IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT, SEMINOLE COUNTY S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
|
|
- Walter Norton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CARILLON COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATION, INC., and KEN HOFER, Petitioners, vs. SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AHG GROUP, LLC, and UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION, INC., Respondents. / CASE NO. SC DCA Case No. 5D Cir. Ct. Case No AP RESPONDENT, SEMINOLE COUNTY S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ROBERT A. MCMILLAN County Attorney for Seminole County, Florida Florida Bar No: BY: KATHLEEN FUREY-TRAN Assistant County Attorney Florida Bar No Seminole County Services Building 1101 East First Street Sanford, Florida Telephone: (407) Facsimile: (407) KTran@seminolecountyfl.gov Attorneys for Seminole County
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii ISSUE PRESENTED... 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT... 2 ARGUMENT... 2 JURISDICTION IS ABSENT BECAUSE THE DECISION DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH A DECISION OF THIS COURT OR ANOTHER DISTRICT COURT... 2 A. NO CONFLICT JURISDICTION EXISTS... 3 B. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE CONCLUSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE i
3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES PAGE Board of County Comm rs of Hillsborough County v. Casa Development, Ltd. 332 So.2d 651 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)... 6 Boucher v. Novotny 102 So.2d 132 (Fla. 1958)... 8 Connor v. Town of Palm Beach 398 So.2d 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)... 6 Coral Reef Nurseries, Inc. v. Babcock Co. 410 So.2d 648 (Fla.3d DCA 1982)... 4, 5 Florida Power & Light Co. v. City of Dania 761 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 2000)... 7 Harris v. Goff 151 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963)... 6 Jennings v. Dade County 589 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) rev. den. 598 So.2d 75 (Fla. 1992)... 2, 3, 4 Joshua v. City of Gainesville 768 So.2d 432 (Fla. 2000)... 5, 8 Kupke v. Orange County 838 So.2d 598 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)... 6 Kyle v. Kyle 139 So.2d 885 (Fla. 1962)... 8 Lee County v. Sunbelt Equities, II, Ltd. Partnership 619 So.2d 996 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)... 6 Martin County Conservation Alliance v. Martin County ---So.3d---, 35 Fla. L. Weekly D1386, 2010 WL (Case No. 1D ) (Fla. 1st DCA June 21, 2010) Mathews v. Eldridge 424 U.S. 319 (1976)... 5, 8 Reaves v. State 485 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1986)... 9 ii
4 CASES (con't) PAGE Renard v. Dade County 261 So.2d 832 (Fla. 1972)... 7, 8 Sanders v. City of Orlando 997 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 2008)... 9 Seminole Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Casselberry 811 So.2d 693 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)... 6 Trustees of Internal Imp. Fund v. Lobean 127 So.2d 98 (Fla. 1961)... 9 Walgreen Co. v. Polk County 524 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)... 6 STATUTES, CODES and RULES Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution... 2 Florida Rule Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv)... 2 Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.120(d)... 9 Section , Florida Statutes (2010)... 7, 8, 10 Section (1), Florida Statutes (2010)... 8 RELATED CASES Carillon Community Residential, etc., et al., v. Seminole County, Florida, AHG Group, LLC., et al. 45 So.3d 7, 35 Fla. L. Weekly D1467 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) reh. den. Oct. 6, 2010 (The Decision)... passim Carillon Community Homeowners Association et.al. v. Seminole County, et.al., Case Number 09-CA W, Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Seminole County iii
5 ISSUE PRESENTED The issue before this Court is whether, in a quasi-judicial zoning proceeding, limiting the right to cross-examine witnesses by participants, who are not the applicant or the local government, is in express and direct conflict with the oft- repeated dictum that parties must be able to cross-examine witnesses. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS The Seminole County Board of County Commissioners ("BCC") recently amended existing land use entitlements allowing a mixed use development on private property. The BCC approved the major amendment on January 27, On February 26, 2009, Petitioners filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the Circuit Court for the Eighteenth Judicial District and an amended petition on April 29, On August 29, 2009, Circuit Court denied the amended petition. On October 26, 2009, Petitioners filed a petition for writ of certiorari at the Fifth District Court of Appeal (the "Fifth DCA"). On July 2, 2010, the Fifth DCA rendered a per curiam decision with discussion ("the Decision" hereinafter cited as "D at #"). On October 6, 2010, the Fifth DCA denied Petitioners motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc and certification to the Supreme Court of Florida. These orders, subject to four-corners review in this Court, are in Petitioners Appendix. 1
