Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 75 Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 17
|
|
- Matilda Doyle
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 ABDIKHADAR JAMA an individual, JEES JEES, an individual, and MOHAMED MOHAMED, an individual, vs. Plaintiff, GOLDEN GATE AMERICA LLC, a foreign limited liability company and EAN HOLDINGS LLC, ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC., a foreign corporation, and VANGUARD AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, a foreign business entity d/b/a NATIONAL CAR RENTAL, ALAMO RENT A CAR, and ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR, Defendants. ANSWER No. Case No. :-cv-00-rsl DEFENDANT EAN HOLDINGS LLC S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Defendant EAN Holdings LLC ( EAN ) files this answer to Plaintiffs First Amended Class Action Complaint. To the extent that any allegation in the complaint is not specifically admitted, the allegation is denied. EAN answers the corresponding numbered paragraphs of the complaint as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION. Plaintiffs bring this class action individually and on behalf of the Class against (i) Golden Gate America LLC ( GGA ) and (ii) Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and Vanguard (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
2 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Automotive Group LLC (collectively, Enterprise ) under Chapter., et seq., of the City of SeaTac Municipal Code, the City s minimum wage ordinance (the Ordinance ), and for unjust enrichment, upon personal knowledge as to themselves and their own acts, and as to all other matters upon information and belief based on the investigation made by their attorneys. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent Paragraph requires a response, EAN admits that Plaintiffs purport to bring this action individually and on behalf of the Class. EAN denies that Plaintiffs are entitled to relief under the claims asserted in Paragraph. EAN otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph.. The facts giving rise to this action involve the Defendants violations of the Ordinance by failing to pay the prevailing minimum wage to hourly workers within the Class. ANSWER: EAN denies Paragraph.. As a result of Defendants wrongful conduct, the Plaintiffs and the Class have been injured. ANSWER: EAN denies Paragraph. PARTIES. Plaintiff Abdikhadar Jama is a natural person and at all times relevant hereto has been a resident of King County, Washington. From June through August, Plaintiff Jama worked for the Defendants as a car washer at an hourly wage rate less than $.00. ANSWER: EAN denies that EAN employed Plaintiff Jama. EAN admits, on information and belief, that Golden Gate America LLC ( Golden Gate ) employed Plaintiff Jama. EAN is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the remaining allegations of Paragraph and on that basis denies the same.. Plaintiff Jees Jees is a natural person and at all times relevant hereto has been a resident of King County, Washington. From January through July, Plaintiff Jees worked for the Defendants as a service agent (car cleaner) and shuttle driver at an hourly wage rate less than $.00. (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
3 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 ANSWER: EAN denies that EAN employed Plaintiff Jees. EAN admits, on information and belief, that Golden Gate employed Plaintiff Jees. EAN is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the remaining allegations of Paragraph and on that basis denies the same.. Plaintiff Mohamed Mohamed is a natural person and at all times relevant hereto has been a resident of King County, Washington. From June through February, Plaintiff Mohamed worked for the Defendants as a service agent (car cleaner) and shuttle driver at an hourly wage rate less than $.00. ANSWER: EAN denies that EAN employed Plaintiff Mohamed. EAN admits, on information and belief, that Golden Gate employed Plaintiff Mohamed. EAN is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the remaining allegations of Paragraph and on that basis denies the same.. Golden Gate America LLC is, on information and belief, a foreign corporation with headquarters at 0 Cape Hatteras Drive, Clermont, FL. GGA provides travelrelated services at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and otherwise within the City of SeaTac. ANSWER: EAN admits that Golden Gate provides certain car-washing and carcleaning services as a contractor for EAN at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. EAN otherwise lacks sufficient knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations contained in Paragraph, and on that basis, EAN denies the remaining allegations of that Paragraph.. Defendant GGA describes itself in online publicity as follows: We are a dedicated labor team operating out of key car rental facilities, such as the major metropolitan airports. Our services manage the parking, cleaning and maintenance of rental vehicles. We provide complete fleet and staffing management for car rental facilities, nationwide. ANSWER: EAN admits that the quoted language appears on Golden Gate s website. EAN otherwise lacks sufficient knowledge or information sufficient to form a (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
4 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 belief as to the allegations contained in Paragraph, and on that basis, EAN denies the remaining allegations of that Paragraph.. Defendant EAN Holdings, LLC and/or Enterprise Holdings, Inc. ( Enterprise ) are, on information and belief, foreign business entities with headquarters at 00 Corporate Park Drive, St. Louis, MO 0. EAN Holdings, LLC and Enterprise Holdings, Inc. may be one and the same entities. Enterprise provides rental car services at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and otherwise within the City of SeaTac. ANSWER: EAN admits that it provides rental car services at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. EAN further admits that it is a limited liability company and that its sole member is Enterprise Holdings, Inc. ( EHI ). EAN further admits that EAN and EHI are incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware with their principal places of business in St. Louis, Missouri. Except as expressly admitted, EAN denies the allegations of Paragraph. 0. Defendant Enterprise describes itself in online publicity as follows: With annual revenues of $. billion and more than,000 employees, Enterprise Holdings and its affiliates own and operate more than. million cars and trucks. Enterprise Holdings the largest car rental service provider in the world measured by revenue, employees and fleet and its affiliates together offer a total transportation solution and are all united by a common mission: To be the best transportation service provider in the world... to exceed our customers expectations for service, quality and value... to provide our employees with a great place to work... and to serve our communities as a committed corporate citizen. ANSWER: EAN denies that it currently describes itself in online publicly with the quoted text in Paragraph 0. EAN accordingly denies the allegations in Paragraph 0.. Defendant Vanguard Automotive Group ( Vanguard ) is, on information and belief, a foreign business entity that is a subsidiary, affiliate, or business name of Defendant Enterprise. Vanguard s actual business form is unknown to the Plaintiff. On information and (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
