Re: Comments to Proposed California Supreme Court Rule Regarding Fingerprinting of Active Licensed Attorneys
|
|
- Maximillian Newman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 December 23, 2017 The State Bar of California Fingerprinting Rule Public Comment Office of General Counsel 180 Howard Street San Francisco, CA To whom it may concern: Re: Comments to Proposed California Supreme Court Rule Regarding Fingerprinting of Active Licensed Attorneys Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments to the proposed California Supreme Court rule regarding fingerprinting of active licensed attorneys. 1 For the reasons described below, the National Employment Law Project (NELP) and the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) disagree with the proposed rule. Alternatively, we recommend specific modifications to the rule before it is finalized to ensure that individuals with arrest and conviction records disproportionately people of color are not unfairly deprived of the opportunity to practice law in California. NELP is a non-profit law and policy organization with more than 45 years of experience advocating for the employment rights of the nation s workers. NELP advocates for policies to create good jobs, expand access to work, and strengthen protections and support for low-wage workers and the unemployed. One of NELP s key programs focuses on fair chance hiring and licensing policies that reduce barriers to employment for people with arrest and conviction records. NELP has worked closely with advocates and policymakers throughout the country, including at the local and state level in California, to ensure that employment and occupational licensing policies contain strong protections for jobseekers with records and that such laws are actively enforced. LDF is a non-profit, non-partisan law organization, founded in 1940 under the leadership of Thurgood Marshall to achieve racial justice and ensure the full, 1 Proposed California Rule of Court Regarding Fingerprinting of Active Licensed Attorneys, State Bar. of Cal., Comment/Public-Comment-Archives/2017-Public-Comment/ (last visited Dec. 22, 2017).
2 fair, and free exercise of constitutional and statutory rights for Black people and other communities of color. LDF has been involved in precedent-setting and other important litigation challenging employment discrimination before federal and state courts. See, e.g., Lewis v. City of Chicago, 560 U.S. 205 (2010); Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164 (1989); Franks v. Bowman Transp. Co., 424 U.S. 747 (1976); Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (1975); Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971); Hithon v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 144 F. App x 795 (11th Cir. 2005). In its unanimous decision in Griggs, which LDF litigated, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized the disparate impact theory of liability in the employment context. LDF also challenges policies that exclude individuals with criminal records from jobs. See, e.g., Waldon v. Cincinnati Pub. Schs., 941 F. Supp. 2d 884 (S.D. Ohio 2013) (denying defendants motion to dismiss a disparate impact case alleging that Black former public-school employees were terminated for having been convicted of specified crimes under Ohio law); Mem. & Op. at 1, 46-47, Little v. Wash. Metro Area Transit Auth. (WMATA), No. 1:14-cv RMC (D.D.C. Apr. 18, 2017), ECF No. 186 (certifying a class of affected job applicants with respect to plaintiffs claim that WMATA s criminal background check policy is facially neutral, but has a disparate impact on Black applicants). On October 20, 2017, Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, sent a letter to the State Bar directing it to consider and present to the Court any proposed court rules that may be appropriate to facilitate implementation of California Business and Professions Code, section That section was recently amended to authorize the State Bar to require any applicant for admission and any current member to submit or resubmit fingerprints to the California Department of Justice (DOJ) to obtain conviction and arrest information on the individual. 3 However, the amended California law does not obligate the State Bar to require submission or resubmission of attorney fingerprints to DOJ. 4 As described below, NELP and LDF believe the current proposed rule is inconsistent with the general trend toward increasing professional opportunities for individuals with conviction and arrest records and raises significant civil rights concerns. We also believe that the proposed rule is overbroad and vague. We strongly disagree with the Supreme Court s statement in its October 20 letter that requiring fingerprints of all applicants and active members is a critical component 2 Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, Letter to President and Executive Director of State Bar of California Re: State Bar Fingerprinting (Oct. 20, 2017), 3 Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 6054 (West 2018). 4 State Bar of California, Open Session BOT Agenda Item No. 701, Memo to Members of Board of Trustees from State Bar Staff at 2 (Nov. 3, 2017),
3 of public protection and strengthens the State Bar s discipline system. 5 There is no basis for the claim that requiring attorneys to submit their fingerprints in order to obtain updated arrest information on these individuals serves to better protect the public. The New Landscape of Federal and State Laws Protecting Individuals with Records The State Bar s proposed rule expanding the collection of arrest and conviction information on active licensed attorneys contrasts significantly with the trend in civil rights and occupational licensing laws to reduce employment barriers for the nearly one in three California adults who have an arrest or conviction record. 6 In California, African Americans are nearly four times more likely to be arrested for a felony than whites, and are nearly 11 times more likely to be incarcerated in the state s prisons. Latinos in California are also significantly overrepresented at all levels of the criminal justice system. 7 Over-policing is a primary driver of this overrepresentation: in Los Angeles, for example, African Americans and Latinos are not only more likely to be stopped by the police, but they are also more likely to be arrested when stopped. 8 Because of the extreme disparate impact of criminal background checks on people of color, in 2012 the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) updated its 1987 policy on employer use of arrest and conviction records. 9 The 2012 EEOC guidance interpreting Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 advises employers who consider arrest or conviction records in employment decisions to develop a targeted screen considering the nature of the conviction, the 5 Cantil-Sakauye, supra note 2, at 2. 6 California Governor Brown Signs Fair Chance Act, Extending Ban the Box to Private Employers, National Employment Law Project (Oct. 15, 2017), 7 Letter of Marc Bendick of Bendick and Egan Economic Consultants, Inc. to Fair Employment and Housing Council (Mar. 26, 2016). 8 Ian Ayres & Jonathan Borowsky, A Study of Racially Disparate Outcomes In The Los Angeles Police Department, ACLU S. Cal. (Oct. 2008), 9 EEOC Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended 42 U.S.C. Section 2000 et seq., U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Apr. 25, 2012),
