ORISSA HIGH COURT,CUTTACK
|
|
|
- Sharon Fox
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 CMP/330/2018 M/S.RAJIB LOCHAN PATTNAIK OTHERS. C.COPY OF ORDER DT IN F.A.O. NO. 1/18 NOT FILED. 2 CONTC/1189/ PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME 3 MACA/404/2018 M/S.SUBRATA SATPATHY 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME 21. STATUTORY DEPOSIT/AWARDED AMOUNT NOT DEPOSITED. 4 WP(C)/4979/2018 M/S.R.P.KAR 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. PG. 7 NOS. 61, 90, 94 & 114 NOT LEGIBLE. 5 MACA/403/2018 M/S.SUBRAT SATPATHY 21. STATUTORY DEPOSIT/AWARDED AMOUNT NOT DEPOSITED. 6 WP(C)/5290/2018 M/S.PRASANTA KUMAR SATAPATHY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. DATE OF ORDER AS MENTIONED IN INDEX NOT TALLY WITH ANX-1. 7 WP(C)/4369/2018 M/S.KAJAL SAHOO OTHERS. PUT UP FOR S.R. AFTER FILING OF INDEX AND ANXS. 8 WP(C)/4399/2018 M/S.PRADEEP KUMAR CHOUDHURY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 19. UNDERTAKING FOR NON FILING OF TRANSLATED COPY NOT FILED 20. VERNACULAR CERTIFICATE NOT FURNISHED. OTHERS. NEAT & LEGIBLE COPY OF PG. 18, 39 & 40 TO BE FILED. OTHERS. PRAYER PORTION OF ANX-8 (PG.44) IS INCOMPLETE 9 WP(C)/4381/2018 M/S.ASHOK KU DAS 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 10 WP(C)/4382/2018 M/S.GYANESWAR SATPATHY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 10. SUBJECT CODE NOT FURNISHED. OTHERS. NEAT & LEGIBLE COPY OF PG. 7,8, 15 & Page 1/12
2 17 TO BE FILED WITHOUT BLACK MARK. 11 WP(C)/5579/2018 M/S.PRASANNA KUMAR MISHRA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 8. CAUSE TITLE NOT IN ORDER. OTHERS. ANX-6 NOT LEGIBLE. OTHERS. NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED. 12 LAA/54/2018 M/S.GITIMAY MISHRA 7. VAKALATNAMA NOT PROPERLY STAMPED,EXECUTED,ACCEPTED. OTHERS. PROCESS FEE OF RS IS DEFICIT ON REQUISITES. OTHERS. DATE NOT FURNISHED IN PRAYER PORTION OF APPEAL MEMO. 13 LAA/58/2018 MR.T.K.PRAHARAJ (A.S.C.) 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME OTHERS. COPY OF IMPUGNED J. NOT FILED WITH THE REQUISITES FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 1 T0 3 & ONE OF THE WRITTEN PROCESS FILED FOR RESPONDENT 3 INSTEAD OF 2 COPIES OF WRITTEN PROCESS. 14 CONTC/613/ RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. AUTHENTICATED COPY OF JUDGMENT UNDER 15 WP(C)/4814/2018 M/S.SUMANTA KUMAR NAYAK 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO ANX-3 NOT FILED. 16 MACA/389/2018 M/S.BIRANCHI NARAYAN RATH 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME 17 MACA/365/2018 M/S.K.C.NAYAK 1. COURT FEE IS DEFICIENT. 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME 18 MACA/386/2018 M/S.BAIBASWATA PANIGRAHI 1. COURT FEE IS DEFICIENT. 3. AUTHENTICATION FEE IS DEFICIENT. 19 LAA/57/2018 MR.T.K.PRAHARAJ (A.S.C.) 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME OTHERS. COPY OF IMPUGNED JUDG. NOT FILED FOR ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 3 WITH REQUISITES. Page 2/12
3 20 LAA/56/2018 MR.T.K.PRAHARAJ (A.S.C.) 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME OTHERS. COPY OF IMPUGNED NOT FILED FOR ISSUE OF NOTICE TO RESP. NOS. 1 & 2 WITH REQUISITES. SO ALSO INSTEAD OF TWO COPIES OF WRITTEN PROCESS ONLY ONE COPY FILED FOR ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO RESP. NO LAA/55/2018 MR.T.K.PRAHARAJ (A.S.C.) 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME OTHERS. COPY OF IMPUGNED NOT FILED FOR ISSUE OF NOTICE TO RESP. NOS. 1 & 2 WITH REQUISITES. SO ALSO INSTEAD OF TWO COPIES OF WRITTEN PROCESS ONLY ONE COPY FILED FOR ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO RESP. NO LAA/62/2018 MR.T.K.PRAHARAJ (A.S.C.) 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME OTHERS. COPY OF IMPUGNED JUDG. NOT FILED FOR ISSUE OF NOTICE TO RESP. NOS. 1 & 2 WITH REQUISITES. SO ALSO INSTEAD OF TWO COPIES OF WRITTEN PROCESS ONLY ONE COPY FILED FOR ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO RESP. NO LAA/61/2018 MR.T.K.PRAHARAJ (A.S.C.) 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME OTHERS. COPY OF IMPUGNED JUDG. NOT FILED WITH REQUISITES FOR SOLE RESPONDENT. 24 LAA/60/2018 MR.T.K.PRAHARAJ(A.S.C.) 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME OTHERS. COPY OF IMPUGNED JUDG. NOT FILED WITH REQUISITES FOR RESP. NO. 1 SOLE RESPONDENT. 25 LAA/59/2018 MR.T.K.PRAHARAJ (A.S.C.) 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME OTHERS. COPY OF IMPUGNED JUDG. FOR NOTICE ON RESPONDENT NO. 1 & 2 NOT FILED WITH REQUISITES AND ONLY ONE COPY OF WRITTEN PROCESS FOR RESP. NO. 2 FILED INSTEAD OF TWO COPIES OF WRITTEN PROCESS. 26 CONTC/4/2018 M/S.BISWABIHARI MOHANTY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 27 CRLA/227/2018 M/S.SOURA CHANDRA MOHAPATRA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO Page 3/12
