CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: DISCOVERY
|
|
- Vivian King
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: DISCOVERY Judge Thomas R. Swvabey* It goes without saying that every person charged with the commission of a criminal offence should be given the opportunity of discovering both the precise nature of the charge held against him and the means by which the Crown intends to demonstrate the charge. While our present system of criminal procedure, perhaps more through informal practice than by the written rule, generally affords such opportunity for disclosure, there is growing support for the argument that, to achieve uniformity in both the opportunity and extent of discovery available to the accused person, some code of procedure is required upon which both defense and Crown counsel can rely. The Law Reform Commission, in its Working Paper entitled Criminal Procedure-Discovery, suggests such a code of procedure and the suggestion will, undoubtably, meet with widespread approval. However, the scope of the proposals contained in the Working Paper and the rigid formality of the rules it seeks to apply will, and indeed should, be the subject of much debate. For the recommendations found in the Working Paper must be based upon the questionable premise that our system of pre-trial disclosure, as it exists today, has been a total failure and has resulted in the application of the criminal sanction in significant numbers of instances where the person before the court was innocent of the offence charged. Only on this premise could such a complete overhaul of our criminal procedure, as is recommended by the authors of the Working Paper, be justified. The recommendations contained in the Law Reform Commission's Working Paper represent an over-reaction to a recognized weakness in a system that is basically sound and which has operated, in all but a very few instances, to produce a high standard of justice while at the same time seeking to administer the application of criminal sanctions to those who offend against our criminal laws. Rather than simply proposing a set of guidelines under which Crown counsel must operate in disclosing to the defence the nature of its case prior to trial, and making those guidelines enforceable by pre-trial rulings of the court, the authors of the Working Paper go much further. They propose a system of discovery that would extend even to the delay of a plea of guilty in a case involving the most overtly committed summary conviction offence until the Crown has completed and delivered to the accused a lengthy, and in many respects redundant, form of written disclosure. Instead of recognizing the advantages of flexibility in a system which must serve the needs of the remote and rural areas of our country as well as those of our urban centers, the proposals contained in the Working Paper urge a rigid pre-trial procedure demanding the presence of the judiciary and other officers of the court at times and places they would not otherwise be * Ontario Provincial Court Judge, Criminal Division.
2 Ottawa Law Review [Vol. 7:295 required. And, in lieu of a system where inclusion of evidence at trial has always rested upon the issue of relevancy, the proposals recommend the adoption of certain exclusionary rules the effect of which would be to prevent the court from hearing available evidence, no matter how relevant, where the Crown had failed by way of formal disclosure to reveal the existence of such evidence. In short, the procedures recommended in the Working Paper make the merits of the case itself subordinate to the conduct of its prosecution. The recommendations contained in the Law Reform Commission's Working Paper, if adopted, would create extensive and rigid pre-plea and pre-trial formal procedures heretofore not deemed necessary. From a practical standpoint one must first ask whether such drastic formalization of criminal discovery is required to assure attainment of the aims and purposes of the criminal law of this country. The answer to this question depends upon how unworkable our present system of pre-trial discovery is found to be. In this regard, there is no evidence whatsoever contained in the Law Reform Commission's Working Paper to suggest that the nature of our criminal process or the rules which presently govern pre-trial procedure significantly impede either the search for truth or the civil rights of the individual accused of having committed a criminal wrong. 1 In fact, the concluding paragraph of chapter two of the Working Paper succinctly summarizes the characteristics of our system of criminal justice that have afforded a unique protection against the conviction of innocent persons. ' If anything, what evidence which does exist would suggest that the present rights of the accused in the face of criminal charges, which include the right to complete silence and the presumption of innocence, when coupled with the burden placed on the Crown to prove guilt beyond all reasonable doubt, permit a substantial number of offenders to go free. This is the case notwithstanding manifestations which, in any other forum, or in any other social or commercial interaction between individuals or groups, would dictate a different conclusion. Having regard for the complete lack of any proof, or, for that matter, any well-grounded suspicions, that innocent persons are being subjected to the sanctions of our criminal laws, the adoption of any wholesale changes in our criminal procedure must be approached with considerable caution and scepticism. What is more, keeping in mind the primary purpose of the criminal law, the cost to society of such changes, both monetary and in terms of delay in the application of the criminal sanction to those who have in fact violated the rules of society, cannot be disregarded. What is proposed in the Working Paper would be expensive in both these areas. At a time when law enforcement agencies are hard pressed to keep up with their present duties and Crown attorneys are experiencing great difficulties in meeting all their court engagements, implementation of the Working 1 LAw REFORM COMMISSION OF CANADA, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-DISCOVERY, WORKING PAPER 4 at (1974). 'Id. at
