IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
|
|
- Jeremy Bailey
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) MARY ADDI ) CASE NO Indian Hollow Road ) Elyria, Ohio 44035, ) JUDGE In Pro Se ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) COMPLAINT vs. ) ) HORIZON SCIENCE ACADEMY ) (Jury Demand Endorsed Hereon) DENISON MIDDLE SCHOOL ) 1700 Denison Road ) Cleveland, Ohio 44109, ) ) and ) ) MURAT SAGNAK ) C/O Gateway Academy South ) 6651 Gravois Avenue ) Saint Louis, MO ) ) and ) ) CONCEPT SCHOOLS, NFP ) 2250 E. Devon Ave. Ste. 215 ) Des Plaines, Illinois ) ) Defendants. ) Now comes Plaintiff, Mary Addi, by and in pro se and for her Complaint against Defendants, Horizon Science Academy, Murat Sagnak, and Concept Schools, alleges and states the following:
2 PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Mary Addi (Ms. Addi) is an individual who resides in Lorain County, Ohio, and is an employee as defined by R.C. Chapter All action alleged in this complaint that pertains to Plaintiff Mary Addi took place in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. 2. Defendant Horizon Science Academy Denison Middle School ( Horizon ) is a charter school and does business in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Defendant Horizon is an employer as defined by R.C. Chapter Defendant Murat Sagnak (Sagnak) is an individual who was employed by Defendant Horizon in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. At all times relevant Defendant Sagnak was a supervisor of Plaintiff and he is an employer as defined by R.C. Chapter Defendant Concept Schools, NFP is the company that runs Defendant Horizon Science Academy. At all times relevant, Defendant Concept Schools operated Defendant Horizon Science Academy which is Plaintiff s employer as defined by R.C. Chapter VENUE 5. Whereas the anticipated amount of damages exceeds the jurisdictional amount of the municipal courts of Ohio under R.C , jurisdiction in this action rests in the court of Common Pleas under of the Ohio Revised Code. 6. Whereas this cause of action arose in Cuyahoga County, this Court is the proper venue for this action under Rule 3(B)(3) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure.
3 STATEMENT OF FACTS 7. Plaintiff Mary Addi is a 61 year old Caucasian, female, and American citizen, and was employed by Defendants from August 2006 through February 12, Ms. Addi has a bachelor s degree in education, a graduate degree in teaching, and a Master s degree in business administration, and is licensed to teach in both California and Ohio. Ms. Addi was employed by the Horizon Science Academy Denison Middle School 1700 Denison Ave., Cleveland Ohio (Horizon). 8. Ms. Addi was terminated from her job in a retaliatory action because of complaints she made regarding discrimination, disparate pay, and retaliation. Ms. Addi was terminated for being a Caucasian female, a Christian, and an American citizen married to a Turkish national who was a member of the Gulen movement. 9. During Plaintiff s employment with Defendants, she and other employees who were similarly situated were subjected repeatedly to disparate pay, discrimination based on their gender, and discrimination based on national origin, and discrimination based on religion. 10. The Gulen movement is an Islamic movement that follows a Turkish imam named Fethullah Gulen. The movement has approximately 140 schools operating in 25 United States. Horizon employs numerous male Turkish nationals who are here in the United States on H-1B visas, and who are likewise followers of the Gulen movement. An H-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa in the United States. It allows U.S. employers to temporarily employ foreign workers in specialty occupations. If a foreign worker in H-1B status quits or is dismissed from the sponsoring employer, the worker must either apply for and be granted a change of status to
4 another non-immigrant status, find another employer (subject to application for adjustment of status and/or change of visa), or leave the United States. 11. These Turkish nationals hold both teaching and administrative positions at Horizon. From the beginning of her employment, Ms. Addi learned that nearly every administrator and some of the math and science teachers were male Turkish nationals in the United States on H1B visas. These Turkish males are under qualified for the positions that they hold. The majority of these teachers do not hold teaching credentials or teaching licenses other than substitute licenses. Many of the administrators do not have graduate degrees. Despite these deficiencies, these Turkish males command significantly higher salaries and positions than their more qualified American co-workers and female co-workers. 12. The disparity in pay is significant, as much as $12,000 per year. During the school year, while Ms. Addi, as a licensed, experienced teacher with a graduate degree made $30,000, Mustafa Emanet, an unlicensed and less experienced teacher made $42,000. Mr. Emanet was brought to the United States to be an IT administrator but was thrust into a teaching position with absolutely no teaching experience. Turkish males with little teaching experience and without licenses were consistently paid significantly higher salaries than their more qualified female American counterparts. 13. During her time at Horizon, Ms. Addi worked as an English teacher, a secretary, a special education teacher, and a grant writer. Despite her impressive qualifications, undergraduate and graduate degrees in teaching, Ms. Addi was nonetheless happy to fill in wherever she was needed. Ms. Addi was initially
5 hired by Murat Sagnak as an English teacher, August 15, 2006 for the school year at the rate of $30,000. Ms. Addi completed her $30,000 English teacher contract for the school year. Ms. Addi was offered and accepted a contract with Horizon to teach English for the school year at the rate of $32,100. Ms. Addi instead decided to work for the Cleveland Municipal School District (CMSD) for the school year and was subsequently released from her contract with Horizon. Ms. Addi decided to leave CMSD halfway through the year and received a contract with Horizon on January 15, 2008 as a per diem special education teacher. Ms. Addi, while a licensed teacher and administrator in Ohio, does not have a special certification in special education. The per diem contract was to end on June 6, Ms. Addi s problems at Horizon increased in the late spring of 2008 after she began to complain about instances of discrimination and unequal treatment. In April or May of 2008, Ms. Addi complained to her supervisor, Director/Dean of Academics Murat Sagnak, about instances of workplace gender and national origin discrimination. Plaintiff complained to Defendant Sagnak in or about the month of April Plaintiff complained that she was not offered a chance to apply for an open Dean of Students position. Ms. Addi also complained about the fact that she was not offered an interview for an open Associate Dean of Academics position despite her extensive qualifications. 15. On June 2, 2008, school officials learned that Ms. Addi had married her Turkish coworker, Mustafa Emanet in January On the same day administrators learned of her marriage, June 1, 2008, Ms. Addi was terminated. Ms. Addi s
