IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
|
|
- Giles Higgins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS Number C Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams TEKTEL, INC., v. Plaintiff, THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. PLAINTIFF S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS RCFC 12(b) MOTIONS Cyrus E. Phillips IV ALBO & OBLON, L.L.P. Courthouse Plaza 2200 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1201 Arlington, Virginia Attorney for Plaintiff, Tektel, Incorporated REDACTED VERSION
2 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 2 of 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii-iii ISSUES PRESENTED ARGUMENT I. THE PARTIES COURSE OF DEALINGS DEMONSTRATES THAT THESE INSTRUMENTS ARE NOT ORDERS PLACED UNDER A STRANGER S GSA SCHEDULE CONTRACT II. PLAINTIFF TEKTEL MAY PROPERLY SEEK A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT TOGETHER WITH ITS DEMAND FOR MONIES PRESENTLY DUE CONCLUSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE i -
3 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 3 of 18 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES STATUTES 28 U.S.C. 1491(a)(1) , 9, 10, 11 REGULATIONS Federal Acquisition Regulation , DISPUTES, 48 C.F.R., Ch. 1 ( Edition) Federal Acquisition Regulation , DEFAULT (FIXED-PRICE SUPPLY AND SERVICE) (APR 1984), 48 C.F.R., Ch. 1 ( Edition) RESTATEMENTS RESTATEMENT OF THE LAW, SECOND, CONTRACTS, 202, Rules in Aid of Interpretation CASES Frolow v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co., 710 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2013) Holmes v. United States, 657 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2011) ii -
4 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 4 of 18 James v. Zurich-American Insurance Co., 203 F.3d 250 (3 rd Cir. 2000), cert. denied June 29 th, 2000, 2000 U.S. LEXIS National Air Traffic Controllers Association v. United States, 160 F.3d 714 (Fed. Cir. 1998) Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh, 707 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2013) Smith v. United States, 709 F.3d 1114 (Fed. Cir. 2013) iii -
5 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 5 of 18 PLAINTIFF S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS RCFC 12(b) MOTIONS ISSUES PRESENTED I. Are These Instruments Placed Under A Stranger s GSA Schedule Contract, Or Instead Are These Instruments Binding Bilateral Agreements Between Defendants And Plaintiff Tektel Within The Tucker Act Jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. 1491(a)(1), Of The United States Court Of Federal Claims? II. Has Plaintiff Tektel Properly Joined A Request For Declaratory Relief With A Demand For Monies Presently Due? ARGUMENT I. The Parties Course Of Dealing Demonstrates That These Instruments Are Not Orders Placed Under A Stranger s GSA Schedule Contract. Defendants United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and Administrative Office of the United States Courts argue these Instruments are placed - 1 -
6 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 6 of 18 under a GSA Schedule Contract between Nortel Networks, Incorporated (Nortel) and the United States. ECF Document Number 58 *SEALED*, pages 15 of 45 and 23 of 45, filed April 16 th, Because Nortel is a stranger to these proceedings and under the GSA Schedule Contract Plaintiff Tektel s status is relegated to that of an amanuensis for Nortel, Defendants argue Plaintiff Tektel is not in privity of Contract with Defendants. ECF Document Number 58 *SEALED*, pages 26 through 27 of 45, filed April 16 th, If these Instruments are read as Orders placed under Nortel s GSA Schedule Contract, then they must have been terminated as required by Federal Acquisition Regulation , 48 C.F.R., Ch. 1 ( Edition). Federal Acquisition Regulation distributes authority to resolve Disputes concerning Orders placed under GSA Schedule Contracts depending on the particulars of the Dispute: Disputes. (a) Disputes pertaining to the performance of orders under a schedule contract