3 Spring 1975] Discovery Paper's proposals would require enormous increases, across the country, in the manpower of these arms of the criminal process. A system heretofore relatively free from paperwork would become one struggling to keep up with the demands of a new procedure that seemingly places its total faith in the written word. The now, for the most part, easily obtained disclosure, by way of a short discussion with either the Crown or investigating officer prior to the opening of court or during a recess, in the thousands of cases which are usually disposed of on the initial appearance of the accused in court, would be replaced by a formal system of written disclosure requiring adjournment by the Crown for compliance. To suggest that such a form of written disclosure could be prepared by the Crown and ready for delivery to the accused on his first appearance in court is to reveal a complete lack of understanding of the flow of such cases through the criminal courts. To suggest that the quality of justice might be improved by the adjournment of such cases in order that written disclosure can be prepared is nothing more than academic theory unsupported by any findings of fact. Given the experience of civil litigation where pre-trial procedures evolve around written pleadings and subsequent examinations upon those pleadings, the delays that can be envisioned by the requirements of the Law Reform Commission's Working Paper are of such a magnitude as to make the application of the proposals contained therein frightening. The adage that holds, "justice delayed is justice denied", is, in the field of criminal law, supplemented with the knowledge that the effectiveness of the criminal sanction can be directly related to the swiftness of its application to those who break the law. If pre-trial procedures are to be made so time consuming and so accommodating to the tactic of deliberate delay that the trial of the central issue itself is postponed for an inordinate period of time, much of the protection the criminal law seeks to provide will be lost. In a recent study of the criminal process in Ontario, the Law Reform Commission of that province suggested that criminal cases should be disposed of within ninety days of the date on which the accused first appears in court.' This is a goal that is, under present procedures, being attained in a minority of cases except where the accused pleads guilty to the charge. The adoption of the proposals contained in the Working Paper of the Law Reform Commission of Canada would make such a goal completely unrealistic in defended cases and would even delay the application of the criminal sanction in cases where the person accused desired to plead guilty to the charge held against him. Any delay in criminal proceedings is contrary to the public interest and should only be allowed to occur where absolutely necessary to insure fair trial of the accused. The authors of the Working Paper have underrated the opportunity for discovery available under our present system of criminal justice. Firstly, they cite a survey of the Law Reform Commission's research officers in 3 ONTARIO LAW REFORM COMMISSION, I REPORT ON ADMINISTRATION OF ON-rARio CouRTs 11 (1973).
4 Ottawa Law Review [Vol. 7:295 support of the need for a code of procedure for discovery in criminal cases. ' This same survey would seem to demonstrate a unanimous opinion on the part of prosecutors that the character of their role demands that they give some form of discovery to the accused. Secondly, through misinterpretation of figures obtained from the Dominion Bureau of Statistics applicable to the year 1969, the authors jump to the erroneous conclusion that, "[i]n reality the preliminary inquiry is only made available in a small minority of criminal cases." ' The 1969 figures indicate that ninety-four per cent of the indictable offences in that year were disposed of by magistrates or provincial judges. Such a figure does not, of course, indicate that in ninety-four per cent of the indictable offences the accused was denied the right of obtaining discovery through the means of a preliminary inquiry. In fact, in all but a very few of these indictable offences disposed of by magistrates or provincial judges in 1969 the accused could have elected to proceed by way of preliminary inquiry. One must assume, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, that satisfactory disclosure was obtained in these cases. Otherwise the accused almost certainly would have elected to have a preliminary inquiry and thereby obtain disclosure of the case against him. Having regard for the not infrequent practice of re-electing and pleading guilty following the completion of the preliminary inquiry, it should be further observed that a significant number of these cases would be ones where a preliminary inquiry was in fact held. When these considerations are applied to the statistics relied upon by the authors of the Working Paper, it is quite wrong to conclude that the preliminary inquiry is available only "in a small minority of criminal cases." ' Only in those relatively few indictable offences over which the magistrate has exclusive jurisdiction is the right of preliminary inquiry denied to the accused person. In all other indictable offences the opportunity for discovery through preliminary inquiry exists and, taking into account the number of pleas of guilty following preliminary inquiry, it is safe to conclude that the preliminary inquiry was in fact used as a vehicle for discovery in substantially more than the six per cent of the indictable offences in 1969 tried by a court other than the magistrate's or provincial judge's court. Perhaps the most far reaching proposals contained in the Law Reform Commission's Working Paper are those that deal with pre-plea disclosure procedures. The large majority of persons charged with criminal offences plead guilty to the charges without trial. Under our present system the plea is accepted immediately when tendered, and the case is disposed of with a minimum of delay in a manner requiring relatively little time of the court, the Crown attorney and other court officials. While the system is not designed to encourage persons to plead guilty without trial, neither is it 4 Supra note 1, at d. at Id. 7 Id. at 10.
