UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION"

Transcription

1 1 MILBERG LLP JEFF S. WESTERMAN (SBN ) One California Plaza 00 S. Grand Ave., Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 001- Telephone : () - Facsimile : () - jwesterman@milberg.com MILBERG LLP GEORGE A. BAUER III ANITA KARTALOPOULOS One Pennsylvania Plaza, th Floor New York, NY 1 Telephone : () -00 Facsimile : () -1 gbauer@milberg.com akartalopoulos@milberg.com Lead Counsel for the Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION RICHARD GREGORY, On Behalf of Himself) Case No.: C-0--VRW and All Others Similarly Situated, ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, ) REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF THREE () vs. ) ORDERS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, AS CHIRON CORPORATION, HOWARD H. ) MODIFIED BY THE COURT'S ORDER PIEN, JOHN A. LAMBERT and DAVID V. ) DATED 1/0/0 SMITH, ) Defendants. QUEST FOR ENTRY OF THREE () ORDERS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 1/0/0 ASE NO.: C-0--VRW DOCS\00v1

2 1 On January, 0 this Court entered an Order (Docket # ), which, among other 1 things, granted Lead Plaintiff's motion for settlement approval, pursuant to a Stipulation and 1 Agreement of Settlement filed herein on May, 0 (Docket # 0), as updated per Docket 1 #. The January, 0 Order (Docket # ) also determined that the fees to be awarded to 1 class counsel should be in the amount of $,00,000. On or about November, 0, Plaintiff's Lead Counsel submitted three proposed I forms of Orders contemplated under the Stipulation to effectuate the Settlement's terms. See Docket Ws, and. Plaintiff's Lead Counsel submit this request to update those forms and to request that they be entered now. Lead Plaintiffs Counsel have reviewed the revised forms of these Orders with 1 Defendants' Counsel and understand that Defendants join in requesting the entry of the Final Order and Judgment, and do not oppose entry of the Order Approving Plan of Allocation or the Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees. This request also appears consistent with the Court's comments at the December, 0 1 final approval hearing. Final Approval Hearing Transcript at 1:- and :- (Docket # ). Request for entry of Final Order and Judgment It is a condition to the effectiveness of the Settlement that a "Final Order and Judgment, I substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit B annexed to the Stipulation be entered! 1 Paragraph of the Stipulation provides:. The "Effective Date of Settlement shall be the date when all the following shall have occurred: (a) approval by the Court of the Settlement, following notice to the Class and a hearing, as prescribed by Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and (b) entry by the Court of a Final Order and Judgment, substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit B annexed hereto, and such Final Order and Judgment becomes Final, or, in the event that the Court enters a final order and judgment in a form other than that provided above ("Alternative QUEST FOR ENTRY OF THREE () ORDERS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 1/0/0-1 - ASE NO.:C-0--VRW DOCS\00v1

3 Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a form of the Final Order and Judgment substantially in 1 the form as was attached to the Stipulation as Exhibit B, and previously submitted as Docket 1 #, with minor modifications updating the dates and referring to this Court's January, 0 1 Order. A Delta View comparison of this form to the form submitted as Docket # is attached 1 hereto as Exhibit B which highlights the modifications from the version submitted as Docket #. Request for entry of Order Approving Plan of Allocation Although not a condition of the Settlement, the Stipulation provides at paragraph that I Plaintiff's Lead Counsel would also "request entry of an order substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, approving the Plan of Allocation. The Plan of Allocation was set forth in 1 the Settlement Notice given to the members of the Class and not a single objection was made with respect to the Plan of Allocation. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a form of the Order Approving Plan of Allocation 1 substantially in the form as was attached to the Stipulation as Exhibit C, with minor modifications updating the dates and referring to this Court's January, 0 Order. A Delta View comparison of this form to the form submitted as Docket # is attached hereto as Exhibit D which highlights the modifications from the version submitted as Docket #. Request for entry of Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees Although also not a condition of the Settlement, the Stipulation provides at paragraph 1 that "Lead Plaintiffs Counsel, with approval of Lead Plaintiff may also request entry of an order approving Lead Plaintiffs Counsel's application for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses. A form of Order Awarding Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees was attached to the Stipulation as Exhibit D. Judgment ) and none of the parties hereto elects to terminate this Settlement, the date that such Alternative Judgment becomes Final. QUEST FOR ENTRY OF THREE () ORDERS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 1/0/0 -- CASE NO.:C-0--VRW DOCS\00v1

4 Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a form of the Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees substantially in the form as was attached to the Stipulation as Exhibit D, with modifications filling in the amount of the fees awarded in this Court's January, 0 Order and filling in the amount of the expenses requested and conforming the form to this Court's January, 0 Order. A Delta View comparison of this form to the form submitted as Docket # is attached hereto as #. Exhibit F which highlights the modifications from the version submitted as Docket **** It is respectfully requested that the Court enter the forms of orders submitted herewith as Exhibits A, C and E as contemplated in the Stipulation approved by the Court. DATED : January, 0 MILBERG LLP JEFF S. WESTERMAN 1 /s/jeffs. Westerman JEFF S. WESTERMAN One California Plaza 00 South Grand Avenue, Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 001 Telephone : () - Facsimile : () - jwesterman@milberg.com MILBERG LLP GEORGE A. BAUER III ANITA KARTALOPOULOS One Pennsylvania Plaza New York, NY 1 Telephone : () -00 Facsimile : () -1 gbauer@milberg.com akartalopoulos@milberg.com Lead Counsel for the Class QUEST FOR ENTRY OF THREE () ORDERS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 1/0/0 - - ASE NO.:C-0--VRW DOCS\00v1

5 KROLL HEINEMAN, LLC Wood Avenue South, Suite 0 Iselin, NJ 00 Telephone: () 1-00 Facsimile: () 1- akroll@krollfirm.com VINCENT GIBLIN PITTA & DREIER LLP Park Avenue, th Floor New York, New York 0 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () -1 vgiblin@pittadreier.com Counsel for Plaintiffs 1 QUEST FOR ENTRY OF THREE () ORDERS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 1/0/0 -- CASE NO.:C-0--VRW DOCS\00v1

