RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AMENDMENTS BULLETIN
|
|
- Elfrieda Butler
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AMENDMENTS BULLETIN July 2009 SUMMARY [The information below is provided as a service by Shillingtons LLP and is not intended to be legal advice. Those seeking additional information on the issues above or any other matter should contact a member of the firm at (519) ] Effective January 1, 2010, with no transition period, the most significant changes ever made to the Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194 (Rules), will be in full force and effect. These changes will have a dramatic impact on the way that litigation is conducted in the province of Ontario. Some of the most significant changes are discussed within this bulletin. The key mantra with respect to these changes, as outlined by those responsible for making them, is proportionality. The thought behind the changes was to make the legal system more accessible and affordable, and to ensure that legal fees and time expended on a particular case were proportionate to the complexity, value and time invested in the particular matter. Some of the most significant changes to certain Rules are discussed below. It should be stressed that this is by no means an exhaustive list, and an in-depth review of the Rules in their entirety is highly recommended. RULE 3.04: TIMETABLES This is a new rule which allows parties, by written agreement, to amend a timetable established or amended by a judge or case management master, unless the order prohibits the amendment. However, this agreement shall not amend the date of setting down for trial or restoring an action to a trial list. Failure to comply with a timetable can lead to a stay, dismissal, striking of defence or any other order. A request for sanctions can be brought on a motion.
2 2 RULE 4.1: DUTY OF EXPERT Rule 4.1 is a new rule with an associated Form 53, which requires any expert witness to acknowledge their duty as outlined in Rule 4.1 to provide an opinion that is fair, objective and non-partisan, to provide opinion evidence related only to matters within the expert s area of expertise, and to provide the court with additional assistance that the court may reasonably require to determine the matter in issue. This obligation owed by the expert is above their obligation to any party by which that expert was retained. Form 53 must be attached to any report signed by the expert. It outlines that the expert has reviewed and acknowledged these obligations under Rule 4.1. This change is as a result of concern over the expert bias and the use of hired guns. The provision requires the lawyer to specifically review the role of an expert witness with that witness and confirm that the expert witness understands their role. The language incorporated was taken from similar rules in the United Kingdom and Australia. RULE 20: SUMMARY DISPOSITION When reviewing the Rules with respect to summary judgement, it was determined that the Rule 20 was not working, was not significantly flexible, and had a significant cost deterrent as a result of the substantial indemnity costs presumption against the party bringing the motion. Changes include a slight rewording of the test from no genuine issue for trial to no genuine issue requiring a trial. The judges are now permitted to consider evidence submitted by the parties and weigh the evidence, evaluate the credibility of deponents and draw any reasonable inferences from the evidence. The judge also has the power to conduct a mini trial for the purposes of exercising any of the aforementioned powers and request oral evidence with or without time limits. The trial can be ordered to proceed expeditiously. The cost deterrent has been removed, and replaced with discretion for the court to award substantial indemnity costs against either party if the party acted unreasonably by making or responding to the motion, or if the party acted in bad faith for purpose of delay. RULE 24.1: MANDATORY MEDIATION This rule applies to actions governed by this rule before January 1, 2010, or commenced after January 1, 2010 in Ottawa, Toronto and Essex County. A list of exceptions is included. One change is that mediation shall take place within 180 days after the first defence is filed, as compared with previous 90 day timeframe. Mediation may be postponed to a later date on consent if the consent it filed. Before setting the matter down for trial, a party must file the mediation report. The mediation coordinator can assign a mediator if certain conditions are not met and a mediation session shall be within 90 days of assignment of
3 3 mediator unless the court orders otherwise. The insured person is not required to attend, but a representative of the insurer is required to attend. RULES : DISCOVERY The changes to discovery procedure are perhaps the most extensive of all the changes to the Rules. Rule 29.1 is an entirely new rule which makes discovery plans mandatory for all forms of discovery. The discovery plan is a form that is to be agreed between counsel, in writing, filed 60 days following the close of pleadings, before obtaining any evidence on discovery. Specific details must be incorporated, and consequences can follow if the discovery plan is not followed. The specific contents of the discovery plan are as follows: The intended scope of documentary discovery under Rule 30.02, taking into account relevance, costs, and the importance and complexity of the issues in the particular case. Dates for service of each party s affidavit of documents. Information respecting the timing, costs and manner of the production and documents by the parties and any other person. The names of persons intended to be produced for oral examination for discovery under Rule 31, and information respecting the timing and length of the examination. Any other information intended to result in the expeditious and cost effective