7 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 7 of 18 (1) Under the Disputes clause of the schedule contract, the ordering activity contracting officer may (i) Issue final decisions on disputes arising from performance of the order (but see paragraph (b) of this section; or (ii) Refer the dispute to the schedule contracting officer. (2) The ordering activity contracting officer shall notify the schedule contracting officer promptly of any final decision. (b) Disputes pertaining to the terms and conditions of schedule contracts. The ordering activity contracting officer shall refer all disputes that relate to the contract terms and conditions to the schedule contracting officer for resolution under the Disputes clause of the contract and notify the schedule contractor of the referral..... Federal Acquisition Regulation , 48 C.F.R., Ch. 1 ( Edition) (Emphasis added). On Monday, March 1 st, 2010 Michael W. Dobbins, formerly the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, wrote Plaintiff Tektel that I have received a background investigation report to determine your suitability to be a contractor for the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
8 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 8 of 18 (Emphasis added). The Clerk wrote in this letter that Plaintiff Tektel s President had previously been convicted of drug related offenses and that this is considered to be a felony charge. The Clerk did not provide a copy of the background investigation report and did not request documentation of the Judgment of Conviction. ECF Document Number 37-1, pages 15 through 16 of 25, filed October 18 th, On Friday, March 5 th, 2010 Plaintiff Tektel wrote the Clerk its President had never been convicted of a felony offense and that the felony offense charged had been reduced to a misdemeanor conviction. Plaintiff Tektel asked the Clerk to allow Plaintiff Tektel, its technicians and its President, to continue performance of the two Instruments here in dispute. Plaintiff Tektel explained it was delivering services to other Federal agencies, and these other Federal agencies required, and had performed, background checks. On Wednesday, March 17 th, 2010 Plaintiff Tektel provided the Clerk with a Case Number from the Kentucky court system documenting that its - 4 -
9 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 9 of 18 President had been convicted of a misdemeanor, not the felony charged. ECF Document Number 37-1, page 16 of 25, filed October 18 th, On Thursday, March 18 th, 2010 the Clerk wrote Plaintiff Tektel: I previously gave you until March 16, 2010 to provide any documentation necessary to clarify this issue. You provided two s informing me that this was not a felony, but you provided no documentation. The contract with your firm is considered highly sensitive. I have consulted with the Court, and the Court has more stringent policies than other government units. I am hereby canceling the contract for cause, effective at the close of business on Friday, March 19, Please make the appropriate arrangements with... of my office regarding the return of any equipment. I do wish you success in your future endeavors. ECF Document Number 37-1, page 17 of 25, filed October 18 th, This was far more than a routine Dispute about facts concerning the performance of these two Instruments; it involved Plaintiff s Tektel s assertion that these Instruments did not extend suitability requirements to Plaintiff Tektel s President and that - 5 -
10 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 10 of 18 other Federal Agencies had determined Plaintiff Tektel to be a suitable Federal Contractor. The Clerk confirmed that more than the facts of performance of these Instruments were in issue when he claimed cause to support the cancellation because the Court has more stringent policies than other government units. There is a bright-line rule all Disputes requiring interpretation of a GSA Schedule Contract and Orders placed thereunder go to a GSA Schedule Contracting Officer even if those disputes also require interpretation of the order, or involve performance under the order. Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh, 707 F.3d 1367, 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2013). Under a GSA Schedule Contract and Orders placed under that GSA Schedule Contract, authority to decide a dispute regarding interpretation of schedule contract provisions, in whole or in part, regardless of whether the parties frame the dispute as pertaining to performance, belongs solely to the GSA Schedule Contracting Officer, not to someone at the Ordering Activity. If the Dispute concerns interpretation of any part of the Instrument s terms and conditions, and not solely the - 6 -
