IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NUMBER STATE, EX REL. ELIZABETH A. KOBLY, ET AL. RELATORS. vs. YOUNGSTOWN CITY COUNCIL, ET AL.
|
|
- Berenice Hall
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ORIGlNAC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NUMBER STATE, EX REL. ELIZABETH A. KOBLY, ET AL. RELATORS vs. YOUNGSTOWN CITY COUNCIL, ET AL. RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS' MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO RELATORS' MOTION TO STRIKE EXHIBITS FROM ANSWER AND TO STRIKE RESPONDENTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS JOHN B. JUHASZ (23777) 7081 WEST BOULEVARD, SUITE 4 YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO (330) FAX: (330) jbjjurisdoc@yahoo.com ATTORNEY FOR RELATORS IRIS TORRES GUGLUCELLO LAW DIRECTOR (19416) ANTHONY J. FARRIS COUNSEL OF RECORD DEPUTY LAW DIRECTOR (55695) CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN 26 South Phelps Street Youngstown, Ohio (330) Fax: (330) irisq@cityofyounqstownoh.com a-jf@cityofyounqstownoh.com TTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENTS JUN 24?_0U00 CLERK OF COURT I SUPREME COURT OF OHIO I JUN ^ 4 Z009 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE, EX REL. ELIZABETH A. KOBLY, ET AL. CASE NUMBER Relators vs. YOUNGSTOWN CITY COUNCIL, ET AL. Respondents RESPONDENTS' MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO RELATORS' MOTION TO STRIKE EXHIBITS FROM ANSWER AND TO STRIKE RESPONDENTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Now come Respondents Youngstown City Council, City of Youngstown and Mayor Jay Williams, by and thtough counsel, and respond in opposition to Relators' motion to strike pursuant to Ohio Civ.R. 12(F). Rule 12(F) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure does not authorize or require that the exhibits to Respondents' Answer nor Respondents' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be stricken. A Memorandum setting forth grounds in support of that conclusion is attached and incorporated in this Motion. For all the foregoing reasons, Respondents respectfully request that this Honorable Court overrule Relators' Motion to Strike Exhibits from Answer and to Strike Respondents' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in its entirety. Respectfully submitted, ANTHONY J^ L^ARRIS DEPUTY LA DIRECTOR CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN
3 MEMORANDUM Relators have moved, purportedly pursuant to Ohio Civ.R. 12(F), to strike exhibits attached to Respondents' Answer and a motion filed by Respondents. Rule 12(F) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to move to have "... stricken from the pleadings any insufficient claim or defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent or scandalous matter." It is unclear from reviewing Relators' Memorandum which, if any, of the bases for a motion to strike set forth in Ohio Civ.R. 12(F) Relators are suggesting apply to Respondents' exhibits. Exhibits are obviously not claims or defenses. Under Civ.R. 12(F),..`[r]edundant' matter consists of allegations which constitute a needless repetition of other averments. `Immaterial' matter is that which has no essential or important relationship to the claim for relief or the defenses being pleaded or a statement of unnecessary particulars in connection with and descriptive of that which is material.... `[I]mpertinent' matter consists of statements which do not pertain and are not necessary to the issues in question.... `[S]candalous' matter is that which improperly casts a derogatory light on someone, most typically a party to the action." 5A Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure (2d ed.), Civil Section It cannot be seriously maintained that the exhibits, which consist of a letter from the administrative director of the Ohio Supreme Court giving advice and offering assistance to remedy the situation (Exhibit A), a report providing an available option to remedy the situation (Exhibit B), and a City ordinance
4 appropriating funds for Relators to hire counsel (Exhibit C), are redundant or scandalous. These exhibits are material and pertinent to defenses alleged by Respondents. Respondents explicitly set forth as one of the defenses in its Answer that Relators have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because they have and had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law available to them through availing themselves of the assistance offered by the Ohio Supreme Court. Exhibits A and B relate to and pertain to that defense and are not unnecessarily particular. Exhibit C relates and pertains to Respondents' defense, explicitly set forth in its Answer, that it has appropriated funds for Relators to hire special counsel and is not in any way unnecessary. The exhibits are therefore also not immaterial or impertinent. None of the types of materials that can be stricken pursuant to an Ohio Civ.R. 12(F) motion would include Respondents' exhibits. Rather than identifying any basis for striking Respondents' exhibits pursuant to Ohio Civ.R. 12, Relators instead focus on Ohio Civ.R. 10. Rule 10(D) identifies certain instances when items must be attached to a pleading. Amongst those items is a copy of the account or written instrument if a claim or defense is based on that account or written instrument. Rule 10(C) states that a written instrument attached to a pleading is a part of the pleading. Relators extrapolate from these simple statements to argue that only documents that they consider to be "written instruments" can become part of the pleadings and, therefore, be considered in deciding on a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Such is not now nor has it ever been the law in the State of Ohio.