completion of the discovery process in the manner that is proportionate to the importance and complexity of the action. There is a positive duty to update the discovery plan. There are potential consequences for failing to agree on a discovery plan. The Rules with respect to the discovery plan are expected to require more coordination and collaboration between counsel, as well as forcing counsel to review and know their case prior to examinations for discovery. The second major change is to the scope of discovery. Although courts had generally interpreted the scope of discovery as being broader than relevance at trial, and used a semblance of relevancy test, the new rules replace the phrase relating to any matter in issue with the phrase relevant to any matter in issue, seemingly defining the scope of discovery as relevant. Rule outlines the decision making process with respect to whether a party or person must answer a question or produce a document, which includes the time required for a
4 4 party to answer or to produce the document, expenses associated, undue prejudice, undue interference with the orderly progress of an action, information or documents readily available to the party requesting it and excessive volume of documents. Fishing expeditions are going to be eliminated, and the proportionality concept, prevalent throughout the Rules, will be important. Finally, time limits for examinations for discovery have been added. Oral discovery must not exceed a total of seven hours of examination, regardless of the number of parties or other persons to be examined, except with the consent of the parties or with leave or the court. Specific guidelines are included for the court to consider when deciding whether to grant leave to extend time for discovery, mainly: the amount of money at issue, the complexity of the issue as a factor of law, the amount of time that ought reasonably to be required in the action for all examinations, the financial position of each party, the conduct of any party, a party s denial or refusal to admit anything that should be have been admitted, and anything in the interest of justice. One option may be to serve a request to admit prior to examinations for discovery in an effort to narrow what is truly in dispute, so that discovery can be planned accordingly. RULE 50: PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE The entire rule has been revoked and replaced, although many of the subsections do remain the same. The overall thought prior to changes was to make pre-trials more meaningful, as concern regarding the merit of pre-trials had been an ongoing issue. Material must now be filed at least five days prior to the pre-trial. Counsel must request that the presiding Justice accept any late documentation. Rule notes that unless a judge orders otherwise, parties shall participate by personal attendance or teleconference/video conference if undue travel or time or expense is required. The decision maker with authority to settle must be available to contact during the pre-trial conference. This is expected to be a significant change, as personal attendance is expected to allow the judge to communicate more personally with the parties, allow the parties to see the procedure firsthand, and perhaps facilitate settlement. With respect to fixed trial dates, the presiding judge must complete a pre-trial report, which includes the steps needed to be completed before the action is ready for trial and the time required to complete it. This report is placed with the trial record. With written consent of the parties, a judge who conducts a pre-trial conference can also try the action. Judges can also make an orders for costs at a pre-trial. Failure to comply with the Rules may prompt a cost order.
5 5 RULE 53.03: EVIDENCE AT TRIAL - EXPERT WITNESSES Significant changes have been made to the deadline for filing expert reports. Expert reports must now be filed not less than 90 days before the pre-trial, as opposed to 90 days before trial. A responding report must similarly be served 60 days before the pre-trial, as opposed to the previous 60 days before the trial. Furthermore, within 60 days following an action being set down for trial, parties must agree to a schedule setting out dates for the service of expert reports, unless the court orders otherwise. These changes were incorporated to avoid trial adjournments related to late service of expert reports and to promote more meaningful pre-trial conferences and early settlement. This may result in pre-trial dates being set closer to the date for trial. Interestingly, the rules for supplementary expert reports are unchanged, and must be served on every other party not less than 30 days prior to commencement of trial. Despite the above, Rule 53.08(1), which requires that the court shall grant leave to permit late delivery of reports, was not changed, and thus it is possible that courts will still continue to accept late service of expert reports as before. A further change has been made to what an expert report is required to include. According to Rule 53.03(2.1), an expert report shall contain the following information: The expert s name, address and area of expertise. The expert s qualifications in employment and educational experience in his or her area of expertise. The instructions provided to the expert in relation to the proceeding. The nature of the opinion being sought on each issue and the proceeding to which the opinion relates. The expert s opinion respecting each issue and, where there is a range of opinions given, a summary of the range and the reasons for the expert s own opinion within that range. The expert s reason for his/her opinion including: Description of the factual assumptions on which the opinion is based; and A description of any research conducted by the expert that led him or her to form the opinion and a list of every document, if any relied on by the expert informing the opinion.