11 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 11 of 18 factual details of performance, then the Ordering Activity cannot decide it. Id., 707 F.3d, at Here it was the Ordering Activities, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, which decided that the terms of these Instruments encompassed their more stringent policies regarding the suitability of those with whom they were conducting the public s business. But if these Instruments were only Orders under Nortel s GSA Schedule Contract and if Plaintiff Tektel were but an amanuensis for Nortel, then it was only the GSA Schedule Contracting Officer, not the Clerk for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois or the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, who had the authority to decide whether these Instruments imposed a duty on Plaintiff Tektel which had been breached, a breach justifying the cancellation of these Instruments rather than their Termination for Convenience
12 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 12 of 18 The RESTATEMENT OF THE LAW, SECOND, CONTRACTS, 202, Rules in Aid of Interpretation, (5) provides that [w]herever reasonable, the manifestations of intention of the parties to a promise or agreement are interpreted as consistent with each other and with any relevant course of performance, course of dealing, or usage of trade. Comment h. Preference for consistency, explains that [a] meaning consistent with all the circumstances is preferred to a meaning which requires part of the context be disregarded. So if these Instruments are nothing more than Orders placed under Nortel s GSA Schedule Contract, then how is it that the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, not the GSA Schedule Contracting Officer, decided that Plaintiff Tektel was in breach of its obligations under these Instruments, a breach justifying their cancellation rather than their Termination for Convenience? His lack of authority if these Instruments are nothing more than Orders placed under Nortel s GSA Schedule Contract is context which cannot be disregarded. [A] course - 8 -
13 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 13 of 18 of performance is the best indication of what the parties meant by their Agreement. Frolow v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co., 710 F.3d 1303, 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (New Jersey law); [P]arties to a contract are free to define and clarify or even to change the contract s terms.... James v. Zurich-American Insurance Co., 203 F.3d 250, 256 (3 rd Cir. 2000), cert. denied June 29 th, 2000, 2000 U.S. LEXIS The DEFAULT (FIXED-PRICE SUPPLY AND SERVICE) (APR 1984) clause, Federal Acquisition Regulation , 48 C.F.R., Ch. 1 ( Edition) incorporated in these two Instruments, ECF Document Number 37-1, pages 13 through 14 of 25, filed October 18 th, 2012, expressly provides in subparagraph (g) a substantive right to money damages, i.e., these two Instruments promise that if it is determined Plaintiff Tektel was not in default, or that Plaintiff Tektel s default was excusable, then the rights and obligations of these parties arising by reason of the Clerk s cancellation of these two Instruments for cause shall be determined as if this cancellation had been issued for the convenience of the Government, entitling Plaintiff Tektel to an equit
14 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 14 of 18 able adjustment. Smith v. United States, 709 F.3d 1114, 1116 (Fed. Cir. 2013); [W]hen a breach of contract claim is brought in the Court of Federal Claims under the Tucker Act [28 U.S.C. 1491(a)(1)], the plaintiff comes armed with the presumption that money damages are available.... Holmes v. United States, 657 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2011). II. Plaintiff Tektel May Properly Seek A Declaratory Judgment Together With Its Demand For Monies Presently Due. Defendants United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and Administrative Office of the United States Courts suppose, wrongly, that Plaintiff Tektel seeks only a Declaratory Judgment, arguing that this assertion does not satisfy the jurisdictional requirement of 28 U.S.C. 1491(a)(1) for a demand for presently due money damages. ECF Document Number 58 *SEALED*, pages 37 through 38 of 45, filed April 16 th,
