Cambios en el el reglamento EPC desde el el 1 de abril de 2010: a a correr!
|
|
- Madlyn Goodman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Cambios en el el reglamento EPC desde el el 1 de abril de 2010: a a correr! Anna Barlocci, Mathieu de de Rooij Agentes de de Patentes Europeas ZBM Patents Zea, Zea, Barlocci & Markvardsen de de Mayo de de "Los Lunes de de Patentes" Madrid Centre de de Patents de de la la Universitat de de Barcelona Oficina Española de de Patentes y Marcas
2 Programa Objetivo de la EPO al introducir los cambios Overview de los principales cambios (situación anterior / cambio / aplicación / entrada en vigor): Menor flexibilidad en la búsqueda Obligación de responder a las objeciones manifestadas por el examinador en un informe de búsqueda de la EPO Menos posibilidades de modificar voluntariamente las reivindicaciones Severas restricciones a la presentación de solicitudes divisionarias Consecuencias para solicitantes y agentes Discusión de posibles estrategias 2
3 Objective of the EPO: increase procedural efficiency Source: EPO 3
4 Less flexibility in the search (1) Previous practice If non-unity: the examiner searched only the first invention. Further search fees payable to have other inventions searched If no meaningful search possible (lack of clarity, lack of conciseness, insufficiency,...): the examiner issued a nosearch or partial search communication under R.63 If several independent claims in the same category, with unity but not meeting R. 43(2): all claims searched later, in examination, only one (any of them) could be prosecuted 4
5 Less flexibility in the search (2) Rule 43(2) (unamended) (2) Without prejudice to Article 82, a European patent application may contain more than one independent claim in the same category (product, process, apparatus or use) only if the subject-matter of the application involves one of the following: (a) a plurality of interrelated products, (b) different uses of a product or apparatus, (c) alternative solutions to a particular problem, where it is inappropriate to cover these alternatives by a single claim. 5
6 Less flexibility in the search (3) Changes Rule 62a - Applications containing a plurality of independent claims (new) Rule 63 - Incomplete search (amended) 6
7 Less flexibility in the search (4) Rule 62a - Applications containing a plurality of independent claims (1) If the European Patent Office considers that the claims as filed do not comply with Rule 43, paragraph 2, it shall invite the applicant to indicate, within a period of two months, the claims complying with Rule 43, paragraph 2, on the basis of which the search is to be carried out. If the applicant fails to provide such an indication in due time, the search shall be carried out on the basis of the first claim in each category. (2) The Examining Division shall invite the applicant to restrict the claims to the subject-matter searched unless it finds that the objection under paragraph 1 was not justified. 7
8 Less flexibility in the search (5) Rule 63 Incomplete search (1) If the European Patent Office considers that the European patent application fails to such an extent to comply with this Convention that it is impossible to carry out a meaningful search regarding the state of the art on the basis of all or some of the subject-matter claimed, it shall invite the applicant to file, within a period of two months, a statement indicating the subject-matter to be searched. (2) If the statement under paragraph 1 is not filed in due time, or if it is not sufficient to overcome the deficiency noted under paragraph 1, the European Patent Office shall either issue a reasoned declaration stating that the European patent application fails to such an extent to comply with this Convention that it is impossible to carry out a meaningful search regarding the state of the art on the basis of all or some of the subject-matter claimed or, as far as is practicable, draw up a partial search report. The reasoned declaration or the partial search report shall be considered, for the purposes of subsequent proceedings, as the European search report..../... 8
9 Less flexibility in the search (6) Rule 63 Incomplete search (cont.).../... (3) When a partial search report has been drawn up, the Examining Division shall invite the applicant to restrict the claims to the subject-matter searched unless it finds that the objection under paragraph 1 was not justified. 9
10 Less flexibility in the search (7) New situation If non-unity: no changes If several independent claims in one category: only one searched (unless "no particular effort", as before); no possibility of paying further search fees If no meaningful search possible: the examiner asks the applicant for a "statement" before searching or issuing partial search / no search declaration Unsearched subject matter must be deleted from the claims 10
11 Overview of changes Less flexibility in the search Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion Amendments Time limit for filing divisionals 11
12 Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion (1) Previous practice Euro-direct applications: issue of EESR (objections) request for examination issue of "clone" office action reply to office action EESR (opt. reply) REQ.EX OA REPLY Euro-PCT applications: issue of EPO-ISR in int. phase (objections) entry in regional phase and request for examination issue of "clone" office action reply to office action EPO-ISR (opt. reply) REG.PH. OA REPLY 12
13 Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion (2) Rule 70 Request for examination (unamended) (1) The applicant may request examination of the European patent application up to six months after the date on which the European Patent Bulletin mentions the publication of the European search report. The request may not be withdrawn. (2) If the request for examination has been filed before the European search report has been transmitted to the applicant, the European Patent Office shall invite the applicant to indicate, within a period to be specified, whether he wishes to proceed further with the application, and shall give him the opportunity to comment on the search report and to amend, where appropriate, the description, claims and drawings. (...) 13
14 Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion (3) Changes Rule 70a - Response to the extended European search report (new) Rule Amendment of the application (Euro-PCT) (amended) No change in practice if there are no objections in EESR or EPO-ISA 14
15 Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion (4) Rule 70a - Response to the extended European search report (1) In the opinion accompanying the European search report the European Patent Office shall give the applicant the opportunity to comment on the extended European search report and, where appropriate, invite him to correct any deficiencies noted in the opinion accompanying the European search report and to amend the description, claims and drawings within the period referred to in Rule 70, paragraph 1. 15