5 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 belief, Vanguard is located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Defendant Enterprise, through Vanguard, conducts the business of National Car Rental, Alamo Rent A Car, and Enterprise Rent-A-Car. ANSWER: EAN denies Paragraph.. On information and belief, within the boundaries of the City of SeaTac, Enterprise jointly with GGA provides Rental Car Labor management and Support Services, and/or other services that bring them within the minimum wage requirements of the Ordinance. ANSWER: EAN denies Paragraph.. Enterprise, in joint operations and concerted action with GGA, are the employers of the Plaintiff and the Class. ANSWER: EAN denies Paragraph. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. The Defendants are located or are doing business in King County, Washington. The wrongful acts complained of here occurred in whole or in part in King County, Washington. ANSWER: EAN admits that it does business in King County, Washington. EAN otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph.. This action was originally filed in King County Superior Court and was subsequently removed by Defendant GGA to federal court in the Western District of Washington. ANSWER: EAN admits Paragraph.. This court had personal jurisdiction over the Defendants and subject matter jurisdiction over the matters related to this action. ANSWER: Paragraph states legal conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN does not dispute that this Court has personal jurisdiction over EAN and subject matter jurisdiction over the matters related to this action. (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
6 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS. Section..00 of the Ordinance requires certain employers within the City to pay a $ minimum wage to certain employees, subject to annual adjustments to be effective on January of the next successive year. The law became effective on January,. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is.. The minimum wage for was $ and for was $.. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is.. The two categories of employers that are subject to the Ordinance are identified as Hospitality Employers and Transportation Employers. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is.. A Hospitality Employer is defined as follows: Hospitality Employer means a person who operates within the City any Hotel that has one hundred (00) or more guest rooms and thirty (0) or more workers or who operates any institutional foodservice or retail operation employing ten (0) or more nonmanagerial, nonsupervisory employees. This shall include any person who employs others providing services for customers on the aforementioned premises, such as a temporary agency or subcontractor. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is. (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
7 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0. A Transportation Employer is defined as: Transportation Employer means: ) A person, excluding a certificated air carrier performing services for itself, who: a) operates or provides within the City any of the following: any curbside passenger check-in services; baggage check services; wheelchair escort services; baggage handling; cargo handling; rental luggage cart services; aircraft interior cleaning; aircraft carpet cleaning; aircraft washing and cleaning; aviation ground support equipment washing and cleaning; aircraft water or lavatory services; aircraft fueling; ground transportation management; or any janitorial and custodial services, facility maintenance services, security services, or customer service performed in any facility where any of the services listed in this paragraph are also performed; and b) employs twenty-five () or more nonmanagerial, nonsupervisory employees in the performance of that service. ) A transportation employer also includes any person who: a) operates or provides rental car services utilizing or operating a fleet of more than one hundred (00) cars; shuttle transportation utilizing or operating a fleet of more than ten (0) vans or buses; or parking lot management controlling more than one hundred (00) parking spaces; and b) employs twenty-five () or more nonmanagerial, nonsupervisory employees in the performance of that operation. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is.. The two categories of employees that are subject to the Ordinance are Hospitality Workers and Transportation Workers. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is.. A Hospitality Worker is defined as: Hospitality Worker means any nonmanagerial, nonsupervisory individual employed by a Hospitality Employer. (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
8 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is.. A Transportation Worker is defined as: Transportation Worker means any nonmanagerial, nonsupervisory individual employed by a Transportation Employer. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is.. Washington law recognizes that two or more employers may be considered joint employers where they are not completely disassociated with respect to the employment of a particular employee and may be deemed to share control of the employee, directly or indirectly, by reason of the fact that one employer controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the other employer. Becerra v. Expert Janitorial, LLC, Wash. d, -, P.d (). ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is.. Joint employers are responsible, both individually and jointly, for compliance with all of the applicable provisions of both state and federal wage and hour laws. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is.. In the instant case, Enterprise contracts with GGA for the provision of workers to operate Enterprise s facilities in the City of SeaTac. Numerous facts prove that Enterprise and GGA are joint employers of the putative class. For example, and without limitation, during the relevant time period: (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
