TOLATA: Common misconceptions and update Rhys Taylor Barrister and Arbitrator 30 Park Place
|
|
- Helena Hensley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TOLATA: Common misconceptions and update Rhys Taylor Barrister and Arbitrator 30 Park Place
2 10 Common misconceptions Misconception 1 of 10 It s family law and the result needs to be fair (fairness only plays very limited role) Touchstone parties intentions
3 10 Common misconceptions Misconception 2 of 10 The importance of express declaration of trust. Since April 1998 contained within the TR1 ALWAYS get the TR1 in joint names case. Very limited circumstances when you can depart from TR1 Fraud, common mistake, undue influence. Subsequent constructive trust/estoppel e.g. Clarke v Meadus [2010] EWHC 3117 (Ch) The beneficial interest under an express trust of a party who leaves the property on the breakdown of a relationship will not be affected merely because nothing is said or done about the beneficial interest at the time of departure, although the other arrangements then made by the parties may support the inference of a common intention that the beneficial interests should be varied. (Lewin on Trusts, 19 th edition, paragraph 9-060)
4 10 Common misconceptions Misconception 3 of 10 The role of contributions. They are merely evidence of what the parties may have intended, not an end in themselves. Must be clear what is gift, loan or direct contribution to purchase or significant development. Often woolly/inconsistent thinking here.
5 10 Common misconceptions Misconception 4 of 10 What to ask the client? Who said what, where and when? Get as much detail as possible (maybe need conference?)
6 10 Common misconceptions Misconception 5 of 10 The importance of consistency Need for clear letter before action But beware of months of open correspondence can be hostage to fortune
7 10 Common misconceptions Misconception 6 of 10 Need to prove detrimental reliance. What did claimant do in light of whatever was said? Would they have done it anyway?
8 10 Common misconceptions Misconception 7 of 10 What discussions are admissible and what discussions are made without prejudice.
9 10 Common misconceptions Misconception 8 of 10 How to start proceedings. Part 7 or Part 8? Is there a substantial dispute of fact? Order for sale only? Need to line up your ducks in either event. Part 8 exhibit evidence which you are relying upon
10 10 Common misconceptions Misconception 9 of 10 Costs The amount Always ask what are costs implications of this? Need to be realistic about costs budgeting Some family departments might require costs draughtsman
11 10 Common misconceptions Misconception 10 of 10 Complexity Far more complicated than is often given credit When the work needs to be incurred. Frontloading.
12 ADR of TOLATA disputes Problems with litigation Time it takes to get to trial and lack of judicial resources Costs: amount, budgeting, shifting Publicity Mediation But what if parties have wildly differing views as to the merits? Reluctance by mediators to give a view if does not settle. Early Neutral Evaluation See amendment to CPR 3(1)(m) from 1/10/15. Statutory backing to Seals v Williams [2015] EWHC 1829 (Ch) and Briggs LJ s recommendations in Get into the right parish Then for parties to finalise agreement? Arbitration, quick, enforceable under s.9aa and no costs shifting.
13 Case law update Bagum v Hafiz & Hai [2015] EWCA Civ 801 Wider family dispute. Mother + 2 x adult sons, TICs equal shares declared by parties when one son left. Later dispute re sale should there be sale or could one party buy the other out? What is role of trustees? s.6, have regard to rights of beneficiaries and not to act in contravention of equity, which arguably includes duty to get best price and not to favour one beneficiary over another. What is role of court? Can step into shoes of trustees (s.14) but range of matters to take into account at s.15 wider than s.6. No power to order one party buys the other out, but (on facts of case including purpose of trust and good comparables) can give one party option of first refusal. Likely to be rare, but don t overlook potential. N.b. PD40D esp 3.1, permission to bid
14 Case law update O Kelly v Davies [2014] EWCA Civ 1606 First instance finding that parties put property into the name of woman for purposes of benefit fraud. Remember Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340. Fraud then did not matter as was not relied upon in context of resulting trust. Trainspotters question post Stack v Dowden and Jones v Kernott does this principle apply in context of constructive trust (which is used in preference to the resulting trust in domestic consumer context. ) Here the man s interest was inferred from his actions in relation to dealing with the property. He did not need to plead fraud to explain his case. Man therefore successful on facts of case But beware of illegality issues
15 Case law update Curran v Collins [2015] EWCA Civ 404 Full frontal challenge to Lloyds Bank v Rosset dropped (but leave to appeal to SC has been sought) Difficulty of challenging first instance findings of fact. Excuse cases (Eves v Eves & Grant v Edwards) reviewed and tightened up. Capehorn v Harris [2015] EWCA Civ 955 Appeal from decision of DJ Langley in Central London County Court First instance judge wrong to say that court could impute (as opposed to infer) an agreement to co-own at stage 1 in single legal owner case. Cf: imputation when it comes to quantification or stage 2.
