THE IJIABILITY FOR GRATUITOUS ADVICE. By E. I. SYKES, B.A., LL.B.
|
|
- Ashlynn Berry
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 I THE IJIABILITY FOR GRATUITOUS ADVICE By E. I. SYKES, B.A., LL.B. N Banbury v. The Bank of Montreall Lord Finlay L.C. and Lord Atkinson were r~sponsible for certain obiter dicta regarding a topic which lies on the vague borderline between the provinces of the law of contract and the law of tort. The questions may thus be stated: To what ~xtent, if at all, is a person who gives gratuitous advice to another liable for loss and, if liability does exist, is it a liability in contract or in tort 1 Judges seem to have imported into this and related questions considerations derived from the law relating to bailments, and it is submitt!d that a short examination of the nature of the liability for breach of gratuitous bailment will form a basis for an approach to the main question of this article. Professor Winfield points outz that though the orthodox theory now is that bailment is a species of contract, it is really in some respects at least sui generis. Breach of bailment is sometimes a tort, sometimes a breach of contract. But the liability is not necessarily either contractual or delictual. Bailment may, on the one hand, exist independently of contract. Professor Winfield cites the case of R. v. Robson3 where it was held that a woman was properly convicted of larceny as bailee, in spite of the argument for the defence that bailment was a contract, and that she was incapable of contracting (as was then the case). On the other hand there are obvious differences distinguishing breach of bailment from liability in tort. In Professor Winfield's view bailment is a generic conception. Originally, the liability was delictual and the question of consideration was irrelevant. But the growth of the doctrine of consideration led the minds of lawyers in the seventeenth century to attempt to reconcile it with the existence of the liability for gratuitous bailment. In 1703, in Coggs v. Bernard/< the Court, obsessed with the necessity of finding consideration in the "contract" of bailment, found it in the fact that the owner had trusted the bailee with the goods. "The reason of the action is the particular trust reposed in the defendant to which he has concurred by his assumption."5 This principle covers cases in which a man has engaged another to do work with certain materials without reward. An action will not lie for non-performance, but will lie if the defendant actually enters upon the work and does it negligently.6 But the importance of such principle for present purposes lies in the fact that it has been analogically extended to cases where no bailment is involved. Coming nearer to our present subject, we must notice briefly the case of an agreement for gratuitous service which does not involve a bailment, but which involves more than the giving of advice. The 1. (1918) A.C The Province of the Law of Tort, Ch. V. 3. (1861) 31 L.J.N.S. (M.C. 22). 4. (1703) 2 Ld. Raym. 5. (1703) 2 Ld. Raym Elsee v. Gatwara (1793) 5 Term Rep,
2 212 RES JUDICATAE typical instance is the case of a doctor who agrees without reward to perform an operation on a patient. In such cases it is generally agreed that there is a liability for negligence once the service is undertaken, although it is not generally stated whether this liability is for breach of contract or for a tort. Salmond and Winfield7 think there is liability in contract as well as in tort; they use the conception of "trust" which finds its authority in Coggs v. Bernard.8 The contract might be put: "If you will deliver your body into my charge and trust me with the care of it, I promise to take due care of it." So also in the case of the owner of a motor car receiving a friend as a gratuitous passenger. Having defined the considerations likely to influence the judicial mind in dealing with the topic of gratuitous advice de novo, we approach the two decisions in which the matter has been discussed. In De La Bere v. Pearson,9 the defendants, who were newspaper proprietors, advertised in their newspaper that their city editor would answer inquiries from readers of the paper desiring financial advice. The plaintiff, a reader of the paper, wrote to the, city editor asking him to recommend" a good stockbroker." The editor recommended a person who was, unknown to him, an undischarged bankrupt. The plaintiff, in reliance on this recommendation, sent money for investment to this person, who promptly misappropriated it. It was held by the Court of Appeal that the plaintiff could recover this amount from the defendant. Counsel for the defendant in the Court below, however, had admitted that a contractual liability arose, and in the Court of Appeal the argument for the defence that there was no contract between the parties does not seem to have been strongly pressed. The main question argued was that of remoteness of damages. The members of the Court of Appeal were unanimous in thinking that there was a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, but in view of what has been above stated, and especially in view of the fact that the decision appealed from was on a narrower point, it is doubtful whether this point was actually at issue. Thus the headnote to the case and the comment of Salmond and WinfieldlO may possibly need some qualification. In so far as it is asserted that the case is an authority for the view that a contractual duty not to give negligent advice arises, some have found the consideration in the detriment incurred by the plaintiff in trusting the defendant with his financial security, while others have thought that the consideration lay in the tendency to benefit the circulation of the defendant's newspaper. The latter is the view taken by the Court of Appeal. In Banbury v. The Bank of Montrealll the question did not come up for actual judicial pronouncement. There the plaintiff, who was visiting Canada seeking investments, had been given a letter of introduction from the general manager of the defendant bank to the 7. Prim:iple8 of the Law of CcmtNete, p (1703) 2 Ld. Raym (1908) I.Ri.B Supra, p (1918) A.C. 626.