9 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Plaintiffs primarily work on property and equipment owned by Enterprise, GGA workers tasks performed for Enterprise was piecework and/or not work that required initiative, judgment or foresight, Without GGA s employees, Enterprise would be unable to refresh its rental car inventory and re-rent vehicles, Class members who worked as drivers moved cars from the return area to the ready line, where they would be picked up by Enterprise customers with whom the drivers interacted, Workers regularly provided customers with assistance in the same manner as Enterprise s direct employees, including directions as to how to get on the shuttle bus, where to take their luggage, how to get to the freeway, what are good restaurants in the area, and similar inquiries, Workers acting as Service Agents performed duties directly related to Enterprise s operations, including checking rental cars for damage, vacuuming and cleaning the interior of the cars, and running the cars through a car wash, and cleaning the area of the Rental Car Facility where they serviced the rental cars. ANSWER: EAN admits that Golden Gate provides certain car-washing and carcleaning services as a contractor for EAN at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. EAN further admits that Golden Gate s employees move rental cars to and from Golden Gate s car-washing and car-cleaning area. Except as expressly admitted, EAN denies the allegations of Paragraph. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AS TO PLAINTIFFS. As described more fully in the table found in Paragraph, above, the Plaintiffs were employed by the Defendants in the relevant time period in capacities governed by the Ordinance and were paid less than the then-prevailing minimum wage. (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
10 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page 0 of 0 ANSWER: EAN responds that there is no table found in Paragraph, above. EAN further denies the allegations of Paragraph.. By failing to pay the prevailing minimum wage, Defendants acted unlawfully and proximately caused damages to the Plaintiffs in an amount to be proven at trial. ANSWER: EAN denies Paragraph. CLASS ALLEGATIONS 0. Plaintiffs bring this class action pursuant to Civil Rule on behalf of themselves and all members of the following Class: All joint employees of the Defendants who have been either Hospitality Workers or Transportation Workers and who worked one or more hours within the City of SeaTac at any time during the time period from January,, to the present, and who were paid less than the prevailing minimum wage prescribed by City of SeaTac Ordinance..00. ANSWER: Paragraph 0 states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN admits that Plaintiffs purport to bring this action on behalf of the proposed class. EAN otherwise denies the allegations of Paragraph 0.. Plaintiffs reserve the right to amend or modify this Complaint and/or the Class definition after receiving Defendants Answers and responses to meaningful discovery and/or in the motion for class certification. ANSWER: Paragraph is a reservation of rights to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN responds that it is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to these allegations contained in Paragraph, and on that basis denies the allegations of that Paragraph.. Members of the Class are so numerous and geographically dispersed that joinder of all Class members is impracticable. The precise number and identities of Class members are unknown to Plaintiff but should be obtainable through notice and discovery. Notice can be (:-cv- RSL) main..00 fax
11 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 provided through a variety of means including publication, the cost of which is properly imposed on Defendants. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN denies the allegations of that Paragraph.. Plaintiff will fairly and adequately protect the interests of all Class members and has retained counsel competent and experienced in class and employment litigation and who have been repeatedly found to be adequate to represent the interests of class members in other complex class actions. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN denies the allegations of that Paragraph.. Plaintiff s claims are typical of the claims of the Class whose members sustained similar types of injury arising out of the conduct challenged in this action. The injuries flow from the common nucleus of operative facts detailed above. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN denies the allegations of that Paragraph.. There is a well-defined community of interest in the common questions of law and/or fact alleged herein since the rights of each Class member were infringed or violated in a similar fashion based upon Defendants wrongdoing or arise out of similar legal obligations. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN denies the allegations of that Paragraph.. The common questions of law and fact detailed in this Complaint predominate over any questions solely affecting individual Class members. Defendants engaged in a common course of conduct giving rise to the legal rights sought to be enforced by Plaintiff and (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
12 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 the Class members. Individual questions, if any, pale by comparison to the numerous common questions that predominate. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN denies the allegations of that Paragraph.. A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy because joinder of all Class members is impracticable. Furthermore, the expense and burden of individual litigation make it impossible for the Class members to individually redress the wrongs done to them. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN denies the allegations of that Paragraph.. The claims in this action are manageable on a class-wide basis and can be the subject of a class-wide plan for litigating and resolving these issues. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN denies the allegations of that Paragraph.. Defendants have also acted or have refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the Class, thereby making it appropriate to grant final declaratory and injunctive relief with respect to the Class as a whole. ANSWER: Paragraph states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN denies the allegations of that Paragraph. (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
