IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04- LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 4D MANUEL CASTRO, Petitioner, ROGER BRAZEAU, DOE TOWING, INC., et al.
|
|
- Clarissa Marshall
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04- LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 4D MANUEL CASTRO, Petitioner, v. ROGER BRAZEAU, DOE TOWING, INC., et al., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF WASSON & ASSOCIATES CHARTERED 1320 S. Dixie Highway, Suite 450 Miami, FL Telephone: (305) LAW OFFICES OF JESUS O. CERVANTES 8550 West Flagler Street, Suite 120 Miami, Florida (305)
2 Co-Counsel for Petitioner TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND OF THE FACTS SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ARGUMENT:. 3 I. THE FOURTH DISTRICT S OPINION CONFLICTS WITH OTHER DISTRICTS ON WHETHER A CONTINUANCE SHOULD BE GRANT TO ALLOW THE PLAINTIFF TO PROCURE AN AFFIDAVIT FROM HIS EXPERT II. THE FOURTH DISTRICT S OPINION CONFLICTS WITH OTHER DISTRICTS ON WHETHER A LAY WITNESS MAY GIVE AN OPINION AS TO THE SPEED AN AUTOMOBILE WAS TRAVELING III. THE FOURTH DISTRICT S OPINION CONFLICTS WITH OTHER DISTRICTS ON WHETHER SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS IMPROPER WHEN THE POSSIBILITY OF A FACT ISSUE EXISTS i
3 CONCLUSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ii
4 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Albers v. Dasho, 355 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1978) Breausche v. Prough, 592 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc., 732 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1999) Crowell v. Unicom Anesthesia Assoc. 845 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) Fleming v. Fleming, 710 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1998) Garcia v. Crescent Plaza Condo Ass n, Inc., 813 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) Marrero v. Corcino, 813 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2002) Martinez v. State, 692 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA Nomo Research, Inc. v. CCL Plastic Packaging, Inc., 862 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) Reeves v. State, 647 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) Snyder v. Cheezem Dev. Corp., 373 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) iii
5 Tally v. Fain, 692 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 5 th DCA 1997) Van Deese v. McKinnonville Hunting Club, Inc., No. 1D , 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8911 (Fla. 1 st DCA June 18, 2004) Vandyk v. Southside Gun, Inc., 638 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1994) Zwinge v. Hettinger, 530 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS The following recitation of the facts is copied from the opinion issued as a result of the Plaintiff/Petitioner s appeal of the summary final judgment granted in favor of Defendant/Respondent Roger Brazeau: Castro was driving with two passengers on I-95 in Broward County when his vehicle hit a metal object in the road, causing a tire blowout. He pulled to the side of the highway and exited the vehicle with his passengers. Shortly thereafter, defendant Jackson hit the same object, causing her to lose control of her car, and sending it spinning into defendant Brazeau s vehicle. Brazeau immediately hit the brakes, his air bag deployed, and his car veered into the guardrail. While he maintains that he hit the guardrail and not Castro s vehicle, other witnesses testified that he hit Castro s vehicle and Castro himself, causing injuries. Castro filed suit for damages against Jackson, Brazeau and an unknown Doe towing company which he alleged was responsible for dropping the metal object hit by Jackson onto the highway. Brazeau moved for summary judgment contending that the material facts were not in dispute, and he was not negligent. He presented his deposition, Castro s deposition, and the deposition of Castro s 1
6 passengers. No evidence suggested any negligence, other than the passengers testimony regarding Brazeau s speed. Neither Castro nor his passengers saw the Brazeau vehicle before the accident [between Brazeau s vehicle and Jackson s vehicle]. One of the passengers testified that Brazeau must have been traveling very fast because of the damage caused to Castro s vehicle s chassis in the crash. There was no expert evidence offered to show that the crash damage would indicate that Brazeau was speeding or that he was negligent. The trial judge asked Castro s attorney whether he had an affidavit from an accident reconstruction expert. The attorney responded that he had thought the witness testimony was sufficient. He said that he did have an expert but had not as yet taken the expert s deposition. The lawyer then asked for a continuance to obtain such evidence. The judge refused to continue the case. The trial court granted summary judgment. The decision under review holds that the passengers opinions as to the speed of Defendant s vehicle did not create a disputed issue of material fact to overcome summary judgment. The Fourth District in its decision implicitly receded from its prior decision in Marrero v. Corcino, 813 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2002) which held that an affidavit submitted in opposition to a motion for summary judgment was sufficient to create a fact issue on the defendant s excessive speed, even though the affiant stated that he was unable to observe the defendant coming prior to the accident, and based the lay opinion concerning speed on the facts that the Defendant came out of nowhere and left long skid marks. Id. at While conflict between decisions of the Fourth District will not itself establish this Court s jurisdiction, the intra-district conflict is cited to demonstrate the necessity 2
