UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA"

Transcription

1 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Kurt Seipel, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, v. Plaintiff, Case No.: COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Safety Signs Inc. and Safety Signs, LLC, Defendants. Kurt Seipel ( Plaintiff Seipel ), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the members of the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, by and through his attorneys, Nichols Kaster, PLLP, brings this action against Defendants Safety Signs Inc. and Safety Signs, LLC (collectively Defendant ) for damages and other relief relating to violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Minnesota law. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. The state of Minnesota requires employees who work on projects, financed in whole or in part by state funds, to be paid at a prevailing wage rate. This case is about Defendant s systematic violation of federal and state law by (1) calculating overtime related to work on projects financed in whole or part by state funds at an hourly rate set by Defendant rather than the basic hourly rate set by state prevailing wage law, (2) applying the wrong labor code when calculating prevailing and overtime wages related to work on projects financed in whole or part by state funds, (3) failing to include

2 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 2 of 22 all time at the jobsite as hours worked when calculating prevailing and overtime wages, (4) failing to post the prevailing wage rate at its job sites, (5) failing to keep proper records; and (6) deducting administration fees related to fringe benefits. 2. Plaintiff Seipel brings this case on behalf of himself and Defendant s other traffic control and pavement marking employees (and those similarly situated) to recover for these violations. 3. This action is brought as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201, et seq., ( FLSA ) for failure to pay federally mandated compensation. 4. This action is also brought as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to remedy violations of Minnesota law, under the Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act, Minn. Stat , et seq. ( MFLSA ), the Minnesota Prevailing Wage Law, Minn. Stat , the Minnesota Wage Laws, Minn. Stat and , and breach of contract. 5. Defendant willfully engaged in a pattern, policy, and practice of unlawful conduct for the actions alleged in this Complaint, in violation of the federal and state rights of Plaintiff Seipel, others similarly situated, and members of the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This action arises under the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. Therefore, the Court has original jurisdiction to hear this Complaint and to adjudicate the claims stated herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C

3 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 3 of This Court also has supplemental jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367, over the state law claims, as the state and federal claims derive from a common nucleus of operative fact. 8. Venue is proper in the United States District Court, District of Minnesota, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391, as Defendant resides in this District and because events giving rise to the claims occurred here. PARTIES Plaintiff Seipel 9. Plaintiff Seipel is an adult resident of the State of Wisconsin. Plaintiff Seipel works for Defendant in the pavement marking division at Defendant s Lakeville, Minnesota office and at various job sites in Minnesota. 10. Plaintiff Seipel has worked for Defendant from approximately June 2013 to the present. 11. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b), Plaintiff Seipel has consented in writing to be a party to the FLSA claims asserted in this action. Plaintiff Seipel s signed consent form is attached as Exhibit A. 12. Plaintiff Seipel and others similarly situated are current and former employees of Defendant within the meaning of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 203(e)(1). 13. Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class are current and former employees of Defendant within the meaning of Minn. Stat , Minn. Stat , and other applicable laws. 3

4 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 4 of Plaintiff Seipel, others similarly situated, and members of the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class have been employed by Defendant within at three years prior to the filing of this lawsuit. Defendant 15. Upon information and belief, Defendant Safety Signs does business under two legal names, Safety Signs Inc. and Safety Signs, LLC. 16. Safety Signs Inc. is a domestic corporation, with its principal place of business in Lakeville, Minnesota. 17. Safety Signs, LLC is a domestic corporation, with its principal place of business in Lakeville, Minnesota. 18. At all relevant times, Defendant has employed individuals engaged in interstate commerce and/or the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C According to its website, Defendant provides traffic-control equipment and services to help keep roads, work zones, construction crews, and pedestrians safe when roads are under construction. Defendant s customers include state and munincipal highway departments throughout Minnesota as well as local contractors and privateproperty owners. 20. Upon information and belief, Defendant s gross annual sales made or business done has been $500,000 or greater at all relevant times. 4

5 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 5 of Defendant maintains its main office in Lakeville, Minnesota as well as three regional offices in Duluth, Mankato, and Rochester, Minnesota. Defendant employs traffic control and pavement marking employees throughout the state. 22. Defendant is an employer engaged in interstate commerce and/or the production of goods for commerce, within the meaning of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 203(d). 23. Defendant has been and continues to be an employer and employs employees including Plaintiff Seipel, others similarly situated, and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class. See Minn. Stat , , subd. 7, , subd. 4. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS FOR ALL CLAIMS 24. Plaintiff Seipel, others similarly situated, and members of the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class worked as laborers in traffic control or pavement marking (or in other similar positions) for Defendant. 25. Defendant provides traffic-control services as part of highway construction projects in the state of Minnesota. Plaintiff Seipel and the similarly situated employees job duties included, but were not limited to: setting up and taking down barriers and signs to close roads or divert drivers to different road lanes for construction; marking pavement with paint, epoxy, or tape of various colors; or grinding away or water blasting off old paint and tape on asphalt and/or concrete roads to divert traffic for construction. In performing these job duties, Plaintiff Seipel and the similarly situated operated heavy equipment at times. 26. Plaintiff Seipel and those similarly situated performed work on projects financed in whole or in part by state funds. 5

6 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 6 of Minnesota law requires employers to pay their employees who work on projects funded in whole or in part by state funds, wages comparable to similar work in the area where the project is located (the prevailing wage ). A purpose of this law is to prevent local wage standards from being undercut on construction projects by low bidders that try to import cheap labor as a cost-cutting technique. See Minn. Stat The prevailing wage consists of a basic hourly rate and a fringe benefit rate. The fringe benefit rate can include benefits such as health insurance, pension plans, and holiday, vacation, and sick plans. The combination of these two rates is the prevailing wage rate. 29. In instances where Plaintiff Seipel and the similarly situated worked on projects that were not financed in whole or in part by state funds, Defendant paid them an hourly rate of pay, which was set by Defendant. 30. When Plaintiff Seipel and the similarly situated worked on projects financed in whole or in part by state funds, Defendant was required to pay them the prevailing wage rate consisting of a basic hourly rate, which was set by law and higher than their hourly rate set by Defendant, plus a fringe benefit rate set by law. See Minn. Stat The prevailing hours of labor may not be more than eight hours per day or more than 40 hours per week. Minn. Stat , Subd. 4. For hours worked in excess of the prevailing hours of labor, employees must be compensated at a rate of at least one 6