13 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 CAUSES OF ACTION Count Statutory Violations 0. RCW.. establishes Washington State s minimum wage and provides for enforcement of more favorable minimum wages that may be established federal, state, or local law or ordinance. ANSWER: Paragraph 0 states a legal conclusion to which no response is required. To the extent a response is required, EAN denies the allegations of Paragraph 0.. Pursuant to RCW..00, Any employer who pays any employee less than wages to which such employee is entitled under or by virtue of this chapter, shall be liable to such employee affected for the full amount of such wage rate, less any amount actually paid to such employee by the employer, and for costs and such reasonable attorney s fees as may be allowed by the court. ANSWER: EAN admits that RCW..00 contains the quoted text. Except as expressly admitted, EAN denies the allegations of Paragraph.. Pursuant to RCW..00, Any employer or officer, vice principal or agent of any employer, whether said employer be in private business or an elected public official, who *** () Willfully and with intent to deprive the employee of any part of his or her wages, shall pay any employee a lower wage than the wage such employer is obligated to pay such employee by any statute, ordinance, or contract; *** Shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. ANSWER: EAN admits that RCW..00 contains the quoted text. Except as expressly admitted, EAN denies the allegations of Paragraph.. Pursuant to..00, (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
14 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Any employer and any officer, vice principal or agent of any employer who shall violate any of the provisions of RCW..00 () and () shall be liable in a civil action by the aggrieved employee or his or her assignee to judgment for twice the amount of the wages unlawfully rebated or withheld by way of exemplary damages, together with costs of suit and a reasonable sum for attorney s fees: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That the benefits of this section shall not be available to any employee who has knowingly submitted to such violations. ANSWER: EAN admits that RCW..00 contains the quoted text. Except as expressly admitted, EAN denies the allegations of Paragraph.. The Defendants, as joint employers, are jointly and individually responsible for ensuring compliance with the Ordinance. ANSWER: EAN denies Paragraph.. Defendants have violated the foregoing statutes and are liable to the Plaintiffs and the Class for actual damages, double damages, and attorneys fees and costs. ANSWER: EAN denies Paragraph. Count Unjust Enrichment. As described more fully above, the Defendants have been unjustly enriched by wrongfully withholding wages from the Class. ANSWER: EAN denies Paragraph. Count Injunctive and Declaratory Relief. As described more fully above, the Plaintiffs and the Class are entitled to a declaration of their right to be paid the prevailing minimum wage and an injunction prohibiting the Defendants from further violations of the Ordinance. ANSWER: EAN denies Paragraph. PRAYER FOR RELIEF EAN denies that any relief sought by the Plaintiffs as described in Plaintiffs Prayer for Relief is appropriate. (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
15 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 AFFIRMATIVE AND OTHER DEFENSES EAN raises the following affirmative and other defenses and reserves its rights to amend or supplement these affirmative and other defenses.. The Complaint and each of its purported causes of action fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.. The Complaint and each of its purported causes of action are barred because the Airline Deregulation Act, U.S.C. (b)(), preempts SeaTac Municipal Code section The Complaint and each of its purported causes of action are barred because the National Labor Relations Act, U.S.C. et seq., preempts SeaTac Municipal Code section SeaTac Municipal Code section..00 interferes with airport operations and therefore cannot apply to EAN s operations at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport because, under the Revised Airports Act, the airport is under the exclusive jurisdiction and control of the Port of Seattle. See RCW Plaintiffs and the putative class cannot recover statutory penalties under RCW..00 because a bona fide dispute exists as to whether Plaintiffs and the putative class were paid in compliance with applicable law.. Plaintiffs and the putative class cannot recover statutory penalties under RCW..00 because Plaintiffs and the putative class knowingly submitted to the alleged wage withholdings.. EAN is not an employer or joint employer of Plaintiffs and the putative class. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, EAN prays for the following relief: A. That the First Amended Complaint, and its purported causes of action, be dismissed with prejudice; B. That the Court award EAN fees, expenses, and costs to the full extent permitted (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
16 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 by law; and circumstances. C. That the Court award such other relief as is just and proper under the DATED this th day of June,. By: s/ Harry J.F. Korrell By: s/ Taylor S. Ball By: s/ Ryan C. Hess By: s/ Laura Turczanski Harry J. F. Korrell, WSBA # Taylor S. Ball, WSBA # Ryan C. Hess, WSBA #0 Laura Turczanski, WSBA #00 Telephone: --0 Fax: harrykorrell@dwt.com taylorball@dwt.com ryanhess@dwt.com lauraturczanski@dwt.com Attorneys for Defendant EAN HOLDINGS, LLC (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
17 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June,, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: Duncan C. Turner Badgley Mullins Turner PLLC Ballinger Way NE, Suite 0 Seattle, WA Telephone: () - duncantumer@badgleymullins.com Daniel R. Whitmore Law Office of Daniel R. Whitmore th Avenue West, Suite 0 Seattle, WA Telephone: () dan@whitmorelawfirm.com DATED this th day of June,. /s/ Margaret C. Sinnott Margaret C. Sinnott EAN HOLDINGS LLC S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS (:-cv- RSL) -..0 main..00 fax
STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ) ) ) ) Plaintiff Mohamed A. Hussein ( Plaintiff ), by his attorneys and on behalf of all others
1 1 1 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT MOHAMED A. HUSSEIN, Plaintiff, v. ABM INDUSTRIES, INC, a foreign corporation, Defendant. Plaintiff Mohamed A. Hussein ( Plaintiff, by his attorneys
More informationCase 2:16-cv RSL Document 34 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 ABDIKHADAR JAMA, an individual, ANEB ABDINOR HIREY, an individual,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. No SEA
The Honorable William Downing IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING 0 GUULED ALI, an individual, AHMED- AMIN DAHIR, an individual, ROBERT W. HOUSER, an individual,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ABDIKHADAR JAMA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOLDEN GATE AMERICA LLC, Defendant. Case No.