6 contract was to end on June 6, Defendants failed to take prompt or adequate remedial action in response to Plaintiffs complaints, in terms of disparate treatment, and discrimination toward Plaintiff and other similarly situated employees continued and increased after Plaintiff s complaints about such conduct. Said conduct of Defendants in this regard constitutes retaliation upon the Plaintiff in response to her complaints. 17. On June 3, 2008 the President of Concept School (Concept School oversees Horizon and other Gulen charter schools), Hussein Kara, flew in for a meeting with Mr. Sagnak and Plaintiff s husband, Mr. Emanet. Mr. Emanet was told in no uncertain terms that he would lose his job if Ms. Addi filed any further discrimination complaints. Mr. Emanet was also told he would no longer have a job if he refused to divorce Ms. Addi because she was not a Muslim, was a Christian, and did not belong to the Gulen Movement. 18. Plaintiff filed a timely complaint with the EEOC, following her first separation from Horizon on or about June 2, Ms. Addi filed a complaint with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission (OCRC) that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) investigated on or about July 23, The complaint alleged gender discrimination, age discrimination, national origin discrimination, disparate pay, and retaliation. 19. After the complaint was filed, Ms. Addi retained counsel (Anthony Lazzaro) who wrote a letter of representation to Horizon. After Horizon received the letter, Ms. Addi was finally interviewed twice by Angela Ross for the vacant Associate Dean position. The dean position was ultimately filled by a less qualified male, Mr.
7 Terry. Ms. Addi and her husband were both offered contracts, and as negotiated by Mr. Lazzaro, for the school year. Horizon even created a grant writer position just for Ms. Addi. Per the contract, Ms. Addi was to make $40,000 per year payable in 23 semi-monthly payments beginning August 2008 and ending July 31, While Ms. Addi was willing and able to fully perform her contract for , she was prevented from doing so because on February 12, 2009, Ms. Addi s position was terminated. Horizon repudiated the contract. Plaintiff s employment contract was terminated by the Defendants on February 12, 2009 in a retaliatory action. At the time of the termination, Ms. Addi was employed under contract as a grant writer. Ms. Addi s employment was terminated by the Dean of Academics, Murat Sagnak. 21. Horizon defends the termination on the grounds that Ms. Addi was working concurrently as a substitute teacher in the Keystone Local School District. Horizon claimed this work as a substitute teacher was interfering with Ms. Addi s contractual duties as a grant writer at Horizon. This justification for termination is merely pretext. 22. Ms. Addi s required duties as a grant writer allowed her great latitude to work from home at her convenience. Ms. Addi was free to work at night and on the weekends if she so desired. Ms. Addi was in fact instructed by Mr. Sagnak to only meet with Horizon administrators after the school day ended. Ms. Addi was merely to meet with Mr. Sagnak at Horizon once a week after the normal school day was over and the staff had left the building. Ms. Addi s contractual duties at
8 Horizon were not adversely affected by her work as a substitute teacher. 23. Ms. Addi was terminated because she is a female Caucasian American citizen married to a Turkish national, because she reported the discrimination, and because she filed an EEOC complaint to protect her rights. Ms. Addi anticipated finishing the contract and teaching at Horizon for 5 more years, since she was close to retirement. 24. Ms. Addi believes that administrators at Horizon tortiously interfered with her subsequent efforts to seek gainful employment as a teacher. After her position was terminated, Ms. Addi applied for other teaching jobs and despite her extensive qualifications and experience, she was not hired. Ms. Addi believes that Horizon was giving potential employers bad references about her job performance. This tortious interference prevented Ms. Addi from obtaining a position in her desired field of teaching. 25. Plaintiff and her husband were repeatedly harassed and threatened by Horizon school representatives, both at Horizon Denison and Plaintiff s husband while visiting his family in Turkey. Plaintiff s husband was told that he should divorce Plaintiff Addi because she was not a Muslim or a member of the Gulen organization. 26. On or about June 3, 2008, agents of Horizon contacted Mustafa s family in Turkey and began a pattern of harassment and intimidation both here and in Turkey. Mr. Emanet s brother was contacted via by a former Horizon board member, Mr. Altunas, and told that Mr. Emanet was in trouble and married to an American, Caucasian, and Christian woman (Mr. Emanet s family was
9 unaware of Ms. Addi and Mr. Emanet s nuptials). Mr. Emanet s mother was recovering from open heart surgery and this news greatly upset her. After receiving this , Mr. Emanet s family asked him to return to Turkey to help care for his mother. While in Turkey, Mr. Emanet s brother received a visit from a member of the Gulen movement suggesting that Mr. Emanet not return to the United States because he would no longer have a job when he returned to the United States Despite these threats Mr. Emanet returned to the United States and his wife in July Mr. Emanet was not offered a contract with Horizon for the school year and was not rehired until Plaintiff hired an attorney to negotiate a contract for Mr. Emanet. 27. Plaintiff Mary Addi complained to the Horizon Board of Directors about such hostility, disparate treatment, and discrimination based on her gender and national origin on or about September 8, Ms. Addi felt that neither the EEOC investigation nor her complaint from the spring of 2008 to her supervisor, Mr. Sagnak, produced results. 28. In fact, Ms. Addi found a large number of derogatory s addressing both her marriage to Mr. Emanet and her complaints of discrimination. Plaintiff complained to Defendant Sagnak on or about September 4, 2008 about discriminatory behavior and derogatory s. Defendant Mr. Sagnak did not address this complaint. Ms. Addi wrote a letter to Mr. Sagnak providing evidence of the discriminatory and derogatory s and asking for some type of resolution. In the letter Ms. Addi states that she will involve the school Board of Directors if no action is taken. The letter produced no results. Next Ms. Addi