6 DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL I, the undersigned, declare: 1. That declarant is and was, at all times herein mentioned, employed in the County of Los Angeles, over the age of years, and not a party to or interest in the within action; that declarant's business address is One California Plaza, 00 South Grand Avenue, Suite 00, Los Angeles, California That on January, 0, declarant served the REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF THREE () ORDERS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, AS 1 MODIFIED BY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 1/0/0 by depositing a true copy thereof in a United States mailbox at Los Angeles, California in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid and addressed to the parties listed on the attached Service List.. That there is a regular communication by mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed.. That a true and correct copy of this document is being served to the following persons who commented on the settlement by (a) (b) (c) (d) Mr. Steve Rogers at [mailto:roges@yahoo.com]; Ms. Laurie Lamb at [mailto:bllamb@earthlink.net]; Mr. Jerome Gleim at [mailto:jgleim@aol.com]; Mr. Leland G. Coe at [mailto:leecoe@paulbunyan.net]; (e) Roy W. Fogle and Patricia A. Fogle, Trustees of the Roy W & Patricia A. Fogle Trust dated // at [mailto:prfogle@sbcglobal.net]; and (f) Mr. Peter Williamson and Ms. Margaret Williamson at [mailto:pwmcw@cox.net].. That on the above date, declarant served via to: scac@law.stanford.edu. QUEST FOR ENTRY OF THREE () ORDERS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 1/0/0 -- CASE NO.:C-0--VRW DOCS\00v1

7 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day of January, 0, at Los Angeles, California. ()LIZ ABET VI O 1 QUEST FOR ENTRY OF THREE () ORDERS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 1/0/0 -- CASE NO.:C-0--VRW DOCS\00v1

8 1 SERVICE LIST Richard Gregory v. Chiron Corporation, et al. USDC - San Francisco - Case No.C-0--VRW Counselfor Plaintiffs Jeff S. Westerman George A. Bauer III Elizabeth P. Lin Anita Kartalopoulos MILBERG LLP MILBERG LLP One California Plaza One Pennsylvania Plaza 00 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 00 New York, NY 1 Los Angeles, CA 001 Telephone: () -00 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () -1 Facsimile: () - Lionel Glancy KROLL HEINEMAN LLC GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP Wood Avenue South, Suite 0 01 Ave. of the Stars, Suite Iselin, NJ 00 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: () 1-00 Telephone: () 1-0 Facsimile: () 1- Facsimile: () 1-0 Brian P. Murray Vincent Giblin MURRAY, FRANK & SAILER LLP PITTA & DREIER LLP Madison Avenue, Suite 01 Park Avenue New York, NY 0 th Floor Telephone: () - New York, New York 0 Facsimile: () - Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () -1 Counselfor Defendants James E. Lyons Eric Waxman Amy Park SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 00 S. Grand Avenue Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 001 San Francisco, CA 1 Telephone: () -000 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -00 Facsimile: () - Paul K. Rowe Rachelle Silverberg WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ 1 West nd Street New York, New York 0 Telephone: () 0-00 Facsimile: () 0-00 QUEST FOR ENTRY OF THREE () ORDERS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 1/0/0 -- CASE NO.:C-0--VRW DOCS\00v1

9 Other Counsel Jeffrey R. Krinsk FINKELSTEIN & KRINSK 01 W. Broadway, Suite San Diego, CA 01- Telephone: () -1 Facsimile: () - 1 QUEST FOR ENTRY OF THREE () ORDERS PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 1/0/0 -- CASE NO.:C-0--VRW DOCS\00v1

10 Exhibit A

11 MILBERG LLP JEFF S. WESTERMAN (SBN ) 00 S. Grand Ave., Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 001- Telephone : () - Facsimile : () - jwesterman@milberg.com MILBERG LLP GEORGE A BAUER III ANITA KARTALOPOULOS One Pennsylvania Plaza New York, NY 1 Telephone : () -00 Facsimile : () -1 gbauer@milberg.com akartalopoulos@milberg.com Lead Counsel for the Class 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION RICHARD GREGORY, On Behalf of Himself ) and All Others Similarly Situated, ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. C-0--VRW CLASS ACTION vs. ) FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT CHIRON CORPORATION, HOWARD H. ) PIEN, JOHN A. LAMBERT and DAVID V. ) SMITH, ) Defendants. ) final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW DOCS\v

12 On the rd day of December, 0, a hearing was held before this Court to determine: (1) 1 whether the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated as of March 1, 0 (the "Stipulation ) are fair, reasonable, and adequate for the settlement of all claims 1 asserted by the Class against Defendants in the Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations of 1 the Federal Securities Laws, dated April, 0 (the "Complaint ) now pending in this Court I under the above caption (including the release ofthe Released Parties) and are in the best interests of the Class and should be approved; and () whether judgment should be entered dismissing the Complaint on the merits and with prejudice in favor of Defendants and as against all persons or entities who are members of the Class herein who have not requested exclusion therefrom. The Court having considered all matters submitted to it at the hearing and otherwise; and it appearing that the Court's Notice of Proposed Settlement (the "Cover Notice ), the Notice of Pendency of 1 Class Action and Proposed Settlement Thereof, Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Settlement Fairness Hearing (the "Settlement Notice ), and the Proof of Claim and Release form (the "Proof of Claim ) substantially in the forms approved by the Court were mailed to all persons or entities reasonably identifiable, who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Chiron Corporation, now known as Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. ("Chiron ) during the period from July, 0 through October, 0 (the "Class Period ), except those persons or entities excluded from the Class, as shown by the records of Chiron's transfer agent, and as further identified through the mailing of the Cover Notice, the Settlement Notice, and the Proof of Claim pursuant to earlier orders of the Court, at the respective addresses set forth in such records, and that a summary notice of the hearing substantially in the form approved by the Court was published in the national edition of The Wall Street Journal, and Investor's Business Daily pursuant to the specifications of the Court; and all capitalized terms used herein having the meanings as set forth and defined in the Stipulation. And the Court having now approved the Stipulation and entered an Order on January, 0, 1 Docket Number, approving the Settlement and awarding fees. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter ofthe Action, the Lead Plaintiff, all Class Members, and Defendants. final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW -1 - DOCS\v

