IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, CIVIL DIVISION FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO. : v. : Judge David E. Cain
|
|
- Amie Chambers
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, CIVIL DIVISION FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO OHIOANS FOR CONCEALED CARRY, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : Case No. 18CV5216 v. : Judge David E. Cain CITY OF COLUMBUS, et al., : Defendants. : : : : (PROPOSED) BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE STATE OF OHIO IN SUPPORT OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Respectfully submitted, MIKE DEWINE Ohio Attorney General s/ Steven T. Voigt STEVEN T. VOIGT ( ) Principal Assistant Attorney General Constitutional Offices Section 30 E. Broad Street, 16 th Floor Tel: Fax: steven.voigt@ohioattorneygeneral.gov JONATHAN R. FULKERSON ( ) Deputy Chief Counsel FREDERICK D. NELSON ( ) Senior Advisor 30 E. Broad Street, 17 th Floor Tel: Fax: frederick.nelson@ohioattorneygeneral.gov jonathan.fulkerson@ohioattorneygeneral.gov Counsel for proposed Amicus Curiae State of Ohio 1
2 The State of Ohio submits this amicus brief to vindicate the effectiveness of a duly enacted state law, R.C. 9.68, that the Ohio Supreme Court already has determined to be a general law that displaces municipal firearm ordinances and does not unconstitutionally infringe on municipal home rule authority. City of Cleveland v. State, 128 Ohio St. 3d 135, (2010). Ohio has a vital interest in maintaining its constitutional system under which the lawful policies of the State as established by the General Assembly or the people pursuant to constitutional processes are not displaced, piecemeal, by local ordinances. The Constitution of the State of Ohio and binding precedent of the Ohio Supreme Court make clear that city ordinances must give way to the general laws of the State. For example, municipalities may adopt and enforce within their limits only such local police regulations as are not in conflict with general laws of Ohio. City of Cleveland v. Betts, 168 Ohio St. 386 (syl.) (1958); see Ohio Constitution, Article XVIII, Section 3. Thus, a police power regulation in a city ordinance may not validly contravene a statutory enactment of general application throughout the state, and must give way if it is in conflict therewith. Betts, 168 Ohio St. at 388; see also, e.g., Am. Fin. Servs. Ass n v. City of Cleveland, 112 Ohio St. 3d 170, 173, 179 (2006) (police power ordinance that is in conflict must yield in the face of a general state law ; any local ordinances that seek to prohibit conduct that the state has authorized are in conflict with the state statutes and are therefore unconstitutional ). Ohio Revised Code 9.68 establishes the law of the State of Ohio that [e]xcept as specifically provided by the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, state law, or federal law, a person without further permission or process, may own, possess, or keep any firearm, part of a firearm, its components, and its ammunition. R.C. 9.68(A). The General Assembly adopted this provision of state law having explicitly found the need to 1
3 provide uniform laws throughout the state regulating the ownership, possession, and purchase of firearms, their components, and their ammunition. Id. Thus, and as described by Ohio s Supreme Court, the statute provides that only federal or state regulations can limit an Ohioan s individual right to bear arms. City of Cleveland v. State, 128 Ohio St. 3d at 135. Local ordinances cannot. Our Supreme Court has reaffirm[ed] that R.C is part of a comprehensive statewide legislative enactment that must be read as such. Id. at 138, citing Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. City of Clyde, 120 Ohio St. 3d 96 (2008). Moreover, it is undisputed that the statute applies to all parts of the state and operates uniformly. Id. at 140. R.C establishes police regulations and applies to all citizens generally. Id. at 141. Therefore, the Supreme Court has held that R.C is a general law that displaces municipal firearm ordinances and does not unconstitutionally infringe on municipal home rule authority. Id. at As the Supreme Court succinctly has explained: R.C addresses the General Assembly s concern that absent a uniform law throughout the state, law abiding gun owners would face a confusing patchwork of licensing requirements, possession restrictions, and criminal penalties as they travel from one jurisdiction to another. Id. at 142. But that is precisely the sort of local patchwork restriction and penalty that City ordinance as codified in Columbus City Code impermissibly creates. By purporting to make it unlawful for any person to acquire, have, carry, or use a trigger crank, a bump-fire device, or any part, combination of parts, component, device, attachment, or accessory, that is designed or functions to accelerate the rate of fire of a semiautomatic firearm but not convert the semi-automatic firearm into an automatic firearm, 2