7 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT This Court has jurisdiction to review the decision below under the jurisdictional grant of Fla. Const. Art. V, 3(b)(3) because this decision expressly and directly conflicts with decisions of other district courts of appeal on the same points of law, to wit: 1) Whether a trial court should grant continuance of a summary judgment motion hearing when additional material evidence is available and the continuance would serve the interest of justice without prejudicing the defendant; speed; 2) Whether a lay person s observation is competent evidence of a vehicle s 3) Whether testimony which establishes the possibility of a genuine issue of material fact precludes summary judgment. ARGUMENT I. THE FOURTH DISTRICT S OPINION CONFLICTS WITH OTHER DISTRICTS ON WHETHER A CONTINUANCE SHOULD BE GRANTED TO ALLOW THE PLAINTIFF TO PROCURE AN AFFIDAVIT FROM HIS EXPERT for this Court to exercise its jurisdiction (created through conflict with other districts decisions) in order to clarify the law for the lower courts of Florida in this area. 3
8 This Court should accept jurisdiction to resolve conflict created by the Fourth District s decision to uphold the denial of the continuance of the hearing on the defense motion for summary judgment. The First District reversed the denial of a continuance of a hearing for summary judgment motion where, given additional time, counsel could garner additional evidentiary facts necessary for a resolution of the motion. Vandyk v. Southside Gun, Inc., 638 So. 2d 138, 140 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1994). As a basis for its decision, the court stated: Public policy requires that our courts be ever vigilant in making summary disposition of causes lest the application of the rule result in eroding or destroying the fundamental right of litigants under our system of jurisprudence to have the issues made by the pleadings tried by a jury of fellow citizens. The importance of preserving the jury system, and the concomitant right of a litigant to a jury trial on the merits of his case, should be zealously protected. In Tally v. Fain, 692 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 5 th DCA 1997), the Fifth District reversed the denial of a continuance, requested telephonically on the day and time of the hearing, where there was no emergency which required proceeding with the hearing and postponement would not prejudice the other party. The Second District has held that the denial of a continuance and the granting of summary judgment is an abuse of discretion when continuance would allow completion of discovery that was material to the merits. See Crowell v. Unicom 4
9 Anesthesia Assoc. 845 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Even the Fourth District has held that the denial of a continuance is an abuse of discretion when it creates an injustice for the movant and the opposing party would not be prejudiced or inconvenienced by the delay. See Fleming v. Fleming, 710 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1998). 2 Because public policy strongly favors adjudication on the merits and the decision herein under review denies the Plaintiff his day in court, this Court should exercise its discretionary jurisdiction. II. THE FOURTH DISTRICT S OPINION CONFLICTS WITH OTHER DISTRICTS ON WHETHER A LAY WITNESS MAY GIVE AN OPINION AS TO THE SPEED AN AUTOMOBILE WAS TRAVELING This Court should exercise its discretion to accept jurisdiction because the Fourth District s decision directly conflicts with the decisions of other district courts that lay persons need not be qualified as an expert in order to express an opinion as to the speed of a vehicle. In Zwinge v. Hettinger, 530 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), the Second 2 Again, while intra-district conflict between the Fourth District s cases will not alone establish this Court s jurisdiction, the existence of those inconsistent adjudications within a single district bespeaks the need for this Court to exercise its discretionary power created by the conflict with decisions of other districts to clarify the law applicable to summary judgment motions in negligence cases statewide. 5