16 Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion (4) Rule 70a - Response to the extended European search report (Cont.) (2) In the case referred to in Rule 70, paragraph 2, or if a supplementary European search report is drawn up on a Euro-PCT-application, the European Patent Office shall give the applicant the opportunity to comment on the extended European search report and, where appropriate, invite him to correct any deficiencies noted in the opinion accompanying the European search report and to amend the description, claims and drawings within the period specified for indicating whether he wishes to proceed further with the application. (6 months, see Guid. C-VI-111, A-VI-2.3) (3) If the applicant neither complies with nor comments on an invitation in accordance with paragraph 1 or 2, the application shall be deemed to be withdrawn. 16
17 Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion (5) Rule 161 Amendment of the application (1) If the European Patent Office has acted as the International Searching Authority and, where a demand under Article 31 PCT was filed, also as the International Preliminary Examining Authority for a Euro-PCT application, it shall give the applicant the opportunity to comment on the written opinion of the International Searching Authority or the International Preliminary Examination Report and, where appropriate, invite him to correct any deficiencies noted in the written opinion or in the International Preliminary Examination Report and to amend the description, claims and drawings within a period of one month from the respective communication. If the European Patent Office has drawn up a supplementary international search report, an invitation in accordance with the first sentence shall be issued in respect of the explanations given in accordance with Rule 45bis.7(e) PCT. If the applicant does not comply with or comment on an invitation in accordance with the first or second sentence, the application shall be deemed to be withdrawn..../... 17
18 Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion (6) Rule 161 Amendment of the application (cont.) (2) Where the European Patent Office draws up a supplementary European search report on a Euro-PCT application, the application may be amended once within a period of one month from a communication informing the applicant accordingly. The application as amended shall serve as the basis for the supplementary European search. (Thus, as in previous practice, if EPO was not ISA/IPEA, amendment of Euro-PCT before EPO is possible within one month from communication R.161, before EPO draws up supplementary ESR) 18
19 Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion (7) Direct European applications: 6 mo EESR Publ. EESR Request examination Reply EESR 19
20 Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion (8) Euro-PCT applications where EPO not ISA: 1 mo 6 mo ISR not EPO Euro-PCT Entry reg. phase Comm. R.161 Amend claims? SESR Confirm exam. Reply SESR 20
21 Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion (9) Euro-PCT applications where EPO is ISA: < 2 mo 1 mo ISR from EPO Euro-PCT Entry reg. phase Comm. R.161 Amend claims? Reply SESR No reply required if amendments Art 19/Art 34 PCT were filed, provided the amended claims are maintained in Euro-PCT; or if amended claims are filed upon entry, before issue of comm. R
22 Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion (10) New situation EESR / EPO-ISR/ SESR treated in practice like an office action Reply to objections must be filed earlier Tight time limit in Euro-PCT when EPO was ISA Further processing (Art 121) available if no reply Office action issued if "incomplete" reply 22
23 Overview of changes Less flexibility in the search Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion Amendments Time limit for filing divisionals 23
24 Previous practice Amendments (1) Applicant could amend the description, claims and drawings of his own volition, After receipt of ESR, and After receipt of first office action Amended claims could not relate to unsearched subjectmatter which did not combine with the originally claimed invention to form a single inventive concept Identifying amendments and their basis required by EPO 24
25 Amendments (2) Changes Rule 137 (2), (3) - opportunity for amendments of applicant's own volition (amended) Rule 137 (4) - identification and basis (new) Rule 137 (5) subject-matter of amended claims (amended) 25
26 Amendments (3) Rule Amendment of the European patent application (1) Before receiving the European search report, the applicant may not amend the description, claims or drawings of a European patent application unless otherwise provided. (2) Together with any comments, corrections or amendments made in response to communications by the European Patent Office under Rule 70a, paragraph 1 or 2, or Rule 161, paragraph 1, the applicant may amend the description, claims and drawings of his own volition. (3) No further amendment may be made without the consent of the Examining Division. 26
27 Amendments (4) Rule Amendment of the European patent application (cont.) (4) When filing any amendments referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3, the applicant shall identify them and indicate the basis for them in the application as filed. If the Examining Division notes a failure to meet either requirement, it may request the correction of this deficiency within a period of one month. (if no reply: application deemed withdrawn. Further processing (Art 121) available) (5) Amended claims may not relate to unsearched subject-matter which does not combine with the originally claimed invention or group of inventions to form a single general inventive concept. Nor may they relate to subject-matter not searched in accordance with Rule 62a or Rule
28 Amendments (5) New situation Only one opportunity to amend of own volition Such voluntary amendments must be filed early Identification/basis of amendments legal requirement Claims not searched under new rules cannot be introduced later on 28
29 Overview of changes Less flexibility in the search Compulsory reply to EPO search opinion Amendments Time limit for filing divisionals 29
30 Time limit for filing divisionals (1) Previous practice A divisional application could be filed at any time up to the grant of the parent application The parent application could be itself a divisional from an earlier application ("chains" of divisionals were possible)
31 Time limit for filing divisionals (2) Changes Rule 36 (1) Conditions for filing European divisional applications (amended) Rule 36 (2) - language of divisionals (amended)
32 Time limit for filing divisionals (3) Rule 36 - European divisional applications (1) The applicant may file a divisional application relating to any pending earlier European patent application, provided that: (a) the divisional application is filed before the expiry of a time limit of twenty-four months from the Examining Division's first communication in respect of the earliest application for which a communication has been issued, or (b) the divisional application is filed before the expiry of a time limit of twenty-four months from any communication in which the Examining Division has objected that the earlier application does not meet the requirements of Article 82, provided it was raising that specific objection for the first time. (...)
