MISREPRESENTATION INTRODUCTION
|
|
- Harold Whitehead
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MISREPRESENTATION INTRODUCTION During the course of pre-contractual negotiations a number of statements may be made with a view to inducing the other party to enter into the contract. For example a seller of a car may describe it as a good little runner or accidents free or as having very low mileage. Such statements may affect the nature and extent of the parties contractual undertakings. If an undertaking or assurance is a term of the contract or a collateral contract and it proves to be false, an action may lie for breach of contract. In that case the representee sues upon what is in truth a promise. But if this is the case then the representee must show that this promise forms part of a valid contract. On the other hand, if the promise does not constitute a term of the contract but a mere representation, and it proves false, the remedy will lie, in most cases, in an action for rescission and or damages for misrepresentation. The basic problem in misrepresentation is therefore the effect of pre-contractual statements. A misleading statement made during the negotiations leading to a contract may fall into one of three categories. First, it may be a mere puff, a commendatory expression which by virtue of its vagueness or extravagance would not be expected to and does not ground any form of liability. Secondly, the preliminary statement may be intended by neither party to have contractual effect, but nevertheless may seriously affect the inclination of one party to enter into the contract. It is then known as a representation. If it proves false, the party misled will not be entitled to claim damages for breach of contract, for no contractual stipulation has been broken; but will be entitled to claim the relief accorded by the law in the case of misrepresentation. Thirdly, the preliminary statement may be a term of the contract, or constitute a warranty collateral to the contract, if the party making the statement undertakes or guarantees that it is true. There is an overlap between the second and third categories because a statement that is a misrepresentation may become a term of the contract. In such cases there will be a choice of remedy since the party misled will be entitled to claim damages for breach of contract and to relief for misrepresentation. DEFINITION AND NATURE OF MISREPRESENTATION A misrepresentation is a false statement of fact, made pre-contractually, which is intended to induce the representee to enter into a contract and which has that effect. It has thus been defined as a statement of fact made by one party to the contract (the representor) to the other (the representee) which, while not forming a term of the contract, is yet one of the reasons that induces the representee to enter into the contract. A misrepresentation can also be viewed as a representation that is untrue. A representation means a statement of some specific existing fact or past event, not a statement of intention or of opinion of law. An opinion is a statement of a belief based on grounds incapable of actual proof. This means that statements of future conduct or intention do not constitute misrepresentation if they prove to be false. The law therefore 1
2 draws a distinction between a representation of fact which is untrue and an unfulfilled promise to do something in future. The above mentioned distinction does not mean that a statement of intention can never be a representation of fact. It at least implies that the alleged intention does exist and if it is untrue it may amount to a misrepresentation of an existing fact. In Edgington v. Fitzmaurice [1885] 29 Ch. D. 459, company directors raised money from the public by stating that the money would be used to expand the business. In fact their intention was to use the money to pay off the company s existing debt. It was held that the prospectus was fraudulent misrepresentation of fact. The company had not made a promise which they might or might not be able to fulfil. They had simply told a lie. The prospectus represented something other than it really is. Such a misrepresentation is one of fact. Bowen L.J. said: the state of a man s mind is as much a fact as the state of his digestion. It is true that it is very difficult to prove what the state of a man s mind at a particular time is, but, if it can be ascertained, it is as much a fact as anything else. A misrepresentation as to the state of a man s mind is, therefore, a misstatement of fact. Thus it has been held that, if a person buys goods having at the time no means to pay or having formed an intention not to pay for them, that person makes a fraudulent misrepresentation. As already observed, statements of belief or opinion do not amount to a misrepresentation. But there can be circumstances in which an opinion is construed as a statement of fact, as for instance where the opinion is not honestly held. Again, there is also the view that where a layman relies on an expert statement as a positive assertion to back up his own view as if they were true facts, liability in misrepresentation will lie if it turns out to be incorrect. Should the representor assert that his statement was only an opinion, he might be met with the argument that, as an expert, he is impliedly saying that he knows facts which justify his opinion. These views will be the subject of illustration in subsequent paragraphs. Nevertheless some expressions of opinion are mere puff and cannot amount to misrepresentation. For that matter, eulogistic commendation of products by sellers and advertisers cannot for the most part be regarded as representations. Thus to describe land as fertile and improvable or as uncommonly rich water meadow is not to constitute a representation. Bondzi-Simpson has provided further insight into the subject. He writes: A representation is a statement of fact that is made by one party to another intended to induce and that induces the other to enter into a contract. A misrepresentation is a false statement of fact that is intended to induce and in fact induces another to enter into the contract. The author expatiated on his definition with some useful deductions. He noted that if the statement is one of opinion only, and not a statement of fact, even if false, there is no misrepresentation. Continuing, he noted that if the statement related to law or legal effects, rather than it being a statement of fact, there is no contract. Concluding his analysis, the learned author stated that, if even the statement was false, but the 2
3 one alleging misrepresentation was not aware of the statement or did not rely on it, then there is no misrepresentation because there was no inducement. Case law illustration of the definition and nature of misrepresentation is possible. In Bisset v. Wilkinson [1927] A.C. 177, the respondents agreed to purchase from the appellants certain lands at Avondale, in the Southern Island of New Zealand, for the purpose of sheep-farming, and in reliance on the appellant s statements that he estimated the lands would carry two thousand sheep. The land, unfortunately, was incapable of holding two thousand sheep. The appellant had not, and no other person had at any time, carried out sheep-farming on the lands in question. When the appellant claimed the balance of the purchase price, the respondents counter-claimed rescission of the contract on the ground of misrepresentation. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council held that the statement was merely an opinion which the appellant honestly held and accordingly the claim for rescission failed. Again, in Economides v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. plc [1997] 3 W.L.R. 1066, a statement that the cost of replacing the contents of a flat was 16,000 made by a 21-years-old student with no special knowledge was a statement of opinion. Bondzi-Simpson contrasted the scenario in the above cases with Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd v. Mardon [1976] 2 ALL ERS. Here, the Court of Appeal held that a forecast made by a person who possessed special knowledge and skill was not a statement of opinion but a statement of fact. If false it amounted to a misrepresentation and damages would lie. In the case, a tenant was induced to take a lease of a petrol station, from an oil company by a statement made by an experienced salesman on the company s behalf, as to the potential future turnover of the premises. As the tenant had relied on the salesman s superior knowledge and experience, it was held that the company was under a duty of care at common law (N/B: A duty of care may exist at common law even in a purely commercial relationship, such as that of buyer and seller or landlord and tenant). Lord Denning MR made some useful statements in the Esso Petroleum case. He said: it was a forecast made by a party, Esso, who had special knowledge and skill. It was the yardstick by which they measured the worth of a filling station. They had much experienced and expertise at their disposal. They were in a much better position than Mr. Mardon to make a forecast (emphasis added). Lord Denning stated further: it seems to me that if such a person makes a forecast intending that the other should act on it and he does act on it it can well be interpreted as a warranty that the forecast is sound and reliable in this sense that they made it with reasonable care and skill If the forecast turned out to be an unsound forecast, such as no person of skill or experience should have made, there is a breach of warranty. (Emphasis added again). In Brown v. Raphael [1958] Ch. 636, it was held that an opinion may be actionable as a misrepresentation where the representor is in a far stronger position to ascertain the facts than the representee. It must be noted that there are many commercial relationships in which each party consciously relies on his own skill or judgment or where it is reasonable for the 3
4 representor to assume that the representee will be advised by his own experts. In such cases there would be no duty of care at common law; though, even in the absence of a special relationship, there can be liability in damages under the English Misrepresentation Act. MEANING OF INDUCEMENT To be actional the false statement must induce the contract. As a general rule, there can be no liability in respect of a falsehood which does not induce the other party to enter into the contract. Consequently, there will be no reliance and hence no inducement in the following circumstances: (i) The misrepresentation did not come to the plaintiff s notice. For example, where false reports of a company s financial affairs have been published but the plaintiff had not read them. (ii) The plaintiff relied not on the misrepresentation but on his own judgment. In Attwood v. Small [1838] 6 C.L.L F 232, the plaintiffs asked questions as to the capabilities of the property. The defendant s answer was verified by persons appointed by the plaintiffs. Six (6) months after the sale was completed, the plaintiffs found that the defendant s statements had been inaccurate, and they sought to rescind on the ground of misrepresentation. It was held that the plaintiffs could not rescind the contract since they had not been induced to contract by the defendant s statements, but rather by their own engineer s report. This rule does not apply to fraudulent misrepresentation. If, however, the plaintiff had been induced to contract by misrepresentation, it is no answer to say that he had been afforded the means of verifying it. Thus in Redgrave v. Hurd [1881] Ch. D. 1, a party was induced to purchase a solicitor s house and practice by innocent misrepresentation as to the value of the practice. He was allowed rescission even though the books and papers which he had been invited to examine, and did not, would have revealed the falsity of the representation. In Central Railway Co. of Venezuela v. Kisch [1867] L.R. 2 H.L. 99, the defendants issued a prospectus which contained representations which were untrue and deceptive. The plaintiffs were given the opportunity of inspecting certain reports and plans which supplied the correct data. It was held that it is not sufficient to mitigate a falsehood by giving the victim a chance to verify the statement from plans and documents. Chitty holds the view that, if the misrepresentation did not affect the representee s mind, because he was unaware that it had been made, or because he was not influenced by it, or because he would have entered into the contract even had he known the true facts, or because he knew that it was false, he has no remedy. Thus in Horsfall v. Thomas [1862] 1 H. & C. 90, a seller delivered to a buyer a gun which was defective, for after being fired it exploded, and the buyer was injured; the buyer had not examined the gun, but he alleged that the sale had been procured by fraudulent misrepresentation and that the defect had been concealed. The Court rejected his claim because, as the buyer had never examined the gun, an attempt to conceal the defect, if such an attempt had been made, had had no effect on his mind. However, an action for breach of the implied terms as to quality and fitness would probably lie in such circumstances today. 4
5 Again, it is not necessary for the plaintiff to show that the misrepresentation was the only/sole inducement for him to enter into the contract. It is sufficient if it can be shown to have been one of the inducing causes. Thus in Edgington v. Fitmaurice (supra) the plaintiff was induced to take debentures in a company partly because of a misrepresentation in the prospectus, but also because of a mistaken belief of his own that the debentures conferred a charge on the company s property. He was held to be entitled to have the contract rescinded, and Cotton L.J. said, It is not necessary to show that the misstatement was the sole cause of his acting as he did. In other words, where a person seeks to rescind a contract on the ground of misrepresentation, it is not necessary for him to prove that if the misrepresentation had not been made, he would not have made the contract; it is sufficient if there is evidence to show that he was materially influenced by the misrepresentation. MATERIALITY Treitel argues that a misrepresentation generally has no effect unless it is material or of importance to the other party. He says that the misrepresentation must be one which would affect the judgment of a reasonable person in deciding whether, or on what terms, to enter into the contract; or one that would induce him to enter into the contract without making such inquiries as he would otherwise make. Chitty also remarks that there is no clear authority denying relief to a representee who has, in fact, been influenced by a misrepresentation which would not have influenced a reasonable man. He submits further that, where the representor knows or ought to know that the representee is likely to act on the misrepresentation, relief will not be denied merely because a reasonable man would not have been influenced by it SILENCE OR NON DISCLOSURE As a general rule caveat emptor prevails so there is no duty of disclosure in precontractual dealings. Therefore, mere silence as such is not misrepresentation. Putting it differently, the general rule is that mere non-disclosure does not constitute misrepresentation, for there is, in general, no duty on the parties to a contract to disclose material facts to each other; however dishonest such non-disclosure may be in particular circumstances. So, for example, in Percival v. Wright [1902] 2 Ch. 421, a company director who had inside information about certain facts likely to enhance the value of the company s shares was held to be under no duty to disclose this fact to a shareholder from whom he bought some shares. In general there is no duty on a party to a contract to disclose problems voluntarily. Thus if one party is labouring under a misapprehension, there is no duty on the other party to correct it. In Hands v. Simpson Fawcett [1928], it was held that a commercial traveler who failed to disclose at a job interview that he had had serious motoring convictions made no misrepresentation. He was not obliged to disclose such brushes with the law. However, silence can amount to a misrepresentation and thus afford the ground for relief in three circumstances, namely: 5
