IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC KHOSROW MAKEKI, M.D., and KHOSROW MALEKI, P.A., a Florida professional association,
|
|
- Dwayne Baldwin Daniels
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC KHOSROW MAKEKI, M.D., and KHOSROW MALEKI, P.A., a Florida professional association, Petitioners, vs. M.A. HAJIANPOUR, M.D., M.A. HAJIANPOUR, M.D., P.A. a Florida professional association and ZOYA PHYSICAL THERAPY AND REHABILITATION CENTER, INC., Respondents. RESPONSE TO JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF CYNTHIA E. GUNTHER BRUCE S. ROGOW, P.A. Broward Financial Centre, Ste East Broward Blvd. Fort Lauderdale, FL (954) BRUCE S. ROGOW BRUCE S. ROGOW, P.A. Broward Financial Centre, Ste East Broward Blvd. Fort Lauderdale, FL (954)
2 Counsel for Respondents
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 9
10 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CITATIONS... ii STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT... 2 ARGUMENT... 3 THERE IS NO CONFLICT;... THERE IS NO JURISDICTION 3 CONCLUSION... 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE... 8 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE... 9 x
11 TABLE OF CITATIONS CASES Page Florida Dep t of Transportation v. Armadillo Partners, So. 2d 279 (Fla. 2003) 2, 3, 5 Hajianpour v. Maleki, 932 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2006)...1, 3, 4, 7 H.K. Corp. v. Estate of Miller, 405 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)... 6 Orpe v. Carnival Corp., 909 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)... 6 Rochelle v. State Road Department, 196 So. 2d (Fla. 2d DCA 1967) 5 State Road Department v. Falcon, Inc., 157 So. 2d (Fla. 2d DCA 1963) 5, 6 xi
12
13 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS The Petitioner s Statement of the Case and Facts (as set out in the district court s decision) (Petitioner s Brief, p. 2) is accurate to the extent that it restates the case and facts from the decision below. The sum and substance of the decision below is that Petitioner s expert testimony that two doctors who had no obligation to practice together, who had been in litigation since 1992, who had no buyer for a practice, who had in the ensuing twelve years never made more than $600,000 a year, would be grossing $18.7 million in 2012 and earn $5 million a year after taxes was conjecture and speculation and should have been stricken. Hajianpour v. Maleki, 932 So. 2d 459, 462 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2006). As we demonstrate below, the decision below posed no conflict with this Court s decisions and no disharmony with the decisions of any other court. 1
14 Therefore review should be denied. 2
15 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT There is no express and direct conflict with Florida Dep t of Transportation v. Armadillo Partners, 849 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 2003) or any other cases and therefore there is no basis for the exercise of jurisdiction. The District Court of Appeal decision was based on established case law that requires the striking of expert testimony that is conjectural and speculative and unsupported by facts or recognized methodology. That is all that happened here. Neither Armadillo nor its predecessors and progeny (Petitioner s Brief, p. 6) were, or are, implicated by the decision below. 3
16 ARGUMENT THERE IS NO CONFLICT; THERE IS NO JURISDICTION Petitioner asserts that the decision below establishes a direct, express, and flagrant departure from the Armadillo directive that an expert s evaluation method is not a matter that relates to the competency of his testimony unless the method used by the witness is so totally inadequate or improper that adoption of the method would require departing from all common sense and reason.... Petitioner s Brief, p. 6. The Petitioner, after quarreling with what the District Court of Appeal did find and did not do (id. at 8) (emphasis in original), concludes its conflict argument with the Armadillo doctrine contemplates that juries are fully capable of weighing the opinions of competing experts subjected to the crucible of cross-examination. Id. at 9. 4
17 Petitioner s zeal in disagreeing with the opinion below glosses over the reasons why the court found the McNulty opinion to be based on speculation and conjecture, not supported by the facts, or not arrived at by recognized methodology.... Hajianpour v. Maleki, 932 So. 2d at 464. Indeed, those reasons actually meet the Armadillo totally inadequate or improper caveat. Armadillo, 849 So. 2d at 287. The court below wrote: McNulty assumed that these two physicians would continue in practice for twenty years, despite the fact that neither one of them had a long term employment agreement or a non-compete agreement with the P.A. He was unable to explain any factual basis for his assumption that they would practice together for twenty years. * * * On cross-examination McNulty admitted that he assumed in his evaluation an ongoing business even though he knew there was not one because the litigation began in July He assumed no breach and did not consider whether a buyer would buy a business in litigation. McNulty did not consider the present or future impact of 5