6 Petitioners now seek discretionary review, alleging an express and direct conflict with "a decision of several other district court decisions" regarding the "right of 'affected' or 'interested' parties". Petitioners Brief at 6 (hereinafter PB at #). Petitioners also claim conflict jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. PB at 3. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT There is no express and direct conflict on the same question of law as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. The Decision clearly distinguishes between process that is due parties in a quasi-judicial proceeding, such as the government and the applicant, from the analysis of what process is due other participants, which includes neighboring property owners such as Petitioners. Therefore, there is no basis for conflict jurisdiction. ARGUMENT JURISDICTION IS ABSENT BECAUSE THE DECISION DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH A DECISION OF THIS COURT OR ANOTHER DISTRICT COURT. Petitioners attempt to invoke discretionary jurisdiction based on Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), alleging that "Contrary to Jennings [Jennings v. Dade County, 589 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) rev. den. 598 So.2d 75 (Fla. 1992)], the Fifth DCA held that adjoining landowners, like the Petitioners, do not have a due process right to cross-examine 2
7 witnesses during a quasi-judicial zoning hearing." PB at 5 (citation added). The Fifth DCA states, "To the contrary, Jennings states, in dictum, the general proposition that parties to quasi-judicial hearings 'must be able to present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be informed of all the facts upon which the commission acts.'" D at 5-6 (emphasis in the original). "When applying these general due process principles to the specific context of quasi-judicial administrative hearings, it is important to distinguish between parties and participants." D at 3. Further, the Decision expressly found Petitioners cases not in conflict and distinguishable on the facts as involving parties, not participants, or based upon specific due process rights conferred by local ordinances. "Petitioners incorrectly assert that Florida law requires that all participants in quasijudicial proceedings be allowed to cross-examine witnesses. Florida law has no such requirement." D at 4-5; "... many cases asserted by Petitioners... involved parties, not participants." D at 5. Therefore, Petitioners cases do not expressly and directly conflict with the Decision. A. NO CONFLICT JURISDICTION EXISTS The decisional point of law dispositive in Jennings did not involve the rights of participants in a quasi-judicial hearing to cross-examination. Jennings held that an ex-parte 3
8 communication creates a presumption of prejudice. Jennings, 589 So.2d at Jennings mentions cross-examination one time, in dictum, in a general discussion about quasi-judicial hearings unrelated to the holding. See Jennings, 589 So.2d at The Jennings rule of ex-parte communication is not disturbed nor overruled by a party s right to cross-examination. Jennings attributes the quote that parties are entitled to cross-examination in quasi-judicial hearings to Coral Reef Nurseries, Inc. v. Babcock Co., 410 So.2d 648, 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Jennings, 589 So.2d at The Coral Reef case was subject to local ordinances expressly affording "interested parties" the right to cross-examine witnesses. See D at 6, note 1. In the concurring opinion in Jennings, 589 So.2d at 1345, Judge Ferguson cited the Dade County Charter in note 5 which explicitly affords rights of cross-examination to "a party or his counsel". Jennings, 589 So.2d at 1345, n.5. There was no local ordinance affording cross-examination in a quasi-judicial hearing in the case at bar, which distinguishes it from Coral Reef. See D at 6, note 1. Coral Reef and, by reference, Jennings are not directly and expressly in conflict with the Decision because Coral Reef addressed local ordinances. D at 5, at 6, note 1. See Coral Reef, 410 So.2d at 652; Jennings, 589 So.2d at
9 Coral Reef also did not "hold that an adjoining landowner has a due process right to cross-examine witnesses in a quasijudicial rezoning hearing". D at 5. The Decision does not overturn Coral Reef. See Coral Reef, 410 So.2d at 652 (held: a commission s determination that res judicata did not apply to a rezoning application was not an abuse of discretion). Not only is there no conflict jurisdiction but the Decision is strongly supported by the Supreme Courts of the United States and Florida. "Quasi-judicial hearing generally meets basic due process requirements if parties are provided notice of hearing and opportunity to be heard." Joshua v. City of Gainesville, 768 So.2d 432, 438 (Fla. 2000). A court must first decide whether the complaining party has been deprived of a constitutionally protected liberty or property interest. See Id., 768 So.2d at 438. Absent such a deprivation, there can be no denial of due process. Id. See also Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 334 (1976)(factors to be weighed in analyzing whether due process is constitutionally sufficient). Participants may not be entitled to cross-examination even though they are entitled to some due process based on the Mathews test. See Mathews, 424 U.S. at 334. The Decision was clear that parties are entitled to cross-examination and other interests must be weighed to determine the amount of process that is due. D at 7. 5