5 The case law in Ohio reflects that a myriad of writings and materials attached to or incorporated into pleadings are subject to consideration in the determination of a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Determination of a motion for judgment on the pleadings is restricted solely to the allegations in the pleadings, as well as any material incorporated by reference or attached as exhibits to those pleadings. Ridenour v. Wilkinson, 10th Dist. No. 07AP- 200, 2007-Ohio-5695, at 9116, Curtis v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 10th Dist. No. 04AP-1214, 2006-Ohio-15, at 9124, Schuetz v. State Farm, 147 Ohio Misc. 2d 22, 890 N.E. 2d 374, 383, 2007-Ohio-7267, at 9[32. The determination of a motion for judgment on the pleadings is generally restricted solely to the allegations, but an exception exists which permits consideration of documents attached and incorporated into pleadings. Smith v. Nagel, 9th Dist. No , at 17. A court must limit its determination of a motion for judgment on the pleadings solely to the allegations in the pleadings and any writings attached to those pleadings. Ferchill v. Beach Cliff Bd. of Trustees, 162 Ohio App. 3d 144, 147, Ohio-3475, at 16, 832 N.E. 2d 1238, 1241, Vinicky v. Pristas, 163 Ohio App. 3d 508, 510, 2005-Ohio-5196, at 9[3, 839 N.E. 2d 88, 90, Drozeck v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. (2000), 140 Ohio App. 3d 816, 820, 749 N.E. 2d 775, 778, Amzee Corp. v. Comerica Bank-Midwest, 2002-Ohio-3084, at 134, 49 UCC Rep. Serv. 2d 833, Thomas v. Byrd- Bennett, 8th Dist. No , 2001-Ohio-4160, at 914, Workman v. Franklin County (August 28, 2001), 10th Dist. No. OOAP Relators are unable to cite any Ohio cases in which an exhibit was struck from a pleading because the court did not view it as a written instrument. If Relators' position were the law in the
6 State of Ohio, their own exhibits would have to be excluded. There is such a dearth of authority for Relators' position that they cannot even provide a definition of written instrument that has been used in Ohio courts for such a purpose. It is, therefore, by necessity that Relators seek to find some support in the federal court system. Relators describe at length a few cases from the small number of federal courts which have excluded exhibits under the federal rules of civil procedure because the court determined that they were not written instruments. Even within those cases however, one can find a recognition that the viewpoint being expressed is in conflict with the majority of federal courts. See, In re: Empyrean Biosciences, Inc. Securities Litigation (N.D. Ohio 2003), 219 F.R.D. 408 at 410, fn. 3 and fn. 4, 408 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. 9192, 629. Most federal courts either do not engage in this analysis or define the term so broadly that it would easily encompass Respondents' exhibits. See Northern Indiana Gun and Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend (1998), 163 F. 3d 449, Gant v. Wallingford (1995), 69 F. 3d 669, Branch v. Tunnel (1994), 14 F. 3d 449, overruled on other grounds, Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara (2002), 307 F. 3d 1119, In re Wade (1992), 969 F. 2d 241, Hall v. Bellman (1991), 935 F. 2d "Appended to... [the]... second amended complaint are a large number of exhibits. These documents are a part of the complaint for all purposes, including the purpose of determining what the complaint alleges. Fed R. Civ. P. 10(C); see Hall v. Bellman, 935 F. 2d 1106 (10th Cir. 1991) (written documents attached to the complaint as exhibits are considered part of the complaint for consideration in a rule
7 12(b)(6) dismissal); Goldman v. Belden, 754 F. 2d 1059, (2d Cir. 1985)(same). The Court does not look to any of the appended exhibits as `matters outside the pleading' for purposes of determining issues of fact; rather, the Court examines the exhibits solely for the purpose of determining the legal sufficiency of...