The opposition procedure and limitation and revocation procedures

Transcription

1 The opposition procedure and limitation and revocation procedures Closa Daniel Beaucé Gaëtan 26-30/11/2012

2 Contents Introduction Legal framework Procedure Intervention of the assumed infringer Observations by third parties Request for limitation or revocation

3 Introduction

4 What is an opposition? Post-grant procedure Allows public to challenge grant of patent it considers to have been wrongly granted May result in limitation or revocation of patent GL D I - 1

5 Reasons for opposing a patent Infringement Licensing/cross-licensing Strategy Patent intelligence Political/ethical reasons

6 The grant and opposition procedures compared Procedure up to grant ex parte Examining division Applicant Opposition Opposition division Code of conduct inter partes Proprietor Opponent Opponent Opponent

7 Opposition under the EPC Uniform, centralised procedure Allows public to limit or revoke European patents which it believes to have been wrongly granted

8 Opposition under the EPC: when? EPO grant procedure Publication of mention of grant Patent 9 months Opposition Effect as national patent Examination of opposition 1. Maintenance in amended form 2. Rejection of opposition 3. Revocation of patent

9 Oppositions in European patents granted 5.2% opposed Over one-third of all opposed patents revoked

10 Percentage of granted patents opposed, by field

11 Percentage of granted patents opposed, by origin

12 Oppositions filed online

13 Legal framework

14 Legal framework EPC Opposition procedure Articles , Rules Opposition division Article 19 Common provisions Articles Rules

15 Patent specification

16 Grounds for opposition Article 100 (a) Not novel No inventive step Not industrially applicable Excluded, excepted Art NOT lack of clarity or unity (b) (c) Insufficiently disclosed Amended beyond original disclosure Art 83 Art 123(2)

17 Article 101 EPC Article 101(1) Opposition division communicates with parties examines opposition Rule 79 Rule 81 Revocation Article 101(2)(3) Decision Rejection of opposition Maintenance in amended form

18 Procedure

19 Filing an opposition Article 99 - Any person* may file an opposition - Within 9 months of publication of mention of grant - Written reasoned statement required - Fee to be paid - Parties proprietor opponent * G 3/97: except proprietor

20 Overview of procedure after filing Formalities stage Allocation to an opposition division Examination and communications Decision Art. 101(2) and (3)

21 Formalities stage Receipt of notice of opposition R. 79(1) Copies to proprietor yes Deemed filed - fee in time Art.99(1) - fax confirmed - signatures - translations - representative no Deemed not filed Admissible? no Inadmissible yes Allocation to opposition division - not within 9 months - insufficient identification - no statement of extent R. 76(2)(c) - no grounds R. 76(2)(c) - no facts/evidence/arguments R. 76(2)(c) Guidelines D-IV

22 The notice of opposition Must meet the requirements of Art. 99(1) and Rule 76 Core issues: what and why? Rule 76(2)(c) The notice of opposition shall contain: (c) a statement of the extent to which the European patent is opposed and of the grounds on which the opposition is based, as well as an indication of the facts and evidence presented in support of these grounds

23 Rule 76(2)(c) Extent: What is opposed? The entire patent or only parts or embodiments thereof? All the claims, or just some of them? Grounds: Opponent must cite at least one of the grounds under Art. 100, if only implicitly (T 653/99). Indication: The "indication" as a whole must serve to substantiate the attack/attacks mounted. This makes the issue of substantiation a central and important element of any opposition and one that requires careful consideration and attention. What is required is a clear and coherent presentation of the case made, enabling the proprietor and the opposition division to understand the objections without undue burden and on an objective basis, and hence to be in a position to respond.

24 Facts/arguments/evidence Facts and evidence filed late during opposition proceedings are only exceptionally admitted if prima facie relevant. Opponent must indicate which part of the documents opposition is based on. Opposition based on prior use: Notice of opposition must indicate when, where, what and how. Detailed evidence of prior use may be filed later. Evidence can be produced after expiry of the opposition period.

25 The opposition division Art 19 Chairman Conducts oral proceedings Has the casting vote If necessary - Does groundwork - Issues communications - Takes decision 1st member 2nd member Takes minutes Legal member Hears witnesses No more than one member - NOT chairman - may have been involved in procedure up to grant.

26 Procedure: general provisions Art. 113(1) right to be heard Basis for decision : only on grounds a party has had opportunity to comment on Art. 114 extent of examination not restricted to facts/arguments/evidence of parties (own motion) Late submissions may be disregarded Art. 116 oral proceedings at request of parties public before opposition division

27 The examination stage Admissible? Substantive examination Art. 113(1) Route 1 Route 2 Route 3 Communication to parties Oral proceedings Decision

28 Amendments Rule 80 Proprietor may amend claims but only to address grounds for opposition Amendments must comply with the EPC Arts Art. 84 Art. 123(2) Art. 123(3) Ø The right to amend should not be used to tidy up and improve the disclosure of the patent (T 127/85).

29 Final stage Decision Art. 101(2)(3) Revocation Final Rejection of opposition Interlocutory Maintenance in amended form Proprietor Opponent Proprietor/opponent Art. 104 Apportionment of costs Appeal Art. 106 Printing fee and translation Rule 82(2)

30 Oral proceedings Article 116 Rule 115 Summons Non-appearance Rule 116 Invitation Final date for submissions Rule 124 Minutes Article 117 Rule Taking of evidence 4 Language

31 Conduct of oral proceedings Preparation - Authorisations - Late submissions - Language requests - Parties attending Oral proceedings Code of conduct Opening Main phase Decision Rule 111 Minutes Notification of decision

32 Intervention of the assumed infringer

33 Article 105 (1) Any third party may, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations, intervene in opposition proceedings after the opposition period has expired, if the third party proves that (a) (b) proceedings for infringement of the same patent have been instituted against him, or following a request of the proprietor of the patent to cease alleged infringement, the third party has instituted proceedings for a ruling that he is not infringing the patent. (2) An admissible intervention shall be treated as an opposition. The intervener acquires the status and rights of an normal' opponent.

34 Observations by third parties

35 Article 115 EPC Third party may not be a party to the proceedings. Article 115 Observations possible at all times before the EPO, but only have effect if proceedings are pending. They are added to the file [public under Art. 128(4)] and are taken into account by the opposition division (in opposition proceedings).

36 Request for limitation or revocation

37 Article 105a-c A central administrative procedure introduced with EPC Open to the proprietor at any time after the grant of the patent. Pending opposition proceedings take precedence - Art. 105a(2). The limitation or revocation will take effect ex tunc, i.e. from the outset - Art. 68. The procedure is ex parte and designed for rapid processing by the EPO (< 2 months). Must include amended claims that are limited in scope, but patentability of the resulting patent will not be examined. Solves the problem of non-permitted "self-opposition" (G 9/93).

38 Thank you for your kind attention