13 1. The Court finds that the prerequisites for a class action under Federal Rules of Civil 1 Procedure (a) and (b)() have been satisfied in that: (a) the number of Class Members is so I numerous that joinder of all members thereof is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact 1 common to the Class; (c) the claims of Lead Plaintiff, as the Class Representative, are typical of the 1 claims of the Class it seeks to represent; (d) Lead Plaintiff and Lead Plaintiff's Counsel have and 1 will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Class; (e) the questions of law and fact common to Class Members predominate over any questions affecting only individual Class Members; and (f) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.. Pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure this Court hereby finally I certifies this action as a class action on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Chiron during the period from July, 0 through October, 0. Excluded from the Settlement Class shall be the Individual Defendants, their heirs, affiliates, successors and assigns, and the current or former officers and directors of Chiron. Also excluded from the Class are the persons and/or entities who requested exclusion from the Class as listed on Exhibit 1 annexed hereto.. Notice ofthe Pendency ofthis Action as a class action and ofthe proposed Settlement 1 was given to all Class Members who could be identified with reasonable effort. The form and method of notifying the Class Members of the pendency of the action as a class action and of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement met the requirements of Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Section D(a)() of the Securities Exchange Act of, U.S.C. u-(a)() as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of, due process, and any other applicable law, constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances, constituted due and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled thereto. and. The Settlement is approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate and in the best interests I of the Class, and the Class Members and the parties are directed to consummate the Settlement in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Stipulation. final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - - DOCS\v

14 . The Complaint and the Action are hereby dismissed with prejudice and, except as 1 provided in the Stipulation, without costs as against Defendants.. Lead Plaintiff and the Class Members, in their individual capacities, their capacities I as purchasers, holders or sellers of Chiron common stock, and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, beneficiaries, predecessors, successors, assigns I and transferees, immediate and remote, are hereby permanently barred and enjoined from directly, indirectly or derivatively instituting, commencing or prosecuting any and all claims, causes of action, demands, rights, or liabilities (including but not limited to claims for violation of the federal securities laws, negligence, gross negligence, professional negligence, breach of duty of care and/or breach of duty of loyalty and/or breach of the duty of candor, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, mismanagement, corporate waste, malpractice, breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, 1 violations of any state statutes including, without limitation, the California Corporations Code and California Business & Professions Code and its Delaware equivalent, or federal statutes, rules or regulations, and any "Unknown Claims as defined below) that have been or that could have been asserted in this or any other forum by or on behalf of Lead Plaintiff, the Settlement Class or any Settlement Class Member based on, arising out of, in connection with, or related in any way to their purchase or other acquisition, holding or sale or other disposition of Chiron's common stock during the Settlement Class Period. By way of illustration, not limitation, Released Claims shall include I claims, causes of action, demands, rights, or liabilities based on, arising out of, in connection with, or relating in any way to: (A)any of the facts, circumstances, allegations, representations, statements, reports, disclosures, transactions, events, occurrences, acts, omissions or failures to act, of whatever kind or character, irrespective of the state of mind of the actor performing or omitting to perform the same, that have been or could have been alleged in any pleading, amended pleading, argument, complaint, amended complaint, brief, motion, report, discovery response or filing in the Action; (B)any matter, cause or thing whatsoever, including, but not limited to, any action, omission or failure to act of whatever kind or character, irrespective of the state of mind of the actor performing or omitting to perform the same, arising out of or relating to the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any disclosure or statement made in any filings, proxy statements, prospectus, reports, press releases, statements, representations, analyst reports or announcements concerning Chiron's operations, services, products, financial condition or prospects or in any filing with the Securities final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - DOCS\v

15 1 and Exchange Commission or any other federal or state governmental agency or regulatory board (collectively referred to as "public statements ), or in the preparation or dissemination of, or failure to disseminate, any such public statements, at any time during or concerning July, 0, through and including October, 0; or (C)any of the facts, circumstances, representations, statements, reports, disclosures, transactions, events, occurrences, acts or omissions of whatever kind or character, regardless of the state of mind of the actor performing or omitting to perform the same, encompassed by subparagraph (a) and (b), above, that have been or that could have been alleged, or made the subject of any claim or action in state court or otherwise under the law of any state, common law or in equity, in any pleading, amended pleading, demand, complaint, amended complaint, motion, discovery response or filing. (the "Released Claims ) against any and all of the Defendants, Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation, Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc., and their past, present and future parent entities, affiliates, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors and assigns, and each oftheir past, present and future officers, directors, attorneys, auditors, accountants, advisors, consultants, insurers, employees, associates, stockholders, controlling persons, representatives, underwriters and other agents, including their agents, assigns, spouses, heirs, executors, trustees, general and limited partners and partnerships, personal representatives, estates and administrators (the "Released Parties ). "Unknown Claims means any Released Claims that Lead Plaintiff or any other Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released Persons which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its settlement with and release of the Released Persons, or might have affected his, her or its decision not to object to this Settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims, upon the Effective Date, Lead Plaintiff shall expressly and each of the other Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Final Order and Judgment shall have, expressly waived, the provisions, rights and benefits of California Civil Code, which provides: A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor. Lead Plaintiff shall expressly and each of the other Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Final Order and Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - - DOCS\v

16 provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or 1 principle of common law, which is similar, comparable and equivalent to California Civil Code 1. Lead Plaintiff and the other Settlement Class Members may hereafter discover facts in 1 addition to or different from those which he, she or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but Lead Plaintiff shall expressly and each other 1 Settlement Class Member, upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation ofthis Final Order and Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct that is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. Lead Plaintiff and the 1 other Settlement Class Members shall be deemed by operation of this Final Order and Judgment to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and a key element of the settlement of which this release is a part.. The Released Claims are hereby compromised, settled, released, discharged and 1 dismissed as against the Released Parties on the merits and with prejudice by virtue of the proceedings herein and this Final Order and Judgment.. Defendants and the successors and assigns of any of them, are hereby permanently barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing or prosecuting any and all claims, rights or causes of action or liabilities whatsoever, whether based on federal, state, local, statutory or common law or any other law, rule or regulation, including both known claims and Unknown Claims, that have been or could have been asserted in the Action or any forum by the Defendants or any of them or the successors and assigns of any of them against Lead Plaintiff, any or all ofthe Class Members or their attorneys, which arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, assertion, defense, resolution or settlement of the Action (except for claims to enforce the Settlement) (the "Released Defendants' Claims ). The Released Defendants' Claims are hereby compromised, settled, released, final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - - DOCS\v

