Defending Against the Dangerous Condition Exception to a Public Entity s Sovereign Immunity
|
|
- Kathryn McKenzie
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Defending Against the Dangerous Condition Exception to a Public Entity s Sovereign Immunity Edward W. Zeidler II Brown & James, P.C. St. Louis, MO (314)
2 Origins of the DCE DCE comes from This statute reinstated sovereign immunity for public entities, responding to the Missouri Supreme Court s abolition of same. Although sovereign immunity is reinstated, includes two express exceptions: (1) negligent acts of public employees arising from operation of motor vehicles; and (2) injuries caused by dangerous condition of a public entity s property
3 Plaintiff s Burden To make a submissible case, Plaintiff must show: 1. The alleged dangerous condition exists on the public entity s property; 2. The alleged injury directly resulted from the alleged dangerous condition; 3. The alleged dangerous condition created a reasonably forseeable risk of harm of the kind sustained by Plaintiff; and 4. A public employee negligently created the condition or had actual or constructive notice of the condition. State ex. rel Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission v. Dierker, 961 S.W.2d 58 (Mo.banc 1988).
4 POTENTIAL DEFENSE #1: The alleged dangerous condition does not exist on my property This argument is a direct rebuttal of the first element of Plaintiff s claim. Property is deemed to be the property of a public entity if the public entity has exclusive possession and control over the property. State ex. rel Division of Motor Carrier and Railroad Safety v. Russell, 91 S.W.3d 471 (Mo.banc 2002). To determine whether public entity has exclusive possession and control, courts look to the ability of the public entity to monitor the property, exclude unauthorized persons and generally exercise control.
5 Examples of Exclusive Possession and Control Analysis Temporary step at polling place rented by public entity was public entity s property. James v. Farrington, 844 S.W.2d 517 (Mo.App.W.D. 1992). Sidewalk in which public entity had reversionary property interest was not public entity s property. Dorlon v. City of Springfield, 843 S.W.2d 934 (Mo.App.S.D. 1992).
6 How to Win Necessarily a fact-intensive inquiry. Two circumstances under which courts are likely to find that property is not the public entity s property for purposes of the DCE: 1) Find a statute vesting ownership and control in another party; and/or 2) Establish that the alleged dangerous condition, even if it impacts your property and even if you are aware of it, is located on neighboring property.
7 POTENTIAL DEFENSE #2: The alleged dangerous condition is not the contemplated type of condition. Often this is a hotly contested issue. This is due in part to divergent and inconsistent caselaw. To try to make sense of the caselaw, do two things: 1. Start at the top (Missouri Supreme Court) 2. Divide the world in half (alleged dangerous conditions not involving public roadways vs. alleged dangerous conditions that do involve public roadways)
8 STARTING AT THE TOP For alleged dangerous conditions not related to public roadways, the Missouri Supreme Court has spoken three times: 1. Kanagawa v. State ex rel Freeman, 685 S.W.2d 831 (Mo.banc 1985) 2. Alexander v. State, 756 S.W.2d 539 (Mo.banc 1988) 3. Cain v. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, 239 S.W.2d 590 (Mo.banc 2007)
9 WHAT ARE WE LEFT WITH? Kanagawa says dangerous conditions must involve defect in physical condition of property. Alexander says condition is dangerous if, by its very existence and without intervention by third parties, it poses a physical threat. Cain does not expand Alexander, it just applies it. SO two types of conditions fall within the DCE.
10 Failure to Perform Intangible Acts - 1 Plaintiffs argue that the negligent positioning of objects language in Alexander dramatically expands the types of conditions that qualify under DCE, such that alleged failure to perform intangible acts (ie: failure to warn, failure to barricade, failure to secure) would qualify. We argue that it does not: Alexander and Kane involve affirmative actions by public employees, changing property from safe to not safe, not intangible acts. The DCE is to be narrowly construed.