6 1. Where the statement is a half-truth such that it conveys the wrong impression or because of what it leaves unsaid. Again, where the statement was true when made, but due to a change of circumstances has become false by the time it is acted upon. Treitel says, a person may have to disclose material facts which come to his notice before the conclusion of a contract if they falsify a representation previously made by him. Thus in With v. O Flanagan [1936] Ch. 575, negotiations for the sale of a medical practice were begun in January, when the practice was said to be worth 2,000. A contract of sale was made on May 1, by which time the practice had become worthless because of the intervening illness of the vendor. The contract was set aside on the ground that the vendor ought to have communicated this change of circumstances to the purchasers. 2. In contracts uberrimae fidei (of the utmost good faith), there is a duty to disclose all the material facts as one party is in a strong position to know the truth, for instance insurance contracts. Two reasons can be advanced for the existence of a duty to disclose in contracts uberrimae fidei. The first is that, in certain classes of contract, one of the parties is presumed to have means of knowledge which are not accessible to the other, either at all or only by incurring disproportionately high costs. The party who is presumed to have the information is therefore bound to disclose everything which may be supposed likely to affect the judgment of the other party. Contracts of marine, fire, and life insurance and indeed contracts of insurance of every kind are of this nature. The second reason is that, in certain situations, the relationship between the contracting parties is not a pure arms length commercial relationship but one of trust and confidence or one of dependence which imposes upon the party in whom confidence is reposed a duty to make disclosure. 3. Where a fiduciary relationship exists between the contracting parties, there is a duty to disclose all material facts. Such relationships include: trustee and beneficiary; bank manager and client (customer); principal and agent; solicitor and client; doctor and patient; partner and partner; priest and disciple; but it does not include master and servant. The main contracts that fall within this category are contracts of insurance, guarantees and family settlements. TYPES OF MISREPRESENTATION There are three types of misrepresentation: fraudulent, negligent and innocent. FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION Referring to several authorities, Bondzi-Simpson explains that, a fraudulent misrepresentation is one made by a person to induce another into a contract knowing very well that the statement he is making is false, or recklessly making a statement not caring that it is true or false, or stated differently, knowingly and fraudulently stating a material untruth which brings about wholly or partially the contract. At common law a fraudulent misrepresentation not only renders the contract voidable at the suit of the party misled, but also gives rise to an action for damages in respect of the deceit. 6
7 In Derry v. Peek [1889] 14 App. Cas 337, the House of Lords held that a statement is fraudulent only if made (i) with knowledge of its falsity, or (ii) without belief in its truth, or (iii) recklessly, not caring whether it is true or false. Recklessness goes beyond mere carelessness. Fraud is a serious charge which must be clearly and distinctly proved. The meaning of fraud is provided by Derry v. Peek where it was also decided that in order for fraud to be established, it is necessary to prove the absence of an honest belief in the truth of that which has been stated. In Derry v. Peek, a company issued a prospectus stating that it was entitled to use steam power to run trams; the respondents obtained shares on the strength of this representation, which was in fact false, although at the time the company had reason to believe that permission would be granted by the Board of Trade as a matter of course. Permission to use steam power was, however, not granted and the company was wound up; in an action for deceit the House of Lords held that the directors were not liable in damages for fraudulent misrepresentation. The decisive factor, in Lord Herschell s words, was that they honestly believed that what they asserted was true. By way of summary, if a representor honestly believes his statement to be true, he cannot be liable for deceit, no matter how ill-advised, stupid, or even negligent he may have been. Traditionally, fraud has attracted the best remedies for the representee but it is difficult to establish. The burden is a heavy one to discharge. Once the representee proves that there has been a fraudulent misrepresentation, the burden shifts to the representor to show that he was honest in his belief. In an action for deceit, motive is irrelevant. Once it has been established that the representee has acted upon a fraudulent misrepresentation, liability ensues, although the representor may not have been influenced by any bad motive. However, the representor is not liable until the representee has acted on the representation and thereby suffered loss. NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION In simple terms, Bondzi-Simpson defines negligent misrepresentation as a false statement made by a person who had a duty of care towards the other. Treitel also states that, a misrepresentation is negligent if it is made carelessly and in breach of a duty owed by the representor to the representee to take reasonable care that the representation is accurate. According to him, it used to be thought that such a duty could arise only where the relationship between representor and representee arose out of a pre-existing contract between them, or where it was fiduciary. But this narrow view was rejected in Hedley Byrne & Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners Ltd. [1964] AC 465 where the law was greatly widened by the decision that a duty to take care in making statements could arise out of many other special relationships. However, the enactment of the English Misrepresentation Act of 1967 has somewhat reduced the scope of the duty of care as far as the law of contract is concerned. In Esso Petroleum v. Mardon [1976] Q.B. 801, it was said that the special relationship arises where the representor has or purports to have some special skill or knowledge and knows or should know that the representee will rely on the representation. In Hedley Byrne & Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners Ltd. (supra), the claimants suffered loss as a result of having given credit to a firm called Easipower Ltd., in reliance on a reference carelessly given by Easipower s bank, who knew of the purpose for which the 7
8 reference was required. The actual decision was that the bank was not liable because the reference had been given without responsibility. But the House of Lords made it clear that, had there been no such disclaimer, the bank would have owed to the claimants a duty to take reasonable care in the making of statements contained in the reference. The importance of the Hedley Byrne case lies in its recognition that the duty arises not only in situations of fiduciary and contractual relationships, but also in situations where there is a special relationship between the parties. INNOCENT MISREPRESENTATION Until 1963, the term innocent misrepresentation was used to describe all misrepresentations which were not fraudulent. In the light of the decision in the Hedley Byrne case, the phrase innocent misrepresentation may now be used to refer to a statement without any provable fault. In other words, with innocent misrepresentation the maker of the statement has reasonable grounds for believing in its truth. An innocent misrepresentation is a statement which the maker honestly and reasonably believes to be true. In an innocent misrepresentation the law represents an attempt to strike a balance between two innocent parties, the maker of the statement and the person who has been induced to make a contract in reliance on that statement. Beatson asserts that the term innocent misrepresentation must be understood to mean a misrepresentation in which no element of fraud or negligence is presented. (Emphasis added). Again, Bondzi-Simpson writes that, innocent misrepresentation is one that contains a falsehood that was unknown to the declarant or that the declarant believed to be true. In innocent misrepresentation, there is no moral blame ascribed to the declarant. REMEDIES AVAILABLE FOR MISREPRESENTATION Every type of misrepresentation attracts a remedy once the plaintiff has established his case. And the appropriate remedy is determined by the lack of care exercised by the misrepresentor. The remedies are rescission, damages and sometimes indemnity. 1. Remedy for Fraudulent Misrepresentation: The remedies for fraudulent misrepresentation are several. At common law, a fraudulent misrepresentation renders the contract voidable. The injured party may either affirm the contract or bring an action for damages for deceit or may elect to rescind the contract, i.e. have it set aside, and sue for damages. For any loss suffered. If the injured party is sued for specific performance or damages, the fraud may be set up as a defence and a counterclaim for damages for any loss suffered may be brought. If the contract has not yet been executed, the injured party may repudiate it and recover any money paid in an action had for money had and received, but it has been held that an account of profits made by the fraudster does not lie. The party misled may also recover in respect of opportunities forgone as a result of entering into the contract. Thus in East v. Maurer [1991]1 W.L.R.461, the plaintiff purchased a hairdressing salon on the basis of a fraudulent misrepresentation. Damages were awarded for the profit the plaintiff might have made had he bought a different 8