4 time elapsed since the conviction, and the nature of the job. 10 It also encourages employers to conduct an individualized assessment of applicants excluded by the screen to determine whether the policy as applied is job-related and consistent with business necessity. 11 And in California, new regulations enforced by the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) incorporate the EEOC s arrest and conviction guidance. 12 California is a national leader on a range of criminal justice reforms, including policies limiting the collateral consequences of excessive law enforcement measures that have most severely impacted communities of color. For example, on January 1, 2018, California will become the tenth state in the nation to require private and public-sector employers to ban the box (or remove questions regarding criminal history) on job applications, delaying conviction inquiries and background checks until the conditional offer stage of the hiring process. 13 The national movement to reduce the collateral consequences of a conviction or arrest record also includes reform of federal and state occupational licensing laws. 14 For example, in 2011, then-u.s. Attorney General Eric Holder sent a letter to all state attorneys general, noting that many laws and policies pertaining to individuals with convictions create unnecessary barriers to critical opportunities, including in employment and housing. 15 While he acknowledged that some consequences serve important public safety purposes, he urged the attorneys general to evaluate collateral consequences in their states with an eye toward how and where each state could eradicate burdens on individuals with records without compromising public safety. 16 Attorney General Holder also directed federal 10 Id. 11 Id. 12 Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2, (2017); Consideration of Criminal History in Employment Decisions Regulations, Fair Employment & Housing Council, (last visited Dec. 22, 2017). 13 Ban the Box, supra note 6; Cal. Gov t Code (West 2017). 14 Michelle N. Rodriguez & Beth Avery, Unlicensed and Untapped: Removing Barriers to State Occupational Licenses for People with Records, National Employment Law Project (Apr. 2016), Licenses.pdf; Maurice Emsellem, et al., Fair Chance Licensing Reform: Opening Pathways for People with Records to Join Licensed Professions, National Employment Law Project (Oct. 2017), 15 Office of the Attorney General, Letter to State Attorneys General (Apr. 18, 2011), 16 Id.
5 agencies to consider collateral consequences when proposing any new regulation or guidance. 17 The State Bar s move to expand background check requirements flies the face of the national and state trend toward policies that tailor collateral consequences to legitimate public safety concerns and encourage employment of people with records, recognizing that it ultimately benefits our economy and public safety. By failing to embrace this well-reasoned trend, the State Bar s new policy is likely to disproportionately affect attorneys of color, given that over-policing and overcriminalization have most severely impacted Black and Latinx communities. Key Concerns Related to the State Bar s Use of Arrest Records and the Moral Character Standard Of special relevance to the proposed rule, the EEOC cautions strongly against the use of arrest records, explaining that an exclusion based on an arrest, in itself, is not job related and consistent with business necessity. 18 The EEOC makes clear that the fact of an arrest does not establish that criminal conduct has occurred... arrests are not proof of criminal conduct. 19 The new DFEH regulations and California Labor Code Section go further than the EEOC guidance and strictly prohibit employers from considering arrest records when making any employment decision. 20 Despite growing recognition that access to arrest records should be narrowly restricted in the employment context, the State Bar s proposed rule seeks to vastly expand the impact of arrests on California attorneys. We believe that existing law is more than sufficient to determine when attorneys have been charged or convicted of certain crimes that may impact their ability to serve their clients and the public. California law requires licensed attorneys to report felony indictments, charges, and convictions, as well as the certain misdemeanor convictions. 21 Attorneys are not required to report arrests; nor are they required to report every category of 17 See, e.g., Collateral Consequences, Federal Interagency Reentry Council (Aug. 2016), 18 EEOC Enforcement Guidance, supra note Id.; see also Schware v. Bd. of Bar Exam rs, 353 U.S. 232, 241 (1957) ( The mere fact that a [person] has been arrested has very little, if any, probative value in showing that he has engaged in any misconduct. ). 20 Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2, (2017); Cal. Lab. Code (West 2017). 21 Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 6068(o)(4)-(5) (West 2004).
6 misdemeanor conviction. 22 Thus, the circumstances in which an attorney is required to report involvement with the criminal justice system are far more limited than the proposed rule. We understand that State Bar staff believe that updated arrest information is needed to compensate for the failure of licensed attorneys to report certain charges and convictions as required by California law. 23 However, staff determined that, over a three-year period, only 29 felony convictions were not self-reported. 24 Of note, all 29 of those felony convictions were reported to the State Bar by courts, as the law also provides for other mechanisms to report attorney conduct other than self-reporting. 25 We believe that an average of ten unreported convictions a year cannot justify requiring nearly 190,000 attorneys (or all the licensed attorneys other than the 1,500 for whom the State Bar has previously retained fingerprint records), to provide their fingerprints, particularly given that members will be required to bear the costs, estimated to be $82 per attorney. 26 Indeed, we are aware of no other state that requires licensed attorneys to submit fingerprint records to generate subsequent arrest information. 27 Further, it is unclear from the proposed rule how arrest information will be considered by the State Bar. State Bar staff plan to issue rules to determine what additional steps need to be taken when they learn of new or undisclosed criminal history information for members, but no information has been disclosed as to how arrests will be considered or when attorneys will subject to disciplinary proceedings based on arrest information See Member s Report of Criminal Proceedings (Dec. 31, 2013), gs.pdf. 23 BOT Agenda, supra note 4, at Id. 25 Id.; see also Lawyer Regulation, State Bar of Cal., Discipline/Lawyer-Regulation (last visited Dec. 21, 2017). 26 BOT Agenda, supra note 4, at Earlier this year, the Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 302, relating to the continuation and functions of the state bar, which went into effect on September 1, See S.B. 302, 85 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Tex. 2017), The criminal history section (Sec ), requiring each member of the state bar submit a complete and legible set of fingerprints, did not make it into the final bill. Texas Legislature Online, Legislation Text, S.B. 302, (compare House Committee Report version with Enrolled version). 28 BOT Agenda, supra note 4, at 5.