11 Failure to Perform Intangible Acts - 2 Several post-alexander cases hold that failure to perform an intangible act does not constitute a dangerous condition for purposes of the DCE. No DCE for alleged failure to secure or barricade balance beam or place it in safer location. Necker v. Bridgeton, 938 S.W.2d 198 (Mo.App.E.D. 1997) No DCE for alleged failure to guard or barricade bannister. Stevenson v. City of St. Louis School District, 820 S.W.2d 609 (Mo.App.E.D. 1991) No DCE for failure to barricade or warn of dangerous associated with concrete river channel. Trumbo v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, 877 S.W.2d 198 (Mo.App.E.D. 1994).
12 Negligent Design of Roadway Claims -1 Traditionally, these claims are treated as a separate category of purported dangerous conditions. That began with Donahue v. City of St. Louis, 758 S.W.2d 50 (Mo.banc 1988) Court examined 1985 amendment to This amendment created new category of dangerous condition negligent, defective or dangerous design of a highway or road
13 Negligent Design of Roadway Claims -2 Negligent design of roadway claims proper after Donahue. Failure to warn of bridge around sharp curve fell within DCE. Wilkes v. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, 762 S.W.2d 27 (Mo.banc 1989). Failure to warn of intersection which had obscured traffic signals fell within DCE. Cole v. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, 770 S.W.2d 296 (Mo.App.W.D. 1989). Failure to install shoulders and guardrails fell within DCE. Brown v. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, 805 S.W.2d 274 (Mo.App.W.D. 1991)
14 Negligent Design of Roadway Claims -3 Donahue was good law for 9 years along comes Hensley v. Jackson County, 227 S.W.3d 491 (Mo.banc 2007) Donahue got it wrong Negligent design of roadway cases were already within the DCE before the 1985 amendment. Down stops sign cases are negligent maintenance cases and not negligent design cases. Negligent maintenance cases are also within the DCE.
15 Negligent Design of Roadway Claims -4 How to respond to these claims? If a negligent design of roadway claim, the claim will most likely be permitted. However, the statutory state of the art defense is available. If a negligent maintenance of roadway claim, Hensley now appears to allow this claim.
16 POTENTIAL DEFENSE #3: The injury did not directly result from the alleged dangerous condition. Directly resulted from = proximate cause. Test for proximate cause is whether the injury is the natural and probable consequence of the defendant s negligence. Concurrent negligence of third party does not cut off responsibility of public entity for dangerous condition. This includes negligence of drivers in intersectional accident cases
17 Definition of Sufficient Intervening Act For an intervening act to cut off the liability of the public entity, it must be a new and independent force that so interrupts the chain of events that it becomes the responsible, direct, proximate and intermediate cause of the injury, but it may not consist of merely an act of concurring or contributing negligence. United Missouri Bank v. City of Grandview, 105 S.W.3d 890 (Mo.App. 2003).
18 Examples of Sufficient Intervening Acts Death of motorist struck by concrete thrown from highway overpass did not directly result from alleged inadequate fencing on overpass or alleged negligent failure to remove loose concrete from overpass. State ex rel Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission v. Dierker, 961 S.W.2d 58. Even where overpasses on both sides of overpass at issue were enclosed and public entity had knowledge that incidents could occur, condition of overpass still not proximate cause of injury to motorist. Tucker v. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, 250 S.W.3d 373 (Mo.App.W.D. 2008). Injury to student struck by piece of glass thrown by another student on public entity s property did not directly result from condition of property. Dale v. Edmonds, 819 S.W.2d 388 (Mo.App.1991).
19 CONCLUSION There are fertile avenues of defense to DCE claims. The alleged dangerous condition is not on my property Even if it is my property, the alleged dangerous condition is not the type of dangerous condition contemplated by the statute. Even if it is my property, and even if it is the type of dangerous condition contemplated by the statute, the injury was not the direct result of the alleged dangerous condition.
20
Jeopardy. Road Commission Jeopardy. Charles F. Behler Smith, Haughey, Rice & Roegge, PC. Mark D. Jahnke Specialty Claims Services, Inc. Who Am I?