7 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 7 of 22 and one-half (1-1/2) times the hourly basic rate of pay. Minn. Stat , Subd. 1, , Subd The applicable prevailing wage rate varies upon geographic area and the type of job performed (i.e., the labor code). See e.g., Minn. R et. seq. 33. Defendant failed to pay Plaintiff Seipel and the similarly situated, on projects, financed in whole or in part by state funds, at a rate of at least one and one-half (1-1/2) times the hourly basic rate of pay when they worked hours in excess of the prevailing hours of labor. Instead, Defendant paid them one and one-half (1-1/2) times their lesser hourly rate of pay for these hours worked. 34. Upon information and belief, Defendant also denied Plaintiff Seipel and the similarly situated compensation for time spent at the jobsites. This resulted in Plaintiffs and the similarly situated not being paid for all their hours worked. 35. Defendant also misclassified Plaintiff Seipel and those similarly situated by incorrectly classifying them under a labor code that resulted in a lower prevailing wage rate than what is required by law. 36. For example, in several instances, Defendant classified Plaintiff Seipel as a traffic control person, when he was performing the job duties of a pavement marking or marking removal equipment employee. The prevailing wage rate for a traffic control person is typically less than the prevailing wage rate for a pavement marking employee. 37. Defendant routinely suffered and permitted Plaintiff Seipel and others similarly situated to work more than eight (8) hours in a day and more than forty (40) and 7

8 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 8 of 22 forty eight (48) hours in a workweek without paying them the proper overtime compensation for all of their hours worked. 38. For instance, Plaintiff Seipel typically worked over eight (8) hours in a day and over fifty (50) hours per week, where a majority of the hours and overtime hours worked were on projects financed in whole or in part by state funds. Defendant is in possession of the records of these hours worked. 39. Defendant failed to consistently post at the jobsite in a conspicuous place the prevailing wage rates. See Minn. Stat , Subd. 4, , Subd Defendant also misrepresented to Plaintiff Seipel and those similarly situated that the projects on which they were working were not projects financed in whole or in part by state funds, and therefore not prevailing wage jobs, when in actuality they were. When Plaintiff Seipel asked Defendant if he was working on a prevailing wage job, Defendant told him to not worry about it. 41. Defendant routinely deducted a percentage of the fringe benefit received by Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class as a purported administrative fee. 42. Defendant was aware, or should have been aware, that Plaintiff Seipel and those similarly situated should receive compensation calculated at the prevailing wage rate because, upon information and belief, the Minnesota Department of Transportation audited and ordered Defendant to pay back wages to its employees for certain jobs under its jurisdiction. 8

9 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 9 of Defendant received complaints about its failure to pay proper prevailing wages and overtime wages. When Plaintiff Seipel and his co-workers complained to their supervisors, the complaints were ignored. FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION ALLEGATIONS 44. Plaintiff Seipel, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, realleges and incorporates by reference the above paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 45. Plaintiff Seipel brings this action on behalf of himself and all individuals similarly situated. The proposed Collective Class for the FLSA claims is defined as follows: All persons who worked as laborers and/or construction workers in traffic control and/or pavement marking (or in other similar positions) for Defendant any time from three years prior to the filing of this Complaint through the entry of judgment (the FLSA Collective ). 46. Plaintiff Seipel consented in writing to be a part of this action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b). As this case proceeds, it is likely that other individuals will sign consent forms and join as plaintiffs. 47. Plaintiff Seipel and the FLSA Collective are victims of Defendant s widespread, repeated, systematic and consistent illegal policies that have resulted in violations of their rights under the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq., and that have caused significant damage to Plaintiff Seipel and the FLSA Collective. 48. Defendant willfully engaged in a pattern of violating the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq., as described in this Complaint in ways including, but not limited to, failing to 9

10 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 10 of 22 pay employees proper overtime compensation based on the prevailing wage rate. See 29 U.S.C Defendant is liable under the FLSA for failing to properly compensate Plaintiff Seipel and the FLSA Collective, and, as such, notice should be sent to the FLSA Collective. There are numerous similarly situated current and former employees of Defendant who have suffered from the common policies and practices of Defendant, and who would benefit from the issuance of a Court-supervised notice of the present lawsuit and the opportunity to join. Those similarly situated employees are known to Defendant, and are readily identifiable through Defendant s records. MINNESOTA CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS 50. Plaintiff Seipel, on behalf of himself and all members of the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, re-alleges and incorporates by reference the above paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 51. Plaintiff Seipel brings a claim on behalf of himself and as a class action pursuant to Rule 23(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class is defined as: All persons who worked as laborers and/or construction workers in traffic control and/or pavement marking (or in other similar positions) for Defendant in Minnesota at any time three years prior to the filing of this Complaint through the entry of judgment (the Minnesota Rule 23 Class ). 52. Individuals in the Minnesota Rule 23 Class are so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. While the precise number of class members has not been determined at this time, upon information and belief, Defendant has employed in excess 10