15 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 15 of 18 Defendants misread National Air Traffic Controllers Association v. United States, 160 F.3d 714 (Fed. Cir. 1998), a Case which stands only for the unremarkable proposition that this Court s 28 U.S.C. 1491(a)(1) jurisdiction does not attach to a demand for declaratory relief not coupled with a demand for presently due monies, Id., 160 F.3d, at The problem in National Air Traffic Controllers was that the Plaintiffs there were barred from asserting a claim for monies presently due because their collective bargaining agreement required their money claim be submitted to arbitration, not to this Court. National Air Traffic Controllers holds that although this Court has been authorized to grant equitable relief in certain limited circumstances, those circumstances do not include the general authority to grant equitable relief whenever a declaratory judgment or an injunction would assist a claimant in obtaining money benefits in another forum. Id., 160 F.3d, at 716 (Emphasis added). Plaintiff Tektel s Amended Complaint here properly couples a claim for $123, in presently due monies, ECF Document Number 37-1, pages 3 and 4 of
16 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 16 of and page 23 of 25, filed October 18 th, 2012, a claim made in this forum, with a claim for a Declaratory Judgment in aid of that money claim, ECF Document Number 37-1, pages 22 and 23 of 25, filed October 18 th, CONCLUSION For all of the reasons set forth in the foregoing Brief in Support of Plaintiff Tektel s Response to Defendants RCFC 12(b) Motions, Plaintiff Tektel respectfully requests that the Court deny the RCFC 12(b) Motions filed by Defendants United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Cyrus E. Phillips IV Cyrus E. Phillips IV Virginia State Bar Number
17 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 17 of 18 May 30 th, 2013 ALBO & OBLON, L.L.P. Courthouse Plaza 2200 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1201 Arlington, Virginia Telephone: (703) Facsimile: (703) Mobile: (703) Electronic Mail: Attorney of record for Plaintiff, Tektel, Incorporated
18 Case 1:11-cv MCW Document 62-1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 18 of 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that on Thursday, May 30 th, 2013 a true and complete copy of this Plaintiff s Brief in Support of Plaintiff s Response to Defendants RCFC 12(b) Motions was filed electronically via the Court s Electronic Case Filing System, through which notice of this filing will be sent to: Amanda L. Tantum, Esq. Electronic Mail: Amanda.Tantum@usdoj.gov Attorney of record for Defendants, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. /s/ Cyrus E. Phillips IV Cyrus E. Phillips IV
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:11-cv-00445-MCW Document 29-1 Filed 08/15/12 Page 1 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS Number 11-445C Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams TEXTEL, INC., v. Plaintiff, THE UNITED STATES,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case: 13-5105 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 09/09/2013 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2013-5105 CREWZERS FIRE CREW TRANSPORT, INC., v. Plaintiff-Appellant, UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BID PROTEST
Case 1:15-cv-00158-MBH Document 25 Filed 03/15/15 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BID PROTEST Number 15-158C Judge Marian Blank Horn VISUAL CONNECTIONS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, THE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:06-cv-00436-MCW Document 139 Filed 01/21/12 Page 1 of 36 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS Number 06-436C Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams ULYSSES, INC, v. Plaintiff, THE UNITED STATES,
More informationNo IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. KINGDOMWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Petitioner, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
No. 14-916 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States KINGDOMWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for
More information~ No.l3- r C ) Judge ) ) )
Case 1:13-cv-00185-SGB Document 1 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 24 I FILED MAR 11 2013 U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS In the United States Court of Federal Claims SPERIENTCORPORATION, INC. Suite533 410 I Dublin
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:12-cv-00064-SGB Document 19-1 Filed 12/07/12 Page 1 of 48 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS Number 12-064C Judge Susan G. Braden CREWZERS FIRE CREW TRANSPORT, INC., v. Plaintiff, THE
More informationVirginia: In The Circuit Court for the City of Portsmouth
Virginia: In The Circuit Court for the City of Portsmouth ) COOPER, SPONG & DAVIS, P.C. ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) Case No. CL15003864-00 ) PORTSMOUTH REDEVELOPMENT ) AND HOUSING AUTHORITY ) ) Defendants.