10 wrote a letter to the Board of Directors of Horizon asking for Mr. Sagnak s resignation and an investigation into the discrimination at Horizon. The derogatory s were provided to the Board as evidence of discrimination. The Board initiated an investigation and a written report was submitted to the Board by investigator Mark White. The report acknowledged misconduct and recommended a training session for faculty staff and administrators to help prevent further instances of workplace harassment and discrimination. 29. Ms. Addi s two (2) complaints to her boss, a complaint to the school board, and a complaint to the OCRC ultimately led to the retaliatory termination of her employment. Ms. Addi s desire to work in a discrimination free environment, a statutorily provided right by O.R.C (A), led directly to the termination of her employment. 30. Despite the complaints of Ms. Addi and others, Mr. Sagnak remained in a supervisory position, in spite of his track record of discrimination. In addition to Ms. Addi s claim, Horizon and Mr. Sagnak had at least two other discrimination claims filed against them. Don Gehrlein and Gloria Catalusci both former employees of Horizon, both filed discrimination lawsuits against Horizon. Mr. Gehrlein and Ms. Catalusci are both American citizens and were both employed as associate deans at Horizon prior to bringing their discrimination claims. 31. The EEOC closed its file on the charges that Ms. Addi alleged. The investigation ended on July 30, 2010 because the EEOC was unable to establish the violation of any statutes and issued a Notice of Right to Sue. 32. Defendants attempted to prevent Plaintiff s husband from testifying on her behalf
11 and as testimony directly related to her discrimination claims. In the summer of 2009, while Mr. Emanet was again visiting his family in Turkey, Horizon Science Academy Denison Middle School employee Hasan Akkaya met with Plaintiff s husband, Mr. Emanet, and instructed him to sign a false document stating that he had manufactured evidence that had been turned over to federal authorities/agencies for investigation into Horizon Science Academy s discriminatory practices and business dealings. Mr. Akkaya informed Mr. Emanet that if he signed the documents that the Gulen organization, and through Horizon Science Academy Denison, would find him suitable employment in another foreign country, pay his medical expenses for treatment for alopecia, and find a Muslim woman to marry. 33. Ms. Addi s estimated damages include: A two- year pay discrepancy of $6,000 - $12,000 per year for a total of $12,000 - $24,000. Ms. Addi anticipated 10 more years of teaching until her retirement at a salary of at least $40,000 a year = $400,000 plus. Ms. Addi lost her medical insurance and benefits. As a result of her termination, Ms. Addi suffers from mental anguish including; depression, anxiety, and nervousness. Horizon s tortious interference prevented Ms. Addi from obtaining a teaching position with a different school district thereby limiting Ms. Addi s income and preventing COUNT ONE (Gender Discrimination) 34. Plaintiff hereby reaffirms and reasserts all of the allegations raised in the previous paragraphs of this complaint as if fully re-written herein.
12 35. The action of Defendants as alleged herein constitutes discrimination against Plaintiff based on her gender in violation of R.C (A) with respect to the tenure, terms, conditions, privileges of employment, and other matters directly and/or indirectly related to their employment, by treating them differently than similarly-situated Caucasian co-workers, and by other means to be determined at trial. 36. The aforementioned conduct of Defendants was done maliciously and/or intentionally or with reckless disregard for the rights of Plaintiffs. 37. Defendants conduct as herein alleged constituted a conscious disregard for the rights and/or safety of Plaintiff that had a great probability of causing, and did cause, substantial damage to her, thereby rendering Defendants liable for punitive damages. 38. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants discriminatory conduct as alleged herein, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount in excess of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars. 39. As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants conduct, Plaintiff has incurred severe economic damages (including, but not limited to loss of income and other benefits), pain and suffering, humiliation, severe emotional distress, and the loss of enjoyment of life for which Plaintiff asserts a claim against Defendants as authorized under R.C COUNT TWO (National Origin Discrimination) 40. Plaintiff hereby reaffirms and reasserts all of the allegations raised in the previous
13 paragraphs of this complaint as if fully re-written herein. 41. Plaintiff is an American citizen and is a member of a protected class. 42. Plaintiff was treated differently than similarly-situated Turkish nationals. 43. Plaintiff was denied opportunities that were offered to similarly situated Turkish nationals. 44. The action of Defendants as alleged herein constitutes discrimination against Plaintiff based on her national origin in violation of R.C (A) with respect to the tenure, terms, conditions, privileges of employment, and other matters directly and/or indirectly related to their employment, by treating them differently than similarly-situated Caucasian co-workers, and by other means to be determined at trial. 45. The aforementioned conduct of Defendants was done maliciously and/or intentionally or with reckless disregard for the rights of Plaintiffs. 46. Defendants conduct as herein alleged constituted a conscious disregard for the rights and/or safety of Plaintiff that had a great probability of causing, and did cause, substantial damage to her, thereby rendering Defendants liable for punitive damages. 47. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants discriminatory conduct as alleged herein, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount in excess of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars. 48. As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants conduct, Plaintiff has incurred severe economic damages (including, but not limited to loss of income and other benefits), pain and suffering, humiliation, severe emotional distress, and