6 6 An acknowledgement of the expert s duty which is signed by the expert (the aforementioned Form 53). New changes highlighted included specific factual assumptions underlying the expert reports now being required to be specified and the importance of specifically understanding the case prior to requesting a formal expert opinion. RULE 76: SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE The most significant change for this rule is the increase in the monetary limit from $50, to $100, It should also be noted that the Small Claims Court limit has been increased from $10, to $25, As the appeal route to the Court of Appeal remains at $50,000.00, and is as yet unchanged in accordance with the new Rules, it is possible that Simplified Procedure cases could be headed to the Court of Appeal, although this provision may be changed in the future. A new change incorporated examinations for discovery for Simplified Procedure cases. Examinations for discovery are limited to two hours, regardless of the number of parties. With respect to motions, the motion form must be served and submitted to the court before the motion is brought, as contrasted with the previous rule where the moving party must serve a motion form and submit it at court before the motion is heard. There is now no different procedure for summary judgement in Simplified Procedure. With respect to setting the action down for trial, the Plaintiff must set the action down for trial within 180 days after the first Statement of Defence or Notice of Intent to Defend is filed, as contrasted with the previous 90 day period. The former rule requiring the attendance of parties and/or those with authority to attend or be accessible for pre-trial is revoked; however, new changes to the pretrial regime as previously discussed would take precedence. With respect to a summary trial, ten minutes of chief, cross and re-examination on affidavits have all been incorporated. RULE 77: CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT This applies to case managed actions and applications in Ottawa, Toronto and Essex County. A judge or case management master is given a wide variety of powers under Rule 77.04, but under Rule 77.05, a proceeding can be assigned for case management on consent, on the initiative of a regional senior judge, or at the request of a party on a motion. All steps can be heard and conducted by a particular judge and all motions would be made to the same judge.
7 7 CONCLUSION It is important to note that this is not the full list of all Rules changed, as many of the timelines and timeframes have also been slightly altered. As noted above, a full review of all changes to the Rules is highly recommended.
AMENDMENTS TO THE ONTARIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Toll-free 1.877.262.7762 www.virtualassociates.ca AMENDMENTS TO THE ONTARIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE This chart is updated as of July 1, 2017. This table is intended as a guideline only. The statutory
More informationCASE MANAGEMENT AND MEDIATION IN ONTARIO, CANADA. Case Management is a work in progress
CASE MANAGEMENT AND MEDIATION IN ONTARIO, CANADA Case Management is a work in progress What is case management? The pace of the case is controlled by the court Case flow management: the rules fix the deadlines;
More informationActions must be set down for trial within two years of being defended.
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, EAST REGION OFFICE OF THE MASTER HOW DOES THE NEW PRE-TRIAL PROCESS WORK? Actions must be set down for trial within two years of being defended. The two year deadline can only
More informationSuperior Court of Justice (Ontario) NEW CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PILOT FOR TORONTO REGION: RULE 78 CASES. By Regional Senior Justice Warren K.
Superior Court of Justice (Ontario) NEW CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PILOT FOR TORONTO REGION: RULE 78 CASES A) Summary: By Regional Senior Justice Warren K. Winkler By the summer of 2004, the Toronto civil justice
More informationCivil Procedure Act 2010
Examinable excerpts of Civil Procedure Act 2010 as at 2 October 2018 1 Purposes CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY (1) The main purposes of this Act are (a) to reform and modernise the laws, practice, procedure and
More informationGetting Out Early: Motion Techniques for Early Resolution of Claims. Jay Skukowski
Getting Out Early: Motion Techniques for Early Resolution of Claims Jay Skukowski 416-593-1221 jskukowski@blaney.com What is a Motion? A motion is an oral or written application requesting a court to make
More informationYork Regional Police. Rules for Discipline Hearings under Part V the Police Services Act
York Regional Police Rules for Discipline Hearings under Part V the Police Services Act September 2014 Rules for Discipline Hearings under Part V the Police Services Act Application and General 1.0 These
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THECOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO INDEX
October 1, 1996 Last Update: February 23, 2018 Index Page 1 RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THECOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO INDEX RULE 1 - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION...
More informationIntroductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario
Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario Table of Contents INTRODUCTION This guide contains an overview of the Canadian legal system and court structure as well as key procedural and substantive
More informationDisposition before Trial
Disposition before Trial Presented By Andrew J. Heal January 13, 2011 Q: What's the difference between a good lawyer and a bad lawyer? A: A bad lawyer can let a case drag out for several years. A good
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS INDEX
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS INDEX RULE 1 INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION... 1 1.01 Definitions... 1 1.02 Interpretations
More informationLitigation Process. in the Province. Ontario
Litigation Process in the Province of Ontario Demand Letter This document is only intended to provide a generic outline of the litigation process for educational purposes. The specific details of each
More information2010: A Litigation Odyssey
2010: A Litigation Odyssey Thursday, September 24, 2009 Registration: 7:15 AM Breakfast and networking: 7:15 8:00 AM seminar: 8:00 9:30 AM Fraser Milner Casgrain llp 1 First Canadian Place, 100 King Street
More informationTYPES OF MOTIONS Jennifer Griffiths and Marni Miller
TYPES OF MOTIONS Jennifer Griffiths and Marni Miller A motion provides the mechanism for a party in litigation to obtain the court s direction on a limited issue prior to trial. Motions can be used to
More information- 4 - APPLICABILITY OF ARBITRATIONS ACT, 1991
www.barryfisher.ca - 2 - INTRODUCTION Up until very recently it was assumed that the only way in which a non-unionized employee could have his or her employment dispute adjudicated upon was either before
More informationThe New Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure:
The New Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure: Do They Go Far Enough Towards Addressing Expert Independence? Research Project for Emerging Issues / Advanced Topics Course Diploma in Investigative and Forensic
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTION COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENTS TO COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH RULES (CIVIL) EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2018
PRACTICE DIRECTION COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA RE: COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENTS TO COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH RULES (CIVIL) EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2018 Animating the comprehensive amendments to the Court
More informationADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope... 3 Rule 2 Construction of
More informationTITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 475 TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : DISPUTE RESOLUTION PART 475 CONTESTED CASES AND OTHER FORMAL HEARINGS
More informationRule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL Introduction Definitions General Principles
Rule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL 8401. Introduction (1) The Rules of Practice and Procedure (the Rules of Procedure ) set out the rules that govern the conduct of IIROC s enforcement proceedings
More informationA BILL FOR A LAW FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL JUSTICE IN EKITI STATE EKITI STATE OF NIGERIA
A BILL FOR A LAW FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL JUSTICE IN EKITI STATE EKITI STATE OF NIGERIA 1 EKITI STATE OF NIGERIA ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL JUSTICE BILL, 2018 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Objectives
More informationNEW BRUNSWICK CLASS ACTIONS Chapter C A Plaintiff Perspective. Class Proceedings Act, proclaimed in New Brunswick in June of 2007.
NEW BRUNSWICK CLASS ACTIONS Chapter C-5.15 A Plaintiff Perspective Class Proceedings Act, proclaimed in New Brunswick in June of 2007. General S.2(3) allows a proceeding started under Rule 14, to be continued
More informationUniform Class Proceedings Act
8-1 Uniform Law Conference of Canada Uniform Class Proceedings Act 8-2 Table of Contents PART I: DEFINITIONS 1 Definitions PART II: CERTIFICATION 2 Plaintiff s class proceeding 3 Defendant s class proceeding
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF REGISTERED PSYCHOTHERAPISTS AND REGISTERED MENTAL HEALTH THERAPISTS OF ONTARIO INDEX
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF REGISTERED PSYCHOTHERAPISTS AND REGISTERED MENTAL HEALTH THERAPISTS OF ONTARIO INDEX RULE 1 - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION... 3 1.01 Definitions...