3 THE LIABILITY FOR GRATUITOUS ADVICE 213 branch managers thereof asking them if the plaintiff applied to them for advice to place themselves at his disposal. The plaintiff presented the letter to the branch manager at Victoria, British Columbia, upon whose oral advice he invested 2,000 upon mortgage to secure a loan to It company. The company having failed to pay either principal or interest, he brought an action against the bank claiming damages for negligence and breach of duty whilst acting as his bankers. The case was decided against the plaintiff on the ground that there was no evidence upon which the jury could find that the branch manager had the requisite authority from the general manager to give such advice, and the question of the liability of the defendant had there been sufficient authority was not directly in point. Two of their Lordships, however, made some remarks on the point. Lord Finlay12 was in favour of the existence of such a liability and seemed to think similar considerations would apply as in the case of bailments. The consideration would be simply the confidence reposed in the person who undertook the duty of giving the advice. Such a person need not undertake the duty at all, but, if he does undertake it, he must exercise due care in discharging it. He thought there was no difference between the case of a physician who treats a patient gratuitously and that of a lawyer or banker who advises a client or customer gratuitously. But, rather significantly, he goes on to say that, though he thought that even where the advice was given for motives of charity or benevolence, there would still be liability, yet here was not a case of merely gratuitous advice. The whole transaction was a business one. The bank was to undertake the receipt and application of the money if advanced, and it had an interest in the success of the contract. Lord Atkinson13 agreed that the liability could not be confined to physical as distinct from mental acts. There was no difference between the case of a doctor treating a patient for heart disease and that of a doctor merely telling the same patient that he has heart disease without treating. It would appear from the dicta in Banbury's case and from the decision in De La Bere v. Pearson (though as indicated above it is doubtful what the ratio decidendi of that case is), that if the question did now come up for decision in a clear form such a right of action would be recognized by the Court. The granting of such a remedy would also appear to be socially desirable, subject to certain limitations. It is necessary, however, to ask whether such a liability can be placed on any logical legal ground. Neither Lord Finlay nor Lord Atkinson suggest any answer and only bald statements are given in De La Bere v. Pears.on. Counsel for the plaintiff in Banbury's case contended for liability in both contract and tort. But it seems clear that in a case of mere advice liability in tort would be excluded by the rule in Derry v. Peek!4 that for an innocent misrepresentation of fact, even if made negli- 12. lbid., at p Ibid., at P (1889) 14 A.C. 3M.
4 214 R.ES JUDICATAE gently, no action will lie, quite apart from the question whether all statements made in the course of giving advice can be fitted into the definition of "representation of fact." Moreover, despite Lord F.inlay's remarks, there appears to be a clear distinction between the case of a doctor performing a gratuitous operation on, or administering drugs to, a patient and that of a doctor merely giving gratuitous advice on the patient's ailment. In the former case there is a liability in tort because a man owes a duty, apart from contract, not to do or cause physical harm to a person. Excluding the question of liability in tort, can we fit the liability for negligently tendering gratuitous advice into the categories of the law of contract without being guilty of Procrustian violence? Can we satisfy the requirements of the rule that consideration is necessary to the validity of a simple contract? There seems to be no warrant for applying to this question ideas deduced from the law of bailments, and saying with Lord Finlay that the consideration is the trust reposed in the person advising, or adopting Salmond and Winfield's notion of a "consideration of trust.' '15 Carried to its logical conclusion, this would make the breach of any gratuitous promise actionable so long as the promisee acted on the faith of it being observed. The consideration would be the confidence reposed in the person who gives the promise. In the law of bailments this notion of trust is, since Coggs v. Bernard, firmly entrenched, but there it has the justification that there is a physical thing entrusted to the bailee and a parting with possession thereof by the bailor. The solution of the problem seems, however, to have been suggested in another remark by Lord Atkin, that in Banbu,ry's case the whole transaction was "a business one. " It is submitted that where there is a business nexus between adviser and advised, and the advice given arises out of that nexus, consideration can be said to exist because of the possibility of a whole series of reciprocal benefits between the parties. Thus, in Banbury's case, consideration would lie in the handling by the bank of the plaintiff's business and the possibility of increasing that business, and in De La Bere v. Pearson, in the possibility of increased sales and circulation of the defendant's newspaper. In the case of a solicitor giving advice it would lie in the establishment of the solicitor-client relation with all its possibilities of mutual benefits. Of course, the mere promise to give advice would not be enough to found any liability, but once the task is undertaken the existence of the business relation would be enough to found a duty to carry out the task without negligence, provided the advice arises directly out of and in virtue of the business relation. This also implies that the person giving advice does so as a skilled person and in such circumstances that he must reasonably be taken as anticipating the other person would act upon such advice, as otherwise an animus contrahendi would not exist. The only question, of course, is the rather formidable one of the extent and scope of the phrase, "business relation." Should it include all cases of skilled persons who give advice in such circumstances that 15. Principles of the Law of Contracts. p. 79.