16 Case law update Graham-York v Graham-York and others [2015] EWCA Civ 72 Mortgage company seeking possession claim and equity asserted by way of defence. 25% interest inferred from conduct, which included contributions to purchase. Tomlinson LJ in quantification exercise, where it is permissible for the court to impute rather than infer a common intention as to the parties respective shares, the court is nevertheless not concerned with some form of redistributive justice. The enquiry into fairness is limited to property issues. Equity of exoneration akin to a whole course of dealing review when quantifying shares. Can t take benefit and not burden.
17 Case law update Southwell v Blackburn [2014] EWCA Civ 1347 Property bought in sole name of man who made promises, falling short of a promise to share the equity in the property, that woman would always have a home and be secure in the property. In reliance on the assurance, woman gave up her AST which she had spent 20,000 setting up. Lived as man and wife for a number of years. Constructive trust claim failed. Proprietary estoppel claim succeeded and woman got 28,500 lump sum ( 20k adjusted for inflation). Assurance, Reliance, Detriment made out. Assurance: clear and unequivocal vs. clear enough Property related? Detriment: Not a narrow or technical concept, not an accounting exercise. Court dodged question of benefit and burden when living together. Groundbreaking? Choosing between constructive trust and estoppel.
18 Case law update Davies v Davies & Davies [2015] EWHC 015 (Ch) The well known dictum, coined in Crabb v Arun, that a remedy for proprietary estoppel must be the minimum to do justice for the claimant. The value of the equity will depend upon (a) all the circumstances of the case, including (b) expectation and (c) detriment. The court must balance the proportionality of the expectation with that of the detriment incurred. Proportionality lies at the heart of the doctrine of proprietary estoppel and permeates its every application. When considering detriment this must be balanced against any relevant benefit enjoyed by the claimant. The court is not simply concerned with financial detriment but looks at all the circumstances in the round. When there is a clear understanding between the parties, falling short of a contract, In such a case the court s natural response is to fulfil the claimant s expectations. But if the claimant s expectations are uncertain, or extravagant, or out of all proportion to the detriment which the claimant has suffered the court can and should recognise that the claimant s equity should be satisfied in another (and generally more limited) way. The question of preventing unconscionable conduct permeates all considerations. The end result must be a just one having regard to the assumption made by the party asserting the estoppel and the detriment which he has experienced.
19 Case law update See also:- Lothian v Webb hotel/friend (Westlaw 2014, WL ) Davies v Davies Farming/brothers [2015] EWHC 1384 (Ch) 3 questions for estoppel:- Is an equity established? (Assurance, Reliance, Detriment) What is the extent of the equity? (Balancing of any benefits against Detriment) What relief is appropriate to satisfy the equity? (What is just in all the circumstances?)
20 Stuff at the end These slides are not intended as formal legal advice and should not be relied upon as such.
1. This update will focus on three core areas of law and practice:
ToLATA 1996 Update Andrew Commins, Barrister, St John s Chambers Published April 2017 1. This update will focus on three core areas of law and practice: a. Equitable accounting (EA) b. Imputing and inferring
More informationStepping off the Family Lawyers Desert Island
Stepping off the Family Lawyers Desert Island : Procedure and Tactics for Family Lawyers Andrzej Bojarski Barrister, Mediator and Family Arbitrator Head of 36Family Why Venture off the Desert Island? TOLATA
More informationTOLATA UPDATE Issuing a claim. Claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996
TOLATA UPDATE 2013 Issuing a claim Claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 A claim is normally brought under CPR Part 8 (short claim form and detailed witness statement in
More informationThe Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996
A Practical Guide to The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 for Family Lawyers Thrings LLP, Bath 5 July 2017 RODERICK MOORE, BARRISTER Introduction 1. A working knowledge of the Trusts
More informationExpectation, Reliance and Detriment. What is it the essential aim of the remedy of proprietary estoppel?