11 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 11 of 22 of sixty (60) individuals in traffic control and pavement marking in Minnesota during the applicable limitations period. Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class have been equally affected by Defendant s violations of law. 53. There are questions of law and fact common to the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class that predominate over any questions solely affecting individual members of the proposed Class, including but not limited to: a. Whether Defendant paid Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class proper prevailing and overtime wages; b. Whether Defendant s charge to Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 class for administration fees was unlawful; c. Whether Defendant maintained accurate records that are necessary and appropriate to enforce the state laws; d. Whether Defendant s conduct was willful; e. The proper measure of damages sustained by the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class; and f. Whether Defendant should be enjoined from such violations in the future. 54. Plaintiff Seipel s claims are typical of those of the members of the Minnesota Rule 23 Class. Plaintiff Seipel, like the other members of the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, was subject to Defendant s policies and practices of willfully failing to pay the proper prevailing and overtime wages. Plaintiff Seipel and members of the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class have sustained similar injuries as a result of Defendant s actions they were all denied proper prevailing wage and overtime pay they should have received. 11

12 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 12 of Plaintiff Seipel will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Minnesota Rule 23 Class, and has retained counsel experienced in complex wage and hour class and collective action litigation. 56. This action is properly maintainable as a class action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(1), 23(b)(2), and 23(b)(3). 57. This action is properly maintainable as a class action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(1) because prosecuting separate actions by individual class members would create a risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual class members that would establish incompatible standards of conduct for Defendant. 58. This action is properly maintainable as a class action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2) because Defendant has acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief with respect to the class as a whole. 59. This action is properly maintainable as a class action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3) because questions of law or fact predominate over any questions affecting individual class members, and a class action is superior to other methods in order to ensure a fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy because, in the context of wage and hour litigation, individual plaintiffs lack the financial resources to vigorously prosecute separate lawsuits in federal court against large defendants. Class litigation is also superior because it will preclude the need for unduly duplicative litigation resulting in inconsistent judgments pertaining to Defendant s policies and practices. There do not appear to be any difficulties in managing this class action. 12

13 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 13 of Plaintiff Seipel intends to send notice to all members of the Minnesota Rule 23 Class to the extent required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. CAUSES OF ACTION COUNT ONE VIOLATION OF THE FLSA OVERTIME PROVISIONS On Behalf of Plaintiff Seipel and the FLSA Collective 61. Plaintiff Seipel, on behalf of himself and the FLSA Collective, re-alleges and incorporates by reference the above paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 62. The FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 207, requires employers to pay their employees for hours worked in excess of forty (40) in a work week at a rate no less than one and onehalf times their regular hourly rate of pay. 63. Plaintiff Seipel and the FLSA Collective consistently worked more than forty (40) hours per week for Defendant. 64. Defendant did not pay Plaintiff Seipel and those similarly situated the overtime pay they were owed due to its policy and practice of (1) calculating overtime related to work on projects financed in whole or part by state funds at an hourly rate set by Defendant rather than the basic hourly rate set by state prevailing wage law or blended rate if applicable; (2) applying the wrong labor code when calculating their overtime wages related to work on projects financed in whole or part by state funds; (3) failing to include all time worked at the jobsite when calculating overtime wages; and (4) deducting administration fees related to fringe benefits. 13

14 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 14 of The forgoing conduct, as alleged, constitutes a willful violation of the FLSA within the meaning of 29 U.S.C Upon information and belief, Defendant also violated the FLSA by failing to accurately record, report, and/or preserve records of hours worked by Plaintiff Seipel and the FLSA Collective, thus failing to make, keep, and preserve records with respect to each of its employees sufficient to determine their wages, hours, and other conditions and practice of employment. 67. As the direct and proximate result of Defendant s unlawful conduct, Plaintiff Seipel and the FLSA Collective have suffered and will continue to suffer a loss of income and other damages. Plaintiff Seipel and the FLSA Collective are entitled to damages, liquidated damages, attorneys fees, and costs incurred in connection with this claim. COUNT TWO VIOLATION OF MFLSA OVERTIME PROVISIONS On Behalf of Plaintiff Seipel and the Proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class 68. Plaintiff Seipel, on behalf of himself and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, re-alleges and incorporates by reference the above paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 69. The MFLSA, specifically, Minn. Stat , requires employers to pay their employees for hours worked in excess of forty eight (48) in a work week at a rate no less than one and one-half (1-1/2) times their regular hourly rate of pay. 14

15 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 15 of The Minnesota Prevailing Wage Law, specifically, Minn. Stat , requires that laborers or mechanics of a prevailing wage job be paid one and one-half (1-1/2) times the hourly basic rate of pay for hours worked that exceed the prevailing hours. Prevailing hours are defined as hours worked up to eight (8) in one day or forty (40) in on one week. 71. Plaintiff Seipel and the Minnesota Rule 23 Class consistently worked more than eight (8) hours in one day and forty (40) hours in one week for Defendant on projects financed in whole or part by state funds. 72. Defendant did not pay Plaintiff Seipel and those similarly situated the overtime pay they were owed due to its policy and practice of (1) calculating overtime related to work on projects financed in whole or part by state funds at an hourly rate set by Defendant rather than the basic hourly rate set by state prevailing wage law or blended rate if applicable; (2) applying the wrong labor code when calculating their overtime wages related to work on projects financed in whole or part by state funds; (3) failing to include all time at the jobsite as hours worked when calculating overtime wages; and (4) deducting administration fees related to fringe benefits. 73. The forgoing conduct, as alleged, constitutes a willful violation of law within the meaning of Minn. Stat (5). 74. As the direct and proximate result of Defendant s unlawful conduct, Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class have suffered and will continue to suffer a loss of income and other damages. Plaintiff Seipel and the Minnesota 15