[the]... claims, which are based on the facts and allegations documented in the exhibits. Thus, the Court does not convert... [the]... motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)...". Realtek Industries, Inc. v. Nomura Securities (1996), 939 F. Supp. 572, at fn. 1. There is obviously no basis for Relators' motion to strike Respondents' exhibits. Relators also however use their motion to insert an additional argument unrelated to the motion to strike. Relators suggest that it is "curious" that Respondents have chosen to make part of the pleadings exhibits which include a statement that does not coincide with Respondents' defenses. Relators clearly do not understand that making exhibits part of the pleadings because their existence supports Respondents' defenses does not mean that Respondents are asserting the truth of every statement contained within them. This can best be illustrated by examining the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Jones v. City of Cincinnati (2008), 521 F. 3d 555. In Jones, numerous exhibits, including transcripts of interviews with police officers who had allegedly beaten the plaintiff and excerpts from the report of a citizen board regarding the incident, were attached to the complaint. "Defendants argue that because a`copy of a written instrument that is an exhibit to
8 a pleading is part of the pleading for all purposes,' Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(C), all the facts stated in the exhibits to the complaint must be assumed to be true for purposes of the motion to dismiss. Even if we assume that a transcript of an interview constitutes a `written instrument,' treating a transcript as part of a pleading does not mean that we assume everything the officers said in those interviews is true.... Rule 10(C) `does not require a plaintiff to adopt every word within the exhibits as true for purposes of pleading simply because the documents were attached to the complaint to support an alleged fact.' See N. Ind. Gun and Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend, 163 F. 3d 449, (7th Cir. 1998)." Jones at page Relators' motion to strike Respondents' exhibits has no merit. Relators' motion to strike Respondents' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is even more frivolous. Relators' motion to strike Respondents' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is dependent on Relators prevailing on their other motion to strike which has already been refuted. Further, Rule 12(F) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure allows for certain things to be stricken from pleadings. Motion are not pleadings. Rule 7(A) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure identifies the documents that are pleadings and those documents do not include motions for judgment on the pleadings. A motion for judgment on the pleadings is a motion as defined in Rule 7(B) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure. A motion to strike enables a party to seek to have items stricken from a pleading, not a motion. Harrison v. Clemente (2000), 93 F. Supp. 2d 856, 857.
9 For all the foregoing reasons, Respondents move this Honorable Court for an Order overruling Relators' Motion to Strike Exhibits from Answer and to Strike Respondents' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Respectfully submitted, ANTHONY J. RRIS DEPUTY LAW DIRECTOR CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing RESPONDENTS' MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO RELATORS' MOTION TO STRIKE EXHIBITS FROM ANSWER AND TO STRIKE RESPONDENTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS was mailed by regular mail on this 23rd day of June, 2009, to JOHN B. JUHASZ ( ), 7081 WEST BOULEVARD, SUITE 4, YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO, , ATTORNEY FOR RELATORS. ANTHONY J.UMRRIS DEPUTY LAW DIRECTOR
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Payne v. Grant County Board of County Commissioners et al Doc. 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SHARI PAYNE, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. CIV-14-362-M GRANT COUNTY,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS
[Cite as Summit at St. Andrews Home Owners Assn. v. Kollar, 2012-Ohio-1696.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT SUMMIT AT ST. ANDREWS ) HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, ) CASE
More informationCase 2:18-cv KJD-CWH Document 7 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0-kjd-cwh Document Filed // Page of 0 MICHAEL R. BROOKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 HUNTER S. DAVIDSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 00 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. CIV S KJM-KJN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. Plaintiff, GENDARME CAPITAL CORPORATION; et al., Defendants. No. CIV S--00 KJM-KJN
More informationCase 1:15-cv JFA Document 13 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 90
Case 1:15-cv-00212-JFA Document 13 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 90 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division JOSEPH L. CARPENTER, an individual; Plaintiff, v.
More informationSTATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT
[Cite as Galloway v. Horkulic, 2003-Ohio-5145.] STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ATTORNEY WILLIAM GALLOWAY, ) ) CASE NO. 02 JE 52 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ) ) - VS -
More informationCase: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 10 Filed: 11/22/10 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 286
Case: 1:10-cv-00820-SJD Doc #: 10 Filed: 11/22/10 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 286 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO FOR THE WESTERN DIVISION TRACIE HUNTER CASE NO. 1:10-cv-820 Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 0 1 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney KENDALL J. NEWMAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 01 I Street, Suite -0 Sacramento, CA 1 Telephone: ( -1 GREGORY G. KATSAS Acting Assistant Attorney General
More informationThis matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings
IN THE COURT OF COr- - - - - - - - CUYAHOGA COUf NOEL CUMMINGS; Plaintiff, JUDGE PAMELA A. v. HARVEY ABENS IOSUE CO., LPA, et al. Defendants. OPINION AND JOURNAL ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
More informationCase 1:14-cv ESH Document 51 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:14-cv-00403-ESH Document 51 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SAI, vs. PLAINTIFF, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT. Case No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Roger Hall, et al., Plaintiffs, Status Conference Scheduled for Aug. 3, 2007 v. Civil Action 04-00814 (HHK Central Intelligence Agency, ECF Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:06-cv JGG
Case 6:06-cv-00479-ACC-JGG Document 10 Filed 05/30/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-05102-AT Document 52 Filed 11/09/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMMON CAUSE GEORGIA, as an ) organization, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:13-cv LO-TRJ Document 5 Filed 03/12/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 21
Case 1:13-cv-00021-LO-TRJ Document 5 Filed 03/12/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Alemayehu Kebede Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. DAMIAN STINNIE, et al.,
Appeal: 17-1740 Doc: 41 Filed: 08/21/2017 Pg: 1 of 12 No. 17-1740 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DAMIAN STINNIE, et al., v. Plaintiffs-Appellants, RICHARD HOLCOMB, in his
More informationCase 1:10-cv AKH Document 68 Filed 03/25/11 Page 1 of 12. Plaintiff, Defendant.
Case 1:10-cv-03864-AKH Document 68 Filed 03/25/11 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARY K. JONES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, ECF
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, Civil Action No (JBS/JS)
ROYAL v. DABNEY et al Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY GREGORY ROYAL, HONORABLE JEROME B. SIMANDLE v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 16-2535 (JBS/JS) PAMELA MILLER
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MACOUPIN COUNTY, ILLINOIS PLAINTIFF S SECOND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MACOUPIN COUNTY, ILLINOIS JOHN KRAFT, Plaintiff, 17 MR 25 v. CITY OF CARLINVILLE, Defendant. PLAINTIFF S SECOND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION V. A-13-CA-359 LY
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. HRA Zone, L.L.C. et al Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. V. A-13-CA-359 LY HRA ZONE, L.L.C.,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0253p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JOHN A. OLAGUES, a shareholder of TimkenSteel
More informationPlaintiffs' Response to Individual Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice
Plaintiffs' Response to Individual Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice Source: Milberg Weiss Date: 11/15/01 Time: 9:36 AM MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP REED R. KATHREIN (139304 LESLEY E.