4 OTHERS. PG. NO. 32 OF THE X.COPY OF THE JUDG. OF JGR NO. 490/13 NOT LEGIBLE. 28 WP(C)/5924/2018 M/S.KAMALA KANTA NAYAK OTHERS. NEAT COPY OF PG. 15 TO BE FILED. 29 CRLMP/365/2018 M/S.SOUMYA MISHRA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 30 WP(C)/4877/2018 M/S.ASHOK KU SAHU 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 31 WP(C)/4865/2018 M/S.LAMBODAR PRADHAN 3. AUTHENTICATION FEE IS DEFICIENT. 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 32 WP(C)/4880/2018 M/S.PRAFULLA KUMAR KAR 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 33 WP(C)/4900/2018 M/S.KSHIROD K.ROUT OTHERS. AUTHENTICATED COPY OF ANX-2 NOT FILED. 34 WP(C)/4882/2018 M/S.DUKHISHYAMA DAS 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. PG. NO. 19 IS NOT CLEARLY VISIBLE. 35 WP(C)/3813/2018 M/S.SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL(S AND OTHERS. ME) NEAT COPY OF PG. NOS. 61 TO 64 & 94 TO BE FILED. 36 TRP(C)/97/2018 M/S.B.MOHANTY 7. VAKALATNAMA NOT PROPERLY STAMPED,EXECUTED,ACCEPTED. 37 TRP(C)/98/2018 M/S.K.K.PAHIL OTHERS. O.PS. ARE NOT PROPERLY DESCRIBED IN INDEX AND V.NAMA. 38 WP(C)/4710/2018 M/S.DAYANANDA MOHAPATRA 8. CAUSE TITLE NOT IN ORDER. 39 WP(C)/4743/2018 M/S.GOPINATH MISHRA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 20. VERNACULAR CERTIFICATE NOT FURNISHED. OTHERS. DIRECTION TO STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER AS SOUGHT FOR IN THE PRAYER PORTION APPEARS TO BE WRONG IN VIEW OF ANX-1 40 CMP/511/2018 M/S.NIRMAL KISHORE RATH 8. CAUSE TITLE NOT IN ORDER. Page 4/12
5 41 CRLA/254/2018 M/S.DHIRENDRA KUMAR MOHAPATRA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. PROVISION OF LAW IN MISC. CASE NO. 617/18 APPEARS TO BE NOT CORRECTLY FURNISHED. OTHERS. IN PRAYER PORTION OF APPEAL MEMO NAME OF COURT NOT EXACTLY TALLY WITH T.C. JUDGMENT. 42 CRLA/251/2018 M/S.LAXMAN PRADHAN 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 43 CRLA/255/2018 M/S.M.M.PATTNAIK 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 7. VAKALATNAMA NOT PROPERLY STAMPED,EXECUTED,ACCEPTED. OTHERS. BEING AGGRIEVED NOT FURNISHED SEPARATELY & GOOD GROUND CERT. ALSO NOT FURNISHED IN APPEAL MEMO. 44 CRLA/233/2018 M/S.J.N.PANDA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. IN PG. 4 OF THE BEING AGGRIEVED PORTION OF APPEAL MEMO DATE OF IMPUGNED JUDG. & CASE NO. APPEARS TO BE NOT CORRECTLY FURNISHED. OTHERS. IN THE PRAYER NAME OF TRIAL COURT AND CASE NO. APPEARS TO BE NOT CORRECTLY FURNISHED. 45 MACA/409/2018 M/S.MRINALINI PADHI 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME 21. STATUTORY DEPOSIT/AWARDED AMOUNT NOT DEPOSITED. 46 WP(C)/4941/2018 M/S.P.K.PANDA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 47 WP(C)/4909/2018 M/S.MANORANJAN PADHY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 8. CAUSE TITLE NOT IN ORDER. 48 WP(C)/4965/2018 M/S.PRAVAKAR BEHERA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. PG. 15 NOT LEGIBLE. 49 WP(C)/4950/2018 M/S.SUBASH CHANDRA PUSPALAKA 5. SECOND COPY OF PETITION NOT FILED. Page 5/12
6 50 WP(C)/4985/2018 M/S.RAMDAS ACHARY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. PG. NO. 11 IS NOT A NEAT COPY. 51 WP(C)/4987/2018 M/S.PRAGYANANDA PATTNAIK 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 19. UNDERTAKING FOR NON FILING OF TRANSLATED COPY NOT FILED 20. VERNACULAR CERTIFICATE NOT FURNISHED. 52 WP(C)/4930/2018 M/S.DINABANDHU NAYAK 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. PG. 7 & 8 NOT NEAT COPY. 53 WP(C)/4933/2018 M/S.RITA MOHANTY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 19. UNDERTAKING FOR NON FILING OF TRANSLATED COPY NOT FILED 54 WP(C)/4999/2018 M/S.PABITRA KUMAR NAYAK 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 55 WP(C)/4954/2018 M/S.BIDYADHAR MANASINGH 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 56 WP(C)/4969/2018 M/S.AJIT KUMAR CHOUDHURY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. DATE OF ORDER IN ANX-12 MENTIONED IN INDEX & BODY OF PETN. NOT TALLY TO THAT OF SAID ANX. 57 WP(C)/4904/2018 M/S.SATYAJIT MOHANTY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 58 CRLREV/283/2018 M/S.NIRMAL RANJAN ROUTRAY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. CERT. NOT FURNISHED REGARDING FILING OF SUCH CASE BEFORE THE APPELLATE COURT. 59 WP(C)/4976/2018 M/S.UPENDRA KUMAR SAMAL 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. PG. 13 NOT NEAT COPY. 60 WP(C)/5449/2018 M/S.RAJENDRA KUMAR PRADHAN 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO Page 6/12