16 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 16 of 22 Rule 23 Class are entitled to damages, liquidated damages, attorneys fees, and costs incurred in connection with this claim. COUNT THREE VIOLATION OF MINNESOTA S PREVAILING WAGE PROVISIONS On Behalf of Plaintiff Seipel and the Proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class 75. Plaintiff Seipel, on behalf of himself and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, re-alleges and incorporates by reference the above paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 76. Plaintiff Seipel brings this cause of action under the Minnesota Prevailing Wage Law, Minn. Stat , Subd. 8, for failure to pay the proper prevailing wage as set forth in Minn. Stat The Minnesota Prevailing Wage Law, specifically, Minn. Stat , requires that laborers or mechanics of a prevailing wage job be paid one and one-half (1-1/2) times the hourly basic rate of pay for hours worked that exceed the prevailing hours. Prevailing hours are defined as hours worked up to eight (8) in one day or forty (40) in on one week. Minn. Stat , Subd Plaintiff Seipel and the Minnesota Rule 23 Class consistently worked more than eight (8) hours in one day and forty (40) hours in one week for Defendant on projects financed in whole or in part by state funds. 79. Defendant did not pay Plaintiff Seipel and those similarly situated the prevailing wages they were owed due to its policy and practice of (1) calculating overtime related to work on projects financed in whole or part by state funds at an hourly 16

17 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 17 of 22 rate set by Defendant rather than the basic hourly rate set by state prevailing wage law or blended rate if applicable; (2) applying the wrong labor code when calculating their prevailing and overtime wages related to work on projects financed in whole or part by state funds; (3) failing to include all time at the jobsite as hours worked when calculating prevailing and overtime wages related to work on projects financed in whole or part by state funds; (4) failing to post the prevailing wage rate at its job sites; and (5) deducting administration fees related to fringe benefits. 80. The forgoing conduct, as alleged, constitutes a willful violation of law within the meaning of Minn. Stat (5). 81. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s unlawful conduct, Plaintiff Seipel and members of the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class have suffered and will continue to suffer a loss of income and other damages. Plaintiff Seipel and the Minnesota Rule 23 Class are entitled to damages, liquidated damages, attorneys fees, and costs incurred in connection with this claim. COUNT FOUR VIOLATIONS OF THE MFLSA RECORD KEEPING PROVISIONS On Behalf of Plaintiff Seipel and the Proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class 82. Plaintiff Seipel, on behalf of himself and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, re-alleges and incorporates by reference the above paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 83. Pursuant to Minn. Stat , employers are required to make and keep records regarding work hours and pay. 17

18 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 18 of Defendant unlawfully failed to maintain records as required by Minn. Stat Defendant s actions in violating the above named statute were willful and not the result of mistake or inadvertence. 86. As a direct result of Defendant s unlawful conduct, Plaintiff Seipel and members of the Minnesota Rule 23 Class have suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial. COUNT FIVE VIOLATION OF MINN. STAT On Behalf of Plaintiff Seipel and the Proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class 87. Plaintiff Seipel, on behalf of himself and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, re-alleges and incorporates by reference the above paragraphs as if fully set forth herein 88. Pursuant to Minn. Stat , an employer cannot take deductions from wages for loss, theft, damage or other indebtedness without the worker s written permission. 89. Defendant willfully violated Minn. Stat when it deducted administration fees, from Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class fringe benefits. 90. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants unlawful conduct, Plaintiff Seipel and members of the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class have suffered and will continue to suffer a loss of income and other damages. Plaintiff Seipel and the Minnesota 18

19 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 19 of 22 Rule 23 Class are entitled to damages, liquidated damages, attorneys fees, and costs incurred in connection with this claim. COUNT SIX VIOLATION OF MINN. STAT On Behalf of Plaintiff Seipel and the Proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class 91. Plaintiff Seipel, on behalf of himself and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, re-alleges and incorporates by reference the above paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 92. Pursuant to Minn. Stat , employers must pay all wages earned by an employee at least once every 31 days on a regular pay day, designated in advance by the employer, regardless of whether the employee requests payment at longer intervals. 93. Defendant willfully violated Minn. Stat when it failed to pay prevailing wages and overtime compensation required by state law, and deducted administration fees, from Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class fringe benefits. 94. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants unlawful conduct, Plaintiff Seipel and members of the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class have suffered and will continue to suffer a loss of income and other damages. Plaintiff Seipel and the Minnesota Rule 23 Class are entitled to damages, civil penalties, attorneys fees, and costs incurred in connection with this claim. 19

20 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 20 of 22 COUNT SEVEN BREACH OF CONTRACT On Behalf of Plaintiff Seipel and the Minnesota Rule 23 Class 95. Plaintiff Seipel, on behalf of himself and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, re-alleges and incorporates by reference the above paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 96. Defendant entered into many valid contracts with public contracting authorities within the state of Minnesota of which Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class are third party beneficiaries. 97. These contracts provide that Defendant will pay Plaintiff Seipel at the prescribed prevailing wages for the prevailing hours worked as well as overtime premiums for hours worked in excess of the prevailing hours, in accordance with Minn. Stat Defendant failed to honor these contracts by not paying proper prevailing wages and overtime compensation to Plaintiff Seipel and those similarly situated. 99. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants unlawful conduct, Plaintiff Seipel and members of the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class have suffered and will continue to suffer a loss of income and other damages. Plaintiff Seipel and the Minnesota Rule 23 Class are entitled to damages, liquidated damages, and other costs incurred in connection with this claim. 20

21 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 21 of 22 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Seipel, on behalf of himself and the FLSA Collective, prays for relief as follows: a) Designation of this action as a collective action on behalf of the FLSA Collective and prompt issuance of notice pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b) to those similarly situated apprising them of the pendency of this action, and permitting them to assert timely FLSA claims in this action by filing individual consent forms pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b); b) Judgment against Defendant finding it failed to pay proper overtime for Plaintiff Seipel and the FLSA Collective; c) Judgment against Defendant for an amount equal to Plaintiff Seipel and the FLSA Collective s unpaid back wages at the applicable overtime rates; d) Judgment against Defendant for violating the FLSA by failing to maintain accurate time records of all the hours worked by Plaintiff Seipel and the FLSA Collective; e) A finding that Defendant s violations of the FLSA are willful; f) All costs and attorneys fees incurred prosecuting this claim; g) An award of prejudgment interest; h) An award of liquidated damages; i) Leave to add additional plaintiff by motion, the filing of written consent forms, or any other method approved by the Court; and j) All further relief as the Court deems just and equitable. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Seipel as Class Representative, on behalf of himself and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, prays for relief as follows: a) Certification of this action as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 on behalf of the Minnesota Class and the appointment of Plaintiff Seipel as Class Representative and his counsel as Class Counsel; 21