Expectation, Reliance and Detriment. What is it the essential aim of the remedy of proprietary estoppel? Elizabeth Fitzgerald discusses this controversial topic in the wake of the recent decision of the
More informationImputation, Fairness and the Family Home
Imputation, Fairness and the Family Home Graham-York v York [2015] EWCA Civ 72 The recent Court of Appeal ruling in Graham-York v York 1 makes for interesting reading. The parties cohabited for over 33
More informationCO-OWNERSHIP OF LAND, CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND A FEW OTHER THINGS.
CO-OWNERSHIP OF LAND, CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND A FEW OTHER THINGS. 1. Today I am talking about co-ownership of property. This is a huge topic, so I thought for a one-hour seminar I would cover only a few
More informationOliver Wooding, Barrister St John s Chambers
Wills, Trusts and Tax Team Contentious Probate Case Law Update 2016 Oliver Wooding, Barrister St John s Chambers Our apologies this has not been a vintage year. Supreme Court will hear a further quantum
More informationLIFE AFTER KERNOTT V JONES
LIFE AFTER KERNOTT V JONES Tim Walsh, Guildhall Chambers Claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 generally 1. Claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act
More informationTOLATA. Trusts of Land Where are we now? Michelle Stevens-Hoare Hardwicke
TOLATA Trusts of Land Where are we now? by Michelle Stevens-Hoare Hardwicke Michelle Stevens-Hoare aka Brie has developed a successful specialist property practice focusing particular on real property,
More informationJONES v KERNOTT AN OPPORTUNITY FOR SOME CLARIFICATION
JONES v KERNOTT AN OPPORTUNITY FOR SOME CLARIFICATION Zoe Henry 1 Oxford Street, Nottingham, NG1 5BH. Tel +44 (0) 115 941 8851 Fax +44 (0) 115 941 4169 DX 10042 Nottingham 96a New Walk, Leicester, LE1
More informationProperty Law Briefing
MARCH 2018 Zachary Bredemear May I serve by email? The CPR vs Party Wall Act 1996 The Party Wall Act 1996 contains provisions that deal with service of documents by email (s.15(1a)-(1c)). The provisions
More informationThe case of Moore v Moore [2016]
Down on the farm Rebecca Cattermole highlights the current position on the doctrine of estoppel in the context of recent case law Rebecca Cattermole is a barrister at Tanfield Chambers It was a useful
More informationUNLOCKING LAND LAW. Thomas v Clydesdale Bank plc [2010] EWHC 2755
Update July 2012 Chapter 1 Definition of land Mew v Tristmire [2011] EWCA Civ 912 This case concerned issues that had been previously raised in Elitestone v Morris [1997] 1 WLR 687 (see Unlocking Land
More informationEQUITABLE ACCOUNTING AFTER STACK v DOWDEN
EQUITABLE ACCOUNTING AFTER STACK v DOWDEN The typical situation: 1. Mr & Mrs Smith married in 1985 and purchased their home in 1988 with the assistance of a sizeable mortgage from a high street bank. They
More informationAdverse Possession Update
Adverse Possession Update Alex Troup St John s Chambers 8 th June 2010 The old law Unregistered land: the "old law" applies, i.e. 12 years adverse possession gives squatter possessory title Registered
More informationTrusts and intervenors in financial remedies cases
Trusts and intervenors in financial remedies cases Zoe Saunders, St John s Chambers Published on 16th October 2014 Zoe will look at trusts in financial remedies post-petrodel and top tips for dealing with
More informationUnjust enrichment? Bank secures equitable charge where it failed to get a legal charge: Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus [2015] UKSC 66
Unjust enrichment? Bank secures equitable charge where it failed to get a legal charge: Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus [2015] UKSC 66 1. The decision of the Supreme Court in Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd
More informationEnforcing oral agreements to develop land in English law Panesar, S. Published version deposited in CURVE March 2012
Enforcing oral agreements to develop land in English law Panesar, S. Published version deposited in CURVE March 2012 Original citation & hyperlink: Panesar, S. (2009) Enforcing oral agreements to develop
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D GERALD ALEXANDER RHABURN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2012 CLAIM NO. 31 of 2011 MICHELLE CARD CLAIMANT AND GERALD ALEXANDER RHABURN DEFENDANT Hearings 2012 24 th January 6 th February 7 th May 31 st May 16 th July Ms.
More informationREVIEW OF COMPARATIVE LAW VOLUME XXVIII YEAR 2017
REVIEW OF COMPARATIVE LAW VOLUME XXVIII YEAR 2017 ENGLAND: DID THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF JONES V KERNOTT CLARIFY THE LAW IN RELATION TO TRUSTS OF THE FAMILY HOME? Bartłomiej Orawiec*
More informationFIGHTING INHERITANCE ACT CLAIMS - A GUIDE FOR CHARITIES. In times of financial and fiscal austerity Charities face lean times.