10 The Fifth DCA distinguished between due process due parties, as opposed to participants in a quasi-judicial zoning proceeding and therefore Petitioners cases are distinguishable. In, Kupke v. Orange County, 838 So.2d 598 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), Mr. Kupke was a farmer and a party with property rights (equipment) at risk in a code enforcement hearing. D at 4, 5. Lee County v. Sunbelt Equities, II, Ltd. Partnership, 619 So.2d 996 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), involved a property owner/party who was denied rezoning of his property. See Id. at Seminole Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Casselberry, 811 So.2d 693, 696 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), involved a party s, not a participant s, business license revocation. D at 4. The Decision also points out that Bd. of County Comm rs of Hillsborough County v. Casa Development, Ltd., 332 So.2d 651 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), involves parties not participants. D at 5. Casa Development, Ltd. was an applicant/party denied a water and sewer franchise. In Harris v. Goff, 151 So.2d 642(Fla. 1st DCA 1963), the landowners directly subject to a zoning change sought review. These landowners were parties. D at 5. Connor v. Town of Palm Beach, 398 So.2d 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), involved a party/police officer s hearing in which he was denied disability benefits. In Walgreen Co., a pharmacy, the applicant/party, was denied a variance. See Walgreen Co. v. Polk County, 524 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). These cases are distinguishable because 6
11 the decisions related to parties, not participants, and the character of the proceeding is factually opposed. Petitioners Brief at 6, note 4, argues "third parties" should have due process rights equal to parties in a quasijudicial proceeding. However, the Florida Power & Light case, is referring to the right of appeal on certiorari, rather than as a party in the quasi-judicial proceeding. Any other person or entity affected by the quasi-judicial decision, i.e. a "third party", other than the parties of the applicant and the government, may bring a certiorari appeal. See Florida Power & Light Co. v. City of Dania, 761 So.2d 1089, 1092 (Fla. 2000). These cases support the premise that where substantial property interests are at risk, parties are entitled to crossexamination. These cases cannot be read so broadly to support the premise that participants are also entitled to crossexamination. Therefore, the Decision is not in conflict with any of the above cases. See D at 5. Petitioners reliance on Renard v. Dade County, 261 So.2d 832 (Fla. 1972), as a basis for conflict is misplaced in that Renard has been abrogated, for many years, by Section , Florida Statutes (2010). The Renard court clarified standing of citizens in the community by distinguishing between a sitespecific zoning matter (similar to our facts) and challenging an ordinance with wide application (distinguishable from our 7
12 facts). The holding of Renard limited the rights of aggrieved or adversely affected persons challenging a zoning matter by increasing their burden of proof to "a definite interest exceeding the general interest in community". Renard, 261 So.2d at 837 citing Boucher v. Novotny, 102 So.2d 132, 135 (Fla. 1958). The legislature broadened this standard under Section , Florida Statutes (2010). This statutory provision is the exclusive method for an aggrieved or adversely affected party to appeal and challenge the consistency of a development order with a comprehensive plan. See (1), Fla. Stat. (2010). Renard also held that when challenging a zoning ordinance that has wide application over the community, an affected party has standing to challenge such an ordinance. See Renard, 261 So.2d at 836. This case did not challenge a general zoning ordinance. Since the term "affected party" relates to challenging a wider zoning ordinance, the cases are distinguishable. Further, use of the term "party" in "affected party" is not dispositive to the scope of sufficient due process without engaging in analysis of the respective property rights. See Joshua, 768 So.2d at 438; See also Mathews, 424 U.S. at 334. The conflict must be such that the later decision would have the effect of overruling the earlier one. See Kyle v. Kyle, 139 So.2d 885, 887 (Fla. 1962). The conflict must be obvious 8
13 and patently reflected in the decisions relied on and result from an application of law to facts which are in essence on all fours. See Trustees of Internal Imp. Fund v. Lobean, 127 So.2d 98, 101 (1961) (emphasis added). B. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE Petitioners Brief on Jurisdiction does not comply with the Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.120(d) requirement to be "limited solely to the issue of the supreme court's jurisdiction". In order to glean the appearance of a conflict, Petitioners engaged in argument which violates this Court's "four corners" rule by including discussion of "affected parties" which exceeds the limited nature of the discussion relevant to jurisdictional analysis. See Reaves v. State, 485 So.2d 829, n.3 (Fla. 1986); See Sanders v. City of Orlando, 997 So.2d 1089, 1097 (Fla. 2008)(Cantero, J., dissenting)(interpretation of a separate subsection of a statute should not constitute a conflict). Petitioner's presentation of the case, suggesting that this is a matter of great public importance, PB at 1, note 2, or that the decision was unfair, PB at 1, note 1, PB at 6, note 5, and PB at 9, also suffers from being argumentative, rather than factual and is improper as a basis for conflict jurisdiction. The Fifth DCA determined this case is not worthy of 9