17 discharged and dismissed on the merits and with prejudice by virtue of the proceedings herein and 1 this Final Order and Judgment.. Neither this Final Order and Judgment nor the Stipulation or any of its terms and provisions or any documents executed or any proceedings taken pursuant to it, shall be: (a) offered or received against the Released Parties as evidence of or construed as or deemed to be evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Released Parties with respect to the truth of any fact alleged by Lead Plaintiff or the validity of any claim that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation, or the deficiency of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation, liability, negligence, fault, or wrongdoing of Defendants; or of any (b) offered or received against the Released Parties as evidence of a presumption, 1 concession or admission of any fault, misrepresentation or omission with respect to any statement or written document approved or made by any Defendant; (c) offered or received against the Released Parties as evidence of a presumption, concession or admission with respect to any liability, negligence, fault or wrongdoing, or in any way referred to for any other reason as against any of the Released Parties, in any other civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of the Stipulation; provided, however, that Defendants may refer to this Final Order and Judgment, the Stipulation or any of its terms and provisions or any documents executed or any proceedings taken pursuant to it to effectuate the liability protection granted them hereunder, including in any action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on the principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, full faith and credit, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar reduction, or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or any other defense or counterclaim; (d) construed against Defendants as an admission or concession that the I consideration to be given hereunder represents the amount which could be or would have been recovered after trial; or final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - - DOCS\v

18 1 (e) construed as or received in evidence as an admission, concession or 1 presumption against Lead Plaintiff or any of the Class Members that any of their claims are without I merit, or that any defenses asserted by the Defendants have any merit, or that damages recoverable I under the Complaint would not have exceeded the Gross Settlement Fund.. The Court finds that all parties and their counsel have complied with each 1 requirement of Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to all proceedings herein.. The finality of this Final Order and Judgment shall not be affected, in any manner, by 1 rulings that the Court may make on Lead Plaintiffs Plan of Allocation and/or Lead Plaintiff's Counsel's application for an award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses. There shall be no distribution of any of the Net Settlement Fund to any Class Member until a plan of allocation is finally approved and is affirmed on appeal or is no longer subject to review by appeal or certiorari, and the time for any petition for rehearing, appeal, or review, by certiorari or otherwise, of the order approving the Plan of Allocation has expired. 1. In the event this Final Order and Judgment does not become Final (including, by way I of example and not limitation, is vacated, modified or reversed on appeal), it shall be rendered null and void and shall be vacated and, in such event, (i) all orders entered and releases delivered in connection therewith shall be null and void and inadmissible in any proceeding in any tribunal, and (ii) the Settlement Class shall be automatically decertified without prejudice to Lead Plaintiffs right to seek, or Defendants' right to oppose, class certification in the future, and (iii) each party shall be restored to his, her or its respective position as it existed prior to June, 0.. Exclusive jurisdiction is hereby retained over the parties and the Class Members for 1 all matters relating to this Action, including the administration, interpretation, effectuation or enforcement of the Stipulation and this Final Order and Judgment, and including any application for fees and expenses incurred in connection with administering and distributing the settlement proceeds to the Class Members.. Without further order of the Court, the parties may agree to reasonable extensions of 1 time to carry out any of the provisions of the Stipulation. final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - DOCS\v

19 . There is no just reason for delay in the entry of this Final Order and Judgment and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court is expressly directed pursuant to Rule (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 Dated:, 0 Honorable Vaughn R. Walker UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - - DOCS\v

20 Exhibit B

21 MILBERG LLP JEFF S. WESTERMAN (SBN ) 00 S. Grand Ave., Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 001- Telephone : () - Facsimile : () - jwesterman@milberg.com MILBERG LLP GEORGE A BAUER III ANITA KARTALOPOULOS One Pennsylvania Plaza New York, NY 1 Telephone : () -00 Facsimile : () -1 gbauer@milberg.com akartalopoulos@milberg.com Lead Counsel for the Class 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION RICHARD GREGORY, On Behalf of Himself ) and All Others Similarly Situated, ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. C-0--VRW CLASS ACTION vs. ) FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT CHIRON CORPORATION, HOWARD H. ) PIEN, JOHN A. LAMBERT and DAVID V. ) SMITH, ) Defendants. ) final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW DOCS\v-j

22 On the rd day of December, 0, a hearing was held before this Court to determine: (1) 1 whether the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated as of March 1, 0 (the "Stipulation ) are fair, reasonable, and adequate for the settlement of all claims 1 asserted by the Class against Defendants in the Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations of 1 the Federal Securities Laws, dated April, 0 (the "Complaint ) now pending in this Court I under the above caption (including the release ofthe Released Parties) and are in the best interests of the Class and should be approved; and () whether judgment should be entered dismissing the Complaint on the merits and with prejudice in favor of Defendants and as against all persons or entities who are members of the Class herein who have not requested exclusion therefrom. The Court having considered all matters submitted to it at the hearing and otherwise; and it appearing that the Court's Notice of Proposed Settlement (the "Cover Notice ), the Notice of Pendency of 1 Class Action and Proposed Settlement Thereof, Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Settlement Fairness Hearing (the "Settlement Notice ), and the Proof of Claim and Release form (the "Proof of Claim ) substantially in the forms approved by the Court were mailed to all persons or entities reasonably identifiable, who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Chiron Corporation, now known as Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. ("Chiron ) during the period from July, 0 through October, 0 (the "Class Period ), except those persons or entities excluded from the Class, as shown by the records of Chiron's transfer agent, and as further identified through the mailing of the Cover Notice, the Settlement Notice, and the Proof of Claim pursuant to earlier orders of the Court, at the respective addresses set forth in such records, and that a summary notice of the hearing substantially in the form approved by the Court was published in the national edition of The Wall Street Journal, and Investor's Business Daily pursuant to the specifications of the Court; and all capitalized terms used herein having the meanings as set forth and defined in the Stipulation. And the Court having now approved the Stipulation and entered an Order on January.0. 1 Docket Number, approving the Settlement and awarding fees. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter ofthe Action, the Lead Plaintiff, all Class Members, and Defendants. final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW -1 - DOCS\v-j