FIGHTING INHERITANCE ACT CLAIMS - A GUIDE FOR CHARITIES In times of financial and fiscal austerity Charities face lean times. All of those who work and/or live in London will see individuals seeking to
More informationTLATA Update. 1. Inference and imputation 2. Recent cases of note 3. Brexit Britain. Andrew Commins, Barrister, St John s Chambers
TLATA Update Andrew Commins, Barrister, St John s Chambers Published July 2017 1. Inference and imputation 2. Recent cases of note 3. Brexit Britain Andrew Commins 2017 1 P a g e Introduction Article I
More informationPart 18 Questions in RTA Cases Where Fraud is Alleged. By Deborah Tompkinson Clerksroom August 2012
Part 18 Questions in RTA Cases Where Fraud is Alleged By Deborah Tompkinson Clerksroom August 2012 Telephone 0845 083 3000 or go to www.clerksroom.com 1 Introduction If you have got this far, then you
More informationDurham Research Online
Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 20 January 2016 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Hayward, A. (2015) 'Cohabitants,
More informationCuthbert v Gair (t/a The Bowes Manor Equestrian Centre) [2008] APP.L.R. 09/03
JUDGMENT : Master Haworth : Costs Court. 3 rd September 2008 1. This is an appeal pursuant to CPR Rule 47.20 from a decision of Costs Officer Martin in relation to a detailed assessment which took place
More informationAlternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) In Chapter 36 of his Final Report Jackson LJ wrote:
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) In Chapter 36 of his Final Report Jackson LJ wrote: 4.2 I recommend that: (i) There should be a serious campaign (a) to ensure that all litigation lawyers and judges
More informationUpdate on contentious probate and trust cases
Update on contentious probate and trust cases Richard Gold, St John s Chambers Published on 27 th October [References in square brackets are to paragraph numbers in the judgments.] Hutchinson v Grant [2016]
More informationCONTRACTS. Miscellaneous applications of ACL for Contracts:! 6 PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL! Assumption! Detrimental Reliance!...
CONTRACTS Miscellaneous applications of ACL for Contracts:! 6 PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL! 7 1. Assumption!... 7 2. Detrimental Reliance!... 7 3. Unconscionability!... 8 Remedy of Promissory Estoppel!... 8 PRIVITY!
More informationEquitable Estoppel: Defining the Detriment
Bond Law Review Volume 11 Issue 1 Article 8 1999 Equitable Estoppel: Defining the Detriment Denis S. K Ong Bond University, denis_ong@bond.edu.au Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr
More informationESTOPPEL BY CONDUCT AND ELECTION
ESTOPPEL BY CONDUCT AND ELECTION by The Honourable Mr Justice K. R. Handley AO BA, LLB (Sydney), Honorary Bencher, Lincoln's Inn, Visiting Fellow, Wolfson College, Cambridge A Judge of the Court of Appeal
More informationAdjudication in a new landscape
Adjudication in a new landscape Charles Auld, St John s Chambers Published on 13 th March 2014 Introduction 1. Under the Land Registration Act 1925 disputes were referred to the Solicitor to HM Land Registry.
More informationDavies v. Davies the Cowshed Cinderella and the clock strikes 12.