5 Spring 1975] Discovery designed to discourage confession of guilt at the earliest opportunity by those persons who have in fact committed criminal offences. The proposals of the Working Paper presuppose that our present system promotes the conviction of innocent persons who plead guilty to offences they have not committed. They also suggest a procedure that cannot help but discourage the truly guilty person from admitting his guilt. In finding fault with our present system of accepting pleas of guilty to criminal charges, the authors of the Working Paper assert that the plea of guilty amounts to an admission of legal as well as factual involvement in the offence charged. While such may well be the implications of a plea of guilty it does not follow that the court must, or indeed would, register a conviction on these admissions alone. There is a duty for the judge to see that both the facts and the law justify conviction before registering the conviction and this duty is applicable even where the accused pleads guilty to the offence. Thus, on a plea of guilty the judge will ask the accused if he agrees with the facts as they have been related to the court and if the accused agrees with the facts the judge will then assure himself that the law justifies a conviction for the offence charged based upon the facts admitted. Only then is a conviction registered. There can be no doubt that a number of persons plead guilty to offences which they might not be found guilty of if the Crown were forced to prove guilt by way of trial. In many of these cases it is the admission of guilt by the accused that makes certain what is otherwise only circumstantial evidence available to the Crown. The pre-plea discovery procedures suggested by the authors of the Working Paper appear to be prompted by yearnings for advocacy rather than by any real conviction that injustices are resulting from our present practice of accepting pleas of guilty in the first instance. Reflecting perhaps a spirit of gamesmanship, the propoed preplea discovery procedure would require the Crown to reveal its weaknesses as well as its strengths. And, in requiring the Crown to submit in writing to the accused such universally accepted information as the right of the accused to plead not guilty to the charge and the right of the accused to consult with counsel, the Crown is placed in the position of throwing the gauntlet at the feet of the accused thereby urging battle and discouraging confession. Given the extent of free legal aid services, the danger is that many truly guilty persons, who would otherwise plead guilty to the charges, will accept the challenge to do legal battle. And our system of criminal justice cannot afford the luxury of hosting full scale legal battles where guilt is obvious and guilt would otherwise be admitted. Nor is there anything to be gained by such luxury other than the possible academic satisfaction of seeing guilt established in every case without the aid of admission on the part of the accused. We must always be on guard to insure that those accused of criminal offences do not feel compelled to make confessions or admissions either prior to trial while being questioned by investigators or at trial by way of
6 Ottawa Law Review [Vol. 7:295 pleading guilty. Such confessions, admissions or pleas will always be tainted with the possibility that they do not represent the truth of the matter at issue. At the same time it would be sheer folly to adopt any procedure that might have the effect of encouraging the truly guilty, who otherwise might freely admit their guilt, to engage in legal proceedings in the hope that, though guilty, they might go free. It is one thing to guarantee the right of fair trial. It is quite another to encourage the truly guilty to seek such a trial. Our system of criminal justice must always be ready to receive the confession of the guilty at whatever point such confession is freely offered. The pre-plea proposals contained in the Working Paper would make the confessor await a formal show of strength from his antagonist. Such a procedure cannot help but discourage confession and encourage those legal mercenaries who thrive on delaying the inevitable in hopeless causes. Of all the good characteristics about our criminal law process perhaps the one we can be most thankful for, in this age of social complexity, is the relative simplicity of our system. Unlike other countries where the criminal process has become crippled by pre-trial procedures and secondary issues, in Canada we have avoided the creation of.conditions precedent to trial and have directed all our efforts towards the expeditious determination of the central issue of guilt or innocence. Even in the case of serious offences our procedure permits, by consent of the accused, a method of speedy trial whereby almost every indictable offence may be tried without a jury and the consequent commitment of time which attaches to trial by jury. Both the constitutional monopoly given to the federal government to enact criminal law and the concentration of the original criminal jurisdiction in one court within the judicial hierarchy have served to shield our system from the pitfalls of a multiplicity of proceedings and competing judicial jurisdictions. It is this simplistic and unencumbered system of criminal justice, perhaps more than anything else, that has permitted our system to keep pace with rapidly growing case loads while other countries, faced with similar demands, have seen their criminal process ground almost to a halt. In seeking to improve our system of criminal justice we need to devise a procedure whereby disclosure is uniformly made available to all persons seeking to discover the nature of charges brought against them by the state. The Law Reform Commission's Working Paper, in reaching this conclusion, has expressed a concern shared in general by the whole legal profession. There can be no doubt that a set of guidelines governing disclosure, enforceable by the courts, would facilitate defence counsel, instruct Crown counsel and expedite the work of the courts. The guarantee of uniform availability of disclosure is a worthy objective of reform. However, the authors of the Law Reform Commission's Working Paper seek to mandatorily impose disclosure upon the accused. To this extent, their proposals are both impractical and unnecessary.
Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems.