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1
Case: 1:18-cv-04861 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MARY NISI, On behalf of herself and the class
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT CREWZERS FIRE CREW ) TRANSPORT, INC., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. 2011-5069 ) UNITED STATES, ) ) Appellee. ) APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Harrisburg Division --ELECTRONICALLY FILED--
Case 1:17-cv-00100-YK Document 63 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Harrisburg Division GREGORY J. HARTNETT, et al., v. Plaintiffs, PENNSYLVANIA
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601
Case: 1:12-cv-05746 Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PHILIP CHARVAT, on behalf of himself
More informationn a t i o n a l IMMIGRATION p r o j e c t of the national lawyers guild
n a t i o n a l IMMIGRATION p r o j e c t of the national lawyers guild PRACTICE ADVISORY: SAMPLE CARACHURI-ROSENDO MOTIONS June 21, 2010 By Simon Craven, Trina Realmuto and Dan Kesselbrenner 1 Prior to
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. Plaintiff 4:02CR57-SPM v. XXXX, Defendant. MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT AS MULTIPLICITOUS
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD 6F CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD 6F CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- Xerox Corporation Under Contract No. GS-25F-0062L Delivery Order No. W9133L-07-F-0003 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ASBCA No. 584 78 Jonathan S. Aronie,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:06-cv-00949 Document 121 Filed 12/13/2007 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION G.M. SIGN, INC., Plaintiff, vs. 06 C 949 FRANKLIN BANK, S.S.B.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Norfolk Division. Plaintiff, Defendants. MEMORANDUM FINAL ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division FILED AUG 2 2 2012 PROJECT VOTE/VOTING FOR AMERICA, INC., CLERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT NORFOLK. VA Plaintiff, v. CIVIL No. 2:10cv75
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. Virginia Eastern District Court Case No. 2:15-cv Bergano, D.D.S., P.C. et al v. City Of Virginia Beach et al
PlainSite Legal Document Virginia Eastern District Court Case No. 2:15-cv-00520 Bergano, D.D.S., P.C. et al v. City Of Virginia Beach et al Document 25 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think
More informationIn The United States Court of Federal Claims No C
In The United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-194C (Filed Under Seal: September 3, 2014) Reissued: September 16, 2014 1 COMPLIANCE SOLUTIONS OCCUPATIONAL TRAINERS, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff,
More informationIn the United States Court of Federal Claims No C (Filed: August 29, 2014)
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-20C (Filed: August 29, 2014) GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS, INC., Contracts Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. Plaintiff, 7104 (b); Government Claim; Failure
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Canon Solutions America, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W911SE-04-A-0007 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No.
More informationIn the United States Court of Federal Claims
TALLACUS v. USA Doc. 28 In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 10-311C (Filed June 30, 2011) LARRY D. TALLACUS, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Contracts; pendency of claims in other
More informationJOINT RULE 16(b)/26(f) REPORT
Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 C.D. Michel S.B.N. Joshua R. Dale SBN 0 Sean A. Brady SBN 00 Anna M. Barvir SBN MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 0 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 00 Long Beach,
More informationCase 1:10-cv GBL -TRJ Document 54 Filed 11/02/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 476
Case 1:10-cv-00765-GBL -TRJ Document 54 Filed 11/02/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 476 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationCase: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-3766 NAPERVILLE SMART METER AWARENESS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NAPERVILLE, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District
More informationCase 3:07-cv WHA Document 6 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 59
Case 3:07-cv-04337-WHA Document 6 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 59 1 2 3 John Brosnan 3321 Vincent Road Pleasant Hill, California 94523 Telephone: 510.779.1006 Facsimile: 925.237.8300 4 5 6 7 8 JOHN BROSNAN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:10-cv-00277-LY Document 3-7 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION MEDICUS INSURANCE CO., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:10-cv-00277-LY
More informationCase 1:03-cv NG Document 687 Filed 11/12/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:03-cv-11661-NG Document 687 Filed 11/12/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. Act. No. 03-cv-11661-NG (LEAD DOCKET
More informationCase 1:06-cv SLR Document 12 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:06-cv-00414-SLR Document 12 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ORACLE CORPORATION and ORACLE U.S.A. INC., v. Plaintiffs, EPICREALM LICENSING,
More information: : : : MOTION OF K&L GATES LLP TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL AND TO FILE SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT UNDER SEAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------x Homebridge Mortgage Bankers Corp., Plaintiff, -against- Vantage Capital Corp., et al.,
More informationCase4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3
Case:-cv-0-JSW Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division 0 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. 0 Washington, D.C. 000 Phone: (0 -; Fax: (0-0 Attorneys for the Government Defs.
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1
Case: 1:18-cv-01456 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TAPHIA WILLIAMS, Individually and on ) Behalf
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Before the Court is Twin City Fire Insurance Company s ( Twin City ) Motion for
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRADEN PARTNERS, LP, et al., v. Plaintiffs, TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-jst ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 11. : : Petitioner, : : Respondent.