14 the loss of enjoyment of life for which Plaintiff asserts a claim against Defendants as authorized under R.C COUNT THREE (Religious Discrimination) 49. Plaintiff hereby reaffirms and reasserts all of the allegations raised in the previous paragraphs of this complaint as if fully re-written herein. 50. Plaintiff is an American citizen and is a member of a protected class. 51. Plaintiff was treated differently than similarly-situated Muslims. 52. Plaintiff was denied opportunities that were offered to similarly situated Muslims. 53. The action of Defendants as alleged herein constitutes discrimination against Plaintiff based on her religious beliefs. 54. In violation of R.C (A)(1) with respect to the tenure, terms, conditions, privileges of employment, and other matters directly and/or indirectly related to their employment, by treating them differently than similarly-situated Christian co-workers, and by other means to be determined at trial. 55. The aforementioned conduct of Defendants was done maliciously and/or intentionally or with reckless disregard for the rights of Plaintiff. 56. Defendants conduct as herein alleged constituted a conscious disregard for the rights and/or safety of Plaintiff that had a great probability of causing, and did cause, substantial damage to her, thereby rendering Defendants liable for punitive damages. 57. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants discriminatory conduct as alleged herein, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount in excess of Twenty-Five
15 Thousand Dollars. 58. As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants conduct, Plaintiff has incurred severe economic damages (including, but not limited to loss of income and other benefits), pain and suffering, humiliation, severe emotional distress, and the loss of enjoyment of life for which Plaintiff asserts a claim against Defendants as authorized under R.C COUNT FOUR (Discrimination in Pay) 59. Plaintiff hereby reaffirms and reasserts all of the allegations raised in the previous paragraphs of this complaint as if fully re-written herein. 60. In violation of Ohio Revised Code (2), Defendants did Discriminate against, limit the employment opportunities of, or otherwise adversely affect the employment status, wages, hours, or employment conditions of any person as an employee because of race, color, religion, sex, military status, national origin, disability, age, or ancestry. Defendant Horizon paid Plaintiff disproportionately less than her similarly situated male Turkish national co-workers. 61. Plaintiff and her similarly-situated American Caucasian male and female coworkers held the same job title, performed jobs which required equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which were performed under similar working conditions. 62. Plaintiff held the same or higher educational qualifications as her male Turkish national coworkers and was as, if not more, qualified than her male Turkish national coworkers.
16 63. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants wrongful actions, conduct, and/or failure to act, Plaintiff has suffered and in all likelihood will continue to suffer severe damages, including but not limited to, lost wages, mental anguish and emotional distress, stress, anxiety, and inability to engage in her usual activities, all to her detriment. 64. As a further direct and proximate result of the foregoing conduct, Plaintiff has suffered damages, including punitive damages, for the outrageous conduct of Defendants in an amount to be determined at trial. As a result of Defendants action as set forth above, Plaintiff asserts a claim against Defendants as authorized under R.C (2). As a result of Defendants action as set forth above, Plaintiff is entitled to recover in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages, including attorney s fees and the costs of this action, in an amount to be determined at trial. COUNT FIVE (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) 65. Plaintiff hereby reaffirms and reasserts all of the allegations raised in the previous paragraphs of this complaint as if fully re-written herein. 66. Defendants owed a duty to the Plaintiff to refrain from intentional and/or negligent injury to her. The wrongful conduct of Defendants as alleged herein resulted in the intentional infliction of emotional distress to Plaintiffs for which Defendants are liable. 67. Defendants breached their duty to the Plaintiff based on their conduct as alleged herein, and Defendants intentionally and proximately caused injury to Plaintiffs in
17 the form of embarrassment, mental anguish, loss of reputation, loss of selfesteem, harm to Plaintiff s relationship with her spouse and family, and other emotional distress with physical injury in form of adverse health effects. Said injuries caused extreme pain and suffering in the past and will likely continue to cause pain and suffering in the future. 68. Defendants conduct as alleged herein was outrageous and had proximately caused damage to Plaintiffs arising from their intentional infliction of serious emotional distress upon them for which they are entitled to judgment and recovery under Ohio law. 69. Defendants conduct as described herein was willful, malicious, with spite and ill will, and/or with a reckless disregard for Plaintiffs legal rights. 70. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants conduct, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount in excess of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars. 71. As a further direct and proximate result of the foregoing conduct, Plaintiff has suffered damages, including punitive damages, for the outrageous conduct of Defendants in an amount to be determined at trial. As a result of Defendants action as set forth above, Plaintiff is entitled to recover in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages, including attorney s fees and the costs of this action, in an amount to be determined at trial. COUNT SIX (Negligent Retention and Supervision) 72. Plaintiff hereby reaffirms and reasserts all of the allegations raised in the previous paragraphs of this complaint as if fully re-written herein.