CONDUCT OF CRIMINAL LITIGATION Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems. Basic Principles of the Policy - Rene Descartes (1596-1650), "Discours de la Methode"
More informationCRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF JUSTICE CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL. July 23, 2015
CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF JUSTICE CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL ARCS/ORCS FILE NUMBER: 55000-00 56220-00 EFFECTIVE DATE: July 23, 2015 POLICY CODE: RES 1 SUBJECT: CROSS-REFERENCE: Resolution Discussions
More informationCRIMINAL LAW PROFESSIONAL STANDARD #2
CRIMINAL LAW PROFESSIONAL STANDARD #2 NAME OF STANDARD A GUILTY PLEA Brief Description of Standard: A standard on the steps to be taken by counsel before entering a guilty plea on behalf of a client. Committee
More informationCriminal Procedure (Reform and Modernisation) Bill 2010
Digest No. 1819 Criminal Procedure (Reform and Modernisation) Bill 2010 Date of Introduction: 15 November 2010 Portfolio: Select Committee: Published: 18 November 2010 by John McSoriley BA LL.B, Barrister,
More informationCriminal Procedure Act 2009
Examinable excerpts of Criminal Procedure Act 2009 as at 2 October 2017 CHAPTER 2 COMMENCING A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING PART 2.1 WAYS IN WHICH A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IS COMMENCED 5 How a criminal proceeding
More informationAn Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota
An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender s Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Federal Public Defender's Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Table of Contents
More informationCONTEMPT OF COURT ACT
LAWS OF KENYA CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT NO. 46 OF 2016 Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org Contempt of Court No. 46 of 2016 Section
More informationEFFECTIVE DATE: November 18, 2005
CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL ARCS/ORCS FILE NUMBER: 55820-00 (and issue specific) SUBJECT: Legal Advice to the Police POLICY Statement of Principle
More informationUniform Class Proceedings Act
8-1 Uniform Law Conference of Canada Uniform Class Proceedings Act 8-2 Table of Contents PART I: DEFINITIONS 1 Definitions PART II: CERTIFICATION 2 Plaintiff s class proceeding 3 Defendant s class proceeding
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTIVE I Preliminary Inquiry. Amendments to the Criminal Code of Canada regarding Preliminary Inquiries came into force on June 1, 2004.
PRACTICE DIRECTIVE I Preliminary Inquiry Amendments to the Criminal Code of Canada regarding Preliminary Inquiries came into force on June 1, 2004. Statutory Provisions: Criminal Code - Part XVIII 1. No
More informationBERMUDA CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE (DISCLOSURE AND CRIMINAL REFORM ACT 2015) REGULATIONS 2015 BR 89 / 2015
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE (DISCLOSURE AND CRIMINAL BR 89 / 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Citation Amends section 3 Amends section 5 Amends section 7 Amends
More informationYOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW
YOU VE been CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU NEED to KNOW 1 This booklet is intended to provide general information only. If you require specific legal advice, please consult the appropriate legislation or
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR. PRACTICE DIRECTIVE P.D. (Crim.) No
SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR PRACTICE DIRECTIVE P.D. (Crim.) No. 2018-01 RULES AFFECTED: Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, r. 6, and 9-15 EFFECTIVE
More informationRoster Lawyers Tariff of Fees
Roster Lawyers Tariff of Fees December 7, 2015 Schedule 2 Roster Lawyers Tariff of Fees Table of Contents 1. Criminal Certificates 20 2. Criminal Appeal Certificates 27 3. Civil Certificates 30 4. Administrative
More informationCIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND. Differentiated Case Management Plan for Criminal Cases INTRODUCTION
CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND Differentiated Case Management Plan for Criminal Cases INTRODUCTION This Criminal Differentiated Case Management Plan (DCMP) is established in accordance with
More informationLegal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No st April, RULES THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES, 2016
Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No. 45 21st April, 2016 181 LEGAL NOTICE NO. 55 REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT, CHAP. 12:02 RULES MADE BY THE RULES COMMITTEE UNDER SECTION
More informationISSUES FOR DISCUSSION
BAIL HEARINGS ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Saskatoon Criminal Defence Lawyers Association December 1, 1998 Fall Seminar, 1998: Bail Hearings and Sentencing Also available to members at the SCDLA Web site: http://www.lexicongraphics.com/scdla.htm
More informationREVIEW JUDGMENT DELIVERED : 1 NOVEMBER 2002
Republic of South Africa REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) HIGH COURT REF No : 1907/2002 CASE No : D 122/2002 Magistrate s Series No : 171/2002 In the
More informationCRIMINAL PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR THE REGIONAL COURTS IN SOUTH AFRICA
CRIMINAL PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR THE REGIONAL COURTS IN SOUTH AFRICA 2017 5 th Revision Page 1 PREAMBLE Whereas the Chief Justice has issued Norms and Standards for the performance of judicial functions
More informationEnvironmental Laws. Enforcement of First Nation Land Laws & Environmental Protection Laws
Environmental Laws Enforcement of First Nation Land Laws & Environmental Protection Laws What is Enforcement? Definitions of enforcement To compel or impose observance of the law To encourage compliance
More informationCourt Records Glossary
Court Records Glossary Documents Affidavit Answer Appeal Brief Case File Complaint Deposition Docket Indictment Interrogatories Injunction Judgment Opinion Pleadings Praecipe A written or printed statement
More informationThe Class Actions Act
1 CLASS ACTIONS c. C-12.01 The Class Actions Act being Chapter C-12.01 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2001 (effective January 1, 2002) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2007, c.21; and 2015,
More informationMINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND LEGAL AFFAIRS
MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND LEGAL AFFAIRS RESPONSE TO THE FIRST REPORT OF THE JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE AND LEGAL AFFAIRS ON AN INQUIRY INTO CRIMINAL CASE FLOW MANAGEMENT IN THE JUDICIAL
More informationCRIMINAL RULES OF THE ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE RULE 1 GENERAL. (2) Dealing with proceedings justly and efficiently includes
CRIMINAL RULES OF THE ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE RULE 1 GENERAL Fundamental objective 1.1 (1) The fundamental objective of these rules is to ensure that proceedings in the Ontario Court of Justice are dealt
More informationPractice Guidance Note (draft) Lewes and Chichester Crown Courts. Early Guilty Plea Protocol. Created on 21/08/ :52:00.