22 CASE 0:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 22 of 22 b) Judgment against Defendant finding it failed to pay Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class proper compensation and overtime compensation; c) Judgment against Defendant for an amount equal to Plaintiff Seipel s and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class unpaid back wages; d) Judgment against Defendant for an amount equal to the administration fees deducted from Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class; e) All relief available on Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class claim for breach of contract, including, without limitation, an award of all of unpaid prevailing and overtime wages; f) Judgment against Defendant for violating Minnesota law by failing to maintain accurate time records of all the hours worked by Plaintiff Seipel and the proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class; g) All damages, liquidated damages, civil penalties, and prejudgment interest available; h) All costs and attorneys fees incurred prosecuting this claim; and i) All further relief as the Court deems just and equitable. Dated: January 13, 2015 NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP /s/ Michele R. Fisher Michele R. Fisher, MN Bar No Brittany Skemp, MN Bar. No IDS Center, 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN Telephone (612) Fax (612) fisher@nka.com bbachmanskemp@nka.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT v. (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT v. (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED) CASE 0:14-cv-01414 Document 1 Filed 05/06/14 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Toni Marano and Summer Schultz, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:15-cv-03748 Document 1 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA TONA CLEVENGER, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the

More information

Case 8:10-cv RWT Document 77 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 8:10-cv RWT Document 77 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Case 8:10-cv-01958-RWT Document 77 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SAMUEL CALDERON, Civil Action No.: 8:10-cv-01958-RWT TOM FITZGERALD SECOND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:15-cv-00563-SRN-SER Document 19 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Paris Shoots, Jonathan Bell, Maxwell Turner, Tammy Hope, and Phillipp Ostrovsky on

More information

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23 Case 7:18-cv-03583-CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------X CHRISTOPHER AYALA, BENJAMIN

More information

CASE 0:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:16-cv-02040 Document 1 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA John Voss, individually and on behalf : of other similarly situated individuals, : : Civil File

More information

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case: 1:17-cv-07753 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SUSIE BIGGER, on behalf of herself, individually, and on

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FITAPELLI & SCHAFFER, LLP Brian S. Schaffer 475 Park Avenue South, 12 th Floor New York, New York 10016 Telephone: (212) 300-0375 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon. 2:16-cv-13717-AJT-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/19/16 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1 STEPHANIE PERKINS, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, BENORE LOGISTIC SYSTEMS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants. Case 1:17-cv-05118 Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Jason McFadden, individually and on behalf of all others similarly-situated,

More information

Case: 3:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/23/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 3:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/23/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Case: 3:11-cv-00592 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/23/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ROBERTA FOSBINDER-BITTORF individually and on behalf of all others

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14 Case 1:17-cv-06654 Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Ernest Moore, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, -v- 33 Union

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION MARYROSE WOLFE, and CASSIE KLEIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION Plaintiffs, v. SL MANAGEMENT

More information

Case: 3:14-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/31/14 1 of 18. PageID #: 1

Case: 3:14-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/31/14 1 of 18. PageID #: 1 Case: 3:14-cv-02849 Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/31/14 1 of 18. PageID #: 1 JUDITH KAMPFER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 15-CV-1588

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 15-CV-1588 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION mil ANGELA BRANDT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 15-CV-1588 WATER

More information

JURISDICTION AND VENUE. 2. This Court has original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331

JURISDICTION AND VENUE. 2. This Court has original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 D. Maimon Kirschenbaum Denise A. Schulman Charles E. Joseph JOSEPH, HERZFELD, HESTER & KIRSCHENBAUM LLP 757 Third Avenue 25 th Floor New York, NY 10017 (212) 688-5640 (212) 688-2548 (fax) Attorneys for

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case: 1:16-cv-10844 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ARLENE KAMINSKI, individually and on behalf of all others

More information

SECOND AMENDED COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

SECOND AMENDED COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN PAUL FRITZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Post Office Box 51 McFarland, Wisconsin 53558 Plaintiffs,

More information

they are so related in this action within such original jurisdiction that they form part (212) (212) (fax)

they are so related in this action within such original jurisdiction that they form part (212) (212) (fax) Case 1:17-cv-05260 Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 15 D. Maimon Kirschenbaum Lucas C. Buzzard JOSEPH & KIRSCHENBAUM LLP 32 Broadway, Suite 601 New York, NY 10004 (212) 688-5640 (212) 688-2548 (fax)

More information

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 13 U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON NO.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 13 U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON NO. Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 JAMIE BAZZELL and CARISSA ALIOTO, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, vs. U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:16-cv-04407-AT Document 1 Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Catherine Esteppe, individually and on behalf of all other similarly

More information

4:18-cv RBH Date Filed 05/24/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION

4:18-cv RBH Date Filed 05/24/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION 4:18-cv-01422-RBH Date Filed 05/24/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION MICHAEL PECORA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly

More information

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/03/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) )

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/03/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) Case: 1:17-cv-00018 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/03/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS LAURA BYRNE, on behalf of herself, individually, and on

More information

Case 1:17-cv AJN Document 17 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv AJN Document 17 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:17-cv-00957-AJN Document 17 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEBRA JULIAN & STEPHANIE MCKINNEY, on behalf of themselves and others similarly

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT Case 1:17-cv-02488 Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

("FLSA"). This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the New York state law claims, as they. (212) (212) (fax)

(FLSA). This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the New York state law claims, as they. (212) (212) (fax) Case 1:17-cv-04455 Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 11 D. Maimon Kirschenbaum JOSEPH & KIRSCHENBAUM LLP 32 Broadway, Suite 601 New York, NY 10004 (212) 688-5640 (212) 688-2548 (fax) Attorneysfor Named