4 including, but not limited to bump stocks, bump-fire stocks, slide fires, and accelerators, and then by purporting to penalize such a violation as a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail with a mandatory minimum sentence of 180 days and a fine of up to $1,500, Columbus City Code at , the City firearm ordinance imposes a local prohibition and penalty on possession of various firearm parts or components that are not otherwise currently regulated in such a fashion. The federal government currently is contemplating a proposed regulation relating to such or similar gun parts or components, but is accepting public comment on its proposal through June 27, 2018 and has not yet made any such regulation final. See 83 Fed. Reg et seq. (March 29, 2018 proposed rule on Bump-Stock-Type Devices); see also President s Memorandum for the Attorney General, 83 Fed. Reg (Feb.23, 2018) ( directing the Department of Justice... to propose for notice and comment a rule banning all devices that turn legal weapons into machineguns ). More significantly, uniform Ohio law preempts the field and displaces municipal firearm ordinances. Cleveland v. State, 128 Ohio St. 3d at 142. Because it cannot seriously be argued that the City s ordinance is anything other than an ordinance relating to firearms, that ends the question: Ohio has decided that individuals should not have to know, decipher, and understand a patchwork of local restrictions in this area, and has established that apart from zoning ordinance[s] regulating commercial sales, see R.C. 9.68(D) regulation of firearms, their components, and their ammunition shall be provided by uniform laws throughout the state. R.C. 9.68(A). Any suggestion by the City that bump stocks and the like are not encompassed within the phrase firearms, their components, and their ammunition, as later rephrased in the next statutory sentenced to comprehend any firearm, part of a firearm, its components, and its 3
5 ammunition, id., would fly in the face of dictionary definitions and general rules of statutory construction. Indeed, the Columbus City Code itself explicitly uses the words any part, combination of parts, [or] component in its own definition of parts and components prohibited as illegal rate-of-fire acceleration firearm accessor[ies]. City Code (C)(1). Moreover, when interpreting a statute, courts are to look to the plain language and the words used should be given their usual, normal and customary meaning in that context. State ex rel. Pennington v. Gundler, 75 Ohio St. 3d 171, 173 (1996). Dictionary.com defines component to mean a constituent part; element; ingredient. Roget s 21 st Century Thesaurus, 3 rd ed. (2005) recites synonyms for the noun component to include fixings, ingredient[s], makings, peripheral[s], plug-in[s], and the like. A replacement part or device affixed to a gun that changes the way in which the weapon functions qualifies under any normal understanding of the term component. And the fact that a part or component was not original to an object does not make it any less a component. See, e.g., R.C (addressing motor vehicle assembled from component parts by a person other than the manufacturer ); State v. Helbig, 1988 Ohio App. Lexis 27 (8 th Dist. App. 1988) ( is sufficiently definite and clear to withstand vagueness challenge; Webster s New Collegiate Dictionary (1976) at p. 231 defines component as serving or helping to constitute. Component parts include but are not limited to major body parts used in rebuilding a motor vehicle. ). And here, as for example in Logan v. United States, 552 U.S. 23, 31 (2007), the context in which the word appears counsels adherence to the word s ordinary meaning. Words in a list are generally known by the company they keep. See also, e.g., Scalia and Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts (Thompson/West 2012) at 195 ( Associated words bear on one another s meaning (noscitur a sociis) ). Here, where the phrases firearms, their 4
6 components, and their ammunition and any firearm, part of a firearm, its components, and its ammunition extend by their terms to all parts of a firearm and even to ammunition that may be inserted into or expelled from a firearm, and where those phrases additionally are used in the context of ensuring uniform laws throughout the state extending beyond ownership, possession, purchase, and sale even to transport and storage and carrying, it would be difficult to fathom a rule of construction under which firearm component would not include a type of gun stock or a trigger crank used as an element or ingredient of the firearm. Ohio Revised Code 9.68 does not of its own authority preclude state regulation of the sorts of parts or components that the City seeks to outlaw. Rather, it specifies that any such regulation must be accomplished by uniform laws throughout the state. The patchwork problems that the statute works to avoid, which would threaten differing prohibitions and penalties from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, is demonstrated by a comparison of this Columbus ordinance with a related but by no means identical ordinance recently adopted by the City of Cincinnati. That measure, codified in the Cincinnati Municipal Code as , targets any device designed or functioning to accelerate the rate of fire of a firearm to approximate an automatic weapon, including bump stocks, trigger cranks, slide fire devices, and other similar accessories. Cincinnati Municipal Code (a). This definition appears to overlap with, but not mirror, the Columbus City Code definition at issue. And the penalties for violation appear different: The Cincinnati ordinance (which unlike the Columbus ordinance also covers sale of such parts or components) declares a violation to be a misdemeanor of the first degree, Cincinnati Municipal Code (c), which pursuant to would call for imprisonment of up to six months and a fine of not more than $1,000. The Columbus ordinance, by contrast, purports to create a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail with a mandatory 5