10 District held that the trial court properly allowed three eyewitnesses to testify regarding their observations and opinions concerning the speed of vehicles involved in an accident. None of the witnesses were qualified experts. As in this case, the accident in the Zwinge case involved two separate collisions. Two of the three eyewitnesses did not see the other vehicle before it collided with the third vehicle involved in the accident, just as the witnesses in this case did not see Brazeau s vehicle before it was impacted by Jackson s car. Because the Second DCA reversed the summary judgment for the defendant based upon that non-expert testimony regarding speed, the case is factually indistinguishable from this case and the conflict vests this Court with jurisdiction. In Martinez v. State, 692 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), the Third District held that opinion testimony of lay witnesses about the speed of a defendant s vehicle at the time of the accident was admissible. In its decision below, the Fourth District upheld the trial court s ruling disallowing witness testimony that the Defendant s vehicle was coming very fast before it impacted the Plaintiff s vehicle, instead of allowing the jury to determine the credibility of the testimony. This holding also conflicts with the Second District s decision in Reeves v. State, 647 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), which decision followed the Fourth District s previous holding in Albers v. Dasho, 355 So. 2d 150 6
11 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1978), that even though the witness had only a brief opportunity to observe the speed of the vehicle in question, his opinion as to its speed was held admissible, and the fact that he had only a brief time to observe the vehicle was regarded as affecting only the weight of his testimony and not its competency. 7
12 III. THE FOURTH DISTRICT S OPINION CONFLICTS WITH OTHER DISTRICTS ON WHETHER SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS IMPROPER WHEN THE POSSIBILITY OF A FACT ISSUE EXISTS Even assuming the evidentiary insufficiency of the testimony by the lay witnesses concerning the speed of the Defendant s vehicle, that testimony establishes the possibility of a genuine issue of material fact that can be proven with other evidence. Therefore, because that testimony creates some doubt as to whether there is no genuine issue of material fact, the decision under review conflicts with decisions of other districts. The party opposing a motion for summary judgment need not create a genuine issue of material fact in order to defeat summary judgment, according to the law established in other districts of Florida. All the opponent must do is demonstrate the possibility of a genuine fact issue in order to render summary judgment improper. If the record reflects the existence of any genuine issue of material fact or the possibility of any issue, or if the record raises even the slightest doubt that an issue might exist, summary judgment is improper. Snyder v. Cheezem Dev. Corp., 373 So. 2d 719, 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)(emphasis added). Accord, e.g., Garcia v. Crescent Plaza Condo Ass n, Inc., 813 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). 8
13 While admissible evidence may be necessary to create an actual issue of material fact, the cases demonstrate that a summary judgment should not be granted even absent such an actual issue. A possible issue of material fact will defeat summary judgment even if no actual issue has been established through admissible evidence. If the record reflects even the possibility of a material issue of fact, or if different inferences can be drawn from the facts, that doubt must be resolved against the moving party and summary judgment must be denied. Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc., 732 So. 2d 1092, 1095 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1999)(emphasis added). Accord, e.g., Van Deese v. McKinnonville Hunting Club, Inc., No. 1D , 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8911 (Fla. 1 st DCA June 18, 2004); Nomo Research, Inc. v. CCL Plastic Packaging, Inc., 862 So. 2d 785, 787 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)( If the slightest doubt exists, summary judgment must be reversed ). The Fourth District s decision expressly and directly conflicts with decisions from other districts which reverse summary judgment even where the proof offered in opposition to the summary judgment is not, in and of itself, admissible. In Breausche v. Prough, 592 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), the court reversed a summary judgment based upon an affidavit which the court indicated was itself not admissible evidence to create an issue of fact, but sufficient to demonstrate the possibility that the opposing party could adduce some admissible evidence on that point. The court held: 9
14 We believe this affidavit is sufficient to defeat summary judgment for the Appellees because it indicates that the Appellant may be able to produce admissible evidence in support of her claim for relief. Id. at Thus, even if the lay opinion testimony of the witnesses in this case was legally insufficient to create an issue of fact, (because it takes expert credentials to base a speed estimate upon crush damage to a vehicle), that non-expert testimony certainly reflects the likelihood that the Plaintiff could present admissible expert testimony on the matter at trial, thereby creating the possibility of a genuine issue of fact and rendering summary judgment improper. This Court should accept jurisdiction due to that conflict in the standard applied by the district courts of appeal. CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, the Fourth District s decision directly conflicts with decisions of other district courts of appeal on at least three separate issues, this Court should accept jurisdiction and consider the matter on the merits. Respectfully submitted, WASSON & ASSOCIATES CHARTERED Suite 450 Gables One Tower 1320 South Dixie Highway Miami, Florida (305) LAW OFFICES OF JESUS O. CERVANTES Suite West Flagler Street Miami, Florida (305)