More information

Case 2:16-cv LDW-SIL Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 19. No. 16-cv-6584

Case 2:16-cv LDW-SIL Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 19. No. 16-cv-6584 Case 2:16-cv-06584-LDW-SIL Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NICOLE COLLYMORE and FAISAL MALIK, on behalf of themselves and all

More information

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the putative class.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the putative class. Case 1:17-cv-07009 Document 1 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 18 PagelD 1 Darren P.B. Rumack (DR-2642) THE KLEIN LAW GROUP 39 Broadway Suite 1530 New York, NY 10006 Phone: 212-344-9022 Fax: 212-344-0301 Attorneys

More information

Case 2 : 08-cv JWL-DJW Document 43 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case 2 : 08-cv JWL-DJW Document 43 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 12 Case 2 : 08-cv-02222-JWL-DJW Document 43 Filed 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS RICK HARLOW, JON SCHOEPFLIN, MYRA LISA DAVIS, and JIM KOVAL individually

More information

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiff proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs, and proposed Class

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiff proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs, and proposed Class Case 1:17-cv-06413 Document 1 Filed 08/23/17 Page 1 of 17 D. Maimon Kirschenbaum Josef Nussbaum JOSEPH & KIRSCHENBAUM LLP 32 Broadway, Suite 601 New York, NY 10004 (212) 688-5640 (212) 688-2548 (fax) Attorneysfor

More information

1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND

1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND Case 5:16-cv-02572 Document 1 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Jose_ph R. Becerra (State Bar No. 210709) BECERRA LAW FIRM

More information

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE NATURE OF THE ACTION Case 1:19-cv-00429 Document 1 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MUSTAFA FTEJA, Individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, v.

More information

similarly situated, seeks the recovery of unpaid wages and related damages for unpaid minimum wage and overtime hours worked, while employed by Bab.

similarly situated, seeks the recovery of unpaid wages and related damages for unpaid minimum wage and overtime hours worked, while employed by Bab. Case 1:17-cv-00800 Document 1 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 14 Darren P.B. Rumack THE KLEIN LAW GROUP 39 Broadway Suite 1530 New York, NY 10006 Phone: 212-344-9022 Fax: 212-344-0301 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

More information

Case: 1:17-cv MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/14/17 Page: 1 of 24 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/14/17 Page: 1 of 24 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Case 117-cv-00102-MRB Doc # 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 24 PAGEID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION LIAN HUI QI, individually and on behalf of all Case No. other

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION AISHA PHILLIPS on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SMITHFIELD PACKING

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff,

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff, Case 1:17-cv-00786 Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ZHEN MING CHEN, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, YUMMY

More information

Case 5:18-cv EJD Document 31 Filed 05/03/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 5:18-cv EJD Document 31 Filed 05/03/18 Page 1 of 14 Case :-cv-00-ejd Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Edward J. Wynne (SBN ) ewynne@wynnelawfirm.com WYNNE LAW FIRM 0 E. Sir Francis Drake Blvd., Ste. G Larkspur, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -00 Gregg I.

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15 Case 1:16-cv-09169 Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Wanda Rosario-Medina, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0-jfw-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Nicholas Ranallo, Attorney at Law SBN 0 Dogwood Way Boulder Creek, CA 00 Phone: ( 0-0 Fax: ( 0 nick@ranallolawoffice.com PIANKO LAW GROUP, PLLC

More information

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13 6:15-cv-02475-MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Roger DeBenedetto, individually and on ) behalf

More information

Case 1:09-cv CAP Document 1 Filed 12/21/2009 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:09-cv CAP Document 1 Filed 12/21/2009 Page 1 of 14 Case 1:09-cv-03579-CAP Document 1 Filed 12/21/2009 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION FILED i11 CLERKS 0FF1CE DEC 2 12009 TIANNA WINGATE,

More information

Plaintiff, Defendant.

Plaintiff, Defendant. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NOEL CINTRON, -against- Plaintiff, TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC a/k/a TRUMP CORPORATION and TRUMP TOWER COMMERCIAL LLC, Index No. SUMMONS The basis for

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15 Case 1:18-cv-00914 Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15 Justin Cilenti (GC 2321) Peter H. Cooper (PRC 4714) CILENTI & COOPER, PLLC 708 Third A venue - 6th Floor New York, NY 10017 T. (212) 209-3933 F.

More information

Case: 3:15-cv jdp Document #: 1 Filed: 02/10/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case: 3:15-cv jdp Document #: 1 Filed: 02/10/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Case: 3:15-cv-00081-jdp Document #: 1 Filed: 02/10/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LONG, D., individually and on behalf of all others similarly

More information

Case: 2:16-cv ALM-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/16 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 1

Case: 2:16-cv ALM-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/16 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 1 Case: 2:16-cv-00581-ALM-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/16 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HAMDI HASSAN, on behalf of himself

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants. Case 1:17-cv-09635 Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 Justin Cilenti (GC 2321) Peter H. Cooper (PHC 4714) CILENTI & COOPER, PLLC 708 Third A venue - 6 1 h Floor New York, NY 10017 T. (212) 209-3933

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-00-jjt Document Filed 0// Page of 0 SUSAN MARTIN (AZ#0 DANIEL BONNETT (AZ#0 JENNIFER KROLL (AZ#0 MARTIN & BONNETT, P.L.L.C. N. nd Street, Suite Phoenix, Arizona 0 Telephone: (0 0-00 smartin@martinbonnett.com

More information

underpaid overtime compensation, and such other relief available by law. Plaintiffs, against INC.; ARLETE TURTURRO, jointly and severally,

underpaid overtime compensation, and such other relief available by law. Plaintiffs, against INC.; ARLETE TURTURRO, jointly and severally, Case 7:17-cv-00669 Document 1 Filed 01/29/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANGEL PUCHA and MARIA ALBA M. PUCHA PAUCAR, individually and in behalf of all