14 certification as a matter of great public importance. See the Orders. Petitioners argument that they are denied a right to create a complete record is irrelevant to the analysis of conflict jurisdiction. See PB at 9. Further, the premise that Petitioners offer as a basis for this argument is patently false: "the only opportunity affected parties have to create a record and to impugn the credibility is during the quasijudicial zoning hearing itself". PB at 9. For many years, the legislature has provided, in Section , Florida Statutes (2010), a statutory avenue of de novo review by "affected parties" in a comprehensive plan consistency challenge, which is also appellate in nature , Fla. Stat. (2010); See Martin County Conservation Alliance v. Martin County, --So.3d--, 35 Fla. L. Weekly D1386 (Case No. 1D )(Fla. 1st DCA 2010)(not yet released for publication), limiting the application of "affected parties" to Section , Florida Statutes (2010). Petitioners have availed themselves of this advantage in a separate case currently pending in Circuit Court. For these reasons, this Court should deny review. CONCLUSION This Court should find that conflict jurisdiction does not exist and deny review. 10
15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished by U.S. Mail this 3rd day of December, 2010 to the addressees named below: David A. Theriaque, Esq. 433 North Magnolia Drive Tallahassee, FL Attorney for Petitioners Michael V. Elsberry, Esq. P.O. Box 2809 Orlando, FL Attorney for Co-Respondents Michael W. Woodward, Esq. P. O. Box 92 Interlachen, FL Putnam Citizens Alliance, Inc. and Putnam County Environmental Council, Inc. Nancy E. Stroud, Esq Glades Road, Suite 251 Boca Raton, FL American Planning Association, Florida Chapter Daniel J. Lobeck, Esq Main Street, Suite 301 Sarasota, FL Sorrento Ranches Homeowners Association, Inc. Ralf G. Brookes, Esq E. Cape Coral Pky, #107 Cape Coral, FL Florida Audubon Society, Inc. Preston T. Robertson, Esq. P. O. Box 6870 Tallahassee, FL Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. William L. Earl, Esq Ranchero Drive Sarasota, FL Sarasota County Council of Neighborhood Associations, Inc. 11
16 Robert K. Lincoln, Esq Main Street, Suite 600 Sarasota, FL Robert K. Lincoln, Esq. Tracey I. Arpen, Jr Lorretto Road Jacksonville, FL Attorney for Scenic America-Florida Chapter, Inc. C. Allen Watts, Esq. 351 E. New York Avenue Suite 200 Deland, FL Friends of Florida, Inc. Patrick C. Howell, Esq. 150 N. Westmonte Drive Altamonte Springs, FL Lake Forest Master Community Association, Inc. ROBERT A. McMILLAN County Attorney for Seminole County, Florida Florida Bar No: Seminole County Services Building 1101 East First Street Sanford, Florida Telephone: (407) Facsimile: (407) Attorney for Seminole County By:/s/Kathleen Furey-Tran KATHLEEN FUREY-TRAN Assistant County Attorney Florida Bar No.: CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY that this motion complies with the font requirements of Rule 9.100(l) Rules of Appellate Procedure. By: /s/kathleen Furey-Tran KATHLEEN FUREY-TRAN Assistant County Attorney Florida Bar No.: p:\users\kfurey-tran\litigation\carillon v. sc, ahg, ucf\fl supreme court\seminole county's jurisdictional answer brief.docx 12
RESPONSE BY T3 FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC TO PETITIONERS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE DIVISION CASE NO.: 502015CA006598AY NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF PALM BEACH, INC., a Florida non-profit
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BETTY JEAN MANN, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. SC02-2646 BETTY JEAN MANN, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA and ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Respondents. PETITIONER
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES FOR REHEARING AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to Review Quasi-Judicial Action: Agencies, Boards, and Commissions of Local Government: ZONING Substantial Competent Evidence Petition did not demonstrate a departure from
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 10750991 Electronically Filed 02/27/2014 10:29:07 AM RECEIVED, 2/27/2014 10:33:37, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LISA M. DETOURNAY, ) BRENDA RANDOL, and
More informationIN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT ORLANDO LAKE FOREST JOINT VENTURE, a Florida joint venture; ORLANDO LAKE FOREST INC., a Florida corporation; NTS MORTGAGE INCOME FUND, a Delaware corporation; OLF II CORPORATION,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER COURT NO.: 4D JACK LIEBMAN. Petitioner. vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC03-1896 LOWER COURT NO.: 4D00-2883 JACK LIEBMAN Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC06-56 BEVERLY PENZELL AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC06-56 BEVERLY PENZELL AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioners, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondent. RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER CASE NO.: 5D ORLANDO LAKE FOREST JOINT VENTURE, ETC., ET AL.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC09-1151 LOWER CASE NO.: 5D08-2096 ORLANDO LAKE FOREST JOINT VENTURE, ETC., ET AL., Petitioner, v. LAKE FOREST MASTER COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. Respondent. RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY
IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY RAINBOW RIVER CONSERVATION, INC., a Florida Corporation, and FREDERICK S. JOHNSTON, MICHAEL G. RAUSCH, MAX P LYNN, JOHN DENNIS, PATRICIA M ERMATINGER,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LESTER SMULL, Petitioner, CASE NO.: 4 TH DCA CASE NO.:4D02-1818 v. THE TOWN OF JUPITER, a Florida municipal corporation Respondent. / PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D04-4825 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT, Respondent. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationTOWN OF PALM BEACH S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Respondent, TOWN OF PALM BEACH ( Town ), by and through its
Filing # 39824852 E-Filed 04/04/2016 04:10:27 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL APPELLATE DIVISION CASE NO: 502015CA006598XXXXMB (AY)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ORANGE, vs. Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC04-2045 Lower Tribunal No.: 5D03-4065 RALEIGH WILSON, SR. EVELYN WILSON and RALEIGH WILSON, JR., Respondents.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. ELIAS AND DAHLIA MORALES, Appellants, Case No.: SC DCA Case No.: 5D vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA ELIAS AND DAHLIA MORALES, Appellants, Case No.: SC06-1322 DCA Case No.: 5D05-4925 vs. LETICIA J. MARQUES, Appellee. / APPEAL FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NUMBER: SC Lower Tribunal No. 5D
DAVID M. POMERANCE and RICHARD C. POMERANCE, Petitioners, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA vs. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, CASE NUMBER: SC00-912 Lower
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC. TOWN OF PONCE INLET, Petitioner, PACETTA, LLC, ET AL. Respondents. LOWER CASE NUMBER: 5D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC TOWN OF PONCE INLET, Petitioner, v. PACETTA, LLC, ET AL. Respondents. LOWER CASE NUMBER: 5D10-1123 On Discretionary Review From The District Court Of Appeal,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. PETITIONER, CASE NO.: SC Lower Tribunal No.: 5D05- AMENDED PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ELIAS MORALES, ET AL. 4295 vs. PETITIONER, CASE NO.: SC06-1322 Lower Tribunal No.: 5D05- LETICIA J. MARQUES, RESPONDENT. / AMENDED PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Elias Morales,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO.: SC11-734 THIRD DCA CASE NO. s: 3D09-3102 & 3D10-848 CIRCUIT CASE NO.: 09-25070-CA-01 UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1141 DCA CASE NO. 3D03-2169 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Case Number: SC RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Case Number: SC09-1722 Westgate Tabernacle Petitioners, vs. 4 th DCA CASE No. 4D07-3792 PALM BEACH COUNTY, Respondent. RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF Robert
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Supreme Court Case No. SC02-2736 5th DCA Case Nos.: 5D01-1662, 5D01-1663, 5D01-1664, 5D01-1665 & 5D01-3426 GREAT AMERICAN RESTAURANTS, INC., et al, v. Petitioners/Appellants,
More informationIN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY
IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY RAINBOW RIVER RANCH, LLC and CONSERVATION LAND GROUP, LLC Plaintiffs v. Case No. 10-1960-CA-A CITY OF DUNNELLON, FLORIDA Defendant. And RAINBOW
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4 th DCA 4D ) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1298 (4 th DCA 4D05-1624) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION LAURA FISHER ZIBURA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC07-1672 PETER SPOREA, ET AL., Petitioners, vs. CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT S AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Appeal from the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-1056 TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIS, Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL McCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 07-1021 CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2003 ORANGE COUNTY, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 5D02-3592 JOHN LEWIS, Respondent. / Opinion filed October 10, 2003 Petition
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM Appellant, v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2007 JAMES CRAIG DUNLAP, ET AL., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D06-4059 ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ETC., Appellee. / Opinion filed
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC04-156
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. SC04-156 Petition for Discretionary Review of A Decision of the District Court of Appeal of Florida First District Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC FIRST DISTRICT CASE NO. 1D L.T. CASE NO CA WENDY HABEGGER, Petitioner, vs.