More informationCase 2:16-cv RSL Document 84 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 0 ABDIKHADAR JAMA an individual, JEES JEES, an individual, and MOHAMED MOHAMED, an individual, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
More informationCase 2:16-cv RSL Document 74 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 ABDIKHADAR JAMA, an individual, JEES JEES, an individual, and MOHAMED MOHAMED, an individual, Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 2:16-cv JCC Document 9 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-00-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of Honorable John C. Coughenour 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE YASIN HUFUNE, an individual, and SAMATAR
More informationCase 2:16-cv MAT Document 10 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Plaintiff.
Case :-cv-00-mat Document Filed 0// Page of HASSAN HIRSI, an individual, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff. THE HERTZ CORPORATION, a foreign corporation,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY
The Honorable Johanna Bender 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY SCOTT JUDD, an individual; YING YANG, an individual; JIAN SONG, an individual; KINCHUN SO, an individual;
More informationCase 2:16-cv RSL Document 13 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-0-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ANANAIS ALLEN, an individual, and AUSTIN CLOY, an individual, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed /0/ Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA SPENCER MCCULLOH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING NO.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING MITCH SPENCER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. Defendant. NO.
More informationCase 2:13-cv MJP Document 19 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-0-mjp Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE MARSHA J. PECHMAN ANA LOPEZ DEMETRIO and FRANCISCO EUGENIO PAZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCase3:15-cv Document1 Filed01/09/15 Page1 of 16
Case:-cv-00 Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 Matthew C. Helland, CA State Bar No. 0 helland@nka.com Daniel S. Brome, CA State Bar No. dbrome@nka.com NICHOLS KASTER, LLP One Embarcadero Center, Suite San Francisco,
More informationCase 5:18-cv EJD Document 31 Filed 05/03/18 Page 1 of 14
Case :-cv-00-ejd Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Edward J. Wynne (SBN ) ewynne@wynnelawfirm.com WYNNE LAW FIRM 0 E. Sir Francis Drake Blvd., Ste. G Larkspur, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -00 Gregg I.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-psg-pla Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Edward J. Wynne (SBN ) ewynne@wynnelawfirm.com J.E.B. Pickett (SBN ) Jebpickett@wynnelawfirm.com WYNNE LAW FIRM 0 Drakes Landing Road, Suite
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Case No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Case 1:17-cv-00346 Document 1 Filed 04/12/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-wqh-ags Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 Helen I. Zeldes (SBN 00) helen@coastlaw.com Andrew J. Kubik (SBN 0) andy@coastlaw.com COAST LAW GROUP, LLP 0 S. Coast Hwy 0 Encinitas, CA 0 Tel:
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:16-cv-10844 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ARLENE KAMINSKI, individually and on behalf of all others
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY
THE HONORABLE THERESA B. DOYLE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY 0 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO., a Washington labor organization, v. Plaintiff, STATE OF WASHINGTON (DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS)
More informationCase 2:16-cv RAJ Document 8 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-00-raj Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable Richard A. Jones 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE SAMATAR ABDI, an individual, and AHMED
More informationCase 1:13-cv PAB-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:13-cv-03258-PAB-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. KATHY WORNICKI, on behalf of herself and
More informationCLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado Arapahoe County Justice Center 7325 S. Potomac Street Centennial, Colorado 80112 FRED D. BAUER, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE
More informationCase 1:13-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:13-cv-11392-GAO Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS LEAH MIRABELLA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 13-cv-11392
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:15-cv-06177 Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------- )( ABU ASHRAF, on behalf
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-jfw-jc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: BOREN, OSHER & LUFTMAN LLP Paul K. Haines (SBN ) Email: phaines@bollaw.com Fletcher W. Schmidt (SBN ) Email: fschmidt@bollaw.com N. Sepulveda
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION
Case :-cv-0-tsz Document Filed 0// Page of Honorable Thomas S. Zilly UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE TIFFANY SMITH, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated,