Case 117-cv-00554 Document 1 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------ x ORACLE CORPORATION,
More informationCase 5:14-cv BLF Document 798 Filed 09/26/18 Page 1 of 7
Case 5:4-cv-05344-BLF Document 798 Filed 09/26/8 Page of 7 Kathleen Sullivan (SBN 24226) kathleensullivan@quinnemanuel.com Todd Anten (pro hac vice) toddanten@quinnemanuel.com 5 Madison Avenue, 22 nd Floor
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit JULIO VILLARS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. 2014-5124 Appeal from the United
More informationCase 1:15-cv NBF Document 16 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:15-cv-00342-NBF Document 16 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS THE INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. No. 15-342L
More informationCase: 1:17-cv JG Doc #: 87 Filed: 01/11/19 1 of 5. PageID #: 1056 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:17-cv-01516-JG Doc #: 87 Filed: 01/11/19 1 of 5. PageID #: 1056 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION STEPHANIE LYNN STEIGERWALD on behalf of herself and
More informationcase 4:12-cv RLM-APR document 10 filed 02/27/12 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
case 4:12-cv-00002-RLM-APR document 10 filed 02/27/12 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION TRUSTEES OF THE INDIANA STATE ) COUNCIL OF ROOFERS HEALTH
More informationCase 2:16-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1
Case 2:16-cv-02068-SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1 Liza M. Walsh Christine I. Gannon CONNELL FOLEY LLP One Newark Center 1085 Raymond Blvd., 19 th Floor Newark, NJ 07102 Tel.: (973)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division - IN RE: BLACKWATER ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT LITIGATION Case No. 1:09-cv-615 Case No. 1:09-cv-616 Case No. 1:09-cv-617
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, CHARLES D.
Appellate Case: 17-4059 Document: 01019889341 01019889684 Date Filed: 10/23/2017 Page: 1 No. 17-4059 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
More informationCase 1:17-cv LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:17-cv-00681-LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RD LEGAL FUNDING, LLC and RD LEGAL FUNDING PARTNERS, LP, Plaintiffs, - against -
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS
Case 5:14-cv-00182-C Document 5 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1 STAMPS BROTHERS OIL & GAS LLC, for itself and all others similarly
More informationCase: 1:08-cv Document #: 30 Filed: 03/24/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:107
Case: 1:08-cv-00825 Document #: 30 Filed: 03/24/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:107 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MERIT MANAGEMENT GROUP, a Nevada limited partnership,
More informationCase 3:06-cr LAB Document 378 Filed 09/01/07 Page 1 of 3
Case :0-cr-0-LAB Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 0 Larry A. Hammond Arizona State Bar No. 000 Diane M. Meyers Arizona State Bar No. 0 OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona
More informationINDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk
July 23, 2013 INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge Chambers Courtroom Deputy Clerk United States Courthouse Ms. Gina Sicora 300 Quarropas Street (914) 390-4178
More informationCase , Document 34-1, 03/18/2016, , Page1 of 1
Case 16-413, Document 34-1, 03/18/2016, 1731407, Page1 of 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-857-8500
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 20 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Case 2:16-cv-10696 Document 20 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION CMH HOMES, INC. Petitioner, v.
More informationCase 3:12-cv MJR-PMF Document 83 Filed 10/03/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #806 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:12-cv-01072-MJR-PMF Document 83 Filed 10/03/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #806 CYRIL B. KORTE, JANE E. KORTE, and KORTE & LUITJOHAN CONTRACTORS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationCase 3:17-cv MPS Document 28 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:17-cv-01586-MPS Document 28 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ASHLEY BROOK SMITH, Plaintiff, No. 3:17-CV-1586-MPS v. JRK RESIDENTIAL GROUP, INC., Defendant.