Filing # 11759404 Electronically Filed 03/26/2014 10:24:29 AM RECEIVED, 3/26/2014 10:28:40, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC13-2506 FIRST DISTRICT CASE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CITY OF KEY WEST, vs. Defendant/Petitioner Case No. SC12-898 FLORIDA KEYS COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Plaintiff/Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT, FLORIDA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILLIAM E. WILLIAMSON, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC08-2192 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS PATE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BEST DIVERSIFIED, INC. and PETER HUFF. Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC06-1823 BEST DIVERSIFIED, INC. and PETER HUFF Petitioners, vs. OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA and STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondents.
More informationWRIT NO.: FINAL ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. Petitioner Dean Tasman ( Tasman ) timely petitions this Court for a Writ of
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEAN TASMAN Petitioner, CASE NO.: 2006-CA-4542-O WRIT NO.: 06-45 v. ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Respondents. / Petition
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC, vs. Petitioner, Supreme Court Case No. SC03-2063 THIRD DCA CASE NO. 02-3002 LT Case No. 00-21824 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT PAMELA JO BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL
Electronically Filed 06/27/2013 12:18:58 PM ET RECEIVED, 6/27/2013 12:23:39, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOHNNIE LEE REMBERT, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC13-1125
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida 89,005 AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.020(a) AND ADOPTION OF FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.190. [September 27, 1996] PER CURIAM. The Appellate Rules
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SCO5-938 Lower Case No. 3D RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROCCO NAPOLITANO Petitioner, v. Case No. SCO5-938 Lower Case No. 3D04--318 STATE OF FLORIDA, Florida Department of Corrections Respondent. ================================================================
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-901 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC WILLIE L. CLARK, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1248 WILLIE L. CLARK, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST, JR Attorney General
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
Filing # 8803708 Electronically Filed 01/03/2014 05:25:42 PM RECEIVED, 1/3/2014 17:28:35, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. and ANHEUSER-BUSCH,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ANDREW MCKEE, Petitioner, vs. JURISDICTIONAL ANSWER BRIEF TOWER HILL SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Filing # 22727607 E-Filed 01/20/2015 12:24:06 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC14-2299 ANDREW MCKEE, Petitioner, vs. TOWER HILL SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, RECEIVED, 01/20/2015 12:28:38 PM,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 12/21/2016 10:21 AM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal SOLO AERO CORP., a Florida corporation, vs. Petitioner, AMERICA-CV
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC L.T. No.: CA 13
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA BEATRICE HURST, as Personal Representative of the Estate of KENNETH HURST, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC07-722 L.T. No.:04-24071 CA 13 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KEITH R. HARRIS, DC# 635563 Petitioner, vs. Case No. SC08-1367 L.T. No. 1D06-5125 THE FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent. / RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURIDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC05-54 L.T. NO. 2D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC05-54 L.T. NO. 2D03-1594 VANDERBILT SHORES CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC., VANDERBILT CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC., VANDERBILT LANDINGS, CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC.,
More informationFILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED. v. CASE NO.: 1D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA D.R. HORTON, INC. - - JACKSONVILLE, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 16753499 Electronically Filed 08/05/2014 04:58:21 PM RECEIVED, 8/5/2014 17:03:44, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC14-1360 L.T. CASE NO.: 2D13-3872
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Sup. Ct. case no. SC07- DCA case no. 1D LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Petitioner, vs. STEPHEN S. DOBSON, III, P.A., Sup. Ct. case no. SC07- DCA case no. 1D05-4326 Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05- ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Petitioners,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05- ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Petitioners, W.G. MILLS, INC. OF BRADENTON, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, and O DONNELL, NACCARATO
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC L.C. Case No. 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC12-1525 L.C. Case No. 4D10-4333 BARBARA TURCOTTE and MELVIN TURCOTTE, v. Petitioners, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, and SEMINOLE PROPERTIES II, INC., Respondents. JURISDICTIONAL
More informationv. CASE NO.: 2006-CA-0759-O Writ No.: STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, DIVISION OF DRIVER LICENSES,
IN THE CIRCUITCOURT FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA MATTHEW WEST, Petitioner, v. CASE NO.: 2006-CA-0759-O Writ No.: 06-08 STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC DCA Case No.: 4D RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JACQUELINE HARVEY, Petitioner, vs. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST, etc., et al., Case No.: SC11-1909 DCA Case No.: 4D10-674 Respondent. / RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA NICHOLAS J. MORANA and ANN L. MORANA, Petitioners, v. Case No.: SC-08-988 HERNANDO COUNTY, etc., and KAREN NICOLAI, in her Official Capacity as the Hernando