Road Commission Jeopardy Mark D. Jahnke Specialty Claims Services, Inc. Charles F. Behler Smith, Haughey, Rice & Roegge, PC Jeopardy Highway Law Protect Yourself! Who Am I? At Work This & That 100 200
More informationMOTORIST DROWNS IN RETENTION POND ADJACENT TO HIGHWAY
MOTORIST DROWNS IN RETENTION POND ADJACENT TO HIGHWAY James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1988 James C. Kozlowski Based upon conversations with many park and recreation administrators, it appears that there
More informationSun Tzu, The Art of War
Know Thine Enemy: What is the plaintiff lawyer who is suing you thinking? Sun Tzu, The Art of War So it is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be put at risk even in a hundred
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHANNON COUNTY, MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHANNON COUNTY, MISSOURI KENZY J. GASTON, 278 5th Street Summersville, MO 65571 and Case No. KEAGAN R. GASTON, a minor, by his Next Friend, KENZY J. GASTON, and KENNY GASTON 11916
More informationSafety & Liability Does pursuit of safety expose an agency to liability? liability for action liability for inaction liability for trying something ne
Liability and Complete Streets Safety & Liability Does pursuit of safety expose an agency to liability? liability for action liability for inaction liability for trying something new Safety Driven by Profession
More informationDecember 2016 THE GAME OF THRONES. Michael Shaunessy
December 2016 OR THE GAME OF THRONES Michael Shaunessy I. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IS THE STARTING POINT Purpose of Sovereign Immunity: Sovereign immunity... protects the public from boneheaded acts. Brown &
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0437 444444444444 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PETITIONER, v. JOSE LUIS PERCHES, SR. AND ALMA DELIA PERCHES, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Carol J. Rodriguez, Administratrix of the Estate of Aurelio Rodriguez, Deceased, Appellant v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation v. No.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 15, 2008 Session. JAMES CONDRA and SABRA CONDRA v. BRADLEY COUNTY, TENNESSEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 15, 2008 Session JAMES CONDRA and SABRA CONDRA v. BRADLEY COUNTY, TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradley County No. V02342H
More informationCourt of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont NO. 09-12-00560-CV CLARK CONSTRUCTION OF TEXAS, LTD. AND CLARK CONSTRUCTION OF TEXAS, INC., Appellants V. KAREN PATRICIA BENDY, PEGGY RADER,
More informationFIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-2237 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. DENISE LORRAINE HANANIA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI JANE TURNER, et al., Plaintiffs, Cause No. 07SL-CC00605 vs. Division No. 9 Date: October 21, 2010 SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CLAYTON, et. al., Defendants.
More informationDiener v Fernandez 2015 NY Slip Op 30109(U) January 5, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 6805/2014 Judge: Robert J.