7 61 WP(C)/5410/2018 M/S.S.B.SATAPATHY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 62 CRLREV/297/2018 M/S.MANORANJAN ACHARYA 8. CAUSE TITLE NOT IN ORDER. OTHERS. GOOD GROUND CERTIFICATE NOT FURNISHED. 63 WP(C)/5153/2018 M/S.RAJDIPA BEHURA OTHERS. NEAT COPY OF ANX-1 TO BE FILED. OTHERS. TITLE OF THE PETITIONER IN THE BODY OF THE ANX-3 NOT CORRECTLY FURNISHED. 64 WP(C)/5154/2018 M/S.S.C.PRADHAN 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. C.COPY OF ANX-6 NOT FILED. 65 WP(C)/5150/2018 M/S.U.C.BEHURA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 66 WP(C)/5156/2018 M/S.GOURANG CHARAN MOHAPATRA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 20. VERNACULAR CERTIFICATE NOT FURNISHED. 67 WP(C)/5155/2018 M/S.GOURANG CHARAN MOHAPATRA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 68 WP(C)/5159/2018 M/S.J.N.PANDA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. ANX-3 NOT LEGIBLE. 69 WP(C)/5170/2018 M/S.S.C.DASH 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 19. UNDERTAKING FOR NON FILING OF TRANSLATED COPY NOT FILED 70 WP(C)/5176/2018 M/S.BAMADEV BARAL 3. AUTHENTICATION FEE IS DEFICIENT. 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 71 WP(C)/5137/2018 M/S.SITAKANTA RATH 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 19. UNDERTAKING FOR NON FILING OF TRANSLATED COPY NOT FILED OTHERS. GROUNDS BEFORE PRAYER NOT FURNISHED. 72 WP(C)/5113/2018 M/S.K.K.SWAIN 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO Page 7/12
8 OTHERS. ANX-2 NOT LEGIBLE. 73 WP(C)/5109/2018 M/S.KARUNAKAR GAYA 3. AUTHENTICATION FEE IS DEFICIENT. 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 74 WP(C)/4971/2018 M/S.SURYA NARAYAN MISHRA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 75 WP(C)/5224/2018 M/S.SIDHARTHA MISRA-1 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 76 CRLMA/84/ NOT PROPERLY INDEXED. OTHERS. C.COPY OF ORDER DTD NOT FILED. 77 WP(C)/5218/2018 M/S.LAXMAN PRADHAN 4. AFFIDAVIT/VERIFICATION NOT PROPER. 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 78 CONTC/559/2018 M/S.SAMIR KU.MISHRA 17. REFERENCE CERTIFICATE NOT FURNISHED. OTHERS. O.P. NO.2 HAS BEEN IMPLEADED AS CONTEMNER ONLY IN THE CONTC PETITION. 79 CRLMA/57/2009 M/S PROVISION OF LAW NOT FURNISHED ON TOP OF CAUSE TITLE. 18. CERTIFIED COPY OF TRIAL/APPELLATE COURT ORDER NOT FILED OTHERS. THE BLAPL NO. 2809/09 BEING RESTORED TO FILE ON HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF ON VIDE ORDER NO.4 & 5 RESPECTIVELY WHICH MAY KINDLY BE PURSUED. 80 CRLMA/43/ RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 10. SUBJECT CODE NOT FURNISHED. 12. ASSESMENT SLIP NOT FILLED-IN PROPERLY. 18. CERTIFIED COPY OF TRIAL/APPELLATE COURT ORDER NOT FILED 81 WP(C)/5910/2018 M/S.SIBANARAYAN BISWAL 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. PG. NO. 9 IS NOT CLEARLY READABLE. 82 WP(C)/5962/2018 M/S.HARA PRASAD RATH 20. VERNACULAR CERTIFICATE NOT FURNISHED. Page 8/12
9 83 CMP/522/2018 M/S.SANTOSH KUMAR DASH OTHERS. NEAT COPY OF PG.NOS. 15 TO 19 TO BE FILED. 84 CONTC/5/2018 M/S SUSANTA KUMAR MISHRA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 85 CONTC/1555/2017 M/S.B.K.NAYAK-1 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. C. COPY OF IMPUGNED ORDER NOT FILED 86 ITA/41/2018 M/S.RADHESHYAM CHIMANKA(SR.S.C.)(INCOME 1. COURT TAX) FEE IS DEFICIENT. 87 TRPCRL/32/2018 M/S.BINAYA KUMAR MOHANTY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 88 SAO/7/2018 M/S.BIBEKANANDA BHUYAN 20. VERNACULAR CERTIFICATE NOT FURNISHED. 89 CRLLP/49/2018 M/S.ARUN KUMAR MISHRA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 90 RSA/134/2018 M/S.BHAKTAHARI MOHANTY 7. VAKALATNAMA NOT PROPERLY STAMPED,EXECUTED,ACCEPTED. 8. CAUSE TITLE NOT IN ORDER. OTHERS. ONE SIDED COPY OF T.C. JUDGMENT, A.C. JUDGMENT & DECREE NOT FILED. 91 WP(C)/5283/2018 M/S.GURUDUTTA SENAPATI OTHERS. PUT UP FOR S.R. AFTER PROPERLY PAGINATION MADE IN INDEX AND IN PETN. FOR S.R. 92 WP(C)/5244/2018 M/S.CHITTARANJAN PATTNAIK 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 8. CAUSE TITLE NOT IN ORDER. OF OSS NO. 725/17 NOT FILED. 93 WP(C)/5215/2018 M/S.CHITTARANJAN PATTNAIK 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. ANX-3 NOT NEAT. 94 WP(C)/5306/2018 M/S.R.N.DASMOHAPATRA 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. COPY OF ANX-1 NOT ATTESTED AS TRUE COPY. 95 MATA/44/2018 M/S.SUSAMARANI SAHOO OTHERS. THIS APPEAL DOES NOT LIE TO THIS Page 9/12
