2 LIMITED Appellants PERPETUAL TRUST LIMITED First Respondent JOHN MORRIS
TOLATA: Common misconceptions and update Rhys Taylor Barrister and Arbitrator 30 Park Place
TOLATA: Common misconceptions and update Rhys Taylor Barrister and Arbitrator 30 Park Place 10 Common misconceptions Misconception 1 of 10 It s family law and the result needs to be fair (fairness only
Case Note. Carty v London Borough Of Croydon. Andrew Knott. I Context
Case Note Carty v London Borough Of Croydon Andrew Knott Macrossans Lawyers, Brisbane, Australia I Context The law regulating schools, those who work in them, and those who deal with them, involves increasingly
COMMENT PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL IN NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMENT PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL IN NEW SOUTH WALES Since the case of Central London Property Trust Ltd v. High Trees House Ltd,l there has been a good deal of academic and judicial discussion of the operation,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A. D., 2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A. D., 2013 CLAIM NO. 104 OF 2013 BETWEEN (BYRON WARREN CLAIMANT ( (AND (SEABREEZE COMPANY LIMITED FIRST DEFENDANT ((In Receivership) (THE BELIZE BANK LIMITED SECOND DEFENDANT
SHORTER ARTICLES JUDICIAL SOVEREIGNTY AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
Cambridge Law Journal, 61(1), March 2002, pp. 53±65 Printed in Great Britain SHORTER ARTICLES JUDICIAL SOVEREIGNTY AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 ALISON L. YOUNG* SECTION 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998
Some ethical questions when opposing parties are. unrepresented or upon ceasing to act as a solicitor
Some ethical questions when opposing parties are unrepresented or upon ceasing to act as a solicitor Monash Guest Lecture in Ethics 9 March 2011 G.T. Pagone * I thought I might talk to you today about
The Weekly Law Reports 28 March W.L.R. *Ex parte MOLYNEAUX AND OTHERS Nov. 25 Taylor J.
The Weekly Law Reports 28 March 1986 1 W.L.R. 331 A [QUEEN'S BENCH IVISION] *Ex parte MOLYNEAUX AN OTHERS 1985 Nov. 25 Taylor J. g Crown Prerogative Treaty-making power Agreement between United Kingdom
!"#$%&'(&)'*+%*+,& /G$+:'($"0B",E$"#'8E,",0"?$+%'9*,$"..."HH" I'('9B0+%*,'09"..."H>" ?E$")*+02"/4'&$9:$"#J2$"..."HK"
!#$%&'(&)'*+%*+,& #$%$&'$()*+,-...- /(,011$2...3 )+'4',5678$9:5*9&7(('89%$9,(;< +& )*+,'$(=...>?$+%(*9&@9,$+1+$,*,'09...A @9,$+1+$,*,'090BC09,+*:,(...-- )$+B0+%*9:$*9&?$+%'9*,'09...-3?$+%'9*,'09B0+D+$*:E...-F
CHOICE OF LAW (GOVERNING LAW) BOILERPLATE CLAUSE
CHOICE OF LAW (GOVERNING LAW) BOILERPLATE CLAUSE Need to know A choice of law clause (or governing law clause) enables contracting parties to nominate the law which applies to govern their contract. The
~ HULL&HULLLLP. ~ _ B~irri~tel$ and Solicitors Trust 'E:rerience" PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL - CONSIDER IT A CLAIM AGAINST THE ASSETS OF AN ESTATE
~ HULL&HULLLLP ~ _ B~irri~tel$ and Solicitors Trust 'E:rerience" PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL - CONSIDER IT A CLAIM AGAINST THE ASSETS OF AN ESTATE Ian M. Hull and Suzana Popovic-Montag Ian M. Hull Tel: (416)