18 competing practices. 932 So. 2d at 462. McNulty, who had never valued a professional association provider of medical services assumed a rapid increase in their practice and concluded that in the year 2012 the two physicians would be together grossing $18.7 million and they would each be earning $5 million a year after taxes. Id. (emphasis supplied). If there were ever a case that cried out for application of the principles striking expert testimony as conjectural, speculative, unfounded and unsupported by recognized methodology, this is the case. This is not a case of an expert not considering all the factors; this is a case of an expert offering an opinion that cannot be applied to the facts. Hajianpour and Maleki were kaput and there was no way to opine that 20 years after their rift they would make $18.7 million dollars. The cases cited by Petitioner as consistent with Armadillo are, indeed, consistent, making them distinguishable from the instant case. Rochelle v. State Road Department, 196 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967), involved a dispute about the value of land acquired for the construction of an interchange for the turnpike. Id. at 478. The trial judge excluded expert testimony which compared the land to similar land in different areas where the turnpike passed. Id. On appeal, the second district concluded that despite the remoteness of the properties from one 6
19 another, this was a reasonable comparison given the purpose and design of a turnpike and reversed the admissibility ruling. See id. at The expert in Rochelle did not imagine lands used for turnpikes that did not exist. That would have been analogous to the invented factors used in McNulty s testimony. There is no analogy to be made between the instant case and Rochelle. State Road Department v. Falcon, Inc., 157 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963), like Armadillo involved a failure to include a particular factor. Id. at 564. In Falcon, an eminent domain case, experts were utilized to determine the value of the subject land. See id. The trial court granted a new trial based on prejudice caused by the failure of one expert to include in his evaluation a particular sale involving the property. Id. The district court reversed, finding that failure to be too minor to support taking discretion away from the jury. Id. at 566. Falcon does not support the notion that experts can inflate their calculation results with facts not supported in the record. H.K. Corp. v. Estate of Miller, 405 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and Orpe v. Carnival Corp., 909 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), are equally inapplicable. H.K. Corp. was a personal injury case involving a diving accident. Id. at 219. The purpose of the expert s testimony in that case was to help prove that the hotel pool s inadequate water level was the proximate cause of the 7
20 Plaintiff s injury. Id. The court stated that the testimony of plaintiffs expert witness was properly admitted into evidence on the basis that... the sufficiency of the facts required to form an opinion must normally be decided by the expert himself. There is no dispute that McNulty was entitled to determine the sufficiency of the facts forming the basis of his opinion. His expert opinion did not however, afford him the ability to create facts. Orpe, another personal injury case arising from a cruise ship passenger s injury, dealt with the qualifications of the Plaintiff s sole liability witness to testify as an expert. 909 So. 2d at 930. The instant case is not concerned with issues of expert qualifications. Finally, Petitioner contends that Respondent s expert at trial (Mr. Fishkind) provided evidence on which the jury could have found damages, undermining the district court s decision of no liability. Petitioner has simply ignored that the District Court recognized that [i]n Fishkind s opinion, Maleki had mitigated any and all damages he might have sustained as a result of the breach and was entitled to nothing. Maleki v. Hajianpour, 932 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Thus, there was no competent evidence to support Maleki s claim. CONCLUSION The decision below posed no conflict with this Court s decisions, nor any disharmony or fear for a slew of inter-district and intra district conflicts. 8
21 Petitioner s Brief, p. 10. Review should be denied. 9
22 Respectfully submitted, BRUCE S. ROGOW Florida Bar No CYNTHIA E. GUNTHER Florida Bar No BRUCE S. ROGOW, P.A. Broward Financial Centre, Suite East Broward Blvd. Fort Lauderdale, FL Ph: (954) Fax: (954) Counsel for Respondents CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished via U.S. Mail this 19th day of September, 2006 to the following persons: JEFFREY P. KAISER, ESQ E. Saint Andrews Drive Hialeah, FL ARTHUR J. ENGLAND, JR. GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A Brickell Avenue Miami, FL JOHN R. KELSO CATHERINE M. RODRIGUEZ LEVEY, AIRAN, SHEVIN, ET AL. Gables One Tower, PH #
23 1320 South Dixie Highway Coral Gables, FL CYNTHIA E. GUNTHER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY that this Brief is in compliance with Rule 9.210, Fla. R. App.P., and is prepared in Times New Roman 14-point font. CYNTHIA E. GUNTHER 11
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D SUSAN FIXEL, INC., a Florida Corporation, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-707 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D05-243 SUSAN FIXEL, INC., a Florida Corporation, Petitioner, v. ROSENTHAL & ROSENTHAL, INC., a New York Corporation, Respondent.