Practice Guidance Note (draft) Lewes and Chichester Crown Courts Early Guilty Plea Protocol Deleted: Created on 21/08/2012 13:52:00 PREAMBLE EARLY GUILTY PLEA SCHEME (CROWN COURT) PRACTICE GUIDANCE NOTE
More informationRULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AMENDMENTS BULLETIN
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AMENDMENTS BULLETIN July 2009 SUMMARY [The information below is provided as a service by Shillingtons LLP and is not intended to be legal advice. Those seeking additional information
More informationCLASS PROCEEDINGS ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton,
More informationLR Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal
LR2-308. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal proceedings in the Second Judicial District Court. This
More informationGROUP 3 TRIAL AND SENTENCING IN CORPORATE CRIME CASES
GROUP 3 TRIAL AND SENTENCING IN CORPORATE CRIME CASES Chairperson Mr. Mohamed Ahmed Abani (Niger) Co-Chairperson Mr. Takeshi Hashimoto (Japan) Rapporteur Mr. McSyd Hubert Chalunda (Malawi) Co-Rapporteur
More informationBill C-2: Fair and Efficient Criminal Trials Act
Bill C-2: Fair and Efficient Criminal Trials Act Publication No. 41-1-C2-E 14 June 2011 Robin MacKay Legal and Legislative Affairs Division Parliamentary Information and Research Service Legislative Summary
More informationAPPLICATIONS FOR MINISTERIAL REVIEW MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE ANNUAL REPORT 2018 MINISTER OF JUSTICE
APPLICATIONS FOR MINISTERIAL REVIEW MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE ANNUAL REPORT 2018 MINISTER OF JUSTICE Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any
More informationPRE-TRIAL COORDINATION PROTOCOL ADULT CHARGES
PRE-TRIAL COORDINATION PROTOCOL ADULT CHARGES This Protocol is subject to change. It is expected that over time changes will be made and the Protocol will be amended. Please refer to our website at www.manitobacourts.mb.ca
More informationReduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea Guideline Consultation
Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea Guideline Consultation Published on 11 February 2016 The consultation will end on 5 May 2016 A consultation produced by the Sentencing Council. This information
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF MANITOBA
Date: 20180831 Docket: CR 14-15-00636 (Thompson Centre) Indexed as: R. v. Clemons Cited as: 2018 MBQB 144 COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF MANITOBA IN THE MATTER OF: AND IN THE MATTER OF: The Criminal Code of
More informationLISTING PROCEDURE FOR SUMMARY CRIMINAL TRIALS
Local Court of New South Wales PRACTICE NOTE NO. 7 of 2007 ISSUED: 9 November 2007 LISTING PROCEDURE F SUMMARY CRIMINAL TRIALS This Practice Note applies where a plea of not guilty is entered in respect
More informationAPPLICATIONS FOR MINISTERIAL REVIEW MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE ANNUAL REPORT 2014 MINISTER OF JUSTICE
S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S APPLICATIONS FOR MINISTERIAL REVIEW MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE ANNUAL REPORT 2014 MINISTER OF JUSTICE S E S R E V R I V N I G N G C A C N A A N D A I D A I N A S N S Information
More informationAfter the initial charges are laid against the accused the trial should take place: After Preliminary inquiry: within six months to one year
The Court Process: Time Frames and Expected Proceedings www.owjn.org/issues/assault/qa2.htm After the initial charges are laid against the accused the trial should take place: After Preliminary inquiry:
More informationVictorian Courts. Mapping the Court process. A step-by-step guide through the Magistrates, County and Supreme Courts. d e f e n c e l a w y e r s
Victorian Courts Mapping the Court process A step-by-step guide through the Magistrates, County and Supreme Courts Written by Shaun Pascoe and Amelia Ramsay d e f e n c e l a w y e r s Index 5 8 12 16
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA
PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA November 4, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE TO PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT
More informationThe Criminal Court System. Law 521 Chapter Seven
The Criminal Court System Law 521 Chapter Seven The Feds make criminal law and procedure. Criminal Court Structure Provinces responsible for organizing, administering, and maintaining the criminal court
More informationTo provide a continuum of innovative and cost effective legal services for people in need throughout Alberta.