7 minimum jail term of at least one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days and up to a $1500 fine. Those differences in statutory scope and in potential punishment illustrate the confusing patchwork of restrictions, and criminal penalties that would confront Ohioans (and others) as they travel from one jurisdiction to another within the State if the General Assembly s design to displace local ordinance is not honored. Ohio therefore submits this amicus brief respectfully asking that the Court enjoin operation of Columbus City Code as in contravention of Ohio Revised Code 9.68 requiring that firearm regulations be uniform throughout the state. Respectfully submitted, MIKE DEWINE Ohio Attorney General s/ Steven T. Voigt STEVEN T. VOIGT ( ) Principal Assistant Attorney General Constitutional Offices Section 30 E. Broad Street, 16 th Floor Tel: Fax: steven.voigt@ohioattorneygeneral.gov JONATHAN R. FULKERSON ( ) Deputy Chief Counsel FREDERICK D. NELSON ( ) Senior Advisor 30 E. Broad Street, 17 th Floor Tel: Fax: frederick.nelson@ohioattorneygeneral.gov jonathan.fulkerson@ohioattorneygeneral.gov Counsel for proposed Amicus Curiae State of Ohio 6
8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June 22, 2018, the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court by using the e-filing system, and a copy of the foregoing has been sent to the following via electronic mail and regular U.S. Mail: Derek A. DeBrosse Barney DeBrosse, LLC 503 S. Front Street, Suite 240B derek@barneydebrosse.com James P. Sean Maloney 8917 Eagle Ridge Court Westchester, Ohio smaloneyesq@gmail.com Ronald Lemieux P.O. Box Cleveland, Ohio rlemieux@ronaldlemieuxlaw.com Lara N. Baker-Morrish Richard N. Coglianese Charles P. Campisano Columbus City Attorney s Office 77 N. Front Street, 4 th Floor lnbaker-morrish@columbus.gov cpcampisano@columbus.gov rncoglianese@columbus.gov Counsel for Defendants David S. Kessler Blaugrund, Herbert, Martin 300 W. Wilson Bridge Road, Suite 100 Worthington, Ohio dsk@bkmplaw.com spp@bkmplaw.com Counsel for Plaintiffs s/ Steven T. Voigt STEVEN T. VOIGT ( ) Principal Assistant Attorney General 7
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CIVIL DIVISION HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CIVIL DIVISION HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO BUCKEYE FIREARMS FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. A 1803098 v. THE CITY OF CINCINNATI, et al., Defendants. MOTION OF STATE
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO THE STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. OHIO : ATTORNEY GENERAL MIKE DEWINE : 30 East Broad Street, 17 th floor : Case No. Columbus, Ohio 43215, : : LUCAS COUNTY PROSECUTOR
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CITY OF COLUMBUS : 90 West Broad Street : Case No. Columbus, Ohio 43215 : : Judge Plaintiff, : : v. : : STATE OF OHIO : 30 East Broad Street, 17 th Floor
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 1L CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
97422066 CITY OF CLEVELAND Plaintiff STATE OF OHIO Defendant 97422066 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 1L CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO Judge: MICHAEL J RUSSD'AHOGA COUNTY JOURNAL ENTRY 96 DISP.OTHER - FINAL 01/30/2017:
More informationMARCH 2017 LAW REVIEW GUN PERMITTEES CHALLENGE PARK FIREARM REGULATIONS
GUN PERMITTEES CHALLENGE PARK FIREARM REGULATIONS James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2016 James C. Kozlowski As illustrated by the state court opinions described herein, gun owner groups and individuals have
More information3:10-cv SEM # 38 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
3:10-cv-03187-SEM # 38 Page 1 of 7 E-FILED Friday, 31 October, 2014 02:49:58 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
More informationTHE CITY OF CLEVELAND, APPELLEE,
[Cite as Cleveland v. State, 138 Ohio St.3d 232, 2014-Ohio-86.] THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, APPELLEE, v. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT. [Cite as Cleveland v. State, 138 Ohio St.3d 232, 2014-Ohio-86.] The General
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO Ohioans for Concealed Carry, et al., : : Case No.: 18CV-005216 Plaintiffs, : : v. : Judge David E. Cain : City of Columbus, et al., : : Defendants. :
More informationPLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Now come Plaintiffs, by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Ohio Civil Rule
Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc., et al. : In the Sandusky County : Common Pleas Court Plaintiffs : : Case No. 04-CV769 vs. : : Judge: Harry A. Sargent City of Clyde, Ohio, et al. : : Defendants. : PLAINTIFFS
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CITY OF COLUMBUS, : : Case No. Plaintiff, : : Judge v. : : STATE OF OHIO, : : Defendant. : : PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Now comes
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 18, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 18, 2015 - Case No. 2015-0303 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO R. LOTUS JUSTICE, et al., Relators, Case No. 2015-0303 v. UNITED STATES, et al., Respondents.
More informationS 2292 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
LC00 01 -- S S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO CRIMINAL OFFENSES -- WEAPONS Introduced By: Senators Seveney, Coyne, DiPalma, Pearson,
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL CASE NO. MICHAEL DEWINE 30 East Broad St., 14 th Floor JUDGE Columbus, Ohio 43215 Plaintiff, v. EB RETAIL, LLC
More informationH 7075 SUBSTITUTE A AS AMENDED ======== LC003045/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
01 -- H 0 SUBSTITUTE A AS AMENDED LC000/SUB A S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO CRIMINAL OFFENSES -- WEAPONS Introduced By: Representatives
More informationCase 1:19-cv LAS Document 4 Filed 03/28/19 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:19-cv-00449-LAS Document 4 Filed 03/28/19 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS THE MODERN SPORTSMAN, LLC; RW ARMS, LTD.; MARK MAXWELL, Individually; and MICHAEL STEWART, Individually,
More informationS 0464 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
LC000 0 -- S 0 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 0 A N A C T RELATING TO CRIMINAL OFFENSES -- WEAPONS Introduced By: Senators Coyne, Goodwin, Sosnowski, Felag,
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed April 10, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed April 10, 2015 - Case No. 2015-0406 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : Case No. 15-0406 : Plaintiff--Appellant, : On Appeal from the Franklin : County
More informationShots Fired: 2 nd Amendment, Restoration Rights, & Gun Trusts
Shots Fired: 2 nd Amendment, Restoration Rights, & Gun Trusts The Second Amendment Generally Generally - Gun Control - Two areas - My conflict - Federal Law - State Law - Political Issues - Always changing
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Cleveland v. State, 185 Ohio App.3d 59, 2009-Ohio-5968.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92663 THE CITY OF CLEVELAND, APPELLANT,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : : : : : : : : : :... O P I N I O N
[Cite as Dayton v. State, 2015-Ohio-3160.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY CITY OF DAYTON, OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee v. STATE OF OHIO Defendant-Appellant : : :
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:10-cv-00059-WDM-MEH Document 6 Filed 03/01/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-CV-00059-WDM-MEH GRAY PETERSON, Plaintiff,
More informationCase: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 54 Filed: 02/21/13 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 652
Case 112-cv-00797-SJD Doc # 54 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 9 PAGEID # 652 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Fair Elections Ohio, et al., Plaintiffs, Jon
More informationTennessee Firearms Association 2018 State Legislative Candidate Survey
Tennessee Firearms Association 2018 State Legislative Candidate Survey This survey is being sent to all candidates for Tennessee State House and State Senate. This survey is to be completed by the candidate
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 16, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2015
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 16, 2015 - Case No. 2015-0303 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2015 R. Lotus Justice: : Relator, : : Case No. 215-0303 vs. : : Franklin County Court of Common
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Holloway v. State, 2014-Ohio-2971.] [Please see original opinion at 2014-Ohio-1951.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100586
More information29 ordinances that require a criminal history records check and a 3 to 5-day waiting period in
1 ALACHUA COUNTY 2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3 4 5 ORDINANCE 2018-6 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY 8 COMMISSIONERS OF ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA, 9 CREATING CHAPTER 82, SALE OF FIREARMS, RELATING
More information1. SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE. 2. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT. 3. STAPLE ALL ADDITIONAL PAGES 1/30/2014 3:13CV739
Case: 14-319 Document: 7-1 Page: 1 02/14/2014 1156655 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT CIVIL APPEAL PRE-ARGUMENT STATEMENT (FORM C) 1. SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE. 2. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT.