15 Attorneys for Petitioner By: ANNABEL C. MAJEWSKI Florida Bar No CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy hereof was served by U.S. Mail, upon Kerry C. McGuinn, Jr. and Burke G. Lopez, Rywant, Alvarez, Jones, Russo & Guyton, counsel for Respondent, 109 N. Brush Street, Suite 500, Tampa, Florida 33601, on this 28 th day of June, By: ANNABEL C. MAJEWSKI Florida Bar No CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing brief has been computer generated in 14 point Times New Roman and complies with the requirements of Rule By: ANNABEL C. MAJEWSKI Florida Bar No
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC04- Lower Tribunal Case No.: 4D MANUEL CASTRO, Petitioner, ROGER BRAZEAU, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC04- Lower Tribunal Case No.: 4D03-2073 MANUEL CASTRO, Petitioner, v. ROGER BRAZEAU, Respondent. ON PETITION FOP DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida. CUSTOM SCREENING & CRUSHING INC., and CUSTOM CRUSHING & MATERIAL, INC. Petitioners, vs. GLOBETEC CONSTRUCTION, LLC
In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC12-403 CUSTOM SCREENING & CRUSHING INC., and CUSTOM CRUSHING & MATERIAL, INC. Petitioners, vs. GLOBETEC CONSTRUCTION, LLC Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1141 DCA CASE NO. 3D03-2169 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY and AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY Petitioners, CASE NO: vs. Lower Tribunal No. 2D01-5770 BILTMORE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. and CENTRAL-ALLIED ENTERPRISES,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.:
MARIA CEVALLOS, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 4th District Case No: 4D08-3042 v. Petitioner, KERI ANN RIDEOUT and LINDA RIDEOUT, Respondents. / PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
More informationFLORIDA SUPREME COURT TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. CASE No.: SC
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE No.: SC03-2029 CITY OF HALLANDALE, a municipality, Lower Tribunal Case No.: 4D02-3366 (District Court of Appeal of Petitioner, Florida, Fourth District)
More informationOF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT. vs. ** CASE NO. 3D An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Judith L. Kreeger, Judge.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2002 WANE BOGOSIAN, ** Appellant, ** vs. ** CASE NO. 3D99-0255 STATE FARM MUTUAL ** AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE LOWER COMPANY, ** TRIBUNAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, L.T. Case No. 4D ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA OLIVER BOZEMAN, CASE NO. SC06-1463 Petitioner, L.T. Case No. 4D04-2232 vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ****************************************************************
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D06-5070 JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner, v. ALTERNATIVE LEGAL, INC., Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF A DECISION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE N O SC06-764 District Court N O 03D04-2123 KLAUS VERMEULEN, Petitioner, v. WORLDWIDE HOLIDAYS, INC., Respondent. On Petition for Discretionary Review from the District
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Electronically Filed 08/20/2013 05:25:08 PM ET RECEIVED, 8/20/2013 17:28:33, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC13- PEGGY T. STIMPSON, and RALPH M. STIMPSON, Petitioners,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC04-489
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA BIOMET, INC., a foreign corporation with its principal place of business in Warsaw, Indiana and licensed to do and be in business in Florida, and MIKE TRIESTE,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D
FILEMENA PORCARO, as the personal representative of the Estate of John Anthony Porcaro, vs. Petitioner, GREAT SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-924 DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC (Lower Tribunal Case No. 3D07-363) AHMAD ASAD, TONY GARCIA AND NOEL RIVERA, Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12-653 (Lower Tribunal Case No. 3D07-363) AHMAD ASAD, TONY GARCIA AND NOEL RIVERA, Petitioners, vs. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AND SGT. PATRICIA SEDANO, Respondents. ON
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 20, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-2607 Lower Tribunal No. 14-31429 Rebecca Willie-Koonce,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STACI LEVY, as Personal Representative of THE ESTATE Case No: SC 01-2786 OF BRANDON LEVY, Lower Tribunal Case No: 00-4DOO-3671 Plaintiff/Appellant, v. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KEVIN TRACY. v. Petitioner, Case No. SC07-2057 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS PATE TALLAHASSEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D FRANTZY JEAN-MARIE, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-531 DCA CASE NO. 3D04-2570 FRANTZY JEAN-MARIE, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Lower Tribunal No. 2D ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION BASED ON ALLEGED CONFLICT OF DECISIONS