Diener v Fernandez 2015 NY Slip Op 30109(U) January 5, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 6805/2014 Judge: Robert J. McDonald Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationIn the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR DR. J. ALEXANDER MARCHOSKY, ) No. ED95992 ) Appellant, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of vs. ) St. Louis County ) ST. LUKE S EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI SALLY G. HURT, City, State, ZIP And SUSAN G. HURT, City, Street, ZIP Case No. Division Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOE Serve at: City, State, Zip Defendant.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE. C.A. No. 01A CV-00393
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE JOHN F. NICHOLS AND KERRY L. STEWART, Vs. Plaintiffs-Appellees, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, Defendant-Appellant,
More information23 USC 148. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 23 - HIGHWAYS CHAPTER 1 - FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS 148. Highway safety improvement program (a) Definitions. In this section, the following definitions apply: (1) High risk rural road. The term high risk
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-CA-02526-COA OLIVER DAVID CHISOLM, JR., OLIVER DAVID CHISOLM, III, CAROLYN ELIZABETH CHISOLM AND KAYLA LOUISA CHISOLM APPELLANTS v. MISSISSIPPI
More informationOpinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Keshav Joshi, M.D., Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospital, St. Luke's Hospital, St. Luke's Heath Corporation,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Ryan Stahon, No. 2224 C.D. 2012 Appellant Argued November 12, 2013 v. Harborcreek Township and Bambi Denning BEFORE HONORABLE DAN PELLEGRINI, President Judge HONORABLE
More informationSCR Introduced by Senators Smith, Lesko: Begay, Burges, Farnsworth D, Griffin, McGuire, Yee; Representatives Finchem, Kern, Mesnard
REFERENCE TITLE: photo radar prohibition State of Arizona Senate Fifty-second Legislature Second Regular Session SCR 00 Introduced by Senators Smith, Lesko: Begay, Burges, Farnsworth D, Griffin, McGuire,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 31, 2002
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 31, 2002 LANA MARLER, ET AL. v. BOBBY E. SCOGGINS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rhea County No. 18471 Buddy D. Perry, Judge
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 03-0655 444444444444 MARY R. DILLARD, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS COMMUNITY SURVIVOR OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH LEWIS DILLARD, DECEASED, AND MARY R. DILLARD A/N/F
More informationASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JULY 13, 2017
ASSEMBLY, No. 0 STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JULY, 0 Sponsored by: Assemblyman NICHOLAS CHIARAVALLOTI District (Hudson) SYNOPSIS Establishes pilot program for automated speed enforcement
More informationBY-LAW NO This By-law may be cited as Camrose County Road Use By-law
BY-LAW NO.1141 BY-LAW NO.1141 A By-law of Camrose County in the Province of Alberta introduced for the controlling and regulating the use of highways within Camrose County. WHEREAS by virtue of the authority
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS RAND O LEARY, Personal Representative of the Estate of THOMAS TRUETT, UNPUBLISHED May 6, 2014 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 313638 Wayne Circuit Court WAYNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT
More informationMTAS MORe. Published on MTAS ( Home > Printer-friendly PDF > Printer-friendly PDF > Speed Bumps
Published on MTAS (http://www.mtas.tennessee.edu) Home > Printer-friendly PDF > Printer-friendly PDF > Speed Bumps Dear Reader: The following document was created from the MTAS website (www.mtas.tennessee.edu).
More informationHankerson v Harris-Camden Term. Equip. Inc 2018 NY Slip Op 32764(U) October 26, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Judge:
Hankerson v Harris-Camden Term. Equip. Inc 2018 NY Slip Op 32764(U) October 26, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 153054/2018 Judge: Adam Silvera Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationTITLE 16 STREETS AND SIDEWALKS, ETC 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS
16-1 TITLE 16 STREETS AND SIDEWALKS, ETC 1 CHAPTER 1. MISCELLANEOUS. 2. SIGNS IN RIGHTS-OF-WAY. 3. LINES OF SIGHT AT INTERSECTIONS. CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS SECTION 16-101. Definitions. 16-102. Permit to
More informationSTATE OF MISSOURI TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW
STATE OF MISSOURI TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW Kevin L. Fritz Patrick E. Foppe Lashly & Baer, P.C. 714 Locust Street St. Louis, MO 63101 Tel: (314) 436-8309 Email: klfritz@lashlybaer.com pfoppe@lashlybaer.com
More informationDEFENDING HIGH EXPOSURE DANGEROUS CONDITION LAWSUITS
DEFENDING HIGH EXPOSURE DANGEROUS CONDITION LAWSUITS KEVIN FISHER, VICE PRESIDENT INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. WILLIAM C. HAGGERTY, J.D. NEIL TARDIFF, J.D. DANGEROUS CONDITION CLAIMS: The Basics
More informationBYLAW NO. 18/2006 NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF FOOTHILLS NO. 31 ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
BYLAW NO. 18/2006 BEING A BYLAW TO REGULATE SIGNING ERECTED ON PUBLIC LANDS AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNING FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY AND ADJACENT TO HIGHWAYS WHICH ARE UNDER THE
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GAILA MARIE MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION July 11, 2006 9:05 a.m. V No. 259228 Kent Circuit Court THE RAPID INTER-URBAN TRANSIT LC No. 03-001526-NO PARTNERSHIP
More informationv. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN September 13, 1996 D.S. NASH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Present: All the Justices LOIS EVONE CHERRY v. Record No. 951876 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN September 13, 1996 D.S. NASH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CAMPBELL COUNTY H.