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC FOREST RIVER, INC. Petitioner/Defendant, vs. JOSEPH GELINAS, Respondent/Plaintiff.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC 06-1654 FOREST RIVER, INC. Petitioner/Defendant, vs. JOSEPH GELINAS, Respondent/Plaintiff. ON REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL WEST PALM BEACH,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC14-1092 COY A. KOONTZ, JR., AS Lower Tribunal Case No. 5D06-1116 PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JOY CHATLOS D ARATA, etc., Petitioner, THE CHATLOS FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Respondents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-2097 JOY CHATLOS D ARATA, etc., Petitioner, v. THE CHATLOS FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Respondents. BRIEF OF RESPONDENTS ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 5D EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC., n/k/a/ PRUDENTIAL EQUITY GROUP, LLC and WILLIAM J. BREWSTER, JR. Defendants/Petitioners, v. CASE NO. SC06-935 DCA CASE NO. 5D05-248 EPISCOPAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. L.T. No. 1D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT ANDERSON Petitioner, VS. Case No. SC07-306 L.T. No. 1D06-2486 FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On petition for discretionary
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Third District Court of Appeal Case No. 3D09-1314 Lower Court Case No. 08-39632 CA 04 (11 th Judicial Circuit) VENEZIA LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER, EMILY HALE S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA EMILY HALE, Petitioner, -vs- DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF FLORIDA, Case No.: SC08-371 L.T. Case No.: 98-107CA Respondent. ********************************************** PETITIONER,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF. On Review from the District Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PAULA GORDON, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES Respondent. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID03-449 PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. (4th DCA Case No. 4D ) STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JESSIE HILL, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. (4th DCA Case No. 4D02-3362) STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JESSIE HILL, Respondent. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST JR., Attorney
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 1D CARL DORÉLIEN, Appellant, vs. MARIE JEANNE JEAN, Appellee.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 1D06-4806 CARL DORÉLIEN, Appellant, vs. MARIE JEANNE JEAN, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM A NON-FINAL ORDER OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DAVID M. POLEN, v. ROSA POLEN, Petitioner, Respondent. / CASE NO. SC06-1226 4 TH DCA CASE NO. 4D06-1002 AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Respectfully submitted, JOEL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC 12-216 MIKE HARIDOPOLOS, in his official capacity as the Florida Senate President, Petitioners, v. 1st DCA Case No. 1D10-6285 L.T. Case No. 09-CA-4534 CITIZENS
More informationIN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY
IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY RAINBOW RIVER RANCH, LLC and CONSERVATION LAND GROUP, LLC Plaintiffs v. Case No. 10-1960-CA-A and CITY OF DUNNELLON, FLORIDA Case No. 09-6247-CA-B
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Jerome S. Rydell and Dale E. Krueger, individually and derivatively, on behalf of the shareholders of Surf Tech International, Inc., and Sigma Financial Corporation, a Michigan
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA JUNIOR JOSEPH, ) ) Appellee/Petitioner, ) ) 5th DCA Case No. 5D09-1356 ) ) Supreme Court Case No. SC11-179 STATE OF FLORIDA,) ) Appellant/Respondent. ) ) APPEAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 73,780 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ROBERTO PASTOR, Respondent. ...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 73,780 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, 'a Petitioner, vs. ROBERTO PASTOR, Respondent.... ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW... INITIAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06- FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL CASE NOS.: 1D05-4521/1D05-4524/1D05-4526 (Consolidated) L.T. Case No. 04-1647 THE SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RAMESES, INC., d/b/a CLEO S and STEVEN G. MASON, P.A., v. Petitioners, Case No.: SC10-670 Lower Tribunal: 5D09-208 JERRY DEMINGS, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC95217 CHARLES DUSSEAU, et al., Petitioners, vs. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al., Respondents. [May 17, 2001] SHAW, J. We have for review Metropolitan
More informationPetitioner, CASE NO:73,465 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BENOIT BALTHAZAR, vs. Petitioner, CASE NO:73,465 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH Attorney General Tallahassee, Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
Electronically Filed 05/17/2013 11:04:14 AM ET RECEIVED, 5/17/2013 11:08:35, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARK ERIC OSTERBACK, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC13-812 STATE
More informationAMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT BOB WHITE, SHERIFF OF PASCO COUNTY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BOB WHITE, SHERIFF OF PASCO COUNTY, Appellant, Case No.: SC11-445 vs. L.T. No.: 1D09-3106 (First DCA) FLORIDA STATE LODGE, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, INC., Appellee. / ON
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-352 THE VILLAS DEL VERDE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner, vs. CLARK H. SCHERER, III, Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2006