More informationRYVMED MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., DEVON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., DEVON MEDICAL, INC., d/b/a DEVON MEDICAL SUPPLIES, and SUPPLY MARKETING, INC.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-1257 RYVMED MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., vs. Petitioner, DEVON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., DEVON MEDICAL, INC., d/b/a DEVON MEDICAL SUPPLIES, and SUPPLY MARKETING, INC.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC Lower Tribunal No: 3d
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA EVENT SERVICES AMERICA, INC. d/b/a CONTEMPORARY SERVICES COMPANY, CASE NO. SC06-284 Lower Tribunal No: 3d04-2368 v. Petitioner, ANTHONY RAGUSA and KAREN RAGUSA, his wife,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.SC00-2346 PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, v. KATHERINE HARRIS, as Secretary of State of the State of Florida, and ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH, as Attorney
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 00-2346 PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, vs. KATHERINE HARRIS, as Secretary of State, State of Florida, and ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH, as Attorney
More informationCASE NO. SC07- MARIA HERRERA, PETITIONER, RESPONDENT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07- MARIA HERRERA, PETITIONER, VS. EDWARD A. SCHILLING, RESPONDENT. BRIEF ON JURISDICTION OF PETITIONER MARIA HERRERA ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 12/21/2016 10:21 AM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal SOLO AERO CORP., a Florida corporation, vs. Petitioner, AMERICA-CV
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CHRISTY AILLS, Petitioner, LUCIANO BOEMI, M.D., and LUCIANO BOEMI, M.D., P.A., Respondents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-2087 CHRISTY AILLS, Petitioner, v. LUCIANO BOEMI, M.D., and LUCIANO BOEMI, M.D., P.A., Respondents. RESPONDENTS AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC. Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-1397 PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, v. V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC Respondent. RESPONDENT V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC Lower Court Case No. 1D
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS, INC., Petitioner, v. Case No. SC03-1656 Lower Court Case No. 1D02-1530 GARY JULIANA, II, a minor child, by and through his parents
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA Case No. 4D Florida Bar No
DAVION MCKEITHAN, a minor, by and through his parent and next best friend, DELORES MCKEITHAN and DELORES MCKEITHAN, individually, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-1876 DCA Case No. 4D03-2154
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D
FILEMENA PORCARO, as the personal representative of the Estate of John Anthony Porcaro, vs. Petitioner, GREAT SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-924 DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC L. T. CASE NO.: 4D
MARTIN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., v. Petitioner, IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11-1070 L. T. CASE NO.: 4D09-2497 ALEXANDER WEBSTER, individually, and as Personal Representative
More informationCASE NO. SC THEODORE SPERA, STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-1304 THEODORE SPERA, vs. Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF BRUCE S. ROGOW CYNTHIA E. GUNTHER BRUCE S. ROGOW, P.A. Broward
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC04- Lower Tribunal Case No.: 4D MANUEL CASTRO, Petitioner, ROGER BRAZEAU, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC04- Lower Tribunal Case No.: 4D03-2073 MANUEL CASTRO, Petitioner, v. ROGER BRAZEAU, Respondent. ON PETITION FOP DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MOSES ACHORD, et al., vs. Petitioners, Case No. SC11-228 L.T. CASE NO. 4D09-1906 OSCEOLA FARMS CO., Respondent. / RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Robert C.