More informationJOANN E. LEWIS OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No November 1, 1996
Present: All the Justices JOANN E. LEWIS OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No. 960421 November 1, 1996 CARPENTER COMPANY FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND T. J. Markow, Judge
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KAREN L. PIPER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) vs. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CITY OF PITTSBURGH; ) JOHN DOE NO. 1 of the
More informationDon t Forget the Immunity Offered by the Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 21, Number 1 (21.1.30) Property Insurance By: Tracy E. Stevenson Robbins, Salomon & Patt,
More informationCASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Marjorie Renee Hill, Judge.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA LEVY COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE/ NORTH AMERICAN RISK SERVICES, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationRegulating the Traditional Public Forum & Annual Update of Missouri Land Use Cases
Regulating the Traditional Public Forum & Annual Update of Missouri Land Use Cases Missouri Municipal Attorneys Association July 16, 2016 Presented By: Steven Lucas Maggie Eveker Cunningham, Vogel & Rost,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2018 WY 28
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING TIMOTHY ARCHER and RYANN ARCHER, individually and as wrongful death representatives of Sophia Archer, a minor, deceased, and as wrongful death beneficiaries and as
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court has before it Defendant E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and
MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT (City of St. Louis DAVID F. SMITH, Plaintiff, vs. UNION CARBIDE CORP., et al., Defendants. Cause No. 1422-CC00457 Division No. 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 4, 2002 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 4, 2002 Session HANNAH ROBINSON v. CHARLES C. BREWER, ET AL. A Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C99-392 The Honorable Roger
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY BRET AND PATTY SHEPARD and ) JASON, BRYAN, LOUISE AND ) PATRICK PAULEY, ) 00C-08-042 ) (Consolidated) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) KIMBERLY
More informationTITLE 16 STREETS AND SIDEWALKS, ETC 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS
Change 10, January 15, 2008 16-1 CHAPTER 1. MISCELLANEOUS. 2. EXCAVATIONS AND CUTS. 3. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACCEPTANCE. TITLE 16 STREETS AND SIDEWALKS, ETC 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS SECTION 16-101. Obstructing
More informationMotion for Rehearing Denied July 14, 1971; Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied August 12, 1971 COUNSEL
TAFOYA V. WHITSON, 1971-NMCA-098, 83 N.M. 23, 487 P.2d 1093 (Ct. App. 1971) MELCOR TAFOYA and SABINA TAFOYA, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. BOBBY WHITSON, Defendant-Appellee No. 544 COURT OF APPEALS
More informationAGREEMENT FOR CONTROL OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING INDIANA
AGREEMENT FOR CONTROL OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING Agreement between the State of Indiana and the United States of America concerning the Control of Outdoor Advertising in Areas Adjacent to the Interstate and
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY BY-LAW NUMBER
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY BY-LAW NUMBER 2018-044 Being a by-law to manage and regulate election signs and other election advertising devices within the Town of East Gwillimbury WHEREAS
More informationWoodstock Village Ordinances Revision #3 Title 8; Chapter 1-Page 1 REVISION #3 OF EDITION #4 TITLE 8 TRAFFIC, VEHICLES & PARKING
Woodstock Village Ordinances Revision #3 Title 8; Chapter 1-Page 1 REVISION #3 OF EDITION #4 TITLE 8 TRAFFIC, VEHICLES & PARKING Be it ordained by the Woodstock Village Board of Trustees that Woodstock
More informationJUDGMENT REVERSED, ORDER VACATED, AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Division I Opinion by JUDGE TAUBMAN Dailey and Booras, JJ.