33 Time limit for filing divisionals (4) Voluntary divisionals R.36(1)(a) clear case 1 24 mo EP filing EESR EP1 PCT filing ISR Reply to SR 1st OA Deadline all Grant / ref. / Divisionals withdr. / d.w. R.36(1)(a) div. EP2 filing
34 Time limit for filing divisionals (5) Voluntary divisionals R. 36(1)(a) clear case 2 24 mo EP filing EESR EP1 Reply to SR 1st OA Grant / ref. / withdr. / d.w. PCT filing ISR Deadline divisionals
35 Time limit for filing divisionals (6) Voluntary divisionals R. 36(1)(a) clear case 3 24 mo EP filing EESR PCT filing ISR Reply to SR 1st OA filing Grant / ref. / withdr. / d.w. Deadline Divisionals of EP1 Deadline Divisionals of EP2 R.36(1)(a) EP1 div. EP2
36 Time limit for filing divisionals (7) Voluntary divisionals R. 36(1)(a) clear (?) case 4 24 mo EP1 Filing - ISR/EESR - reply EPO info: filing 1st OA 1st OA 24 mo?! div EP2 Deadline all divisionals R.36(1)(a)??? (here EP1) But R.36(1)(a): "... first communication in respect of the earliest application for which a communication has been issued" (here EP2)
37 Time limit for filing divisionals (8) Mandatory divisionals R.36(1)(b) clear case 5 24 mo EP1 1st OA no lack of unity Deadline all Divisionals R.36(1)(a) 24 mo div. EP2 filing OA lack of unity Deadline Divisionals R.36(1)(b)
38 Time limit for filing divisionals (9) Mandatory divisionals R.36(1)(b) (maybe) clear case 6 24 mo 24 mo 24 mo EP1 1st OA no lack of unity Deadline Divisionals R.36(1)(a) OA lack of unity A-B Deadline Divisionals R.36(1)(b) OA lack of unity C-D New deadline Divisionals R.36(1)(b) EPO info:
39 Time limit for filing divisionals (10) Triggers for 24-mo time limits 1st OA = 1st comm. Art 94(3), or comm. R.71(3) if 1st If the 1st OA is the intention to grant, then the deadline for filing divisionals will most likely be the grant of the parent (well before 24 mo.) EESR/SESR are not OA and do not trigger time limit 24-mo for mandatory divisionals also triggered by interview, phone call, summons to OP, OP,...
40 Time limit for filing divisionals (11) New situation Only "safe" time limit: 24 mo. from first OA issued for any application in the sequence Further 24 mo. from non-unity objection raised for the first time, if you can get one from examiner (can you?) Objection under R.137(5) not a non-unity objection, no new 24-mo. time limit Objection under R. 43(2) not a non-unity objection, no new 24-mo. time limit If time limit missed: Further processing (Art. 121) not available Re-establishment (Art. 122) possible if conditions met
41 Summary of changes Source: EPO
42 Entry into force / transitional provisions New Rules 62a, 63, 70a, 137: apply to EESR/SESR drawn up from 1st of April 2010 New Rule 161: applies to Euro-PCT applications for which R.161 communication is issued from 1st of April 2010 New Rule 36: for applications for which the 1st OA has already been issued before 1st of April 2010, divisionals may be filed at least until 1st of October 2010.
43 Doubts and difficulties (1) Maybe some inconsistency between rules and information provided by EPO? e.g. 24-mo of R.36(1)(a) counted from 1st communication in earliest application for which a communication has been issued, or from first communication in earliest application of sequence? Uncertainty until BA case law developed Potential changes in interpretation against applicant's interests: keep on the safe side!
44 Doubts and difficulties (2) How will examiners apply the new rules? Higher degree of discretion (or more relevance) e.g. objections Art. 82 / Rule 43(2) if several independent claims are filed during prosecution: according to C-III-3.3, "Where the application also lacks unity of invention, the examiner may raise an objection under either Rule 43(2) or Art. 82 or under both. The applicant cannot contest which of these objections has priority (see T 1073/98, Reasons 7.2)." Also possible objection R.137(2),(3) not time for own-volition amendments No possibility to appeal
45 Consequences for applicants/attorneys (1) Less possibilities to have several aspects searched at an early stage, in one application Unsearched subject matter cannot continue, but filing of divisionals restricted Less possibilities to choose invention to be prosecuted in the application Shorter time limits to file replies and to decide on subject-matter to be protected In general, shorter prosecution times and earlier expenses
46 Consequences for applicants/attorneys (2) Uncertainty especially about the possibility to obtain additional time for mandatory divisionals (even if the non-unity situation "really" arises during prosecution!) Advice to clients difficult Tighter time limits Broad range of strategies available (many not yet safe), depending on particular case and client
47 Potential remedies/strategies (1) (not necessarily useful or efficient...!) Delay prosecution using further processing, not filing indication and basis of amendments, etc. (little time advantage!) Study EESR/ISR/SESR as early as possible File incomplete reply to EESR/ISR/SESR to obtain a 1st OA on similar objections to those of SR (risk: 1st OA "easy" and issued early) If R.43(2) objection in examination, argue that claims fall in R43(2)(c) case (case law not too clear)
48 Potential remedies/strategies (2) (not necessarily useful or efficient...!) File "precautionary" divisionals at the end of the first 24-mo time limit (expensive!) With non-unity, to trigger new time limit (no guarantee that objection will be non-unity!) Repeat with a further divisional, with a different lack of unity, to get another time limit (EPO will try to avoid!) File early divisional, accelerate: assess patentability before the 24-mo deadline is triggered by 1st OA in parent (expensive; maybe change in EPO interpret.?)