10 HONBLE HIGH COURT U/S. 16(2) CIVIL COURT ACT 1984 (AMENDMENT) AFTER THIS MAY LIE TO THE DISTRICT JUDGE. 96 MACA/369/2018 M/S.BINAYAK PR.MOHANTY 1. COURT FEE IS DEFICIENT. 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME OTHERS. ONE SIDED COPY OF FREE COPY NOT FILED. 97 MACA/370/2018 M/S.BINAYAK PR.MOHANTY OTHERS. VALUATION OF APPEAL & COURT FEE PAYABLE THEREON NOT FURNISHED. 98 MACA/385/2018 M/S.BAIBASWATA PANIGRAHI 1. COURT FEE IS DEFICIENT. 7. VAKALATNAMA NOT PROPERLY STAMPED,EXECUTED,ACCEPTED. OTHERS. C.FEE OF RS. 6/- NOT PAID ON MISC. CASE NO. 549/18 99 WP(C)/4373/2018 M/S.N.P.PARIJA 3. AUTHENTICATION FEE IS DEFICIENT. 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. NEAT & LEGIBLE COPY OF PG. 11 & 15 TO BE FILED. 100 WP(C)/4370/2018 MR.PRADEEP KU.CHOUDHURY 3. AUTHENTICATION FEE IS DEFICIENT. OTHERS. IN ANX-3, EMC NO. IS 47/12 BUT IN INDEX SHEET IT IS MENTIONED CMC 49/12. OTHERS. IN PG. 4 OF WPC IT IS MENTIONED ANX-3 AS CMC 49/12. OTHERS. AGAINST ANX-1 PG. 3 OF WPC IN PLACE OF EMC60/10 IT IS MENTIONED CMC60/ WP(C)/5979/2018 M/S.MANORANJAN PADHY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 102 WP(C)/6002/2018 M/S.SATYABRATA MOHANTY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. NEAT & LEGIBLE COPY OF PG. 13 TO BE FILED. 103 WP(C)/3880/2018 M/S.B.PANIGRAHI 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. NEAT COPY OF PGS. 61, 107 TO 109, 126, 127, 129 TO 137, 256, 290 TO 324, 332 TO 348 TO BE FILED. TO BE FILED. Page 10/12
11 OTHERS. C. COPY OF ANX-20 TO BE FILED. 104 WP(C)/4722/2018 M/S.MANASI DHAL 8. CAUSE TITLE NOT IN ORDER. OTHERS. PG. MARKS NOT FURNISHED IN THE INDEX. 105 WP(C)/4726/2018 M/S.BISWAJIT MOHAPATRA 1. COURT FEE IS DEFICIENT. 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 106 RPFAM/91/2018 M/S.SAMIT KU.MISHRA 16. PETITION/APPEAL NOT IN TIME 107 FAO/155/2018 SR.S.C.(S AND ME) OTHERS. PG.NO. 41 NOT LEGIBLE. OTHERS. PG. NOS. 43 TO 46 ARE NOT NEAT COPIES. 108 WP(C)/5277/2018 M/S.ASMIYA RANJAN MAJHI 7. VAKALATNAMA NOT PROPERLY STAMPED,EXECUTED,ACCEPTED. 109 WP(C)/5263/2018 M/S.RANJAN KU.NAYAK 5. SECOND COPY OF PETITION NOT FILED. 110 WP(C)/5265/2018 M/S.R.P.DALAI 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 111 RSA/150/2018 M/S.JITENDRA KU.NAIK OTHERS. COPY OF T.C. JUDGMENT NOT FILED. 112 WP(C)/5769/2018 ADDL.GOVT.ADVOCATE 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 113 WP(C)/4859/2018 M/S.ANUP UDAYA SENAPATI 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 114 WP(C)/4991/2018 M/S.AMIYA KUMAR MOHANTY(A) 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 19. UNDERTAKING FOR NON FILING OF TRANSLATED COPY NOT FILED OTHERS. ANX- 1 TO 4 NOT ATTESTED. 115 WP(C)/6023/2018 M/S.RANJIT SAMAL 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 116 WP(C)/6026/2018 M/S.RANJIT SAMAL 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. DESCRIPTION OF ANX. AT PG. 6 TO 8 OF THE PETN. IS NOT ACCORDANCE WITH THE INDEX. Page 11/12
12 117 WP(C)/6024/2018 M/S.RANJIT SAMAL 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 118 WP(C)/6021/2018 M/S.RANJIT SAMAL 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 119 WP(C)/6019/2018 M/S.RANJIT SAMAL 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 120 CRLMP/398/2018 M/S.ANJAN KU.BISWAL 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. PG. 13 NOT LEGIBLE. 121 CRLMP/395/2018 M/S.B.PASAYAT 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. SUBJECT CODE NOT CORRECTLY FURNISHED. OTHERS. ANX.1 PG. 21 TO 26 NOT LEGIBLE. 122 WP(C)/3454/2018 M/S.ASHOK PANIGRAHI 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. AUTHENTICATED COPY OF ANX-5, 7 & 1 NOT FILED. OTHERS. ORDER DT SOUGHT TO BE QUASHED ON PRAYER PARA II OF THE PETN AND ALSO FOR THIS NEITHER ANNEXED NOR FILED ALONG WITH THE WRIT PETN. 123 WP(C)/5255/2018 M/S.SAMARENDRA PATTANAIK 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. COPY OF H.R.C. CASE NO. 4011/2017 WHICH IS MENTIONED IN THE PRAYER PORTION OF THE WRIT PETN NOT FILED. 124 WP(C)/5267/2018 M/S.P.K.CHAND 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 125 WP(C)/3429/2018 M/S.S.C.DASH 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 126 CMP/508/2018 M/S.MILAN KANUNGO OTHERS. PUT UP FOR S,R. AFTER FILING OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS I.E. ANXS. Page 12/12
ORISSA HIGH COURT,CUTTACK
1 WP(C)/6130/2018 M/S.B.K.ROUTRAY OTHERS. PG. NO. 24 TO 30 NOT VISIBLE. 2 WP(C)/5993/2018 M/S.SIBA PRASAD SWAIN 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO 3 WP(C)/6050/2018 M/S.DEBASIS TRIPATHY 6. RECEIPT SHOWING
ORISSA HIGH COURT,CUTTACK
1 CONTC/339/2018 --- OTHERS. SUBJECT CODE NOT CORRECTLY FURNISHED. 2 CONTC/1418/2017 --------------------------- 6. RECEIPT SHOWING SERV.COPY TO OTHERS. COLLECTOR, GANJAM NOT BEEN MADE A PARTY. 3 CONTC/217/2018
ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK NOTIFICATION
ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK NOTIFICATION No. 966 / dtd.24.10.2013 X-3/2013 Pursuant to the resolution passed in the Full Court held on 01.10.2013 and 21.10.2013 Hon ble the Chief Justice has been pleased
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(C) Nos. 23946 of 2014, 4918, 4919, 4920, 4921, 3424, 3309, 3310 and 1733 of 2015 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. ----------