23 1. The Court finds that the prerequisites for a class action under Federal Rules of Civil 1 Procedure (a) and (b)() have been satisfied in that: (a) the number of Class Members is so I numerous that joinder of all members thereof is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact 1 common to the Class; (c) the claims of Lead Plaintiff, as the Class Representative, are typical of the 1 claims of the Class it seeks to represent; (d) Lead Plaintiff and Lead Plaintiff's Counsel have and 1 will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Class; (e) the questions of law and fact common to Class Members predominate over any questions affecting only individual Class Members; and (f) a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.. Pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure this Court hereby finally I certifies this action as a class action on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Chiron during the period from July, 0 through October, 0. Excluded from the Settlement Class shall be the Individual Defendants, their heirs, affiliates, successors and assigns, and the current or former officers and directors of Chiron. Also excluded from the Class are the persons and/or entities who requested exclusion from the Class as listed on Exhibit 1 annexed hereto.. Notice ofthe Pendency ofthis Action as a class action and ofthe proposed Settlement 1 was given to all Class Members who could be identified with reasonable effort. The form and method of notifying the Class Members of the pendency of the action as a class action and of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement met the requirements of Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Section D(a)() of the Securities Exchange Act of, U.S.C. u-(a)() as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of, due process, and any other applicable law, constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances, constituted due and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled thereto. and. The Settlement is approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate and in the best interests I of the Class, and the Class Members and the parties are directed to consummate the Settlement in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Stipulation. final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - - DOCS\v-j

24 . The Complaint and the Action are hereby dismissed with prejudice and, except as 1 provided in the Stipulation, without costs as against Defendants.. Lead Plaintiff and the Class Members, in their individual capacities, their capacities I as purchasers, holders or sellers of Chiron common stock, and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, beneficiaries, predecessors, successors, assigns I and transferees, immediate and remote, are hereby permanently barred and enjoined from directly, indirectly or derivatively instituting, commencing or prosecuting any and all claims, causes of action, demands, rights, or liabilities (including but not limited to claims for violation of the federal securities laws, negligence, gross negligence, professional negligence, breach of duty of care and/or breach of duty of loyalty and/or breach of the duty of candor, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, mismanagement, corporate waste, malpractice, breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, 1 violations of any state statutes including, without limitation, the California Corporations Code and California Business & Professions Code and its Delaware equivalent, or federal statutes, rules or regulations, and any "Unknown Claims as defined below) that have been or that could have been asserted in this or any other forum by or on behalf of Lead Plaintiff, the Settlement Class or any Settlement Class Member based on, arising out of, in connection with, or related in any way to their purchase or other acquisition, holding or sale or other disposition of Chiron's common stock during the Settlement Class Period. By way of illustration, not limitation, Released Claims shall include I claims, causes of action, demands, rights, or liabilities based on, arising out of, in connection with, or relating in any way to: (A)any of the facts, circumstances, allegations, representations, statements, reports, disclosures, transactions, events, occurrences, acts, omissions or failures to act, of whatever kind or character, irrespective of the state of mind of the actor performing or omitting to perform the same, that have been or could have been alleged in any pleading, amended pleading, argument, complaint, amended complaint, brief, motion, report, discovery response or filing in the Action; (B)any matter, cause or thing whatsoever, including, but not limited to, any action, omission or failure to act of whatever kind or character, irrespective of the state of mind of the actor performing or omitting to perform the same, arising out of or relating to the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any disclosure or statement made in any filings, proxy statements, prospectus, reports, press releases, statements, representations, analyst reports or announcements concerning Chiron's operations, services, products, financial condition or prospects or in any filing with the Securities final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - DOCS\v-j

25 1 and Exchange Commission or any other federal or state governmental agency or regulatory board (collectively referred to as "public statements ), or in the preparation or dissemination of, or failure to disseminate, any such public statements, at any time during or concerning July, 0, through and including October, 0; or (C)any of the facts, circumstances, representations, statements, reports, disclosures, transactions, events, occurrences, acts or omissions of whatever kind or character, regardless of the state of mind of the actor performing or omitting to perform the same, encompassed by subparagraph (a) and (b), above, that have been or that could have been alleged, or made the subject of any claim or action in state court or otherwise under the law of any state, common law or in equity, in any pleading, amended pleading, demand, complaint, amended complaint, motion, discovery response or filing. (the "Released Claims ) against any and all of the Defendants, Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation, Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc., and their past, present and future parent entities, affiliates, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors and assigns, and each oftheir past, present and future officers, directors, attorneys, auditors, accountants, advisors, consultants, insurers, employees, associates, stockholders, controlling persons, representatives, underwriters and other agents, including their agents, assigns, spouses, heirs, executors, trustees, general and limited partners and partnerships, personal representatives, estates and administrators (the "Released Parties ). "Unknown Claims means any Released Claims that Lead Plaintiff or any other Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released Persons which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its settlement with and release of the Released Persons, or might have affected his, her or its decision not to object to this Settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims, upon the Effective Date, Lead Plaintiff shall expressly and each of the other Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Final Order and Judgment shall have, expressly waived, the provisions, rights and benefits of California Civil Code, which provides: A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor. Lead Plaintiff shall expressly and each of the other Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Final Order and Judgment shall have, expressly waived any and all final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - - DOCS\v-j

26 provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or 1 principle of common law, which is similar, comparable and equivalent to California Civil Code 1. Lead Plaintiff and the other Settlement Class Members may hereafter discover facts in 1 addition to or different from those which he, she or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but Lead Plaintiff shall expressly and each other 1 Settlement Class Member, upon the Effective Date, shall be deemed to have, and by operation ofthis Final Order and Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct that is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. Lead Plaintiff and the 1 other Settlement Class Members shall be deemed by operation of this Final Order and Judgment to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and a key element of the settlement of which this release is a part.. The Released Claims are hereby compromised, settled, released, discharged and 1 dismissed as against the Released Parties on the merits and with prejudice by virtue of the proceedings herein and this Final Order and Judgment.. Defendants and the successors and assigns of any of them, are hereby permanently barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing or prosecuting any and all claims, rights or causes of action or liabilities whatsoever, whether based on federal, state, local, statutory or common law or any other law, rule or regulation, including both known claims and Unknown Claims, that have been or could have been asserted in the Action or any forum by the Defendants or any of them or the successors and assigns of any of them against Lead Plaintiff, any or all ofthe Class Members or their attorneys, which arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, assertion, defense, resolution or settlement of the Action (except for claims to enforce the Settlement) (the "Released Defendants' Claims ). The Released Defendants' Claims are hereby compromised, settled, released, final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - - DOCS\v-j