7 We are also concerned with the overly broad and vague standards that the State Bar has set forth in defining the offenses that are are presumed not to be of good moral character in the absence of a pardon or a showing of overwhelming reform and rehabilitation. 29 According to the State Bar, these include violent felonies, felonies involving moral turpitude, and crimes involving breach of fiduciary duty. As the EEOC emphasized in the 2012 arrest and conviction guidance, the standards should take into account the persuasive redemption research documenting that six or seven years after release, the likelihood of committing an offense was only marginally higher for a formerly incarcerated person than for the general population. 30 More recent research concluded that, after a relatively short time, ranging from three to seven years for different offenses, the probability of a new arrest for individuals with records fell even below the probability for the general population. 31 Thus, the State Bar s moral character determination should be more closely aligned with the standards set forth in the EEOC guidance, which have evolved to take into account the latest research and best practices regulating criminal background checks for employment. Recommendations to Modify the Proposed Fingerprinting Rule For the reasons described above, we urge the State Bar to abandon the proposed rule requiring the collection and retention of fingerprint records to generate subsequent arrest information on active licensed attorneys. Alternatively, we recommend that the State Bar rule be modified to incorporate the following protections. 1. Tailor the rule to be consistent with existing law. Individuals generally cannot be denied a professional license because of an arrest. The rule should be limited to collect information that could form the basis for denying or revoking an attorney license, such as convictions, or, in the very least, formal charges. 29 Factors Regarding Moral Character Determination, State Bar of Cal., (last visited Dec. 22, 2017). 30 Megan C. Kurlycheck, et al., Scarlet Letters and Recidivism: Does an Old Criminal Record Predict Future Offending?, 5 Criminology & Pub. Pol y 483, 483 (2006), 31 Alfred Blumstein & Kiminori Nakamura, Extension of Current Estimates of Redemption Times: Robustness Testing, Out-of-State Arrests, and Racial Differences 37, 41 (Nov. 2012),
8 2. Specify how arrest information will be considered. If the State Bar declines to tailor the rule to those categories of information that members are required to report, it must specify how arrest information will be considered for disciplinary purposes. 3. Clarify that the proposed rule does not authorize notification of subsequent arrests connected with FBI records. The State Bar should clarify that the proposed rule is limited to the retention of fingerprints for the purposes of notifying the State Bar of subsequent arrests related to state DOJ records, not FBI records as well. While current California law authorizes DOJ to retain fingerprints to report subsequent arrests reported in the FBI records (called rapback ), 32 DOJ has not exercised its discretion to begin implementing the policy. Thus, no California licensing boards or certification agencies have received FBI rapback information, nor will the State Bar until it is authorized to do so by DOJ. 4. The State Bar should provide a copy of the record to the licensed attorney at the same time that the record is received by the State Bar. Under current California law, all employment licensing and certification entities (including the State Bar) must provide a copy of the full state and federal criminal history record (including a subsequent arrest or disposition notification) to an individual if the information is the basis for an adverse employment, licensing, or certification decision. 33 Rather than waiting until an adverse decision has been made based on the information, we urge the State Bar to provide a copy of the state and federal records to an attorney at the same time that it is received by the State Bar and offer the individual the opportunity to verify its accuracy. By doing so, attorneys with an arrest record will be in a position to take immediate corrective action where necessary, which will also ensure that the State Bar is not expending unnecessary time and resources evaluating inaccurate or incomplete information. In addition, it is only fair to provide the attorney with a copy of the information given that the attorney will be paying for the record under the proposed rule. 5. The State Bar should adopt strong and transparent procedures for members and applicants to challenge the accuracy of arrest records. In addition to providing the individual with a copy of the state and federal 32 Cal. Penal Code (a) (West 2016). 33 Id.
9 records when it is made available to the State Bar by DOJ, the State Bar should adopt strong and transparent procedures that maximize the opportunity for attorneys to challenge the accuracy of the record. Specifically, a customized form should be created to facilitate the appeal process, which should be prominently featured on the State Bar website along with a clear explanation of the individual s right to receive a copy of the state and federal record and the applicable appeal rights. 6. The State Bar should reevaluate its criteria for consideration of arrest and conviction information to give greater weight to the interests of members and applicants with records. As former Attorney General Eric Holder cautioned, the excessive law enforcement activities of the past several decades have had a devastating impact on communities of color. He accordingly urged states to carefully tailor their laws and policies to reduce or eliminate those that could impede successful reentry without community benefit. 34 As described above, the State Bar s policies go too far in penalizing people with records who are otherwise valued members of their communities. These concerns are supported as well by academics and commentators who specialize in bar admissions standards. 35 Thus, we urge the State Bar to reevaluate its criteria to ensure that the use of arrest and conviction information more fairly balances the respective interests of the public, bar applicants, and licensed attorneys. 34 State Attorneys General, supra note See, e.g., Deborah L. Rhode, Virtue and the Law: The Good Moral Character Requirement in Occupational Licensing, Bar Regulation, and Immigration Proceedings, Law and Society Inquiry, J. Am. B. Found. 2017, at
10 * * * Thank you for your consideration of these comments, and please contact us if we can provide additional information as the process develops. Sincerely, Maurice Emsellem Coty Montag (CA Bar No ) Elizabeth Lauren Avery (CA Bar No ) Kristen Johnson (CA Bar No ) Philip Mychael Hernandez (CA Bar No ) Michaele Turnage Young (CA Bar No ) Nayantara Mehta (CA Bar No ) Nana Wilberforce (CA Bar No ) Michelle Natividad Rodriguez (CA Bar No ) NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. National Employment Law Project
Employee Rights and Employer Responsibilities in a New Era of Criminal Background Checks for Employment
Employee Rights and Employer Responsibilities in a New Era of Criminal Background Checks for Employment EEOC Technical Assistance Program Seminar September 10, 2009 Pasadena, CA Maurice Emsellem Policy
More informationAfrican American Male Unemployment & the Role of Criminal Background Checks.