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : GRATUITY. WP(C) No.19753/2004. Order reserved on : Date of Decision: August 21, 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : GRATUITY WP(C) No.19753/2004 Order reserved on : 18.7.2006. Date of Decision: August 21, 2006 Delhi Transport Corporation through The Chairman I.P.Estate,
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Mr. Vivek Madhok & Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocates. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR.
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 70/2010 % PRATEEK SINGH PATEL Through: Date of decision: 8 th July, 2010.... Petitioner Mr. Vivek Madhok & Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocates. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL
MC (WA) No. 27 of 2015 IN WA No. of BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE T NANDAKUMAR SINGH
MC (WA) No. 27 of 2015 IN WA No. of THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH, THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE T NANDAKUMAR SINGH 16.04.2015 applicants. Mr SC Shyam, learned senior counsel, appears for the Mr PN Nongbri,
Through: Mr. Kartik Prasad with Ms. Reeja Varghese, Adv. versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE W.P.(C) No. 943/2015 & CM Nos.1653-1654/2015 DATE OF DECISION : 30th January, 2015 SUBHA KUMAR DASH... Petitioner Through: Mr.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Reserved on: % Date of Decision: WP(C) No.7084 of 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 25.11.2013 % Date of Decision: 28.11.2013 + WP(C) No.7084 of 2010 PARAS NATURAL SPRING WATER PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. S.K. Bansal, Adv.... Petitioner
W.P.(C) No of 2013
W.P.(C) No. 3177 of 2013 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 31.07.2017 Heard Mr. Bhaskar Dev Konwar, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Sheema Bhuyan, learned counsel appearing for the
JUDGE. Cont.Cas(C) No. 9 of 2016 B E F O R E HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA (Friday)
Cont.Cas(C) No. 9 of 2016 Mr. Ali Hussain appears for the respondent No. 1 and submits that he will be filing vakalatnama today. He submits that he would like to obtain instructions in this matter as the
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, AT DHARWAD BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS. W.P. No /2012 (GM-CPC)
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS BETWEEN: W.P. No. 71556-71559/2012 (GM-CPC) VYSHNAVI
ITEM NO COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS. Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).
ITEM NO.15+55 COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 99/2017 RAI SABYASACHI AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Course Report It is very important to build the capacity and create awareness among the ORS officers who have been selected or Promoted from other
Course Report It is very important to build the capacity and create awareness among the ORS officers who have been selected or Promoted from other cadre and entered into Odisha revenue Services for smooth
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 21/2007
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: Babulal Choudhury and others Appellants -Versus- Ganesh Chandra Bharali and another... Respondents
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)
Review Petition No. 73/2013 (Arising out of Misc. Case No. 705/2013 In FAO 6/2013) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development
CHAPTER XVI. Appeals and Revision Applications of Courts other than the High Court
CHAPTER XVI Appeals and Revision Applications of Courts other than the High Court = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 1. Joint appeals or applications
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No of Bokaro Steel Workers Union 2. N.M.D.C. Mines Workers' Union Petitioners
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 3996 of 2006 1. Bokaro Steel Workers Union 2. N.M.D.C. Mines Workers' Union Petitioners Versus Steel Authority of India Limited and others Respondents
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Decision: 11 th March, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.1702/2010 Date of Decision: 11 th March, 2010 PAVITRA GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.... Petitioner Through: Mr. L.B. Rai & Mr. Rajeev Kumar Rai, Advocates
W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI
BY COURT: 1 W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution of India) Parmanand Pandey & Anr.. Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors.....