Electronically Filed 07/31/2013 04:44:07 PM ET RECEIVED, 7/31/2013 16:48:32, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT VON GOETZMAN Petitioner/Pro Se SC No. 13-9999 v.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO.: SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NOS.: 4D
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO.: SC08-774 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NOS.: 4D07-1055 MANZINI & ASSOCIATES, P.A., vs. Petitioner, BROWARD SHERIFF S OFFICE and SONYA D. WIMBERLY, Respondents. / On Discretionary Review
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida A.K. GIFT SHOP, INC., Petitioner,
In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC12-362 A.K. GIFT SHOP, INC., Petitioner, v. DTRS INTERCONTINENTAL MIAMI, LLC, as Assignee of Intercontinental Hotels Corporation, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR
More informationIN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
A-49949-9/ALM IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PETITION TO REVIEW DECISION FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA 4 TH DCA Appeal No. 4D05-1598 DAMIEN PENDERGRASS, etc. et al
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CHRISTY AILLS, Petitioner, LUCIANO BOEMI, M.D., and LUCIANO BOEMI, M.D., P.A., Respondents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-2087 CHRISTY AILLS, Petitioner, v. LUCIANO BOEMI, M.D., and LUCIANO BOEMI, M.D., P.A., Respondents. RESPONDENTS AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA EDWIN MATOS, PETITIONER, CASE NO: SC05-887 Lower Trib. Case No: 4D03-2043 vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT. / PETITIONER S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Fleischman & Fleischman,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC09-1115 DISTRICT CASE NOS. 4D07-3703 and 4D07-4641 (Consolidated) L.T. CASE NO. 50 2005 CA 002721 XXXX MB SHEILA M. HULICK and THE REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D04-4825 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT, Respondent. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No: SC03-26 Lower Tribunal No: 2D DAVID C. McNEIL, RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Petitioner/Defendant. v. Case No: SC03-26 Lower Tribunal No: 2D01-4547 DAVID C. McNEIL, Respondent/Plaintiff. / RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D
Electronically Filed 10/09/2013 11:26:52 AM ET RECEIVED, 10/9/2013 11:28:34, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC2013-1834 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D11-3004
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STERLING R. LANIER, JR. v. Petitioner, Case No. SC08-19 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D JAMAR ANTWAN HILL, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-929 DCA CASE NO. 3D06-468 JAMAR ANTWAN HILL, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D VINCENT MARGIOTTI. Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-2290 DCA CASE NO. 3D02-2862 VINCENT MARGIOTTI Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA MICHAEL M. ROMAN, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-905 MICHAEL M. ROMAN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationCASE NO. SC THEODORE SPERA, STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-1304 THEODORE SPERA, vs. Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF BRUCE S. ROGOW CYNTHIA E. GUNTHER BRUCE S. ROGOW, P.A. Broward
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC KHOSROW MAKEKI, M.D., and KHOSROW MALEKI, P.A., a Florida professional association,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-1704 KHOSROW MAKEKI, M.D., and KHOSROW MALEKI, P.A., a Florida professional association, Petitioners, vs. M.A. HAJIANPOUR, M.D., M.A. HAJIANPOUR, M.D., P.A.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
Electronically Filed 09/05/2013 01:58:18 PM ET RECEIVED, 9/5/2013 14:03:32, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA NORMA WOLFE and JOHN WOLFE, Petitioners,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC Lower Tribunal No.: 1D ADAMS GRADING AND TRUCKING, INC. and JOHN M.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC07-1175 Lower Tribunal No.: 1D06-1760 ADAMS GRADING AND TRUCKING, INC. and JOHN M. BLOODSWORTH, Petitioners, vs. MICHAEL E. GRAY, Respondent. ON REVIEW FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC BERTHA JACKSON, PETITIONER, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-659 BERTHA JACKSON, PETITIONER, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC L. T. CASE NO.: 4D
MARTIN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., v. Petitioner, IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11-1070 L. T. CASE NO.: 4D09-2497 ALEXANDER WEBSTER, individually, and as Personal Representative