Davies v. Davies the Cowshed Cinderella and the clock strikes 12. Leslie Blohm QC, St John s Chambers Published on 7 th October 2016 There is much academic debate about how the courts should go about assessing
More informationTHE INHERITANCE ACT IN 2016
THE INHERITANCE ACT IN 2016 Tim Walsh, Guildhall Chambers 1. There have been two major developments in the law concerning the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 in the last two
More informationJudgement As Approved by the Court
Neutral Citation Number: [2007] EWCA Civ 1166 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION MR JUSTICE WYN WILLIAMS
More information~ HULL&HULLLLP. ~ _ B~irri~tel$ and Solicitors Trust 'E:rerience" PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL - CONSIDER IT A CLAIM AGAINST THE ASSETS OF AN ESTATE
~ HULL&HULLLLP ~ _ B~irri~tel$ and Solicitors Trust 'E:rerience" PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL - CONSIDER IT A CLAIM AGAINST THE ASSETS OF AN ESTATE Ian M. Hull and Suzana Popovic-Montag Ian M. Hull Tel: (416)
More informationBefore: MRS JUSTICE O'FARRELL DBE Between:
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 2395 (TCC) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT Case No: HT-2017-000173 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A
More informationA PRACTITIONER Practitioner
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 44 LCDT 003/15 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN THE CANTERBURY STANDARDS COMMITTEE (No 1) Applicant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ESAU RALPH BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER A. RAJKUMAR. Reasons for decision
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV No. 2010-00120 BETWEEN MALYN BERNARD CLAIMANT AND NESTER PATRICIA RALPH ESAU RALPH DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER
More informationProperty Litigation Association Property Bar Association Joint Seminar London, 19 September 2012
Property Litigation Association Property Bar Association Joint Seminar London, 19 September 2012 PROPRIETARY RESTITUTION: RIGHTS AND REMEDIES Professor Graham Virgo Professor of English Private Law Faculty
More informationBefore : LADY JUSTICE ARDEN LORD JUSTICE UNDERHILL and LORD JUSTICE BRIGGS with MASTER GORDON SAKER (Senior Costs Judge) sitting as an Assessor
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 1096 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM BIRKENHEAD COUNTY COURT AND FAMILY COURT District Judge Campbell A89YJ009 Before : Case No: A2/2015/1787
More informationOVERVIEW OF CONTRACT LAW
OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT LAW Liability is generally the key issue in regards to contractual disputes. Purpose of K law is to provide the rules which determine when one party is liable to another under or in
More informationKernott, Stack, and Oxley made simple: a practitioner s view. Juanita Roche* Introduction
Kernott, Stack, and Oxley made simple: a practitioner s view Juanita Roche* Introduction The law on constructive trusts of the home has a reputation for being difficult. This reputation is undeserved:
More informationCOSTS IN PROBATE AND ESTATE DISPUTES ELIS GOMER
COSTS IN PROBATE AND ESTATE DISPUTES ELIS GOMER Costs in probate and estate disputes: costs will come from the estate and other myths The recent Inheritance Act case of Williams v Martin 1 in which the
More informationInsolvency judge declares divorce consent order signed by bankrupt husband void
Insolvency judge declares divorce consent order signed by bankrupt husband void Ian Robert [Trustee in bankruptcy of Jonathan Elichaoff (deceased)] v. Sarah Woodall [2016] EWHC 2987 (Ch) Article by David
More informationFinancial Assistance for the Purchase of the Company s Shares
1. General Proposition: Financial Assistance for the Purchase of the Company s Shares Problem Solving Methodology: 1. State general proposition 2. Is the Company providing Financial Assistance 3. If so
More informationDavies v Davies. The story of the Cowshed Cinderella
Davies v Davies or The story of the Cowshed Cinderella 'Cowshed Cinderella' wins 1.3m from her parents after being made to milk cows while her sisters partied Davies v Davies 1 in a far away country known
More informationAlex Troup Head of Wills and Trusts Team
Alex Troup Head of Wills and Trusts Team Call 1998 (Gray s Inn) Qualifications MA (Oxon) Literae Humaniores, William Shaw Scholarship and Karmel Award (both Grays Inn) Professional Memberships Chancery
More informationSection 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989
Section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 Katie Hooper St John s Chambers Friday, 17 th June 2011 Section 2: Contracts for the sale etc of land to be made by signed writing SS
More informationBefore : SIR WILLIAM BLACKBURNE Between : - and. - and - - and -
Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 87 (Ch) Case No: HC-2014-000167 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 22/01/2015 Before : SIR WILLIAM
More informationand- ANDREW RONNAN AND SOLARPOWER PV LIMITED
Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 1774 (Ch) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION MANCHESTER DISTRICT REGISTRY HHJ Waksman QC sitting as a Judge of the High Court Case No: 2MA30319 The High
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUIT NO.: 983 of 1996 BETWEEN JOAN BERNADETTE MAINGOT Executrix of the estate of Rose Mary Maingot, deceased Claimant and MONICA DEVAUX Defendant Appearances For
More informationEnforcement of Judgements: Orders for Sale. Jonathan Owen
Enforcement of Judgements: Orders for Sale Jonathan Owen Introduction 1. The Practice Direction to Part 70 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (hereafter the CPR ) sets out the methods of enforcing money
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2011-04424 BETWEEN VERNA FOSTER Claimant AND RENEE AYANA BAIN Defendant Before the Honourable Mr. Justice R. Rahim Appearances:
More informationPre-Action Protocol for Professional Negligence
Page 1 of 7 Pre-Action Protocol for Professional Negligence PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL THIS PROTOCOL MERGES THE TWO PROTOCOLS PREVIOUSLY PRODUCED BY THE SOLICITORS INDEMNITY FUND (SIF)
More informationALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION A HANDY GUIDE
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION A HANDY GUIDE An introduction At Brodies we understand when litigation is the best option for our clients but also where their interests are best served by dispute resolution
More informationBefore : MR JUSTICE MORGAN Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2008] EWHC 459 (Ch) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION Case No: HC07C01375 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 11/03/2008 Before : MR JUSTICE MORGAN
More informationIllegality Defense Developments In UK And Cayman Islands
Illegality Defense Developments In UK And Cayman Islands By James Elliott and William Peake November 27, 2018, 4:39 PM EST The principles that a person should not benefit from his own wrongdoing and that
More informationTake It All: The unhappy marriage of bankruptcy and financial remedies on divorce
Take It All: The unhappy marriage of bankruptcy and financial remedies on divorce Bethany Hardwick, Barrister, St John s Chambers Published on 27 April 2017 CONTENTS: A. Statutes for reference Page 2 B.