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Dickson & Campbell, L.L.C. v. Cleveland, 181 Ohio App.3d 238, 2009-Ohio-738.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90519 DICKSON
More informationNo. 19- In the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
No. 19-444444444444444444444444 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit IN RE GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC., ET AL., EMERGENCY PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More information1 SB By Senator Williams. 4 RFD: Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 05/12/2016.
1 SB2 2 173265-1 3 By Senator Williams 4 RFD: Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 05/12/2016 Page 0 1 173265-1:n:02/01/2016:JET/mfc LRS2016-309 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SYNOPSIS:
More informationCity Council Staff Report
City Council Staff Report DATE: September 21, 2016 CONSENT CALENDAR SUBJECT: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1899 RELATING TO FIREARMS FROM: BY: David H. Ready, City Manager Office of the
More informationCALIFORNIA LOCAL AUTHORITY TO REGULATE FIREARMS
CALIFORNIA LOCAL AUTHORITY TO REGULATE FIREARMS Article XI, 7 of the California Constitution provides that [a] county or city may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other
More informationReferred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to public safety. (BDR )
S.B. SENATE BILL NO. SENATORS ROBERSON, LIPPARELLI, HAMMOND, BROWER, SETTELMEYER; FARLEY, GOICOECHEA, GUSTAVSON, HARDY, HARRIS AND KIECKHEFER FEBRUARY, 0 JOINT SPONSORS: ASSEMBLYMEN HAMBRICK, WHEELER AND
More informationMay 8, Via Facsimile ( ) and electronic mail
Ross A. Day * Matthew Swihart * LICENSED IN OREGON AND WASHINGTON LICENSED IN OREGON AND FLORIDA Via Facsimile (503.373.7414) and electronic mail (irrlistnotifier.sos@state.or.us) The Honorable Dennis
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 143 Filed: 10/17/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1018
Case: 1:10-cv-04257 Document #: 143 Filed: 10/17/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1018 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SECOND AMENDMENT ARMS (a d/b/a of
More informationGun Safety in Florida: Laws, Issues and Challenges League of Women Voters of Florida
Gun Safety in : Laws, Issues and Challenges 2017 League of Women Voters of LWVF Position The LWVF supports regulations concerning the purchase, ownership, and use of handguns that balance as nearly as
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Case: 19-1268 Document: 11-1 Filed: 03/20/2019 Page: 1 (1 of 16) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) In re ) GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, ) INC., et al., ) Case No. 19-1268 ) Petitioners,
More informationMotion Picture Work Permit
Motion Picture Work Permit Prepared by Contract Services Section Emergency Operations Division 1 2 Motion Picture Laws 2008 Table of Contents SEC. 11.00. PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO CODE. SEC.. 12.22.13 Infrequent
More informationCase 5:10-cv C Document 66 Filed 07/11/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID 869
Case 5:10-cv-00141-C Document 66 Filed 07/11/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID 869 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION ) REBEKAH JENNINGS; BRENNAN ) HARMON; ANDREW
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA LENKA KNUTSON and ) SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) Case No. ) CHUCK CURRY, in his official capacity as ) Sheriff
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JURISDICTION OF AMICUS CURIAE THE OHIO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, CITY OF COLUMBUS AND CITY OF DAYTON
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO r/^': ^: % Bradley L. Walker, Case No. 13-1.277 V. Appellees, On Appeal from the Sixth District Court of Appeals Lucas County, Ohio City of Toledo, et al., Appellants. Court
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS DAVID J. RADICH and LI-RONG RADICH, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:14-CV-20 ) JAMES C. DELEON GUERRERO, in his ) official capacity
More informationAgenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009
Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009 TO: FROM: CONTACT: SUBJECT: Mayor and Councilmembers Vyto Adomaitis, Director, RDA, Neighborhood Services and Public Safety Department Lt. Phil
More informationCurrent Legal Issues with Weapons in the Workplace
Current Legal Issues with Weapons in the Workplace Kimberly C. Shumate The Ohio State University Office of Human Resources Columbus, Ohio 14-088 Table of Contents I. Wrongful Termination... 1 II. Other
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2013 RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RELATOR'S ACTION IN MANDAMUS
4 I ^^. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2013 Edward Jackson, Case No. 13-0086 -vs- Relator, ORIGINAL ACTION Ronald J. Obrien and Judge David Cain et. al., Respondents.. Court of Appeals Case No. 89AP-1015
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Case 3:15-cv-00162 Document 132 Filed in TXSD on 08/22/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationMAY 28, Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Makes technical corrections to measures passed by the 78th Legislative Session.