To provide a continuum of innovative and cost effective legal services for people in need throughout Alberta. Effective on Certificates Issued on or after November 1, 2009 Table of Contents Introduction...1
More informationCRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF JUSTICE CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL. April 13, 2015
CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF JUSTICE CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL ARCS/ORCS FILE NUMBER: 55580-00 SUBJECT: EFFECTIVE DATE: April 13, 2015 POLICY CODE: INC 1 CROSS-REFERENCE: In-Custody Informer
More informationBERMUDA CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2013 BR 30 / 2013
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2013 BR 30 / 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 Citation and commencement PRELIMINARY CITATION,
More informationChapter 1. Crime and Justice in the United States
Chapter 1 Crime and Justice in the United States Chapter Objectives After completing this chapter, you should be able to do the following: Describe how the type of crime routinely presented by the media
More informationREPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA HIGH COURT OF NAMIBIA MAIN DIVISION, WINDHOEK
REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA NOT REPORTABLE HIGH COURT OF NAMIBIA MAIN DIVISION, WINDHOEK REVIEW JUDGMENT Case no: CR 39/2017 In the matter between: THE STATE And HENDRIK BAM MATHEW MWANGA 1 ST ACCUSED 2 ND ACCUSED
More informationLegal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 106, 5th October, 2017
Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 106, 5th October, 2017 Second Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No.
More informationINITIAL RESPONSE TO THE CARLOWAY REPORT
INITIAL RESPONSE TO THE CARLOWAY REPORT November 2011 For further information contact Maggie Scott QC; Jodie Blackstock, Director of Criminal and EU Justice Policy Email: scottish.justice@advocates.org.uk
More informationInvestigations and Enforcement
Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 24.1.2 Last Revised January 26, 2007 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor Los Angeles,
More informationNotes and Observations to the questions relating to Criminal Legal Aid
Notes and Observations to the questions relating to Criminal Legal Aid Question 24: Do you agree with the proposals to: pay a single fixed fee of 565 for a guilty plea in an either way case which the magistrates
More informationPreparation and Planning: Interviewers are taught to properly prepare and plan for the interview and formulate aims and objectives.
In 1984 Britain introduced the Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 1984 (PACE) and the Codes of Practice for police officers which eventually resulted in a set of national guidelines on interviewing both
More informationLOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B
124 NORTH CAROLINA ROBESON COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B Rule 1. Name. These rules shall
More information2016 VCE Legal Studies examination report
2016 VCE Legal Studies examination report General comments The 2016 Legal Studies examination was a challenge for some students. Students should respond to the question, use the stimulus material in their
More informationCriminal Pre-Trial Conference Pilot Project Evaluation Report
Criminal Pre-Trial Conference Pilot Project Evaluation Report January 18, 2012 The current members of the Criminal Law Sub-Committee are: Madam Justice Holmes (Chair) Associate Chief Justice Cullen Mr.
More informationBill C-337 Judicial Accountability through Sexual Assault Law Training Act
Bill C-337 Judicial Accountability through Sexual Assault Law Training Act CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTION April 2017 500-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5S8 tel/tél : 613.237.2925
More informationTHE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES (TRIBUNALS) ACT, 1973
THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES (TRIBUNALS) ACT, 1973 (ACT NO. XIX OF 1973). [20th July, 1973] An Act to provide for the detention, prosecution and punishment of persons for genocide, crimes against humanity,
More informationCriminal Procedure Act, 1993
Criminal Procedure Act, 1993 Number 40 of 1993 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT, 1993 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Interpretation. 2. Review by Court of Criminal Appeal of alleged miscarriage of justice or
More informationLEVEL 6 - UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014
LEVEL 6 - UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key
More informationYouth Criminal Justice Act
Page 1 of 92 Youth Criminal Justice Act ( 2002, c. 1 ) Disclaimer: These documents are not the official versions (more). Act current to September 3rd, 2008 Attention: See coming into force provision and
More informationSuperior Court of Justice (Ontario) NEW CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PILOT FOR TORONTO REGION: RULE 78 CASES. By Regional Senior Justice Warren K.