More informationCase No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHELLE FLANAGAN, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Case: 18-55717, 11/20/2018, ID: 11095057, DktEntry: 27, Page 1 of 21 Case No. 18-55717 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHELLE FLANAGAN, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. XAVIER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION THE OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY, : Case No. C2:04-1055 : Plaintiff, : Judge Marbley : Magistrate Judge Kemp vs. : : J. KENNETH BLACKWELL,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Stafford v. Geico General Insurance Company et al Doc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 0 PAMELA STAFFORD, vs. Plaintiff, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants. :-cv-00-rcj-wgc
More informationCase 1:99-cv PRM Document 74 Filed 01/10/2002 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:99-cv-02200-PRM Document 74 Filed 01/10/2002 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CENTURY BUSINESS SERVICES ) CASE NO.: 1:99CV2200
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, VS. THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO. 13-579-BAJ-RLB Defendants. MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS ANSWER
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as In re Foreclosure of Liens, 2015-Ohio-1258.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF THE: : O P I N I O N FORECLOSURE OF LIENS AND FORFEITURE OF
More informationCase 2:06-cv SSV-SS Document 682 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:06-cv-04091-SSV-SS Document 682 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. BRANCH CONSULTANTS, L.L.C. VERSUS * CIVIL
More informationCase 1:13-cv WYD-MEH Document 41 Filed 08/13/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:13-cv-02707-WYD-MEH Document 41 Filed 08/13/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 Civil Action No. 13-cv-02707-WYD-MEH MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, v. Plaintiff, JOHN BUTLER, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 9 Filed: 04/11/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:218
Case: 1:13-cv-01569 Document #: 9 Filed: 04/11/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:218 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PAUL DUFFY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )
More informationCase 1:07-cv RHB Document 8 Filed 10/02/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:07-cv-00648-RHB Document 8 Filed 10/02/2007 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FRANK GLOVER, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-12-0000450 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I PAUL K. CULLEN aka PAUL KAUKA NAKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAVINIA CURRIER and PUU O HOKU RANCH, LTD., Defendants-Appellees.
More informationCourt of Common Pleas
Motion No. 4578249 NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Court of Common Pleas MOTION FOR UEAVE TO FIFE ANSWER INSTANTER March 30, 201714:26 By: NICHOLAS
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Pearson v. Warrensville Hts. City Schools, 2008-Ohio-1102.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 88527 DARNELL PEARSON, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Klaus v. Jonestown Bank and Trust Company, of Jonestown, Pennsylvania Doc. 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS KLAUS, CIVIL ACTION NO. 112-CV-2488 individually
More informationCase 1:06-cv PAG Document 6 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:06-cv-02284-PAG Document 6 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Carrie Harkless, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Case No. 1:06-cv-2284
More informationCase 0:12-cv WJZ Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2012 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:1-cv-61735-WJZ Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 1/13/01 Page 1 of 5 BROWARD BULLDOG, INC., a Florida corporation not for profit, and DAN CHRISTENSEN, founder, operator and editor of the BrowardBulldog.com
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO RAYSHON WATLEY, pro se Relator, : V. Case No. _r': f.. Mandamus Action THE TENTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS Respondent. MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT THE TENTH DISTRICT COURT
More informationCase 1:18-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case 1:18-cv-00011-ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc. v. Google, Inc. Doc. Case :0-cv-0-RMW Document Filed /0/00 Page of 0 RICHARD L. KELLNER, SBN FRANK E. MARCHETTI, SBN 0 KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP 0 South Grand Avenue,
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, CIVIL DIVISION FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO. : v. : Judge David E. Cain
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, CIVIL DIVISION FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO OHIOANS FOR CONCEALED CARRY, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : Case No. 18CV5216 v. : Judge David E. Cain CITY OF COLUMBUS, et al., : Defendants.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff,
Case :-cv-0-sjo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California PETER K. SOUTHWORTH Supervising Deputy Attorney General JONATHAN M. EISENBERG Deputy Attorney
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. v. CASE NO SAC
Orange v. Lyon County Detention Center Doc. 4 KYNDAL GRANT ORANGE, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS v. CASE NO. 18-3141-SAC LYON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Defendant.
More informationNAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio Court of Common Pleas
NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Court of Common Pleas OTHER Electronically Filed: September 26,2016 10:04 By: DANIEL J. MYERS 0087909 Confirmation
More informationCase: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 130 Filed: 07/08/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 2883
Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 130 Filed: 07/08/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 2883 LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., and ROBERT HART, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) CAUSE NO: 1:05-CV-0634-SEB-VSS
Case 1:05-cv-00634-SEB-VSS Document 116 Filed 01/23/2006 Page 1 of 10 INDIANA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. TODD ROKITA, et al., Defendants. WILLIAM CRAWFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. MARION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:08-cv-02117-P Document 67 Filed 11/18/10 Page 1 of 7 PageID 934 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY; BOYD L. RICHIE, in his capacity
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EAST ST. LOUIS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Digital Background Corporation v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EAST ST. LOUIS DIVISION DIGITAL BACKGROUND CORPORATION, vs. APPLE, INC.,
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed May 01, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed May 01, 2015 - Case No. 2015-0670 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE EX REL. WILLIAM A. CLUMM, : : Relator, : Case No. 2015-0670 : v. : Original Action in Mandamus
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CIVIL DIVISION HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CIVIL DIVISION HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO BUCKEYE FIREARMS FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. A 1803098 v. THE CITY OF CINCINNATI, et al., Defendants. MOTION OF STATE
More informationCase3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7
Case:0-cv-0-RS Document Filed0/0/ Page of C. D. Michel - S.B.N. Glenn S. McRoberts - S.B.N. Clinton B. Monfort - S.B.N. 0 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, PC 0 E. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 00 Long Beach, CA 00 Telephone:
More informationStewart v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al Doc. 32 ELLIE STEWART v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:06-cv-00949 Document 121 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION G.M. SIGN, INC., Plaintiff, vs. 06 C 949 FRANKLIN BANK, S.S.B.,
More informationPlaintiff, MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO DISMISS AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF OLMSTED --------------- Wilmar Investments, LLC, DISTRICT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Civil Other/Misc. --------------- Judge: Joseph F. Chase Court File #55-CV-15-6531
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:10-cv-06264-PSG -AGR Document 18 Filed 12/09/10 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:355 CENTRAL DISTRICT F CALIFRNIA Present: The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge Wendy K. Hernandez
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION [NUMBER]
Parts in blue print are instructions to user, not to be included in filed document unless so noted. [Parts and references in green font, if any, refer to juvenile proceedings. See Practice Note, this web
More informationCase: 1:08-cv DCN Doc #: 81 Filed: 02/19/10 1 of 6. PageID #: 2805 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case 108-cv-01339-DCN Doc # 81 Filed 02/19/10 1 of 6. PageID # 2805 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ANGELA LOWE, Plaintiff, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY/ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Vincent J. Margello, Jr., et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) O P I N I O N
[Cite as DeAscentis v. Margello, 2005-Ohio-1520.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT James M. DeAscentis et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : (Cross-Appellees), No. 04AP-4 v. : (C.P.C.
More informationCase 3:10-cv HLH Document 19 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:10-cv-00315-HLH Document 19 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO, A federally recognized Indian Tribe, Plaintiff, v. Case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Clemons v. Google, Inc. Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION RICHARD CLEMONS, v. GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:17-CV-00963-AJT-TCB
More informationCase 4:13-cv KGB Document 47 Filed 12/23/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Case 4:13-cv-00410-KGB Document 47 Filed 12/23/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RITA and PAM JERNIGAN and BECCA and TARA AUSTIN PLAINTIFFS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION
KEIRAND R. MOORE, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION E-FILED Friday, 23 February, 2018 10:57:20 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD v. Case No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:07-cv-00896-BBM Document 16 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) JACK E. ALDERMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No.