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2006 COUNTY OF VOLUSIA, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D05-1032 CORRECTED OPINION CITY OF DELTONA, ET AL, Respondents. / Opinion
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PERRY TANKSLEY, Petitioner, vs. 214 MAIN STREET CORP. and 3B REALTY NORTH, INC., Sup. Ct. Case No: SC07-272 Second DCA Case No: 2D06-768 Respondents. *********************************/
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2004 SEMINOLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D02-3605 CITY OF CASSELBERRY, FLORIDA, Appellee. Opinion Filed
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA MICHAEL M. ROMAN, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-905 MICHAEL M. ROMAN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL CASE NO. 4D10-3345 RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. L.T. NO.: 3D ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE RIGGINS Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC06-205 vs. L.T. NO.: 3D04-2620 AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, Respondent. / ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, v. Supreme Court Case No.: SC Lower Tribunal Case No.:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOSEPH R. REDNER, Petitioner, v. Supreme Court Case No.: SC03-1612 Lower Tribunal Case No.: 96-02652 CITY OF TAMPA, Respondent. PETITIONER S FIRST AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN Tl le SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SCl3-153 L. T. CASR NOS.; 4DI J-4801, CA COCE
E]cctronically Filed 07/01/2013 (M:47:23 PM ET RECEIVED. 7/]/2013 l6:48:35. Thomas D. Hall. Clerk. Supreme Court IN Tl le SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SCl3-153 L. T. CASR NOS.; 4DI J-4801,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. DAPHNE ELAINE HENSON, Florida Second District Court of Appeal Case Appellee. Number: 2D /
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DOUGLAS LEE HENSON Appellant, Case Nos. SC06-1003 v. DAPHNE ELAINE HENSON, Florida Second District Court of Appeal Case Appellee. Number: 2D06-826 / APPELLEE'S BRIEF ON
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, CHARLES FRATELLO, Respondent. Case No. SC07-780
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. CHARLES FRATELLO, Respondent. Case No. SC07-780 ****************************************************************** ON APPEAL
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT. Appellant, Appellate Case No. 2D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MARTIN NEGRON, a member of the ASSOCIATION OF POINCIANA VILLAGES, INC., a not-for-profit Corporation, RECEIVED, 2/22/2018 4:53 PM,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11- THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY a Florida Corporation,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11- THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D10-108 UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY a Florida Corporation, Petitioner, -v- KENDALL SOUTH MEDICAL CENTER INC., & DAILYN
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC05-1586 BRUCE BERNSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. HARVEY GOLDMAN, Respondent, PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Petition to Review Decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2009
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2009 Opinion filed January 21, 2009. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D08-1064 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CORBBLIN BUSH, v. Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Supreme Court Case No.: SC04-2306 DCA Case No.: 5D04-42 L.T. Case No.: 90-3798-CFA Respondents. Petitioner Corbblin
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CHRISTINE BAUER and THOMAS BAUER, Petitioners, ONE WEST BANK, FSB, Respondent.
Filing # 17071819 Electronically Filed 08/13/2014 05:11:43 PM RECEIVED, 8/13/2014 17:13:41, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC14-1575 CHRISTINE BAUER and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC HARVEY JAY WEINBERG and KENNETH ALAN WEINBERG,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 06-1941 BETTY WEINBERG, v. Petitioner, HARVEY JAY WEINBERG and KENNETH ALAN WEINBERG, Respondents. On Petition For Discretionary Review Of A Decision Of The
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., A/A/O MARVELIS BAUZA, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-131 THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D09-771 PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., A/A/O MARVELIS BAUZA, Petitioner, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Third DCA Case Nos. 3D / 3D L.T. Case No CA 15
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC08-1877 Third DCA Case Nos. 3D07-2875 / 3D07-3106 L.T. Case No. 04-17958 CA 15 VALAT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD. Petitioner, vs. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. Respondent.
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2007
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2007 Opinion filed July 18, 2007. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D06-1326 Lower Tribunal No. 05-045
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOY CHATLOS D ARATA, etc., Petitioner, vs. Case No. SC04-2097 DCA Cases Nos. 5D02-3330 & 5D02-3590 (Consolidated Appeals) THE CHATLOS FOUNDATION, INC., et al. Respondents.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D Respondent. /
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D10-1422 ANA MARIA AGUILAR-FERNANDEZ, vs. Petitioner, UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. / PETITIONER=S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. ( CREC/Bell or Petitioner ), seeks certiorari review of Respondent s, Orange County Board of
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA WARREN WEISER/ELIAS CHOTAS, AGENTS FOR CREC/ BELL UNIVERSITY PLAZA, LLC, Petitioner, vs. ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY
More information