More informationThe New Rules Of Practice For Estates: An Overview
The New Rules Of Practice For Estates: An Overview Suzana Popovic-Montag, Hull & Hull LLP I. AN OVERVIEW On July 9, 2015, several amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure 1 (the Rules ) were filed with
More informationProcedural Rules Mining and Lands Commissioner
FR MENU Procedural Rules Mining and Lands Commissioner These rules apply to all proceedings before the Mining and Lands Commissioner that started on or after February 5, 2018. On this page Preamble Application
More informationEFFECTIVE DATE: When Published [Information outdated - Feb. 2000]
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario SECTION: Procedures - Hearings INDEX NO.: P520-780 TITLE: APPROVED BY: PUBLISHED: Pre-Hearing Conference Procedures
More informationCommercial Litigation. Update
A P R I L 2 0 1 4 Commercial Litigation Update EDITOR: John Polyzogopoulos 416.593.2953 jpolyzogopoulos@blaney.com This newsletter is designed to bring news of changes to the law, new law, interesting
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON CHAPTER I: HEARINGS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS
RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON CHAPTER I: HEARINGS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS Purpose These are intended to facilitate orderly open record
More informationChapter 36 Mediation and Arbitration 2015 EDITION
Chapter 36 Mediation and Arbitration 2015 EDITION MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION SPECIAL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS DISPUTE RESOLUTION (Generally) 36.100 Policy for ORS 36.100 to 36.238 36.105 Declaration of purpose
More informationCHAIR S DIRECTIONS (for Standard Dwellinghouse claims)
CHAIR S DIRECTIONS (for Standard Dwellinghouse claims) 1. Introduction 1.1 These directions are effective from 21 September 2015 and are issued pursuant to s114 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services
More informationGuernsey case management and civil proceedings
JERSEY GUERNSEY LONDON BVI SINGAPORE GUERNSEY BRIEFING August 2015 Guernsey case management and civil proceedings Proactive case management is a concept that pervades modern Guernsey civil procedure. This
More informationONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 32
ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 32 Resolving Disputes in Displacement and Termination Applications in the Construction Industry during the Construction Open Period This Information
More informationDiscipline How does it work? February 15, 2017
Discipline How does it work? February 15, 2017 Regulatory Process Specialist Office of the Registrar James Howell Human Resources Professional Association 2 Rebecca Durcan HRPA s Regulatory Counsel Partner
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE & FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE & FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE October 2015 RULES OF PROCEDURE Table of Contents RULE 1 INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION... 4 1.01 DEFINITIONS... 4 1.02 GENERAL
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 150B Article 3 1
Article 3. Administrative Hearings. 150B-22. Settlement; contested case. It is the policy of this State that any dispute between an agency and another person that involves the person's rights, duties,
More informationPCLL Conversion Examination June 2010 Examiner s Comments Civil Procedure
PCLL Conversion Examination June 2010 Examiner s Comments Civil Procedure The Standard and Format of the Examination The examination format was not new and the paper was not a difficult one. It was disappointing
More informationR in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers
R-17-0010 in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers R-17-0010 was a rule petition filed by the Supreme Court s Committee on Civil Justice Reform in January 2017. The Supreme Court s Order in R-17-0010,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT
Page 1 of 15 Home Feedback Site Map Français Home Court of Appeal for Ontario Superior Court of Justice Ontario Court of Justice Location Superior Court of Justice Divisional Court Appeal Information Package
More informationSMALL CLAIMS COURT RULES SUMMARY OF CONTENTS RULE 1 INTERPRETATION
SMALL CLAIMS COURT RULES SUMMARY OF CONTENTS Rule 1. Interpretation Rule 2. Non-Compliance with the Rules Rule 3. Time Rule 4. Parties Under Disability Rule 5. Partners and Sole Proprietorships Rule 6.
More informationThe court annexed arbitration program.
NEVADA ARBITRATION RULES (Rules Governing Alternative Dispute Resolution, Part B) (effective July 1, 1992; as amended effective January 1, 2008) Rule 1. The court annexed arbitration program. The Court
More informationBY-LAW NO. 44 ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS - RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE
BY-LAW NO. 44 OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS - RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OCSWSSW - Discipline Committee Rules of Procedure Index Page
More informationPART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS
PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS What this Part is about: This Part is designed to resolve issues and questions arising in the course of a Court action. It includes rules describing how applications
More informationSUGGESTED AMENDMENT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (CR)
0 (a) Scope. This rule applies if a case schedule or court order requires mediation. On a party s motion for good cause or on its own initiative, the court may order any parties to mediate pursuant to
More informationRULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 6:4. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL
RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 6:4. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL 6:4-1. Transfer of Actions (a) Consolidation With Actions In Other Courts. An action pending in the Special Civil
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT *, v. *, Plaintiff, Case No. * Division 11 Chapter 60 Defendant, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Now on this * day of *, 201*, after review
More informationINDEX. Abuse of Process, 29, 48, 82, 116, 140, 141, 214, 243, 254, 312, 338, 350
INDEX Please note: 1. APP references are to the appendices, principally, but not exclusively, to the SCC Hryniak decision 2. References below include quotations from judicial decisions on the page indicated
More informationCosts in Small Claims Court. By: W. Patrick Sloan, B.A. LL.B. Ferguson Barristers LLP
Costs in Small Claims Court By: W. Patrick Sloan, B.A. LL.B. Ferguson Barristers LLP Introduction The small claims court is intended to allow quicker and more cost efficient access to justice. Coupled
More informationRULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1. Definitions. As used in these rules: (A) Arbitration means a process whereby a neutral third person, called an arbitrator, considers
More informationGUIDE TO DISCIPLINARY HEARING PROCEDURES
GUIDE TO DISCIPLINARY HEARING PROCEDURES All persons named as respondents in a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) have the right to a hearing. The purpose
More informationGuide to Litigation in Canada. Guide to Litigation in Canada 1
Guide to Litigation in Canada Guide to Litigation in Canada 1 CONTENTS Introduction: Litigating in Canada... 3 Litigation in Each Province Alberta... 4 British Columbia... 8 Manitoba... 11 New Brunswick...