More informationNo [DC# CV MJJ] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants,
No. 99 17551 [DC# CV 99-4389-MJJ] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, vs. MARY V. KING; et al., Defendants - Appellees. APPEAL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:
Case 9:18-cv-81345-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2018 Page 1 of 4 JOHN DOE, vs. Plaintiff, RICHARD L. SWEARINGEN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Florida Department of Law
More informationCase 0:12-cv WJZ Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2012 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:12-cv-61735-WJZ Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2012 Page 1 of 6 BROWARD BULLDOG, INC., a Florida corporation not for profit, and DAN CHRISTENSEN, founder, operator and editor of the BrowardBulldog.com
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 19 Filed: 06/13/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:901
Case: 1:13-cv-01569 Document #: 19 Filed: 06/13/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:901 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PAUL DUFFY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case
More informationCase: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 91 Filed: 03/25/14 Page: 1 of 26 PAGEID #: 2237
Case 213-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc # 91 Filed 03/25/14 Page 1 of 26 PAGEID # 2237 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al, -vs- Plaintiffs, JON
More informationCase 8:10-cv RAL-TBM Document 19 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:10-cv-00024-RAL-TBM Document 19 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION OULAWLESSNESS PRODUCTIONS INC.; BAND OF OUTLAWS TOURING, INC.; and
More informationI. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE OFFICE OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF GEORGIA., by and through his parents,. and ; and., Plaintiffs, v. Docket No.: OSAH-DOE-SE-1203970-92-Miller LOWNDES COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Eric Dane et al v. Gawker Media LLC et al Doc. 1 MARTIN D. SINGER (BAR NO. YAEL E. HOLTKAMP (BAR NO. 0 HENRY L. SELF III (BAR NO. LAVELY & SINGER PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Century Park East, Suite 00 Los
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. JSA Appraisal Service et al Doc. 0 0 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as Receiver for INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit DAVID HALPERN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PERITEC BIOSCIENCES, LTD., PERITEC BIOSCIENCES, RAJESH K. KHOSLA,
More informationIMM FED 13 Z013 CLERK OF COURT SUPR^ME COURT F 0H1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. FRANCESCA STEINHART, et al., CASE NO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IMM FRANCESCA STEINHART, et al., Relators, vs. CASE NO. 2013-0102 Original Action in Mandamus THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES, et al. Respondents. RESPONDENT
More informationSTATE OF IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LAKE COUIIML CIVIL DIVISION. 4iv'7C.. /L. 14't0 h'o'i. Pro ye Defendant
STATE OF 01110 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LAKE COUIIML CIVIL DIVISION E 0 BRYAN ANTHONY REO, Case No. 15CV001 IM DEC to P : 3 V. Plaintiff, MARTIN LINDSTEDT, Defendant. Hon. Richard L. (0,UREEN G.
More informationCase 2:09-cv KMM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2010 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:09-cv-14370-KMM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2010 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION MARCELLUS M. MASON, JR. Plaintiff, vs. CHASE HOME
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc., 2013-Ohio-2487.] COURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BILBARAN FARM, INC. : JUDGES: : : Hon. John W. Wise, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant
More informationIN THE 13TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI
IN THE 13TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI THE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 09-BA-CV02314 GALEN J. SUPPES, WILLIAM R. SUTTERLIN, RENEWABLE ALTERNATIVES,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION SULEYMAN CILIV, d/b/a 77 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING AND TRADING COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, UXB INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant.