Superior Court of Justice (Ontario) NEW CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PILOT FOR TORONTO REGION: RULE 78 CASES A) Summary: By Regional Senior Justice Warren K. Winkler By the summer of 2004, the Toronto civil justice
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA. N$17.60 WINDHOEK 9 May 2014 No. 5461
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$17.60 WINDHOEK 9 May 2014 No. 5461 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 67 High Court Practice Directions: Rules of High Court of Namibia, 2014... 1 Government
More informationSUBMISSION FROM THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND
Introduction SUBMISSION FROM THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND The Law Society of Scotland (the Society) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Public Audit Committee s call for written evidence on the joint
More informationBPTC syllabus and curriculum 2017/18
BPTC syllabus and curriculum 2017/18 1 Contents Civil litigation and evidence... 4 Introduction... 4 1 General Matters... 5 2 Limitation... 6 3 Pre-action Conduct... 7 4 Commencing Proceedings... 8 5 Parties...
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE STEVEN LAUX. Argued: March 31, 2015 Opinion Issued: May 22, 2015
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationCOMMENT ON FAILURE OF ACCUSED TO TESTIFY
Yale Law Journal Volume 26 Issue 6 Yale Law Journal Article 3 1917 COMMENT ON FAILURE OF ACCUSED TO TESTIFY WALTER T. DUNMORE Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj
More informationInvestigative Negligence. Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board (2007)
Investigative Negligence Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board (2007) By Gino Arcaro M.Ed., B.Sc. Niagara College Coordinator Police Foundations Program I. Commentary Part 1 Every police
More informationR. v. Cody: Trial within a reasonable time and enhancing efficiency
R. v. Cody: Trial within a reasonable time and enhancing efficiency Kenneth Jull, Gardiner Roberts LLP The Supreme Court decision in Jordan 1 was a watershed decision that changed the balancing required
More informationSummary criminal legal assistance reform. Frequently asked questions guidance
Summary criminal legal assistance reform Frequently asked questions guidance Issued ugust 2008 Contents ppearance from custody Page 1. ppointed solicitors 4 2. Circumstances where BWOR can be provided
More informationSection 1: Statement of Purpose Section 2: Voluntary Discovery Section 3: Discovery by Order of the Court... 2
Discovery in Criminal Cases Table of Contents Section 1: Statement of Purpose... 2 Section 2: Voluntary Discovery... 2 Section 3: Discovery by Order of the Court... 2 Section 4: Mandatory Disclosure by
More informationThe Code. for Crown Prosecutors
The Code for Crown Prosecutors January 2013 Introduction 1.1 The Code for Crown Prosecutors (the Code) is issued by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) under section 10 of the Prosecution of Offences
More informationOUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS
OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS What happens during a criminal case may be confusing to a victim or witness. The following summary will explain how a case generally progresses through Oklahoma s criminal
More informationGetting it Right First Time Case Ownership Duty of Direct Engagement Consistent judicial case management
1. Better Case Management (BCM) links certain key complementary initiatives, which together should improve the way cases are processed through the system, for the benefit of all concerned within the criminal
More informationACCESS TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE Divergent Trends in the Legal Profession DISCLOSURE REVISITED
ACCESS TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE Divergent Trends in the Legal Profession November 29, 2002 DISCLOSURE REVISITED Faculty: Anne Malick, Q.C. Speaking Notes Access to Solicitor/Client Privilegd Information-McClure
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE SENTENCING TASK FORCE Diversion Working Group
COMPREHENSIVE SENTENCING TASK FORCE Diversion Working Group RECOMMENDATION PRESENTED TO THE CCJJ November 9, 2012 FY13-CS #4 Expand the availability of adult pretrial diversion options within Colorado
More informationTHE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES (TRIBUNALS) ACT, 1973
THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES (TRIBUNALS) ACT, 1973 (ACT NO. XIX OF 1973). [20th July, 1973] An Act to provide for the detention, prosecution and punishment of persons for genocide, crimes against humanity,
More informationDISCLOSURE: THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS IN PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE CASES. Andrew J. Heal
DISCLOSURE: THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS IN PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE CASES Andrew J. Heal ANDREW J. HEAL, PARTNER HEAL & Co. LLP - 2 - DISCLOSURE: THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROSECUTION
More informationWilliam B. Stinchcombe
R. v. Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326 William B. Stinchcombe Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Stinchcombe File No.: 21904. 1991: May 2; 1991: November 7. Present: La Forest,
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) High Court Ref No: 14519 Khayelitsha Case No: RCA 151/10 In the matter between: STATE And SINTHEMBA VIKA Per: BINNS-WARD & ROGERS JJ Delivered:
More informationDr Vicky Kemp Visiting Scholar University of Nottingham
Dr Vicky Kemp Visiting Scholar University of Nottingham From Suspect to Trial: The aphorism that trial starts at the police station is now more true than ever... It is not only what the suspect does say,
More informationReforming Scots Criminal Law and Practice: Reform of Sheriff and Jury Procedure. Response to consultation. March 2013
Reforming Scots Criminal Law and Practice: Reform of Sheriff and Jury Procedure Response to consultation March 2013 For further information please contact: Jodie Blackstock, Director of Criminal and EU
More informationPROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Bowser, 2016 NSPC 34. Her Majesty the Queen v. Joseph Wayne Bowser and Ricky Daniel Cameron
PROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Bowser, 2016 NSPC 34 Between: Date: April 14, 2016 Docket: 2379172-73, 2379175-76 Registry: Dartmouth Her Majesty the Queen v. Joseph Wayne Bowser and Ricky
More informationONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE
COURT FILE No.: Regional Municipality of York File #00-86401409-90 Citation: R. v. Vellone, 2009 ONCJ 150 ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under of the Provincial Offences Act BETWEEN:
More informationCase 3:09-cr GHD-SAA Document 49 Filed 04/09/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
Case 3:09-cr-00002-GHD-SAA Document 49 Filed 04/09/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL NO. 3:09CR002 BOBBY B. DELAUGHTER
More informationPolicy of the Provincial Court of British Columbia
Information Regarding Bans on Publication Policy Effective Date: Policy Code: February 28, 2011 ACC-3 Scope of Application: Applies to Provincial Court of proceedings. Purpose of Policy To provide a general
More informationEASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. ) IYMAN FARIS, ) a/k/a Mohammad Rauf, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT
More informationAdversary trial Key features Evaluation Review
Chapter 11 Adversary system In this chapter we investigate the main features of the trial system, the reasons why we adhere to it and the problems associated with it. We compare the operation of the adversary
More informationCanadian Criminal Law and Impaired Driving
Canadian Criminal Law and Impaired Driving H. Pruden Department of Justice (Canada) Ottawa, Ontario Abstract This article outlines the current criminal legislation directed against alcohol and drug driving
More informationPretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial
C H A P T E R 1 0 Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial O U T L I N E Introduction Pretrial Activities The Criminal Trial Stages of a Criminal Trial Improving the Adjudication Process L E A R N I
More informationEFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION OF THE POLICE AND PROSECUTION IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA. John Maru*
EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION OF THE POLICE AND PROSECUTION IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA John Maru* The criminal justice system of any society depends very much on the thorough, efficient and effective
More informationPenalties and Sentences Act 1985
Penalties and Sentences Act 1985 No. 10260 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section 1. Purposes. 2. Commencement. 3. Definitions. PART 1 PRELIMINARY PART 2 GENERAL SENTENCING PROVISIONS 4. Court may take guilty plea
More informationCriminal Procedure (Reform and Modernisation) Bill
Criminal Procedure (Reform and Modernisation) Bill Submission of the New Zealand Police Association Submitted to the Justice and Electoral Committee 18 February 2011 Criminal Procedure (Reform and Modernisation)
More informationCourtroom Terminology
Courtroom Terminology Accused: formally charged but not yet tried for committing a crime; the person who has been charged may also be called the defendant. Acquittal: a judgment of court, based on the
More informationReliance Document Management Improving Efficiency
Reliance Document Management Improving Efficiency Introduction Murray L. Smith, LL.M., Chartered Arbitrator www.smithbarristers.com msmith@smithbarristers.com The reputation of arbitration has suffered
More informationTim has been charged with criminal damage to the value of 10,000 at a children s playground
Bail & Pre-Trial Procedures By the end of this unit, you will be able to explain [A01]: What is meant by bail The rules governing the operation of bail within the criminal law What a plea before venue
More informationCHAPTER. Criminal Trial. Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
CHAPTER 10 Criminal Trial 1 The Criminal Trial START HERE 2009 Pearson Education, Inc 2 Review 3 The Nature and Purpose of the Criminal Trial: The trial process is highly formalized and governed by rules
More information2 [4] And further that Angelica Cechirc, Alexander Verbon, and Pavel Muzhikov and Stanislav Kavalenka, between October the 28 th, 2003, and March the
Info # 04-01374, 04-01579, 05-01037, 04-01373 Citation: R. v. Muzhikov et al., 2005 ONCJ 67 ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Mr. Michael Holme for the Crown AND PAVEL MUZHIKOV STANISLAV
More informationCOURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS
COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Title... 2 Section 2. Purpose... 2 Section 3. Definitions... 2 Section 4. Fundamental Rights of Defendants... 4 Section 5. Arraignment...
More informationCriminal Procedure Regulation 2005
New South Wales under the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Her Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has made the following Regulation under the Criminal Procedure Act 1986. BOB
More informationHOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA
HOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA This legal guide explains the steps you will go through if you should be arrested or charged with a crime in Florida. This guide is only general information and
More informationUNDERSTANDING THE NEW ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT, 2015
UNDERSTANDING THE NEW ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT, 2015 PAPER DELIVERED BY: MRS E.I. ALAKIJA DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS LAGOS STATE NIGERIA BAR ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL CONFERENCE,
More informationThe learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.
Unit 11 Title: Criminal Litigation Level: 3 Credit Value: 7 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the powers of the police to arrest and detain a person for the purpose of investigating a criminal
More information