5 THE LIABILITY FOR GRATUITOUS ADVICE 215 they must be taken as assuming that the other person intends to act upon it, such advice being given in connection with the matters in which they are skilled? Can we say that in such relations as doctor and patient, banker and customer, financial adviser and inquirer, that the "business" element is essential or merely fortuitous? It is submitted with some diffidence that in cases where some element of a business relationship exists between the parties, there is liability for gratuitous advice given in virtue of that relationship, and that this liability is contractual. In many cases other considerations will intervene. In many cases there will be involved the doing of physical acts to the plaintiff, and therefore there will be superadded a liability in tort, e.g., a negligent surgical operation, provided the facts bring the case within one of the heads of liability in tort. And where there is advice given falsely and fraudulently, there will be liability in tort provided certain conditions are fulfilled. In such mixed cases of advice and physical services, it may be very material to separate the contractual and delictual elements, as in cases where the defence of infancy is raised. If the view indicated in De La Bere v. Pearson and Banbury's case is ultimately vindicated, the time will certainly be ripe for the abandonment of the word "gratuitous" as applied to such contracts. The promise to give" free" advice is gratuitous, but the implied promise to use due care in giving advice, in circumstances as above defined, is given for good consideration.
TORTS SPECIFIC TORTS NEGLIGENCE
TORTS A tort is a private civil wrong. It is prosecuted by the individual or entity that was wronged against the wrongdoer. One aim of tort law is to provide compensation for injuries. The goal of the
More informationChapter 14 Bailment & Pledge
LIST OF SECTIONS TO BE DISCUSSED IN THIS CHAPTER Chapter 14 SECTION NO. SECTION NAME 148 CONTRACT OF BAILMENT 150 BAILORS DUTY TO DISCLOSE FAULT IN THE GOODS 151 BAILEES DUTY TO TAKE CARE OF GOODS 153
More informationLIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY ACCOUNTANTS
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY ACCOUNTANTS Introduction 1. Traditionally, a central plank of an accountant s corporate work has been carrying out the audit. However, over the years the profession s role has
More informationConveyancers Licensing Act 2003 No 3
New South Wales Conveyancers Licensing Act 2003 No 3 Contents Part 1 Part 2 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Definitions 2 4 Conveyancing work 4 5 Notes 5 Licences Division 1 Requirement
More informationOntario Court Declines to Impose a Duty on a Bank to Protect Third-Party Victims of a Fraud based on Constructive Knowledge
Ontario Court Declines to Impose a Duty on a Bank to Protect Third-Party Victims of a Fraud based on Constructive Knowledge I. Overview Mark Evans and Ara Basmadjian Dentons Canada LLP In 1169822 Ontario
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF CONTRACT
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF CONTRACT P. S. ATIYAH Formerly Professor of English Law in the University of Oxford FIFTH EDITION CLARENDON PRESS OXFORD 1995 Contents Table of Cases i. The Development of
More informationA PRACTITIONER Practitioner
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 44 LCDT 003/15 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN THE CANTERBURY STANDARDS COMMITTEE (No 1) Applicant
More informationPREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ACT
Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada License Disclaimer This Act is current to November 1, 2017 See the Tables of Legislative Changes for this Act s legislative history, including
More informationBELIZE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT CHAPTER 318 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT CHAPTER 318 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner
More informationCase Note. Carty v London Borough Of Croydon. Andrew Knott. I Context
Case Note Carty v London Borough Of Croydon Andrew Knott Macrossans Lawyers, Brisbane, Australia I Context The law regulating schools, those who work in them, and those who deal with them, involves increasingly
More informationPublished on e-first 1 June AGENCY LAW
Published on e-first 1 June 2018 3. AGENCY LAW Pearlie KOH LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore), LLM (University of Melbourne); Advocate & Solicitor (Singapore); Associate Professor, Singapore
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND TECU CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2010-01135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ERNEST TROTMAN CAMILLE RICHARDS TROTMAN Claimants AND TECU CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED ************************************************
More informationCONTRACT LAW SUMMARY
CONTRACT LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL UK CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO CONTRACT LAW 6 DEFINITION OF CONTRACT LAW 6 1) The Classical Model of Contract Law 6 INTENTION TO CREATE LEGAL RELATIONS 8 INTRODUCTION TO INTENTION
More informationCED: An Overview of the Law
Torts BY: Edwin Durbin, B.Comm., LL.B., LL.M. of the Ontario Bar Part II Principles of Liability Click HERE to access the CED and the Canadian Abridgment titles for this excerpt on Westlaw Canada II.1.(a):
More informationARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION
Company No: 3044323 THE COMPANIES ACTS 1985 TO 2006 COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE AND NOT HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION of THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION (Adopted by special resolution dated
More informationa) The body of law as made by judges through the determination of cases. d) The system of law that emerged following the Norman Conquest in 1066.