More informationCase3:14-cv MEJ Document1 Filed11/24/14 Page1 of 18
Case:-cv-000-MEJ Document Filed// Page of TINA WOLFSON, SBN 0 twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com ROBERT AHDOOT, SBN 0 rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com THEODORE W. MAYA, SBN tmaya@ahdootwolfson.com BRADLEY K. KING, SBN
More information1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND
Case 5:16-cv-02572 Document 1 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Jose_ph R. Becerra (State Bar No. 210709) BECERRA LAW FIRM
More informationCase3:15-cv Document1 Filed07/10/15 Page1 of 12
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 Michael L. Schrag (SBN: ) mls@classlawgroup.com Andre M. Mura (SBN: ) amm@classlawgroup.com Steve A. Lopez (SBN: 000) sal@classlawgroup.com GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING. Plaintiff Steven Burnett, by his undersigned counsel, for his class action complaint
THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER Department 0 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING STEVEN BURNETT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:13-cv PAB-KMT Document 98 Filed 01/20/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 19
Case 1:13-cv-03258-PAB-KMT Document 98 Filed 01/20/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 19 ` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-03258-PAB-KMT KATHY WORNICKI;
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
EDWARD J. WYNNE, SBN 11 WYNNE LAW FIRM Wood Island 0 E. Sir Francis Drake Blvd., Ste. G Larkspur, CA Telephone: (1) 1-00 Facsimile: (1) 1-00 ewynne@wynnelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and the putative
More information11 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
The Honorable Carol Murphy 2 7 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF THURSTON JASON BEECHLER, on behalf of himself and al others similarly situated. No. -2-0- CLASS
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/21/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/21/2017 EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT E Case 114-cv-08406-VSB Document 40 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEMOND MOORE and MICHAEL KIMMELMAN, P.C. v. Plaintiffs, IOD INCORPORATED
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.
Case 1:17-cv-05118 Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Jason McFadden, individually and on behalf of all others similarly-situated,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION AISHA PHILLIPS on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SMITHFIELD PACKING
More informationCase 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0-jfw-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Nicholas Ranallo, Attorney at Law SBN 0 Dogwood Way Boulder Creek, CA 00 Phone: ( 0-0 Fax: ( 0 nick@ranallolawoffice.com PIANKO LAW GROUP, PLLC
More informationCase 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE NATURE OF THE ACTION
Case 1:19-cv-00429 Document 1 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MUSTAFA FTEJA, Individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, v.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.
1 1 1 1 0 1 Joshua H. Haffner, SBN 1 (jhh@haffnerlawyers.com) Graham G. Lambert, Esq. SBN 00 gl@haffnerlawyers.com HAFFNER LAW PC South Figueroa Street, Suite Los Angeles, California 001 Telephone: ()
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.
2:16-cv-13717-AJT-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/19/16 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1 STEPHANIE PERKINS, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, BENORE LOGISTIC SYSTEMS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES. Plaintiffs, vs. CLASS ACTION ALLEGED JURY TRIAL REQUESTED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IAN JORDAN, a Washington resident, on behalf of a plaintiff s class consisting of himself Cause No. and all other persons similarly
More informationCase: 2:16-cv ALM-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/16 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 2:16-cv-00581-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/16 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HAMDI HASSAN, on behalf of himself
More informationCase 1:17-cv AJN Document 17 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:17-cv-00957-AJN Document 17 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEBRA JULIAN & STEPHANIE MCKINNEY, on behalf of themselves and others similarly
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:15-cv-00071 Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Kurt Seipel, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and the proposed Minnesota
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:17-cv-07753 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SUSIE BIGGER, on behalf of herself, individually, and on
More informationFILED 18 AUG 30 AM 11:45
Case :-cv-00 Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of FILED AUG 0 AM : KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --- SEA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION TORRI M. HOUSTON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 4:17-cv-00266-BCW v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. For its answer to the Complaint, Defendants James Allen Diamonds, Inc.