More informationBody Corporate Plan No. PS509946A v VM Romano Construction Group Pty Ltd & Anor (Domestic Building) [2009] VCAT 1662
VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION DOMESTIC BUILDING LIST VCAT REFERENCE NO. D679/2007 CATCHWORDS Whether leave to withdraw earlier admissions should be granted APPLICANT FIRST
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND oo000oo BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER JUDGMENT
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. CV 2007-1149 BETWEEN PAUL DE FOUR CLAIMANT AND GAIL RAHIM DEFENDANT -----------------oo000oo-------------------- BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationA response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers December 2017
Civil Justice Council ADR and Civil Justice A response by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers December 2017 Page 1 of 10 The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) is a not-for-profit organisation
More informationAhmad Al-Naimi (t/a Buildmaster Construction Services) v. Islamic Press Agency Inc [2000] APP.L.R. 01/28
CA on Appeal from High Court of Justice TCC (HHJ Bowsher QC) before Waller LJ; Chadwick LJ. 28 th January 2000. JUDGMENT : Lord Justice Waller: 1. This is an appeal from the decision of His Honour Judge
More informationA lively controversy The role of detriment in the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. Caroline Shea QC. Falcon Chambers
A lively controversy The role of detriment in the doctrine of proprietary estoppel Caroline Shea QC Falcon Chambers 1. In this paper I consider some of the issues relating to detriment as that concept
More informationCOSTS SPECIAL CASES COSTS PAYABLE BY OR TO PARTICULAR PERSONS
COSTS SPECIAL CASES PART 48 PART 48 Contents of this Part I Rule 48.1 Rule 48.2 Rule 48.3 Rule 48.4 Rule 48.5 Rule 48.6 Rule 48.6A II Rule 48.7 Rule 48.8 Rule 48.9 Rule 48.10 COSTS PAYABLE BY OR TO PARTICULAR
More informationGalliford Try Construction Ltd v Mott MacDonald Ltd [2008] APP.L.R. 03/14
JUDGMENT : Mr Justice Coulson : TCC. 14 th March 2008 Introduction 1. This is an application by the Defendant for an order that paragraphs 39 to 48 inclusive of the witness statement of Mr Joseph Martin,
More informationJUDGMENT. Rolle Family and Company Limited (Appellant) v Rolle (Respondent) (Bahamas)
Michaelmas Term [2017] UKPC 35 Privy Council Appeal No 0095 of 2015 JUDGMENT Rolle Family and Company Limited (Appellant) v Rolle (Respondent) (Bahamas) From the Court of Appeal of the Commonwealth of
More informationAfrica and Arbitration: Predicting the future through historical lenses. Enforcement of awards: challenges and practical considerations
Africa and Arbitration: Predicting the future through historical lenses Enforcement of awards: challenges and practical considerations 11 September 2014 1. Introduction The past 10 years have seen a significant
More informationOver 50s Life Cover Proposal and Declaration of Trust for Life Policy
Over 50s Life Cover Proposal and Declaration of Trust for Life Policy Flexible Trust It is important that you have sought professional advice before completing this trust deed. Date and Declaration of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER REASONS
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. CV 2009-01049 BETWEEN RUDOLPH SYDNEY CLAIMANT AND JOSEPH THOMAS DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES
More informationRTA Post Jackson How to deal with them 3 months on what have we learned?