More informationREASONS FOR DECISION. Civil Procedure R R O 1990 Reg 194 the. its brakes in order to avoid a collision with another vehicle
CITATION BAYNE v TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION 2014 ONSC 733 COURT FILE NOs CV 08 348401 and CV 09 386390 MOTION HEARD JANUARY 21 2014 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ONTARIO RE Angela Bayne v Toronto Transit Commission
More informationTHE LAND TRIBUNAL ACT NO.7 OF 1994 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY PART II LOCATION AND STAFFING OF LAND TRIBUNALS
THE LAND TRIBUNAL ACT NO.7 OF 1994 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION TITLE PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. PART II LOCATION AND STAFFING OF LAND TRIBUNALS 3. Location
More informationPROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR HEARINGS BEFORE THE MINING AND LANDS COMMISSIONER
PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR HEARINGS BEFORE THE MINING AND LANDS COMMISSIONER Office of the Mining and Lands Commissioner Box 330, 24th Floor, 700 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M5G 126 Table of Contents PROCEDURAL
More informationEmployment Dispute Arbitration Rules and Procedures
Employment Dispute Arbitration Rules and Procedures An employee 1 may obtain a copy of these ACE Companies ("ACE") 2 Employment Dispute Arbitration Rules and Procedures from a human resource representative
More informationSeptember 10, 2012 VIA
Suite 400 510 Burrard Street Vancouver, BC V6C 3A8 Tel: (604) 601-6000 Fax: (604) 682-0914 www.lss.bc.ca Office of the Executive Director September 10, 2012 VIA EMAIL Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
More informationFEDERAL COURT PRACTICE AND ARREST OF SHIPS
Nova Scotia Barristers Society Continuing Professional Development July 12, 2006 FEDERAL COURT PRACTICE AND ARREST OF SHIPS Richard F. Southcott Admiralty Jurisdiction Federal Court and Provincial Superior
More informationThe Class Actions Act
1 CLASS ACTIONS c. C-12.01 The Class Actions Act being Chapter C-12.01 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2001 (effective January 1, 2002) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2007, c.21; and 2015,
More informationKey Features of Proposed Changes to the North Carolina Business Court Rules May 6, 2016
Key Features of Proposed Changes to the North Carolina Business Court Rules May 6, 2016 Jennifer Van Zant, Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard LLP (Greensboro) Stephen Feldman, Ellis & Winters
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure having submitted its One Hundred Sixty-Fourth Report to the Court recommending
More informationStanding Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals
Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act 2002-142 Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I--PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS Subpart
More informationISSUES IN CASE MANAGEMENT. The Case Management Conference. Commercial Court CPD and CLE at Monash 25 February 2010.
ISSUES IN CASE MANAGEMENT The Case Management Conference Commercial Court CPD and CLE at Monash 25 February 2010 Jennifer Davies 1 The overriding objective of case management, and of the changes introduced
More informationSUMMARY OF CHANGES COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES
SUMMARY OF CHANGES COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES Amended and Effective October, 1, 2013 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES: 1. Mediation R-9. Mediation: Mediation is increasingly relied upon and is an accepted part of
More informationCHAPTER 03 - HEARINGS DIVISION SECTION HEARING PROCEDURES
CHAPTER 03 - HEARINGS DIVISION SECTION.0100 - HEARING PROCEDURES 26 NCAC 03.0101 GENERAL (a) The Rules of Civil Procedure as contained in G.S. 1A-1 and the General Rules of Practice for the Superior and
More informationCARDINAL HEALTH CANADA INC., Defendant ENDORSEMENT. [2] The plaintiff s motion for summary judgment is dismissed.