Honorable Thomas S. Zilly 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE BLUE NILE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. C0-Z 1 v. Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS' AMENDED ANSWER AND
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION WHEEL PROS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, WHEELS OUTLET, INC., ABDUL NAIM, AND DOES 1-25, Defendants. Case No. Electronically
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: Bobby Saadian, Esq. SBN: 0 Colin M. Jones, Esq. SBN: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM 0 Wilshire Blvd., th Floor Los Angeles, California 000 Tel: () - Fax: () - Attorneys
More informationJURISDICTION AND VENUE. 2. This Court has original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331
D. Maimon Kirschenbaum Denise A. Schulman Charles E. Joseph JOSEPH, HERZFELD, HESTER & KIRSCHENBAUM LLP 757 Third Avenue 25 th Floor New York, NY 10017 (212) 688-5640 (212) 688-2548 (fax) Attorneys for
More informationthey are so related in this action within such original jurisdiction that they form part (212) (212) (fax)
Case 1:17-cv-05260 Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 15 D. Maimon Kirschenbaum Lucas C. Buzzard JOSEPH & KIRSCHENBAUM LLP 32 Broadway, Suite 601 New York, NY 10004 (212) 688-5640 (212) 688-2548 (fax)
More informationSECOND AMENDED COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN PAUL FRITZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Post Office Box 51 McFarland, Wisconsin 53558 Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 2:14-cv MJP Document 1 Filed 03/24/14 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-00-mjp Document Filed 0// Page of 0 KENNETH WRIGHT on his own behalf and on behalf of other similarly situated persons, v. Plaintiff, Lyft, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Defendants. UNITED STATES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Plaintiff, Case No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Case 1:14-cv-02120-MHS-WEJ Document 1 Filed 07/03/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DANIEL ANTOINE, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (hereinafter FedEx Ground ), by and
THE HONORABLE BRUCE HELLER SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY MITCH SPENCER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. --00- SEA v. Plaintiff, ACTION COMPLAINT FEDEX GROUND
More informationCase: 3:14-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/31/14 1 of 18. PageID #: 1
Case: 3:14-cv-02849 Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/31/14 1 of 18. PageID #: 1 JUDITH KAMPFER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
More informationPlaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION v. PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. 216(b)
Case: 4:18-cv-01562-JAR Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/17/18 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MAR BELLA SANDOVAL, Civil Action No. 18-cv-1562 Individually
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case :-cv-0-dmr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of THE RESTIS LAW FIRM, P.C. William R. Restis, Esq. (SBN ) william@restislaw.com 0 West C Street, Suite 0 San Diego, California Telephone: +..0. 0 UNITED STATES
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-06654 Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Ernest Moore, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, -v- 33 Union
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. [Complaint Filed 11/24/2010] [Alameda County Case No.
RANDALL CRANE (Cal. Bar No. 0) rcrane@cranelaw.com LEONARD EMMA (Cal. Bar No. ) lemma@cranelaw.com LAW OFFICE OF RANDALL CRANE 0 Grand Avenue, Suite 0 Oakland, California -0 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile:
More information("FLSA"). This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the New York state law claims, as they. (212) (212) (fax)
Case 1:17-cv-04455 Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 11 D. Maimon Kirschenbaum JOSEPH & KIRSCHENBAUM LLP 32 Broadway, Suite 601 New York, NY 10004 (212) 688-5640 (212) 688-2548 (fax) Attorneysfor Named
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION TORRI M. HOUSTON, individually, and ) on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:17-cv-00266-BCW
More informationCase4:13-cv YGR Document23 Filed05/03/13 Page1 of 34
Case:-cv-00-YGR Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 DAVID D. SOHN, Cal. Bar No. david@sohnlegal.com SOHN LEGAL GROUP, P.C. California Street, th Floor San Francisco, California 0 --00; -- (Fax) DAVID BORGEN,
More informationCase: 1:17-cv DCN Doc #: 14 Filed: 03/02/17 1 of 19. PageID #: 69
Case: 1:17-cv-00103-DCN Doc #: 14 Filed: 03/02/17 1 of 19. PageID #: 69 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TOBIAS MOONEYHAM and DEREK SLEVE, individually
More information8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY 9 STATE OF WASHINGTON, 10. Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION
E-FILED IN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON September 20 2017 9:34 AM 1 2 KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK NO: 17-2-11422-2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE
More informationP H I L L I P S DAYES
Case :-cv-0000-nvw Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 P H I L L I P S DAYES NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 0 North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 0 Telephone: -00-JOB-LAWS
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiffs and the putative class.