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 155 Filed: 12/17/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1288 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:12-cv-05383 Document #: 155 Filed: 12/17/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1288 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS U. S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. PEREGRINE
More informationCase 4:18-cv JSW Document 18 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-0-jsw Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 0 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP SHAWN A. WILLIAMS ( Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: /- /- (fax shawnw@rgrdlaw.com
More informationCase 2:12-cv RAJ Document 13 Filed 10/25/12 Page 1 of 16
Case :-cv-00-raj Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 0 THE TULALIP TRIBES OF WASHINGTON v. Plaintiff, STATE OF WASHINGTON; WASHINGTON STATE GAMBLING
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:00-mc-00005-DPH Doc # 1353 Filed 01/10/18 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 21734 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: CASE NO. 00-CV-00005-DT (Settlement Facility Matters)
More information2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 11/03/14 Entry Number 27 Page 1 of 13
2:14-cv-04010-RMG Date Filed 11/03/14 Entry Number 27 Page 1 of 13 Colleen Therese Condon and Anne Nichols Bleckley, Plaintiffs, v. Nimrata (Nikki Randhawa Haley, in her official capacity as Governor of
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- Tele-Consultants, Inc. Under Contract No. 000000-00-0-0000 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) ASBCA No. 58129 Thomas 0. Mason, Esq. Francis E.
More informationconsidering appointing, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Case 1:11-cv-10230-MLW Document 173 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-WQH -NLS Document Filed 0// Page of 0 CHINMAX MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC., a Chinese Corporation, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Case 2:15-cv-05867-CAS-JPR Document 78-14 Filed 07/27/16 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1276 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney DOROTHY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-04776-LMM Document 35 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION RHONDA J. MARTIN, et al., v. BRIAN KEMP, et al.,
More informationCase 3:16-cv REP Document 24 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 447
Case 3:16-cv-00467-REP Document 24 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 447 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION CARROLL BOSTON CORRELL, JR., on behalf
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BID PROTEST
Case 1:15-cv-01033-SGB Document 27-2 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BID PROTEST Number 15-1033C Judge Susan G. Braden OCTO CONSULTING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: Bobby Saadian, Esq. SBN: 0 Colin M. Jones, Esq. SBN: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM 0 Wilshire Blvd., th Floor Los Angeles, California 000 Tel: () - Fax: () - Attorneys
More informationEX PARTE MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON CHARLES H. MOORE S JOINDER TO MOTION OF THE CREDITORS
0 Kenneth H. Prochnow (SBN ) Robert C. Chiles (SBN 0) Chiles and Prochnow, LLP 00 El Camino Real Suite Palo Alto, CA 0 Telephone: 0--000 Facsimile: 0--00 email: kprochnow@chilesprolaw.com email: rchiles@chilesprolaw.com
More informationCase 1:16-md GAO Document 381 Filed 08/17/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:16-md-02677-GAO Document 381 Filed 08/17/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE: DAILY FANTASY SPORTS LITIGATION 1:16-md-02677-GAO DEFENDANTS
More informationCase 3:15-cv GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:15-cv-00681-GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION VAUGHAN SCOTT, Movant, VS. Civil Action No. 15-cv-
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/2016 05:58 PM INDEX NO. 654871/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2016 Case 1:16-cv-07734 Document 1 Filed 10/03/16 Page 1 of 7 Anne B. Sekel, Esq. FOLEY &
More informationEmployment Application
Employment Application Applicants are considered for all positions without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender, sexual/gender identity, national origin, age, marital
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership; UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation; VIRGIN RECORDS
More informationILLINOIS. Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter /5(h)
ILLINOIS Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 20 2630/5(h) (h) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act to the contrary and cumulative with any rights to expungement of criminal records, whenever
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED JUL 18 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS JANE ROES, 1-2, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
More informationCase 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3
Case :-cv-0-hsg Document 0 Filed // Page of 0 JUSTIN M. SANDBERG, IL. BAR NO. 00 L Street NW Washington, D.C. 000 Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0-0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
More informationCase 5:14-cv JPB Document 50 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 267
Case 5:14-cv-00039-JPB Document 50 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 267 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/2016 10:52 AM INDEX NO. 154973/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationCase 0:18-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2018 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.