9 salon in the area, i.e. he could recover for the opportunity cost of relying on the misrepresentation. 2. Damages for Negligent Misrepresentation: The representee may choose to claim damages under the principle in Hedley Byrne v Heller and Partner in the tort of negligence or he may decide to rescind the contract. The award of damages under Hedley Byrne differs from the damages in deceit only in that, under Hedley Byrne, the remoteness test is that of reasonable foreseability. If the representee sues in negligence, he has to satisfy the Court that the representor owed him a duty of care and had breached it. 3. Remedy for Innocent Misrepresentation: At common law no remedy whatsoever was available for innocent misrepresentation. The common law recognized fraud, or the breach of a contractual term, but gave no relief whatsoever for an innocent misrepresentation which merely induced the formation of a contract. It was left to the Courts of Chancery to grant relief by the application of equitable principles. In equity, a contract could be set aside for innocent misrepresentation. But it was not a ground for an award of damages, for damages are a legal remedy and they were not available in the Courts of Chancery. Accordingly, where a misrepresentation is described as wholly innocent, the misled party s sole remedy is rescission. The innocent party in this situation has no right to damages but may ask the court to grant the equitable remedy of rescission, i.e. restoration to the pre-contractual state of affairs. Generally, rescission involves a process of restitution, i.e. a process whereby each party restores what he has obtained from the other party under the contract. RESCISSION The effect of misrepresentation is to make the contract voidable and not void. What this means is that the contract is valid unless and until it is set aside by the representee. When the representee discovers the misrepresentation, he has the option to affirm or to rescind the contract. A contract is affirmed if the representee on discovering the misrepresentation nevertheless declares his intention to proceed with the contract or does some act from which such an intention may reasonably be inferred. On the other hand that representee may rescind the contract by indicating that he refuses to be bound by its provisions. Rescission is available for every type of misrepresentation. Where a contract is rescinded it is terminated ab initio (from the outset.) or as if it had never existed. In Newbigging v. Adam [1886] 34Ch.D.582, the plaintiff entered into a partnership with the defendants and provided 10,000 of new capital. He was induced to enter into the partnership by a material innocent misrepresentation as to the capacity of certain machinery. The business failed and the plaintiff sued for rescission of the agreement, for recovery of his capital, and for an indemnity against all claims which might be made against him by virtue of his having 9
10 become a partner. All members of the Court of Appeal agreed that the plaintiff was entitled to the relief for which he asked. Lord Atkin stated: where one party to a contract expresses by word or act in an unequivocal manner that by reason of fraud or essential error of material kind inducing him to enter into a contract, he has resolved to rescind it, and refuses to be bound by it, the expression of his election, if justified by the facts, terminates the contract, puts the parties in status quo ante and restores things, as between them, to the position in which they stood before the contract was entered into. A contract can be rescinded by giving notice to the representor, but this is not always necessary. It can also be rescinded by any other act indicating repudiation of liability, e.g. notifying the authorities (see Car and universal Finance Co. Ltd v. Caldwell [1961] 1Q.B.525). The injured party may also apply to the court for an order of rescission. Rescission is effective from the date of communication to the representor and not before. An order of rescission may be accompanied by the court ordering an indemnity. This is a money payment by the misrepresentor to restore the parties to their original position as if the contract was never made. An award of indemnity relates only to obligations necessarily created by the contract or incurred as a result of the representation. An indemnity is thus different from damages. BARS OR LIMITS TO RESCISSION (i) (ii) (iii) The following are the limits or bars to rescission: Affirmation: if the representee with full knowledge of the facts and of the misrepresentation elects to affirm the contract, the affirmation is complete and final and provides a bar to rescission. Because it is complete and final it cannot be revived. Changes made by Misrepresentee: where a person has been induced by misrepresentation to purchase something and the buyer has so changed the subject matter to the extent that he can no longer restore what he obtained under the contract, the buyer may lose the right to rescind. Similarly, the purchaser of a business cannot get back his purchase money after carrying on the business for some months and disposing of some of its assets. Changes made by the Misrepresentor: A sale may also be induced by misrepresentation on the part of the buyer, e.g. as to his solvency (his ability to pay his debts) or as to the value of the subject matter. The seller s right to rescind would be affected in a practical sense where the buyer consumes the property or so alters it that the seller has no interest in getting it back. As a matter of law, however, a buyer who is guilty of fraud cannot rely on his own dealings with the subject matter as a bar to the seller s right to rescind. A very obvious example of impossibility of 10
11 (iv) restoration is where the subject matter is food which has been eaten. A modern tendency is for the courts to award rescission if the substantial identity of the property remains even though the parties cannot be precisely restored to their pre-contract position, financial adjustments being made where necessary. Lapse of Time: lapse of time may in certain circumstances bar the right to rescind. It may be treated as evidence of affirmation where the party misled fails to exercise the right to rescind for a considerable time after discovering the representation to be untrue. So representees must act timeously or within a reasonable time. In Leaf v. International Galleries[1950]2K.B.86, the plaintiff bought from the defendants a picture of Salisbury Cathedral which the defendants innocently represented to him at the time of the purchase to have been painted by Constable. Five years later, when he tried to sell it, he discovered this was not the case. He endeavoured to return the picture and recover the price. The defendants refused, whereupon he brought an action claiming rescission of the contract of sale. The Courts of Appeal held that the right to rescind had been lost. (v) Third party Rights: the rule was enunciated in White v Garden [1851]10 C.B.919 that rescission cannot be ordered where third party rights have accrued, bonafide and for value. Thus if A obtains goods from B by misrepresentation and sells them to C, who takes in good faith, B cannot later rescind on learning of the misrepresentation in order to recover the goods from C. 11
Fraud, Mistake and Misrepresentation
Recent Developments in European Contract Law Winter term 2007/08 Fraud, Mistake and Misrepresentation 1 Introduction: Fraud, mistake, misrepresentation When should a party be held to the contract, if he/she
More informationMisrepresentation under English Contract Law and Its Comparison to Slovak Contract Law
Misrepresentation under English Contract Law and Its Comparison to Slovak Contract Law Lucia Šírová Faculty of Law, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia lucia.sirova@flaw.uniba.sk ICLR, 2016, Vol.