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC TYRA WILLIAMS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 12-655 TYRA WILLIAMS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION PAMELA JO BONDI Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 12/21/2016 10:21 AM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal SOLO AERO CORP., a Florida corporation, vs. Petitioner, AMERICA-CV
More informationPetitioner, moves this Honorable Court for leave to file this Answer Brief, and. Respondent accepts the Plaintiff's statement of the case and
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11-793 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. MANUEL DEJESUl Respond ANSWER BRIEF OF RESPONDENT ON JURISDICTION COMES NOW, the Respondent, Manuel DeJesus Deras,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC (Fourth DCA Case No. 4D )
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC11-452 (Fourth DCA Case No. 4D09-1690) MYRON ALPHESUS STANLEY, JR., Petitioner, vs. QUEST INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT, INC., Respondent. PETITIONER S AMENDED BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC DCA Case No. 3D v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANGELO KYRELIS, Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC12-642 DCA Case No. 3D11-1730 v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992 ONEWEST BANK, FSB (SUBSTITUTED PARTY FOR FORMER PLAINTIFF INDYMAC
More informationJames H. Wyman, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Coral Gables, for Appellant/Cross- Appellee.
HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC. OF IOWA, v. Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. COMES NOW, Respondent, WEST GABLES REHABILITATION
Filing # 9790298 Electronically Filed 01/31/2014 04:16:52 PM RECEIvED, 1/31/2014 16:18:46, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARIE E. MENENDEZ, Petitioner, CASE NO.:
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 10, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D18-1013 Lower Tribunal No. 15-9538 Keys Country Resort,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, CHARLES FRATELLO, Respondent. Case No. SC07-780
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. CHARLES FRATELLO, Respondent. Case No. SC07-780 ****************************************************************** ON APPEAL
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida LABARGA, J. No. SC09-2238 MARIA CEVALLOS, Petitioner, vs. KERI ANN RIDEOUT, et al., Respondents. [November 21, 2012] Maria Cevallos seeks review of the decision of the Fourth District
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADVANCED 3-D DIAGNOSTICS, INC., as assignee of Marck Chery, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000058-A-O Lower Case No.: 2013-SC-001600-O
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF On Review From The Fourth District Court of Appeal
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA USA TRUCK, INC., v. Defendant/Petitioner, Case No: SC05-8 4DCA Case No. 4D03-2485 JORGE ADOLPHO GALVEZ, ET AL. Plaintiff/Respondent. PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF On
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 13, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D14-1540 Lower Tribunal No. 12-9493 Sandor Eduardo Guillen,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903
E-Filed Document May 23 2016 10:57:29 2015-CA-00903-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903 MARKWETZEL APPELLANT VERSUS RICHARD SEARS APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE
More informationNo. 94-CV Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (Hon. Mary Ellen Abrecht, Trial Judge)
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER COURT NO.: 4D JACK LIEBMAN. Petitioner. vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC03-1896 LOWER COURT NO.: 4D00-2883 JACK LIEBMAN Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. DCA: 3D AUNDRA JOHNSON, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC09-966 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. DCA: 3D07-2145 AUNDRA JOHNSON, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT
More informationFLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Case No.: SC nd DCA Case No.: 2D Lower Tribunal Case No.: G Hillsborough County, Florida Circuit Court
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT MICHAEL F. SHEEHAN, M.D., Petitioner, vs. SCOTT SWEET, Respondent. / Case No.: SC06-1373 2nd DCA Case No.: 2D04-2744 Lower Tribunal Case No.: 03-5936G Hillsborough County, Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 07-1021 CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES WILLIAMS, Petitioner, Case No. SC03-479 v. DCA No. 2D00-5373 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / Circuit Court No. 99-2651-CA On Petition for Discretionary Review of the
More informationRESPONDENT S RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. The Respondent, Robert L. Schimmel, by and through undersigned counsel,
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 3D16-2545 RECEIVED, 12/9/2016 7:06 PM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal ARNOLD D. HESSEN, an individual. HESSEN, SCHIMMEL & DECASTRO,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ORDER. Before WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge. HOWARD PILTCH, et al.. Plaintiffs - Appellants
