F LDD WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ORIGINAL THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. OLERh OF GQURT SUPREME OF QHI JUL CLERK OF C URT

Transcription

1 ORIGINAL THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2364 W. McMicken ave WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Petitioner STATE of OHIO, ex rel. V. Vickie Roland-Staffend Respondent 6716 Yankee Rd. Middletown, Ohio OLERh OF GQURT SUPREME OF QHI F LDD JUL CLERK OF C URT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 Table of Contents WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Petition Pleading Affidavit of indigency Affidavit of Facts Writ of Habeas Corpus requested

3 OHIO SUPREME COURT Robin Roland Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus State of Ohio, ex rel. V. Vickie Staffend Roland Now comes Petitioner to request this Honorable Court to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to inquire into the detention and restraint of the parties' minor child, Cassandra Nicole Roland. o Attached are Facts in support of o Pleading o And the actual Writ of Habeas Corpus Petitioner requests. The writ of habeas corpus is the oldest remedy known to determine custody or visitation of children. There is a restraint under color of law. There is a need for expediency, equity and, above all, the best interests of the child. The primary factor in invoking the writ is consideration of the child's best interests. The statute never limits the common law jurisdiction of the court to entertain habeas corpus proceedings, nor curtail the broad inherent equitable powers of the court concerning custody of the children. There has been a Show cause/ Contempt action and sentencing pending since There is no other adequate remedy at law. BRENT ROSS Notary Poblic, State of Ohio My Commission Expires April

4 Pleadine in Suppoort of Writ of Habeas Corpus Petitioner requests that this Honorable Court order Habeas Corpus in order to show cause as to the detention of said offspring. Petitioner is acting on his behalf of the best interests of the child and of the state, hence the People, ex rel. The writ must be made returnable in the county where it was issued and Respondent brought before the Honorable Judge Barbara Schneider Carter, a judge of Butler County Common Pleas Court, Domestic Division, or, in case of absence or disability, before some other judge of the same court, at Hamilton, Ohio, forthwith to do and receive what our said judge shall then and there consider: Provide cause for the detention of records including proper birth date, social security number, medical and school records concerning Cassandra Nicole Roland in her behalf; and summon the said Respondent to then and there to appear before our said judge, to show the cause of the taking, restraining and detention of the said child, Cassandra Nicole Roland and said records and to order the respondent to show cause why the person and records detained should not be released so that the ends of justice are to be served. Petitioner is not requesting the presence of the said child at the hearing as this would not be in the best interest of the child. Further litigation is not in the best interest of this child. It is for this reason that Petitioner seeks this Writ to cure. Please Note: This is a Constitutional Jurisdiction Writ requested, not a statuatory. 1

5 In re Black (1973), 36 Ohio St. 3d The Court of Appeals and Supreme Court have original jurisdiction in habeas actions concerning juveniles. The exclusive jurisdiction of the juvenile court as to matters concerning minors concerns only statutory, as opposed to constitutional jurisdiction. BRENT Notary Public, State 01Ohio my Commission 2ptE6 iras Apnl 8 Burgoo.biscuits@gmaii.com 2

6 THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2364 W. McMicken ave Petitioner STATE of OHIO, ex rel. WRIT OF IHABEAS CORPIIS FRcTS lo SOpem- V. Vickie Roland-Staffend Respondent 6716 Yankee Rd. Middletown, Ohio 45044

7 Now comes Affiant, being of sound mind and competent to testify and states that The following FACTS IN SUPPORT are based upon firsthand, personal knowledge, is true, correct and certain, so help me, God Petitioner, Respondent and child all reside in the state of Ohio. Parties have a Shared parenting decree out of Butler County, Ohio. Respondent has been convicted of two counts of contempt of court and sentenced to 30 days in jail, after which Respondent rammed her car into Petitioner's, with said offspring on board. She was cited for aggravated, vehicular assault by West Chester Police. The contempt hearing and subsequent contempt/ show cause hearings have been cancelled. This was 12 years ago! Stephen Alfred Yarborough ("Judge For Hire" as his business cards of which he passed out at the courthouse said) entered this case with no jurisdiction or authority of law. He failed to identify the parties, failed to identify the controversy and failed to recognize the venue jurisdiction in which the offense was committed. ORC Stephen Alfred Yarborough's commission of lies and fraud under the color of law are too numerous to list here, but it is obvious that he lacked the basic elements of jurisdiction and never provided any Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law upon which to appeal or affect any remedy. To wit: he incarcerated Petitioner without disclosing nature or cause and continued to use false addresses to obtain failures of service simply to pad his coffers. 1

8 Respondent is using a Yarborough entry from 2000 to deny all records, rights or remedy to petitioner. This "order" states That Petitioner's visitation will be terminated until he cooperates with the mental health professionals. First, there was no visitation, there is no visitation. That is not at issue in this Habeas Corpus. Second, there were already two psychological evaluations in the file which recommended that petitioner have shared parenting. Third, Stephen Alfred Yarborough incarcerated Petitioner for a year in a jail where there were no mental health professionals available at all and Petitioner was denied his necessary medication. Dr. Skales had to personally call the jail and demand that the jail administer Petitioner's anti-depressants. She had to personally send Petitioner's case manager to jail to see to this. Anyway, the extreme prejudice and outright fraud by Stephen Alfred Yarborough went on and on, all of which can be documented and verified with substantial affidavits. Suffice it to say: No Rights= No Remedy. Add to this, Respondent, NOT petitioner violated this Yarborough " order" by bringing said child to Petitioner for babysitting purposes under threat that he cooperate or " you will never see her again." Petitioner has had regular, frequent parenting time for a nine year period during which the parties were quite amenable. It is during the past 15 months or so that Respondent has denied all access to records, accounts, parenting time, church, 2

9 school records and all the elements of the best interests of the child. It is Mandatory that parties attend mediation before returning to court. This is in writing in our divorce decree. The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is outlined in Article IV, Section 2(B) of the Ohio Constitution. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in this constitutional habeas corpus. There is no other adequate remedy at l aw. ^^EN^^f Ohio N^ WVVission ExPires ppro 18, 2016 Robin Roland 3

10 Writ of Habeas Corpus The Supreme Court,State of Ohio, ss.: To the sheriff of our several counties, greeting: We command you that you bring the body of Vickie Staffend-Roland of 6716 Yankee Rd. Liberty Township, Ohio detaining and restraining the liberty of Cassandra Roland, as it is said, you take and have before the Honorable Judge Barbara Schneider Carter, a judge of Butler County Common Pleas Court, Domestic Division, or, in case of absence or disability, before some other judge of the same court, at Hamilton, Ohio, forthwith to do and receive what our said judge shall then and there consider: Provide cause for the detention of records including proper birthdate, social security number concerning in her behalf; and summon the said Respondent to then and there to appear before our said judge, to show the cause of the taking, restraining and detention of the said child, Cassandra Nicole Roland. Witness, at this day of, in the year