49 Potential remedies/strategies (3) (not necessarily useful or efficient...!) Obtain early information on the patentability of all potentially interesting subject-matter Design the strategy depending on the information available and the likelihood of needing divisionals Make sure that each divisional contains all the subject matter you may want to later divide this may involve adding some sort of claim structure into the description
50 Potential remedies/strategies (4) (not necessarily useful or efficient...!) If several claims not complying with R.43(2) Add broad main claim even if barely new or not new, or claim with alternatives, to avoid R.62a(1) problem (still risk of R.63 objection or non-unity a posteriori) File PCT to obtain complete search (US provis. then unnecessary) with EPO/ISA to avoid SESR in Euro-PCT and be able to choose claims to be prosecuted in exam (who will make the search?)
51 Potential remedies/strategies (5) (not necessarily useful or efficient...!) If non-unity Pay additional search fees to assess patentability and evaluate interest to file divisionals Amend when replying to the EESR/ISR, to avoid lack of unity objection in 1st OA Later you can file divisionals (and get a refund of the search fees paid in the search stage)
52 Potential remedies/strategies (6) (not necessarily useful or efficient...!) Euro-PCT from foreign clients Discuss advantages/drawbacks of EPO as ISA (if choice possible) Recommend early review of claims by EP attorney, well before regional phase deadline, and preferably even before filing PCT
53 Your opinions, doubts, strategies,...? Gracias por vuestra atención Gracias por vuestra atención
JETRO seminar. Recent Rule change and latest developments at the EPO:
JETRO seminar Recent Rule change and latest developments at the EPO: Alfred Spigarelli Director Patent procedures management DG1 Business services EPO Düsseldorf 4 November, 2010 Overview RAISING THE BAR
More informationpct2ep.com Guide to claim amendment after EPO regional phase entry
pct2ep.com Guide to claim amendment after EPO regional phase entry Claim amendments in the EPO Guide to the issues to consider After a PCT application enters the EPO regional phase, and before any search
More informationRaising the Bar and EPC changes as from 1 April 2010
Platform Formalities Officers 1 st Annual Formalities Officers Conference Rijswijk, 11 March 2010 Raising the Bar and EPC changes as from 1 April 2010 Luise Zimmermann European Patent Office Content Raising
More informationThe effects of the EPC
The effects of the EPC The second round of amendments to the European Patent Convention Implementing Regulations is imminent By Paul-Alexander Wacker and Stephan Kopp, Kuhnen & Wacker IP firm, Freising
More informationPCT procedure before the EPO as International Authority. Camille-Rémy Bogliolo Head, Department of PCT Affairs
PCT procedure before the EPO as International Authority Camille-Rémy Bogliolo Head, Department of PCT Affairs Madrid, 3 November 2016 PCT procedure before the EPO as ISA and IPEA Informal clarification
More informationManaging costs and timeliness at EPO & UKIPO. Mike Jennings A.A.Thornton & Co October 2017
Managing costs and timeliness at EPO & UKIPO Mike Jennings A.A.Thornton & Co October 2017 Patent attorneys don t like: Excessive official fees such as EPO fees on entry to PCT regional phase may deter
More informationDETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface... v v About the Authors... xiii vii Summary Table of Contents... xv ix Chapter 1. European Patent Law as International Law... 1 I. European Patent Law Arises From Multiple
More informationTable 1: General overview of the PCT procedure Legend:
Table 1: General overview of the PCT procedure EPC: European Patent Convention OJ: EPO Official Journal RO: Receiving Office IB: International Bureau Copy of priority document [ I.8.2] IPEA: International
More informationFC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017
Question 1 Part A Your UK-based client, NC Ltd, employs 50 people and is about to file a new US patent application, US1, claiming priority from a GB patent application, GB0. US1 is not subject to any licensing.
More informationTable of Contents I INTERNATIONAL PHASE BEFORE THE RECEIVING OFFICE AND INTERNATIONAL BUREAU.. 14
Table of Contents I INTERNATIONAL PHASE BEFORE THE RECEIVING OFFICE AND INTERNATIONAL BUREAU.. 14 I.1. Who can file a PCT application?... 19 I.1.1. US law and the applicant (declaration of inventorship)...
More informationFoundation Certificate
Foundation Certificate International Patent Law FC3 Friday 13 October 2017 10:00 to 13:00 INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES 1. You should attempt five of questions 1 to 6. 2. Each question carries 20 marks. 3.