CITATION: ANDERSON v. CARDINAL HEALTH, 2013 ONSC 5226 COURT FILE NO.: CV-13-471868-0000 DATE: 20130815 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: LILLIAN ANDERSON, Plaintiff AND CARDINAL HEALTH CANADA INC.,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION PLAINTIFF NAME v. DEFENDANT NAME Case No. Hon. Richard N. LaFlamme / PLAINTIFF S COUNSEL NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE AND
More informationCivil Justice Improvements (CJI) Committee. Update #2
A Brief Re-cap from Update #1 Civil Justice Improvements (CJI) Committee Update #2 CJI Committee members recognize that many factors, including the resources available to each court system, influence the
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER
RULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER INTRODUCTION The following Rules of Procedure have been adopted by the Cowlitz County Hearing Examiner. The examiner and deputy examiners
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Financial Services Tribunal Tribunal des services financiers RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL Ce document est également disponible en français TABLE
More informationCanada Intellectual property enforcement
Sponsored by Statistical data supplied by Canada Intellectual property enforcement This article first appeared in IP Value 2004, Building and enforcing intellectual property value, An international guide
More informationSUMMARY OF CONTENTS SC-1.
SUMMARY OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Chapter 1. Preliminary Matters............................ 1-1 Chapter 2. Parties...................................... 2-1 Chapter 3. Service......................................
More informationThe Pre-Hearing Conference in Arbitration A Step by Step Guide
The Pre-Hearing Conference in Arbitration A Step by Step Guide By Philip S. Cottone, Esq. FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) calls it the Initial Pre-Hearing Conference in its securities arbitrations,
More informationCLASS PROCEEDINGS ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton,
More informationSUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES
SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES Justice: HON. THOMAS RADEMAKER Secretary: MARILYN McINTOSH Part Clerk: TRINA PAYNE Phone: (516) 493-3420 Courtroom: (516) 493-3423 Fax:
More informationORDINANCE XVII DISMISSAL AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE OF ACADEMIC STAFF: TRIBUNAL AND APPEALS PROCEDURES
ORDINANCE XVII DISMISSAL AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE OF ACADEMIC STAFF: TRIBUNAL AND APPEALS PROCEDURES Preamble Statute 21 requires that procedures be defined by Ordinance in relation to: A. Part III: Paragraphs
More informationSUMMARY JUDGMENT IN THE FEDERAL COURT AND IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL. A Discussion Paper of the Rules Subcommittee on Summary Judgment
1 SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN THE FEDERAL COURT AND IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL A Discussion Paper of the Rules Subcommittee on Summary Judgment I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of summary judgment is to dispose
More informationBring Me Your Disputes and I will Set You Free
Bring Me Your Disputes and I will Set You Free Presented by: John Campion November 28, 2017 JOHN CAMPION The Code: The Legal Mind Analysis Process Strategy JOHN CAMPION 2 Analysis: Overview The Learning
More information[4] The defendant is a corporation incorporated under the laws of Ontario carrying on business as a theme water park in Limoges Ontario.
CITATION: CYR v. CALYPSO PARC INC. 2016 ONSC 2683 COURT FILE NO.: 12-54440 DATE: May 11, 2016 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: FRANCINE CYR Plaintiff AND: CALYPSO PARC INC. Defendant BEFORE: COUNSEL:
More informationDiscipline Committee Rules
Discipline Committee Rules Revised April 2014 Table Of Contents Rule 1 Definitions 3 Rule 2 Procedural and Interlocutory Motions 3 Rule 3 Production From Third Parties 4 Rule 4 Withdrawal of Allegations
More informationON1CALL RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR HEARINGS 1) DEFINITIONS
ON1CALL RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR HEARINGS 1) DEFINITIONS 360 Feedback means the web-based solution provided by the Corporation for either (i) Members or Members designates to use to notify the Corporation
More informationSUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
Chief Justice Directive 11-02 SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Reenact and Amend CJD 11-02 for Cases Filed January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2015 I hereby reenact and amend CJD 11-02
More informationDISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THAILAND: LITIGATION
DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THAILAND: LITIGATION INTRODUCTION Thailand has its own civil justice system, which differs significantly from that in common law jurisdictions, both in terms of process and terminology.