ASSEMBLY BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY (ON BEHALF OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL) MAY, 0 Referred to Committee on Judiciary A.B. SUMMARY Makes technical corrections to measures passed by the th Legislative
More informationCITY OF CLEVELAND PARKING VIOLATIONS BUREAU REGINALD E. BARNES
[Cite as Cleveland Parking Violations Bur. v. Barnes, 2010-Ohio-6164.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 94502 CITY OF CLEVELAND PARKING
More informationl_132_ nd General Assembly Regular Session Sub. H. B. No
132nd General Assembly Regular Session Sub. H. B. No. 228 2017-2018 A B I L L To amend sections 9.68, 307.932, 2307.601, 2901.05, 2901.09, 2923.12, 2923.126, 2923.16, 2953.37, 5321.01, and 5321.13 and
More informationLEDD. t DEC. MARCIA ivi6-ii^uel ^ C^.ERK 5UPREMF CGt IR7 (y^ OI 11f1. Case No
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES AERIE 2171 MEIGS, INC., ET. AL. vs. Appellants, STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Case No. 2006-2105 On Appeal from the Fourth Appellate
More informationNEEDLEMAN AND PISANO Montville Professional Building 161 Route 202, P.O. Box 187 Montville, New Jersey (973) Attorneys for Plaintiffs
NEEDLEMAN AND PISANO Montville Professional Building 161 Route 202, P.O. Box 187 Montville, New Jersey 07045 (973) 334-4422 Attorneys for Plaintiffs * SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC04-0485 5D03-120 STEVEN EUGENE ISELEY, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL PETITIONER
More informationH 7688 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
======== LC000 ======== 01 -- H S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE--COURTS -- EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDERS
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case: 12-16258, 09/13/2016, ID: 10122368, DktEntry: 102-1, Page 1 of 5 (1 of 23) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOUIS KEALOHA, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
More informationCase: Document: 18-1 Filed: 09/11/2014 Page: 1
Case: 14-3877 Document: 18-1 Filed: 09/11/2014 Page: 1 Case No. 14-3877 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT OHIO STATE CONFERENCE OF : THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION : On Appeal from
More informationTHE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. DAVIS, APPELLANT.
[Cite as State v. Davis, Ohio St.3d, 2007-Ohio-5025.] NOTICE This opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF HALL COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA, FILE NO. FAMILY VIOLENCE EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF HALL COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA, PLAINTIFF, vs. CIVIL ACTION, FILE NO. DEFENDANT. FAMILY VIOLENCE EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER The Plaintiff having prayed pursuant to O.C.G.A. 19-13-1
More informationCase 1:18-cv MJG Document 1 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:18-cv-01064-MJG Document 1 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BRIAN KIRK MALPASSO 39034 Cooney Neck Road Mechanicsville, St. Mary s County,
More informationOCCAOnline Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals
OCCAOnline Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals [NOTE ON USE: The uniform Judgment and Sentence Form 13.8 shall be used in all felony convictions and any misdemeanor the subsequent conviction of which
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed September 12, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed September 12, 2015 - Case No. 2015-1422 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. : CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN, : : Relator, : Case No. 2015-1422 : v. : Original
More informationCase 3:11-cv JPB Document 3 Filed 01/24/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 3
Case 3:11-cv-00005-JPB Document 3 Filed 01/24/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT MARTINSBURG West Virginia Citizens Defense League,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT OPPOSITION TO EMERGENCY PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND FOR A STAY OF AGENCY ACTION
Case: 19-1268 Document: 10 Filed: 03/20/2019 Page: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN RE GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC., ET AL. Case No. 19-1268 OPPOSITION TO EMERGENCY PETITION
More informationCOUNTY GOVERNMENT AND THE NEW GUN LAW
COUNTY GOVERNMENT AND THE NEW GUN LAW Guns in County Buildings Act 2013-283 includes a specific provision prohibiting firearms in certain buildings without the express permission of the person or entity
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AUDREY J. SCHERING PLAINTIFF AND THE OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY INTERVENOR-PLAINTIFF v. J. KENNETH BLACKWELL. DEFENDANT Case No.