More informationDIFFICULT EPO ACTIONS TO DOCKET uithe Reliability of your IP Data your IP Data Integrity: How to Ruin the Reliability of your IP Data
DIFFICULT EPO ACTIONS TO DOCKET uithe Reliability of your IP Data your IP Data Integrity: How to Ruin the Reliability of your IP Data Difficult EPO Docketing Items Presenters and panelists: o Ann McCrackin,
More informationPCT developments. U.S. Bar-EPO Partnership for Quality meeting
PCT developments U.S. Bar-EPO Partnership for Quality meeting Niclas Morey, John Beatty 12 May 2015 Topics Lifting of EPO limitation in business methods PCT developments - address for correspondence PCT
More informationCandidate's Answer - DI
Candidate's Answer - DI Candidate's Answer - DI Question 1 Deadline for entering European Regional Phase = 31 m from filing date or priority date if priority is claimed (Art 39(1)(b) PCT, R107 EPC). No
More informationR 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is
Candidate s Answer DII 1. HVHF plugs + PP has: US2 - granted in US (related to US 1) EP1 - pending before EPO + + for all states LBP has: FR1 - France - still pending? EP2 - granted for DE, ES, FR, GB
More informationand Examination Reports
Interpreting and Utilizing Search and Examination Reports WIPO Sub-Regional Workshop, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 29.11.-01.12.2011 Steffen Wolf, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany Work-sharing: Information
More informationPart IV. Fees payable on entering the European regional phase. Fees - general remarks
IV.7.5. extend beyond the originally filed contents of the application in the original language, then the application in its original language can form the basis for such an amendment, which is consequently
More informationPart IV. IV.7. Republication of the international application in an EPO official language. Fees payable on entering the European regional phase
IV.7. Republication of the international application in an EPO official language Art.158(1) EPC The publication under Art.21 PCT of an international application designating the EPO takes the place of the
More informationPart II. Time limit for completing the International search. Application not searched
II.6. Time limit for completing the International search Art.18(1) PCT The International search report must be ready within the prescribed time limit. R42.1 PCT The International search report (or the
More informationPART I IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO PART I OF THE CONVENTION
EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the grant of European Patents as last amended on 15 October 2014 enter into force on 1 April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I IMPLEMENTING
More informationPatent Administrators Course 2015 Final Examination Answers
Patent Administrators Course 2015 Final Examination Answers Full marks are still available for answers which do not contain the matter in square brackets [ ] below. Question 1 15 marks. Deduct 0.5 marks
More informationQUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report
QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% Question 1 a) Deadline for validating granted European patent in EPC six months after the publication of European search report 0 b) i) Germany
More informationUnderstanding and Utilization of the ISR and WOISA. Shunsuke YAMAMOTO Examination Standards Office Japan Patent Office
Understanding and Utilization of the ISR and WOISA Shunsuke YAMAMOTO Examination Standards Office Japan Patent Office 2016.09 What are the ISR and the WOISA? ISR The result of the international search
More informationAGREEMENT. between the European Patent Organisation and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization
AGREEMENT between the European Patent Organisation and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization in relation to the functioning of the European Patent Office as an International
More informationSpeed of processing at the EPO. Timely delivery of quality products
Speed of processing at the EPO Timely delivery of quality products John Beatty EPO September 18 th, 2017 Agenda Early certainty: 6 / 12 / 15 Accelerating & shortening the procedure: Your choices! Quality
More informationPatent Fees and Pricing: Structures and Policies
Patent Fees and Pricing: Structures and Policies The Output of R&D activities: Harnessing the Power of Patent Data JRC-IPTS 4 th Workshop Nikolaus Thumm, EPO Chief Economist Sevilla 24 May, 2012 Background
More informationImplementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents
Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of 5 October 1973 as adopted by decision of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation of 7 December 2006
More informationChapter 1800 Patent Cooperation Treaty
Chapter 1800 Patent Cooperation Treaty 1801 Basic Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Principles 1802 PCT Definitions 1803 Reservations Under the PCT Taken by the United States of America 1805 Where to File
More informationRevision of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal
Revision of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal Revised public draft, for presentation at the User consultation conference on 5 December 2018 25 October 2018 Deletions are struck through; additions/modifications
More informationStrategic Use of the PCT:
Strategic Use of the PCT: A US User s Perspective David Reed, Consultant, PCT Legal Division, WIPO Published 22 July 2011 This presentation draws upon a wealth of practical filing experience and presents
More informationFICPI & AIPLA Colloquium, June 2007 A Comprehensive Approach to Patent Quality
FICPI & AIPLA Colloquium, June 2007 A Comprehensive Approach to Patent Quality Deficiencies in patent applications and problems created by applicants and attorneys Author : J Pearce, EPO Date : 8 June
More informationThe trial period of this Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) pilot program will commence on December 1 st 2016 and will end on November 30 th 2018.
Procedure for filing a request with regarding the Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program between the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property () and the Austrian Patent Office (APO) The trial period
More informationPATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT): BENEFITS AND STRATEGIES FOR APPLICANTS. Seminar on WIPO Services and Initiatives Gary L. Montle Nashville, TN
PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT): BENEFITS AND STRATEGIES FOR APPLICANTS Seminar on WIPO Services and Initiatives Gary L. Montle Nashville, TN April 13, 2016 Topics for Discussion General considerations
More informationQUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 51%
QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 5% Question A a) The client does qualify.5(i) as the number of employees must be 5 or fewer b) A micro entity must be an individual with 4 or fewer
More informationPatents: opposition proceedings and nullity actions a comparison between Europe and Japan
Murgitroyd and Sonoda & Kobayashi present Topic 1 Topic 2 Topic 3 Topic 4 Contact Patents: opposition proceedings and nullity actions a comparison between Europe and Japan Luca Escoffier Diane Beylier
More informationPart II PPH using the PCT international work products from the JPO
Procedures to file a request to the IMPI for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program between the IMPI (Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial) and the JPO (Japan Patent Office) Part I PPH using
More informationWhen a request for participation in the PPH pilot program is presented, the applicant must file a free style writing to IMPI.