1. Who of the following was NOT a proponent of natural law? a) Aristotle b) Jeremy Bentham c) St Augustine d) St Thomas Aquinas 2. The term 'common law' has three different meanings. Which of the following
More informationContractual Remedies Act 1979
Reprint as at 1 September 2017 Contractual Remedies Act 1979 Public Act 1979 No 11 Date of assent 6 August 1979 Commencement see section 1(2) Contractual Remedies Act 1979: repealed, on 1 September 2017,
More informationAge Discrimination and Public Authorities. Andrew Hogan
Age Discrimination and Public Authorities Andrew Hogan Introduction 1. On 1 st October 2012 the provisions in the Equality Act 2010, which prohibit age discrimination in the provision of goods and services
More informationBANKRUPTCY ACT (CHAPTER 20)
BANKRUPTCY ACT (CHAPTER 20) Act 15 of 1995 1996REVISED EDITION Cap. 20 2000 REVISEDEDITION Cap. 20 37 of 1999 42 of 1999 S 380/97 S 126/99 S 301/99 37 of 2001 38 of 2002 An Act relating to the law of bankruptcy
More informationARCHITECTS REGISTRATION COUNCIL SEMINARS
ARCHITECTS REGISTRATION COUNCIL SEMINARS CONTRACT FORMATION FRED PHIRI ARCH.Bw May 27, 2017 1 Contents Legal Systems Legal Systems Examples Legal System Applications Civil Law Relationships Law of Obligations
More informationPREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ACT
PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ACT Published by Quickscribe Services Ltd. Updated To: [includes 2017 Bill 7, c. 3 amendments (effective
More informationFIJI ISLANDS HIGH COURT ACT (CHAPTER 13) HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) RULES 1998
FIJI ISLANDS HIGH COURT ACT (CHAPTER 13) HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) RULES 1998 IN exercise of the powers conferred upon me by Section 25 of the High Court Act, I hereby make the following Rules: Citation 1.
More informationTorts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 Chapter 32
Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 Chapter 32 Preliminary 1 Definition of wrongful interference with goods In this Act wrongful interference, or wrongful interference with goods, means (d) conversion
More information2014 ONSC 4841 Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Cruz v. McPherson CarswellOnt 11387, 2014 ONSC 4841, 244 A.C.W.S. (3d) 720
2014 ONSC 4841 Ontario Superior Court of Justice Cruz v. McPherson 2014 CarswellOnt 11387, 2014 ONSC 4841, 244 A.C.W.S. (3d) 720 Terra Cruz and Carmen Cruz, Plaintiffs and Jason Mcpherson, 546291 Ontario
More informationAPPEAL FROM DECISION OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL TRIBUNAL ON A
* 41/93 Commissioner s File: CIS/674/1994 SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 1986 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ACT 1992 APPEAL FROM DECISION OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL TRIBUNAL ON A QUESTION OF LAW DECISION OF THE SOCIAL
More informationCourt of Appeals 1992
+You Search Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail More Sign in 80 ny2d 377 Search Advanced Scholar Search Read this case How cited Prudential Ins. Co. v. Dewey, 80 NY 2d 377 - NY: Court of Appeals 1992
More informationTHE COMPANIES ACTS 1985, 1989 and 2006 MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION OF ACADEMY OF SOCIAL
THE COMPANIES ACTS 1985, 1989 and 2006 Company Limited by Guarantee and not having a Share Capital MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION OF ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES As amended by resolution at an Extraordinary General
More informationREPEALED LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 266
Section 1 LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 266 Contents 1 Definitions 2 Application of Act 3 Limitation periods 4 Counterclaim or other claim or proceeding 5 Effect of confirming a cause of action 6 Running of time
More informationCHAPTER 2. Appointment of examiner
PART 10 EXAMINERSHIPS CHAPTER 1 Interpretation 508. Interpretation (Part 10) 509. Power of court to appoint examiner 510. Petition for court 511. Independent expert s report CHAPTER 2 Appointment of examiner
More informationA Defence to CrIminal Responsibility for Performing Surgical Operations: Section 45 of the Criminal Code*
1048 McGILL LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 26 A Defence to CrIminal Responsibility for Performing Surgical Operations: Section 45 of the Criminal Code* A number of writers commenting on the legality of surgical operations
More informationLegal Business. Overview Of Court Procedure. Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple industry and business communities
Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple industry and business communities Overview Of Court Procedure 1 Rajah & Tann 4 Battery Road #26-01 Bank of China Building Singapore 049908
More informationTHE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY ANU COLLEGE OF LAW Social Science Research Network Legal Scholarship Network ANU College of Law Research Paper No. 09-30 Thomas Alured Faunce and Esme Shirlow Australian
More informationORMROD v. CROSVILLE MOTOR SERVICES LTD.