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse Room 2722-219 S. Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 Office of the Clerk Phone: (312) 435-5850
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS RICHARD HILL, as Next Friend of STEPHANIE HILL, a Minor, UNPUBLISHED January 31, 2003 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 235216 Wayne Circuit Court REMA ANNE ELIAN and GHASSAN
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DIGICAST NEW MEDIA, INC., Petitioner, -vs- FIERA.COM, INC., Respondent. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SCO3-418 THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D02-441 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 01-24419 CA 22 DIGICAST NEW MEDIA, INC., Petitioner, -vs- FIERA.COM, INC., Respondent. APPEAL FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARK VINCENT OLVERA, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC03-3803 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEBBIE CARTER, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of KYLE MAK, deceased and survivors thereof, a minor, CASE NO. SC03-961 DCA CASE NO.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 21ST CENTURY CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LARRY RIDNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED October 28, 2003 v No. 240710 Monroe Circuit Court CHARLEY RAFKO TOWNE and CAROL SUE LC No. 99-010343-NI TOWNE, Defendants-Appellees.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CAL HENDERSON, CASE NO.: 91,965 Petitioner/Defendant, DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND DISTRICT v. NO.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CAL HENDERSON, CASE NO.: 91,965 Petitioner/Defendant, DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND DISTRICT v. NO.: 96-02301 ISAC B. BOWDEN, et. al., Respondents/Plaintiffs. / REPLY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF FLORIDA NEW TESTAMENT BAPTIST CHURCH, INCORPORATED OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. CASE NO. SC08- STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
Filing # 45970766 E-Filed 09/01/2016 12:25:05 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC16-1323 v. Complainant, The Florida Bar File No. 2014-70,056 (11G) JOSE MARIA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC Lower Tribunal No: 3d
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA EVENT SERVICES AMERICA, INC. d/b/a CONTEMPORARY SERVICES COMPANY, CASE NO. SC06-284 Lower Tribunal No: 3d04-2368 v. Petitioner, ANTHONY RAGUSA and KAREN RAGUSA, his wife,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. SC
Electronically Filed 08/26/2013 04:20:02 PM ET RECEIVED, 8/26/2013 16:23:40, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, v. SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs-Appellants : C.A. CASE NO
[Cite as Carder v. Kettering, 2004-Ohio-4260.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO TERRY D. CARDER, et al. : Plaintiffs-Appellants : C.A. CASE NO. 20219 v. : T.C. CASE NO. 2003 CV 1640
More informationTHE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS
2016 UT App 17 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS SCOTT EVANS, Appellant, v. PAUL HUBER AND DRILLING RESOURCES, LLC, Appellees. Memorandum Decision No. 20140850-CA Filed January 22, 2016 Fifth District Court, St.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. DALE JOHNSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. SC ) (4DCA ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DALE JOHNSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. SC ) (4DCA 05-1585) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Respondent. ) ) PETITIONER=S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Review from the District
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC ADRIAN FlUDMAN. Petitioner V5. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS. Respondent
Electronical]v Filed 10/07/20l303:01:37 PM ET RECE]VED. l0/7/20]3 2 l:38:3i Thomas D. Hall Clerk. Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC13-1607 ADRIAN FlUDMAN Petitioner V5. SAFECO INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D Respondent. /
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D10-1422 ANA MARIA AGUILAR-FERNANDEZ, vs. Petitioner, UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. / PETITIONER=S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: JANUARY 9, 2015; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2013-CA-000772-MR PEGGY GILBERT APPELLANT APPEAL FROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE ROBERT G.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL CASE NO. 4D10-3345 RESPONDENT
More informationFLORIDA SUPREME COURT. JEAN ANN KOLINCHAK and GERARD BERNOTAS. Appellants, 2DCA Case No. 2D v. SCG l 509 FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF FLORIDA,
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT JEAN ANN KOLINCHAK and GERARD BERNOTAS O Appellants, 2DCA Case No. 2D11-4598 v. SCG l 509 FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF FLORIDA, Appellee BRIEF AND TABLE OF CONTENTS OF APPELLANTS JEAN ANN