Case 1:17-cv-07009 Document 1 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 18 PagelD 1 Darren P.B. Rumack (DR-2642) THE KLEIN LAW GROUP 39 Broadway Suite 1530 New York, NY 10006 Phone: 212-344-9022 Fax: 212-344-0301 Attorneys
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA
Case :-cv-000-bro-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 CHRIS BAKER, State Bar No. cbaker@bakerlp.com MIKE CURTIS, State Bar No. mcurtis@bakerlp.com BAKER & SCHWARTZ, P.C. Montgomery Street, Suite
More informationCase 1:14-cv JHR-KMW Document 1 Filed 05/01/14 Page 1 of 32 PageID: 1
Case 1:14-cv-02787-JHR-KMW Document 1 Filed 05/01/14 Page 1 of 32 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ---------------------------------------------------------------X BARBARA
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff,
Case 1:17-cv-00786 Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ZHEN MING CHEN, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, YUMMY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:17-cv-00751-R Document 1 Filed 07/13/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MATTHEW W. LEVERETT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase: 1:17-cv MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/14/17 Page: 1 of 24 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Case 117-cv-00102-MRB Doc # 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 24 PAGEID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION LIAN HUI QI, individually and on behalf of all Case No. other
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION ) OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT ) DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and ) THOMAS SHUTT, WILLIAM PIPER, ) DON SULLIVAN, SR.,
More informationCase 3:13-cv GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:13-cv-00101-GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS THOMAS R. GUARINO, on behalf of ) Himself and all other similarly
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/13 Page 1 of 37 PageID #:1
Case: 1:13-cv-03294 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/13 Page 1 of 37 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION EDIS TRUCKING, INC., individually and on behalf
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION TORRI M. HOUSTON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. v. SAINT LUKE S HEALTH
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING 0 0 MADHURI R. DEVARA and SUNIL KUMAR SAVARAM, individually and the marital community composed thereof, vs. Plaintiffs, MV
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:18-cv-00914 Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15 Justin Cilenti (GC 2321) Peter H. Cooper (PRC 4714) CILENTI & COOPER, PLLC 708 Third A venue - 6th Floor New York, NY 10017 T. (212) 209-3933 F.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO: 1:15-cv RNS
JOAQUIN F. BADIAS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, LUMBER LIQUIDATORS LEASING, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
More informationCase 1:19-cv AJN Document 2 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:19-cv-01707-AJN Document 2 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD MARTIN, LORI LESSER, LEIDIANA LLERENA, DAVID GUTFELD, and all others
More informationCase 2:16-cv RSL Document 82 Filed 12/20/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed // Page of The Honorable Robert Lasnik 0 MOHAMED A. HUSSEIN, an individual, and HASSAN HIRSI, an individual, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-06244 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DANIEL BANAKUS, individually and on
More informationunderpaid overtime compensation, and such other relief available by law. Plaintiffs, against INC.; ARLETE TURTURRO, jointly and severally,
Case 7:17-cv-00669 Document 1 Filed 01/29/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANGEL PUCHA and MARIA ALBA M. PUCHA PAUCAR, individually and in behalf of all
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. BEATRICE JEAN, and other similarly situated individuals, v. Plaintiff(s, NEW NATIONAL LLC d/b/a National Hotel, Defendant.
More informationCase 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1
Case 5:15-cv-00112-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ELISSA SHETZER, Individually and on Behalf of
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-at-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS A Professional Corporation Scott J. Ferrell, Bar No. sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com Victoria C. Knowles, Bar No. vknowles@pacifictrialattorneys.com
More informationCase 3:15-cv DRH-DGW Document 8 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:15-cv-00775-DRH-DGW Document 8 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CATHY JOHNSON and RANDAL ) JOHNSON, on behalf of themselves
More informationCase 8:10-cv RWT Document 77 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 8:10-cv-01958-RWT Document 77 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SAMUEL CALDERON, Civil Action No.: 8:10-cv-01958-RWT TOM FITZGERALD SECOND
More informationCase 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12
Case 0:17-cv-60089-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL PANARIELLO, individually and on behalf
More information(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiff proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs, and proposed Class
Case 1:17-cv-06413 Document 1 Filed 08/23/17 Page 1 of 17 D. Maimon Kirschenbaum Josef Nussbaum JOSEPH & KIRSCHENBAUM LLP 32 Broadway, Suite 601 New York, NY 10004 (212) 688-5640 (212) 688-2548 (fax) Attorneysfor
More informationCase 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2018 Page 1 of 10. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.
Case 9:18-cv-80605-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2018 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. Shelli Buhr, on behalf of herself and others similarly
More informationCase: 4:14-cv AGF Doc. #: 49 Filed: 04/03/15 Page: 1 of 49 PageID #: 637
Case: 4:14-cv-01833-AGF Doc. #: 49 Filed: 04/03/15 Page: 1 of 49 PageID #: 637 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. LOUIS DIVISION MARK BOSWELL, DAVID LUTTON, and VICKIE
More informationR. BRIAN DIXON, Bar No LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Case :-cv-000-jgb-rao Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 R. BRIAN DIXON, Bar No. 0 bdixon@littler.com Bush Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone:..0 Facsimile:..0 DOUGLAS A. WICKHAM, Bar
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-02127-MLB Document 1 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ROSA LOPEZ, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY ) CRAIG WILLIAMS, JOHN WILLIAMS ) AND FRED BERRY on behalf of ) themselves and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No. ) v. )
More informationI. ANSWER. COMES NOW Defendant IMPULSE MEDIA GROUP, INC. in the above-captioned
United States of America v. Impulse Media Group Inc Doc. Case :0-cv-0-RSL Document Filed 0//0 Page of HON. ROBERT S. LASNIK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 UNITED
More informationCase 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-0-jcm-vcf Document Filed // Page of R. Scott Weide, Esq. Nevada Bar No. sweide@weidemiller.com Ryan Gile, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 0 rgile@weidemiller.com Kendelee L. Works, Esq. Nevada Bar No. kworks@weidemiller.com
More informationCase 8:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 MILSTEIN, ADELMAN, JACKSON, FAIRCHILD & WADE, LLP Gillian L. Wade, Bar No. gwade@milsteinadelman.com 00 Constellation Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 00 Tel:
More information