242 SYDNEY LAW REVIEW VICARIOUS LIABILITY OF THE CAR-OWNER ORMROD v. CROSVILLE MOTOR SERVICES LTD. The recent case of Ormrod and Anor. v. Crosville Motor Services Ltd. and Anor. (Murphy 3rd Party)l compels
More informationProfiting from your own mistakes: Common law liability and working directors
Profiting from your own mistakes: Common law liability and working directors Author: Tim Wardell Special Counsel Edwards Michael Lawyers Profiting from your own mistakes: Common law liability and working
More informationBUSINESS LAW THE ROLE OF LAW IN CANADIAN SOCIETY BUSINESS LAW. Appendix A. Sources of Law. The Court System
Appendix A BUSINESS LAW THE ROLE OF LAW IN CANADIAN SOCIETY Law is the set of rules and standards that a society agrees upon to govern the behaviour of its citizens. Both the British and the French influenced
More informationCONTRACT LAW. Elements of a Contract
CONTRACT LAW Contracts: Types and Sources in Australia CONTRACT: An agreement concerning promises made between two or more parties with the intention of creating certain legal rights and obligations upon
More informationTRADING TERMS OF KLINGER LTD
1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 In these terms of trade: (1) Business Day means a day other than Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in the place in which a document is received or an act is done, as may be applicable;
More informationTrusts Law 463 Fall Term Lecture Notes No. 3. Bailment is difficult because it bridges property, tort and contract.
Trusts Law 463 Fall Term 2013 Lecture Notes No. 3 TRUST AND BAILMENT Bailment is difficult because it bridges property, tort and contract. Bailment exists where one person (the bailee) is voluntarily possessed
More information"In summary, I'd suggest that solicitors have to be awfully careful about giving undertakings. They certainly do cause trouble from time to time.
CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION CONFERENCE APRIL 11, 1987 SOLICITOR'S UNDERTAKINGS - AN OUTLINE 1. The purpose of this paper is to outline some of the considerations a solicitor must have in mind when making
More informationLAWS OF KENYA THE NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION ACT. No. 30 of 2011
LAWS OF KENYA THE NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION ACT No. 30 of 2011 Published by the National Council for Law Reporting With the Authority of the Attorney-General NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION
More informationTopic Pleading and Joinder of claims and parties, Representative and Class Actions 1) Res Judicata (Colbran )
WEEK 3 Topic Pleading and Joinder of claims and parties, Representative and Class Actions 1) Res Judicata (Colbran 363-370) Res judicata is a type of plea made in court that precludes the relitgation of
More informationMemorandum and Articles of Association of
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Guarantee and not having a Share Capital Memorandum and Articles of Association of 21 st November 2013 Bates Wells & Braithwaite London LLP 2-6 Cannon Street London
More informationSCHEDULE. Corporate Practices (Model Memorandum and Articles of Association)
SCHEDULE Corporate Practices (Model Memorandum and Articles of Association) 1.102 (Schedule) [Rule 4(e)] The enclosed Model Memorandum and Articles of Association comprising the following titles have been
More informationMAY 2012 BUSINESS AND CORPORATE LAW SOLUTION
SOLUTION 1 A court decision that is called as an example or analogy to resolve similar questions of law in later cases. The doctrine of decisis et not quieta movere. Stand by past decisions and do not
More informationSherani v Jagroop [1973] FJSC 3; [1973] 19 FLR 85 (24 October 1973)
Sherani v Jagroop [1973] FJSC 3; [1973] 19 FLR 85 (24 October 1973) (1973) 19 FLR 85 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FIJI SHER MOHAMMED KHAN SHERANl v. MANOHAR JAGROOP AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT, 1973 (Tuivaga
More informationPrivate Investigators Bill 2005
Private Investigators Bill 2005 A Draft Bill Setting Out The Regulatory Requirements For The Private Investigation Profession in Australia This draft Bill has been researched and prepared by the Australian
More informationMemorandum and Articles of Association of Hull University Union Limited
Memorandum and Articles of Association of Hull University Union Limited Company Limited by Guarantee and not having a Share Capital Memorandum of Association of Hull University Union Limited Each subscriber
More informationDirectors' Duties in Guernsey
Directors' Duties in Guernsey March 2018 1. OVERVIEW 1.1 This note provides a brief synopsis of the common law duties owed by directors of companies ("companies") incorporated in the Island of Guernsey
More informationFLORIDA BAR ETHICS OPINION OPINION 02-4 April 2, Advisory ethics opinions are not binding.