More informationExperts in International Disputes
Nicholas Gould Experts in International Disputes Introduction It has been said that the role of an expert in an international construction dispute is to provide independent opinion evidence based on the
More informationTHE WHY, WHEN AND HOW OF THE MOTION FOR DIRECTION AND ORDER GIVING DIRECTIONS
THE WHY, WHEN AND HOW OF THE MOTION FOR DIRECTION AND ORDER GIVING DIRECTIONS Recommended Best Practices for Passing of Accounts Applications by Fiduciaries The Law Society of Upper Canada Chair: the Honourable
More informationDSCC Uniform Administrative Procedures Policy
DSCC Uniform Administrative Procedures Policy 01: Mission, Purpose and System of Governance 01:07:00:00 Purpose: The purpose of these procedures is to provide a basis for uniform procedures to be used
More informationSTATUS HEARINGS UNDER RULE 48.14
Volume 20, No. 4 June 2012 Civil Litigation Section STATUS HEARINGS UNDER RULE 48.14 Philip Cho Although entirely replaced in the 2010 amendments, unlike the transition provision under Rule 48.15, 1 status
More informationNOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY. VESTED IN the Environmental Control Board by Section 1049-a
NOTICE OF PROMULGATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD, CHAPTER 3 OF TITLE 48 OF THE RULES OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY
More informationPASSING OF ACCOUNTS / FIDUCIARY ACCOUNTS Osgoode PD February 9, Kimberly A. Whaley
PASSING OF ACCOUNTS / FIDUCIARY ACCOUNTS Osgoode PD February 9, 2017 Kimberly A. Whaley Overview! Duty to Account! Process, Procedure & Format! Compensation and Costs! Trends in Case Law - Common Objections!
More informationPART FAMILY LAW
11.01 Scope 11.02 Affidavit of Parties and Production of Documents 11.03 Interrogatories 11.04 Attorney for the Child 11.05 Conciliation, Mediation, Advice to Court, Investigations and Reports 11.06 Case
More informationAssessment Review Board
Assessment Review Board RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (made under section 25.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act) INDEX 1. RULES Application and Definitions (Rules 1-2) Interpretation and Effect
More informationREVOKED AS OF APRIL 11, 2016
MSA Hearing Procedures Table of Contents PART 1 INTERPRETATION 1 Definitions 2 Application of Procedures PART 2 GENERAL MATTERS 3 Directions 4 Setting of time limits and extending or abridging time 5 Variation
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE Event Service of Complaint Scheduled Time Total Time After Complaint Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks Initial
More informationWake County Family Court Rules Domestic
RULE 1: RULE 2: Wake County Family Court Rules Domestic TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL RULES INCLUDING TIME STANDARDS...1 DOMESTIC FAMILY COURT CASE FILINGS; ASSIGNMENT TO DISTRICT COURT JUDGES...3 RULE 3:
More informationARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties
ARBITRATION RULES 1. Agreement of Parties The parties shall be deemed to have made these rules a part of their arbitration agreement whenever they have provided for arbitration by ADR Services, Inc. (hereinafter
More informationCIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND. Differentiated Case Management Plan for Criminal Cases INTRODUCTION
CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND Differentiated Case Management Plan for Criminal Cases INTRODUCTION This Criminal Differentiated Case Management Plan (DCMP) is established in accordance with
More informationLR Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal
LR2-308. Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal proceedings in the Second Judicial District Court. This
More informationTHE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO PRETRIAL ORDERS
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 5.10 PRETRIAL ORDERS WHEREAS, Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.200(c) requires that orders setting pretrial conferences shall be uniform
More informationDue Process Hearings in California An Overview
Due Process Hearings in California An Overview The California Department of General Services, Office of Administrative Hearings handles all requests for due process hearing. The Office of Administrative
More informationTITLE 2 PROCEDURAL RULE BOARD OF ARCHITECTS SERIES 2 DISCIPLINARY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES FOR ARCHITECTS
TITLE 2 PROCEDURAL RULE BOARD OF ARCHITECTS SERIES 2 DISCIPLINARY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES FOR ARCHITECTS 2-2-1. General. 3.5. Investigator means a member or staff member of the board, or a licensed architect,
More informationGowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, Mark Siegel and Rosanne Dawson, Defendants. Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP, Third Party
CITATION: Ozerdinc Family Trust et al v Gowling et al, 2017 ONSC 6 COURT FILE NO.: 13-57421 A1 DATE: 2017/01/03 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: BEFORE: Ozerdinc Family Trust, Muharrem Ersin Ozerdinc,
More information