More informationIMM FED 13 Z013 CLERK OF COURT SUPR^ME COURT F 0H1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. FRANCESCA STEINHART, et al., CASE NO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IMM FRANCESCA STEINHART, et al., Relators, vs. CASE NO. 2013-0102 Original Action in Mandamus THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES, et al. Respondents. RESPONDENT
More informationCase 3:17-cr JAG Document 26 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 155
Case 3:17-cr-00123-JAG Document 26 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 155 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Case
More informationF4 & F5 Offender Placement
September 12, 2012 Christina Madriguera Esq., Legislative Liaison/Analyst Seeking Sponsor F4 & F5 Offender Placement PROPOSED TITLE INFORMATION To modify language in Ohio Revised Code 2929.13(B)(1)(a),
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WHITE PLAINS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WHITE PLAINS DIVISION ALAN KACHALSKY, CHRISTINA NIKOLOV, and Case No. SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., COMPLAINT Plaintiffs,
More informationTOWN OF KIOWA ORDINANCE NO
TOWN OF KIOWA ORDINANCE NO. 2010-09 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 16 OF THE TOWN OF KIOWA MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION THERETO OF A NEW ARTICLE XVI CONCERNING THE RETAIL SALE, DISTRIBUTION, CULTIVATION
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
Nos. 08-1497; 08-1521 In the Supreme Court of the United States NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. OTIS MCDONALD, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY
[Cite as Ross Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Roop, 2011-Ohio-1748.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY : COMMISSIONERS OF ROSS : Case No. 10CA3161 COUNTY, OHIO,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY. The STATE OF OHIO, CASE NUMBER v. O P I N I O N
[Cite as State v. Stanovich, 173 Ohio App.3d 304, 2007-Ohio-4234.] COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY The STATE OF OHIO, CASE NUMBER 6-06-10 APPELLEE, v. O P I N I O N STANOVICH, APPELLANT.
More information12PREM;^O ^, Q^0 APR CLERK OFCOURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
[State of Ohio ex rel.]david Fox, Relator, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2008 vs. Case No. 08-0626 Franklin County Common Pleas Court, Original Complaint in Mandamus Respondent. MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT
More informationINTRODUCTION JURISDICTION VENUE
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock St. Denver, CO 80203 Plaintiff: SCOTT GESSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Colorado, v. Defendant: DEBRA
More informationFILED FRANK WHITE JR, )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY SCOTT BURNETT, et al., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CASE NO: 1816-CV01045 vs. ) DIVISION 11 ) FILED FRANK WHITE JR, ) DIVISION 11 ) Defendant. ) 31-Aug-2018
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA National Rifle Association, Shawn : Lupka, Curtis Reese, Richard Haid : and Jeffrey Armstrong, : Appellants : : v. : No. 2048 C.D. 2009 : Argued: April 20, 2010
More informationARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Table of Contents Section 1.010. Short title; introduction to Chapter... 2 Section 1.020. Authority... 2 Section 1.030. Jurisdiction... 2 Section 1.040. Purpose (Amend. #33)...
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
David R. Langdon (0067046) Thomas W. Kidd, Jr. (0066359) Bradley M. Peppo (0083847) Trial Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO LETOHIOVOTE.ORG 208 East State Street
More informationCase No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. AMERICARE MEDSERVICES, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, vs.