More informationCQUniversity Division of Higher Education School of Business and Law
CQUniversity Division of Higher Education School of Business and Law LAWS11062 Contract Law B Topic 2 Misrepresentation and Misleading & Deceptive Conduct Term 2, 2014 Anthony Marinac CQUniversity 2014
More informationFRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION
FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION Author: Nasser Hamid Binding: Softcover, 500 pages Publication Price: MYR 200.00 CONTENTS Chapter 1 STATEMENTS, REPRESENTATIONS AND FRAUD Representation Misrepresentation Fraudulent
More informationEdwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP
Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP The Legal 500 & The In-House Lawyer Legal Briefing Corporate and commercial Kimberley Cottrell, Trainee KCottrell@edwardswildman.com Christopher Pease, Associate CPease@edwardswildman.com
More informationMISTAKE. (1) the other party to the contract knew or should have known of the mistake; or
MISTAKE Mistake of Fact: The parties entered into a contract with different understandings of one or more material facts relating to the contract s performance. Mutual Mistake: A mistake by both contracting
More informationLIABILITY IN RESPECT OF OFFERING OF INTERESTS IN A CAYMAN ISLANDS EXEMPTED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
LIABILITY IN RESPECT OF OFFERING OF INTERESTS IN A CAYMAN ISLANDS EXEMPTED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MEMORANDUM CONCERNING LIABILITY IN RESPECT OF OFFERING OF INTERESTS IN A CAYMAN ISLANDS EXEMPTED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
More informationCHAPTER 8: GENUINE AGREEMENT
CHAPTER 8: GENUINE AGREEMENT GENUINE AGREEMENT AND RESCISSION A valid offer and valid acceptance generally results in an enforceable contract. If one of the parties used physical threats to acquire the
More informationBUSINESS AND CORPORATE LAW NOV 2010
BUSINESS AND CORPORATE LAW NOV 2010 SOLUTION 1 a) Limitation of actions requires that since there must be an end to litigation, certain classes of lawsuits must be brought within a fixed period of time,
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 2 CONTRACT LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2013
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 2 CONTRACT LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2013 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationa) The body of law as made by judges through the determination of cases. d) The system of law that emerged following the Norman Conquest in 1066.
1. Who of the following was NOT a proponent of natural law? a) Aristotle b) Jeremy Bentham c) St Augustine d) St Thomas Aquinas 2. The term 'common law' has three different meanings. Which of the following
More informationFINAL LAWS1075 EXAM NOTES CONTENTS Establishing Contract Formation VITIATING
FINAL LAWS1075 EXAM NOTES CONTENTS Establishing Contract Formation------------------------------------------------------------------------2 VITIATING FACTORS Misrepresentation-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3
More informationLEVEL 4 - UNIT 1 CONTRACT LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2015
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 4 - UNIT 1 CONTRACT LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2015 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationCONTRACT LAW. Elements of a Contract
CONTRACT LAW Contracts: Types and Sources in Australia CONTRACT: An agreement concerning promises made between two or more parties with the intention of creating certain legal rights and obligations upon
More informationRecent Developments in English Contract Law
September 2011 Recent Developments in English Contract Law BY GARRETT HAYES, ROSS MCNAUGHTON & GEORGE WESTON This Stay Current focuses on four significant recent cases in England which may have implications
More informationStudy Notes & Practice Questions. Updated 2018 Exams
Orea Real Estate Exam Course Study Notes & Practice Questions Updated 2018 Exams All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, transmitted or stored in any material form (including
More informationContents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. The Agreement to Contract
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases Chapter 1: The Agreement to Contract 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Elements required for a valid simple contract 1.3 The phenomenon of agreement
More informationReality of Consent. Reality of Consent. Reality of Consent. Chapter 13
Reality of Consent Chapter 13 Reality of Consent It is crucial to the economy and commerce that the law be counted on to enforce contracts. However, in some cases there are compelling reasons to permit
More informationSHOULD AN INNOCENT HALF-TRUTH BE AN ACTIONABLE MISREPRESENTATION UNDER THE CONTRACTUAL REMEDIES ACT 1979?
(2011) 2 NZLSJ New Zealand Law Students Journal 624 SHOULD AN INNOCENT HALF-TRUTH BE AN ACTIONABLE MISREPRESENTATION UNDER THE CONTRACTUAL REMEDIES ACT 1979? EMMA BIGGS * Introduction A vendor, in an attempt
More informationBe Careful and Honest in What You Say: Fraud in Arbitration
Be Careful and Honest in What You Say: Fraud in Arbitration by Vincent Moran QC Vincent Moran QC acted for the successful Claimant in Celtic v Knowles, the first reported decision under the 1996 Arbitration
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 2 CONTRACT LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 2 CONTRACT LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationMISREPRESENTATIONS IN PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS
MISREPRESENTATIONS IN PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS A paper presented to The Property Litigation Association Autumn Training Day at the Royal Society of Medicine on 2 October 2007 by Daniel Hochberg Wilberforce
More informationLiability for Misstatement in Prospectus: Where to Stop?
Liability for Misstatement in Prospectus: Where to Stop? Introduction Manendra Singh This article focuses on the wide applicability of liability provisions with respect to any misstatement made in the
More informationREPEALED LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 266
Section 1 LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 266 Contents 1 Definitions 2 Application of Act 3 Limitation periods 4 Counterclaim or other claim or proceeding 5 Effect of confirming a cause of action 6 Running of time
More informationLIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY ACCOUNTANTS
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY ACCOUNTANTS Introduction 1. Traditionally, a central plank of an accountant s corporate work has been carrying out the audit. However, over the years the profession s role has
More informationSOLUTION BUSINESS AND CORPORATE LAW NOV 2012
SOLUTION 1 A. The Lower Courts include: B. i. The circuit courts ii. The magistrate courts; and iii. The National House of Chiefs, Regional houses of chiefs and every traditional council in respect of
More informationPART 5 DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS CHAPTER 1 Preliminary and definitions 219. Interpretation and application (Part 5) 220.
PART 5 DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS CHAPTER 1 Preliminary and definitions 219. Interpretation and application (Part 5) 220. Connected persons 221. Shadow directors 222. De facto director CHAPTER
More informationClass B.Com. I Sem. (Hons.)