18 73. Defendant Sagnak was incompetent as an agent of Defendant Horizon because of his failure to prevent and/or eliminate discrimination at Defendant Horizon and/or failure to take reasonable steps to do so Defendant Horizon owed a duty to their employees to properly supervise Defendant Sagnak to prevent discrimination in the workplace upon Plaintiff and others. 75. Defendant Horizon knew or, with the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known of the conduct of Defendant Sagnak. 76. Defendant Horizon breached the foregoing duty when it failed to take reasonable steps to prevent and/or stop Defendant Sagnak s conduct against Plaintiff as described herein. 77. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing conduct, Plaintiff has suffered severe economic damages by the loss of her job (including, but not limited to, the loss of income and other benefits), pain and suffering, humiliation, severe emotional distress, the loss of enjoyment of life, and was otherwise damaged. Said injuries caused extreme pain and suffering in the past and will likely continue to cause pain and suffering in the future. Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount in excess of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars. 78. As a further direct and proximate result of the foregoing conduct, Plaintiff has suffered damages, including punitive damages, for the outrageous conduct of Defendants in an amount to be determined at trial. As a result of Defendants action as set forth above, Plaintiff is entitled to recover in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages, including attorney s fees and the costs
19 of this action, in an amount to be determined at trial. COUNT SEVEN (Unlawful Retaliation) 79. Plaintiff hereby reaffirms and reasserts all of the allegations raised in the previous paragraphs of this complaint as if fully re-written herein. 80. Plaintiff s complaints to their employer about hostility, disparate treatment, and discrimination based on their gender and national origin and that of similarly situated employees constitutes opposition to an unlawful discriminatory practice under R.C (I). 81. Defendants continued and increased hostility, disparate treatment, and discrimination based on Plaintiff s national origin and gender after she complained to her employer constitutes an adverse employment action by the Defendants against the Plaintiff, and further discrimination and/or retaliation against the Plaintiff. 82. Defendants ultimate termination of the Plaintiff on February 12, 2009 was a retaliatory reaction for the complaint the Plaintiff filed with the school s Board of Directors in September 2008, and for the EEOC complaint that Plaintiff filed in July 2008, and for the Plaintiff and her husband s cooperation with a Department of Labor Investigation into Horizon Denison s activities. 83. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants discriminatory conduct as alleged herein, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount in excess of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars. 84. As a further direct and proximate result of Defendants conduct, Plaintiff has
20 incurred severe economic damages (including, but not limited to loss of income and other benefits), pain and suffering, humiliation, severe emotional distress, and the loss of enjoyment of life for which Plaintiff asserts a claim against Defendants as authorized under R.C As a result of Defendants action as set forth above, Plaintiff is entitled to recover in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages, including attorney s fees and the costs of this action, in an amount to be determined at trial. COUNT EIGHT (Aid, Abet, Incite, Compel, or Coerce Discriminatory Acts) 85. In violation of R.C (J), the Defendants and through their assigned agents, attempted numerous times to Aid, abet, incite, compel, or coerce the doing of any act declared by this section to be an unlawful discriminatory practice, to obstruct or prevent any person from complying with this chapter or any order issued under it, or to attempt directly or indirectly to commit any act declared by this section to be an unlawful discriminatory practice. 86. Through their numerous and intimidating contacts with Plaintiff s husband by their designated agents, Defendants repeatedly engaged in acts aimed at obstructing and coercing Plaintiff s husband into not testifying or participating in Plaintiff s anti-discrimination actions and complaints against the Defendants. The Defendants employed agents to aid and abet in obstructing Plaintiff s right to prove and defend discrimination claims against the Defendants. 87. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing conduct, Plaintiff has suffered severe economic damages by the loss of her job (including, but not limited to, the
21 loss of income and other benefits), pain and suffering, humiliation, severe emotional distress, the loss of enjoyment of life, and was otherwise damaged. Said injuries caused extreme pain and suffering in the past and will likely continue to cause pain and suffering in the future. Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount in excess of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars. 88. As a further direct and proximate result of the foregoing conduct, Plaintiff has suffered damages, including punitive damages, for the outrageous conduct of Defendants in an amount to be determined at trial. As a result of Defendants action as set forth above, Plaintiff is entitled to recover in addition to compensatory damages, punitive damages, including attorney s fees and the costs of this action, in an amount to be determined at trial. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF DEMANDS JUDGMENT AS FOLLOWS: As to All Claims: That this Honorable Court award Plaintiff Addi compensatory damages for her loss of income and benefits, including past economic loss and pay, future economic loss and pay, and/or the loss of opportunity to earn future income, effects of financial strain, physical injury, loss to reputation, embarrassment, depression, emotional distress, and other personal injury in an amount in excess of $25, to be determined at trial; and That this Honorable Court award Plaintiff Addi punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial; and
22 That this Court award Plaintiff Addi, costs and interest as to all Claims in an amount to be determined at trial; and That this Court award Plaintiff Addi costs per statute as applicable in an amount to be determined at trial; and That this Honorable Court grant Plaintiff Addi such other and further relief as may be just and equitable. Respectfully submitted, Mary Addi Mary Addi In pro se Indian Hollow Rd. Elyria, OH Telephone: (440) JURY DEMAND Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury in this case by the applicable amount of jurors allowed by law.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 2:07-cv-01314-LH-KBM Document 1 Filed 12/28/07 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO BRENDA A. COUCH, Plaintiff, v. No.: HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY-EL PASO,
More informationCase 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-00141-CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA-DAVENPORT DIVISION MELISSA ROSE WALDING MILLIGAN, Plaintiff, No.
More informationCase: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220
Case: 1:06-cv-02337-JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13
Case 4:16-cv-00648-JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION COURTNEY GRAHAM CASE NO. Plaintiff v. DRAKE UNIVERSITY/KNAPP
More informationCase 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-00-gmn-vcf Document Filed 0// Page of JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 COLLIN M. JAYNE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON 00 South Seventh Street, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada
More information9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8
9:12-cv-02672-PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION JULIE BANGERT, ) Civil Action #: ) PLAINTIFF,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!