www.clerksroom.com Administration: Equity House Blackbrook Park Avenue Taunton Somerset TA1 2PX DX: 97188 Taunton Blackbrook T: 0845 083 3000 F: 0845 083 3001 mail@clerksroom.com www.clerksroom.com RTA
More informationBefore : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ROTH Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 1830 (Ch) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION REVENUE LIST Case No: HC-2013-000527 Royal Courts of Justice Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL
More informationCase Note. PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL AS A LAST RESORT Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] 2 AC 415; [2013] 3 WLR 1
(2014) 26 SAcLJ Piercing the Corporate Veil as a Last Resort 249 Case Note PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL AS A LAST RESORT Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] 2 AC 415; [2013] 3 WLR 1 This
More informationCHARGING ORDERS INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURE. Tom Morris
CHARGING ORDERS INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURE Tom Morris tmorris@landmarkchambers.co.uk Overview (1) General principles (2) The court s discretion (3) Procedure for obtaining a charging order (1) Introduction:
More informationBrightman J, in Ottway Norman[1972] Ch 698 identified the basic requirements for a fully secret trust:
Secret trusts In this month s CPD we are going to look at a secret trusts and ensure that the student can identify and distinguish between the two different types of secret trusts. The paper will also
More informationIN THE SOUTHEND COUNTY COURT CASE NO 0BQ IRVING BENJAMIN GRAHAM. SAND MARTIN HEIGHTS RESIDENTS COMPANY LIMITED Respondent JUDGMENT
IN THE SOUTHEND COUNTY COURT CASE NO 0BQ 12347 HHJ MOLONEY QC BETWEEN IRVING BENJAMIN GRAHAM Appellant And SAND MARTIN HEIGHTS RESIDENTS COMPANY LIMITED Respondent JUDGMENT [handed down at Southend Crown
More informationTrusts Law 463 Fall Term Lecture Notes No. 3. Bailment is difficult because it bridges property, tort and contract.
Trusts Law 463 Fall Term 2013 Lecture Notes No. 3 TRUST AND BAILMENT Bailment is difficult because it bridges property, tort and contract. Bailment exists where one person (the bailee) is voluntarily possessed
More informationBEDDOE ORDERS: ADEQUATE COSTS PROTECTION FOR TRUSTEES AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES? Jennifer Seaman
BEDDOE ORDERS: ADEQUATE COSTS PROTECTION FOR TRUSTEES AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES? Jennifer Seaman 1 Introduction 1. This paper will focus on Beddoe Orders and whether they provide suitable costs protection
More information02-Dec The legal environment. The legal environment. The Auditor s Legal Liability
The Auditor s Legal Liability The legal environment Litigation related to alleged audit failures have caused some concern in the profession The requirement to hold a practising certificate imposes an obligation
More informationCivil Procedure Lecture Notes Lecture 1: Overview of a Civil Proceeding
Civil Procedure Lecture Notes Lecture 1: Overview of a Civil Proceeding Civil dispute o Any legal dispute that is not a criminal dispute o Could be either a public or private law matter o Includes relatively
More informationTwenty Years Forward, Twenty Years Back A Legal Review. Outline of a Talk to the Professional Indemnity Forum Conference
Twenty Years Forward, Twenty Years Back A Legal Review Outline of a Talk to the Professional Indemnity Forum Conference William Flenley QC, Hailsham Chambers 1 Summary 1. I have been asked to speak about
More informationArticle by David Bowden. Dr Brian May & Anita Dobson v. Wavell Group Limited & Dr Farid Bizzari Claim Number: A02CL398
Appeal judge allows 75k legal costs to Anita Dobson and Queen s Brian May for nuisance caused by their neighbour s Kensington super basement construction Dr Brian May & Anita Dobson v. Wavell Group Limited
More informationSurveys for Hello from the Other Side: Judge Panel on Ethics and Court Procedures
PRESENTED AT 12 th Annual Consumer Bankruptcy Practice July 14 15, 2016 Galveston, Texas Surveys for Hello from the Other Side: Judge Panel on Ethics and Court Procedures Sarah Wood (Moderator) Law Clerk
More informationModernising Succession: Law Commission Consultation
Modernising Succession: Law Commission Consultation Last month (13 th July 2017) the Law Commission launched a consultation paper to tackle issues surrounding the law of Wills, chiefly aiming to bring
More informationAlbon (t/a NA Carriage Co) v Naza Motor Trading Sdn Bhd (No 4) [2007] APP.L.R. 07/31