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION RUBY SHEFFIELD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff Civil Action No.: 7:16-cv-332

More information

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA Case :-cv-000-bro-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 CHRIS BAKER, State Bar No. cbaker@bakerlp.com MIKE CURTIS, State Bar No. mcurtis@bakerlp.com BAKER & SCHWARTZ, P.C. Montgomery Street, Suite

More information

\~~\r,>~~~~>:~<~,~:<~ J,,~:~\

\~~\r,>~~~~>:~<~,~:<~ J,,~:~\ D. Maimon Kirschenbaum (DK 2448) Charles E. Joseph (CJ-9442) JOSEPH & HERZFELD LLP 757 Third Avenue zs" Floor New York, NY 10017 (212) 688-5640 (212) 688-2548 (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiffs and the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION FELICIA D. GRAY; individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION TORRI M. HOUSTON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. v. SAINT LUKE S HEALTH

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/20/17 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/20/17 Page 1 of 13 Case 1:17-cv-01280 Document 1 Filed 02/20/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ARACELI MENDEZ GUTIERREZ, individually and in behalf of all other persons similarly

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/16 Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/16 Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:16-cv-00660 Document 1 Filed 01/28/16 Page 1 of 29 FITAPELLI & SCHAFFER, LLP Joseph A. Fitapelli Brian S. Schaffer Armando A. Ortiz 475 Park Avenue South, 12 th Floor New York, NY 10016 Telephone:

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION AMENDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION LISA ADAMS, individually, and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. HY-VEE, INC., Defendant.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge COMPLAINT Case: 1:11-cv-08285 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/19/11 Page 1 of 37 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LARRY DEAN, SR. and WHITNEY EDWARDS,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION TORRI M. HOUSTON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 4:17-cv-00266-BCW v.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION TORRI M. HOUSTON, individually, and ) on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:17-cv-00266-BCW

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/04/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/04/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-04936 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/04/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTINA PADILLA and JESSICA ) ZAMUDIO,

More information

KUO, M.J. STATEME1IT. (hereinafter referred to as "Defendants"), to recover damages for egregious violations. Telephone: U.

KUO, M.J. STATEME1IT. (hereinafter referred to as Defendants), to recover damages for egregious violations. Telephone: U. Case 1:16-cv-06269-PKC-PK Document 1 Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 13 PagelD 1 0 CV.1 0 Helen F. Dalton & Associates, P.C. Roman Avshalumov (RA 5508) 69-12 Austin Street 2016NOV 10 PM 4: 35 Forest Hills, NY

More information

Case 1:14-cv JHR-KMW Document 1 Filed 05/01/14 Page 1 of 32 PageID: 1

Case 1:14-cv JHR-KMW Document 1 Filed 05/01/14 Page 1 of 32 PageID: 1 Case 1:14-cv-02787-JHR-KMW Document 1 Filed 05/01/14 Page 1 of 32 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ---------------------------------------------------------------X BARBARA

More information

Case 1:16-cv KAM-RML Document 1 Filed 09/26/16 Page 1 of 31 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv KAM-RML Document 1 Filed 09/26/16 Page 1 of 31 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:16-cv-05320-KAM-RML Document 1 Filed 09/26/16 Page 1 of 31 PageID #: 1 FITAPELLI & SCHAFFER, LLP Joseph A. Fitapelli Frank J. Mazzaferro 28 Liberty Street, 30th Floor New York, New York 10005 Telephone:

More information

Case 1:19-cv AJN Document 2 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:19-cv AJN Document 2 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:19-cv-01707-AJN Document 2 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD MARTIN, LORI LESSER, LEIDIANA LLERENA, DAVID GUTFELD, and all others

More information

7:14-cv TMC Date Filed 10/21/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13

7:14-cv TMC Date Filed 10/21/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13 7:14-cv-04094-TMC Date Filed 10/21/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA SPARTANBURG DIVISION Frederick Hankins and David Seegars, ) individually

More information

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0000 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 SHEILA K. SEXTON, SBN 0 COSTA KERESTENZIS, SBN LORRIE E. BRADLEY, SBN 0 BEESON, TAYER & BODINE, APC Ninth Street, nd Floor Oakland, CA 0-0 Telephone:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0000-jah -CAB Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK Norman B. Blumenthal (State Bar #0) Kyle R. Nordrehaug (State Bar #0) Aparajit Bhowmik (State Bar #0) Calle Clara

More information

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION v. PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. 216(b)

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION v. PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. 216(b) Case: 4:18-cv-01562-JAR Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/17/18 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MAR BELLA SANDOVAL, Civil Action No. 18-cv-1562 Individually

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY ) CRAIG WILLIAMS, JOHN WILLIAMS ) AND FRED BERRY on behalf of ) themselves and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No. ) v. )

More information

Case 1:18-cv MSK-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/18/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:18-cv MSK-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/18/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:18-cv-02386-MSK-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/18/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO SCOTT BEAN and JOSHUA FERGUSON, individually and on behalf of others similarly

More information

Case 3:10-cv P-BN Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 995

Case 3:10-cv P-BN Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 995 Case 3:10-cv-01332-P-BN Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 995 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BRIAN PARKER, MICHAEL FRANK, MARK DAILEY,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:15-cv-02498 Document 1 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 46 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Duniyo Hussein, Naima Omar Issa, Leyla Yusuf, Raymond Deshler, Assiongbonvi Luc Kangnigan, Melvin

More information

P H I L L I P S DAYES

P H I L L I P S DAYES Case :-cv-0000-nvw Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 P H I L L I P S DAYES NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 0 North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 0 Telephone: -00-JOB-LAWS

More information

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiffand the proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiffand the proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs Case 1:17-cv-00287 Document 1 Filed 01/13/17 Page 1 of 14 D. Maimon Kirschenbaum JOSEPH & KIRSCHENBAUM LLP 32 Broadway, Suite 601 New York, NY 10004 (212) 688-5640 (212) 688-2548 (fax) Attorneysfor Named