African American Male Unemployment & the Role of Criminal Background Checks. Center for American Progress June 19, 2009 February 11, 2008 Maurice Emsellem Oakland, California (510) 663-5700 emsellem@nelp.org
More informationFair Chance Licensing Removing Barriers to Licensed Professions Facing People with Conviction Records
Fair Chance Licensing Removing Barriers to Licensed Professions Facing People with Conviction Records December 11, 2017 Beth Avery Staff Attorney bavery@nelp.org Approximately 70 million people in the
More informationNo In the SUPREME COURT of the. CHRISTAL FIELDS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF WASHINGTON. DEPARTMENT OF EARLY LEARNING, Respondent.
No. 95024-5 In the SUPREME COURT of the STATE OF WASHINGTON CHRISTAL FIELDS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF EARLY LEARNING, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF
More informationselassie Before the Senior Staff Attorney yment Law Project
Testimony of Tsedeye Gebres selassie National Employ yment Law Project In Support of New York City Fair Chance Act Before the New York City Council, Committee on Civil Rights Hearing on New York City Fair
More informationWHEN DISCRETION MEANS DENIAL: Criminal Records Barriers to Federally Subsidized Housing. October 26, 2016 Housing Action Illinois Conference
WHEN DISCRETION MEANS DENIAL: Criminal Records Barriers to Federally Subsidized Housing October 26, 2016 Housing Action Illinois Conference Criminal Records & Public Safety There is NO empirical evidence
More informationImproving Employment Outcomes for People with Criminal Histories
January 31, 2018 Improving Employment Outcomes for People with Criminal Histories Marc Pelka, Deputy Director of State Initiatives Erica Nelson, Policy Analyst The Council of State Governments Justice
More informationEEOC Enforcement Guidance on Criminal Background Checks. By: Jonathan G. Rector, Associate Attorney Crowe & Dunlevy
EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Criminal Background Checks By: Jonathan G. Rector, Associate Attorney Crowe & Dunlevy Title VII Title VII (Civil Rights Act of 1964) prohibits employment discrimination based
More informationModel State Legislation to Reduce Employment Barriers for People with Criminal Records
Model State Legislation to Reduce Employment Barriers for People with Criminal Records Hosted by: NELP, Sentencing Project, National H.I.R.E. Network November 22, 2011 Presenters: Michelle Natividad Rodriguez
More informationAugust 10, Arrest and Conviction Records as a Barrier to Employment
August 10, 2011 Chair Berrien Commissioners Ishimaru, Barker, Feldblum and Lipnic U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 131 M Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20507 By email to commissionmeetingcomments@eeoc.gov
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
No. 16-4372 In the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the EIGHTH CIRCUIT CARA WILLIAMS, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT OF THE UNITED
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:18-cv-02993 Document 1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 16 OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP Adam T. Klein Ossai Miazad Lewis Steel Cheryl-Lyn Bentley Christopher McNerney 685 Third Avenue, 25th Floor New York, New York
More informationConference on Criminal Records and Employment
Conference on Criminal Records and Employment Title VII, Adverse Impact, and Criminal Records as a Selection Device, Matrix Approaches, and the Uniform Selection Guidelines David Lopez General Counsel,
More informationHow are Ex Offenders impacted by
What is the Elected Officials' Role in Assisting Employment for Ex-Offenders? on behalf of the Texas Association of Black City Council Members presented by the Office of State Senator Royce West Thursday
More informationEmployment Rights of People with Criminal Convictions
Employment Rights of People with Criminal Convictions Pathways to Employment Conference January 29, 2016 Armando Aguilar, CADC II Margaret Stevenson, JD San José State University Record Clearance Project
More informationFrequently Asked Questions about EEOC Guidance on Consideration of Criminal History
Frequently Asked Questions about EEOC Guidance on Consideration of Criminal History Texas law precludes school district employment for persons with certain criminal history. The federal Equal Employment
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY The Criminal Record Expungement Amendment Act of 2017 (22-0045) The Criminal Record Accuracy Assurance Act of 2017 (22-0404) The Record Sealing
More informationAddressing Barriers to Licensing for People with Criminal Records. August 9, 2018
Addressing Barriers to Licensing for People with Criminal Records August 9, 2018 Presenters Chidi Umez, Project Manager, CSG Justice Center Beth Avery, Staff Attorney, National Employment Law Project Lee
More informationFair Chance Hiring: Reducing Criminal Records Barriers to Employment Improves Public Safety and Builds Stronger Communities
Fair Chance Hiring: Reducing Criminal Records Barriers to Employment Improves Public Safety and Builds Stronger Communities The University of Texas School of Law November 14, 2014 Maurice Emsellem National
More informationDaily Labor Report DISCRIMINATION
Daily Labor Report Reproduced with permission from Daily Labor Report, 213 DLR I-1, 11/01/2013. Copyright 2013 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com DISCRIMINATION Equal
More informationMajor U.S. Cities Adopt New Hiring Policies Removing Unfair Barriers to Employment of People with Criminal Records