JUDGMENT : Mr Justice Lightman: Chancery Division. 31 st July 2007 INTRODUCTION 1. I have given a series of judgments on interlocutory applications in this action. The action relates to the business dealings
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2012-01391 BETWEEN CAROL ANNE WILSON Claimant AND BOSWELL CHARLES Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES
More informationGENERAL RULES ABOUT COSTS
PRACTICE DIRECTION PART 44 DIRECTIONS RELATING TO PART 44 GENERAL RULES ABOUT COSTS SECTION 7 SOLICITOR S DUTY TO NOTIFY CLIENT: RULE 44.2 7.1 For the purposes of rule 44.2 client includes a party for
More informationTHE LEGAL EXECUTIVE AS PRACTISING AND QUALIFIED LAWYERS
Irish Institute of Legal Executives Ltd. THE LEGAL EXECUTIVE AS PRACTISING AND QUALIFIED LAWYERS PUTTING CONSUMERS OF LEGAL SERVICES FIRST PAPER FOR STAKEHOLDERS Presented by The Irish Institute of Legal
More informationBefore: MR JUSTICE EDWARDS-STUART Between:
Neutral Citation Number: [2011] EWHC 3313 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Case No: CO/7435/2011 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 13/12/2011
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN MUKESH SIRJU VIDESH SAMUEL AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINDIAD AND TOBAGO DECISION
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2014-03454 BETWEEN MUKESH SIRJU VIDESH SAMUEL Claimants AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINDIAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE
More informationThe learner can: 1.1 Distinguish between the civil and criminal jurisdiction. 1.2 Explain the scope of civil litigation.
Unit 9 Title: Civil Litigation Level: 3 Credit Value: 7 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the context of civil litigation within the English and Welsh legal system Assessment criteria The
More informationCOLLEGE CHAMBERS ANCILLARY RELIEF LECTURE JANUARY 2010 THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION AND TRUSTS OF LAND CLAIMS IN ANCILLARY RELIEF CASES
COLLEGE CHAMBERS ANCILLARY RELIEF LECTURE JANUARY 2010 THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION AND TRUSTS OF LAND CLAIMS 1.1 Interveners 1.2 Beneficial interest in FMH 1.3 Loaned monies 1.4 Gift 1.5 Evidence 1.6 Interveners
More informationJUDGMENT. Tiuta International Limited (in liquidation) (Respondent) v De Villiers Surveyors Limited (Appellant)
Michaelmas Term [2017] UKSC 77 On appeal from: [2016] EWCA Civ 661 JUDGMENT Tiuta International Limited (in liquidation) (Respondent) v De Villiers Surveyors Limited (Appellant) before Lady Hale, President
More informationLIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT
LAWS OF KENYA LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT CHAPTER 22 Revised Edition 2012 [2010] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev. 2012]
More informationBest Interests Applications to the Court of Protection
Best Interests Applications to the Court of Protection Bristol Marriot Royal Hotel - Thursday, 21st March 2013 by Charlie Newington-Bridges Historical Background Law Commission Proposals 1. The Law Commission,
More informationThe Current Regime. Unreasonable Behaviour
Lord Justice Jackson s Supplemental Report into Civil Litigation Costs After many months of work, Lord Justice Jackson s report on fixed costs is now available. This briefing considers his proposals and
More informationVariation of Lump Sums All Change on Costs Allowances. Coram Chambers. Michael Horton Richard Yorke. 21 March 2013
Variation of Lump Sums All Change on Costs Allowances Coram Chambers Michael Horton Richard Yorke 21 March 2013 1.5 CPD points Introduction 1. Today s talk will cover: A brief introduction to the decision
More informationCommercial Litigation Seminar COSTS. Maurice Collins SC Monday 13 February 2012
Commercial Litigation Seminar COSTS Maurice Collins SC Monday 13 February 2012 PRELIMINARY 1. There are many aspects of the process by which an order for costs is, so to speak, translated into a sum of
More informationLegal Strategies - case law and arguments to combat plaintiffs strategies to defeat arbitration agreements.
Legal Strategies - case law and arguments to combat plaintiffs strategies to defeat arbitration agreements. Operational Strategies - forms, policies, procedures and practices to combat plaintiffs strategies
More informationB e f o r e: MR JUSTICE OUSELEY. Between: THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF ASSOCIATION OF BRITISH COMMUTERS LIMITED Claimant
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Crim 2169 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT CO/498/2017 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Thursday, 29 June
More information