FLORIDA BAR ETHICS OPINION OPINION 02-4 April 2, 2004 Advisory ethics opinions are not binding. When the lawyer in a personal injury case is in possession of settlement funds against which third persons
More informationThe Reasonable Person Test An Objective/Subjective Dichotomy
Is it always true that the reasonable person test eliminates the personal equation (Glasgow Corp v Muir, per Lord MacMillan)? In particular, how do you reconcile Philips v William Whiteley with Nettleship
More informationOMBUDSMAN BILL, 2017
Arrangement of Sections Section PART I - PRELIMINARY 3 1. Short title...3 2. Interpretation...3 3. Application of Act...4 PART II OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN 5 ESTABLISHMENT AND FUNCTIONS OF OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY : : : : : : : : : :
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY In the Matter of Respondent. RICHARD G. CERVIZZI, A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar Registration
More informationBERMUDA LEGAL AID (GENERAL) REGULATIONS 1980 BR 70 / 1980
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA LEGAL AID (GENERAL) REGULATIONS 1980 BR 70 / 1980 [made by the Minister of Health and Social Services after consultation with the Chief Justice under the Legal Aid Act 1980
More informationTHE FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT 31 U.S.C
THE FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733 Reflecting proposed amendments in S. 386, the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009, as passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on May 6, 2009
More informationARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION. -of- THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION
Company No: 3044323 THE COMPANIES ACTS 1985 TO 2006 COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE AND NOT HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION -of- THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION (Adopted by special resolution dated
More informationLegal & Ethical Applications: Exam #1: Review LAWS 3930 & FoE 1, 3, 4, 9, and 11 & Microecon. & Chapters 5, Page 1 of 8
Review LAWS 3930 & FoE 1, 3, 4, 9, and 11 & Microecon. & Chapters 5, Page 1 of 8 print name on the line above as your signature INSTRUCTIONS: 1. This Exam #1 must be completed within the allocated time
More informationChinese Contract Law: A Brief Introduction. ZHANG Xuezhong. Assistant Professor of Law.
Chinese Contract Law: A Brief Introduction ZHANG Xuezhong Assistant Professor of Law zhangxuezhong@ecupl.edu.cn East China University of Politics and Law Overview 1. In General 2. Principles of Chinese
More informationCHAPTER 2 CONTRACT LAWS INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, A contract is an agreement made between two or more parties which the law will enforce.
CHAPTER 2 CONTRACT LAWS INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 Definition of Contract A contract is an agreement made between two or more parties which the law will enforce. Sec 2(h) defines contract as an agreement
More informationPresented by Joseph Li (Revised on 30/7/2013)
Overview of the law and practice relating to Enduring Power of Attorney under the Enduring Powers of Attorney Ordinance and Part II Order under the Mental Health Ordinance Presented by Joseph Li (Revised
More informationEnforcement of Foreign Judgments. The Usual Rules Apply (no exception for insolvency)
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments The Usual Rules Apply (no exception for insolvency) The Supreme Court has just given judgment (24 October 2012) in Rubin and another v Eurofinance SA and others and New
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOHN GREMO, v Plaintiff-Appellee, SPECTRUM FINISHINGS, INC., a Michigan corporation, UNPUBLISHED April 18, 1997 No. 189610 Macomb Circuit Court LC No. 91-3942 NO Defendant/Cross
More informationThe new Societies Act
The new Societies Act What BC societies need to know about the changing legislation Prepared and presented by: Michael Blatchford Overview background member funded society status good news constitution
More information(company number 2065) - and - (company number SC )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE NO: OF 2011 CHANCERY DIVISION COMPANIES COURT LLOYDS TSB BANK PLC (company number 2065) - and - BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC (company number SC 327000) SCHEME for the transfer of part
More informationCapturing the IT customer s requirements: a shared responsibility
Page 1 of 5 18th BILETA Conference:Controlling Information in the Online Environment April, 2003 QMW, London Capturing the IT customer s requirements: a shared responsibility Ruth Atkins University of
More informationHEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004
2004 No 2608 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004 Made 4th October 2004 Laid before Parliament 7th October 2004 Coming
More informationASSESSING CAPACITY IN CANADA: Putting the Lawyer at the Heart of Capacity Assessments. Kimberly A. Whaley STEP London, Dec 7, 2018
ASSESSING CAPACITY IN CANADA: Putting the Lawyer at the Heart of Capacity Assessments Kimberly A. Whaley STEP London, Dec 7, 2018 Agenda Capacity in General: Statutory vs Common Law Medical / Legal Capacity
More informationSummer 2014 Elements of Law: Part One (AP/ADMS 2610D 3.0) (Note: Subject to Further Revision)
ELEMENTS OF LAW Summer 2014 Elements of Law: Part One (AP/ADMS 2610D 3.0) (Note: Subject to Further Revision) Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional Studies School of Administrative Studies York University
More informationLaw Society of Alberta National Mobility FAQs. Visiting Lawyers
General 1. What kind of work brings me under the oversight of the Law Society of Alberta? Provide legal services means to engage in the practice of law (a) physically in Alberta, except with respect to
More informationTHE BUILDING CONTROL AMENDMENT REGULATIONS. Martin Waldron BL
MARTIN WALDRON BL FCIArb MSCSI MRICS Accredited Adjudicator & Mediator Law Library The Four Courts Dublin 7 +353(1)8177865 +353(86)2395167 www.waldron.ie martin@waldron.ie THE BUILDING CONTROL AMENDMENT
More informationCAUSATION & RISK. Upping the risk: when does it count? James Townsend, Guildhall Chambers
CAUSATION & RISK Upping the risk: when does it count? James Townsend, Guildhall Chambers Causation: a question of policy Causation is not just a matter of fact or philosophy: it s a matter of policy The
More informationand MUNICIPALITY OF NKONKOBE
Not reportable In the High Court of South Africa (South Eastern Cape Local Division) (Port Elizabeth High Court) Case No 2356/2006 Delivered: In the matter between PETER FRANCE N.O. HILLARY BARRIS N.O.
More informationThe Role of Counsel Pursuant to Section 3 of the Substitute Decisions Act. Trusts and Estates Division of the Ontario Bar Association
The Role of Counsel Pursuant to Section 3 of the Substitute Decisions Act Trusts and Estates Division of the Ontario Bar Association November 24, 2009 D ARCY HILTZ 1 Section 3 of the Substitute Decisions
More informationUnjust enrichment? Bank secures equitable charge where it failed to get a legal charge: Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus [2015] UKSC 66
Unjust enrichment? Bank secures equitable charge where it failed to get a legal charge: Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus [2015] UKSC 66 1. The decision of the Supreme Court in Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd
More information64 Contractual Remedies 1979, No. 11
64 Contractual Remedies 1979, No. 11 ANALYSIS 8. Rules applying to cancellation 'fitle 9. Power of Court to grant relief 1. Short Title and commencement 10. Recovery of damages 2. Interpretation 11. Assignees
More informationBYLAWS OF 501c3 CORPORATION. 1.1 NAME. The name of the corporation is.
ot}- BYLAWS OF 501c3 1 CORPORATION 1.1 NAME. The name of the corporation is. 1.2 PLACES OF BUSINESS. The corporation shall have its principal place of business in, and may have such other places of business
More informationRepublic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) MR VIDEO (PTY) LTD...Applicant / Respondent
Republic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: CASE NO: 18783/2011 MR VIDEO (PTY) LTD...Applicant / Respondent and BROADWAY DVD CITY
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS CONCERNING THE LIABILITY OF BUILDING PROFESSIONALS IN NSW
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS CONCERNING THE LIABILITY OF BUILDING PROFESSIONALS IN NSW Paper given by Brian Walton to the Annual Conference of the Australian Institute of Building Surveyors 21 22 July 2014 Introduction
More informationOmbudsman s Determination
Ombudsman s Determination Applicant Scheme Respondent(s) Mr A Local Government Pension Scheme (the Scheme) Enfield Council (the Council) Complaint summary Mr A has complained that the Council, his former
More informationEmployment Special Interest Group
Employment law: the convenient jurisdiction to bring equal pay claims - the High Court or County Court on the one hand or the Employment Tribunal on the other hand? Jonathan Owen Introduction 1. On 24
More informationPart 44 Alberta Divorce Rules
R561.1-562.1 Part 44 Alberta Divorce Rules Forms will be found in Schedule B Definitions 561.1 In this Part, (a) Act means the Divorce Act (Canada) (RSC 1985, c3 (2nd) Supp.); (b) divorce proceeding means
More informationOBJECTION YOUR HONOUR!