Updated January 3, 2007 Major U.S. Cities Adopt New Hiring Policies Removing Unfair Barriers to Employment of People with Criminal Records Several major cities across the United States (including Boston,
More informationPresenter: Jennifer Kisela, CSG Justice Center Moderator: Representative Jon Lovick, Washington House of Representatives
CSG West Public Safety Forum Presenter: Jennifer Kisela, CSG Justice Center Moderator: Representative Jon Lovick, Washington House of Representatives Overview 01 CSG Justice Center 02 03 04 05 How Sates
More informationADVISORY: TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE LETTER NO
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ADVISORY SYSTEM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Washington, D.C. 20210 CLASSIFICATION OWI CORRESPONDENCE SYMBOL DWASWS/OWI DATE May 25, 2012 ADVISORY: TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT
More informationBackground Checks: Title Goes Here. Best Practices & Legal Compliance. Presented By: Stephen R. Woods Gustavo A. Suarez
Background Checks: Title Goes Here Best Practices & Legal Compliance Presented By: Stephen R. Woods Gustavo A. Suarez Background Check Process 1. Determining Whether and When a Background Check Can Be
More informationFair Chance Hiring. Economic Development and Housing Committee, September 5, 2017
Fair Chance Hiring Economic Development and Housing Committee, September 5, 2017 Beverly Davis, Assistant Director, Fair Housing and Human Rights Office Background The City removed general criminal history
More informationNEW YORK REENTRY ROUNDTABLE ADDRESSING THE ISSUES FACED BY THE FORMERLY INCARCERATED AS THEY RE-ENTER THE COMMUNITY
NEW YORK REENTRY ROUNDTABLE ADDRESSING THE ISSUES FACED BY THE FORMERLY INCARCERATED AS THEY RE-ENTER THE COMMUNITY Advocacy Day 2008 Legislative Proposals INTRODUCTION...1 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS...2
More informationUnderstanding the Legal Landscape of Criminal Records in Hiring Decisions
Understanding the Legal Landscape of Criminal Records in Hiring Decisions Overview 01 02 03 Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions Policy Options for Addressing Criminal Records in Hiring Decisions
More informationFair Chance Hiring. Economic Development Committee, April 17, Beverly Davis, Assistant Director, Fair Housing and Human Rights Office
Fair Chance Hiring Economic Development Committee, April 17, 2017 Beverly Davis, Assistant Director, Fair Housing and Human Rights Office Background Dallas City Council was briefed on Ban The Box and Fair
More informationSENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 24, 2014
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY, 0 Sponsored by: Senator SANDRA B. CUNNINGHAM District (Hudson) Senator M. TERESA RUIZ District (Essex) Co-Sponsored by: Senators Pou,
More informationPlaintiffs, who represent a class of African American and Latino teachers in the New
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------X GULINO, ET AL., -against- Plaintiffs, 96-CV-8414 (KMW) OPINION & ORDER THE BOARD OF EDUCATION
More informationCase 1:14-cv RMC Document 1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-01289-RMC Document 1 Filed 07/30/14 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ERICK LITTLE 21251 Owlsnest Circle Germantown, MD 20876 LAWRENCE WHITTED 1819 P Street SE,
More informationState Reforms Reducing Collateral Consequences for People with Criminal Records
A project of State Reforms Reducing Collateral Consequences for People with Criminal Records Tuesday, Sept. 25, 2012 Panelists: Rachel Bloom, ACLU; Nicolette Chambery, CBI; Roberta Meyers, LAC/HIRE; Nicole
More informationALAMEDA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT
ALAMEDA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT JOINT RE ENTRY OPEN TABLE MEETING March 13, 2013 Probation Center, 400 Broadway, Oakland (Room 430) MEETING NOTES Introductions Special Presentation East Bay Community
More informationEmployment Rights and Criminal Records. May 9, 2018
Employment Rights and Criminal Records May 9, 2018 Employment Law: The Basics Employment at Will - The general rule is that the employer or the employee can terminate the relationship for any reason and
More informationCOMMENTS ON PROPOSED BHDDH REGULATIONS FOR THE LICENSING OF ORGANIZATIONS AND FACILITIES LICENSED BY BHDDH [212-RICR ] October 2018
128 DORRANCE STREET, SUITE 400 PROVIDENCE, RI 02903 401.831.7171 (t) 401.831.7175 (f) www.riaclu.org info@riaclu.org COMMENTS ON PROPOSED BHDDH REGULATIONS FOR THE LICENSING OF ORGANIZATIONS AND FACILITIES
More informationTHE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance adding Article 9 to Chapter XVIII of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to limit employers consideration of the criminal history of applicants for employment. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY
More informationAssessing the Need to Regulate Use of Background Checks in San Francisco
Assessing the Need to Regulate Use of Background Checks in San Francisco FACT SHEET Thousands of people in our community, as many as 200,000 San Franciscans, face discrimination based on prior arrests
More informationCriminal Background Check Laws Can Complicate Hiring Decisions
Criminal Background Check Laws Can Complicate Hiring Decisions Mitchell Boyarsky and Peter J. Dugan New York Law Journal October 22, 2012 Across the United States, employers regularly conduct criminal
More informationE. Adverse Employment Decision means to decline to hire, not promote or discharge a person, or to revoke a person s Conditional Offer of Employment.