More informationCase3:09-cv RS Document102 Filed11/21/11 Page1 of 7
Case:0-cv-0-RS Document Filed// Page of DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar # City Attorney WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar # SHERRI SOKELAND KAISER, State Bar # Deputy City Attorneys Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
More informationCITY OF CLEVELAND JEFFREY POSNER
[Cite as Cleveland v. Posner, 2010-Ohio-3091.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 93893 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JEFFREY
More informationIn the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District DAVID L. BIERSMITH, v. Appellant, CURRY ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent. WD73231 OPINION FILED: October 25, 2011 Appeal from the Circuit Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MEMORANDUM OF APPELLEE VERNON D. REYNOLDS, D.O., IN RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR JLTI2ISDICTION
%fy IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PHILIP A. CRAIG, NO. 14-1539 Appellant, vs. VERNON D. REYNOLDS, D.O., On Appeal from the Franklin County Court ofappeals,tenth Appellate District, Case No. 12 CV 12670
More informationPanzella v. County of Nassau et al Doc. 73. On October II, 2013, plaintiff Christine Panzella ("plaintiff') commenced this civil
Panzella v. County of Nassau et al Doc. 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------){ CHRISTINE PANZELLA, Individually and
More informationCase 1:18-cv ABJ Document 18 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Case 1:18-cv-00011-ABJ Document 18 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : ORDER. AND NOW, this day of, 2007, upon
GULLIFORD v. PHILADELPHIA EAGLES et al Doc. 11 Case 207-cv-02346-EL Document 11 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ELAINE C. GULLIFORD,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Case: 15-5100 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 09/01/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT ANTHONY PISZEL, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) v. ) 2015-5100 ) UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant-Appellee.
More informationCase 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 41 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 189
Case 1:16-cv-02431-JMS-DML Document 41 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 189 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION JOHN DOE, formerly known as ) JANE DOE,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No CIV-MOORE/GOODMAN
Mitchell v. McNeil Doc. 149 STEVEN ANTHONY MITCHELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 09-22866-CIV-MOORE/GOODMAN v. Plaintiff, WALTER A. McNEIL, et al., Defendants. /
More informationCase 2:16-cv APG-GWF Document 3 Filed 04/24/16 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-00-apg-gwf Document Filed 0// Page of CHARLES C. RAINEY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 chaz@raineylegal.com RAINEY LEGAL GROUP, PLLC 0 W. Martin Avenue, Second Floor Las Vegas, Nevada +.0..00 (ph +...
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
GRaGIN L IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO BranchLotspeich,. CASE NO. 60 Appellant, On Appeal from the V.. Hamilton County Court of Appeals, First R. A. Hermes, Inc. dba About Space,. Appellate District Appellee.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. v. Civil Action No. 2: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY and MARFORK COAL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 2:06-0614 THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
More informationCase: 1:16-cv DAP Doc #: 11 Filed: 11/28/16 1 of 6. PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:16-cv-02325-DAP Doc #: 11 Filed: 11/28/16 1 of 6. PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ANTHONY NOVAK, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF PARMA, et
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 3 " -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ^^ James A. Lucido, 3 " - ^^^ Appellant,. On Appeal from the Stark County Court vs.. of Appeals, Fifth Judicial District Utterback Dental Group, Inc., Court of Appeals Appellee..
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION HAROLD BLICK, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CASE NO. 3:14-CV-00022 v. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ABBOTT DIABETES CARE, INC., Plaintiff, C.A. No. 06-514 GMS v. DEXCOM, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM I. INTRODUCTION On August 17, 2006, Abbott
More information12PREM;^O ^, Q^0 APR CLERK OFCOURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
[State of Ohio ex rel.]david Fox, Relator, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2008 vs. Case No. 08-0626 Franklin County Common Pleas Court, Original Complaint in Mandamus Respondent. MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case 0:09-cv-01798-MJD-RLE Document 17 Filed 11/02/09 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA John H. Reuer and Larry R. Maetzold, vs. Plaintiffs, Grand Casino Hinckley and Grand
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Anita Rios, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : 3:04CV7724 v. : : Judge Carr J. Kenneth Blackwell, : Defendant. : : : MOTION TO INTERVENE
More informationCase 2:17-cv NBF Document 55 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-00210-NBF Document 55 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PROJECT ON PREDATORY STUDENT LENDING OF THE LEGAL SERVICES CENTER
More information