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MYRA VAIVADA, Petitioner, CASE NO. SC04-867 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JOSE VALDES and JUANA VALDES, his wife, Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-971 JOSE VALDES and JUANA VALDES, his wife, Petitioners, vs. GAB ROBINS NORTH AMERICA, INC., SOUTHERN UNDERWRITERS, INC., CAPITAL ASSURANCE SERVICES, INC.,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION - HOA DAVID HOLT, DEBRA DE BELL, and MICHAEL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA RESPONDENTS ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND RSKCO S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA VICKI LUCAS, vs. Petitioner, ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and RSKCO, CASE NO.: SC07-1736 L.T. Case No.: 1D06-5161 Respondents. / RESPONDENTS ENGLEWOOD
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC L.T. CASE NO. 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. LEROY MACKEY, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-879 L.T. CASE NO. 4D09-527 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. LEROY MACKEY, Respondent. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION PAMELA JO BONDI Attorney
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4th DCA Case No. 4D ) RICHARD MUCCIO, Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-1077 (4th DCA Case No. 4D05-3194) RICHARD MUCCIO, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM
More informationv No Oakland Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PHILLIP PETER ORZECHOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED September 20, 2018 v No. 340085 Oakland Circuit Court YOLANDA ORZECHOWSKI, LC No. 2016-153952-NI
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D Lower Tribunal Case No.: CA-21
E-Copy Received Jul 3, 2014 1:03 AM IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D14-542 Lower Tribunal Case No.: 12-45100-CA-21 ELAD MORTGAGE GROUP, LLC, a Florida
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ERIC W. SMALLRIDGE, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC05-1506 District Court Case No. 1D03-4751 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER MICHAEL UFFERMAN
More informationfihj oj 9lidinumd on g fltumdtuj tire 16tft dtuj oj fjei'pau:vaj, 2017.
VIRGINIA: Jn tire Supwne &.ud oj ViMJinia fleld at tire Supwne &.ud fijuii!tj.ing in tire fihj oj 9lidinumd on g fltumdtuj tire 16tft dtuj oj fjei'pau:vaj, 2017. Orlando A. Cruz, Appellant, against Record
More informationIn the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STEVE SAUNDERS, v. KATHLEEN BASKA, Appellant, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) WD75405 FILED: April 16, 2013 APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PLATTE COUNTY THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CHARLES STRONG, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1823 CHARLES STRONG, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
More informationCASE NO.: 4D JOHN TAGLIERI, an individual, Appellant, Appellees. REPLY BRIEF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CASE NO.: 4D14-1983 JOHN TAGLIERI, an individual, RECEIVED, 9/8/2015 1:38 PM, Clerk, Fourth District Court of Appeal Appellant, V. DONALD J. TRUMP, THE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 12, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 12, 2005 Session RHONDA D. DUNCAN v. ROSE M. LLOYD, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 01C-1459 Walter C. Kurtz,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT
JOHN KISH and ELIZABETH KISH, vs. Petitioners, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-1523 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF
More informationEvidence Study & Review Session One Learning from Multiple Choice
Evidence Study & Review Session One Learning from Multiple Choice Directions: Please move into groups of three or four people. First, as a group, decide what you think are the key big picture concepts
More informationCASE NO. 1D Charles F. Beall, Jr. of Moore, Hill & Westmoreland, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOHN R. FERIS, JR., v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-4633
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Appellant/Petitioner SUPREME COURT CASE NO vs. DCA CASE NO. 5D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PURDIE BURKES Appellant/Petitioner SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 07-328 vs. DCA CASE NO. 5D05-3523 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee/ / AMENDED PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION (EXPRESS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO.4D LT. NO CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC10-2361 DCA CASE NO.4D08-1375 LT. NO. 06-4008CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationPETITIONER, CHARLOTTE TAYLOR S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA 500 S. DUVAL ST. TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399 CHARLOTTE TAYLOR, Plaintiff/Petitioner SC07-1763 4DCA# 4D06-2801 L.T. CASE NO. 502004CA004084XXXXMB v. CITY OF LAKE WORTH; CODE ENFORCEMENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC Third District Case Nos. 3D and 3D Lower Tribunal Case No.
Filing # 11177291 Electronically Filed 03/11/2014 10:18:49 AM RECEIVED, 3/11/2014 10:23:38, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC14-263 Third District
More information