Removing Barriers to Employment I. Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to remove barriers to employment so that people with criminal histories are able to provide for themselves and their families;
More informationRoad to Re-Entry: Criminal Records, Ban the Box and Getting Back into the Workforce
Road to Re-Entry: Criminal Records, Ban the Box and Getting Back into the Workforce Clifford L. Hammond Foster Swift, P.C. 28411 Northwestern Highway Suite 500 chammond@fosterswift.com 248.538.6324 What
More informationNo CV. IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Case: 17-1889 Document: 003112654086 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2017 No. 17-1889-CV IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT FRANK LONG, MICHAEL WHITE, and JOSEPH SHIPLEY, individually
More informationRecent employment law developments Use of credit checks and fact/length of unemployment? November 4 th, Senate passes ENDA 61-30
Recent employment law developments Use of credit checks and fact/length of unemployment? November 4 th, Senate passes ENDA 61-30 What will House do? EEOC Guidance on Criminal Background Checks (2012) Title
More informationHIRING PRACTICES & CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS
600.060 HIRING PRACTICES & CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS A. 1. shall verify employment eligibility by examination of documents establishing identity and employment authorization and completion of the Form
More informationThe Impact of Criminal Background Checks and the EEOC s Conviction Records Policy on the Employment of Black and Hispanic Workers
The Impact of Criminal Background Checks and the EEOC s Conviction Records Policy on the Employment of Black and Hispanic Workers Written Testimony submitted to The United States Commission on Civil Rights
More informationNEVADA ENACTS SWEEPING CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM. Tick Segerblom, Nevada State Senator, Chair Senate Committee on Judiciary
NEVADA ENACTS SWEEPING CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM Tick Segerblom, Nevada State Senator, Chair Senate Committee on Judiciary Nicolas Anthony, Esq., Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau I. Introduction During
More information111th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R To secure the Federal voting rights of persons who have been released from incarceration.
H.R.3335 (Companion bill is S.1516 by Feingold) Title: To secure the Federal voting rights of persons who have been released from incarceration. Sponsor: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14] (introduced 7/24/2009)
More informationSTUDY COMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL RECORDS ACCESS AND ACCURACY FINAL REPORT TO SCOPE AND PROGRAM Submitted by Robert J Tennessen, Chair December 16, 2013
STUDY COMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL RECORDS ACCESS AND ACCURACY FINAL REPORT TO SCOPE AND PROGRAM Submitted by Robert J Tennessen, Chair December 16, 2013 The Study Committee on Criminal Records Access and Accuracy
More informationChart #5 Consideration of Criminal Record in Licensing and Employment CHART #5 CONSIDERATION OF CRIMINAL RECORD IN LICENSING AND EMPLOYMENT
CHART #5 CONSIDERATION OF CRIMINAL RECORD IN LICENSING AND EMPLOYMENT State AL licensing, public and private (including negligent hiring) licensing and public licensing only public only Civil rights restored
More information9/20/2012. Background Checks Under Fire: Is Your Screening Process at Risk?
Background Checks Under Fire: Is Your Screening Process at Risk? 2 1 Presenter Angela Bosworth, JD Vice President of Compliance and General Counsel, EmployeeScreenIQ abosworth@employeescreen.com angela43215@gmail.com
More informationEEOC Issues Comprehensive Guidance Regarding Employers' Use of Criminal Background Information
A Publication of the American Bar Association Section of Labor and Employment Law EEOC Issues Comprehensive Guidance Regarding Employers' Use of Criminal Background Information On April 25, 2012, the U.S.
More informationDomestic Violence and Housing Appendix 3
Domestic Violence and Housing Appendix 3 L e g a l S e r v i c e s o f N o r t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a Mother Lode Regional Office 190 Reamer Street Auburn CA 95603 Voice: (530) 823-7560 Toll Free:
More informationAbout California. 1. Restrictions on CRAs
About California 1 California is of special significance because California laws are considered by many to be both confusing and considered overwhelming. Therefore it is critical for both CRAs and employers
More informationYour Committee, to which this proposal was referred, has amended the proposal to read as follows and recommends its adoption as amended.
Public Safety and Criminal Justice Proposal No. 4, 2014 Your Committee, to which this proposal was referred, has amended the proposal to read as follows and recommends its adoption as amended. CITY COUNTY
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00082-CV THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLANT V. N.R.J. APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-20001-158
More informationRedemption in the Face of Stale Criminal Records Used for Background Checks
Redemption in the Face of Stale Criminal Records Used for Background Checks Alfred Blumstein Carnegie Mellon University Kiminori Nakamura University of Maryland December 8, 2011 Partially supported by
More informationASSEMBLY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR. ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 215th LEGISLATURE ADOPTED DECEMBER 16, 2013
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR ASSEMBLY, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE ADOPTED DECEMBER, 0 Sponsored by: Assemblywoman BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN District (Hunterdon and Mercer) Assemblyman JERRY
More information20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates
20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates CANDIDATE: KATHY JENNINGS (D) The Coalition for Smart Justice is committed to cutting the number of prisoners in Delaware in half and eliminating racial
More informationBackground Checks and Ban the Box Legislation. November 8, 2017
Background Checks and Ban the Box Legislation November 8, 2017 Presented By Uzo Nwonwu Littler, Kansas City UNwonwu@littler.com, 816.627.4446 Jason Plowman Littler, Kansas City JPlowman@littler.com, 816.627.4435
More informationGetting People with Criminal Records Hired: What Employment Specialists Need to Know
Getting People with Criminal Records Hired: What Employment Specialists Need to Know Cabrini Green Legal Aid Cynthia Cornelius, Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by the Albert and Anne Mansfield Family
More informationCriminal Background Checks
Criminal Background Checks Sonia Lee, Director of Affiliate Financial Services Habitat for Humanity International We build strength, stability and self-reliance through shelter. Today s Goal Gain a basic
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,575 EX PARTE ANTONIO DAVILA JIMENEZ, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1990CR4654-W3 IN THE 187TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR
More informationCity of El Cenizo, Texas, et al v. State of Texas Doc. 79 Att. 1
City of El Cenizo, Texas, et al v. State of Texas Doc. 79 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION City of El Cenizo, Texas, et al. Plaintiffs,
More informationEXPERT ANALYSIS Heightened Restrictions on Use of Criminal Background History: What Employers Need To Know
Westlaw Journal EMPLOYMENT Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 31, ISSUE 16 / FEBRUARY 28, 2017 EXPERT ANALYSIS Heightened Restrictions on Use of Criminal Background
More informationTestimony on behalf of the. American Civil Liberties Union of the Nation s Capital. Stephen M. Block Legislative Counsel.