Case: 17-55565, 11/08/2017, ID: 10648446, DktEntry: 54-1, Page 1 of 5 (1 of 24) Case No. 17-55565 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMERICARE MEDSERVICES, INC., Plaintiff and
More informationORIGINAL. JUN 2 6 ZU S. Main St., Suite 4 00 CLERK OF COURT Akron, Ohio COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellant,
ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ESBER BEVERAGE COMPANY, -vs- Plaintiff-Appellant, LABATT USA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC et al., Ohio Supreme Court Case No. 12-0941 On Appeal from the Stark County Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
!r 0r^ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE EX REL. RICIIARD L. CURLEY, Relator, V. Case No. 2013-1896 Original Action in Replevin NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, Respondent. 1VIOT`ION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT
More informationBEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NO. 610
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NO. 610 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MECHANISM FOR THE MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO ESTABLISH MAXIMUM VEHICLE
More informationS 2492 SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC005022/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
01 -- S SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC000/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE--COURTS -- EXTREME RISK
More informationFOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. VILLAGE OF OLD MILL CREEK, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, No
No. 17-2433 and No. 17-2445 Consolidated FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT VILLAGE OF OLD MILL CREEK, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 17-2433 ANTHONY M. STAR, Defendant-Appellee. and EXELON GENERATION COMPANY,
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as Akron v. State, 2015-Ohio-5243.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) CITY OF AKRON, et al. C.A. No. 27769 Appellees v. STATE OF OHIO, et al.
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as State v. Shover, 2012-Ohio-3788.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 25944 Appellee v. SEAN E. SHOVER Appellant APPEAL
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA National Rifle Association, National Shooting Sports Foundation, Pennsylvania Association of Firearms Retailers v. No. 1305 C.D. 2008 City of Philadelphia, Mayor
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN : CASE NO. 09CV AMERICAN CITIZENS : (LULAC) : JUDGE 20 West 12 th Street Suite 402a : Cincinnati, Ohio, 45202 :
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO. 2014-1557 STATE OF OHIO Appellant -vs- DEAN M. KLEMBUS ` I Appellee On Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate District Court of Appeals
More informationCase: 1:11-cv Document #: 56 Filed: 04/30/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:864
Case: 1:11-cv-01304 Document #: 56 Filed: 04/30/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:864 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SHAWN GOWDER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No.
More informationUnited States District Court Central District of California
Case :-cv-0-odw-afm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: O 0 HOMEAWAY.COM, INC. Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SANTA MONICA, Defendant. AIRBNB, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SANTA MONICA Defendant. United States
More informationCase 3:12-cv MJR-PMF Document 83 Filed 10/03/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #806 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:12-cv-01072-MJR-PMF Document 83 Filed 10/03/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #806 CYRIL B. KORTE, JANE E. KORTE, and KORTE & LUITJOHAN CONTRACTORS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No
Case: 10-56971, 05/21/2015, ID: 9545868, DktEntry: 313-1, Page 1 of 3 (1 of 22) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No. 10-56971 Plaintiffs-Appellants,
More informationAgenda Cover Memorandum
Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: November 20, 2017 Fiscal Year: FY18 Meeting Type: Committee of the Whole City Council Budget Workshop Item Title: Approve the final reading of a resolution authorizing
More informationTHE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO. Appellant. : August 11, 2006
[Cite as State v. Brown, 168 Ohio App.3d 314, 2006-Ohio-4174.] THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO The STATE OF OHIO, : O P I N I O N Appellee, : v. : CASE NO. 2005-T-0100
More informationLEE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO
LEE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 00-13 AN ORDINANCE OF LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING LEE COUNTY ORDINANCE 94-27, PERTAINING TO THE TOWING OF VEHICLES PARKED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE REMOVAL OF STORAGE OF VEHICLES
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 15140956 Electronically Filed 06/23/2014 05:57:34 PM RECEIVED, 6/23/2014 17:58:42, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RICHARD MASONE, v. Petitioner, CASE NO.
More informationDefendants Answer to Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. All Defendants ask this Court to deny Plaintiffs request for a preliminary
Frank J. Lavery, Esquire Pennsylvania Bar No. 42370 Joshua M. Autry, Esquire Pennsylvania Bar No. 208459 225 Market Street, Suite 304 P.O. Box 1245, Harrisburg, PA 17108-1245 (717) 233-6633 (phone) (717)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 3:14-cv-213 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 3:14-cv-213 GENERAL SYNOD OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, et al., v. Plaintiffs, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as the Attorney
More informationTEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STALKING
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA, Petitioner, Case No.: Division: and, Respondent. TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STALKING The Petition for Injunction
More information