SYLLABUS Class B.Com. I Sem. (Hons.) Subject Business Regulatory Framework UNIT I UNIT II UNIT III UNIT IV UNIT V Contract Act 1872 Definition nature of contract, offer and acceptances capacity of parties
More informationCapturing the IT customer s requirements: a shared responsibility
Page 1 of 5 18th BILETA Conference:Controlling Information in the Online Environment April, 2003 QMW, London Capturing the IT customer s requirements: a shared responsibility Ruth Atkins University of
More informationA breach of contract occurs where a party does not comply with one or more of the terms of contract, express or implied.
CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG Breach and Remedy Refer to Richards, P. Law of Contract Chapters 16-18 Uff, J. Construction Law 9 th Edition Chapter 9 BREACH OF CONTRACT A breach of contract occurs where
More informationTHE IJIABILITY FOR GRATUITOUS ADVICE. By E. I. SYKES, B.A., LL.B.
I THE IJIABILITY FOR GRATUITOUS ADVICE By E. I. SYKES, B.A., LL.B. N Banbury v. The Bank of Montreall Lord Finlay L.C. and Lord Atkinson were r~sponsible for certain obiter dicta regarding a topic which
More informationUNIT 2 - CONTRACT LAW. Suggested Answers January 2009
Note to Candidates and Tutors: UNIT 2 - CONTRACT LAW Suggested Answers January 2009 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students should
More informationCHAPTER 2 CONTRACT LAWS INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, A contract is an agreement made between two or more parties which the law will enforce.
CHAPTER 2 CONTRACT LAWS INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 Definition of Contract A contract is an agreement made between two or more parties which the law will enforce. Sec 2(h) defines contract as an agreement
More informationLAW OF CONTRACTS II IN TANZANIA
Moshi Co-operative University From the SelectedWorks of MWAKISIKI MWAKISIKI Summer April 9, 2017 LAW OF CONTRACTS II IN TANZANIA Tsar MWAKISIKI MWAKISIKI, EDWARDS, Moshi Co-operative University This work
More informationDirectors' Duties in Guernsey
Directors' Duties in Guernsey March 2018 1. OVERVIEW 1.1 This note provides a brief synopsis of the common law duties owed by directors of companies ("companies") incorporated in the Island of Guernsey
More informationAttorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual,
VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL
More informationAPPEAL FROM DECISION OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL TRIBUNAL ON A
* 41/93 Commissioner s File: CIS/674/1994 SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 1986 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ACT 1992 APPEAL FROM DECISION OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL TRIBUNAL ON A QUESTION OF LAW DECISION OF THE SOCIAL
More informationContractual Remedies Act 1979
Reprint as at 1 September 2017 Contractual Remedies Act 1979 Public Act 1979 No 11 Date of assent 6 August 1979 Commencement see section 1(2) Contractual Remedies Act 1979: repealed, on 1 September 2017,
More informationOVERVIEW OF CONTRACT LAW
OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT LAW Liability is generally the key issue in regards to contractual disputes. Purpose of K law is to provide the rules which determine when one party is liable to another under or in
More informationMARK SCHEME for the May/June 2007 question paper 9084 LAW
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS GCE Advanced Level MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2007 question paper 9084 LAW 9084/03 Paper 3, maximum raw mark 75 This mark scheme is published as an
More informationContents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. The Agreement to Contract
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases Chapter 1: The Agreement to Contract 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Elements required for a valid simple contract 1.3 The phenomenon of agreement
More informationJ U L Y V O L U M E 6 3
LEGAL MATTERS J U L Y 2 0 1 6 V O L U M E 6 3 For a contract to be considered valid and binding in South Africa, certain requirements must be met, inter alia, there must be consensus ad idem between the
More information36C Attorneys' fees and costs. NC General Statutes - Chapter 36C Article 10 1
Article 10. Liability of Trustees and Rights of Persons Dealing with Trustees. 36C-10-1001. Remedies for breach of trust. (a) A violation by a trustee of a duty the trustee owes under a trust is a breach
More informationCHAPTER INTERNATIONAL TRUST ACT
SAINT LUCIA CHAPTER 12.19 INTERNATIONAL TRUST ACT Revised Edition Showing the law as at 31 December 2008 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority
More informationGenuine Agreement (Genuine Assent)
Chapter 7 Genuine Agreement (Genuine Assent) Business Law Ms. Turner Genuine Agreement (Genuine Assent) Agreement to enter into a contract that is evidenced by words or conduct between parties If there
More informationPART 2 REGULATED ACTIVITIES Chapter I Regulated Activities 3. Regulated activities. Chapter II The General Prohibition 4. The general prohibition.
FINANCIAL SERVICES ACT 2008 (Chapter 8) Arrangement of Sections PART 1 THE REGULATOR AND THE REGULATORY OBJECTIVES 1. The Financial Supervision Commission. 2. Exercise of functions to be compatible with
More informationDilapidations Representations
Dilapidations Representations Keith Firn BSc(Hons), MRICS, MFPWS Chartered Surveyor, Datum Building Consultancy Ltd Michael R. Watson Partner, Property Litigation, Shulmans Solicitors Dilapidations; Dishonesty;
More informationSTOCK EXCHANGE ACT 1988 Act 38 of August 1989 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
STOCK EXCHANGE ACT 1988 Act 38 of 1988-12 August 1989 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1 Short title 30 Dealings in securities quoted on the official list 2 Interpretation 31 Clearing House PART I - THE STOCK EXCHANGE
More informationChinese Contract Law: A Brief Introduction. ZHANG Xuezhong. Assistant Professor of Law.
Chinese Contract Law: A Brief Introduction ZHANG Xuezhong Assistant Professor of Law zhangxuezhong@ecupl.edu.cn East China University of Politics and Law Overview 1. In General 2. Principles of Chinese
More informationLegal Truth where the duties to the Court and the Client Collide Professor Alan Paterson OBE
Legal Truth where the duties to the Court and the Client Collide Professor Alan Paterson OBE Director, Centre for Professional Legal Studies Strathclyde University Outline of Presentation 1. Introduction
More informationQuestion 1: I read that a mentally impaired adult s contracts may be void or voidable. Which is it?