More informationCASE NO. SC CORAL REEF DRIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, etc. et al., DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a foreign limited partnership,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-2367 CORAL REEF DRIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, etc. et al., vs. Petitioners, DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a foreign limited partnership, Respondent. On a
More informationCASE NO. SC DAVID M. SORIA, M.D., INPHYNET CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. and TEAM HEALTH, INC., JURISDICTIONAL ANSWER BRIEF
IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT _ CASE NO. SC11-2050 DAVID M. SORIA, M.D., vs Petitioner. INPHYNET CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. and TEAM HEALTH, INC., Respondents. On discretionary conflict review of a decision
More informationCase 1:12-cv MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2013 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:12-cv-22439-MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2013 Page 1 of 8 MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a sovereign nation and Federally recognized Indian tribe, vs. Plaintiff, IN THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC MIRACLE CENTER ASSOCIATES, Petitioner, vs. SCANDINAVIAN HEALTH SPA, INC. et al. Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC05-884 MIRACLE CENTER ASSOCIATES, Petitioner, vs. SCANDINAVIAN HEALTH SPA, INC. et al Respondent. ON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC DCA Case No. 3D v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANGELO KYRELIS, Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC12-642 DCA Case No. 3D11-1730 v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992 ONEWEST BANK, FSB (SUBSTITUTED PARTY FOR FORMER PLAINTIFF INDYMAC
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BRIEF ON JURISDICTION OF RESPONDENT, EDWARD A. SCHILLING
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARIA HERRERA, Petitioner, Case No.: SC07-839 v. EDWARD A. SCHILLING Respondent. BRIEF ON JURISDICTION OF RESPONDENT, EDWARD A. SCHILLING On Discretionary Review from the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JORGE LUIS DOMINGUEZ, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JORGE LUIS DOMINGUEZ, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD DISTRICT BRIEF
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC05-1586 BRUCE BERNSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. HARVEY GOLDMAN, Respondent, PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Petition to Review Decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-49 ADAM W. MASON, Petitioner, vs. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. and ROCHE LABORATORIES INC., Respondents.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-49 ADAM W. MASON, Petitioner, vs. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. and ROCHE LABORATORIES INC., Respondents. ON REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT, CASE
More informationJURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENTS
HERB PHILLIPS, an individual, ) and STRIKER YACHT CORP., a ) New York corporation authorized ) and doing business in Florida, ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) ) EDWARD ENNIS, JR., an ) individual; GEORGE PURVIS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D DOCTOR DIABETIC SUPPLY, INC., Appellant / Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-1922 3DCA CASE NO. 3D09-1475 DOCTOR DIABETIC SUPPLY, INC., Appellant / Petitioner, v. POAP CORP. d/b/a EXCHANGE PLACE, Appellee / Respondent. PETITIONER
More informationDESARROLLO INDUSTRIAL BIOACUATICO S.A. ( DIBSA ), E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO. L.T. No. 4D01-779 DESARROLLO INDUSTRIAL BIOACUATICO S.A. ( DIBSA ), Petitioner, vs. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Respondent. On Petition for Discretionary Review
More informationCITY OF MIAMI, PETITIONER, RESPONDENTS.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1449 CITY OF MIAMI, PETITIONER, VS. FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF DADE COUNTY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. BRIEF ON JURISDICTION OF CITY OF MIAMI ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BASSAM ABIFARAJ and RAYYA ABIFARAJ, on behalf of and as parents and natural guardians of SAMER ABIFARAJ, a deceased minor, vs. Petitioners, SC05-1595 L.T. Case No.: 1D03-4344
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC BEVERLY ROGERS, et. al. v. THE ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC00-2373 BEVERLY ROGERS, et. al. v. THE ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, et al. Petitioners/Appellants Respondents/Appellees 4 TH DCA CASE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D CITY OF MIAMI. Petitioner. vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D01-3050 CITY OF MIAMI Petitioner vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL. Respondents RESPONDENTS ANSWER BRIEF TO PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D06-5070 JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner, v. ALTERNATIVE LEGAL, INC., Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF A DECISION
More informationNO SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WALTER WEISENBERG. Petitioner, vs. COSTA CROCIERE, S.p.A. Respondent.