Procedures to file a request to the for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program between the (Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial) and the KIPO (Korean Intellectual Property Office) Part I Mottainai
More informationFC3 International Patent Law Question Paper Sample Assessment Material
SECTION A Question 1 a) List six facts relating to utility models, at least one of which should relate to a difference between utility models and patents. b) Can utility models be obtained in Germany,
More informationAdded matter under the EPC. Chris Gabriel Examiner Directorate 1222
Added matter under the EPC Chris Gabriel Examiner Directorate 1222 April 2018 Contents Added matter under the EPC Basic principles under the EPC First to file Article 123(2) EPC Interpretation Gold standard
More informationSummary and Conclusions
Summary and Conclusions In this thesis, results are presented of a study on the alignment of the European Patent Convention and the Patent Cooperation Treaty with requirements of the Patent Law Treaty.
More informationUnity of inventions at the EPO - Amendments to rule 29 EPC
PATENTS Unity of inventions at the EPO - Amendments to rule 29 EPC This document presents provisions of the European Patent Convention regarding unity of invention and their applications by the EPO, both
More informationAGREEMENT. between the Finnish Patent and Registration Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization
AGREEMENT between the Finnish Patent and Registration Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization in relation to the functioning of the Finnish Patent and Registration
More informationINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (SERBIA)
PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter Page 1 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (SERBIA) AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY INTO THE NATIONAL PHASE SUMMARY THE PROCEDURE IN
More informationAGREEMENT. (as in force from September 1, 2018)*
AGREEMENT between the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization in relation to the functioning of the State Enterprise
More informationAgreement. (as in force from April 1, 2017)*
Agreement between the European Patent Organisation and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization in relation to the functioning of the European Patent Office as an International
More informationThe European patent system
The European patent system Presenter: Dominique Winne Examiner (ICT) 7 November 2017 Contents EPC PCT Granting procedure at the 2 1 Optional The patent system yesterday and today Senate of Venice, 1474
More informationIP LAW HARMONISATION: BEYOND THE STATUTE
IP LAW HARMONISATION: BEYOND THE STATUTE Harmonisation of the statutes Harmonisation of Patent Office practice Harmonisation of Court practice Dealing with increasing workloads Tony Maschio & John Lloyd
More informationOverview on EPO s Current Initiatives for Improving Timeliness. Heli Pihlajamaa Director Patent Law
Overview on EPO s Current Initiatives for Improving Timeliness Heli Pihlajamaa Director Patent Law 14 October 2016 Content Time matters Early Certainty Expediting the Proceedings Streamlined opposition
More informationProcedures and Requirements for Filing a Request for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program (PPH) at the National Institute of Industrial Property of the Argentine Republic (INPI). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationL 172/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union
L 172/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.7.2005 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1041/2005 of 29 June 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the
More informationDeferred examination of European patent applications. 2. German delegation 3. Netherlands delegation
CA/51/09 Orig.: en Munich, 06.03.2009 SUBJECT: SUBMITTED BY: ADDRESSEES: Deferred examination of European patent applications 1. Danish delegation 2. German delegation 3. Netherlands delegation Administrative
More informationTopic 1: Overview of Search and Examination under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)
Topic 1: Overview of Search and Examination under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Lutz Mailänder Head, Patent Information Section Global IP Infrastructure Sector Tokio 26 November 2013 Agenda PCT system
More informationProcedures to file a request to the JPO (Japan Patent Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program
Part I PPH using the national work products Procedures to file a request to the JPO (Japan Patent Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program Amended on July 6, 2017 Part I PPH using the national
More informationNews and analysis on IP law, regulation and policy from around the world. For the latest updates, visit
WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REPORT >>> News and analysis on IP law, regulation and policy from around the world. For the latest updates, visit www.bna.com International Information for International Business
More informationEUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO)
PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter Page 1 EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (O) AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY INTO THE NATIONAL PHASE SUMMARY THE PROCEDURE IN THE NATIONAL
More informationOutline of PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination PCT Workshop Tokyo February 27-March
Outline of PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination PCT Workshop Tokyo February 27-March 1 2013 Takashi Yamashita Director, PCT International Cooperation Division, WIPO Global patenting activities
More informationPatent Prosecution in Multiple Countries. Alessandro Steinfl U.S. and EP Patent Attorney
Alessandro Steinfl U.S. and EP Patent Attorney The problems 1. Timing Length of prosecution varies Request for Exam at time of filing or later Extensions of time to respond vary from country to country
More informationEUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO)
PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter Page 1 EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (O) AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY INTO THE NATIONAL PHASE SUMMARY THE PROCEDURE IN THE NATIONAL
More informationThe proposed amendments to the Rules of the Boards of Appeal. Patentee s Perspective. Bayerischer Patentanwaltsverein e.v.