Testimony on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union of the Nation s Capital By Stephen M. Block Legislative Counsel Before the Committee on Government Affairs and the Environment Of the Council of
More informationWashington, D.C Washington, D.C
July 3, 2007 The Honorable Bobby Scott The Honorable Randy Forbes Chair Ranking Member Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security and Homeland Security U.S.
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1995 SESSION CHAPTER 545 SENATE BILL 53
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1995 SESSION CHAPTER 545 SENATE BILL 53 AN ACT TO REQUIRE THE REGISTRATION OF PERSONS CONVICTED OF CERTAIN CRIMINAL SEXUAL OFFENSES. The General Assembly of North Carolina
More informationTESTIMONY MARGARET COLGATE LOVE. on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. before the JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY. of the
TESTIMONY OF MARGARET COLGATE LOVE on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION before the JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY of the MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL COURT on the subject of Alternative Sentencing and
More informationPAROLE BOARD HEARINGS FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS
PAROLE BOARD HEARINGS FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS Juvenile Sentencing Project Quinnipiac University School of Law September 2018 This memo addresses the criteria and procedures that parole boards should use
More informationCRIMINAL RECORDS REVIEW ACT RSBC 1996, CHAPTER 86
Current to BC Regs. Bull. March 10, 2008 CRIMINAL RECORDS REVIEW ACT RSBC 1996, CHAPTER 86 Contents Section 1 Definitions 2 Purpose 3 Equivalent standards 4 Criminal record check 5 Reconsideration 6 Use
More informationArizona Anti-Immigrant Law: SB 1070
Arizona Passes Harsh Anti-Immigrant Law By Karen A. Herrling In his Sunday blog, Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angles described the recently enacted Arizona law as the country s most retrogressive, mean-spirited,
More informationEnsure Fair Wages for Workers with Disabilities. Reform H-2B Guest Worker Program. Consider Lump-Sum Settlements and Public Benefit Eligibility
May June 2011 Volume 45, Numbers 1 2 Ensure Fair Wages for Workers with Disabilities Reform H-2B Guest Worker Program Consider Lump-Sum Settlements and Public Benefit Eligibility Target Underlying Causes
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY In the Matter of: : : HOWARD R. SHMUCKLER, : : Respondent. : Bar Docket Nos. 81-07 & 244-07 : A Member of the Bar of the : District
More informationShort-Term Transitional Leave Program in Oregon
Short-Term Transitional Leave Program in Oregon January 2016 Criminal Justice Commission Michael Schmidt, Executive Director Oregon Analysis Center Kelly Officer, Director With Special Thanks To: Jeremiah
More informationBen Tulchin, Corey O Neil and Kiel Brunner; Tulchin Research
August 26, 2015 To: From: Re: Interested Parties Ben Tulchin, Corey O Neil and Kiel Brunner; Tulchin Research California Statewide Survey Finds Voters Demand More Transparency in Police Misconduct Cases
More informationPENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION AND REPORT RECOMMENDATION
PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION AND REPORT RECOMMENDATION The PBA Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Committee recommends that
More informationInsights COMMUNITY PARTNERS JUST OPPORTUNITY. Creating Fairer Employment Practice for Justice-Involved Young Adults
Insights COMMUNITY PARTNERS JUST OPPORTUNITY Creating Fairer Employment Practice for Justice-Involved Young Adults I want to be given a fair chance, based on my abilities and not judged for my past mistakes
More informationCOUNTY OF EL DORADO, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POLICY
E-9 1 of 6 I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to: A. Ensure that individuals having access to Federal Tax Information (FTI) have been thoroughly vetted through a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
More informationChapter 3 - General Institution
Chapter 3 - General Institution AP 3540 Stalking Sexual Misconduct, Dating Violence, Domestic Violence, and References: California Education Code Sections 67380, 67383, and 67385; 67386 (a)(1) - 67389(a)(1),
More informationImplementation of the California Values Act (SB 54) and Legal Issues with Immigration Detainers
VIA U.S. MAIL January 26, 2018 Secretary Scott Kernan California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 1515 S Street Sacramento, CA 95811 RE: Implementation of the California Values Act (SB 54)
More informationRE: Preventing the Disenfranchisement of Texas Voters After Hurricane Harvey
New York Office 40 Rector Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10006-1738 Washington, D.C. Office 1444 Eye Street, NW, 10th Floor Washington, D.C. 20005 T 212.965.2200 F 212.226.7592 T 202.682.1300 F 202.682.1312
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
P.O. Box 5675, Berkeley, CA 94705 USA Submission by HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCATES, a non-governmental organization based in special consultative status with ECOSOC, to the Human Rights Council for its Universal
More informationWASHINGTON COALITION OF MINORITY LEGAL PROFESSIONALS
WASHINGTON COALITION OF MINORITY LEGAL PROFESSIONALS Educating the Public to Improve the Justice System for Minority Communities Dear Candidate, October 1, 2018 Thank you for running for Prosecuting Attorney.