NO. 10-1256 SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WALTER WEISENBERG Petitioner, vs. COSTA CROCIERE, S.p.A. Respondent. On Appeal From the Third District Court of Appeal LT Case No(s): 3D07-555; 04-23514 PETITIONER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1141 DCA CASE NO. 3D03-2169 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JOSE VALDES and JUANA VALDES, his wife, Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-971 JOSE VALDES and JUANA VALDES, his wife, Petitioners, vs. GAB ROBINS NORTH AMERICA, INC., SOUTHERN UNDERWRITERS, INC., CAPITAL ASSURANCE SERVICES, INC.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO.: 3D BOCA INVESTORS GROUP, INC. Petitioner, vs. IRWIN POTASH et al.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC03-351 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO.: 3D01-2587 BOCA INVESTORS GROUP, INC. Petitioner, vs. IRWIN POTASH et al., Respondents. On Discretionary Conflict Review of a
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT, CITY OF LARGO, ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION IN RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S AMENDED BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARY KATHERINE DAY-PETRANO CASE NO. SC05-1181 L.T. 2D04-4867 Petitioner, v. PINELLAS COUNTY AND CIRCUIT COURTS OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA; STATE OF FLORIDA;
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STACI LEVY, as Personal Representative of THE ESTATE Case No: SC 01-2786 OF BRANDON LEVY, Lower Tribunal Case No: 00-4DOO-3671 Plaintiff/Appellant, v. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO.: SC11-734 THIRD DCA CASE NO. s: 3D09-3102 & 3D10-848 CIRCUIT CASE NO.: 09-25070-CA-01 UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA RESPONDENT HENRY ANDREW HACSI S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CYNTHIA MARTIN, vs. Petitioner, HENRY ANDREW HACSI, CASE NO.: SC05-1857 L.T. Case No.: 5D04-2807 Respondent. / RESPONDENT HENRY ANDREW HACSI S BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. COMES NOW, Respondent, WEST GABLES REHABILITATION
Filing # 9790298 Electronically Filed 01/31/2014 04:16:52 PM RECEIvED, 1/31/2014 16:18:46, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARIE E. MENENDEZ, Petitioner, CASE NO.:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 3D
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SPENCER MCGUINNESS, Petitioner, v. PROSPECT ARAGON, LLC, Respondent. RESPONDENT S REPLY BRIEF LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN K. GOODKIND Brian K. Goodkind Fla. Bar No.: 347795 4121 La Playa
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA PAMELA GRUNOW, as Personal Representative of the Estate of BARRY GRUNOW, deceased, vs. Petitioner, VALOR CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation, TALLAHASSEE,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 10750991 Electronically Filed 02/27/2014 10:29:07 AM RECEIVED, 2/27/2014 10:33:37, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LISA M. DETOURNAY, ) BRENDA RANDOL, and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11-1737 Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D10-4687 Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Case No. 10-07095(25) WILLIAM TELLI, Petitioner, v. BROWARD COUNTY AND
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-2229 DESARROLLO INDUSTRIAL 4DCA CASE NO. 4D01-779 BIOACUATICO S.A., vs. Petitioner, E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Respondent. / RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 15572814 Electronically Filed 07/03/2014 05:32:02 PM RECEIVED, 7/3/2014 17:33:34, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court MOHAMMAD ANWAR FARID AL-SALEH, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Court of Appeal s Case No.: 4D JAN KRZYNOWEK, Petitioner, -vs- TZVI SCHACHTER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Court of Appeal s Case No.: 4D06-2266 JAN KRZYNOWEK, Petitioner, -vs- TZVI SCHACHTER Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH
More informationCASE NO. SC10- L.T. No. 3D GLK, L.P., a Washington limited partnership, and EMANUEL ORGANEK,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10- L.T. No. 3D09-591 GLK, L.P., a Washington limited partnership, and EMANUEL ORGANEK, vs. Petitioners, FOUR SEASONS HOTELS LIMITED, a Canadian corporation,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: SC Lower Tribunal Nos.: 5D CA W HOWARD BROWNING, Petitioner, vs. LYNN ANNE POIRIER,
Filing # 18199903 Electronically Filed 09/12/2014 10:17:38 PM RECEIVED, 9/12/2014 22:18:53, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC13-2416 Lower Tribunal Nos.:
More informationDefendant, Frank Avellino ( Avellino ), files this response to Plaintiff s Supplemental
Filing # 17305505 Electronically Filed 08/20/2014 12:33:55 PM P & S ASSOCIATES GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, etc. et al., Plaintiffs, vs. MICHAEL D. SULLIVAN, et al. Defendants. / IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JOHN RUIZ, ANTHONY DAVIDE, Petitioners, vs. AUSTRALIA MEJIA. Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 08-1659 JOHN RUIZ, ANTHONY DAVIDE, Petitioners, vs. AUSTRALIA MEJIA Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, CASE NO. 3D-07-2254
More informationDEFENDANT CITY OF HIALEAH S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Filing # 14713582 Electronically Filed 06/11/2014 06:32:24 PM SILVIO MEMBRENO and FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF VENDORS, INC., v. Plaintiffs, THE CITY OF HIALEAH, FLORIDA, Defendants. / IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
More informationPETITIONERS REPLY BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-1397 DANIEL DELMONICO AND MYD MARINE DISTRIBUTOR, INC., vs. Petitioners, ARTHUR RODGERS TRAYNOR, JR. and AKERMAN, SENTERFITT & EIDSON, Respondents. PETITIONERS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. and MILLENNIUM PHYSICAN DCA Case No.: 2D GROUP, LLC,
Filing # 14582210 Electronically Filed 06/09/2014 02:42:53 PM RECEIVED, 6/9/2014 14:43:36, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOSEPH S. CHIRILLO, JR., M.D., JOSEPH S.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 2 5 AN 0 23 SHANDALYN SANDERS, as Personal Representative of the Estates of CLARA --- SANDERS, deceased, and CHAUNCEY SANDERS, deceased, Petitioner,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC05-2130 STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, vs. APPELLANT, GULFSTREAM PARK RACING ASSOCIATION,
More informationCase 0:09-cv WPD Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:09-cv-60016-WPD Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA HOLLYWOOD MOBILE ESTATES LIMITED, a Florida Limited Partnership,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC L.T. No. 2D SOUTHSTAR EQUITY, L.L.C. and BROOKSIDE PROPERTIES, INC., Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC08-962 L.T. No. 2D05-1306 SOUTHSTAR EQUITY, L.L.C. and BROOKSIDE PROPERTIES, INC., Petitioners, vs. LAI CHAU, Respondent. RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON
More informationTALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. 4 th DCA CASE NO. 4D
A-47276-9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA COLLEEN NODURFT, Plaintiff/Appellant, Respondent, Case No.: SC04-2179 4 th DCA CASE NO. 4D03-2516 vs. SERVICO CENTRE ASSOCIATES,
More informationCASE NO.: 4D JOHN TAGLIERI, an individual, Appellant, Appellees. REPLY BRIEF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CASE NO.: 4D14-1983 JOHN TAGLIERI, an individual, RECEIVED, 9/8/2015 1:38 PM, Clerk, Fourth District Court of Appeal Appellant, V. DONALD J. TRUMP, THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 3D04-95 GROVE ISLE ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant/Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1481 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 3D04-95 GROVE ISLE ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant/Petitioner, vs. IRENE ARDITI and MAURICE ARDITI, Plaintiffs/Respondents.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO: SC L.T. Case No. 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA COLUMBIA HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF SOUTH BROWARD, d/b/a WESTSIDE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a foreign for profit corporation, vs. Petitioner/Defendant, CASE NO:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC L. T. CASE NO.: 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1644 L. T. CASE NO.: 4D04-1970 SANDRA H. LAND, vs. Petitioner, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER Rebecca J. Covey,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO.4D LT. NO CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC10-2361 DCA CASE NO.4D08-1375 LT. NO. 06-4008CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. Lower Tribunal Case No. 09-CA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Lower Tribunal Case No. 09-CA-001404 VILA & SON LANDSCAPING CORPORATION, Petitioner vs. POSEN CONSTRUCTION, INC., Respondent PETITIONER'S JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D VINCENT MARGIOTTI. Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-2290 DCA CASE NO. 3D02-2862 VINCENT MARGIOTTI Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONERS BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA AHKTAR QAZI, M.D, FLORIDA RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.A., Defendants/Petitioners, SUPREME COURT CASE NUMBER: FIFTH DISTRICT vs. CASE NUMBER: 5D01-3055 RICHARD LARRY GOOLSBY,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER COURT NO.: 4D JACK LIEBMAN. Petitioner. vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC03-1896 LOWER COURT NO.: 4D00-2883 JACK LIEBMAN Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CBS RADIO STATIONS, INC. f/k/a INFINITY RADIO, INC., vs. Appellant/Petitioner, Case Nos. SC10-2189, SC10-2191 (consolidated) L.T. Case No. 4D08-3504 ELENA WHITBY, a/k/a
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04- LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 4D MANUEL CASTRO, Petitioner, ROGER BRAZEAU, DOE TOWING, INC., et al.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04- LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 4D03-2073 MANUEL CASTRO, Petitioner, v. ROGER BRAZEAU, DOE TOWING, INC., et al., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM A DECISION OF THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.
LARSON & LARSON, P.A., HERBERT W. LARSON, and H. WILLIAM LARSON, JR., IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Defendants/Petitioners, -vs- Sup. Ct. Case No. SC08-428 TSE INDUSTRIES, INC., Respondent. / ON PETITION
More informationCase 0:13-cr JIC Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2013 Page 1 of 5
Case 0:13-cr-60068-JIC Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2013 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 13-60068-CR-COHN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEBBIE CARTER, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of KYLE MAK, deceased and survivors thereof, a minor, CASE NO. SC03-961 DCA CASE NO.
More informationSUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. v. CASE No. SC L.T. Case No. 1D BASIL D. FOSSUM, M.D. and DENNIS M. LEWIS, M.D.,
SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA BETH LINN and ANTHONY LINN, Petitioners, v. CASE No. SC05-134 L.T. Case No. 1D03-4152 BASIL D. FOSSUM, M.D. and DENNIS M. LEWIS, M.D., Respondents. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
More informationRESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1365 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D02-4510 RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF GARY A. BARCUS Appellant/Petitioner vs. GROVE AT GRAND PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Respondent
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA TAM INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Florida corporation d/b/a FALLS OF MARGATE, S.C. Case No.: 07-1356 D.C. CASE NO.: 05-01712 (04) Petitioner/Defendant/Appellee. L.T.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC Lower Court Case Number 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC06-2110 Lower Court Case Number 4D05-4560 EDWARD SEGAL, Petitioner, vs. BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, Respondent. BROWARD COUNTY S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE N O SC06-764 District Court N O 03D04-2123 KLAUS VERMEULEN, Petitioner, v. WORLDWIDE HOLIDAYS, INC., Respondent. On Petition for Discretionary Review from the District
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CHARLIE CRIST, Attorney ) General of the State of ) Florida, ) ) Petitioner, ) Case No. SC vs. ) ) Fourth District REP. CORRINE BROWN, et al., ) Case Nos. 4D02-2353 & 4D02-2401
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D Fla. Bar No
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-308 DCA CASE NO. 3D01-2229 Fla. Bar No. 137172 E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO., INC., etc., et al. vs. Petitioners, CLAIRE J. SIDRAN, et al., Respondents. / BRIEF
More informationIf you paid Overdraft Fees to M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, you may be eligible for a payment from a Class Action Settlement.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If you paid Overdraft Fees to M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, you may be eligible for a payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC L.T. CASE NO. 3D MATTHEW SANGUINE, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-543 L.T. CASE NO. 3D04-1337 MATTHEW SANGUINE, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW BRIEF OF RESPONDENT ON
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NOS.: SC , SC & SC PALM BEACH COUNTY vs. KATHERINE HARRIS, ET CANVASSING BOARD