The proposed amendments to the Rules of the Boards of Appeal Patentee s Perspective Bayerischer Patentanwaltsverein e.v. 13 November 2018 For discussion purposes only Dr. Hendrik Wichmann, Wuesthoff &
More informationDrafting, Filing and Processing of PCT Applications
Drafting, Filing and Processing of PCT Applications Mikhail GAVRIKOV WIPO Tehran, Iran June 18-19, 2014 What does РСТ filing include? Findings prior to PCT application drafting starts: when to file application?
More informationEPO boards of appeal decisions. Date of decision 25 November 1987
Abstract The Board of Appeal is of the opinion that the features of Claims 2-10 are interwoven with those of Claim 1 to such an extent that even when the subject-matter of Claim 1 or of Claim 1 and some
More informationKey to the European Patent Convention Edition Part VI
Key to the European Patent Convention Edition 2011 Part VI Article 106 - Decisions subject to appeal PART VI - APPEALS PROCEDURE Article 106 i - Decisions subject to appeal (1) An appeal shall lie from
More informationEUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO)
PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter Page 1 EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (O) AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY INTO THE NATIONAL PHASE SUMMARY THE PROCEDURE IN THE NATIONAL
More information2015 Noréns Patentbyrå AB
Self-Collision in patent applications How to Avoid Shooting Your Client in the Foot A European perspective with some thoughts on the global situation, including other jurisdictions Jan Modin FICPI Special
More informationSEEKING THE GOLD (STANDARD) Amendments before EPO. Marco Lissandrini European Patent Attorney
SEEKING THE GOLD (STANDARD) Amendments before EPO Marco Lissandrini European Patent Attorney TOPICS LEGAL FRAMEWORK: the basic principles REAL-LIFE EXAMPLES: take-away tips CONCLUSIONS: suggestions for
More informationAGREEMENT. between the Government of Israel and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization
AGREEMENT between the Government of Israel and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization in relation to the functioning of the Israel Patent Office as an International Searching
More informationRevision of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal. First public draft online user consultation. 1 February 2018
Revision of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal First public draft online user consultation 1 February 2018 Article 1 Business distribution and composition (1) The Presidium referred to in Rule
More informationAttachment: Opinions on the Draft Amendment of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law of the People s Republic of China
March 31, 2009 To: Legislative Affairs Office State Council People s Republic of China Hirohiko Usui President Japan Intellectual Property Association Opinions on the Draft Amendment of the Implementing
More informationPCT/GL/ISPE/1 Page 154 PART V WRITTEN OPINION/INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION REPORT
Page 154 PART V WRITTEN OPINION/INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION REPORT Chapter 17 Content of Written Opinions and the International Preliminary Examination Report Introduction 17.01 This chapter
More informationCIPA Introductory Certificate in Patent Administration Syllabus
Introduction - Structure of the syllabus This syllabus is set out as follows: 1. Information about the qualification. 2. The aims of the qualification. 3. A unit by unit description of the qualification
More informationFiling Requirements for a U.S. Patent Application. Emphasis on National Stage Applications 2017 BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLP
Filing Requirements for a U.S. Patent Application Emphasis on National Stage Applications 2017 BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLP TERMINOLOGY Different Names (most common)? Regular Priority application
More informationEUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE Guidelines for Examination Part E - Guidelines on General Procedural Matters Amended in December, 2007
EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE Guidelines for Examination Part E - Guidelines on General Procedural Matters Amended in December, 2007 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I COMMUNICATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS 1. Communications
More informationAGREEMENT. between the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization
AGREEMENT between the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization in relation to the functioning of the Spanish Patent and Trademark
More informationObvious mistakes and other corrections. Isabel Auría Lansac, Lawyer PCT Affairs Susana Ruiz Pérez, European Patent Attorney, COAPI
Obvious mistakes and other corrections Isabel Auría Lansac, Lawyer PCT Affairs Susana Ruiz Pérez, European Patent Attorney, COAPI Madrid, 25.10.2017 Overview Obvious mistakes A case: change of applicant
More informationBESCHWERDEKAMMERN DES EUROPÄISCHEN PATENTAMTS BOARDS OF APPEAL OF THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE CHAMBRES DE RECOURS DE L'OFFICE EUROPEEN DES BREVETS
Abstract A Euro-PCT applicant who has not carried out a certain procedural act within the time limit prescribed in the PCT can take advantage of the relevant provisions of the EPC concerning re-establishment
More informationContents. I. Introduction 1. II. Filing of European patent applications 1. III. Documents which may be filed with the competent national authorities 2
Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Filing of European patent applications 1 1. Place of filing 1 2. Method of filing 2 III. Documents which may be filed with the competent national authorities 2 1. Introduction
More informationProcedures to file a request to the SPTO (Spanish Patent and Trademark Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program
Procedures to file a request to the (Spanish Patent and Trademark Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program Part I PPH using the national work products Applicants can request accelerated examination
More informationGuide to WIPO Services
World Intellectual Property Organization Guide to WIPO Services Helping you protect inventions, trademarks & designs resolve domain name & other IP disputes The World Intellectual Property Organization
More informationHANDLING OF PATENT APPLICATIONS UNDER THE EPC
KRAMER BARSKE SCHMIDTCHEN PATENTA HANDLING OF PATENT APPLICATIONS UNDER THE EPC Dr. Ulla Allgayer Patent Attorney European Patent Attorney Munich, Germany March 2005 Radeckestr. 43, 81245 Munich, Germany,
More informationTopic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art
Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art Lutz Mailänder Head, International Cooperation on Examination and Training Section Harare September 22, 2017 Agenda Prior art in the presence of priorities Multiple
More informationPRACTICE TIPS FOR PATENT PROSECUTION BEFORE THE USPTO
PRACTICE TIPS FOR PATENT PROSECUTION BEFORE THE USPTO HERSHKOVITZ IP GROUP INTA 2012 WASHINGTON, D.C. www.hershkovitzipgroup.com Try to obtain written instructions (Order Letter) from client (the following
More informationPatents in Europe 2018/2019. Helping business compete in the global economy. How to prepare for oral proceedings for European patents
In association with How to prepare for oral proceedings for European patents NLO Hans Hutter and René van Duijvenbode Patents in Europe 2018/2019 Helping business compete in the global economy HOW TO FORTIFY
More informationPart I PPH using the national work products from the JPO
Part I PPH using the national work products from the JPO Procedures to file a request to the SIC (Colombian Superintendence of Industry and Commerce) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program between
More informationRegulations to the Norwegian Patents Act (The Patent Regulations)
Regulations to the Norwegian Patents Act (The Patent Regulations) This is an unofficial translation of the regulations to the Norwegian Patents Act. Should there be any differences between this translation
More informationEPO boards of appeal decisions. Date of decision 30 October 1991 Case number J 0042/
Abstract Applicants submitted an international application requesting a European patent (Euro-PCT application). A European application was subsequently submitted claiming priority of the Euro-PCT application.