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 10 Case 1:18-cv-03145 Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 10 CILENTI & COOPER, 'PLLC Justin Cilenti (GC2321) Peter H. Cooper (PHC4714) 708 Third A venue - 6 1 h ifloor New York, NY 10017 T. (212) 209-3933

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION Case 1:18-cv-00058-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 03/26/18 Page 1 of 21 WILLIAM A. D ALTON D ALTON LAW FIRM, P.C. 222 North 32nd Street, Suite 903 P.O. Drawer 702 Billings, MT 59103-0702 Tel (406) 245-6643 Fax

More information

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 Case 5:15-cv-00112-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ELISSA SHETZER, Individually and on Behalf of

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action 1:16-cv-1080

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action 1:16-cv-1080 Case 1:16-cv-01080 Document 1 Filed 08/24/16 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action 1:16-cv-1080 ) CYNTHIA ALLEN, individually and on )

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-psg-pla Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Edward J. Wynne (SBN ) ewynne@wynnelawfirm.com J.E.B. Pickett (SBN ) Jebpickett@wynnelawfirm.com WYNNE LAW FIRM 0 Drakes Landing Road, Suite

More information

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18 Case 3:12-cv-04176-M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION FELICIA D. GRAY, individually and on behalf of

More information

Case 1:16-cv MJW Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:16-cv MJW Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:16-cv-00304-MJW Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. ASHLEY DROLLINGER, individually and on behalf of similarly

More information

ThSTS. hereby state and allege. bring this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.

ThSTS. hereby state and allege. bring this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Case 5:17-cv-05082-TLB Document 1 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 16 PagelD 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v, Ai WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION D U0LAS TRACE CLARK and DYLAN LUFF, Each

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Case :-cv-00-dcb Document Filed 0// Page of Michael Zoldan; AZ Bar No. 0 Jason Barrat; AZ Bar No. 00 00 N. Northsight Blvd., Suite Scottsdale, AZ 0 Tel & Fax: 0..0 mzoldan@zoldangroup.com jbarrat@zoldangroup.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KARLA OSOLIN CASE NO. 1:09-cv-2935 2989 Rockefeller Road Willoughby Hills, OH 44092 JUDGE GWIN on behalf of herself and all others

More information

2:14-cv DCN Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

2:14-cv DCN Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 2:14-cv-04138-DCN Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 Jose A. Rivera, On Behalf of Himself and other Similarly Situated Employees Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT

More information

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 19

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 19 Case 1:15-cv-06177 Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------- )( ABU ASHRAF, on behalf

More information

(212) (212) (fax)

(212) (212) (fax) Case 1:19-cv-01138 Document 1 Filed 02/06/19 Page 1 of 17 D. Maimon Kirschenbaum JOSEPH KIRSCHENBAUM LLP 32 Broadway, Suite 601 New York, NY 10004 (212) 688-5640 (212) 688-2548 (fax) Attorneysfor Named

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-jfw-jc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: BOREN, OSHER & LUFTMAN LLP Paul K. Haines (SBN ) Email: phaines@bollaw.com Fletcher W. Schmidt (SBN ) Email: fschmidt@bollaw.com N. Sepulveda

More information

"Defendants"), to recover damages for egregious. Plaintiffs, -against- counsel, brings this action against FIVE BROTHERS AUTO SPA AND LUBE

Defendants), to recover damages for egregious. Plaintiffs, -against- counsel, brings this action against FIVE BROTHERS AUTO SPA AND LUBE Case 1:18-cv-00907 Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15 Helen F. Dalton & Associates, P.C. Helen F. Dalton (HFD 3231) Roman Avshalumov (RA 5508) 69-12 Austin Street Forest Hills, NY 11375 UNITED STATES

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:18-cv-02127-MLB Document 1 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ROSA LOPEZ, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated,

More information

2:17-cv DCN Date Filed 09/10/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

2:17-cv DCN Date Filed 09/10/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9 2:17-cv-02429-DCN Date Filed 09/10/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Veronica R. McNeil, On Behalf of Herself and

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION Joseph Clark, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, Harrah s NC Casino

More information

approximately 1,100other similarly situated employees at its facilities in the Freemont,

approximately 1,100other similarly situated employees at its facilities in the Freemont, 0 approximately,00other similarly situated employees at its facilities in the Freemont, California area and elsewhere (the other similarly situated former employees ).. The Plaintiff brings this action

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Defendant. / INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Defendant. / INTRODUCTION 2:17-cv-10359-VAR-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 02/03/17 Pg 1 of 18 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN STEPHANE PARROTT and KEVIN WILLIAMS, Individually and on Behalf

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No. 1 1 1 1 0 1 Joshua H. Haffner, SBN 1 (jhh@haffnerlawyers.com) Graham G. Lambert, Esq. SBN 00 gl@haffnerlawyers.com HAFFNER LAW PC South Figueroa Street, Suite Los Angeles, California 001 Telephone: ()

More information

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed01/09/15 Page1 of 16

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed01/09/15 Page1 of 16 Case:-cv-00 Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 Matthew C. Helland, CA State Bar No. 0 helland@nka.com Daniel S. Brome, CA State Bar No. dbrome@nka.com NICHOLS KASTER, LLP One Embarcadero Center, Suite San Francisco,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Stacy Collins, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated CIVIL ACTION NO.: individuals. Plaintiffs V.. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. and.

More information

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:1

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:1 Case: 1:14-cv-02143 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSE SANCHEZ, on behalf of himself and all

More information

4:17-cv RBH Date Filed 05/19/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 36

4:17-cv RBH Date Filed 05/19/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 36 4:17-cv-01308-RBH Date Filed 05/19/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 36 In the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina Florence Division Chris Gagliastre, Zachary Tarry, and Olga Zayneeva,

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-10259 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION THERON BRADLEY, and TOMMY ) JENKINS

More information