THE ELECTION PETITIONS PROCEDURE RULES, KARNATAKA
111 THE ELECTION PETITIONS PROCEDURE RULES, KARNATAKA 112 THE ELECTION PETITIONS PROCEDURE RULES, KARNATAKA NOTIFICATION R.O.C.No.866/67, dated 28 th March 1967 In exercise of the powers conferred by Article
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CHANGE OF LAND USE MATTER Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 5180/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CHANGE OF LAND USE MATTER Date of Decision: 25.04.2013 W.P.(C) 5180/2012 NEERA SHARMA... Petitioner Through: Mr S.K. Rungta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prashant
Prasenjit Mandal, J.:
CIVIL REVISION Present : The Hon ble Mr. Justice Prasenjit Mandal Judgment on 25.08.2010 C.O. No. 4446 of 2007 Shyam Kishor Sahu Versus Ajit Kumar Das. Points: Evidence- Evidence closed as per the order
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP 17 of 2017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 1. KANHAIYA LAL KANKANI CRP 17 of 2017 2. SMT. RAJ KUMARI KANKANI..Petitioners -Versus- 1. AMBIKA SUPPLY AND SERVICES
1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015 1. Bahari Reserve Gaon Min Samabai Samity Limited, Village & PO- Bahari, PS-
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No OF 2010
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 4667 OF 2010 SHRI SURAJEET DAS, SON OF SHRI CHITTA RANJAN DAS, RESIDENT OF PANJABARI (BOTAHGULI),
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. FAO (OS) No.178/2008. Judgment Reserved on : 30th September, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FAO (OS) No.178/2008 Judgment Reserved on : 30th September, 2008 Judgment pronounced on : 9th January, 2009 Ms. Jyotika Kumar...
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WP(C) No.2855 of 2010 Ramesh Goswami Writ Petitioner
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013 HINDUSTAN INSECTICIEDES LTD.... Appellant Through Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No of 2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3482 of 2014 Balwinder Singh, son of late Bahadur Singh Nagi, Resident of Katras Road, PS Bank More, Dist. Dhanbad s/o Sardar Rawal Singh, R/o Gurunanakpur,
CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2016) MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS.Appellants VERSUS J U D G M E N T
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10379 OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8586 of 2016) MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS.Appellants VERSUS RAZIYA KHANAM (D)
IN THE HIGH COURT MANIPUR AT IMPHAL. Writ Petition(C) No. 543 Of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT MANIPUR AT IMPHAL Writ Petition(C) No. 543 Of 2013 Shri Ngairangbam Somorendro Singh, Aged about 53 years, s/o Ng. Ibochou Singh, resident of Malom Tulihal, PO Tulihal, PS Nambol, District-Bishnupur
PATNA HIGH COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY FAQ ON PATNA HIGH COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SCHEME
PATNA HIGH COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY FAQ ON PATNA HIGH COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SCHEME 1 What is Middle Income Group Scheme? This scheme provides legal services to the middle
JUDGEMENT AND ORDER (CAV)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RFA 08/2013 1. Manoj Lala, son of Late Mohanlal Lala, R/o. Central Road, Silchar, PO & PS- Silcahr, District-
CHAPTER XII. Preparation of Paper Books (A) GENERAL. 1. Paper books shall when printed be in accordance with the following directions :--
39 CHAPTER XII Preparation of Paper Books (A) GENERAL 1. Paper books shall when printed be in accordance with the following directions :-- (a) The size shall be 32 by 64 cms. of foolscap folio. (b) The
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND,MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 157(AP) of 2012 M/S JORAM MPCS LTD. - Vs... Petitioner STATE OF ARUNACHAL
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Page 1 of 15 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) NO.4448/2007 1. Sri Abhiram Pegu, S/o Damodar Pegu, R/O- Nalipipar, P.O & P.S- Dhemaji, District-
BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. SEN
PIL No. 3 of 2014 THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. SEN Mr Pradeep Rai and Mr N Syngkon, learned Amicus Curiae appear for the petitioner. Mr KS Kynjing, learned Advocate General, represents the State respondents.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 946 OF 2009
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 946 OF 2009 1. SRI PRAMOD KUMAR KEDIA, S/O. LATE BISWANATH KEDIA. 2. SRI SMTI. NIMAWATI KEDIA,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 2/2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8398/2013
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 2/2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8398/2013 YATINDER KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS MUKUND
CHAPTER XVII. Appeals to the High Court And Superintendence and. revision and transfer of cases by the High Court. Jail Petitions
CHAPTER XVII Appeals to the High Court And Superintendence and revision and transfer of cases by the High Court Jail Petitions 1. Every officer in charge of jail on receiving a petition of appeal or a
THE GUJARAT HIGH COURT RULES, 1993
In supersession of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 as made applicable to this High Court and as amended from time to time, the Honourable the Chief Justice and Judges of the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT W.P.(C) 7933/2010. Date of Decision : 16th February, 2012.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT W.P.(C) 7933/2010 Date of Decision : 16th February, 2012. SAK INDUSTRIES PVT LTD... Petitioner Through Mr. Ajay Vohra and Ms. Kavita Jha,
M/S. Iritech Inc vs The Controller Of Patents on 20 April, % Judgment pronounced on: 20th April, 2017
Delhi High Court M/S. Iritech Inc vs The Controller Of Patents on 20 April, 2017 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: 20th April, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7850/2014 M/S. IRITECH INC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL No OF 2012 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1837 OF 2012 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 8255 of 2010) REPORTABLE Indra Kumar Patodia & Anr.... Appellant(s) Versus
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Page 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 1961 of 2010 Smt. Padma Rani Mudai Hazarika - Versus - - Petitioner Union of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD & ANR. WITH
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1232 OF 2019 R V PRASANNAKUMAAR & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL
FAQ on Jharkhand High Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Scheme
For Private Circulation : Awareness Purpose Only JHARKHAND HIGH COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY FAQ on Jharkhand High Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Scheme Published & Printed by : Jharkhand