More informationCA/102/17 Orig.: en Munich, Amendments of the Rules relating to Fees. President of the European Patent Office
CA/102/17 Orig.: en Munich, 6.10.2017 SUBJECT: SUBMITTED BY: ADDRESSEES: Amendments of the Rules relating to Fees President of the European Patent Office 1. Budget and Finance Committee (for opinion) 2.
More informationPatents: Utility Models Overview of requirements, procedures and tactical use in Europe and Japan
Murgitroyd and Sonoda & Kobayashi present Topic 1 Topic 2 Topic 3 Topic 4 Contact Patents: Utility Models Overview of requirements, procedures and tactical use in Europe and Japan Dr.sc. Robert Börner
More informationPart V. Time limits under the PCT. Computation of time limits
V.1. V.1.1. Time limits under the PCT The following sections relate to the computation of time limits (expressed in years, months or days), and to the possibility of extending them. Note that the following
More informationPATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
E PCT/GL/ISPE/6 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: June 6, 2017 PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) PCT INTERNATIONAL SEARCH AND PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION GUIDELINES (Guidelines for the Processing by International Searching
More informationThe Specification Proposed for Grant
The EPO Grant Phase - Briefing te Patents EPO Grant Phase A final stage in the successful prosecution of European patent applications is the issuance by the European Patent Office (EPO) of a tice of Allowance
More informationThe opposition procedure and limitation and revocation procedures
The opposition procedure and limitation and revocation procedures Closa Daniel Beaucé Gaëtan 26-30/11/2012 Contents Introduction Legal framework Procedure Intervention of the assumed infringer Observations
More informationINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (PHILIPPINES)
PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter Page 1 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (ILIPPINES) AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY INTO THE NATIONAL ASE SUMMARY THE PROCEDURE IN
More informationRegulations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. (as in force from July 1, 2018)
Regulations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (as in force from July 1, 2018) Editor s Note: For details concerning amendments to the Regulations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, and for access to
More informationPERU ANSWERS IN THE NAME OF THE PERUVIAN GROUP. by Maria del Carmen Arana Courrejolles QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PUBLICATION OF PATENT APPLICATIONS
PERU ANSWERS IN THE NAME OF THE PERUVIAN GROUP by Maria del Carmen Arana Courrejolles QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PUBLICATION OF PATENT APPLICATIONS Questions Groups are invited to answer the following questions
More informationEuropean patent prosecution
Houston Paris Austin Tokyo Hangzhou Alexandria European patent prosecution Tips to reduce costs while maintaining quality March 2, 2018 Francesca Giovannini European patent attorney giovannini@oshaliang.eu
More informationWSPLA (Wash. State Patent Law Assoc.) Lunch Seminar
WSPLA (Wash. State Patent Law Assoc.) Lunch Seminar Date: March 15, 2017 12:00-1:30~2:00 Place: Seattle, WA (Washington Athletic Club 1325 6 th Ave. Seattle 98101) 1 Dos and Don ts of US Inbound & Outbound
More informationAgreement. between the Nordic Patent Institute and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization
Agreement between the Nordic Patent Institute and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization in relation to the functioning of the Nordic Patent Institute as an International
More informationAGREEMENT. between the Indian Patent Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization
AGREEMENT between the Indian Patent Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization in relation to the functioning of the Indian Patent Office as an International Searching
More informationCA/97/16 Orig.: en Munich, President of the European Patent Office. Administrative Council (for information) SUMMARY
CA/97/16 Orig.: en Munich, 25.11.2016 SUBJECT: SUBMITTED BY: ADDRESSEES: Early Certainty President of the European Patent Office Administrative Council (for information) SUMMARY Delivering patents with
More informationROMANIA Patent Law NO.64/1991 OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO.613/19 AUGUST 2014
ROMANIA Patent Law NO.64/1991 OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO.613/19 AUGUST 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I - GENERAL PROVISIONS Art. 1 Art. 2 Art. 3 Art. 4 Art. 5 CHAPTER II - PATENTABLE INVENTIONS
More information