27 discharged and dismissed on the merits and with prejudice by virtue of the proceedings herein and 1 this Final Order and Judgment.. Neither this Final Order and Judgment nor the Stipulation or any of its terms and provisions or any documents executed or any proceedings taken pursuant to it, shall be: (a) offered or received against the Released Parties as evidence of or construed as or deemed to be evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Released Parties with respect to the truth of any fact alleged by Lead Plaintiff or the validity of any claim that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation, or the deficiency of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation, liability, negligence, fault, or wrongdoing of Defendants; or of any (b) offered or received against the Released Parties as evidence of a presumption, 1 concession or admission of any fault, misrepresentation or omission with respect to any statement or written document approved or made by any Defendant; (c) offered or received against the Released Parties as evidence of a presumption, concession or admission with respect to any liability, negligence, fault or wrongdoing, or in any way referred to for any other reason as against any of the Released Parties, in any other civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of the Stipulation; provided, however, that Defendants may refer to this Final Order and Judgment, the Stipulation or any of its terms and provisions or any documents executed or any proceedings taken pursuant to it to effectuate the liability protection granted them hereunder, including in any action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on the principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, full faith and credit, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar reduction, or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or any other defense or counterclaim; (d) construed against Defendants as an admission or concession that the I consideration to be given hereunder represents the amount which could be or would have been recovered after trial; or final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - - DOCS\v-j

28 1 (e) construed as or received in evidence as an admission, concession or 1 presumption against Lead Plaintiff or any of the Class Members that any of their claims are without I merit, or that any defenses asserted by the Defendants have any merit, or that damages recoverable I under the Complaint would not have exceeded the Gross Settlement Fund.. The Court finds that all parties and their counsel have complied with each 1 requirement of Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to all proceedings herein.. The finality of this Final Order and Judgment shall not be affected, in any manner, by 1 rulings that the Court may make on Lead Plaintiffs Plan of Allocation and/or Lead Plaintiff's Counsel's application for an award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses. There shall be no distribution of any of the Net Settlement Fund to any Class Member until a plan of allocation is finally approved and is affirmed on appeal or is no longer subject to review by appeal or certiorari, and the time for any petition for rehearing, appeal, or review, by certiorari or otherwise, of the order approving the Plan of Allocation has expired. 1. In the event this Final Order and Judgment does not become Final (including, by way I of example and not limitation, is vacated, modified or reversed on appeal), it shall be rendered null and void and shall be vacated and, in such event, (i) all orders entered and releases delivered in connection therewith shall be null and void and inadmissible in any proceeding in any tribunal, and (ii) the Settlement Class shall be automatically decertified without prejudice to Lead Plaintiffs right to seek, or Defendants' right to oppose, class certification in the future, and (iii) each party shall be restored to his, her or its respective position as it existed prior to June, 0.. Exclusive jurisdiction is hereby retained over the parties and the Class Members for 1 all matters relating to this Action, including the administration, interpretation, effectuation or enforcement of the Stipulation and this Final Order and Judgment, and including any application for fees and expenses incurred in connection with administering and distributing the settlement proceeds to the Class Members.. Without further order of the Court, the parties may agree to reasonable extensions of 1 time to carry out any of the provisions of the Stipulation. final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - DOCS\v-j

29 . There is no just reason for delay in the entry of this Final Order and Judgment and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court is expressly directed pursuant to Rule (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dated:, 00 T the under-signed, declar e. Honorable Vaughn R. Walker UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 was, at al time s herein menti o ned, employed in the Getmty of L os Angele s, ever- the age of ye ar s, and n ot a pafty t o or- intere st in the within > th a t. deel amnt' s b usines s address i s One G aifemia Plaza, 00 South GFmd Avenue, Suite 00, L Angele s, Califo rnia Th t N ember-, de a ov 0 l er ed e am s v the N A r FINAL ORDER AND YUDGMENT- by depos iting a tfu e eopy there o f in a United State s mailb o x at Los Angele s, Gaife mi -a in a seaed envelope with postage ther-e en fu lly prepaid and addre s sed to the paftie s li sted on th attached Service List. ( a) NU Steve Roger s at [mai1t e!r-egesyahoo.ce (b) M s. Laurie Lamb at [ te bl1 b@e v no t]. ^ " =mar ( c ) NU. eromgle t[mai1t o!jg1e a el.ce (d) NU. Lel el and Co e at [ t o.!ieecoe@ p au n ya = ma t,. r ( e) Re^ y - ^x.: Fogle and Patric ia A. F og le, Trus t " of the Rey^ - ^x.: & Patric ia A. F og le Tr st dated // a t [m a ;lt o : p rfgle@ bcg l o b a n ot]. a n final Order and Judgment ASE NO.:C-0--VRW - - DOCS\v-j

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ]' STUART ROSENBERG Plaintiff 93723077 93723077 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO Case No: CV-l$fetffift) I U P 2: 0 I lllll it CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC ET

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXA S SHERMAN DIVISION FILE D U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MAR 21200 7 DAVID J. MALANu, t;lerk BY DEPUTY PLA, LLC, individually and on

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A SAN JOSE DIVISION In re McKESSON HBOC, INC. Master File No. -CV-0 RMW (PVT) SECURITIES LITIGATION And Related Cases CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-ygr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARK NATHANSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. EFiled: Oct 20 2015 11:35AM EDT Transaction ID 58039964 Case No. 10553-VCN IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE NPS PHARMACEUTICALS STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No.