Case 1:13-cv-01294-PLM Doc #1 Filed 11/27/13 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JILL CRANE, PLAINTIFF, v. MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL,
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:13-cv-05315 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN BUENO, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, )
More informationCase 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00498-RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 LISA COLE, Plaintiff, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY DEPARTMENT
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
1 1 1 Darrell J. York, Esq. (SBN 1 Sarah L. Garvey, Esq. (SBN 1 Law Offices of York & Garvey 1 N. Larchmont Blvd., #0 Los Angeles, CA 000 Telephone: ( 0- Facsimile: ( -0 Email: djylaw@gmail.com Email:
More informationCase 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:16-cv-02339-JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ASIA BLUNT ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ) KANSAS
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION
Case 1:16-cv-00628 Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 KIMBERLY PERREAULT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND v. C.A. HARMONY FIRE DISTRICT and STUART D. PEARSON, Chief Individually
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE SUSAN EDMONSOND, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Serve Clerk of the County Commission: 102 East Wall Street
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:10-cv-02411-JDW-EAJ Document 1 Filed 10/27/10 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION BELINDA BROADERS, AS PARENT, NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FOR AND
More informationCase: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2
Case: 5:15-cv-01425-SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2 3. At all times material herein, Suarez Corporation was Stewart s employer within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. 623 et seq. 4. At all times
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK PATRICIA RYBNIK, Plaintiff, -against- Index No. 158679/2016 MW 303 Corp. d/b/a MANHATTAN WEST HOTEL CORP., CYMO TRADING CORP., DANIEL DANSO, YOUNG
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:11-cv-00101-L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) SATERA WASHINGTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) (2)
More information2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT
2:18-cv-02186-CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 E-FILED Friday, 06 July, 2018 11:28:40 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION
Case 1:16-cv-00629 Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 LINDA FERRAGAMO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND v. C.A. HARMONY FIRE DISTRICT and STUART D. PEARSON, Chief Individually
More informationDJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.
eelveo FEB 2 0 018 DJAS Case 1:18-cv-00150-RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18 FILED FEB 202018 CLERK tj.. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ci.ix, U.S DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FARRAH
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION SOLEIL BONNIN 5901 Montrose Road, Apt. C802 Rockville, MD 20852 v. Plaintiff, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 3900 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
More informationCase 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164
Case :-cv-000-rswl-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Genie Harrison, SBN Mary Olszewska, SBN 0 Amber Phillips, SBN 00 GENIE HARRISON LAW FIRM, APC W. th Street, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 T:
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE JF KIMBERLY ASARO, v Plaintiff, Case No.: 17- - CD Hon.: CITY OF DETROIT, FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMISSIONER ERIC JONES, in his official capacity,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION ERICA N. STEWART PLAINTIFF V. CAUSE NO.: TAROLD DURHAM and BELHAVEN UNIVERSITY DEFENDANTS COMPLAINT (JURY
More informationJURISDICTION AND VENUE
KEVIN T. LAFKY, OSB #85263 klafky~,la~ky.com LARRY L. LINDER, OSB #0 1072 1linder~lafkv.com Lafky & Lafky 429 Court Street NE Salem, OR 97301 tel: (503) 585-2450 fax: (503) 585-0205 Attorney for Plaintiff
More information1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626
// : AM CV0 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 1 KAON-JABBAR EAST EL, an individual, v. Plaintiff, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a foreign business corporation, Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT COVINGTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT COVINGTON NANCY LEIDNER ) PLAINTIFF, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-CV-197-DLB ) MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ) ELECTRONICALLY FILED
More informationCase 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-0-jsc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of WILLIAM C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (State Bar No. ) BENNETT & JOHNSON, LLP 0 Harrison Street, Suite 00 Oakland, California Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 william@bennettjohnsonlaw.com
More informationCOMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
2:17-cv-12623-GAD-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 08/10/17 Pg 1 of 32 Pg ID 1 JOSE SUAREZ, vs. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CITY OF WARREN; LIEUTENANT JAMES
More informationFILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/ :56 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017
FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/2017 09:56 AM INDEX NO. 150126/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No. COUNTY OF RICHMOND Date purchased:
More informationCase 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:17-cv-14382-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: KELLY DOE, vs. Plaintiff, EVAN CRAMER,
More informationCase 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10
Case 5:09-cv-00349-JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV- REBECCA LEACH, ) ) Complaint
More informationCase 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Thomas A. Saenz (State Bar No. 0) Denise Hulett (State Bar No. ) Andres Holguin-Flores (State Bar No. 00) MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND S.
More informationSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO. 2018-CP-45- ANDRE L. WEATHERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS ) WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL
More informationCourt of Common Pleas
NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Court of Common Pleas New Case Electronically Filed: October 4, 2017 19:43 By: MICHAEL J. O'SHEA 0039330 Confirmation
More informationCase 1:14-cv RM-MJW Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-01483-RM-MJW Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO Case No. CANDICE ZAMORA BRIDGERS, vs. Plaintiff, CITY
More informationPlaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ESTATE OF HARLAND OLSEN c/o Eadie Hill Trial Lawyers 3100 E. 45 St., Suite 218 Cleveland, Ohio 44127 and vs. Plaintiff, ATHENIAN ASSISTED LIVING, INC.
More informationFOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
KEVIN T. LAFKY, OSB #85263 klafky @lafky.com LARRY L. LINDER, OSB #01072 llinder@lafky.com Lafky & Lafky 429 Court Street NE Salem, OR 97301 tel: (503) 585-2450 fax: (503) 585-0205 Attorneys for Tony Rodriguez
More informationCourthouse News Service
0 0 PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 0 JESHAWNA R. HARRELL, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. PRICE AND ASSOCIATES A Professional Law Corporation Telegraph Avenue, Ste. 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION
Filing # 70650268 E-Filed 04/12/2018 04:52:52 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION NEAL CUEVAS, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. CITY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ANGELINA ADAMS, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 16-2689 HASKELL INDIAN NATIONS UNIVERSITY, and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and SALLY JEWELL, in
More informationCase 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36
Case 1:14-cv-03673-KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36 ANTHONY G. MANGO (AM-4962) MANGO & IACOVIELLO, LLP 14 Penn Plaza, Suite 1919 New York, New York 10122 212-695-5454 212-695-0797
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES
~~ ~J Lichelle Smith IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE 1) S D,C Atlanta M AY 16 2008 JAMES NATT EN, C lerk By. AU-I~ Plaintiff,
More informationCase 5:14-cv CMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 5:14-cv-00152-CMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ELISABETH ASBEL, Plaintiff, vs. RENEWABLE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CLAUDE GRANT, individually and on behalf ) of all others similarly situated, ) ) NO. Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) METROPOLITAN
More informationCase 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:15-cv-23825-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (Miami Division) Case No: DAVID BALDWIN, vs. COMPLAINT Plaintiff,
More information3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10
3:17-cv-02281-MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Amanda Santos, Deryck Santos, ) and Aidan McKenna. ) ) FOURTH
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 1) Americans for Safe Access Webster St., Suite 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: () - Fax: () 1-0 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN
More informationCase 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-05977-FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY -------------------------------------------------------X SALEEM LIGHTY, -against- Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION KIRK CHRZANOWSKI, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 12 CV 50020 ) LOUIS A. BIANCHI, individually and in ) Judge: his
More information2:18-cv PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO.
2:18-cv-10735-PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 TARA EDWARDS, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. SCRIPPS MEDIA, INC., d/b/a WXYZ-TV,
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case 3:14-cv-01961-KI Document 1 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 17 Daniel Snyder, OSB No. 78385 dansnyder@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Carl Post, OSB No. 06105 carlpost@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Cynthia Gaddis,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:15-cv-12604-MOB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 07/23/15 Pg 1 of 11 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FAISAL G. KHALAF, PH.D, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 2015- Hon. FORD
More informationCASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES
~~~~~~~SAS DEC 1 5 ZOOO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT R EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JAMES1P~COR~ CLE WESTERN DIVISION BY:~ bep CCEF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION PLAINTIFF VS. CASE NO.
More informationCase 8:11-cv PJM Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 8:11-cv-01195-PJM Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND RUTH JOHNSON 9727 MOUNT PISGAH ROAD, APT #611 SILVER SPRING, MD 20903, Plaintiff,
More informationFrom Article at GetOutOfDebt.org
Case 5:04-cv-01148-L Document 1 Filed 09/14/04 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 1. VELMA McMAHAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) No. CIV-04- ) 1. TVC MARKETING
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:10-cv-00480-L Document 1 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) DETROY JARRETT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) (1) UHS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION KESEANDA BROOKS, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) Hon. v. ) Magistrate ) MEDICAL FACILITIES OF ) AMERICA, INC., d/b/a HANOVER ) HEALTH
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Information or instructions: Plaintiff's original petition-auto accident 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit. 2. It assumes several plaintiffs were rear-ended by an employee
More informationGRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff S.P., a fictitious name
POMPELIO, FOREMAN & GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff S.P., a fictitious name S. P., a fictitious name, vs. Plaintiff,
More informationHow to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation
How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation Ty Hyderally, Esq. Hyderally & Associates, P.C. 33 Plymouth Street, Suite 202 Montclair, NJ 07042 tyh@employmentlit.com www.employmentlit.com O- (973)
More informationCase 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION
Case 2:07-cv-02507-JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and SUKHBIR KAUR, Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE, PLAINTIFF, -- against -- THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK AND WILLIAM V. HARRIS COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case :0-cv-0-ROS Document Filed 0//0 Page of 0 0 JELLISON LAW OFFICES, PLLC 0 North Central Avenue Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) 0-0 E-mail: jim@jellisonlaw.com JAMES M.
More informationCase3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5
Case:0-cv-00-WHA Document Filed0//0 Page of Wayne Johnson, SBN: Law Offices of Wayne Johnson P.O. Box 0 Oakland, CA 0 (0) - Attorney for Plaintiffs 0 LYNART COLLINS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN
More informationCourthouse News Service
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JILRIALE LYLE, Plaintiff, v. No. THE CATO CORPORATION, Defendant. COMPLAINT Comes now the Plaintiff, Jilriale Lyle,
More informationCase 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16
Case :-cv-0-edl Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 Jinny Kim, State Bar No. Alexis Alvarez, State Bar No. The LEGAL AID SOCIETY EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone:
More informationCase 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 LAW OFFICES OF PERRY C. WANDER Perry Wander, Esq. (SBN: ) Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: -- Facsimile: -- pcwlaw@msn.com pcwlawyer.com
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11. Deadline
Case 1:18-cv-00674 Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SANDEEP REHAL, Plaintiff, - against - HARVEY WEINSTEIN, THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY LLC, THE
More informationCase 4:19-cv JSW Document 4-1 Filed 03/07/19 Page 2 of 30
Case :-cv-0-jsw Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0 Marísa Díaz, CSB No. 0 E-mail: mdiaz@legalaidatwork.org Christopher Ho, CSB No. E-mail: cho@legalaidatwork.org LEGAL AID AT WORK 0 Montgomery Street,
More informationCase 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13
Case 3:16-cv-01907-MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13 Daniel Snyder, OSB No. 783856 dansnyder@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Carl Post, OSB No. 061058 carlpost@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com John Burgess,
More informationUnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk
2/2/2018 1:06 PM Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 22259610 By: Nelson Cuero Filed: 2/2/2018 1:06 PM CAUSE NO. KRISTEN GRIMES, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, v. HARRIS COUNTY,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION MONICA DANIEL HUTCHISON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No.: 09-3018-CV-S-RED vs. ) ) Jury Trial Demanded TEXAS COUNTY,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI CHRISTINE DENT, Cause No: Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED vs. PAUL CERAME AUTO GROUP Serve: Spenserv - St. Louis, Inc. 1 North Brentwood Blvd.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. BEATRICE JEAN, and other similarly situated individuals, v. Plaintiff(s, NEW NATIONAL LLC d/b/a National Hotel, Defendant.