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 09CA0349 City and County of Denver District Court No. 08CV8549 Honorable Herbert L. Stern, III, Judge Annette Herrera, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City and County
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Fedarko v. Cleveland, 2014-Ohio-2531.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100223 SALLY A. FEDARKO, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES
More informationPreparing and Trying Negligence Cases
Ottawa Law School March 5, 2018 Preparing and Trying Negligence Cases Presented by: DAVID F. MACDONALD, Partner *David MacDonald Law Professional Corporation 1-888-223-0448 647-290-7291 cell dmacdonald@thomsonrogers.com
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
2017 IL 121800 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 121800) ISAAC COHEN, Appellee, v. THE CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT, Appellant. Opinion filed December 29, 2017. Rehearing denied March
More informationJANIE L. GROMER, ) ) Plaintiff - Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD29942 ) HUBERT MATCHETT, SR., ) Opinion filed: ) July 28, 2010 Defendant - Appellant.
JANIE L. GROMER, ) ) Plaintiff - Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD29942 ) HUBERT MATCHETT, SR., ) Opinion filed: ) July 28, 2010 Defendant - Appellant. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BUTLER COUNTY Honorable
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Schuster v. Kokosing Constr. Co., Inc., 178 Ohio App.3d 374, 2008-Ohio-5075.] COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCHUSTER ET AL., JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D02-58
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2002 JOHN WILLIAM WRIGHT, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D02-58 RING POWER CORPORATION, d/b/a DIESEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and FRANK
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ERIN LEECH, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED October 11, 2005 v No. 253827 Kent Circuit Court ANITA KRAMER, LC No. 03-006701-NI and Defendant, KENT COUNTY BOARD OF ROAD
More informationIn the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STEVE SAUNDERS, v. KATHLEEN BASKA, Appellant, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) WD75405 FILED: April 16, 2013 APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PLATTE COUNTY THE
More informationQuestion 1. On what theory or theories might damages be recovered, and what defenses might reasonably be raised in actions by:
Question 1 A state statute requires motorcyclists to wear a safety helmet while riding, and is enforced by means of citations and fines. Having mislaid his helmet, Adam jumped on his motorcycle without
More informationCourt of Claims of Ohio
[Cite as Adams v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 2010-Ohio-2035.] Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 12, 2006 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 12, 2006 Session TERRY WAYNE POTTS, ET AL. v. NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 02C167 Barbara Haynes,
More informationBEING A BY-LAW to regulate Election Signs and to repeal By-law RE
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER 2018-050-RE BEING A BY-LAW to regulate Election Signs and to repeal By-law 2017-041-RE WHEREAS subsection 11(3), paragraph 1 of the Municipal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant/Appellee. Appeal from the Superior Court of Maricopa County
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE RONALD and TONYA BROOKOVER, husband and wife, v. Plaintiffs/Appellants, ROBERTS ENTERPRISES, INC., an Arizona corporation, Defendant/Appellee. 1 CA-CV
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/04/ :50 AM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/04/2014 11:50 AM INDEX NO. 651283/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationEstate of Bowen v City of New York 2016 NY Slip Op 32950(U) January 15, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Donna M.