Question 1: I read that a mentally impaired adult s contracts may be void or voidable. Which is it? Answer 1: It depends. If a court of proper jurisdiction has found an adult to be non compos mentis, or
More informationMILLER v. WILLIAM CHEVROLET/GEO, INC. 326 Ill. App. 3d 642; 762 N.E.2d 1 (1 st Dist. 2001)
MILLER v. WILLIAM CHEVROLET/GEO, INC. 326 Ill. App. 3d 642; 762 N.E.2d 1 (1 st Dist. 2001) Plaintiff Otha Miller appeals from an order of the Cook County circuit court granting summary judgment in favor
More informationAttorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER
VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SOUTH
More informationRESCISSION 1. Seminar, College of Law, Sydney, 10 March Edmund Finnane 2
RESCISSION 1 Seminar, College of Law, Sydney, 10 March 2009 Edmund Finnane 2 1 RESCISSION - AT LAW AND IN EQUITY The term rescission is used in various senses, but in its narrow sense the term is concerned
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. PRIME EQUIPMENT RENTALS LIMITED Claimant AND AND THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY (TRINIDAD & TOBAGO) LIMITED
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2014-00133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PRIME EQUIPMENT RENTALS LIMITED Claimant AND ANAND SINGH Defendant AND THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY (TRINIDAD
More informationWEEK 2: INTERFERENCE WITH PURE ECONOMIC INTERESTS 10 DECEIT 10 INJURIOUS FALSEHOOD 13
TABLE OF CONTENTS NEGLIGENCE CAUSING PURE ECONOMIC LOSS 5 NEGLIGENT MISSTATEMENTS UNDER TORT LAW 5 VULNERABILITY OF THE PLAINTIFF 5 REASONABLE RELIANCE 5 SPECIAL SKILL 6 SALIENT FEATURES IN SPECIAL CASES
More informationAll BATCHES DATE: (B-2, P-1) MAXIMUM MARKS: 60 TIMING: 2 Hours
All BATCHES DATE: 22.07.2018 (B-2, P-1) MAXIMUM MARKS: 60 TIMING: 2 Hours PAPER 1: BUSINESS LAW All Questions is compulsory. Answer 1: (a) Incorrect. In accordance with the provisions of the Indian Contract
More information9084 LAW 9084/32 Paper 3, maximum raw mark 75
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS GCE Advanced Level MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2011 question paper for the guidance of teachers 9084 LAW 9084/32 Paper 3, maximum raw mark 75 This mark
More informationNegligence 1. Duty of Care 2. Breach of duty of care p 718 c) p 724
Negligence 1. Duty of Care Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 - a duty of care could exist in any situation where loss, damage or injury to one party was reasonable foreseeable (foreseeable harm) - the
More informationChapter II, Book III, Code Civil Of Intentional and Unintentional Wrongs
Chapter II, Book III, Code Civil Of Intentional and Unintentional Wrongs Art. 1382 (now Art. 1240) Any act whatever of man, which causes damage to another, obliges the one by whose fault it occurred, to
More informationUNILATERAL MISTAKE IN THE ENGLISH COURTS: REASSERTING THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH
Singapore Journal of Legal Studies [2009] 226 234 UNILATERAL MISTAKE IN THE ENGLISH COURTS: REASSERTING THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH Statoil A.S.A. v. Louis Dreyfus Energy Services L.P. (The Harriette N )
More informationFormation 1 / Certificate in Business and Accounting.
Formation 1 / Certificate in Business and Accounting. Business laws & Professional Ethics: MCQ Self - Assessment Questions 1 1. The Irish Constitution can only be amended by: a) The People b) The President
More informationContinuing to act after negligence rights, problems and consequences
Continuing to act after negligence rights, problems and consequences Leslie Blohm QC, St John s Chambers Published on 29 th April 2014 What is the scope of this talk? 1. With the best will in the world,
More informationMAY 2012 BUSINESS AND CORPORATE LAW SOLUTION
SOLUTION 1 A court decision that is called as an example or analogy to resolve similar questions of law in later cases. The doctrine of decisis et not quieta movere. Stand by past decisions and do not
More informationEBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS ) CASE No.: SIMILARLY SITUATED, ) 7 ) 8 Plaintiff, ) CLASS ACTION vs. ) COMPLAINT 9 ) FOR VIOLATIONS
More informationIntroduction to Contract Law
Introduction to Contract Law Introduction to Contract Law Acknowledgments Writer: Editor: Word processing & Graphics: Alicia Hutton, Mandy Welling REIT Professional Development Departments Version Number:
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 2 CONTRACT LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JUNE 2011
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 2 CONTRACT LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JUNE 2011 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationCambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published
Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level LAW 9084/31 Paper 3 October/November 2016 MARK SCHEME Maximum Mark: 75 Published This mark scheme is
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS- SALES OF GOODS & SERVICES. The buyer's attention is in particular drawn to the provisions of condition 10.4.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS- SALES OF GOODS & SERVICES. The buyer's attention is in particular drawn to the provisions of condition 10.4. 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 The definitions and rules of interpretation
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/21/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 88 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/21/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ASTORIA 48 TH STREET CAPITAL, INC., INDEX NO. 504376/2015 Plaintiff, ANSWER TO AMENDED -against- COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS OP EQUITIES, LLC AND
More informationCredit Account Application Form Part 1
Credit Account Application Form Part 1 1» How to Apply Please fill out the required information below in black ink & BLOCK capitals. You may fax or email this application to: Credit accounts are only issued
More informationLONDON PHARMA & CHEMICALS GROUP LTD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
LONDON PHARMA & CHEMICALS GROUP LTD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1. The definitions and rules of interpretation set out below apply in these terms and conditions. Company: London Pharma
More information64 Contractual Remedies 1979, No. 11
64 Contractual Remedies 1979, No. 11 ANALYSIS 8. Rules applying to cancellation 'fitle 9. Power of Court to grant relief 1. Short Title and commencement 10. Recovery of damages 2. Interpretation 11. Assignees
More informationGenuineness of Assent
Genuineness of Assent A party who demonstrates that she did not genuinely assent to the terms of a contract may avoid an otherwise valid contract. Genuine assent may be lacking due to mistake, fraudulent
More informationCASES. Caveat Emptor? L.A. Lawrenson *
CASES The Sale of Goods by Description - A Return to Caveat Emptor? L.A. Lawrenson * Few decisions are reported on the provisions of Section 13 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979, so any such case which is
More information1. Law of Contracts Terms of Contracts
1. Law of Contracts 1.3. Terms of Contracts The first step in determining the terms of a contract is to establish what the parties said or wrote. Statements made during the course of negotiations may traditionally
More informationJUSTICE COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
1 1 1 ANS (NAME) (ADDRESS) (CITY, STATE, ZIP) (TELEPHONE) Defendant Pro Se JUSTICE COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA ) ) Case No.: Plaintiff, ) Dept. No.: ) vs. ) ) ANSWER ) (Auto Deficiency) ) Defendant. ) )
More informationCASE NO. 1D John R. Dowd, Jr., and Charles G. Brackins of The Dowd Law Firm, P.A., Ft. Walton Beach, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA THOMAS J. DUGGAN, LLC, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.
More informationTURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS TRUSTS BILL 2015 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES
TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS TRUSTS BILL 2015 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES PART I PRELIMINARY CLAUSE 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Meaning of insolvent 4. Meaning of personal relationship
More informationTHE NEVIS INTERNATIONAL MUTUAL FUNDS ORDINANCE, 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Preliminary. PART I Administration. PART II Public Funds
THE NEVIS INTERNATIONAL MUTUAL FUNDS ORDINANCE, 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation 3. Appointments 4. Delegation of power 5. Annual report 6. Records of the
More informationLEARNING UNIT 2: THE LAW OF CONTRACT
LEARNING UNIT 2: THE LAW OF CONTRACT OBJECTIVES: Describe the essentials of a valid contract Explain the difference between a valid, void and voidable contract Explain the contractual capacity of minors
More informationTURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS THE TRUSTS ORDINANCE 1990 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Part 1 - Preliminary
TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS THE TRUSTS ORDINANCE 1990 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Citation and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Existence of a trust 4. Applicable law of a trust 5. Jurisdiction of the Court
More informationEQUITABLE REMEDIES IN COMMERCIAL LITIGATION: Concurrent session 1A Constructive trust
EQUITABLE REMEDIES IN COMMERCIAL LITIGATION: Concurrent session 1A Constructive trust LIMITATION PERIODS, DISHONEST ASSISTANCE, KNOWING RECEIPT AND CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS Thursday, 5 March 2015 for the Joint
More informationMANUFACTURER LIABLE FOR BREACH OF EXPRESS WARRANTY: PRIVITY NOT REQUIRED
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS MANUFACTURER LIABLE FOR BREACH OF EXPRESS WARRANTY: PRIVITY NOT REQUIRED Rogers v. Toni Home Permanent Co., 167 Ohio St. 244, 147 N.E.2d 612 (1958) In her petition plaintiff alleged
More informationMLL217 MISLEADING CONDUCT AND ECONOMIC TORTS
MLL217 MISLEADING CONDUCT AND ECONOMIC TORTS Contents FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS... 5 Other Common Law Torts Regulating False or Misleading Statements... 5 Deceit... 5 Injurious falsehood... 6 Negligent
More informationKEY ASPECTS OF THE LAW OF CONTRACT
This article is relevant to Paper F4 (ENG) Together, contract and the tort of negligence form syllabus area B of the Paper F4 (ENG) syllabus: the law of obligations. As this indicates, the areas have a
More informationTopic 3: OTHER COMMON LAW TORTS REGULATING FALSE OR MISLEADING STATEMENTS
Topic 3: OTHER COMMON LAW TORTS REGULATING FALSE OR MISLEADING STATEMENTS These torts regulate liability for false or misleading statements 1. Tort of Deceit Magill v Magill (2006) Held: Couple married
More informationTHE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE CONSUMER PROTECTION (FAIR TRADING) ACT (CHAPTER 52A)
THE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE CONSUMER PROTECTION (FAIR TRADING) ACT (CHAPTER 52A) (Original Enactment: Act 27 of 2003) REVISED EDITION 2009 (31st July 2009) Prepared and Published by THE LAW
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-5100-H ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT ) NORVERGENCE, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ) I. INTRODUCTION
More information(company number 2065) - and - (company number SC )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE NO: OF 2011 CHANCERY DIVISION COMPANIES COURT LLOYDS TSB BANK PLC (company number 2065) - and - BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC (company number SC 327000) SCHEME for the transfer of part
More informationNo. U Ml An WILLODEAN P. PRECISE, COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION C WILLODEAN P. PRECISE, V. Plaintiff, No. U4-244 8 Ml An CLASS ACTION JURY DEMAND DUNCAN WILLIAMS, INC. Defendant. COMPLAINT
More informationTort Law - Constructive Fraud or Actual Fraud - Is There Still a Distinction between Them - Wolf and Klar Cos. v. Garner
16 N.M. L. Rev. 171 (Winter 1986 1986) Winter 1986 Tort Law - Constructive Fraud or Actual Fraud - Is There Still a Distinction between Them - Wolf and Klar Cos. v. Garner Adolph Craig Sutton Recommended
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND TECU CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2010-01135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ERNEST TROTMAN CAMILLE RICHARDS TROTMAN Claimants AND TECU CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED ************************************************
More informationUnjust enrichment? Bank secures equitable charge where it failed to get a legal charge: Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus [2015] UKSC 66
Unjust enrichment? Bank secures equitable charge where it failed to get a legal charge: Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus [2015] UKSC 66 1. The decision of the Supreme Court in Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd
More informationDefine genuine agreement and rescission. Identify when duress occurs. Describe how someone may exercise undue influence.
Define genuine agreement and rescission Identify when duress occurs Describe how someone may exercise undue influence. Genuine Agreement/Assent: meeting of the minds Must be willful and voluntary Must
More informationFOUNDATIONS (WINDING UP) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 2009
FOUNDATIONS (WINDING UP) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 2009 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2017 This is a revised edition of the law Foundations (Winding up) (Jersey) Regulations 2009 Arrangement
More informationLatent Defect in Ileritable Property
Latent Defect in Ileritable Property Does this give a purchaser the right to resile? JUDGING writer has by consulted the practice on of theconveyancers subject, a purchaser and the is opinions generally
More informationELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER 15
C H A P T E R 15 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER 15 UNIFORM PARTNERSHIP ACT (1914) Part I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS 1. Name of Act This act may be cited as Uniform Partnership Act. 2. Definition of Terms
More informationBETWEEN: CLIFFORD WHITING CLAIMANTS EMILY WHITING
THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE 2003 ACTION NO. 311 OF 2003 BETWEEN: CLIFFORD WHITING CLAIMANTS EMILY WHITING AND GRANTWELL LIMITED DEFENDANTS D.B.A. COLDWELL BANKERS Ms. N. Badillo for the claimants Mr. L.
More information