More information

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :0-cv-0-RAJ Document Filed 0//0 Page of The Honorable Richard A. Jones UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 IN RE: WSB FINANCIAL GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION Master

More information

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I Case 1:09-cv-00118-VM-FM Document 1457 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I u:nu ATl\'J!~O'd.L)J 'l J 1 J~'.ll'JO:XXl : " \ (J

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION Case 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML Document 98 Filed 11/04/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1307 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION In re ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. CASE

More information

the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Certain Defendant s

the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Certain Defendant s UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3 :99CV-539- H IN RE: ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT On July 12, 2005,

More information

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 2 of 9 BETWEEN EXHIBIT "A" CANADIAN PRE-APPROVAL ORDER ONTARIO SUPERIOR

More information

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 Case 2:16-cv-05218-ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION THE PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE FUNDS, On Behalf of Itself and Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, CFC INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION HENRY LACE on behalf of himself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 3:12-CV-00363-JD-CAN ) v. )

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, Plaintiffs, v. DOUGLAS W. BROYLES, MARVIN D. BURKETT, STEPHEN L. DOMENIK, DR. NORMAN GODINHO, RONALD

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY x JOANN KRAJEWSKI, PAUL Consolidated Case No. 02-CV-221038 MCHENDRY, and MICHAEL LAMB, Division No. 8 Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant

More information

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296 Case 5:12-cv-05162-SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

More information

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283 Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY fl RE COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, inc. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page2 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page3 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 3:10-cv-04841-FLW-DEA Document 131 Filed 11/21/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 2942 Case 3:10 -cv-04841 - ELW- DEA Document 127-1 Filed 11/20/13 Page 1 of 8 PagelD: 2917 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT

More information

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 1:11-cv-08066-JGK Document 130 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 11 Case 1:11-cv-08066-JGK Document 108-6 Filed 12/17/14 Page 2 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OKLAHOMA POLICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ADELE BRODY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, Index No.: 008835/2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest ROBERT

More information

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9 Case 1:11-cv-01646-LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9 Case 1:11-cv-01646-LAK-JCF Document 284-1 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE

More information

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. (Denbury or Defendant) shares pursuant to the merger of Case 1:10-cv-01917-JG-VVP Document 143 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 9369 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELI BENSINGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE CABLEVISION/RAINBOW MEDIA TRACKING STOCK LITIGATION Cons. C.A. No. 19819-VCN NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE Case No. 30-2009-00236910 CLASS ACTION Assigned

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x Case 112-cv-01203-VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11 CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN

More information

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND Case 1:14-cv-01343-RGA Document 57 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 873 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE VAMSI ANDAVARAPU, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of Himself and All ) Case No. 98-009023-AI Others Similarly

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TRADING STRATEGIES FUND, on CIVIL DIVISION Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, No. 12-11460 Plaintiff, -against- NOORUDDIN S.

More information

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281 Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document

More information

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2 Case5:09-cv-02147-JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13 Exhibit A-2 Case5:09-cv-02147-JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page2 of 13 1 SCOTT+SCOTT LLP MARY K. BLASY (211262) 2 WALTER W. NOSS (pro hac

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Case 1:11-cv-02400-RWS Document 72-5 Filed 01/27/14 Page 1 of 93 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) CIVIL ACTION NO. IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PACHOLDER HIGH YIELD FUND, INC., ) COPERNICUS EURO CDO-I B.V., ) TOPSAIL CBO, LTD., TCW LINC III ) CBO, LTD.,

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Deadline for Submission: September 15, 2017 PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM IF YOU PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED CAESARSTONE, LTD. COMMON STOCK ( CAESARSTONE ) DURING THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 12, 2014

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM In the United States District Court For the Western District of Oklahoma NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and On Behalf of All Others

More information

GLS Dublin OH *P-GLS$F-POC/1*

GLS Dublin OH *P-GLS$F-POC/1* Must be Postmarked No Later Than March 26, 2010 Ladmen Partners v Globalstar Settlement c/o The Garden City Group, Inc PO Box 9349 GLS Dublin OH 43017-4249 1-866-396-5584 *P-GLSF-POC/1* Claim Number: Control

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:17-cv-00869-RDM Document 31 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 701 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NICHOLAS W. FULTON, derivatively on behalf of OVASCIENCE, INC., vs. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

In The Circuit Court of The Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, In and For Hillsborough County, Florida X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : X

In The Circuit Court of The Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, In and For Hillsborough County, Florida X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : X In The Circuit Court of The Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, In and For Hillsborough County, Florida MATILDA FRANZITTA, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant AEROSONIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff vs. DAVID

More information

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK..

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK.. II I Case 1:04-cv-08141-DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 Case 1 :04-cv-OS141-DAB Document 543-1 Filed 05/17/10 Pa e 1 of S - ---... USDC SDN"t ----I;, DOctllrffiNT! UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION BERNARD FIDEL, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and Lead Case No. C-1-00-320 All Others Similarly Situated, (Consolidated with No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MARGARET B. ADAM, On Behalf of Herself ) No. C-93-20399-RMW(EAI) and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiff,

More information

* * * * * * * * * * * * * CIRCUIT COURT v. LINDA F. POWERS, et al., * MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Defendants. STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

* * * * * * * * * * * * * CIRCUIT COURT v. LINDA F. POWERS, et al., * MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Defendants. STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT KENT WELLS, Plaintiff, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT v. FOR LINDA F. POWERS, et al., MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Defendants. MARYLAND Case No. 427353-V Hon. David A. Boynton STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT This

More information

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON IN RE GALENA BIOPHARMA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, Case No. 3:14-cv-00367-SI FINAL ORDER

More information

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed // Page of 0 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release and its attached exhibits ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ), is entered into by

More information

This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the Stipulation ) is entered into among plaintiffs

This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the Stipulation ) is entered into among plaintiffs 0 0 This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the Stipulation is entered into among plaintiffs Richard Layne, Julietta Teratsouian and Carole Carpenter (collectively Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves

More information

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 2 of 31 PAGEID #: 1034 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-60661-CIV-DIMITROULEAS In re DS Healthcare Group, Inc. Securities Litigation / STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement

More information

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t  LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i! Case 1:14-cv-06046-JGK Document 142 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 10 1,=-= :=---- --- 1 usns son~ 1,.!oocuME?~T " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i! UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU - \! SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YO OC ~: ---r.:;;t;;.,.---

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE BOISE INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 8933-VCG NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

More information

COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Compromise and Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement ) is made and entered into between Reorganized Adelphia Communications Corporation ( ACC ) and its affiliated

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 4:14-cv-11191-LVP-MKM Doc # 94-2 Filed 11/13/15 Pg 110 of 121 Pg ID 3379 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Exhibit B NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM,

More information

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION PATRICK HENDRICKS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Pahlavan v. British Airways PLC et al Doc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Joseph W. Cotchett (; jcotchett@cpmlegal.com COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY San Francisco Airport Office Center 0 Malcolm Road, Suite 0 Burlingame, CA