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case Case 2:08-cv-02695-STA-tmp 2:08-zz-09999 Document Document 806 1 Filed Filed 10/15/2008 Page Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT TIMOTHY J. ELLIS, CASE NO.: 1:07CV1541 59 James Place Northfield, OH 44067, Plaintiff, JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT -vs-
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/ :57 AM INDEX NO /2015
INDEX NO. 151068/2015 FILED : NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/13/2015 01: 01 AM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2018 02/13/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.
JANE DOE, Individual And As Next Friend Of LISA DOE, AND LISA DOE, Individual, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.
More information3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8
3:17-cv-02281-MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Amanda Santos and Deryck Santos ) as parents and guardians
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/2015 04:39 PM INDEX NO. 155631/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND
Antrobus et al v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al Doc. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Lynette Antrobus, Individually c/o John Mulvey, Esq. 2306 Park Ave., Suite 104
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Anthony J. Palik (SBN 01 LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ, INC. 0 Ninth Street, Suite Sacramento, CA Office: ( -1 Fax: ( - Attorneys for Plaintiff Jack Nichols UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT
More informationHYDERALLY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
HYDERALLY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Ty Hyderally, Esq. 33 Plymouth Street, Suite 202 Montclair, NJ 07042 tyh@employmentlit.com www.employmentlit.com O- (973) 509-8500 F (973) 509-8501 HOW TO USE TORTS TACTICALLY
More information2:16-cv DCN-MGB Date Filed 06/06/16 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13
2:16-cv-01822-DCN-MGB Date Filed 06/06/16 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION SHANNON E. DILDINE, ) Civil Action No.: 2:16-cv-01822-DCN-MGB
More informationPRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Brooklyn in which he was serving out the last months of his prison sentence to a
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------X Daniel McGowan : : Plaintiff, : : COMPLAINT AND -v- : DEMAND FOR A : JURY TRIAL United States
More informationCOMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 THE PARTIES. HEATHER MONASKY (hereinafter referred to as MONASKY ), is an individual, who was employed by THE MATIAN FIRM, APC, and Shawn Matian. Hereinafter referred to as DEFENDANTS..
More informationCase 1:18-cv JTN-ESC ECF No. 7 filed 06/11/18 PageID.30 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:18-cv-00405-JTN-ESC ECF No. 7 filed 06/11/18 PageID.30 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KIMBERLY FRENCH, GLORIA REID, TIESHA BRANCH,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA Civil Action No: 8:03CV165 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY and/or OMAHA
More informationCase 0:08-cv JRT-FLN Document 1 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case 0:08-cv-00029-JRT-FLN Document 1 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Linda Hildreth, Plaintiff, v. American Red Cross of the Twin Cities Area, and The
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION CHARLES TAYLOR ) 1524 NOVA AVENUE ) CAPITOL HEIGHTS, MD 20743 ) ) ) ) Individually and as ) Class Representative ) ) PLAINTIFF )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION CYNTHIA HUFFMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 01-3144-ODS ) NEW PRIME, INC. d/b/a/ PRIME, INC. ) Serve Registered
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SANDRA DILAURA and : Civil Action No. 03-2200 JEFFREY DILAURA, w/h, and : THE UNITED STATES EQUAL : EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY : COMMISSION,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL BRANCH -- UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
DLS/D ERFSIFIED LEGAL SERVICES, INC 1-0- FILro CIVIL SUSINESS OFFICE ; 1- RAL DIVISION 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 P. CHRISTOPHER ARDALAN, SB# ARDALAN & ASSOCIATES, PLC 0 Canoga Ave., Suite Woodland Hills, CA 1 Telephone:
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :58 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/2016 1058 AM INDEX NO. 157853/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/20/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationCase 3:16-cv DRH-PMF Document 6 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 21 Page ID #19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:16-cv-00207-DRH-PMF Document 6 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 21 Page ID #19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS KAREN GAUEN, Ed.D., v. Plaintiff, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF
More informationCase5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10
Case:-cv-0-EJD Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 Zahra Billoo, State Bar No. COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS (CAIR) 000 Scott Blvd., Suite 0 Santa Clara, CA 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) - Email:
More informationFILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.
, #, Case 5:05-cv-00965-WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 FILED JUN - 6 2006 CLERK~~k~Iu, COURT COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ~ D~PUTY CLERK ALICIA MANSEL, VS. Plaintiff-Intervenor, Civil Action No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:16-cv-00156-RC Document 1 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JOHN TOPPINGS and STEPHANIE TOPPINGS, PLAINTIFFS,
More information