Estate of Bowen v City of New York 2016 NY Slip Op 32950(U) January 15, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 113317/11 Judge: Donna M. Mills Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Mary Beth Daubenspeck, Administratrix : of the Estate of Daniel R. Daubenspeck; : Samuel S. Knight and Marta C. Knight, : Administrator and Administratrix of the
More informationPage 1 of 10 N.C.P.I. MOTOR VEHICLE TABLE OF CONTENTS MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION
Page 1 of 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION GUIDE TO THE USE OF THIS BOOK SIGNIFICANT NEW DEVELOPMENTS NORTH CAROLINA PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CASES: *Dates the instructions
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 3, 2001 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 3, 2001 Session JANICE SADLER, d/b/a XANADU VIDEO v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Tennessee Claims Commission No. 303688 No. M2000-01103-COA-R3-CV
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STACEY HELFNER, Next Friend of AMBER SEILICKI, Minor, UNPUBLISHED June 20, 2006 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 265757 Macomb Circuit Court CENTER LINE PUBLIC SCHOOLS and LC
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as Seikel v. Akron, 191 Ohio App.3d 362, 2010-Ohio-5983.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) SEIKEL et al., C. A. No. 25000 Appellees, v. CITY
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 May Tort Claims Act negligence insufficient findings of fact contributory negligence
NO. COA12-1307 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 7 May 2013 WILLIAM R. NUNN, Plaintiff, v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (F/K/A DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION), Defendant. North Carolina Industrial Commission
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS RONALD BOREK, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED September 29, 2011 v No. 298754 Monroe Circuit Court JAMES ROBERT HARRIS and SWIFT LC No. 09-027763-NI TRANSPORTATION,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 5/3/2018 3:03 PM 43-CV-2018-900267.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA MARY B. ROBERSON, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA CORRIE and TRACY ANDREWS, ) as Parents
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 10, 2002 Session. BARBARA CAGLE v. GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT CO.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 10, 2002 Session BARBARA CAGLE v. GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT CO. A Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson County No. 98C-2380 The Honorable
More informationCAUSE NUMBER DC H. DEBORAH BROCK AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHRIS BROCK Plaintiffs
CAUSE NUMBER DC-09-0044-H DEBORAH BROCK AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHRIS BROCK Plaintiffs vs. MELVIN WAYNE MANSFIELD; DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS DISTRIBUTION TRANSPORTATION SERVICES COMPANY; DTS TRUCK DIVISION
More informationLittering Statutes for Political Candidates in North Carolina
2016 SIGN ORDINANCE INFORMATION Littering Statutes for Political Candidates in North Carolina 14-156. Injuring fixtures and other property of electric-power companies. It shall be unlawful for any person
More informationCourt of Claims of Ohio
[Cite as Klisuric v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 2011-Ohio-6910.] JAMES A. KLISURIC Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida LABARGA, J. No. SC09-2238 MARIA CEVALLOS, Petitioner, vs. KERI ANN RIDEOUT, et al., Respondents. [November 21, 2012] Maria Cevallos seeks review of the decision of the Fourth District
More informationCertiorari not Applied for COUNSEL
1 DUNN V. STATE EX REL. TAXATION & REVENUE DEPT., 1993-NMCA-059, 116 N.M. 1, 859 P.2d 469 (Ct. App. 1993) Monica E. DUNN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Patrick A. Cortez, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Elizabeth Karbowski, : Appellant : : v. : No. 1800 C.D. 2008 : Submitted: June 10, 2009 The City of Scranton and John Doe, : Independent Contractor : BEFORE: HONORABLE
More informationCase 1:13-cv RJJ Doc #1 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:13-cv-01374-RJJ Doc #1 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TYRONE ALLEN, LORIANNE STEVENS, and RAYVAR WILLIAMS,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 6 October 2015
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA15-131 Filed: 6 October 2015 Buncombe County, No. 14 CVS 2648 GAILLARD BELLOWS and her husband, JON BELLOWS, Plaintiffs, v. ASHEVILLE CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) -vs- ) Case No. 2018 TR ) JOHN Q. TRUCKER, ) Defendant. ) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
More informationFILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 02/15/ :54 PM INDEX NO. E157285/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/15/2017
STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF NIAGARA MARTINE JURON vs. Plaintiff, GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS HOLDING CORPORATION, COMPLAINT GENERAL MOTORS LLC, SATURN OF CLARENCE, INC., now known
More informationJune 2017 Supplement to Pattern Jury Instructions for Motor Vehicle Cases
Page 1 of 1 June 2017 Supplement to Pattern Jury Instructions for Motor Vehicle Cases This supplement contains a new table of contents for the motor vehicle instructions, replacement instructions for motor
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA ) CASE NO: CV-2014-
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 1/10/2014 10:45 AM 03-CV-2014-900064.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA TIFFANY B. MCCORD, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA DAVID LEE MAHONE and
More informationWD In the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District. Ray Charles Bate and Deborah Sue Bate, Appellants
WD 76086 In the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District Ray Charles Bate and Deborah Sue Bate, Appellants v. Greenwich Insurance Company, Respondent Appeal from the Circuit Court of Boone County,
More informationIn The Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
In The Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL., ) SAMUEL K. LIPARI, ) Relator, ) ) v. ) ) No. THE HONORABLE ) JUDGE MICHAEL W. MANNERS, ) CIRCUIT COURT OF ) JACKSON COUNTY,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Date of Release: May 1, 1992 No. 17176 Kamloops Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: ) ) JACQUELYN BARBARA DAVIDSON ) ) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT PLAINTIFF ) ) OF THE HONOURABLE AND: )
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. (Sacramento) ----
Filed 3/29/10; pub. order (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- IDA LANE et al., C060744 v. Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct.
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Information or instructions: Plaintiff's original petition-auto accident 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit. 2. It assumes several plaintiffs were rear-ended by an employee
More informationLegal Brief. Liability for Injuries on Public Property
Legal Brief Liability for Injuries on Public Property By Roger Huebner, Deputy Executive Director & General Counsel; Brian Day, Staff Attorney; & Jerry Zarley, Paralegal With the summer season in full
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 KAYLA M. SUPANCIK, AN INCAPACITED PERSON, BY ELIZABETH SUPANCIK, PLENARY GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE, AND APRIL SUPANCIK, INDIVIDUALLY
More informationChapter 12: Products Liability
Law 580: Torts Thursday, November 19, 2015 November 24, 25 Casebook pages 914-965 Chapter 12: Products Liability Products Liability Prima Facie Case: 1. Injury 2. Seller of products 3. Defect 4. Cause
More informationCity of Kingston. Ontario. By-Law Number A By-law To Regulate Election Signs In The City of Kingston
City of Kingston Ontario By-Law Number 2014-16 A By-law To Regulate Election Signs In The City of Kingston Amending By-Laws: Passed: December 17, 2013 Updated: March 20, 2018 By-law Number Date Passed
More informationLUCAS COUNTY SANITARY ENGINEER BUILDING SEWERS AND CONNECTIONS RULES AND REGULATIONS
LUCAS COUNTY SANITARY ENGINEER BUILDING SEWERS AND CONNECTIONS RULES AND REGULATIONS Section 1. All sewers or sewer improvements that have been constructed or sewers or sewer improvements hereinafter constructed
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA James Sondergaard : : v. : No. 224 C.D. 2012 : Argued: December 12, 2012 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Department of Transportation, : Bureau of Driver Licensing,
More informationNO. 44,112-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * *
Judgment rendered May 13, 2009. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. NO. 44,112-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * JOANN
More informationColorado Revised Statutes 2017 TITLE 24
TITLE 24 GOVERNMENT - STATE ARTICLE 10 Governmental Immunity Editor's note: The doctrine of sovereign immunity of the state, school districts, and counties was prospectively overruled in three Colorado
More informationLIABILITY UNDER THE TEXAS TORT CLAIMS ACT
LIABILITY UNDER THE TEXAS TORT CLAIMS ACT By: Richard Evans Staff Attorney Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool The King Can Do No Wrong 1 Sovereign Immunity Under common law, state and political
More informationOf the City of Los Angeles July 22, Honorable Members: C. D. No. 9
Office of the City Engineer Los Angeles, California To the Public Works and Gang Reduction Committee Of the Honorable Council Of the City of Los Angeles July 22, 2015 Honorable Members: C. D. No. 9 SUBJECT:
More information