OBJECTION YOUR HONOUR! ROBERT S. HARRISON JENNIFER McALEER FASKEN MARTINEAU DuMOULIN LLP THE BASICS What is an Objection? By definition an objection is an interruption. It should only be made when it is
More informationTHE JERSEY LAW COMMISSION
THE JERSEY LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER CORROBORATION OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS JERSEY LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER No 3/2008/CP December 2008 The Jersey Law Commission was set up by a Proposition
More informationCOMPANIES BILL Unofficial version. As amended in Report Stage (Dáil) on 25 th March and 2 nd April 2014
COMPANIES BILL 2012 Unofficial version As amended in Report Stage (Dáil) on 25 th March and 2 nd April 2014 v1.02.04.2014 Disclaimer: Whilst every care has been taken in reflecting the changes made at
More informationSocial Workers Act CHAPTER 12 OF THE ACTS OF as amended by. 2001, c. 19; 2005, c. 60; 2012, c. 48, s. 40; 2015, c. 52
Social Workers Act CHAPTER 12 OF THE ACTS OF 1993 as amended by 2001, c. 19; 2005, c. 60; 2012, c. 48, s. 40; 2015, c. 52 2016 Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of Nova Scotia Published by
More information3. AGENCY AND PARTNERSHIP LAW AGENCY LAW
(2014) 15 SAL Ann Rev Agency and Partnership Law 39 3. AGENCY AND PARTNERSHIP LAW Pearlie KOH LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore), LLM (University of Melbourne); Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore);
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as Tarquinio v. Equity Trust Co., 2007-Ohio-3305.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) FRANK TARQUINIO, et al. C. A. No. 06CA008913 Appellants
More informationEQUITABLE RELIEF IN THE LAW OF HIRE-PURCHASE
EQUITABLE RELIEF IN THE LAW OF HIRE-PURCHASE THE article by Mr. Aubrey L. Diamond in the Modern Law Review of September, 1956 (at p. 498), advanced the view that the court has power to grant equitable
More informationBERMUDA 2004 : 32 OMBUDSMAN ACT 2004
BERMUDA 2004 : 32 OMBUDSMAN ACT 2004 Date of Assent: 17 December 2004 Operative Date: 1 May 2005 1 Short title 2 Interpretation 3 Application of the Act 4 Office of Ombudsman 5 Functions and jurisdiction
More informationPREVIOUS CHAPTER 10:22 RESEARCH ACT
TITLE 10 TITLE 10 PREVIOUS CHAPTER Chapter 10:22 RESEARCH ACT Acts 5/1986, 2/1988, 18/1989 (s. 40, s. 43), 11/1991 (s. 29), 2/1998, 22/2001. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short
More informationADULT SUPPORT AND PROTECTION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2007
ADULT SUPPORT AND PROTECTION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2007 EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Scottish Executive in order to assist the reader of the Act. They do
More informationA PROTOCOL ISSUED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION SETTING OUT THE PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED IN THE VICTIMS ADVOCATE PILOT AREAS
A PROTOCOL ISSUED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION SETTING OUT THE PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED IN THE VICTIMS ADVOCATE PILOT AREAS General Principles This protocol provides a description of
More informationMEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION. OF THE ERNEST FOUNDATION (Working for a healthy, safer community and with children and young people)
A CHARITY AND COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE The companies acts 1985 and 1989 MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE ERNEST FOUNDATION (Working for a healthy, safer community and with children and
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE ACT 13 OF [Government Gazette: 7 August 1995 No. 1121] Commencement: 1 November 1995 ACT
PUBLIC SERVICE ACT 13 OF 1995 [Government Gazette: 7 August 1995 No. 1121] Commencement: 1 November 1995 [Date of ACT To provide for the establishment, management and efficiency of the Public Service,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JEANNIE L. COLLINS, Personal Representative of the Estate of RICHARD E. COLLINS, Deceased, and KIRBY TOTTINGHAM, UNPUBLISHED March 22, 2005 Plaintiffs-Appellants, V No.
More informationCuthbert v Gair (t/a The Bowes Manor Equestrian Centre) [2008] APP.L.R. 09/03
JUDGMENT : Master Haworth : Costs Court. 3 rd September 2008 1. This is an appeal pursuant to CPR Rule 47.20 from a decision of Costs Officer Martin in relation to a detailed assessment which took place
More informationLicensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2014
Immigration Advisers Authority Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2014 This code of conduct sets out the required standards of professional and ethical conduct for licensed immigration advisers.
More information"collective agreement" means an agreement as to industrial matters;
Page 1 of 36 Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Industrial Relations Act. Interpretation 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires "award" means an award made by a Court; "collective
More informationProvince of Alberta ATB FINANCIAL ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter A Current as of December 15, Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 15, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue
More informationDRAFT OMBUDSMAN ACT FOR THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES
TABLED DOCUMENT 322-17(5) TABLED ON OCTOBER 1, 2015 DRAFT OMBUDSMAN ACT FOR THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES LEGEND 1. This Draft Act was prepared based on similar legislation in other Canadian jurisdictions
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PETER BALALAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED August 2, 2012 v No. 302540 Wayne Circuit Court STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No. 08-109599-NF Defendant-Appellant.
More information