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NOS.: SC00-2346, SC00-2348 & SC00-2349 PALM BEACH COUNTY vs. KATHERINE HARRIS, ET CANVASSING BOARD AL. VOLUSIA COUNTY vs. MICHAEL MCDERMOTT, CANVASSING BOARD ET AL.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC
CYNTHIA McCAULEY, Plaintiff IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA vs. CASE NO. SC00-2462 MARC NOLEN, RICHARD STEWART, THE HONORABLE THOMAS WELCH, in their official capacities as members of the BAY COUNTY CANVASSING
More informationIf You Paid Overdraft Fees to Comerica Bank, You May be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Comerica Bank, You May be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal court authorized
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.:
MARIA CEVALLOS, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 4th District Case No: 4D08-3042 v. Petitioner, KERI ANN RIDEOUT and LINDA RIDEOUT, Respondents. / PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
More informationMOTION TO EXCLUDE UNRELIABLE EVIDENCE (Plant or root growth evidence) Defendant,, by and through her undersigned attorney, moves this Honorable
MOTION TO EXCLUDE UNRELIABLE EVIDENCE (Plant or root growth evidence) Defendant,, by and through her undersigned attorney, moves this Honorable Court to exclude from this cause any testimony or evidence
More informationFLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Case No.: SC nd DCA Case No.: 2D Lower Tribunal Case No.: G Hillsborough County, Florida Circuit Court
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT MICHAEL F. SHEEHAN, M.D., Petitioner, vs. SCOTT SWEET, Respondent. / Case No.: SC06-1373 2nd DCA Case No.: 2D04-2744 Lower Tribunal Case No.: 03-5936G Hillsborough County, Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CARLOS VALDES v. Petitioner, SC Case: SC04-199 First DCA Case: 1D02-4026 INTEGRATED ADMINISTRATORS and WAL-MART STORE #6020, Respondent. / On discretionary review from the
More informationPlaintiff, JOSE GILBERTO SERRANO, Pro Se, hereby files this Response to the Motion to. Introduction
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: 2014 CA 2505 ON JOSE GILBERTO SERRANO, Plaintiff, vs. PUNITIVE DAMAGES PERSONAL INJURY HERITAGE PARTNERS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC EAST COAST ENTERTAINMENT, INC., d/b/a THE VOODOO LOUNGE., Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-764 EAST COAST ENTERTAINMENT, INC., d/b/a THE VOODOO LOUNGE., Petitioner, vs. JENNIFER BORDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-331
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-331 STUART HOROWITZ as Personal Representative of the Estate of LENA HOROWITZ, vs. Petitioner, PLANTATION GENERAL HOSPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/a COLUMBIA PLANTATION
More informationIN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
A-49949-9/ALM IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PETITION TO REVIEW DECISION FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA 4 TH DCA Appeal No. 4D05-1598 DAMIEN PENDERGRASS, etc. et al
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. BRIEF OF PETITIONER ON APPEAL On Appeal from the Fourth District Court of Appeal
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA AQUA-TERRA, INC. OF MARTIN COUNTY, Petitioner, -vs- CASE NO. SC08-1271 LONG BEACH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, GENE BEBBLE, GARY BALDWIN, MICHAEL W. CONNORS,
More informationFiling # E-Filed 04/04/ :49:40 PM
Filing # 54608023 E-Filed 04/04/2017 12:49:40 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA P & S ASSOCIATES GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, etc. et al., CASE NO. 12-034123
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO.: 3D LT CASE NO.: CA 25
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 10/28/2016 5:01 PM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal APPEAL NO.: 3D16-1531 LT CASE NO.: 13-16460 CA 25 LAGUNA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D EDUARDO GIRALT, Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-950 DCA CASE NO. 3D03-857 EDUARDO GIRALT, Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
More informationPLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS THIRD REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
Filing # 16808933 Electronically Filed 08/06/2014 05:22:51 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT PHILIP J. VON KAHLE, as Conservator of IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, P&S Associates,
More information