PART II Procedure and Practice CHAPTER VI. General Rules regarding Applications and Affidavits
14 PART II Procedure and Practice CHAPTER VI General Rules regarding Applications and Affidavits 1. Every application to the High Court shall be a petition written in the English language. 2. Every petition
+ W.P.(C) 6724/2015 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 12, 2016 Judgment Delivered on : January 18, 2016 + W.P.(C) 6724/2015 SURINDER SINGH SACHDEV...Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rahul
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 21.01.2011 + WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos.839-840/2011 DINESH KUMAR & ANR. PETITIONERS Through: Mr.S.N.Khanna, Advocate Versus DELHI COOPERATIVE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF :Versus: WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS & 3394 OF 2006
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3392 OF 2006 STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH. APPELLANT :Versus: RAVINDER KUMAR SANKHAYAN (DEAD) AND ORS. WITH.RESPONDENTS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY. WRIT PETITION No OF 2013 (LB-BBMP)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 24 th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY WRIT PETITION No.14387 OF 2013 (LB-BBMP) BETWEEN: UNION OF INDIA
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH W.A. NO.122 OF 2014 In the matter of a reference made by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.09.2014... Sri Kasinath Nayak. Petitioner -Versus- State
The Odisha. G a z e t t e PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY CONTENTS PAGE
The Odisha G a z e t t e PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY 6;" ( -988+-4! 073.+:! 0/,79+7: &! &$%)#5+12+ %! %* * 0%.!/!1%.! ), )0 )2%, 1-1()0.!/1 ), -/$%/ 1(!1 )1 +!3 "% &)*%$!0! 0%.!/!1% #-+.)*!1)-, CONTENTS PART
NOTIFICATION Shimla -2, the 21st January, 2006
(Authoritative English Text) GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT NOTIFICATION Shimla -2, the 21st January, 2006 No. PER (AR) F (7) -2/98-Vol.1. - In exercise of the powers
Editorial Board. 2nd CONVOCATION of National Law University, Odisha held at Odisha Judicial Academy, Cuttack on 8th August 2015.
2nd CONVOCATION - 2015 of National Law University, Odisha held at Odisha Judicial Academy, Cuttack on 8th August 2015. 2 Editorial Board Hon ble Shri Justice I. Mahanty Hon ble Shri Justice S.C. Parija
$~9. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % RSA 228/2015 and C.M. No.12883/2015. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
$~9. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision: 03.09.2015 % RSA 228/2015 and C.M. No.12883/2015 SHRI BABU LAL Through: Mr. V. Shukla, Advocate.... Appellant versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 20007 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.16749 of 2010) Anil Kumar Singh...Appellant(s) VERSUS Vijay Pal Singh &
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL, MANDATORY INJUNCTION. Date of Judgment: CM(M) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL, MANDATORY INJUNCTION Date of Judgment: 14.02.2012 CM(M) No.557/2008 DALMIA CEMENT (BHARAT) LTD. Through: Mr. D.K. Malhotra, Advocate....
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. CRLMC No Of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK CRLMC No. 3031 Of 2006 An application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with G.R. Case No.844 of 2003 pending on the file of S.D.J.M.,
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Sri Rajesh Jaiswal, S/o Sri Radha Raman Jaiswal, Resident of Thana Back Road, Ward No. 11, New Amolapatty, Golaghat-785621.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PROPERTY DISPUTE. LPA of Date of decision:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PROPERTY DISPUTE LPA 577-580 of 2006 Date of decision: 20.01.2009 INDERJEET SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) and OTHERS APPELLANTS Through: Mr.R.K.Saini, Mr.Nikhil
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND,RANCHI.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND,RANCHI. W.P.(C) No. 6094 of 2012 Laxmi Narain Bhagat... Petitioner Versus Naresh Prasad & others..... Respondents For the Petitioners :- Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the Respondents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6850 OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(Civil)No.19027 of 2018 @ Diary No.18927 of 2018) PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 &
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT OF FLAT. W.P.(C) No.5180/2011. Decided on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT OF FLAT W.P.(C) No.5180/2011 Decided on: 16.01.2012 IN THE MATTER OF PITAMBER DUTT Through : Mr. V. Sridhar Reddy, Adv.... Petitioner versus
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) RULES, (1) These rules may be called the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) RULES, 1993 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections(1) and (2) of section 36 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institution Ordinance, 1993
Supreme Court Rules, 1980
Supreme Court Rules, 1980 SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN NOTIFICATION Rawalpindi, the 20th November, 1980 THE SUPREME COURT, RULES, 1980 S.R.O.1159(I)/80. In exercise of the powers conferred under Article 191
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4761/2016 & CM Appls /2016. versus. Through: None
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4761/2016 & CM Appls. 19862-19864/2016 UNION OF INDIA... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Adv. for Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advs. versus VANSH
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015 Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora -Vs-...Petitioner M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07. Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Railways Act, 1989 W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07 Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008 M.K. SHARMA.. Petitioner Through : Mr. K.N. Kataria,
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on: 20 th April, versus. Advocates who appeared in this case:
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: 20 th April, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7850/2014 M/S. IRITECH INC versus... Petitioner THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS... Respondents Advocates who appeared
Through: Mr. Deepak Khosla, Petitioner in person.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RESERVED ON: 12.09.2014 PRONOUNCED ON: 12.12.2014 REVIEW PET.188/2014, CM APPL.5366-5369/2014, 14453/2014 IN W.P. (C) 6148/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE. THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI. WRIT PETITION No.37514/2017 (T-RES)
1/9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22 nd DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI BETWEEN: WRIT PETITION No.37514/2017 (T-RES) XL HEALTH CORPORATION INDIA
W.P. (C) No of 2005