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION. Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION. Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION Coordination Proceeding JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO. 4256 VERISIGN CASES

More information

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION 12 In re KINDER MORGAN, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION (This Order Relates to All Actions.) Consolidated Case No. 06-C-801 ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING

More information

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 9:14-cv-81156-WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In re: Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A. Securities Litigation

More information

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS Exhibit A IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. CAPEX LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 9318-VCL SCHEDULING ORDER WHEREAS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 4:14-cv-11191-LVP-MKM Doc # 95 Filed 11/20/15 Pg 1 of 19 Pg ID 3450 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and

More information

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D Case 211-cv-03535-CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D Case 211-cv-03535-CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 2 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

More information

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA :-cv-00-cas-jem Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 RANDY ROMERO; ET AL., V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, GROWLIFE, INC.; ET AL, Defendants. AND RELATED CASES

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION MARVIN E. SIKES, v. Plaintiff, CRAIG A. WINN, THOMAS MORGAN, REX SCATENA and DEAN M. JOHNSON, Civil Action

More information

Case 4:05-cv RAS-DDB Document 74-1 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 4:05-cv RAS-DDB Document 74-1 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION Case 4:05-cv-00078-RAS-DDB Document 74-1 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLA, LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re VELTI PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. 3:13-cv-03889-WHO (Consolidated

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAREER EDUCATION ) CORPORATION SECURITIES ) LITIGATION ) No. 03 C 8884 Honorable Joan Humphrey Lefkow STIPULATION

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR Gentiva Securities Litigation Website: www.gentivasecuritieslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@gentivasecuritieslitigation.com P.O. Box 3058 Toll Free: 888-593-7570 Portland, OR 97208-3058

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting ase L 6v v (E-ea s e 1: 1 6R P_)-dRK DOCUM DocuemnjT2 4 F, Ie&W/2V71& FP a72 1 OF 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR IN RE ELETROBRAS SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 15-cv-5754-JGK

More information

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 7:13-cv-03073-NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL GOLDEMBERG, ANNIE LE, and HOW ARD PETLACK, on behalf of themselves

More information

Case 2:13-cv RSM Document 90-1 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:13-cv RSM Document 90-1 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case :-cv-0-rsm Document 0- Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON In re Atossa Genetics, Inc. Securities Litigation Civil Action No. -cv-0-rsm 0 STIPULATION AND

More information

Case 3:10-cv ECR -WGC Document 97 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:10-cv ECR -WGC Document 97 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case 3:10-cv-00132-ECR -WGC Document 97 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 34 LAW OFFICES OF MARK WRAY Mark Wray 608 Lander Street Reno, Nevada 89509 Telephone: (775) 348-8877 BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD LLP Sandy A. Liebhard

More information

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 Case 1:15-cv-01249-WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 15-cv-1249

More information

JUDGMENT APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION AGAINST BERNARD EBBERS. On this day of, 2005, a hearing having been held before this Court to

JUDGMENT APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION AGAINST BERNARD EBBERS. On this day of, 2005, a hearing having been held before this Court to UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE WORLDCOM, INC. : MASTER FILE NO. SECURITIES LITIGATION : 02 Civ. 3288 (DLC) : : This Document Relates to: : : 02 Civ. 3288 02 Civ. 4973

More information

Case 1:13-cv ALC-HBP Document 29 Filed 06/26/13 Page 1 of 60 ECF CASE

Case 1:13-cv ALC-HBP Document 29 Filed 06/26/13 Page 1 of 60 ECF CASE Case 1:13-cv-00933-ALC-HBP Document 29 Filed 06/26/13 Page 1 of 60 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually on Behalf

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the accompanying Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action and Final Approval Hearing

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION JOHN NICHOLAS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2013 CH 11752 Consolidated

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE RAYTHEON COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 19018 NC NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION WILLIAM E. BURGES and ROSE M. BURGES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BANCORPSOUTH, INC., et

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND Case 1:09-cv-00554-JNL-PAS Document 122 Filed 09/14/15 Page 1 of 33 PageID #: 3581 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND RICHARD MEDOFF, Individually and On ) No. 1:09-cv-00554-JNL-PAS

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA SARATOGA ADVANTAGE TRUST and THEODORE HYER, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. ICG, INC. a/k/a INTERNATIONAL COAL

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOUIS GRASSO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. CV 06-02639 vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION VITESSE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE THOMAS D. KEELEY and LINDA TALLEY HEWITT, On ) Master Case File No. 737787 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) (Consolidated

More information

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26 Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document1 Filed04//11 Page1 of 1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (3113) DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM (24863 1) 3 Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA J. WRIGHT WILLIAMSON and THEOPHILUS ) HERBST, JR., Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal ) Defendant THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC., ) ) Case No. CJ 2002-1144

More information

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:08-cv-03653-BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES J HAYES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION MDL DOCKET NO. 1506 (CAS) ALL CASES STONERIDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CAROLYN LYNN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, ARTHUR F. HELF, H. LAMAR COX, MICHAEL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA In re STRATOSPHERE CORPORATION SECURITIES ) Master File No. LITIGATION ) CV-S-96-00708-PMP-(RLH) ) This Document Relates To: ) CLASS ACTION ) ALL ACTIONS.

More information

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13 Case 1:15-cv-06369-JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv-06369-JFK Document 109-3 Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13 Exhibit C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE 0:13-cv-01686-MJD-KMM Document 524 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re MEDTRONIC, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.

More information

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13 ---~------------------ Case 1:12-cv-09456-JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SILVERCORP METALS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE Case: 1:12-cv-00276 Document #: 113 Filed: 11/06/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:2694 2c THURMAN ROSS, by and on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS EFiled: Jan 17 2018 03:59PM EST Transaction ID 61579740 Case No. 12619-CB Exhibit A IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG, INC. C.A.

More information

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant.

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant. Case 116-cv-02487-KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x SHIVA STEIN, Plaintiff, - against

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Civil Action No. 05-cv-01265-WDM-MEH (Consolidated with 05-cv-01344-WDM-MEH) WEST PALM BEACH FIREFIGHTERS PENSION FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, STARTEK, INC.,

More information

IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE

IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE In re PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master Docket

More information