Case 0:18-cv-60530-UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2018 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. ENVISION HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, and SHERIDAN HEALTHCORP,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Green v. LifeVest Publishing, Inc. et al Doc. 63 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action File No. 09-cv-00925-PAB-MEH WENDY GREEN, individually
More informationCase 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778
Case 3:13-cv-04987-M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ILIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NINTENDO
More informationPRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 16-3356 ALISSA MOON; YASMEEN DAVIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. BREATHLESS INC, a/k/a Vision Food
More informationCase 1:18-cv TCW Document 218 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BID PROTEST
Case 1:18-cv-00204-TCW Document 218 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BID PROTEST FMS Investment Corp. et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant, and PERFORMANT
More informationCase 1:16-cv ABJ Document 8 Filed 05/02/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-01976-ABJ Document 8 Filed 05/02/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FADI ELSALAMEEN Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-cv-1976 (ABJ) BANK OF PALESTINE,
More informationDean Schomburg;v. Dow Jones & Co Inc
2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-14-2012 Dean Schomburg;v. Dow Jones & Co Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 12-2415
More informationCase pwb Doc 1097 Filed 11/26/14 Entered 11/26/14 10:26:12 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9
Document Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 CGLA LIQUIDATION, INC., f/k/a Cagle s, Case No. 11-80202-PWB Inc., CF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:08-cv-02117-P Document 68 Filed 11/18/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID 943 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY; BOYD L. RICHIE, in his capacity
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
-WMC SEC v. Presto, et al Doc. 1 1 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, PRESTO TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., AND ALFRED LOUIS VASSALLO,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendants-Appellants.
Appellate Case: 18-4038 Document: 01019969195 Date Filed: 04/03/2018 Page: 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Plaintiff-Appellee, Case No.: 18-4038
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:08-cv-02117-P Document 15 Filed 12/19/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY; BOYD L. RICHIE, in his capacity as
More informationRULES OF COURT of the TWENTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. Revised Effective April 1, Table of Contents
RULES OF COURT of the TWENTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Revised Effective April 1, 2015 Table of Contents General Provisions Application of Rules. Business Hours, Days and Holidays. Schedule of Regular Days.
More informationCase 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01295-TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-CV-01295 v. UNITED STATES
More informationCase 5:10-cv HRL Document 65 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-HRL Document Filed 0// Page of 0 E-filed 0//0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 HAYLEY HICKCOX-HUFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. US AIRWAYS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case
More informationCase 2:11-cv BSJ Document 460 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:11-cv-00099-BSJ Document 460 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 10 Alan Edelman aedelman@cftc.gov James H. Holl, III jholl@cftc.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 1155 21
More informationCase 1:08-cv Document 49 Filed 12/22/09 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:08-cv-07200 Document 49 Filed 12/22/09 Page 1 of 9 David Bourke, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff, v. No. 08 C 7200 Judge James B. Zagel County
More informationCase 1:11-cv MCW Document 104 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:11-cv-00445-MCW Document 104 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS TEKTEL, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 11-445C ) (Judge Coster Williams) THE UNITED STATES,
More informationCase 0:17-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2017 Page 1 of 6. Case No. 0:17-cv BB RICHARD WIGGINS,
Case 0:17-cv-60468-BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION ASKER B. ASKER, BASSAM ASKAR,
More informationCase 3:14-cv B Document 8-2 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID 68 EXHIBIT B
Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID 68 EXHIBIT B Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 Filed 03/11/14 Page 2 of 24 PageID 69 Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 Filed 03/11/14
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit CLEVELAND ASSETS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee 2017-2113 Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case No. 7:14-CV F
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case No. 7:14-CV-00295-F UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, $107,702.66 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED
More informationCase 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 7:18-cv-00321 Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARTIN ORBACH and PHILLIP SEGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NON-UNION PLAN, EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED
More informationCase AJC Doc 303 Filed 03/19/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION
Case 16-20516-AJC Doc 303 Filed 03/19/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION IN RE: PROVIDENCE FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS INC. and PROVIDENCE FIXED INCOME
More information