More informationCriminal Conviction Screening Policies: Best Practices to Avoid Disparate Impact Liability
Criminal Conviction Screening Policies: Best Practices to Avoid Disparate Impact Liability By MICHAEL W. SKOJEC, ESQ. and MICHAEL P. CIANFICHI BALLARD SPAHR LLP Overview In June 2015, the Supreme Court
More informationMassachusetts Overhauls Accessibility to Criminal Information of Applicants and Employees
CLIENT ALERT Massachusetts Overhauls Accessibility to Criminal Information of Applicants and Employees On Friday, August 6, 2010, Governor Deval Patrick signed a bill (the Bill ) that amends a number of
More informationARBITRATION ADVISORY 01-02
ARBITRATION ADVISORY 01-02 ARBITRATION ADVISORY RE: ENFORCEMENT OF NON-REFUNDABLE RETAINER PROVISIONS May 16, 2001 Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the Committee on Mandatory
More informationTestimony of Dale Ho. Assistant Counsel, Political Participation Group. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. In Support of AB 420
Testimony of Dale Ho Assistant Counsel, Political Participation Group NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. In Support of AB 420 California State Assembly Committee on Elections and Redistricting
More informationSUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA OFFICE OF BAR ADMISSIONS
SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA OFFICE OF BAR ADMISSIONS POLICY STATEMENT OF THE BOARD TO DETERMINE FITNESS OF BAR APPLICANTS REGARDING CHARACTER AND FITNESS REVIEWS The Supreme Court of Georgia has delegated
More informationDecember 12, Rhode Island Department of Health 3 Capitol Hill Providence, RI Dear Dr. Alexander-Scott:
December 12, 2018 Dr. Nicole Alexander-Scott, Director Rhode Island Department of Health 3 Capitol Hill Providence, RI 02908 (by email and mail) Dear Dr. Alexander-Scott: The undersigned local and national
More informationldf DEFEND EDUCATE EMPOWER Testimony of Kristen Clarke Co-Director, Political Participation Group NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
Notional Office 99 Hudson Street, Suite 1600 New York, NY 1001 3 ldf T212965.2200 F 212.226.7592 www.noacpldf.org DEFEND EDUCATE EMPOWER Woshington, D.C. Office 1444 Eye Street, NW, 10th Floor Washington,
More information2010] RECENT CASES 753
RECENT CASES CONSTITUTIONAL LAW EIGHTH AMENDMENT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HOLDS THAT PRISONER RELEASE IS NECESSARY TO REMEDY UNCONSTITUTIONAL CALIFORNIA PRISON CONDITIONS. Coleman v. Schwarzenegger,
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued December 6, 2012 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-11-00877-CV THE CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant V. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUBROGEE, Appellee
More informationThe changes will affect three populations of youth differently depending upon their status on the day the bill was enacted on Oct.
TO: Interested Parties FROM: Youth Law Center, San Francisco DATE: October 27, 2010 RE: Analysis of DJJ Parole Realignment to the Counties On October 19, 2010, the Public Safety budget trailer bill, A.B.
More informationThe National Employment and Reentry Committee
The National Employment and Reentry Committee Federal Policy Recommendations to Increase Job Opportunities for Justice-Involved Workers A policy brief submitted to the White House Domestic Policy Council
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION
PROTOPAPAS et al v. EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. et al Doc. 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GEORGE PROTOPAPAS, Plaintiff, v. EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., Civil Action
More informationCase3:01-cv TEH Document2826 Filed12/01/14 Page1 of 2
Case3:01-cv-01351-TEH Document2826 Filed12/01/14 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California JONATHAN L. WOLFF Senior Assistant Attorney General JAY C. RUSSELL PATRICK R.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OPINION AND ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:15-cv-01802 v. Judge Watson Magistrate Judge King
More informationCriminal Records and Employment: Legal Update and Guidance on Compliance in a Continuously Changing Legal Environment
Criminal Records and Employment: Legal Update and Guidance on Compliance in a Continuously Changing Legal Environment Rod M. Fliegel Shareholder Chair, Hiring and Background Checks Practice Group San Francisco
More informationMARIPOSA COUNTY REFERENCE CHECK POLICY
MARIPOSA COUNTY REFERENCE CHECK POLICY March, 2016 Table of Contents Responding to Reference Check Requests...1 Conducting Reference Checks....2 Appendix A - Checklist for Initiating a Reference Check......4
More informationSTATUTES / RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Probation Revocations
STATUTES / RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Probation Revocations Rule 27.4. Initiation of revocation proceedings; securing the probationer's presence; arrest (a) INITIATION OF REVOCATION PROCEEDINGS. (1)
More informationSAN FRANCISCO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AGENCY CERTIFICATE/LICENSE DISCIPLINE PROCESS FOR PREHOSPITAL PERSONNEL
SAN FRANCISCO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AGENCY I. PURPOSE CERTIFICATE/LICENSE DISCIPLINE PROCESS FOR PREHOSPITAL PERSONNEL Policy Reference No.: 2070 Review Date: January 1, 2013 Supersedes: September
More information