-1- W.P. (C) No. 1992 of 2005 WITH W.P. (C) No. 3105 of 2007 [In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India] By Court: Jharkhand State Electricity Board through Electrical
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9365/ Petitioner. versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9365/2014 Judgment reserved on August 24, 2015 Judgment delivered on September 10, 2015 SHALU Through: versus... Petitioner Mr.N.S.Dalal, Adv. PRAGATI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY WRIT PETITION NO OF 2011(LB-BMP)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY WRIT PETITION NO.41274 OF 2011(LB-BMP) BETWEEN: ASTRAZENECA PHARMA INDIA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: 28.4.2011 RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD..Appellant Through: Mr.P.K.Seth,
W.P. (C) No. 8579/2007 Page 1 of 5
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI WP (C) No. 8579/2007 + DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION...Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitender Kumar Advocate. Versus MOHINDER PAL SHARMA...Respondent Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. Judgment delivered on: WP (C) 4642/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER Judgment delivered on: 02.07.2008 WP (C) 4642/2008 M/S KESHAV SHARES and STOCKS LIMITED... Petitioner - versus - INCOME TAX OFFICER AND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Judgment: RSA No.53/2011 & CM. Nos /2011. Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BENAMI TRANSACTIONS (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1988 Date of Judgment: 22.03.2011 RSA No.53/2011 & CM. Nos. 5887-88/2011 MANOJ GUPTA Through: Mr.P.N.Dham, Advocate...Appellant
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5096/2015 & Crl.M.A /2015 Date of Decision : January 13 th, 2016.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5096/2015 & Crl.M.A. 18348/2015 Date of Decision : January 13 th, 2016 ANGLE INFRASTRUCTURE P.LTD.... Petitioner Through Mr.Akhil Sibal,Ms.Bina Gupta,
Maheshwary Ispat Limited vs Tata Capital Financial Services... on 17 April, 2015
Calcutta High Court Maheshwary Ispat Limited vs Tata Capital Financial Services... on 17 April, 2015 Author: Banerjee Form No. J.(2) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original
BEFORE THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION. PETITION No. CP 02/17
BEFORE THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION PETITION No. CP 02/17 In the matter of : Non implementation of the order dated 29.05.2017 in P/005/2016 of Kerala State Electricity Ombudsman.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 Date of decision: 24.05.2011 WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.7523/2011 YUDHVIR SINGH Versus Through: PETITIONER Mr.N.S.Dalal,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 406 OF 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 406 OF 2009 Reserved on : 11-05-2010 Date of pronouncement: 04-06-2010 M/s Kesinga Paper Mills Private Limited..Petitioner
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on: 4 th January, versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: 4 th January, 2016 + CS(OS) No.2934/2011 J.C BAMFORD EXCAVATORS LIMITED & ANR... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Pravin Anand, Adv. with Ms.Vaishali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No of 2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 3336 of 2015 M/S CORPORATE ISPAT ALLOYS LIMITED, HAVING ITS UNIT AT TOTATALWADI, P.O. BURUDIH, DISTRICT SARAIKELA KHARSAWAN, JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.No.2556/2012 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI.PRAKASH S/O PARAMESHWARAPPA AGED
85/B/11-DD/114/11/DC/255/13 on the file of the 2nd Respondent in respect of the complaints of professional misconduct against the 3rd Respondent herei
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 27.07.2016 + W.P.(C) 6140/2016 R. SIBRAMANIAN... Petitioner versus THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & ORS.... Respondents
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 32. + W.P.(C) No. 332 of 2010 M/S UCB FARCHIM SA... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Ms. Arpita Sawhney and Mr. Sukhdev,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.117 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014] Versus
![IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.117 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014] Versus](/thumbs/93/112110226.jpg "IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.117 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014] Versus")
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.117 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 19516 of 2014] Sushil Thomas Abraham... Appellant(s) Versus M/s Skyline Build.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment reserved on: 15.03.2011 Judgment delivered on: 18.03.2011 RSA No.243/2006 & CM No.10268/2006 SHRI.D.V. SINGH & ANR...Appellants
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012 DESIGN WORKS Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Adv.... Appellant Versus ICICI BANK LTD... Respondent
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5661/2015, C.M. No /2015, C.M. No /2017 & C.M. No. 2777/2018.
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5661/2015, C.M. No. 10188/2015, C.M. No. 31355/2017 & C.M. No. 2777/2018 RIAZUDDIN Through:... Petitioner Ms. Sona Babbar, Advocate for Mr. Peeyoosh
Civil Revision Present : The Hon ble Justice Prabhat Kumar Dey Judgment on : C.O. No of 2008 Maya Sardar & Others -vs- Smt.
Civil Revision Present : The Hon ble Justice Prabhat Kumar Dey Judgment on : 23.08.2010 C.O. No. 3533 of 2008 Maya Sardar & Others -vs- Smt. Annapurna Ghosh Point: Valuation of Suit- Suit for recovery
-COPY OF- INCOME TAX INSTRUCTION NO. 4/2011 DATED IT-
-COPY OF- INCOME TAX INSTRUCTION NO. 4/2011 DATED 9-3-2011 IT- Instructions regarding Standard Operating Procedure on filing of Appeals/Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) by the Income Tax Department in the
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 353 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO OF 2015) VERSUS
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 353 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12581 OF 2015) THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, MYSORE & ANR....APPELLANT(S)
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Co.Pet. 787/2015 BANDHU SYSTEMATIX PRIVATE LIMITED...PETITIONER. Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Co.Pet. 787/2015 BANDHU SYSTEMATIX PRIVATE LIMITED...PETITIONER Through Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate. Versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES...RESPONDENT Through Ms. Aparna
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.194 OF 2012 HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD & ANR.
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.194 OF 2012 COMMON CAUSE PETITIONER(S) VERSUS HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH T.C.(C) No.